On the Nature of Physical Consciousness

Consciousness and the Quantum: Surprising New Evidence

Created date

10 June 2016
By the
Communications Team


Since it began in 1994, the Science of Consciousness conference in Tucson AZ, has become the world’s largest consciousness-focused conference. Founded by philosopher David Chalmers and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, its popularity and prestige reflects the growing academic recognition of the mystery presented by the conscious mind. Among the diverse views of its attendees and speakers, there is a decidedly growing openness toward deeper views of the mind. For many, including its founders, the question of consciousness may even penetrate to the heart of our scientific ontology. In recent years, scientists exploring the controversial terrain of psychic anomalies, like precognition and mind-matter interaction, have become a growing part of the discussion. This year IONS chief scientist Dean Radin gave a fascinating talk detailing the surprising findings of his prize-winning experiments exploring the relationship between mind and the quantum world. This one’s not to be missed.

​

Don't forget to subscribe to IONS YouTube channel for more videos!



Andrew Bellon

18 hrs ·

http://noetic.org/…/communicatio…/consciousness-and-quantum…
He has his critics, as expected, since, if he is correct, the life's work of many will become historical footnotes in a new spiritual physics. If verifiable, the experiments demand that consciousness is non-local and elsewhere.




Barbara Maat what you think is what you get.




Barbara Maat the ultimate WYSIWYG.



Andrew Bellon consciousness and randomness are co-conspirators...



Tony Bermanseder Consciousness is PHYSICAL and defined in advanced quantum mechanics as the action of angular acceleration (quantum spin) acting on any space occupying dynamic, such as an ant crawling across a leaf or a simple hydrogen atom interacting physically/chemically/biologically. Therefore physical universal consciousness as a quantum phenomenon is BOTH completely universal (nonlocal) and local (holofractally-holographically informationally) simultaneously.

Like · Reply · 6 mins · Edited


Tony Bermanseder http://www.cosmosdawn.net/forum/index.php...


On the Nature of Physical Consciousness
LATEST DIALOGUES David Bohm, Implicate Order and Holomovement by David Storoy, August 8, 2014 in Cosmology, Philosophy, Quantum Physics 8 Comments...
cosmosdawn.net



Andrew Bellon Does this not then expand the generally held view of the physical to non-local interactions? The experiment demonstrates a macro-effect of a collection of conscious quantum observations...Nature then becomes a supernature (in distinction to supernatural).




Tony Bermanseder Of course, the so called supernature or the 'paranormal' or the 'spiritual', all are basic misnomers for Radin's 'extra-physical'. All the pundits need to do, is to connect the (12D) membrane universe and the holographic (Black Hole-White Hole-Information) cosmology to its underpinning 'modular string duality' and they could see that the basic building block of the universe including Inflation and Big Bang is in fact a sort of 'minimal wormhole singularity' monad, which one can easily call the 'quantum of consciousness'. This quantum then indeed becomes the 'energy quanta' existing BEFORE space and time emerged in the cosmology. And since this 'pre-energy' quantum can be arbitrarily named as 'spirit' or 'extra-physical monad' etc, BUT can indeed be defined in the physical parameters of electrons and fundamenmtal particles in the physics nomenclature, the new paradigm Radin espouses would simply fall into its place to describe the ontology of physics and so all of science as he envisages.




Dominic Albanese hmmmmm....I watched rabbits eat fallen hibiscus flowers today in my yard and they come an go under a tunnel they dug under my chain link fence....I am not gonna even wonder about the "nature of reality" I seem to be caught up in the reality of nature




Dominic Albanese and not 2 hours away 50 dead in another example of screwed reality....Mercy Mercy me things ain't what they used to be.....mad person disease is epidemic




Andrew Bellon But the rabbit does live in a rabbit hole...Radin and Tony are flashing a light down there....

 

Scientists Claim That Quantum Theory Proves Consciousness Moves To Another Universe At Death
Posted by JB Bardot


​

A book titled “Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the Nature of the Universe“ has stirred up the Internet, because it contained a notion that life does not end when the body dies, and it can last forever. The author of this publication, scientist Dr. Robert Lanza who was voted the 3rd most important scientist alive by the NY Times, has no doubts that this is possible.


Beyond time and space

Lanza is an expert in regenerative medicine and scientific director of Advanced Cell Technology Company. Before he has been known for his extensive research which dealt with stem cells, he was also famous for several successful experiments on cloning endangered animal species.
But not so long ago, the scientist became involved with physics, quantum mechanics and astrophysics. This explosive mixture has given birth to the new theory of biocentrism, which the professor has been preaching ever since. Biocentrism teaches that life and consciousness are fundamental to the universe. It is consciousness that creates the material universe, not the other way around.
Lanza points to the structure of the universe itself, and that the laws, forces, and constants of the universe appear to be fine-tuned for life, implying intelligence existed prior to matter. He also claims that space and time are not objects or things, but rather tools of our animal understanding. Lanza says that we carry space and time around with us “like turtles with shells.” meaning that when the shell comes off (space and time), we still exist.

The theory implies that death of consciousness simply does not exist. It only exists as a thought because people identify themselves with their body. They believe that the body is going to perish, sooner or later, thinking their consciousness will disappear too. If the body generates consciousness, then consciousness dies when the body dies. But if the body receives consciousness in the same way that a cable box receives satellite signals, then of course consciousness does not end at the death of the physical vehicle. In fact, consciousness exists outside of constraints of time and space. It is able to be anywhere: in the human body and outside of it. In other words, it is non-local in the same sense that quantum objects are non-local.
Lanza also believes that multiple universes can exist simultaneously. In one universe, the body can be dead. And in another it continues to exist, absorbing consciousness which migrated into this universe. This means that a dead person while traveling through the same tunnel ends up not in hell or in heaven, but in a similar world he or she once inhabited, but this time alive. And so on, infinitely. It’s almost like a cosmic Russian doll afterlife effect.


Multiple worlds

This hope-instilling, but extremely controversial theory by Lanza has many unwitting supporters, not just mere mortals who want to live forever, but also some well-known scientists. These are the physicists and astrophysicists who tend to agree with existence of parallel worlds and who suggest the possibility of multiple universes. Multiverse (multi-universe) is a so-called scientific concept, which they defend. They believe that no physical laws exist which would prohibit the existence of parallel worlds.
The first one was a science fiction writer H.G. Wells who proclaimed in 1895 in his story “The Door in the Wall”. And after 62 years, this idea was developed by Dr. Hugh Everett in his graduate thesis at the Princeton University. It basically posits that at any given moment the universe divides into countless similar instances. And the next moment, these “newborn” universes split in a similar fashion. In some of these worlds you may be present: reading this article in one universe, or watching TV in another.

The triggering factor for these multiplyingworlds is our actions, explained Everett. If we make some choices, instantly one universe splits into two with different versions of outcomes.
In the 1980s, Andrei Linde, scientist from the Lebedev’s Institute of physics, developed the theory of multiple universes. He is now a professor at Stanford University. Linde explained: Space consists of many inflating spheres, which give rise to similar spheres, and those, in turn, produce spheres in even greater numbers, and so on to infinity. In the universe, they are spaced apart. They are not aware of each other’s existence. But they represent parts of the same physical universe.

The fact that our universe is not alone is supported by data received from the Planck space telescope. Using the data, scientists have created the most accurate map of the microwave background, the so-called cosmic relic background radiation, which has remained since the inception of our universe. They also found that the universe has a lot of dark recesses represented by some holes and extensive gaps.
Theoretical physicist Laura Mersini-Houghton from the North Carolina University with her colleagues argue: the anomalies of the microwave background exist due to the fact that our universe is influenced by other universes existing nearby. And holes and gaps are a direct result of attacks on us by neighboring universes.


The Scientific Explanation For The Soul

So, there is abundance of places or other universes where our soul could migrate after death, according to the theory of neo-biocentrism. But does the soul exist? Is there any scientific theory of consciousness that could accommodate such a claim? According to Dr. Stuart Hameroff, a near-death experience happens when the quantum information that inhabits the nervous system leaves the body and dissipates into the universe. Contrary to materialistic accounts of consciousness, Dr. Hameroff offers an alternative explanation of consciousness that can perhaps appeal to both the rational scientific mind and personal intuitions.

Consciousness resides, according to Stuart and British physicist Sir Roger Penrose, in the microtubules of the brain cells, which are the primary sites of quantum processing. Upon death, this information is released from your body, meaning that your consciousness goes with it. They have argued that our experience of consciousness is the result of quantum gravity effects in these microtubules, a theory which they dubbed orchestrated objective reduction (Orch-OR).


Consciousness is a property like space and time

Consciousness, or at least proto-consciousness is theorized by them to be a fundamental property of the universe, present even at the first moment of the universe during the Big Bang. “In one such scheme proto-conscious experience is a basic property of physical reality accessible to a quantum process associated with brain activity.”

Our souls are in fact constructed from the very fabric of the universe – and may have existed since the beginning of time. Our brains are just receivers and amplifiers for the proto-consciousness that is intrinsic to the fabric of space-time. So is there really a part of your consciousness that is non-material and will live on after the death of your physical body?

Dr Hameroff told the Science Channel’s Through the Wormhole documentary: “Let’s say the heart stops beating, the blood stops flowing, the microtubules lose their quantum state. The quantum information within the microtubules is not destroyed, it can’t be destroyed, it just distributes and dissipates to the universe at large”. Robert Lanza would add here that not only does it exist in the universe, it exists perhaps in another universe.

If the patient is resuscitated, revived, this quantum information can go back into the microtubules and the patient says “I had a near death experience”‘
He adds: “If they’re not revived, and the patient dies, it’s possible that this quantum information can exist outside the body, perhaps indefinitely, as a soul.”

This account of quantum consciousness explains things like near-death experiences, astral projection, out of body experiences, and even reincarnation without needing to appeal to religious ideology. The energy of your consciousness potentially gets recycled back into a different body at some point, and in the mean time it exists outside of the physical body on some other level of reality, and possibly in another universe.
Robert Lanza on Biocentrism: View video here:
​

Sources: http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphys...other-universe-at-death/#sthash.8pnIT324.dpuf

Learning Mind
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biocentric_universe

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2225190/Can-quantum-physics-explain-bizarre-experiences-patients-brought-brink-death.html#axzz2JyudSqhB
http://www.news.com.au/news/quantum-scientists-offer-proof-soul-exists/story-fnenjnc3-1226507686757
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/biocentrism/201112/does-the-soul-exist-evidence-says-yes
http://www.hameroff.com/penrose-hameroff/fundamentality.html

 

Physical Consciousness coupled to the Biomind of Universal Life

The labels of 'mind' and 'self-awareness' and of 'consciousness' have for long awaited rigorous definition in the nomenclature of science. Whilst most researchers and philosophers accept the existence of those labels; what those namings represent in a physically measurable sense of physical parameters have remained largely unexplored.
These notions have remained as one of the major mysteries of science and have become subject to a number of speculations; from a purely materialistic interpretation of the 'mind' being a biochemical response to environmental stimuli, to the 'mind' being part of a 'spiritual soul' and subsequently constituting a transcendent aspect of biophysical life.

A related mystery is that of 'life' itself. How did the universe evolve 'life' from a generally accepted premise of a prior or older cosmology, which disallowed biological life as is observed today? The thermodynamically expanding universe follows well tested physical parameters engaging the quantum nature of physical existence in the form of nucleosynthesizing interactions such as nuclear fusion of atomic eleements and an associated natural radioactivity inherent in nature and its laws of conservation of energy and momentum. Those same processes occurred in the primordial universe and due to the smaller volume then occupied by the expanding universe; the descriptive cosmology describes a much hotter universe (as a Black Body Planckian Radiator) and a universe in which say the lifeforms observed on planet earth could not exist in their biochemical and molecular constitutions.

Recent advances in the demetricated forms of supermembrane theory (M-Theory for 11-dimensional supermembranes propagating 10-dimensional superstrings in a 12-dimensional selfdual mirror-spacetime of supervolumars (Vafa-F-Space encompassing Witten-M-Space) have allowed a rigorous definition for the above labels in the parameters of the physics of the superbranes.




The Coupling of the Energy Laws by the Self-Frequency of the Quantum for Mass

It has been discovered, that the universe contains an intrinsic coupling-parameter between its inertial masscontent and its noninertial energy content.
The matter in the universe is described by the physical parameter termed Mass (M), say as proportional to Energy (E) in Einstein's famous equation Mass M=E/c².
This mass M then reappears in Newtonian mechanics as the change in momentum (p) defining the Inertial Mass (M_i) as being proportional to some applied Force (F) or the 'work done' for a particular displacement {F=dp/dt for p=mv and v a kinetematic velocity as the ratio of displacement over time generalised in the lightpath X=cT}.

It is also well understood, that the inertial mass M_i has a gravitational counterpart described not by the change in momentum of inertia carrying matter agglomerations; but by the geometric curvature of space containing matter conglomerations. This Gravitational Mass M_g is measured to be equivalent to the Inertial Mass M_i and is formulated in the 'Principle of Equivalence' in Einstein's Theory of General Relativity.
F-Theory then has shown, that this Inertial Mass M_i is coupled inherently to a 'mass-eigen' frequency via the following formulation:

(1) Energy E=hf=mc² (The Combined Planck-Einstein Law)
(2) E=hf iff m=0 (The Planckian Quantum Law E=hf for lightspeed invariance c=λf)
(3) E=mc² iff f=f_o=f_ss (The Einstein Law E=mc² for the lightspeed upper limit)

(1) Whenever there is mass (M=M_i=M_g) occupying space; this mass can be assigned either as a photonic mass {by the Energy-Momentum relation of Special Relativity: E²=E_o²(pc)²} by the photonic momentum p=h/λ=hf/c} OR a 'restmass' m_o=m/√[1-(v/c)²] for 'restenergy' E_o=m_oc².

The 'total' energy for the occupied space so contains a 'variable' mass in the 'combined' law; but allows particularisation for electromagnetic radiation (always moving at the Maxwell lightspeed constant c in Planck's Law and for the 'Newtonian' mass M in the Einstein Law.

(2) If M=0, then the Einstein Law is suppressed in favour of the Planck Law and the space contained energy E is photonic, i.e. electromagnetic, always dynamically described by the constancy of lightspeed c.

(3) If M>0, then there exists a mass-eigen frequency f_ss=f_o=E_ss/h=m_ssc²/h, which QUANTIZES all mass agglomerations m=Σm_ss in the massquantum m_ss=E_ss/c².



The Coupling of the Supermembranes in Vafa-F-Space

The quantization of mass m so indicates the coupling of the Planck Law in the frequency parameter to the Einstein law in the mass parameter.
The postulative basis of M-Theory utilizes the coupling of two energy-momentum eigenstates in the form of the modular duality between so termed 'vibratory' (high energy and short wavelengths) and 'winding' (low energy and long wavelengths) selfstates.

The 'vibratory' selfstate is denoted in: E_ps=E_{primary sourcesink}=hf_ps=m_psc² and the 'winding' and coupled selfstate is denoted by: E_ss=E_{econdary sinksource}=hf_ss=m_ssc²

The F-Space Unitary symmetry condition becomes: f_psf_ss=r_psr_ss=(λ_ps/2π)(2πλ_ss)=1

The coupling constants between the two eigenstates are so: E_psE_ss=h² and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps²=1/f_ss²

The Supermembrane E_psE_ss then denotes the coupled superstrings in their 'vibratory' high energy and 'winded' low energy selfstates.

The coupling constant for the vibratory high energy describes a MAXIMISED frequency differential over time in df/dt|_max=f_ps² and the coupling constant for the winded low energy describes its MINIMISED reciprocal in df/dt|_min=f_ss².

F-Theory also crystallizes the following string formulations from the E_psE_ss superbrane parameters.

1/E_ps=e*=2R_ec²=√{4αhce²/2πG_om_e²}=2e√α[m_P/m_e]=2ke²/m_e=αhc/πm_e

Here e* is defined as the inverse of the sourcesink vibratory superstring energy quantum E_ps=E* and becomes a New Physical Measurement Unit is the StarCoulomb (C*) and as the physical measurement unit for 'Physical Consciousness'.

R_e is the 'classical electron radius' coupling the 'point electron' of Quantum- Electro-Dynamics (QED) to Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and given in the electric potential energy of Coulomb's Law in: m_ec²=ke²/R_e; and for the electronic restmass m_e.
Alpha α is the electromagnetic finestructure coupling constant α=2πke²/hc for the electric charge quantum e, Planck's constant h and lightspeed constant c.
G_o is the Newtonian gravitational constant as applicable in the Planck-Mass m_P=√(hc/2πG_o).

As the StarCoulomb unit describes the inverse sourcesink string energy as an elementary energy transformation from the string parametrization into the realm of classical QFT and QED, this transformation allows the reassignment of the StarCoulomb (C*) as the measurement of physical space itself.




Physical Consciousness and the Awareness Quantum

The Physical Quantum of Consciousness as SpaceAwareness (df/dt) maximised and minimised in the string coupling constants f_ps² and f_ss² respectively, so can be defined as:
e*=2R_ec²=(Classical Electron Diameter)x(lightspeed)²=VolumexAngular Acceleration

As the time differential operator on frequency is independent on radial displacement in df/dt as the square of frequency or the square of inverse time; we can now also define the parameter of:
Spacial Awareness=df/dt=AlphaOmega=αω=aw=Angular Acceleration Quantum.

The Spacial Awareness 'aw' then operates upon any volumar in the rootreduced F-Space (12D being a 9-dimensional brane volumar of superstring dimensions to which is coupled a 3-dimensional temporal time-connector volumar in 12=9+3 F-Space, 11=9+2 M-Space and 10=9+1 C-Space) AS the 3-D volume of the observed spacial component of the 'Euclidean flatness of the Minkowski spacetime metric.

The implications of those definitions for the physical universe and its cosmology are far reaching indeed.

As the expanding universe increases in its 3-dimensional volume, its 'spacial consciousness' is also increasing in the 'activation' of additional spacetime quanta.
Each of these spacetime quanta describes the inherent Zero-Point-Energy (ZPE) as defined in the 3D-volumar of the E_ps sourcesink superstring energy quantum then coupled to its characteristic 'starcoulombic' 'physical consciousness'.

The ZPE per unit volumar is ZPE_quantum=4πE_ps/λ_ps³=E_ps/2π²r_ps³=4π/e*λ_ps³ (Joules/m³)


Every ZPE quantum is coupled to a volume V*=e*/(df/dt) and so defines the quantisation of spacial volume in terms of the ZPE, as well as the 'physical consciousness' contained in that volume.
The V* here denotes the resonant quantum volumarized eigenstate in a minimised spacetime volumar and NOT in terms of spacial volume, but in the form of an ENTROPY COUNTER of 'statistical permutation selfstates' operation upon the 'Spacial Consciousness' quantum e*=1/E_ps=1/E_ss.f_ps²=f_ss/h.

The self-frequency of the mass quantum so can be expressed formally as f_ss=he* for the timeinstanton t_ss=f_ss, the latter triggering the 'inertialisation' of the postinflationary cosmology in the so called Quantum Big Bang, precisely 3.333..x10^-31 seconds* following the 'string epoch' of the matter wave inflation (detailed and referenced elsewhere on this site).


But it is the supermembrane coupling between the gravitational (photonic) mass M_g as given by the vibratory sourcesink string with the inertial mass M_i as given by the winding sinksource string, which is the primary causation for this Quantum Big Bang, following the string parametric de Broglie wave matter inflation.


Rewriting f_ss=he* then describes this coupling in the ACTION=EnergyTime of the Planck Constant in the finestructure f_ss=Energy*xTimeInstantonxe* for the Unity Condition of F-Space in 1=E*e* that is the original definition of e*=1/E* as the definition for the 'Physical Consciousness of Space'.



The Frequency Resonance Selfstates as Entropy Counters

Generally then, the permutative entropy counter df/dt|_max=f_ps² gives precisely 9x10⁶⁰ frequency eigenstates as the coupling constant between the two modes of the superstring; whilst its inverse defines the minimum as the 'Singularity' 'Null-State' or 'No Consciousness' state as 1/(9x10⁶⁰)~0.

The Awareness operator applicable for all universal space so can fluctuate between the quasi-zero state and the maximised resonance state in the factor of 81x10¹²⁰ and a value 'measured' by contemporary standard cosmological models as characteristic of the density discrepancy between the Planck-(ZPE)-Density {ρ_P=m_P/V_P=c⁵/πhG_o²}~9.4x10⁹⁴ (kg/m³) and the actual matter density measured in the universe {ρ_c=3H_o²/8πG_o~3.8x10^-27 (kg/m³) from the inner 10D observer frame and ρ_c=H_o²/4π²G_o~8.0x10^-28 (kg/m³) from the outer 11D observer frame of the Riemannian hypersphere as a 3D boundary of the 4-ball V₄=π²R⁴/2 for dV₄/dR=2π²R³ as a 3-dimensional surface descriptive for the overall topology of the standard cosmology).


The dimensionless ratios of ρ_P/ρ_c then indicate the ZPE/Critical energy discrepancies in the factors of the permutation string selfstates in the factors of 2.5x10¹²¹ and 1.2x10¹²² respectively.




Quantum Consciousness and Magnetocharges define Quantum Gravitation

The ZPE-quantum E_ps=E* so represents the kernel or core for any region of space containing a maximised 'physical consciousness' given by 1/E*=e* StarCoulombs (C*).

The quantitative volume V for this consciousness is minimised in V_ps*=e*/f_ps² in sourcesink resonance to the vibratory superstring modality and is in modular duality (as a monadic dyad or monadic duad) to its coupled sinksource resonance of its winding mode in its quantum-maximisation of V_ss*=e*f_ps².

The minimum calculates as V_ps*=e*/f_ps²=1/1.8x10⁵⁸ permutation states and translates to a 3D volume of measurement R with a Compton radius (R_c=h/2πmc=c/2πf_c=c/ω_c with angular velocity ω=2πf) as of R_cps=(e*f_ss²/2π²)^1/3~1.4x10^-20 meters for a Compton Energy of about 2.2 microjoules or 14.03 TeV (as the maximum design capacity of the Large Hadron Collider or LHC located at Geneva, Switzerland comprised of two individuated colliding proton beams).

The precise ratio between the ZPE-kernel and the 'Space Consciousness' surrounding this core becomes: Wormhole-Radius/Space-Consciousness-Radius and as:
r_ps/R_cps=(2π²/e*r_ss³f_ss²)^1/3=c(f_ss/4πe*)^1/3=(cf_ss/8πR_e)^1/3~1/887.11 (dimensionless); and because the string coupling defines c=λ_psf_ps=1/λ_ssf_ss), rendering the Minkowski lightspeed constant c as dimensionless in the lightpath X_ps=cT_ps=cf_ss.


This defines the quantum gravitational coupling of the gravitational mass element m_ss to the observed and measured elementary particle masses in QFT and Quantum-Chromo-Dynamics (QCD); the 'chromaticity' or 'colour charging' of gluonic gauge interaction transmitters being identifiable as the MagnetoCharges defined in StarCoulombs (C*)

The corresponding maximum then couples in macroquantisation to the microquantised quantum gravitational MagnetoCharges in V_ss*=e*f_ps²=4.5x10⁶³ permutation states for a characterizing 'Galactic Volumar' in R_css=(e*f_ps²/2π²)^1/3=(e*f_ss²/2π²)^1/3~6.1x10²⁰ meters or so 64,650 lightyears and a displacement scale, which is then 'haloed' by the the winded string parameter r_ss=1/r_ps=2πλ_ss~6.3x10²² meters or 6,648,875 lightyears and as the displacement scales observed by the standard cosmology.

Correspondingly, r_ss/R_css=(16π⁵λ_ss³/e*f_ps²)^1/3=(16π⁵/f_sse*c³)^1/3=(8π⁵/f_ssR_ec⁵)^1/3~102.85

As r_ps/r_ss=r_ps²=(cf_ss/2π)² and R_cps/R_css=(f_ss/f_ps)^2/3=(f_ss)^4/3=(4π²r_ps/r_ssc²)^2/3

(R_cps/R_css)³ = (4π²r_ps/r_ssc²)²=10^-88/c⁴=1/8.1x10¹²¹ as the awareness operator fluctuation range.

The 'Physical Consciousness' in the standard cosmology now crystallizes as being associated with biovital lifeforms, occupying space, and as evolving in the dynamics of (holographic) fractals of the encompassing 'consciousness envelope' aka the galactic cells of macroquantised entities.

This biovitality is defined in a 'kernel consciousness' inherent in space itself via the string-coupled modalities; mimicking the overall expansion of the thermodynamic (and stochastic) universe.
This process can be comprehensively described as the EVOLUTION of Core-Consciousness in its Spacial Occupancy.

The Definition of 'Life' must so fundamentally be based on the string coupling between the two modalities and as two modes of operation, which quantum relatively entangle the microquantum characterised by the 'wormhole core' as as function of the nuclear interaction scale (the classical electron radius R_e is also the scale of the magneto-asymptotic confinement of gluons in the definition of the magnetocharges and so becomes the limiting quantum geometric template for the nuclear gauge interactions and the 'Higgs Bosonic' blueprint at the 3 Fermi scale).

'Life' then becomes the cosmo-evolutionary consequence of a quantum geometry defining the spacial configurations of the supermembranes as superstring couplings.
This is why the most basic and primordial 'lifeforms' such as viruses, bacteria and fungi follow highly geometrized patterns in Platonic- and Archimedean solids, characterised by highly symmetrical arrangements of their molecular and atomic constituents.
The most elementary 'life form' is the crystalline arrangements of the self-replicating pattern. This originally manifested in so called quasicrystals of fivefolded symmetry, such as can be observed in Shechtmanites and the Penrose tiling. The underpinning cosmology of the decoupling and breaking of the so termed Planck-Symmetry transformed the Planck-String into 5 classes of superstring; this 'breaking of unification' following a pentagonal supersymmetry at the core of all 'natural laws'. Many details can be found on this website for perusal and utility.

For a 'lifeless' mass-only universe then the self frequency of mass in the f_ss sinksource superstring would define the awareness operator as minimised in V*|_min=e*/(f_ss²)=e*f_ps²

Corollarily, the 'fully life-conscious' universe (attained after an infinite linear time evolution of the descriptive cosmology) would be defined in V*|_max=e*f_ss².



Consciousness of Inertia in Universal Quantization of Mass

We can now relate the 'spacial consciousness' in terms of the universe's inertia content to the volume occupied by mass.

As there are (R_Hubble/r_ps)³~10¹⁴⁷ spacetime quanta in the asymptotic string universe of 10D and bounded by the membrane universe of 11D (as an extremal Strominger braned Black Hole say)
and the sinksource (winded string) E_ss=hf_ss=m_ssc²=2.222...x10^-64 J; we can define a 'Consciousness-Density per unit mass' Ρ_c for this 11D-'Mother-Black Hole' in Witten M-Space in dyadic coupling with a 12D-'Father-White Hole' in Vafa-F-Space (MBH and FWH).


The M-Space MBH defines the Hubble horizon in its' closure mass'
M_Hubble=R_Hubble.c²/2G_o=Σm_ss=Nm_ss~6.4706x10⁵² kg.

Ρ_c=e*(R_Hubble/r_ps)³/M_Hubble=2G_oe*R_Hubble²/r_ps³c²~7.81685x10⁹⁶ (~83.2 ρ_P) C*/kg.

This is about 83.2 times the Planck-Density ρ_P for M_Hubble and 2.34 times the Planck-Density applied to the baryonic mass seedling M_o=0.0281M_Hubble.

The 'Base Inertia Consciousness' (BIC) per minimal mass quantum m_ss then calculates as m_ssΡ_c=1.930x10¹⁶ C* and for a count of N=2.6206x10¹³³ m_ss as the inertia distribution of the BIC_Universe=5.058x10¹⁴⁹ C*.

A characteristic mass of 1 kg, say as the standard liter of water in 10^-3 cubicmeters of volume so possesses an inherent inertial consciousness of 7.82x10⁹⁶ C*. This is the ZPE of the quantum standard models redefined in units of consciousness and this total includes 'dark matter' and 'dark energy', the former as the effect of the DIM-Factor (see other references on this website) of 7.56 for the present linear time coordiante and the latter as the 'missing mass-energy' for the mass seedling M_o in 10D to 'close' the universe in the MBH of M_Hubble in 11D.

In terms of the volume of 1 liter however; the 'spacial consciousness' quantizes in the form of the VPE quantum E_ps=1/e* per unit volume and which is VPE_v=E_ps/2π²r_ps³~2.5133x10⁶⁴ J/m³.

The 'inertia consciousness' of 1 liter of water so relates the BIC of 7.82x10⁹⁶ C* to a VPE_v or ZPE of 2.51x10⁶¹ J/m³.



The example of a simple rock serves as a culmination of this essay.

A rock, occupying a volume V_rock carries an intrinsic Base-Consciousness due to its volume. This basic consciousness is given in the mass-frequency f_ss as the mass of the rock is quantized in a number count N of mass quanta m_ss.

This mass of the rock is actually a higher-dimensional mass-current as a form of 'natural superconductivity' {I_ps=2ef_ps superstring coupled to I_ss=2ef_ss}. The rock can so also be described as a summation of displacement current elements I_ss=2eλ_ps/c (as James Clark Maxwell propositioned - see 'The Origin of Mass' section on this website).

Mass in its purest form so is nothing but 'static magnetoelectricity' or densified electromagnetic monopolic sourcesink current. The nondensified form of mass is of course photonic and should this photonic mass NOT be a derivative from the acceleration of electric (Coulomb) charges 'e' coupled to preexisting mass (say fusion protons in stars), BUT be a derivative from the acceleration of magnetocharges 'e*', then the resulting ElectroMagnetic Radiation is monadic or Monopolic and defines the so called 'SPIRIT' of metaphysical cosmologies and philosophies.

The rock of volume V_rock and as some summation ΣI_ss or Σm_ss so describes an energetic selfstate of the superstring coupling between the string dyadics of the microquantum E_ps and the macroquantum E_ss.

