Gene-edited 2013 Bat Cornavirus Ratg13

CULCULCAN · Sep 9, 2021

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

Dr. William B. Karesh is the Executive Vice President for Health and Policy at EcoHealth Alliance. He serves as the president of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Working Group on Wildlife Diseases and also chairs the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Wildlife Health Specialist Group, a network of wildlife and health experts around the world. Dr. Karesh also serves on the World Health Organization's (W.H.O.) International Health Regulations Roster of Experts focused on the human-animal interface and wildlife health. Currently, Dr. Karesh is the EPT Partner Liaison for the USAID Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT-2 program, a >$120 million effort focused on predicting and preventing pandemic diseases. He is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Armine Arustamyan California Intercontinental University Degree Name Doctoral Field Of Study Business Administration Dates attended or expected graduation2010 – 2014 Activities and Societies: Global Business Leadership American University of Armenia Degree NameMaster's Degree Field Of Study System Management and Industrial Engineering Dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1997 Yerevan State University Degree Name Master Field Of Study Science in Physics Dates attended or expected graduation1987 – 1992

Leilani Francisco PhD MA PMP The Johns Hopkins University Degree Name Ph.D. Field Of Study International Public Health University of Maryland College Park Degree Name B.A. Field Of Study Sociocultural Anthropology University of South Florida Degree Name M.A.Field Of Study Applied Medical Anthropology

Dr. Epstein received a PhD in Disease Ecology from Kingston University, London and his DVM and MPH from Tufts University. A veterinarian and disease ecologist, Dr. Jonathan Epstein is the Vice President for Science and Outreach at EcoHealth Alliance. His research focuses on the ecology of emerging zoonotic viruses such as Nipah and Ebola virus, along with SARS, Midde East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and others that have emerged within Asia and Africa.

Evelyn Luciano Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA)Field Of StudyHuman Resources Management and Services Certificate Dates attended or expected graduation2003 – 2003 Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA) Field Of Study Counseling Psychology dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1999 Community Mental Health and School Counseling Catholic University of Puerto Rico Degree Name BSN Field Of Study Bachelor of Science In Nursing Grade BSN Dates attended or expected graduation1975 – 1979

Dr. Ellen Carlin DVM is Assistant Research Professor at the Center for Global Health Science and Security, with a primary faculty appointment within the Department of Microbiology and Immunology. Her research interests are in the epidemiology of emerging infections. She studies incidence and transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens, focusing on the interfaces among people, animals, and the environments in which they live. She was Senior Professional Staff with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security (Peter T. King, NY), where for more than five years she handled medical preparedness, biodefense, and science and technology policy. At Georgetown, Ellen is also the director of the Global Infectious Disease graduate program at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Aleksei Chmura: Experienced Chief Of Staff with a demonstrated history of working in the non-profit organization management industry. Skilled in Nonprofit Organizations, Environmental Science, Research, Community Outreach, and Budgeting. Strong administrative professional with a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Biology/Biological Sciences, General from Kingston University. Kingston University is ranked 581 in QS World University Rankings by TopUniversities and enjoys a poor reputation.

Anthony Ramos: Former Senior Director Marketing and Development at EcoHealth Alliance Former Director of Marketing at Schneider Associates Studied Classic Culinary Arts at The French Culinary Institute Studied International relations at Boston University Lives in Lake, Michigan.

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

DASZAK: I'm in charge of in the organization in China...So the point is to establish capabilities in other countries not just take specimens from them and bring them back... that's the strategy and you know this the old adage that if you teach people how to do it, give them the tools then you've really made a difference. The money always dries up and this is something we've seen in the nonprofit world. You get great funding for five years from the foundation they always shift priorities because that's what emerged they closed them down. We have our staff in countries. We have sub contracts through local universities or agencies in-country and we have contracts to do work and it's all collaborative science so people love to interact on collaborative science. You know what I found especially in places like China where increasingly there's a paranoia around collaboration. Science collaboration is open and transparent because of the nature of what you're trying to do you're trying to discover stuff quickly, understand what it means, publish it in high-impact journal, and that drives openness and transparency and that's been great for us around the world it's also great for the U.S. and that's we really need to push that agenda. I think publishing is a very interesting mechanism you have to publish that's the argument we use.

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

Daszak is a double agent who CIA thought was working for them but had been rolled over by the Chinese Communist Party because his father was a Nazi War Criminal, a death camp guard, who taught him to respect authoritarian governments. Daszak became a W.H.O. & Lancet inspector. A good place to be to cover-up for the Chinese and himself after he funneled money to the WIV and to the Bat Lady experiments which resulted in COVID-19 being created. And there is the question of how much money was siphoned off by Daszak?

Daszak: “I’ve seen incredible efforts from everything from [religious sect] Falun Gong to the [Chinese dissident] Miles Guo camp, Steve Bannon’s group pushing the conspiracy theories around China. It’s useful to them. They’re funding it and pushing it and science has been to some extent caught up in that to other instances absolutely crushed by it. We’ve not had access to work in China on the origins for the last 12 months, which is ironic because we could have been on the ground there working with our Chinese colleagues and by now we could have found some really important answers. The rhetoric has held that up. We need that communication [with the Chinese] in an outbreak to learn from them how they control it so we can control it better. It's sad to say, but it will probably cost lives. By sort of narrow-mindedly focusing in on ourselves, or on labs, or on certain cultural politics, we miss the real enemy.”
Daszag was a prime target of Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP via EcoHealth. He parrots the Party Line. But he also was co-opted by the CIA until Trump cut his funds off. ECOHEALTH is a think tank put together by the AID CIA LITE that was supposed to protect America from Pandemics by keeping an eye on bats. But ECOHEALTH began to subsidize Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat experiments at WIV and a recombinant virus leaked from the lab into the streets of Wuhan then into the market and out again. Was it coincidence that SARSCov2 started close to WIV? Just how close the Chinese won't say as they refuse to give out the address of patient zero.

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

"THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER DONORS WHO FUNDED OR COLLABORATED ON CIVILIAN RESEARCH AT THE WIV HAVE A RIGHT AND OBLIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY OF OUR RESEARCH FUNDING WAS DIVERTED TO SECRET CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS AT THE WIV." US EMBASSY FACT SHEET

The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior Researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. Accidental infections in labs have caused several previous virus outbreaks in China and elsewhere, Including a 2004 SARS outbreak in Beijing that infected nine people, killing one. The CCP has prevented independent journalists, investigators, and global health authorities from interviewing researchers at the WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry into the origin of the virus must include interviews with these researchers and a full accounting of their previously unreported illness. Starting in at least 2016 – and with no indication of a stop prior to the COVID-19 outbreak – WIV researchers conducted experiments involving RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). The WIV became a focal point for international coronavirus research after the 2003 SARS outbreak and has since studied animals including mice, bats, and pangolins. The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus, including “RaTG13,” which it sampled from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like illness. W.H.O. investigators must have access to the records of the WIV’s work on bat and other coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak. As part of a thorough inquiry, they must have a full accounting of why the WIV altered and then removed online records of its work with RaTG13 and other viruses.
Secrecy and non-disclosure are standard practice for Beijing. For many years the United States has publicly raised concerns about China’s past biological weapons work, which Beijing has neither documented nor demonstrably eliminated, despite its clear obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention. Today’s revelations just scratch the surface of what is still hidden about COVID-19’s origin in China. Any credible investigation into the origin of COVID-19 demands complete, transparent access to the research labs in Wuhan, including their facilities, samples, personnel, and records. As the world continues to battle this pandemic – and as W.H.O. investigators begin their work, after more than a year of delays – the virus’s origin remains uncertain. The United States will continue to do everything it can to support a credible and thorough investigation, including by continuing to demand transparency on the part of Chinese authorities.Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The United States and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

The United States has repeatedly called for a transparent and thorough investigation into the origin of COVID-19. Understanding the origin of this pandemic is essential for global public health, economic recovery, and international security. To assist the vital work of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) investigative team that arrived in China this week, the United States government is today sharing new information concerning the activities inside China’s government laboratories in 2019. In particular, we urge the W.H.O. to press the government of China to address the following: Illnesses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV): The United States government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. WIV Research on “RaTG13” and “gain-of-function”: Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers studied RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). Since the outbreak, the WIV has not been transparent nor consistent about its work with RaTG13 or other similar viruses, including possible “gain-of-function” experiments to enhance transmissibility or lethality. Secret WIV Links to Military Research: Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The COVID-19 pandemic was avoidable. Any responsible country would have invited world health investigators to Wuhan within days of an outbreak. China instead refused offers of help – including from the United States – and punished brave Chinese doctors, scientists, and journalists who tried to alert the world to the dangers of the virus. Beijing continues today to withhold vital information that scientists need to protect the world from this deadly virus, and the next one. The United States reiterates the importance of unfettered access to virus samples, lab records and personnel, eyewitnesses, and whistleblowers to ensure the credibility of the W.H.O.’s final report. Until the CCP allows a full and thorough accounting of what happened in Wuhan, it is only a matter of time until China births another pandemic and inflicts it on the Chinese people, and the world.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/ensurin...-investigation-of-covid-19s-origin/index.html

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

Baric taught SHI ZHENGLI all she knows about virus creation at the University of North Carolina. Collwell is focused on oceans. Saif is a vet. Hume Field and rest work for the bio-war criminal, Daszak!
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, who has been working in China for 15 years studying diseases that jump from animals to people, said, “We don’t know the source yet, but there’s pretty strong evidence that this is a bat origin coronavirus.” He said, “It’s probably going to be the Chinese horseshoe bat,” a common species that weighs up to an ounce.

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

But zoonoses fall into a gray area, and the 2003 monkeypox outbreak in the Midwest is a perfect example of what can go wrong, said Peter Daszak, director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine at the Wildlife Trust, a group specializing in human-animal diseases. The disease, related to smallpox but less deadly, arrived in a shipment of 18 Gambian giant pouched rats imported for a Chicago pet store, where they infected prairie dogs. By summer's end, there were 37 confirmed human cases -- none fatal, but some scary -- mostly among prairie-dog owners. Millions of live animals come into the country each year, and very few have really good surveillance," Dr. Daszak said. "Fish and Wildlife checks cargoes to see if they have endangered species, but it's the U.S.D.A. that does health checks, and they don't go unless it's an agricultural product, so the pet trade tends to get a pass." "The C.D.C. does a great job with outbreak investigation, but that's after the fact," he said of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "After monkeypox, they put a blanket ban on rodents from some West African countries. But who's looking at rodents from other places? Nobody. And that's a gap."
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/us/sentries-in-us-seek-early-signs-of-an-avian-flu.html

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

It is likely, the study found, that one of these "SARS-like" viruses evolved into the SARS virus at an exotic animal marketplace, where it infected civets, which, in turn, infected humans, according to Michael Farzan, a Harvard Medical School assistant professor who was not involved in the research. But why did this happen when it did? One intriguing possibility is that it is linked to China's economic boom, according to Peter Daszak, a co-author of the SARS paper who is executive director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. With the newfound wealth there, he said, animal markets have grown as more people can afford fresh animal meat. As the markets grow, so do the chances that a virus will jump from one species to the next.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/26/health/blaming-bats-when-man-may-be-culprit.html

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

The flu that is moving through humans appears to have a combination of genes from two normally separate sets of pigs, those from the Americas and from Eurasia, scientists say. However, it is unknown how those pigs met, and there is not yet any genetic proof that this particular flu was ever in a pig. Peter Daszak, president of the Wildlife Trust, found records showing that Mexico imported two pigs from France in 2007, the United States imported a few from Britain and Ireland, and Canada imported hundreds from Europe. “And surely this isn’t the whole truth,” he said. “There must be a hidden illegal trade.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/health/01origin.html

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

“By mapping encroachment into the forest you can predict where the next disease could emerge,” Dr. Daszak, EcoHealth’s president, says. “So we’re going to the edge of villages, we’re going to places where mines have just opened up, areas where new roads are being built. We are going to talk to people who live within these zones and saying, ‘what you are doing is potentially a risk.’”
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-ecology-of-disease.html

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

Peter Daszak, a parasitologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, has even put a number on it: 5.3 new ones each year, based on a study using data from 1940 to 2004. He and his co-authors blamed population growth, deforestation, antibiotic overuse, factory farming, live animal markets, bush meat hunting, jet travel and other factors.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/health/new-tools-to-hunt-new-viruses.htm

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

It was the darkest hour since the new illness, known as Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, first appeared in Saudi Arabia late in 2012. In all, more than 700 cases have been documented in 20 countries, nearly all of them linked to Saudi Arabia. More than 250 people have died. King Abdullah fired the country’s health minister and his deputy in April, leaving experts wondering whether the shake-up would bring greater transparency and international cooperation. “In the U.S., when you have a crisis like the Veterans Administration scandal, the new head is in front of the TV cameras explaining what the new plan is,” said Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a veterinary organization that tracked the disease in animals. “There is no tradition of openness in Saudi Arabia.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/world/middleeast/flawed-saudi-response-fueled-outbreak-of-mers-middle-east-virus.htm

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

Daszak describes Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, as exactly the kind of threat that Disease X was meant to represent: a novel, highly infectious coronavirus, with a high mortality rate, and no existing treatment or prevention. “The problem isn’t that prevention was impossible,” Daszak told me. “It was very possible. But we didn’t do it. Governments thought it was too expensive. Pharmaceutical companies operate for profit.” And the W.H.O., for the most part, had neither the funding nor the power to enforce the large-scale global collaboration necessary to wit. Examples from several countries suggest that the Chinese vaccines may not be very effective at preventing the spread of the virus, particularly the new variants, but Daszak overlooks this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/magazine/pandemic-vaccine.html

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

We, the undersigned, are public health scientists who have closely followed the emergence of 2019-nCoV, and are deeply concerned about its impact on global health and well-being. We have watched as the scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable. We sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China who continue to save lives and protect global health during the challenge of this novel coronavirus outbreak. We are all in this together, with our Chinese counterparts in the forefront, against this new viral threat. The rapid, open and transparent sharing of data on 2019-nCoV is now being threatened by rumors and misinformation around the origins of this outbreak. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that 2019-nCoV does not have a natural origin. Scientists from multiple countries have published and analyzed 2019-nCoV genomes1, and they overwhelmingly conclude that this virus originated in wildlife, as have so many other emerging diseases. This is further supported by a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and by the scientific communities they represent. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumors, and prejudice that jeopardize our global collaboration in the fight against this virus. We support the call from the Director-General of the World Health Organization to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture13. We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus. We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the front-line!
Signatories
Dr. James Hughes, Professor Emeritus, Emory University School of Medicine
Dr. Rita Colwell, Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland College Park
Dr. Linda Saif, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University
Dr. Billy Karesh, Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Peter Daszak, President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Hume Field, Honorary Professor, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

When peterdaszak.com went online the first ones to become aware of it were the Chinese The CCP had an alert on their agent Peter Daszak. But by visiting the page they confirmed the fact he was a Chinese agent or agent of influence. Peter was a prime target for Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP. He parrots the Party Line. The Nazi ideas he learned from his father made him respect the Reds, who are sterilizing ethnic minorities like the Nazis did.

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

Communism found a receptive home in mainland China. The WIV is run by Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee CHANGCAI HE who was the chairman of the corporate trade union of Wuhan Branch from Jan. 2004 to Sep. 2013, and the Corporate Secretary of the Party at Wuhan Branch from Oct. 2005 to Jul. 2013. Since the Aug. of 2013, he has been the deputy director general of Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS. This CCP apparatchik runs the institute and if anyone steps out of line they are either imprisoned, sent to a "re-grooving" institute or killed.
Changcai HE: http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Directors2016

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

Academician Xi Chong Nanshan has already delivered a speech on TV. Wuhan New Coronavirus is not the true source of the virus. There are 5 new coronavirus series, ABCDE bat sleeve BAT (H52) and then mutates H53> The C family pathogens in China, with variants of C56 and MV2, spread throughout the world. But the United States had five major families of ABCDE two years ago, the US Government CDC (Center Disease of Control) Concealing the illness, when a military contest was held in Wuhan in November, two American soldiers went to the Wuhan Hospital in Hubei to catch a cold. It was the first hospital in Wuhan, China, which discovered a coronavirus transmission in early December (Golden Eagle) Tan Hospital and Wuhan Central Hospital). From this calculation, it should be that the US soldiers brought the virus into Wuhan in the Wuhan military competition, and the virus series H1 (referred to as the son) came to China. If China wants to check the origin of these two American blood sources, we can confirm the source. The US should have ABCDE two years ago (H13, H3, H1, H56, MV2) These five kinds of viruses have hundreds of pathogens in bats. Among them, the United States has mutated five kinds of pathogens. The United States has always been a stable fact. This is why the U.S. government is in a hurry to send them Americans back to the United States, and is afraid to find pathogens from Americans. In this way, the outbreak of the new coronavirus can rest on the Chinese. The viruses in the Middle East are MV2 and H56. No such virus has been detected in China. The seriously ill Iranians said that they had never been to China and had no Chinese friends, but had been to the United States. The world knows that many wealthy people in Middle Eastern countries buy properties in the United States, and their children are also studying in the United States. I am going to write this article today and spread it to the seven major media in the world. My title will read "Americans are the tumors of the world's viruses." The Washington Post published the title of the article last month, stating "Chinese are sick men of East Asia", the birthplace of the virus. I let the world see the hypocrisy, viciousness, loss of conscience, and the spread of the virus to people all over the world.

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world, that's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic."

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

COVID-19 has NOT been found in bats nor in any intermediate species. Peter Daszak insisits the virus jumped from an intermediate species to humans to cover up the fact that the virus' creation was financed by Eco-Health Alliance. Daszak used the CIA / USAID / PENTAGON money he didn't pocket to fund the project that was supposed to predict a SARS-like viral emergence with is bogus "PREDICT PROGRAM."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/14/health/WHO-covid-daszak-china-virus.html
Daszak reflected on the atmosphere in Wuhan and his first glimpse of the seafood market where the initial outbreak occurred last year, although it was not the site of the first cases. He also said the path ahead would be straightforward scientifically, but not politically. A transcript of the conversation, condensed and edited for length, follows:
James Gorman: You’ve been to China and to Wuhan many times before. How was this different?
DASZAK: Well, this was weird. There’s certain things when you go into China that you’re supposed to do. The first thing you do is have a meeting and then have a meal. And if you don’t have a meal, it’s considered extremely rude. This time we spent two weeks in Zoom calls from our quarantine hotel. Then we went to meet in person and still didn’t have meals with our host. We had meals in a separate room. So it was just a very difficult, very intense, very emotional trip. In Wuhan, there’s this feeling of post-traumatic shock. The city went on lockdown, I think, 76 days. They were locked in their apartments — people died, and they didn’t know about it. And from then on, they’ve been accused of starting a pandemic, and it’s been called the Wuhan virus, the China virus, and there was just a sense of outrage and sadness.
James Gorman: Did that make it difficult in terms of the scientific purpose of the trip?
DASZAK: No. You’ve got a task to do. You’ve volunteered. You know what it’s going to be like. You get caught up in the historical importance. I don’t know if we were the first foreigners to walk around the Huanan seafood market, which is blocked off even to Chinese citizens. The only people that have been in there have been the Chinese disease investigators. We met with the doctors that treated the first known Covid patients. ¹These people have been through harrowing conditions, and they’re now lauded as heroes in China, and then the rest of the world now is fighting that war. And China, of course, is absolutely petrified of this virus catching hold again. When you arrive at the airport, they come on the plane in full P.P.E.; you’re escorted down a separate quarantine pathway; you get tested. You’re driven to the hotel, you go in your room, and you’re locked in for two weeks. It’s just severe. The people who come to your door are in full P.P.E. The waste from your trash, from the hotel room, goes into a yellow bag with a biohazard sign on it. It was a totally different experience when I returned home, where I didn’t even get a notification that I’ve got to quarantine. I signed on to the New York state app, but no one is going to knock on my door and tell me, “Stay indoors.”
1. But Daszak didn't get their names. James Gorman:
Did you learn anything from this trip that you didn’t know before?
DASZAK: From Day 1, the data we were seeing were new that had never been seen outside China. Who were the vendors in the Huanan seafood market? Where did they get their supply chains? And what were the contacts of the first cases? How real were the first cases? What other clusters were there? When you asked for more, the Chinese scientists would go off, and a couple of days later, they’ve done the analysis, and we’ve got new information. It was extremely useful. At the time, you couldn’t really say much. We were trying to not undermine the process by revealing anything while we were on the trip.
James Gorman: What can you say now about the market and what you saw?
DASZAK: The market closed on the 31st of December 31, 2020 or January 1, 2021, and China C.D.C. sent a team in of scientists to try and find out what was going on. It was a very extensive study, swabbing every surface of this place. We knew early on that there were 500 samples collected, and there were many positives, and in that sampling were some animal carcasses, or meat. But there was not really much information publicly about what had been done. So we got all that information. And that, to me, was a real eye-opener. They’d actually done over 900 swabs in the end, a huge amount of work. They had been through the sewage system. They’d been into the air ventilation shaft to look for bats. They’d caught animals around the market. They’d caught cats, stray cats, rats, they even caught one weasel. They’d sampled snakes. People had live snakes at the market, live turtles, live frogs. Rabbits were there, rabbit carcasses. A farm with rabbits could have been really critical. There was talk about badgers, and in China, when they say badger, that means ferret badger. It’s a mustelid, related to weasels. Animals were coming into that market that could have carried the coronavirus. They could have been infected by bats somewhere else in China and brought it in. So that’s clue No. 1. There were 10 stalls that sold wildlife. There were vendors from South China, including Yunnan Province, Guangxi Province and Guangdong Province. Yunnan Province is where the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is found in bats. Guangxi and Guangdong are where the pangolins were captured. They had close viruses. You’ve got animals coming in to the market which are susceptible. Some of these are coming from places where we know the nearest relatives of the virus are found. So there’s the real red flag. Now the Chinese group did swab those animals, and they were all negative, but it’s just one small group of animals in the freezer that were left behind. We don’t know what else was for sale there. So these two clues are really important. When we got to actually visit the market, to me it was quite striking. The pictures you see of that market closed now are of quite orderly buildings with shutters, and you think, This a very efficient, typical city market. It doesn’t really look like a live animal market. Once you get there on the ground, it’s different. It’s pretty ramshackle. It looks like a place that would sell live animals. There’s plenty of evidence of live aquatic animals, the turtle tanks, the fish tanks, the snakes, which we know were available. What we now have are a clear link and a potential pathway.
James Gorman: What about the cases that appeared before the outbreak in the seafood market?
DASZAK: There was other spread going on outside of Huanan market. There are other patients who have no links to the market, quite a few in December. There were other markets. And we do know that some of the patients had links to other markets. We need to do some further work, and then the Chinese colleagues need to do some further work. When we sat down as a group, the China team and the W.H.O. team on the last full day of work, and said, “Let’s go through the hypotheses,” the one that received the most enthusiastic support was this pathway — wildlife, through a domesticated wildlife link, into Wuhan.
James Gorman: What is the next step?
DASZAK: For the animals chain, it’s straightforward. The suppliers are known. They know the farm name; they know the owner of the farm. You’ve got to go down to the farm and interview the farmer and the family. You’ve got to test them. You’ve got to test the community. You’ve got to go and look and see if there are any animals left at any farms nearby and see if they’ve got evidence of infection, and see if there is any cross-border movement. If the virus is in those southern border states, it’s possible that there’s been some movement across neighboring countries like Vietnam, Laos or Myanmar. We’re finding more and more related viruses now. There’s one in Japan and one in Cambodia, one in Thailand. For the human side, look for earlier cases, for clusters; look in blood banks for serum, if possible. Anything like this is going to be sensitive in China, and it’s going to take some persuasion and diplomacy and energy for them to do that because, to be honest, looking for the source of this virus within China is not a great, high priority I think for the Chinese government. Anywhere this virus is shown to emerge is a political issue. That’s one of the problems, and that is clear and obvious to anyone who has been looking at this.
James Gorman: Do you have a particular animal that you suspect right now as an intermediate link, more strongly than others?
DASZAK: IT’S TOO UP IN THE AIR. We don’t know if civets were on sale. We know they are very easily infected. We don’t know what the situation is with the mink farms in China or the other fur farms, like raccoon dogs, even though they’re normally farmed in a different part of China. That needs to be followed up on, too. But if you were to say which pathway would you put the most weight on, I think the virus emerging either in Southeast Asia or Southern China from bats, getting into a domesticated wildlife farm. I’ve been to many of these, and they often have mixed species — civets, ferret badgers, raccoon dogs. Those animals would be able to get infected from bats. Either the people that work there get infected and bring it in, or animals are shipped in, live or recently killed, that bring the virus into a market. Once it’s in a market — either Huanan or another one in Wuhan — you’ve got a dense population of people moving through those markets. And it’s going to be a real potential for an amplification.
James Gorman: The new data that you saw, for instance, on the vendors and their supply chains, will that be in your full report?
DASZAK: I hope so. There’ll be some things that are going to be confidential, without a doubt. Patient records are kept highly confidential in China. We have an image in the West of China being authoritarian and they are videoing everyone. They can have access to anything. But patient records are very private, and some are not accessible. We wanted to meet with certain patients. They didn’t want to meet, so they weren’t pushed to meet with us. There’s no reason to believe that was shenanigans. I’m hoping all the information about vendors, vendor chains will be there. But if not, we’ve seen it. We’ve got it. And we will be following up.

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

Nearly one-quarter of the world’s mammal species are bats, and their ability to fly while hosting a petri dish of viruses makes them both zoological marvels and efficient vectors of disease. Infectious diseases that are believed to have emerged from bats in recent decades include coronaviruses like SARS and MERS, along with other viruses like Nipah, Hendra and Ebola. Most of these viruses were transferred from bats to an intermediate host, like a palm civet or camel, before making their way to humans.
The coronavirus that causes Covid-19, which came to public attention in late 2019, has not been conclusively traced to bats, in Yunnan Province in southwestern China.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/world/asia/thailand-bats-coronavirus.html
The WIV was awarded a patent for cages to hold live bats for testing just months before the virus started spreading. The Mail has established that the WIV filed an application in June 2018 to patent "bat rearing cages capable of healthy growth and breeding under artificial conditions." The patent was granted in January 2019. A separate patent, filed by the WIV on October 16, 2020, relates to the "artificial breeding method of wild bat."The patent discusses cross-species transmission of SARS- CoV from bat to humans and other animals, saying: "Bats infected with the virus naturally or artificially have no obvious clinical symptoms, and the mechanism is unknown. The invention aims to provide an artificial breeding method of wild bat predators, which aims at overcoming the defects in the prior art, and the wild bat predators are artificially domesticated, bred and passaged to establish an artificial breeding group, thereby providing a brand-new model experimental animal for scientific research." Daszak tweeted in April 2020: "The researchers don't keep the bats, nor do they kill them. All bats are released back to their cave site after sampling. It's a conservation measure and is much safer in terms of disease spread than killing them or trying to keep them in a lab. The WIV does not have live or dead bats in it. There is no evidence anywhere that this happened"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-planned-breed-animals-virus-experiments.html

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

The CCP controlled scientists can only find a virus in nature that resembles SARS-CoV-2 and not the virus itself is telling. A virus virtually identical to SARS-CoV-1 was found in the Himalayan, or masked, palm civet. It is related to the mongoose, resembles a large weasel and is a threatened species. There are viruses in bats closely resembling SARS-CoV-2 that were used in the gain-of-threat experiments. Until SARS-CoV-2 is discovered in animals it is laboratory escape.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/24/world/strain-of-sars-is-found-in-3-animal-species-in-asia.html
Initial phylogenetic analyses reveal that the SARS-CoV-1 in civets and humans actually come from two distant branches, but the SARS-CoV from civets during the incipient phase of the epidemic had 99.8% sequence similarity to the human SARS-CoV “Our research has shown that the SARS coronavirus found in human victims is the same as the SARS coronavirus found in civet cats,” a paper quoted Wang Ming, an official from the Guangzhou Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, as saying. As research progressed horseshoes bats were blamed, however, the Chinese put an end tothe epidemic when they slaughters and boiled most of the civets in all of China. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ame2.12017

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

David Asher, a former lead investigator of the task force created by the Trump administration, said it was "sort of ridiculous" to believe the deadly disease passed naturally from animals to humans. "We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci's NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The data disproportionately stacked up, as we investigated, that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source. I had biostatisticians at one of our national labs calculate the odds of this evolving in nature, and it was like 1 in 13 million, and then they revised it to about 1 in 13 billion. So, to say this came out of a zoonotic situation is sort of ridiculous. We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. [Anthony] Fauci’s NIAID organization, that there was almost no evidence that supported a natural zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The epicenter of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain of function techniques.” State Department official Chris Ford "seemed disinterested,” Asher recalled. “He said even if we came to it, how did we know where it came out of, what lab. Very rarely in my life in government have I ever encountered someone who was more of a ‘neg’-ocrat, less a bureaucrat, than that individual.”
Fauci acknowledged that NIH granted the Wuhan lab $600,000 over a period of five years to investigate bat coronaviruses, but emphatically denied the money was used for gain of threat research. However, according to David Asher, “the Chinese most certainly felt that NIH was supporting their gain of function research” and claimed that the variants developed in the lab “were not similar to anything, for example, what could occur in natural evolution.”

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

DISCUSSION: We investigated the patterns of molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. Although the genomic analyses suggested that SARS-CoV-2 was closest to RaTG13, their difference at neutral sites was much higher than previously realized. Our results provide novel insights for tracing the intermediate natural host of SARS-CoV-2. With population genetic analyses of 103 genomes of SARS-CoV-2, we found that SARS-CoV-2 viruses had two major lineages (L and S lineages), and the two lineages were well defined by just two SNPs that show complete linkage across SARS-CoV-2 strains. The L lineage (~70%) was found to be more prevalent than the S lineage (~30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, our evolutionary analyses suggested the S appeared to be more related to coronaviruses in animals. Since nonsynonymous sites are usually under stronger negative selection than synonymous sites, calculating sequence differences without separating these two classes of sites could lead to a potentially significant underestimate of the degree of molecular divergence. For example, although the overall nucleotides only differed by ~4% between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, the genomic average dS value, which is usually a neutral proxy, was 0.17 between these two viruses (Table 1). Of note, the genome-wide dS value is 0.012 between humans and chimpanzees, and 0.08 between humans and rhesus macaques [36]. Thus, the neutral molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 is 14 times larger than that between humans and chimpanzees, and twice as large as that between humans and macaques. The genomic average dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GD Pangolin-CoV is 0.469, which is comparable to that between humans and mice (0.5), and the dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GX Pangolin-Cov is even larger (0.722). The scale of these measures suggests that we should perhaps consider the difference in the neutral evolving site rather than the difference in all nucleotide sequences when tracing the origin and natural intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. In this work, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 can be divided into two major lineages (L and S). Intriguingly, the S and L lineages can be clearly defined by just two tightly linked SNPs at positions 8,782 (orf1ab: T8517C, synonymous) and 28,144 (ORF8: C251T, S84L). orf1ab, which encodes replicase/transcriptase, is required for viral genome replication and might also be important for viral pathogenesis [38]. Although the T8517C mutation in orf1ab does not change the protein sequence (it changes the codon AGT (Ser) to AGC (Ser)), it may affect orf1ab translation since AGT is preferred while AGC is unpreferred (Table S2). ORF8 promotes the expression of ATF6, the ER unfolded protein response factor, in human cells. Thus, it will be interesting to investigate the function of the S84L AA change in ORF8, as well as the combinatory effect of these two mutations in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. As previously noted, the data examined in this study are still very limited, and follow-up analyses of a larger set of data are needed to have a better understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2.
https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036/5775463
If it could be proven that the virus mutated that would mean it was not artificial. "Even for pandemic flu — a virus much more given to rapid change than the one that causes Covid-19 — a few months would be a short timeline for a widespread functional mutation. There isn't a clear-cut evolutionary case for a virus like SARS-CoV2, which has already managed to infect more than 6 million people and often causes mild symptoms, to quickly get milder. If anything, it seems more likely that it would be genetically stable.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...-peak-lull-in-cases-doesn-t-mean-weaker-virus

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

"The corona virus that causes COVID-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, shares 96% of its genetic sequence with a virus found in bats. It is in the collection of viral genomes assembled during those studies that scientists have now found the bat virus closest to SARS-COV-2. A strain called RATG13 gathered in the same cave in Yunnan shares 96% of its genetic sequence with the new virus. RATG13 is not that virus’s ancestor. It is something more like its cousin. Edward Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney, estimates that the 4% difference between the two represents at least 20 years of evolutionary divergence from some common antecedent, and probably something more like 50."
https://www.economist.com/science-a...uzzle-of-covid-19s-origin-are-coming-to-light

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

In May 2020 WIV researchers identified RmYN02 from an analysis of 227 bat samples collected in Yunnan province, China, between May and October of 2019. "Since the discovery that bats were the reservoir of SARS coronavirus in 2005, there has been great interest in bats as reservoir species for infectious diseases, particularly as they carry a very high diversity of RNA viruses, including coronaviruses," Shi Zhengli says. RNA from the samples was sent for metagenomic next-generation sequencing in early January 2020, soon after the discovery of SARS-CoV-2. Across the whole genome, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is another virus, called RaTG13, which was previously identified from bats in Yunnan province. But RmYN02, the virus newly discovered here, is even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 in some parts of the genome, including in the longest encoding section of the genome called 1ab, where they share 97.2% of their RNA. The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SAR-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor binding domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells.
The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02, is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its spike protein meet. SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a four-amino-acid insertion at the junction of S1 and S2; this insertion is unique to the virus and has been present in all SARS-CoV-2 sequenced so far. According to SHI ZHENGLI insertions in RmYN02 are not the same as those in SARS-CoV-2, which indicates that they occurred through independent insertion events. But a similar insertion event happening in a virus identified in bats strongly suggests that these kinds of insertions are of natural origin. SHI ZHENGLI: "Our findings suggest that these insertion events that initially appeared to be very unusual can, in fact, occur naturally in animal betacoronaviruses. Our work sheds more light on the evolutionary ancestry of SARS-CoV-2. Neither RaTG13 nor RmYN02 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, because there is still an evolutionary gap between these viruses. But our study strongly suggests that sampling of more wildlife species will reveal viruses that are even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps even its direct ancestors, which will tell us a great deal about how this virus emerged in humans."
Pure speculation. No closer bat virus has been found as of June 13, 2021. The more likey scenario is that Shi Zhengli and Daszak modified a virus resembling SARS-CoV-19 in BSL-2 lab and it escaped.

RmYN02 FURIN

The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SARS-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that the novel coronavirus uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells, they said. The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02 is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its Spike Protein meet, according to the researchers. The viral Spike Protein mediates SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells and harbors a S1/S2 cleavage site containing multiple arginine residues (multibasic) not found in closely related animal coronaviruses. However, the role of this multibasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. Here, we report that the cellular protease furin ¹cleaves the Spike Protein at the S1/S2 site and that cleavage is essential for S-protein-mediated cell-cell fusion and entry into human lung cells. Moreover, optimizing the S1/S2 site increased cell-cell, but not virus-cell, fusion, suggesting that the corresponding viral variants might exhibit increased cell-cell spread and potentially altered virulence. Our results suggest that acquisition of a S1/S2 multibasic cleavage site was essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection of humans and identify furin as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276520302641

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

Highlights
• Pangolin-CoV is 91.02% identical to SARS-CoV-2 at the whole-genome level
• Pangolin-CoV is the second closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 behind RaTG13
• Five key amino acids in the RBD are consistent between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
• Only SARS-CoV-2 contains a potential cleavage site for furin proteases
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220303602
Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, an organization that works on animal-to-human spillover diseases, said that accumulating evidence on pangolins made it “doubtful that this species played a role in the outbreak.” “We need to keep looking for the original reservoir” — likely a bat,” he said, adding that the potential intermediate host would likely be another mammal species that’s more widely traded in the Yunnan-to-Wuhan corridor of China. While the pangolin trade is vast, Dr. Daszak said most of it “is in their scales, dried, in which viruses would almost certainly not be able to persist.” He opposes trade in the highly endangered animal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/pangolin-coronavirus.html

PETER DASZAK

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

Daszak still claims that any suggestion of a lab leak of a genetically altered virus is "conspiracy theory," a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event, a belief embraced by many Trumpoids who know something is happening, but don't know what it is. Of course Daszak had to say that the virus came from nature and anyone who disagreed was a conspiratorialist, otherwise people might examine his role in the pandemic. The other players roles who caused the pandemic were easily ascertainable by reviewing the scientific literature they generated while conducting these experiments with SARS-CoV-2 close relatives in the very city where the pandemic first broke out and in at least two USA labs..

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

Since 2014, the EcoHealth Alliance has received a grant from the National Institutes of Health, until its funding was abruptly cut two weeks ago. The reason, as “60 Minutes” reported on Sunday evening, was a conspiracy theory spread by Representative Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican who in March wore a gas mask on the House floor to mock concern about the new coronavirus. On April 14, 2020 Gaetz appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show and claimed that the N.I.H. grant went to the Wuhan Institute, which Gaetz intimated might have been the source of the virus — the institute may have “birthed a monster,” in his words. The first of Gaetz’s claims was flatly false, and the second unlikely; the C.I.A. has reportedly found no evidence of a link between the virus and the Wuhan lab. But at a White House briefing a few days later, a reporter from the right-wing website Newsmax told President Trump that under Barack Obama, the N.I.H. gave the Wuhan lab a $3.7 million grant. “Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?” she asked. In fact, Trump’s administration had recently renewed EcoHealth’s grant, but Trump didn’t appear to know that. “The Obama administration gave them a grant of $3.7 million?” he asked. Then he said, “We will end that grant very quickly.” And they did. But ending the grant dealt a blow to efforts to find treatments and a vaccine for the coronavirus. Remdesivir, the antiviral drug that’s shown some promise in Covid-19 patients, was earlier tested against bat viruses EcoHealth discovered. Months before this pandemic began, Reuters reported, the Trump administration axed the job of an epidemiologist working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China to help detect emerging disease outbreaks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/opinion/coronavirus-trump.html
NIH PRESS RELEASE: "The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans." In a previous R01 we found that bats in southern China harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs, some of which can use human ACE2 to enter cells, infect humanized mouse models causing SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines. nih.gov

DASZAK: "Look, first, the idea that this virus escaped from a lab is just pure baloney. It’s simply not true. I’ve been working with that lab for 15 years. And the samples collected were collected by me and others in collaboration with our Chinese colleagues. They’re some of the best scientists in the world. There was no viral isolate in the lab. There was no cultured virus that’s anything related to SARS coronavirus 2. So it’s just not possible.¹Now, how did it get into the market? We know for sure that the Wuhan market was part of this outbreak, but we think that the first few cases weren’t in the market. And this is not uncommon. We’ve seen this with many, many other disease outbreaks, new viruses that emerge. They trickle out from rural areas through a person getting infected maybe in Hunan province and then moving into Wuhan, that maybe they’re part of the wildlife trade. Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets. These wet markets aren’t just places to sell wildlife; they’re places where people congregate. They come in in droves. They circulate around. They’re really good places for a virus to spread. And if a person brings it in, or an animal, that virus will spread. And it looks like that’s what’s happened here."
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/peter_daszak_coronavirus
1. Dr. Wang Yanyi said the institute now had three strains of live viruses, including one that was 96 per cent genomically similar to the Sars virus. But their highest similarity to Sars-CoV-2 was only 79.8 per cent, Wang Yanyi said.
If the disease "trickled out from rural areas" because there are as many bats in Wuhan as there are in New York City why didn't someone in those rural areas become infected first? Why wasn't Hunan put under lock-down? "Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets." Why did the market closest to the Wuhan Institute of Virology get infected and no other wet markets? As documented in this Data Base the virus did not originate in the market but this Chinese agent of influence sticks with a variation of the market story.
"Before accepting the first batch of test samples from COVID-19 patients on December 30, 2019, the institute’s labs did not have the novel coronavirus and no one at the institute has contracted COVID-19 to this day. “It is impossible for the virus to leak from such a high-security laboratory,” said Yuan Zhiming, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in an interview with CGTN on April 18. The claim that the novel coronavirus escaped from the laboratory is pure nonsense, said Peter Daszak, chairperson of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit organization, who has been cooperating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 15 years. There is no virus cultivation related to the new coronavirus in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so the so-called “laboratory leak theory” is impossible, said Peter Daszak who is responsible for studying emerging infectious diseases worldwide."
https://business.facebook.com/188625661189259/posts/3264254063626388
Simply untrue as evidenced by the scientific papers generated by the Institute.

NPR DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world. That's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic. We're finding 1 to 7 million people exposed to these viruses every year in Southeast Asia; that's the pathway. It's just so obvious to all of us working in the field," he says. No conspiracy theories Despite the evidence, misinformation about the virus's origins continue to proliferate. For Peter Daszak who has worked on other outbreaks, the pattern is all too familiar: "Every time we get a new virus emerging, we have people that say, 'This could have come from a lab,'" he says. What's unusual about this outbreak, he says, is that senior officials in both China and the U.S. have traded accusations that each nation is somehow responsible for the virus. "It's a real shame that the conspiracy theories can get to the level they've got with policymakers," he says. The political heat has strained the very scientific collaborations meant to detect these viruses as they emerge, warns Jonna Mazet. The PREDICT system she runs relies on the voluntary cooperation of many countries, with researchers freely sharing data about viruses they're spotting within their borders. "With this sort of blame game that's going on, we put ourselves at much more risk." Peter Daszak says the time for finger-pointing is over. "We have a bat virus in my neighborhood in New York killing people," he says. "Let's get real about this."

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

“One thing that I heard from the WIV lab director that I thought was very interesting, and he said, and he speaks okay English, we were asking him all these questions about, they call them rumors over there, we call them conspiracy theories, and he said basically, in sort of his version of English, we’ve not responded to those rumors because if you do that, you give them oxygen. So I think people misunderstand the Chinese government, and he’s a Chinese government worker at the senior level running a lab, not speaking up about when they’re accused. The reason is, he stated quite clearly, they don’t want to give oxygen to these conspiracies. They’re unfounded. And every now and again, they make a statement: that is simply not true. What do you do?"

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

Do you think that we will ever know where Sars-Cov-2 came from – and does it matter?
DASZAK: It does matter, but we're never going to know 100 per cent for sure – it's very hard to definitively prove, without being there at the time. In that space of uncertainty, conspiracy theories abound – for instance the idea it could have been bio-engineered. This is ridiculous, but it’s time consuming to fight these fires. I think it will take a couple of years to track Sar-Cov-2 properly. ¹ We need to trace back the sorts of animals that were going into Wuhan’s wet market – and the people. It’s quite possible it was circulating on a farm for weeks or months before emerging in Wuhan. Every time we've looked at the origins of the new disease in the past, we’ve found out it was actually around a lot longer than thought. Perhaps we will find it was just missed because, in most people, it just causes a cough – who in rural China doesn't have a cough every now and again?
1. In a couple of years the trail would have dried up!
What do you think is driving the conspiracy theories we’ve seen over the last few months?
DASZAK: People buy into conspiracy theories because they’re convincing stories told by charismatic people with just enough science and fact to make them seem plausible. The truth also tends to be less interesting. In this case, people in China are exposed to bats, who harbour viruses. It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring. Clearly this is part of the politics now. Take the US. We're seeing conspiracy theories being elevated in a polarised press, to the point where politicians then use that to make policy decisions. Which is pretty frightening. This is ultimately damaging to public health: US media focus on the lab leak hypothesis has led to "political tensions hindering an effort to find the source of the virus." Not unexpected. When you mix politics with science, you get...politics!"
Who are your heroes and villains of the pandemic?
DASZAK: Then there are people like SHI ZHENGLI in China, who has stuck through death threats and a complete disparaging of her character, just to do what she does: try to save lives. A few have been convicted, but many have been dragged through the mud for no good cause. I've heard many in leadership positions at NIH & in academia say privately that this casts a shadow of McCarthyism & is clearly politically motivated.
It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring.¹ 1. There is only a cyclone fence around WIV. Making new virus is exciting, not boring. DASZAK: Finally the only cases in rural China where bats abound were characterized by a mild cough or no symptoms. No rural Chinese came down with full blown Sars-Cov-2.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

Trump issued a statement boasting of his early insistence that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus. “To me, it was obvious from the beginning,” he said. “But I was badly criticized, as usual.”Biden's investigation was prompted when in May 2021 the CCP refused to allow the W.H.O. to conduct further investigation. This former Congressional researcher is hoping this website, along with the lawsuit I am filing against Dr. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH & NAID, will spark a Congressional investigation of the lab origins of Covid-19. The Biden Corona Report has to exonerate China since if it blamed China how would the Western powers punish China? The New York Times started setting the tone for the cover-up:

"One allied nation [France?] passed on information that three workers in the Wuhan virological laboratory were hospitalized with serious flulike symptoms in the autumn of 2019. The information about the sickened workers is considered important, but officials cautioned that it did not constitute evidence that they caught the virus at the laboratory — they may have brought it there.¹ Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters he had not seen any conclusive evidence about the cause of the pandemic, but supported the effort to look deeper. We need to know the origin, how this happened.” In his announcement Biden said two intelligence agencies believed the virus most likely occurred naturally, while at least one other favored the theory that it leaked accidentally from a lab in China. "None had high confidence in their assessments, the president noted."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/coronavirus-origins-intelligence.html
"Still, that a top lab studying this family of viruses happens to be located in the same city where the epidemic emerged could very well be a coincidence. Wuhan is an urban center larger than New York City, with a steady flow of visitors from other parts of China. It also has many large markets dealing in wildlife brought from across China and beyond. When wild animals are kept in close quarters, viruses have an opportunity to jump from species to species, sometimes resulting in dangerous recombinations that can lead to new diseases." The Wuhan Market theory has been debunked by numerous studies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/health/wuhan-coronavirus-lab-leak.html
1. What absurdity! Someone contaminated a lab where experiments with Coronavirus were being conducted from the outside? The NYT also reported: "The intelligence on the three workers came from outside the United States intelligence agencies’ own collection, which means its veracity is more difficult to authenticate. The source of the information was unclear, but several American officials said they believed the report that the three researchers got sick."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/politics/biden-coronavirus-origins.html

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

Early investigations into SARS-CoV-2 emergence and the resulting COVID-19 disease outbreak proposed the proximate cause was a zoonotic spillover event in late November or early December 2019 in Wuhan, China. This was supported by preliminary epidemiological studies, including the initial clinical series which linked two-thirds of the identified cases to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan. Critically, the study found no direct connection to the market for 14 individuals, including the first known case of COVID-19, leaving open the possibility of alternate points of origin and infection. Additionally, virologic samples of wildlife in the Huanan market could not be linked to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting transmission at the market was downstream from the spillover event. Here we consider that SARS-CoV-2 may have already been circulating in the community prior to the identification of the Huanan Market cluster. This hypothesis is supported by emerging epidemiologic and phylogenetic evidence indicating that the virus emerged in southern China and may have already spread internationally, and adapted for efficient human transmission by the time it was detected in late December.
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42669767/Satellite_Images_Baidu_COVID19_manuscript_preprint.pdf

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

"The new virus revealed itself gradually in humans last December 2019, in Wuhan, and in January 2020 several Chinese laboratories, including SHI ZHENGLI - a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin. SHI ZHENGLI directs the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, WIV a biosafety level 4 laboratory located in Jiangxia District, Wuhan. Her lab sequenced wholly or partly the genomes of samples from different patients, including five complete genomes. SHI ZHENGLI and her colleagues made their announcement on January 23, 2020 that the virus found in those five patients was 96.2-per-cent identical to the bat coronavirus they had warned about three years earlier." ¹"By that time, the virus had been circulating in Wuhan for at least seven weeks, and three consequential misconceptions had been propagated, not just by political leaders but by hospital officials and the Chinese version of the C.D.C.:

That the outbreak had begun in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which famously sold much more than seafood;

That the virus wasn’t dangerous

That it didn’t pass from person to person. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/11/why-werent-we-ready-for-the-coronavirus

1. The 4% differences is thousands of genomes. The viruses were SIMILAR not identical and the virus was not an evolutionary cousin of CoV-19 nor could it cause disease in humans

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

"On the second and third points, there was disagreement by clinicians treating patients, such as Zhang Li, at Wuhan’s Jinyintan Hospital, who told the Wall Street Journal in late February, “I was on alert because this was a new pneumonia and because I’d dealt with SARS.” The misconception that the market was the origin of the outbreak is implicitly contradicted by a scientific paper published in late January 2020, by a group of physicians from Wuhan and Beijing, describing clinical features of the first forty-one patients. Twenty-seven of them, the paper said, had been exposed in the Huanan market. Since a single horseshoe bat would be unlikely to infect twenty-seven people, even if they diced it into hors d’œuvres, and since by some accounts bats weren’t even on sale in the market at that time, a few scientists have speculated that there was an intermediate host animal—a snake, a pangolin, a palm civet?—in which the virus amplified itself, before that larger creature was sold or butchered. The molecular evidence for snakes is weak, pangolins are a complicated story, and civets aren’t implicated this time." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986264

DANIEL LUCEY

"An American physician and scholar Daniel R. Lucey (who had also worked the SARS outbreak, in Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Toronto) wondered about the fourteen other early patients. He noticed that the first of them, falling sick on December 1, 2019 had no direct or secondary contact with the market. That meant, given the incubation period, that the virus must have been circulating in Wuhan outside the market since November 2020. This doesn’t controvert the likelihood of the virus originating in a bat, but it suggests that perhaps it went into the Huanan market, as well as coming out of it, in humans." SARS-CoV-2 is a subtle bug."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext#bib35
"The logic seems straightforward. But a more complete analysis of early cases suggests that locating the origin of the virus may not be so simple. A study published in the found that of the first 425 patients, only 45 percent had connections to the market. A separate Jan. 24, 2020 analysis published in the Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — did not have market links¹."
1. Neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

"Scientific American quotes Dr. Kevin Olival Vice President for Research at EcoHealth Alliance a group that has been implicated in funding the pandemic: "How and where the SARS-CoV-2 spillover occurred is not known for certain. There was an early suspicion that the initial outbreak could have started at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which was closed on January 1 2020. But “we don’t know if the spillover happened outside the market and then began spreading after it was brought there,” says. It is also unclear if there was an intermediate animal host between the disease-carrying bats and humans." ¹ Dr. Olival’s role as Senior Research Scientist at EcoHealth Alliance involves coordinating the modeling and analytics research; integrating evolutionary and ecological theories to understand the drivers of disease emergence; and managing zoonotic disease surveillance efforts in Thailand and Indonesia under the USAID PREDICT project.
1. Everything is unclear.

