White folks 'slaves' to the machine longer than most other nations...INDENTURED SERVANT CONTRACTS

Not just Fauci and Gates,but Prince Charles and his Mother too,
they Patented the "Cure" in November 2018 BEFORE ANYONE HAD HEARD OF THE FAKE VIRUS!


Like
ReplyRepost
···

 

America was built by "convicts" under the guise of the 1717 Transportation Act
which enabled (((merchants))) to transport "convicts" to America as slaves,
but these paled in comparison to the White slaves who were brought here as so-call "indentured servants".
Virginia was built by the hands of White slaves starting in 1607 after the founding of Jamestown.
By 1648, one-half to two-third of the population in the colonies was White slaves after the Thirty Years' War
left Europe in ruin and destitute.
When they say America was built by slaves,
they just got the wrong ones because no cotton picker ever built anything.
It was the White slaves that built this country.
Happy Birthday America!
Read more

 

WHO BROUGHT THE SLAVES TO AMERICA?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PxDySFkxbmVC/

 

#The_iLLs aka #The_Parasites
formerly known as the illuminati






#The_iLLs aka #The_Parasites
formerly known as the illuminati

 

How Native Americans adopted slavery from white settlers

And how black people in Indian Territory were denied their rights even after their emancipation.

• 
  Alaina E Roberts
  Alaina E Roberts is Assistant Professor of History at the University of Pittsburgh.

Published On 27 Dec 2018


Five nations in the Indian Territory
- the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole
- kept black slaves for decades [AP Photo]
Last week marked the 153rd anniversary of the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1865.

Rightly celebrated as a milestone for the black American community, the 13th Amendment led to the eventual liberation
of all African Americans enslaved in the United States of the late 19th century.

But the 13th Amendment did not free all black enslaved people in the boundaries of modern-day US.

Members of five Native American nations, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole Nations
(known as the Five Tribes), owned black slaves.

Then located outside the territorial boundaries of the US in a region known as Indian Territory
(modern-day Oklahoma), these sovereign nations were not affected by proclamations or constitutional amendments.

Instead, separate treaties had to be made between the US and these Native American nations not only to free enslaved peoples,
but also to formally end the American Civil War battles and antagonism between American and Native American troops.


The fact that by the time of the Civil War black chattel slavery had been an element of life among the Five Tribes
for decades is rarely discussed.

It is, however, an important aspect of US history which serves to remind us of the complexity of colonialism,
exploitation and victimization that laid the foundations of our country.
Captivity and slavery among Native Americans

The indigenous peoples of North America had utilised a form of captive-taking and involuntary labour
long before European contact.

But this form of bondage was neither trans-generational nor permanent.

Captive-taking was most often used to replace a dead loved one within the family with a new person.

The captive would then take on this deceased person’s sexual or labour-related capacities.

Through various avenues, such as “sexual relationships, adoption, hard work, military service, or escape,
captives could enhance their status or even assume new identities.”

After European contact in the 1500s, white Europeans persuaded Native Americans to enslave members
of other Native American tribes using the European method of slave-trading,
which focused on the accumulation of captives for sale and thus, profit, rather than for population augmentation.

The Native American slave trade thrived for over a century, but began to be largely phased out in the early to mid-18th century.

An important factor in its decline was the Yamasee War of 1715-1717.

After colonists in the English colony of Carolina began defaulting on some of their trade agreements
and enslaving even members of their ally tribes, the Yamasee Nation began to question its own alliance with Carolina.

Along with the Lower Creeks and the Savannahs, the Yamasees declared war on Carolina,
killing 400 colonists, approximately seven percent of the white population.

The Carolinian colonists put together a force of black slaves, militiamen, volunteers and friendly Native American nations,
which defeated the Yamasees and their allies.

While the Yamasees lost, they succeeded in forcing European colonists to reconsider the risks inherent in the system
of Native American enslavement.