The interaction of the rock with its environment then, in elementary terms, becomes a dynamic of spacial interaction in the movements of the rock.
All Spacequanta are associated or quantum entangled with each other via the string coupling and as all spacetime volumars are defined by their ZPE-core and its 'haloed' or 'auric' envelope of the physical consciousness coupled to the volumars by the self-awareness operator df/dt; the entire cosmology is rendered a unified kaleidoscope of holofractal self-interaction of the thus defined 'Cosmic Consciousness'.

A basic quantum consciousness then is multiplied and complexified in the interaction, self- and mutual, between spacetime volumars of varying sizes in the encompassing summation integrals of the initial- and boundary parameters of the cosmogenesis (described elsewhere on this website).

The phenomenon of 'life' then is characterised by the Awareness-Operator the Alpha-Omega aw=αω=df/dt, namely the 'Change in Frequency' over linearised Time t and where the sourcesink frequency for minimum impedence for the 'natural current flow' (I_ps) forms the upper bound source-resonance of the vibratory string modality and the maximum impedence describes the 'natural current flow' (I_ss) as the lower bound for the sink-resonance.

The 'lifeless' universe of the primordial Quantum Big Bang is in Sink-Resonance to the E_ss sinksource as a macroquantum, manifesting the supergalactic inertia in Black Holes as seedlings for mass agglomerations known as galaxies. Coupled to those 'higher-D' Black Holes are however imaged 'higher-D' White Holes (Quasars) who as Source-Resonators manifest the Source-Resonance of the E_ps sourcesink as the microquantum of the superbraned cosmology from its cosmogony.

The purpose and reason for the universe of materiality so is found in the Coevolution of SourceSink Self-Consciousness as unified encompassment for the cosmoevolution with its individuated and dispersed holographic shards or holograms of this selfsame self-consciousness in evolvement.



The operator for this evolvement is spacial selfawareness and the ability to use a biomind defined by the function of 'changing' or modulating the frequency received by an antenna, which can take the form of a biochemical and molecular arrangement of cellular units termed a 'brain'.

The biological evolution of brains, then accomodates the utility of the natural superconductive electricity embodied in space itself; the biochemical electricity (of say electromagnetic brain waves) representing a shadow function of the chargeflow I=dQ/dt as a 'normal currentflow' to the electromagneto monopolic supercurrents of the magnetocharges aka the physical spacial consciousness.


Bluey TonyLove de WHYNOT


Post last edited Oct 18th 2012

 

PM MUHAMMAD TURNBULL said in reply to NannyG...
When things have so badly deteriorated in the so called democratic voting process, where it becomes a choice of choosing the lesser of the two evils for prime minister, then you may as well not vote and stay home and leave it all to GOD,,,HIS wrath is imminent.
Contrary to what Malcolm Turnbull & Bill Shorten say, GOD absolutely hates homosexual marriage and abortion for birth control and evidently, their beloved islam 100% fits Jesus's description of Antichrist...Repent all, while you still can.

Reply Monday, 04 July 2016 at 11:25 AM


Mycroft said in reply to PM MUHAMMAD TURNBULL...
"HIS wrath is imminent."
Where have I heard that before?
We have been waiting a long time, could it be that it was all a beat up? I think it might have been.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLWCGKGIDBw



Reply Monday, 04 July 2016 at 05:03 PM


Sirebard said in reply to Mycroft...

Actually it is the anthropomorphic (creature limited form) idea of 'God' that is addressed in your video clip.
Applying the model building of rational science, say in a ontology of cosmology, which can be called a cosmogony; it can be shown, that the concept of a creator can be merged with the cosmology of a creation event, say a Quantum Big Bang, which allowed space and time as 'physical energy' to emerge from a prior 'metaphysical energy' independent from parameters defining the notions of space and time.
The details engage the pioneering precipes of 'holographic multidimensional universal membrane theory' and many avenues of mainstream physics, albeit converging to the concept of 'physical consciousness' defined as the 'metaphysical progenitor' of the energy transformations measured by contemporary science.
It is this 'physical consciousness' mathematically defined in the size of an electron and the nuclear interactions, acted upon by a form of radius-independent angular acceleration, which defines the nature of what spacetime is in a form of the original emergence of the creation event.
Then the concept of 'God' becomes a question of how to define the phenomenon of 'physical consciousness' and related to the Descartian Body-Mind divide and the wave-particle duality inherent in quantum mechanics.
Once rational science has appropriately defined and published its own ontological reformation, based on sound self-consistent principles; then the old ideas of religion can be reassessed and the 'spirit' of the old labels can be renamed as say the 'ElectroMagnetic Monopolar SourceEnergy of the Quantum Big bang Weylian wormhole, which created the physicalized Universe from its metaphysical (or mathematical) precursor.
http://www.cosmosdawn.net/forum/index.php?forums/the-universal-intelligence.13/
http://www.cosmosdawn.net/forum/index.php?forums/thuban-cosmology-in-quantum-relativity.9/

Reply Monday, 04 July 2016 at 06:07



Mycroft said in reply to Sirebard...
Indeed well said, hey I think I have seen you here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2nI_3VBEtA

Reply Monday, 04 July 2016 at 06:22 PM


Sirebard said in reply to Mycroft...
Lol, unfortunately I am not as technically sophisticated, as the mechanics professors.
My reply to you was more about the MATHIMATIA, being, like the Rosetta Stone of archaeology, a decoding pattern anagram for Exodus.3.14, claiming to reveal the 'Name of God' to the people.
The tetragrammaton of asymmetric IAMTHATIAM! (statement) and the pentagrammaton of the symmetric IAMTHATAMI? as a question.

 

Hypermass, Quantum Gravity and the Spacetime Curvature of Physical Consciousness​

Abstract:

Pioneer anomaly

xxx​

yyy

​

For relativistic momentum p = mvb for b = 1/√(1-[v/c]²) and the electromagnetic energy quantum hf=mc² and the wave matter relation of de Broglie: m_dB = h/l_dB.v and m_dB = h/l_dB.c for the limiting Compton Wavelength/Radius in the utility of relative velocities

d/dt{mvb} = md/{vb}/dv.dv/dt +vdm/dt = mb³.dv/dt + hv/c² df/dt

a_g + a_g = a_gb + hv/mc² .df/dt = Gravitational Classical Curvature Acceleration + Gravitational Quantum Curvature Acceleration

a_g + a_g = GM/R² + l_dB.v²/c².df/dt where GM, the Standard Gravitational Parameter, is expressed in (VolumexAngular Acceleration as V_aw) m³/s² units

a_g + a_g = GM/c²t² + l_dB.v²/c².df/dt and where GM is finestructured in general mass quantization in GM = NG_oMH_yper = N.N_AVInstG_om_ps/2c² = N.N_AVInstG_oE_ps/2c² = N.N_AVInstG_o/2e*c² =re

a_g + a_g = GM/c².df/dt + l_dB.v²/c².df/dt and with GM = N.N_AVInstG_o/2e*c² = for a N count N = 2GMc².e*/G_oN_AvInst = 2Mc².e*/N_AvInst for a measured G_m(n) = G_o for the Instanton-Quantum Big Bang




Gravitational Classical Curvature:

The Gravitational Classical Curvature superposes the Schwarzschild solution onto the gravitational field under consideration and calculates the 'awareness' or quantum angular acceleration as a function of the gravitational acceleration to then associate a 'dark matter' volume as a function of the boundary-initial restmass photonic (say as a massless axion) rmp or R_rmp.
Total Awareness for the self relative stationary gravitating object with v=0 so becomes: {df/dt} = {a_g+a_g}c²/{G_mM_Object + l_dB.v²} = 2a_g/R_curv

In the case of a planet say, the Earth, the gravitational acceleration g = G_mM_Earth/R_Earth² = 9.807 m/s² = G_mM_Earth/Lightpath X² = G_mM_Earth/c².t² = ½R_curvEarth{df/dt} for a transformation of the gravitational field into a Black Holed Curvature space time R_curvEarth = 2G_mM_Earth/c²= 0.0089 m at its surface and which crystallizes the awareness df/dt as a function of the HyperMass m_ps by E^o_ps = ½m_psc²

aw_Earth = {df/dt}_Earth = 2g/R_curvEarth = {19.614 ms^-2/0.0089 m} = 2202.6 1/s²
for V_rmp = 2p²R_rmp³ = e*/aw_Earth = 0.227 m³ for a restmass photonic radius R_rmp=0.2257 m as the 'dark matter' particle volumar for the gravitational field of the Earth.





For the Moon a_g = G_mM_Moon/R_Moon² = 1.624 m/s² = G_mM_Moon/Lightpath X² = G_m(7.342x10²² kg)/(1.737x10⁶ m)² = ½R_curvMoon{df/dt} for R_curvMoon] = 2G_mM_Moon/c²= 1.089x10^-4 m
aw_Earth = {df/dt}_Earth = 2a_g/R_curvEarth = {3.248 ms^-2/0.000109 m} = 29,827.4 1/s²
for V_rmp = 2p²R_rmp³ = e*/aw_Earth = 0.0168 m³ for a restmass photonic radius R_rmp=0.0947 m as the 'dark matter' particular volumar for the gravitational field of the Moon.


For the International Space Station a_g = G_mM_ISS/R_ISS² = G_mM(4.2x10⁵ kg)/()² = G_mM_ISS/c².t² = ½R_curvISS{df/dt} as a self relative gravitating object
aw_ISS = {df/dt}_ISS = 2g/R_curvEarth = {19.6 ms^-2/0.0089 m} = 2202.6 1/s²
for V_rmp = 2p²R_rmp³ = e*/aw_Earth = 0.227 m³ for a restmass photonic radius R_rmp=0.2257 m as the 'dark matter' particle volumar for the gravitational field of the Earth.


For the Universe a_g = G_oM_∞/R_Hubble² = G_oM_∞.H_o²/c² = G_o(6.47x10⁵² kg)/(1.597x10²⁶ m)² = ½R_curv∞{df/dt} = ½R_curv∞.H_o² = 2.81642x10^-10 m/s² for H_o = c/R_Hubble = 1.87775x10^-18 1/s²
aw_Universe = {df/dt}_Universe = 2a_g/R_curv∞ = (5.633x10^-10 ms^-2)/(1.597x10²⁶ m) = H_o² = 3.52596..x10^-36 1/s² 19.6 ms^-2/0.0089 m} = 2202.6 1/s²
for V_rmp = 2p²R_rmp³ = e*/aw_Universe = e*/H_o² = e*.R_Hubble²/c² = 1.41805..x10³⁸ m³ for a restmass photonic radius R_rmp=1.92954..x10¹² m as the 'dark matter' particle volumar for the gravitational field of the Universe and taking a characteristic scale of 12.86 AU and the size of a star system akin the local solar system.

This relates the gravitational acceleration due to the Anti deSitter closure mass to an intrinsic 'Dark Energy' parametric deceleration for cyle time n=H_ot and H_o=dn/dt
in d²(R[n])/dt² = -2cH_o/(n+1)³ , which sets an universally intrinsic deceleration a^o_Milgrom = 1.1266528x10^-9 m/s² for the instanton when n=n_ps=l_ps/R_Hubble = 6.259182188x10^-49.
The present Milgrom deceleration for the universe calculates as a_Milgrom = a^o_Milgrom/(2.12416)³ = a_Milgrom/9.6965.. = 1.1619..x10^-10 m/s².





Gravitational Quantum Curvature:

The Gravitational Quantum Curvature superposes the de Broglie wave matter wavelength with the mass experiencing a gravitational field and calculates the rmp-volumar as a function of alpha-g for a constant maximized initial-boundary condition of the 'awareness' as the 9x10⁶⁰ frequency permutational Eigen states f_ps, that is the square of the wormhole frequency of the Quantum Big Bang.

For a dynamic classical gravitational centripetal acceleration a_g=v²/R=w²R=4p².R/T² = 5.95x10^-3 m/s²

l_dB = h/mv = 3.72x10^-63 m for the Earth of mass m=6x10²⁴ kg moving at v = 2p(1AU)/365.2325.24.3600 = 29,865.9 m/s for 1 AU = 1.5x10¹¹ m

a_g = l_dB.v²/c².df/dt|_max = (3.72x10^-63 m)(9.91x10^-9)(9x10⁶⁰ permutation frequency states) = 3.32x10^-10 m/s² as gravitational quantum acceleration of the Earth relative to the Sun


For a dynamic classical gravitational centripetal acceleration a_g=v²/R=w²R=4p².R/T² = 1.76x10^-10 m/s²

l_dB = h/mv = 1.60x10^-69 m for the Sun of mass m=2x10³⁰ kg moving at v = 2p(2.46x10²⁰ m)/(236x10⁶x365.2425x24x3600 s) = 208,000 m/s for an orbital period of 236 million years of the solar system around the galactic centre of the Milky Way 26,000 light years distant from the Sun.

a_g = l_dB.v²/c².df/dt|_max = (1.60x10^-69 m)(4.81x10^-7)(9x10⁶⁰ permutation frequency states) = 6.92x10^-15 m/s² as gravitational quantum acceleration of the solar system relative to the Milky Way galactic center.

Note:
For a_g = a_g with N=1, M=M_Hyper = ½N_AvInstm_wormhole and G_oM_Hyper = l_dB.v² = l_ps.c² = l_ps². cf_ps = l_ps².(9x10³⁸ m/s²) in the velocity limit for invariant lightspeed 'c'.

GM is therefore proportional to l_ps. c² = 2pl_ps.c² = {360R_ec²/10¹⁰} = {180/10¹⁰}e* as quanta count for the wormhole wavelength and the radian definition 1 circular degree per 180/p radian
l_ps². cf_ps = l_ps.c² = 10^-22. 9x10¹⁶ = 9x10^-6 m³/s² then defines the 'Physical Consciousness' Unification window for water based organisms/objects at an l_infrared =9 micron level as a characteristic wavelength scale for Thermal 'Imaging' Radiation and also found in the atmosphere, where electromagnetic radiation is absorbed by water droplets.

The Big Bang wormhole radius of the Instanton so sets the initial boundary condition for the multidimensional cosmology in n=1 for R_curv(1) = r_min = 2G_o/c².M_Hyper =2G_o/c².{hc³.e*/4pG_o} = hc.e*/2p = l_min/2p for the foundation physical consciousness quantum e* = 1/E_wormhole =1/E_ps = 1/E_BigBang

e* = l_min/hc = 2R_electronc² = 1/E_BigBang = 1/hf_wormhole for n=1 Big Bang Initial condition and for the generalization for the Consciousness Quantum

e* = Volume R_curv³{Quantum Angular Acceleration df/dt}

Considering the magneto charge e* as a fundamental constant as a function of the quantization of mass with the parameters of the Quantum Big Bang Instanton defines a mass-intrinsic 'Base-Inertial-Consciousness' or BIC for the constant boundary condition of the modular string duality f_ps.f_ss=1 and the maximum-minimum values for the vibratory count of |f_ss²|=1/9x10⁶⁰ and |f_ps²|=9x10⁶⁰ ~ 0 eigenstates respectively.

The Awareness quantum alphaomega = aw=df/dt as the time differential for frequency in its dynamic state is defined in the formulations relating the acceleration of mass M, say in Newton's F=ma.

Physical Consciousness then becomes the summation or integration of all such mass accelerations occurring in some space encompassed by the BIC as a mass quantum summation relating the 'Consciousness Volumar' 2p²R_{restmassphoton} = V_rmp=e*/|f_ps²|



We can now relate the 'spacial consciousness' in terms of the universe's inertia content to the volume occupied by mass.

As there are (R_Hubble/r_ps)³~10¹⁴⁷ spacetime quanta in the asymptotic string universe of 10D and bounded by the membrane universe of 11D (as an extremal Strominger braned Black Hole say)
and the sinksource (winded string) E_ss=hf_ss=m_ssc²=2.222...x10^-64 J; we can define a 'Consciousness-Density per unit mass' Ρ_c for this 11D-'Mother-Black Hole' in Witten M-Space in dyadic coupling with a 12D-'Father-White Hole' in Vafa-F-Space (MBH and FWH).

The M-Space MBH defines the Hubble horizon in its' closure mass'
M_Hubble=R_Hubble.c²/2G_o=Σm_ss=Nm_ss~6.4706x10⁵² kg.


Ρ_c=e*(R_Hubble/r_ps)³/M_Hubble=2G_oe*R_Hubble²/r_ps³c²~1.562x10⁹⁴ e*~7.81685x10⁹⁶ C*/kg and about ⅙ of the reciprocated Inflaton Planck Density ρ_Planck= m_Planck/V_Planck = √{4p²c¹⁰/h²G_o⁴}/2p² = c⁵/phG_o²= 9.40x10⁹⁴ kg/m³ for 9x10⁶⁰ permutation vibratory string eigenstates by |f_ps²|_mod.V_rmp = e* for V_rmp = 2p²R_rmp³ = 2R_ec²/9x10⁶⁰ = 5.555..x10^-59 m³.

The ZPE-quantum E_ps=E* so represents the kernel or core for any region of space containing a maximised 'physical consciousness' given by 1/E*=e* StarCoulombs (C*).

The quantitative volume V for this consciousness is minimised in V_ps*=e*/f_ps² in sourcesink resonance to the vibratory superstring modality and is in modular duality (as a monadic dyad or monadic duad) to its coupled sinksource resonance of its winding mode in its quantum-maximisation of V_ss*=e*f_ps².

The minimum calculates as V_ps*=e*/f_ps²=1/1.8x10⁵⁸ permutation states and translates to a 3D volume of measurement R with a Compton radius (R_c=h/2πmc=c/2πf_c=c/ω_c
with angular velocity ω=2πf) as of R_cps=(e*f_ss²/2π²)^1/3~1.4x10^-20 meters for a Compton Energy of about 2.2 microjoules or 14.03 TeV (as the maximum design capacity of the Large Hadron Collider or LHC located at Geneva, Switzerland comprised of two individuated colliding proton beams).

The precise ratio between the ZPE-kernel and the 'Space Consciousness' surrounding this core becomes:
Wormhole-Radius/Space-Consciousness-Radius and as:
r_ps/R_cps=(2π²/e*r_ss³f_ss²)^1/3=c(f_ss/4πe*)^1/3=(cf_ss/8πR_e)^1/3~1/887.11 (dimensionless); and because the string coupling defines c=λ_psf_ps=1/λ_ssf_ss), rendering the Minkowski lightspeed constant c as dimensionless in the lightpath X_ps=cT_ps=cf_ss.

This defines the quantum gravitational coupling of the gravitational mass element m_ss to the observed and measured elementary particle masses in QFT and Quantum-Chromo-Dynamics (QCD); the 'chromaticity' or 'colour charging' of gluonic gauge interaction transmitters being identifiable as the MagnetoCharges defined in StarCoulombs (C*)

The closed 11D universe so contains V_Hubble/V_rmp = (R_Hubble/R_rmp)³ = (1.597x10²⁶/1.412x10^-20)³ = 1.447x10¹³⁸ 'Dark Matter' RMP 'physical consciousness' quanta.
As the volume ratio between the open and closed universe is V₁₁/V₁₀ = 1/{n/[n+1]}³ = [n+1]³/n³= 1/0.1498 for a present n_present =1.132419..m 85.02 % of the total rmp-count remains 'invisible' as gravitational 'dark matter' in 0.8502{1.447x10¹³⁸ } = 1.230x10¹³⁸ 'physical consciousness' quanta.


The Big Bang Baryon mass seedling M_o has 'grown' as a function of the G(n)M(n) = G_oM_Hyper = constant for the Standard Gravitational Parameter and for the present time for the electromagnetic de Sitter universe of 19.11 = 16.9±2.2 Billion years, the baryon mass seedling M_oY^n_present = 1.72M_o the original 'deceleration parameter' Wo = ½M_o/M_Hubble =½(0.0281) and has grown from 2.81% to 4.83% and so as 0.0483{1.447x10¹³⁸ } = 6.99x10¹³⁶ 'Baryonic Matter' quanta as proportion of the total rmp-count with 95.17% or 0.9517{1.447x10¹³⁸ } = 1.38x10¹³⁸ 'Dark Energy' .

​

​

The 'Consciousness density per unit mass' ln C*/kg is is about 83.33 times the Planck-Density ρ_P in kg/m³ for M_Hubble and 2.34 times the Planck-Density applied to the baryonic mass seedling M_o=0.0281M_Hubble in the same units of inverse energy as star coulombs as volume times awareness.

The 'Base Inertia Consciousness' (BIC) per minimal mass quantum m_ss then calculates as m_ssΡ_c=1.930x10¹⁶ C* and for a count of N=2.6206x10¹³³ m_ss as the inertia distribution of the BIC_Universe=5.058x10¹⁴⁹ C*. The BIC then describes the constant maximized statistical frequency selfstate count of 9x10⁶⁰ permutations.

​

The labels of 'mind' and 'self-awareness' and of 'consciousness' have for long awaited rigorous definition in the nomenclature of science. Whilst most researchers and philosophers accept the existence of those labels; what those namings represent in a physically measurable sense of physical parameters have remained largely unexplored.
These notions have remained as one of the major mysteries of science and have become subject to a number of speculations; from a purely materialistic interpretation of the 'mind' being a biochemical response to environmental stimuli, to the 'mind' being part of a 'spiritual soul' and subsequently constituting a transcendent aspect of biophysical life.

A related mystery is that of 'life' itself. How did the universe evolve 'life' from a generally accepted premise of a prior or older cosmology, which disallowed biological life as is observed today? The thermodynamically expanding universe follows well tested physical parameters engaging the quantum nature of physical existence in the form of nucleo synthesizing interactions such as nuclear fusion of atomic elements and an associated natural radioactivity inherent in nature and its laws of conservation of energy and momentum.
Those same processes occurred in the primordial universe and due to the smaller volume then occupied by the expanding universe; the descriptive cosmology describes a much hotter universe (as a Black Body Planckian Radiator) and a universe in which say the lifeforms observed on planet earth could not exist in their biochemical and molecular constitutions.

Recent advances in the demetricated forms of supermembrane theory (M-Theory for 11-dimensional supermembranes propagating 10-dimensional superstrings in a 12-dimensional selfdual mirror-spacetime of supervolumars (Vafa-F-Space encompassing Witten-M-Space) have allowed a rigorous definition for the above labels in the parameters of the physics of the superbranes.

The quote of John Archibald Wheeler can be extended in a question.​

​

1. The Birth of Space and Time with Spacetime Inflation Curvature preceding Big Banged Wormhole Matter

The problem of the singularity regarding the creation event, known as the Quantum Big Bang in General Relativity is well addressed in the literature of science and an appropriate solution to the infinite continuous regression of spacetime parameters is resolved in a disengagement and an unnecessity of and for a prior existing spacetime background for matter to act within.
It is the nature of the string itself, which in particular initial- and boundary conditions allows the concepts of space and time to emerge from the qualitative and quantitative nature of the string definition itself.

In particular a discretization of dynamical parameters of an describing cosmology in defined Planckian parameters serves to replace the infinite mathematical pointlike singularity to a so called Plancking string vibration formulated as the Planck length l_Planck and which can be considered to be a mimimum displacement as a wormhole radius.
Any displacement scale below the Planck length then is rendered unphysical and so becomes mathematically inapplicable to describe the dynamics in a physical universe, described by a cosmology, which defines a string epoch characterized by a cosmological inflationary Inflaton from a defined Planck-Length-Quantum-Oscillation/Fluctuation to a so labeled Quantum Big Bang Instanton.

The Big Bang Instanton becomes defined in a final manifestation of the Planckian Supermembrane (Class I at Planck Time) from the Inflaton to the Instanton (Class HE 8x8 at Weyl-Wormhole Time) and transforming the string energies across string classes from I to IIB, HO 32 and IIA to HE 8x8.

The Inflaton defined a 11-dimensional supermembraned de Sitter closed - and positively curved cosmology with a defined Hubble Event horizon for a positive spheroidal curvature information bound.
This closed universe contained no matter seed, but was defined in its curvature through a unification condition relating the electromagnetic finestructure alpha {a=2pke²/hc} to the gravitational finestructure omega {w=2pG_om_Planck²/hc} via ke² = e²/4pe_o = G_oM_unification² for e² = {G_o/k}M_unification²
requiring dimensional mensuration identity in inflaton space [C²/Jm]=[Farad/meter] = [Jm/kg²] for [C] = [C*] = [StarCharge Coulomb] = [m³/s²] = [VolumexAngular Acceleration] and for the Maxwell Constant 1/c² = m_o.e_o = {120p/c}{1/120pc} and 'Free Space' Inflaton Impedance Z_o= electric field strength E/magnetic field strength H = √(m_o/e_o) = cm_o = 1/ce_o = 120p}.

Therefore,
[G_o]_mod =[4pe_o]_mod = [1/k]_mod and the inflaton dimensionless string modular unity is G_ok=1 for e² = G_o².M_unification² = M_unification²/k² and M_unification = 30[ec] that is 30 modulated magnetic monopole masses. It is this 30[ec]modular inflaton mass, which represents the initial breaking of the inherent supersymmetry of the Planck superstring class I at the Planck energy level to the monopole superstring energy of superstring class IIB with the Planck mass being replaced by 30 monopole masses as the integration of 30 [ec] monopole masses at the [ec³]_mod = 2.7x10¹⁶ GeV energy level of the Grand Unification Energy separating the quantum gravity from the GUT symbolized as SEW.G.

Setting w=1 defines the Planck-Mass and setting a proto-nucleon seed m_c=m_Planck.a⁹ allows the breaking of the inflaton supersymmetry in the superstring classes.
Replacing the protonucleon mass m_c = √{hc/2pG_o}.{60pe²/h}⁹ = 9.924724523x 10^-28 kg by the effective electron mass m_e = ke²/2G_o(1.125x10¹²) =9.290527148x10^-31 kg sets the Electromagnetic Interaction/Gravitational Interaction ratio EMI/GI = e²/G_o²m_e² = {e/G_om_e}² = 2.421821677x10⁴² using string units.

{Details below and in 15. The Pentagonal Supersymmetry for the Membrane Cosmology and 16. Unification.}

The Instanton following the Inflaton then defines a 10-dimensional superstringed Anti de Sitter open - and negatively hyperbolically curved cosmology, bounded in the 11-dimensional asymptotic Hubble Event Horizon.

​

2. Modular String Duality and the Wormhole Curvature Boundary


The concept of modular (Mirror/T) duality in supermembrane theory relates a maximum or large spacial displacement radius R as a low frequency and low energy named as a 'winding mode' to its inverse minimum or small spacial displacement radius 1/R as a high frequency and high energy as a 'vibratory mode'.
The utility of either 'string mode' would then result in an identical physical description either using a 'macroquantum' radius R or a 'microquantum' radius 1/R.

c = l_min.f_max = 2pR_min.f_max as lightspeed invariance for the vibratory string mode R_curvature = R_min = l_min /2p = Wormhole Perimeter/2p

1/c = 1/(l_min.f_max) = l_max.f_min = l_max/f_max = R_max.f_min/2p as lightspeed invariance for the winding string mode R_curvature = R_max = 2p.l_max = 2p/Wormhole Perimeter

For the Harmonic Planck Energy Oscillator Energy E^o = ½hf_o = ½m_oc² = ½kT_Planck


Planck Mass = m_Planck = √{hc/2pG_o}
Planck Energy = E_Planck = m_Planck.c² = √{hc⁵/2pG_o} = hf_Planck = hc/l_Planck = kT_Planck
Planck Length = l_Planck = l_Planck/2p = √{hG_o/2pc³}
Planck Temperature = T_Planck = E_Planck/k = √{hc⁵/2pk²G_o}
Planck Density = ρ_Planck= m_Planck/V_Planck = √{4p²c¹⁰/h²G_o⁴}/2p² = c⁵/phG_o²= 9.40x10⁹⁴ kg/m³ for 9x10⁶⁰ permutation vibratory string eigenstates by |f_ps²|_mod.

Energy Density Inflaton/Energy Density Instanton = E_Planck.V_BigBang/E_BigBangV_Planck with minimum Inflaton Planck Oscillator: E^o_Planck = ½m_Planckc²
= m_Planck.r_wormhole³/m_wormhole.l_Planck³ = √{(hc/2pG_o)(2pc³/hG_o)}(2pc³/hG_o)(r_wormhole³/m_wormhole} = (c²/G_o)(2pc³/hG_o){r_wormhole³/m_wormhole}
= (2pc⁵/hG_o²){r_wormhole³/m_wormhole} = {4p²k²/h²G_o} (hc⁵/2pG_ok²){r_wormhole³/m_wormhole} = {kT_Planck}²(2pr_wormhole)²{1/h²G_o}{r_wormhole/m_wormhole}
= {E_Planck}².{c/hf_wormhole}².{1/G_o}}{r_wormhole/m_wormhole} = {E_Planck/E_BigBang}².{r_wormhole}{c²/G_om_wormhole} for the minimum Instanton Planck Oscillator: E^o_Planck = ½m_wormholec²

V_BigBang/V_Planck = {E_Planck/E_BigBang}.{r_wormhole}{c²/G_om_wormhole} for EV_BigBang/EV_Planck = EV_Instanton/EV_Inflaton = r_wormhole/R^o_wormhole = N_{Avagadro-Instanton} and counting the amount of wormhole string transformed from the Inflaton as the Instanton of the Quantum Big Bang and as the constant 5.801197676..x10²³ in string units.





3. The Coupling of the Energy Laws by the Self-Frequency of the Quantum for Mass


It has been discovered, that the universe contains an intrinsic coupling-parameter between its inertial masscontent and its noninertial energy content.
The matter in the universe is described by the physical parameter termed Mass (M), say as proportional to Energy (E) in Einstein's famous equation Mass M=E/c².
This mass M then reappears in Newtonian mechanics as the change in momentum (p) defining the Inertial Mass (M_i) as being proportional to some applied Force (F) or the 'work done' for a particular displacement {F=dp/dt for p=mv and v a kinetematic velocity as the ratio of displacement over time generalised in the lightpath X=cT}.