In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic "hotspots" and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases - animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-coronavirus-slipped-past-disease-detective
Despite referencing Scientific American and NEJM to show the virus didn't start at the market the Washington Post claimed it was doubtful the virus orginated at WIV. Why? "conspiracy theories." The Covid-19 Research Institute did not unearth any conspiracy to release the virus, instead it discovered evidence that the virus, which was created naturally in bats, altered using Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat and/or RECOMBINANT techniques by microbiologists who made the virus more deadly and transmissible than previous SARS Corona virus and accidentally leaked. This genetic engineering also gave the virus the ability to allow it to transmit a plethora of diseases, evade detection and do a whole lot of other things viruses found in nature don't do.

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

It is possible for viruses to escape from a laboratory by infecting a worker. In the early 2000s, there were three documented cases of the original SARS virus escaping from a laboratory environment, according to Lim Poh Lian, a senior consultant at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases in Singapore. In the case of a 2003 incident in Singapore, a student became infected with SARS after his samples of West Nile virus were cross-contaminated with live SARS virus. That virus was being grown in relatively large quantities in the lab for studies on the disease, and the student was not properly trained in safety procedures for the lab he was working in.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...t-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

JULY 2003 An outbreak of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome occurred among students in a college (College A) in Kunming, Yunnan province, China in 2003. Subsequent investigations revealed the presence of hantavirus antibodies and antigens in laboratory rats at College A and two other institutions. Hantavirus antibodies were detected in 15 additional individuals other than the index case in these three locations. Epidemiologic data indicated that the human infections were a result of zoonotic transmission of the virus from laboratory rats.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20380897/

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

"The modern era of pathogen releases can be said to have begun in 1973 in England, when a lab assistant working with smallpox infected herself and spread it to three others, two of whom died. Four years later, smallpox was almost officially eradicated from the wild, yet the following year a medical photographer at Birmingham Medical School mysteriously died of the disease. It turned out that researchers in another part of the building were experimenting with smallpox, and the virus most likely reached the photographer through the ventilation system. Mother Jones

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

Patients with unexplained pneumonias started showing up at hospitals; within days, dozens were dead. The secret police seized doctors’ records and ordered them to keep silent. American spies picked up clues about a lab leak, but the local authorities had a more mundane explanation: contaminated meat. [The Chinese blamed Covid-19 on contaminated frozen meat.] In April and May 1979, at least 66 people died after airborne anthrax bacteria emerged from a military lab in the Soviet Union. But leading American scientists voiced confidence in the Soviets’ claim that the pathogen had jumped from animals to humans. Only after a full-fledged investigation in the 1990s did one of those scientists confirm the earlier suspicions: The accident in what is now the Russian Urals city of Yekaterinburg was a lab leak, one of the deadliest ever documented. Dr. Meselson, a biological warfare expert, studied classified intelligence suggesting that the Soviet anthrax outbreak could have been linked to a military facility nearby. Six years later, he wrote that the Soviet explanation of the epidemic’s natural origins was plausible. The evidence the Soviets provided was consistent, he said, with the theory that people had been stricken by intestinal anthrax that originated in contaminated bone meal used as animal feed. “The concept of truth, in fact, is very complicated,” said Lev Grinberg, a Yekaterinburg pathologist who secretly preserved evidence of the true nature of the outbreak in 1979. “Those who don’t want to accept the truth will always find ways not to accept it.”
The incident was only confirmed in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when President Boris Yeltsin invited an independent team of scientists to investigate. Using 2010 data from the CDC, one expert estimated that somewhere in the United States, “a breach of containment happens about twice weekly.” Some have involved deadly agents including anthrax, avian flu, and Ebola. Most incidents are minor, but not all. Take two examples at lower-risk labs: In 2009, a researcher at the University of Chicago died after being infected by a weakened strain of plague. In 2012, a postdoc at San Francisco’s VA Medical Center came down with meningitis from his lab. He died.

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

"SARS-CoV-2 infection have caused global pandemic and claimed over 5,000,000 tolls1–4. Although the genetic sequences of their etiologic viruses are of high homology, the clinical and pathological characteristics of COVID-19 significantly differ from SARS5,6. Especially, it seems that SARS-CoV-2 undergoes vast replication in vivo without being effectively monitored by anti-viral immunity.

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane Medical School in New Orleans, observed that Chinese scientists would have to have collected SARS-CoV-2 and then grown it in a colony of cells, but somehow never publish any details of it even as they published reports on other coronaviruses for years."We don't know if any such reports existed as the WIV database was taken off line in September 2019 and never restored. Suppression of information in a totalitarian country is quietly, easily and quicky accomplished especially when there is so much at stake if it came to light the virus originated at the WIV, even though, if not for Daszak, the Chinese probably would never have carried these experiments out! “It makes no sense to me. Why did they hold onto the virus?” Dr. Garry said. But the reason they held on to them was to theoretically develop a vaccine before one of the viruses emerged and caused an epidemic. Garry continued: "Genetic analysis shows the virus began to spread sometime in the fall or winter of 2019. Those same analyses supported an earlier Kristain Anderson theory that the virus was not genetically engineered in a laboratory. Garry says the reason is simple — the virus infects people in a way that scientists had never seen before: "The virus is just really too good at what it's doing. No human using a computer could do this. This is very clearly a natural process that occurred." In addition, he says, there are no signs of human genetic modification in the virus's code.¹

1. Garry is a side kick of Kristain Anderson https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=criecCgAAAAJ&hl=en
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...irus-compare-to-mers-sars-and-the-common-cold
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

In 2004, the Chinese and French governments signed a cooperation agreement on fighting and preventing new diseases, stressing the active cooperation between China and France in the construction of high-level biosafety laboratories and the system construction of biosafety laws and regulations etc. In order to implement the spirit of Sino-French agreement, in 2005, Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook the task of building a national biosafety laboratory of Wuhan, Chinese Academy of Sciences. With nearly 10 years of unremitting efforts, the laboratory completed the physical facilities in January 2015. In August 2016, it obtained the recognition and authentication certificate for the critical protection equipment installation and commissioning.

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

At the time when it was launched by Jacques Chirac and his Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin, in 2004, the P4 was at the heart of a showdown in France. Those in favor, politicians and scientists, said that China, which had barely emerged from SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), should be helped to defend itself against epidemics. But Defense, External Intelligence (DGSE) and Foreign Affairs were standing against a project that they believed could serve a military bacteriological weapon program. They suspected that Beijing would want to equip itself with five or seven P4 laboratories, including two for military purposes. "We knew the risks involved and thought that the Chinese would control everything and quickly eject us from the project. We believed that providing this cutting-edge technology to a country with an infinite power agenda risked exposing France in return, ”said a diplomat who followed the case closely. According to a high-ranking source, the project would also have provoked a crisis in Pasteur, where the Assembly of the Hundred, the parliament of the Institute, would have denounced the access authorized by the contract to some of its databases, before see the decision imposed by its management. " There were arguments, because China has a real medical problem with epidemics and France had an advantage in this technology very advanced. But the Chinese know how to copy and duplicate. And we thought the P4 would give China instruments if it ever wanted to start a biological weapons program, "said a senior diplomat, who was in strategic affairs at the time. French scholars played a big role in pushing the project. " There was a blindness of the scientific community which refused to see the reality of the Chinese system. Researchers believed that openness to capitalism would transform China into a normal country. It was to forget that it remained above all a Leninist state in which science is not independent but directed by the Communist Party ", explains Valérie Niquet, specialist in Asia at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS). Since the start of the epidemic, the party and the state have been involved in research, manipulating dates and rewriting the history of the coronavirus.
https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

On April 21, Le Figaro published an article "Investigation: How the P4 laboratory in Wuhan, exported by France, escaped all control" signed by Isabelle Lasserre. Some comments in the article are shocking. The Chinese Embassy in France wants to question them. She wrote in the article that: "On February 16, Chinese state media also reported deficiencies. They claimed in particular that researchers threw laboratory materials down the drain, after experimentation and without having subjected them to the specific treatment intended for biological discharges. They also pointed out that a certain number of researchers, to make ends meet, were selling laboratory animals which had undergone experiments on the markets of Wuhan. As anyone with common sense knows very well, a high-level laboratory is endowed with rigorous management systems and codes of conduct for scientific research, how is it possible that the basic faults described in the article appear? This is an extremely serious problem which seriously damages the reputation of Chinese research institutions and the national image of China. We ask the journalist to tell her readers specifically that her comments come from which media and which reports. Otherwise, they can only be considered as lies. The author of the text made many criticisms of the joint construction of the P4 laboratory in Wuhan by China and France. It is his personal opinion, in which the Embassy does not intervene. But the descriptions in the article are very likely to misinform readers, and do not promote mutual knowledge of the Chinese and French peoples and friendly cooperation between the two countries. The Chinese Embassy in France recommends the video of an interview given by Mr. Yuan Zhiming, Director of the Wuhan branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on April 20 at CGTN. The author of the article could undoubtedly obtain useful information in this, which would help him to know the question concerned in a more complete and more precise way.
The core of the Wuhan BSL-4 Laboratory is surrounded by stainless-steel walls, forming a "box-within-a-box" structure. The core lab enclosure can ensure sufficient structural strength and tightness to form a static seal. The lab's dynamic seal uses negative pressure technology to ensure a strict and orderly pressure gradient between the functional areas, thereby effectively preventing any air contaminated by infectious pathogenic microorganisms from spreading to areas with low contamination probability and to the external environment spreading.
https://www.biospace.com/article/re...of-virology-s-vital-role-in-fighting-covid-19
Air emitted from the lab is filtered and discharged by two-stage high-efficiency filters to ensure the safety of the emissions. Waste water is discharged after high-temperature treatment in a sewage treatment system. Polluted waste in the lab is subjected to high-temperature and high-pressure treatment by double-door autoclaves, and then safely removed and delivered to a centralized medical waste disposal unit with corresponding qualifications for disposal. Whenever personnel pass through the entrance and exit channels, their positive pressure protective suits are chemically disinfected using the chemical showers to ensure the safety of the passageways. The above technical protection measures ensure that viruses inside the lab cannot escape.
Plum Island Reports Disease Outbreak By John Rather Aug. 22, 2004 THE Department of Homeland Security confirmed last week that the highly contagious foot-and-mouth virus had briefly spread within the Plum Island Animal Disease Center in two previously undisclosed incidents earlier this summer. A spokesman for the department, which took over the high-security laboratory from the Department of Agriculture in June 2003, said safety procedures had been stepped up and laboratory rooms disinfected after the incidents, which occurred on June 24 and July 19.

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

In a CNN interview on March 26, 2021 Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director under Trump, made a candid admission: “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.” Redfield added that he believed the release was an accident, not an intentional act. In his view, nothing that happened since his first calls with Dr. Gao changed a simple fact: The WIV needed to be ruled out as a source, and it hadn’t been. After the interview aired, death threats flooded his inbox. The vitriol came not just from strangers who thought he was being racially insensitive but also from prominent scientists, some of whom used to be his friends. One said he should just “wither and die.”

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

STILL HEAD OF W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is an Ethiopian microbiologist and internationally recognized malaria researcher, who has served since 2017 as Director-General of the World Health Organization. Tedros is the first non-physician and first African in the role, who has been endorsed by the African Union. Born: March 3, 1965 (age 55 years), Asmara, Eritrea Nationality: Ethiopian Party: Tigray People's Liberation Front
Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) SUMMARY: The Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF) is a political party in Tigray, Ethiopia that has been listed as a perpetrator in the Global Terrorism Database, based on ten incidents occurring between 1976 and 1990 (see GTD link). Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), also known as Popular revolution for the freedom of Tigray, Woyane, Weyane is an active group formed c. 1975. TRAC ANALYSIS: IDEOLOGY Separatist / New Regime Nationalist / Ethnic Nationalist, Left Wing Terrorist Groups (Maoist, Marxist, Communist, Socialist) TRAC ANALYSIS: TACTICS Attacks on Soft Targets, Assassinations as a Terrorist Tactic TRAC

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

"Much of the blame for W.H.O.’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a W.H.O. goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does W.H.O. seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of W.H.O.’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at W.H.O. generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. To avoid stigmatization against nation and race, the World Health Organization discourages the use of regions, countries, individuals, and animals on naming human infectious diseases and pathogens in its guidelines issued in 2015. The guidelines emphasize that viruses infect all people. That is to say, when an outbreak happens, everyone is at risk, regardless of his or her identity or location. The W.H.O. on February 11, 2020 announced the name of the novel coronavirus as SARS-CoV-2 on social media to “prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing,” W.H.O. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said." https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-health-coronavirus-disinformation-11586122093

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course Mission. The Division aims to improve health in the W.H.O. European Region by addressing the determinants, risks and consequences of chronic, noncommunicable conditions, by promoting mental and physical wellbeing across the life course, by the population-based prevention and clinical control of disease, and by preventing violence and injury. Biography: Dr Gauden Galea is a public health physician who has worked for W.H.O. since 1998. He has held posts as regional adviser on noncommunicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region, and as coordinator of health promotion in W.H.O. headquarters. Dr Galea has been Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion at W.H.O./Europe since January 2011. He has a special interest in health promotion, in the social determinants of noncommunicable diseases, and in the links between these diseases and the development agenda."
"Dr Gauden: https://web.archive.org/web/20160609075623/http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/executive-management/dr-gauden-galeaGalea

ADDENDUM

https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...scientists-joining-covid-origin-investigation
https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/corona-leaked-likely-wuhan-institute-virology-experts
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884792-MACE-E-PAI-COVID-19-ANALYSIS-Redacted.htm
https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/did...program-in-a-chinese-laboratory-very-possibly
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2020-articles/19392-expert-attacks-ecohealth-alliance-s-involvement-in-really-risky-bat-coronavirus-research-in-wuhan-labs?
https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched
https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038

Shi’s answers were coordinated with public information staffers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, of which WIV is part, and it took her 2 months to prepare them. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen of Scripps Research says he suspects Shi’s answers were “carefully vetted” by the Chinese government. “But they’re all logical, genuine, and stick to the science as one would have expected from a world-class scientist and one of the leading experts on coronaviruses,” Andersen says. However, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, who from the early days of the pandemic has urged that an investigation look into the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a laboratory accident, was decidedly unimpressed. “Most of these answers are formulaic, almost robotic, reiterations of statements previously made by Chinese authorities and state media,” Ebright says.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...st-center-covid-19-origin-theories-speaks-out

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

Daszak's Zoonotic chirade was over after "an allied power" determined several lab technicans or scientists became contaminated with an enhanced SARS virus and brought it into Wuhan during its incubation period. (1.) Incubation time for COVID-19 between 2 and 10 days has been recorded by the W.H.O. The W.H.O. stated on February 10, 2020, at its press conference, that a very long duration of incubation can represent double exposure, 24 days was a specified point to be regarded in the sense of the study's key results. (2.) The Chinese National Health Commission initially expected a 10 to 14 days incubation period. (3.) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from United States of America assumes the incubation period of 2 to 14 days for COVID-1929 (4.) Doctors and health-care practitioners, of leading Chinese group DXY.cn predicts an incubation period of "3 to 7 days, and up to 14 days." (5.) In a report released on February 9, 2020, the incubation time was observed as long as 24 days (range from 0-24 days; average of 3 days) (6). In a JAMA report released on February 21, 2020, a 19-day incubation period in infected patient has been identified, Hubei Province registered another case with an incubation time of 27 days, on February 22, 2020. An analysis sponsored by the Holland Ministry of Health and released by Eurosurveillance examined data for 88 identified travelers to and from Wuhan, which were identified as COVID-19 infected patients between January 20 and 28, 2020. It was calculated that the mean incubation period was 6.4 days. The incubation duration varied from 2.1 to 11.1 days. The 11.1-day maximum limit may be known as conservative. The incubation time greatly differs between the patients, according to a Chinese article reported by New England Journal of Medicine on January 30, 2020.

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

520 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 1200, New York, NY 10018 212.380.4460
AS SOON AS THIS PANDEMIC ENDS THOSE WHO SURVIVED COVID
WILL DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THIS OFFICE

DASZAK GREW RICH FROM HIS SCAM THAT NEVER PRODUCED A VACCINE

DASZAK EMAILS

Dear Randy:
As a member of the EcoHealth Alliance Board of Trustees, I would like to thank you and your wonderful colleagues for the generous vocal support and for the funding you are making possible for Peter and his research team. The entire board and the Alliance team are truly grateful for the extraordinary boost in morale you and your colleagues have provided. Peter and his team are doing critically important work on COVID-19 and its origin. In genuine gratitude, Rita.
Dear Ralph, Linda, Jim, Rita, Linfa and Hume, I’ve been following the events around the novel coronavirus emergence in China very closely and have been dismayed by the recent spreading of rumors, misinformation and conspiracy theories on its origins. These are now specifically targeting scientists with whom we’ve collaborated for many years, and who have been working heroically to fight this outbreak and share data with unprecedented speed, openness and transparency. These conspiracy theories threaten to undermine the very global collaborations that we need to deal with a disease that has already spread across continents. We have drafted a simple statement of solidarity and support for scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, and would like to invite you to join us as the first signatories. If you agree, we will send this letter to a group of around half-a-dozen other leaders in the field and then disseminate this widely with a sign-up webpage for others to show their support by signing up to its language. I will then personally present this at my plenary during the ICID 2020 conference in Malaysia in two weeks, with the goal of also getting widespread attention in SE Asia to our support for the work that our colleagues in China are undertaking. I sincerely hope you can join us. Please review the letter, and let me know if you are willing to join Billy Karesh and myself as co-signatories. Also, please confirm your title and affiliation that will be shown in the letter. We plan to make circulate this widely to coincide with a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, which will likely be released tomorrow or Friday. Thank you for your consideration and support of the scientific and public health community around the world! Cheers, Peter Daszak President EcoHealth Alliance 460 West 34th Street – 17th Floor New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 212-380-4474 Website: www.ecohealthalliance. NUMEROUS PAGES DELETED AFTER THIS.

From: Tara Hoda<hoda@ecohealthalliance.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 1:57 PM
To: rcolwell@umiacs.umd.edu; Victoria Lord
Cc: Anthony Ramos; Peter Daszak
Subject: Carnegie Corporation Contacts
Dear Dr. Colwell: It was so wonderful meeting you at the board meeting last week. As mentioned, we will be submitting a Letter of Inquiry to the Carnegie Corporation under their International Peace and Security portfolio. Our proposed project focuses on promoting a multi-sectoral approach and building capacity and partnerships for pandemic outbreaks and international health security processes in Western Asia. Our LOI is attached to this e-mail. You had mentioned you may have connections with the following people who are members of Carnegie Corporation's Board of Directors:
1) Jared Cohon
2) John DeGioia
3) Marcia McNutt
4) Judy Woodruff
For the Carnegie Corporation, it will greatly increase our chances of having our proposal considered if we have a point of contact. Would you be willing to put us in touch with one of the people above, or to directly send an e-mail letting them EcoHealth Alliance will be submitting an application? Any and all leads would be greatly appreciated. Best, Tara
Tara Hoda Development Associate EcoHealth Alliance
I’m on a panel on biothreats…National Press Club, Washington, DC, Monday afternoon April 30…along with a roster of DoD, CIA, DHS, and other assorted luminaries. Anything I should say or comment on regarding EcoHealth, Peter?

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

Mrs. Morris Hadley, another civic leader, whose husband was one-time head of the Carnegie Foundation and is now head of the CIA conduit Rubicon Foundation. Through his membership in the law firm of Milbank, Tween, Hadley, and McCloy he has close association with John J. McCloy, once chairman of the board of Chase Manhattan Bank, former chairman of the Ford Foundation, past president of the World Bank, past U.S. High Commissioner to Germany and chairman of the board of the New York International House, a Rockefeller-backed institution dedicated to making the foreign student feel at home.
I think that many of EcoHealth Alliance's initiatives would dovetail well with Carnegie Corporation's International Peace and Security area of interest. EcoHealth Alliance's President, Dr. Peter Daszak, is the chair of the National Academies of Sciences' Forum on Microbial Threats, a member of the NRC Advisory Committee to the US Global Change Research Program, and has advised the Director for Medical Preparedness Policy on the White House National Security Staff on global health issues. He is also actively involved in the W.H.O. Expert group on Public Health Emergency Disease Prioritization.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the “Statement” Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”
ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

Ecohealth Alliance integrates innovative science-based solutions and partnerships that increase capacity to achieve two interrelated goals: protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases and safeguarding ecosystems by promoting conservation. USAID PREDICT EMERGING PANDEMIC THREAT PROGRAM - assesses capacity and develops plans for the implementation of wildlife surveillance support. They develop models of disease risk and spread, implement a smart (strategic, measurable, adaptive, responsive, and targeted) wildlife surveillance strategy to identify and target high-risk wildlife in the region's most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dept of Defense - serological bio surveillance for spillover of henipa viruses and filo viruses at agricultural and hunting human-animal interfaces in peninsular Malaysia. The objective is to enhance capacity within the Malaysia government to characterize the distribution of and detect spillover of novel and known henipa viruses and filo viruses, (both groups include high consequence zoonotic pathogens) in indigenous populations and farms in peninsular Malaysia. Current surveillance strategies for novel zoonotic viruses rely exclusively on molecular detection tools, but Nipah and Ebola viruses are present at low prevalence in bat species which makes infected individuals difficult to detect. By establishing a multiplexed serological assay developed to detect antibodies against any henipa and filo viruses, the government of Malaysia will more effectively be able to determine the distribution of these high-impact viruses in wildlife reservoirs and detect evidence of spillover in at-risk human or livestock populations. The most comprehensive investigation of the epidemiology and ecolog of the RVF virus ever conducted. The project brings together a diverse group of experts from governmental, non-governmental, academic and private organizations, both domestic and international. the 2010-2011 outbreak of RVF in south Africa had a significant impact on the health of people, animals and the local economy. Thus, a better, more integrated understanding of the virus in the environment and in animal and human populations is critically needed to improve public awareness. a booklet explaining the risks of RVF and similar diseases was developed for distribution to study participants in the region. Rather than being a collection of independent science projects, this one health project integrates data collected from climate and weather, vegetation cycles, and mosquito studies to better predict outbreaks in South Africa. Evidence of RVF in animals and people is being collected to better understand exposure, with groups of people in occupations with high risk for rvf and flocks of sheep will be followed for approximately four years. the work is centered in the free state and northern cape provinces and includes the epicenter of previous RVF outbreaks within the 40,000km2 study region. Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development. Dr. Daszak’s research has been instrumental in identifying and predicting the impact of emerging diseases across the globe. His achievements include identifying the bat origin of SARS, identifying the underlying drivers of Nipah and Hendra virus emergence, producing the first ever global emerging disease hotspots map, developing a strategy to find out how many unknown viruses exist that could threaten to become pandemic, identifying the first case of a species extinction due to disease, and discovering the disease chytridiomycosis as the cause global amphibian declines.
PREDICT is a consortium or partners working to enable global surveillance for pathogens that can spillover from animal hosts to people by building capacities to detect and discover viruses of pandemic potential. The project is part of USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats program and is led by the UC Davis One Health Institute. The core partners are USAID, EcoHealth Alliance, Metabiota Inc., Wildlife Conservation Society, and Smithsonian Institution, along with a network of scientists and professionals in over 30 countries around the world. Contact us at predict@ucdavis.edu.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13618543

W.H.O.

GUIDESTAR NON-PROFIT REPORT

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/updates

Kaspar Sebastian Bohdan Daszak is 20 years old and lives in an apartment in Stockholm. He lives with John Ramstedt. BORN 8/27/2000. John or Peter Daszak's son? His home is valued at $1,627,859.80 United States Dollars
https://www.hitta.se/kaspar+daszak/stockholm/person/VgPwmnoooK

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

THE FRENCH HELP WIV BUILD THE LEVEL 4 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB DESPITE DUAL USE CONCERNS
THE PROXIMITY FACTOR
PATIENT ZERO
TEXAS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN BED WITH WIV THANKS TO FAUCI GRANT

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

SHI ZHENG LI CREATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY
BATLADY MAKE BIG MISTAKE: SHE DID IT IN A LEVEL 2 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB, AND IT LEAKED OR SOMEONE GOT INFECTED IN THE LAB AND BROUGHT THE VIRUS BACK HOME.
SHI ZHENG LI WORK AT THE TIME OF OUTBREAK INVOLVED STUDYING CORONA VIRUSES ALMOST IDENTICAL TO SARS Co-V-2
SHI ZHENG LI CHRONOLOGY SHOWS SHE HAS A FINGER IN EVERY CORONA VIRUS EXPERIMENT
SHI ZHENG LI POST SARS-CoV-2 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE
DESTRUCTION OF SARS-COV-2 SAMPLES
THE INTERVIEW WITH THE BAT LADY "COVID IS PUNISHMENT FOR AN UNSANITARY LIFESTYLE"
2018 SHI ZHENG LI WAS CREATING SYNTHETIC VIRUSES
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS IN UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL LAB PRODUCED NOVEL VIRUS MORE DEADLY TO OLDER PEOPLE JUST LIKE SARS-CoV-2 AND STIR DEBATE ABOUT GoF RESEARCH CAUSING A PANDEMIC 2020: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SL-SHC014-MA15: MAN MADE VIRUS WHICH USES ACE2 RECEPTOR

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS SYNTHESIZING VIRUSES THAT ATTACK ACE2 RECEPTORS IN HUMANS WERE PRECURSORS TO CREATION OF SARS-CoV-2
2015: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SARS: CREATION OF A VIRUS THAT CAN USE ACE2 AS RECEPTOR

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

NEW YORK TIMES 9/20/2020 CHINA VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE
THE AUSTRIAN STUDY: IS CONSIDERING A GENETIC-MANIPULATION ORIGIN FOR SARS-COV-2 A CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT MUST BE CENSORED? ROSSANA SEGRETO UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY
PASSAGING
THE NORWEGIAN STUDY
SIR RICHARD DEARLOVE FORMER MI-5 DIRECTOR SUPPORTS NORWEGIAN STUDY
UNIQUE NEW FEATURE OF SARS-CoV-2 CALLED "UNEXPECTED INSERTION"
SHING HEI ZHAN, BENJAMIN E. DEVERMAN AND YUJIA ALINA CHAN, “SARS-COV-2 IS WELL ADAPTED FOR HUMANS
HUMAN ENGINEERING OF A POLYBASIC HA CLEAVAGE SITE MUTANT WAS EASILY ACCOMPLISHED

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

RICHARD EBRIGHT: THESE EXPERIMENTS HAS GOTS TO GO!

THE WET MARKET

VIRUS WAS NEVER FOUND IN ANIMALS AT THE WET MARKET OR ANYWHERE ELSE
THE PANGOLINS DID IT
CHICOM RE-ACTION DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN
BOLTON AND TRUMP PAVE THE WAY FOR THE PANDEMIC

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

NEW WHO JUNKET
WHO DISPUTES THE FACT THE VIRUS LINGERS IN THE AIR INDOORS, INFECTING THOSE NEARBY.
CCP PROPAGANDA

Table of Contents

DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN DASZAK, WAS A NAZI DEATH CAMP GUARD

FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN

DOCTOR "MENGELE" DASZAK

FOR ECO-FASCISTS - COVID-19 "NATURE IS HEALING"

FAUCI TRUSTS THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

WHY DID AN OILY BUBBLE OF GENES JUST ABOUT 100 NANOMETERS IN DIAMETER (A TRILLION WEIGH LESS THAN A RAINDROP) FIRST SURFACE IN WUHAN, CHINA?

"THE BAT LADY" IS A WEIRDO

YOUNG BAT LADY

THE SMOKING GUN DOCUMENT

DASZAK EXPLORES THE LAB LEAK THEORY

Dr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation." Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment

EARLIER EXPERIMENTS INVOLVED THE SPIKE PROTEINS WHICH ARE THE KEYS TO INVADING THE HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

ECO-FASCIST DASZAK FINANCED WIV GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WITH YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY

THE PANDEMIC WAS CREATED BY DASZAK, AN ECO-FASCIST, TO CUT DOWN ON HUMAN POPULATION GROWTH THAT'S DESTROYING NATURE

THE MISSING COMPONENT: DASZAK'S IMPLICIT RACISM

THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AND THIS WEBPAGE IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY

DASZAK WAS A BLOODY SUCCESS

THE MONSTER MOVIE

CHINESE-AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK TWEETS

HAVING DASZAK AS A W.H.O INVESTIGATOR WAS LIKE HAVING AL CAPONE SIT ON ON THE CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION.

FAUCI'S INVOLVMENT IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

FIRE FAUCI AND REPLACE HIM WITH FORMER FDA HEAD Dr. SCOTT GOTTLIEB

Dr. FAUCI, WHO APPROVED DASZAK'S GRANTS, SUDDENLY WANTS ANOTHER INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IF HE SAID HE DIDN'T WANT ONE SUSPICION WOULD FALL ON HIM

FAUCI PROPONENT OF GoF / GoT OPPOSES GoF / BAN IN WASHINGTON POST AND DEFENDS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS

BENEFITS AND RISKS OF INFLUENZA RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED ANTHONY S. FAUCI, FRANCIS S. COLLINS

FAUCI SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT

THE LANCET QUESTIONS DASZAK'S OBJECTIVITY "ADDENDUM: COMPETING INTERESTS AND THE ORIGINS OF SARS-COV-2"

DASZAK WAS DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN RECOMBINANT EXPERIMENTS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS INVOLVED RECOMBINANT BAT CORONAVIRUSES / NOVEMBER 30, 2017:"DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS"

MANY OF THESE GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED WITH VIRUSES FOUND IN HORSESHOE BATS - CLOSE RELATIVES TO THE SARS-CoV-19 VIRUS

DASZAK'S METHODOLOGY RELIED ON GAIN-OF-THREAT, GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

DASZAK PLAYED ON THE BENEFICENT MOTIVATION OF MOST SCIENTISTS WHO CONDUCT GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS

ProGoFer's and Anti-GoFers

THE CRITICS OF GoF/GoT PREDICTED IT WOULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC

DAVID RELMAN STANFORD UNIVERSITY MICROBIOLOGIST

MICROBIOLOGIST JONATHAN LATHAM

DR. RICHARD EBRIGHT OPPOSES BARIC'S GoF EXPERIMENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AND WIV

DASZAK'S CRIMINAL LIABILITY

DR. DASZAK'S BOGUS FAMILY BACKGROUND: "PETER COTTINGTON DASZAK" IS NOT HIS REAL NAME

DASZAK IS UNQUALIFIED FOR MICROBIOLOGY

DASZAK INTERVIEW DECEMBER 2019

PETER DASZAK TALKS ABOUT HIS EARLY YEARS

DASZAK'S BOGUS C.V.

THE GRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY STEMMY AND FAUCI

BEFORE THE CORONA VIRUS OUTBREAK IN 2019 THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION, GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED IN BSL-2 LAB

FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LABORATORY MODIFICATION

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2. IN SILICO COMPARISON OF SPIKE PROTEIN-ACE2 BINDING AFFINITIES ACROSS SPECIES; SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THE SARS-COV-2 VIRUS

THE BINDING ENERGY BETWEEN SARS-COV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN AND ACE2 WAS HIGHEST FOR HUMANS OUT OF ALL SPECIES TESTED

THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LAB CREATION GAIN-OF-THREAT INSERTIONS AT POLYBASIC FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE PRRA IS EVIDENCE VIRUS WAS MODIFIED FOR INCREASED INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENICITY - DR. RONEN SHEMESH

ARGININE / FURIN

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT MADE A COVID-19, THAT OCCURRED IN NATURE, MORE TRANSMITTABLE AND MORE LETHAL

LASTING AFTER EFFECTS UNLIKE OTHER CORONA VIRUSES

CHRONOLOGY

HIGH RECOMBINATION AND MUTATION RATES IN MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS SUGGEST THAT CORONAVIRUSES MAY BE POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT EMERGING VIRUSES

REVERSE GENETICS WITH A FULL-LENGTH INFECTIOUS CDNA OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

2002-2004 THE WIV SCIENTISTS BEGAN COLLECTING BAT VIRUS SINCE THE SARS-1 OUTBREAK

DEVELOPMENT OF MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS MHV AND SARS-COV INFECTIOUS CDNA CONSTRUCTS (BARIC)

COMPOSITIONS OF CORONAVIRUSES WITH A RECOMBINATION-RESISTANT GENOME (BARIC)

REVIEW OF BATS AND SARS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS - GoT

SHI ZHENGLI: DIFFERENCE IN RECEPTOR USAGE BETWEEN SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME (SARS) CORONAVIRUS AND SARS-LIKE CORONAVIRUS OF BAT ORIGIN

PETER DASZAK: RISK OF VIRAL EMERGENCE FROM BATS (DASZAK)

RON FOUCHIER, EARLY GAIN-OF-THREAT "SCIENTIST CREATED AN AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS IN FAVOR OF SHARING H5N1 VIRUS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

W.H.O. CONCERNED THAT NEW H5N1 INFLUENZA RESEARCH COULD UNDERMINE THE 2011 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA PFREPAREDNESS FRAMEWORK

THE PAPER DESCRIBING HOW THE LETHAL H5N1 BIRD FLU COULD BE MADE EASIER TO SPREAD WAS PUBLISHED SIX MONTHS AFTER A SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD SUGGESTED THAT THE PAPERS’ MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DATA BE CENSORED.

FOUCHIER EXPLAINED HOW EASY IT WAS TO CREATE AN AIRBORNE AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS USING GAIN-OF-THREAT TECHNOLOGY

US-CHINA ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP; KUNMING, CHINA

BATS AS ANIMAL RESERVOIRS FOR THE SARS CORONAVIRUS: HYPOTHESIS PROVED AFTER 10 YEARS OF VIRUS HUNTING VIROLOGICA SINICA

NIAD AND HIH GRANTS

ONE OF SEVERAL NEAR FATAL ERRORS THAT TRIGGERED THE GoF / GOT BAN INVOLVED H5N1 INFLUENZA VIRUS

OBAMA BANS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH IN US

DOING DILIGENCE TO ASSESS THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF LIFE SCIENCES GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT OUTSOURCED TO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AFTER AMERICA BANS IT AS TOO DANGEROUS

UNDERSTANDING THE RISK OF BAT CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCE (DASZAK)

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CHIMERIC CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS (BARIC)

SPILLOVER AND PANDEMIC PROPERTIES OF ZOONOTIC VIRUSES WITH HIGH HOST PLASTICITY (DASZAK)

SARS-LIKE WIV1-COV POISED FOR HUMAN EMERGENCE / SHI ZHENGLI AND BARIC CO-AUTHORS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE ARGUMENT IS ESSENTIALLY A RERUN OF THE DEBATE OVER WHETHER TO ALLOW LAB RESEARCH THAT INCREASES THE VIRULENCE, EASE OF SPREAD OR HOST RANGE OF DANGEROUS PATHOGENS — WHAT IS KNOWN AS ‘GAIN-OF-FUNCTION’ RESEARCH.

2015 ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT OF PROPOSED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

As with all life sciences research involving pathogens, GOF studies entail inherent biosafety and biosecurity risks. GOF research involving the generation of pathogens with pandemic potential involves the greatest risks. A laboratory accident involving such a pathogen could potentially release a pathogen that could spread rapidly and efficiently through the human population.

BAT SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME-LIKE CORONAVIRUS WIV1 ENCODES AN EXTRA ACCESSORY PROTEIN, ORFX, INVOLVED IN MODULATION OF THE HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE (BARIC, SHI ZHENGLI)

EFFICIENT REVERSE GENETIC SYSTEMS FOR RAPID GENETIC MANIPULATION OF EMERGENT AND PREEMERGENT INFECTIOUS CORONAVIRUSES

INSIDE THE CHINESE LAB POISED TO STUDY WORLD'S MOST DANGEROUS PATHOGENS MAXIMUM-SECURITY BIOLAB IS PART OF PLAN TO BUILD NETWORK OF BSL-4 FACILITIES ACROSS CHINA

BAT CAVE SOLVES MYSTERY OF DEADLY SARS VIRUS — AND SUGGESTS NEW OUTBREAK COULD OCCUR: CHINESE SCIENTISTS FIND ALL THE GENETIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF SARS IN A SINGLE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE BATS.

NOVEMBER 2017 DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS

TRUMP LIFTS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT BAN

BSL-4 OPENS AT WIV JANUARY 19, 2018

NIH LIFTS FUNDING PAUSE ON GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

THE STATE DEPARTMENT CABLES INDICATE A LACK OF TRAINED TECHNICIANS AT WIV

BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

WANG YANYI

WUHAN LAB CHIEF WANG YANYI DISPUTES APRIL 2018 WIV NATURE ARTICLE

THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY VIRUS DATABASE WAS TAKEN OFFLINE

LACK OF CELL PHONE ACTIVITY AT WIV

ROAD BLOCKS AROUND WIV

FINANCING SHI ZHENGLI'S GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WAS PART OF THE PREDICT PROGRAM AND THAT IS WHY IT WAS SHUT DOWN

PATIENTS ZERO

DASZAK'S EMAIL'S DELETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2019 AND JANUARY 2020

FEDERAL OFFICIALS ENDED A MORATORIUM IMPOSED THREE YEARS AGO ON FUNDING RESEARCH THAT ALTERS GERMS TO MAKE THEM MORE LETHAL

EARLY W.H.O. REPORT

DASZAK WORKED CLOSELY WITH ZHENG-LI SHI WHEN SARS-CoV-19 SURFACED

THE BAT LADY WANTED TO CALL HER VIRUS TARS

RECTIFICATION OF LAB THAT MAPPED GENOME

WIV WAS CALLING IN OUTSIDERS TO HELP WITH BIOSAFETY

DASZAK CLAIMS HE WARNED THE WORLD ABOUT COVID

ZHENG-LI SHI: A PNEUMONIA OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW CORONAVIRUS OF PROBABLE BAT ORIGIN

NEW BIOSECURITY LAW DECREEDED IN CHINA

KRISTIAN ANDERSON STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATTING COVID-19

CHINESE ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT THE UNIQUE CORONA VIRUS WAS FOUND IN NATURE

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE CHINESE RESEARCHERS AT WIV WERE RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM THE GALVESTON NATIONAL LABORATORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AND OTHER U.S. ORGANIZATIONS, BUT THE CHINESE REQUESTED ADDITIONAL HELP

WHY CITE EXEMPTION FIVE?

TRUMP CUTS OFF FUNDS TO ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS ASKED THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY (NSABB) TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF ITS DEALINGS WITH THE WIV

WEIFENG SHI CLAIMS ANOMALOUS INSERTIONS CAN HAPPEN NATURALLY

TWO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY SCIENTISTS, XING-YI GE AND ZHENGLI-LI SHI, USE REVERSE GENETICS TO GENERATE A CHIMERICAL VIRUS CLOSELY RESEMBLING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS COVID-19

ORIGIN AND CROSS-SPECIES TRANSMISSION OF BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

POMPEO SAYS VIRUS WAS FROM LAB THEN WALKS IT BACK

TRUMP WANTED AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

TRUMP ENDS GRANT TO ECHO HEALTH ALLIANCE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GET ANONYMOUS GRANT FROM A CCP PUPPET

TRUMP PULLS USA OUT OF W.H.O.

NIH GRANT REINSTATED BUT THE MONEY CAN'T BE SUB-AWARDED TO THE WIV

TRUMP WANTS TO FORM A COMMISSION TO LOOK INTO THE WIV LAB LEAK

CHI COM AGENT OF INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK HEADED THE W.HO. TEAM THAT SUGGESTED COVID-19 ORIGINATED IN BARCELONA AND ENTERED CHINA VIA FROZEN MEAT

THE BARCELONA BEEF THEORY W.H.O. LEGITIMATIZED

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: HOW THE W.H.O.'S HUNT FOR COVID'S ORIGINS STUMBLED IN CHINA

ACCORDING TO W.H.O.'S REPORT DASZAK'S JOINT INTERNATIONAL TEAM EXAMINED FOUR SCENARIOS:

THE W.H.O. TEAM PUSHES THE PREPOSTEROUS THEORY THAT THE VIRUS WAS SPREAD TO HUMANS IN SHIPMENTS OF FROZEN FOODS FROM SPAIN

THE COVID IN SPAIN WAS NOT FOUND IN THE DRAIN

EVIDENCE FOR THE EARLY OCCURRENCE OF SARS-COV-2 FROM OTHER STUDIES

THE FROZEN FOOD THEORY LACKS ONE THING - THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN COVID CASES IN BARCELONA, SPAIN, BEFORE THE ONES IN HUNAN BROKE OUT

TYPE OF GOODS DEALT BY ENVIRONMENTAL POSITIVE STALLS / RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE COLD CHAIN IN 2019

THE PERSISTENCE OF LIVE SARS-COV-2 IN ENVIRONMENTS RELATED TO THE COLD-CHAIN / EXAMPLES OF INTRODUCTION OF COVID-19 INTO CHINA THROUGH IMPORTED COLD CHAIN PRODUCTS

CONCLUSIONS

THE HUNAN MARKET ORIGIN THEORY DEBUNKED BY W.H.O.

W.H.O.- INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

EXPLANATION OF HYPOTHESIS

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ARGUMENTS AGAINST INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD

HIGHLIGHTS FROM SHORT W.H.O. REPORT

W.H.O. REPORT IS A BIG NOTHING BURGER

USG REJECTS WHO INVESTIGATION

WALL STREET JOURNAL: SCIENTISTS REJECT COVID-COVER-UP ORCHESTRATED BY DASZAK

INVESTIGATE THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

FRANK COLLINS CLAIMS NEITHER NIH NOR NIAID HAVE EVER APPROVED ANY GRANT THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH ON CORONAVIRUSES THAT WOULD HAVE INCREASED THEIR TRANSMISSIBILITY OR LETHALITY FOR HUMANS

STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

CCP MOUTHPIECE GLOBAL TIMES: US INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION OF CORONAVIRUS ORIGINS EXPOSES ITS FOUR ‘ACHILLES HEELS’: GLOBAL TIMES EDITORIAL

RALPH BARIC'S ROLE IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

BARIC WAS CONDUCTING SARS RESEARCH BEFORE A 2003 OUTBREAK IN CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

BARIC'S LAB LEAKED IN 2003 AND CAUSED A MINOR EPIDEMIC IN NORTH CAROLINA

HOW CAN YOU HAVE SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS AND NOT HAVE SARS?

GAIN OF FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH INVOLVES CREATION OF RECOMINANT VIRUS IN UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA IN COLLABORATION WITH SCIENTISTS FROM WIV

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 9, 2015

BARIC'S LAB RAT BITES STUDENT

REDACTIONS OF BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS

BARIC SUPPORTS THE ZOONOTIC THEORY BECAUSE HE PLAYED A PART IN STARTING THE PANDEMIC DUE TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH WIV SCIENTISTS

TRUMP-FUELED SUSPICION OF WUHAN LAB ENSNARES NEW YORK NONPROFIT RESEARCHING BAT CORONAVIRUSES

ANTHONY FAUCHI EMAILS

THE ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GRANTS

SAM HUSSEINI: PETER DASZAK'S ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE HAS HIDDEN ALMOST $40 MILLION IN PENTAGON FUNDING AND MILITARIZED PANDEMIC SCIENCE

THE PREDICT PROGRAM WAS A CON JOB AND FAILURE: IT HAS BEEN ALLEGED THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THE GRANT MONEY WAS HIDDEN AWAY BY DASZAK FOR HIS OWN USE

ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE STAFF AND DUPES

SOME OF USAID/CIA ECO-HEALTH PREDICT CREW

Executives Listed on Filing

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

RmYN02 FURIN

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

ADDENDUM

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK EMAILS

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

W.H.O.

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

THE WET MARKET

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

Dr. William B. Karesh is the Executive Vice President for Health and Policy at EcoHealth Alliance. He serves as the president of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Working Group on Wildlife Diseases and also chairs the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Wildlife Health Specialist Group, a network of wildlife and health experts around the world. Dr. Karesh also serves on the World Health Organization's (W.H.O.) International Health Regulations Roster of Experts focused on the human-animal interface and wildlife health. Currently, Dr. Karesh is the EPT Partner Liaison for the USAID Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT-2 program, a >$120 million effort focused on predicting and preventing pandemic diseases. He is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Armine Arustamyan California Intercontinental University Degree Name Doctoral Field Of Study Business Administration Dates attended or expected graduation2010 – 2014 Activities and Societies: Global Business Leadership American University of Armenia Degree NameMaster's Degree Field Of Study System Management and Industrial Engineering Dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1997 Yerevan State University Degree Name Master Field Of Study Science in Physics Dates attended or expected graduation1987 – 1992

Leilani Francisco PhD MA PMP The Johns Hopkins University Degree Name Ph.D. Field Of Study International Public Health University of Maryland College Park Degree Name B.A. Field Of Study Sociocultural Anthropology University of South Florida Degree Name M.A.Field Of Study Applied Medical Anthropology

Dr. Epstein received a PhD in Disease Ecology from Kingston University, London and his DVM and MPH from Tufts University. A veterinarian and disease ecologist, Dr. Jonathan Epstein is the Vice President for Science and Outreach at EcoHealth Alliance. His research focuses on the ecology of emerging zoonotic viruses such as Nipah and Ebola virus, along with SARS, Midde East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and others that have emerged within Asia and Africa.

Evelyn Luciano Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA)Field Of StudyHuman Resources Management and Services Certificate Dates attended or expected graduation2003 – 2003 Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA) Field Of Study Counseling Psychology dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1999 Community Mental Health and School Counseling Catholic University of Puerto Rico Degree Name BSN Field Of Study Bachelor of Science In Nursing Grade BSN Dates attended or expected graduation1975 – 1979

Dr. Ellen Carlin DVM is Assistant Research Professor at the Center for Global Health Science and Security, with a primary faculty appointment within the Department of Microbiology and Immunology. Her research interests are in the epidemiology of emerging infections. She studies incidence and transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens, focusing on the interfaces among people, animals, and the environments in which they live. She was Senior Professional Staff with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security (Peter T. King, NY), where for more than five years she handled medical preparedness, biodefense, and science and technology policy. At Georgetown, Ellen is also the director of the Global Infectious Disease graduate program at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Aleksei Chmura: Experienced Chief Of Staff with a demonstrated history of working in the non-profit organization management industry. Skilled in Nonprofit Organizations, Environmental Science, Research, Community Outreach, and Budgeting. Strong administrative professional with a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Biology/Biological Sciences, General from Kingston University. Kingston University is ranked 581 in QS World University Rankings by TopUniversities and enjoys a poor reputation.

Anthony Ramos: Former Senior Director Marketing and Development at EcoHealth Alliance Former Director of Marketing at Schneider Associates Studied Classic Culinary Arts at The French Culinary Institute Studied International relations at Boston University Lives in Lake, Michigan.

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

DASZAK: I'm in charge of in the organization in China...So the point is to establish capabilities in other countries not just take specimens from them and bring them back... that's the strategy and you know this the old adage that if you teach people how to do it, give them the tools then you've really made a difference. The money always dries up and this is something we've seen in the nonprofit world. You get great funding for five years from the foundation they always shift priorities because that's what emerged they closed them down. We have our staff in countries. We have sub contracts through local universities or agencies in-country and we have contracts to do work and it's all collaborative science so people love to interact on collaborative science. You know what I found especially in places like China where increasingly there's a paranoia around collaboration. Science collaboration is open and transparent because of the nature of what you're trying to do you're trying to discover stuff quickly, understand what it means, publish it in high-impact journal, and that drives openness and transparency and that's been great for us around the world it's also great for the U.S. and that's we really need to push that agenda. I think publishing is a very interesting mechanism you have to publish that's the argument we use.

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

Daszak is a double agent who CIA thought was working for them but had been rolled over by the Chinese Communist Party because his father was a Nazi War Criminal, a death camp guard, who taught him to respect authoritarian governments. Daszak became a W.H.O. & Lancet inspector. A good place to be to cover-up for the Chinese and himself after he funneled money to the WIV and to the Bat Lady experiments which resulted in COVID-19 being created. And there is the question of how much money was siphoned off by Daszak?

Daszak: “I’ve seen incredible efforts from everything from [religious sect] Falun Gong to the [Chinese dissident] Miles Guo camp, Steve Bannon’s group pushing the conspiracy theories around China. It’s useful to them. They’re funding it and pushing it and science has been to some extent caught up in that to other instances absolutely crushed by it. We’ve not had access to work in China on the origins for the last 12 months, which is ironic because we could have been on the ground there working with our Chinese colleagues and by now we could have found some really important answers. The rhetoric has held that up. We need that communication [with the Chinese] in an outbreak to learn from them how they control it so we can control it better. It's sad to say, but it will probably cost lives. By sort of narrow-mindedly focusing in on ourselves, or on labs, or on certain cultural politics, we miss the real enemy.”
Daszag was a prime target of Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP via EcoHealth. He parrots the Party Line. But he also was co-opted by the CIA until Trump cut his funds off. ECOHEALTH is a think tank put together by the AID CIA LITE that was supposed to protect America from Pandemics by keeping an eye on bats. But ECOHEALTH began to subsidize Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat experiments at WIV and a recombinant virus leaked from the lab into the streets of Wuhan then into the market and out again. Was it coincidence that SARSCov2 started close to WIV? Just how close the Chinese won't say as they refuse to give out the address of patient zero.