If Native Americans became angry at the terms of enslavement or allied Native Americans were accidentally enslaved,
they might once again retaliate militarily.

In addition, enslaved Native Americans often successfully escaped from their owners,
as they were familiar with the geography and could elude slave catchers and return to their homelands.

Therefore, after the Yamasee War, the African transatlantic slave trade to the North American colonies
drastically increased to account for the loss of Native American slaves.
Some members of the Five Tribes became owners of enslaved black women and men themselves,
as they increasingly adapted to Euro-American norms, such as style of dress and governmental structure.

Beginning in the late 1700s and intensifying in the early 1800s, members of the Five Tribes
used enslaved black women and men as domestic and agricultural labourers.

For example, Chickasaw planters exported an estimated 1,000 bales of cotton in 1830;
this cotton was picked and processed by black slaves.

Comparatively, in 1826, the state of Georgia produced 150,000 bales of cotton.

In 1860, about 30 years after their removal to Indian Territory from their respective homes in the Southeast,
Cherokee Nation citizens owned 2,511 slaves (15 percent of their total population),
Choctaw citizens owned 2,349 slaves (14 percent of their total population),
and Creek citizens owned 1,532 slaves (10 percent of their total population).

Chickasaw citizens owned 975 slaves, which amounted to 18 percent of their total population,
a proportion equivalent to that of white slave owners in Tennessee, a former neighbour of the Chickasaw Nation
and a large slaveholding state.

This made the Chickasaws the largest slave-holding nation of the Five Tribes, in proportion to their population.

National laws restricted the movement of enslaved people, preventing them from learning to read and write,
and prohibited interracial relationships.

However, as in the US, the majority of people in these nations did not own slaves.

Large-scale crop production and the system of slavery that made it possible and lucrative were mainly adopted
by wealthier Native families, whose prosperity allowed them to influence the political, social, and economic affairs of their nations.

Thus, an influential proportion of tribal citizens stood to lose a vital part of their economic resources if emancipation took place.

The Five Tribes involved themselves in the Civil War militarily to preserve their practice of slavery and to fight for political autonomy.

Members of all nations served on both the Union and Confederate sides of the war, and a number of battles
took place within Indian Territory.

After the war, the treaties signed between the US and all five of these slaveholding Native American nations,
called the Treaties of 1866, ended wartime hostilities and freed and enfranchised people of African descent.

These treaties were part of a larger American mission to take over Native American land, and also included land cessions
and American settlement and railway construction in Indian Territory.
Citizenship rights

While the former slaves of the Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, and Choctaw Nations became tribal citizens due to the Treaties of 1866,
throughout the 20th century, all of the Five Tribes eventually rescinded the tribal membership of these freed people
and their descendants.

Although their former slaves had lived among them for generations, sharing land, history, and trauma with them,
the Five Tribes claimed that they were interlopers who had no place among them because they had no Native ancestry.

The descendants of these former slaves fought back, filing several lawsuits.

On August 31, 2017, the descendants of people enslaved by members of the Cherokee Nation were victorious.

The US District Court in Washington ruled that these descendants should have citizenship rights in the Cherokee Nation.

Now the descendants of people enslaved by the Creek Nation have filed a similar suit, hoping to find commensurate validation.

So, when we observe and honour the anniversary of the 13th Amendment, let us remember that not all people of African descent
had the same experience of freedom. Those African Americans living among western indigenous nations waited until the summer of 1866
to gain their freedom, and even then, they fought to find true liberation from economic, social, and political duress.

Just as our current moment sees white and black Americans arguing over the memory of the Civil War
and the removal (or not) of Confederate monuments, so discussions of slavery in Native American nations
and the historical relationships between the Five Tribes and people of African descent
are also fraught with many difficult issues.

The story of the people of African descent owned by Native Americans is unique,
but also simply another tale of coercion and community in the diverse African American experience.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

---

• 
  Alaina E Roberts
  Alaina E Roberts is Assistant Professor of History at the University of Pittsburgh.
  
