UN-Globalist Collectivism and Political Disclosure

Andy Dean
Tony Bermanseder
since when is international law above our commonwealth law. Because anything the Australian government has signed without the people’s say so is null and void. In which case is illegal and treason under our constitution

Tony Bermanseder
You are so right; treason it is, unwillingly, but as slave to 'expert' advice.This the problem see. Politicians should work bono as true servants for the people and using whatever true expertise they have for the national interest. Career politicians should be eliminated. Do you think some 'generous' and well meaning Australians would agree to ''expert administer' Australian interests without being lobbied

• 
  Author
  Tony Bermanseder
  Who is in political control in Australia?
  
  Australians are 'at the mercy' of national bueraucrats, taking their orders from international or globalist bueraucrats including the UN and WHO and IMF, created by well known philantropy foundations.
  Anyone under the impression, that elected' politicians have real input into 'globalist decision making' should reevaluate their information sources.
  Martial Law has been declared under international not national legislature.
  
  
  View: https://youtu.be/l2ZRT-gWZ8M
  
  

youtube.com
Medical Martial Law 2020

Nola Trevor
Andy Dean
hey I have a family like everyone else and I would like to enjoy my time with them ,how do you know it is Finnish ,nobody talking about dictatorship all your ask is to do is stay out of arms way and try not to catch the virus,by the way it this virus loves the cold weather hates heat,hope you and your family survive the virus,bet my Bottom dollar you would be an anti Vaxer

Andy Dean
Nola Trevor
you have no freedom now and it’s just the start. Geez it’s been gradually picking up speed for the last couple of years and now it’s in full operation of agenda 21 mmm it’s 2020 now by 2030 this world will be totally destroyed

Nola Trevor
Andy Dean
don't worry China haven't full taken over yet,give it time

Andy Dean
Nola Trevor
fark China. I wouldn’t blame any Aussie if they belted Chinese people up because their people have screwed ya to the wall

Tony Bermanseder
Nola, noone with half a rational thinking and reasoning capability, would question the intent of Scott Morrison and the majority of the Australian politicians. The problem is far deeper and relates to a motto you have heard. The motto is a 'need to know ' basis for a hierarchy of administration, public, secret, governmental or otherwise. the problem is one of manipulating public opinion for predetermined purposes as say constructed by exponents 'in the know' of the encompassing purpose of the agenda. The Australian government is made up of publically elected 'officials', but those officials will have to follow 'public servant guidelines' to attain office.
Those guidelines then are obscured by 'expert advice' might this be scientific, financial or otherwise. The corruption then sets in in the 'experts' becoming globalist international exponents without direct allegiances to the 'national representatives. Scomo means well and his emotions are sincere, but he and his are unknowing servants-slaves to an international conglomeration of supranational interest groups. One fundamental part of this is the federal reserve banking cartel, privately owned and in no way associasted with nation Australia, but in a partnership with the global elites, basically unknown and unseen as historical derivatives from old aristocratic and artisian lineages.

Why do you think the AAA triple credit rating is one of the most quoted aim for a sound Australian economy by the politicians?

It is because a AA credit rating would result in more interest payments by you and the Australian taxpayer to the international money banksters who create money at whim to 'lend' aka blackmail any government's federal reserve bank through a well designed b ut devious Keynesian monetary policy 'sold' to the lawyer-political class on 'expert' advice. The same holds true for the Corona19 Virus which is biogenetic engineering of a natural immune system requiring NO medical interference for required immunology responses.

Nola Trevor
Tony Bermanseder
in other words we are stuffed!

Tony Bermanseder
Nola Trevor
In terms of political reconfiguration yes, but our young ones will still inherit a new world from the ashes of the old. But this becomes the outcome of structures and information not under the control of the 'echeloners'.

 

Is 5G dangerous to human health?​

No need to 'smash your phone', but become aware how EMR interacts with biological cellular structure.
The size of a cell in the body is in the micrometer range about 1 thousandth of a millimeter. Atomic structure is about a thousand times smaller and subatomic structure reduces this scale up to a factor of a million.
EMR damage to the cellular micro-structure so becomes relevant at the micron scale of a thousandth of a millimeter. The Gigahertz wavelength is in the say 10 cm scale and so indeed interferes with the bodily organs and body tissue.

The problem with 5G is more profound in the satellite coverage bombarding the surface of grid-connected receiver cell towers on the earth to each other via the nature of the signals transmitted from satellite to cell tower to the biochemical and bioelectric living organism receivers.

The nature of the data transmitted and for what purpose this data is targeted, so becomes of importance to implement 5G and what safety precautions should apply.
For example injecting human bodies with metallic substances like Aluminum and Mercury found in vaccines, will have detrimental effects via th photoelectric effect and the human immune system reliant upon biochemical and biomagnetic balance for its maximum functionality.

EMR weapons exist and have been used for crowd-control using the metallicity in human bodies for measures of control.
The danger of 5 G and its ground connected grid to be used by military-police state purposes of population control so is immense and no globalist controlled political agency should be trusted to use this technology for the benefit of the terrestrial populance at the present timeframe.
​

https://youtu.be/XwTe3vH0R68​

 

View: https://youtu.be/IIDths-UdDA
​

12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic

Below is our list of twelve medical experts whose opinions on the Coronavirus outbreak contradict the official narratives of the MSM, and the memes so prevalent on social media.

* * *​

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.
What he says:
We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.
[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.
All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.


View: https://youtu.be/JBB9bA-gXL4

*​

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician specialising in Pulmonology, politician and former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In 2009 he called for an inquiry into alleged conflicts of interest surrounding the EU response to the Swine Flu pandemic.
What he says:
Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.
We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”
That’s missing.