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

"THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER DONORS WHO FUNDED OR COLLABORATED ON CIVILIAN RESEARCH AT THE WIV HAVE A RIGHT AND OBLIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY OF OUR RESEARCH FUNDING WAS DIVERTED TO SECRET CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS AT THE WIV." US EMBASSY FACT SHEET

The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior Researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. Accidental infections in labs have caused several previous virus outbreaks in China and elsewhere, Including a 2004 SARS outbreak in Beijing that infected nine people, killing one. The CCP has prevented independent journalists, investigators, and global health authorities from interviewing researchers at the WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry into the origin of the virus must include interviews with these researchers and a full accounting of their previously unreported illness. Starting in at least 2016 – and with no indication of a stop prior to the COVID-19 outbreak – WIV researchers conducted experiments involving RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). The WIV became a focal point for international coronavirus research after the 2003 SARS outbreak and has since studied animals including mice, bats, and pangolins. The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus, including “RaTG13,” which it sampled from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like illness. W.H.O. investigators must have access to the records of the WIV’s work on bat and other coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak. As part of a thorough inquiry, they must have a full accounting of why the WIV altered and then removed online records of its work with RaTG13 and other viruses.
Secrecy and non-disclosure are standard practice for Beijing. For many years the United States has publicly raised concerns about China’s past biological weapons work, which Beijing has neither documented nor demonstrably eliminated, despite its clear obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention. Today’s revelations just scratch the surface of what is still hidden about COVID-19’s origin in China. Any credible investigation into the origin of COVID-19 demands complete, transparent access to the research labs in Wuhan, including their facilities, samples, personnel, and records. As the world continues to battle this pandemic – and as W.H.O. investigators begin their work, after more than a year of delays – the virus’s origin remains uncertain. The United States will continue to do everything it can to support a credible and thorough investigation, including by continuing to demand transparency on the part of Chinese authorities.Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The United States and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

The United States has repeatedly called for a transparent and thorough investigation into the origin of COVID-19. Understanding the origin of this pandemic is essential for global public health, economic recovery, and international security. To assist the vital work of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) investigative team that arrived in China this week, the United States government is today sharing new information concerning the activities inside China’s government laboratories in 2019. In particular, we urge the W.H.O. to press the government of China to address the following: Illnesses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV): The United States government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. WIV Research on “RaTG13” and “gain-of-function”: Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers studied RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). Since the outbreak, the WIV has not been transparent nor consistent about its work with RaTG13 or other similar viruses, including possible “gain-of-function” experiments to enhance transmissibility or lethality. Secret WIV Links to Military Research: Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The COVID-19 pandemic was avoidable. Any responsible country would have invited world health investigators to Wuhan within days of an outbreak. China instead refused offers of help – including from the United States – and punished brave Chinese doctors, scientists, and journalists who tried to alert the world to the dangers of the virus. Beijing continues today to withhold vital information that scientists need to protect the world from this deadly virus, and the next one. The United States reiterates the importance of unfettered access to virus samples, lab records and personnel, eyewitnesses, and whistleblowers to ensure the credibility of the W.H.O.’s final report. Until the CCP allows a full and thorough accounting of what happened in Wuhan, it is only a matter of time until China births another pandemic and inflicts it on the Chinese people, and the world.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/ensurin...-investigation-of-covid-19s-origin/index.html

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

Baric taught SHI ZHENGLI all she knows about virus creation at the University of North Carolina. Collwell is focused on oceans. Saif is a vet. Hume Field and rest work for the bio-war criminal, Daszak!
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, who has been working in China for 15 years studying diseases that jump from animals to people, said, “We don’t know the source yet, but there’s pretty strong evidence that this is a bat origin coronavirus.” He said, “It’s probably going to be the Chinese horseshoe bat,” a common species that weighs up to an ounce.

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

But zoonoses fall into a gray area, and the 2003 monkeypox outbreak in the Midwest is a perfect example of what can go wrong, said Peter Daszak, director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine at the Wildlife Trust, a group specializing in human-animal diseases. The disease, related to smallpox but less deadly, arrived in a shipment of 18 Gambian giant pouched rats imported for a Chicago pet store, where they infected prairie dogs. By summer's end, there were 37 confirmed human cases -- none fatal, but some scary -- mostly among prairie-dog owners. Millions of live animals come into the country each year, and very few have really good surveillance," Dr. Daszak said. "Fish and Wildlife checks cargoes to see if they have endangered species, but it's the U.S.D.A. that does health checks, and they don't go unless it's an agricultural product, so the pet trade tends to get a pass." "The C.D.C. does a great job with outbreak investigation, but that's after the fact," he said of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "After monkeypox, they put a blanket ban on rodents from some West African countries. But who's looking at rodents from other places? Nobody. And that's a gap."
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/us/sentries-in-us-seek-early-signs-of-an-avian-flu.html

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

It is likely, the study found, that one of these "SARS-like" viruses evolved into the SARS virus at an exotic animal marketplace, where it infected civets, which, in turn, infected humans, according to Michael Farzan, a Harvard Medical School assistant professor who was not involved in the research. But why did this happen when it did? One intriguing possibility is that it is linked to China's economic boom, according to Peter Daszak, a co-author of the SARS paper who is executive director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. With the newfound wealth there, he said, animal markets have grown as more people can afford fresh animal meat. As the markets grow, so do the chances that a virus will jump from one species to the next.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/26/health/blaming-bats-when-man-may-be-culprit.html

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

The flu that is moving through humans appears to have a combination of genes from two normally separate sets of pigs, those from the Americas and from Eurasia, scientists say. However, it is unknown how those pigs met, and there is not yet any genetic proof that this particular flu was ever in a pig. Peter Daszak, president of the Wildlife Trust, found records showing that Mexico imported two pigs from France in 2007, the United States imported a few from Britain and Ireland, and Canada imported hundreds from Europe. “And surely this isn’t the whole truth,” he said. “There must be a hidden illegal trade.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/health/01origin.html

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

“By mapping encroachment into the forest you can predict where the next disease could emerge,” Dr. Daszak, EcoHealth’s president, says. “So we’re going to the edge of villages, we’re going to places where mines have just opened up, areas where new roads are being built. We are going to talk to people who live within these zones and saying, ‘what you are doing is potentially a risk.’”
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-ecology-of-disease.html

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

Peter Daszak, a parasitologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, has even put a number on it: 5.3 new ones each year, based on a study using data from 1940 to 2004. He and his co-authors blamed population growth, deforestation, antibiotic overuse, factory farming, live animal markets, bush meat hunting, jet travel and other factors.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/health/new-tools-to-hunt-new-viruses.htm

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

It was the darkest hour since the new illness, known as Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, first appeared in Saudi Arabia late in 2012. In all, more than 700 cases have been documented in 20 countries, nearly all of them linked to Saudi Arabia. More than 250 people have died. King Abdullah fired the country’s health minister and his deputy in April, leaving experts wondering whether the shake-up would bring greater transparency and international cooperation. “In the U.S., when you have a crisis like the Veterans Administration scandal, the new head is in front of the TV cameras explaining what the new plan is,” said Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a veterinary organization that tracked the disease in animals. “There is no tradition of openness in Saudi Arabia.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/world/middleeast/flawed-saudi-response-fueled-outbreak-of-mers-middle-east-virus.htm

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

Daszak describes Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, as exactly the kind of threat that Disease X was meant to represent: a novel, highly infectious coronavirus, with a high mortality rate, and no existing treatment or prevention. “The problem isn’t that prevention was impossible,” Daszak told me. “It was very possible. But we didn’t do it. Governments thought it was too expensive. Pharmaceutical companies operate for profit.” And the W.H.O., for the most part, had neither the funding nor the power to enforce the large-scale global collaboration necessary to wit. Examples from several countries suggest that the Chinese vaccines may not be very effective at preventing the spread of the virus, particularly the new variants, but Daszak overlooks this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/magazine/pandemic-vaccine.html

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

We, the undersigned, are public health scientists who have closely followed the emergence of 2019-nCoV, and are deeply concerned about its impact on global health and well-being. We have watched as the scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable. We sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China who continue to save lives and protect global health during the challenge of this novel coronavirus outbreak. We are all in this together, with our Chinese counterparts in the forefront, against this new viral threat. The rapid, open and transparent sharing of data on 2019-nCoV is now being threatened by rumors and misinformation around the origins of this outbreak. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that 2019-nCoV does not have a natural origin. Scientists from multiple countries have published and analyzed 2019-nCoV genomes1, and they overwhelmingly conclude that this virus originated in wildlife, as have so many other emerging diseases. This is further supported by a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and by the scientific communities they represent. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumors, and prejudice that jeopardize our global collaboration in the fight against this virus. We support the call from the Director-General of the World Health Organization to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture13. We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus. We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the front-line!
Signatories
Dr. James Hughes, Professor Emeritus, Emory University School of Medicine
Dr. Rita Colwell, Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland College Park
Dr. Linda Saif, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University
Dr. Billy Karesh, Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Peter Daszak, President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Hume Field, Honorary Professor, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

When peterdaszak.com went online the first ones to become aware of it were the Chinese The CCP had an alert on their agent Peter Daszak. But by visiting the page they confirmed the fact he was a Chinese agent or agent of influence. Peter was a prime target for Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP. He parrots the Party Line. The Nazi ideas he learned from his father made him respect the Reds, who are sterilizing ethnic minorities like the Nazis did.

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

Communism found a receptive home in mainland China. The WIV is run by Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee CHANGCAI HE who was the chairman of the corporate trade union of Wuhan Branch from Jan. 2004 to Sep. 2013, and the Corporate Secretary of the Party at Wuhan Branch from Oct. 2005 to Jul. 2013. Since the Aug. of 2013, he has been the deputy director general of Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS. This CCP apparatchik runs the institute and if anyone steps out of line they are either imprisoned, sent to a "re-grooving" institute or killed.
Changcai HE: http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Directors2016

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

Academician Xi Chong Nanshan has already delivered a speech on TV. Wuhan New Coronavirus is not the true source of the virus. There are 5 new coronavirus series, ABCDE bat sleeve BAT (H52) and then mutates H53> The C family pathogens in China, with variants of C56 and MV2, spread throughout the world. But the United States had five major families of ABCDE two years ago, the US Government CDC (Center Disease of Control) Concealing the illness, when a military contest was held in Wuhan in November, two American soldiers went to the Wuhan Hospital in Hubei to catch a cold. It was the first hospital in Wuhan, China, which discovered a coronavirus transmission in early December (Golden Eagle) Tan Hospital and Wuhan Central Hospital). From this calculation, it should be that the US soldiers brought the virus into Wuhan in the Wuhan military competition, and the virus series H1 (referred to as the son) came to China. If China wants to check the origin of these two American blood sources, we can confirm the source. The US should have ABCDE two years ago (H13, H3, H1, H56, MV2) These five kinds of viruses have hundreds of pathogens in bats. Among them, the United States has mutated five kinds of pathogens. The United States has always been a stable fact. This is why the U.S. government is in a hurry to send them Americans back to the United States, and is afraid to find pathogens from Americans. In this way, the outbreak of the new coronavirus can rest on the Chinese. The viruses in the Middle East are MV2 and H56. No such virus has been detected in China. The seriously ill Iranians said that they had never been to China and had no Chinese friends, but had been to the United States. The world knows that many wealthy people in Middle Eastern countries buy properties in the United States, and their children are also studying in the United States. I am going to write this article today and spread it to the seven major media in the world. My title will read "Americans are the tumors of the world's viruses." The Washington Post published the title of the article last month, stating "Chinese are sick men of East Asia", the birthplace of the virus. I let the world see the hypocrisy, viciousness, loss of conscience, and the spread of the virus to people all over the world.

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world, that's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic."

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

COVID-19 has NOT been found in bats nor in any intermediate species. Peter Daszak insisits the virus jumped from an intermediate species to humans to cover up the fact that the virus' creation was financed by Eco-Health Alliance. Daszak used the CIA / USAID / PENTAGON money he didn't pocket to fund the project that was supposed to predict a SARS-like viral emergence with is bogus "PREDICT PROGRAM."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/14/health/WHO-covid-daszak-china-virus.html
Daszak reflected on the atmosphere in Wuhan and his first glimpse of the seafood market where the initial outbreak occurred last year, although it was not the site of the first cases. He also said the path ahead would be straightforward scientifically, but not politically. A transcript of the conversation, condensed and edited for length, follows:
James Gorman: You’ve been to China and to Wuhan many times before. How was this different?
DASZAK: Well, this was weird. There’s certain things when you go into China that you’re supposed to do. The first thing you do is have a meeting and then have a meal. And if you don’t have a meal, it’s considered extremely rude. This time we spent two weeks in Zoom calls from our quarantine hotel. Then we went to meet in person and still didn’t have meals with our host. We had meals in a separate room. So it was just a very difficult, very intense, very emotional trip. In Wuhan, there’s this feeling of post-traumatic shock. The city went on lockdown, I think, 76 days. They were locked in their apartments — people died, and they didn’t know about it. And from then on, they’ve been accused of starting a pandemic, and it’s been called the Wuhan virus, the China virus, and there was just a sense of outrage and sadness.
James Gorman: Did that make it difficult in terms of the scientific purpose of the trip?
DASZAK: No. You’ve got a task to do. You’ve volunteered. You know what it’s going to be like. You get caught up in the historical importance. I don’t know if we were the first foreigners to walk around the Huanan seafood market, which is blocked off even to Chinese citizens. The only people that have been in there have been the Chinese disease investigators. We met with the doctors that treated the first known Covid patients. ¹These people have been through harrowing conditions, and they’re now lauded as heroes in China, and then the rest of the world now is fighting that war. And China, of course, is absolutely petrified of this virus catching hold again. When you arrive at the airport, they come on the plane in full P.P.E.; you’re escorted down a separate quarantine pathway; you get tested. You’re driven to the hotel, you go in your room, and you’re locked in for two weeks. It’s just severe. The people who come to your door are in full P.P.E. The waste from your trash, from the hotel room, goes into a yellow bag with a biohazard sign on it. It was a totally different experience when I returned home, where I didn’t even get a notification that I’ve got to quarantine. I signed on to the New York state app, but no one is going to knock on my door and tell me, “Stay indoors.”
1. But Daszak didn't get their names. James Gorman:
Did you learn anything from this trip that you didn’t know before?
DASZAK: From Day 1, the data we were seeing were new that had never been seen outside China. Who were the vendors in the Huanan seafood market? Where did they get their supply chains? And what were the contacts of the first cases? How real were the first cases? What other clusters were there? When you asked for more, the Chinese scientists would go off, and a couple of days later, they’ve done the analysis, and we’ve got new information. It was extremely useful. At the time, you couldn’t really say much. We were trying to not undermine the process by revealing anything while we were on the trip.
James Gorman: What can you say now about the market and what you saw?
DASZAK: The market closed on the 31st of December 31, 2020 or January 1, 2021, and China C.D.C. sent a team in of scientists to try and find out what was going on. It was a very extensive study, swabbing every surface of this place. We knew early on that there were 500 samples collected, and there were many positives, and in that sampling were some animal carcasses, or meat. But there was not really much information publicly about what had been done. So we got all that information. And that, to me, was a real eye-opener. They’d actually done over 900 swabs in the end, a huge amount of work. They had been through the sewage system. They’d been into the air ventilation shaft to look for bats. They’d caught animals around the market. They’d caught cats, stray cats, rats, they even caught one weasel. They’d sampled snakes. People had live snakes at the market, live turtles, live frogs. Rabbits were there, rabbit carcasses. A farm with rabbits could have been really critical. There was talk about badgers, and in China, when they say badger, that means ferret badger. It’s a mustelid, related to weasels. Animals were coming into that market that could have carried the coronavirus. They could have been infected by bats somewhere else in China and brought it in. So that’s clue No. 1. There were 10 stalls that sold wildlife. There were vendors from South China, including Yunnan Province, Guangxi Province and Guangdong Province. Yunnan Province is where the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is found in bats. Guangxi and Guangdong are where the pangolins were captured. They had close viruses. You’ve got animals coming in to the market which are susceptible. Some of these are coming from places where we know the nearest relatives of the virus are found. So there’s the real red flag. Now the Chinese group did swab those animals, and they were all negative, but it’s just one small group of animals in the freezer that were left behind. We don’t know what else was for sale there. So these two clues are really important. When we got to actually visit the market, to me it was quite striking. The pictures you see of that market closed now are of quite orderly buildings with shutters, and you think, This a very efficient, typical city market. It doesn’t really look like a live animal market. Once you get there on the ground, it’s different. It’s pretty ramshackle. It looks like a place that would sell live animals. There’s plenty of evidence of live aquatic animals, the turtle tanks, the fish tanks, the snakes, which we know were available. What we now have are a clear link and a potential pathway.
James Gorman: What about the cases that appeared before the outbreak in the seafood market?
DASZAK: There was other spread going on outside of Huanan market. There are other patients who have no links to the market, quite a few in December. There were other markets. And we do know that some of the patients had links to other markets. We need to do some further work, and then the Chinese colleagues need to do some further work. When we sat down as a group, the China team and the W.H.O. team on the last full day of work, and said, “Let’s go through the hypotheses,” the one that received the most enthusiastic support was this pathway — wildlife, through a domesticated wildlife link, into Wuhan.
James Gorman: What is the next step?
DASZAK: For the animals chain, it’s straightforward. The suppliers are known. They know the farm name; they know the owner of the farm. You’ve got to go down to the farm and interview the farmer and the family. You’ve got to test them. You’ve got to test the community. You’ve got to go and look and see if there are any animals left at any farms nearby and see if they’ve got evidence of infection, and see if there is any cross-border movement. If the virus is in those southern border states, it’s possible that there’s been some movement across neighboring countries like Vietnam, Laos or Myanmar. We’re finding more and more related viruses now. There’s one in Japan and one in Cambodia, one in Thailand. For the human side, look for earlier cases, for clusters; look in blood banks for serum, if possible. Anything like this is going to be sensitive in China, and it’s going to take some persuasion and diplomacy and energy for them to do that because, to be honest, looking for the source of this virus within China is not a great, high priority I think for the Chinese government. Anywhere this virus is shown to emerge is a political issue. That’s one of the problems, and that is clear and obvious to anyone who has been looking at this.
James Gorman: Do you have a particular animal that you suspect right now as an intermediate link, more strongly than others?
DASZAK: IT’S TOO UP IN THE AIR. We don’t know if civets were on sale. We know they are very easily infected. We don’t know what the situation is with the mink farms in China or the other fur farms, like raccoon dogs, even though they’re normally farmed in a different part of China. That needs to be followed up on, too. But if you were to say which pathway would you put the most weight on, I think the virus emerging either in Southeast Asia or Southern China from bats, getting into a domesticated wildlife farm. I’ve been to many of these, and they often have mixed species — civets, ferret badgers, raccoon dogs. Those animals would be able to get infected from bats. Either the people that work there get infected and bring it in, or animals are shipped in, live or recently killed, that bring the virus into a market. Once it’s in a market — either Huanan or another one in Wuhan — you’ve got a dense population of people moving through those markets. And it’s going to be a real potential for an amplification.
James Gorman: The new data that you saw, for instance, on the vendors and their supply chains, will that be in your full report?
DASZAK: I hope so. There’ll be some things that are going to be confidential, without a doubt. Patient records are kept highly confidential in China. We have an image in the West of China being authoritarian and they are videoing everyone. They can have access to anything. But patient records are very private, and some are not accessible. We wanted to meet with certain patients. They didn’t want to meet, so they weren’t pushed to meet with us. There’s no reason to believe that was shenanigans. I’m hoping all the information about vendors, vendor chains will be there. But if not, we’ve seen it. We’ve got it. And we will be following up.

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

Nearly one-quarter of the world’s mammal species are bats, and their ability to fly while hosting a petri dish of viruses makes them both zoological marvels and efficient vectors of disease. Infectious diseases that are believed to have emerged from bats in recent decades include coronaviruses like SARS and MERS, along with other viruses like Nipah, Hendra and Ebola. Most of these viruses were transferred from bats to an intermediate host, like a palm civet or camel, before making their way to humans.
The coronavirus that causes Covid-19, which came to public attention in late 2019, has not been conclusively traced to bats, in Yunnan Province in southwestern China.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/world/asia/thailand-bats-coronavirus.html
The WIV was awarded a patent for cages to hold live bats for testing just months before the virus started spreading. The Mail has established that the WIV filed an application in June 2018 to patent "bat rearing cages capable of healthy growth and breeding under artificial conditions." The patent was granted in January 2019. A separate patent, filed by the WIV on October 16, 2020, relates to the "artificial breeding method of wild bat."The patent discusses cross-species transmission of SARS- CoV from bat to humans and other animals, saying: "Bats infected with the virus naturally or artificially have no obvious clinical symptoms, and the mechanism is unknown. The invention aims to provide an artificial breeding method of wild bat predators, which aims at overcoming the defects in the prior art, and the wild bat predators are artificially domesticated, bred and passaged to establish an artificial breeding group, thereby providing a brand-new model experimental animal for scientific research." Daszak tweeted in April 2020: "The researchers don't keep the bats, nor do they kill them. All bats are released back to their cave site after sampling. It's a conservation measure and is much safer in terms of disease spread than killing them or trying to keep them in a lab. The WIV does not have live or dead bats in it. There is no evidence anywhere that this happened"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-planned-breed-animals-virus-experiments.html

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

The CCP controlled scientists can only find a virus in nature that resembles SARS-CoV-2 and not the virus itself is telling. A virus virtually identical to SARS-CoV-1 was found in the Himalayan, or masked, palm civet. It is related to the mongoose, resembles a large weasel and is a threatened species. There are viruses in bats closely resembling SARS-CoV-2 that were used in the gain-of-threat experiments. Until SARS-CoV-2 is discovered in animals it is laboratory escape.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/24/world/strain-of-sars-is-found-in-3-animal-species-in-asia.html
Initial phylogenetic analyses reveal that the SARS-CoV-1 in civets and humans actually come from two distant branches, but the SARS-CoV from civets during the incipient phase of the epidemic had 99.8% sequence similarity to the human SARS-CoV “Our research has shown that the SARS coronavirus found in human victims is the same as the SARS coronavirus found in civet cats,” a paper quoted Wang Ming, an official from the Guangzhou Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, as saying. As research progressed horseshoes bats were blamed, however, the Chinese put an end tothe epidemic when they slaughters and boiled most of the civets in all of China. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ame2.12017

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

David Asher, a former lead investigator of the task force created by the Trump administration, said it was "sort of ridiculous" to believe the deadly disease passed naturally from animals to humans. "We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci's NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The data disproportionately stacked up, as we investigated, that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source. I had biostatisticians at one of our national labs calculate the odds of this evolving in nature, and it was like 1 in 13 million, and then they revised it to about 1 in 13 billion. So, to say this came out of a zoonotic situation is sort of ridiculous. We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. [Anthony] Fauci’s NIAID organization, that there was almost no evidence that supported a natural zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The epicenter of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain of function techniques.” State Department official Chris Ford "seemed disinterested,” Asher recalled. “He said even if we came to it, how did we know where it came out of, what lab. Very rarely in my life in government have I ever encountered someone who was more of a ‘neg’-ocrat, less a bureaucrat, than that individual.”
Fauci acknowledged that NIH granted the Wuhan lab $600,000 over a period of five years to investigate bat coronaviruses, but emphatically denied the money was used for gain of threat research. However, according to David Asher, “the Chinese most certainly felt that NIH was supporting their gain of function research” and claimed that the variants developed in the lab “were not similar to anything, for example, what could occur in natural evolution.”

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

DISCUSSION: We investigated the patterns of molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. Although the genomic analyses suggested that SARS-CoV-2 was closest to RaTG13, their difference at neutral sites was much higher than previously realized. Our results provide novel insights for tracing the intermediate natural host of SARS-CoV-2. With population genetic analyses of 103 genomes of SARS-CoV-2, we found that SARS-CoV-2 viruses had two major lineages (L and S lineages), and the two lineages were well defined by just two SNPs that show complete linkage across SARS-CoV-2 strains. The L lineage (~70%) was found to be more prevalent than the S lineage (~30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, our evolutionary analyses suggested the S appeared to be more related to coronaviruses in animals. Since nonsynonymous sites are usually under stronger negative selection than synonymous sites, calculating sequence differences without separating these two classes of sites could lead to a potentially significant underestimate of the degree of molecular divergence. For example, although the overall nucleotides only differed by ~4% between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, the genomic average dS value, which is usually a neutral proxy, was 0.17 between these two viruses (Table 1). Of note, the genome-wide dS value is 0.012 between humans and chimpanzees, and 0.08 between humans and rhesus macaques [36]. Thus, the neutral molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 is 14 times larger than that between humans and chimpanzees, and twice as large as that between humans and macaques. The genomic average dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GD Pangolin-CoV is 0.469, which is comparable to that between humans and mice (0.5), and the dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GX Pangolin-Cov is even larger (0.722). The scale of these measures suggests that we should perhaps consider the difference in the neutral evolving site rather than the difference in all nucleotide sequences when tracing the origin and natural intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. In this work, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 can be divided into two major lineages (L and S). Intriguingly, the S and L lineages can be clearly defined by just two tightly linked SNPs at positions 8,782 (orf1ab: T8517C, synonymous) and 28,144 (ORF8: C251T, S84L). orf1ab, which encodes replicase/transcriptase, is required for viral genome replication and might also be important for viral pathogenesis [38]. Although the T8517C mutation in orf1ab does not change the protein sequence (it changes the codon AGT (Ser) to AGC (Ser)), it may affect orf1ab translation since AGT is preferred while AGC is unpreferred (Table S2). ORF8 promotes the expression of ATF6, the ER unfolded protein response factor, in human cells. Thus, it will be interesting to investigate the function of the S84L AA change in ORF8, as well as the combinatory effect of these two mutations in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. As previously noted, the data examined in this study are still very limited, and follow-up analyses of a larger set of data are needed to have a better understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2.
https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036/5775463
If it could be proven that the virus mutated that would mean it was not artificial. "Even for pandemic flu — a virus much more given to rapid change than the one that causes Covid-19 — a few months would be a short timeline for a widespread functional mutation. There isn't a clear-cut evolutionary case for a virus like SARS-CoV2, which has already managed to infect more than 6 million people and often causes mild symptoms, to quickly get milder. If anything, it seems more likely that it would be genetically stable.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...-peak-lull-in-cases-doesn-t-mean-weaker-virus

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

"The corona virus that causes COVID-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, shares 96% of its genetic sequence with a virus found in bats. It is in the collection of viral genomes assembled during those studies that scientists have now found the bat virus closest to SARS-COV-2. A strain called RATG13 gathered in the same cave in Yunnan shares 96% of its genetic sequence with the new virus. RATG13 is not that virus’s ancestor. It is something more like its cousin. Edward Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney, estimates that the 4% difference between the two represents at least 20 years of evolutionary divergence from some common antecedent, and probably something more like 50."
https://www.economist.com/science-a...uzzle-of-covid-19s-origin-are-coming-to-light

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

In May 2020 WIV researchers identified RmYN02 from an analysis of 227 bat samples collected in Yunnan province, China, between May and October of 2019. "Since the discovery that bats were the reservoir of SARS coronavirus in 2005, there has been great interest in bats as reservoir species for infectious diseases, particularly as they carry a very high diversity of RNA viruses, including coronaviruses," Shi Zhengli says. RNA from the samples was sent for metagenomic next-generation sequencing in early January 2020, soon after the discovery of SARS-CoV-2. Across the whole genome, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is another virus, called RaTG13, which was previously identified from bats in Yunnan province. But RmYN02, the virus newly discovered here, is even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 in some parts of the genome, including in the longest encoding section of the genome called 1ab, where they share 97.2% of their RNA. The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SAR-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor binding domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells.
The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02, is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its spike protein meet. SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a four-amino-acid insertion at the junction of S1 and S2; this insertion is unique to the virus and has been present in all SARS-CoV-2 sequenced so far. According to SHI ZHENGLI insertions in RmYN02 are not the same as those in SARS-CoV-2, which indicates that they occurred through independent insertion events. But a similar insertion event happening in a virus identified in bats strongly suggests that these kinds of insertions are of natural origin. SHI ZHENGLI: "Our findings suggest that these insertion events that initially appeared to be very unusual can, in fact, occur naturally in animal betacoronaviruses. Our work sheds more light on the evolutionary ancestry of SARS-CoV-2. Neither RaTG13 nor RmYN02 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, because there is still an evolutionary gap between these viruses. But our study strongly suggests that sampling of more wildlife species will reveal viruses that are even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps even its direct ancestors, which will tell us a great deal about how this virus emerged in humans."
Pure speculation. No closer bat virus has been found as of June 13, 2021. The more likey scenario is that Shi Zhengli and Daszak modified a virus resembling SARS-CoV-19 in BSL-2 lab and it escaped.

RmYN02 FURIN

The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SARS-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that the novel coronavirus uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells, they said. The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02 is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its Spike Protein meet, according to the researchers. The viral Spike Protein mediates SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells and harbors a S1/S2 cleavage site containing multiple arginine residues (multibasic) not found in closely related animal coronaviruses. However, the role of this multibasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. Here, we report that the cellular protease furin ¹cleaves the Spike Protein at the S1/S2 site and that cleavage is essential for S-protein-mediated cell-cell fusion and entry into human lung cells. Moreover, optimizing the S1/S2 site increased cell-cell, but not virus-cell, fusion, suggesting that the corresponding viral variants might exhibit increased cell-cell spread and potentially altered virulence. Our results suggest that acquisition of a S1/S2 multibasic cleavage site was essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection of humans and identify furin as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276520302641

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

Highlights
• Pangolin-CoV is 91.02% identical to SARS-CoV-2 at the whole-genome level
• Pangolin-CoV is the second closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 behind RaTG13
• Five key amino acids in the RBD are consistent between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
• Only SARS-CoV-2 contains a potential cleavage site for furin proteases
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220303602
Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, an organization that works on animal-to-human spillover diseases, said that accumulating evidence on pangolins made it “doubtful that this species played a role in the outbreak.” “We need to keep looking for the original reservoir” — likely a bat,” he said, adding that the potential intermediate host would likely be another mammal species that’s more widely traded in the Yunnan-to-Wuhan corridor of China. While the pangolin trade is vast, Dr. Daszak said most of it “is in their scales, dried, in which viruses would almost certainly not be able to persist.” He opposes trade in the highly endangered animal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/pangolin-coronavirus.html

PETER DASZAK

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

Daszak still claims that any suggestion of a lab leak of a genetically altered virus is "conspiracy theory," a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event, a belief embraced by many Trumpoids who know something is happening, but don't know what it is. Of course Daszak had to say that the virus came from nature and anyone who disagreed was a conspiratorialist, otherwise people might examine his role in the pandemic. The other players roles who caused the pandemic were easily ascertainable by reviewing the scientific literature they generated while conducting these experiments with SARS-CoV-2 close relatives in the very city where the pandemic first broke out and in at least two USA labs..

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

Since 2014, the EcoHealth Alliance has received a grant from the National Institutes of Health, until its funding was abruptly cut two weeks ago. The reason, as “60 Minutes” reported on Sunday evening, was a conspiracy theory spread by Representative Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican who in March wore a gas mask on the House floor to mock concern about the new coronavirus. On April 14, 2020 Gaetz appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show and claimed that the N.I.H. grant went to the Wuhan Institute, which Gaetz intimated might have been the source of the virus — the institute may have “birthed a monster,” in his words. The first of Gaetz’s claims was flatly false, and the second unlikely; the C.I.A. has reportedly found no evidence of a link between the virus and the Wuhan lab. But at a White House briefing a few days later, a reporter from the right-wing website Newsmax told President Trump that under Barack Obama, the N.I.H. gave the Wuhan lab a $3.7 million grant. “Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?” she asked. In fact, Trump’s administration had recently renewed EcoHealth’s grant, but Trump didn’t appear to know that. “The Obama administration gave them a grant of $3.7 million?” he asked. Then he said, “We will end that grant very quickly.” And they did. But ending the grant dealt a blow to efforts to find treatments and a vaccine for the coronavirus. Remdesivir, the antiviral drug that’s shown some promise in Covid-19 patients, was earlier tested against bat viruses EcoHealth discovered. Months before this pandemic began, Reuters reported, the Trump administration axed the job of an epidemiologist working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China to help detect emerging disease outbreaks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/opinion/coronavirus-trump.html
NIH PRESS RELEASE: "The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans." In a previous R01 we found that bats in southern China harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs, some of which can use human ACE2 to enter cells, infect humanized mouse models causing SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines. nih.gov

DASZAK: "Look, first, the idea that this virus escaped from a lab is just pure baloney. It’s simply not true. I’ve been working with that lab for 15 years. And the samples collected were collected by me and others in collaboration with our Chinese colleagues. They’re some of the best scientists in the world. There was no viral isolate in the lab. There was no cultured virus that’s anything related to SARS coronavirus 2. So it’s just not possible.¹Now, how did it get into the market? We know for sure that the Wuhan market was part of this outbreak, but we think that the first few cases weren’t in the market. And this is not uncommon. We’ve seen this with many, many other disease outbreaks, new viruses that emerge. They trickle out from rural areas through a person getting infected maybe in Hunan province and then moving into Wuhan, that maybe they’re part of the wildlife trade. Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets. These wet markets aren’t just places to sell wildlife; they’re places where people congregate. They come in in droves. They circulate around. They’re really good places for a virus to spread. And if a person brings it in, or an animal, that virus will spread. And it looks like that’s what’s happened here."
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/peter_daszak_coronavirus
1. Dr. Wang Yanyi said the institute now had three strains of live viruses, including one that was 96 per cent genomically similar to the Sars virus. But their highest similarity to Sars-CoV-2 was only 79.8 per cent, Wang Yanyi said.
If the disease "trickled out from rural areas" because there are as many bats in Wuhan as there are in New York City why didn't someone in those rural areas become infected first? Why wasn't Hunan put under lock-down? "Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets." Why did the market closest to the Wuhan Institute of Virology get infected and no other wet markets? As documented in this Data Base the virus did not originate in the market but this Chinese agent of influence sticks with a variation of the market story.
"Before accepting the first batch of test samples from COVID-19 patients on December 30, 2019, the institute’s labs did not have the novel coronavirus and no one at the institute has contracted COVID-19 to this day. “It is impossible for the virus to leak from such a high-security laboratory,” said Yuan Zhiming, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in an interview with CGTN on April 18. The claim that the novel coronavirus escaped from the laboratory is pure nonsense, said Peter Daszak, chairperson of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit organization, who has been cooperating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 15 years. There is no virus cultivation related to the new coronavirus in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so the so-called “laboratory leak theory” is impossible, said Peter Daszak who is responsible for studying emerging infectious diseases worldwide."
https://business.facebook.com/188625661189259/posts/3264254063626388
Simply untrue as evidenced by the scientific papers generated by the Institute.

NPR DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world. That's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic. We're finding 1 to 7 million people exposed to these viruses every year in Southeast Asia; that's the pathway. It's just so obvious to all of us working in the field," he says. No conspiracy theories Despite the evidence, misinformation about the virus's origins continue to proliferate. For Peter Daszak who has worked on other outbreaks, the pattern is all too familiar: "Every time we get a new virus emerging, we have people that say, 'This could have come from a lab,'" he says. What's unusual about this outbreak, he says, is that senior officials in both China and the U.S. have traded accusations that each nation is somehow responsible for the virus. "It's a real shame that the conspiracy theories can get to the level they've got with policymakers," he says. The political heat has strained the very scientific collaborations meant to detect these viruses as they emerge, warns Jonna Mazet. The PREDICT system she runs relies on the voluntary cooperation of many countries, with researchers freely sharing data about viruses they're spotting within their borders. "With this sort of blame game that's going on, we put ourselves at much more risk." Peter Daszak says the time for finger-pointing is over. "We have a bat virus in my neighborhood in New York killing people," he says. "Let's get real about this."

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

“One thing that I heard from the WIV lab director that I thought was very interesting, and he said, and he speaks okay English, we were asking him all these questions about, they call them rumors over there, we call them conspiracy theories, and he said basically, in sort of his version of English, we’ve not responded to those rumors because if you do that, you give them oxygen. So I think people misunderstand the Chinese government, and he’s a Chinese government worker at the senior level running a lab, not speaking up about when they’re accused. The reason is, he stated quite clearly, they don’t want to give oxygen to these conspiracies. They’re unfounded. And every now and again, they make a statement: that is simply not true. What do you do?"

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

Do you think that we will ever know where Sars-Cov-2 came from – and does it matter?
DASZAK: It does matter, but we're never going to know 100 per cent for sure – it's very hard to definitively prove, without being there at the time. In that space of uncertainty, conspiracy theories abound – for instance the idea it could have been bio-engineered. This is ridiculous, but it’s time consuming to fight these fires. I think it will take a couple of years to track Sar-Cov-2 properly. ¹ We need to trace back the sorts of animals that were going into Wuhan’s wet market – and the people. It’s quite possible it was circulating on a farm for weeks or months before emerging in Wuhan. Every time we've looked at the origins of the new disease in the past, we’ve found out it was actually around a lot longer than thought. Perhaps we will find it was just missed because, in most people, it just causes a cough – who in rural China doesn't have a cough every now and again?
1. In a couple of years the trail would have dried up!
What do you think is driving the conspiracy theories we’ve seen over the last few months?
DASZAK: People buy into conspiracy theories because they’re convincing stories told by charismatic people with just enough science and fact to make them seem plausible. The truth also tends to be less interesting. In this case, people in China are exposed to bats, who harbour viruses. It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring. Clearly this is part of the politics now. Take the US. We're seeing conspiracy theories being elevated in a polarised press, to the point where politicians then use that to make policy decisions. Which is pretty frightening. This is ultimately damaging to public health: US media focus on the lab leak hypothesis has led to "political tensions hindering an effort to find the source of the virus." Not unexpected. When you mix politics with science, you get...politics!"
Who are your heroes and villains of the pandemic?
DASZAK: Then there are people like SHI ZHENGLI in China, who has stuck through death threats and a complete disparaging of her character, just to do what she does: try to save lives. A few have been convicted, but many have been dragged through the mud for no good cause. I've heard many in leadership positions at NIH & in academia say privately that this casts a shadow of McCarthyism & is clearly politically motivated.
It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring.¹ 1. There is only a cyclone fence around WIV. Making new virus is exciting, not boring. DASZAK: Finally the only cases in rural China where bats abound were characterized by a mild cough or no symptoms. No rural Chinese came down with full blown Sars-Cov-2.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

Trump issued a statement boasting of his early insistence that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus. “To me, it was obvious from the beginning,” he said. “But I was badly criticized, as usual.”Biden's investigation was prompted when in May 2021 the CCP refused to allow the W.H.O. to conduct further investigation. This former Congressional researcher is hoping this website, along with the lawsuit I am filing against Dr. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH & NAID, will spark a Congressional investigation of the lab origins of Covid-19. The Biden Corona Report has to exonerate China since if it blamed China how would the Western powers punish China? The New York Times started setting the tone for the cover-up:

"One allied nation [France?] passed on information that three workers in the Wuhan virological laboratory were hospitalized with serious flulike symptoms in the autumn of 2019. The information about the sickened workers is considered important, but officials cautioned that it did not constitute evidence that they caught the virus at the laboratory — they may have brought it there.¹ Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters he had not seen any conclusive evidence about the cause of the pandemic, but supported the effort to look deeper. We need to know the origin, how this happened.” In his announcement Biden said two intelligence agencies believed the virus most likely occurred naturally, while at least one other favored the theory that it leaked accidentally from a lab in China. "None had high confidence in their assessments, the president noted."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/coronavirus-origins-intelligence.html
"Still, that a top lab studying this family of viruses happens to be located in the same city where the epidemic emerged could very well be a coincidence. Wuhan is an urban center larger than New York City, with a steady flow of visitors from other parts of China. It also has many large markets dealing in wildlife brought from across China and beyond. When wild animals are kept in close quarters, viruses have an opportunity to jump from species to species, sometimes resulting in dangerous recombinations that can lead to new diseases." The Wuhan Market theory has been debunked by numerous studies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/health/wuhan-coronavirus-lab-leak.html
1. What absurdity! Someone contaminated a lab where experiments with Coronavirus were being conducted from the outside? The NYT also reported: "The intelligence on the three workers came from outside the United States intelligence agencies’ own collection, which means its veracity is more difficult to authenticate. The source of the information was unclear, but several American officials said they believed the report that the three researchers got sick."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/politics/biden-coronavirus-origins.html

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

Early investigations into SARS-CoV-2 emergence and the resulting COVID-19 disease outbreak proposed the proximate cause was a zoonotic spillover event in late November or early December 2019 in Wuhan, China. This was supported by preliminary epidemiological studies, including the initial clinical series which linked two-thirds of the identified cases to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan. Critically, the study found no direct connection to the market for 14 individuals, including the first known case of COVID-19, leaving open the possibility of alternate points of origin and infection. Additionally, virologic samples of wildlife in the Huanan market could not be linked to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting transmission at the market was downstream from the spillover event. Here we consider that SARS-CoV-2 may have already been circulating in the community prior to the identification of the Huanan Market cluster. This hypothesis is supported by emerging epidemiologic and phylogenetic evidence indicating that the virus emerged in southern China and may have already spread internationally, and adapted for efficient human transmission by the time it was detected in late December.
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42669767/Satellite_Images_Baidu_COVID19_manuscript_preprint.pdf

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

"The new virus revealed itself gradually in humans last December 2019, in Wuhan, and in January 2020 several Chinese laboratories, including SHI ZHENGLI - a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin. SHI ZHENGLI directs the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, WIV a biosafety level 4 laboratory located in Jiangxia District, Wuhan. Her lab sequenced wholly or partly the genomes of samples from different patients, including five complete genomes. SHI ZHENGLI and her colleagues made their announcement on January 23, 2020 that the virus found in those five patients was 96.2-per-cent identical to the bat coronavirus they had warned about three years earlier." ¹"By that time, the virus had been circulating in Wuhan for at least seven weeks, and three consequential misconceptions had been propagated, not just by political leaders but by hospital officials and the Chinese version of the C.D.C.:

That the outbreak had begun in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which famously sold much more than seafood;

That the virus wasn’t dangerous

That it didn’t pass from person to person. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/11/why-werent-we-ready-for-the-coronavirus

1. The 4% differences is thousands of genomes. The viruses were SIMILAR not identical and the virus was not an evolutionary cousin of CoV-19 nor could it cause disease in humans

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

"On the second and third points, there was disagreement by clinicians treating patients, such as Zhang Li, at Wuhan’s Jinyintan Hospital, who told the Wall Street Journal in late February, “I was on alert because this was a new pneumonia and because I’d dealt with SARS.” The misconception that the market was the origin of the outbreak is implicitly contradicted by a scientific paper published in late January 2020, by a group of physicians from Wuhan and Beijing, describing clinical features of the first forty-one patients. Twenty-seven of them, the paper said, had been exposed in the Huanan market. Since a single horseshoe bat would be unlikely to infect twenty-seven people, even if they diced it into hors d’œuvres, and since by some accounts bats weren’t even on sale in the market at that time, a few scientists have speculated that there was an intermediate host animal—a snake, a pangolin, a palm civet?—in which the virus amplified itself, before that larger creature was sold or butchered. The molecular evidence for snakes is weak, pangolins are a complicated story, and civets aren’t implicated this time." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986264

DANIEL LUCEY

"An American physician and scholar Daniel R. Lucey (who had also worked the SARS outbreak, in Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Toronto) wondered about the fourteen other early patients. He noticed that the first of them, falling sick on December 1, 2019 had no direct or secondary contact with the market. That meant, given the incubation period, that the virus must have been circulating in Wuhan outside the market since November 2020. This doesn’t controvert the likelihood of the virus originating in a bat, but it suggests that perhaps it went into the Huanan market, as well as coming out of it, in humans." SARS-CoV-2 is a subtle bug."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext#bib35
"The logic seems straightforward. But a more complete analysis of early cases suggests that locating the origin of the virus may not be so simple. A study published in the found that of the first 425 patients, only 45 percent had connections to the market. A separate Jan. 24, 2020 analysis published in the Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — did not have market links¹."
1. Neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

"Scientific American quotes Dr. Kevin Olival Vice President for Research at EcoHealth Alliance a group that has been implicated in funding the pandemic: "How and where the SARS-CoV-2 spillover occurred is not known for certain. There was an early suspicion that the initial outbreak could have started at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which was closed on January 1 2020. But “we don’t know if the spillover happened outside the market and then began spreading after it was brought there,” says. It is also unclear if there was an intermediate animal host between the disease-carrying bats and humans." ¹ Dr. Olival’s role as Senior Research Scientist at EcoHealth Alliance involves coordinating the modeling and analytics research; integrating evolutionary and ecological theories to understand the drivers of disease emergence; and managing zoonotic disease surveillance efforts in Thailand and Indonesia under the USAID PREDICT project.
1. Everything is unclear.

In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic "hotspots" and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases - animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-coronavirus-slipped-past-disease-detective
Despite referencing Scientific American and NEJM to show the virus didn't start at the market the Washington Post claimed it was doubtful the virus orginated at WIV. Why? "conspiracy theories." The Covid-19 Research Institute did not unearth any conspiracy to release the virus, instead it discovered evidence that the virus, which was created naturally in bats, altered using Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat and/or RECOMBINANT techniques by microbiologists who made the virus more deadly and transmissible than previous SARS Corona virus and accidentally leaked. This genetic engineering also gave the virus the ability to allow it to transmit a plethora of diseases, evade detection and do a whole lot of other things viruses found in nature don't do.

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

It is possible for viruses to escape from a laboratory by infecting a worker. In the early 2000s, there were three documented cases of the original SARS virus escaping from a laboratory environment, according to Lim Poh Lian, a senior consultant at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases in Singapore. In the case of a 2003 incident in Singapore, a student became infected with SARS after his samples of West Nile virus were cross-contaminated with live SARS virus. That virus was being grown in relatively large quantities in the lab for studies on the disease, and the student was not properly trained in safety procedures for the lab he was working in.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...t-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

JULY 2003 An outbreak of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome occurred among students in a college (College A) in Kunming, Yunnan province, China in 2003. Subsequent investigations revealed the presence of hantavirus antibodies and antigens in laboratory rats at College A and two other institutions. Hantavirus antibodies were detected in 15 additional individuals other than the index case in these three locations. Epidemiologic data indicated that the human infections were a result of zoonotic transmission of the virus from laboratory rats.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20380897/

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

"The modern era of pathogen releases can be said to have begun in 1973 in England, when a lab assistant working with smallpox infected herself and spread it to three others, two of whom died. Four years later, smallpox was almost officially eradicated from the wild, yet the following year a medical photographer at Birmingham Medical School mysteriously died of the disease. It turned out that researchers in another part of the building were experimenting with smallpox, and the virus most likely reached the photographer through the ventilation system. Mother Jones

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

Patients with unexplained pneumonias started showing up at hospitals; within days, dozens were dead. The secret police seized doctors’ records and ordered them to keep silent. American spies picked up clues about a lab leak, but the local authorities had a more mundane explanation: contaminated meat. [The Chinese blamed Covid-19 on contaminated frozen meat.] In April and May 1979, at least 66 people died after airborne anthrax bacteria emerged from a military lab in the Soviet Union. But leading American scientists voiced confidence in the Soviets’ claim that the pathogen had jumped from animals to humans. Only after a full-fledged investigation in the 1990s did one of those scientists confirm the earlier suspicions: The accident in what is now the Russian Urals city of Yekaterinburg was a lab leak, one of the deadliest ever documented. Dr. Meselson, a biological warfare expert, studied classified intelligence suggesting that the Soviet anthrax outbreak could have been linked to a military facility nearby. Six years later, he wrote that the Soviet explanation of the epidemic’s natural origins was plausible. The evidence the Soviets provided was consistent, he said, with the theory that people had been stricken by intestinal anthrax that originated in contaminated bone meal used as animal feed. “The concept of truth, in fact, is very complicated,” said Lev Grinberg, a Yekaterinburg pathologist who secretly preserved evidence of the true nature of the outbreak in 1979. “Those who don’t want to accept the truth will always find ways not to accept it.”
The incident was only confirmed in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when President Boris Yeltsin invited an independent team of scientists to investigate. Using 2010 data from the CDC, one expert estimated that somewhere in the United States, “a breach of containment happens about twice weekly.” Some have involved deadly agents including anthrax, avian flu, and Ebola. Most incidents are minor, but not all. Take two examples at lower-risk labs: In 2009, a researcher at the University of Chicago died after being infected by a weakened strain of plague. In 2012, a postdoc at San Francisco’s VA Medical Center came down with meningitis from his lab. He died.

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

"SARS-CoV-2 infection have caused global pandemic and claimed over 5,000,000 tolls1–4. Although the genetic sequences of their etiologic viruses are of high homology, the clinical and pathological characteristics of COVID-19 significantly differ from SARS5,6. Especially, it seems that SARS-CoV-2 undergoes vast replication in vivo without being effectively monitored by anti-viral immunity.

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane Medical School in New Orleans, observed that Chinese scientists would have to have collected SARS-CoV-2 and then grown it in a colony of cells, but somehow never publish any details of it even as they published reports on other coronaviruses for years."We don't know if any such reports existed as the WIV database was taken off line in September 2019 and never restored. Suppression of information in a totalitarian country is quietly, easily and quicky accomplished especially when there is so much at stake if it came to light the virus originated at the WIV, even though, if not for Daszak, the Chinese probably would never have carried these experiments out! “It makes no sense to me. Why did they hold onto the virus?” Dr. Garry said. But the reason they held on to them was to theoretically develop a vaccine before one of the viruses emerged and caused an epidemic. Garry continued: "Genetic analysis shows the virus began to spread sometime in the fall or winter of 2019. Those same analyses supported an earlier Kristain Anderson theory that the virus was not genetically engineered in a laboratory. Garry says the reason is simple — the virus infects people in a way that scientists had never seen before: "The virus is just really too good at what it's doing. No human using a computer could do this. This is very clearly a natural process that occurred." In addition, he says, there are no signs of human genetic modification in the virus's code.¹
1. Garry is a side kick of Kristain Anderson https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=criecCgAAAAJ&hl=en
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...irus-compare-to-mers-sars-and-the-common-cold
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

In 2004, the Chinese and French governments signed a cooperation agreement on fighting and preventing new diseases, stressing the active cooperation between China and France in the construction of high-level biosafety laboratories and the system construction of biosafety laws and regulations etc. In order to implement the spirit of Sino-French agreement, in 2005, Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook the task of building a national biosafety laboratory of Wuhan, Chinese Academy of Sciences. With nearly 10 years of unremitting efforts, the laboratory completed the physical facilities in January 2015. In August 2016, it obtained the recognition and authentication certificate for the critical protection equipment installation and commissioning.

