The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

​

 

​

 

A changing narrative - is it too late?



​

 

Allahu Akbar versus Praise God!




Gun Control in Chicago's BLM versus BLM!​

 

​

The Crime That Will (Could) Destroy America

Are the U.S. and NATO inciting Russia into war? To thousands of objective experts, it does appear so. BALTOPS 16, a NATO military exercise, is now taking place in the Baltic Sea in very close proximity to Russia.

​

"Over the next three weeks BALTOPS 16 will draw together some 6,000 personnel, 45 warships, and 60 aircraft from 17 nations, including the United States, Germany, the U.K., the Netherlands, along with the littoral states of the Baltic States who are NATO members (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Denmark) or NATO partners (Sweden and Finland)."

"Washington's move to place a new ground-based missile defense system in Romania with Poland's recruitment drive and the BALTOPS 16 exercise will surely raise tensions with Russia which are at an all time high since the Cold War. Russia views this move as a threat to its security with NATO's encirclement of Russia is as reckless and as dangerous as you can get in terms of escalating the possibility of a disastrous war."

Imagine how the American people would react if Russia or China began putting missile systems on our northern and southern borders.

The report continues, "Russia is more than prepared to fight a war against NATO which would not last more than three days at best according to the Rand Corporation, a think tank based in Santa Monica, California. The Rand corporation employed well-known players in the political arena including war criminal Henry Kissinger as an advisor and George W. Bush-era Neocons such as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (former Chairman of the board 1981-1986 and again in 1995-1996) and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice who was a former intern and trustee. The RAND corporation report admitted that a NATO war against Russia would last between 36 and 60 hours . . . ."

"If NATO were that foolish to start a war against Russia, European countries across Western Europe would be open to Russian missile strikes crippling Europe's already fragile social and economic fabric. An attack on Russia would be the end of NATO, literally. Russia has capabilities that are far more advanced than what the U.S. and NATO forces have in their arsenal . . . ."

"The U.S. and its allies including Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia and other Gulf puppet states were all involved in creating the civil war in Syria in 2011 through a proxy opposition group to oust President Bashar al-Assad. The 'protests' were orchestrated by a covert operation led by US-NATO-Israeli intelligence agencies to create chaos in order to fault the Syrian government through propaganda. Washington and Israel want to destabilize Syria as a Nation State and break-up Syria into several small nation-states easier for the governments of the U.S. and Israel to control. Israel's interest in destabilizing Syria goes back decades, perhaps as far back when the State of Israel was declared a new independent state in 1948."

"For now, Washington . . . will continue to target smaller, weaker nations with their terrorists who they fund, train and manage in the Middle East and Africa. They will continue to destabilize governments through 'regime change' in Latin America as they recently did in Brazil and are in the process of targeting Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia through their Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) or controlled 'opposition groups' allied with Washington and Wall Street."

"As for NATO forces on Russia's borders, they would be destroyed in less than three days if they were foolish enough to follow Washington's orders, then again Vassal states have no say in their own foreign or domestic affairs in the first place. NATO is a willing participant waiting for its annihilation as they sacrifice their lives and their nations in a war against Russia not for Europe, but for the American Empire."

Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Ronald Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, was absolutely right when he said, "The crazed filth that controls US foreign policy is capable of defending US hegemony with nuclear weapons. The neoconservatives must be removed from power, arrested, and put on international trial for their horrendous war crimes before they defend their hegemony with Armageddon.

"Neoconservatives and their allies in the military/security complex make audacious use of false flag attacks. These evil people are capable of orchestrating a false flag attack that propels the US and Russia to war."

Both major political parties in Washington, D.C., have brought the United States to the precipice of economic ruin. They have shredded the U.S. Constitution to the point that, for all intents and purposes, it does not even exist. Far too often, our court systems have failed to provide justice for the American people. Federal agencies such as the EPA and BLM have brought the American citizenry to a boiling point. The only thing that keeps the power establishment intact is their lying propaganda ministers in the mainstream media. But people by the millions (from both the left and the right) are seeing through the façade.