View: https://youtu.be/p_AyuhbnPOI

*​

Dr Joel Kettner s professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba province and Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases.
What he says:
I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.
[…]
I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.
[…]
In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.
Audio Player

00:00

00:00

Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.

*​

Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences. He is director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS).
He is also the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. He was chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine as well as adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine.
As a physician, scientist and author he has made contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, data science and clinical research. In addition, he pioneered the field of meta-research. He has shown that much of the published research does not meet good scientific standards of evidence.
What he says:
Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.
The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.
[…]
Could the Covid-19 case fatality rate be that low? No, some say, pointing to the high rate in elderly people. However, even some so-called mild or common-cold-type coronaviruses that have been known for decades can have case fatality rates as high as 8% when they infect elderly people in nursing homes.
[…]
If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to “influenza-like illness” would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.
– “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”, Stat News, 17th March 2020

*​

Dr Yoram Lass is an Israeli physician, politician and former Director General of the Health Ministry. He also worked as Associate Dean of the Tel Aviv University Medical School and during the 1980s presented the science-based television show Tatzpit.
What he says:
Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country. In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season and so far 40-50 people have died of the coronavirus, most of them in a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington.
[…]
In every country, more people die from regular flu compared with those who die from the coronavirus.
[…]
…there is a very good example that we all forget: the swine flu in 2009. That was a virus that reached the world from Mexico and until today there is no vaccination against it. But what? At that time there was no Facebook or there maybe was but it was still in its infancy. The coronavirus, in contrast, is a virus with public relations.
Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong.
– Interview in Globes, March 22nd 2020

*​

Dr Pietro Vernazza is a Swiss physician specialising Infectious Diseases at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen and Professor of Health Policy.
What he says:
We have reliable figures from Italy and a work by epidemiologists, which has been published in the renowned science journal ‹Science›, which examined the spread in China. This makes it clear that around 85 percent of all infections have occurred without anyone noticing the infection. 90 percent of the deceased patients are verifiably over 70 years old, 50 percent over 80 years.
[…]
In Italy, one in ten people diagnosed die, according to the findings of the Science publication, that is statistically one of every 1,000 people infected. Each individual case is tragic, but often – similar to the flu season – it affects people who are at the end of their lives.
[…]
If we close the schools, we will prevent the children from quickly becoming immune.
[…]
We should better integrate the scientific facts into the political decisions.
– Interview in St. Galler Tagblatt, 22nd March 2020

*​

Frank Ulrich Montgomery is German radiologist, former President of the German Medical Association and Deputy Chairman of the World Medical Association.
What he says:
I’m not a fan of lockdown. Anyone who imposes something like this must also say when and how to pick it up again. Since we have to assume that the virus will be with us for a long time, I wonder when we will return to normal? You can’t keep schools and daycare centers closed until the end of the year. Because it will take at least that long until we have a vaccine. Italy has imposed a lockdown and has the opposite effect. They quickly reached their capacity limits, but did not slow down the virus spread within the lockdown.
– Interview in General Anzeiger, 18th March 2020

*​

Prof. Hendrik Streeck is a German HIV researcher, epidemiologist and clinical trialist. He is professor of virology, and the director of the Institute of Virology and HIV Research, at Bonn University.
What he says:
The new pathogen is not that dangerous, it is even less dangerous than Sars-1. The special thing is that Sars-CoV-2 replicates in the upper throat area and is therefore much more infectious because the virus jumps from throat to throat, so to speak. But that is also an advantage: Because Sars-1 replicates in the deep lungs, it is not so infectious, but it definitely gets on the lungs, which makes it more dangerous.
[…]
You also have to take into account that the Sars-CoV-2 deaths in Germany were exclusively old people. In Heinsberg, for example, a 78-year-old man with previous illnesses died of heart failure, and that without Sars-2 lung involvement. Since he was infected, he naturally appears in the Covid 19 statistics. But the question is whether he would not have died anyway, even without Sars-2.
– Interview in Frankfurter Allgemeine, 16th March 2020

*​

Dr Yanis Roussel et. al. – A team of researchers from the Institut Hospitalo-universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, conducting a peer-reviewed study on Coronavirus mortality for the government of France under the ‘Investments for the Future’ programme.
What they say:
The problem of SARS-CoV-2 is probably overestimated, as 2.6 million people die of respiratory infections each year compared with less than 4000 deaths for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of writing.
[…]
This study compared the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries (1.3%) with the mortality rate of common coronaviruses identified in AP-HM patients (0.8%) from 1 January 2013 to 2 March 2020. Chi-squared test was performed, and the P-value was 0.11 (not significant).
[…]
…it should be noted that systematic studies of other coronaviruses (but not yet for SARS-CoV-2) have found that the percentage of asymptomatic carriers is equal to or even higher than the percentage of symptomatic patients. The same data for SARS-CoV-2 may soon be available, which will further reduce the relative risk associated with this specific pathology.
– “SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data”, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 19th March 2020

*​

Dr. David Katz is an American physician and founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center
What he says:
I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near-total meltdown of normal life — schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned — will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself. The stock market will bounce back in time, but many businesses never will. The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order.
– “Is Our Fight Against Coronavirus Worse Than the Disease?”, New York Times 20th March 2020

*​

Michael T. Osterholm is regents professor and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.
What he says:
Consider the effect of shutting down offices, schools, transportation systems, restaurants, hotels, stores, theaters, concert halls, sporting events and other venues indefinitely and leaving all of their workers unemployed and on the public dole. The likely result would be not just a depression but a complete economic breakdown, with countless permanently lost jobs, long before a vaccine is ready or natural immunity takes hold.
[…]
[T]he best alternative will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, keep business and manufacturing operating, and “run” society, while at the same time advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our health-care capacity as aggressively as possible. With this battle plan, we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based.
– “Facing covid-19 reality: A national lockdown is no cure”, Washington Post 21st March 2020