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

At the time when it was launched by Jacques Chirac and his Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin, in 2004, the P4 was at the heart of a showdown in France. Those in favor, politicians and scientists, said that China, which had barely emerged from SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), should be helped to defend itself against epidemics. But Defense, External Intelligence (DGSE) and Foreign Affairs were standing against a project that they believed could serve a military bacteriological weapon program. They suspected that Beijing would want to equip itself with five or seven P4 laboratories, including two for military purposes. "We knew the risks involved and thought that the Chinese would control everything and quickly eject us from the project. We believed that providing this cutting-edge technology to a country with an infinite power agenda risked exposing France in return, ”said a diplomat who followed the case closely. According to a high-ranking source, the project would also have provoked a crisis in Pasteur, where the Assembly of the Hundred, the parliament of the Institute, would have denounced the access authorized by the contract to some of its databases, before see the decision imposed by its management. " There were arguments, because China has a real medical problem with epidemics and France had an advantage in this technology very advanced. But the Chinese know how to copy and duplicate. And we thought the P4 would give China instruments if it ever wanted to start a biological weapons program, "said a senior diplomat, who was in strategic affairs at the time. French scholars played a big role in pushing the project. " There was a blindness of the scientific community which refused to see the reality of the Chinese system. Researchers believed that openness to capitalism would transform China into a normal country. It was to forget that it remained above all a Leninist state in which science is not independent but directed by the Communist Party ", explains Valérie Niquet, specialist in Asia at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS). Since the start of the epidemic, the party and the state have been involved in research, manipulating dates and rewriting the history of the coronavirus.
https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

On April 21, Le Figaro published an article "Investigation: How the P4 laboratory in Wuhan, exported by France, escaped all control" signed by Isabelle Lasserre. Some comments in the article are shocking. The Chinese Embassy in France wants to question them. She wrote in the article that: "On February 16, Chinese state media also reported deficiencies. They claimed in particular that researchers threw laboratory materials down the drain, after experimentation and without having subjected them to the specific treatment intended for biological discharges. They also pointed out that a certain number of researchers, to make ends meet, were selling laboratory animals which had undergone experiments on the markets of Wuhan. As anyone with common sense knows very well, a high-level laboratory is endowed with rigorous management systems and codes of conduct for scientific research, how is it possible that the basic faults described in the article appear? This is an extremely serious problem which seriously damages the reputation of Chinese research institutions and the national image of China. We ask the journalist to tell her readers specifically that her comments come from which media and which reports. Otherwise, they can only be considered as lies. The author of the text made many criticisms of the joint construction of the P4 laboratory in Wuhan by China and France. It is his personal opinion, in which the Embassy does not intervene. But the descriptions in the article are very likely to misinform readers, and do not promote mutual knowledge of the Chinese and French peoples and friendly cooperation between the two countries. The Chinese Embassy in France recommends the video of an interview given by Mr. Yuan Zhiming, Director of the Wuhan branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on April 20 at CGTN. The author of the article could undoubtedly obtain useful information in this, which would help him to know the question concerned in a more complete and more precise way.
The core of the Wuhan BSL-4 Laboratory is surrounded by stainless-steel walls, forming a "box-within-a-box" structure. The core lab enclosure can ensure sufficient structural strength and tightness to form a static seal. The lab's dynamic seal uses negative pressure technology to ensure a strict and orderly pressure gradient between the functional areas, thereby effectively preventing any air contaminated by infectious pathogenic microorganisms from spreading to areas with low contamination probability and to the external environment spreading.
https://www.biospace.com/article/re...of-virology-s-vital-role-in-fighting-covid-19
Air emitted from the lab is filtered and discharged by two-stage high-efficiency filters to ensure the safety of the emissions. Waste water is discharged after high-temperature treatment in a sewage treatment system. Polluted waste in the lab is subjected to high-temperature and high-pressure treatment by double-door autoclaves, and then safely removed and delivered to a centralized medical waste disposal unit with corresponding qualifications for disposal. Whenever personnel pass through the entrance and exit channels, their positive pressure protective suits are chemically disinfected using the chemical showers to ensure the safety of the passageways. The above technical protection measures ensure that viruses inside the lab cannot escape.
Plum Island Reports Disease Outbreak By John Rather Aug. 22, 2004 THE Department of Homeland Security confirmed last week that the highly contagious foot-and-mouth virus had briefly spread within the Plum Island Animal Disease Center in two previously undisclosed incidents earlier this summer. A spokesman for the department, which took over the high-security laboratory from the Department of Agriculture in June 2003, said safety procedures had been stepped up and laboratory rooms disinfected after the incidents, which occurred on June 24 and July 19.

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

In a CNN interview on March 26, 2021 Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director under Trump, made a candid admission: “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.” Redfield added that he believed the release was an accident, not an intentional act. In his view, nothing that happened since his first calls with Dr. Gao changed a simple fact: The WIV needed to be ruled out as a source, and it hadn’t been. After the interview aired, death threats flooded his inbox. The vitriol came not just from strangers who thought he was being racially insensitive but also from prominent scientists, some of whom used to be his friends. One said he should just “wither and die.”

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

STILL HEAD OF W.H.O.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is an Ethiopian microbiologist and internationally recognized malaria researcher, who has served since 2017 as Director-General of the World Health Organization. Tedros is the first non-physician and first African in the role, who has been endorsed by the African Union. Born: March 3, 1965 (age 55 years), Asmara, Eritrea Nationality: Ethiopian Party: Tigray People's Liberation Front
Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) SUMMARY: The Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF) is a political party in Tigray, Ethiopia that has been listed as a perpetrator in the Global Terrorism Database, based on ten incidents occurring between 1976 and 1990 (see GTD link). Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), also known as Popular revolution for the freedom of Tigray, Woyane, Weyane is an active group formed c. 1975. TRAC ANALYSIS: IDEOLOGY Separatist / New Regime Nationalist / Ethnic Nationalist, Left Wing Terrorist Groups (Maoist, Marxist, Communist, Socialist) TRAC ANALYSIS: TACTICS Attacks on Soft Targets, Assassinations as a Terrorist Tactic TRAC

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

"Much of the blame for W.H.O.’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a W.H.O. goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does W.H.O. seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of W.H.O.’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at W.H.O. generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. To avoid stigmatization against nation and race, the World Health Organization discourages the use of regions, countries, individuals, and animals on naming human infectious diseases and pathogens in its guidelines issued in 2015. The guidelines emphasize that viruses infect all people. That is to say, when an outbreak happens, everyone is at risk, regardless of his or her identity or location. The W.H.O. on February 11, 2020 announced the name of the novel coronavirus as SARS-CoV-2 on social media to “prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing,” W.H.O. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said." https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-health-coronavirus-disinformation-11586122093

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course Mission. The Division aims to improve health in the W.H.O. European Region by addressing the determinants, risks and consequences of chronic, noncommunicable conditions, by promoting mental and physical wellbeing across the life course, by the population-based prevention and clinical control of disease, and by preventing violence and injury. Biography: Dr Gauden Galea is a public health physician who has worked for W.H.O. since 1998. He has held posts as regional adviser on noncommunicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region, and as coordinator of health promotion in W.H.O. headquarters. Dr Galea has been Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion at W.H.O./Europe since January 2011. He has a special interest in health promotion, in the social determinants of noncommunicable diseases, and in the links between these diseases and the development agenda."
"Dr Gauden: https://web.archive.org/web/20160609075623/http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/executive-management/dr-gauden-galeaGalea

ADDENDUM

https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...scientists-joining-covid-origin-investigation
https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/corona-leaked-likely-wuhan-institute-virology-experts
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884792-MACE-E-PAI-COVID-19-ANALYSIS-Redacted.htm
https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/did...program-in-a-chinese-laboratory-very-possibly
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2020-articles/19392-expert-attacks-ecohealth-alliance-s-involvement-in-really-risky-bat-coronavirus-research-in-wuhan-labs?
https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched
https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038

Shi’s answers were coordinated with public information staffers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, of which WIV is part, and it took her 2 months to prepare them. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen of Scripps Research says he suspects Shi’s answers were “carefully vetted” by the Chinese government. “But they’re all logical, genuine, and stick to the science as one would have expected from a world-class scientist and one of the leading experts on coronaviruses,” Andersen says. However, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, who from the early days of the pandemic has urged that an investigation look into the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a laboratory accident, was decidedly unimpressed. “Most of these answers are formulaic, almost robotic, reiterations of statements previously made by Chinese authorities and state media,” Ebright says.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...st-center-covid-19-origin-theories-speaks-out

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

Daszak's Zoonotic chirade was over after "an allied power" determined several lab technicans or scientists became contaminated with an enhanced SARS virus and brought it into Wuhan during its incubation period. (1.) Incubation time for COVID-19 between 2 and 10 days has been recorded by the W.H.O. The W.H.O. stated on February 10, 2020, at its press conference, that a very long duration of incubation can represent double exposure, 24 days was a specified point to be regarded in the sense of the study's key results. (2.) The Chinese National Health Commission initially expected a 10 to 14 days incubation period. (3.) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from United States of America assumes the incubation period of 2 to 14 days for COVID-1929 (4.) Doctors and health-care practitioners, of leading Chinese group DXY.cn predicts an incubation period of "3 to 7 days, and up to 14 days." (5.) In a report released on February 9, 2020, the incubation time was observed as long as 24 days (range from 0-24 days; average of 3 days) (6). In a JAMA report released on February 21, 2020, a 19-day incubation period in infected patient has been identified, Hubei Province registered another case with an incubation time of 27 days, on February 22, 2020. An analysis sponsored by the Holland Ministry of Health and released by Eurosurveillance examined data for 88 identified travelers to and from Wuhan, which were identified as COVID-19 infected patients between January 20 and 28, 2020. It was calculated that the mean incubation period was 6.4 days. The incubation duration varied from 2.1 to 11.1 days. The 11.1-day maximum limit may be known as conservative. The incubation time greatly differs between the patients, according to a Chinese article reported by New England Journal of Medicine on January 30, 2020.

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

520 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 1200, New York, NY 10018 212.380.4460
AS SOON AS THIS PANDEMIC ENDS THOSE WHO SURVIVED COVID
WILL DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THIS OFFICE

DASZAK GREW RICH FROM HIS SCAM THAT NEVER PRODUCED A VACCINE
DASZAK EMAILS

Dear Randy:
As a member of the EcoHealth Alliance Board of Trustees, I would like to thank you and your wonderful colleagues for the generous vocal support and for the funding you are making possible for Peter and his research team. The entire board and the Alliance team are truly grateful for the extraordinary boost in morale you and your colleagues have provided. Peter and his team are doing critically important work on COVID-19 and its origin. In genuine gratitude, Rita.
Dear Ralph, Linda, Jim, Rita, Linfa and Hume, I’ve been following the events around the novel coronavirus emergence in China very closely and have been dismayed by the recent spreading of rumors, misinformation and conspiracy theories on its origins. These are now specifically targeting scientists with whom we’ve collaborated for many years, and who have been working heroically to fight this outbreak and share data with unprecedented speed, openness and transparency. These conspiracy theories threaten to undermine the very global collaborations that we need to deal with a disease that has already spread across continents. We have drafted a simple statement of solidarity and support for scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, and would like to invite you to join us as the first signatories. If you agree, we will send this letter to a group of around half-a-dozen other leaders in the field and then disseminate this widely with a sign-up webpage for others to show their support by signing up to its language. I will then personally present this at my plenary during the ICID 2020 conference in Malaysia in two weeks, with the goal of also getting widespread attention in SE Asia to our support for the work that our colleagues in China are undertaking. I sincerely hope you can join us. Please review the letter, and let me know if you are willing to join Billy Karesh and myself as co-signatories. Also, please confirm your title and affiliation that will be shown in the letter. We plan to make circulate this widely to coincide with a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, which will likely be released tomorrow or Friday. Thank you for your consideration and support of the scientific and public health community around the world! Cheers, Peter Daszak President EcoHealth Alliance 460 West 34th Street – 17th Floor New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 212-380-4474 Website: www.ecohealthalliance. NUMEROUS PAGES DELETED AFTER THIS.

From: Tara Hoda<hoda@ecohealthalliance.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 1:57 PM
To: rcolwell@umiacs.umd.edu; Victoria Lord
Cc: Anthony Ramos; Peter Daszak
Subject: Carnegie Corporation Contacts
Dear Dr. Colwell: It was so wonderful meeting you at the board meeting last week. As mentioned, we will be submitting a Letter of Inquiry to the Carnegie Corporation under their International Peace and Security portfolio. Our proposed project focuses on promoting a multi-sectoral approach and building capacity and partnerships for pandemic outbreaks and international health security processes in Western Asia. Our LOI is attached to this e-mail. You had mentioned you may have connections with the following people who are members of Carnegie Corporation's Board of Directors:
1) Jared Cohon
2) John DeGioia
3) Marcia McNutt
4) Judy Woodruff
For the Carnegie Corporation, it will greatly increase our chances of having our proposal considered if we have a point of contact. Would you be willing to put us in touch with one of the people above, or to directly send an e-mail letting them EcoHealth Alliance will be submitting an application? Any and all leads would be greatly appreciated. Best, Tara
Tara Hoda Development Associate EcoHealth Alliance
I’m on a panel on biothreats…National Press Club, Washington, DC, Monday afternoon April 30…along with a roster of DoD, CIA, DHS, and other assorted luminaries. Anything I should say or comment on regarding EcoHealth, Peter?

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

Mrs. Morris Hadley, another civic leader, whose husband was one-time head of the Carnegie Foundation and is now head of the CIA conduit Rubicon Foundation. Through his membership in the law firm of Milbank, Tween, Hadley, and McCloy he has close association with John J. McCloy, once chairman of the board of Chase Manhattan Bank, former chairman of the Ford Foundation, past president of the World Bank, past U.S. High Commissioner to Germany and chairman of the board of the New York International House, a Rockefeller-backed institution dedicated to making the foreign student feel at home.
I think that many of EcoHealth Alliance's initiatives would dovetail well with Carnegie Corporation's International Peace and Security area of interest. EcoHealth Alliance's President, Dr. Peter Daszak, is the chair of the National Academies of Sciences' Forum on Microbial Threats, a member of the NRC Advisory Committee to the US Global Change Research Program, and has advised the Director for Medical Preparedness Policy on the White House National Security Staff on global health issues. He is also actively involved in the W.H.O. Expert group on Public Health Emergency Disease Prioritization.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the “Statement” Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”
ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

Ecohealth Alliance integrates innovative science-based solutions and partnerships that increase capacity to achieve two interrelated goals: protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases and safeguarding ecosystems by promoting conservation. USAID PREDICT EMERGING PANDEMIC THREAT PROGRAM - assesses capacity and develops plans for the implementation of wildlife surveillance support. They develop models of disease risk and spread, implement a smart (strategic, measurable, adaptive, responsive, and targeted) wildlife surveillance strategy to identify and target high-risk wildlife in the region's most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dept of Defense - serological bio surveillance for spillover of henipa viruses and filo viruses at agricultural and hunting human-animal interfaces in peninsular Malaysia. The objective is to enhance capacity within the Malaysia government to characterize the distribution of and detect spillover of novel and known henipa viruses and filo viruses, (both groups include high consequence zoonotic pathogens) in indigenous populations and farms in peninsular Malaysia. Current surveillance strategies for novel zoonotic viruses rely exclusively on molecular detection tools, but Nipah and Ebola viruses are present at low prevalence in bat species which makes infected individuals difficult to detect. By establishing a multiplexed serological assay developed to detect antibodies against any henipa and filo viruses, the government of Malaysia will more effectively be able to determine the distribution of these high-impact viruses in wildlife reservoirs and detect evidence of spillover in at-risk human or livestock populations. The most comprehensive investigation of the epidemiology and ecolog of the RVF virus ever conducted. The project brings together a diverse group of experts from governmental, non-governmental, academic and private organizations, both domestic and international. the 2010-2011 outbreak of RVF in south Africa had a significant impact on the health of people, animals and the local economy. Thus, a better, more integrated understanding of the virus in the environment and in animal and human populations is critically needed to improve public awareness. a booklet explaining the risks of RVF and similar diseases was developed for distribution to study participants in the region. Rather than being a collection of independent science projects, this one health project integrates data collected from climate and weather, vegetation cycles, and mosquito studies to better predict outbreaks in South Africa. Evidence of RVF in animals and people is being collected to better understand exposure, with groups of people in occupations with high risk for rvf and flocks of sheep will be followed for approximately four years. the work is centered in the free state and northern cape provinces and includes the epicenter of previous RVF outbreaks within the 40,000km2 study region. Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development. Dr. Daszak’s research has been instrumental in identifying and predicting the impact of emerging diseases across the globe. His achievements include identifying the bat origin of SARS, identifying the underlying drivers of Nipah and Hendra virus emergence, producing the first ever global emerging disease hotspots map, developing a strategy to find out how many unknown viruses exist that could threaten to become pandemic, identifying the first case of a species extinction due to disease, and discovering the disease chytridiomycosis as the cause global amphibian declines.
PREDICT is a consortium or partners working to enable global surveillance for pathogens that can spillover from animal hosts to people by building capacities to detect and discover viruses of pandemic potential. The project is part of USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats program and is led by the UC Davis One Health Institute. The core partners are USAID, EcoHealth Alliance, Metabiota Inc., Wildlife Conservation Society, and Smithsonian Institution, along with a network of scientists and professionals in over 30 countries around the world. Contact us at predict@ucdavis.edu.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13618543

W.H.O.

GUIDESTAR NON-PROFIT REPORT

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/updates
Kaspar Sebastian Bohdan Daszak is 20 years old and lives in an apartment in Stockholm. He lives with John Ramstedt. BORN 8/27/2000. John or Peter Daszak's son? His home is valued at $1,627,859.80 United States Dollars
https://www.hitta.se/kaspar+daszak/stockholm/person/VgPwmnoooK

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

THE FRENCH HELP WIV BUILD THE LEVEL 4 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB DESPITE DUAL USE CONCERNS
THE PROXIMITY FACTOR
PATIENT ZERO
TEXAS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN BED WITH WIV THANKS TO FAUCI GRANT

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

SHI ZHENG LI CREATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY
BATLADY MAKE BIG MISTAKE: SHE DID IT IN A LEVEL 2 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB, AND IT LEAKED OR SOMEONE GOT INFECTED IN THE LAB AND BROUGHT THE VIRUS BACK HOME.
SHI ZHENG LI WORK AT THE TIME OF OUTBREAK INVOLVED STUDYING CORONA VIRUSES ALMOST IDENTICAL TO SARS Co-V-2
SHI ZHENG LI CHRONOLOGY SHOWS SHE HAS A FINGER IN EVERY CORONA VIRUS EXPERIMENT
SHI ZHENG LI POST SARS-CoV-2 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE
DESTRUCTION OF SARS-COV-2 SAMPLES
THE INTERVIEW WITH THE BAT LADY "COVID IS PUNISHMENT FOR AN UNSANITARY LIFESTYLE"
2018 SHI ZHENG LI WAS CREATING SYNTHETIC VIRUSES
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS IN UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL LAB PRODUCED NOVEL VIRUS MORE DEADLY TO OLDER PEOPLE JUST LIKE SARS-CoV-2 AND STIR DEBATE ABOUT GoF RESEARCH CAUSING A PANDEMIC 2020: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SL-SHC014-MA15: MAN MADE VIRUS WHICH USES ACE2 RECEPTOR

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS SYNTHESIZING VIRUSES THAT ATTACK ACE2 RECEPTORS IN HUMANS WERE PRECURSORS TO CREATION OF SARS-CoV-2
2015: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SARS: CREATION OF A VIRUS THAT CAN USE ACE2 AS RECEPTOR

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

NEW YORK TIMES 9/20/2020 CHINA VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE
THE AUSTRIAN STUDY: IS CONSIDERING A GENETIC-MANIPULATION ORIGIN FOR SARS-COV-2 A CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT MUST BE CENSORED? ROSSANA SEGRETO UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY
PASSAGING
THE NORWEGIAN STUDY
SIR RICHARD DEARLOVE FORMER MI-5 DIRECTOR SUPPORTS NORWEGIAN STUDY
UNIQUE NEW FEATURE OF SARS-CoV-2 CALLED "UNEXPECTED INSERTION"
SHING HEI ZHAN, BENJAMIN E. DEVERMAN AND YUJIA ALINA CHAN, “SARS-COV-2 IS WELL ADAPTED FOR HUMANS
HUMAN ENGINEERING OF A POLYBASIC HA CLEAVAGE SITE MUTANT WAS EASILY ACCOMPLISHED

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

RICHARD EBRIGHT: THESE EXPERIMENTS HAS GOTS TO GO!

THE WET MARKET

VIRUS WAS NEVER FOUND IN ANIMALS AT THE WET MARKET OR ANYWHERE ELSE
THE PANGOLINS DID IT
CHICOM RE-ACTION DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN
BOLTON AND TRUMP PAVE THE WAY FOR THE PANDEMIC

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

NEW WHO JUNKET
WHO DISPUTES THE FACT THE VIRUS LINGERS IN THE AIR INDOORS, INFECTING THOSE NEARBY.
CCP PROPAGANDA

Table of Contents

DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN DASZAK, WAS A NAZI DEATH CAMP GUARD

FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN

DOCTOR "MENGELE" DASZAK

FOR ECO-FASCISTS - COVID-19 "NATURE IS HEALING"

FAUCI TRUSTS THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

WHY DID AN OILY BUBBLE OF GENES JUST ABOUT 100 NANOMETERS IN DIAMETER (A TRILLION WEIGH LESS THAN A RAINDROP) FIRST SURFACE IN WUHAN, CHINA?

"THE BAT LADY" IS A WEIRDO

YOUNG BAT LADY

THE SMOKING GUN DOCUMENT

DASZAK EXPLORES THE LAB LEAK THEORY

Dr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation." Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment

EARLIER EXPERIMENTS INVOLVED THE SPIKE PROTEINS WHICH ARE THE KEYS TO INVADING THE HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

ECO-FASCIST DASZAK FINANCED WIV GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WITH YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY

THE PANDEMIC WAS CREATED BY DASZAK, AN ECO-FASCIST, TO CUT DOWN ON HUMAN POPULATION GROWTH THAT'S DESTROYING NATURE

THE MISSING COMPONENT: DASZAK'S IMPLICIT RACISM

THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AND THIS WEBPAGE IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY

DASZAK WAS A BLOODY SUCCESS

THE MONSTER MOVIE

CHINESE-AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK TWEETS

HAVING DASZAK AS A W.H.O INVESTIGATOR WAS LIKE HAVING AL CAPONE SIT ON ON THE CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION.

FAUCI'S INVOLVMENT IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

FIRE FAUCI AND REPLACE HIM WITH FORMER FDA HEAD Dr. SCOTT GOTTLIEB

Dr. FAUCI, WHO APPROVED DASZAK'S GRANTS, SUDDENLY WANTS ANOTHER INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IF HE SAID HE DIDN'T WANT ONE SUSPICION WOULD FALL ON HIM

FAUCI PROPONENT OF GoF / GoT OPPOSES GoF / BAN IN WASHINGTON POST AND DEFENDS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS

BENEFITS AND RISKS OF INFLUENZA RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED ANTHONY S. FAUCI, FRANCIS S. COLLINS

FAUCI SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT

THE LANCET QUESTIONS DASZAK'S OBJECTIVITY "ADDENDUM: COMPETING INTERESTS AND THE ORIGINS OF SARS-COV-2"

DASZAK WAS DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN RECOMBINANT EXPERIMENTS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS INVOLVED RECOMBINANT BAT CORONAVIRUSES / NOVEMBER 30, 2017:"DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS"

MANY OF THESE GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED WITH VIRUSES FOUND IN HORSESHOE BATS - CLOSE RELATIVES TO THE SARS-CoV-19 VIRUS

DASZAK'S METHODOLOGY RELIED ON GAIN-OF-THREAT, GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

DASZAK PLAYED ON THE BENEFICENT MOTIVATION OF MOST SCIENTISTS WHO CONDUCT GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS

ProGoFer's and Anti-GoFers

THE CRITICS OF GoF/GoT PREDICTED IT WOULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC

DAVID RELMAN STANFORD UNIVERSITY MICROBIOLOGIST

MICROBIOLOGIST JONATHAN LATHAM

DR. RICHARD EBRIGHT OPPOSES BARIC'S GoF EXPERIMENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AND WIV

DASZAK'S CRIMINAL LIABILITY

DR. DASZAK'S BOGUS FAMILY BACKGROUND: "PETER COTTINGTON DASZAK" IS NOT HIS REAL NAME

DASZAK IS UNQUALIFIED FOR MICROBIOLOGY

DASZAK INTERVIEW DECEMBER 2019

PETER DASZAK TALKS ABOUT HIS EARLY YEARS

DASZAK'S BOGUS C.V.

THE GRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY STEMMY AND FAUCI

BEFORE THE CORONA VIRUS OUTBREAK IN 2019 THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION, GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED IN BSL-2 LAB

FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LABORATORY MODIFICATION

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2. IN SILICO COMPARISON OF SPIKE PROTEIN-ACE2 BINDING AFFINITIES ACROSS SPECIES; SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THE SARS-COV-2 VIRUS

THE BINDING ENERGY BETWEEN SARS-COV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN AND ACE2 WAS HIGHEST FOR HUMANS OUT OF ALL SPECIES TESTED

THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LAB CREATION GAIN-OF-THREAT INSERTIONS AT POLYBASIC FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE PRRA IS EVIDENCE VIRUS WAS MODIFIED FOR INCREASED INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENICITY - DR. RONEN SHEMESH

ARGININE / FURIN

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT MADE A COVID-19, THAT OCCURRED IN NATURE, MORE TRANSMITTABLE AND MORE LETHAL

LASTING AFTER EFFECTS UNLIKE OTHER CORONA VIRUSES

CHRONOLOGY

HIGH RECOMBINATION AND MUTATION RATES IN MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS SUGGEST THAT CORONAVIRUSES MAY BE POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT EMERGING VIRUSES

REVERSE GENETICS WITH A FULL-LENGTH INFECTIOUS CDNA OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

2002-2004 THE WIV SCIENTISTS BEGAN COLLECTING BAT VIRUS SINCE THE SARS-1 OUTBREAK

DEVELOPMENT OF MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS MHV AND SARS-COV INFECTIOUS CDNA CONSTRUCTS (BARIC)

COMPOSITIONS OF CORONAVIRUSES WITH A RECOMBINATION-RESISTANT GENOME (BARIC)

REVIEW OF BATS AND SARS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS - GoT

SHI ZHENGLI: DIFFERENCE IN RECEPTOR USAGE BETWEEN SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME (SARS) CORONAVIRUS AND SARS-LIKE CORONAVIRUS OF BAT ORIGIN

PETER DASZAK: RISK OF VIRAL EMERGENCE FROM BATS (DASZAK)

RON FOUCHIER, EARLY GAIN-OF-THREAT "SCIENTIST CREATED AN AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS IN FAVOR OF SHARING H5N1 VIRUS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

W.H.O. CONCERNED THAT NEW H5N1 INFLUENZA RESEARCH COULD UNDERMINE THE 2011 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA PFREPAREDNESS FRAMEWORK

THE PAPER DESCRIBING HOW THE LETHAL H5N1 BIRD FLU COULD BE MADE EASIER TO SPREAD WAS PUBLISHED SIX MONTHS AFTER A SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD SUGGESTED THAT THE PAPERS’ MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DATA BE CENSORED.

FOUCHIER EXPLAINED HOW EASY IT WAS TO CREATE AN AIRBORNE AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS USING GAIN-OF-THREAT TECHNOLOGY

US-CHINA ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP; KUNMING, CHINA

BATS AS ANIMAL RESERVOIRS FOR THE SARS CORONAVIRUS: HYPOTHESIS PROVED AFTER 10 YEARS OF VIRUS HUNTING VIROLOGICA SINICA

NIAD AND HIH GRANTS

ONE OF SEVERAL NEAR FATAL ERRORS THAT TRIGGERED THE GoF / GOT BAN INVOLVED H5N1 INFLUENZA VIRUS

OBAMA BANS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH IN US

DOING DILIGENCE TO ASSESS THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF LIFE SCIENCES GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT OUTSOURCED TO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AFTER AMERICA BANS IT AS TOO DANGEROUS

UNDERSTANDING THE RISK OF BAT CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCE (DASZAK)

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CHIMERIC CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS (BARIC)

SPILLOVER AND PANDEMIC PROPERTIES OF ZOONOTIC VIRUSES WITH HIGH HOST PLASTICITY (DASZAK)

SARS-LIKE WIV1-COV POISED FOR HUMAN EMERGENCE / SHI ZHENGLI AND BARIC CO-AUTHORS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE ARGUMENT IS ESSENTIALLY A RERUN OF THE DEBATE OVER WHETHER TO ALLOW LAB RESEARCH THAT INCREASES THE VIRULENCE, EASE OF SPREAD OR HOST RANGE OF DANGEROUS PATHOGENS — WHAT IS KNOWN AS ‘GAIN-OF-FUNCTION’ RESEARCH.

2015 ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT OF PROPOSED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

As with all life sciences research involving pathogens, GOF studies entail inherent biosafety and biosecurity risks. GOF research involving the generation of pathogens with pandemic potential involves the greatest risks. A laboratory accident involving such a pathogen could potentially release a pathogen that could spread rapidly and efficiently through the human population.

BAT SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME-LIKE CORONAVIRUS WIV1 ENCODES AN EXTRA ACCESSORY PROTEIN, ORFX, INVOLVED IN MODULATION OF THE HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE (BARIC, SHI ZHENGLI)

EFFICIENT REVERSE GENETIC SYSTEMS FOR RAPID GENETIC MANIPULATION OF EMERGENT AND PREEMERGENT INFECTIOUS CORONAVIRUSES

INSIDE THE CHINESE LAB POISED TO STUDY WORLD'S MOST DANGEROUS PATHOGENS MAXIMUM-SECURITY BIOLAB IS PART OF PLAN TO BUILD NETWORK OF BSL-4 FACILITIES ACROSS CHINA

BAT CAVE SOLVES MYSTERY OF DEADLY SARS VIRUS — AND SUGGESTS NEW OUTBREAK COULD OCCUR: CHINESE SCIENTISTS FIND ALL THE GENETIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF SARS IN A SINGLE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE BATS.

NOVEMBER 2017 DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS

TRUMP LIFTS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT BAN

BSL-4 OPENS AT WIV JANUARY 19, 2018

NIH LIFTS FUNDING PAUSE ON GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

THE STATE DEPARTMENT CABLES INDICATE A LACK OF TRAINED TECHNICIANS AT WIV

BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

WANG YANYI

WUHAN LAB CHIEF WANG YANYI DISPUTES APRIL 2018 WIV NATURE ARTICLE

THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY VIRUS DATABASE WAS TAKEN OFFLINE

LACK OF CELL PHONE ACTIVITY AT WIV

ROAD BLOCKS AROUND WIV

FINANCING SHI ZHENGLI'S GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WAS PART OF THE PREDICT PROGRAM AND THAT IS WHY IT WAS SHUT DOWN

PATIENTS ZERO

DASZAK'S EMAIL'S DELETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2019 AND JANUARY 2020

FEDERAL OFFICIALS ENDED A MORATORIUM IMPOSED THREE YEARS AGO ON FUNDING RESEARCH THAT ALTERS GERMS TO MAKE THEM MORE LETHAL

EARLY W.H.O. REPORT

DASZAK WORKED CLOSELY WITH ZHENG-LI SHI WHEN SARS-CoV-19 SURFACED

THE BAT LADY WANTED TO CALL HER VIRUS TARS

RECTIFICATION OF LAB THAT MAPPED GENOME

WIV WAS CALLING IN OUTSIDERS TO HELP WITH BIOSAFETY

DASZAK CLAIMS HE WARNED THE WORLD ABOUT COVID

ZHENG-LI SHI: A PNEUMONIA OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW CORONAVIRUS OF PROBABLE BAT ORIGIN

NEW BIOSECURITY LAW DECREEDED IN CHINA

KRISTIAN ANDERSON STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATTING COVID-19

CHINESE ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT THE UNIQUE CORONA VIRUS WAS FOUND IN NATURE

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE CHINESE RESEARCHERS AT WIV WERE RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM THE GALVESTON NATIONAL LABORATORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AND OTHER U.S. ORGANIZATIONS, BUT THE CHINESE REQUESTED ADDITIONAL HELP

WHY CITE EXEMPTION FIVE?

TRUMP CUTS OFF FUNDS TO ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS ASKED THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY (NSABB) TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF ITS DEALINGS WITH THE WIV

WEIFENG SHI CLAIMS ANOMALOUS INSERTIONS CAN HAPPEN NATURALLY

TWO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY SCIENTISTS, XING-YI GE AND ZHENGLI-LI SHI, USE REVERSE GENETICS TO GENERATE A CHIMERICAL VIRUS CLOSELY RESEMBLING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS COVID-19

ORIGIN AND CROSS-SPECIES TRANSMISSION OF BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

POMPEO SAYS VIRUS WAS FROM LAB THEN WALKS IT BACK

TRUMP WANTED AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

TRUMP ENDS GRANT TO ECHO HEALTH ALLIANCE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GET ANONYMOUS GRANT FROM A CCP PUPPET

TRUMP PULLS USA OUT OF W.H.O.

NIH GRANT REINSTATED BUT THE MONEY CAN'T BE SUB-AWARDED TO THE WIV

TRUMP WANTS TO FORM A COMMISSION TO LOOK INTO THE WIV LAB LEAK

CHI COM AGENT OF INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK HEADED THE W.HO. TEAM THAT SUGGESTED COVID-19 ORIGINATED IN BARCELONA AND ENTERED CHINA VIA FROZEN MEAT

THE BARCELONA BEEF THEORY W.H.O. LEGITIMATIZED

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: HOW THE W.H.O.'S HUNT FOR COVID'S ORIGINS STUMBLED IN CHINA

ACCORDING TO W.H.O.'S REPORT DASZAK'S JOINT INTERNATIONAL TEAM EXAMINED FOUR SCENARIOS:

THE W.H.O. TEAM PUSHES THE PREPOSTEROUS THEORY THAT THE VIRUS WAS SPREAD TO HUMANS IN SHIPMENTS OF FROZEN FOODS FROM SPAIN

THE COVID IN SPAIN WAS NOT FOUND IN THE DRAIN

EVIDENCE FOR THE EARLY OCCURRENCE OF SARS-COV-2 FROM OTHER STUDIES

THE FROZEN FOOD THEORY LACKS ONE THING - THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN COVID CASES IN BARCELONA, SPAIN, BEFORE THE ONES IN HUNAN BROKE OUT

TYPE OF GOODS DEALT BY ENVIRONMENTAL POSITIVE STALLS / RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE COLD CHAIN IN 2019

THE PERSISTENCE OF LIVE SARS-COV-2 IN ENVIRONMENTS RELATED TO THE COLD-CHAIN / EXAMPLES OF INTRODUCTION OF COVID-19 INTO CHINA THROUGH IMPORTED COLD CHAIN PRODUCTS

CONCLUSIONS

THE HUNAN MARKET ORIGIN THEORY DEBUNKED BY W.H.O.

W.H.O.- INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

EXPLANATION OF HYPOTHESIS

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ARGUMENTS AGAINST INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD

HIGHLIGHTS FROM SHORT W.H.O. REPORT

W.H.O. REPORT IS A BIG NOTHING BURGER

USG REJECTS WHO INVESTIGATION

WALL STREET JOURNAL: SCIENTISTS REJECT COVID-COVER-UP ORCHESTRATED BY DASZAK

INVESTIGATE THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

FRANK COLLINS CLAIMS NEITHER NIH NOR NIAID HAVE EVER APPROVED ANY GRANT THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH ON CORONAVIRUSES THAT WOULD HAVE INCREASED THEIR TRANSMISSIBILITY OR LETHALITY FOR HUMANS

STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

CCP MOUTHPIECE GLOBAL TIMES: US INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION OF CORONAVIRUS ORIGINS EXPOSES ITS FOUR ‘ACHILLES HEELS’: GLOBAL TIMES EDITORIAL

RALPH BARIC'S ROLE IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

BARIC WAS CONDUCTING SARS RESEARCH BEFORE A 2003 OUTBREAK IN CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

BARIC'S LAB LEAKED IN 2003 AND CAUSED A MINOR EPIDEMIC IN NORTH CAROLINA

HOW CAN YOU HAVE SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS AND NOT HAVE SARS?

GAIN OF FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH INVOLVES CREATION OF RECOMINANT VIRUS IN UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA IN COLLABORATION WITH SCIENTISTS FROM WIV

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 9, 2015

BARIC'S LAB RAT BITES STUDENT

REDACTIONS OF BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS

BARIC SUPPORTS THE ZOONOTIC THEORY BECAUSE HE PLAYED A PART IN STARTING THE PANDEMIC DUE TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH WIV SCIENTISTS

TRUMP-FUELED SUSPICION OF WUHAN LAB ENSNARES NEW YORK NONPROFIT RESEARCHING BAT CORONAVIRUSES

ANTHONY FAUCHI EMAILS

THE ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GRANTS

SAM HUSSEINI: PETER DASZAK'S ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE HAS HIDDEN ALMOST $40 MILLION IN PENTAGON FUNDING AND MILITARIZED PANDEMIC SCIENCE

THE PREDICT PROGRAM WAS A CON JOB AND FAILURE: IT HAS BEEN ALLEGED THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THE GRANT MONEY WAS HIDDEN AWAY BY DASZAK FOR HIS

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

Dr. William B. Karesh is the Executive Vice President for Health and Policy at EcoHealth Alliance. He serves as the president of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Working Group on Wildlife Diseases and also chairs the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Wildlife Health Specialist Group, a network of wildlife and health experts around the world. Dr. Karesh also serves on the World Health Organization's (W.H.O.) International Health Regulations Roster of Experts focused on the human-animal interface and wildlife health. Currently, Dr. Karesh is the EPT Partner Liaison for the USAID Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT-2 program, a >$120 million effort focused on predicting and preventing pandemic diseases. He is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Armine Arustamyan California Intercontinental University Degree Name Doctoral Field Of Study Business Administration Dates attended or expected graduation2010 – 2014 Activities and Societies: Global Business Leadership American University of Armenia Degree NameMaster's Degree Field Of Study System Management and Industrial Engineering Dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1997 Yerevan State University Degree Name Master Field Of Study Science in Physics Dates attended or expected graduation1987 – 1992

Leilani Francisco PhD MA PMP The Johns Hopkins University Degree Name Ph.D. Field Of Study International Public Health University of Maryland College Park Degree Name B.A. Field Of Study Sociocultural Anthropology University of South Florida Degree Name M.A.Field Of Study Applied Medical Anthropology

Dr. Epstein received a PhD in Disease Ecology from Kingston University, London and his DVM and MPH from Tufts University. A veterinarian and disease ecologist, Dr. Jonathan Epstein is the Vice President for Science and Outreach at EcoHealth Alliance. His research focuses on the ecology of emerging zoonotic viruses such as Nipah and Ebola virus, along with SARS, Midde East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and others that have emerged within Asia and Africa.

Evelyn Luciano Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA)Field Of StudyHuman Resources Management and Services Certificate Dates attended or expected graduation2003 – 2003 Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA) Field Of Study Counseling Psychology dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1999 Community Mental Health and School Counseling Catholic University of Puerto Rico Degree Name BSN Field Of Study Bachelor of Science In Nursing Grade BSN Dates attended or expected graduation1975 – 1979

Dr. Ellen Carlin DVM is Assistant Research Professor at the Center for Global Health Science and Security, with a primary faculty appointment within the Department of Microbiology and Immunology. Her research interests are in the epidemiology of emerging infections. She studies incidence and transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens, focusing on the interfaces among people, animals, and the environments in which they live. She was Senior Professional Staff with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security (Peter T. King, NY), where for more than five years she handled medical preparedness, biodefense, and science and technology policy. At Georgetown, Ellen is also the director of the Global Infectious Disease graduate program at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Aleksei Chmura: Experienced Chief Of Staff with a demonstrated history of working in the non-profit organization management industry. Skilled in Nonprofit Organizations, Environmental Science, Research, Community Outreach, and Budgeting. Strong administrative professional with a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Biology/Biological Sciences, General from Kingston University. Kingston University is ranked 581 in QS World University Rankings by TopUniversities and enjoys a poor reputation.

Anthony Ramos: Former Senior Director Marketing and Development at EcoHealth Alliance Former Director of Marketing at Schneider Associates Studied Classic Culinary Arts at The French Culinary Institute Studied International relations at Boston University Lives in Lake, Michigan.

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

DASZAK: I'm in charge of in the organization in China...So the point is to establish capabilities in other countries not just take specimens from them and bring them back... that's the strategy and you know this the old adage that if you teach people how to do it, give them the tools then you've really made a difference. The money always dries up and this is something we've seen in the nonprofit world. You get great funding for five years from the foundation they always shift priorities because that's what emerged they closed them down. We have our staff in countries. We have sub contracts through local universities or agencies in-country and we have contracts to do work and it's all collaborative science so people love to interact on collaborative science. You know what I found especially in places like China where increasingly there's a paranoia around collaboration. Science collaboration is open and transparent because of the nature of what you're trying to do you're trying to discover stuff quickly, understand what it means, publish it in high-impact journal, and that drives openness and transparency and that's been great for us around the world it's also great for the U.S. and that's we really need to push that agenda. I think publishing is a very interesting mechanism you have to publish that's the argument we use.

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

Daszak is a double agent who CIA thought was working for them but had been rolled over by the Chinese Communist Party because his father was a Nazi War Criminal, a death camp guard, who taught him to respect authoritarian governments. Daszak became a W.H.O. & Lancet inspector. A good place to be to cover-up for the Chinese and himself after he funneled money to the WIV and to the Bat Lady experiments which resulted in COVID-19 being created. And there is the question of how much money was siphoned off by Daszak?

Daszak: “I’ve seen incredible efforts from everything from [religious sect] Falun Gong to the [Chinese dissident] Miles Guo camp, Steve Bannon’s group pushing the conspiracy theories around China. It’s useful to them. They’re funding it and pushing it and science has been to some extent caught up in that to other instances absolutely crushed by it. We’ve not had access to work in China on the origins for the last 12 months, which is ironic because we could have been on the ground there working with our Chinese colleagues and by now we could have found some really important answers. The rhetoric has held that up. We need that communication [with the Chinese] in an outbreak to learn from them how they control it so we can control it better. It's sad to say, but it will probably cost lives. By sort of narrow-mindedly focusing in on ourselves, or on labs, or on certain cultural politics, we miss the real enemy.”
Daszag was a prime target of Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP via EcoHealth. He parrots the Party Line. But he also was co-opted by the CIA until Trump cut his funds off. ECOHEALTH is a think tank put together by the AID CIA LITE that was supposed to protect America from Pandemics by keeping an eye on bats. But ECOHEALTH began to subsidize Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat experiments at WIV and a recombinant virus leaked from the lab into the streets of Wuhan then into the market and out again. Was it coincidence that SARSCov2 started close to WIV? Just how close the Chinese won't say as they refuse to give out the address of patient zero.

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

"THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER DONORS WHO FUNDED OR COLLABORATED ON CIVILIAN RESEARCH AT THE WIV HAVE A RIGHT AND OBLIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY OF OUR RESEARCH FUNDING WAS DIVERTED TO SECRET CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS AT THE WIV." US EMBASSY FACT SHEET

The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior Researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. Accidental infections in labs have caused several previous virus outbreaks in China and elsewhere, Including a 2004 SARS outbreak in Beijing that infected nine people, killing one. The CCP has prevented independent journalists, investigators, and global health authorities from interviewing researchers at the WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry into the origin of the virus must include interviews with these researchers and a full accounting of their previously unreported illness. Starting in at least 2016 – and with no indication of a stop prior to the COVID-19 outbreak – WIV researchers conducted experiments involving RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). The WIV became a focal point for international coronavirus research after the 2003 SARS outbreak and has since studied animals including mice, bats, and pangolins. The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus, including “RaTG13,” which it sampled from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like illness. W.H.O. investigators must have access to the records of the WIV’s work on bat and other coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak. As part of a thorough inquiry, they must have a full accounting of why the WIV altered and then removed online records of its work with RaTG13 and other viruses.
Secrecy and non-disclosure are standard practice for Beijing. For many years the United States has publicly raised concerns about China’s past biological weapons work, which Beijing has neither documented nor demonstrably eliminated, despite its clear obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention. Today’s revelations just scratch the surface of what is still hidden about COVID-19’s origin in China. Any credible investigation into the origin of COVID-19 demands complete, transparent access to the research labs in Wuhan, including their facilities, samples, personnel, and records. As the world continues to battle this pandemic – and as W.H.O. investigators begin their work, after more than a year of delays – the virus’s origin remains uncertain. The United States will continue to do everything it can to support a credible and thorough investigation, including by continuing to demand transparency on the part of Chinese authorities.Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The United States and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

The United States has repeatedly called for a transparent and thorough investigation into the origin of COVID-19. Understanding the origin of this pandemic is essential for global public health, economic recovery, and international security. To assist the vital work of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) investigative team that arrived in China this week, the United States government is today sharing new information concerning the activities inside China’s government laboratories in 2019. In particular, we urge the W.H.O. to press the government of China to address the following: Illnesses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV): The United States government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. WIV Research on “RaTG13” and “gain-of-function”: Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers studied RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). Since the outbreak, the WIV has not been transparent nor consistent about its work with RaTG13 or other similar viruses, including possible “gain-of-function” experiments to enhance transmissibility or lethality. Secret WIV Links to Military Research: Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The COVID-19 pandemic was avoidable. Any responsible country would have invited world health investigators to Wuhan within days of an outbreak. China instead refused offers of help – including from the United States – and punished brave Chinese doctors, scientists, and journalists who tried to alert the world to the dangers of the virus. Beijing continues today to withhold vital information that scientists need to protect the world from this deadly virus, and the next one. The United States reiterates the importance of unfettered access to virus samples, lab records and personnel, eyewitnesses, and whistleblowers to ensure the credibility of the W.H.O.’s final report. Until the CCP allows a full and thorough accounting of what happened in Wuhan, it is only a matter of time until China births another pandemic and inflicts it on the Chinese people, and the world.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/ensurin...-investigation-of-covid-19s-origin/index.html

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

Baric taught SHI ZHENGLI all she knows about virus creation at the University of North Carolina. Collwell is focused on oceans. Saif is a vet. Hume Field and rest work for the bio-war criminal, Daszak!
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, who has been working in China for 15 years studying diseases that jump from animals to people, said, “We don’t know the source yet, but there’s pretty strong evidence that this is a bat origin coronavirus.” He said, “It’s probably going to be the Chinese horseshoe bat,” a common species that weighs up to an ounce.

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

But zoonoses fall into a gray area, and the 2003 monkeypox outbreak in the Midwest is a perfect example of what can go wrong, said Peter Daszak, director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine at the Wildlife Trust, a group specializing in human-animal diseases. The disease, related to smallpox but less deadly, arrived in a shipment of 18 Gambian giant pouched rats imported for a Chicago pet store, where they infected prairie dogs. By summer's end, there were 37 confirmed human cases -- none fatal, but some scary -- mostly among prairie-dog owners. Millions of live animals come into the country each year, and very few have really good surveillance," Dr. Daszak said. "Fish and Wildlife checks cargoes to see if they have endangered species, but it's the U.S.D.A. that does health checks, and they don't go unless it's an agricultural product, so the pet trade tends to get a pass." "The C.D.C. does a great job with outbreak investigation, but that's after the fact," he said of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "After monkeypox, they put a blanket ban on rodents from some West African countries. But who's looking at rodents from other places? Nobody. And that's a gap."
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/us/sentries-in-us-seek-early-signs-of-an-avian-flu.html

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

It is likely, the study found, that one of these "SARS-like" viruses evolved into the SARS virus at an exotic animal marketplace, where it infected civets, which, in turn, infected humans, according to Michael Farzan, a Harvard Medical School assistant professor who was not involved in the research. But why did this happen when it did? One intriguing possibility is that it is linked to China's economic boom, according to Peter Daszak, a co-author of the SARS paper who is executive director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. With the newfound wealth there, he said, animal markets have grown as more people can afford fresh animal meat. As the markets grow, so do the chances that a virus will jump from one species to the next.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/26/health/blaming-bats-when-man-may-be-culprit.html

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

The flu that is moving through humans appears to have a combination of genes from two normally separate sets of pigs, those from the Americas and from Eurasia, scientists say. However, it is unknown how those pigs met, and there is not yet any genetic proof that this particular flu was ever in a pig. Peter Daszak, president of the Wildlife Trust, found records showing that Mexico imported two pigs from France in 2007, the United States imported a few from Britain and Ireland, and Canada imported hundreds from Europe. “And surely this isn’t the whole truth,” he said. “There must be a hidden illegal trade.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/health/01origin.html

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

“By mapping encroachment into the forest you can predict where the next disease could emerge,” Dr. Daszak, EcoHealth’s president, says. “So we’re going to the edge of villages, we’re going to places where mines have just opened up, areas where new roads are being built. We are going to talk to people who live within these zones and saying, ‘what you are doing is potentially a risk.’”
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-ecology-of-disease.html

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

Peter Daszak, a parasitologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, has even put a number on it: 5.3 new ones each year, based on a study using data from 1940 to 2004. He and his co-authors blamed population growth, deforestation, antibiotic overuse, factory farming, live animal markets, bush meat hunting, jet travel and other factors.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/health/new-tools-to-hunt-new-viruses.htm

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

It was the darkest hour since the new illness, known as Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, first appeared in Saudi Arabia late in 2012. In all, more than 700 cases have been documented in 20 countries, nearly all of them linked to Saudi Arabia. More than 250 people have died. King Abdullah fired the country’s health minister and his deputy in April, leaving experts wondering whether the shake-up would bring greater transparency and international cooperation. “In the U.S., when you have a crisis like the Veterans Administration scandal, the new head is in front of the TV cameras explaining what the new plan is,” said Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a veterinary organization that tracked the disease in animals. “There is no tradition of openness in Saudi Arabia.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/world/middleeast/flawed-saudi-response-fueled-outbreak-of-mers-middle-east-virus.htm

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

Daszak describes Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, as exactly the kind of threat that Disease X was meant to represent: a novel, highly infectious coronavirus, with a high mortality rate, and no existing treatment or prevention. “The problem isn’t that prevention was impossible,” Daszak told me. “It was very possible. But we didn’t do it. Governments thought it was too expensive. Pharmaceutical companies operate for profit.” And the W.H.O., for the most part, had neither the funding nor the power to enforce the large-scale global collaboration necessary to wit. Examples from several countries suggest that the Chinese vaccines may not be very effective at preventing the spread of the virus, particularly the new variants, but Daszak overlooks this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/magazine/pandemic-vaccine.html

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

We, the undersigned, are public health scientists who have closely followed the emergence of 2019-nCoV, and are deeply concerned about its impact on global health and well-being. We have watched as the scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable. We sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China who continue to save lives and protect global health during the challenge of this novel coronavirus outbreak. We are all in this together, with our Chinese counterparts in the forefront, against this new viral threat. The rapid, open and transparent sharing of data on 2019-nCoV is now being threatened by rumors and misinformation around the origins of this outbreak. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that 2019-nCoV does not have a natural origin. Scientists from multiple countries have published and analyzed 2019-nCoV genomes1, and they overwhelmingly conclude that this virus originated in wildlife, as have so many other emerging diseases. This is further supported by a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and by the scientific communities they represent. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumors, and prejudice that jeopardize our global collaboration in the fight against this virus. We support the call from the Director-General of the World Health Organization to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture13. We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus. We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the front-line!
Signatories
Dr. James Hughes, Professor Emeritus, Emory University School of Medicine
Dr. Rita Colwell, Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland College Park
Dr. Linda Saif, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University
Dr. Billy Karesh, Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Peter Daszak, President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Hume Field, Honorary Professor, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

When peterdaszak.com went online the first ones to become aware of it were the Chinese The CCP had an alert on their agent Peter Daszak. But by visiting the page they confirmed the fact he was a Chinese agent or agent of influence. Peter was a prime target for Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP. He parrots the Party Line. The Nazi ideas he learned from his father made him respect the Reds, who are sterilizing ethnic minorities like the Nazis did.