  How Native Americans adopted slavery from white settlers | Conflict | Al Jazeera
  https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/...mericans-adopted-slavery-from-white-settlers/
  

 

A BiLLIONAiRE
NATIVE AMERICAN - tobacco industry

Who is the richest Native American in the world?
by admin Is the richest Native American in the world a Mr. Ken Hill,
a tobacco magnate from the Six Nations Reservation in Ontario Canada.
Mr. Ken Hill is a Haudenosaunee, a branch of Indigenous People’s from the mighty Iroquois Confederacy.


TOBACCO KING: Indigenous billionaire businessman's lavish lifestyle | Toronto Sun
https://torontosun.com/news/provinc...ous-billionaire-businessmans-lavish-lifestyle

 

TOBACCO KING: Indigenous billionaire businessman's lavish lifestyle | Toronto Sun
https://torontosun.com/news/provinc...ous-billionaire-businessmans-lavish-lifestyle

• Ontario

TOBACCO KING: Indigenous billionaire businessman's

lavish lifestyle

Author of the article:
Sam Pazzano Courts Bureau
Publishing date:
Sep 07, 2018 • September 7, 2018 • 5 minute read • Join the conversation

Ken Hill (Grand River Enterprises)
Article content

Ken Hill may well be the wealthiest Indigenous businessman in Canada.


The billionaire Six Nations resident launched the world’s largest private Indigenous-owned corporation, Grand River Enterprises Ltd., in 1992 — selling enormous volumes of cigarettes in Germany, the Bahamas, the U.S. and elsewhere.


Cann raises nearly $35 million as it launches in Canada


The company does hundreds of millions of dollars in business annually and Hill receives tens of millions of dollars in profits each year.
According to court documents filed in a support case against him,
Hill pays no income tax on his self-reported income of $5.3 million in 2013 because of Indian Act exemptions.

Brittany Beaver, his ex-lover and mother of his son who is now receiving child support of $33,000 a month from Hill,
has desperately tried to determine his true income and wealth, according to her filings.

She alleges Hill “repeatedly threatened her that she will never know his true income or net worth because he doesn’t file income tax returns and has connections that will assist him in hiding his assets from her.”
He denied saying this.
After two years of litigation, she says, Hill finally relented and provided further financial disclosure.
He revealed he makes $5.49 million but his total expenses surpass that at $7.4 million. His legal bills alone in 2017 were $1.2 million.
He listed several Canadian properties, including a $1.135 million Lee Ave. home in Kitchener (held in trust for their son) where his boy, Beaver, her new boyfriend and their child live.

Brittany Beaver (FACEBOOK_)
According to his disclosure, Hill states his car collection is valued at $5.58 million, his 2010 Lazzara 76-foot yacht is worth $2.76 M and his 2013 Sea Ray Sundancer, $939,000.

Hill’s expansive garage has a fleet of luxury vehicles, including a Lamborghini, three Porsches, at least two Ferraris, four Rolls Royces, says Beaver.
He lives in a world of luxury and comfort that most people dream of and often takes his private jet to Vegas where he stays in the most expensive suites ($4,000 to $25,000 a night), according to court documents.
Hill parties with rock legend Rod Stewart, former boxing champ Mike Tyson, actorss Tia Carrere and Emmanuel Lewis, Trailer Park Boys and rapper Snoop Dogg, who recorded a track with Hill’s rapper son Josh that became controversial because it referred to “pocahotties.”
While Hill and Beaver were involved romantically, he lavished her with expensive gifts, frequent travel (sometimes with him, but often without him) and shopping sprees, according to the court records.