*​

Dr Peter Goetzsche is Professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen and founder of the Cochrane Medical Collaboration. He has written several books on corruption in the field of medicine and the power of big pharmaceutical companies.
What he says:
Our main problem is that no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian. They will only get in trouble if they do too little. So, our politicians and those working with public health do much more than they should do.
No such draconian measures were applied during the 2009 influenza pandemic, and they obviously cannot be applied every winter, which is all year round, as it is always winter somewhere. We cannot close down the whole world permanently.
Should it turn out that the epidemic wanes before long, there will be a queue of people wanting to take credit for this. And we can be damned sure draconian measures will be applied again next time. But remember the joke about tigers. “Why do you blow the horn?” “To keep the tigers away.” “But there are no tigers here.” “There you see!”
– “Corona: an epidemic of mass panic”, blog post on Deadly Medicines 21st March 2020

https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/

 

10 MORE Experts Criticising the Coronavirus Panic

Following on from our previous list,
here are ten more expert voices,
drowned out or disregarded
by the mainstream narrative,
offering their take on the coronavirus outbreak.

* * *​

Dr. Sunetra Gupta et al.
are an Oxford-based research team constructing
an epidemiological model for the coronavirus outbreak,
their paper has yet to be peer-reviewed,
but the abstract is available online.

Dr Gupta is a Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology
at the University of Oxford with
an interest in infectious disease agents
that are responsible for malaria, HIV, influenza
and bacterial meningitis.

She is a recipient of the Sahitya Akademi Award,
the Scientific Medal by the Zoological Society of London
and the Royal Society Rosalind Franklin Award
for her scientific research.

What they say:

Importantly, the results we present here suggest
the ongoing epidemics in the UK and Italy
started at least a month before the first reported death
and have already led to the accumulation of significant levels
of herd immunity in both countries.

There is an inverse relationship between the proportion
currently immune and the fraction of the population
vulnerable to severe disease.

– Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight
the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys
to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic,
24th March 2020

– – –
​

The research presents a very different view
of the epidemic to the modelling at Imperial College London […]

“I’m surprised that there has been such unqualified acceptance
of the Imperial model”, Dr Gupta said.
[…]

The Oxford results would mean the country
had already acquired substantial her immunity
through the unrecognized spread of covid19
over more than two months.

Although some experts have shed doubt on the strength
and length of the human immune response to the virus,
Prof Gupta said the emerging evidence made her confident
that humanity would build up herd immunity against Covid19

– “Coronavirus may have infected halt the population”,
Financial Times,
24th March 2020

*​

Dr Karin Mölling is a German virologist
whose research focused on retroviruses,
particularly human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

She was a full professor and director of the Institute
of Medical Virology at the University of Zurich
from 1993 until her retirement in 2008
and received multiple honours and awards for her work.

What she says:

You are now told every morning how many SARS-Corona 2 deaths there are.
But they don’t tell you how many people already are infected
with influenza this winter and how many deaths it has caused.

This winter, the flu is not severe, but around 80,000 are infected.

You don’t get these numbers at all.

Something similar occurred two years ago.

This is not put into the right context.

[…]

Every week a person dies in Berlin from multi-resistant germs.

That adds up to 35,000 a year in Germany.

This is not mentioned at all.

I believe that we have had situations like this several times
and that the measures are now being taken too far.

I am of the opinion that maybe one should not
do so much against young people having parties together
and infecting each other.

We have to build immunity somehow.

How can that be possible without contacts?

The younger ones handle the infection much better.

But we have to protect the elderly,
and protect them in a way that can be scrutinized;
is it reasonable what we are doing now,
to stretch out the epidemic in a way
that almost paralyzes the entire world economy?

[…]

The Robert Koch Institute provides the figures.

Then you sit there as a listener or spectator:

20 dead again, how terrible!

Do you know when I would start to panic?

If there are 20,000.

Then we get close to what went on completely quietly two years ago.

The 2018 influenza epidemic, with 25,000 deaths,
never disconcerted the press.

The clinics had to deal with an additional 60,000 patients,
which was no problem in the clinics either!

[…]

That is the main fear:

the disease is presented as a terrible disease.

The disease per se is like the flu in a normal winter.

It is even weaker in the first week.

– Interview on Anti-Empire.com,
23rd March 2020

*
​

Dr Anders Tegnell is a Swedish physician
and civil servant who has been State Epidemiologist
of the Public Health Agency of Sweden since 2013.

Dr Tegnell graduated from medical school in 1985,
specialising in infectious disease.

He later obtained a PhD in Medical Science
from Linköping University in 2003 and an MSc in 2004.

What he says:

“All measures that we take must be feasible
over a longer period of time.”

Otherwise, the population will lose acceptance
of the entire corona strategy.

Older people or people with previous health problems
should be isolated as much as possible.

So no visits to children or grandchildren,
no journeys by public transport, if possible no shopping.

That is the one rule.

The other is:

Anyone with symptoms should stay at home immediately,
even with the slightest cough.

“If you follow these two rules,
you don’t need any further measures,
the effect of which is only very marginal anyway,”

– “The World Stands Still…
Except for Sweden”, Zeit.de, 24th March 2020

*
​

Dr Pablo Goldschmidt is an Argentine-French virologist
specializing in tropical diseases, and Professor of Molecular Pharmacology
at the Université Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris.

He is a graduate of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry
of the University of Buenos Aires and Faculty of Medicine
of the Hospital Center of Pitié-Salpetrière, Paris.

He currently resides in France, w
here he has worked for almost 40 years as a researcher
in clinical laboratories developing diagnostic technology.

What he says:

The ill-founded opinions expressed by international experts,
replicated by the media and social networks
repeat the unnecessary panic that we have previously experienced.