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

Communism found a receptive home in mainland China. The WIV is run by Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee CHANGCAI HE who was the chairman of the corporate trade union of Wuhan Branch from Jan. 2004 to Sep. 2013, and the Corporate Secretary of the Party at Wuhan Branch from Oct. 2005 to Jul. 2013. Since the Aug. of 2013, he has been the deputy director general of Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS. This CCP apparatchik runs the institute and if anyone steps out of line they are either imprisoned, sent to a "re-grooving" institute or killed.
Changcai HE: http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Directors2016

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

Academician Xi Chong Nanshan has already delivered a speech on TV. Wuhan New Coronavirus is not the true source of the virus. There are 5 new coronavirus series, ABCDE bat sleeve BAT (H52) and then mutates H53> The C family pathogens in China, with variants of C56 and MV2, spread throughout the world. But the United States had five major families of ABCDE two years ago, the US Government CDC (Center Disease of Control) Concealing the illness, when a military contest was held in Wuhan in November, two American soldiers went to the Wuhan Hospital in Hubei to catch a cold. It was the first hospital in Wuhan, China, which discovered a coronavirus transmission in early December (Golden Eagle) Tan Hospital and Wuhan Central Hospital). From this calculation, it should be that the US soldiers brought the virus into Wuhan in the Wuhan military competition, and the virus series H1 (referred to as the son) came to China. If China wants to check the origin of these two American blood sources, we can confirm the source. The US should have ABCDE two years ago (H13, H3, H1, H56, MV2) These five kinds of viruses have hundreds of pathogens in bats. Among them, the United States has mutated five kinds of pathogens. The United States has always been a stable fact. This is why the U.S. government is in a hurry to send them Americans back to the United States, and is afraid to find pathogens from Americans. In this way, the outbreak of the new coronavirus can rest on the Chinese. The viruses in the Middle East are MV2 and H56. No such virus has been detected in China. The seriously ill Iranians said that they had never been to China and had no Chinese friends, but had been to the United States. The world knows that many wealthy people in Middle Eastern countries buy properties in the United States, and their children are also studying in the United States. I am going to write this article today and spread it to the seven major media in the world. My title will read "Americans are the tumors of the world's viruses." The Washington Post published the title of the article last month, stating "Chinese are sick men of East Asia", the birthplace of the virus. I let the world see the hypocrisy, viciousness, loss of conscience, and the spread of the virus to people all over the world.

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world, that's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic."

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

COVID-19 has NOT been found in bats nor in any intermediate species. Peter Daszak insisits the virus jumped from an intermediate species to humans to cover up the fact that the virus' creation was financed by Eco-Health Alliance. Daszak used the CIA / USAID / PENTAGON money he didn't pocket to fund the project that was supposed to predict a SARS-like viral emergence with is bogus "PREDICT PROGRAM."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/14/health/WHO-covid-daszak-china-virus.html
Daszak reflected on the atmosphere in Wuhan and his first glimpse of the seafood market where the initial outbreak occurred last year, although it was not the site of the first cases. He also said the path ahead would be straightforward scientifically, but not politically. A transcript of the conversation, condensed and edited for length, follows:
James Gorman: You’ve been to China and to Wuhan many times before. How was this different?
DASZAK: Well, this was weird. There’s certain things when you go into China that you’re supposed to do. The first thing you do is have a meeting and then have a meal. And if you don’t have a meal, it’s considered extremely rude. This time we spent two weeks in Zoom calls from our quarantine hotel. Then we went to meet in person and still didn’t have meals with our host. We had meals in a separate room. So it was just a very difficult, very intense, very emotional trip. In Wuhan, there’s this feeling of post-traumatic shock. The city went on lockdown, I think, 76 days. They were locked in their apartments — people died, and they didn’t know about it. And from then on, they’ve been accused of starting a pandemic, and it’s been called the Wuhan virus, the China virus, and there was just a sense of outrage and sadness.
James Gorman: Did that make it difficult in terms of the scientific purpose of the trip?
DASZAK: No. You’ve got a task to do. You’ve volunteered. You know what it’s going to be like. You get caught up in the historical importance. I don’t know if we were the first foreigners to walk around the Huanan seafood market, which is blocked off even to Chinese citizens. The only people that have been in there have been the Chinese disease investigators. We met with the doctors that treated the first known Covid patients. ¹These people have been through harrowing conditions, and they’re now lauded as heroes in China, and then the rest of the world now is fighting that war. And China, of course, is absolutely petrified of this virus catching hold again. When you arrive at the airport, they come on the plane in full P.P.E.; you’re escorted down a separate quarantine pathway; you get tested. You’re driven to the hotel, you go in your room, and you’re locked in for two weeks. It’s just severe. The people who come to your door are in full P.P.E. The waste from your trash, from the hotel room, goes into a yellow bag with a biohazard sign on it. It was a totally different experience when I returned home, where I didn’t even get a notification that I’ve got to quarantine. I signed on to the New York state app, but no one is going to knock on my door and tell me, “Stay indoors.”
1. But Daszak didn't get their names. James Gorman:
Did you learn anything from this trip that you didn’t know before?
DASZAK: From Day 1, the data we were seeing were new that had never been seen outside China. Who were the vendors in the Huanan seafood market? Where did they get their supply chains? And what were the contacts of the first cases? How real were the first cases? What other clusters were there? When you asked for more, the Chinese scientists would go off, and a couple of days later, they’ve done the analysis, and we’ve got new information. It was extremely useful. At the time, you couldn’t really say much. We were trying to not undermine the process by revealing anything while we were on the trip.
James Gorman: What can you say now about the market and what you saw?
DASZAK: The market closed on the 31st of December 31, 2020 or January 1, 2021, and China C.D.C. sent a team in of scientists to try and find out what was going on. It was a very extensive study, swabbing every surface of this place. We knew early on that there were 500 samples collected, and there were many positives, and in that sampling were some animal carcasses, or meat. But there was not really much information publicly about what had been done. So we got all that information. And that, to me, was a real eye-opener. They’d actually done over 900 swabs in the end, a huge amount of work. They had been through the sewage system. They’d been into the air ventilation shaft to look for bats. They’d caught animals around the market. They’d caught cats, stray cats, rats, they even caught one weasel. They’d sampled snakes. People had live snakes at the market, live turtles, live frogs. Rabbits were there, rabbit carcasses. A farm with rabbits could have been really critical. There was talk about badgers, and in China, when they say badger, that means ferret badger. It’s a mustelid, related to weasels. Animals were coming into that market that could have carried the coronavirus. They could have been infected by bats somewhere else in China and brought it in. So that’s clue No. 1. There were 10 stalls that sold wildlife. There were vendors from South China, including Yunnan Province, Guangxi Province and Guangdong Province. Yunnan Province is where the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is found in bats. Guangxi and Guangdong are where the pangolins were captured. They had close viruses. You’ve got animals coming in to the market which are susceptible. Some of these are coming from places where we know the nearest relatives of the virus are found. So there’s the real red flag. Now the Chinese group did swab those animals, and they were all negative, but it’s just one small group of animals in the freezer that were left behind. We don’t know what else was for sale there. So these two clues are really important. When we got to actually visit the market, to me it was quite striking. The pictures you see of that market closed now are of quite orderly buildings with shutters, and you think, This a very efficient, typical city market. It doesn’t really look like a live animal market. Once you get there on the ground, it’s different. It’s pretty ramshackle. It looks like a place that would sell live animals. There’s plenty of evidence of live aquatic animals, the turtle tanks, the fish tanks, the snakes, which we know were available. What we now have are a clear link and a potential pathway.
James Gorman: What about the cases that appeared before the outbreak in the seafood market?
DASZAK: There was other spread going on outside of Huanan market. There are other patients who have no links to the market, quite a few in December. There were other markets. And we do know that some of the patients had links to other markets. We need to do some further work, and then the Chinese colleagues need to do some further work. When we sat down as a group, the China team and the W.H.O. team on the last full day of work, and said, “Let’s go through the hypotheses,” the one that received the most enthusiastic support was this pathway — wildlife, through a domesticated wildlife link, into Wuhan.
James Gorman: What is the next step?
DASZAK: For the animals chain, it’s straightforward. The suppliers are known. They know the farm name; they know the owner of the farm. You’ve got to go down to the farm and interview the farmer and the family. You’ve got to test them. You’ve got to test the community. You’ve got to go and look and see if there are any animals left at any farms nearby and see if they’ve got evidence of infection, and see if there is any cross-border movement. If the virus is in those southern border states, it’s possible that there’s been some movement across neighboring countries like Vietnam, Laos or Myanmar. We’re finding more and more related viruses now. There’s one in Japan and one in Cambodia, one in Thailand. For the human side, look for earlier cases, for clusters; look in blood banks for serum, if possible. Anything like this is going to be sensitive in China, and it’s going to take some persuasion and diplomacy and energy for them to do that because, to be honest, looking for the source of this virus within China is not a great, high priority I think for the Chinese government. Anywhere this virus is shown to emerge is a political issue. That’s one of the problems, and that is clear and obvious to anyone who has been looking at this.
James Gorman: Do you have a particular animal that you suspect right now as an intermediate link, more strongly than others?
DASZAK: IT’S TOO UP IN THE AIR. We don’t know if civets were on sale. We know they are very easily infected. We don’t know what the situation is with the mink farms in China or the other fur farms, like raccoon dogs, even though they’re normally farmed in a different part of China. That needs to be followed up on, too. But if you were to say which pathway would you put the most weight on, I think the virus emerging either in Southeast Asia or Southern China from bats, getting into a domesticated wildlife farm. I’ve been to many of these, and they often have mixed species — civets, ferret badgers, raccoon dogs. Those animals would be able to get infected from bats. Either the people that work there get infected and bring it in, or animals are shipped in, live or recently killed, that bring the virus into a market. Once it’s in a market — either Huanan or another one in Wuhan — you’ve got a dense population of people moving through those markets. And it’s going to be a real potential for an amplification.
James Gorman: The new data that you saw, for instance, on the vendors and their supply chains, will that be in your full report?
DASZAK: I hope so. There’ll be some things that are going to be confidential, without a doubt. Patient records are kept highly confidential in China. We have an image in the West of China being authoritarian and they are videoing everyone. They can have access to anything. But patient records are very private, and some are not accessible. We wanted to meet with certain patients. They didn’t want to meet, so they weren’t pushed to meet with us. There’s no reason to believe that was shenanigans. I’m hoping all the information about vendors, vendor chains will be there. But if not, we’ve seen it. We’ve got it. And we will be following up.

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

Nearly one-quarter of the world’s mammal species are bats, and their ability to fly while hosting a petri dish of viruses makes them both zoological marvels and efficient vectors of disease. Infectious diseases that are believed to have emerged from bats in recent decades include coronaviruses like SARS and MERS, along with other viruses like Nipah, Hendra and Ebola. Most of these viruses were transferred from bats to an intermediate host, like a palm civet or camel, before making their way to humans.
The coronavirus that causes Covid-19, which came to public attention in late 2019, has not been conclusively traced to bats, in Yunnan Province in southwestern China.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/world/asia/thailand-bats-coronavirus.html
The WIV was awarded a patent for cages to hold live bats for testing just months before the virus started spreading. The Mail has established that the WIV filed an application in June 2018 to patent "bat rearing cages capable of healthy growth and breeding under artificial conditions." The patent was granted in January 2019. A separate patent, filed by the WIV on October 16, 2020, relates to the "artificial breeding method of wild bat."The patent discusses cross-species transmission of SARS- CoV from bat to humans and other animals, saying: "Bats infected with the virus naturally or artificially have no obvious clinical symptoms, and the mechanism is unknown. The invention aims to provide an artificial breeding method of wild bat predators, which aims at overcoming the defects in the prior art, and the wild bat predators are artificially domesticated, bred and passaged to establish an artificial breeding group, thereby providing a brand-new model experimental animal for scientific research." Daszak tweeted in April 2020: "The researchers don't keep the bats, nor do they kill them. All bats are released back to their cave site after sampling. It's a conservation measure and is much safer in terms of disease spread than killing them or trying to keep them in a lab. The WIV does not have live or dead bats in it. There is no evidence anywhere that this happened"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-planned-breed-animals-virus-experiments.html

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

The CCP controlled scientists can only find a virus in nature that resembles SARS-CoV-2 and not the virus itself is telling. A virus virtually identical to SARS-CoV-1 was found in the Himalayan, or masked, palm civet. It is related to the mongoose, resembles a large weasel and is a threatened species. There are viruses in bats closely resembling SARS-CoV-2 that were used in the gain-of-threat experiments. Until SARS-CoV-2 is discovered in animals it is laboratory escape.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/24/world/strain-of-sars-is-found-in-3-animal-species-in-asia.html
Initial phylogenetic analyses reveal that the SARS-CoV-1 in civets and humans actually come from two distant branches, but the SARS-CoV from civets during the incipient phase of the epidemic had 99.8% sequence similarity to the human SARS-CoV “Our research has shown that the SARS coronavirus found in human victims is the same as the SARS coronavirus found in civet cats,” a paper quoted Wang Ming, an official from the Guangzhou Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, as saying. As research progressed horseshoes bats were blamed, however, the Chinese put an end tothe epidemic when they slaughters and boiled most of the civets in all of China. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ame2.12017

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

David Asher, a former lead investigator of the task force created by the Trump administration, said it was "sort of ridiculous" to believe the deadly disease passed naturally from animals to humans. "We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci's NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The data disproportionately stacked up, as we investigated, that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source. I had biostatisticians at one of our national labs calculate the odds of this evolving in nature, and it was like 1 in 13 million, and then they revised it to about 1 in 13 billion. So, to say this came out of a zoonotic situation is sort of ridiculous. We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. [Anthony] Fauci’s NIAID organization, that there was almost no evidence that supported a natural zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The epicenter of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain of function techniques.” State Department official Chris Ford "seemed disinterested,” Asher recalled. “He said even if we came to it, how did we know where it came out of, what lab. Very rarely in my life in government have I ever encountered someone who was more of a ‘neg’-ocrat, less a bureaucrat, than that individual.”
Fauci acknowledged that NIH granted the Wuhan lab $600,000 over a period of five years to investigate bat coronaviruses, but emphatically denied the money was used for gain of threat research. However, according to David Asher, “the Chinese most certainly felt that NIH was supporting their gain of function research” and claimed that the variants developed in the lab “were not similar to anything, for example, what could occur in natural evolution.”

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

DISCUSSION: We investigated the patterns of molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. Although the genomic analyses suggested that SARS-CoV-2 was closest to RaTG13, their difference at neutral sites was much higher than previously realized. Our results provide novel insights for tracing the intermediate natural host of SARS-CoV-2. With population genetic analyses of 103 genomes of SARS-CoV-2, we found that SARS-CoV-2 viruses had two major lineages (L and S lineages), and the two lineages were well defined by just two SNPs that show complete linkage across SARS-CoV-2 strains. The L lineage (~70%) was found to be more prevalent than the S lineage (~30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, our evolutionary analyses suggested the S appeared to be more related to coronaviruses in animals. Since nonsynonymous sites are usually under stronger negative selection than synonymous sites, calculating sequence differences without separating these two classes of sites could lead to a potentially significant underestimate of the degree of molecular divergence. For example, although the overall nucleotides only differed by ~4% between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, the genomic average dS value, which is usually a neutral proxy, was 0.17 between these two viruses (Table 1). Of note, the genome-wide dS value is 0.012 between humans and chimpanzees, and 0.08 between humans and rhesus macaques [36]. Thus, the neutral molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 is 14 times larger than that between humans and chimpanzees, and twice as large as that between humans and macaques. The genomic average dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GD Pangolin-CoV is 0.469, which is comparable to that between humans and mice (0.5), and the dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GX Pangolin-Cov is even larger (0.722). The scale of these measures suggests that we should perhaps consider the difference in the neutral evolving site rather than the difference in all nucleotide sequences when tracing the origin and natural intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. In this work, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 can be divided into two major lineages (L and S). Intriguingly, the S and L lineages can be clearly defined by just two tightly linked SNPs at positions 8,782 (orf1ab: T8517C, synonymous) and 28,144 (ORF8: C251T, S84L). orf1ab, which encodes replicase/transcriptase, is required for viral genome replication and might also be important for viral pathogenesis [38]. Although the T8517C mutation in orf1ab does not change the protein sequence (it changes the codon AGT (Ser) to AGC (Ser)), it may affect orf1ab translation since AGT is preferred while AGC is unpreferred (Table S2). ORF8 promotes the expression of ATF6, the ER unfolded protein response factor, in human cells. Thus, it will be interesting to investigate the function of the S84L AA change in ORF8, as well as the combinatory effect of these two mutations in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. As previously noted, the data examined in this study are still very limited, and follow-up analyses of a larger set of data are needed to have a better understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2.
https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036/5775463
If it could be proven that the virus mutated that would mean it was not artificial. "Even for pandemic flu — a virus much more given to rapid change than the one that causes Covid-19 — a few months would be a short timeline for a widespread functional mutation. There isn't a clear-cut evolutionary case for a virus like SARS-CoV2, which has already managed to infect more than 6 million people and often causes mild symptoms, to quickly get milder. If anything, it seems more likely that it would be genetically stable.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...-peak-lull-in-cases-doesn-t-mean-weaker-virus

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

"The corona virus that causes COVID-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, shares 96% of its genetic sequence with a virus found in bats. It is in the collection of viral genomes assembled during those studies that scientists have now found the bat virus closest to SARS-COV-2. A strain called RATG13 gathered in the same cave in Yunnan shares 96% of its genetic sequence with the new virus. RATG13 is not that virus’s ancestor. It is something more like its cousin. Edward Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney, estimates that the 4% difference between the two represents at least 20 years of evolutionary divergence from some common antecedent, and probably something more like 50."
https://www.economist.com/science-a...uzzle-of-covid-19s-origin-are-coming-to-light

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

In May 2020 WIV researchers identified RmYN02 from an analysis of 227 bat samples collected in Yunnan province, China, between May and October of 2019. "Since the discovery that bats were the reservoir of SARS coronavirus in 2005, there has been great interest in bats as reservoir species for infectious diseases, particularly as they carry a very high diversity of RNA viruses, including coronaviruses," Shi Zhengli says. RNA from the samples was sent for metagenomic next-generation sequencing in early January 2020, soon after the discovery of SARS-CoV-2. Across the whole genome, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is another virus, called RaTG13, which was previously identified from bats in Yunnan province. But RmYN02, the virus newly discovered here, is even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 in some parts of the genome, including in the longest encoding section of the genome called 1ab, where they share 97.2% of their RNA. The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SAR-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor binding domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells.
The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02, is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its spike protein meet. SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a four-amino-acid insertion at the junction of S1 and S2; this insertion is unique to the virus and has been present in all SARS-CoV-2 sequenced so far. According to SHI ZHENGLI insertions in RmYN02 are not the same as those in SARS-CoV-2, which indicates that they occurred through independent insertion events. But a similar insertion event happening in a virus identified in bats strongly suggests that these kinds of insertions are of natural origin. SHI ZHENGLI: "Our findings suggest that these insertion events that initially appeared to be very unusual can, in fact, occur naturally in animal betacoronaviruses. Our work sheds more light on the evolutionary ancestry of SARS-CoV-2. Neither RaTG13 nor RmYN02 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, because there is still an evolutionary gap between these viruses. But our study strongly suggests that sampling of more wildlife species will reveal viruses that are even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps even its direct ancestors, which will tell us a great deal about how this virus emerged in humans."
Pure speculation. No closer bat virus has been found as of June 13, 2021. The more likey scenario is that Shi Zhengli and Daszak modified a virus resembling SARS-CoV-19 in BSL-2 lab and it escaped.

RmYN02 FURIN

The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SARS-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that the novel coronavirus uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells, they said. The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02 is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its Spike Protein meet, according to the researchers. The viral Spike Protein mediates SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells and harbors a S1/S2 cleavage site containing multiple arginine residues (multibasic) not found in closely related animal coronaviruses. However, the role of this multibasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. Here, we report that the cellular protease furin ¹cleaves the Spike Protein at the S1/S2 site and that cleavage is essential for S-protein-mediated cell-cell fusion and entry into human lung cells. Moreover, optimizing the S1/S2 site increased cell-cell, but not virus-cell, fusion, suggesting that the corresponding viral variants might exhibit increased cell-cell spread and potentially altered virulence. Our results suggest that acquisition of a S1/S2 multibasic cleavage site was essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection of humans and identify furin as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276520302641

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

Highlights
• Pangolin-CoV is 91.02% identical to SARS-CoV-2 at the whole-genome level
• Pangolin-CoV is the second closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 behind RaTG13
• Five key amino acids in the RBD are consistent between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
• Only SARS-CoV-2 contains a potential cleavage site for furin proteases
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220303602
Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, an organization that works on animal-to-human spillover diseases, said that accumulating evidence on pangolins made it “doubtful that this species played a role in the outbreak.” “We need to keep looking for the original reservoir” — likely a bat,” he said, adding that the potential intermediate host would likely be another mammal species that’s more widely traded in the Yunnan-to-Wuhan corridor of China. While the pangolin trade is vast, Dr. Daszak said most of it “is in their scales, dried, in which viruses would almost certainly not be able to persist.” He opposes trade in the highly endangered animal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/pangolin-coronavirus.html

PETER DASZAK

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

Daszak still claims that any suggestion of a lab leak of a genetically altered virus is "conspiracy theory," a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event, a belief embraced by many Trumpoids who know something is happening, but don't know what it is. Of course Daszak had to say that the virus came from nature and anyone who disagreed was a conspiratorialist, otherwise people might examine his role in the pandemic. The other players roles who caused the pandemic were easily ascertainable by reviewing the scientific literature they generated while conducting these experiments with SARS-CoV-2 close relatives in the very city where the pandemic first broke out and in at least two USA labs..

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

Since 2014, the EcoHealth Alliance has received a grant from the National Institutes of Health, until its funding was abruptly cut two weeks ago. The reason, as “60 Minutes” reported on Sunday evening, was a conspiracy theory spread by Representative Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican who in March wore a gas mask on the House floor to mock concern about the new coronavirus. On April 14, 2020 Gaetz appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show and claimed that the N.I.H. grant went to the Wuhan Institute, which Gaetz intimated might have been the source of the virus — the institute may have “birthed a monster,” in his words. The first of Gaetz’s claims was flatly false, and the second unlikely; the C.I.A. has reportedly found no evidence of a link between the virus and the Wuhan lab. But at a White House briefing a few days later, a reporter from the right-wing website Newsmax told President Trump that under Barack Obama, the N.I.H. gave the Wuhan lab a $3.7 million grant. “Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?” she asked. In fact, Trump’s administration had recently renewed EcoHealth’s grant, but Trump didn’t appear to know that. “The Obama administration gave them a grant of $3.7 million?” he asked. Then he said, “We will end that grant very quickly.” And they did. But ending the grant dealt a blow to efforts to find treatments and a vaccine for the coronavirus. Remdesivir, the antiviral drug that’s shown some promise in Covid-19 patients, was earlier tested against bat viruses EcoHealth discovered. Months before this pandemic began, Reuters reported, the Trump administration axed the job of an epidemiologist working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China to help detect emerging disease outbreaks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/opinion/coronavirus-trump.html
NIH PRESS RELEASE: "The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans." In a previous R01 we found that bats in southern China harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs, some of which can use human ACE2 to enter cells, infect humanized mouse models causing SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines. nih.gov

DASZAK: "Look, first, the idea that this virus escaped from a lab is just pure baloney. It’s simply not true. I’ve been working with that lab for 15 years. And the samples collected were collected by me and others in collaboration with our Chinese colleagues. They’re some of the best scientists in the world. There was no viral isolate in the lab. There was no cultured virus that’s anything related to SARS coronavirus 2. So it’s just not possible.¹Now, how did it get into the market? We know for sure that the Wuhan market was part of this outbreak, but we think that the first few cases weren’t in the market. And this is not uncommon. We’ve seen this with many, many other disease outbreaks, new viruses that emerge. They trickle out from rural areas through a person getting infected maybe in Hunan province and then moving into Wuhan, that maybe they’re part of the wildlife trade. Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets. These wet markets aren’t just places to sell wildlife; they’re places where people congregate. They come in in droves. They circulate around. They’re really good places for a virus to spread. And if a person brings it in, or an animal, that virus will spread. And it looks like that’s what’s happened here."
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/peter_daszak_coronavirus
1. Dr. Wang Yanyi said the institute now had three strains of live viruses, including one that was 96 per cent genomically similar to the Sars virus. But their highest similarity to Sars-CoV-2 was only 79.8 per cent, Wang Yanyi said.
If the disease "trickled out from rural areas" because there are as many bats in Wuhan as there are in New York City why didn't someone in those rural areas become infected first? Why wasn't Hunan put under lock-down? "Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets." Why did the market closest to the Wuhan Institute of Virology get infected and no other wet markets? As documented in this Data Base the virus did not originate in the market but this Chinese agent of influence sticks with a variation of the market story.
"Before accepting the first batch of test samples from COVID-19 patients on December 30, 2019, the institute’s labs did not have the novel coronavirus and no one at the institute has contracted COVID-19 to this day. “It is impossible for the virus to leak from such a high-security laboratory,” said Yuan Zhiming, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in an interview with CGTN on April 18. The claim that the novel coronavirus escaped from the laboratory is pure nonsense, said Peter Daszak, chairperson of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit organization, who has been cooperating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 15 years. There is no virus cultivation related to the new coronavirus in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so the so-called “laboratory leak theory” is impossible, said Peter Daszak who is responsible for studying emerging infectious diseases worldwide."
https://business.facebook.com/188625661189259/posts/3264254063626388
Simply untrue as evidenced by the scientific papers generated by the Institute.

NPR DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world. That's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic. We're finding 1 to 7 million people exposed to these viruses every year in Southeast Asia; that's the pathway. It's just so obvious to all of us working in the field," he says. No conspiracy theories Despite the evidence, misinformation about the virus's origins continue to proliferate. For Peter Daszak who has worked on other outbreaks, the pattern is all too familiar: "Every time we get a new virus emerging, we have people that say, 'This could have come from a lab,'" he says. What's unusual about this outbreak, he says, is that senior officials in both China and the U.S. have traded accusations that each nation is somehow responsible for the virus. "It's a real shame that the conspiracy theories can get to the level they've got with policymakers," he says. The political heat has strained the very scientific collaborations meant to detect these viruses as they emerge, warns Jonna Mazet. The PREDICT system she runs relies on the voluntary cooperation of many countries, with researchers freely sharing data about viruses they're spotting within their borders. "With this sort of blame game that's going on, we put ourselves at much more risk." Peter Daszak says the time for finger-pointing is over. "We have a bat virus in my neighborhood in New York killing people," he says. "Let's get real about this."

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

“One thing that I heard from the WIV lab director that I thought was very interesting, and he said, and he speaks okay English, we were asking him all these questions about, they call them rumors over there, we call them conspiracy theories, and he said basically, in sort of his version of English, we’ve not responded to those rumors because if you do that, you give them oxygen. So I think people misunderstand the Chinese government, and he’s a Chinese government worker at the senior level running a lab, not speaking up about when they’re accused. The reason is, he stated quite clearly, they don’t want to give oxygen to these conspiracies. They’re unfounded. And every now and again, they make a statement: that is simply not true. What do you do?"

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

Do you think that we will ever know where Sars-Cov-2 came from – and does it matter?
DASZAK: It does matter, but we're never going to know 100 per cent for sure – it's very hard to definitively prove, without being there at the time. In that space of uncertainty, conspiracy theories abound – for instance the idea it could have been bio-engineered. This is ridiculous, but it’s time consuming to fight these fires. I think it will take a couple of years to track Sar-Cov-2 properly. ¹ We need to trace back the sorts of animals that were going into Wuhan’s wet market – and the people. It’s quite possible it was circulating on a farm for weeks or months before emerging in Wuhan. Every time we've looked at the origins of the new disease in the past, we’ve found out it was actually around a lot longer than thought. Perhaps we will find it was just missed because, in most people, it just causes a cough – who in rural China doesn't have a cough every now and again?
1. In a couple of years the trail would have dried up!
What do you think is driving the conspiracy theories we’ve seen over the last few months?
DASZAK: People buy into conspiracy theories because they’re convincing stories told by charismatic people with just enough science and fact to make them seem plausible. The truth also tends to be less interesting. In this case, people in China are exposed to bats, who harbour viruses. It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring. Clearly this is part of the politics now. Take the US. We're seeing conspiracy theories being elevated in a polarised press, to the point where politicians then use that to make policy decisions. Which is pretty frightening. This is ultimately damaging to public health: US media focus on the lab leak hypothesis has led to "political tensions hindering an effort to find the source of the virus." Not unexpected. When you mix politics with science, you get...politics!"
Who are your heroes and villains of the pandemic?
DASZAK: Then there are people like SHI ZHENGLI in China, who has stuck through death threats and a complete disparaging of her character, just to do what she does: try to save lives. A few have been convicted, but many have been dragged through the mud for no good cause. I've heard many in leadership positions at NIH & in academia say privately that this casts a shadow of McCarthyism & is clearly politically motivated.
It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring.¹ 1. There is only a cyclone fence around WIV. Making new virus is exciting, not boring. DASZAK: Finally the only cases in rural China where bats abound were characterized by a mild cough or no symptoms. No rural Chinese came down with full blown Sars-Cov-2.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

Trump issued a statement boasting of his early insistence that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus. “To me, it was obvious from the beginning,” he said. “But I was badly criticized, as usual.”Biden's investigation was prompted when in May 2021 the CCP refused to allow the W.H.O. to conduct further investigation. This former Congressional researcher is hoping this website, along with the lawsuit I am filing against Dr. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH & NAID, will spark a Congressional investigation of the lab origins of Covid-19. The Biden Corona Report has to exonerate China since if it blamed China how would the Western powers punish China? The New York Times started setting the tone for the cover-up:

"One allied nation [France?] passed on information that three workers in the Wuhan virological laboratory were hospitalized with serious flulike symptoms in the autumn of 2019. The information about the sickened workers is considered important, but officials cautioned that it did not constitute evidence that they caught the virus at the laboratory — they may have brought it there.¹ Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters he had not seen any conclusive evidence about the cause of the pandemic, but supported the effort to look deeper. We need to know the origin, how this happened.” In his announcement Biden said two intelligence agencies believed the virus most likely occurred naturally, while at least one other favored the theory that it leaked accidentally from a lab in China. "None had high confidence in their assessments, the president noted."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/coronavirus-origins-intelligence.html
"Still, that a top lab studying this family of viruses happens to be located in the same city where the epidemic emerged could very well be a coincidence. Wuhan is an urban center larger than New York City, with a steady flow of visitors from other parts of China. It also has many large markets dealing in wildlife brought from across China and beyond. When wild animals are kept in close quarters, viruses have an opportunity to jump from species to species, sometimes resulting in dangerous recombinations that can lead to new diseases." The Wuhan Market theory has been debunked by numerous studies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/health/wuhan-coronavirus-lab-leak.html
1. What absurdity! Someone contaminated a lab where experiments with Coronavirus were being conducted from the outside? The NYT also reported: "The intelligence on the three workers came from outside the United States intelligence agencies’ own collection, which means its veracity is more difficult to authenticate. The source of the information was unclear, but several American officials said they believed the report that the three researchers got sick."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/politics/biden-coronavirus-origins.html

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

Early investigations into SARS-CoV-2 emergence and the resulting COVID-19 disease outbreak proposed the proximate cause was a zoonotic spillover event in late November or early December 2019 in Wuhan, China. This was supported by preliminary epidemiological studies, including the initial clinical series which linked two-thirds of the identified cases to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan. Critically, the study found no direct connection to the market for 14 individuals, including the first known case of COVID-19, leaving open the possibility of alternate points of origin and infection. Additionally, virologic samples of wildlife in the Huanan market could not be linked to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting transmission at the market was downstream from the spillover event. Here we consider that SARS-CoV-2 may have already been circulating in the community prior to the identification of the Huanan Market cluster. This hypothesis is supported by emerging epidemiologic and phylogenetic evidence indicating that the virus emerged in southern China and may have already spread internationally, and adapted for efficient human transmission by the time it was detected in late December.
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42669767/Satellite_Images_Baidu_COVID19_manuscript_preprint.pdf

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

"The new virus revealed itself gradually in humans last December 2019, in Wuhan, and in January 2020 several Chinese laboratories, including SHI ZHENGLI - a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin. SHI ZHENGLI directs the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, WIV a biosafety level 4 laboratory located in Jiangxia District, Wuhan. Her lab sequenced wholly or partly the genomes of samples from different patients, including five complete genomes. SHI ZHENGLI and her colleagues made their announcement on January 23, 2020 that the virus found in those five patients was 96.2-per-cent identical to the bat coronavirus they had warned about three years earlier." ¹"By that time, the virus had been circulating in Wuhan for at least seven weeks, and three consequential misconceptions had been propagated, not just by political leaders but by hospital officials and the Chinese version of the C.D.C.:

That the outbreak had begun in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which famously sold much more than seafood;

That the virus wasn’t dangerous

That it didn’t pass from person to person. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/11/why-werent-we-ready-for-the-coronavirus

1. The 4% differences is thousands of genomes. The viruses were SIMILAR not identical and the virus was not an evolutionary cousin of CoV-19 nor could it cause disease in humans

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

"On the second and third points, there was disagreement by clinicians treating patients, such as Zhang Li, at Wuhan’s Jinyintan Hospital, who told the Wall Street Journal in late February, “I was on alert because this was a new pneumonia and because I’d dealt with SARS.” The misconception that the market was the origin of the outbreak is implicitly contradicted by a scientific paper published in late January 2020, by a group of physicians from Wuhan and Beijing, describing clinical features of the first forty-one patients. Twenty-seven of them, the paper said, had been exposed in the Huanan market. Since a single horseshoe bat would be unlikely to infect twenty-seven people, even if they diced it into hors d’œuvres, and since by some accounts bats weren’t even on sale in the market at that time, a few scientists have speculated that there was an intermediate host animal—a snake, a pangolin, a palm civet?—in which the virus amplified itself, before that larger creature was sold or butchered. The molecular evidence for snakes is weak, pangolins are a complicated story, and civets aren’t implicated this time." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986264

DANIEL LUCEY

"An American physician and scholar Daniel R. Lucey (who had also worked the SARS outbreak, in Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Toronto) wondered about the fourteen other early patients. He noticed that the first of them, falling sick on December 1, 2019 had no direct or secondary contact with the market. That meant, given the incubation period, that the virus must have been circulating in Wuhan outside the market since November 2020. This doesn’t controvert the likelihood of the virus originating in a bat, but it suggests that perhaps it went into the Huanan market, as well as coming out of it, in humans." SARS-CoV-2 is a subtle bug."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext#bib35
"The logic seems straightforward. But a more complete analysis of early cases suggests that locating the origin of the virus may not be so simple. A study published in the found that of the first 425 patients, only 45 percent had connections to the market. A separate Jan. 24, 2020 analysis published in the Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — did not have market links¹."
1. Neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

"Scientific American quotes Dr. Kevin Olival Vice President for Research at EcoHealth Alliance a group that has been implicated in funding the pandemic: "How and where the SARS-CoV-2 spillover occurred is not known for certain. There was an early suspicion that the initial outbreak could have started at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which was closed on January 1 2020. But “we don’t know if the spillover happened outside the market and then began spreading after it was brought there,” says. It is also unclear if there was an intermediate animal host between the disease-carrying bats and humans." ¹ Dr. Olival’s role as Senior Research Scientist at EcoHealth Alliance involves coordinating the modeling and analytics research; integrating evolutionary and ecological theories to understand the drivers of disease emergence; and managing zoonotic disease surveillance efforts in Thailand and Indonesia under the USAID PREDICT project.
1. Everything is unclear.

In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic "hotspots" and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases - animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-coronavirus-slipped-past-disease-detective
Despite referencing Scientific American and NEJM to show the virus didn't start at the market the Washington Post claimed it was doubtful the virus orginated at WIV. Why? "conspiracy theories." The Covid-19 Research Institute did not unearth any conspiracy to release the virus, instead it discovered evidence that the virus, which was created naturally in bats, altered using Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat and/or RECOMBINANT techniques by microbiologists who made the virus more deadly and transmissible than previous SARS Corona virus and accidentally leaked. This genetic engineering also gave the virus the ability to allow it to transmit a plethora of diseases, evade detection and do a whole lot of other things viruses found in nature don't do.

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

It is possible for viruses to escape from a laboratory by infecting a worker. In the early 2000s, there were three documented cases of the original SARS virus escaping from a laboratory environment, according to Lim Poh Lian, a senior consultant at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases in Singapore. In the case of a 2003 incident in Singapore, a student became infected with SARS after his samples of West Nile virus were cross-contaminated with live SARS virus. That virus was being grown in relatively large quantities in the lab for studies on the disease, and the student was not properly trained in safety procedures for the lab he was working in.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...t-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

JULY 2003 An outbreak of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome occurred among students in a college (College A) in Kunming, Yunnan province, China in 2003. Subsequent investigations revealed the presence of hantavirus antibodies and antigens in laboratory rats at College A and two other institutions. Hantavirus antibodies were detected in 15 additional individuals other than the index case in these three locations. Epidemiologic data indicated that the human infections were a result of zoonotic transmission of the virus from laboratory rats.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20380897/

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

"The modern era of pathogen releases can be said to have begun in 1973 in England, when a lab assistant working with smallpox infected herself and spread it to three others, two of whom died. Four years later, smallpox was almost officially eradicated from the wild, yet the following year a medical photographer at Birmingham Medical School mysteriously died of the disease. It turned out that researchers in another part of the building were experimenting with smallpox, and the virus most likely reached the photographer through the ventilation system. Mother Jones

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

Patients with unexplained pneumonias started showing up at hospitals; within days, dozens were dead. The secret police seized doctors’ records and ordered them to keep silent. American spies picked up clues about a lab leak, but the local authorities had a more mundane explanation: contaminated meat. [The Chinese blamed Covid-19 on contaminated frozen meat.] In April and May 1979, at least 66 people died after airborne anthrax bacteria emerged from a military lab in the Soviet Union. But leading American scientists voiced confidence in the Soviets’ claim that the pathogen had jumped from animals to humans. Only after a full-fledged investigation in the 1990s did one of those scientists confirm the earlier suspicions: The accident in what is now the Russian Urals city of Yekaterinburg was a lab leak, one of the deadliest ever documented. Dr. Meselson, a biological warfare expert, studied classified intelligence suggesting that the Soviet anthrax outbreak could have been linked to a military facility nearby. Six years later, he wrote that the Soviet explanation of the epidemic’s natural origins was plausible. The evidence the Soviets provided was consistent, he said, with the theory that people had been stricken by intestinal anthrax that originated in contaminated bone meal used as animal feed. “The concept of truth, in fact, is very complicated,” said Lev Grinberg, a Yekaterinburg pathologist who secretly preserved evidence of the true nature of the outbreak in 1979. “Those who don’t want to accept the truth will always find ways not to accept it.”
The incident was only confirmed in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when President Boris Yeltsin invited an independent team of scientists to investigate. Using 2010 data from the CDC, one expert estimated that somewhere in the United States, “a breach of containment happens about twice weekly.” Some have involved deadly agents including anthrax, avian flu, and Ebola. Most incidents are minor, but not all. Take two examples at lower-risk labs: In 2009, a researcher at the University of Chicago died after being infected by a weakened strain of plague. In 2012, a postdoc at San Francisco’s VA Medical Center came down with meningitis from his lab. He died.

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

"SARS-CoV-2 infection have caused global pandemic and claimed over 5,000,000 tolls1–4. Although the genetic sequences of their etiologic viruses are of high homology, the clinical and pathological characteristics of COVID-19 significantly differ from SARS5,6. Especially, it seems that SARS-CoV-2 undergoes vast replication in vivo without being effectively monitored by anti-viral immunity.

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane Medical School in New Orleans, observed that Chinese scientists would have to have collected SARS-CoV-2 and then grown it in a colony of cells, but somehow never publish any details of it even as they published reports on other coronaviruses for years."We don't know if any such reports existed as the WIV database was taken off line in September 2019 and never restored. Suppression of information in a totalitarian country is quietly, easily and quicky accomplished especially when there is so much at stake if it came to light the virus originated at the WIV, even though, if not for Daszak, the Chinese probably would never have carried these experiments out! “It makes no sense to me. Why did they hold onto the virus?” Dr. Garry said. But the reason they held on to them was to theoretically develop a vaccine before one of the viruses emerged and caused an epidemic. Garry continued: "Genetic analysis shows the virus began to spread sometime in the fall or winter of 2019. Those same analyses supported an earlier Kristain Anderson theory that the virus was not genetically engineered in a laboratory. Garry says the reason is simple — the virus infects people in a way that scientists had never seen before: "The virus is just really too good at what it's doing. No human using a computer could do this. This is very clearly a natural process that occurred." In addition, he says, there are no signs of human genetic modification in the virus's code.¹
1. Garry is a side kick of Kristain Anderson https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=criecCgAAAAJ&hl=en
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...irus-compare-to-mers-sars-and-the-common-cold
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

In 2004, the Chinese and French governments signed a cooperation agreement on fighting and preventing new diseases, stressing the active cooperation between China and France in the construction of high-level biosafety laboratories and the system construction of biosafety laws and regulations etc. In order to implement the spirit of Sino-French agreement, in 2005, Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook the task of building a national biosafety laboratory of Wuhan, Chinese Academy of Sciences. With nearly 10 years of unremitting efforts, the laboratory completed the physical facilities in January 2015. In August 2016, it obtained the recognition and authentication certificate for the critical protection equipment installation and commissioning.

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

At the time when it was launched by Jacques Chirac and his Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin, in 2004, the P4 was at the heart of a showdown in France. Those in favor, politicians and scientists, said that China, which had barely emerged from SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), should be helped to defend itself against epidemics. But Defense, External Intelligence (DGSE) and Foreign Affairs were standing against a project that they believed could serve a military bacteriological weapon program. They suspected that Beijing would want to equip itself with five or seven P4 laboratories, including two for military purposes. "We knew the risks involved and thought that the Chinese would control everything and quickly eject us from the project. We believed that providing this cutting-edge technology to a country with an infinite power agenda risked exposing France in return, ”said a diplomat who followed the case closely. According to a high-ranking source, the project would also have provoked a crisis in Pasteur, where the Assembly of the Hundred, the parliament of the Institute, would have denounced the access authorized by the contract to some of its databases, before see the decision imposed by its management. " There were arguments, because China has a real medical problem with epidemics and France had an advantage in this technology very advanced. But the Chinese know how to copy and duplicate. And we thought the P4 would give China instruments if it ever wanted to start a biological weapons program, "said a senior diplomat, who was in strategic affairs at the time. French scholars played a big role in pushing the project. " There was a blindness of the scientific community which refused to see the reality of the Chinese system. Researchers believed that openness to capitalism would transform China into a normal country. It was to forget that it remained above all a Leninist state in which science is not independent but directed by the Communist Party ", explains Valérie Niquet, specialist in Asia at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS). Since the start of the epidemic, the party and the state have been involved in research, manipulating dates and rewriting the history of the coronavirus.
https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

On April 21, Le Figaro published an article "Investigation: How the P4 laboratory in Wuhan, exported by France, escaped all control" signed by Isabelle Lasserre. Some comments in the article are shocking. The Chinese Embassy in France wants to question them. She wrote in the article that: "On February 16, Chinese state media also reported deficiencies. They claimed in particular that researchers threw laboratory materials down the drain, after experimentation and without having subjected them to the specific treatment intended for biological discharges. They also pointed out that a certain number of researchers, to make ends meet, were selling laboratory animals which had undergone experiments on the markets of Wuhan. As anyone with common sense knows very well, a high-level laboratory is endowed with rigorous management systems and codes of conduct for scientific research, how is it possible that the basic faults described in the article appear? This is an extremely serious problem which seriously damages the reputation of Chinese research institutions and the national image of China. We ask the journalist to tell her readers specifically that her comments come from which media and which reports. Otherwise, they can only be considered as lies. The author of the text made many criticisms of the joint construction of the P4 laboratory in Wuhan by China and France. It is his personal opinion, in which the Embassy does not intervene. But the descriptions in the article are very likely to misinform readers, and do not promote mutual knowledge of the Chinese and French peoples and friendly cooperation between the two countries. The Chinese Embassy in France recommends the video of an interview given by Mr. Yuan Zhiming, Director of the Wuhan branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on April 20 at CGTN. The author of the article could undoubtedly obtain useful information in this, which would help him to know the question concerned in a more complete and more precise way.
The core of the Wuhan BSL-4 Laboratory is surrounded by stainless-steel walls, forming a "box-within-a-box" structure. The core lab enclosure can ensure sufficient structural strength and tightness to form a static seal. The lab's dynamic seal uses negative pressure technology to ensure a strict and orderly pressure gradient between the functional areas, thereby effectively preventing any air contaminated by infectious pathogenic microorganisms from spreading to areas with low contamination probability and to the external environment spreading.
https://www.biospace.com/article/re...of-virology-s-vital-role-in-fighting-covid-19
Air emitted from the lab is filtered and discharged by two-stage high-efficiency filters to ensure the safety of the emissions. Waste water is discharged after high-temperature treatment in a sewage treatment system. Polluted waste in the lab is subjected to high-temperature and high-pressure treatment by double-door autoclaves, and then safely removed and delivered to a centralized medical waste disposal unit with corresponding qualifications for disposal. Whenever personnel pass through the entrance and exit channels, their positive pressure protective suits are chemically disinfected using the chemical showers to ensure the safety of the passageways. The above technical protection measures ensure that viruses inside the lab cannot escape.
Plum Island Reports Disease Outbreak By John Rather Aug. 22, 2004 THE Department of Homeland Security confirmed last week that the highly contagious foot-and-mouth virus had briefly spread within the Plum Island Animal Disease Center in two previously undisclosed incidents earlier this summer. A spokesman for the department, which took over the high-security laboratory from the Department of Agriculture in June 2003, said safety procedures had been stepped up and laboratory rooms disinfected after the incidents, which occurred on June 24 and July 19.

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

In a CNN interview on March 26, 2021 Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director under Trump, made a candid admission: “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.” Redfield added that he believed the release was an accident, not an intentional act. In his view, nothing that happened since his first calls with Dr. Gao changed a simple fact: The WIV needed to be ruled out as a source, and it hadn’t been. After the interview aired, death threats flooded his inbox. The vitriol came not just from strangers who thought he was being racially insensitive but also from prominent scientists, some of whom used to be his friends. One said he should just “wither and die.”

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

STILL HEAD OF W.H.O.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is an Ethiopian microbiologist and internationally recognized malaria researcher, who has served since 2017 as Director-General of the World Health Organization. Tedros is the first non-physician and first African in the role, who has been endorsed by the African Union. Born: March 3, 1965 (age 55 years), Asmara, Eritrea Nationality: Ethiopian Party: Tigray People's Liberation Front
Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) SUMMARY: The Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF) is a political party in Tigray, Ethiopia that has been listed as a perpetrator in the Global Terrorism Database, based on ten incidents occurring between 1976 and 1990 (see GTD link). Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), also known as Popular revolution for the freedom of Tigray, Woyane, Weyane is an active group formed c. 1975. TRAC ANALYSIS: IDEOLOGY Separatist / New Regime Nationalist / Ethnic Nationalist, Left Wing Terrorist Groups (Maoist, Marxist, Communist, Socialist) TRAC ANALYSIS: TACTICS Attacks on Soft Targets, Assassinations as a Terrorist Tactic TRAC

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

"Much of the blame for W.H.O.’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a W.H.O. goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does W.H.O. seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of W.H.O.’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at W.H.O. generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. To avoid stigmatization against nation and race, the World Health Organization discourages the use of regions, countries, individuals, and animals on naming human infectious diseases and pathogens in its guidelines issued in 2015. The guidelines emphasize that viruses infect all people. That is to say, when an outbreak happens, everyone is at risk, regardless of his or her identity or location. The W.H.O. on February 11, 2020 announced the name of the novel coronavirus as SARS-CoV-2 on social media to “prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing,” W.H.O. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said." https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-health-coronavirus-disinformation-11586122093

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course Mission. The Division aims to improve health in the W.H.O. European Region by addressing the determinants, risks and consequences of chronic, noncommunicable conditions, by promoting mental and physical wellbeing across the life course, by the population-based prevention and clinical control of disease, and by preventing violence and injury. Biography: Dr Gauden Galea is a public health physician who has worked for W.H.O. since 1998. He has held posts as regional adviser on noncommunicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region, and as coordinator of health promotion in W.H.O. headquarters. Dr Galea has been Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion at W.H.O./Europe since January 2011. He has a special interest in health promotion, in the social determinants of noncommunicable diseases, and in the links between these diseases and the development agenda."
"Dr Gauden: https://web.archive.org/web/20160609075623/http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/executive-management/dr-gauden-galeaGalea

ADDENDUM

https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...scientists-joining-covid-origin-investigation
https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/corona-leaked-likely-wuhan-institute-virology-experts
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884792-MACE-E-PAI-COVID-19-ANALYSIS-Redacted.htm
https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/did...program-in-a-chinese-laboratory-very-possibly
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2020-articles/19392-expert-attacks-ecohealth-alliance-s-involvement-in-really-risky-bat-coronavirus-research-in-wuhan-labs?
https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched
https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038

Shi’s answers were coordinated with public information staffers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, of which WIV is part, and it took her 2 months to prepare them. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen of Scripps Research says he suspects Shi’s answers were “carefully vetted” by the Chinese government. “But they’re all logical, genuine, and stick to the science as one would have expected from a world-class scientist and one of the leading experts on coronaviruses,” Andersen says. However, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, who from the early days of the pandemic has urged that an investigation look into the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a laboratory accident, was decidedly unimpressed. “Most of these answers are formulaic, almost robotic, reiterations of statements previously made by Chinese authorities and state media,” Ebright says.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...st-center-covid-19-origin-theories-speaks-out

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

Daszak's Zoonotic chirade was over after "an allied power" determined several lab technicans or scientists became contaminated with an enhanced SARS virus and brought it into Wuhan during its incubation period. (1.) Incubation time for COVID-19 between 2 and 10 days has been recorded by the W.H.O. The W.H.O. stated on February 10, 2020, at its press conference, that a very long duration of incubation can represent double exposure, 24 days was a specified point to be regarded in the sense of the study's key results. (2.) The Chinese National Health Commission initially expected a 10 to 14 days incubation period. (3.) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from United States of America assumes the incubation period of 2 to 14 days for COVID-1929 (4.) Doctors and health-care practitioners, of leading Chinese group DXY.cn predicts an incubation period of "3 to 7 days, and up to 14 days." (5.) In a report released on February 9, 2020, the incubation time was observed as long as 24 days (range from 0-24 days; average of 3 days) (6). In a JAMA report released on February 21, 2020, a 19-day incubation period in infected patient has been identified, Hubei Province registered another case with an incubation time of 27 days, on February 22, 2020. An analysis sponsored by the Holland Ministry of Health and released by Eurosurveillance examined data for 88 identified travelers to and from Wuhan, which were identified as COVID-19 infected patients between January 20 and 28, 2020. It was calculated that the mean incubation period was 6.4 days. The incubation duration varied from 2.1 to 11.1 days. The 11.1-day maximum limit may be known as conservative. The incubation time greatly differs between the patients, according to a Chinese article reported by New England Journal of Medicine on January 30, 2020.