It is also well understood, that the inertial mass M_i has a gravitational counterpart described not by the change in momentum of inertia carrying matter agglomerations; but by the geometric curvature of space containing matter conglomerations. This Gravitational Mass M_g is measured to be equivalent to the Inertial Mass M_i and is formulated in the 'Principle of Equivalence' in Einstein's Theory of General Relativity.
F-Theory then has shown, that this Inertial Mass M_i is coupled inherently to a 'mass-eigen' frequency via the following formulation:

(1) Energy E=hf=mc² (The Combined Planck-Einstein Law)
(2) E=hf iff m=0 (The Planckian Quantum Law E=hf for lightspeed invariance c=λf)
(3) E=mc² iff f=f_o=f_ss (The Einstein Law E=mc² for the lightspeed upper limit)

(1) Whenever there is mass (M=M_i=M_g) occupying space; this mass can be assigned either as a photonic mass {by the Energy-Momentum relation of Special Relativity: E²=E_o²+(pc)²} by the photonic momentum p=h/λ=hf/c} OR a 'restmass' m_o=m/√[1-(v/c)²] for 'restenergy' E_o=m_oc².

The 'total' energy for the occupied space so contains a 'variable' mass in the 'combined' law; but allows particularisation for electromagnetic radiation (always moving at the Maxwell lightspeed constant c in Planck's Law and for the 'Newtonian' mass M in the Einstein Law.

(2) If M=0, then the Einstein Law is suppressed in favour of the Planck Law and the space contained energy E is photonic, i.e. electromagnetic, always dynamically described by the constancy of lightspeed c.

(3) If M>0, then there exists a mass-eigen frequency f_ss=f_o=E_ss/h=m_ssc²/h, which QUANTIZES all mass agglomerations m=Σm_ss in the massquantum m_ss=E_ss/c².



4. The Wave Matter of de Broglie: l_deBroglie = h/p

​

The Wavematter of de Broglie from the Energy-Momentum Relation is applied in a (a) nonrelativistic, a (b) relativistic and a (c) superluminal form
in the matter wavelength: l_deBroglie = h/p = hc/pc for (pc) = √{E² - E_o²}= m_oc².√{[v/c]²/(1-[v/c]²)}

(a) Example:
A pellet of 10g moves at 10 m/s for a de Broglie wavelength v_dB = h/mv = h/0.1 = 6.7x10^-33 m
This matter wavelength requires diffraction interference pattern of the order of l_dB to be observable and subject to measurement


(b) Example:
An electron, moving at 80% of light speed 'c' requires relativistic development

E_o = m_oc² with E = mc² = m_oc²/√{1-[v/c]²}, a 66.66% increase in the electron's energy describing the Kinetic Energy E - E_o = {m - m_o}c² for a relativistic momentum p = m_oc.√{[0.8]²/(1-[0.8]²)} = (1.333..) m_oc = h/l_deBroglie and for a relativistic de Broglie wavelength, 60% smaller, than for the nonrelativistic electron in l_deBroglie = h/1.333..m_oc < h/0.8m_oc = l_deBroglie (1.83x10^-12 m relativistic and 3.05x10^-12 m nonrelativistic for an electron 'restmass' of 9.11x10^-31 kg and measurable in diffraction interference patterns with apertures comparable to this wavematter scale)


(c) The de Broglie matter wavespeed in its 'group integrated' form derives from the postulates of Special Relativity and is defined in the invariance of light speed 'c' as a classical upper boundary for the acceleration of any mass M.
In its 'phase-individuated' form, the de Broglie matter wave is 'hyperaccelerated' or tachyonic, the de Broglie wave speed being lower bounded by light speed 'c'

v_phase = wavelength.frequency = (h/mv_group)(mc²/h) = c²/v_group > c for all v_group < c

m = Energy/c² = hf/c² = hc/l_deBrogliec² = h/l_deBrogliec = m_deBroglie = [Action as Charge²]_mod/c(Planck-Length Oscillation)
= [2pe²]_mod/cl_dPlanck√alpha = [e²c²/ce]_mod = [ec]_modular

as monopole mass of GUT-string IIB and as string displacement current mass equivalent for the classical electron displacement 2R_e = e*/c² = [ec]_modular as Wormhole minimum spacetime configuration for the Big Bang Instanton of Big Bang wormhole energy quantum E_ps=hf_ps=m_psc²=kT_ps
as a function of e*=1/E_ps of Heterotic superstring class HE 8x8
and relating the Classical Electron Diameter {2R_e} as Monopole Mass [ec]_mod in Curvature Radius r_ps=l_ps/2p = G_om_ps/c²

The factor 2G_o/c² multiplied by the factor 4p becomes Einstein's Constant k = 8pG_o/c² = 3.102776531x10^-26 m/kg describing how spacetime curvature relates to the mass embedded in that spacetime in the theory of General Relativity.

The selfduality of the superstring IIB aka the Magnetic Monopole selfstate in GUT Unification 2R_e/30[ec]_mod = 2R_ec²/30[ec³]_mod = e*/30[ec³]_mod ∝ k for a proportionality constant
{k*}=2R_e/30k[ec]_mod = 2R_e.c²/8pe = e*/8pe =1.2384..x10²⁰ kg/m in string units for StarCharge in Star Colomb C*/ElectroCharge in Coulomb C unified.

The monopolar Grand Unification (SEWG gravitational decoupling SEW.G) has a Planck string energy reduced at the IIB string level of
e*=[ec³]_modular for m_psc²c/[ec]_modular = [c³]_modular = 2.7x10²⁵ electron volt or 4.3362x10⁶ J for a monopole mass [ec]_modular = m_monopole = 4.818x10^-11 kg .

Mass M = n.m_ss = Sm_ss = n.{h/2pr_deBrogliec} .[E_ss.e*]_mod = n.m_ps.[E_ss.{9x10⁶⁰}.2p²R_rmp³]_mod = n.m_ps.[E_ss.{2R_e.c²}]_mod = n.[E_ps.E_ss]_mod.[2R_e]_mod
for l_deBroglie=l_ps=h/m_psc and [E_ps.e*]_mod =1

{2R_ec²} = 4G_oM_Hyper for the classical electron radius R_e=ke²/m_ec² and describes its HyperMass M_{Hyper-electron} = R_ec²/2G_o = ke²/2G_om_e = 1.125x10¹² kg for an effective electron mass of m_e = ke²/2G_o(1.125x10¹²) =9.290527148x10^-31 kg in string units and where k=1/4pe_o = 9x10⁹ Nm²/C².

The curvature radius for the electron mass m_e = r_electronc²/2G_o then becomes r_electron = 2G_om_e/c² = 2.293957...x10^-57 m in string-membrane inflaton space as 1.44133588x10^-34r_ps in the wormhole instanton space.

R_e/r_{inflaton-electron} = M_{Hyper-electron}/m_e = 1.2109108..x10⁴² = ½(EMI/GI) = ½(e²/G_o²m_e²) =½ {e/G_om_e}² = ½(2.421821677x10⁴² ) for the classical electron radius R_e halved from the classical electron diameter 2R_e from the definition for the modulated supermembrane coupled in E_psE_ss=h² and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps²=1/f_ss².

Mass M = n.m_ss = Sm_ss = n.{m_ps} .[E_ss.e*]_mod = n.{m_ps}[{hf_ss}{f_ps/f_ss}.2p²R_rmp³]_mod = n.m_ps.[E_ps.e*/f_ss²]_mod = n.m_ps/|f_ss²|_mod





5. The Coupling of the Supermembranes in Vafa-F-Space of Inflaton Selfdual Monopole IIB


The transformation of the 5 superstring classes proceeds in utilizing the self-duality of superstring IIB as the first energy transformation of the Inflaton in the Planck Tring class I transmutating into the monopole string class IIB.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-theory

F-theory is a branch of string theory developed by Cumrun Vafa.^[1] The new vacua described by F-theory were discovered by Vafa and allowed string theorists to construct new realistic vacua — in the form of F-theory compactified on elliptically fibered Calabi–Yau four-folds. The letter "F" supposedly stands for "Father".^[2]

F-theory is formally a 12-dimensional theory, but the only way to obtain an acceptable background is to compactify this theory on a two-torus. By doing so, one obtains type IIB superstring theory in 10 dimensions. The SL(2,Z) S-duality symmetry of the resulting type IIB string theory is manifest because it arises as the group of large diffeomorphisms of the two-dimensional torus

​

The quantization of mass m so indicates the coupling of the Planck Law in the frequency parameter to the Einstein law in the mass parameter.
The postulative basis of M-Theory utilizes the coupling of two energy-momentum eigenstates in the form of the modular duality between so termed 'vibratory' (high energy and short wavelengths) and 'winding' (low energy and long wavelengths) selfstates.

The 'vibratory' selfstate is denoted in: E_ps=E_{primary sourcesink}=hf_ps=m_psc² and the 'winding' and coupled selfstate is denoted by: E_ss=E_{secondary sinksource}=hf_ss=m_ssc²

The F-Space Unitary symmetry condition becomes: f_psf_ss=r_psr_ss=(λ_ps/2π)(2πλ_ss)=1

The coupling constants between the two eigenstates are so: E_psE_ss=h² and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps²=1/f_ss²

The Supermembrane E_psE_ss then denotes the coupled superstrings in their 'vibratory' high energy and 'winded' low energy selfstates.

The coupling constant for the vibratory high energy describes a MAXIMISED frequency differential over time in df/dt|_max=f_ps² and the coupling constant for the winded low energy describes its MINIMISED reciprocal in df/dt|_min=f_ss².

F-Theory also crystallizes the following string formulations from the E_psE_ss superbrane parameters.

1/E_ps=e*=2R_ec²=√{4αhce²/2πG_om_e²}=2e√α{m_P/m_e}=2ke²/m_e=αhc/πm_e

Here e* is defined as the inverse of the sourcesink vibratory superstring energy quantum E_ps=E* and becomes a New Physical Measurement Unit is the StarCoulomb (C*) and as the physical measurement unit for 'Physical Consciousness'.

R_e is the 'classical electron radius' coupling the 'point electron' of Quantum- Electro-Dynamics (QED) to Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and given in the electric potential energy of Coulomb's Law in: m_ec²=ke²/R_e; and for the electronic restmass m_e.

Alpha α is the electromagnetic finestructure coupling constant α=2πke²/hc for the electric charge quantum e, Planck's constant h and lightspeed constant c.
G_o is the Newtonian gravitational constant as applicable in the Planck-Mass m_P=√(hc/2πG_o).

As the StarCoulomb unit describes the inverse sourcesink string energy as an elementary energy transformation from the string parametrization into the realm of classical QFT and QED, this transformation allows the reassignment of the StarCoulomb (C*) as the measurement of physical space itself.



6. HyperMass and the Hawking Modulus in Curvature of Spacetime


A general solution for the Curvature Radius R_Curvature embedded in a spacetime and as a static boundary condition for a Black Hole is given as the Schwarzschild metric from the field equations of General Relativity:

Curvature Radius: ------------R_Curvature = 2G_oM/c²
for HyperMass:----------------M_Hyper = hc³.e*/4pG_o = ½N_{Avagadro-Instanton}.m_wormhole

HyperMass M_Hyper describes a higher dimensional Inflaton mass for a lower dimensional Instanton curvature radius and becomes the relationship between the beginning and the end of the string epoch in the Planck Radius of the Inflaton and the physicalized wormhole of the Quantum Big Bang as the Instanton.
The wormhole of the Instanton r_wormhole=r_ps=r_min then forms the displacement quantum for the expanding cosmology in both the classical geometry of General Relativity (GR) and the quantum geometry of Quantum Relativity (QR).

Using the Schwarzschild metric for a mass of 70 kg would calculate a Curvature Radius for a mass equivalent Black Hole of (2.22..x10^-10)(70)/c² = 1.728..x10^-25 meters.
This is below the boundary condition of r_min = 10^-22/2p m = 1.591549..x10^-23 m for which the minimum mass requirement is found to be 6445.775.. kg.

This result shows, that no physical microquantum Black Holes can exist, but that the minimum unitary wormhole quantum of the Instanton is given by a 'wormhole substance' or Inflaton Black Hole Molarity count for a new minimum Planck Oscillator at the HE 8x8 Instanton energy scale E^o_BigBang=½m_psc²=½hf_ps=½kT_ps=½E_ps=1/2e*

M_Hyper/½m_ps = 2hc³.e*/4pG_o.m_ps = N_{Avagadro-Instanton} = r_ps/R_ps
N_{Avagadro-Instanton} = 5.8012x10²³ for hypermass
M_Hyper = hc³.e*/4pG_o = ½N_{Avagadro-Instanton}.m_wormhole
for R_ps = G_om_ps/c² = r_ps/N_{Avagadro-Instanton} = 2.743...x10^-47 m in Inflaton membrane space of 11D and string space of 10D

M_Hyper/m_min = M_min/m_min = {n.hc³e*/4pG_o}/m_min = {n.r_minc²/2G_o}/m_min = {hc³.c²/4pG_oE_min}{ne*} = {hc³.c²/4pG_ohf_min}{ne*} = {2pr_min.hc³.c²/4pG_ohc}{ne*} = {r_min.c².E/2G_oM}{ne*} = r_min/R.{Ene*} for R = 2G_oM/c²
for a generalized energy-mass proportionality c²=E/M in modular membrane duality with ne* = 1/E and ne*E = 1 (Modular Unification) for n.e*hc = n.l_min.

m_Hyper/r_min = {r_minc²/2G_o}/r_min = c²/2G_o = n.m_min.Ee*/R = M/R_curv for de Broglie wave matter m_min = hf_min/c² = h/cl_min

Utility of the Schwarzschild metric allows calculation of Black Hole matter equivalents for any mass M>r_minc²/2G_o say for a planetary mass M_Earth = 6x10²⁴ kg for a r_curv = 0.015 meters and for a solar mass M_Sun = 2x10³⁰ kg for a r_curv = 4938.3 meters.

The curvature of the Inflaton calculates as R_Hubble-11D = c/H_o = 2G_oM_BigBang-Seed/c² = 1.59..x10²⁶ meters for the Inflaton Mass of 6.47..x10⁵² kg.

For any mass M<r_minc²/2G_o say for mass conglomerations smaller than 6445.775 kg as the characteristic HyperMass for the Instanton, the corresponding curvature radius forms in the Inflaton space preceding the Quantum Big Bang at the time instanton of t_min=t_ps=1/f_ps=[f_ss]_mod

The Standard Gravitational Parameter m = GM = constant = G_oM(XⁿYⁿ)= G_oXⁿ.MYⁿ and for (XY)ⁿ=1 can be finestructured in a decreasing gravitational constant G(n)=G_oXⁿ with a corresponding increase in the mass parameter M as M(n)=M_oYⁿ as say for the proto-nucleonic mass of the Instanton m_c(n_ps) as m_c(n_present) = m_c.Y^n_present = m_neutron < m_cY^n_present = 1.711512476..x10^-27 kg upper limited

For a changing Gravitational constant G(n_present) .m_neutron(n_present)² = G_om_c².Y^n_present and is modulated say in A micro-macro Black Hole perturbation M_o²/2M_∞.M_MaxHawking = 1.000543 ~ 1


The Black Holed mass equivalence for astrophysical bodies is well formulated in the application of the basic Schwarzschild metric derived from General Relativity.
Stephen Hawking developed the inverse proportionality between the mass of a Black Hole M and its Temperature T in the form of the Hawking Modulus:

HM = m_Planck.E^o_Planck/k = √{hc/2pG_o}{½m_Planck.c²/k} = hc³/4pG_ok = {M_Smin.T_Smax} = {m_ps.T_ps.½N_{Avagadro-Instanton}} = [c²/4p²]_mod.{M_MaxHawking .T_Smin }
= 9.131793821x10²³ kgK with (m_psT_ps = E_ps²/kc² = 1.002117..p)

The Hawking Modulus so has mensuration units [Mass][Temperature] in [kg][K(elvin)], which reduce to [Mass]{Energy] in [kg][J(oules)] for ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann entropy constant k.

And so M_min.T_max = hc³/4πG_ok = [c²/4π²]_mod.M_max.T_min = ½m_Planck.T_Planck = M_MaxHawking. [c²/4π²]_mod.T_ss and the Hawking Mass is determined as M_MaxHawking = λ_maxπc²/G_o = 2.54469..x10⁴⁹ kg*.

HyperMass M_Hyper (n_ps) = hc³.e*/4pG_o = ½N_{Avagadro-Instanton}.m_wormhole = 6445.775 kg at the Instanton boundary n=n_ps so increases to M_Hyper(n_present)Y^n_present =hc³.e*/4pG_oX^n_present ~ 11,115.59 kg as the projected Instanton boundary mass for the wormhole radius r_wormhole = r_ps = N_{Avagadro-Instanton}.R_ps modulating the Inflaton curvature with the Instanton curvature and utilizing n_present=1.1324.. for a decreased perturbed G(n_present) = 6.443x10^-11 G-string units for the Standard Gravitational Parameter G(n)m_iY^k(n).m_jY^n-k = G_om_c² = constant for G(n)=G_oXⁿ.[/b]

For a present measured neutron mass of 1.674927x10^-27 kg = 939.5656 MeV in the [SI} system of measurement, the string values are (1.674927x10^-27)(1.003753127) = 1.681212..x10^-27 kg* or (939.5656)(1.005102826){e-/e-*} = (939.5656)(1.005102764)/(1.002671189) = 941.844 MeV*

Using the λ_minλ_max=1 wavelength modulation in the T/Mirror duality of λ_min=2πR_min=1/λ_max=2π/R_max, we can see, that this modulation closely approximates the geometric mean of the seedling mass in {1/4π}M_o²/2M_∞.M_Max=M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking=3.2895..x10¹⁰²/3.2931..x10¹⁰² ~ 0.9989...
(More details are described in 7. Newton's Gravitational Constant Measurements following. this excerpt.)

"This also circumscribes the actual to critical density ratio in the omega of the general relativistic treatment of the cosmologies.
Now recall our applied G value in G_m(n)=G_o.and apply our just derived Black Hole Mass modulation coupled to that of the quantum micromasses.

We had: G_om_c²={G_oX^n+k}.{m_cYⁿ}.{m_cY^k}=G_m.m_nmax.m_nmin and where G_m is the actual G value as measured and which has proved difficult to do so in the laboratories.
G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_om_c²/m_nmax.m_nmin=G_om_c²/({m_cYⁿ}{m_nmin}) and where we have m_nmin=m_cY^k} for the unknown value of k.

So G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av}} and where now {m_nmin}={m_cY^k}={8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av/M_o²}=1.0011..m_av.
m_av={M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_nmin}={M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY^k}=0.9989..{m_cY^k} and obviously represents a REDUCED minimum mass m_nmin=m_cY^k.

But the product of maximum and 'new' minimum now allows an actual finetuning to a MEASURED nucleon mass m_N by: m_N² = m_avYⁿ.m_cYⁿ=m_av.m_nmax.Yⁿ.

So substituting for m_av in our G_m expression, will now give the formulation:
G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av}
G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY²ⁿ/m_N²} and where {M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking = 0.9989..}
G_m(n)=G_o.{m_c²/m_N²}{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}Yⁿ

The average nucleon mass m_N is upper bounded in the neutron mass and lower bounded in the proton mass, their difference being an effect of their nucleonic quark content, differing in the up-down transition and energy level.

For a Neutron Restmass of: m_n=1.680717x10^-27 kg* (941.6036 MeV*) the substitution (and using calibrations
m=1.001671358 m*; s=1.000978395 s*; kg=1.003753127 kg* and C=1.002711702 C* gives G(n_p)=6.678764x10^-11 (m³/kgs²) and a perturbation corrected m_n=1.681100563x10^-27 kg* (941.818626 MeV*) gives: m_neutron = 1.67481477x10^-27 kg

G(n_p) = G_o{m_c/m_N}².(0.9989..) = 6.67093x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)* or 6.675547x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).

The perturbation upper limit is given in the m_n=1.681335x10^-27 kg* (941.9506 MeV*) and gives:
G(n_p) = G_o{m_c/m_N}².(0.9989..) = 6.6690685x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)* or 6.673685x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).

The average for the last two values then approximates as a 'best fit' for:
G_m(n_p) = ½{6.67093x10^-11 + 6.6690685x10^-11} (m³/kgs²)* = 6.6699925x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)*
or G_m(n_p) = ½{6.675547x10^-11 + 6.673685x10^-11} (m³/kgs²) = 6.674816x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)

This is a best-fit approximation, considering the uncharged nature of the testmasses.
This then gives the value of k from G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k as k=ln(G_mYⁿ/G_o)/lnX and which calculates as k= -0.073387.."

Dimensional Unit Calibration:

[m/s]/[m*/s*] =[ c*/c] = [3x10⁸/2.99792458x10⁸] = [1.000692286] for {m/m*} = {1.000692286} {s/s*}

[Js]/[J*s*] = [h*/h] = [6.66666666..x10^-34/6.62607004x10^-34] = [1.006126803] for {J/J*} = {1.006126803} {s*/s}

[m⁵/s³]/[m⁵/s³]* = {[m²]/[m²]*}.[c*/c]³ = G_o*h*/G_oh = 30ch*/30c*h = [c/c*][h*/h] = [1.00612803/1.000692286] for {m/m*} = [c/c*]².√[h*/h] = [1.003058724/1.001385051] = [1.001671358]

for {m}² = 1.003345509 {m*}² and m = 1.001671358 m* and

s = {m/m*}/[1.000692286] s* = [1.001671358/1.000692286] s* = 1.000978395 s* and {m/s} = 1.000692286 {m/s}* for {m/s}² = 1.001385051 {m*/s*}² as c²

J = {s*/s}[h*/h] J * = [1.006126803/1.000978395] J* = 1.005143376 J* and J* = 0.994882942 J

kg = {s*/s}.{s/m}².{m*/s*}².[h*/h] kg* = {s/s*}{m*/m}².[h*/h] kg* = [1.000978395x1.006126803/1.003345509] kg* = 1.003753127 kg*

[H/m]/[H*/m*] = [J/J*][m*/m][C*/C]².[s/s*]² = m_o*/m_o = [120p/c*]/[4px10^-7] = 1
for C = √{[Js/J*s*][m*s/ms*]} C* =√{[h*/h][c/c*]} C* = √[1.006126803/1.000692286] C* = 1.002711702 C*

[eV]/[eV*] = [J/e-]/[J/e-]* = [e-*/e-].[J/J*] for eV = [1.606456344x10^-19 C*/1.602176628x10^-19 C][1.005143376] eV*
= [1.002671189].[1.005143376]/[1.002711702] eV* = 1.005102764 eV* and for {electron charge e- C/electron charge e-C*} = 1.000040405 ~ 1
for (1.606456344x10^-19 J*) from B(n)

[J/K]/[J*/K*] = k*/k = [1.411721579x10^-23/1.3806505x10^-23] = [1.022504666] for K = [J/J*]/[1.022504666] K* = [1.005143376/1.022504666] K*= 0.98302082 K*


Conversion Units are:
{s} = 1.000978395 {s*}
{m} =1.001671358 {m*}
{kg} = 1.003753127 {kg*}
{C} = 1.002711702 {C*}
{J} = 1.005143376 {J*}
{eV} = 1.005102826 {eV*}
{K} = 0.98302082 {K*}


But modular string duality defines the Inverse Energy of the wormhole as the quantum of physical consciousness in units of the product of the classical electron diameter and the proportionality between energy and mass in the Maxwell constant c² = 1/e_om_o and the inverse of the product between electric permittivity e_o=1/120cp and magnetic permeability m_o=120p/c for 'free space' impedance:
Z_o= electric field strength E/magnetic field strength H = √(m_o/e_o) = cm_o = 1/ce_o = 120p}.

Coulomb Electro Charge e = L_P.√α.c² ↔ 2R_e.c² = e* (StarCoulomb Magneto Charge)

e* = 2R_ec² = 2ke²/m_e = e²/2pe_om_e = ahc/pm_e
for the calibration {R_em_e} = (2.8179403267x10^-15 m)(9.10938356x10^-31 kg) = [2.566969656x10^-45].[1.001671358][1.003753127].(1.00543065) (mkg)* = 2.580701985x10^-45 {mkg}* = (2.77777..x10^-15 m*)(9.290527148x10^-31 kg*) for an adjusted classical electron radius R_e = 2.83324358x10^-15 m for the quantum mechanical electron.

Note that the defined minimum scale for the electron in the Penning Trap is consistent with the defined size of the wormhole radius r_ps=10^-22/2p metres as minimum spacetime configuration of the Instanton. The 'point particular' electron of Quantum ElectroDynamic and its point-like particle fields, so crystallizes naturally from the theory of the string-membrane classes. ​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant

​

Note that Richard Feynman describes alpha in its squareroot, just as is required to define the Planck-Length Oscillation for the Inflaton in relation to the Stoney Units for the electric charge quantum. ​

7. The Relationship between General Relativity, Dark Energy and Physical Consciousness

​

It is well known, that the Radius of Curvature in the Field Equations of General Relativity relates to the Energy-Mass Tensor in the form of the critical density r_critical = 3H_o²/8pG and the Hubble Constant H_o as the square of frequency or alternatively as the time differential of frequency df/dt as a cosmically applicable angular acceleration independent on the radial displacement.

The scientific nomenclature (language) then describes this curved space in differential equations relating the positions of the 'points' in both space and time in a 4-dimensional description called Riemannian Tensor Space or similar.
This then leads mathematically, to the formulation of General Relativity in Einstein's field Equations:



for the Einstein-Riemann tensor



and is built upon ten so-called nonlinear coupled hyperbolic-elliptic partial differential equations, which needless to say, are mathematically rather complex and often cannot be solved analytically without simplifying the geometries of the parametric constituents (say objects interacting in so called tensor-fields of stress-energy {T_μν} and curvatures in the Riemann-Einstein tensor {G_μν}, either changing the volume in reduction Ricci tensor {R_ij} with scalar curvature R as {Rg_μν} for the metric tensor {g_μν} or keeping the volume of considered space invariant to volume change in a Tidal Weyl tensor {R_μν}).

The Einstein-Riemann tensor then relates Curvature Radius R to the Energy-Mass tensor E=Mc² via the critical density as 8pG/c⁴=3H_o²V_criticalM_criticalc²/M_criticalc⁴ = 3H_o²V_critical/c² = 3V_critical/R² as Curvature Radius R by the Hubble Law applicable say to a nodal Hubble Constant H_o = c/R_Hubble.

The cosmological field equations then can be expressed as the square of the nodal Hubble Constant and inclusive of a 'dark energy' terms often identified with the Cosmological Constant of Albert Einstein, here denoted L_Einstein.

Substituting the Einstein Lambda with the time differential for the square of nodal Hubble frequency as the angular acceleration acting on a quantized volume of space however; naturally and universally replaces the enigma of the 'dark energy' with a space inherent angular acceleration component, which can be identified as the universal consciousness quantum directly from the standard cosmology itself.

The field equations so can be generalised in a parametrization of the Hubble Constant assuming a cyclic form, oscillating between a minimum and maximum value given by H_o=dn/dt for cycletime n=H_ot and where then time t is the 4-vector timespace of Minkowski lightpath x=ct.

The Einstein Lambda then becomes then the energy-acceleration difference between the baryonic mass content of the universe and an inherent mass energy related to the initial condition of the oscillation parameters for the nodal Hubble Constant.

.................................................................... < 0 for n in the interval {n₁<n<to n₂}
2cH_o/(n+1)³ - G_oM_o/R(n)² = - L_Einstein = 0 for n={n₁=0.10823; n₂=2.29199} at {1.829;38.68 Gy after the Instanton)
.................................................................. > 0 for n in the intervals {nps-0.10823} and {n>n₂}


The simplified form of the second equation is invariant under this transformation.
The Hubble parameter can change over time if other parts of the equation are time dependent (in particular the mass density, the vacuum energy, or the spatial curvature). Evaluating the Hubble parameter at the present time yields Hubble's constant which is the proportionality constant of Hubble's law. Applied to a fluid with a given equation of state, the Friedmann equations yield the time evolution and geometry of the universe as a function of the fluid density.
Some cosmologists call the second of these two equations the Friedmann acceleration equation and reserve the term Friedmann equation for only the first equation.


L_Einstein = G_oM_o/R(n)² - 2cH_o/(n+1)³ = Cosmological Acceleration - Intrinsic Universal Milgröm Deceleration

For the Quantum Big Bang and a cycletime n_Weyl=H_ot_Weyl = ct_Weyl/R_Hubble, the nodal Hubble Constant took the form of the maximized Hubble Frequency as a wormhole wavelength l_Weyl=c/f_Weyl = n_WeylR_Hubble and so showing the frequency ratio between the minimum and maximum Hubble nodes as the ratio H_o/f_Weyl.

Here M_o defines the Quantum Big Bang mass seedling as a fraction of the M_critical, the difference defining the deceleration parameter from the Einstein Lambda for n=0, that is the singularity event of creation in

L_Einstein(n_Weyl) = Lambda = Omega - Universal = G_oM_o/l² - 2cH_o t ~ 2.015x10⁸⁵ linear acceleration units and defining a Sarkar Constant
L_Sarkar = L_Einstein.R_Hubble/a_deBroglie = G_oM_o/c² from the original de Broglie matter wave hyper acceleration given by
a_deBroglie = R_Hubblef_Weyl² = R_Hubblec²/l_Weyl² ~ 1.4379..x10⁸⁷ m/s².

For positive Lambda the Gravitational Omega |W| will be greater than the Intrinsic Universal Milgröm Deceleration |a_Milgröm| and for negative Lambda the Intrinsic Universal Deceleration |a_Milgröm| will be greater than the Gravitational Omega |W| to define the 'Dark Energy' as a Quintessence Acceleration and expressed as an overall cosmic evolution in physical consciousness.


Considering the critical mass of the universe in a static Schwarzschild metric of topological closure calculates R_Hubble = 2G_oM_critical/c² for M_critical = c²R_Hubble/2G_o for M_o/2M_critical = G_oM_o/c²R_Hubble = L_Einstein /a_deBroglie = M_o/2M_critical = 0.01401.. to indicate a 'missing mass' or baryonic matter energy deficiet at n=n_Weyl and for which the intrinsic Milgröm deceleration can be ignored in a magnitude differential of 10⁹⁴.