At some point, the only way the Neocons in Washington, D.C., and their crony monopolists (they are NOT capitalists) in New York City can keep their charade afloat is via a major war. War is the ultimate tool of globalists to enslave free societies. People will accept usurpations of their liberties during a time of war that they would NEVER accept otherwise. Plus, global war would provide the power establishment with the opportunity to create a new currency (no doubt a cashless system), wipe out national debt, and suspend constitutional law.

Is this what D.C. has planned for our near future: WAR? Think of the "national emergency" orders that could be executed by the President; think of the abridgments of the Bill of Rights; think of the entire American nation under "lockdown." Not to mention the loss of multiplied thousands of innocent American lives in the process.

The United States has not tasted real war on its homeland since The War Between The States. For the most part, the American people have no idea what war is like. War is something that is fought "over there." On the other hand, Russia has recent memories of the horrors of war and, in my mind, is showing great restraint against NATO's encroachments and incitements. But Mr. Putin will only tolerate so much.

What the U.S. and NATO are doing in Eastern Europe is insane. To goad Vladimir Putin into war is the mark of desperate and despicably evil men. Then again, insanity and evil tend to go together.

Come to think about it, what the U.S. is doing in the Middle East and Western Europe is insane. Make no mistake about it: U.S. foreign policy has created the massive immigration problem in Western Europe. It's time to admit it: U.S. foreign policy has brought both Europe and America to the precipice of economic disaster and nuclear war.

And for those of us who still believe in the importance of "Just War," please remember that the greatest international crime that nations can commit is the Crime of Aggression. Nothing equals its condemnation under Natural Law. And right now it seems crystal clear that the U.S. and NATO are the aggressors, and therefore, if forced into war, Russia would be fighting a defensive, and thus, "Just War," while the United States and NATO would be fighting an unjust war of aggression.

In the past, Germany, Japan, and Italy found themselves on the wrong side of history. Right now, it seems obvious that it is the United States and NATO – along with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Israel – that are on the wrong side of history.

The American people had better turn off the sports channels long enough to pay attention to what is happening RIGHT NOW in Eastern Europe. It will be too late when nuclear missiles start landing in your backyard, folks.

And as is the case with every major failure within a nation, it is the pulpits that are the most culpable. For at least a half century or more, pastors have taught the American people almost NOTHING in regards to the fundamental principles of liberty, nations, and Natural Law. Think of it: in the State of South Carolina in which there are probably more professing Christians (and churches) per square mile than in any other State in the country, a reprobate Neocon warmonger such as Lindsey Graham (a 2016 Bilderberg participant, by the way) is the State's senior senator.

Thanks to pastors and Christians who vote for people such as Lindsey Graham, the United States has been involved in myriad crimes of aggression all over the world for decades. That's not an unpatriotic statement; that's a factual statement.

Many people like to quote Missouri Senator Carl Schurz' (1829-1906) statement, "My country, right or wrong." But they seldom finish the quote. What Senator Schurz said was, "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."

When we turn a blind eye as our nation commits crimes against humanity in violation of both international law and Natural Law, we are NOT being patriotic. If that's not the case, we owe the people of Nazi Germany a huge apology.

The leaders and people of Old Testament Israel thought God's prophets were "unpatriotic" too. But they weren't. Who loves their nation more: the ones who say nothing and let their country slide into human oppression and divine judgment or the ones who try to call their nation back to the side of human dignity and divine approbation?

Again, there is no worse crime for a nation to commit than the Crime of Aggression.

About a year ago, I delivered a scriptural analysis of the seriousness of the Crime of Aggression. I showed how Jehovah God treats this crime so seriously that He almost ended David's kingdom over it and in the process destroyed thousands of David's men. Had David not repented of the Crime of Aggression that he was about to commit, God would have destroyed the entire nation. And, folks, God is no respecter of persons (or nations), and if America does not repent of this egregious Crime of Aggression, He will destroy us.