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

520 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 1200, New York, NY 10018 212.380.4460
AS SOON AS THIS PANDEMIC ENDS THOSE WHO SURVIVED COVID
WILL DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THIS OFFICE

DASZAK GREW RICH FROM HIS SCAM THAT NEVER PRODUCED A VACCINE
DASZAK EMAILS

Dear Randy:
As a member of the EcoHealth Alliance Board of Trustees, I would like to thank you and your wonderful colleagues for the generous vocal support and for the funding you are making possible for Peter and his research team. The entire board and the Alliance team are truly grateful for the extraordinary boost in morale you and your colleagues have provided. Peter and his team are doing critically important work on COVID-19 and its origin. In genuine gratitude, Rita.
Dear Ralph, Linda, Jim, Rita, Linfa and Hume, I’ve been following the events around the novel coronavirus emergence in China very closely and have been dismayed by the recent spreading of rumors, misinformation and conspiracy theories on its origins. These are now specifically targeting scientists with whom we’ve collaborated for many years, and who have been working heroically to fight this outbreak and share data with unprecedented speed, openness and transparency. These conspiracy theories threaten to undermine the very global collaborations that we need to deal with a disease that has already spread across continents. We have drafted a simple statement of solidarity and support for scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, and would like to invite you to join us as the first signatories. If you agree, we will send this letter to a group of around half-a-dozen other leaders in the field and then disseminate this widely with a sign-up webpage for others to show their support by signing up to its language. I will then personally present this at my plenary during the ICID 2020 conference in Malaysia in two weeks, with the goal of also getting widespread attention in SE Asia to our support for the work that our colleagues in China are undertaking. I sincerely hope you can join us. Please review the letter, and let me know if you are willing to join Billy Karesh and myself as co-signatories. Also, please confirm your title and affiliation that will be shown in the letter. We plan to make circulate this widely to coincide with a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, which will likely be released tomorrow or Friday. Thank you for your consideration and support of the scientific and public health community around the world! Cheers, Peter Daszak President EcoHealth Alliance 460 West 34th Street – 17th Floor New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 212-380-4474 Website: www.ecohealthalliance. NUMEROUS PAGES DELETED AFTER THIS.

From: Tara Hoda<hoda@ecohealthalliance.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 1:57 PM
To: rcolwell@umiacs.umd.edu; Victoria Lord
Cc: Anthony Ramos; Peter Daszak
Subject: Carnegie Corporation Contacts
Dear Dr. Colwell: It was so wonderful meeting you at the board meeting last week. As mentioned, we will be submitting a Letter of Inquiry to the Carnegie Corporation under their International Peace and Security portfolio. Our proposed project focuses on promoting a multi-sectoral approach and building capacity and partnerships for pandemic outbreaks and international health security processes in Western Asia. Our LOI is attached to this e-mail. You had mentioned you may have connections with the following people who are members of Carnegie Corporation's Board of Directors:
1) Jared Cohon
2) John DeGioia
3) Marcia McNutt
4) Judy Woodruff
For the Carnegie Corporation, it will greatly increase our chances of having our proposal considered if we have a point of contact. Would you be willing to put us in touch with one of the people above, or to directly send an e-mail letting them EcoHealth Alliance will be submitting an application? Any and all leads would be greatly appreciated. Best, Tara
Tara Hoda Development Associate EcoHealth Alliance
I’m on a panel on biothreats…National Press Club, Washington, DC, Monday afternoon April 30…along with a roster of DoD, CIA, DHS, and other assorted luminaries. Anything I should say or comment on regarding EcoHealth, Peter?

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

Mrs. Morris Hadley, another civic leader, whose husband was one-time head of the Carnegie Foundation and is now head of the CIA conduit Rubicon Foundation. Through his membership in the law firm of Milbank, Tween, Hadley, and McCloy he has close association with John J. McCloy, once chairman of the board of Chase Manhattan Bank, former chairman of the Ford Foundation, past president of the World Bank, past U.S. High Commissioner to Germany and chairman of the board of the New York International House, a Rockefeller-backed institution dedicated to making the foreign student feel at home.
I think that many of EcoHealth Alliance's initiatives would dovetail well with Carnegie Corporation's International Peace and Security area of interest. EcoHealth Alliance's President, Dr. Peter Daszak, is the chair of the National Academies of Sciences' Forum on Microbial Threats, a member of the NRC Advisory Committee to the US Global Change Research Program, and has advised the Director for Medical Preparedness Policy on the White House National Security Staff on global health issues. He is also actively involved in the W.H.O. Expert group on Public Health Emergency Disease Prioritization.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the “Statement” Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”
ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

Ecohealth Alliance integrates innovative science-based solutions and partnerships that increase capacity to achieve two interrelated goals: protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases and safeguarding ecosystems by promoting conservation. USAID PREDICT EMERGING PANDEMIC THREAT PROGRAM - assesses capacity and develops plans for the implementation of wildlife surveillance support. They develop models of disease risk and spread, implement a smart (strategic, measurable, adaptive, responsive, and targeted) wildlife surveillance strategy to identify and target high-risk wildlife in the region's most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dept of Defense - serological bio surveillance for spillover of henipa viruses and filo viruses at agricultural and hunting human-animal interfaces in peninsular Malaysia. The objective is to enhance capacity within the Malaysia government to characterize the distribution of and detect spillover of novel and known henipa viruses and filo viruses, (both groups include high consequence zoonotic pathogens) in indigenous populations and farms in peninsular Malaysia. Current surveillance strategies for novel zoonotic viruses rely exclusively on molecular detection tools, but Nipah and Ebola viruses are present at low prevalence in bat species which makes infected individuals difficult to detect. By establishing a multiplexed serological assay developed to detect antibodies against any henipa and filo viruses, the government of Malaysia will more effectively be able to determine the distribution of these high-impact viruses in wildlife reservoirs and detect evidence of spillover in at-risk human or livestock populations. The most comprehensive investigation of the epidemiology and ecolog of the RVF virus ever conducted. The project brings together a diverse group of experts from governmental, non-governmental, academic and private organizations, both domestic and international. the 2010-2011 outbreak of RVF in south Africa had a significant impact on the health of people, animals and the local economy. Thus, a better, more integrated understanding of the virus in the environment and in animal and human populations is critically needed to improve public awareness. a booklet explaining the risks of RVF and similar diseases was developed for distribution to study participants in the region. Rather than being a collection of independent science projects, this one health project integrates data collected from climate and weather, vegetation cycles, and mosquito studies to better predict outbreaks in South Africa. Evidence of RVF in animals and people is being collected to better understand exposure, with groups of people in occupations with high risk for rvf and flocks of sheep will be followed for approximately four years. the work is centered in the free state and northern cape provinces and includes the epicenter of previous RVF outbreaks within the 40,000km2 study region. Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development. Dr. Daszak’s research has been instrumental in identifying and predicting the impact of emerging diseases across the globe. His achievements include identifying the bat origin of SARS, identifying the underlying drivers of Nipah and Hendra virus emergence, producing the first ever global emerging disease hotspots map, developing a strategy to find out how many unknown viruses exist that could threaten to become pandemic, identifying the first case of a species extinction due to disease, and discovering the disease chytridiomycosis as the cause global amphibian declines.
PREDICT is a consortium or partners working to enable global surveillance for pathogens that can spillover from animal hosts to people by building capacities to detect and discover viruses of pandemic potential. The project is part of USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats program and is led by the UC Davis One Health Institute. The core partners are USAID, EcoHealth Alliance, Metabiota Inc., Wildlife Conservation Society, and Smithsonian Institution, along with a network of scientists and professionals in over 30 countries around the world. Contact us at predict@ucdavis.edu.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13618543

W.H.O.

GUIDESTAR NON-PROFIT REPORT

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/updates
Kaspar Sebastian Bohdan Daszak is 20 years old and lives in an apartment in Stockholm. He lives with John Ramstedt. BORN 8/27/2000. John or Peter Daszak's son? His home is valued at $1,627,859.80 United States Dollars
https://www.hitta.se/kaspar+daszak/stockholm/person/VgPwmnoooK

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

THE FRENCH HELP WIV BUILD THE LEVEL 4 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB DESPITE DUAL USE CONCERNS
THE PROXIMITY FACTOR
PATIENT ZERO
TEXAS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN BED WITH WIV THANKS TO FAUCI GRANT

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

SHI ZHENG LI CREATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY
BATLADY MAKE BIG MISTAKE: SHE DID IT IN A LEVEL 2 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB, AND IT LEAKED OR SOMEONE GOT INFECTED IN THE LAB AND BROUGHT THE VIRUS BACK HOME.
SHI ZHENG LI WORK AT THE TIME OF OUTBREAK INVOLVED STUDYING CORONA VIRUSES ALMOST IDENTICAL TO SARS Co-V-2
SHI ZHENG LI CHRONOLOGY SHOWS SHE HAS A FINGER IN EVERY CORONA VIRUS EXPERIMENT
SHI ZHENG LI POST SARS-CoV-2 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE
DESTRUCTION OF SARS-COV-2 SAMPLES
THE INTERVIEW WITH THE BAT LADY "COVID IS PUNISHMENT FOR AN UNSANITARY LIFESTYLE"
2018 SHI ZHENG LI WAS CREATING SYNTHETIC VIRUSES
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS IN UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL LAB PRODUCED NOVEL VIRUS MORE DEADLY TO OLDER PEOPLE JUST LIKE SARS-CoV-2 AND STIR DEBATE ABOUT GoF RESEARCH CAUSING A PANDEMIC 2020: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SL-SHC014-MA15: MAN MADE VIRUS WHICH USES ACE2 RECEPTOR

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS SYNTHESIZING VIRUSES THAT ATTACK ACE2 RECEPTORS IN HUMANS WERE PRECURSORS TO CREATION OF SARS-CoV-2
2015: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SARS: CREATION OF A VIRUS THAT CAN USE ACE2 AS RECEPTOR

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

NEW YORK TIMES 9/20/2020 CHINA VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE
THE AUSTRIAN STUDY: IS CONSIDERING A GENETIC-MANIPULATION ORIGIN FOR SARS-COV-2 A CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT MUST BE CENSORED? ROSSANA SEGRETO UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY
PASSAGING
THE NORWEGIAN STUDY
SIR RICHARD DEARLOVE FORMER MI-5 DIRECTOR SUPPORTS NORWEGIAN STUDY
UNIQUE NEW FEATURE OF SARS-CoV-2 CALLED "UNEXPECTED INSERTION"
SHING HEI ZHAN, BENJAMIN E. DEVERMAN AND YUJIA ALINA CHAN, “SARS-COV-2 IS WELL ADAPTED FOR HUMANS
HUMAN ENGINEERING OF A POLYBASIC HA CLEAVAGE SITE MUTANT WAS EASILY ACCOMPLISHED

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

RICHARD EBRIGHT: THESE EXPERIMENTS HAS GOTS TO GO!

THE WET MARKET

VIRUS WAS NEVER FOUND IN ANIMALS AT THE WET MARKET OR ANYWHERE ELSE
THE PANGOLINS DID IT
CHICOM RE-ACTION DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN
BOLTON AND TRUMP PAVE THE WAY FOR THE PANDEMIC

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

NEW WHO JUNKET
WHO DISPUTES THE FACT THE VIRUS LINGERS IN THE AIR INDOORS, INFECTING THOSE NEARBY.
CCP PROPAGANDA

Table of Contents

DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN DASZAK, WAS A NAZI DEATH CAMP GUARD

FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN

DOCTOR "MENGELE" DASZAK

FOR ECO-FASCISTS - COVID-19 "NATURE IS HEALING"

FAUCI TRUSTS THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

WHY DID AN OILY BUBBLE OF GENES JUST ABOUT 100 NANOMETERS IN DIAMETER (A TRILLION WEIGH LESS THAN A RAINDROP) FIRST SURFACE IN WUHAN, CHINA?

"THE BAT LADY" IS A WEIRDO

YOUNG BAT LADY

THE SMOKING GUN DOCUMENT

DASZAK EXPLORES THE LAB LEAK THEORY

Dr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation." Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment

EARLIER EXPERIMENTS INVOLVED THE SPIKE PROTEINS WHICH ARE THE KEYS TO INVADING THE HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

ECO-FASCIST DASZAK FINANCED WIV GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WITH YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY

THE PANDEMIC WAS CREATED BY DASZAK, AN ECO-FASCIST, TO CUT DOWN ON HUMAN POPULATION GROWTH THAT'S DESTROYING NATURE

THE MISSING COMPONENT: DASZAK'S IMPLICIT RACISM

THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AND THIS WEBPAGE IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY

DASZAK WAS A BLOODY SUCCESS

THE MONSTER MOVIE

CHINESE-AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK TWEETS

HAVING DASZAK AS A W.H.O INVESTIGATOR WAS LIKE HAVING AL CAPONE SIT ON ON THE CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION.

FAUCI'S INVOLVMENT IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

FIRE FAUCI AND REPLACE HIM WITH FORMER FDA HEAD Dr. SCOTT GOTTLIEB

Dr. FAUCI, WHO APPROVED DASZAK'S GRANTS, SUDDENLY WANTS ANOTHER INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IF HE SAID HE DIDN'T WANT ONE SUSPICION WOULD FALL ON HIM

FAUCI PROPONENT OF GoF / GoT OPPOSES GoF / BAN IN WASHINGTON POST AND DEFENDS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS

BENEFITS AND RISKS OF INFLUENZA RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED ANTHONY S. FAUCI, FRANCIS S. COLLINS

FAUCI SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT

THE LANCET QUESTIONS DASZAK'S OBJECTIVITY "ADDENDUM: COMPETING INTERESTS AND THE ORIGINS OF SARS-COV-2"

DASZAK WAS DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN RECOMBINANT EXPERIMENTS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS INVOLVED RECOMBINANT BAT CORONAVIRUSES / NOVEMBER 30, 2017:"DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS"

MANY OF THESE GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED WITH VIRUSES FOUND IN HORSESHOE BATS - CLOSE RELATIVES TO THE SARS-CoV-19 VIRUS

DASZAK'S METHODOLOGY RELIED ON GAIN-OF-THREAT, GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

DASZAK PLAYED ON THE BENEFICENT MOTIVATION OF MOST SCIENTISTS WHO CONDUCT GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS

ProGoFer's and Anti-GoFers

THE CRITICS OF GoF/GoT PREDICTED IT WOULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC

DAVID RELMAN STANFORD UNIVERSITY MICROBIOLOGIST

MICROBIOLOGIST JONATHAN LATHAM

DR. RICHARD EBRIGHT OPPOSES BARIC'S GoF EXPERIMENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AND WIV

DASZAK'S CRIMINAL LIABILITY

DR. DASZAK'S BOGUS FAMILY BACKGROUND: "PETER COTTINGTON DASZAK" IS NOT HIS REAL NAME

DASZAK IS UNQUALIFIED FOR MICROBIOLOGY

DASZAK INTERVIEW DECEMBER 2019

PETER DASZAK TALKS ABOUT HIS EARLY YEARS

DASZAK'S BOGUS C.V.

THE GRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY STEMMY AND FAUCI

BEFORE THE CORONA VIRUS OUTBREAK IN 2019 THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION, GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED IN BSL-2 LAB

FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LABORATORY MODIFICATION

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2. IN SILICO COMPARISON OF SPIKE PROTEIN-ACE2 BINDING AFFINITIES ACROSS SPECIES; SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THE SARS-COV-2 VIRUS

THE BINDING ENERGY BETWEEN SARS-COV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN AND ACE2 WAS HIGHEST FOR HUMANS OUT OF ALL SPECIES TESTED

THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LAB CREATION GAIN-OF-THREAT INSERTIONS AT POLYBASIC FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE PRRA IS EVIDENCE VIRUS WAS MODIFIED FOR INCREASED INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENICITY - DR. RONEN SHEMESH

ARGININE / FURIN

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT MADE A COVID-19, THAT OCCURRED IN NATURE, MORE TRANSMITTABLE AND MORE LETHAL

LASTING AFTER EFFECTS UNLIKE OTHER CORONA VIRUSES

CHRONOLOGY

HIGH RECOMBINATION AND MUTATION RATES IN MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS SUGGEST THAT CORONAVIRUSES MAY BE POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT EMERGING VIRUSES

REVERSE GENETICS WITH A FULL-LENGTH INFECTIOUS CDNA OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

2002-2004 THE WIV SCIENTISTS BEGAN COLLECTING BAT VIRUS SINCE THE SARS-1 OUTBREAK

DEVELOPMENT OF MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS MHV AND SARS-COV INFECTIOUS CDNA CONSTRUCTS (BARIC)

COMPOSITIONS OF CORONAVIRUSES WITH A RECOMBINATION-RESISTANT GENOME (BARIC)

REVIEW OF BATS AND SARS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS - GoT

SHI ZHENGLI: DIFFERENCE IN RECEPTOR USAGE BETWEEN SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME (SARS) CORONAVIRUS AND SARS-LIKE CORONAVIRUS OF BAT ORIGIN

PETER DASZAK: RISK OF VIRAL EMERGENCE FROM BATS (DASZAK)

RON FOUCHIER, EARLY GAIN-OF-THREAT "SCIENTIST CREATED AN AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS IN FAVOR OF SHARING H5N1 VIRUS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

W.H.O. CONCERNED THAT NEW H5N1 INFLUENZA RESEARCH COULD UNDERMINE THE 2011 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA PFREPAREDNESS FRAMEWORK

THE PAPER DESCRIBING HOW THE LETHAL H5N1 BIRD FLU COULD BE MADE EASIER TO SPREAD WAS PUBLISHED SIX MONTHS AFTER A SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD SUGGESTED THAT THE PAPERS’ MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DATA BE CENSORED.

FOUCHIER EXPLAINED HOW EASY IT WAS TO CREATE AN AIRBORNE AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS USING GAIN-OF-THREAT TECHNOLOGY

US-CHINA ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP; KUNMING, CHINA

BATS AS ANIMAL RESERVOIRS FOR THE SARS CORONAVIRUS: HYPOTHESIS PROVED AFTER 10 YEARS OF VIRUS HUNTING VIROLOGICA SINICA

NIAD AND HIH GRANTS

ONE OF SEVERAL NEAR FATAL ERRORS THAT TRIGGERED THE GoF / GOT BAN INVOLVED H5N1 INFLUENZA VIRUS

OBAMA BANS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH IN US

DOING DILIGENCE TO ASSESS THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF LIFE SCIENCES GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT OUTSOURCED TO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AFTER AMERICA BANS IT AS TOO DANGEROUS

UNDERSTANDING THE RISK OF BAT CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCE (DASZAK)

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CHIMERIC CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS (BARIC)

SPILLOVER AND PANDEMIC PROPERTIES OF ZOONOTIC VIRUSES WITH HIGH HOST PLASTICITY (DASZAK)

SARS-LIKE WIV1-COV POISED FOR HUMAN EMERGENCE / SHI ZHENGLI AND BARIC CO-AUTHORS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE ARGUMENT IS ESSENTIALLY A RERUN OF THE DEBATE OVER WHETHER TO ALLOW LAB RESEARCH THAT INCREASES THE VIRULENCE, EASE OF SPREAD OR HOST RANGE OF DANGEROUS PATHOGENS — WHAT IS KNOWN AS ‘GAIN-OF-FUNCTION’ RESEARCH.

2015 ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT OF PROPOSED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

As with all life sciences research involving pathogens, GOF studies entail inherent biosafety and biosecurity risks. GOF research involving the generation of pathogens with pandemic potential involves the greatest risks. A laboratory accident involving such a pathogen could potentially release a pathogen that could spread rapidly and efficiently through the human population.

BAT SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME-LIKE CORONAVIRUS WIV1 ENCODES AN EXTRA ACCESSORY PROTEIN, ORFX, INVOLVED IN MODULATION OF THE HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE (BARIC, SHI ZHENGLI)

EFFICIENT REVERSE GENETIC SYSTEMS FOR RAPID GENETIC MANIPULATION OF EMERGENT AND PREEMERGENT INFECTIOUS CORONAVIRUSES

INSIDE THE CHINESE LAB POISED TO STUDY WORLD'S MOST DANGEROUS PATHOGENS MAXIMUM-SECURITY BIOLAB IS PART OF PLAN TO BUILD NETWORK OF BSL-4 FACILITIES ACROSS CHINA

BAT CAVE SOLVES MYSTERY OF DEADLY SARS VIRUS — AND SUGGESTS NEW OUTBREAK COULD OCCUR: CHINESE SCIENTISTS FIND ALL THE GENETIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF SARS IN A SINGLE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE BATS.

NOVEMBER 2017 DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS

TRUMP LIFTS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT BAN

BSL-4 OPENS AT WIV JANUARY 19, 2018

NIH LIFTS FUNDING PAUSE ON GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

THE STATE DEPARTMENT CABLES INDICATE A LACK OF TRAINED TECHNICIANS AT WIV

BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

WANG YANYI

WUHAN LAB CHIEF WANG YANYI DISPUTES APRIL 2018 WIV NATURE ARTICLE

THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY VIRUS DATABASE WAS TAKEN OFFLINE

LACK OF CELL PHONE ACTIVITY AT WIV

ROAD BLOCKS AROUND WIV

FINANCING SHI ZHENGLI'S GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WAS PART OF THE PREDICT PROGRAM AND THAT IS WHY IT WAS SHUT DOWN

PATIENTS ZERO

DASZAK'S EMAIL'S DELETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2019 AND JANUARY 2020

FEDERAL OFFICIALS ENDED A MORATORIUM IMPOSED THREE YEARS AGO ON FUNDING RESEARCH THAT ALTERS GERMS TO MAKE THEM MORE LETHAL

EARLY W.H.O. REPORT

DASZAK WORKED CLOSELY WITH ZHENG-LI SHI WHEN SARS-CoV-19 SURFACED

THE BAT LADY WANTED TO CALL HER VIRUS TARS

RECTIFICATION OF LAB THAT MAPPED GENOME

WIV WAS CALLING IN OUTSIDERS TO HELP WITH BIOSAFETY

DASZAK CLAIMS HE WARNED THE WORLD ABOUT COVID

ZHENG-LI SHI: A PNEUMONIA OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW CORONAVIRUS OF PROBABLE BAT ORIGIN

NEW BIOSECURITY LAW DECREEDED IN CHINA

KRISTIAN ANDERSON STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATTING COVID-19

CHINESE ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT THE UNIQUE CORONA VIRUS WAS FOUND IN NATURE

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE CHINESE RESEARCHERS AT WIV WERE RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM THE GALVESTON NATIONAL LABORATORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AND OTHER U.S. ORGANIZATIONS, BUT THE CHINESE REQUESTED ADDITIONAL HELP

WHY CITE EXEMPTION FIVE?

TRUMP CUTS OFF FUNDS TO ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS ASKED THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY (NSABB) TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF ITS DEALINGS WITH THE WIV

WEIFENG SHI CLAIMS ANOMALOUS INSERTIONS CAN HAPPEN NATURALLY

TWO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY SCIENTISTS, XING-YI GE AND ZHENGLI-LI SHI, USE REVERSE GENETICS TO GENERATE A CHIMERICAL VIRUS CLOSELY RESEMBLING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS COVID-19

ORIGIN AND CROSS-SPECIES TRANSMISSION OF BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

POMPEO SAYS VIRUS WAS FROM LAB THEN WALKS IT BACK

TRUMP WANTED AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

TRUMP ENDS GRANT TO ECHO HEALTH ALLIANCE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GET ANONYMOUS GRANT FROM A CCP PUPPET

TRUMP PULLS USA OUT OF W.H.O.

NIH GRANT REINSTATED BUT THE MONEY CAN'T BE SUB-AWARDED TO THE WIV

TRUMP WANTS TO FORM A COMMISSION TO LOOK INTO THE WIV LAB LEAK

CHI COM AGENT OF INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK HEADED THE W.HO. TEAM THAT SUGGESTED COVID-19 ORIGINATED IN BARCELONA AND ENTERED CHINA VIA FROZEN MEAT

THE BARCELONA BEEF THEORY W.H.O. LEGITIMATIZED

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: HOW THE W.H.O.'S HUNT FOR COVID'S ORIGINS STUMBLED IN CHINA

ACCORDING TO W.H.O.'S REPORT DASZAK'S JOINT INTERNATIONAL TEAM EXAMINED FOUR SCENARIOS:

THE W.H.O. TEAM PUSHES THE PREPOSTEROUS THEORY THAT THE VIRUS WAS SPREAD TO HUMANS IN SHIPMENTS OF FROZEN FOODS FROM SPAIN

THE COVID IN SPAIN WAS NOT FOUND IN THE DRAIN

EVIDENCE FOR THE EARLY OCCURRENCE OF SARS-COV-2 FROM OTHER STUDIES

THE FROZEN FOOD THEORY LACKS ONE THING - THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN COVID CASES IN BARCELONA, SPAIN, BEFORE THE ONES IN HUNAN BROKE OUT

TYPE OF GOODS DEALT BY ENVIRONMENTAL POSITIVE STALLS / RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE COLD CHAIN IN 2019

THE PERSISTENCE OF LIVE SARS-COV-2 IN ENVIRONMENTS RELATED TO THE COLD-CHAIN / EXAMPLES OF INTRODUCTION OF COVID-19 INTO CHINA THROUGH IMPORTED COLD CHAIN PRODUCTS

CONCLUSIONS

THE HUNAN MARKET ORIGIN THEORY DEBUNKED BY W.H.O.

W.H.O.- INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

EXPLANATION OF HYPOTHESIS

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ARGUMENTS AGAINST INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD

HIGHLIGHTS FROM SHORT W.H.O. REPORT

W.H.O. REPORT IS A BIG NOTHING BURGER

USG REJECTS WHO INVESTIGATION

WALL STREET JOURNAL: SCIENTISTS REJECT COVID-COVER-UP ORCHESTRATED BY DASZAK

INVESTIGATE THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

FRANK COLLINS CLAIMS NEITHER NIH NOR NIAID HAVE EVER APPROVED ANY GRANT THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH ON CORONAVIRUSES THAT WOULD HAVE INCREASED THEIR TRANSMISSIBILITY OR LETHALITY FOR HUMANS

STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

CCP MOUTHPIECE GLOBAL TIMES: US INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION OF CORONAVIRUS ORIGINS EXPOSES ITS FOUR ‘ACHILLES HEELS’: GLOBAL TIMES EDITORIAL

RALPH BARIC'S ROLE IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

BARIC WAS CONDUCTING SARS RESEARCH BEFORE A 2003 OUTBREAK IN CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

BARIC'S LAB LEAKED IN 2003 AND CAUSED A MINOR EPIDEMIC IN NORTH CAROLINA

HOW CAN YOU HAVE SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS AND NOT HAVE SARS?

GAIN OF FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH INVOLVES CREATION OF RECOMINANT VIRUS IN UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA IN COLLABORATION WITH SCIENTISTS FROM WIV

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 9, 2015

BARIC'S LAB RAT BITES STUDENT

REDACTIONS OF BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS

BARIC SUPPORTS THE ZOONOTIC THEORY BECAUSE HE PLAYED A PART IN STARTING THE PANDEMIC DUE TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH WIV SCIENTISTS

TRUMP-FUELED SUSPICION OF WUHAN LAB ENSNARES NEW YORK NONPROFIT RESEARCHING BAT CORONAVIRUSES

ANTHONY FAUCHI EMAILS

THE ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GRANTS

SAM HUSSEINI: PETER DASZAK'S ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE HAS HIDDEN ALMOST $40 MILLION IN PENTAGON FUNDING AND MILITARIZED PANDEMIC SCIENCE

THE PREDICT PROGRAM WAS A CON JOB AND FAILURE: IT HAS BEEN ALLEGED THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THE GRANT MONEY WAS HIDDEN AWAY BY DASZAK FOR HIS OWN USE

ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE STAFF AND DUPES

SOME OF USAID/CIA ECO-HEALTH PREDICT CREW

Executives Listed on Filing

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

RmYN02 FURIN

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

ADDENDUM

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK EMAILS

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

W.H.O.

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

THE WET MARKET

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

OWN USE

ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE STAFF AND DUPES

SOME OF USAID/CIA ECO-HEALTH PREDICT CREW

Executives Listed on Filing

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

RmYN02 FURIN

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

ADDENDUM

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK EMAILS

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

W.H.O.

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

THE WET MARKET

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

CULCULCAN · Sep 9, 2021

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

Dr. William B. Karesh is the Executive Vice President for Health and Policy at EcoHealth Alliance. He serves as the president of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Working Group on Wildlife Diseases and also chairs the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Wildlife Health Specialist Group, a network of wildlife and health experts around the world. Dr. Karesh also serves on the World Health Organization's (W.H.O.) International Health Regulations Roster of Experts focused on the human-animal interface and wildlife health. Currently, Dr. Karesh is the EPT Partner Liaison for the USAID Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT-2 program, a >$120 million effort focused on predicting and preventing pandemic diseases. He is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Armine Arustamyan California Intercontinental University Degree Name Doctoral Field Of Study Business Administration Dates attended or expected graduation2010 – 2014 Activities and Societies: Global Business Leadership American University of Armenia Degree NameMaster's Degree Field Of Study System Management and Industrial Engineering Dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1997 Yerevan State University Degree Name Master Field Of Study Science in Physics Dates attended or expected graduation1987 – 1992

Leilani Francisco PhD MA PMP The Johns Hopkins University Degree Name Ph.D. Field Of Study International Public Health University of Maryland College Park Degree Name B.A. Field Of Study Sociocultural Anthropology University of South Florida Degree Name M.A.Field Of Study Applied Medical Anthropology

Dr. Epstein received a PhD in Disease Ecology from Kingston University, London and his DVM and MPH from Tufts University. A veterinarian and disease ecologist, Dr. Jonathan Epstein is the Vice President for Science and Outreach at EcoHealth Alliance. His research focuses on the ecology of emerging zoonotic viruses such as Nipah and Ebola virus, along with SARS, Midde East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and others that have emerged within Asia and Africa.

Evelyn Luciano Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA)Field Of StudyHuman Resources Management and Services Certificate Dates attended or expected graduation2003 – 2003 Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA) Field Of Study Counseling Psychology dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1999 Community Mental Health and School Counseling Catholic University of Puerto Rico Degree Name BSN Field Of Study Bachelor of Science In Nursing Grade BSN Dates attended or expected graduation1975 – 1979

Dr. Ellen Carlin DVM is Assistant Research Professor at the Center for Global Health Science and Security, with a primary faculty appointment within the Department of Microbiology and Immunology. Her research interests are in the epidemiology of emerging infections. She studies incidence and transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens, focusing on the interfaces among people, animals, and the environments in which they live. She was Senior Professional Staff with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security (Peter T. King, NY), where for more than five years she handled medical preparedness, biodefense, and science and technology policy. At Georgetown, Ellen is also the director of the Global Infectious Disease graduate program at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Aleksei Chmura: Experienced Chief Of Staff with a demonstrated history of working in the non-profit organization management industry. Skilled in Nonprofit Organizations, Environmental Science, Research, Community Outreach, and Budgeting. Strong administrative professional with a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Biology/Biological Sciences, General from Kingston University. Kingston University is ranked 581 in QS World University Rankings by TopUniversities and enjoys a poor reputation.

Anthony Ramos: Former Senior Director Marketing and Development at EcoHealth Alliance Former Director of Marketing at Schneider Associates Studied Classic Culinary Arts at The French Culinary Institute Studied International relations at Boston University Lives in Lake, Michigan.

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

DASZAK: I'm in charge of in the organization in China...So the point is to establish capabilities in other countries not just take specimens from them and bring them back... that's the strategy and you know this the old adage that if you teach people how to do it, give them the tools then you've really made a difference. The money always dries up and this is something we've seen in the nonprofit world. You get great funding for five years from the foundation they always shift priorities because that's what emerged they closed them down. We have our staff in countries. We have sub contracts through local universities or agencies in-country and we have contracts to do work and it's all collaborative science so people love to interact on collaborative science. You know what I found especially in places like China where increasingly there's a paranoia around collaboration. Science collaboration is open and transparent because of the nature of what you're trying to do you're trying to discover stuff quickly, understand what it means, publish it in high-impact journal, and that drives openness and transparency and that's been great for us around the world it's also great for the U.S. and that's we really need to push that agenda. I think publishing is a very interesting mechanism you have to publish that's the argument we use.

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

Daszak is a double agent who CIA thought was working for them but had been rolled over by the Chinese Communist Party because his father was a Nazi War Criminal, a death camp guard, who taught him to respect authoritarian governments. Daszak became a W.H.O. & Lancet inspector. A good place to be to cover-up for the Chinese and himself after he funneled money to the WIV and to the Bat Lady experiments which resulted in COVID-19 being created. And there is the question of how much money was siphoned off by Daszak?

Daszak: “I’ve seen incredible efforts from everything from [religious sect] Falun Gong to the [Chinese dissident] Miles Guo camp, Steve Bannon’s group pushing the conspiracy theories around China. It’s useful to them. They’re funding it and pushing it and science has been to some extent caught up in that to other instances absolutely crushed by it. We’ve not had access to work in China on the origins for the last 12 months, which is ironic because we could have been on the ground there working with our Chinese colleagues and by now we could have found some really important answers. The rhetoric has held that up. We need that communication [with the Chinese] in an outbreak to learn from them how they control it so we can control it better. It's sad to say, but it will probably cost lives. By sort of narrow-mindedly focusing in on ourselves, or on labs, or on certain cultural politics, we miss the real enemy.”
Daszag was a prime target of Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP via EcoHealth. He parrots the Party Line. But he also was co-opted by the CIA until Trump cut his funds off. ECOHEALTH is a think tank put together by the AID CIA LITE that was supposed to protect America from Pandemics by keeping an eye on bats. But ECOHEALTH began to subsidize Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat experiments at WIV and a recombinant virus leaked from the lab into the streets of Wuhan then into the market and out again. Was it coincidence that SARSCov2 started close to WIV? Just how close the Chinese won't say as they refuse to give out the address of patient zero.

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

"THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER DONORS WHO FUNDED OR COLLABORATED ON CIVILIAN RESEARCH AT THE WIV HAVE A RIGHT AND OBLIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY OF OUR RESEARCH FUNDING WAS DIVERTED TO SECRET CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS AT THE WIV." US EMBASSY FACT SHEET

The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior Researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. Accidental infections in labs have caused several previous virus outbreaks in China and elsewhere, Including a 2004 SARS outbreak in Beijing that infected nine people, killing one. The CCP has prevented independent journalists, investigators, and global health authorities from interviewing researchers at the WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry into the origin of the virus must include interviews with these researchers and a full accounting of their previously unreported illness. Starting in at least 2016 – and with no indication of a stop prior to the COVID-19 outbreak – WIV researchers conducted experiments involving RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). The WIV became a focal point for international coronavirus research after the 2003 SARS outbreak and has since studied animals including mice, bats, and pangolins. The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus, including “RaTG13,” which it sampled from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like illness. W.H.O. investigators must have access to the records of the WIV’s work on bat and other coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak. As part of a thorough inquiry, they must have a full accounting of why the WIV altered and then removed online records of its work with RaTG13 and other viruses.
Secrecy and non-disclosure are standard practice for Beijing. For many years the United States has publicly raised concerns about China’s past biological weapons work, which Beijing has neither documented nor demonstrably eliminated, despite its clear obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention. Today’s revelations just scratch the surface of what is still hidden about COVID-19’s origin in China. Any credible investigation into the origin of COVID-19 demands complete, transparent access to the research labs in Wuhan, including their facilities, samples, personnel, and records. As the world continues to battle this pandemic – and as W.H.O. investigators begin their work, after more than a year of delays – the virus’s origin remains uncertain. The United States will continue to do everything it can to support a credible and thorough investigation, including by continuing to demand transparency on the part of Chinese authorities.Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The United States and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

The United States has repeatedly called for a transparent and thorough investigation into the origin of COVID-19. Understanding the origin of this pandemic is essential for global public health, economic recovery, and international security. To assist the vital work of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) investigative team that arrived in China this week, the United States government is today sharing new information concerning the activities inside China’s government laboratories in 2019. In particular, we urge the W.H.O. to press the government of China to address the following: Illnesses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV): The United States government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. WIV Research on “RaTG13” and “gain-of-function”: Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers studied RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). Since the outbreak, the WIV has not been transparent nor consistent about its work with RaTG13 or other similar viruses, including possible “gain-of-function” experiments to enhance transmissibility or lethality. Secret WIV Links to Military Research: Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The COVID-19 pandemic was avoidable. Any responsible country would have invited world health investigators to Wuhan within days of an outbreak. China instead refused offers of help – including from the United States – and punished brave Chinese doctors, scientists, and journalists who tried to alert the world to the dangers of the virus. Beijing continues today to withhold vital information that scientists need to protect the world from this deadly virus, and the next one. The United States reiterates the importance of unfettered access to virus samples, lab records and personnel, eyewitnesses, and whistleblowers to ensure the credibility of the W.H.O.’s final report. Until the CCP allows a full and thorough accounting of what happened in Wuhan, it is only a matter of time until China births another pandemic and inflicts it on the Chinese people, and the world.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/ensurin...-investigation-of-covid-19s-origin/index.html

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

Baric taught SHI ZHENGLI all she knows about virus creation at the University of North Carolina. Collwell is focused on oceans. Saif is a vet. Hume Field and rest work for the bio-war criminal, Daszak!
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, who has been working in China for 15 years studying diseases that jump from animals to people, said, “We don’t know the source yet, but there’s pretty strong evidence that this is a bat origin coronavirus.” He said, “It’s probably going to be the Chinese horseshoe bat,” a common species that weighs up to an ounce.

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

But zoonoses fall into a gray area, and the 2003 monkeypox outbreak in the Midwest is a perfect example of what can go wrong, said Peter Daszak, director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine at the Wildlife Trust, a group specializing in human-animal diseases. The disease, related to smallpox but less deadly, arrived in a shipment of 18 Gambian giant pouched rats imported for a Chicago pet store, where they infected prairie dogs. By summer's end, there were 37 confirmed human cases -- none fatal, but some scary -- mostly among prairie-dog owners. Millions of live animals come into the country each year, and very few have really good surveillance," Dr. Daszak said. "Fish and Wildlife checks cargoes to see if they have endangered species, but it's the U.S.D.A. that does health checks, and they don't go unless it's an agricultural product, so the pet trade tends to get a pass." "The C.D.C. does a great job with outbreak investigation, but that's after the fact," he said of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "After monkeypox, they put a blanket ban on rodents from some West African countries. But who's looking at rodents from other places? Nobody. And that's a gap."
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/us/sentries-in-us-seek-early-signs-of-an-avian-flu.html

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

It is likely, the study found, that one of these "SARS-like" viruses evolved into the SARS virus at an exotic animal marketplace, where it infected civets, which, in turn, infected humans, according to Michael Farzan, a Harvard Medical School assistant professor who was not involved in the research. But why did this happen when it did? One intriguing possibility is that it is linked to China's economic boom, according to Peter Daszak, a co-author of the SARS paper who is executive director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. With the newfound wealth there, he said, animal markets have grown as more people can afford fresh animal meat. As the markets grow, so do the chances that a virus will jump from one species to the next.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/26/health/blaming-bats-when-man-may-be-culprit.html

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

The flu that is moving through humans appears to have a combination of genes from two normally separate sets of pigs, those from the Americas and from Eurasia, scientists say. However, it is unknown how those pigs met, and there is not yet any genetic proof that this particular flu was ever in a pig. Peter Daszak, president of the Wildlife Trust, found records showing that Mexico imported two pigs from France in 2007, the United States imported a few from Britain and Ireland, and Canada imported hundreds from Europe. “And surely this isn’t the whole truth,” he said. “There must be a hidden illegal trade.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/health/01origin.html

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

“By mapping encroachment into the forest you can predict where the next disease could emerge,” Dr. Daszak, EcoHealth’s president, says. “So we’re going to the edge of villages, we’re going to places where mines have just opened up, areas where new roads are being built. We are going to talk to people who live within these zones and saying, ‘what you are doing is potentially a risk.’”
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-ecology-of-disease.html

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

Peter Daszak, a parasitologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, has even put a number on it: 5.3 new ones each year, based on a study using data from 1940 to 2004. He and his co-authors blamed population growth, deforestation, antibiotic overuse, factory farming, live animal markets, bush meat hunting, jet travel and other factors.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/health/new-tools-to-hunt-new-viruses.htm

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

It was the darkest hour since the new illness, known as Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, first appeared in Saudi Arabia late in 2012. In all, more than 700 cases have been documented in 20 countries, nearly all of them linked to Saudi Arabia. More than 250 people have died. King Abdullah fired the country’s health minister and his deputy in April, leaving experts wondering whether the shake-up would bring greater transparency and international cooperation. “In the U.S., when you have a crisis like the Veterans Administration scandal, the new head is in front of the TV cameras explaining what the new plan is,” said Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a veterinary organization that tracked the disease in animals. “There is no tradition of openness in Saudi Arabia.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/world/middleeast/flawed-saudi-response-fueled-outbreak-of-mers-middle-east-virus.htm

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

Daszak describes Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, as exactly the kind of threat that Disease X was meant to represent: a novel, highly infectious coronavirus, with a high mortality rate, and no existing treatment or prevention. “The problem isn’t that prevention was impossible,” Daszak told me. “It was very possible. But we didn’t do it. Governments thought it was too expensive. Pharmaceutical companies operate for profit.” And the W.H.O., for the most part, had neither the funding nor the power to enforce the large-scale global collaboration necessary to wit. Examples from several countries suggest that the Chinese vaccines may not be very effective at preventing the spread of the virus, particularly the new variants, but Daszak overlooks this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/magazine/pandemic-vaccine.html

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

We, the undersigned, are public health scientists who have closely followed the emergence of 2019-nCoV, and are deeply concerned about its impact on global health and well-being. We have watched as the scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable. We sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China who continue to save lives and protect global health during the challenge of this novel coronavirus outbreak. We are all in this together, with our Chinese counterparts in the forefront, against this new viral threat. The rapid, open and transparent sharing of data on 2019-nCoV is now being threatened by rumors and misinformation around the origins of this outbreak. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that 2019-nCoV does not have a natural origin. Scientists from multiple countries have published and analyzed 2019-nCoV genomes1, and they overwhelmingly conclude that this virus originated in wildlife, as have so many other emerging diseases. This is further supported by a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and by the scientific communities they represent. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumors, and prejudice that jeopardize our global collaboration in the fight against this virus. We support the call from the Director-General of the World Health Organization to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture13. We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus. We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the front-line!
Signatories
Dr. James Hughes, Professor Emeritus, Emory University School of Medicine
Dr. Rita Colwell, Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland College Park
Dr. Linda Saif, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University
Dr. Billy Karesh, Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Peter Daszak, President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Hume Field, Honorary Professor, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

When peterdaszak.com went online the first ones to become aware of it were the Chinese The CCP had an alert on their agent Peter Daszak. But by visiting the page they confirmed the fact he was a Chinese agent or agent of influence. Peter was a prime target for Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP. He parrots the Party Line. The Nazi ideas he learned from his father made him respect the Reds, who are sterilizing ethnic minorities like the Nazis did.

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

Communism found a receptive home in mainland China. The WIV is run by Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee CHANGCAI HE who was the chairman of the corporate trade union of Wuhan Branch from Jan. 2004 to Sep. 2013, and the Corporate Secretary of the Party at Wuhan Branch from Oct. 2005 to Jul. 2013. Since the Aug. of 2013, he has been the deputy director general of Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS. This CCP apparatchik runs the institute and if anyone steps out of line they are either imprisoned, sent to a "re-grooving" institute or killed.
Changcai HE: http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Directors2016

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

Academician Xi Chong Nanshan has already delivered a speech on TV. Wuhan New Coronavirus is not the true source of the virus. There are 5 new coronavirus series, ABCDE bat sleeve BAT (H52) and then mutates H53> The C family pathogens in China, with variants of C56 and MV2, spread throughout the world. But the United States had five major families of ABCDE two years ago, the US Government CDC (Center Disease of Control) Concealing the illness, when a military contest was held in Wuhan in November, two American soldiers went to the Wuhan Hospital in Hubei to catch a cold. It was the first hospital in Wuhan, China, which discovered a coronavirus transmission in early December (Golden Eagle) Tan Hospital and Wuhan Central Hospital). From this calculation, it should be that the US soldiers brought the virus into Wuhan in the Wuhan military competition, and the virus series H1 (referred to as the son) came to China. If China wants to check the origin of these two American blood sources, we can confirm the source. The US should have ABCDE two years ago (H13, H3, H1, H56, MV2) These five kinds of viruses have hundreds of pathogens in bats. Among them, the United States has mutated five kinds of pathogens. The United States has always been a stable fact. This is why the U.S. government is in a hurry to send them Americans back to the United States, and is afraid to find pathogens from Americans. In this way, the outbreak of the new coronavirus can rest on the Chinese. The viruses in the Middle East are MV2 and H56. No such virus has been detected in China. The seriously ill Iranians said that they had never been to China and had no Chinese friends, but had been to the United States. The world knows that many wealthy people in Middle Eastern countries buy properties in the United States, and their children are also studying in the United States. I am going to write this article today and spread it to the seven major media in the world. My title will read "Americans are the tumors of the world's viruses." The Washington Post published the title of the article last month, stating "Chinese are sick men of East Asia", the birthplace of the virus. I let the world see the hypocrisy, viciousness, loss of conscience, and the spread of the virus to people all over the world.

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world, that's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic."

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

COVID-19 has NOT been found in bats nor in any intermediate species. Peter Daszak insisits the virus jumped from an intermediate species to humans to cover up the fact that the virus' creation was financed by Eco-Health Alliance. Daszak used the CIA / USAID / PENTAGON money he didn't pocket to fund the project that was supposed to predict a SARS-like viral emergence with is bogus "PREDICT PROGRAM."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/14/health/WHO-covid-daszak-china-virus.html
Daszak reflected on the atmosphere in Wuhan and his first glimpse of the seafood market where the initial outbreak occurred last year, although it was not the site of the first cases. He also said the path ahead would be straightforward scientifically, but not politically. A transcript of the conversation, condensed and edited for length, follows:
James Gorman: You’ve been to China and to Wuhan many times before. How was this different?
DASZAK: Well, this was weird. There’s certain things when you go into China that you’re supposed to do. The first thing you do is have a meeting and then have a meal. And if you don’t have a meal, it’s considered extremely rude. This time we spent two weeks in Zoom calls from our quarantine hotel. Then we went to meet in person and still didn’t have meals with our host. We had meals in a separate room. So it was just a very difficult, very intense, very emotional trip. In Wuhan, there’s this feeling of post-traumatic shock. The city went on lockdown, I think, 76 days. They were locked in their apartments — people died, and they didn’t know about it. And from then on, they’ve been accused of starting a pandemic, and it’s been called the Wuhan virus, the China virus, and there was just a sense of outrage and sadness.
James Gorman: Did that make it difficult in terms of the scientific purpose of the trip?
DASZAK: No. You’ve got a task to do. You’ve volunteered. You know what it’s going to be like. You get caught up in the historical importance. I don’t know if we were the first foreigners to walk around the Huanan seafood market, which is blocked off even to Chinese citizens. The only people that have been in there have been the Chinese disease investigators. We met with the doctors that treated the first known Covid patients. ¹These people have been through harrowing conditions, and they’re now lauded as heroes in China, and then the rest of the world now is fighting that war. And China, of course, is absolutely petrified of this virus catching hold again. When you arrive at the airport, they come on the plane in full P.P.E.; you’re escorted down a separate quarantine pathway; you get tested. You’re driven to the hotel, you go in your room, and you’re locked in for two weeks. It’s just severe. The people who come to your door are in full P.P.E. The waste from your trash, from the hotel room, goes into a yellow bag with a biohazard sign on it. It was a totally different experience when I returned home, where I didn’t even get a notification that I’ve got to quarantine. I signed on to the New York state app, but no one is going to knock on my door and tell me, “Stay indoors.”
1. But Daszak didn't get their names. James Gorman:
Did you learn anything from this trip that you didn’t know before?
DASZAK: From Day 1, the data we were seeing were new that had never been seen outside China. Who were the vendors in the Huanan seafood market? Where did they get their supply chains? And what were the contacts of the first cases? How real were the first cases? What other clusters were there? When you asked for more, the Chinese scientists would go off, and a couple of days later, they’ve done the analysis, and we’ve got new information. It was extremely useful. At the time, you couldn’t really say much. We were trying to not undermine the process by revealing anything while we were on the trip.
James Gorman: What can you say now about the market and what you saw?
DASZAK: The market closed on the 31st of December 31, 2020 or January 1, 2021, and China C.D.C. sent a team in of scientists to try and find out what was going on. It was a very extensive study, swabbing every surface of this place. We knew early on that there were 500 samples collected, and there were many positives, and in that sampling were some animal carcasses, or meat. But there was not really much information publicly about what had been done. So we got all that information. And that, to me, was a real eye-opener. They’d actually done over 900 swabs in the end, a huge amount of work. They had been through the sewage system. They’d been into the air ventilation shaft to look for bats. They’d caught animals around the market. They’d caught cats, stray cats, rats, they even caught one weasel. They’d sampled snakes. People had live snakes at the market, live turtles, live frogs. Rabbits were there, rabbit carcasses. A farm with rabbits could have been really critical. There was talk about badgers, and in China, when they say badger, that means ferret badger. It’s a mustelid, related to weasels. Animals were coming into that market that could have carried the coronavirus. They could have been infected by bats somewhere else in China and brought it in. So that’s clue No. 1. There were 10 stalls that sold wildlife. There were vendors from South China, including Yunnan Province, Guangxi Province and Guangdong Province. Yunnan Province is where the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is found in bats. Guangxi and Guangdong are where the pangolins were captured. They had close viruses. You’ve got animals coming in to the market which are susceptible. Some of these are coming from places where we know the nearest relatives of the virus are found. So there’s the real red flag. Now the Chinese group did swab those animals, and they were all negative, but it’s just one small group of animals in the freezer that were left behind. We don’t know what else was for sale there. So these two clues are really important. When we got to actually visit the market, to me it was quite striking. The pictures you see of that market closed now are of quite orderly buildings with shutters, and you think, This a very efficient, typical city market. It doesn’t really look like a live animal market. Once you get there on the ground, it’s different. It’s pretty ramshackle. It looks like a place that would sell live animals. There’s plenty of evidence of live aquatic animals, the turtle tanks, the fish tanks, the snakes, which we know were available. What we now have are a clear link and a potential pathway.
James Gorman: What about the cases that appeared before the outbreak in the seafood market?
DASZAK: There was other spread going on outside of Huanan market. There are other patients who have no links to the market, quite a few in December. There were other markets. And we do know that some of the patients had links to other markets. We need to do some further work, and then the Chinese colleagues need to do some further work. When we sat down as a group, the China team and the W.H.O. team on the last full day of work, and said, “Let’s go through the hypotheses,” the one that received the most enthusiastic support was this pathway — wildlife, through a domesticated wildlife link, into Wuhan.
James Gorman: What is the next step?
DASZAK: For the animals chain, it’s straightforward. The suppliers are known. They know the farm name; they know the owner of the farm. You’ve got to go down to the farm and interview the farmer and the family. You’ve got to test them. You’ve got to test the community. You’ve got to go and look and see if there are any animals left at any farms nearby and see if they’ve got evidence of infection, and see if there is any cross-border movement. If the virus is in those southern border states, it’s possible that there’s been some movement across neighboring countries like Vietnam, Laos or Myanmar. We’re finding more and more related viruses now. There’s one in Japan and one in Cambodia, one in Thailand. For the human side, look for earlier cases, for clusters; look in blood banks for serum, if possible. Anything like this is going to be sensitive in China, and it’s going to take some persuasion and diplomacy and energy for them to do that because, to be honest, looking for the source of this virus within China is not a great, high priority I think for the Chinese government. Anywhere this virus is shown to emerge is a political issue. That’s one of the problems, and that is clear and obvious to anyone who has been looking at this.
James Gorman: Do you have a particular animal that you suspect right now as an intermediate link, more strongly than others?
DASZAK: IT’S TOO UP IN THE AIR. We don’t know if civets were on sale. We know they are very easily infected. We don’t know what the situation is with the mink farms in China or the other fur farms, like raccoon dogs, even though they’re normally farmed in a different part of China. That needs to be followed up on, too. But if you were to say which pathway would you put the most weight on, I think the virus emerging either in Southeast Asia or Southern China from bats, getting into a domesticated wildlife farm. I’ve been to many of these, and they often have mixed species — civets, ferret badgers, raccoon dogs. Those animals would be able to get infected from bats. Either the people that work there get infected and bring it in, or animals are shipped in, live or recently killed, that bring the virus into a market. Once it’s in a market — either Huanan or another one in Wuhan — you’ve got a dense population of people moving through those markets. And it’s going to be a real potential for an amplification.
James Gorman: The new data that you saw, for instance, on the vendors and their supply chains, will that be in your full report?
DASZAK: I hope so. There’ll be some things that are going to be confidential, without a doubt. Patient records are kept highly confidential in China. We have an image in the West of China being authoritarian and they are videoing everyone. They can have access to anything. But patient records are very private, and some are not accessible. We wanted to meet with certain patients. They didn’t want to meet, so they weren’t pushed to meet with us. There’s no reason to believe that was shenanigans. I’m hoping all the information about vendors, vendor chains will be there. But if not, we’ve seen it. We’ve got it. And we will be following up.