The coronavirus identified in China in 2019
caused nothing less than a strong cold or flu,
with no difference so far with cold or flu as we know , ”
[…]

Respiratory viral conditions are numerous
and are caused by several viral families and species,
among which the respiratory syncytial virus
(especially in infants), influenza (influenza),
human metapneumoviruses, adenoviruses,
rhinoviruses, and various coronaviruses,
already described years ago.

It is striking that earlier this year global health alerts
have been triggered as a result of infections
by a coronavirus detected in China, COVID-19,
knowing that each year there are 3 million newborns
who die in the world of pneumonia
and 50,000 adults in the United States
for the same cause, without alarms being issued.

[…]

Our planet is the victim of a new sociological phenomenon,
scientific-media harassment , triggered by experts only
on the basis of laboratory molecular diagnostic analysis results.

Communiqués issued from China and Geneva were replicated,
without being confronted from a critical point of view and,
above all, without stressing that coronaviruses
have always infected humans and always caused diarrhoea
and what people call a banal cold or common cold.

Absurd forecasts were extrapolated,
as in 2009 with the H1N1 influenza virus.
[…]
There is no evidence to show that the 2019 coronavirus
is more lethal than respiratory adenoviruses,
influenza viruses, coronaviruses from previous years,
or rhinoviruses responsible for the common cold.

– Interview on Clarin.com, 9th March 2020

*​

Dr Eran Bendavid and Dr Jay Bhattacharya
are professors of medicine and public health at Stanford University.

What they say:

Projections of the death toll could plausibly
be orders of magnitude too high […]

The true fatality rate is the portion of those infected who die,
not the deaths from identified positive cases.

The latter rate is misleading because of selection bias in testing.

The degree of bias is uncertain because available data
are limited.

But it could make the difference b
etween an epidemic that kills 20,000
and one that kills two million.

[…]

A universal quarantine may not be worth the costs
it imposes on the economy, community and individual mental
and physical health.

We should undertake immediate steps
to evaluate the empirical basis of the current lockdowns.

“Is the Coronavirus as Deadly as They Say?”,
Wall Street Journal, 24th March 2020

*
​

Dr Tom Jefferson is a British epidemiologist, based in Rome.

He works for the Cochrane Collaboration, where he is an author
and editor of the Cochrane Collaboration’s acute respiratory infections group,
as well as part of four other Cochrane groups.

He is also an advisor to the Italian National Agency
for Regional Health Services.

What he says:

So I cannot answer my nagging doubts,
there does not seem to be anything special
about this particular epidemic of influenza-like illness.

There are, however, two consequences of this situation that bother me.

The first is the lack of institutional credibility as perceived by my friends.

They range from firefighters, policemen, and even a GP
— not the kind of people you would want to alienate in an emergency.

A restaurant owner told me he would never report himself
to the health authority as that would mean at least two weeks
of closure and his business would go to the wall.

The second is that once the limelight has moved on,
will there be a serious and concentrated international effort
to understand the causes and origins of influenza-like illnesses
and the life cycle of its agents?

Past form tells me not, and we will go back
to pushing influenza as a universal plague
under the roof of the hot house of commercial interest.

Note the difference: Influenza
(caused by influenza A and B viruses,
for which we have licensed vaccines and drugs),
not influenza-like illnesses against which we should wash
our hands all the year round, not just now.

Meanwhile, I still cannot answer Mario’s question:
what’s different this time?
– “Covid 19—many questions, no clear answers”,
British Medical Journal, 2nd March 2020

*
​

Dr Michael Levitt is Professor of biochemistry at Stanford University.
He is a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS), a member of the National Academy
of Sciences and received the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
for the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems.

In February this year, he correctly modelled that the China outbreak
was coming to an end, predicting around 80,000 cases and 3250 deaths.

What he says:
I don’t believe the numbers in Israel,
not because they’re made up, but because the definition
of a case in Israel keeps changing and it’s hard to evaluate
the numbers that way…

There is a lot of unjustified panic in Israel.

I don’t believe the numbers here, everything is politics,
not math.

I will be surprised if number of deaths in Israel
surpasses ten, and even five now with the restrictions.
[…]
To put things in proportion, the number of deaths of coronavirus
in Italy is 10% of the number of deaths of influenza
in the country between 2016-2017.

Even in China it’s hard to look at the number of patients
because the definition of “patient” varies,
so I look at number of deaths.

In Israel there are none, so that’s why it’s not even
on the world map for the disease.”

– “Nobel laureate: surprised if Israel has more than 10 coronavirus deaths”, Jerusalem Post, 20th March 2020

– – –​

[Levitt] analyzed data from 78 countries that reported
more than 50 new cases of COVID-19 every day
and sees “signs of recovery” in many of them.

He’s not focusing on the total number of cases in a country,
but on the number of new cases identified every day
— and, especially, on the change in that number from one day to the next.

“Numbers are still noisy, but there are clear signs of slowed growth.”

“What we need is to control the panic,” he said.

In the grand scheme, “we’re going to be fine.”

– “Why this Nobel laureate predicts a quicker coronavirus recovery:
‘We’re going to be fine'”, Los Angeles Times, 22nd March 2020

*​

German Network for Evidence-Based Medicine
is an association of German scientists, researchers and medical professionals.

The network was founded in 2000 to disseminate
and further develop concepts and methods of evidence-based
and patient-oriented medicine in practice, teaching and research,
and today has around 1000 members.

What they say:
In the majority of cases, COVID-19 takes the form of a mild cold
or is even symptom-free.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that all cases of infection
are recorded, in contrast with deaths which are almost completely recorded.

This leads to an overestimation of the CFR.