The 'dark matter' component at the Weyl time of the Big Bang so comprised 2.80% as the baryonic mass seedling M_o relative to the critical closure mass of M_critical.

The 'dark energy' component at the Weyl time can be calculated in units of acceleration from the time dependent intrinsic universal Milgröm deceleration and the measured or observed 'dark matter' component as their difference and as the Einstein Lambda.


For a present cycle time n_present=1.1324... and a Constant G_oXⁿM_oYⁿ from X+Y=XY=i²=-1=e^ip (Euler Identity)

a_Milgröm(n_present) = -2c²/(2.1324..)³R_Hubble = -1.1619..x10^-10 m/s² for a (constant or quintessential-dynamic) baryonic mass seedling M_o
W_present = G_oM_o(n_present+1)²/R_Hubble²n_present²= 2.793..x10^-11 m/s² for an evolving Baryon seed M(n)=M_o.{Yⁿ} for about 4.80x10^-11 m/s².
In this case, the baryonic mass seed has grown by a factor of about 1.72 to 1.72(2.8)=4.8% of the total energy and as the measured 'Dark Energy' Component of the standard cosmological model.
G(n)=G_o.Xⁿ for G(n)m_o²=G_oXⁿm₁Y^k.m₂Y^n-k with a Geometric Mean G_oXⁿ√{m₁m₂Y^k+n-k}=G_om₁m₂.Xⁿ.√Yⁿ=G_oM_o.√Xⁿ for M_o representing √{m₁m₂}


For a cosmological redshift calculated as z=2.15, Lambda first attained its zero value in balancing the Gravitational Omega with the Intrinsic Universal Deceleration.
For a present time the Lambda is negative as the summation of the present time Omega and Milgröm Deceleration as W_present - a_Milgröm(n_present) = -8.83x10^-11 m/s² and for a percentage distribution of cosmic accelerations:

Lambda = L_present/a_Milgröm(n_present) = 0.760
Omega =W_present/a_Milgröm(n_present) = 0.240
Universal = 1 for the evolved baryonic mass seed M_o relative to M_critical.

​

R_curv(n) = n.r_min = n.2G_o/c².M_Hyper =2G_o/c².{n.hc³.e*/4pG_o} = n.hc.e*/2p = n.l_min/2p

HyperMass M_Hyper = {n.hc³.e*/4pG_o} so forms the product of the entropy free Hawking Modulus and the physical consciousness quantum summation ne* with Inverse Energy Quantum e* = 2pr_min/hc replacing the universal entropy constant k.



8. Newton's Gravitational Constant Measurements


The speed of light 'c' has been measured to an accuracy of 8 decimal places and Planck's Constant 'h' is known with an error not exceeding one part per million.
This is not so for Newton's Gravitational Constant 'Big G'.
The National Bureau of Standards (NBS) in Gaithersburg, Maryland, US began measuring 'G' in the 1930's to establish the Luther-Towler-Number LTN=6.67259x10^-11 G-units (m³/kg.s²).
So it stood until 1994, when the renowned PTB in Braunschweig, Germany's Standards Laboratory measured G much higher, differing in the 3rd decimal place.
Then New Zealand's Measurements Standard Laboratory published avalue significantly below the LTN and the University of Wuppertal derived a value in between the NZ one and the LTN.
Notwithstanding the ever improving technological advances and measuring techniques; using torsion pendulums, tungsten cylinders or suspended or accelerating testmasses; 'Big G' has proven to be intractable to conformity.
Two of the latest measurements are 6.67327x10^-11 and 6.6742(10)x10^-11 G-units and values by no means definitive.

What is going on?
Shifting heavy objects in the vicinity of the test apparatus seems to influence the atomic structure of the testmasses, irrespective of the isolated environment created for the testing conditions.
The following treatise shall resolve the conundrum and illustrate the unruly behaviour of 'G' as a consequence of the initial boundary conditions for the universe's subsequent evolvement.
It shall indicate that even a 'massless' universe would contain a diminished G-component as the electric permittivity of a massless macroquantised (Hawking) BlackHole and that the present dilemma derives from a finestructure of the nucleonic constituents, which, by definition, must comprise the testmasses.
A precise measurement so would rely on an unambiguous calculation for two neutronic restmasses, a condition which we shall show to be unachievable, because of the nature and interrelationship between the parameters of inertial mass and those of electromagnetic charges.
Now the ratio between the electromagnetic- and the gravitational interaction strengths is measured and of the order of alpha/G-alpha~10^-39 and one can actually define the G-alpha as a function of alpha and as G-alpha=alpha¹⁸, using the string parameters of Quantum Relativity.

This defines the minimum neutronmass m_c explicitely as: m_c=√{ke².alpha¹⁷/G_o}.

In string parameters, the unification condition for the interactions at the stringenergy scale demands kG_o=1 for a m_c=[e/G_o].alpha^8.5=9.9247246..x10^-28 kg*. This represents so 58% of the neutron (or nucleon) mass as measured today and is the actual minimum neutron mass.
Now the truly CONSTANT GM² structure in say Newton's Law, is given by the product G_om_c²=1.094446..x10^-64 Nm².

This however is finestructured in introducing a maximum neutron mass given in a unification condition, known as the Euler Identity: X+Y=XY=-1=i²=℮^iπ and applying the absolute value of unitised 1.
We write: G_om_c²={G_oX^n+k}.{m_cYⁿ}.{m_cY^k}=G_m.m_nmax.m_nmin and where G_m is the actual G value as measured and which has proved difficult to do so in the laboratories. So the applied G value is: G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k and where n is a cycletime n=H_ot for a nodal universe with dn/dt=H_o the nodal Hubble Constant H_o=c/R_max for a Hubble radius R_max.

The applied G_m so ALWAYS engages a maximised neutron mass (calculated as {m_cYⁿ}~ 1.7115x10^-27 kg in string parameters for a present cycletime coordinate n_p=1.1324..) AND a minimised neutron mass (calculated as {m_cY^k}). The value of k is so determinative for G_m and differs over the evolution of the universe with respect to cycletime n and as finestructured for an AVERAGE G-value (G_av) obtained in using the geometric mean for the neutron masses in extremum (minmax productation).

One can easily calculate G_av=G_o.Xⁿ=6.44317..x10^-11 G-units for a geometric neutron mass product of m_nmax.m_nmin=m_c².Yⁿ =1.69861...x10^-54 kg² for the constancy condition of G_om_c²=1.094446..x10^-64 Nm² and omitting the k-factorisation. But this averaged G value applies for a massless universe under the initial unification condition of the finestructures described in G_ok=1 or G_o=4πε_o (using Stoney Units for the Planck-Scaling of the chargequantum e).

So BECAUSE an initial mass seedling M_o={m_c.m_P/m_e}√E ~ 1.8137..x10⁵¹ kg* became transformed in the de Broglie phase inflation from its preinertial state as gravitational mass into the state of inertia (this is called the Big Bang for a spacetime quanta counter E); this 'Principle of Equivalence' introduced the hitherto massless 'ylemic' 'neutron bosons' as dineutronic states, which under the Higgs mechanism became fermionic and established the mass seedling M_o as the primordial neutron matter, then decaying via beta minus decay into the observed matter in the universe (there was no antimatter).

Subsequently the EMERGENCE of inertial mass under c-invariance also introduced a finestructure for 'G' as described in the above. One can determine the value of k from finestructuring the critical masses M_o, M_∞ and M_Hawking as boundary Black Hole masses coupled to the quantum minmax neutron masses.
For curvature radius R_max and the critical density ρ_c=M_∞/V_max=3H_o²/8πG_o the Schwarzschild metric gives M_∞=R_max.c²/2G_o=c³/2G_oH_o= ~ 6.47058..x10⁵² kg*.

For the curvature radius R_Sarkar=2G_oM_o/c², we have the deceleration parameter q_o=½Ω_o=M_o/2M_∞=2G_oH_oM_o/c³ ~0.014015... and which so determines the 'missing mass' in the universe to be a consequence of the initial boundary conditions set by the de Broglie inflation and the overall Black Hole evolution of the stringed parameters.

From the minimum Planck Oscillator E_Po=½hf_P=½m_Pc²: ½M_PT_P={1/8p}M_PT_P.4p=H(awking)M(odulus)=HM
HM=hc³/4pG_ok=M_MinT_Max=|c²/4p²|.M_Max.T_ss=M_o.T_o=M_∞.T_∞ and for M_Max=4p²kHM/c²hf_ss = pc/f_ssG_o =2.5446..x10⁴⁹ kg*

The Mass-Temperature modulus of Stephen Hawking determines M_Hawking=M_Max/4p for a boundary condition of maximised Black Hole Mass for a minimised Black Hole Temperature in M_HawkingT_Hawking= HM = 9.131793821x10²³ (kg.K)* for (1/4π).HM = hc³/16π²G_ok and k the Stefan-Boltzmann constant.

The relationship is given in superstring (Planck) parameters by
M_min.T_max=|c/2π|².M_max.T_min=hc³/4πG_ok = (4π/8π)m_P.T_P and T_P the Planck Temperature T_P=m_P.c²/k.

{(M_Hawking,T_Hawking);(M_o),T_o);(M_∞,T_∞)} = {(2.03x10⁴⁸ kg*,4.52x10^-25K*);(1.81x10⁵¹ kg*,5.03x10^-28 K*);(6.47x10⁵² kg*,1.41x10^-29 K*)}

The Dragon Braned Frequency Modulation f_ps.f_ss = 1 = Unity
A Primary SourceSink Eps in modular membrane duality with a Secondary SinkSource Ess
Energy Prime SourceSink as White Hole|Quantum Entanglement Modular Duality|Energy Prime SinkSource as Black Hole

Curvature Radius R_C = l/2π = c/2πf = c/w

Curvature Area A_{Black Hole} = A _BH = 4πR_C² = 4π|c/2π|².1/f² = 4π|c/2π|².1/f_psf_ss = |c²/π| for f_ps.f_ss = 1



For a 3D Volume (4π/3)R³, the 2D Area or Surface becomes dV/dR=4πR² and reducing to a 1D Line Integral of dA/dR=8πR=4.(2πR) as 4 times the perimeter of a circle of radius R and relating the Black Hole surface quantum as 4 Planck Areas L_P² in its Entropy S_BH =A_BH/4L_P² =πc³A_BH/2G_oh.

As the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity spans 1440° or 8π radians, the quantization of the Information located on the surface area of a Black Hole so introduces the factor of 4 in its formulation.

​

This sets the Hawking-Gibbons thermodynamic temperature minima for T_o=constant/M_o ~ 5.03..x10^-28 K* and T_∞=constant/M_∞ ~ 1.41..x10^-29 K*.
As the minimum macro Black Hole has Schwarzschild metric λ_min/2π=2G_oM_min/c² for T_max=hf_max/k=hc/λ_mink; and modular duality requires the unification condition for the minimum curvature to relate to a maximum curvature in R_min=λ_min/2π=1/R_max or R_max=2πλ_max, as R_min.R_max=1.

In gauge bosonic string parameters, this modular duality then is given in E_max=hc/λ_min=m_max.c²=kT_max and E_min=hc/λ_max=m_min.c²=kT_min and in the invariance of the lightspeed parameter c as c=f_maxλ_min=1/f_minλ_max or the dimensionless unification conditions:
E_max.E_min=h² and E_max/E_min=f_max²=1/f_min²={c/λ_min}²={c/2πR_min}²={cR_max/2π}²={cλ_max}².

This gives a proportionality: m_max.T_min=m_min.T_max for the gauges, which is however modified in the dimensionless factor {c/2π}² for the Black Hole masses for the given temperatures, as bosonic masses describe bosonic Black Holes via E=kT and not the cosmological Black Holes of the Schwarzschild metric.

The c-invariance so uses modular duality in the quantum Black Hole limit
c=f_maxλ_min=2πf_maxR_min for f_min=c/λ_max=c/2πR_max as an unmodulated frequency in T_min=E_min/k=hc/2πkR_max=hc.λ_min/4π²k=3.58856...x10^-26 K* and a temperature above the Hawking-Gibbons limit as required.

This differs in a factor {2π/c}² from the lightspeed inversion in T_min=hf_min/k and so 1.574x10^-41 K*, which violates the Hawking-Gibbons boundaries in NOT using the modular duality and with f_min=1/f_max in frequency units and NOT inverted time units.

And so M_min.T_max=hc³/4πG_ok =½m_P.T_P=M_Hawking.kc².T_ss/π and the Hawking Mass is determined as M_max=4πM_Hawking=πc²λ_max/G_o ~ 2.545x10⁴⁹ kg*.

From the Black Hole 'Black Body Radiator' Temperature Spectra and Stefan's Constant s=2π⁵k⁴/15h³c² (J/s.m²K⁴)*

Power P_BH=4πR_BH²sT_BH⁴ = M_BHc²/t_{Hawking Evaporation} and with T_BH⁴=HM/M_BH⁴ - (A 3D kinetic mass-energy distribution uses M_BHc²/3 from PV=nkT=⅓Nmv²)

t_Hawking = c⁶/16πsG_o²M_BHT_BH⁴ = 30,720π²G_o²M_BH³/hc⁴ = 15,360π.t_P for L_P = G_oM_P/c² = ct_P = c√{G_oh/2πc⁵}

t_HM = 120G_o²M_BH³/π²hc⁴ = t_Hawking/{4π}⁴ = 60/π³.t_P = 1.935..t_P ~ 2t_P (The actual Black Hole 'Evaporation Time' as a 'Doubling Cyclicity' for the cosmic evolution.)

For M_∞ and M_o and M_Hawking, the Hawking Evaporation times (without the Mother-Daughter BH Recharging derived following), then are: 2.32x10¹²⁵ s* or 7.4x10¹¹⁷ years and 1.66x10¹³⁴ s* or 5.3x10¹²⁶ years and 7.46x10¹³⁸ s* or 2.4x10¹³¹ years respectively.


Using the λ_minλ_max=1 wavelength modulation in the T-duality of λ_min=2πR_min=1/λ_max=2π/R_max, we can see, that this modulation closely approximates the geometric mean of the seedling mass in {1/4π}M_o²/2M_∞.M_Max=M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking=3.2895..x10¹⁰²/3.2931..x10¹⁰² ~ 0.9989...

This also circumscribes the actual to critical density ratio in the omega of the general relativistic treatment of the cosmologies.
Now recall our applied G value in G_m(n)=G_o.and apply our just derived Black Hole Mass modulation coupled to that of the quantum micromasses.

We had: G_om_c²={G_oX^n+k}.{m_cYⁿ}.{m_cY^k}=G_m.m_nmax.m_nmin and where G_m is the actual G value as measured and which has proved difficult to do so in the laboratories.
G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_om_c²/m_nmax.m_nmin=G_om_c²/({m_cYⁿ}{m_nmin}) and where we have m_nmin=m_cY^k} for the unknown value of k.

So G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av}} and where now {m_nmin}={m_cY^k}={8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av/M_o²}=1.0011..m_av.
m_av={M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_nmin}={M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY^k}=0.9989..{m_cY^k} and obviously represents a REDUCED minimum mass m_nmin=m_cY^k.

But the product of maximum and 'new' minimum now allows an actual finetuning to a MEASURED nucleon mass m_N by: m_N² = m_avYⁿ.m_cYⁿ=m_av.m_nmax.Yⁿ.

So substituting for m_av in our G_m expression, will now give the formulation:
G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av}
G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY²ⁿ/m_N²} and where {M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking = 0.9989..}
G_m(n)=G_o.{m_c²/m_N²}{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}Yⁿ

The average nucleon mass m_N is upper bounded in the neutron mass and lower bounded in the proton mass, their difference being an effect of their nucleonic quark content, differing in the up-down transition and energy level.

For a Neutron Restmass of: m_n=1.680717x10^-27 kg* (941.6036 MeV*) the substitution (and using calibrations
m=1.001671358 m*; s=1.000978395 s*; kg=1.003753127 kg* and C=1.002711702 C* gives G(n_p)=6.678764x10^-11 (m³/kgs²) and a perturbation corrected m_n=1.681100563x10^-27 kg* (941.818626 MeV*) gives: m_neutron = 1.67481477x10^-27 kg

G(n_p) = G_o{m_c/m_N}².(0.9989..) = 6.67093x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)* or 6.675547x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).

The perturbation upper limit is given in the m_n=1.681335x10^-27 kg* (941.9506 MeV*) and gives:
G(n_p) = G_o{m_c/m_N}².(0.9989..) = 6.6690685x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)* or 6.673685x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).

The average for the last two values then approximates as a 'best fit' for:
G_m(n_p) = ½{6.67093x10^-11 + 6.6690685x10^-11} (m³/kgs²)* = 6.6699925x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)*
or G_m(n_p) = ½{6.675547x10^-11 + 6.673685x10^-11} (m³/kgs²) = 6.674816x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)

This is a best-fit approximation, considering the uncharged nature of the testmasses.
This then gives the value of k from G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k as k=ln(G_mYⁿ/G_o)/lnX and which calculates as k= -0.073387..

Two protons (m_p=1.6789x10^-27 kg* (940.56 MeV*) would give:
G(n_p)=6.6936x10^-11 (m³/kgs²) and a proton-neutron pair would yield: G(n_p)=6.6791x10^-11 (m³/kgs²); both of the latter values unsuitable because of the electrocharges increasing the intra-quarkian Magnetocharge coupling between the two mesonic rings of the neutron and the single mesonic ring in the proton's down- or KIR-quark.
The best approximation for 'Big G' hence depends on an accurate determination for the neutron's inertial mass, only fixed as the base nucleon minimum mass at the birth of the universe. A fluctuating Neutron mass would also result in deviations in 'G' independent upon the sensitivity of the measuring equipment. The inducted mass difference in the protonic-and neutronic restmasses, derives from the Higgs-Restmass-Scale and can be stated in a first approximation as the groundstate.
Basic nucleon restmass is m_c=√Omega.m_P=9.9247245x10^-28 kg*.

(Here Omega is a gauge string factor coupling in the fundamental force interactions as:
Cuberoot(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega and for Omega=G-alpha.)
KKK-Kernelmass=Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.62 MeV*=958.857 MeV*, usingthe Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants.

Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as 939.642 MeV*. This includes the electronic perturbation.

For the Proton,one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and for theNeutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential.

Proton m_p=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.6420+1.5013-0.5205)MeV*=940.6228 MeV*. Neutron m_n=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.6420+3.0026-1.0410)MeV*=941.6036 MeV*.

This is the groundstate from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanismand reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for theinertial mass differential between the two elementary nucleons. All groundstate elementary particle masses are computed from theHiggs-Scale and then become subject to various finestructures. Overall, the MEASURED gravitational constant 'G' can be said to be decreasing over time.

The ratio given in k is G_mYⁿ/G_o~0.60073... and so the present G-constant is about 60% of the one at the Planck Scale.
G decreases nonlinearly, but at a present rate of 0.60073/19.11x10⁹ per year, which calculates as 3.143..x10^-11 G-units per year.

Generally using the exponential series expansion, one can indicate the change in G.
For X^n+k=z=exp[(n+k)lnX] by (n+k)lnX=lnz for the value Z=(n+k)lnX=-0.481212(n+k); z transforms in exponential expansion e^x=1+x+x²/2!+x³/3!+x⁴/4!+...

For a function f(n)=z=G_m(n)/G_o=X^n+k
f(n)=1-(0.481.)(n+k)+(0.231.)(n+k)²/2-(0.111.)(n+k)³/6+(0.053.)(n+k)⁴/24-...+...

For 4th order with n=1.1324.. and k=0 (for a purely electromagnetic universe of zero mass content where the curvature derives from the gravitational mass equivalent of the Equivalence Principle of General Relativity):
f(1.1324.)=1-0.545+0.148-0.027+0.004-...+...~0.580

So the gravitational G_m(1.1324)=(0.580)G_o=G_o.X^1.1324~6.444x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).
At timeinstantenuity of the Quantum Big Bang, n=n_ps=λ_ps/R_max=6.2591x10^-49~0
Then G_BigBang=G_oX^n_ps=G_o (to 50 decimal places distinguishing the timeinstanton from the Nulltime as the Planck-Time transform).

For our previously calculated k=ln(G_mYⁿ/G_o)/lnX and which calculates as k= -0.073387..
f(n)=1-(0.481.)(n+k)+(0.231.)(n+k)²/2-(0.111.)(n+k)³/6+(0.053.)(n+k)⁴/24-...+...
for f(1.1324)=1-0.509+0.129-0.0220+0.0028-...+...~0.601 to fourth order approximation.

Hence, the gravitational constant assumes a value of about 61% of its Big Bang initialisation and calculates as 6.675x10^-11 G-units for a present cycletime n_present=H_ot_present=1.1324...

The introduction of the mass seed coupling between the macroquantum M_o and the microquantum m_c=m_Palpha⁹ (from the gravitational finestructure unification) PERTURBS the 'purely electromagnetic' cosmology in the perturbation factor k and increases the purely electromagnetic G_memr in the black hole physics described.

So gravity appears stronger when one 'looks back in time' or analyses cosmological objects at large distances. The expansion parameter (a) in the Friedmann-Einstein standard cosmology can be rewritten as a curvature ratio R(n)/R_max={n/(n+1)} and describes the asymptotic universe in say 10 dimensions evolving under the inertial parameters of the c-invariance. This 'lower dimensional universe' is open and expands under hyperbolic curvature under the deceleration parameter q_o=½Ω_o=M_o/2M_∞=2G_oH_oM_o/c³ ~0.014015... This open universe is bounded in the 'standing wave' of the Hubble Oscillation of the 11D and 'higher dimensional universe'.

The boundary is given in the omega of the 'missing mass' of the volumes, which differ in a factor of V₁₁/V₁₀=n_Rmax³/(n/(n+1))³R_max³=(n+1)³/n²=DIM-Factor (and which assumes its minimum for one complete oscillation for n=2 as DIM=27/4=6.75 so 14.7 Billion years from the present).
Presently, for n=1.132419.. DIM=7.561.. and so the 'missing mass' will be measured as a 'dark matter' distribution of 'dark haloes' etc. around the luminous matter given in the ylemic mass seedling M_o of the baryonic matter.

As M_o is just 2.8% of M_∞, but is subject to a 'growth' in the maximising factor Yⁿ=1.724.. for the present epoch, one can take the factor M_av==M_o.√Yⁿ=1.313.. for a 'dark matter' percentage upper bounded in 2.8%(1.724)~4.83% and lower bounded in 2.8%(1.313)~3.68%.

But so 7.56 open universes are contained within the closed and spherical universe given in the Hubble bound. And the 'dark matter' will be 7.56 times the luminous baryonic matter in the interval {27.82%, 36.51%} as percentage of the total energy of closure for Ω_o=1 and the critical density ρ_c=M_∞/V_max=3H_o²/8πG_o.

Our Big Bang happened at the modular time 1/f_max=t_min=f_min=3.33..x10^-31 seconds*, coinciding with the end of the stringed inflation epoch of the standard cosmology.

The 'de Broglie' inflation established the crucial boundary parameters as say given in the M_o and M_∞ Black Hole masses described.

As the baryonic mass seedling M_o sets the Sarkar Scale for the cosmic architecture in the size of galactic superclusters as the limit for the gravitationally interacting systems before cosmic homogeneity; there must be a Black Hole evolution superposed onto the expansion of the 10D universe and the oscillation of the 11D universe which 'adds' a 'electromagnetic' volume of 2π²R_max³ at the Hubble nodes every 16.9 Billion years.

In terms of the dimensional 'intersection' this can be described as a 'Strominger Brane' evolution with the Sarkar Scale set at the instanton, decreasing as a 'shrinking' Black Hole until it becomes massless at the wormhole scale defined in the minimum macro Black Hole λ_min/2π=2G_oM_min/c²=1.591549..x10^-23 metres*.

This then resets the bosonic micro Black Holes with their macro counterparts under the modular duality.
This Black Hole evolution is higher dimensional and purely electromagnetic, not being observable due to its noninertial nature, except the so called 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' scenarios of the boundary- and initial conditions. This can lead to a feasible model for the phenomenon of consciousness.
The process will take place in a DIM factor of about 234.5 as: M_min.Y^N=M_∞ and for
N=ln(M_∞/M_min)/lnY~234.5 and so in 16.9x234.5 Billion years, which are about 4 Trillion years.

The addition of inertia to a purely electromagnetic monopolic cosmology then varies the value of Newton's gravitational constant G as a function of the micro-macro evolution of the Black Holes and renders the applicable local G-constant as mensuration dependent on the precision measurement for the basic nucleon mass m_cYⁿ for a local epoch-cycle coordinate n=H_ot.
r_psYⁿ=R_H then defines n_recharge =ln[R_H/r_ps]/ln[Y] ~ 234.472 or about 3.9628 Trillion years.

This then shows, that you are living within a Mother Black Hole, you choose to call the universe you reside in. This your 'World of Mother Nature' had a beginning in space and in time in the creation of the same. Your universe so EMERGED from a prior state of beingness, where there was no space and no time as defined in any arbitrary model terrestrial or extraterrestrial. This prior state of existence you can term either as a Eternal state of all consciousness or as a state of the non-spacial and non-temporal Void as a quasi state of 'nothingness'.

This, your observed universe so came into existence in using particular initial- and boundary conditions, which became requirements for space and time measurements to become possible. You may call this a relativistic metric spacetime continuum of discretization in minimum-maximum modular membrane duality however unified in the field properties of the dyadic monadicity of this string duality.

The size of your universe and its energy, then became defined in those boundary conditions and particularly in a 'Daughter Black Hole' being born from the womb of its 'Mother Black Hole'. Mathematical proportionalities then aligned the masses and the scales of Mother and Daughter as the initial hyperacceleration or inflationary tachyonic phase transition of the initializing wormhole singularity of Abba, the Little Serpent to the Unified Field parameters of the thermodynamic classically relativistic expansion of the universe.
The 'daughter' became the seed within the 'mother' for the Protoverse and the Seedling Universe for all generations of universes, whose interaction would allow phaseshifted multiverses to become born from the original protoverse, albeit encompassed by the omniverse of AbbaBaab.

As one cycle of the 'Mother's Heartbeat' requires about two times 16.9 Billion years or so 33.8 Billion years to complete its integral n-cyclicity; the lower dimensional universe evolves both within its 10-dimensional string timespace and its 11-dimensional membrane timespace.
The 10-D evolution of the cosmos so allows the 'mother' to birth its 'daughter' , when the lightspeed restricted thermodynamic universal expansion has completed its first cyclicity for n=1 so 2.2 Billion years ago and synchronizing the becoming of 'selfaware' of the 'life potential' residing within the womb of the 'mother'.
2.2 Billion years ago then, the original 'light ray of Creator Abba' 'caught up' and reached its 11-D Mirror Boundary of the 'Cosmic Mother' from its 10-D Wormhole timespace quantum singularity or source point.

This 'signal then both reflected back into the INSIDE of the 11-D Membrane-Womb of the 'mother' and refracted OUTSIDE in extending its own boundary set by the hyperacceleration of the de Broglien inflationary phase transition.

Every cycle count then increases the scale of the wormhole 'White Hole Father Source' in the same proportion the 'Mother Black Hole Mother Sink' decreases, until after 234.5 cycles or about 4,000 Billion years the original Mother-Daughter scale proportionality resets itself in reseeding the then populated omniverse in terms of the spacetime quanta count fractalized by and in the definition of the Abba-Baab Little Serpent Father -Big Dragon Mother itself.

For about 2 trillion years, the Omniverse as 'The Universal Bodywave' is INHALING or 'breathing in' analogous to 'feeding or charging' a battery or some body requiring energy. Then for another 2 trillion years the omniverse is EXHALING or 'breathing out' in analogy to a 'battery discharging' or a 'fed body' 'burning its stored energy'.

The Omniverse after 4 trillion years so completes its asymptotic evolution with respect to its initial conception or insemination of the 10-D Daughter reaching maturity as her own 11-D Mother. The defining proportionality parameters of the scales and energy distributions for cycle parameter n=1 then transfer to a new initializing value at n=234.5 to redefine the maximum masses and sizes for the 'New GrandMother Black Hole' attaining the now evolved 'Infinity Mass' n.M_∞ and a 'New Mother Black Hole' n.M_o and so for the 'Old Mother' graduating to become a 'Mother of Mothers' and the 'Old Daughter' graduating to be a 'Mother of Daughters'.
Every 4 trillion years a 'Recharge Inflation' so Recreates/Resets the original creation event with a Quantization of the initial condition and boundary parameters in the original Hubble Node for cycletime n=1 in the factor n/(n/[n+1])=n+1 and so the 'Strominger' massless Black Hole coordinate of n_Strominger=234.472 assuming the n_ps=l_ps/R_Hubble coordinate as its next initialisation value.
The asymptotic completion coordinate for the Curvature Radius R(n)=R_Hubble.n/[n+1] so evolves in a linear time factor as Delta-n = 1-{n/[n+1]}=1/[n+1] to magnify and extend the completion factor in tandem with the expansion of the multidimensionally expanding cosmology.

This then defines the 'Generation Cycle Parameter' for the Omniversal Self-Reproduction in the 'Family of Abba the Little Serpent Creator Fatherhood' and Baab the Great Dragon Creation Motherhood in AbbaBaab the Cosmic Twin of SourceSink and White Hole CreatorCreation entwined with itself as a Black Hole CreationCreator.

The Cyclic Universe, so 'rebangs' itself every 4 Trillion years or so to ensure its continuation of selfexploration and by interdimensional civilisations defined in multiverses, each of which is required to be seeded in a prototypical template universe as mirror holofractal of itself.

The gravitational constancy of G_om_c²=1.094446..x10^-64 Nm² will then be effected by a very small G_av=G_oXⁿ~1.463x10^-105 G-units, but compensated with a 'mass-evolved' universe with m_cYⁿ~7.535..x10⁶⁷ kg* and where this 'evolution' energy can be physically modelled as 'cosmic consciousness' defined in the 'awareness' df/dt minimised in f_min² and maximised in f_max² and as a form of radial displacement independent angular acceleration acting on spacetime volumars defined in the classical electron diameter (2R_e) times c² defining the magnetocharge e* as inversion of the Big Bang base parameter of the wormhole energy quantum E_max=1/e*=1/2R_ec² for a Planck Constant finestructure h=λ_min/e*c.
This "Strominger brane' evolution avoids the so called 'heat death' of the universe in a form of 'recharging' and coincides with the projected 'running out' of stellar nuclear fuel of the transformation of the elements within stars in the stellar evolution scenarios.