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

Nearly one-quarter of the world’s mammal species are bats, and their ability to fly while hosting a petri dish of viruses makes them both zoological marvels and efficient vectors of disease. Infectious diseases that are believed to have emerged from bats in recent decades include coronaviruses like SARS and MERS, along with other viruses like Nipah, Hendra and Ebola. Most of these viruses were transferred from bats to an intermediate host, like a palm civet or camel, before making their way to humans.
The coronavirus that causes Covid-19, which came to public attention in late 2019, has not been conclusively traced to bats, in Yunnan Province in southwestern China.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/world/asia/thailand-bats-coronavirus.html
The WIV was awarded a patent for cages to hold live bats for testing just months before the virus started spreading. The Mail has established that the WIV filed an application in June 2018 to patent "bat rearing cages capable of healthy growth and breeding under artificial conditions." The patent was granted in January 2019. A separate patent, filed by the WIV on October 16, 2020, relates to the "artificial breeding method of wild bat."The patent discusses cross-species transmission of SARS- CoV from bat to humans and other animals, saying: "Bats infected with the virus naturally or artificially have no obvious clinical symptoms, and the mechanism is unknown. The invention aims to provide an artificial breeding method of wild bat predators, which aims at overcoming the defects in the prior art, and the wild bat predators are artificially domesticated, bred and passaged to establish an artificial breeding group, thereby providing a brand-new model experimental animal for scientific research." Daszak tweeted in April 2020: "The researchers don't keep the bats, nor do they kill them. All bats are released back to their cave site after sampling. It's a conservation measure and is much safer in terms of disease spread than killing them or trying to keep them in a lab. The WIV does not have live or dead bats in it. There is no evidence anywhere that this happened"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-planned-breed-animals-virus-experiments.html

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

The CCP controlled scientists can only find a virus in nature that resembles SARS-CoV-2 and not the virus itself is telling. A virus virtually identical to SARS-CoV-1 was found in the Himalayan, or masked, palm civet. It is related to the mongoose, resembles a large weasel and is a threatened species. There are viruses in bats closely resembling SARS-CoV-2 that were used in the gain-of-threat experiments. Until SARS-CoV-2 is discovered in animals it is laboratory escape.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/24/world/strain-of-sars-is-found-in-3-animal-species-in-asia.html
Initial phylogenetic analyses reveal that the SARS-CoV-1 in civets and humans actually come from two distant branches, but the SARS-CoV from civets during the incipient phase of the epidemic had 99.8% sequence similarity to the human SARS-CoV “Our research has shown that the SARS coronavirus found in human victims is the same as the SARS coronavirus found in civet cats,” a paper quoted Wang Ming, an official from the Guangzhou Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, as saying. As research progressed horseshoes bats were blamed, however, the Chinese put an end tothe epidemic when they slaughters and boiled most of the civets in all of China. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ame2.12017

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

David Asher, a former lead investigator of the task force created by the Trump administration, said it was "sort of ridiculous" to believe the deadly disease passed naturally from animals to humans. "We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci's NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The data disproportionately stacked up, as we investigated, that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source. I had biostatisticians at one of our national labs calculate the odds of this evolving in nature, and it was like 1 in 13 million, and then they revised it to about 1 in 13 billion. So, to say this came out of a zoonotic situation is sort of ridiculous. We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. [Anthony] Fauci’s NIAID organization, that there was almost no evidence that supported a natural zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The epicenter of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain of function techniques.” State Department official Chris Ford "seemed disinterested,” Asher recalled. “He said even if we came to it, how did we know where it came out of, what lab. Very rarely in my life in government have I ever encountered someone who was more of a ‘neg’-ocrat, less a bureaucrat, than that individual.”
Fauci acknowledged that NIH granted the Wuhan lab $600,000 over a period of five years to investigate bat coronaviruses, but emphatically denied the money was used for gain of threat research. However, according to David Asher, “the Chinese most certainly felt that NIH was supporting their gain of function research” and claimed that the variants developed in the lab “were not similar to anything, for example, what could occur in natural evolution.”

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

DISCUSSION: We investigated the patterns of molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. Although the genomic analyses suggested that SARS-CoV-2 was closest to RaTG13, their difference at neutral sites was much higher than previously realized. Our results provide novel insights for tracing the intermediate natural host of SARS-CoV-2. With population genetic analyses of 103 genomes of SARS-CoV-2, we found that SARS-CoV-2 viruses had two major lineages (L and S lineages), and the two lineages were well defined by just two SNPs that show complete linkage across SARS-CoV-2 strains. The L lineage (~70%) was found to be more prevalent than the S lineage (~30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, our evolutionary analyses suggested the S appeared to be more related to coronaviruses in animals. Since nonsynonymous sites are usually under stronger negative selection than synonymous sites, calculating sequence differences without separating these two classes of sites could lead to a potentially significant underestimate of the degree of molecular divergence. For example, although the overall nucleotides only differed by ~4% between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, the genomic average dS value, which is usually a neutral proxy, was 0.17 between these two viruses (Table 1). Of note, the genome-wide dS value is 0.012 between humans and chimpanzees, and 0.08 between humans and rhesus macaques [36]. Thus, the neutral molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 is 14 times larger than that between humans and chimpanzees, and twice as large as that between humans and macaques. The genomic average dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GD Pangolin-CoV is 0.469, which is comparable to that between humans and mice (0.5), and the dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GX Pangolin-Cov is even larger (0.722). The scale of these measures suggests that we should perhaps consider the difference in the neutral evolving site rather than the difference in all nucleotide sequences when tracing the origin and natural intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. In this work, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 can be divided into two major lineages (L and S). Intriguingly, the S and L lineages can be clearly defined by just two tightly linked SNPs at positions 8,782 (orf1ab: T8517C, synonymous) and 28,144 (ORF8: C251T, S84L). orf1ab, which encodes replicase/transcriptase, is required for viral genome replication and might also be important for viral pathogenesis [38]. Although the T8517C mutation in orf1ab does not change the protein sequence (it changes the codon AGT (Ser) to AGC (Ser)), it may affect orf1ab translation since AGT is preferred while AGC is unpreferred (Table S2). ORF8 promotes the expression of ATF6, the ER unfolded protein response factor, in human cells. Thus, it will be interesting to investigate the function of the S84L AA change in ORF8, as well as the combinatory effect of these two mutations in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. As previously noted, the data examined in this study are still very limited, and follow-up analyses of a larger set of data are needed to have a better understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2.
https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036/5775463
If it could be proven that the virus mutated that would mean it was not artificial. "Even for pandemic flu — a virus much more given to rapid change than the one that causes Covid-19 — a few months would be a short timeline for a widespread functional mutation. There isn't a clear-cut evolutionary case for a virus like SARS-CoV2, which has already managed to infect more than 6 million people and often causes mild symptoms, to quickly get milder. If anything, it seems more likely that it would be genetically stable.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...-peak-lull-in-cases-doesn-t-mean-weaker-virus

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

"The corona virus that causes COVID-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, shares 96% of its genetic sequence with a virus found in bats. It is in the collection of viral genomes assembled during those studies that scientists have now found the bat virus closest to SARS-COV-2. A strain called RATG13 gathered in the same cave in Yunnan shares 96% of its genetic sequence with the new virus. RATG13 is not that virus’s ancestor. It is something more like its cousin. Edward Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney, estimates that the 4% difference between the two represents at least 20 years of evolutionary divergence from some common antecedent, and probably something more like 50."
https://www.economist.com/science-a...uzzle-of-covid-19s-origin-are-coming-to-light

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

In May 2020 WIV researchers identified RmYN02 from an analysis of 227 bat samples collected in Yunnan province, China, between May and October of 2019. "Since the discovery that bats were the reservoir of SARS coronavirus in 2005, there has been great interest in bats as reservoir species for infectious diseases, particularly as they carry a very high diversity of RNA viruses, including coronaviruses," Shi Zhengli says. RNA from the samples was sent for metagenomic next-generation sequencing in early January 2020, soon after the discovery of SARS-CoV-2. Across the whole genome, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is another virus, called RaTG13, which was previously identified from bats in Yunnan province. But RmYN02, the virus newly discovered here, is even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 in some parts of the genome, including in the longest encoding section of the genome called 1ab, where they share 97.2% of their RNA. The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SAR-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor binding domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells.
The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02, is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its spike protein meet. SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a four-amino-acid insertion at the junction of S1 and S2; this insertion is unique to the virus and has been present in all SARS-CoV-2 sequenced so far. According to SHI ZHENGLI insertions in RmYN02 are not the same as those in SARS-CoV-2, which indicates that they occurred through independent insertion events. But a similar insertion event happening in a virus identified in bats strongly suggests that these kinds of insertions are of natural origin. SHI ZHENGLI: "Our findings suggest that these insertion events that initially appeared to be very unusual can, in fact, occur naturally in animal betacoronaviruses. Our work sheds more light on the evolutionary ancestry of SARS-CoV-2. Neither RaTG13 nor RmYN02 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, because there is still an evolutionary gap between these viruses. But our study strongly suggests that sampling of more wildlife species will reveal viruses that are even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps even its direct ancestors, which will tell us a great deal about how this virus emerged in humans."
Pure speculation. No closer bat virus has been found as of June 13, 2021. The more likey scenario is that Shi Zhengli and Daszak modified a virus resembling SARS-CoV-19 in BSL-2 lab and it escaped.

RmYN02 FURIN

The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SARS-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that the novel coronavirus uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells, they said. The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02 is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its Spike Protein meet, according to the researchers. The viral Spike Protein mediates SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells and harbors a S1/S2 cleavage site containing multiple arginine residues (multibasic) not found in closely related animal coronaviruses. However, the role of this multibasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. Here, we report that the cellular protease furin ¹cleaves the Spike Protein at the S1/S2 site and that cleavage is essential for S-protein-mediated cell-cell fusion and entry into human lung cells. Moreover, optimizing the S1/S2 site increased cell-cell, but not virus-cell, fusion, suggesting that the corresponding viral variants might exhibit increased cell-cell spread and potentially altered virulence. Our results suggest that acquisition of a S1/S2 multibasic cleavage site was essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection of humans and identify furin as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276520302641

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

Highlights
• Pangolin-CoV is 91.02% identical to SARS-CoV-2 at the whole-genome level
• Pangolin-CoV is the second closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 behind RaTG13
• Five key amino acids in the RBD are consistent between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
• Only SARS-CoV-2 contains a potential cleavage site for furin proteases
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220303602
Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, an organization that works on animal-to-human spillover diseases, said that accumulating evidence on pangolins made it “doubtful that this species played a role in the outbreak.” “We need to keep looking for the original reservoir” — likely a bat,” he said, adding that the potential intermediate host would likely be another mammal species that’s more widely traded in the Yunnan-to-Wuhan corridor of China. While the pangolin trade is vast, Dr. Daszak said most of it “is in their scales, dried, in which viruses would almost certainly not be able to persist.” He opposes trade in the highly endangered animal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/pangolin-coronavirus.html

PETER DASZAK

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

Daszak still claims that any suggestion of a lab leak of a genetically altered virus is "conspiracy theory," a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event, a belief embraced by many Trumpoids who know something is happening, but don't know what it is. Of course Daszak had to say that the virus came from nature and anyone who disagreed was a conspiratorialist, otherwise people might examine his role in the pandemic. The other players roles who caused the pandemic were easily ascertainable by reviewing the scientific literature they generated while conducting these experiments with SARS-CoV-2 close relatives in the very city where the pandemic first broke out and in at least two USA labs..

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

Since 2014, the EcoHealth Alliance has received a grant from the National Institutes of Health, until its funding was abruptly cut two weeks ago. The reason, as “60 Minutes” reported on Sunday evening, was a conspiracy theory spread by Representative Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican who in March wore a gas mask on the House floor to mock concern about the new coronavirus. On April 14, 2020 Gaetz appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show and claimed that the N.I.H. grant went to the Wuhan Institute, which Gaetz intimated might have been the source of the virus — the institute may have “birthed a monster,” in his words. The first of Gaetz’s claims was flatly false, and the second unlikely; the C.I.A. has reportedly found no evidence of a link between the virus and the Wuhan lab. But at a White House briefing a few days later, a reporter from the right-wing website Newsmax told President Trump that under Barack Obama, the N.I.H. gave the Wuhan lab a $3.7 million grant. “Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?” she asked. In fact, Trump’s administration had recently renewed EcoHealth’s grant, but Trump didn’t appear to know that. “The Obama administration gave them a grant of $3.7 million?” he asked. Then he said, “We will end that grant very quickly.” And they did. But ending the grant dealt a blow to efforts to find treatments and a vaccine for the coronavirus. Remdesivir, the antiviral drug that’s shown some promise in Covid-19 patients, was earlier tested against bat viruses EcoHealth discovered. Months before this pandemic began, Reuters reported, the Trump administration axed the job of an epidemiologist working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China to help detect emerging disease outbreaks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/opinion/coronavirus-trump.html
NIH PRESS RELEASE: "The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans." In a previous R01 we found that bats in southern China harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs, some of which can use human ACE2 to enter cells, infect humanized mouse models causing SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines. nih.gov

DASZAK: "Look, first, the idea that this virus escaped from a lab is just pure baloney. It’s simply not true. I’ve been working with that lab for 15 years. And the samples collected were collected by me and others in collaboration with our Chinese colleagues. They’re some of the best scientists in the world. There was no viral isolate in the lab. There was no cultured virus that’s anything related to SARS coronavirus 2. So it’s just not possible.¹Now, how did it get into the market? We know for sure that the Wuhan market was part of this outbreak, but we think that the first few cases weren’t in the market. And this is not uncommon. We’ve seen this with many, many other disease outbreaks, new viruses that emerge. They trickle out from rural areas through a person getting infected maybe in Hunan province and then moving into Wuhan, that maybe they’re part of the wildlife trade. Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets. These wet markets aren’t just places to sell wildlife; they’re places where people congregate. They come in in droves. They circulate around. They’re really good places for a virus to spread. And if a person brings it in, or an animal, that virus will spread. And it looks like that’s what’s happened here."
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/peter_daszak_coronavirus
1. Dr. Wang Yanyi said the institute now had three strains of live viruses, including one that was 96 per cent genomically similar to the Sars virus. But their highest similarity to Sars-CoV-2 was only 79.8 per cent, Wang Yanyi said.
If the disease "trickled out from rural areas" because there are as many bats in Wuhan as there are in New York City why didn't someone in those rural areas become infected first? Why wasn't Hunan put under lock-down? "Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets." Why did the market closest to the Wuhan Institute of Virology get infected and no other wet markets? As documented in this Data Base the virus did not originate in the market but this Chinese agent of influence sticks with a variation of the market story.
"Before accepting the first batch of test samples from COVID-19 patients on December 30, 2019, the institute’s labs did not have the novel coronavirus and no one at the institute has contracted COVID-19 to this day. “It is impossible for the virus to leak from such a high-security laboratory,” said Yuan Zhiming, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in an interview with CGTN on April 18. The claim that the novel coronavirus escaped from the laboratory is pure nonsense, said Peter Daszak, chairperson of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit organization, who has been cooperating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 15 years. There is no virus cultivation related to the new coronavirus in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so the so-called “laboratory leak theory” is impossible, said Peter Daszak who is responsible for studying emerging infectious diseases worldwide."
https://business.facebook.com/188625661189259/posts/3264254063626388
Simply untrue as evidenced by the scientific papers generated by the Institute.

NPR DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world. That's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic. We're finding 1 to 7 million people exposed to these viruses every year in Southeast Asia; that's the pathway. It's just so obvious to all of us working in the field," he says. No conspiracy theories Despite the evidence, misinformation about the virus's origins continue to proliferate. For Peter Daszak who has worked on other outbreaks, the pattern is all too familiar: "Every time we get a new virus emerging, we have people that say, 'This could have come from a lab,'" he says. What's unusual about this outbreak, he says, is that senior officials in both China and the U.S. have traded accusations that each nation is somehow responsible for the virus. "It's a real shame that the conspiracy theories can get to the level they've got with policymakers," he says. The political heat has strained the very scientific collaborations meant to detect these viruses as they emerge, warns Jonna Mazet. The PREDICT system she runs relies on the voluntary cooperation of many countries, with researchers freely sharing data about viruses they're spotting within their borders. "With this sort of blame game that's going on, we put ourselves at much more risk." Peter Daszak says the time for finger-pointing is over. "We have a bat virus in my neighborhood in New York killing people," he says. "Let's get real about this."

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

“One thing that I heard from the WIV lab director that I thought was very interesting, and he said, and he speaks okay English, we were asking him all these questions about, they call them rumors over there, we call them conspiracy theories, and he said basically, in sort of his version of English, we’ve not responded to those rumors because if you do that, you give them oxygen. So I think people misunderstand the Chinese government, and he’s a Chinese government worker at the senior level running a lab, not speaking up about when they’re accused. The reason is, he stated quite clearly, they don’t want to give oxygen to these conspiracies. They’re unfounded. And every now and again, they make a statement: that is simply not true. What do you do?"

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

Do you think that we will ever know where Sars-Cov-2 came from – and does it matter?
DASZAK: It does matter, but we're never going to know 100 per cent for sure – it's very hard to definitively prove, without being there at the time. In that space of uncertainty, conspiracy theories abound – for instance the idea it could have been bio-engineered. This is ridiculous, but it’s time consuming to fight these fires. I think it will take a couple of years to track Sar-Cov-2 properly. ¹ We need to trace back the sorts of animals that were going into Wuhan’s wet market – and the people. It’s quite possible it was circulating on a farm for weeks or months before emerging in Wuhan. Every time we've looked at the origins of the new disease in the past, we’ve found out it was actually around a lot longer than thought. Perhaps we will find it was just missed because, in most people, it just causes a cough – who in rural China doesn't have a cough every now and again?
1. In a couple of years the trail would have dried up!
What do you think is driving the conspiracy theories we’ve seen over the last few months?
DASZAK: People buy into conspiracy theories because they’re convincing stories told by charismatic people with just enough science and fact to make them seem plausible. The truth also tends to be less interesting. In this case, people in China are exposed to bats, who harbour viruses. It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring. Clearly this is part of the politics now. Take the US. We're seeing conspiracy theories being elevated in a polarised press, to the point where politicians then use that to make policy decisions. Which is pretty frightening. This is ultimately damaging to public health: US media focus on the lab leak hypothesis has led to "political tensions hindering an effort to find the source of the virus." Not unexpected. When you mix politics with science, you get...politics!"
Who are your heroes and villains of the pandemic?
DASZAK: Then there are people like SHI ZHENGLI in China, who has stuck through death threats and a complete disparaging of her character, just to do what she does: try to save lives. A few have been convicted, but many have been dragged through the mud for no good cause. I've heard many in leadership positions at NIH & in academia say privately that this casts a shadow of McCarthyism & is clearly politically motivated.
It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring.¹ 1. There is only a cyclone fence around WIV. Making new virus is exciting, not boring. DASZAK: Finally the only cases in rural China where bats abound were characterized by a mild cough or no symptoms. No rural Chinese came down with full blown Sars-Cov-2.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

Trump issued a statement boasting of his early insistence that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus. “To me, it was obvious from the beginning,” he said. “But I was badly criticized, as usual.”Biden's investigation was prompted when in May 2021 the CCP refused to allow the W.H.O. to conduct further investigation. This former Congressional researcher is hoping this website, along with the lawsuit I am filing against Dr. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH & NAID, will spark a Congressional investigation of the lab origins of Covid-19. The Biden Corona Report has to exonerate China since if it blamed China how would the Western powers punish China? The New York Times started setting the tone for the cover-up:

"One allied nation [France?] passed on information that three workers in the Wuhan virological laboratory were hospitalized with serious flulike symptoms in the autumn of 2019. The information about the sickened workers is considered important, but officials cautioned that it did not constitute evidence that they caught the virus at the laboratory — they may have brought it there.¹ Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters he had not seen any conclusive evidence about the cause of the pandemic, but supported the effort to look deeper. We need to know the origin, how this happened.” In his announcement Biden said two intelligence agencies believed the virus most likely occurred naturally, while at least one other favored the theory that it leaked accidentally from a lab in China. "None had high confidence in their assessments, the president noted."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/coronavirus-origins-intelligence.html
"Still, that a top lab studying this family of viruses happens to be located in the same city where the epidemic emerged could very well be a coincidence. Wuhan is an urban center larger than New York City, with a steady flow of visitors from other parts of China. It also has many large markets dealing in wildlife brought from across China and beyond. When wild animals are kept in close quarters, viruses have an opportunity to jump from species to species, sometimes resulting in dangerous recombinations that can lead to new diseases." The Wuhan Market theory has been debunked by numerous studies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/health/wuhan-coronavirus-lab-leak.html
1. What absurdity! Someone contaminated a lab where experiments with Coronavirus were being conducted from the outside? The NYT also reported: "The intelligence on the three workers came from outside the United States intelligence agencies’ own collection, which means its veracity is more difficult to authenticate. The source of the information was unclear, but several American officials said they believed the report that the three researchers got sick."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/politics/biden-coronavirus-origins.html

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

Early investigations into SARS-CoV-2 emergence and the resulting COVID-19 disease outbreak proposed the proximate cause was a zoonotic spillover event in late November or early December 2019 in Wuhan, China. This was supported by preliminary epidemiological studies, including the initial clinical series which linked two-thirds of the identified cases to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan. Critically, the study found no direct connection to the market for 14 individuals, including the first known case of COVID-19, leaving open the possibility of alternate points of origin and infection. Additionally, virologic samples of wildlife in the Huanan market could not be linked to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting transmission at the market was downstream from the spillover event. Here we consider that SARS-CoV-2 may have already been circulating in the community prior to the identification of the Huanan Market cluster. This hypothesis is supported by emerging epidemiologic and phylogenetic evidence indicating that the virus emerged in southern China and may have already spread internationally, and adapted for efficient human transmission by the time it was detected in late December.
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42669767/Satellite_Images_Baidu_COVID19_manuscript_preprint.pdf

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

"The new virus revealed itself gradually in humans last December 2019, in Wuhan, and in January 2020 several Chinese laboratories, including SHI ZHENGLI - a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin. SHI ZHENGLI directs the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, WIV a biosafety level 4 laboratory located in Jiangxia District, Wuhan. Her lab sequenced wholly or partly the genomes of samples from different patients, including five complete genomes. SHI ZHENGLI and her colleagues made their announcement on January 23, 2020 that the virus found in those five patients was 96.2-per-cent identical to the bat coronavirus they had warned about three years earlier." ¹"By that time, the virus had been circulating in Wuhan for at least seven weeks, and three consequential misconceptions had been propagated, not just by political leaders but by hospital officials and the Chinese version of the C.D.C.:

That the outbreak had begun in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which famously sold much more than seafood;

That the virus wasn’t dangerous

That it didn’t pass from person to person. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/11/why-werent-we-ready-for-the-coronavirus

1. The 4% differences is thousands of genomes. The viruses were SIMILAR not identical and the virus was not an evolutionary cousin of CoV-19 nor could it cause disease in humans

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

"On the second and third points, there was disagreement by clinicians treating patients, such as Zhang Li, at Wuhan’s Jinyintan Hospital, who told the Wall Street Journal in late February, “I was on alert because this was a new pneumonia and because I’d dealt with SARS.” The misconception that the market was the origin of the outbreak is implicitly contradicted by a scientific paper published in late January 2020, by a group of physicians from Wuhan and Beijing, describing clinical features of the first forty-one patients. Twenty-seven of them, the paper said, had been exposed in the Huanan market. Since a single horseshoe bat would be unlikely to infect twenty-seven people, even if they diced it into hors d’œuvres, and since by some accounts bats weren’t even on sale in the market at that time, a few scientists have speculated that there was an intermediate host animal—a snake, a pangolin, a palm civet?—in which the virus amplified itself, before that larger creature was sold or butchered. The molecular evidence for snakes is weak, pangolins are a complicated story, and civets aren’t implicated this time." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986264

DANIEL LUCEY

"An American physician and scholar Daniel R. Lucey (who had also worked the SARS outbreak, in Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Toronto) wondered about the fourteen other early patients. He noticed that the first of them, falling sick on December 1, 2019 had no direct or secondary contact with the market. That meant, given the incubation period, that the virus must have been circulating in Wuhan outside the market since November 2020. This doesn’t controvert the likelihood of the virus originating in a bat, but it suggests that perhaps it went into the Huanan market, as well as coming out of it, in humans." SARS-CoV-2 is a subtle bug."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext#bib35
"The logic seems straightforward. But a more complete analysis of early cases suggests that locating the origin of the virus may not be so simple. A study published in the found that of the first 425 patients, only 45 percent had connections to the market. A separate Jan. 24, 2020 analysis published in the Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — did not have market links¹."
1. Neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

"Scientific American quotes Dr. Kevin Olival Vice President for Research at EcoHealth Alliance a group that has been implicated in funding the pandemic: "How and where the SARS-CoV-2 spillover occurred is not known for certain. There was an early suspicion that the initial outbreak could have started at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which was closed on January 1 2020. But “we don’t know if the spillover happened outside the market and then began spreading after it was brought there,” says. It is also unclear if there was an intermediate animal host between the disease-carrying bats and humans." ¹ Dr. Olival’s role as Senior Research Scientist at EcoHealth Alliance involves coordinating the modeling and analytics research; integrating evolutionary and ecological theories to understand the drivers of disease emergence; and managing zoonotic disease surveillance efforts in Thailand and Indonesia under the USAID PREDICT project.
1. Everything is unclear.

In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic "hotspots" and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases - animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-coronavirus-slipped-past-disease-detective
Despite referencing Scientific American and NEJM to show the virus didn't start at the market the Washington Post claimed it was doubtful the virus orginated at WIV. Why? "conspiracy theories." The Covid-19 Research Institute did not unearth any conspiracy to release the virus, instead it discovered evidence that the virus, which was created naturally in bats, altered using Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat and/or RECOMBINANT techniques by microbiologists who made the virus more deadly and transmissible than previous SARS Corona virus and accidentally leaked. This genetic engineering also gave the virus the ability to allow it to transmit a plethora of diseases, evade detection and do a whole lot of other things viruses found in nature don't do.

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

It is possible for viruses to escape from a laboratory by infecting a worker. In the early 2000s, there were three documented cases of the original SARS virus escaping from a laboratory environment, according to Lim Poh Lian, a senior consultant at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases in Singapore. In the case of a 2003 incident in Singapore, a student became infected with SARS after his samples of West Nile virus were cross-contaminated with live SARS virus. That virus was being grown in relatively large quantities in the lab for studies on the disease, and the student was not properly trained in safety procedures for the lab he was working in.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...t-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

JULY 2003 An outbreak of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome occurred among students in a college (College A) in Kunming, Yunnan province, China in 2003. Subsequent investigations revealed the presence of hantavirus antibodies and antigens in laboratory rats at College A and two other institutions. Hantavirus antibodies were detected in 15 additional individuals other than the index case in these three locations. Epidemiologic data indicated that the human infections were a result of zoonotic transmission of the virus from laboratory rats.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20380897/

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

"The modern era of pathogen releases can be said to have begun in 1973 in England, when a lab assistant working with smallpox infected herself and spread it to three others, two of whom died. Four years later, smallpox was almost officially eradicated from the wild, yet the following year a medical photographer at Birmingham Medical School mysteriously died of the disease. It turned out that researchers in another part of the building were experimenting with smallpox, and the virus most likely reached the photographer through the ventilation system. Mother Jones

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

Patients with unexplained pneumonias started showing up at hospitals; within days, dozens were dead. The secret police seized doctors’ records and ordered them to keep silent. American spies picked up clues about a lab leak, but the local authorities had a more mundane explanation: contaminated meat. [The Chinese blamed Covid-19 on contaminated frozen meat.] In April and May 1979, at least 66 people died after airborne anthrax bacteria emerged from a military lab in the Soviet Union. But leading American scientists voiced confidence in the Soviets’ claim that the pathogen had jumped from animals to humans. Only after a full-fledged investigation in the 1990s did one of those scientists confirm the earlier suspicions: The accident in what is now the Russian Urals city of Yekaterinburg was a lab leak, one of the deadliest ever documented. Dr. Meselson, a biological warfare expert, studied classified intelligence suggesting that the Soviet anthrax outbreak could have been linked to a military facility nearby. Six years later, he wrote that the Soviet explanation of the epidemic’s natural origins was plausible. The evidence the Soviets provided was consistent, he said, with the theory that people had been stricken by intestinal anthrax that originated in contaminated bone meal used as animal feed. “The concept of truth, in fact, is very complicated,” said Lev Grinberg, a Yekaterinburg pathologist who secretly preserved evidence of the true nature of the outbreak in 1979. “Those who don’t want to accept the truth will always find ways not to accept it.”
The incident was only confirmed in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when President Boris Yeltsin invited an independent team of scientists to investigate. Using 2010 data from the CDC, one expert estimated that somewhere in the United States, “a breach of containment happens about twice weekly.” Some have involved deadly agents including anthrax, avian flu, and Ebola. Most incidents are minor, but not all. Take two examples at lower-risk labs: In 2009, a researcher at the University of Chicago died after being infected by a weakened strain of plague. In 2012, a postdoc at San Francisco’s VA Medical Center came down with meningitis from his lab. He died.

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

"SARS-CoV-2 infection have caused global pandemic and claimed over 5,000,000 tolls1–4. Although the genetic sequences of their etiologic viruses are of high homology, the clinical and pathological characteristics of COVID-19 significantly differ from SARS5,6. Especially, it seems that SARS-CoV-2 undergoes vast replication in vivo without being effectively monitored by anti-viral immunity.

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane Medical School in New Orleans, observed that Chinese scientists would have to have collected SARS-CoV-2 and then grown it in a colony of cells, but somehow never publish any details of it even as they published reports on other coronaviruses for years."We don't know if any such reports existed as the WIV database was taken off line in September 2019 and never restored. Suppression of information in a totalitarian country is quietly, easily and quicky accomplished especially when there is so much at stake if it came to light the virus originated at the WIV, even though, if not for Daszak, the Chinese probably would never have carried these experiments out! “It makes no sense to me. Why did they hold onto the virus?” Dr. Garry said. But the reason they held on to them was to theoretically develop a vaccine before one of the viruses emerged and caused an epidemic. Garry continued: "Genetic analysis shows the virus began to spread sometime in the fall or winter of 2019. Those same analyses supported an earlier Kristain Anderson theory that the virus was not genetically engineered in a laboratory. Garry says the reason is simple — the virus infects people in a way that scientists had never seen before: "The virus is just really too good at what it's doing. No human using a computer could do this. This is very clearly a natural process that occurred." In addition, he says, there are no signs of human genetic modification in the virus's code.¹

1. Garry is a side kick of Kristain Anderson https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=criecCgAAAAJ&hl=en
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...irus-compare-to-mers-sars-and-the-common-cold
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

In 2004, the Chinese and French governments signed a cooperation agreement on fighting and preventing new diseases, stressing the active cooperation between China and France in the construction of high-level biosafety laboratories and the system construction of biosafety laws and regulations etc. In order to implement the spirit of Sino-French agreement, in 2005, Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook the task of building a national biosafety laboratory of Wuhan, Chinese Academy of Sciences. With nearly 10 years of unremitting efforts, the laboratory completed the physical facilities in January 2015. In August 2016, it obtained the recognition and authentication certificate for the critical protection equipment installation and commissioning.

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

At the time when it was launched by Jacques Chirac and his Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin, in 2004, the P4 was at the heart of a showdown in France. Those in favor, politicians and scientists, said that China, which had barely emerged from SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), should be helped to defend itself against epidemics. But Defense, External Intelligence (DGSE) and Foreign Affairs were standing against a project that they believed could serve a military bacteriological weapon program. They suspected that Beijing would want to equip itself with five or seven P4 laboratories, including two for military purposes. "We knew the risks involved and thought that the Chinese would control everything and quickly eject us from the project. We believed that providing this cutting-edge technology to a country with an infinite power agenda risked exposing France in return, ”said a diplomat who followed the case closely. According to a high-ranking source, the project would also have provoked a crisis in Pasteur, where the Assembly of the Hundred, the parliament of the Institute, would have denounced the access authorized by the contract to some of its databases, before see the decision imposed by its management. " There were arguments, because China has a real medical problem with epidemics and France had an advantage in this technology very advanced. But the Chinese know how to copy and duplicate. And we thought the P4 would give China instruments if it ever wanted to start a biological weapons program, "said a senior diplomat, who was in strategic affairs at the time. French scholars played a big role in pushing the project. " There was a blindness of the scientific community which refused to see the reality of the Chinese system. Researchers believed that openness to capitalism would transform China into a normal country. It was to forget that it remained above all a Leninist state in which science is not independent but directed by the Communist Party ", explains Valérie Niquet, specialist in Asia at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS). Since the start of the epidemic, the party and the state have been involved in research, manipulating dates and rewriting the history of the coronavirus.
https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

On April 21, Le Figaro published an article "Investigation: How the P4 laboratory in Wuhan, exported by France, escaped all control" signed by Isabelle Lasserre. Some comments in the article are shocking. The Chinese Embassy in France wants to question them. She wrote in the article that: "On February 16, Chinese state media also reported deficiencies. They claimed in particular that researchers threw laboratory materials down the drain, after experimentation and without having subjected them to the specific treatment intended for biological discharges. They also pointed out that a certain number of researchers, to make ends meet, were selling laboratory animals which had undergone experiments on the markets of Wuhan. As anyone with common sense knows very well, a high-level laboratory is endowed with rigorous management systems and codes of conduct for scientific research, how is it possible that the basic faults described in the article appear? This is an extremely serious problem which seriously damages the reputation of Chinese research institutions and the national image of China. We ask the journalist to tell her readers specifically that her comments come from which media and which reports. Otherwise, they can only be considered as lies. The author of the text made many criticisms of the joint construction of the P4 laboratory in Wuhan by China and France. It is his personal opinion, in which the Embassy does not intervene. But the descriptions in the article are very likely to misinform readers, and do not promote mutual knowledge of the Chinese and French peoples and friendly cooperation between the two countries. The Chinese Embassy in France recommends the video of an interview given by Mr. Yuan Zhiming, Director of the Wuhan branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on April 20 at CGTN. The author of the article could undoubtedly obtain useful information in this, which would help him to know the question concerned in a more complete and more precise way.
The core of the Wuhan BSL-4 Laboratory is surrounded by stainless-steel walls, forming a "box-within-a-box" structure. The core lab enclosure can ensure sufficient structural strength and tightness to form a static seal. The lab's dynamic seal uses negative pressure technology to ensure a strict and orderly pressure gradient between the functional areas, thereby effectively preventing any air contaminated by infectious pathogenic microorganisms from spreading to areas with low contamination probability and to the external environment spreading.
https://www.biospace.com/article/re...of-virology-s-vital-role-in-fighting-covid-19
Air emitted from the lab is filtered and discharged by two-stage high-efficiency filters to ensure the safety of the emissions. Waste water is discharged after high-temperature treatment in a sewage treatment system. Polluted waste in the lab is subjected to high-temperature and high-pressure treatment by double-door autoclaves, and then safely removed and delivered to a centralized medical waste disposal unit with corresponding qualifications for disposal. Whenever personnel pass through the entrance and exit channels, their positive pressure protective suits are chemically disinfected using the chemical showers to ensure the safety of the passageways. The above technical protection measures ensure that viruses inside the lab cannot escape.
Plum Island Reports Disease Outbreak By John Rather Aug. 22, 2004 THE Department of Homeland Security confirmed last week that the highly contagious foot-and-mouth virus had briefly spread within the Plum Island Animal Disease Center in two previously undisclosed incidents earlier this summer. A spokesman for the department, which took over the high-security laboratory from the Department of Agriculture in June 2003, said safety procedures had been stepped up and laboratory rooms disinfected after the incidents, which occurred on June 24 and July 19.

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

In a CNN interview on March 26, 2021 Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director under Trump, made a candid admission: “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.” Redfield added that he believed the release was an accident, not an intentional act. In his view, nothing that happened since his first calls with Dr. Gao changed a simple fact: The WIV needed to be ruled out as a source, and it hadn’t been. After the interview aired, death threats flooded his inbox. The vitriol came not just from strangers who thought he was being racially insensitive but also from prominent scientists, some of whom used to be his friends. One said he should just “wither and die.”

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

STILL HEAD OF W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is an Ethiopian microbiologist and internationally recognized malaria researcher, who has served since 2017 as Director-General of the World Health Organization. Tedros is the first non-physician and first African in the role, who has been endorsed by the African Union. Born: March 3, 1965 (age 55 years), Asmara, Eritrea Nationality: Ethiopian Party: Tigray People's Liberation Front
Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) SUMMARY: The Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF) is a political party in Tigray, Ethiopia that has been listed as a perpetrator in the Global Terrorism Database, based on ten incidents occurring between 1976 and 1990 (see GTD link). Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), also known as Popular revolution for the freedom of Tigray, Woyane, Weyane is an active group formed c. 1975. TRAC ANALYSIS: IDEOLOGY Separatist / New Regime Nationalist / Ethnic Nationalist, Left Wing Terrorist Groups (Maoist, Marxist, Communist, Socialist) TRAC ANALYSIS: TACTICS Attacks on Soft Targets, Assassinations as a Terrorist Tactic TRAC

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

"Much of the blame for W.H.O.’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a W.H.O. goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does W.H.O. seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of W.H.O.’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at W.H.O. generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. To avoid stigmatization against nation and race, the World Health Organization discourages the use of regions, countries, individuals, and animals on naming human infectious diseases and pathogens in its guidelines issued in 2015. The guidelines emphasize that viruses infect all people. That is to say, when an outbreak happens, everyone is at risk, regardless of his or her identity or location. The W.H.O. on February 11, 2020 announced the name of the novel coronavirus as SARS-CoV-2 on social media to “prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing,” W.H.O. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said." https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-health-coronavirus-disinformation-11586122093

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course Mission. The Division aims to improve health in the W.H.O. European Region by addressing the determinants, risks and consequences of chronic, noncommunicable conditions, by promoting mental and physical wellbeing across the life course, by the population-based prevention and clinical control of disease, and by preventing violence and injury. Biography: Dr Gauden Galea is a public health physician who has worked for W.H.O. since 1998. He has held posts as regional adviser on noncommunicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region, and as coordinator of health promotion in W.H.O. headquarters. Dr Galea has been Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion at W.H.O./Europe since January 2011. He has a special interest in health promotion, in the social determinants of noncommunicable diseases, and in the links between these diseases and the development agenda."
"Dr Gauden: https://web.archive.org/web/20160609075623/http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/executive-management/dr-gauden-galeaGalea

ADDENDUM

https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...scientists-joining-covid-origin-investigation
https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/corona-leaked-likely-wuhan-institute-virology-experts
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884792-MACE-E-PAI-COVID-19-ANALYSIS-Redacted.htm
https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/did...program-in-a-chinese-laboratory-very-possibly
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2020-articles/19392-expert-attacks-ecohealth-alliance-s-involvement-in-really-risky-bat-coronavirus-research-in-wuhan-labs?
https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched
https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038

Shi’s answers were coordinated with public information staffers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, of which WIV is part, and it took her 2 months to prepare them. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen of Scripps Research says he suspects Shi’s answers were “carefully vetted” by the Chinese government. “But they’re all logical, genuine, and stick to the science as one would have expected from a world-class scientist and one of the leading experts on coronaviruses,” Andersen says. However, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, who from the early days of the pandemic has urged that an investigation look into the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a laboratory accident, was decidedly unimpressed. “Most of these answers are formulaic, almost robotic, reiterations of statements previously made by Chinese authorities and state media,” Ebright says.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...st-center-covid-19-origin-theories-speaks-out

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

Daszak's Zoonotic chirade was over after "an allied power" determined several lab technicans or scientists became contaminated with an enhanced SARS virus and brought it into Wuhan during its incubation period. (1.) Incubation time for COVID-19 between 2 and 10 days has been recorded by the W.H.O. The W.H.O. stated on February 10, 2020, at its press conference, that a very long duration of incubation can represent double exposure, 24 days was a specified point to be regarded in the sense of the study's key results. (2.) The Chinese National Health Commission initially expected a 10 to 14 days incubation period. (3.) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from United States of America assumes the incubation period of 2 to 14 days for COVID-1929 (4.) Doctors and health-care practitioners, of leading Chinese group DXY.cn predicts an incubation period of "3 to 7 days, and up to 14 days." (5.) In a report released on February 9, 2020, the incubation time was observed as long as 24 days (range from 0-24 days; average of 3 days) (6). In a JAMA report released on February 21, 2020, a 19-day incubation period in infected patient has been identified, Hubei Province registered another case with an incubation time of 27 days, on February 22, 2020. An analysis sponsored by the Holland Ministry of Health and released by Eurosurveillance examined data for 88 identified travelers to and from Wuhan, which were identified as COVID-19 infected patients between January 20 and 28, 2020. It was calculated that the mean incubation period was 6.4 days. The incubation duration varied from 2.1 to 11.1 days. The 11.1-day maximum limit may be known as conservative. The incubation time greatly differs between the patients, according to a Chinese article reported by New England Journal of Medicine on January 30, 2020.

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

520 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 1200, New York, NY 10018 212.380.4460
AS SOON AS THIS PANDEMIC ENDS THOSE WHO SURVIVED COVID
WILL DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THIS OFFICE

DASZAK GREW RICH FROM HIS SCAM THAT NEVER PRODUCED A VACCINE

DASZAK EMAILS

Dear Randy:
As a member of the EcoHealth Alliance Board of Trustees, I would like to thank you and your wonderful colleagues for the generous vocal support and for the funding you are making possible for Peter and his research team. The entire board and the Alliance team are truly grateful for the extraordinary boost in morale you and your colleagues have provided. Peter and his team are doing critically important work on COVID-19 and its origin. In genuine gratitude, Rita.
Dear Ralph, Linda, Jim, Rita, Linfa and Hume, I’ve been following the events around the novel coronavirus emergence in China very closely and have been dismayed by the recent spreading of rumors, misinformation and conspiracy theories on its origins. These are now specifically targeting scientists with whom we’ve collaborated for many years, and who have been working heroically to fight this outbreak and share data with unprecedented speed, openness and transparency. These conspiracy theories threaten to undermine the very global collaborations that we need to deal with a disease that has already spread across continents. We have drafted a simple statement of solidarity and support for scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, and would like to invite you to join us as the first signatories. If you agree, we will send this letter to a group of around half-a-dozen other leaders in the field and then disseminate this widely with a sign-up webpage for others to show their support by signing up to its language. I will then personally present this at my plenary during the ICID 2020 conference in Malaysia in two weeks, with the goal of also getting widespread attention in SE Asia to our support for the work that our colleagues in China are undertaking. I sincerely hope you can join us. Please review the letter, and let me know if you are willing to join Billy Karesh and myself as co-signatories. Also, please confirm your title and affiliation that will be shown in the letter. We plan to make circulate this widely to coincide with a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, which will likely be released tomorrow or Friday. Thank you for your consideration and support of the scientific and public health community around the world! Cheers, Peter Daszak President EcoHealth Alliance 460 West 34th Street – 17th Floor New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 212-380-4474 Website: www.ecohealthalliance. NUMEROUS PAGES DELETED AFTER THIS.

From: Tara Hoda<hoda@ecohealthalliance.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 1:57 PM
To: rcolwell@umiacs.umd.edu; Victoria Lord
Cc: Anthony Ramos; Peter Daszak
Subject: Carnegie Corporation Contacts
Dear Dr. Colwell: It was so wonderful meeting you at the board meeting last week. As mentioned, we will be submitting a Letter of Inquiry to the Carnegie Corporation under their International Peace and Security portfolio. Our proposed project focuses on promoting a multi-sectoral approach and building capacity and partnerships for pandemic outbreaks and international health security processes in Western Asia. Our LOI is attached to this e-mail. You had mentioned you may have connections with the following people who are members of Carnegie Corporation's Board of Directors:
1) Jared Cohon
2) John DeGioia
3) Marcia McNutt
4) Judy Woodruff
For the Carnegie Corporation, it will greatly increase our chances of having our proposal considered if we have a point of contact. Would you be willing to put us in touch with one of the people above, or to directly send an e-mail letting them EcoHealth Alliance will be submitting an application? Any and all leads would be greatly appreciated. Best, Tara
Tara Hoda Development Associate EcoHealth Alliance
I’m on a panel on biothreats…National Press Club, Washington, DC, Monday afternoon April 30…along with a roster of DoD, CIA, DHS, and other assorted luminaries. Anything I should say or comment on regarding EcoHealth, Peter?

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

Mrs. Morris Hadley, another civic leader, whose husband was one-time head of the Carnegie Foundation and is now head of the CIA conduit Rubicon Foundation. Through his membership in the law firm of Milbank, Tween, Hadley, and McCloy he has close association with John J. McCloy, once chairman of the board of Chase Manhattan Bank, former chairman of the Ford Foundation, past president of the World Bank, past U.S. High Commissioner to Germany and chairman of the board of the New York International House, a Rockefeller-backed institution dedicated to making the foreign student feel at home.
I think that many of EcoHealth Alliance's initiatives would dovetail well with Carnegie Corporation's International Peace and Security area of interest. EcoHealth Alliance's President, Dr. Peter Daszak, is the chair of the National Academies of Sciences' Forum on Microbial Threats, a member of the NRC Advisory Committee to the US Global Change Research Program, and has advised the Director for Medical Preparedness Policy on the White House National Security Staff on global health issues. He is also actively involved in the W.H.O. Expert group on Public Health Emergency Disease Prioritization.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the “Statement” Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”
ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

Ecohealth Alliance integrates innovative science-based solutions and partnerships that increase capacity to achieve two interrelated goals: protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases and safeguarding ecosystems by promoting conservation. USAID PREDICT EMERGING PANDEMIC THREAT PROGRAM - assesses capacity and develops plans for the implementation of wildlife surveillance support. They develop models of disease risk and spread, implement a smart (strategic, measurable, adaptive, responsive, and targeted) wildlife surveillance strategy to identify and target high-risk wildlife in the region's most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dept of Defense - serological bio surveillance for spillover of henipa viruses and filo viruses at agricultural and hunting human-animal interfaces in peninsular Malaysia. The objective is to enhance capacity within the Malaysia government to characterize the distribution of and detect spillover of novel and known henipa viruses and filo viruses, (both groups include high consequence zoonotic pathogens) in indigenous populations and farms in peninsular Malaysia. Current surveillance strategies for novel zoonotic viruses rely exclusively on molecular detection tools, but Nipah and Ebola viruses are present at low prevalence in bat species which makes infected individuals difficult to detect. By establishing a multiplexed serological assay developed to detect antibodies against any henipa and filo viruses, the government of Malaysia will more effectively be able to determine the distribution of these high-impact viruses in wildlife reservoirs and detect evidence of spillover in at-risk human or livestock populations. The most comprehensive investigation of the epidemiology and ecolog of the RVF virus ever conducted. The project brings together a diverse group of experts from governmental, non-governmental, academic and private organizations, both domestic and international. the 2010-2011 outbreak of RVF in south Africa had a significant impact on the health of people, animals and the local economy. Thus, a better, more integrated understanding of the virus in the environment and in animal and human populations is critically needed to improve public awareness. a booklet explaining the risks of RVF and similar diseases was developed for distribution to study participants in the region. Rather than being a collection of independent science projects, this one health project integrates data collected from climate and weather, vegetation cycles, and mosquito studies to better predict outbreaks in South Africa. Evidence of RVF in animals and people is being collected to better understand exposure, with groups of people in occupations with high risk for rvf and flocks of sheep will be followed for approximately four years. the work is centered in the free state and northern cape provinces and includes the epicenter of previous RVF outbreaks within the 40,000km2 study region. Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development. Dr. Daszak’s research has been instrumental in identifying and predicting the impact of emerging diseases across the globe. His achievements include identifying the bat origin of SARS, identifying the underlying drivers of Nipah and Hendra virus emergence, producing the first ever global emerging disease hotspots map, developing a strategy to find out how many unknown viruses exist that could threaten to become pandemic, identifying the first case of a species extinction due to disease, and discovering the disease chytridiomycosis as the cause global amphibian declines.
PREDICT is a consortium or partners working to enable global surveillance for pathogens that can spillover from animal hosts to people by building capacities to detect and discover viruses of pandemic potential. The project is part of USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats program and is led by the UC Davis One Health Institute. The core partners are USAID, EcoHealth Alliance, Metabiota Inc., Wildlife Conservation Society, and Smithsonian Institution, along with a network of scientists and professionals in over 30 countries around the world. Contact us at predict@ucdavis.edu.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13618543

W.H.O.