I can honestly say that in my entire life of being in church, I have NEVER heard a single pastor or minister say a word from the pulpit about the Crime of Aggression. Not one. Yet it is one of the most significant events in the life of King David. The only sin we ever hear about David committing is his adultery with Bathsheba. That was horrible, yes. And David paid a terrible personal price for that sin. But in terms of national impact, David's intended Crime of Aggression was astronomically more jeopardous to Israel's survival than his adultery. But I doubt that most Christians have ever even heard about it.

I tell you the truth: there is NOTHING more pertinent and relevant to America's current crisis than the Crime of Aggression. Yet this is the crime that America seems to be the most addicted to, and this is the crime that pastors and Christians seem to be the least concerned about.

I urge readers to watch my message DVD: "The Crime Of Aggression: Condemned By The Law Of Nature And Nature's God." Find it here:

The Crime Of Aggression: Condemned By The Law Of Nature And Nature's God

America has taken its crimes of aggression to weak and impotent nations that are mostly helpless to resist. But now America is taking its crimes of aggression to the doorstep of Russia – and is even beginning to do the same in China. If the American people do not soon rein in these rogue out-of-control Neocons and Neolibs running U.S. foreign policy, we will tragically discover that a nuclear Armageddon will soon be at our doorstep. And these Christians who think they are going to escape it are in for a rude awakening. Their indifference is helping to create this nuclear apocalypse, and their false prophecy theology will not save them from it.

But if we all understood the divine principles of Natural Law that govern nations and began holding our civil magistrates accountable to these principles – and to our Constitution – we could indeed prevent what seems now to be inevitable.

http://www.whatsupic.com/news-politics-usa/1465655300.html

 

​

Merkel wants Germany military budget boosted to counter ‘external threats’
Published time: 22 Jun, 2016 05:22
Get short URL

German Chancellor Angela Merkel. ©Hannibal Hanschke / Reuters


Germany should substantially increase its defense spending to cope with “external threats,” Chancellor Angela Merkel has said, stressing that Berlin can’t count on the US, and the EU is incapable of defending itself.
During an economics conference in Berlin on Tuesday, Merkel said the EU can’t rely on the transatlantic partnership with the US to deal with external threats, Reuters reports.
“Sure enough this means that a country like Germany, which today spends around 1.2 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defense, and the United States, which spends 3.4 percent of GDP for defense will have to converge,” Merkel said.

Read more


‘Time for Bundeswehr to grow’: Germany announces 1st army expansion since Cold War

The chancellor maintained it would be no good in the long run if Germany expected others to bear the burden of defense.
Last month, German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen announced the country's first army expansion since the Cold War. Over the next seven years some 14,300 additional soldiers will be recruited, and around 7,000 new troops will be hired in the initial drive, with approximately 4,400 new civilian personnel working alongside them.
In 2015, EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker called for the creation of a united European army, which he said would be aimed at “deterring” Russia and strengthening the alliance.

“With its own army, Europe could react more credibly to the threat to peace in a member state or in a neighboring state,” he said, adding that “a common European army would convey a clear message to Russia that we are serious about defending our European values.”

Although Juncker’s proposal has long been on the agenda, there hasn’t been much progress with regards to its implementation. The bloc has struggled to agree on a common defense policy and has faced financing issues.
Despite the fact that the EU doesn’t have a common army, its foreign policy allows the bloc to launch various operations. As part of its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) adopted in 1999, 21 civilian and 11 military missions were carried out by the EU.

In June, the German government announced it was seeking to make changes to its “White Paper”, a document outlining the country’s security policy and stating it would regard Russia as a threat. Placing Moscow on the list of the 10 most serious threats to Berlin, the German Defense Ministry said Russia is no longer a “partner” but has become a “challenge."



Other “threats” mentioned in the document included international terrorism, radical nationalism, the migrant crisis and an increased risk of epidemics that might occur due to the surge in Germany’s population.
The upcoming NATO summit in Warsaw is also set to put the “Russian threat” high on the agenda. However, not everyone seems to support the idea.
Last week, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier blasted NATO military drills in Eastern Europe simulating the repulsion of the so-called “Russian aggression” and said the confrontation with Moscow would only endanger European security. Instead of exacerbating the situation “through saber-rattling and warmongering,” there ought to be more space for dialogue and cooperation with Moscow, Steinmeier said.