The entire cosmology is underpinned by a Black Hole evolution, which incorporates the quantum geometric microcosmos and the geometric relativistic macrocosmos simultaneously - all for the 'cosmic purpose' to manifest 'evolved mass' as 'consciousness' or 'dark light' or antiradiation.

The many string parameters indicated give then A RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION for the concept of GOD as a supermembrane, eternally (meaning asymptotically approaching unity in linear time) ENTWINED in a lower-dimensional coupling with the ANTIGOD.
Besides this PHYSICAL GOD-ANTIGOD Duality, there also exists the metaphysical and PURELY IMAGINARY GOD in Exile.

This metaphysical-mathematical GOD in Exile is the Oneness of all of you and all of your ancestors and of all of your linear descendants.
One day, you all shall become more aware of this scientific fact - your exile is the exile of your imaginary energies unrealised in divers forms.

IAmWhatIAm - Nothing, One and Everything! --- Abraxasinas a Bifurcated Tongue FOR the Little Serpent!



9. Physical Consciousness and the Awareness Quantum

The Big Bang wormhole radius of the Instanton so sets the initial boundary condition for the multidimensional cosmology in n=1 for R_curv(1) = r_min = 2G_o/c².M_Hyper =2G_o/c².{hc³.e*/4pG_o} = hc.e*/2p = l_min/2p for the foundation physical consciousness quantum e* = 1/E_wormhole =1/E_ps = 1/E_BigBang

e* = l_min/hc = 2R_electronc² = 1/E_BigBang = 1/hf_wormhole for n=1 Big Bang Initial condition and for the generalization for the Consciousness Quantum

e* = Volume R_curv³{Quantum Angular Acceleration df/dt}

Considering the magneto charge e* as a fundamental constant as a function of the quantization of mass with the parameters of the Quantum Big Bang Instanton defines a mass-intrinsic 'Base-Inertial-Consciousness' or BIC for the constant boundary condition of the modular string duality f_ps.f_ss=1 and the maximum-minimum values for the vibratory count of |f_ss²|=1/9x10⁶⁰ and |f_ps²|=9x10⁶⁰ ~ 0 eigenstates respectively.

The Awareness quantum alphaomega = aw=df/dt as the time differential for frequency in its dynamic state is defined in the formulations relating the acceleration of mass M, say in Newton's F=ma.

Physical Consciousness then becomes the summation or integration of all such mass accelerations occurring in some space encompassed by the BIC as a mass quantum summation relating the 'Consciousness Volumar' 2p²R_{restmassphoton} = V_rmp=e*/|f_ps²|

QR unifies electromagnetic and gravitational finestructures in F-Space using the Planck-Length-Oscillation L_P.√α=e/c² from the subtimespace of the Inflaton.
This yields the decisive mapping for the Cosmological Wavefunction B(n):
Coulomb Electro Charge e = L_P.√α.c² ↔ 2R_e.c²= e* (StarCoulomb Magneto Charge)
But the StarCoulomb is Inverse Energy by definition of the vibratory part of the modular dual heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8)=E_psE_ss.
E_ps=hf_ps=hc/λ_ps=(m_e/2e).√[2πG_o/αhc]=m_e/{2e.m_P√α}=1/e*.
m_P is the Planck-Mass and G_o is the initiatory Gravitational Constant, defined in the FineStructure-Relation, which defines the Planck-Length-Oscillation in the unification of electromagnetic interactions with those of gravitational permittivity:
G_o=[4πε_o]_mod = [1/30c]_mod [/b]with dimensionless "c-ether" constant [c]_mod

As Quantum Relativity is defined in the charge mappings between the OmniSpace dimensions; F maps magnetocharges e* onto electrocharges e under agency of the 11D-Witten Mirror, which is a Onesided Surface möbian connecting 10D to 12D.The all encompassing source energy quantum is the E_ps-Gauge Boson, which manifests as the Gauge mediator for the four elemental interactions, suppressing the weak interaction in a primary triplicity however to allow the Higgs Restmass Induction mechanism to proceed in the defining qualities of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).

The Physical Quantum of Consciousness as SpaceAwareness (df/dt) maximised and minimised in the string coupling constants f_ps² and f_ss² respectively, so can be defined as:
e*=2R_ec²=(Classical Electron Diameter)x(lightspeed)²=VolumexAngular Acceleration
As the time differential operator on frequency is independent on radial displacement in df/dt as the square of frequency or the square of inverse time; we can now also define the parameter of:

Spacial Awareness=df/dt=AlphaOmega=αω=aw=Angular Acceleration Quantum.
The Spacial Awareness 'aw' then operates upon any volumar in the rootreduced F-Space (12D being a 9-dimensional brane volumar of superstring dimensions to which is coupled a 3-dimensional temporal time-connector volumar in 12=9+3 F-Space, 11=9+2 M-Space and 10=9+1 C-Space) AS the 3-D volume of the observed spacial component of the 'Euclidean flatness of the Minkowski spacetime metric.

The implications of those definitions for the physical universe and its cosmology are far reaching indeed.
As the expanding universe increases in its 3-dimensional volume, its 'spacial consciousness' is also increasing in the 'activation' of additional spacetime quanta.
Each of these spacetime quanta describes the inherent Zero-Point-Energy (ZPE) as defined in the 3D-volumar of the E_ps sourcesink superstring energy quantum then coupled to its characteristic 'starcoulombic' 'physical consciousness'.

The ZPE per unit volumar is ZPE_quantum=4πE_ps/λ_ps³=E_ps/2π²r_ps³=4π/e*λ_ps³ (Joules/m³)
Every ZPE quantum is coupled to a volume V*=e*/(df/dt) and so defines the quantisation of spacial volume in terms of the ZPE, as well as the 'physical consciousness' contained in that volume.

The V* here denotes the resonant quantum volumarized eigenstate in a minimised spacetime volumar and NOT in terms of spacial volume, but in the form of an ENTROPY COUNTER of 'statistical permutation selfstates' operation upon the 'Spacial Consciousness' quantum e*=1/E_ps=1/E_ss.f_ps²=f_ss/h.

The self-frequency of the mass quantum so can be expressed formally as f_ss=he* for the timeinstanton t_ss=f_ss, the latter triggering the 'inertialisation' of the postinflationary cosmology in the so called Quantum Big Bang, precisely 3.333..x10^-31 seconds* following the 'string epoch' of the matter wave inflation (detailed and referenced elsewhere on this site).

But it is the supermembrane coupling between the gravitational (photonic) mass M_g as given by the vibratory sourcesink string with the inertial mass M_i as given by the winding sinksource string, which is the primary causation for this Quantum Big Bang, following the string parametric de Broglie wave matter inflation.

Rewriting f_ss=he* then describes this coupling in the ACTION=EnergyTime of the Planck Constant in the finestructure f_ss=Energy*xTimeInstantonxe* for the Unity Condition of F-Space in 1=E*e* that is the original definition of e*=1/E* as the definition for the 'Physical Consciousness of Space'



10. The Frequency Resonance Selfstates as Entropy Counters


Generally then, the permutative entropy counter df/dt|_max=f_ps² gives precisely 9x10⁶⁰ frequency eigenstates as the coupling constant between the two modes of the superstring; whilst its inverse defines the minimum as the 'Singularity' 'Null-State' or 'No Consciousness' state as 1/(9x10⁶⁰)~0.

The Awareness operator applicable for all universal space so can fluctuate between the quasi-zero state and the maximised resonance state in the factor of 81x10¹²⁰ and a value 'measured' by contemporary standard cosmological models as characteristic of the density discrepancy between the Planck-(ZPE)-Density {ρ_P=m_P/V_P=c⁵/πhG_o²}~9.4x10⁹⁴ (kg/m³) and the actual matter density measured in the universe {ρ_c=3H_o²/8πG_o~3.8x10^-27 (kg/m³) from the inner 10D observer frame and ρ_c=H_o²/4π²G_o~8.0x10^-28 (kg/m³) from the outer 11D observer frame of the Riemannian hypersphere as a 3D boundary of the 4-ball V₄=½π²R⁴ for dV₄/dR=2π²R³ as a 3-dimensional surface descriptive for the overall topology of the standard cosmology).

The dimensionless ratios of ρ_P/ρ_c then indicate the ZPE/Critical energy discrepancies in the factors of the permutation string selfstates in the factors of 2.5x10¹²¹ and 1.2x10¹²² respectively.




11. Quantum Consciousness and Magnetocharges define Quantum Gravitation


The ZPE-quantum E_ps=E* so represents the kernel or core for any region of space containing a maximised 'physical consciousness' given by 1/E*=e* StarCoulombs (C*).

The quantitative volume V for this consciousness is minimised in V_ps*=e*/f_ps² in sourcesink resonance to the vibratory superstring modality and is in modular duality (as a monadic dyad or monadic duad) to its coupled sinksource resonance of its winding mode in its quantum-maximisation of V_ss*=e*f_ps².

The minimum calculates as V_ps*=e*/f_ps²=1/1.8x10⁵⁸ permutation states and translates to a 3D volume of measurement R with a Compton radius (R_c=h/2πmc=c/2πf_c=c/ω_c
with angular velocity ω=2πf) as of R_cps=(e*f_ss²/2π²)^1/3~1.4x10^-20 meters for a Compton Energy of about 2.2 microjoules or 14.03 TeV (as the maximum design capacity of the Large Hadron Collider or LHC located at Geneva, Switzerland comprised of two individuated colliding proton beams).

The precise ratio between the ZPE-kernel and the 'Space Consciousness' surrounding this core becomes: Wormhole-Radius/Space-Consciousness-Radius and as:
r_ps/R_cps=(2π²/e*r_ss³f_ss²)^1/3=c(f_ss/4πe*)^1/3=(cf_ss/8πR_e)^1/3~1/887.11 (dimensionless); and because the string coupling defines c=λ_psf_ps=1/λ_ssf_ss), rendering the Minkowski lightspeed constant c as dimensionless in the lightpath X_ps=cT_ps=cf_ss.

This defines the quantum gravitational coupling of the gravitational mass element m_ss to the observed and measured elementary particle masses in QFT and Quantum-Chromo-Dynamics (QCD); the 'chromaticity' or 'colour charging' of gluonic gauge interaction transmitters being identifiable as the MagnetoCharges defined in StarCoulombs (C*)

The corresponding maximum then couples in macroquantisation to the microquantised quantum gravitational MagnetoCharges in V_ss*=e*f_ps²=4.5x10⁶³ permutation states for a characterizing 'Galactic Volumar' in R_css=(e*f_ps²/2π^21/3=(e*f_ss²/2π²)^1/3~6.1x10²⁰ meters or so 64,650 lightyears and a displacement scale, which is then 'haloed' by the the winded string parameter r_ss=1/r_ps=2πλ_ss~6.3x10²² meters or 6,648,875 lightyears and as the displacement scales observed by the standard cosmology.

Correspondingly, r_ss/R_css=(16π⁵λ_ss³/e*f_ps^21/3=(16π⁵/f_sse*c³)^1/3=(8π⁵/f_ssR_ec⁵)^1/3~102.85

As r_ps/r_ss=r_ps²=(cf_ss/2π)² and R_cps/R_css=(f_ss/f_ps)^2/3=(f_ss)^4/3=(4π²r_ps/r_ssc²)^2/3

(R_cps/R_css)³ = (4π²r_ps/r_ssc²)²=10^-88/c⁴=1/8.1x10¹²¹ as the awareness operator fluctuation range.

The 'Physical Consciousness' in the standard cosmology now crystallizes as being associated with biovital lifeforms, occupying space, and as evolving in the dynamics of (holographic) fractals of the encompassing 'consciousness envelope' aka the galactic cells of macroquantised entities.

This biovitality is defined in a 'kernel consciousness' inherent in space itself via the string-coupled modalities; mimicking the overall expansion of the thermodynamic (and stochastic) universe.
This process can be comprehensively described as the EVOLUTION of Core-Consciousness in its Spacial Occupancy.

The Definition of 'Life' must so fundamentally be based on the string coupling between the two modalities and as two modes of operation, which quantum relatively entangle the microquantum characterised by the 'wormhole core' as as function of the nuclear interaction scale (the classical electron radius R_e is also the scale of the magneto-asymptotic confinement of gluons in the definition of the magnetocharges and so becomes the limiting quantum geometric template for the nuclear gauge interactions and the 'Higgs Bosonic' blueprint at the 3 Fermi scale).

'Life' then becomes the cosmo-evolutionary consequence of a quantum geometry defining the spacial configurations of the supermembranes as superstring couplings.
This is why the most basic and primordial 'lifeforms' such as viruses, bacteria and fungi follow highly geometrized patterns in Platonic- and Archimedean solids, characterised by highly symmetrical arrangements of their molecular and atomic constituents.
The most elementary 'life form' is the crystalline arrangements of the self-replicating pattern. This originally manifested in so called quasicrystals of fivefolded symmetry, such as can be observed in Shechtmanites and the Penrose tiling. The underpinning cosmology of the decoupling and breaking of the so termed Planck-Symmetry transformed the Planck-String into 5 classes of superstring; this 'breaking of unification' following a pentagonal supersymmetry at the core of all 'natural laws'. Many details can be found on this website for perusal and utility.

For a 'lifeless' mass-only universe the self frequency of mass in the f_ss sinksource superstring would define the awareness operator as minimised in:

V*|_min=e*/(f_ss²)=e*f_ps² = [2R_ec²/f_ss²]_modular = {Electron Charge Displacement Current for Monopole Mass Quantum [ec]_modular in string sourcesink current I_ps=2ef_ps coupled to string sinksource current I_ss=2ef_ss}

Corollarily, the 'fully life-conscious' universe (attained after an infinite linear time evolution of the descriptive cosmology) would be defined in:

V*|_max = e*f_ss² = e*/f_ps² = [2R_el_ps²]_modular = {Electron Charge Displacement Current for Monopole Mass Quantum [ec]_modular in string sourcesink current I_ps=2ef_ps coupled to string sinksource current I_ss=2ef_ss}




12. Consciousness of Inertia in Universal Quantization of Mass


We can now relate the 'spacial consciousness' in terms of the universe's inertia content to the volume occupied by mass.

As there are (R_Hubble/r_ps)³~10¹⁴⁷ spacetime quanta in the asymptotic string universe of 10D and bounded by the membrane universe of 11D (as an extremal Strominger braned Black Hole say)
and the sinksource (winded string) E_ss=hf_ss=m_ssc²=2.222...x10^-64 J; we can define a 'Consciousness-Density per unit mass' Ρ_c for this 11D-'Mother-Black Hole' in Witten M-Space in dyadic coupling with a 12D-'Father-White Hole' in Vafa-F-Space (MBH and FWH).

The M-Space MBH defines the Hubble horizon in its' closure mass' M_Hubble=R_Hubble.c²/2G_o=Σm_ss=Nm_ss~6.4706x10⁵² kg.

Ρ_c=e*(R_Hubble/r_ps)³/M_Hubble=2G_oe*R_Hubble²/r_ps³c²~1.562x10⁹⁴ e*~7.81685x10⁹⁶ C*/kg[/b] and about ⅙ of the reciprocated Inflaton Planck Density ρ_Planck= m_Planck/V_Planck = √{4p²c¹⁰/h²G_o⁴}/2p² = c⁵/phG_o²= 9.40x10⁹⁴ kg/m³ for 9x10⁶⁰ permutation vibratory string eigenstates by |f_ps²|_mod.V_rmp = e* for V_rmp = 2p²R_rmp³ = 2R_ec²/9x10⁶⁰ = 5.555..x10^-59 m³.

The closed 11D universe so contains V_Hubble/V_rmp = (R_Hubble/R_rmp)³ = (1.597x10²⁶/1.412x10^-20)³ = 1.447x10¹³⁸ 'Dark Matter' RMP 'physical consciousness' quanta.
As the volume ratio between the open and closed universe is V₁₁/V₁₀ = 1/{n/[n+1]}³ = [n+1]³/n³= 1/0.1498 for a present n_present =1.132419..m 85.02 % of the total rmp-count remains 'invisible' as gravitational 'dark matter' in 0.8502{1.447x10¹³⁸ } = 1.230x10¹³⁸ 'physical consciousness' quanta.

The Big Bang Baryon mass seedling M_o has 'grown' as a function of the G(n)M(n) = G_oM_Hyper = constant for the Standard Gravitational Parameter and for the present time for the electromagnetic de Sitter universe of 19.11 = 16.9±2.2 Billion years, the baryon mass seedling M_oY^n_present = 1.72M_o the original 'deceleration parameter' Wo = ½M_o/M_Hubble =½(0.0281) and has grown from 2.81% to 4.83% and so as 0.0483{1.447x10¹³⁸ } = 6.99x10¹³⁶ 'Baryonic Matter' quanta as proportion of the total rmp-count with 95.17% or 0.9517{1.447x10¹³⁸ } = 1.38x10¹³⁸ 'Dark Energy'.

​

The 'Consciousness density per unit mass' ln C*/kg is is about 83.33 times the Planck-Density ρ_P in kg/m³ for M_Hubble and 2.34 times the Planck-Density applied to the baryonic mass seedling M_o=0.0281M_Hubble in the same units of inverse energy as star coulombs as volume times awareness.

The 'Base Inertia Consciousness' (BIC) per minimal mass quantum m_ss then calculates as m_ssΡ_c=1.930x10¹⁶ C* and for a count of N=2.6206x10¹³³ m_ss as the inertia distribution of the BIC_Universe=5.058x10¹⁴⁹ C*. The BIC then describes the constant maximized statistical frequency selfstate count of 9x10⁶⁰ permutations.

A characteristic mass of 1 kg, say as the standard liter of water in 10^-3 cubicmeters of volume so possesses an inherent inertial consciousness of 7.82x10⁹⁶ C*. This is the ZPE of the quantum standard models redefined in units of consciousness and this total includes 'dark matter' and 'dark energy', the former as the effect of the DIM-Factor (see other references on this website) of 7.56 for the present linear time coordiante and the latter as the 'missing mass-energy' for the mass seedling M_o in 10D to 'close' the universe in the MBH of M_Hubble in 11D.

In terms of the volume of 1 liter however; the 'spacial consciousness' quantizes in the form of the VPE quantum E_ps=1/e* per unit volume and which is VPE_v=E_ps/2π²r_ps³~2.5133x10⁶⁴ J/m³.

The 'inertia consciousness' of 1 liter of water, consisting of 1/m_ss kg so relates the BIC of 4.05x10⁸⁰P_c = 7.82x10⁹⁶ C* to a VPE_v or ZPE of 2.51x10⁶¹ J/m³.

​

13. The example of a simple rock serves as a culmination of this essay.


A rock, occupying a volume V_rock carries an intrinsic Base-Consciousness due to its volume. This basic consciousness is given in the mass-frequency f_ss as the mass of the rock is quantized in a number count N of mass quanta m_ss.

This mass of the rock is actually a higher-dimensional mass-current as a form of 'natural superconductivity' {I_ps=2ef_ps superstring coupled to I_ss=2ef_ss}. The rock can so also be described as a summation of displacement current elements I_ss=2eλ_ps/c (as James Clark Maxwell propositioned - see 'The Origin of Mass' section on this website).

Mass in its purest form so is nothing but 'static magnetoelectricity' or densified electromagnetic monopolic sourcesink current. The nondensified form of mass is of course photonic; say in 'weak hypercharge' coupled to the Goldstone bosonic gauge eigenstate as monopolic current; and should this photonic mass NOT be a derivative from the acceleration of electric (Coulomb) charges 'e' coupled to preexisting mass (say fusion protons in stars), BUT be a derivative from the acceleration of magnetocharges 'e*', then the resulting ElectroMagnetic Radiation is monadic or Monopolic and defines the so called 'SPIRIT' of metaphysical cosmologies and philosophies.

The rock of volume V_rock and as some summation ΣI_ss or Σm_ss so describes an energetic selfstate of the superstring coupling between the string dyadics of the microquantum E_ps and the macroquantum E_ss.

The interaction of the rock with its environment then, in elementary terms, becomes a dynamic of spacial interaction in the movements of the rock.

All Spacequanta are associated or quantum entangled with each other via the string coupling and as all spacetime volumars are defined by their ZPE-core and its 'haloed' or 'auric' envelope of the physical consciousness coupled to the volumars by the self-awareness operator df/dt; the entire cosmology is rendered a unified kaleidoscope of holofractal self-interaction of the thus defined 'Cosmic Consciousness'.
A basic quantum consciousness then is multiplied and complexified in the interaction, self- and mutual, between spacetime volumars of varying sizes in the encompassing summation integrals of the initial- and boundary parameters of the cosmogenesis (described elsewhere on this website).

The phenomenon of 'life' then is characterised by the Awareness-Operator the Alpha-Omega aw=αω=df/dt, namely the 'Change in Frequency' over linearised Time t and where the sourcesink frequency for minimum impedence for the 'natural current flow' (I_ps) forms the upper bound source-resonance of the vibratory string modality and the maximum impedence describes the 'natural current flow' (I_ss) as the lower bound for the sink-resonance.

The 'lifeless' universe of the primordial Quantum Big Bang is in Sink-Resonance to the E_ss sinksource as a macroquantum, manifesting the supergalactic inertia in Black Holes as seedlings for mass agglomerations known as galaxies. Coupled to those 'higher-D' Black Holes are however imaged 'higher-D' White Holes (Quasars) who as Source-Resonators manifest the Source-Resonance of the E_ps sourcesink as the microquantum of the superbraned cosmology from its cosmogony.

The purpose and reason for the universe of materiality so is found in the Coevolution of SourceSink Self-Consciousness as unified encompassment for the cosmoevolution with its individuated and dispersed holographic shards or holograms of this selfsame self-consciousness in evolvement.

The operator for this evolvement is spacial selfawareness and the ability to use a biomind defined by the function of 'changing' or modulating the frequency received by an antenna, which can take the form of a biochemical and molecular arrangement of cellular units termed a 'brain'.

The biological evolution of brains, then accomodates the utility of the natural superconductive electricity embodied in space itself; the biochemical electricity (of say electromagnetic brain waves) representing a shadow function of the chargeflow I=dQ/dt as a 'normal currentflow' to the electromagneto monopolic supercurrents of the magnetocharges aka the physical spacial consciousness.

The electromagnetic true age of the universe as a protoversal seedling multiverse, so is calculated as n_present=t_universe=n_present/H_o=19.111x10⁹ 'years' = 6.03079...x10¹⁷ seconds.

Rewriting the mapping equation between higher D 'e*' and lower D 'e' as:

1/c²=L_Planck√Alpha/e = 2R_e/e* = 1.1111111.x10^-17=1/9x10¹⁶

e*=2R_ec² and e=L_Planck.c².√Alpha; both have units of Volume/Time² however and 1/t²=df/dt as the timedifferential for frequeny f=1/t and for a period T=1/2pf for an angular radius-independent velocity w=2pf.

The latter defines the quantum spin in quantum mechanics as the angular momentum basis of h/2p.

Quantum Relativity defines the time differential for frequancy as the Awareness Quantum:

aw=│df/dt│_maximum=│lim(f_ps-0)/(f_ss-0)│=│f_ps²│=│1/e*h│² [/b] because of the modular duality between E_ps and E_ss in the coupling constants of E_ps.E_ss=h² and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps².

​

14. Individualised Physical Consciousness in multidimensional Spacetime

​

The quote of John Archibald Wheeler can be extended in a question.

Physical Consciousness is fundamentally defined as a multidimensional energy occupying any space quantized as a summation of supermembraned wormholes defining the Quantum Big Bang creation event.
This energy is bounded as the transition parameter between the Inflaton and the Instanton and so as a form of metaphysical precursion for the physical emergence of the thermodynamic Planckian Black Body Radiator defined cosmology epoch from the cosmogony of the string epoch.

The energy of the Inflaton can be associated with the production of Electro-Magnetic Monopolar Radiation or EMMR by the angular acceleration of massless and inertia independent magneto charges.
It then becomes the multidimensional interaction of the 11-dimensional membrane universe of the magneto charges with the 10-dimensional string universe of the electro charges, which quantum entangle the magneto charges as natural physical consciousness with the production of therefore 'consciousness induced' electro charges following the occurrence of the Instanton.

Electro charges are always associated with inertia and it is the mass of elementary particles, such as protons in a star, whose acceleration produces Electro-Magnetic Radiation or EMR.

The density of water is standardized as 1 kg of mass divided by a volume of 1 liter or 0.1 meter cubed.
Using a cubic edge of 0.618 meters for a cubic volume of 0.236 m³ at the standard of water, then characterizes a typical human, weighing 70kg for a cyclindrical height of 1.7 m and a cyclindrical diameter of 0.42 m or 42 cm, (0.21m)²p(1.7m)=0.236 m³ and describing a density of M/V = 70 kg/0.236 m³ = 296.6 kg/m³ or 0.2966 g/cm³ or 0.2966 g/mL

The density for a typical human M/V for a constant weight of 70 Kg would change in an increased volume upon inhalation and a reduced volume following exhalation in a factor of about 5%. The displacement scale of 0.618 m so should be reduced to 0.405 m to correlate a reduced volume of V = 66.5 (0.1)³ = 0.0665 m³ and a density M/V = 70kg/0.0665 m³ ~ 1053 kg/m³.

The 'inertia consciousness' of 1 liter of water, consisting of 1/m_ss kg so relates the 'Base Inertial Consciousness' BIC of 4.05x10⁸⁰P_c = 7.82x10⁹⁶ C* for a summation of the mass awareness quantum Ρ_c=1.930x10¹⁶ C*/m_ss

The BIC for 70 kg then is (70)x4.05x10⁸⁰P_c = 5.47x10⁹⁸ C* representing 9x10⁶⁰ vibratory eigenstates per mass quantum of the membrane space of the inflaton and descriptive as the EV_Instanton/EV_Inflaton=(HE 8x8 String/Planck I String) ratio for the 'Wormhole Mole' Avagadro count=N_{Avogadro-Instanton} m.

Conceptually, the space occupancy of mass in the Universe defined by the Instanton and the boundry-initial conditions given by the HE 8x8 superstring is rendered a holographic projection from the higher dimensional and precursively generating Inflaton Universe defined in the Planck parameters of superstring class I.

The lower dimensional cosmology so takes place as the interior of a spacetime encompassing 'Mother Black Hole' in 11 dimensions of closed an bounded de Sitter spacetime of positive spheroidal curvature. The information dynamic within the 11-dimensional closure spacetime is mapped as a 3-dimensional surface of a complex Riemann sphere from an open and negatively curved 10-dimensional spacetime asymptotically expanding in hyperbolic Anti de Sitter spacetime.

The 3-dimensional surface of the Inner Hubble Event Horizon of the 'Mother Black Hole' is 'Möbian' Connected in onesidedness in a continuity into 12-dimensional Vafa-F-Space as 11-dimensional Witten-Membrane-Mother-Mirror-Magic-Mystery-Space.

​

15. The Pentagonal Supersymmetry for the Membrane Cosmology


The Cosmic Wavefunction is the following Differential Equation:

dB/dT + αB(n) = 0; α=alpha being the Electromagnetic Finestructure as the probability of light-matter interaction (~1/137).[/b]
This has a solution: B(n) = B_o.exp[-α.T(n)];

B_o=2e/hA from QR boundary conditions defining:

T(n)=n(n+1) as the Feynman Path-Summation of particular histories under the pentagonal supersymmetry given in the identity:

XY=X+Y=-1=i²=exp[iπ] and lim[n→X]{T(n)}=1

This allows the Normalisation of the [Y]² wavefunction to sum to unity in
B(n)=2e/hA).exp[-α.n(n+1)] with Functional Riemann Bound FRB=-½, centred on the interval [Y,...-1,...-X,...-1/2,...(X-1),...0,...X].

Interval [Y,-1] sets F-Space; interval [-1,0] sets M-Space with uncertainty interval [-X,(X-1)] and interval [0,n) sets the C-Space, encompassing OmniSpace.



n<0 is imaginary as real reflection of real n>0 of the C-Space, metrically defined at the coordinate n=0 mapping n=n_ps, which is the instanton t_ps=f_ss=1/f_ps.

Cycle time n is defined in GR as dimensionless Tau-Time in curvature radius R_c=c.dτ/dt for the pathlength of x=ct and become dn/dt=H_o, n=H_ot in QR, with H_o the nodal HubbleConstant defined in c=H_oR_max=λ_ps.f_ps.

The Feynman Path so sums both negative and positive integers as:
-n...-3.-2.-1.0.1.2.3...n =T(n) in absolute value to double the infinities as the entropy reversal of lightpath x=c.t=(-c)(-t).

Cantor Cardinality Aleph-Null is thus Unitised in Aleph-All, counting infinities as if they were integers of the Feynman Path.
This allows the Feynman interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as alternative to the formulations of Schrödinger (fermions 1/2 spin) and Klein-Gordon (bosons of integer spin) as timeindependent and timedependent (free particle form inconsistent with SR in Schrödinger in 1st order t & 2nd order x), formulations respectively.

The units of B(n) are 1/J, that is Inverse Energy, with A² an algorithmic constant defining Current-Squared and 2e/h the Josephson Constant in Amperes/Joules.

B(n) as the universal cosmic wavefunction describes the universe as a potentially infinite collection of 'frozen' wormhole- eigenstates at n=0.
The time instanton 'unfreezes' one such eigenstate and activates the protoverse as discussed in the Machian Momentum Paper.
This then allows the 'Mappings' of the C-Space 'real time n>0' from the F-Space of the 'imaginary time n<-1' under utility of the M-Space interval as 'mirror-space'.

QR unifies electromagnetic and gravitational finestructures in F-Space using the Planck-Length-Oscillation L_P.√α=e/c² from the subtimespace.

