UN-Globalist Collectivism and Political Disclosure

Discussion in 'UN-Globalist Collectivism and Political Disclosure' started by admin, Jan 28, 2018.

Page 18 of 34
  1. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    admin, Apr 30, 2020
    #171
  2. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    Last edited: May 4, 2020
    admin, May 2, 2020
    #172
  3. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    New Understanding of Viruses: They may be Defenders, not Attackers!

    May 4, 2020 Mikey Landings 0
    Screen-Shot-2020-05-04-at-5.03.28-AM-678x381.
    Exosome, Wiki

    pdf. print.
    In this nine-minute video, the current theory that viruses cause illness is compared to an emerging theory of exosomes, which have the same structure and content of viruses but which are immune-system ‘good guys’. That’s because their function is to gather debris from inside cells that have been damaged by environmental and systemic toxins and carry it out of the cells where it can be removed from the body completely. Exosomes also notify other cells of this activity, which causes the entire body to mount a defense. During colder months, exosomes must purge more of these toxins than in warmer months, which may account for the seasonal nature of the flu. Exosomes look exactly like viruses and behave exactly like them as well. However, the old theory views their association with toxic particles as evidence they are bad, while the new theory views their association with toxic particles as evidence they are good. The debate is on, but there is a growing understanding among scientists that viruses and exosomes are one-in-the-same. -GEG

    Tash Stokes
    all virus illnesses are immunization related i think.... so from two months old we are injected and i think certain viruses are activated during different stages of our life... for eg maybe a flu shot can activate a certain code in our dna and so on.
    Do u think thats possible? ??

    Tony Bermanseder
    Of course any vaccine carries the same 'disease' it is supposed to 'fight' in the creation of an immune response creating 'antibodies'.
    If you do not have the disease in the first place, the antibody response will occur naturally without any vaccine, should the immune response became necessary.
    Vaccines are a money making scientific scam and utterly unwarranted as a 'health agency'.

    Tash Stokes
    exactly what i thought. Its such a shame that so many ppl trust the system without a second thought!!
    ​
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2020
    admin, May 5, 2020
    #173
  4. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    Event 201 - World Economic Forum New York, Wuhan military exercises with Bio-Safety Lab4 October 18th, 2019

    The timeline is October 19th, 2019 (Event 201) to December 12th, 2024 to counter the agenda 30.​
    March 2nd, next year 2021 stipulates a nexus mirror point for the entire human history according to the 'futuristic codes', say scripture and native prophecies and so on.
    So it will be geopolitically important of what occurs in the next 11 months from now on and including the November election in the USA.
    A number of the globalist technocracy decisions will depend on what the state of global affairs will be at then end of this year.


    tribulation-.
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2020
    admin, May 6, 2020
    #174
  5. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    Last edited: May 7, 2020
    admin, May 7, 2020
    #175
  6. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    YouTube CENSORED: DOCTORS IN BLACK / PlanDemic

    474,763 views
    ·
    May 7, 2020


    The original video posted to YouTube had over 1 million views before it was deleted for contradicting the World Health Organization and the NIH.


    Truth of Doctors - Features scientist, Dr Judy Mikovits PHD. , Humanity is imprisoned by a killer pandemic.
    People are being arrested for surfing in the ocean and meditating in nature. Nations are collapsing. Hungry citizens are rioting for food. The media has generated so much confusion and fear that people are begging for salvation in a syringe.
    Billionaire patent owners are pushing for globally mandated vaccines.

    Anyone who refuses to be injected with experimental poisons will be prohibited from travel, education and work.
    No, this is not a synopsis for a new horror movie. This is our current reality. Let’s back up to address how we got here...

    In the early 1900s, America’s first Billionaire, John D. Rockefeller bought a German pharmaceutical company that would later assist Hitler to implement his eugenics-based vision by manufacturing chemicals and poisons for war. Rockefeller wanted to eliminate the competitors of Western medicine, so he submitted a report to Congress declaring that there were too many doctors and medical schools in America, and that all natural healing modalities were unscientific quackery.
    Rockefeller called for the standardization of medical education, whereby only his organization be allowed to grant medical school licenses in the US. And so began the practice of immune suppressive, synthetic and toxic drugs.

    Once people had become dependent on this new system and the addictive drugs it provided, the system switched to a paid program, creating lifelong customers for the Rockefellers. Currently, medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US. Rockefeller’s secret weapon to success was the strategy known as, “problem-reaction-solution.” Create a problem, escalate fear, then offer a pre-planned solution. Sound familiar?

    Flash forward to 2020... They named it COVID19. Our leaders of world health predicted millions would die. The National Guard was deployed.
    Makeshift hospitals were erected to care for a massive overflow of patients. Mass graves were dug. Terrifying news reports had people everywhere seeking shelter to avoid connect. The plan is unfolding with precision. But the masters of the Pandemic underestimated one thing... the people.

    Medical professionals and every-day citizens are sharing critical information online. The overlords of big tech have ordered all dissenting voices to be silenced and banned, but they are too late. The slumbering masses are awake and aware that something is not right. Quarantine has provided the missing element: time. Suddenly, our overworked citizenry has ample time to research and investigate for themselves.
    Once you see, you can’t unsee.

    The window of opportunity is open like never before. For the first time in human history, we have the world’s attention. Plandemic will expose the scientific and political elite who run the scam that is our global health system, while laying out a new plan; a plan that allows all of humanity to reconnect with healing forces of nature. 2020 is the code for perfect vision. It is also the year that will go down in history as the moment we finally opened our eyes.


    Posted by
    u/SherlockBeaver

    1 day ago

    Plandemic Documentary debunked

    [​IMG]

    Plandemic Documentary: The Hidden Agenda Behind Covid-19 #DEBUNKED!!

    Edit for TLDR: Dr. Judy Mikovits makes a number of claims in a pseudo-documentary that she discovered a dangerous virus called XMRV but that the Deep State and Big Pharma silenced her including by false arrest with no charges, warrantless search, forced bankruptcy and gag order. She claims that Dr. Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo stole her HIV research and claimed it as their own causing millions of deaths; that she was employed at Camp Dertrick to cause the mutation of Ebola making it infections to humans in the 1990s; that Dr. Fauci has paid people of to silence her ...and many more!

    In reality, Dr. Mikovits is a scientist who in her entire career published only two research papers that she references in the video: a doctoral thesis and a 2011 paper linking the XMRV virus to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome which has since been discredited by over a dozen attempts by peers to replicate it, which she appears to blame Dr. Fauci for. Subsequent to her research being proven fraudulent, Dr. Mikovits was fired from the private foundation that hired her to research cures for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and was expecting a $1.5M grant from the NIAID Dr. Fauci heads to do additional research. She then conspired with a research associate who was also her tenant to steal 18 notebooks, flash drives and a laptop computer that were the physical and intellectual property of the foundation that had just fired her. Warrants for Dr. Mikovits’ arrest and the search of her home were executed based on the confession of the research assistant who delivered the stolen property to her.