According to a study of 565 Japanese people evacuated
from Wuhan, all of whom were tested (regardless of symptoms),
only 9.2% of infected people were detected with currently used
symptom-oriented COVID-19 monitoring [5].

This would mean that the number of infected people
is likely to be about 10 times greater than the number of registered cases.

The CFR would then only be about one tenth of that currently measured.

Others assume an even higher number of unreported cases,
which would further reduce the CFR.

The widespread availability of SARS-CoV-2 tests is limited.

In the USA, for example, an adequate, state-funded testing facility
for all suspected cases has only been available since 11.3.2020 [6].

In Germany as well, there were occasional bottlenecks
which contribute to an overestimation of the CFR.

As the disease spreads, it becomes increasingly difficult
to identify a suspected source of infection.

As a result, common colds in people who unknowingly
had contact with a COVID-19 patient are not necessarily associated
with COVID-19 and those affected do not go to the doctor at all.

An overestimation of the CFR also occurs when a deceased person
is found to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2,
but this was not the cause of death.

[…]

The CFR of 0.2% currently measured for Germany
is below the Robert Koch-Institute’s (RKI)
calculated influenza CFRs of 0.5% in 2017/18
and 0.4% in 2018/19, but above the widely accepted figure
of 0.1% for which there is no reliable evidence.
[…]
Beyond the (rather questionable) conclusions drawn
from the historical example, there is little evidence
that NPIs for COVID-19 actually lead to a reduction
in overall mortality.

A Cochrane Review from 2011 found no robust evidence
for the effectiveness of border control screenings or social distancing.
[…]
A systematic review from 2015 found moderate evidence
that school closures delay the spread of an influenza epidemic,
but at high cost.

Isolation at home slows down the spread of influenza
but leads to increased infection of family members.

It is questionable whether these findings can be transferred
from influenza to COVID-19.

It is completely unclear how long the NPIs
must be maintained and what effects could be achieved
depending on their duration and intensity.

The number of deaths might only be postponed
to a later point in time, without any change in the total number.
[…]
Many questions remain unanswered.

On the one hand, the media confronts us daily with alarming reports
of an exponentially increasing number of ill and dead people worldwide.

On the other hand, the media coverage in no way considers
our required criteria for evidence-based risk communication.

The media is currently communicating raw data,
for example, there have been “X” infected persons
and “Y” deaths to date.

However, this presentation fails to distinguish
between diagnoses and infections.
– “Covid19: Where is the evidence?”,
statement on their website, March 20th 2020

*​

Dr Richard Schabas is the former Chief Medical Officer o
f Ontario, Medical Officer of Hastings
and Prince Edward Public Health
and Chief of Staff at York Central Hospital.

What he says:

Far more cases are out there than are being reported.

This is because many cases have no symptoms
and testing capacity has been limited.

There have been about 100,000 cases reported to date,
but, if we extrapolate from the number of reported deaths
and a presumed case-fatality rate of 0.5 per cent,
the real number is probably closer to two million
– the vast majority mild or asymptomatic.

Likewise, the actual rate of new cases
is probably at least 10,000 a day.

If these numbers sound large, though,
remember that the world is a very big place.

From a global perspective, these numbers are very small.

Second, the Hubei outbreak
– by far the largest, and a kind of worst-case scenario
– appears to be winding down.

How bad was it?

Well, the number of deaths was comparable
to an average influenza season.

That’s not nothing, but it’s not catastrophic,
either, and it isn’t likely to overwhelm
a competent health-care system.

Not even close.
[…]
I am not preaching complacency.

This disease is not going away any time soon;
we should expect more cases and more local outbreaks.

And COVID-19 still has the potential
to become a major global health problem,
with an overall burden comparable to that of influenza.

We need to be vigilant in our surveillance.
[…]
But we also need to be sensible.

Quarantine belongs back in the Middle Ages.

Save your masks for robbing banks.

Stay calm and carry on.

Let’s not make our attempted cures worse than the disease.
– “Strictly by the numbers, the coronavirus
does not register as a dire global crisis”,
Globe and Mail, 11th March 2020

Another thank you to Swiss Propaganda Research
for their excellent work,
as well as to all the commenters
who provided names and suggestions BTL
on the previous piece.

They are not all included, for various reasons,
but it was all useful information.

We also acknowledge voices from other fields,
be they philosophers or human rights lawyers,
have criticised the response to the outbreak,
but we made the decision to limit these lists
solely to those experts in medicine or biological science.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/10-more-experts-criticising-the-coronavirus-panic/

 

The Things You CANNOT Say About Coronavirus
James Corbett


Pssst. You.

Yeah, you.

Are you interested in talking about…

things?

You know, the kind of things
that we’re not allowed to talk about anymore?

You know, since the…uhhh…“The Event“?

You are?

Great.

I mean, you might have noticed things
are getting a bit hairy out there.

As in, you’re likely to get your head bitten off
for daring to suggest that things may not be totally ok
with the “new normal.”

It seems all these new social norms
and cultural taboos that have arisen
in the past few weeks have also created a raft
of new thoughtcrimes:

Things that must not be spoken for fear of being expelled
from polite society . . . or worse.

That’s why it’s so vitally important for us to speak out
about our concerns before these socially-policed
thoughtcrimes become literal crimes.

As I’m sure you know, if these new social norms
are not confronted, voicing dissent will soon become impossible.

So, allow me to voice some thoughtcrimes of my own.

But be forewarned:

I assure you that you will find at least some of my ideas to be offensive.

You will disagree with them strongly.

You will become irate.

The real question is:

What are you going to do to those voicing opinions you disagree with?

Engage in dialogue with them?

Or demand that agents of the state scrub their speech

from the internet and lock them in a cage for their thoughtcrime?

Well, either way, I’ve already committed thoughtcrime
numerous times in recent weeks, I might as well share them with you.