From partner to rival: Germany to designate Russia 'a security challenge'

In late March, Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cabinet adopted a €325-billion federal budget for 2017, with €36.6 billion earmarked for defense.
Citing Russia’s involvement in the Ukraine crisis, NATO members in 2014 agreed to stop making budget cuts on military and spend two percent of each nation's gross domestic product (GDP) on defense. Germany, however, said it would remain below the two-percent commitment.

​

 

Ex-Muslima from Iran on the Nature of Islam
(via Serpentina)

​

 

So the Remain should win!?
The politics of the EU can be compared to the status of 'Modern Music/Art Pop'.




Dumbed down?
Thank You globalist brain washers in divers places!
But the emperor truly is without clothes. And so it continues!

​

Charlotte Cowell for me the EU referendum also boils down to a vote for or against the corporate-political-military machine, and I'm against it. But I recognise that good people have valid fears and questions, that the situation is not simply cut and dried. I would hope to allay some of those fears....



Tony Bermanseder One day you will find out that your 'well meaningness' became a surrender to the intolerable. To transform the physical from the metaphysical requires a feedback from the physical within to the metaphysical without. Only in the closing of the circle can the 'higher life' manifest in the 'lower life'. Subjective opinionated selftruth-relativism is necessitated to be confronted by universal truth of facts and logistical analysis.
Perhaps you know that the 'feeling heart' with the 'thinking mind' is easily deceived and the wise ones allow themselves to engage their 'feeling minds' with a 'thinking heart' to rationalise the sentimentalities of often misnomered 'common sense' and experience, given to personal whimsicalities.
Needless to say, to deviate from the 'being liked and accepted' standard status of your culture will give you isolation, ostracism and exile.
But as a wise one said to the bystanders and the observers: "Be as innocent as doves and as wise as serpents."



Tony Bermanseder [9:08:57 AM] ShilohaPlace: Yes and it will be remain. I understood this yesterday
It looks like the Obama court ruling and brexit are related. Here in Oz the corporations all pestered the UK to remain, as said.



Tony Bermanseder The big cities and Scotland might not be enough to save David Cameron and the EU. The 'investor' markets will 'spook'. Charlotte's optimism regarding the human nous might be vindicated.



Tony Bermanseder March 1st, 23,615BC +360x26,000 = December 21st, 2012 [11:12UCT]+ 1260 (3½x360) = June 3rd, 2016 + 21 = June 24th, 2016 (June 20th, 2016 [22:34UCT]+ 3½) Dan.12.7&10.2-4

Isn't it fitting? RESURGENCE - Independence Day! With brexit ETs and logistics!





Look at the Date!

​

 

We're out of touch with ordinary, 'ghastly' Britons, says ex-BBC chief: Leaked email says it 'ignores and despises' millions because they do not embrace liberal views

• Ex-BBC chief said Corporation 'ignores and despises' millions of Britons
• This is because they do not embrace liberal views of the elite, he said
• BBC was said to be 'bewildered' about how to respond to their concerns

By Ian Drury, Home Affairs Correspondent for the Daily Mail
Published: 08:57 EST, 24 June 2016 | Updated: 14:12 EST, 24 June 2016


The BBC 'ignores and despises' millions of Britons because they do not embrace the liberal views of a metropolitan elite, a leaked memo has revealed.
The Corporation was said to be 'completely bewildered' about how to respond to the concerns of 'ghastly' ordinary people.
There would be no end to the issues facing the broadcaster until the 'London bubble' had burst, said a report by David Cowling, former head of the BBC's political research unit.