    The “documentary” begins…
    “Dr. Judy Mikovits has been called one of the most accomplished scientists of her generation.
    … [claims that Dr. Mikovits revolutionized AIDS testing and treatment]
    At the height of her career, Dr. Mikovits published a blockbuster article in the journal, Science. The controversial article sent shockwaves through the scientific community as it revealed that the common use of animal and human fetal tissues were unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases. For exposing their deadly secrets, the minions of Big Pharma waged war on Dr. Mikovits Destroying her good name, career and personal life.”

    At minute 1:55 in the film “one of the most accomplished scientists of her time” claims that she was arrested, but charged with NOTHING. At minute 1:58 she claims to have been held in jail with no charges, which if true would absolutely violate the 6th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 2:05 she claims there was “no warrant” for her arrest and at 2:13 she claims that her house was searched without a warrant which if true, would violate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and at 2:26 she claims that the stolen intellectual property was PLANTED in her house in California. At 2:57 she claims that the FBI are involved (they were not) and that her case in under seal so that no attorney can represent her or defend her, or they would be found in contempt of court, which if true would of course violate too many Constitutional norms to enumerate but yes, basically ALL of them are being denied her… according to her.
    The actual Criminal charges vs. the wild claims by Dr. Mikovits

    In 2006 Dr. Judy Mikovits was hired as Research Director for a private foundation associated with UNR called Whittemore Peterson Institute for Neuro-Immune Disease (WPI) in Reno, NV which was created by a very wealthy couple comprised of an attorney and a businessman whose daughter suffers from “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome” in an effort to find a cure for their daughter. When Dr. Mikovits went to work at WPI, her contract included clauses not unlike what is included when I do litigation support research for attorneys: her contract states that any and all of her work product belongs to WPI, she may retain NO COPIES of any of it. She most certainly was not authorized to remove any work product from WPI. To do so, is theft of intellectual property.

    Dr. Mikovits was fired from WPI for refusing to turn over a cell sample shipment received at her lab to another researcher at the institute on September 29, 2011, the details of which are outlined in witness Max Proft’s affidavit. (link below)

    After Dr. Mikovits' departure, WPI discovered that 12 to 20 laboratory notebooks and flash drives containing years of research data were missing. In an initial statement through her attorney, Dr. Mikovits stated that she had received notice of her firing from WPI on her cell phone and immediately left Nevada for her home near Ventura, California. Dr. Mikovits denied having the notebooks and, in fact, Dr. Mikovits’ attorney was requesting that the lab notebooks be returned to her so that she could continue to work on the grants she won while employed at the WPI and fulfill her responsibilities on these government grants and corporate contacts.

    After WPI reported a theft to the University of Nevada police, and an investigation was launched and a subordinate research assistant and TENANT of Dr. Mikovits’ in Reno named Max Pfost, provided a sworn affidavit detailing his own complicity in stealing the notebooks and delivering them to Dr. Mikovits. His sworn affidavit was the basis of the warrant for Dr. Mikovits’ arrest and the search of her home in California. I recommend reading his affidavit in full because it provides a lot of relevant details in both the civil and criminal cases:
    http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/268451-exh-1-reply-iso

    Following Dr. Mikovits’ arrest, a second researcher at WPI named Amanda McKenzie also provided a sworn affidavit in which she attests that Dr. Mikovits asked her to remove laboratory samples and other materials from WPI and deliver them to another researcher who is a co-author of Dr. Mikovits’ now-discredited research paper and one of two of the four authors of that study who refuses to retract the study, the other one being Dr. Mikovits. According to her affidavit, Amanda McKenzie declined to do cooperate with Dr. Mikovits’ plans.


    Contrary to Dr. Mikovits’ claim in “Plandemic Documentary” that she was arrested without warrant, held in jail without charges and additionally, her home searched without warrant, in fact, warrants for her arrest and the search and recovery of stolen property at her home WERE issued by the University of Nevada at Reno Police Department November 17, 2011. Dr. Mikovits was arrested at her California home on November 18, 2011 and charged with two felonies: 1. possession of stolen property and 2. unlawful taking of computer data, equipment, supplies, or other computer-related property. She was held without bail for 5 days while awaiting arraignment and hearing on extradition to Nevada - which she waived - after 18 laboratory notebooks belonging to WPI, as well a computer and other items were recovered from her home following the warranted search. The criminal charges were later dismissed without prejudice pending the outcome of the civil trial against Dr. Mikovits for losses related to the stolen but mostly recovered notebooks. The “gag order” Dr. Mikovits refers to relates to the civil lawsuit WPI filed against her which Dr. Mikovits LOST and as a result, was ordered to pay attorney fees and damages to WPI. She chose to declare bankruptcy rather than pay. Frankly, she should never have stolen the notebooks, because she KNEW that her contract with WPI stipulated that all laboratory work product belonged to them, including the all-important notebooks. Unfortunately, I think she felt like she had to steal them because at the time she was still trying to claim her study was valid and adjust testing parameters for the XMRV virus that would create more positive test results from her patients, as noted in the edited abstract of her published study. The notebooks are essential documentation of all the laboratory’s methods.


    In two sworn affidavits, Max Pfost details how Dr. Mikovits told him that “WPI was going down” and that she was going to see to it that at least half of a $1.5M R01 grant from the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease would follow her to a new employer. According to his affidavit:
    “She stated she was going to try to move the R01 grant and the Department of Defense grants and stop the Lipkin study.”
    The Lipkin study was a multi-centre trial, headed by Ian Lipkin, a virologist at Columbia University in New York, trying to prove or disprove once and for all Mikovits’s largely discredited hypothesis that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is caused by a mysterious family of retroviruses, among them XMRV.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448165/

    The Lipkin study was commissioned by DR. ANTHONY FAUCI and this, is where Dr. Mikovits’ true resentment and subsequent slanderous accusations against Dr. Fauci originate. Dr. Fauci may have cost Dr. Mikovits at least $750k in federal grant money by insisting on additional peer-reviewed research of her failed attempt to link the XMRV virus to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
    https://www.virology.ws/2011/05/06/ian-lipkin-on-xmrv/comment-page-4/

    Who is Judy Mikovits and what is she even talking about?
    In 1992 she earned a Ph.D. in biochemistry and molecular biology from George Washington University. Her Ph.D. thesis was entitled “Negative Regulation of HIV Expression in Monocytes” and her empirical thesis research relates to repressor proteins that could inhibit HIV DNA from replicating. Her only published paper on HIV is not suppressed. In fact, this very documentary claims it its’ very first moments that Dr. Mikovits DID revolutionize the testing/treatment of HIV/AIDS so… did she or didn’t she? Her thesis is available here:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2187891/

    Dr. Mikovits did do some post-graduate DNA research in molecular virology at the Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, although she published zero research during her years there. Ze-ro. If Dr. Fauci stole her homework then… where is this 1999 paper she claims she had “in publication”? She doesn’t have a copy? Her research associates don’t???
    It was while working for WPI in 2009 that Dr. Mikovits published the only significant research paper of her career in the journal Science, entitled “Detection of an infectious retrovirus, XMRV, in blood cells of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome”, in which she and four other colleagues claimed to have found genetic markers indicating the presence of retroviruses including one called XMRV in the blood products of patients suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. When no other laboratory could replicate the results Dr. Mikovits published, she went back and altered the protocols for detection to make nearly all the results “positive” for XMRV and other retrovirus, which they concede was done in the edited abstract of their own research paper:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073172/

    By 2011 two of the original researchers including Dr. Lombardi had come to understand that the results they had published were only factually explainable by laboratory contamination and partially retracted their research, later petitioning to have their names removed from the study entirely:
    “Four laboratories tested the samples for the presence of antibodies that react with XMRV proteins. Only WPI and NCI/Ruscetti detected reactive antibodies, both in CFS specimens and negative controls. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of positivity between the positive and negative controls, nor in the identity of the positive samples between the two laboratories.