In happier times, the couple stayed at the largest suite in a Bahamas resort, which cost $20,000 a night. That figure is only slightly less than Hill’s monthly child support payments for his son.
Hill has five other children by four different women — Joshua, Ryan, Jasmine, Gabriella and Jordan, all of whom he financially supports.
Hill either owns or has an interest in a private 10-seater plan, which Beaver and her mother travelled in, she stated in an affidavit.
Hill denies owning a jet or helicopter, saying GRE formerly leased a jet that he accessed. He denied being a billionaire and asserted no one, including himself, has “seemingly unlimited financial resources.”
Beaver also alleges Hill has an 18,000 sq. ft. Bahamas mansion, where her son stayed in December 2014 and December 2015.
Advertisement 6


Hill also possesses “multi-million dollar mansions” in Los Angeles, Atlanta and Miami, she alleges.
None of these properties were mentioned in Hill’s financial disclosure.
Hill also paid for Beaver and a friend to vacation in Costa Rica for two weeks in February 2010, another trip to Hawaii for a week in July that year and a two-week vacation for her and their son to Disney World in Orlando, Fla., in August 2012.
While Hill gave gifts and trips freely and paid his son’s private school tuition of $25,000 a year, his ex alleges he rarely gave their son the most precious commodity of all — his time.
Beaver claims despite her attempts to encourage Hill to foster a relationship with his son, the father admitted in 2016 he only sees their son once every three to six months for a few hours.

Hill also allegedly admitted he didn’t visit the boy in the hospital when he was a year old and suffering from pneumonia.
spazzano@postmedia.com

Brittany Beaver and Ken Hill
PROVINCE KEEPING TABS ON INDIGENOUS CHALLENGE TO FAMILY LAW
First, he was asserting his right as an individual, instead of as an authorized representative of the community, which is impermissible.
The second ground was that this issue is not justiciable, meaning it’s not an issue a court can decide. Instead, this matter should be negotiated between government and Indigenous groups.
The third ground is the attornment issue — a process Hill participated in before the Ontario Superior Court. Brittany Beaver’s lawyers and Justice Chappel agreed that once Hill attorned, he couldn’t then decide to pick his Indigenous system instead.

The fourth ground was that his case wasn’t properly pleaded or argued to be considered. It has been amended five times to shore up this weakness.
The MAG has weighed in on the attornment issue solely but, stunningly, hasn’t written a word in defence of its own legislation in its factum.
And surprisingly, the MAG hasn’t commented on the other three reasons Chappel cited in dismissing Hill’s case for self-government under Haudenosaunee culture for family law.
If Hill succeeds, it means Indigenous people living on reserves could opt out of the Ontario Family Law system, thus invalidating current custodial and support orders. Anxious parents would be plunged into a legal limbo — without any certain court orders.
Advertisement 9



And incredibly, this situation would occur without the province’s lawyers stepping up to support its own laws.
“I think it’s fair to say that we expect the government to defend its own statutory scheme,” said prominent family lawyer Stephen Grant, who is not involved in this case.
“This is clearly the fundamental role of the Attorney General, particularly in constitutional cases,” said Grant, who last year won the Ontario Bar Association Award for Excellence in Family law as well as the Advocacy Society Medal, the highest distinction conveyed upon a lawyer from any practice area.
“I see that it engages access to the family justice system, rights and obligations of child and spousal support and the like, not specifically for this particular family but for all First Nations’ families, both prospectively and, arguably, retroactively,” said Grant.

“In other words, it appears to be a case of general application, affecting the rights and obligations of claimant and recipient spouses on their own behalf and their children as well, at least in Ontario if not the other provinces.”
Grant said the courts must decide this complex conflict of the competing interests of the Constitution and the Charter.
“It’s not up to the AG, as opposed to the judiciary, to reconcile the competing interests of the Constitution and Charter but rather to advocate for the proper interpretation and enforcement of its own legislation,” said Grant, who has practised for 44 years.
— Sam Pazzano



TOBACCO KING: Indigenous billionaire businessman's lavish lifestyle | Toronto Sun
https://torontosun.com/news/provinc...ous-billionaire-businessmans-lavish-lifestyle