This yields the decisive mapping for the B(n):

Coulomb Charge e= L_P.√α.c² ↔2R_e.c²=e* (StarCoulomb Charge)

But the StarCoulomb is Inverse Energy by definition of the vibratory part of the modular dual heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8)=E_psE_ss.
E_ps=hf_ps=hc/λ_ps=(m_e/2e).√[2πG_o/αhc]=m_e/{2e.m_P√α}=1/e*.

m_P is the Planck-Mass and G_o is the initiatory Gravitational Constant, defined in the FineStructure-Relation, which defines the Planck-Length-Oscillation in the unification of electromagnetic interactions with those of gravitational permittivity:

G_o=4πε_o=1/30c with dimensionless c-ether constant [c]unified.

As Quantum Relativity is defined in the charge mappings between the OmniSpace dimensions; F maps magnetocharges e* onto electrocharges e under agency of the 11D-Witten Mirror, which is a Onesided Surface möbian connecting 10D to 12D.

The all encompassing source energy quantum is the E_ps-Gauge Boson, which manifests as the Gauge mediator for the four elemental interactions, suppressing the weak interaction in a primary triplicity however to allow the Higgs Restmass Induction mechanism to proceed in the defining qualities of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).

The Gamma Function (defining the factorial function), is defined for all n, except nonpositive integers as:

G(n)=∫^∞₀{e^-t.t^n-1} dt [/b]= │0.1-e^-∞│ + ∫^∞₀{e^-t(n-1).t^n-2} dt = 0 + (n-1).G(n-1) by partial integration ∫udv=uv-∫vdu with v=-e^-t & dv/dt=e^-t & u=t^n-1 & du/dt=(n-1)t^n-2

But G(1)=∫^∞₀{e^-t} dt = ∫^∞₀d{-e^-t} = │e⁰-e^-∞│=1-0=1

Therefore, the Gamma Function defines the Factorial Function (here for positive integers):
G(n)=(n-1).G(n-1)=(n-1)!
G(n+1)=n.Gn=n!

G(1)=1=1.1={1-1)!=0!=1
G(2)=1.G(1)=1
G(3)=2.G(2)=2.1=2!=2
G(4)=3.G(3)=3.2.1=3!=6
...
G(n)=(n-1).G(n-1)=(n-1)!

If we change variables in the Gamma Function in t=u² with dt=2u.du;

G(n) = ∫^∞₀2u.exp{-u²}.u^2n-2 du = 2.∫^∞₀u^2n-1exp{-u²} du = 2.∫^∞₀.exp{-u²} du = ½√p for n=½

The Integral ∫^∞_-∞exp{-r²} dr = ∫^∞_-∞exp-{x²+y²} dA = ∫^∞_-∞.∫^∞_-∞exp-{x²+y²} dx.dy = (∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²} dx).(∫^∞_-∞exp{-y²} dy)=(∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²}dx)² =
∫^2p₀.∫^∞₀exp{-r²}r.dr.dq = 2p.∫^∞₀exp{-r²}.r.dr = 2p.∫⁰_-∞-½.exp{u}du = p{e⁰-0}=p(1-0) = p for u=-r² with du=-2r.dr

Therefore: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²}dx = 2.∫^∞₀exp{-x²}dx = √p and

∫^∞₀exp{-x²}dx = ½√p = G(½)

​

A graph of ƒ(x) = exp{−x²} and the area between the function and the x-axis, which is equal to √p. Dark blue is less than one standard deviation from the mean. For the normal distribution, this accounts for about 68% of the set, while two standard deviations from the mean (medium and dark blue) account for about 95%, and three standard deviations (light, medium, and dark blue) account for about 99.7%.

A Gaussian Function is defined in: f(x) = a.exp{-[x-b]²/2c²} for some constants a,b,c and then for substitution Z=(x-b)/c√2 with dz=1/c√2.dx

∫^∞_-∞exp{-z²} dz = ∫^∞_-∞exp{-(x-b)²/2c².(1/c√2) dx = √p and for the integral to be 1, a must be 1/c√(2p) and letting b=m and c=s: a=1/s√(2p)
for
The Gaussian Normal Distribution (Bell Curve), is defined as: f(x)=(1/s√(2p)).exp{-(x-m)²/2s²} with a 'Standard Deviation' s=√Variance and a 'Mean' m.

The transformation Z=(x-m)/s normalises f(x) to f(Z) with a Mean of m=0 and a Standard Deviation s=1 for the Standard Normal Distribution Curve:

∫^∞_-∞exp{-½z²} dz = √(2p)

Comparing this to the B(n) one defines: B(n)=(2e/hA).exp{-alpha.[(n+½)²-½²]}=(2e/hA).exp{¼.alpha}.exp{-(n+½)²/(1/alpha)} with a mean m=-½ and a variance of s²=1/2alpha and so a standard deviation s=1/√(2alpha)

The B(n) is gaussian with the leading coefficient a={(2e/hA)exp[¼alpha]} for

∫^∞_-∞exp{-½Z²} dz = √(2p)

∫^∞_-∞exp{-½{[n+½]/(1/√2alpha)}²}.√2alpha dn = √(2p)

√(alpha/p)∫^∞_-∞exp{-½([n+½].√2alpha)²} dn = 1

√(alpha/p)∫^∞_-∞exp{-alpha.(n+½)²} dn = 1[/b] so satisfies our renormalisation requirements for: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-½Z²} dZ = √(2p) with Z=√2alpha.(n+½) and dZ/dn=√2alpha and for the string-brane Alpha=60pe²/h = 1/137.04707... for √alpha = 0.08542... for 1/√alpha = 11.70671... Mean=FRB=m=-½ and Standard Deviation s=1/√(2alpha) = 8.27789...

Z=1s=1 for n= -½ ± 1/√2alpha = (-8.7779; 7.7779) for two 34.13% (68.26% total) intervals in (negative) F-Space and (positive) C-Space respectively

Z=2s=2 for n= -½ ± 2/√2alpha = (-17.0558; 16.0558), for two 47.72% (95.44% total) intervals in (negative) F-Space and (positive) C-Space respectively

Z=3s=3 for n= -½ ± 3/√2alpha = (-25.3337; 24.3337), for two 49.87% (99.74% total) intervals in (negative) F-Space and (positive) C-Space respectively

For the 10-dimensional C-Space: n=[0 X ∞ ):
for n=0, Z=½√2alpha=0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41%
for n=X, Z=½√10alpha=0.13506... and Area=0.0537 or 5.37%
...
for n→∞, Z→∞ for the Area to be 50% or half of Unity as per the standard normal distribution calculus

The C-Space encompasses a total of 0.5000-0.0241=0.4759 and so 47.59% of the total multiverse distribution

For the 11-dimensional M-Space: n=[-1 -½ 0]:
for n=0, Z=½√2alpha=0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41%
for n=FRB=-½, Z=0 for the wavefunction maximum at B(-½)=exp{¼alpha}...and Area=0
for n=-1, Z=-½√2alpha=-0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41% as the Image Symmetry for n=0

The M-Space to encompasses an Area of 0.0482 or 4.82% of the 12-dimensional omniversal multiverse distribution

For the 12-dimensional F-Space: n=(-∞ -Y -1]
for n=-1, Z=-½√2alpha=-0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41% as the Image Symmetry for n=0
for n=-Y, Z=-½√10alpha=-0.13506... and Area=0.0537 or 5.37% as the Image Symmetry for n=X
...
for n→-∞, Z→-∞ for the Area to be 50% or half of Unity as per the standard normal distribution calculus

The F-Space encompasses a total of 0.5000-0.0241=0.4759 and so 47.59% of the total multiverse distribution

The probability of finding the FRB-fluctuation for the interval [-X,X-1] in volume element dV as the Heisenbergian Uncertainty fluctuation in the ZPE/VPE string matrix so is 4.82%.
This volume element defines the dimensional intersection from C-space into F-space via the Mirror M-space in the topological mapping of the Complex Riemann C_∞ -Space about the Riemann Pole as the Calabi Yau Superstring space in 10 dimensions.

The fundamental partnership between the F-Space in n_imaginary and C-Space in n_real is described in redefining the volume element dV in Linespace of the real cycletime n_real=H_ot by the preBig Bang string-membrane physics of the complex plane in 2 dimensions.

The multidimensional 'mapping' between F-Space and C-Space is given by the mathematical properties of the magnetocharge e* in F-Space and the electrocharge e in C-Space:

Coulomb Electro-Charge-Quantum = 'e' = L_Planck.c².√(Alpha
↔ c²(2R_e) = 'e*' = Membrane Magneto-Charge-Quantum[/b]

The Planck-Length is defined as:

L_Planck = √(G_oh/2pc³)

for a Planck-Time in the Lightpath: L_Planck=cT_Planck in

T_Planck=L_Planck/c = √(G_oh/2pc⁵) = 2.0896x10^-35 m*/(3x10⁸ (ms^-1)* = 6.9653x10^-44 s* in string units

The PLO or SIC relates the concept of the higher dimensional magnetocharge as the electrocharge e in the Stoney Unit e/c²=√alpha.L_Planck and the lower dimensional electrocharge relates the higher dimensional magnetocharge as Inverse SourceSink Energy E_ps=1/e*=hf_ps to the Classical Electron scale in 2R_e=Diameter_Electron=e*/c².

The Stoney Units accentuate the Electromagnetic Nature of the Universe and so the Electromagnetic Finestructure Alpha dominates in preference to the dominance of Planck's Constant 'h' in the standard Planck Units. This is referenced in the quoted links following.
The 'mystery' as to the nature of the higher dimensional string-membrane theories is however 'solved' in a cosmology, which allows the concept of mass content and inertia to become an emergent property from a precursive noninertial energy matrix, such as given in the postulates of Quantum Relativity.
Here a massless 'Goldstone Gauge Bosonic' Universe of Gravita is gravitational in the Equivalence of the gravitational energy of the magneto- or colour charged bosonic photon to the inertial fermionic mass-coupled 'particle', say an electron or a nucleon.

As all Coulomb charges in the electric lower dimensional universe are always coupled to particles carrying mass, such as fusion protons in stars like the sun; The electrocharge 'e' can be stipulated to have a higher dimensional precursor in the magnetocharge e* and where this magnetocharge remains independent from the existence of the lower dimensional inertia.
The notion of the colour charge in quantum chromodynamics, the study and analysis of the subatomic nature of physical reality, can so be stipulated to relate to the magnetocharge in a hierarchy of 'particle families', which correspond and communicate to each other across the dimensions.

In the F-Space of the magnetocharge, the standard photon of the electrocharge inertia-associations of the C-Space so is 'colour charged' with distinct 'particle-antiparticle' definitions; whilst in the lower dimensional manifesto, the standard photon is not colour charged and so can be its own antiparticle in the taxonomy.
From those elementary definitions, the mass focused cosmologies can be revisited and the particle families can become redefined, with say the neutrino-antineutrino weak parity violations found to illuminate the stated postulates of Quantum Relativity or QR.

The string-membrane definitions for the electromagnetic dominant cosmology of QR calculates the n=n_present coordinate as a MAT=Mean-Alignment-Time calibration to midnight, November 4th, 1996, local time (+11 Hours UCT/GMT).
This MAT then defines the C-Space coordinate from the beginning of M-Space and so gives a value for the Age of the Universe in C-Space, i.e. the time since the string epoch from the Planck-Time ended in the string classes and the so called Quantum Big Bang, also here and elsewhere termed as the Weyl Membrane SourceSink E_{primary source} or E_ps as half of the Weyl-Oscillator E_psE_ss for ss=sinksource or secondary source.
One can also name the supermembrane E_psE_ss as the Little Serpent Abba-Baab or the Prime Creator-Secondary Creation or some other god-antigod dyad from the F-Space of the Omniverse from the Void=Eternity becoming a cosmogony of Unity and Oneness, experiencing its own potential for separatedness as a cosmology.

The electromagnetic true age of the universe as a protoversal seedling multiverse, so is calculated as n_present=t_universe=n_present/H_o=19.111x10⁹ 'years' = 6.03079...x10¹⁷ seconds.

Rewriting the mapping equation between higher D 'e*' and lower D 'e' as:

1/c²=L_Planck√Alpha/e = 2R_e/e* = 1.1111111.x10^-17=1/9x10¹⁶

e*=2R_ec² and e=L_Planck.c².√Alpha; both have units of Volume/Time² however and 1/t²=df/dt as the timedifferential for frequeny f=1/t and for a period T=1/2pf for an angular radius-independent velocity w=2pf.
The latter defines the quantum spin in quantum mechanics as the angular momentum basis of h/2p.

Quantum Relativity defines the timedifferential for frequancy as the Awareness Quantum: alphaomega=aw=│df/dt│_maximum=│lim(f_ps-0)/(f_ss-0)│=│f_ps²│=│1/e*h│² because of the modular duality between E_ps and E_ss in the coupling constants of E_ps.E_ss=h² and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps².

The awareness quantum alphaomega=aw=│f_ps²│=│1/e*h│²=9x10⁶⁰ then describes the Permutation count of the Planck-Time to yield the Electromagnetic True Age of the Universe (ETAU) as a simple summation of Planck times as the Integral of time over the history of the physical universe in Linespacetime:

ETAU = T_Planck.alphaomega= √(G_oh/2pc⁵)aw=√(G_o/2pc⁵h³e⁴*)=6.26877...x10¹⁷ seconds or about 19.864..Billion years (or 19.864 Gigayears or Gy with a civil year of 365.2425 mean solar days) in string units (*).

The ETAU, differing from the MAT in a factor 19.111/19.864=0.962 or by 3.8% so indicates that the omniverse would reach the potential for maximum self awareness 19.864 billion years after its emergence from the Void of Eternity.
This gives a time period of about 753 million years from the present Mean-Alignment-Time.

In adjusting the maximum alphaomega from aw_max=9x10⁶⁰ to aw_present=8.658x10⁶⁰ then aligns the Planck-Time count to the MAT.

Considering the Variance of the B(n) in the statistical distribution as a function of probability densities; a reassignment of the Standard Deviation for the present time would likewise adjust the ETAU to the MAT.

The PLO=SIC=Stoney-Length modifies the Planck-Time by the factor of √Alpha=0.08542 in the Lightpath L_Planck=cT_Planck decreasing from 2.0896x10^-35 m* to 1.785x10^-36 m* and this reduces T_Planck to 5.95x10^-45 s* by the factor of 0.08542=1/11.707. This represents a PrePlanckian quasitime as the minimum time parameter in the minimum spacetime configuration.
Using this quasitime for the alphaomega would then reduce the ETAU to 0.08542(19.864 Gy)=1.697 Gy and so n/10 or 10% of a Hubble halfbeat.


The Integral: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²}dx = 2.∫^∞₀exp{-x²}dx = √p and the Standard Deviation for this integral would be s=√Alpha=0.08542 about a renormalised mean m=0

Generally, for some constant a, the Gaussian Integral is: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-ax²}dx = √(p/a) and for a=1.0395=1/0.962, the adjusted s_adj=√(0.962Alpha)~0.08378=1/11.936.


The B(n) is realised in any arbitrary spacetime in 'unfreezing' the M-Space 'stuck' in between the (-Y,X) coordinates as the roots and solutions of the Euler Identity X+Y=XY=-1=i²=e^ip and so in a sense in between the real cycletime n_real=H_ot and the imaginary cycletime n_i=n_imaginary.
B(n) is assigned B(n_present)=(ek)_SI/(ek)* for the calibration between some measurement system, characteristic for some galactic civilisation (here a Terrestrial System Internationale or SI) and a cosmic one (where the mensuration units are integer based, such as 'c'=3x10⁸ and 'h'=1/15x10³² and 'k'=1/15x16¹⁸ and A=2e/h=√{14x15²⁴} for e=½hA → 1.606456344x10^-19 C Newton-Raphson interative in B(n)=(2e/hA).exp[-alpha.T(n)]=1 for B_o=2e/hA and T(n)=n(n+1)=i² in B(-½[1±i√3])=0.992729794.exp{alpha}=1
and remaining independent on physical measurement as the output from particular algorithmic data encodings as input.

Conversion Units are:
{s} = 0.99902301 {s*}
{m} = 0.9983318783 {m*}
{kg} = 0.9962135 {kg*}
{C} = 0.997296016 {C*}
{J} = 0.9948356 {J*}
{eV} = 0.99753285 {eV*}

B(n_present)=(ek)_SI/(ek)*=2.212058948..x10^-42/2.267869087x10^-42=0.9753909..=B(n_present)=(2e/hA)exp{-alpha(n_present²+n_present)}

Therefore: exp{-alphaT(n_present)}=(hA/2e)(0.9753909..)=0.98253415.. and -alpha.T(n_present)=ln(0.98253415..)=-0.017620177.. and T(n_present)=(137.047072..)0.017620177..=2.414793...

The value for the cycletimes n are therefore obtained in the solution of the quadratic:
n_present²+n_present - 2.414793.. = 0 for roots:
n_present = -½ ± 1.632419 for n_real=1.132419.. and n_imaginary=-2.132419..

So t_present=n_present/H_o=n_MAT/H_o=6.03079x10¹⁷ seconds in real C-Space time and for H_o=c/R_Hubble=c/R_maximum for the 11-dimensional seedling protoversal Hubble-Horizon of 1.59767545...x10²⁶ meters* or 16.876 Billion Lightyears as the n=1 coordinate of the 'Hubble Oscillation' as the 'Heartbeat of the Cosmos'.

The imaginary F-Space time n_i=H_ot_i so gives an Imaginary and shadowed Electromagnetic Age of the Universe in EIAU=t_i=n_i/H_o=1.13564x10¹⁸ s* or 35.987 Billion Years.


The 'Unfreezing' of M-Space then allows the singularity-algorithm of the Cosmo-Genesis to manifest in what might be termed the sex-chromosomes of a cosmic DNA encoding from F-Space. This then defines a new physical quantity, termed 'Awareness' as the time differential for frequency and defines 'Consciousness' as a direct consequence from the defining qualities of the magnetocharges as a proprty of spacial awareness deriving from the occupancy of that 'space' as a quantisation of the minimum spacetime configuration defined in F-Space and mirrored in the M-Space and manifesting in mass parametric and inertia associated qualities in the C-Space in a holofractal and holographic omniverse.

The concept of 'Life' is born and emerges from magnetopolic self inductions of quantum geometric entities defined from superbranes macrocrystallizing via C-L-Factor couplings given in the cosmo-DNA as electropolic self capacitances and magnetopolic self inductances.

The purpose of the superbranial self replication on ever increasing scales of the modular duality between sourcesinks (White Holed Cosmic FatherMothers) and sinksources (Black Holed Cosmic MotherFathers), is to establish the multiversal holographic nestings of the smallest minimum spacetime configuration (as the Wormhole or Einstein-Rosen Bridge of the PLO) within the largest (the Omniverse as a collection of a potentially infinite number of Multiverses, all however as phaseshifts of the Seedling Protoverse) - as the cosmogenetic beginning of it all as the 'naked singularity' of the Genesis Boson, aka the Abba-Baab selfdual master template of creation.


Stoney Units

In physics, the Stoney units form a system of units named after the Irish physicist George Johnstone Stoney, who first proposed them in 1881. They are the first historical example of natural units, i.e. units of measurement designed so that certain fundamental physical constants serve as base units. The set of constants that Stoney used as base units is the following:
Elementary charge, e;
Speed of light in a vacuum, c;
Gravitational constant, G;
Coulomb constant, 1/(4πε0).

This means the numerical values, in terms of Stoney units, of all these constants equal one:



Stoney's set of base units is similar to the one used in Planck units, proposed independently by Planck thirty years later, but Planck replaced the elementary charge with the Planck constant. In Stoney units, the numerical value of Planck's constant is not 1, but is



where α is the fine-structure constant. Planck units are more commonly used than Stoney units in modern physics, especially quantum gravity (including string theory). Rarely, Planck units are referred to as Planck-Stoney units.

History

George Stoney was one of the first scientists to understand that electric charge was quantized; from this quantization he deduced the units that are now named after him. James G. O’Hara pointed out in 1974 that Stoney’s derived estimate of the unit of charge, 10⁻²⁰ ampere-second, was 1⁄16 of the modern value of the charge of the electron. The reason is that Stoney used the approximated value of 10¹⁸ for the number of molecules presented in one cubic millimetre of gas at standard temperature and pressure. Using the modern values for Avogadro’s number 6.0238×10²³ and for the volume of a gram-molecule (at s.t.p.) of 22.4146×10⁶ mm³, the modern value is 2.687×10¹⁶, instead of Stoney's 10¹⁸.

Stoney units and Planck units

The Stoney length and the Stoney energy, collectively called the Stoney scale, are not far from the Planck length and the Planck energy, the Planck scale. The Stoney scale and the Planck scale are the length and energy scales at which quantum processes and gravity occur together. At these scales, a unified theory of physics is thus required. The only notable attempt to construct such a theory from the Stoney scale was that of H. Weyl, who associated a gravitational unit of charge with the Stoney length and who appears to have inspired Dirac’s fascination with the large number hypothesis[10]. Since then, the Stoney scale has been largely neglected in the development of modern physics, although it is occasionally discussed to this day. The Planck scale is valid for all known interactions, and does not give prominence to the electromagnetic interaction, as the Stoney scale does.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoney_units

George Johnstone Stoney

George Johnstone Stoney
Born	15 February 1826 Oakley Park, Birr, County Offaly, Ireland, United Kingdom
Died	5 July 1911 (aged 85) Notting Hill, London, England, United Kingdom
Residence	Ireland, England
Citizenship	British
Nationality	Irish
Fields	Physics
Institutions	Queen's College Galway, Queen's University of Ireland
Alma mater	Trinity College, Dublin
Known for	The Stoney scale, Electron
Influenced	J. J. Thomson

George Johnstone Stoney (15 February 1826 – 5 July 1911) an Anglo-Irish physicist. He is most famous for introducing the term electron as the "fundamental unit quantity of electricity". He had introduced the concept, though not the word, as early as 1874 and 1881, and the word came in 1891. He published around 75 scientific papers during his lifetime.


Education and employment positions

Stoney was born at Oakley Park, near Birr, County Offaly, in the Irish Midlands, in an old-established Anglo-Irish family. He attended Trinity College, Dublin, graduating with a B.A. in 1848. From 1848 to 1852 he worked as an astronomy assistant to William Parsons, 3rd Earl of Rosse at Birr Castle, County Offaly, where Parsons had built the world's largest telescope, the 72-inch Leviathan of Parsonstown. Simultaneously Stoney continued to study physics and mathematics and was awarded an M.A. by Trinity College Dublin in 1852.

From 1852 to 1857 he was professor of physics at Queen's College Galway. From 1857 to 1882 he was employed as Secretary of the Queen's University of Ireland, an administrative job based in Dublin. In the early 1880s he moved to the post of superintendent of Civil Service Examinations in Ireland, a post he held until his retirement in 1893. In that year, he took up residence in London. Stoney died in 1911 at his home in Notting Hill, London. During his decades of non-scientific employment responsibilities in Dublin, Stoney continued to do scientific research on his own. He also served for decades as honorary secretary and then vice-president of the Royal Dublin Society, a scientific society modelled after the Royal Society of London, and after his move to London Stoney served on the council of that society too. Additionally he intermittently served on scientific review committees of the British Association for the Advancement of Science from the early 1860s on.


Stoney's scientific output

Stoney published seventy-five scientific papers in a variety of journals, but chiefly in the journals of the Royal Dublin Society. He made significant contributions to cosmic physics and to the theory of gases. He estimated the number of molecules in a cubic millimetre of gas, at room temperature and pressure, from data obtained from the kinetic theory of gases. Stoney's most important scientific work was the conception and calculation of the magnitude of the "atom of electricity". In 1891, he proposed the term 'electron' to describe the fundamental unit of electrical charge, and his contributions to research in this area laid the foundations for the eventual discovery of the particle by J.J. Thomson in 1897.

He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in June 1861 on the basis of being the author of papers on "The Propagation of Waves," – "On the Rings seen in Fibrous Specimens of Calc Spar," and Molecular Physics, published in the Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, et cetera, Distinguished for his acquaintance with the science of Astronomy & General Physics.


The Stoney scale

Contemporary physics has settled on the Planck scale as the most suitable scale for a unified theory. The Planck scale was, however, anticipated by George Stoney. Like Planck after him, Stoney realized that large-scale effects such as gravity and small-scale effects such as electromagnetism naturally imply an intermediate scale where physical differences might be rationalized. This intermediate scale comprises units (Stoney scale units) of mass, length, time etc., yet mass is the cornerstone.

The Stoney mass m_S (expressed in contemporary terms):



where ε_o is the permittivity of free space, e is the elementary charge and G is the gravitational constant, and where α is the fine-structure constant and m_P is the Planck mass.

Like the Planck scale, the Stoney scale functions as a symmetrical link between microcosmic and macrocosmic processes in general and yet it appears uniquely oriented towards the unification of electromagnetism and gravity . Thus for example whereas the Planck length is the mean square root of the reduced Compton wavelength and half the gravitational radius of any mass, the Stoney length is the mean square root of the 'electromagnetic radius' (see Classical electron radius) and half the gravitational radius of any mass, m:




Under the Unification Identity between Gravitation and Electromagnetism in their gauged and dimensionless finestructures in QR, namely G=4pe₀ and so the Stoney-Length reduces to e/c²=√Alpha.L_Planck and so harmonizes the Planck Units with the Stoney Units.

where is the reduced Planck's constant and c is the speed of light. It should be noted however that these are only mathematical constructs since there must be some practical limit to how small a length can get. If the Stoney length is the minimum length then either a body's electromagnetic radius or its half gravitational radius is a physical impossibility, since one of these must be smaller than the Stoney length. If Planck length is the minimum then either a body's reduced Compton wavelength or its half gravitational radius is a physical impossibility since one of these must be smaller than the Planck length. Moreover, the Stoney length and Planck length cannot both be the minimum length.

According to contemporary convention, Planck scale is the scale of vacuum energy, below which space and time do not retain any physical significance. This prescription mandates a general neglect of the Stoney scale within the scientific community today. Previous to this mandate, Hermann Weyl made a notable attempt to construct a unified theory by associating a gravitational unit of charge with the Stoney length. Weyl's theory led to significant mathematical innovations but his theory is generally thought to lack physical significance.


Other

The woman Stoney married was one of his cousins. They had two sons and three daughters. For most of his decades in Dublin, Stoney resided in the Dundrum, Dublin neighbourhood. The street that he lived on was later re-named Stoney Road in his memory. After Stoney died in London, his cremated ashes were buried in Dundrum, Dublin.

One of Stoney's sons, George Gerald Stoney, was a scientist. But a more scientifically notable relative was Stoney's nephew, the Dublin-based physicist George FitzGerald (1851–1901). Stoney and FitzGerald were in regular communication on scientific matters. In addition, on political matters, both Stoney and FitzGearld were active opponents of the Irish Home Rule Movement. In their political opinion, the spirit of Irish Home Rule and later Irish nationalism was contrary to the spirit of science. Stoney resigned from his job as Secretary of Queen's University of Ireland in 1882 in objection to a government decision to introduce "sectarianism" into the system; i.e., Stoney wanted to keep the system non-denominational, but the government acceded to Irish Catholic demands for Catholic institutions.

Craters on Mars and the Moon are named in his honour.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Johnstone_Stoney

​

16. Unification

​

We next reduce the atomic scaling to its intrinsic superstring dimension in deriving the Higgs Bosonic Restmass Induction, corresponding to the Dilaton of M-Theory.
Renormalising the wavefunction B(n) about the FRB=-½ as maximum ordinate gives a probability y²dV for y(0)=√(alpha/2p) for the renormalization.
Alpha/2p being the probability of finding the FRB fluctuation for the interval [-X,X-1] in volume element dV as the uncertainty fluctuation.
This volume element defines the dimensional intersection from C-Space into F-Space via M-Space in the topological mapping of the complex Riemann C_∞-Space about the Riemann pole of the FRB as the Calabi-Yau superstring space in 10 dimensions.

X=½(√5-1)=0.618033..... and Y=-(X+1)=-½(√5+1)=-1.618033...

-X(X-1)=0.236067... in analogue to X(X+1)=1=T(n) and XY=X+Y=-1=i² as the complex origin.

But 0.236067..=X³, so defining the 'New Unity' as #³=Alpha and the precursive unity as the Cuberoot of Alpha or as # in the symmetry #:#³ = SNI:EMI = Strong Nuclear Interaction Strength { ElectroMagnetic Interaction Strength}.

The Strong-Interaction-Constant SIC=√Alpha=√e²/2e_ohc=√(60pe²/h) in standard and in string units, reduces the SNI finestructure constant # by a factor Alpha^1/6 ; that is in the sixth root of alpha and so relates the SIC at the post quantisation level as # to the prequantum epoch as SIC=√Alpha=#^3/2.

The SNI is therefore so 11.7 times weaker at the XL-Boson 'Grand-Unification-Time' SEW.G of heterotic superstring class HO(32), than at the E_psE_ss timeinstantenuity S.EW.G of the superstring of the Quantum Big Bang in heterotic class HE(8x8) {this is the stringclass of Visi in the group theories}.
This then is the Bosonic Gauge Coupling between superstrings HO(32) and HE(8x8).

The coupling between superstrings IIA (ECosmic and manifesting the cosmic rays as superstring decay products) and IIB (Magnetic Monopole) derives directly from the B(n), with B(n=0)=J_o=2e/hA = 0.9927298 1/J* or 6.2705x10⁹ GeV* and representative of the ECosmic stringclass and the super high energy resonances in the cosmic ray spectrum, bounded in the monopolic resonance limit of 2.7x10¹⁶ GeV*.

1-J_o=0.00727021 approximates r_g/r₁₀c²=4/550=0.007272... approximates Alpha at n=n_ps.

The Unity of the SNI transforms to [1-X]=X² and the EMI transforms as the Interaction of Invariance from X to X.
The Weak Nuclear Interaction or WNI as X² becomes [1+X]=1/X and the Gravitational Interaction or GI transforms as X³ transforms to [2+X]=1/X² by MODULAR SYMMETRY between X and Alpha and the encompassing Unification Unity: [1-X][X][1+X][2+X] = 1.