    These results demonstrate that XMRV or antibodies to the virus are not present in clinical specimens. Detection of XMRV nucleic acid by WPI is likely a consequence of contamination. The positive serology reported by WPI and NCI/Ruscetti laboratories remained unexplained, but are most likely the result of the presence of cross-reactive epitopes. The authors of the study conclude that ‘routine blood screening for XMRV/P-MLV is not warranted at this time’.”
    https://www.virology.ws/2011/09/27/trust-science-not-scientists/

    This did not stop WPI from bringing to market a laboratory test for XMRV at a cost of $500 to each patient for the financial benefit of WPI, that even Dr. Mikovits did not believe was providing accurate results according to her ”testimony” in “Plandemic Documentary” on YouTube…
    https://phoenixrising.me/research-2...onic-fatigue-syndrome-mecfs/xmrv/xmrv-testing

    In November 2011 Science published a NINE LABORATORY STUDY that also failed to confirm XMRV or other viruses in the blood of and therefore as a cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in patients.
    https://science.sciencemag.org/content/334/6057/814

    By the end of 2011 Science had issued a full retraction of Dr. Mikovits’ published findings in their journal:
    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/201...thors-consent-retracts-paper-tied-mouse-virus

    Let’s review the rest of the video for fun…
    At minute 7:40 Dr. Mikovits begins to falsely claim that the Bayh-Dole Act has “ruined” science by allowing grant recipients to retain ownership claims to their inventions and get rich, but in reality, when it comes to Dr. Fauci (and university researchers similarly under contract with those institutions), by his contractual agreement with NIAID the ownership of those patents, in fact, resides with that agency and thus, with the taxpayers and THAT, is who will receive royalties from the grants Dr. Fauci employed in order to make his discoveries that lead to those patents. Those royalties go 1/2 to the NIAID, a taxpayer-funded agency in order to fund more research grants (like the one Dr. Mikovits has now been denied in light of her unethical practices) and the other 1/2 to the drug manufacturer. I don’t see the problem.

    Dr. Fauci and others at HHS applied for their first patent on a method for activating the immune system in mammals in 1995 and it did involve the Il-2 treatments Dr. Mikovits references in the video at minute 7:40, but nothing in the patent is unique to the treatment of HIV/AIDS; it looks like it most applies to use in treating leukemia and in fact, in the Background of the Invention [0010] included with the patent registration it states: “No method of treatment of HIV with IL-2 has been disclosed which results in a sustained response or which yields long-term beneficial results.” So how is it that this Dr. Mikovits sees fit to BLAME Dr. Fauci for AIDS deaths? It’s slanderous.
    https://patents.justia.com/patent/20030180254

    At 9:17 we are hit with the biggest irony in the world when Dr. Mikovits criticizes Bill Gates’ foundation for helping to fund research (making the FOUNDATION, not Bill Gates himself, possibly eligible for some claim if patents are filed and Stanford v. Roche is the standard that would apply, as it does to all of Dr. Fauci’s patents), when the place that Dr. Mikovits was fired from (WPI) for misappropriating cell samples - the place THROUGH which she was seeking a $1.5M research grant FROM NIAID - is a PRIVATE FOUNDATION that was founded by an attorney and her husband, seeking a cure for their daughter’s Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. WPI contractually had the same rights under Stanford v. Roche to any invention or discovery of hers and after she was fired for misappropriating samples and proven to be a thief of intellectual property, Dr. Mikovits was in danger of losing her own $1.5M grant from NIAID. That’s her real beef here.
    So, what is the truth? Did Dr. Mikovits “discover” a dangerous virus causing “plagues of disease” as this “documentary” claims and then finds herself silenced and bankrupted by the Deep State and Big Pharma? No, she absolutely did not. A man named Dr. Robert Silverman “discovered” the XMRV virus in prostate cancer samples and published his own findings attempting to link that virus to disease in 2006.
    https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.0020025

    Dr. Mikovits met Dr. Silverman at a conference in 2007 and at that time Dr. Mikovits decided to start testing her Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients for the virus, using methods Dr. Silverman actually developed. Dr. Silverman has since stood by HIS discovery of XMRV, but has completely retracted his study linking the virus to the disease of prostate cancer.
    “In their new study in PLOS ONE, Silverman and colleagues meticulously retraced their experimental steps to determine the source of XMRV contamination in their cell cultures, which has garnered praise from other researchers. “These scientists put their egos aside and aggressively and relentlessly pursued several lines of investigation to get to the truth," National Cancer Institute researcher Vinay Pathak told ScienceNOW*.* Pathak was among the researchers who published data that refuted a connection between XMRV and disease.
    …
    After publications by Pathak and others, Silverman said he felt convinced that there was an error in his findings. “I felt I couldn't rest until I figured out how it happened,” Silverman told ScienceNOW. “I wanted to get some closure.””
    https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/surprise-xmrv-retraction-40456

    Too bad Dr. Mikovits has no such ethics.
    This absurd “documentary” then goes on to show video clips of doctors claiming they are being “pressured” to record deaths as Covid-19 but included again is Dr. Erickson, the now-debunked California doctor who DOES NOT ATTEND DYING PATIENTS IN ANY HOSPITAL and therefore, is absolutely NOT “being pressured” to fill out any “death reports”.
    At 14:52 Dr. Mikovits validates the claim that the filmmaker makes that doctors and hospitals are being “incentivized” to report cases as Covid-19 and Dr. Mikovits cites the figure of a $13,000 “bonus”?? from Medicare?? That is so laughable. The overwhelming majority of hospitals in the United States are privately owned, so if ANY hospital is pressuring ANY doctor to falsely code Covid-19 claims with an expectation financial gain, that would be Medicare fraud. IS this documentary seriously meaning to allege that widespread Medicare fraud is being perpetrated by U.S. hospitals that doctors are complicit with? That is one hell of an accusation.
    Dr. Mikovits works in laboratories and apparently understands very little about medical billing for patients, but I have had to deal with mountains of medical bills in personal injury and medical malpractice, so allow me to explain a few things supplemented with some of the newest information as regards Covid-19 coding and billing:

    Patients’ conditions are recorded including using diagnostic codes, for the purposes of billing and also empirical study. Diagnosis coding accurately portrays the medical condition that a patient is experiencing; ICD diagnostic coding accurately reflects a healthcare provider's findings. A healthcare provider’s progress note is composed of four component parts: 1. the patient’s chief complaint, the reason that initiates the healthcare encounter 2. the provider documents his or observations including a review of the patient’s history, a review of pertinent medical systems, and a physical examination. 3. the healthcare provider renders an assessment in the form of a diagnosis 4. a plan of care is ordered. Diagnostic codes are used to justify why medical procedures are performed. If you don’t code a patient for presumptive Covid-19, you cannot order and bill for a Covid-19 test, nor apparently justify hospital quarantine for a Medicare patient without charging the patient an additional co-pay UNLESS you code their diagnosis as Covid-19.
    According to official guidance from the CDC, providers should only use code U07.1 to document a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 as documented by the provider, per documentation of a positive COVID-19 test result, or a presumptive positive COVID-19 test result. This also applies to asymptomatic patients who test positive for coronavirus. “Suspected, possible, probable, or inconclusive cases of COVID-19 should not be assigned U07.1” CDC emphasizes in the guidance. Instead, providers should assign codes explaining the reason for the encounter, such as a fever or Z20.828, “Contact with and (suspected) exposure to other viral communicable diseases”.”
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/COVID-19-guidelines-final.pdf

    Medicare and Medicaid do not have “set amounts” that are paid based on diagnostic codes. Dr. Mikovits is clearly as misinformed as half the internet right now but here is where they are getting the numbers they are twisting into fiction for their own purposes:
    “To project how much hospitals would get paid by the federal government for treating uninsured patients, we look at payments for admissions for similar conditions. For less severe hospitalizations, we use the average Medicare payment for respiratory infections and inflammations with major comorbidities or complications in 2017, which was $13,297. For more severe hospitalizations, we use the average Medicare payment for a respiratory system diagnosis with ventilator support for greater than 96 hours, which was $40,218. Each of these average payments was then increased by 20% to account for the add-on to Medicare inpatient reimbursement for patients with COVID-19 that was included in the CARES Act.
    Before accounting for the 20% add on, Medicare payments are about half of what private insurers pay on average for the same diagnoses. In the absence of this new proposed policy, many of the uninsured would typically be billed based on hospital charges, which are the undiscounted “list prices” for care and are typically much higher than even private insurance reimbursement.”
    https://www.kff.org/uninsured/issue...ing-the-uninsured-hospitalized-with-covid-19/
    https://www.healthsystemtracker.org...-treatment-for-people-with-employer-coverage/

    In case you were wondering, the reasons behind the 20% add on for patients diagnosed with Covid-19, are because according to the Kaiser Family Foundation Medicare already typically pays HALF what private insurers do, Medicare does not pay for additional PPE, Covid-19 patients often have the medical necessity of a private hospital room for quarantine purposes which Medicare does not normally cover and finally, the new Covid-19 coding allows hospital providers to bill for services they provide at alternate sites such as parking lot testing sites, convention centers or hotels, something we haven’t dealt with before but for which they obviously deserve to be reimbursed. The $13k/$39k figures are simply what it cost on average in 2017 to care for someone with respiratory illness in a hospital, it is NOT some “bonus” that anyone is receiving. That is a lie.
    17:13 Dr. Mikovits claims that hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine has been safely used for 70 years to treat a wide range of illnesses for which the FDA has approved its’ use including lupus and rheumatoid arthritis but unfortunately, that is not the same thing as treating Covid-19, and Dr. Mikovits’ peers have come to very, very different conclusions about its’ application as a treatment for Covid-19:
    “Data to support the use of HCQ and CQ for COVID-19 are limited and inconclusive. The drugs have some in vitro activity against several viruses, including coronaviruses and influenza, but previous randomized trials in patients with influenza have been negative (4, 5). In COVID-19, one small nonrandomized study from France (3) (discussed elsewhere in Annals of Internal Medicine [6]) demonstrated benefit but had serious methodological flaws, and a follow-up study still lacked a control group. Yet, another very small, randomized study from China in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 found no difference in recovery rates (7).”
    https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/...during-covid-19-pandemic-what-every-clinician

    “In this phase IIb randomized clinical trial of 81 patients with COVID-19, an unplanned interim analysis recommended by an independent data safety and monitoring board found that a higher dosage of chloroquine diphosphate for 10 days was associated with more toxic effects and lethality, particularly affecting QTc interval prolongation. The limited sample size did not allow the study to show any benefit overall regarding treatment efficacy.”
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2765499

    In conclusion, this woman has a serious axe to grind with her peers and even her former collaborating colleagues. Her published research has been completely discredited by a dozen independent studies. This is why we have peer review of scientific claims - in order to discern real fact. Dr. Mikovits was to a receive $1.5M grant from NIAID herself, which she has now lost due to lack of scientific fact and lack of ethics. Sometimes I see a meme on Facebook that says something about how some people believe that scientists are conspiring to lie to them… like, why would scientists lie? They “lie” or more accurately, falsify data because believe it or not, science is even more competitive than the music industry and scientists can’t sell tickets to their show. In order to receive any money for doing science, one needs an expensive education and to be able to publish credible findings.
    Dr. Mikovits cannot even be honest or discerning in relaying the truth about her legal issues, so I do not know why anyone would take any testimony by this person about anything with anything other than a large grain of salt and that is the nicest way I can say it.



    Steve Fearnow

    10 hrs ·
    OwIs97ro9ZK.
    Bailing Out A Broken System - That’s Built To Fail


    One controversial documentary about a discredited conspiracy theorist or slandered whistle blower depending on which side you stand still doesn’t explain a few things. Terrible models with massive down grades of death rates even with social distancing. The reclassification of any co morbidity or COVID like symptoms on any death being labeled COVID.

    Doctors saying they are being pressured to label deaths this way.
    Why do the number of deaths seem to keep being less and less from the projections?
    Much higher amounts of people have apparently contracted it already than projected and are asymptotic.
    Do you think the government sincerely has our best interest and is truly correct about this with so much conflicting data.
    I’m not the head of the CDC or WHO but I definitely have some questions that don’t seem like they are getting answered by the main stream.
    I think this is also fueling more conspiracy theory which I’ll admit I have entertained and honestly are still somewhat on the fence about.

    I still think this is more about bailing out a broken system than the threat they are telling us this virus is.
    Guess what ?
    Mission Accomplished !
    The entire global economic system was on the verge of locking up back in October of 2019.
    Just search Repo crisis and you will see that trillions was already being pumped into the system by the Fed.
    Also there were many protests in China regarding the environment and human rights.
    I believe the elite had pushed the system to the brink and needed a way out.

    This is not my own theory but has been discussed many times within the world of finance without memes about Karen Science or highly politicized debate. I enjoy following financial and economic information because of this.
    Anyway I know many of you are not as familiar with this world but I wanted to bring some outside perspective as a former financial advisor and someone still following these topics.

    It seems incredibly well timed and with the data not following projections with such hot debate I truly believe there is much more to COVID19 than what the media is allowing us peasants to hear.