Fury at being overlooked for so long has led to vast numbers of Britons – many casting a ballot for the first time – to vote to quit the EU in a howl of frustration at the political elite. Pictured, ballot papers are counted

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...pises-millions-not-embrace-liberal-views.html

Sensitive subjects that worried households were barely acknowledged by the political class, his analysis claimed.
Although he did not name specific issues, Mr Cowling would almost certainly have in mind mass immigration – routinely among the biggest fears of voters – and the way foreign arrivals have changed communities in the UK.
For decades, politicians and the BBC have been accused of censoring debate, branding as 'racist' those who voiced concerns about the perceived erosion of our national identity or the pressure on jobs, housing, schools and healthcare. Fury at being overlooked for so long has led to vast numbers of Britons – many casting a ballot for the first time – to vote to quit the EU in a howl of frustration at the political elite.

Mr Cowling, a former special adviser to a Labour Cabinet minister in the 1970s, made the withering assessment in an internal memo that was leaked on the internet.
His words are damning because the BBC's political research unit provides extensive background briefings for journalists and programme-makers.
But his findings appear to have been dismissed amid fears at the Corporation that it may be perceived as a Right-wing political agenda.
Mr Cowling, who is now a visiting senior research fellow at King's College London, wrote: 'It seems to me that the London bubble has to burst if there is to be any prospect of addressing the issues that have brought us to our current situation.

Millions do not enthuse about diversity and do not embrace metropolitan values yet do not consider themselves lesser human beings. Their values are ignored and despised.
David Cowling, former head of the BBC's political research unit

'There are many millions of people in the UK who do not enthuse about diversity and do not embrace metropolitan values yet do not consider themselves lesser human beings for all that. Until their values and opinions are acknowledged and respected, rather than ignored and despised, our present discord will persist.
'Because these discontents run very wide and very deep and the metropolitan political class, confronted by them, seems completely bewildered and at a loss about how to respond ('who are these ghastly people and where do they come from?' doesn't really hack it).

'The 2016 EU referendum has witnessed the cashing in of some very bitter bankable grudges but I believe that, throughout this 2016 campaign, Europe has been the shadow not the substance.'
Despite Mr Cowling's stinging evaluation, the BBC has been widely seen to have run an even-handed referendum campaign – setting aside what many see as a liberal bias.
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen, a leading Vote Leave supporter, said: 'This analysis is right and refreshing. The political parties and the BBC do not appreciate the legitimate concerns of a large proportion of the population.
'The size of the leave vote will be a demonstration of the size of people's frustrations. A huge swathe of the population feel that their views are irrelevant to the metropolitan elite and the European elite.
'The Establishment is out of touch with a huge proportion of our population.'


The Corporation was said to be 'completely bewildered' about how to respond to the concerns of 'ghastly' ordinary people. Pictured the BBC headquarters in London


Mr Cowling, a specialist on political opinion polling, is a former editor of the BBC's political research unit, which runs a small team of researchers. He now works for the corporation as a freelancer on an 'ad hoc' basis.
He has helped in the commissioning of polls by the BBC in all forms of elections, including at local, parliamentary and European level. Between 1977 and 1979 he was a special adviser to Environment Secretary Peter Shore in James Callaghan's Labour Government.

His words echo those of the BBC's former director-general Mark Thompson who in 2011 admitted there had been 'some years' when the broadcaster was 'very reticent about talking about immigration'.
Mr Thompson said such 'taboo' subjects were avoided by the BBC. He added: 'There was an anxiety about whether or not you might be playing into a political agenda if you did items on immigration.'
A BBC spokesman said: 'This was an internal memo intended to help programme-makers create thought-provoking and broad-ranging impartial coverage.
'It would wrong to read any more into this analysis than that.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3657284/We-touch-ordinary-ghastly-Britons-says-ex-BBC-chief-Leaked-email-says-ignores-despises-millions-not-embrace-liberal-views.html#ixzz4CTfLJS9z
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Real Palestinian Retweeted
((( Sandra ))) ن ‏@SandraTXAS 5h5 hours ago
I have a dream liberals cross MX border #MAGA vote #Trump #RedNationRising #tcot #PJNET #UniteBlue #p2pic.twitter.com/AjoyAmWLys

Wouldn't it be loverly!




​