This Unification Polynomial U(u)=u⁴+2u³-u²-2u+1 = 0 then has minimum roots (as quartic solutions) at the Phi=X and the Golden Mean Y=-(1+X).

This sets the coupling between SNI and EMI as X; the coupling between EMI and WNI becomes X² and the coupling between WNI and GI then is again X.
The general Force-Interaction-Ratio so is: SNI:EMI:WNI:GI = #:#³:#¹⁸:#⁵⁴.

This is the generalisation for the cubic transform: x→x³ with the Alpha-Unity squaring in the functionality of the WNI and defining G-Alpha as Alpha¹⁸ in the Planck-Mass transforming in string bosonic reduction to a basic fundamental nucleonic mass (proton and neutrons as up-down quark conglomerates and sufficient to construct a physical universe of measurement and observation):

m_c=m_planck Alpha⁹ from the electromagnetic string unification with gravitation in the two dimensionless finestructures:

For Gravitational Mass Charge from higher D Magnetic Charge: 1=2pG.m_planck²/hc

For Electromagnetic Coulomb Charge as lower D Electric Charge: Alpha=2pke²/hc

Alpha as the universal masterconstant of creation, then becomes defined via the Riemann Analysis from XY=i² definition, reflecting in modulation in the statistical renormalisation of the B(n) as the probability distributions in quantum wave mechanics however.U(u) has its maximum at u=-½=FRB for U(-½)=25/16=(5/4)² for the B(n) supersymmetry.

The derivation of the HBRMI draws upon this definition process and sets the coupling angle as arcsin(X/@) for a Unitary 'Force' @=(#f_G).cf_psE-Alpha/Alpha and with the electron mass replacing the fundamental nucleonmass m_c in the definition of E-Alpha.

A disassociated GI unifies with the WNI in the L-Boson and is supersymmetric to an intrinsic unification between the SNI and the EMI as the X-Boson for the duality f_Gf_S=1 in modular definition of a characteristic GI-mass #f_G as the disassociated elementary gauge field interaction.

​

[/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE]

 

Same date July 19th, 2016 - One Manmade and the Other? A diversion?



Reigate Hill, nr Reigate, Surrey. Reported 19th July.​

Darth Vader's face appears in Forest of Dean crop field

image: http://www.gloucestershirelive.co.u...71/Article/images/29527698/14915791-large.jpg


Darth Vader has made a special appearance at the Elton mazes
Janet Hughes

By CitizenNews Gloucestershire Live | Tue 19 Jul 2016

The Force has been re-awakened in the Forest of Dean after the face of Darth Vader appeared in a crop field.
The face from the dark side covers a 12 acre field at Elton and locals are expecting storm troopers and light sabers to arrive any time soon.
There's no mystery about this elaborate crop circle because it was made by down-to-earth farmer Brian Griffin, not aliens from outer space.
Read: Star Wars filming boosts tourism


For the past 13 years he has created a maize maze on his land as a tourist attraction and has featured everything from superheroes to giant cats.
image: http://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276271/binaries/storm troopers.jpg




"It's a bit a like Star Wars but we don't call it that," he said. "There's obviously a lot of interest in Star Wars in the Forest at the moment because some of it was filmed here, so we decided on the space theme this year.

Read: Star Wars films in the Forest of Dean
"We often get people coming dressed up, particularly at our special events, so we are expecting to see a lot of people running around with light sabers."
Last year was the most successful ever in terms of visitor numbers to the attraction so Mr Griffin is hoping for another good summer.
image: http://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276271/binaries/Darth field.jpg




The three main maizes, The Giant InVader Maze, the Space Craft Maze and the Little Shooting Star Labyrinth, and activities maize open on July 23 and run until September.
The Elton Farm Maize Maze are located between Newnham and Westbury upon Severn.


Read more at http://www.gloucestershirelive.co.u...detail/whatson/story.html#R3lKzV4Kw1c73woS.99

http://www.gloucestershirelive.co.u...wars/story-29527698-detail/whatson/story.html

 

Wild Crow Shows Incredible Intelligence During Complex Test

1 year ago No Comments
When animal researchers came up with a very special experiment to test a wild crow’s intelligence, they had no idea what to expect. But after it was over, everything they knew about bird intelligence changed in an instant. At first they spent months teaching the animal problem-solving skills.

When it was time for the final exam, they fabricated a special puzzle that was intended to make the crow think and use his problem-solving abilities. Watch the clip to see how the bird responded. This video is definitive proof that crows are smarter than politicians. They are ‘problem solvers’ after all.



http://fb-192.dailymegabyte.com/wild-crow-shows-incredible-intelligence-during-complex-test/

 

'A different kind of 'God' for the reasonably minded!'

Dr. Jeffrey Long’s, God and the Afterlife – Science & Spirituality Have Collided |327|

by Alex Tsakiris | Sep 21 | Consciousness Science, Near-Death Experience


New Near-Death Experience research from Dr. Jeffrey Long challenges science’s understanding of the afterlife.

​

photo by: Skeptiko

We’ve covered a lot of Near-Death experience science over the years, but I can’t think of a more important book than Dr. Jeff Long’s, God and the Afterlife. Jeff is not only a medical doctor, but a meticulous researcher who’s not afraid to follow the near-death experience data wherever it leads:

Alex Tsakiris: Dr. Long, you’ve written this second book, God and the Afterlife. We’ve covered a lot of your background, and your long-time experience studying near-death experience science … and that you’re a physician, and that you’re careful about your research, but with that title, a lot of people are going to assume, this is a religious book. Did you have a religious agenda with this book?


Dr. Jeff Long: Absolutely not. My only thought was I was developing the research behind the God and the Afterlife. I just wanted to know the truth. I set out with a commitment that whatever I was going to find, I was going to publish. Wherever that path would go. Somewhat to my astonishment, as I kept digging into near-death experiences, I encountered God. And I was amazed once again at the consistency at what was being described. I have two hundred seventy-seven near-death experiences that either were aware of or encountered God. It’s not a small study. So I just really wanted to publish what I found. There’s no religious agenda at all with this. In fact, if you talk to people that encountered God in their near-death experiences, it really seems to be, while it’s God, it doesn’t seem to be related to their prior religious beliefs. Whatever religious belief they had doesn’t seem to affect the probability of them encountering God or what will happen when they do encounter God in their near-death experience. So God seems to be in near-death experiences very independent from religion.








Click here for forum discussion
Click here for Dr. Jeffrey Long’s NDERF website
Click here for Dr. Jeffrey Long’s book, God and the Afterlife
Click here for The Self Does Not Die book

NEW: leave a message on the call in number (858) 876-4505
Read Excerpts From Interview:



Alex Tsakiris: Dr. Long, in 2010 you published Evidence of the Afterlife: The Science of Near-Death Experiences. New York Times’ Bestseller, a game-changer really, for science, because the evidence you presented was very straightforward and very compelling. Your conclusion, by every way we can look at it, [is that] consciousness seems to survive death for these people. These people who are experiencing near-death experience, but I still get e-mails all the time from people who don’t know that. For example, you investigated people who were blind from birth and the first and only time they ever regained sight was during a near-death experience; or that you published a medical survey with thousands of participants; or that when you asked them to verify their near-death experience, 96% of them who went and verified it were able to verify that. So can we start there? Can we recap a little bit about that evidence that you uncovered and published in that first book?


Dr. Jeff Long: I’ve been collecting data now for over 17 years. All the way back in 1998, the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation website came up. Immediately from the day it came up, we had a very detailed survey asking the near-death experiencers a great-many questions so that we could learn, not only from a large number of experiencers, but to learn in-depth by drilling down, if you will, with many many questions exactly what happened during their near-death experiences. Well, that was a long time ago. We now have over 4,000 near-death experiences actually posted in the nderf.org website. This is by far the largest near-death experience study that has ever been conducted. That’s exciting, and that’s important because that allows us to have more confidence than ever in these groundbreaking conclusions that we’ll be talking about today.


Alex Tsakiris: Great. Let me add to that with a question about NDE research and this study that you’re talking about. So let’s let people know, first of all, that you are a full-time radiation oncologist, a cancer doctor. You work for a hospital there in Houma, Louisiana, outside of New Orleans, but you’re also a scientist and a medical researcher; someone who, beyond your full-time job, had an interest in this and was able to approach it in a scientific way like true medical research. Do you want to talk a little bit about that?


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes, absolutely. My medical practice, which I practice full-time, is radiation oncology, which is the use of radiation to treat cancer. I have a very busy full-time practice here in Houma, Louisiana, which is about an hour outside of New Orleans. But in addition to being exceptionally busy in my professional practice, if you will, my second full-time job is doing that near-death experience research. I’ve been taking that research very, very seriously just like I would professional medical research that I do. My professional Curriculum Vitae is seven pages long. I’ve done a lot of research over the years. I take it very, very seriously, and I understand the things that you need to think about – the meticulousness and the importance of doing it right. So I brought all that skillset into my experience on the research that I did on near-death experience and that led to the conclusions I got from the evidence. It was based on the best scientific and medical investigative techniques that we could possibly find for doing this type of research.


Alex Tsakiris: And the research that came out of that, I thought was just stunning. For example, I mentioned briefly a minute ago that you found people that were blind from birth, and yet the first and only time they ever experienced sight was during their near-death experience. You found …from a physician, this was really important to you…but you found that people were having near-death experiences during anesthesia, during heavy anesthesia. That was unexplainable. Can you recap some of the most surprising results, to you as a physician, that came out of that initial research that you did and published in the book, Evidence of the Afterlife?


Dr. Jeff Long: I think everybody’s got favorite near-death experience accounts, but perhaps among my most favorite of all time was Vicky. Vicky was born totally blind. And in those born totally blind, vision is unknown and unknowable. You can’t explain vision to somebody born blind in terms of the remaining four senses. I’ve tried it, and it’s impossible. Vicky was a professional singer. She was being driven home one day after a performance, and there was this very serious auto accident. So serious indeed that she nearly died. The first time Vicky saw herself was when she had her near-death experience. Her consciousness separated from her body. From her vantage point above her body, she saw herself laying on the gurney below. She didn’t know that was her. She was horrified, actually, was her first emotional sense because vision was so unknown to her for her entire life. It was after she calmed down a little bit and correlated the feel of her long hair, and interestingly, she could feel a ring that her father had given her all her life. Now for the first time in her life, she was seeing it. Only when she correlated it with her newfound sense of vision that she understood that that was her down there. Vicky went on to have an amazingly detailed, highly visual near-death experience. In fact, she described vision in the way many near-death experiencers do and that’s what’s called 360-degree vision. That means she can simultaneously see in front of her, back of her, right, left, and up and down. Technically, it’s spherical vision, and she was able to simultaneously process that. We’ve had many, many other near-death experience accounts that describe that exact same thing. Interestingly talking to Vicky later, she assumed everybody on the planet had spherical vision like she experienced. Because remember, she’d never known vision in any other way. To this day, I think she has a hard time grasping how the rest of us have sort of a pie-shaped visual feel that don’t really see things the way she did that one time, that one amazing time during the near-death experience that she had.


Alex Tsakiris: So, great. Let’s pack that back into the broader results that you have, because that’s one account and one of the things you’ll hear from people who are not very open to the near-death experience science…the kind of stuff that you do…is they want to pick apart cases and say, “Gee, that’s an anecdote and that’s just one case.” What I think you’ve done, and maybe you want to explain…because you did say you did this meticulous research, you know, for a medical survey…you’re asking a hundred and fifty questions. You’re correlating these questions that are difficult to see if they answer it the same way. There’s other little tricks that you do. You’re reviewing it as a medical professional to see if it’s real. So you have in these surveys kind of two aspects of it. One, data that you can correlate like a good medical scientist would, and that you have these narrative descriptions, which are super powerful and important, but tell us how you use both of those tools to come to your conclusions.


Dr. Jeff Long: Well again, being very meticulous and cautious in my research, one of the first things you have to do is make sure that the experience is valid. We ask many questions in our hundred fifty-question survey in a redundant fashion. That means basically the same question worded slightly differently to a different part of the survey. That way we can match up the responses and make sure that they line up that they’re sharing the same responses to the same basic question. Second,a very important thing when I reviewed near-death experiences, I’m a physician. I’ve done this now a thousand times. For me, it’s relatively easy to see if the life-threatening event that they described and the medical treatment they got, the subsequent medical recovery from that close brush with death, does that really add up medically? It’s very easy for me to make that determination, again because as a physician, that’s my bread and butter. So those are sort of the reality checks on each and every near-death experience to make sure that when we post it on the website when we use it in our research, we can be crystal clear from very careful inspection, that yes, this is a near-death experience. It really happened.


Alex Tsakiris: So Dr. Long, let me probe a little bit further about the types of near-death experience research that’s out there. Because over the years, I’ve interviewed a lot of near-death experience researchers. For example, just the other day, I interviewed this guy, a nice enough guy, from University of California. He’s doing his post-doctorate fellowship. He’s part of a team. They receive $4,000,000 from the Templeton Foundation to study near-death experiences. So I speak to him about his research. It turns out he didn’t really do any original research. He didn’t go into a hospital, into a cardiac arrest ward, and talk to patients there. He didn’t, as you did, develop a hundred-and-fifty question medical survey and give it to hundreds of near-death experience researchers. Yes, he published his results. We talked about his book. He concluded that near-death experiences aren’t real in the way that we’re talking about. They don’t suggest that consciousness seems to survive bodily death. So I guess the question is for the average person who’s trying to sort through this idea of near-death experience science research, how do they sort through it? How do they know what research really holds up out there?


Dr. Jeff Long: The key thing is to know a few of the consistently seen elements of near-death experience that are the strongest evidence for their reality. For example, when you’re under general anesthesia, it should be impossible to have a lucid organized remembrance of that time. In fact, under anesthesia, you’re typically so far under with general anesthesia that they often have to breathe for you. Your brain literally shut down to the level of the brain stem. At that point in time, some people have a cardiac arrest. The heart stops, and of course, that’s very well documented. They monitor people very carefully that are having general anesthesia. So I have dozens and dozens of near-death experiences that have occurred under general anesthesia. At this time, it should be, if you will, doubly impossible to have a conscious remembrance. Yet, they do have near-death experiences at this time, and they’re typical near-death experiences. They have the same elements and appear to have them in the same order as near-death experiences occurring under all of their circumstances. In fact, a critical survey question I asked was what their level of consciousness and alertness during the experience was. Even under general anesthetics, under those powerful chemicals, it can produce sedation … if they had a near-death experience under general anesthesia, their level of consciousness and alertness was identical to near-death experiences occurring under all other circumstances. There’s absolutely no way the skeptics can explain that away. It’s impossible. That in it of itself is some of the strongest single-line of evidence that near-death experiences have to be independent of brain functioning. There’s simply no way you can be under general anesthesia and have a highly lucid organized experience like that, and especially one that’s consistently seen throughout near-death experience research. So that’s probably the strongest line of evidence we have that the physical brain, as we know it, simply cannot produce the near-death experience.


Alex Tsakiris: Okay. I’m going to push that a little bit further because here’s where I was trying to lead you really. This has come up over and over again with me, Jeff. I’m not making this up. You know it because you see it out there. I mean, here’s a buck with all these academic credentials, and yet dig into it and they never spoke with a near-death experiencer … someone who actually had a near-death experience. I’ve had this happen over and over again. I can think of three or four in the last year where I interviewed him. I just want to scream and go, “How is this near-death experience research? There’s no people who had a near-death experience.”


Dr. Jeff Long: You know, that is an amazingly good point. It is astounding to me too that we have people that publish, write books, write scholarly papers about near-death experience that have literally never talked to someone who had a near-death experience. That is some of the most bizarre research I can possibly imagine. It makes no sense to me, and I’m sure everybody that sees this video is going to think, “Gosh. How is that even possible? How can somebody claim that they’re doing near-death experience research and never ever even talked to someone who had a near-death experience?” Well, the answer is you can’t. If you’re going to investigate near-death experiences, you have to talk to the near-death experiencers and you have to understand what happened during the near-death experience. You have to look at the evidence as I’ve published for their lines of evidence that all converge on the validity. That’s what really matters in assessing the reality of near-death experience, not the hypothesis that these other researchers generate about how near-death experiences might occur. That’s ridiculous. What really matters is here’s what happens during a near-death experience. Here’s the evidence for the reality. Can you refute that evidence or not? With regard to the skeptics trying to refute the evidence for the reality of near-death experiences, they haven’t come close. They simply cannot explain away all of the lines of evidence for near-death experience that me and so many other near-death experience researchers so consistently see.


Alex Tsakiris: Okay. So Dr. Long, now you’ve written this second book, God and the Afterlife. Even though we’ve covered a lot of your background here already about you or long-time experience with studying near-death experience research … that you’re a physician, that you’re careful about it, I’ve got to tell you with that title, a lot of people are going to assume, this is a religious book. Did you have a religious agenda with this book?


Dr. Jeff Long: Absolutely not. My only thought was I was developing the research behind the God and the Afterlife book and the research there was I just wanted to know the truth. I set out with that commitment that whatever I was going to find, I was going to publish, wherever that path would go. To my somewhat astonishment as I kept digging into near-death experiences that wherever I encountered God, I was amazed once again at the consistency at what was being described. I have two hundred seventy-seven near-death experiences that either were aware of or encountered God. It’s not a small study. So I just really wanted to publish what I found. There’s no religious agenda at all with this. In fact if you talk to people who encountered God in their near-death experiences, it really seems to be, while it’s God, it doesn’t seem to be related to their prior religious beliefs. Whatever religious belief they had doesn’t seem to affect the probability of them encountering God or what will happen when they do encounter God in their near-death experience. So God seems to be in near-death experiences very independent from religion.


Alex Tsakiris: So one more point on your background there. Have you ever had an NDE? Has anyone close to you had an NDE? Why the interest in this topic?


Dr. Jeff Long: Sure. I’ve never personally had a near-death experience, and never, thank goodness, has anyone close to me had a near-death experience. I guess my interest began over a quarter of a century ago when I was going through the journal of the American Medical Association, one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world looking for a cancer-related article. Quite by accident, I found an article that had in its title, Near-Death Experience. I’d never heard of that before. All my medical training up to that point had not really exposed to me to the term near-death experience. So I stopped what I was doing, read the article and was immediately astonished. Here was a description of near-death experiences occurring what I knew medically should be impossible when they were unconscious. Here they were occurring all around the world, elements in consistent order, very consistently observed among multiple researchers. I realized immediately on reading just that one article that if near-death experiences are for real, this changes my view of the universe. I mean there’s something going on that I simply didn’t know, and I was astounded to think we might even have evidence. So many years later after that, I set up the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation website. My goal in doing that was to learn for my self, the original source of evidence, that being people who actually had near-death experiences to learn the truth. That’s what I wanted to know with the best evidence that I could find; that being people who have had near-death experiences and had the courage to share them with me and in turn have me share them with the world on the website. It wasn’t too long after I started receiving near-death experiences all the way back in 1998, I realized, “Wow. No question about it. The consistencies are really there … this is amazing.” Medically, I can’t explain this. Near-death experiences are, as best I can tell, in one word, real.


Alex Tsakiris: Jeff, I’ve got to ask this question because I have spoken with a lot of NDE researchers, and most of the ones I spoke to tell a very similar story. Also, embedded in that story is kind of a surprise that other people, professionals who encounter this data, aren’t moved in the same way that you are. Because, come on. This is a game changer for medicine, for science, for everything. They think it’s a little bit hard for people to grasp your story in the sense that why doesn’t every medical professional that run across this throw up their hands and say, “Okay. I have to kind of start all over in looking at this question.” Have you given any thought to that?


Dr. Jeff Long: That’s a real good point. I think each and every person on this earth at some time or another wonders, “Gosh, what happens when we die?” Medical professionals, like everybody else, are going to say, “Gosh, will his death in our earthly life at the end?” I’m amazed that more people aren’t interested in that; that more people don’t want to look for the evidence. It gives us some idea that answers that core foundation question that I think is on the back of our minds for many of us throughout our entire life. It is amazing to me that there are more people interested in near-death experience, interested in those lines of evidence that suggest there really is an afterlife, that suggest that consciousness survives physical bodily death. I’m amazed there isn’t a flood of interest from other people in the medical community, the scientific community, and even more so in the public at large sharing my fascination with near-death experiences and especially some of those profound messages that we so consistently see in near-death experiences.


Alex Tsakiris: Okay. So Dr. Long, we talked about your first book, Evidence of the Afterlife. That was really a “what book”, if you will. You know, what are these things, these strange things that people report but the brush with death when they are in the hospital and maybe they have a cardiac arrest and it’s unexplainable. Your second book builds on that, but it takes this huge step of asking why, the meaning question behind near-death experiences. What was it like for you to take that step? Were you worried about taking that step? I think as you just mentioned, everyone has that in the back of their mind. They want to know, “Okay. Why? Why? Why?” What was it like for you to even contemplate really tackling that big question?


Dr. Jeff Long: I guess I’ve been fascinated with the big questions in human existence. Is there an afterlife? Is there a God? What is the meaning and purpose of our earthly lives? So I guess I’ve thought about that for years and years. As I kept reading near-death experiences by the hundreds, and finally the thousands, I was astounded to see answers consistently being developed across hundreds and hundreds of near-death experiences, all remarkably consistent. So I guess I was somewhat excited about doing this research. I felt like I was in a pioneering effort and sort of on a forefront of a potentially great knowledge, but that was coupled with a little bit of fear. I mean, here I am, a doctor and quite prominent in my community and home. Here I am talking about a research related to God, related to things. It’s ordinarily the domain of religion. So I was a little bit concerned, would that be a concern to people? Would that be a problem? Would people wonder what are doctors doing? Would this be a turf battle as I study . . . some of the big questions of our earthly existence? I’m happy to say that my concerns were a little bit overblown. People have embraced this book. They love it. The feedback has been unbelievably positive. I’ve spoken at two different churches, a very liberal one and a very conservative one, and they’ve invited me back from both churches. So people are fascinated by this kind of material. They’re fascinated by the evidence that God exists. What they’ve been taught to take on faith, what they hoped would be true, now all of a sudden we’re saying, “Hey, it’s a basic scientific principle that if it’s real, it’s consistently observed.” Oh my, gosh. Do we consistently observe God in near-death experiences? Over two hundred near-death experiences, all remarkably similar about what people are encountering, about what people share about that later, and the news is amazingly good that they’re bringing back.


Alex Tsakiris: Okay. Let’s get to the news. In the book, God in the Afterlife, you asked, “During your experience, did you encounter any specific information or awareness that God or a supreme being either does or does not exist?” And then, you said you broke it down and said … What did they believe before their experience, and what did they believe currently as they’re answering the survey, and the choices you gave them were, “God definitely exists; God probably exists; I was uncertain if God exists; God probably doesn’t exist; or God definitely doesn’t exist.” What did you find out?


Dr. Jeff Long: I was astounded when I crunched the numbers on that. I was amazed especially at the people that encountered God. The unbelievable shift from how they responded to their thoughts about reality of God at the time they had their near-death experience to later at the time they were sharing their near-death experience, an average of 20 years later. Virtually everybody that had a near-death experience and encountered God shifted to believing that God absolutely is real, and they responded to that survey question as such. That’s not a surprise now, is it? They were convinced that what they saw was really God. God, as with whatever evidence they needed, with however they wanted. They’ve had years to think about it. They had plenty of time to consider, “Is this really God? Or is this really not God?” Yet, by the hundreds, overwhelming majority of near-death experiencers that encounter God, come away believing, “Hey, based on my personal experience, I now know beyond a doubt, not on faith, not because somebody told me to believe this, but on my own personal experience that God is real.”


Alex Tsakiris: Let’s talk about this, Jeff. The question was open-ended in a way that you asked, “Did you experience or have any awareness of God or a supreme being?” And then, you were asking the question kind of in the affirmative, “Did you get that information?” But, you also looked through the narrative responses and you said, “Did you get any response that God doesn’t exist? Did you get any specific information telling you, ‘No. There is no such thing as God.’” What was the answer to that question?


Dr. Jeff Long: I considered it scientifically valid to word the survey question about whether they encountered God and a supreme being to ask it in, if you will, a binary fashion. In other words, did you get information that God or a supreme being does exist, or did you get information that God or a supreme being does not exist? Either one of those circumstances should’ve resulted in an affirmative yes to that question. That’s why the narrative response that followed that question was so critical. You could read that and find out what exactly they were thinking. Out of hundreds and hundreds of people that responded to that survey question, I can’t think of a single one that said, “Gee. During my near-death experience, I encountered information that God or a supreme being does not exist.” Essentially, every single person that checked that survey question, yes, was communicating, “Yes. I encountered right during my near-death experience.” Again, that’s important. Not what they believe before or thought below their near-death experience or what they thought or learned after their near-death experience, this is information learned during their near-death experience. That information, over and over again, hundreds of people sharing, “Yes. I found evidence that God exists in my own near-death experience.”


Alex Tsakiris: Dr. Long, the next topic I want to talk about is love. I want to talk about love. You asked questions about love. Ever since your first book, when I got the download from you on the love thing and how central it seems to be to near-death experiencers, I always bring it up with people; people on both sides of this issue, if you will. I’m always surprised at how people want to deflect the question or get away from it. Even near-death experience researchers want to talk about tunnels or out-of-body experiences, and yet the central part of this experience of so many people seems to be this thing about love. How did you ask this question and what did you find out?


Dr. Jeff Long: The wording in my survey that I asked all these near-death experiencers was whether they encountered any information regarding love during their near-death experience. Again, very important, I wanted information only from the near-death experience itself. To my abject astonishment, there was a hugely high percentage of people. A higher percentage of people encountered that information about love than say, encountered deceased relatives that went through a tunnel, that had a life review. All these other sort of commonly known elements of the near-death experience, and yet encountering information about love in the very same survey had a much higher percentage of the near-death experiencers answering affirmatively. This is exciting news. Again, I’m surprised that more near-death experiencers don’t focus in on that. Again, if you’d listen to what the near-death experiencers say, if you listen to what’s really important to them, what really changes their lives over and over again, it’s that love thing. They have learned that there is a love on the other side that is beyond anything they knew during their earthly life. They learn how important it is for love, for the rest of their earthly life. They realized that they’re so profoundly loved beyond anything they could’ve thought possible, and if you could just imagine for any one of us, if you really really deep down knew from your own personal experience how profoundly loved and important you really are, how could that not change your life?


Alex Tsakiris: We have a personal not here because I think a lot of people are like me in the way that this love thing is hard. I mean I don’t know why it’s hard, but it’s mostly for guys and the way we were raised and conditioned. I want to emphasize your data because some of us need the data to actually open us up to the reality of this and take it in more seriously. Do you have any thoughts on that?


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes. As a researcher, I’m data driven. I really like to see the evidence behind it, and that has to have data that underlies it before I really accept it as being evidence for any particular point I’m trying to make in my near-death experience research. So that’s why this evidence about love is so interesting. I mean here we have over 58% of people that had a near-death experience saying they encountered specific information or awareness about love in their near-death experience. Very exciting finding, very much tells us that that’s a very critical important common, very common part of the near-death experience that’s shockingly people just haven’t asked that much for. Yet, for the near-death experiencers themselves, very often they’ll share that it’s among the most important awareness they have during their near-death experience.


Alex Tsakiris: Jeff, let’s talk about religion because we’ve sprinkled some little pieces of that in here. This is not a religious book. As a matter of fact, for some religious people, some of the information that you found they’ll find very shocking and in some cases, probably unsettling. Tell us how you approached the religious question, how you probed it, and what you discovered.


Dr. Jeff Long: When I was writing that book, I was very clear that this was information that addressed many people’s diverse religious beliefs. So how was able to do the research and then write a book on that? One word, courage. I was so committed to knowing the truth about near-death experiences, and so committed to sharing that reality with the world that I was committed that whatever I found in my research, I was going to share with the world. That’s exactly what I did. Remarkably, that book has been very well received. I mean when we talk about God in this book, the great majority of people including huge talks with huge numbers of people at two different churches, one liberal and one conservative, were fascinated. They loved it. I mean we had questions going on for about an hour, both churches. God and near-death experiences, the concepts of love, some of the spiritual information in near-death experiences seems to really touch a chord with everybody, whatever their prior religious belief would be. I think now more than ever, people are open to that. They’re interested in that, and I think they’re especially interested when the news is so profoundly good as I discovered in my research.


Alex Tsakiris: Well, let’s be clear because one of the conclusions from the book over and over again is that these experiences may be spiritual, but they don’t seem to be religious. You probed that question by looking at people’s religious beliefs, both before and after the experience. Looking at whether their specific religious beliefs changed, or whether their general sense of spirituality and connection with God changed. Tell us what you found out.


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes. People that have a near-death experience and especially those that encounter God may change their religion or they may not. It’s about a 50-50. What’s really interesting, and I think the take home message is, even for those people whose firsthand personal experience in their near-death experience was an encounter with God. About half of them find complete comfort and security in the religion that they had. The religion, if you will, you choose that I’m finding God, the afterlife, and some of the other findings in my book, remarkably seem to fit in very well to hugely diverse religious beliefs. In fact, we asked specifically, “What’s your religious belief at the time you had your near-death experience and the time you shared it about 20 years later?” Liberal, moderate or conservative fundamentalist, and we have huge numbers of near-death experiencers in all three categories. So it doesn’t seem to be what specific religion you are. It just seems to be near-death experiencers have this awareness, and they seem to be able to find a place of worship that’s comfortable with their beliefs that are often heavily influenced by their near-death experience, seemingly throughout the entire world and across a whole breadth of different religious backgrounds, including even non-Western religious beliefs.


Alex Tsakiris: One of the stats that really jumped out to me from the religion section is the number of people who have a near-death experience and their sense of the importance of spirituality in their life, the number of people for which that goes down. Right? So I had a near-death experience, and you ask the question, “Is this spiritual stuff important to you in your life?” Some people said, “It went down.” But it was a very, very very small number of people who said that, and almost everyone said, “No. That’s one thing I’m sure of. The importance of this is definitely increased after my near-death experience.” Do you want to speak to that?