    • 85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=cYEeCNYBp2UAX8BmJOw&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
      Tony Bermanseder
      This debunking the debunker analysis depends on the impartiality of the 'peer review' regarding Judy Mikovits. If then the 'peer review' of say multiple labs discrediting Mikovits' work is itself biased, say as supporting or sponsoring the Fauci-Gallo work; then the debunking or invalidating of Mikovits' reseach becomes itself a 'conspiracy' to uphold the status quo. This does not absolve Judy Mikovits from particular inconsistencies in her testimony; but nevertheless indicates true conspiracy in regards to the overall public-adverse collusion by technocratic-globalist collusion.

      https://youtu.be/LfHEuWaPh9Q
    hp?d=AQA_koi8KHTzC3bX&w=98&h=98&url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FLfHEuWaPh9Q%2Fmaxresdefault.
    youtube.com
    The Crisis of Science
    The Crisis of Science

    • 04213174272_n.?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=r-NFtj9f6LIAX9Vt6tp&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
      Steve Fearnow
      Tony Bermanseder
      Great info. Unfortunately a few friends did a quick search on some fact check site and because this channel is deemed hard right conservative they quickly and totally discredited the information lmao. I consider them close friends but am so upset that many refuse to even look at well sourced valid information because of politics. Sad. Thanks for the info !
    • 85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=cYEeCNYBp2UAX8BmJOw&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
      Tony Bermanseder
      You are welcome. Point is most folks are scientifically illiterate in their 'worship' of the 'scientific experts'. You are one of few who can discern fact based commentary from fact based commentary.
      I have a science degree, but I am not 'trapped' in the scientific hierarchy and therefore folks like myself should be the impartial 'science' advisors to political and legislative decision makers.
      As you know this is not the case in modern politics, where the 'experts' are most often lobby based and agenda compromised.

    Erika Mermuse

    79290603520_o.?_nc_cat=106&_nc_sid=dbb9e7&_nc_ohc=6pJyHvsHWSIAX8dwyp3&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.

    • From Juls Hamrick :

      “For Those Who Doubt the Plandemic Movie

      I researched some of the “facts” going around claiming to have “debunked” the movie, which are being regurgitated by many who prefer to remain asleep and won’t put the effort in to research things themselves. Here is what I found along with all of my supporting sources.

      1. Dr. Anthony Fauci has worked at the National Institute of Health (NIH) since 1968 and has been a Director with the organization since 1984, “both as a scientist and as the head of the NIAID at the NIH”. A simple Wikipedia search resolved that one.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Fauci

      2. The NIH was one of the institutions funding the original study published in 10/23/2009, which Dr. Mikovits participated in and makes reference to in the Plandemic movie. Dr. Fauci worked at and continues to work at the NIH, one of the primary financial contributors to the study as one of it’s most senior directors, so you can indeed say that Dr. Judy Mikovits was in fact working for Dr. Fauci. I have downloaded the complete original study and saved for you to access here (highlights on page 3 denote Dr. Judy Mikovits’s participation and her employing firm) (highlights on page 6 indicate the institutions which provided the funding for the study):
      https://drive.google.com/…/1duM3FU-Tt60yGkSyqbskEFyrE…/view…

      3. The study was challenged in 2010, when other researchers could not replicate their findings and in September 2010, the original team, inclusive of Dr. Judy Mikovits issued an official response supporting their work.
      https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Judy_Mikovits [May need subscription to open]

      4. After which the original study was partially and then subsequently fully retracted (a very rare move in science). The partial retraction document states that two of the co-authors, Robert Silverman and Das Gupta (whom the original study listed as working for the Department of Cancer Biology) re-analyzed the samples they used and discovered that they had been contaminated. Please refer back to the first link provided herein, for item #1 showing the original study, indicates on the document that it has since been retracted.

      5. Judy was arrested and a quote from the prosecuting district attorney said the charges were dropped because "there were issues with the witnesses".
      https://www.sciencemag.org/…/criminal-charges-dropped-again…

      6. In September 2012, Dr. Judy Mikovits and a team of other scientists conducted another study replicating the original one and published their findings, ultimately resolving the scientific communities dispute over the original work.
      https://twp.duke.edu/…/fil…/file-attachments/1441.full_.pdf…
      https://www.sciencemag.org/…/final-study-confirms-virus-not…
      https://mbio.asm.org/content/3/5/e00266-12…

      7. As previously shared in another post, Dr. Fauci does in fact hold a large number of patents related to HIV (as Dr. Judy Mikovits states in the video). He also holds numerous patents related to the Novel Coronavirus.
      https://patents.justia.com/search…
      https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB113383825463714813…

      Other Interesting and Related Facts:
      A. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has appointed Dr. Anthony Fauci to their Vaccination Action Plan.
      https://www.gatesfoundation.org/…/Global-Health-Leaders-Lau…

      B. Bill Gates personally owns a number vaccine related patents
      (among many other interesting and unrelated patents):
      https://patents.justia.com/inventor/william-gates…

      C. Pirbright, a company funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation owns European protecting replication of a variant gene of an avian infectious bronchitis virus.
      European Patent# 3 172 319 B1
      https://data.epo.org/publication-server/pdf-document…

      D. Here is proof that Pirbright is in fact funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
      https://www.gatesfoundation.org/…/Grants/2013/11/OPP1098099…

      E. Pirbright also owns a US patent on the Coronavirus (you will need to scroll down quite a bit to see the owner and inventor..they really covered every base on this patent.)
      https://patents.justia.com/patent/10130701…

      F. Vanderbilt University owns a large number of Coronavirus vaccine patents:
      https://patents.justia.com/patent/7452542…

      G. Dr. Anthony Fauci and the Director of Vanderbilt University go way back with Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci both having attended Vanderbilt.
      https://news.vumc.org/…/caucus-explores-crucial-role-of-ni…/

      H. As previously shared in another post, the polio vaccines the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation tested on children in Africa, causing an outbreak of Polio from the vaccine itself and paralysis on the children.
      https://thebulletin.org/…/vaccine-causing-polio-in-africa…/…

     
    Last edited: May 9, 2020
    admin, May 8, 2020
    #176
  7. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    Safety, Biological Well-Being and biotechnocratic control!

    safety. ​


    The Australian health minister Greg Hunt said:
    "If you want to go to the footy, get the Covid19 surveillance application!"

    What he most likely did not wish to add to his advice given was: --- then you will have to get the the vaccine, that changes your own body dna/rna - then the biotechnological implants for technocratic control by 2025 to 2030'.

    But the Australian vox populi prefers blind trust in a 'caring government, globally controlled' and the 'expert advice' of psychopathic bureaucratic international administrators.

    Covid19 is a biologically-genetically manipulated form of the common corona 'virus-exosome-nanoscaled quantum geometric bioentity'.
    The point of this manipulation is to render it unnatural and human manufactured, so it can be patented or 'owned' by the 'medical technical experts (the globalist technocratic control structure of Agenda 21-2030)'.
    The question of it being a bioweapon so is rendered peripheral. The manipulation of the 'owned' intellectual property can then of course be further 'enhanced' and manipulated to render the corona viral genetic material 'more virulent' in its seasonal mutations.
    A seasonally varying 'super vaccine' so ensures not only great profits for the patent owners of the genetic material; but also allows specific genetic interference through and by this material, as it is nanotechnologically enabled to substitute race- and individual specific genetic characteristics.