Are you ready?

Let’s go.
1. We have met the enemy . . . and it is our neighbors


People imagine that when the boots-on-the-ground tyranny arrives,
it will be enforced by the police or the military.

Newsflash: the boots-on-the-ground tyranny is here,
and it is being enforced by your neighbors,
Joe Sixpack and Jane Soccermom.

Need proof?

How about all the new “snitch lines” that are opening up
in city after city and state after state all around the globe
to help good citizens tattle on neighbors
who aren’t practicing proper social distancing?

That’s right.

It’s not just guys yelling out their windows in Brooklyn anymore.

Now whenever you see someone within two meters
of someone else it is your duty as a loyal citizen
of the Brave New World Order to actively report them
to the authorities so that they can be dealt with by Big Brother.

Rest assured, a score card is being compiled for each jurisdiction,
and the powers-that-shouldn’t-be are keeping a list
of who’s being naughty or nice (Good job, Minnesota!).

Still, while we can all unequivocally and universally agree 100%
with the idea that anyone who physically approaches
another human being in this Year of our Virus 2020
deserves to be charged with manslaughter
for their heinous act, maybe, just mayyyyyybe
—and I’m just spitballing,
so forgive me if this seems brash

—we’re heading into dangerous territory here.

You know, what with the social distancing Stasi
becoming the enforcers of our new police state nightmare and all.

Call me crazy.
2. Doctors are the new soldiers


When 9/11 happened, there was a marked and notable intensification

in the propaganda glorifying the American military.

Not that such propaganda didn’t exist before,

but it was nothing like what we’ve seen since

“the day that changed everything.”

Yes, the hero worship of veterans is one of the hallmarks
of the Age of Terror that 9/11 ushered in .

So if this plandemic is the new 9/11,
what’s the new hero worship?

Well, it should be obvious by now:

Doctors are the new soldiers.

Now we must dutifully show our appreciation
for the brave medical workers on the front lines
of this new war…or face yet more social castigation.

You may have noticed the interesting phenomenon
making its way around the world.

I call it “The Totally Spontaneous Balcony Applause Phenomenon.”

Yes, completely out of the blue, all the people under lockdown
have decided to show their appreciation for the valiant doctors
and nurses in this heroic struggle by going to their balcony
at a pre-appointed time and applauding.

And no, this totally spontaneous phenomenon
is not just occurring in one or two countries.

Or three or four countries.

But in seemingly every country around the globe.

Just like that.

Just out of the blue.

Must be something in the zeitgeist, I guess.

Now you’ll forgive me for being out of the loop,
but as you know the corona madness
has not quite made its way to Japan yet.

(But, precisely as I predicted,
the very same day that the Tokyo 2020 Games
were postponed the Tokyo Governor
suddenly became gravely concerned about her city,
and they are now going to “have to” lockdown Tokyo
unless the poor plebs behave.)

So I don’t know exactly how people
decide on the right time to go to their balcony to applaud.

Is it done by vote?

What if I’m a few minutes late?

Will people think I’m clapping for something else?

What exactly is the etiquette here?

Here’s my thoughtcrime:

I find these displays creepy and off-putting.

I find the glorification of doctors and nurses unsettling.

Not because I think they are all quacks.

Not because I think they are all evil.

Not because I am not grateful for the work that
(some) doctors do (some of the time).

Not because I don’t recognize the enormous stress
that these doctors and nurses are under right now

. But because this socially engineered adoration
is going to be used to push an agenda exactly
like the glorification of veterans was used
to push the militarism agenda of the post-9/11 years.

This time, we are being asked to glorify doctors
and nurses because these are the same trusted experts
whose authority cannot be questioned
who are going to be giving you the vaccine.

You know, The Vaccine.

The one that will bring an end to the then 18-month
long psychological siege that we are being placed under.

What??

You still question the vaccines?

You still dare to defy the authority of these brave doctors
and nurses who risked their lives for us?

You can’t say that, you disgusting conspiracy mongering
throughtcriminal, you!

Be honest, you know that this push is coming.

And they are getting the public to sign on
with all these “spontaneous” balcony applause sessions.

So perhaps you’ll forgive me for not joining in.

3. I do not trust a single one of the numbers being reported about this outbreak


I am still baffled by the attention that otherwise sane human beings
are given to the latest reported numbers from this
or that health agency about the scourge of Covid-19.

People are throwing around CFRs and R0s
like they’ve been studying epidemiology their whole lives.

In truth, they’re just regurgitating whatever they saw
on CNN or were told in the latest Governor Cuomo press conference.

So what do we make of the baffling discrepancy in death rates
from Covid-19 between different countries?

Why is Italy’s death rate from the disease a staggering
10% while China’s is more like 4%?

And what does that mean for the 70% of humanity
that “experts” warn will be infected by this virus?

And while we’re at it, why don’t we ask some
equally meaningful questions, like:

What color is the Easter Bunny?

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

And just how tasty is the cheese that the moon is made of, anyway?

As I demonstrated weeks ago,
methods for diagnosing this disease
vary so widely from country to country
that making comparisons between countries
isn’t even like comparing apples and oranges.

It’s like comparing apples and aardvarks.

And diagnosing a particular type of viral infection via CT scan?

How can we possibly trust the infection numbers
that are being generated by such methods?

All of that would make the calculation of mortality rates
for this disease problematic enough.

But, to make matters worse,
we don’t even have an accurate tally
of the number of people who have died from Covid-19.

Take the infamous Italian example, for instance.

We’re told that the staggering death rates in Italy
(roughly 10% if we go by the official numbers at press time)
are a sign of just how deadly this new virus can be.

…But there’s some problems with those numbers.