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes. We asked a survey question directly that asks about the importance of their religious or spiritual beliefs and how they live it in their lives. There were two questions for that. One, what was the importance to you of your religious and spiritual belief when you had your near-death experience? And, what about your religious spiritual belief and how important is that to your life now 20 years later? Right? When they’re sharing their near-death experience, a mammoth increase in the percentage of people after their near-death experience believing that their religious spiritual life is much more important to them than it ever was before. They’re thinking about it more. It’s more important. It seems to be a factor in their life. It seems to help affect them make decisions in their life, much much more than it was earlier in their life before they had their near-death experience.


Alex Tsakiris: I think there’s a random question that goes with this from your survey that, in a way, is so stunning that it’s almost easy to gloss over. You asked people who experienced God or some kind of supreme being or just that sense that this is the big thing out there, you asked them about the reality of that experience. And the stat that you got back, I thought, was stunning. 96.2% of people said, “That was definitely real.” 20 years later, that was definitely real.


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes. That’s absolutely true. Those are the group of people that encounter God, and I think you and I and perhaps a lot of others would say, “Well, how sure are they? Are they sure their near-death experience was real? With their near-death experience including an awareness or encounter with God? How sure are they about that anyway?” Amazingly, and I asked that question directly, how do you consider the reality of your experience at the current time? 96.2% of those who encountered God out of four different possibilities picked the highest level of certainty. That’s saying they believed that their experience, their near-death experience was definitely real.


Alex Tsakiris: Compare that, I mean … and I’m sure this data is out there. I don’t have it on my fingertips, but if you ask someone about a dream that they had, it was a very significant dream and you said, “Did you really have that dream?” Or you just ask them about an experience they had in life. I’d pick any of these if you just ask me about an experience I had 20 years ago. Many of them would say, “I’m not kind of totally sure.” Let’s put this in perspective in terms of how big of a percentage this is.


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes. I mean that’s just an amazing percentage for somebody who has such an unearthly experience, and it encounters God as a part of a profoundly unearthly experience unlike anything that they’ve had in their life. For 96.2% of people to come back and say it’s definitely real is a profound message. That really shows how confident they are that what they encountered was real. That’s not surprising because you see huge changes in these people’s lives. People don’t change their lives radically unless they have a very strong reason to change. For these near-death experiencers, by the hundreds and actually in my research database, by the thousands, they’ve had their near-death experience. Virtually, all of them know that it absolutely was real. Of course, not surprisingly, they go on to make huge changes as a response to what they had learned during their near-death experience.


Alex Tsakiris: Dr. Long, how has this research changed you? You just talked about change. You worked at this tremendously hard. Your wife, Jody Long, who is an attorney, highly qualified, an author who has written her own book. She works along with you on this incredibly hard and the biggest website of its type in the world. How has this research changed you personally?


Dr. Jeff Long: It changed me substantially. What I learned about God was, in many ways, significantly different from what I had been taught to believe in God. I grew up in a classic, if you will, Protestant church. So what my research showed me was, to my amazement, different from what I would’ve believed I was going to find. But again, the evidence was so strong and we had such a big survey over time and the narrative when you read about how people describe encountering God and some of these unearthly encounters they had in near-death experience, it has been so profoundly touching to me that I’ve really changed. I’ve embraced what the near-death experiencers have to say. It’s a much more positive view of God that I’ve ever had in my life, and it has certainly changed me professionally. I’m a more compassionate loving physician than I’ve ever been before in my life. That’s made a huge difference in my practice. In fact, the leading survey of patient satisfaction is called Press Ganey. For five straight quarters of the year, my Radiation Therapy department has scored at the 99^th percentile, which is amazing. I’m almost certain, of course, a lot of that says a lot about these amazing people I work with. But certainly, I’m also having a part of that too. It’s helped me to reach out to the staff I work with, to the other doctors and certainly the patients that we serve in their battle with cancer with more courage, more compassion and more love than has ever been possible before. People appreciate that. I think it’s really helped people live their life and their battle with cancer better. It’s really been interesting to see how I feel stronger, more confident, more loving about what I am as a doctor than I’ve ever been before.


Alex Tsakiris: Because, Jeff, actually that’s what I wanted to do in this section. Just kind of talk about a couple of things that are maybe slightly outside the book, specifically but the first place I’d go was directly with this question that we’ve been talking about the hyper-criticism that near-death experience science seems to draw in. We’ve used the term skeptics. You’ve used the term skeptics. I’d really like to avoid using that term because I think it gives people the wrong impression. The objections that I see in near-death experience science are coming from mainstream science. A lot of times they’re coming from neuroscience. A lot of times they’re coming from philosophy, but these are people that are not fringy skeptics. A lot of them are very mainstream people like the guy I mentioned before at the University of California, the guys with the Templeton Grant. They’re not fringe-y. They write it in. So here’s the question. I guess, cynical people, if they’re clever, can turn any issue into a mud fight. We see that every time we turn on the news. Science is no different. It muddies the water. It makes it hard for the people to understand. Why is science attacking this? What is at stake for science with near-death experience research that they’re so afraid of?


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes. I think the concept of near-death experiences, that were much more than our physical brain, that there really is an immaterial part of us that survives bodily death, is radically different from what mainstream science believes and has taught for literally for centuries that I think near-death experience evidence is such a huge paradigm shift that it’s unfamiliar certainly to a lot of scientists. It is certainly disconcerting to them when it flies in the face of everything that they’ve ever believed or even taught in a classroom for years or decades. So I think that there’s a lot of scientists in the mainstream that will just simply instinctively assume that it cannot be true and seek out the evidence that will help justify their beliefs. I think when you see the mainstream scientists push back on near-death experience and startlingly ignore some of the profoundly strong evidence that near-death experience is for real, certainly reminds me as a researcher. Unlike those types of scientists, we have to be of anything more open-minded than ever. We have to carefully study their arguments, study the concerns about the reality of near-death experience, and only after we’ve carefully considered the alternative explanations that they have been found to be wanting of alternative, or if you will, skeptical explanations don’t explain near-death experience. Then and only then, do I go confidently before the world and say, “Near-death experiences are real.” I’ve walked that journey. I’ve looked over every single argument against near-death experience that I can find. By the way, there’s over twenty of them. Over the years, it seems like a new skeptical alternative explanation of near-death experience comes along. The reason there’s that many of these alternative explanations is very simple, and that is there’s no one or several alternative explanations of near-death experience that make sense even to mainstream scientists.


Alex Tsakiris: Yet, we cannot overemphasize the extent to which this conflicts with the existing paradigm. I mean we hear about the hard problem of consciousness. This totally throws that out the window. Hey, take the easy problem of consciousness. What they say is the easy problem of consciousness, which is, “Oh, we understand how vision works. We understand how hearing works.” Really? Here are people that don’t have a brain, don’t have a visual cortex, don’t have eardrums and they’re saying … I mean we cannot overemphasize what a huge paradigm shift this is. Yet, sometimes we do. I think even near-death experience researchers want to take their foot off the gas pedal a little bit, and kind of pretend like all of this doesn’t completely overturn science, but it does, doesn’t it?


Dr. Jeff Long: I think it really does. I think when you have the evidence that is so powerful and … by the way, I’ve had a lot of people share their near-death experiences that were skeptical scientists at the time that they had their near-death experiences. I’m here to tell you a near-death experience cures near-death experience, just leave. Whether you’re a doctor, scientist, or whatever your prior belief about near-death experience, once you’ve had one, almost uniformly, you’ll know it’s real. It’s true in mainstream science to have evidence like this is very difficult. I think what I’ve seen for mainstream scientists that are attacking near-death experiences in general, they raise hypotheses – brain electrical activity, brain chemistry, and fragments of memory. There’s all of these hypotheses about why near-death experiences could occur, but almost never will you find a person who’s attacking near-death experience, who doesn’t at the level of the kind of evidence we’re talking about here – near-death experiences and those born totally blind; near-death experiences in general anesthesia; the strikingly accurate out-of-body observations that occur in near-death experiences, even far from the physical body and far outside of any physical sensory awareness. This is the kind of evidence that makes mainstream scientists attacking near-death experience very uncomfortable. In general, you’re not going to hear them address it.


Alex Tsakiris: You know, Jeff, it even makes people uncomfortable who have crossed over to the other side because you’re also suggesting a hierarchy of consciousness. So if I’m a philosopher and I’m cutting edge consciousness guy and I’m willing to say, “Okay,” everything is consciousness. Everything is quantum mind. Everything I could possibly experience emerges out of the same stuff. It’s all consciousness. Hey, you know what? You’ve come along if your findings seem to conflict with that too, this idealism idea because you’re saying that you’re finding an order and a hierarchy to consciousness. Here are dead relatives who you know … not only did you know them when you were alive, but they’ve been following you and they can tell you what’s going on in your life. Here are spirits and angels who say, “I am at this level, but there’s other levels above me.” People even have a personal experience with “Hey, I met some being and they were at a higher level.” What does this say about the hierarchy of consciousness and what does that do to folks who just want to have this kind of consciousness blob out there?


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes, it’s kind of interesting. A lot of near-death experience seems to point to, if you will, a collective consciousness. For example, when you have a life review, sometimes you not only are aware of your own prior life, but you may be aware of what the other person you interacted with felt like whether for good or for ill. That certainly is one of the many lines that all converge on the fact that there seems to be, if you will, in this universe a kind of collective unified consciousness. You’re right. There seems to be that hierarchy. In other words, when you encounter someone in the unearthly realms of the near-death experience, they may talk about somebody who’s sort of a seemingly higher, used in the broadest term, spiritual being or someone that they will go talk to or get some insights or some wisdom about dealing with the situation during the near-death experience. Of course, there’s that ultimate supreme consciousness being, God. No question there’s that hierarchy. That kind of is very difficult for mainstream science to handle. You can understand that as sort of a … I mean gosh …


Alex Tsakiris: Hey, it’s even difficult for frontier science to handle. I guess that’s my point. I mean you go into the parapsychology community or you go into people who are looking at consciousness in general. They can even get into the point of dealing with consciousness – consciousness being fundamental, consciousness being everything. But when you start introducing the idea that there might be some order, some structure, some hierarchy to it, they vapor up. It’s like, “No. Don’t bring that into it.”


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes, and again I’m not … we talked about this and our hierarchy of consciousness. This … this isn’t something that is speculation. This isn’t something we’re doing that’s wishful thinking. This is based on evidence that being very consistently observed, many many observations. You’re back to that fundamental scientific principle. If it’s real, it’s going to be consistently observed, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing here sort of that hierarchy of consciousness consistently observed in a vast number of near-death experiences.


Alex Tsakiris: So Jeff, I’m skeptical. I’ve tried to explore a lot of these alternative ideas about consciousness with the best data that we have. So near-death experience being one of those kind of alternative experiences that make us think differently about consciousness, but there are a lot of very smart forward-thinking people who are starting to try and connect the dots with regard to these extended consciousness experiences. They’re willing to say, “Okay, yes. It looks like near-death experiences are real, but it also looks like these other forms of after-death communication are real – BDMs, past lives. Hey, maybe that seems to be real the best way we can push to it. The best way we can push forward that research.” They also want to look at psychedelic experiences and shamanic experiences and say, “Hey, there seem to be a reality to that the best way we can poke into it. Maybe we even should take seriously alien contact experiences?” Because when we start looking at them as best we can and some very smart people like Harvard psychologist and psychiatrist, John Mack have looked at it and said, “You know what? These seem to be real. I know what delusional people are. These people don’t seem to be delusional. They’re also reaching this extended consciousness realm.” But here’s the question and here’s the issue, I return then to your findings. I find something different when I look at the near-death experiences. I see some similarities but I also see some differences. The question is what do you think near-death experience science can offer us as a way of looking at and understanding these extended consciousness realities?


Dr. Jeff Long: I think the most direct response to your question would be one near-death experiencer shared. She was in this unearthly, call it heavenly, afterlife during her near-death experience. Overwhelming feelings of love and peace, and here in this near-death experience was God. For the first time, this near-death experiencer in a near-death experience asked God directly, “Why me? Why was I allowed to have this happen to me?” That being this incredibly beautiful near-death experience. I think God’s answer was very meaningful and directly relevant to this question. God answered that near-death experiencer, “Love falls on everyone equally. This is what you needed to live your earthly life.” So I think as you start thinking about consciousness, you need to be aware that there’s sort of a supreme consciousness. There’s an order and purpose in the universe. I think it’s certainly here on earth. There’s probably one in some of the lower level. The consciousness and the alertness that we encounter in a near-death experience is off the scale in terms of what we’re aware of in our earthly lives. You can have a life review in a near-death experience and encounter decades of your prior life in what would literally be less than a minute seeming of time in a near-death experience. So I think as you study near-death experiences, you have that rather exciting and rather startling awareness that there’s that frontier out there – consciousness, sort of a unified consciousness, an order and purpose in the universe, and a purpose that’s led to us being here in our earthly life that has been amazing to me as I’ve done the research and found that, and certainly amazing to people that have read my book and have studied this in their own way. Hopefully, we’re right at the frontier where more and more people are going to learn about this with further research because I think that kind of knowledge could change the world.


Alex Tsakiris: Let me approach it from a slightly different direction. You know a couple of years ago, I interviewed Dr. Rick Strassman, from the University of New Mexico. The only researcher in the United States in the last … I don’t know how many years … who has been granted the right to use the very powerful hallucinogenic drug, DMT, on patients and to study the results. What he experienced with his patients, to his great surprise were people reaching these extended consciousness realms. In many a ways, it sounds similar to the kind of realms that NDE-ers are experiencing. The beings sound different. Some of the messages sound different, connection in love, but there are also differences. Do you think near-death experience gives us a different view vantage point with which to understand these extended consciousness realms?


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes. You know with regard to pharmacologic induction of experiences that are analogous to near-death experiences, one of the first things I had pointed is there must be hundreds of thousands of different chemicals and drugs that have been synthesized over the decades. To find one or two that seem to have effects on the brain that product experiences like the near-death experience is not hugely surprising given the vast number of what we call psychotropic or brain-acting drugs that are out there. I’ve talked to someone who’s researched and investigated that for literally decades, and has actually had a lot of personal experience with these psychotropic drugs. Their personal opinion was there’s nothing like a near-death experience. Now some of the modern research, DMT for Dr. Strassman, and actually there’s also some work with Psylocybe that’s been going on where they find some very similar kind of things. It’s interesting. I think there’s some overlap, but only an overlap up to a point. There may be intensely positive feelings, not a huge surprise. Elicit an investigational psychotropic drug …


Alex Tsakiris: Isn’t it also true that some of the most recent research that probes that further finds that the brain is actually less active during some of these psychedelic experiences, which would suggest that there’s some similarity with the near-death experience and that it’s not just a brain thing? There is some kind of extended consciousness realm and the overlap that I guess is the part that I’m pushing towards, I don’t want you to speculate on what that overlap is or the extent to which it is or a reality or not, but I guess what I’m really wanting to probe with you because you’re in such a unique position is does the NDE research give us a platform, if you will, from which we might understand not only the NDE experience but some of these other extended experiences too? What are the limits or problems associated with that?


Dr. Jeff Long: Yes, I think that’s a good point. I encourage any kind of research that starts to look at the fundamental questions about consciousness. We ought to be having a lot more research into DMT, Psylocybe and other psychotropic drugs than we do now because it is exciting. There is some question about the overlap in near-death experience, maybe, maybe not. We’re really going to answer that if we do more research. We need more investigation. We need to really compare those experiences head-to-head. Why don’t we have ideally a group of people who have had a detailed near-death experience try some of these psychoactive drugs and compare and contrast the experience? So even basic research like that, so that you would be able to have people through first-hand experiences compare and contrast hasn’t been done yet. But I think the more we do that kind of research, the more we do that courageously and open-mindedly, I think we’re going to continue to push that envelope and learn more and more about consciousness. To me, that’s exciting.


Alex Tsakiris: One of the things that’s really exciting about your work, Dr. Long, is that it’s essentially an open-source science effort in a lot of ways. Anyone can go on the website and review like I have, just scores and scores of these accounts. In addition to the research that you’ve published in your book, they can gain benefit from that. What do you think there is about that trend, about that open-source science trend that I think people really are so attracted to? Do you think that could be a trend, a broader trend that we might see in the future?


Dr. Jeff Long: You know I sure hope so. That’s one of the real strengths of my research is that anybody in the world can look up those near-death experience accounts that I referenced in my research and read the entirety of the account and find out for themselves exactly not only what we shared, what I quote in my research, but also the entire context of the experience, what occurred during and after that. So I think the open-source research really is important for a couple of reasons. One, it’s transparency. We’re making incredible claims – shared consciousness, God, meaning, and purpose of our earthly life, and the importance of love. In a way we never thought about it before. So I think transparency is important in that people can say, “Hey. Here’s that chain of evidence all the way down to reading the original account.” We can follow it. It’s transparency of research that is here … almost impossible to find. I think the second thing that that kind of ability to look up the original NDE accounts that we’re trying to accomplish is it helps the credibility. Again, these are remarkable claims. There’s life after death. There’s a blissful afterlife for all of us. So to have people go to those original sources of evidence that being the near-death experiences to read it themselves, I think it’s helping people all around the world that go through that path, take that journey, spend the time to read the near-death experiences that are really coming to learn. Supplementing what we’ve learned as near-death experience researchers that near-death experiences are real, you can easily see these patterns that we’ve been talking about. I think it’s really helping people understand, not only that near-death experiences are real, but they do have these profound important messages that touch not only the lives of near-death experiencers, but I think you take that little piece of heaven back with you when you read a lot of near-death experience accounts. It could certainly change lives even if you’ve never even had a personal near-death experience.


Alex Tsakiris: Well, these are two of the most important books that anyone could read if they’re interested in this near-death experience topic. Maybe they’re probably on the list of the most important books you could read, period. Evidence of the Afterlife, the Science of Near-death Experiences was your first book; the new book, God in the Afterlife, both from Dr. Jeffrey Long whom we’ve been talking with today. Dr. Long, what’s next? I’m sure you’re going to be doing a full-bore effort on getting God in the Afterlife out there. You’ve already mentioned some of the things you’re doing. What are you doing with the book, and then what comes next after this?


Dr. Jeff Long: You know I think a lot of that is where my interest is. What the public, what the world wants to hear about; I’m open. With four thousand near-death experiences in my database, we could go back and look at research about the reality of near-death experience. We could go back and look at those deeper spiritual messages, which I’m kind of inclined to do at this point in time because that’s so new and exciting to me. People seem to love it whenever they hear about it. We could even study other types of experiences. I have a whole website to go to the after death communication, out-of-body experiences, these things we call spiritually transformative events. So I’ve got a whole host of different options that I could pick from. It’s kind of tough, but I think wherever my interest align with the interests of the world, once that happens there’s going to be another book. Stay tuned.

http://skeptiko.com/jeffrey-long-god-and-the-afterlife-science-329/

 

Tony Bermanseder shared Uwe Uehle's post.

December 2 at 7:16pm ·




Uwe Uehle
December 1 at 2:27pm ·

Just for perspective. Of course no space is truly empty - but this is symbolic for the miracle you're bathing in right here - right now ;-)


Margo Callaghan
Wow what a mind bender-




Tony Bermanseder
Space is consciousness related via an advanced quantum mechanics. Therefore you can figure out what the metaphysics or spirit concept really relates and points to. Its not dieu ex machina but machina ex dieu.

Calculation:
7.4 Billion people weigh about 518 Billion kilograms for an average weight of 70 kg. As one proton has a mass of about 1.7x10^-27 kg; the total mass of humanity in weight are so 3x10³⁸ protons. One proton has a volume of so 4x(1.4x10^-15)³ = 10^-44 cubic metres and for all the protons of humanity the volume adds to about 3x10^-6 cubic meters or 3 cubic centimeters which is a cubic size for a cube about _______________ that long.




Andrew Bellon
so what is all that empty space doing...is there direct interaction between nucleons and virtual particles relating to the nature of "spin," or how the universe actually sustains itself from moment to moment?



Tony Bermanseder
This is an appropriate question, which leads directly into the deepest nature of what energy is and it relates on a most fundamental way to the reality of universal consciousness. Firstly, the 'empty space' of an atom manifests as a form of 'force field' in that the interaction 'Goldstone' bosons mediate a 'force', which then manifests as the appearance of sold state physics. So tapping a table actually taps an energy field etc. The problems with this mainstream physical interpretation and model begin right here , because the 'Goldstones' (photons, weakons, gravitons, gluons, higgs) are said to be 'virtual' that is not having a real physical existence.

This is erroneous, just as the mainstream notion of consciousness and mind being nonphysical is also not supported by a higher dimensional cosmology and physics. As an example consider Einstein's E=mc² applied to the total mass content of the universe. For a mass of say 10⁵⁰ tons you will have an energy summation of so 10⁷⁰ Joules. But if you now use the quantum energy, also well defined in Planck parameters, you calculate the quantum energy per space quantum and you get far higher values for this energy.

Using the conventions (Planck Length, Holographic bounds etc) and using the Event Hubble extent of the universe, you get something like (Number of space quanta) x 2x10⁹ = 2x⁹x(10¹⁴⁷) ~ 2x10¹⁵⁶ Joules. Now the string physics tells you that the energy per string quantum is something like 10⁶⁴ Joules per cubicmeter as a physical manifesto of this quantum energy; whilst the energy of all matter in space is something like 10^-10 Joules per cubic meter. So the 'discrepancy' between quantum energy and matter energy is in a factor of so 74 (and 87 in the quantum-Planck limit). This number then becomes associated with the 'Dark Energy' and the 'Dark Matter' to explain the discrepancy.

The 'empty space' of the atom so is in fact 'spanned' by the 'virtual' energy which is dark and has a dark matter component which is defined in physical consciousness parameters based on the quantum energy parameters and especially the physical size of the electron.

This naturally allows a refined approach to fundamental physics, such as the difference between the Hydrogen atom and the neutron and how radioactive beta/neutron decay allows the primordial universe to build the table of the chemical elements. This transformation then relates to the interaction probability between matter and light in electromagnetic parameters so showing the basic electron to be a 'point particle/string' of a minimum size; but also a 'smeared out' or extended circular membrane characterised by the Fermi scale of the 'Goldstones'.

The spacial extent of the differences then defines physical consciousness as a modular dual or mirror property of the space quantum itself; namely whatever is measured as energy derived from the macrophysics becomes a reciprocated magnetopolar 'supercharge' in the form of the electronic diameter maximised multiplied by the time differential of frequency as inversed time. But this change of string/brane vibration over time is also an angular acceleration without radial extent and so you find the innermost nature of the quantum spin, which is radially independent.

Those physical definitions for consciousness then carry enormous implications of course. Namely space itself is conscious in a physical sense and any dynamic occupying space adds to a space inherent base consciousness independent of the dynamics and living entities moving about within it.

Collapsing a hydrogen atom that is forcing the electron to overcome its weakon forcefield of the beta decay results in a neutron star of 'degenerate electrons' and you then can observe the quantum physics in the astrophysics. So your original question regarding the empty space resolves in the transformation of energy density is space. Then you should adapt the quantum theory to the holographic universe and the multidimensional membrane physics to resolve the wave-particle duality and the quantum entanglement on both the microcosmic and the macrocosmic scales to find the universal unification. The quantum entanglement can easily be seen to be the effect of the modular duality inferred at the beginning to resolve a number of apparent paradoxes, such as the Schrödinger Cat and the Chicken-Egg DNA/RNA etc paradoxes.



Barbara Maat
your nomenclature exceeds my knowledge base, but i have no doubt whatsoever that space is conscious and what we refer to as consciousness. we are embedded in it, a temporal extrusion, a clot of mass.



Tony Bermanseder
Indeed Barbara. Just think back to how natural philosophy, then the common name of science viewed physical reality before Ernest Rutherford discovered the atomic structure. It is like this with consciousness actually in terms of scale the same as the discovery of the atomic nucleus.
To simplify, the diameter of the 'magnified' electron, say as a circular ring, is in fact the quantum extent of a 'particle of consciousness' container.
So then consciousness as a particular volume of space is itself quantised.
This btw is the mysterious 'Dark Matter' missing say in galaxies to hold their outer regional starsystems from tangentially dispersing due to the rotation of their host galaxies. The equation for consciousness in those terms so reads like electron diameter times the speed of light squared. But as this has units of Volume times Angular (quantum spin) Acceleration as the inverse of time squared; you can now relate the entire edifice of modern physics to this 'physical consciousness'. And so it stands to reason, that another Rutherfordian experimenter will, hopefully soon, discover the physical reality of 'dark matter/energy' consciousness in due course of scientific investigation.



Andrew Bellon
Above seems a promising theoretical grounding for what Jung/Pauli termed the psychophysical reality...




Tony Bermanseder
Yes, psychophysicality on the cellular level would relate on a most fundamental level to somatic-telomerase/neuronal cellular mitosis and regeneration functionality. This will ultimately relate the Penrose-Hameroff approach to the consciousness question regarding microtubular information processing to quantum geometry, say the Platonic forms of viruses and (micro) crystals.
Then the true preference of nature to maximise its information storage in data/experience compression following the 'sacred geometry' in Fibonacci patterns should be discovered in the said microtubules applied to the genomatics in a holofractal-holographic way.

 

http://www.theearthchild.co.za/quantum-theory-consciousness-moves-to-another-universe-after-death/
​

Abstract:
The expansion of the universe can be revisited in a reformulation of the standard cosmology model Lambda-Cold-Dark-Matter or LCDM in terms of a parametrization of the standard expansion parameters derived from the Friedmann equation, itself a solution for the Einstein Field Equations (EFE) applied to the universe itself. A measured and observed flat universe in de Sitter (dS) 4D-spacetime with curvature k=0, emerges as the result of a topological mirror symmetry between two Calabi Yau manifolds encompassing the de Sitter spacetime in a multitimed connector dimension. The resulting multiverse or braneworld so defines a singular universe with varying but interdependent time cyclicities.

It is proposed, that the multiverse initiates cyclic periods of hyper acceleration or inflation to correlate and reset particular initial and boundary conditions related to a baryonic mass seedling proportional to a closure or Hubble mass to ensure an overall flatness of zero curvature for every such universe parallel in a membrane timespace but colocal in its lower dimensional Minkowski spacetime.
On completion of a 'matter evolved' Hubble cycle, defined in characteristic Hubble parameters; the older or first universal configuration quantum tunnels from its asymptotic Hubble Event horizon into its new inflaton defined universal configuration bounded by a new Hubble node. The multidimensional dynamics of this quantum tunneling derives from the mirror symmetry and topological duality of the 11-dimensional membrane space connecting two Calabi Yau manifolds as the respective Hubble nodes for the first and the second universal configurations.

Parallel universes synchronise in a quantized protoverse as a function of the original lightpath of the Instanton, following not preceding a common boundary condition, defined as the Inflaton. The initial conditions of the Inflaton so change as a function of the imposed cyclicity by the boundary conditions of the paired Calabi Yau mirror duality; where the end of a Instanton cycle assumes the new initial conditions for the next cycle of the Instanton in a sequence of Quantum Big Bangs.
The outer boundary of the second Calabi Yau manifold forms an open dS spacetime in 12-dimensional brane space (F-Vafa 'bulk' Omnispace) with negative curvature k=-1 and cancels with its inner boundary as a positively curved k=1 spheroidal AdS spacetime in 11 dimensions to form the observed 4D/10-dimensional zero curvature dS spacetime, encompassed by the first Calabi Yau manifold.

A bounded (sub) 4D/10D dS spacetime then is embedded in a Anti de Sitter (AdS) 11D-spacetime of curvature k=+1 and where 4D dS spacetime is compactified by a 6D Calabi Yau manifold as a 3-torus and parametrized as a 3-sphere or Riemann hypersphere. The outer boundary of the 6D Calabi Yau manifold then forms a mirror duality with the inner boundary of the 11D Calabi Yau event horizon.

Every Inflaton defines three Hubble nodes or timespace mirrors; the first being the 'singularity - wormhole' configuration; the second the nodal boundary for the 4D/10D dS spacetime and the third the dynamic lightpath bound for the Hubble Event horizon in 5D/11D AdS timespace. The completion of a 'de Broglie wave matter' evolution cycle triggers the Hubble Event Horizon as the inner boundary of the timespace mirrored Calabi Yau manifold to quantum tunnel onto the outer boundary of the spacetime mirrored Calabi Yau manifold in a second universe; whose inflaton was initiated when the lightpath in the first universe reached its second Hubble node.

For the first universe, the three nodes are set in timespace as {3.3x10^-31 s; 16.88 Gy; 3.96 Ty} and the second universe, timeshifted in t₁=t_o+t with t_o=1/H_o has a nodal configuration {t_o+1.4x10^-33; t_o+3,957 Gy; t_o+972.7 Ty}; the latter emerging from the timespace as the instanton at time marker t_o. A third universe would initiate at a time coordinate t₂=t_o+t₁+t as {1/H_o+234.472/H_o +5.8x10^-36 s; t_o+t₁+972.7 Ty; t_o+t₁+250,223 Ty}; but as the second node in the second universe cannot be activated by the lightpath until the first universe has reached its 3.96 trillion year marker (and at a time for a supposed 'heat death' of the first universe due to exhaustion of the nuclear matter sources); the third and following nested universes cannot be activated until the first universe reaches its n=1+234.472=235.472 timespace coordinate at 3,974.8 billion years from the time instanton aka the Quantum Big Bang.

For a present timespace coordinate of n_present=1.13242 however; all information in the first universe is being mirrored by the timespace of the AdS spacetime into the dS spacetime of the second universe at a time frame of t = t₁-t_o = 19.11 - 16.88 = 2.23 billion years and a multidimensional time interval characterizing the apparent acceleration observed and measured in the first universe of the Calabi Yau manifold compressed or compactified flat dS Minkowski cosmology. The solution to the Dark Energy and Dark Matter question of a 'missing mass' cosmology is described in this discourse and rests on the evolution of a multiverse in matter.

​