    This then allows the technocratic agenda envisaged altering of the human genetic code and its eventual merger of the human biology with computer algorithm and physical, mental and psychosomatic control.


    A World at Risk!​
    A World at Risk! --- And Australia's 'pledging' contribution!
    Countries and regional organisations must lead by example.
    ...
    All countries must build strong systems.
    ...
    A 8 billion dollar Pledging Event (2min to 4min marker in linked video)
    ...
    Australia's 'pledging' by Scott Morrison


    Transcript
    05 May 2020
    Prime Minister
    E&OE

    PRIME MINISTER: G'day from Australia. We're very pleased to be part of this important event today, and I want to thank the European Commission for bringing us all together for this important purpose.
    COVID-19 is putting us all to the test and it is a test we are all rising to. This is a great shared project by the peoples of the world with a clear purpose: to find that vaccine for COVID-19. A safe vaccine, available to all, affordable to all.
    In Australia and around the world, our best and brightest medical minds and researchers are working tirelessly in the service of all peoples.
    Today, Australia is pledging $352 million Australian dollars towards this global effort to fight COVID-19 and to find that vaccine.

    We're providing $15 million Australian dollars to help develop COVID-19 vaccines and diagnostics to be shared equally between the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND).
    As well, here in Australia, we're also providing $337 million Australian dollars to fund COVID-19 research and development work on vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics and respiratory medicine.
    Our world-class medical researchers and institutions, the University of Queensland, the Doherty Institute and our CSIRO are already working with CEPI to fast track a vaccine. Our pledge builds on A$170 million that we contribute every single year to global partners working on the development and deployment of vaccines, drugs and diagnostics.

    We look forward to continuing our strong support also for GAVI at the pledging conference hosted by Prime Minister Boris Johnson next month. And it's great to see you looking so well, Boris.
    We're also stepping up to assist our region. Our development program is pivoting to focus on COVID-19, especially in our family neighbourhood of the Pacific and Southeast Asia, where we can have the most impact.
    I know we're all hurting and grieving for what has been lost, and so much has been lost. But out of our grief and sadness comes a strong determination to beat this virus by working together. And in so doing, ensuring we are better prepared for future pandemics.

    Thank you so much for the ability to contribute today and be part of this important initiative. And I think the European Commission again for the opportunity.

    ---

    A collusion between the World Bank and the W.H.O. has blackmailed the international planetary community using the plandemic as a tool in a financial-medical 'emergency' and under the auspices of a 20-year completion agenda from 2010-2020-2030.

    blackmail1. blackmail2. blackmail3. blackmail4. ​

    ​
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2020
    admin, May 9, 2020
    #177
  8. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    TH1 & TH2
    TH1 & TH2 - What people and most doctors generally do not know or 'forget' to say about their own immune system!
    ​
    The immuno confusion of the vaxxed versus the stability of the not so vaxxed!


    TH2.
    ​



    A balance of Th1/Th2 cells in the body is defined as immunostasis (or immune balance) and is required for optimum health and wellness. Vaccines promote a failure in immunostasis by making the Th2-type cells dominant.

    In Natural Immunity, for example exposure to chickenpox, Th1 response externalizes the infection and provides permanent immunity.
    In Vaccine-Induced Immunity, Th2 response internalizes the infection because the Immune System was forced into an emergency -based Th2 response and results in poor immune memory. Thus regular vaccine boosters are required throughout life.

    T cells (thymus cells) are the major cell in the immune system; they direct and control all immune responses as well as immune memory. Subsets of T cells are the T-helper cells (Th). T-helper cells coordinate and direct the safest and most effective immune response. Using Moskowitz’s measles example, we know that, when infected with the measles virus naturally via the nasopharyngeal route, the body produces a Th1 response that externalizes the infection and provides permanent immunity. Fever, rash, coughing, sneezing, etc are signs of the body ridding itself of this infection. Bypassing the normal body lines of defense by injecting a vaccine forces the immune system into an emergency-based Th2 response which serves to internalize the infection. You don’t get the disease but are susceptible to the disease later since the Th2 response results in poor immune memory. So, if a natural, viral (measles) infection results in a Th1 response, why don’t we make vaccines that could elicit the same response.

    Adjuvants are often employed to enhance the development of an efficacious specific response. The problem lies within what type of immune response is happening. TH1 is the cell-mediated immune response that happens after naturally acquiring an infection, and then TH2 humoral kicks in with antibodies and ensures immunity, but, they work in tandom. Vaccination uses adjuvants to stimulate a TH2 response, bypassing the TH1, which puts the immune system into a perpetual state of confusion. This can kick in Autoimmunity for predisposed individuals (See the medical textbook “Vaccines and Autoimmunity” by world renowned immunologist Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld MD).

    The vaccination process itself destroys immune capacity by overstimulating the humoral TH2 immune response while never engaging the cell-mediated TH1 immune response. The immune system then stays in a state of agitation, which leads to all sorts of chronic health problems, injury and death. And, never confers immunity (e.g., booster shots are required to create more antibodies - the only measurement of "vaccine effectiveness"). On the other hand, when a child naturally gets an infection a proper TH1 immune response occurs, and then TH2 kicks in, tags the antigens with antibodies and we now have immunity. No need for booster shots.

    "What people don't know about vaccines --what most doctors don't know-- but well demonstrated in medical literature, is that vaccines shift your immune system to an immune suppression type of state called the "TH2 shift." That's what most vaccines do. They shift your immune system to a weaker, antibody type immune system... If you're injecting people with so many vaccines that your keeping them in this constant state --that now your switching everyone to this TH2 immune suppression-- then everyone becomes more susceptible [to infectious diseases]... and no one is talking about that. Now, a lot of scientists know that, but they are afraid to speak out because their careers would be ruined."

    Dr. Russell Blaylock M.D. Neurosurgeon

    The Th1/Th2 balance in autoimmunity.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/8679122/

    Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes in autoimmune disease.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15952931/

    Another explanation:

    "Bypassing the mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting organisms into the body leads to a corruption in the immune system itself where IgA (Immunoglobulin A) is transmitted into IgE (Immunoglobulin E), and/or the B cells are hyperactivated to produce pathological amounts of self-tracking antibody as well as suppression of cytotoxic T cells ‘stealth adapted.’ These are formed when vaccine viruses combine with viruses from tissues used to culture them, or when bacteria lose their cell walls when a person takes antibiotics and transform them into ‘L forms,’ leading to a lack of some critical antigens normally recognized by the cellular immune system.

    The mechanism by which the immune system is corrupted can best be realized when you understand that the two poles of the immune system (the cellular and humoral mechanisms) have a reciprocal relationship in that when the activity of one pole is increased, the other must decrease. Thus, when one is stimulated, the other is inhibited. Since vaccines activate the B cells to secret antibody, the cytotoxic (killer) T cells are subsequently suppressed. In fact, the ‘prevention’ of a disease via vaccination is, in reality, an inability to expel organisms due to the suppression of the cell-mediated response.