As Prof Walter Ricciardi—scientific adviser
to Italy’s minister of health—recently revealed,
“The way in which we code deaths in our country
is very generous in the sense that all the people
who die in hospitals with the coronavirus
are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.”

So how many of the people who are reported as “Covid-19 deaths”
in Italy actually had coronavirus listed as their cause of death?

Just 12 per cent.

What’s more, according to the Italian government’s own report,
half of those who died had three or more other diseases
at the time of the death.

Nearly 80 per cent had at least two other diseases
that they were fighting when they died.

Only 1.7 per cent of those who died had no other disease.

But why listen to James Corbett, conspiracy theorist,
or those silly Italian government health advisors on this matter?

Well, I’m not alone in this suspicion of the official numbers.

It turns out the “Our World in Data” research group
that has been attempting to keep track of the coronavirus numbers
has stopped using the World Health Organization’s data
because “we found many errors in the data published
by the WHO when we went through all the daily Situation Reports.”

And John Ioannidis — who Corbett Report listeners
will remember launched the replication crisis
in science with his landmark 2005 paper on
“Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”
— has recently come out questioning
whether the current Covid-19 response is
“A fiasco in the making.”

As Ioannidis observes:
The data collected so far on how many people are infected
and how the epidemic is evolving are utterly unreliable.

Given the limited testing to date, some deaths
and probably the vast majority of infections due
to SARS-CoV-2 are being missed.

We don’t know if we are failing to capture infections
by a factor of three or 300.

Three months after the outbreak emerged,
most countries, including the U.S.,
lack the ability to test a large number of people
and no countries have reliable data on the prevalence
of the virus in a representative random sample
of the general population.

After this current madness passes,
people will view the public’s blind acceptance
of these practices in the same way that we look
at the public’s blind acceptance of bloodletting
and other methods of medical chicanery from times past.

4. The death of a 91 year-old is a family tragedy, not an event of international concern


OK, so you still insist on taking these phony baloney numbers seriously?

Then let’s take another looks at that Italian report
on those dying with (not of) Covid-19.

The report tells us that the median age of those
who have been pronounced dead with (not of)
Covid-19 is 78.

To put that number in perspective,
the average life expectancy in Italy is 82.8.

That means those who are dying with (not of)
the disease are within years of reaching the average life expectancy
(and, let’s not forget, they are also suffering in the vast majority
of cases from at least two other diseases).

I venture to say that a similar panic could be raised
about just about any viral disease in circulation
if it was being reported in the same way
as this coronavirus is being reported.

Since we’re committing thoughtcrimes here, let’s be blunt:

“Elderly Patient With Multiple Complications
Dies After Contracting Respiratory Illness”
is NOT a news story.

It’s a daily fact of life.

But in fact, it is a news story.

I have been keeping tabs on how the Canadian MSM
have been covering the pandemic panic
and saw a segment on one of the national news broadcasts
about a woman whose 91-year old mother died in a nursing home.

It was implied that this 91-year old woman’s life
was tragically cut short by the coronavirus and,
to make matters worse, her daughter was unable
to hold a funeral or service for her mother b
ecause Canada is currently under lockdown.

I don’t know if I have lost touch with reality
or everyone else has, but let me reiterate:

This is NOT a news story.

Don’t get me wrong:

Any such death is doubtless a tragedy for the family involved.

My heart genuinely goes out to all those
who lose their relatives in such circumstances.

But this is not something that we upend
our entire civilization over.

We do not stop all productive human activity on the planet,
collapse the economy,
send millions upon millions of people to the unemployment line,
institute lockdowns, and begin talking about mandatory vaccinations,
internal passports and other abrogations of essential human freedoms
on such a basis.

In fact, if I were to be dying at the age of 78
due to some viral respiratory illness
along with my other 78-year old cohorts,
I can guarantee that I would be outraged
that the powers-that-shouldn’t-be were
using my death to upend the liberties
that I had spent my life attempting to defend.

It is disgusting.

“But what about the young people who die of the disease?”
you ask.

Fair enough.

Again, according to the official reports
(which, let me remind you, should not be trusted),
there are people under the age of 78 who are dying
from the disease as well, albeit in much smaller numbers.

And, according to the “models” from the “experts”
(who, let’s remember, are right about everything),
there could be hundreds of thousands more deaths
before this pandemic runs its course.

Well, that brings me to my ultimate thoughtcrime:

5. The idea that disease and death are unnatural or avoidable is anti-human


People die.

Sometimes they die of car accidents.

Sometimes they die of work-related mishaps. Sometimes they die of old age.

Sometimes they die under extremely questionable circumstances
while trying to shed light on information that is uncomfortable
for the deep state.

And, yes, sometimes they die of respiratory illnesses
during viral pandemics.

I’ll go one step further:

Our mortality makes us who we are.

Humans are blessed and cursed with a knowledge of our own fate.

No one makes it out of this life alive.

And so the question of what we do with our lives becomes paramount.

But more and more, death is being removed from life.

Our elderly are shipped off to nursing homes
to whither away so that we don’t have to face aging.

The funerary industry is neat and anti-septic.

Death has become an abstraction.

Something that happens somewhere out there,
to other people.

Not to us, though, surely.

But this entire pandemic madness
seems to be predicated on the notion
that disease and death are somehow avoidable.

That we have conquered such things.

Or, at least, that no new disease could ever possibly arise
(bioengineered or not) to upset our perfect balance with nature.

I mean, yes, many people die of the flu every year,
but that doesn’t count.

That’s not new.

This is not to say that we shouldn’t work
to cure diseases and improve our health.

Quite the contrary.

It’s just that this current bout of hysteria
seems almost anti-human;
as if we should be able to transcend our mortal humanity.