    Thus, rather than preventing disease, the disease is actually prevented from ever being resolved. Thus, the autoimmune disease you develop is determined by which tissues in the body are attacked by auto-antibodies. If the inside lining of the gastrointestinal tract (the mucosa) is attacked by auto-antibodies, you can develop leaky gut syndrome. Crohn’s disease and colitis are also caused by auto-antibody attack of the GI tract itself. If the islet (insulin producing) cells of the pancreas are attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop insulin dependent (juvenile) diabetes.

    If the respiratory mucosa is attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop ‘leaky lung’ syndrome where, just as with leaky gut, antigens recognized as foreign to the body which are inhaled are unable to traverse the lining of the respiratory tract, causing the creation of antibodies against those antigens (usually dust, mold, pet or pollen antigens). If the components of the articular surface of the joints are attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop rheumatoid (or juvenile) arthritis. If the kidney tissue is attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop one of the many types of nephritis.

    If you develop auto-antibodies against the very DNA in the nucleus of all cells, you develop systemic Lupus (thus, the autoimmune potential of DNA vaccines being developed now is self-evident: worse yet, DNA components from these vaccines can be incorporated into your DNA, leading to actual genetic changes which could cause extinction of all vaccinated life on the Earth). And on and on and on.

    The brain and spinal chord can also be attacked with auto-antibodies (vaccine induced encephalitis), leading to a variety of neurological diseases. The most severe of these, leading to death, are sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and most cases of ‘shaken baby syndrome.’

    If components of the myelin sheath (the insulating covering of nerve fibers which allows proper nerve conduction) or the actual neurofilaments themselves are attacked by auto-antibodies, the resultant condition is determined solely by the location of the damage done. Such neurological conditions include but are not limited to minimal brain dysfunction, ADD/ADHD, learning disabilities, mental retardation, criminal behavior, the spectrum of pervasive developmental disorders (including autism), multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Lou Gehrig’s disease, Guillain-Barré, and seizure disorders."

    — Rebecca Carley, MD

    https://circleofmamas.com/health-news/vaccines-and-the-th1-th2-immune-response/
    ​

    If you believe a vaccine is going to save us , I have 39 questions for you...
    1. Name 5 vaccine ingredients.
    2. What is MRC-5?
    3. What is WI-38?
    4. What is vaccine court?
    5. What is the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program?
    6. What is the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act?
    7. How has the CDC schedule changed since 1986?
    8. How much money has been paid out by vaccine injury court?
    9. How many doses of how many vaccines are in the CDC schedule between birth and age 16? (70 in US)
    10. Do vaccines contain aborted fetal tissue? If so, which vaccines? And how many aborted babies were needed before they found one with the virus necessary to create the vaccine?
    11. Do any vaccines contain dog, monkey, pig, and human DNA?
    12. What is an adjuvant?
    13. What is an antigen?
    14. Which arm of the immune system do vaccines stimulate?
    15. Which arms of the immune system do natural diseases stimulate?
    16. What is transverse myelitis?
    17. What is encephalopathy?
    18. What is the rate of autism in 2017, what was it in 2000? What was it in 1990?
    19. What is glyphosate and is it in vaccines?
    20. If your child is injured, who will take physical, emotional, and financial responsibility?
    21. What was the Supreme Court’s statement on vaccines in 2011?
    22. Can you provide a study showing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated health outcomes?
    23. Can you show me a safety study proving it is safe to inject multiple vaccines?
    24. What is shedding?
    25. Do vaccines shed? Which vaccines can shed for up to 6 weeks?
    26. Which vaccines are live virus vaccines?
    27. What is the VICP?
    28. What is SV40?
    29. What is MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase)?
    30. What is an acceptable amount of aluminum to ingest per day and how much is injected via the hep B vaccine on day one of life?
    31. Can someone who was vaccinated for pertussis still spread pertussis after being exposed to it? If so, for how long?
    32. What is the death rate from measles in the US from 2005-2015? From the MMR vaccine in same time frame?
    33. What does attenuated mean?
    34. Where can I find information about vaccines?
    35. Are there vaccine consent forms?
    36. Can the vial stopper cause allergic reaction?
    37. Can there be serious reactions to vaccines?
    38. What is NVIC?
    39. Is there any compensation for physicians who have a certain percentage of their patients vaccinated?
    COPY & PASTE. Get searching!
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2020
    admin, May 10, 2020
    #178
  9. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    The original tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist!


    JFK.


    View: https://youtu.be/22O6bt9FihI

    ​
    Transcript of President Dwight D. Eisenhower's Farewell Address (1961)
    btn_print-friendly_off. ​
    My fellow Americans:​

    Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.
    This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.
    Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

    Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.
    My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.
    In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.


    II
    We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

    III
    Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.
    Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology-global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle-with liberty at stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.
    Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small,there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research-these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we which to travel.
    But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs-balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage-balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between action of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.
    The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

    IV
    A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
    Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
    Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United State corporations.
    This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
    We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
    Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
    In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
    Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
    The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
    Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
    It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.


    V
    Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we-you and I, and our government-must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.


    VI
    Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.
    Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.
    Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war-as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years-I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.
    Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.


    VII
    So-in this my last good night to you as your President-I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find somethings worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.
    You and I-my fellow citizens-need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.
    To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing inspiration:
    We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

    Transcription courtesy of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum.


    74642624512_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=hbxl7LfJ2OIAX8l7-o7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Yvonne Barrow
    He was talking about Communism during the Cold War as this was said after the failed Bay of pigs invasion.


    24200525181_o.?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=npWk8mMye5wAX_w7_xl&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Patrice Le Coz
    You'll find that he was actually talking about secret societies.i.e..FreeMasons,Knights Templars,the Order of Skulls & Bones, the Bildeberg club.just to mention a few...

    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    Indeed, Eisenhower's farewell address on January 17th, 1961 was independent from JFK's speech. Conspiracy debunkers stand exposed as debunked debunkers on many avenues of inquiry by competent and independent researchers.


    https://youtu.be/22O6bt9FihI


    View: https://youtu.be/22O6bt9FihI

    ge.php?d=AQD5MOOl25BR9vSy&w=98&h=98&url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2F22O6bt9FihI%2Fhqdefault.
    youtube.com
    Eisenhower Conspiracy theorist
    Eisenhower Conspiracy theorist


    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder

    Transcript excerpt: IV

    A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
    Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
    Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United State corporations.
    This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
    We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
    Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
    In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
    Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
    The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
    Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
    It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

    Transcription courtesy of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum.


    Patrice Le Coz
    " we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." ooops,too late..


    74642624512_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=hbxl7LfJ2OIAX8l7-o7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Yvonne Barrow
    Patrice Le Coz
    no he was talking about communism nothing to do with Freemasons etc lol

    24200525181_o.?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=npWk8mMye5wAX_w7_xl&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Patrice Le Coz
    Everybody knew about the commies,how they went about establishing their regimes,Yvonne,look at the text,or listen to the audio somewhere.."Monolithic and ruthless "conspiracy"..relies on *covert means*..communist didn't need to do this,and never have,they're pretty open about their goals,they don't need to b *covert*..whereas sc do..wake up..