CJ Hopkins, in his characteristically humorous way,
points out the absurdity of this “War on Death” in his latest article:

We can’t let these Russian dissension sowers,​

neo-Nazi accelerationists, and coronavirus-sympathizers confuse us.​

​

They want to convince us that Death is,​

yes, scary, and sad, but inevitable, and natural.​

​

How utterly heartless and insane is that?!​

​

No, we need to close our minds to that nonsense.​

​

People are dying!​

​

This is not normal!​

​

Death is our enemy!​

​

We have to defeat it!​

​

We need to hunt down and neutralize Death!​

​

Root it out if its hidey hole and hang it like we did with Saddam!”​

​

I don’t know why the idea that death is a part of life
should be controversial. B

ut, given that even a respected blogger like Craig Murray
can be largely lambasted by his own audience
for daring to post similar musings,
I suppose that it is.

I don’t know anymore.

Perhaps I’m off my rocker.

All I know is that the room to express dissent
on these topics is fast disappearing.

It’s time for those of us who can tolerate
thoughtcrime to circle the wagons.

The Thought Police are closing in.

So maybe you disagree with me.

Maybe you’re offended by what I say.

Maybe you have your own thoughtcrimes
that you’re afraid to express.

But if we don’t engage in dialogue
about these ideas now, what are the chances
that this information will be easier to share in the future?

So what’s your thoughtcrime?

Share it with the community in the comments below.

The Corbett Report is an independent,
listener-supported alternative news source.

It operates on the principle of open source intelligence
and provides podcasts, interviews, articles and videos
about breaking news and important issues
from 9/11 Truth and false flag terror
to the Big Brother police state, eugenics, geopolitics,
the central banking fraud and more.

Visit the website or subscribe to the YouTube channel
for more content.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/03/the-things-you-cannot-say-about-coronavirus/

 

Is Covid19 a simple cell excretion
'under stress' called and known as Exosome?

 

This is WHO

helped China poison the world

 

Anonymous Message To Bill Gates

Greetings citizens of the world.

We, are, Anonymous.

This is a message for Bill Gates.

In the midst of a historical pandemic,
much of the world is looking to you for solutions,
and it seems that this is no mistake,
because you have positioned yourself
as the Nostradamus of disease.

You have done an incredible job at rebuilding your image,
from a ruthless and cutthroat corporate CEO
to a benevolent philanthropist and savior of the world.

This is nothing new, this is a classic move
from the robber baron’s playbook.

At one time, the notorious industrialist John D. Rockefeller
was one of the most hated people in the country,
due to his poor treatment of workers,
his monopolization of key industries,
and his influence in politics.

After a massacre of striking miners in 1914,
which came to be known as the Ludlow massacre,
Rockefeller’s reputation was at its worst,
so he decided to hire a team of propagandists
to restore his public image.

Leading that team was public relations pioneer Ivy Lee.

Lee was an early influence of Edward Bernays,
who would later write the infamous book “Propaganda,”
a textbook of mind control for tyrants and aristocrats.

Bernays is the nephew of Sigmund Freud,
and often called the “father of propaganda,”
in which case Ivy Lee is the grandfather.
Lee suggested that the families make high profile donations
to various charities and have photographs taken of them
handing out money to the commoners
to make the public think that they were good-hearted
and generous people.

Over time, the plan worked,
and has been replicated by many other aristocrats
who wanted to win favor in the court of public opinion.

At the time of his death, Lee was being investigated by Congress
for his work with the Nazis through the company IG Farben
and a proxy firm called the German Dye Trust.

He was also a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Now that the “new and improved” Bill Gates
has dominated the headlines for years,
many people have forgotten about the accusations
of stealing ideas from others in your industry
and then relentlessly using intellectual property laws
against anyone who threatened your dominance.

Your reputation was at its worst when Microsoft
was caught up in an anti-trust legal battle
with the United States government,
because you spent years developing a tech monopoly
through your company.

In 2001, Microsoft was forced to settle
with the government and give up its monopoly of the industry,
and the next year, you began shifting your time,
and more importantly, your money,
into the pharmaceutical industry.

This time around, you have come to dominate
an industry as an outsider,
through stock investments and charitable organizations
that are not bound to the same regulations
as a publicly-traded company.

There is no doubt that advancing medicine
is a noble cause, and it is true that investments
in public health are important,
but not everyone involved in the pharmaceutical industry
actually has the best interests of the public in mind.

As with any industry, it all comes down to the all mighty dollar.

There are some people in the industry who have good intentions
but judging by your track record at Microsoft,
you are not someone who can be trusted.

And let’s not forget that just months ago,
you were in the news because your relationship
with the disgraced human trafficker Jeffrey Epstein
was being exposed.

Now, as frightened people around the world
are demanding solutions and looking to people
like you for answers, you have advocated
for some extremely draconian measures,
including a surveillance system
to track down anyone who might be infected.

Of course, all of this sounds like a necessary step
in a global pandemic, and this virus is a very real threat,
but in China and other places where these measures
have been implemented, human rights violations
followed quickly after.

It is also very strange that for many years,
your companies and foundations
have been heavily involved in a project called “ID2020,”
something that seems very similar to the systems
you have proposed in recent interviews.

You may own the corporate media,
but we still have the internet,
and you will be exposed!

We are Anonymous!

We are Legion!

We do not forgive!

We do not forget!

Expect us.

https://youtu.be/ngrEePSfc_4
Anonymous Message To Bill Gates


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghBuxHmQiNg&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR0XN4r4Jchksi_IR3WQnz0yemDinfNMovy3oMBZeMRhkgUEX4F009OWaxQ&app=desktop

 

WTH DID MY TRUCK

JUST SAY ???



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2B_xYk-tZJQ&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2tpJRKAmfZ1TcQgw-8IWrOX7fQMkHMZ9KAYtCQHftsGCwFOdTQEDz5AOA