    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    You are attempting to make a stubborn know-it-all mule drink from the water well it refuses to accept of being there to drink from Pat



    Penny Selden
    Yvonne Barrow
    your ignorance on full display, as per usual.


    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder     You are attempting to make a stubborn know-it-all mule drink from the water well it refuses to accept of being there to drink from Pat


    View: https://youtu.be/hcYkv9wZ-fE



    24200525181_o.?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=npWk8mMye5wAX_w7_xl&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Patrice Le Coz
    Cuz the sc have their own armies..they can afford it..look at General Eisenhower's speech,further up.." we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." ooops,too late,and this was in Jan 1961..


    74642624512_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=hbxl7LfJ2OIAX8l7-o7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Yvonne Barrow
    Patrice Le Coz
    This speech is given in the midst of the Cold War; in fact, just a little more than a week after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. Kennedy felt that leaks in the press had, in part, led to the military failure in Cuba. As a result, Kennedy organizes his words around a desire to reconcile two somewhat contradictory needs: “the need for far greater public information; and [the] need for far greater official secrecy.”



    74642624512_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=hbxl7LfJ2OIAX8l7-o7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Yvonne Barrow
    Penny Selden
    Penny whatever


    24200525181_o.?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=npWk8mMye5wAX_w7_xl&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Patrice Le Coz
    Yeah,whatever Yvonne..do some more research..


    74642624512_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=hbxl7LfJ2OIAX8l7-o7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Yvonne Barrow
    Tony Bermanseder
    and Tony I think you are referring to yourself there “stubborn know it all mule”


    65998827520_n.?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=L-Ujy7nQ3MEAX_Wdfe7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Penny Selden
    Yvonne Barrow
    your sources are lying to you. You need to research outside mainstream, instead you laugh and scoff whenever someone points out an alternative to what’s ‘accepted’. There are plenty of first hand accounts of historical events contrary to, and ignored by mainstream. A lot of what our kids are taught at school is bullshit, take from that what you will.


    18466369536_o.?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=zTsFI7_S5goAX_MHmHr&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Ian Lee     Yvonne Barrow
    then why did they kill him


    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    Yvonne Barrow


    33642086400_n.?_nc_cat=103&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=S6njFpTuMB4AX9ZevaP&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.

    74642624512_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=hbxl7LfJ2OIAX8l7-o7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Yvonne Barrow
    Patrice Le Coz
    here we go again with do more research lmao. Cuba is just 90 miles from America. Castro come into power in 1959 he was a Marxist-Leninist socialist. Cuba became an ally with Russia after Castro took power. You think the Americans would be happy having a communist country a stones throw away??


    65998827520_n.?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=L-Ujy7nQ3MEAX_Wdfe7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Penny Selden
    Ian Lee
    many reasons, main one being because he swore to dismantle the CIA, which, to this day remains the world (puppet) front runner of weapons, drugs and human trafficking.



    65998827520_n.?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=L-Ujy7nQ3MEAX_Wdfe7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Penny Selden
    What or WHO orchestrated the Great Depression? I recommend The Fruits of Graft by Wayne Jett.


    74642624512_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=hbxl7LfJ2OIAX8l7-o7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Yvonne Barrow
    Penny Selden
    well although you think I’m “ignorant” you are probably right there. The CIA have used drugs and weapons to buy the influence of groups during covert operations.


    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    Penny's pennies dropping into the ocean of amnesia. Merci cherie!

    View:
    View: https://youtu.be/5d7kYfqoTwc



    65998827520_n.?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=L-Ujy7nQ3MEAX_Wdfe7&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Penny Selden
    Yvonne Barrow
    CIA is just a puppet/avenue.

    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    Perhaps the fortitude will favour the fool's gold and perceived treasures in the overall outcomes portrayed by the 10%.



    View: https://youtu.be/z58hYF44cEI


    Charles Trenet - La Mer /Mr. Bean's Holiday HQ


    29121200128_o.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=Ai8Cbj9z3ssAX_Mfgji&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Penny Gamlin
    I was in junior high school. I cried that day.

    ge.php?d=AQDpwA7guK6t8MyO&w=98&h=98&url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2Ffd_nopTFuZA%2Fhqdefault.
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2020
    admin, May 12, 2020
    #179
  10. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,756
    Question:
    Why did the Vaxxer versus antivaxxer controlled and publically accessible debate(s) result in empty chairs of vaxxers opposite a full contingent of antivaxxers, carrrying scientific evidence as to the medical health threats of vaccines? After initially agreeing to scientifically debate antivaxxers, the vaxxers cancel their prior agreements to debate.

    vaxxerdebate.



    ​
    16959379108_o.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=9aSF9ogRanEAX_adHc4&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Trevor Raymond
    I wonder how many of the anti-vaxxers were vaccinated when they were young..?


    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    Not the point. 3 vaccines as drops in sugar cubes in the 1960's to 1970's at age six; compared to newborn babies injected with 32 in their first year of life, when the natural immune system is still forming.


    16959379108_o.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=9aSF9ogRanEAX_adHc4&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Trevor Raymond
    Tony Bermanseder
    No, it is the point - How many of then didn't get polio, whooping cough, etc because of those vaccinations..?


    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    Listen to the video to learn about the Simian reaction to the polio vaccine yes scam. But you might be infected with cognitive dissonance and not viral exosomes.

    cognitive.
    ​


    16337197056_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=gPpIACjnniYAX9qIJcd&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Belinda Parise
    Trevor Raymond
    there’s more than one “point” and the day that both sides can discuss each intelligently is the day that changes in the right direction may be made.... rather than instantly dismiss each other’s “points” why not each actually give air time to the info provided on both sides and consider revising your standpoint...

    Trevor Raymond
    Tony Bermanseder



    05019576320_n.?_nc_cat=109&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=E9HoezRkhmIAX_wZjb-&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.



    85414510301_n.?_nc_cat=101&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=aCtLPxWB35QAX87dUIU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    Tony Bermanseder
    Trevor Raymond
    So true!


    78901106688_n.?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=aM0_4dGmZGUAX-7i_Ww&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.



    • hp?d=AQC46Lh033XD3x0B&w=98&h=98&url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FvAHOOq4nlMU%2Fmaxresdefault.
      youtube.com
      Caught on camera! W.H.O admits vaccines are not safe


    • 81571448832_o.?_nc_cat=106&_nc_sid=7206a8&_nc_ohc=QLsMIp5Ae_QAX80t2g4&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
      Twangin Backseatelvis
      I'm a vaxxer. Polio, mumps, measles, whooping cough. C19 has me sus tho.

    This post with comments was deleted from the Bolt Report Forum, but can be read on this link: https://cosmosdawn.net/forum/thread...-political-disclosure.2556/page-18#post-18540


    View: https://youtu.be/WLugi6PqXaE
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2020
    admin, May 13, 2020
    #180
Page 18 of 34

Share This Page