GUIDESTAR NON-PROFIT REPORT

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/updates

Kaspar Sebastian Bohdan Daszak is 20 years old and lives in an apartment in Stockholm. He lives with John Ramstedt. BORN 8/27/2000. John or Peter Daszak's son? His home is valued at $1,627,859.80 United States Dollars
https://www.hitta.se/kaspar+daszak/stockholm/person/VgPwmnoooK

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

THE FRENCH HELP WIV BUILD THE LEVEL 4 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB DESPITE DUAL USE CONCERNS
THE PROXIMITY FACTOR
PATIENT ZERO
TEXAS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN BED WITH WIV THANKS TO FAUCI GRANT

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

SHI ZHENG LI CREATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY
BATLADY MAKE BIG MISTAKE: SHE DID IT IN A LEVEL 2 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB, AND IT LEAKED OR SOMEONE GOT INFECTED IN THE LAB AND BROUGHT THE VIRUS BACK HOME.
SHI ZHENG LI WORK AT THE TIME OF OUTBREAK INVOLVED STUDYING CORONA VIRUSES ALMOST IDENTICAL TO SARS Co-V-2
SHI ZHENG LI CHRONOLOGY SHOWS SHE HAS A FINGER IN EVERY CORONA VIRUS EXPERIMENT
SHI ZHENG LI POST SARS-CoV-2 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE
DESTRUCTION OF SARS-COV-2 SAMPLES
THE INTERVIEW WITH THE BAT LADY "COVID IS PUNISHMENT FOR AN UNSANITARY LIFESTYLE"
2018 SHI ZHENG LI WAS CREATING SYNTHETIC VIRUSES
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS IN UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL LAB PRODUCED NOVEL VIRUS MORE DEADLY TO OLDER PEOPLE JUST LIKE SARS-CoV-2 AND STIR DEBATE ABOUT GoF RESEARCH CAUSING A PANDEMIC 2020: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SL-SHC014-MA15: MAN MADE VIRUS WHICH USES ACE2 RECEPTOR

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS SYNTHESIZING VIRUSES THAT ATTACK ACE2 RECEPTORS IN HUMANS WERE PRECURSORS TO CREATION OF SARS-CoV-2
2015: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SARS: CREATION OF A VIRUS THAT CAN USE ACE2 AS RECEPTOR

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

NEW YORK TIMES 9/20/2020 CHINA VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE
THE AUSTRIAN STUDY: IS CONSIDERING A GENETIC-MANIPULATION ORIGIN FOR SARS-COV-2 A CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT MUST BE CENSORED? ROSSANA SEGRETO UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY
PASSAGING
THE NORWEGIAN STUDY
SIR RICHARD DEARLOVE FORMER MI-5 DIRECTOR SUPPORTS NORWEGIAN STUDY
UNIQUE NEW FEATURE OF SARS-CoV-2 CALLED "UNEXPECTED INSERTION"
SHING HEI ZHAN, BENJAMIN E. DEVERMAN AND YUJIA ALINA CHAN, “SARS-COV-2 IS WELL ADAPTED FOR HUMANS
HUMAN ENGINEERING OF A POLYBASIC HA CLEAVAGE SITE MUTANT WAS EASILY ACCOMPLISHED

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

RICHARD EBRIGHT: THESE EXPERIMENTS HAS GOTS TO GO!

THE WET MARKET

VIRUS WAS NEVER FOUND IN ANIMALS AT THE WET MARKET OR ANYWHERE ELSE
THE PANGOLINS DID IT
CHICOM RE-ACTION DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN
BOLTON AND TRUMP PAVE THE WAY FOR THE PANDEMIC

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

NEW WHO JUNKET
WHO DISPUTES THE FACT THE VIRUS LINGERS IN THE AIR INDOORS, INFECTING THOSE NEARBY.
CCP PROPAGANDA

Table of Contents

DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN DASZAK, WAS A NAZI DEATH CAMP GUARD

FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN

DOCTOR "MENGELE" DASZAK

FOR ECO-FASCISTS - COVID-19 "NATURE IS HEALING"

FAUCI TRUSTS THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

WHY DID AN OILY BUBBLE OF GENES JUST ABOUT 100 NANOMETERS IN DIAMETER (A TRILLION WEIGH LESS THAN A RAINDROP) FIRST SURFACE IN WUHAN, CHINA?

"THE BAT LADY" IS A WEIRDO

YOUNG BAT LADY

THE SMOKING GUN DOCUMENT

DASZAK EXPLORES THE LAB LEAK THEORY

Dr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation." Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment

EARLIER EXPERIMENTS INVOLVED THE SPIKE PROTEINS WHICH ARE THE KEYS TO INVADING THE HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

ECO-FASCIST DASZAK FINANCED WIV GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WITH YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY

THE PANDEMIC WAS CREATED BY DASZAK, AN ECO-FASCIST, TO CUT DOWN ON HUMAN POPULATION GROWTH THAT'S DESTROYING NATURE

THE MISSING COMPONENT: DASZAK'S IMPLICIT RACISM

THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AND THIS WEBPAGE IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY

DASZAK WAS A BLOODY SUCCESS

THE MONSTER MOVIE

CHINESE-AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK TWEETS

HAVING DASZAK AS A W.H.O INVESTIGATOR WAS LIKE HAVING AL CAPONE SIT ON ON THE CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION.

FAUCI'S INVOLVMENT IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

FIRE FAUCI AND REPLACE HIM WITH FORMER FDA HEAD Dr. SCOTT GOTTLIEB

Dr. FAUCI, WHO APPROVED DASZAK'S GRANTS, SUDDENLY WANTS ANOTHER INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IF HE SAID HE DIDN'T WANT ONE SUSPICION WOULD FALL ON HIM

FAUCI PROPONENT OF GoF / GoT OPPOSES GoF / BAN IN WASHINGTON POST AND DEFENDS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS

BENEFITS AND RISKS OF INFLUENZA RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED ANTHONY S. FAUCI, FRANCIS S. COLLINS

FAUCI SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT

THE LANCET QUESTIONS DASZAK'S OBJECTIVITY "ADDENDUM: COMPETING INTERESTS AND THE ORIGINS OF SARS-COV-2"

DASZAK WAS DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN RECOMBINANT EXPERIMENTS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS INVOLVED RECOMBINANT BAT CORONAVIRUSES / NOVEMBER 30, 2017:"DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS"

MANY OF THESE GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED WITH VIRUSES FOUND IN HORSESHOE BATS - CLOSE RELATIVES TO THE SARS-CoV-19 VIRUS

DASZAK'S METHODOLOGY RELIED ON GAIN-OF-THREAT, GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

DASZAK PLAYED ON THE BENEFICENT MOTIVATION OF MOST SCIENTISTS WHO CONDUCT GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS

ProGoFer's and Anti-GoFers

THE CRITICS OF GoF/GoT PREDICTED IT WOULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC

DAVID RELMAN STANFORD UNIVERSITY MICROBIOLOGIST

MICROBIOLOGIST JONATHAN LATHAM

DR. RICHARD EBRIGHT OPPOSES BARIC'S GoF EXPERIMENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AND WIV

DASZAK'S CRIMINAL LIABILITY

DR. DASZAK'S BOGUS FAMILY BACKGROUND: "PETER COTTINGTON DASZAK" IS NOT HIS REAL NAME

DASZAK IS UNQUALIFIED FOR MICROBIOLOGY

DASZAK INTERVIEW DECEMBER 2019

PETER DASZAK TALKS ABOUT HIS EARLY YEARS

DASZAK'S BOGUS C.V.

THE GRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY STEMMY AND FAUCI

BEFORE THE CORONA VIRUS OUTBREAK IN 2019 THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION, GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED IN BSL-2 LAB

FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LABORATORY MODIFICATION

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2. IN SILICO COMPARISON OF SPIKE PROTEIN-ACE2 BINDING AFFINITIES ACROSS SPECIES; SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THE SARS-COV-2 VIRUS

THE BINDING ENERGY BETWEEN SARS-COV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN AND ACE2 WAS HIGHEST FOR HUMANS OUT OF ALL SPECIES TESTED

THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LAB CREATION GAIN-OF-THREAT INSERTIONS AT POLYBASIC FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE PRRA IS EVIDENCE VIRUS WAS MODIFIED FOR INCREASED INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENICITY - DR. RONEN SHEMESH

ARGININE / FURIN

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT MADE A COVID-19, THAT OCCURRED IN NATURE, MORE TRANSMITTABLE AND MORE LETHAL

LASTING AFTER EFFECTS UNLIKE OTHER CORONA VIRUSES

CHRONOLOGY

HIGH RECOMBINATION AND MUTATION RATES IN MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS SUGGEST THAT CORONAVIRUSES MAY BE POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT EMERGING VIRUSES

REVERSE GENETICS WITH A FULL-LENGTH INFECTIOUS CDNA OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

2002-2004 THE WIV SCIENTISTS BEGAN COLLECTING BAT VIRUS SINCE THE SARS-1 OUTBREAK

DEVELOPMENT OF MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS MHV AND SARS-COV INFECTIOUS CDNA CONSTRUCTS (BARIC)

COMPOSITIONS OF CORONAVIRUSES WITH A RECOMBINATION-RESISTANT GENOME (BARIC)

REVIEW OF BATS AND SARS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS - GoT

SHI ZHENGLI: DIFFERENCE IN RECEPTOR USAGE BETWEEN SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME (SARS) CORONAVIRUS AND SARS-LIKE CORONAVIRUS OF BAT ORIGIN

PETER DASZAK: RISK OF VIRAL EMERGENCE FROM BATS (DASZAK)

RON FOUCHIER, EARLY GAIN-OF-THREAT "SCIENTIST CREATED AN AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS IN FAVOR OF SHARING H5N1 VIRUS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

W.H.O. CONCERNED THAT NEW H5N1 INFLUENZA RESEARCH COULD UNDERMINE THE 2011 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA PFREPAREDNESS FRAMEWORK

THE PAPER DESCRIBING HOW THE LETHAL H5N1 BIRD FLU COULD BE MADE EASIER TO SPREAD WAS PUBLISHED SIX MONTHS AFTER A SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD SUGGESTED THAT THE PAPERS’ MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DATA BE CENSORED.

FOUCHIER EXPLAINED HOW EASY IT WAS TO CREATE AN AIRBORNE AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS USING GAIN-OF-THREAT TECHNOLOGY

US-CHINA ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP; KUNMING, CHINA

BATS AS ANIMAL RESERVOIRS FOR THE SARS CORONAVIRUS: HYPOTHESIS PROVED AFTER 10 YEARS OF VIRUS HUNTING VIROLOGICA SINICA

NIAD AND HIH GRANTS

ONE OF SEVERAL NEAR FATAL ERRORS THAT TRIGGERED THE GoF / GOT BAN INVOLVED H5N1 INFLUENZA VIRUS

OBAMA BANS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH IN US

DOING DILIGENCE TO ASSESS THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF LIFE SCIENCES GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT OUTSOURCED TO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AFTER AMERICA BANS IT AS TOO DANGEROUS

UNDERSTANDING THE RISK OF BAT CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCE (DASZAK)

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CHIMERIC CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS (BARIC)

SPILLOVER AND PANDEMIC PROPERTIES OF ZOONOTIC VIRUSES WITH HIGH HOST PLASTICITY (DASZAK)

SARS-LIKE WIV1-COV POISED FOR HUMAN EMERGENCE / SHI ZHENGLI AND BARIC CO-AUTHORS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE ARGUMENT IS ESSENTIALLY A RERUN OF THE DEBATE OVER WHETHER TO ALLOW LAB RESEARCH THAT INCREASES THE VIRULENCE, EASE OF SPREAD OR HOST RANGE OF DANGEROUS PATHOGENS — WHAT IS KNOWN AS ‘GAIN-OF-FUNCTION’ RESEARCH.

2015 ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT OF PROPOSED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

As with all life sciences research involving pathogens, GOF studies entail inherent biosafety and biosecurity risks. GOF research involving the generation of pathogens with pandemic potential involves the greatest risks. A laboratory accident involving such a pathogen could potentially release a pathogen that could spread rapidly and efficiently through the human population.

BAT SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME-LIKE CORONAVIRUS WIV1 ENCODES AN EXTRA ACCESSORY PROTEIN, ORFX, INVOLVED IN MODULATION OF THE HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE (BARIC, SHI ZHENGLI)

EFFICIENT REVERSE GENETIC SYSTEMS FOR RAPID GENETIC MANIPULATION OF EMERGENT AND PREEMERGENT INFECTIOUS CORONAVIRUSES

INSIDE THE CHINESE LAB POISED TO STUDY WORLD'S MOST DANGEROUS PATHOGENS MAXIMUM-SECURITY BIOLAB IS PART OF PLAN TO BUILD NETWORK OF BSL-4 FACILITIES ACROSS CHINA

BAT CAVE SOLVES MYSTERY OF DEADLY SARS VIRUS — AND SUGGESTS NEW OUTBREAK COULD OCCUR: CHINESE SCIENTISTS FIND ALL THE GENETIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF SARS IN A SINGLE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE BATS.

NOVEMBER 2017 DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS

TRUMP LIFTS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT BAN

BSL-4 OPENS AT WIV JANUARY 19, 2018

NIH LIFTS FUNDING PAUSE ON GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

THE STATE DEPARTMENT CABLES INDICATE A LACK OF TRAINED TECHNICIANS AT WIV

BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

WANG YANYI

WUHAN LAB CHIEF WANG YANYI DISPUTES APRIL 2018 WIV NATURE ARTICLE

THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY VIRUS DATABASE WAS TAKEN OFFLINE

LACK OF CELL PHONE ACTIVITY AT WIV

ROAD BLOCKS AROUND WIV

FINANCING SHI ZHENGLI'S GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WAS PART OF THE PREDICT PROGRAM AND THAT IS WHY IT WAS SHUT DOWN

PATIENTS ZERO

DASZAK'S EMAIL'S DELETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2019 AND JANUARY 2020

FEDERAL OFFICIALS ENDED A MORATORIUM IMPOSED THREE YEARS AGO ON FUNDING RESEARCH THAT ALTERS GERMS TO MAKE THEM MORE LETHAL

EARLY W.H.O. REPORT

DASZAK WORKED CLOSELY WITH ZHENG-LI SHI WHEN SARS-CoV-19 SURFACED

THE BAT LADY WANTED TO CALL HER VIRUS TARS

RECTIFICATION OF LAB THAT MAPPED GENOME

WIV WAS CALLING IN OUTSIDERS TO HELP WITH BIOSAFETY

DASZAK CLAIMS HE WARNED THE WORLD ABOUT COVID

ZHENG-LI SHI: A PNEUMONIA OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW CORONAVIRUS OF PROBABLE BAT ORIGIN

NEW BIOSECURITY LAW DECREEDED IN CHINA

KRISTIAN ANDERSON STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATTING COVID-19

CHINESE ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT THE UNIQUE CORONA VIRUS WAS FOUND IN NATURE

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE CHINESE RESEARCHERS AT WIV WERE RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM THE GALVESTON NATIONAL LABORATORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AND OTHER U.S. ORGANIZATIONS, BUT THE CHINESE REQUESTED ADDITIONAL HELP

WHY CITE EXEMPTION FIVE?

TRUMP CUTS OFF FUNDS TO ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS ASKED THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY (NSABB) TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF ITS DEALINGS WITH THE WIV

WEIFENG SHI CLAIMS ANOMALOUS INSERTIONS CAN HAPPEN NATURALLY

TWO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY SCIENTISTS, XING-YI GE AND ZHENGLI-LI SHI, USE REVERSE GENETICS TO GENERATE A CHIMERICAL VIRUS CLOSELY RESEMBLING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS COVID-19

ORIGIN AND CROSS-SPECIES TRANSMISSION OF BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

POMPEO SAYS VIRUS WAS FROM LAB THEN WALKS IT BACK

TRUMP WANTED AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

TRUMP ENDS GRANT TO ECHO HEALTH ALLIANCE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GET ANONYMOUS GRANT FROM A CCP PUPPET

TRUMP PULLS USA OUT OF W.H.O.

NIH GRANT REINSTATED BUT THE MONEY CAN'T BE SUB-AWARDED TO THE WIV

TRUMP WANTS TO FORM A COMMISSION TO LOOK INTO THE WIV LAB LEAK

CHI COM AGENT OF INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK HEADED THE W.HO. TEAM THAT SUGGESTED COVID-19 ORIGINATED IN BARCELONA AND ENTERED CHINA VIA FROZEN MEAT

THE BARCELONA BEEF THEORY W.H.O. LEGITIMATIZED

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: HOW THE W.H.O.'S HUNT FOR COVID'S ORIGINS STUMBLED IN CHINA

ACCORDING TO W.H.O.'S REPORT DASZAK'S JOINT INTERNATIONAL TEAM EXAMINED FOUR SCENARIOS:

THE W.H.O. TEAM PUSHES THE PREPOSTEROUS THEORY THAT THE VIRUS WAS SPREAD TO HUMANS IN SHIPMENTS OF FROZEN FOODS FROM SPAIN

THE COVID IN SPAIN WAS NOT FOUND IN THE DRAIN

EVIDENCE FOR THE EARLY OCCURRENCE OF SARS-COV-2 FROM OTHER STUDIES

THE FROZEN FOOD THEORY LACKS ONE THING - THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN COVID CASES IN BARCELONA, SPAIN, BEFORE THE ONES IN HUNAN BROKE OUT

TYPE OF GOODS DEALT BY ENVIRONMENTAL POSITIVE STALLS / RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE COLD CHAIN IN 2019

THE PERSISTENCE OF LIVE SARS-COV-2 IN ENVIRONMENTS RELATED TO THE COLD-CHAIN / EXAMPLES OF INTRODUCTION OF COVID-19 INTO CHINA THROUGH IMPORTED COLD CHAIN PRODUCTS

CONCLUSIONS

THE HUNAN MARKET ORIGIN THEORY DEBUNKED BY W.H.O.

W.H.O.- INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

EXPLANATION OF HYPOTHESIS

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ARGUMENTS AGAINST INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD

HIGHLIGHTS FROM SHORT W.H.O. REPORT

W.H.O. REPORT IS A BIG NOTHING BURGER

USG REJECTS WHO INVESTIGATION

WALL STREET JOURNAL: SCIENTISTS REJECT COVID-COVER-UP ORCHESTRATED BY DASZAK

INVESTIGATE THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

FRANK COLLINS CLAIMS NEITHER NIH NOR NIAID HAVE EVER APPROVED ANY GRANT THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH ON CORONAVIRUSES THAT WOULD HAVE INCREASED THEIR TRANSMISSIBILITY OR LETHALITY FOR HUMANS

STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

CCP MOUTHPIECE GLOBAL TIMES: US INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION OF CORONAVIRUS ORIGINS EXPOSES ITS FOUR ‘ACHILLES HEELS’: GLOBAL TIMES EDITORIAL

RALPH BARIC'S ROLE IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

BARIC WAS CONDUCTING SARS RESEARCH BEFORE A 2003 OUTBREAK IN CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

BARIC'S LAB LEAKED IN 2003 AND CAUSED A MINOR EPIDEMIC IN NORTH CAROLINA

HOW CAN YOU HAVE SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS AND NOT HAVE SARS?

GAIN OF FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH INVOLVES CREATION OF RECOMINANT VIRUS IN UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA IN COLLABORATION WITH SCIENTISTS FROM WIV

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 9, 2015

BARIC'S LAB RAT BITES STUDENT

REDACTIONS OF BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS

BARIC SUPPORTS THE ZOONOTIC THEORY BECAUSE HE PLAYED A PART IN STARTING THE PANDEMIC DUE TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH WIV SCIENTISTS

TRUMP-FUELED SUSPICION OF WUHAN LAB ENSNARES NEW YORK NONPROFIT RESEARCHING BAT CORONAVIRUSES

ANTHONY FAUCHI EMAILS

THE ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GRANTS

SAM HUSSEINI: PETER DASZAK'S ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE HAS HIDDEN ALMOST $40 MILLION IN PENTAGON FUNDING AND MILITARIZED PANDEMIC SCIENCE

THE PREDICT PROGRAM WAS A CON JOB AND FAILURE: IT HAS BEEN ALLEGED THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THE GRANT MONEY WAS HIDDEN AWAY BY DASZAK FOR HIS OWN USE

ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE STAFF AND DUPES

SOME OF USAID/CIA ECO-HEALTH PREDICT CREW

Executives Listed on Filing

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

RmYN02 FURIN

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

ADDENDUM

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK EMAILS

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

W.H.O.

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

THE WET MARKET

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

Dr. William B. Karesh is the Executive Vice President for Health and Policy at EcoHealth Alliance. He serves as the president of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Working Group on Wildlife Diseases and also chairs the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Wildlife Health Specialist Group, a network of wildlife and health experts around the world. Dr. Karesh also serves on the World Health Organization's (W.H.O.) International Health Regulations Roster of Experts focused on the human-animal interface and wildlife health. Currently, Dr. Karesh is the EPT Partner Liaison for the USAID Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT-2 program, a >$120 million effort focused on predicting and preventing pandemic diseases. He is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Armine Arustamyan California Intercontinental University Degree Name Doctoral Field Of Study Business Administration Dates attended or expected graduation2010 – 2014 Activities and Societies: Global Business Leadership American University of Armenia Degree NameMaster's Degree Field Of Study System Management and Industrial Engineering Dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1997 Yerevan State University Degree Name Master Field Of Study Science in Physics Dates attended or expected graduation1987 – 1992

Leilani Francisco PhD MA PMP The Johns Hopkins University Degree Name Ph.D. Field Of Study International Public Health University of Maryland College Park Degree Name B.A. Field Of Study Sociocultural Anthropology University of South Florida Degree Name M.A.Field Of Study Applied Medical Anthropology

Dr. Epstein received a PhD in Disease Ecology from Kingston University, London and his DVM and MPH from Tufts University. A veterinarian and disease ecologist, Dr. Jonathan Epstein is the Vice President for Science and Outreach at EcoHealth Alliance. His research focuses on the ecology of emerging zoonotic viruses such as Nipah and Ebola virus, along with SARS, Midde East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and others that have emerged within Asia and Africa.

Evelyn Luciano Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA)Field Of StudyHuman Resources Management and Services Certificate Dates attended or expected graduation2003 – 2003 Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA) Field Of Study Counseling Psychology dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1999 Community Mental Health and School Counseling Catholic University of Puerto Rico Degree Name BSN Field Of Study Bachelor of Science In Nursing Grade BSN Dates attended or expected graduation1975 – 1979

Dr. Ellen Carlin DVM is Assistant Research Professor at the Center for Global Health Science and Security, with a primary faculty appointment within the Department of Microbiology and Immunology. Her research interests are in the epidemiology of emerging infections. She studies incidence and transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens, focusing on the interfaces among people, animals, and the environments in which they live. She was Senior Professional Staff with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security (Peter T. King, NY), where for more than five years she handled medical preparedness, biodefense, and science and technology policy. At Georgetown, Ellen is also the director of the Global Infectious Disease graduate program at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Aleksei Chmura: Experienced Chief Of Staff with a demonstrated history of working in the non-profit organization management industry. Skilled in Nonprofit Organizations, Environmental Science, Research, Community Outreach, and Budgeting. Strong administrative professional with a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Biology/Biological Sciences, General from Kingston University. Kingston University is ranked 581 in QS World University Rankings by TopUniversities and enjoys a poor reputation.

Anthony Ramos: Former Senior Director Marketing and Development at EcoHealth Alliance Former Director of Marketing at Schneider Associates Studied Classic Culinary Arts at The French Culinary Institute Studied International relations at Boston University Lives in Lake, Michigan.

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

DASZAK: I'm in charge of in the organization in China...So the point is to establish capabilities in other countries not just take specimens from them and bring them back... that's the strategy and you know this the old adage that if you teach people how to do it, give them the tools then you've really made a difference. The money always dries up and this is something we've seen in the nonprofit world. You get great funding for five years from the foundation they always shift priorities because that's what emerged they closed them down. We have our staff in countries. We have sub contracts through local universities or agencies in-country and we have contracts to do work and it's all collaborative science so people love to interact on collaborative science. You know what I found especially in places like China where increasingly there's a paranoia around collaboration. Science collaboration is open and transparent because of the nature of what you're trying to do you're trying to discover stuff quickly, understand what it means, publish it in high-impact journal, and that drives openness and transparency and that's been great for us around the world it's also great for the U.S. and that's we really need to push that agenda. I think publishing is a very interesting mechanism you have to publish that's the argument we use.

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

Daszak is a double agent who CIA thought was working for them but had been rolled over by the Chinese Communist Party because his father was a Nazi War Criminal, a death camp guard, who taught him to respect authoritarian governments. Daszak became a W.H.O. & Lancet inspector. A good place to be to cover-up for the Chinese and himself after he funneled money to the WIV and to the Bat Lady experiments which resulted in COVID-19 being created. And there is the question of how much money was siphoned off by Daszak?

Daszak: “I’ve seen incredible efforts from everything from [religious sect] Falun Gong to the [Chinese dissident] Miles Guo camp, Steve Bannon’s group pushing the conspiracy theories around China. It’s useful to them. They’re funding it and pushing it and science has been to some extent caught up in that to other instances absolutely crushed by it. We’ve not had access to work in China on the origins for the last 12 months, which is ironic because we could have been on the ground there working with our Chinese colleagues and by now we could have found some really important answers. The rhetoric has held that up. We need that communication [with the Chinese] in an outbreak to learn from them how they control it so we can control it better. It's sad to say, but it will probably cost lives. By sort of narrow-mindedly focusing in on ourselves, or on labs, or on certain cultural politics, we miss the real enemy.”
Daszag was a prime target of Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP via EcoHealth. He parrots the Party Line. But he also was co-opted by the CIA until Trump cut his funds off. ECOHEALTH is a think tank put together by the AID CIA LITE that was supposed to protect America from Pandemics by keeping an eye on bats. But ECOHEALTH began to subsidize Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat experiments at WIV and a recombinant virus leaked from the lab into the streets of Wuhan then into the market and out again. Was it coincidence that SARSCov2 started close to WIV? Just how close the Chinese won't say as they refuse to give out the address of patient zero.

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

"THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER DONORS WHO FUNDED OR COLLABORATED ON CIVILIAN RESEARCH AT THE WIV HAVE A RIGHT AND OBLIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY OF OUR RESEARCH FUNDING WAS DIVERTED TO SECRET CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS AT THE WIV." US EMBASSY FACT SHEET

The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior Researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. Accidental infections in labs have caused several previous virus outbreaks in China and elsewhere, Including a 2004 SARS outbreak in Beijing that infected nine people, killing one. The CCP has prevented independent journalists, investigators, and global health authorities from interviewing researchers at the WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry into the origin of the virus must include interviews with these researchers and a full accounting of their previously unreported illness. Starting in at least 2016 – and with no indication of a stop prior to the COVID-19 outbreak – WIV researchers conducted experiments involving RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). The WIV became a focal point for international coronavirus research after the 2003 SARS outbreak and has since studied animals including mice, bats, and pangolins. The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus, including “RaTG13,” which it sampled from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like illness. W.H.O. investigators must have access to the records of the WIV’s work on bat and other coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak. As part of a thorough inquiry, they must have a full accounting of why the WIV altered and then removed online records of its work with RaTG13 and other viruses.
Secrecy and non-disclosure are standard practice for Beijing. For many years the United States has publicly raised concerns about China’s past biological weapons work, which Beijing has neither documented nor demonstrably eliminated, despite its clear obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention. Today’s revelations just scratch the surface of what is still hidden about COVID-19’s origin in China. Any credible investigation into the origin of COVID-19 demands complete, transparent access to the research labs in Wuhan, including their facilities, samples, personnel, and records. As the world continues to battle this pandemic – and as W.H.O. investigators begin their work, after more than a year of delays – the virus’s origin remains uncertain. The United States will continue to do everything it can to support a credible and thorough investigation, including by continuing to demand transparency on the part of Chinese authorities.Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The United States and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

The United States has repeatedly called for a transparent and thorough investigation into the origin of COVID-19. Understanding the origin of this pandemic is essential for global public health, economic recovery, and international security. To assist the vital work of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) investigative team that arrived in China this week, the United States government is today sharing new information concerning the activities inside China’s government laboratories in 2019. In particular, we urge the W.H.O. to press the government of China to address the following: Illnesses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV): The United States government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. WIV Research on “RaTG13” and “gain-of-function”: Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers studied RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). Since the outbreak, the WIV has not been transparent nor consistent about its work with RaTG13 or other similar viruses, including possible “gain-of-function” experiments to enhance transmissibility or lethality. Secret WIV Links to Military Research: Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The COVID-19 pandemic was avoidable. Any responsible country would have invited world health investigators to Wuhan within days of an outbreak. China instead refused offers of help – including from the United States – and punished brave Chinese doctors, scientists, and journalists who tried to alert the world to the dangers of the virus. Beijing continues today to withhold vital information that scientists need to protect the world from this deadly virus, and the next one. The United States reiterates the importance of unfettered access to virus samples, lab records and personnel, eyewitnesses, and whistleblowers to ensure the credibility of the W.H.O.’s final report. Until the CCP allows a full and thorough accounting of what happened in Wuhan, it is only a matter of time until China births another pandemic and inflicts it on the Chinese people, and the world.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/ensurin...-investigation-of-covid-19s-origin/index.html

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

Baric taught SHI ZHENGLI all she knows about virus creation at the University of North Carolina. Collwell is focused on oceans. Saif is a vet. Hume Field and rest work for the bio-war criminal, Daszak!
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, who has been working in China for 15 years studying diseases that jump from animals to people, said, “We don’t know the source yet, but there’s pretty strong evidence that this is a bat origin coronavirus.” He said, “It’s probably going to be the Chinese horseshoe bat,” a common species that weighs up to an ounce.

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

But zoonoses fall into a gray area, and the 2003 monkeypox outbreak in the Midwest is a perfect example of what can go wrong, said Peter Daszak, director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine at the Wildlife Trust, a group specializing in human-animal diseases. The disease, related to smallpox but less deadly, arrived in a shipment of 18 Gambian giant pouched rats imported for a Chicago pet store, where they infected prairie dogs. By summer's end, there were 37 confirmed human cases -- none fatal, but some scary -- mostly among prairie-dog owners. Millions of live animals come into the country each year, and very few have really good surveillance," Dr. Daszak said. "Fish and Wildlife checks cargoes to see if they have endangered species, but it's the U.S.D.A. that does health checks, and they don't go unless it's an agricultural product, so the pet trade tends to get a pass." "The C.D.C. does a great job with outbreak investigation, but that's after the fact," he said of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "After monkeypox, they put a blanket ban on rodents from some West African countries. But who's looking at rodents from other places? Nobody. And that's a gap."
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/us/sentries-in-us-seek-early-signs-of-an-avian-flu.html

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

It is likely, the study found, that one of these "SARS-like" viruses evolved into the SARS virus at an exotic animal marketplace, where it infected civets, which, in turn, infected humans, according to Michael Farzan, a Harvard Medical School assistant professor who was not involved in the research. But why did this happen when it did? One intriguing possibility is that it is linked to China's economic boom, according to Peter Daszak, a co-author of the SARS paper who is executive director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. With the newfound wealth there, he said, animal markets have grown as more people can afford fresh animal meat. As the markets grow, so do the chances that a virus will jump from one species to the next.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/26/health/blaming-bats-when-man-may-be-culprit.html

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

The flu that is moving through humans appears to have a combination of genes from two normally separate sets of pigs, those from the Americas and from Eurasia, scientists say. However, it is unknown how those pigs met, and there is not yet any genetic proof that this particular flu was ever in a pig. Peter Daszak, president of the Wildlife Trust, found records showing that Mexico imported two pigs from France in 2007, the United States imported a few from Britain and Ireland, and Canada imported hundreds from Europe. “And surely this isn’t the whole truth,” he said. “There must be a hidden illegal trade.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/health/01origin.html

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

“By mapping encroachment into the forest you can predict where the next disease could emerge,” Dr. Daszak, EcoHealth’s president, says. “So we’re going to the edge of villages, we’re going to places where mines have just opened up, areas where new roads are being built. We are going to talk to people who live within these zones and saying, ‘what you are doing is potentially a risk.’”
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-ecology-of-disease.html

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

Peter Daszak, a parasitologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, has even put a number on it: 5.3 new ones each year, based on a study using data from 1940 to 2004. He and his co-authors blamed population growth, deforestation, antibiotic overuse, factory farming, live animal markets, bush meat hunting, jet travel and other factors.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/health/new-tools-to-hunt-new-viruses.htm

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

It was the darkest hour since the new illness, known as Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, first appeared in Saudi Arabia late in 2012. In all, more than 700 cases have been documented in 20 countries, nearly all of them linked to Saudi Arabia. More than 250 people have died. King Abdullah fired the country’s health minister and his deputy in April, leaving experts wondering whether the shake-up would bring greater transparency and international cooperation. “In the U.S., when you have a crisis like the Veterans Administration scandal, the new head is in front of the TV cameras explaining what the new plan is,” said Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a veterinary organization that tracked the disease in animals. “There is no tradition of openness in Saudi Arabia.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/world/middleeast/flawed-saudi-response-fueled-outbreak-of-mers-middle-east-virus.htm

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

Daszak describes Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, as exactly the kind of threat that Disease X was meant to represent: a novel, highly infectious coronavirus, with a high mortality rate, and no existing treatment or prevention. “The problem isn’t that prevention was impossible,” Daszak told me. “It was very possible. But we didn’t do it. Governments thought it was too expensive. Pharmaceutical companies operate for profit.” And the W.H.O., for the most part, had neither the funding nor the power to enforce the large-scale global collaboration necessary to wit. Examples from several countries suggest that the Chinese vaccines may not be very effective at preventing the spread of the virus, particularly the new variants, but Daszak overlooks this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/magazine/pandemic-vaccine.html

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

We, the undersigned, are public health scientists who have closely followed the emergence of 2019-nCoV, and are deeply concerned about its impact on global health and well-being. We have watched as the scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable. We sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China who continue to save lives and protect global health during the challenge of this novel coronavirus outbreak. We are all in this together, with our Chinese counterparts in the forefront, against this new viral threat. The rapid, open and transparent sharing of data on 2019-nCoV is now being threatened by rumors and misinformation around the origins of this outbreak. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that 2019-nCoV does not have a natural origin. Scientists from multiple countries have published and analyzed 2019-nCoV genomes1, and they overwhelmingly conclude that this virus originated in wildlife, as have so many other emerging diseases. This is further supported by a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and by the scientific communities they represent. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumors, and prejudice that jeopardize our global collaboration in the fight against this virus. We support the call from the Director-General of the World Health Organization to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture13. We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus. We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the front-line!
Signatories
Dr. James Hughes, Professor Emeritus, Emory University School of Medicine
Dr. Rita Colwell, Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland College Park
Dr. Linda Saif, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University
Dr. Billy Karesh, Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Peter Daszak, President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Hume Field, Honorary Professor, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

When peterdaszak.com went online the first ones to become aware of it were the Chinese The CCP had an alert on their agent Peter Daszak. But by visiting the page they confirmed the fact he was a Chinese agent or agent of influence. Peter was a prime target for Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP. He parrots the Party Line. The Nazi ideas he learned from his father made him respect the Reds, who are sterilizing ethnic minorities like the Nazis did.

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

Communism found a receptive home in mainland China. The WIV is run by Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee CHANGCAI HE who was the chairman of the corporate trade union of Wuhan Branch from Jan. 2004 to Sep. 2013, and the Corporate Secretary of the Party at Wuhan Branch from Oct. 2005 to Jul. 2013. Since the Aug. of 2013, he has been the deputy director general of Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS. This CCP apparatchik runs the institute and if anyone steps out of line they are either imprisoned, sent to a "re-grooving" institute or killed.
Changcai HE: http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Directors2016

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

Academician Xi Chong Nanshan has already delivered a speech on TV. Wuhan New Coronavirus is not the true source of the virus. There are 5 new coronavirus series, ABCDE bat sleeve BAT (H52) and then mutates H53> The C family pathogens in China, with variants of C56 and MV2, spread throughout the world. But the United States had five major families of ABCDE two years ago, the US Government CDC (Center Disease of Control) Concealing the illness, when a military contest was held in Wuhan in November, two American soldiers went to the Wuhan Hospital in Hubei to catch a cold. It was the first hospital in Wuhan, China, which discovered a coronavirus transmission in early December (Golden Eagle) Tan Hospital and Wuhan Central Hospital). From this calculation, it should be that the US soldiers brought the virus into Wuhan in the Wuhan military competition, and the virus series H1 (referred to as the son) came to China. If China wants to check the origin of these two American blood sources, we can confirm the source. The US should have ABCDE two years ago (H13, H3, H1, H56, MV2) These five kinds of viruses have hundreds of pathogens in bats. Among them, the United States has mutated five kinds of pathogens. The United States has always been a stable fact. This is why the U.S. government is in a hurry to send them Americans back to the United States, and is afraid to find pathogens from Americans. In this way, the outbreak of the new coronavirus can rest on the Chinese. The viruses in the Middle East are MV2 and H56. No such virus has been detected in China. The seriously ill Iranians said that they had never been to China and had no Chinese friends, but had been to the United States. The world knows that many wealthy people in Middle Eastern countries buy properties in the United States, and their children are also studying in the United States. I am going to write this article today and spread it to the seven major media in the world. My title will read "Americans are the tumors of the world's viruses." The Washington Post published the title of the article last month, stating "Chinese are sick men of East Asia", the birthplace of the virus. I let the world see the hypocrisy, viciousness, loss of conscience, and the spread of the virus to people all over the world.

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world, that's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic."

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

COVID-19 has NOT been found in bats nor in any intermediate species. Peter Daszak insisits the virus jumped from an intermediate species to humans to cover up the fact that the virus' creation was financed by Eco-Health Alliance. Daszak used the CIA / USAID / PENTAGON money he didn't pocket to fund the project that was supposed to predict a SARS-like viral emergence with is bogus "PREDICT PROGRAM."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/14/health/WHO-covid-daszak-china-virus.html
Daszak reflected on the atmosphere in Wuhan and his first glimpse of the seafood market where the initial outbreak occurred last year, although it was not the site of the first cases. He also said the path ahead would be straightforward scientifically, but not politically. A transcript of the conversation, condensed and edited for length, follows:
James Gorman: You’ve been to China and to Wuhan many times before. How was this different?
DASZAK: Well, this was weird. There’s certain things when you go into China that you’re supposed to do. The first thing you do is have a meeting and then have a meal. And if you don’t have a meal, it’s considered extremely rude. This time we spent two weeks in Zoom calls from our quarantine hotel. Then we went to meet in person and still didn’t have meals with our host. We had meals in a separate room. So it was just a very difficult, very intense, very emotional trip. In Wuhan, there’s this feeling of post-traumatic shock. The city went on lockdown, I think, 76 days. They were locked in their apartments — people died, and they didn’t know about it. And from then on, they’ve been accused of starting a pandemic, and it’s been called the Wuhan virus, the China virus, and there was just a sense of outrage and sadness.
James Gorman: Did that make it difficult in terms of the scientific purpose of the trip?
DASZAK: No. You’ve got a task to do. You’ve volunteered. You know what it’s going to be like. You get caught up in the historical importance. I don’t know if we were the first foreigners to walk around the Huanan seafood market, which is blocked off even to Chinese citizens. The only people that have been in there have been the Chinese disease investigators. We met with the doctors that treated the first known Covid patients. ¹These people have been through harrowing conditions, and they’re now lauded as heroes in China, and then the rest of the world now is fighting that war. And China, of course, is absolutely petrified of this virus catching hold again. When you arrive at the airport, they come on the plane in full P.P.E.; you’re escorted down a separate quarantine pathway; you get tested. You’re driven to the hotel, you go in your room, and you’re locked in for two weeks. It’s just severe. The people who come to your door are in full P.P.E. The waste from your trash, from the hotel room, goes into a yellow bag with a biohazard sign on it. It was a totally different experience when I returned home, where I didn’t even get a notification that I’ve got to quarantine. I signed on to the New York state app, but no one is going to knock on my door and tell me, “Stay indoors.”
1. But Daszak didn't get their names. James Gorman:
Did you learn anything from this trip that you didn’t know before?
DASZAK: From Day 1, the data we were seeing were new that had never been seen outside China. Who were the vendors in the Huanan seafood market? Where did they get their supply chains? And what were the contacts of the first cases? How real were the first cases? What other clusters were there? When you asked for more, the Chinese scientists would go off, and a couple of days later, they’ve done the analysis, and we’ve got new information. It was extremely useful. At the time, you couldn’t really say much. We were trying to not undermine the process by revealing anything while we were on the trip.
James Gorman: What can you say now about the market and what you saw?
DASZAK: The market closed on the 31st of December 31, 2020 or January 1, 2021, and China C.D.C. sent a team in of scientists to try and find out what was going on. It was a very extensive study, swabbing every surface of this place. We knew early on that there were 500 samples collected, and there were many positives, and in that sampling were some animal carcasses, or meat. But there was not really much information publicly about what had been done. So we got all that information. And that, to me, was a real eye-opener. They’d actually done over 900 swabs in the end, a huge amount of work. They had been through the sewage system. They’d been into the air ventilation shaft to look for bats. They’d caught animals around the market. They’d caught cats, stray cats, rats, they even caught one weasel. They’d sampled snakes. People had live snakes at the market, live turtles, live frogs. Rabbits were there, rabbit carcasses. A farm with rabbits could have been really critical. There was talk about badgers, and in China, when they say badger, that means ferret badger. It’s a mustelid, related to weasels. Animals were coming into that market that could have carried the coronavirus. They could have been infected by bats somewhere else in China and brought it in. So that’s clue No. 1. There were 10 stalls that sold wildlife. There were vendors from South China, including Yunnan Province, Guangxi Province and Guangdong Province. Yunnan Province is where the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is found in bats. Guangxi and Guangdong are where the pangolins were captured. They had close viruses. You’ve got animals coming in to the market which are susceptible. Some of these are coming from places where we know the nearest relatives of the virus are found. So there’s the real red flag. Now the Chinese group did swab those animals, and they were all negative, but it’s just one small group of animals in the freezer that were left behind. We don’t know what else was for sale there. So these two clues are really important. When we got to actually visit the market, to me it was quite striking. The pictures you see of that market closed now are of quite orderly buildings with shutters, and you think, This a very efficient, typical city market. It doesn’t really look like a live animal market. Once you get there on the ground, it’s different. It’s pretty ramshackle. It looks like a place that would sell live animals. There’s plenty of evidence of live aquatic animals, the turtle tanks, the fish tanks, the snakes, which we know were available. What we now have are a clear link and a potential pathway.
James Gorman: What about the cases that appeared before the outbreak in the seafood market?
DASZAK: There was other spread going on outside of Huanan market. There are other patients who have no links to the market, quite a few in December. There were other markets. And we do know that some of the patients had links to other markets. We need to do some further work, and then the Chinese colleagues need to do some further work. When we sat down as a group, the China team and the W.H.O. team on the last full day of work, and said, “Let’s go through the hypotheses,” the one that received the most enthusiastic support was this pathway — wildlife, through a domesticated wildlife link, into Wuhan.
James Gorman: What is the next step?
DASZAK: For the animals chain, it’s straightforward. The suppliers are known. They know the farm name; they know the owner of the farm. You’ve got to go down to the farm and interview the farmer and the family. You’ve got to test them. You’ve got to test the community. You’ve got to go and look and see if there are any animals left at any farms nearby and see if they’ve got evidence of infection, and see if there is any cross-border movement. If the virus is in those southern border states, it’s possible that there’s been some movement across neighboring countries like Vietnam, Laos or Myanmar. We’re finding more and more related viruses now. There’s one in Japan and one in Cambodia, one in Thailand. For the human side, look for earlier cases, for clusters; look in blood banks for serum, if possible. Anything like this is going to be sensitive in China, and it’s going to take some persuasion and diplomacy and energy for them to do that because, to be honest, looking for the source of this virus within China is not a great, high priority I think for the Chinese government. Anywhere this virus is shown to emerge is a political issue. That’s one of the problems, and that is clear and obvious to anyone who has been looking at this.
James Gorman: Do you have a particular animal that you suspect right now as an intermediate link, more strongly than others?
DASZAK: IT’S TOO UP IN THE AIR. We don’t know if civets were on sale. We know they are very easily infected. We don’t know what the situation is with the mink farms in China or the other fur farms, like raccoon dogs, even though they’re normally farmed in a different part of China. That needs to be followed up on, too. But if you were to say which pathway would you put the most weight on, I think the virus emerging either in Southeast Asia or Southern China from bats, getting into a domesticated wildlife farm. I’ve been to many of these, and they often have mixed species — civets, ferret badgers, raccoon dogs. Those animals would be able to get infected from bats. Either the people that work there get infected and bring it in, or animals are shipped in, live or recently killed, that bring the virus into a market. Once it’s in a market — either Huanan or another one in Wuhan — you’ve got a dense population of people moving through those markets. And it’s going to be a real potential for an amplification.
James Gorman: The new data that you saw, for instance, on the vendors and their supply chains, will that be in your full report?
DASZAK: I hope so. There’ll be some things that are going to be confidential, without a doubt. Patient records are kept highly confidential in China. We have an image in the West of China being authoritarian and they are videoing everyone. They can have access to anything. But patient records are very private, and some are not accessible. We wanted to meet with certain patients. They didn’t want to meet, so they weren’t pushed to meet with us. There’s no reason to believe that was shenanigans. I’m hoping all the information about vendors, vendor chains will be there. But if not, we’ve seen it. We’ve got it. And we will be following up.

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

Nearly one-quarter of the world’s mammal species are bats, and their ability to fly while hosting a petri dish of viruses makes them both zoological marvels and efficient vectors of disease. Infectious diseases that are believed to have emerged from bats in recent decades include coronaviruses like SARS and MERS, along with other viruses like Nipah, Hendra and Ebola. Most of these viruses were transferred from bats to an intermediate host, like a palm civet or camel, before making their way to humans.
The coronavirus that causes Covid-19, which came to public attention in late 2019, has not been conclusively traced to bats, in Yunnan Province in southwestern China.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/world/asia/thailand-bats-coronavirus.html
The WIV was awarded a patent for cages to hold live bats for testing just months before the virus started spreading. The Mail has established that the WIV filed an application in June 2018 to patent "bat rearing cages capable of healthy growth and breeding under artificial conditions." The patent was granted in January 2019. A separate patent, filed by the WIV on October 16, 2020, relates to the "artificial breeding method of wild bat."The patent discusses cross-species transmission of SARS- CoV from bat to humans and other animals, saying: "Bats infected with the virus naturally or artificially have no obvious clinical symptoms, and the mechanism is unknown. The invention aims to provide an artificial breeding method of wild bat predators, which aims at overcoming the defects in the prior art, and the wild bat predators are artificially domesticated, bred and passaged to establish an artificial breeding group, thereby providing a brand-new model experimental animal for scientific research." Daszak tweeted in April 2020: "The researchers don't keep the bats, nor do they kill them. All bats are released back to their cave site after sampling. It's a conservation measure and is much safer in terms of disease spread than killing them or trying to keep them in a lab. The WIV does not have live or dead bats in it. There is no evidence anywhere that this happened"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-planned-breed-animals-virus-experiments.html

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

The CCP controlled scientists can only find a virus in nature that resembles SARS-CoV-2 and not the virus itself is telling. A virus virtually identical to SARS-CoV-1 was found in the Himalayan, or masked, palm civet. It is related to the mongoose, resembles a large weasel and is a threatened species. There are viruses in bats closely resembling SARS-CoV-2 that were used in the gain-of-threat experiments. Until SARS-CoV-2 is discovered in animals it is laboratory escape.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/24/world/strain-of-sars-is-found-in-3-animal-species-in-asia.html
Initial phylogenetic analyses reveal that the SARS-CoV-1 in civets and humans actually come from two distant branches, but the SARS-CoV from civets during the incipient phase of the epidemic had 99.8% sequence similarity to the human SARS-CoV “Our research has shown that the SARS coronavirus found in human victims is the same as the SARS coronavirus found in civet cats,” a paper quoted Wang Ming, an official from the Guangzhou Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, as saying. As research progressed horseshoes bats were blamed, however, the Chinese put an end tothe epidemic when they slaughters and boiled most of the civets in all of China. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ame2.12017

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

David Asher, a former lead investigator of the task force created by the Trump administration, said it was "sort of ridiculous" to believe the deadly disease passed naturally from animals to humans. "We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci's NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The data disproportionately stacked up, as we investigated, that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source. I had biostatisticians at one of our national labs calculate the odds of this evolving in nature, and it was like 1 in 13 million, and then they revised it to about 1 in 13 billion. So, to say this came out of a zoonotic situation is sort of ridiculous. We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. [Anthony] Fauci’s NIAID organization, that there was almost no evidence that supported a natural zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The epicenter of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain of function techniques.” State Department official Chris Ford "seemed disinterested,” Asher recalled. “He said even if we came to it, how did we know where it came out of, what lab. Very rarely in my life in government have I ever encountered someone who was more of a ‘neg’-ocrat, less a bureaucrat, than that individual.”
Fauci acknowledged that NIH granted the Wuhan lab $600,000 over a period of five years to investigate bat coronaviruses, but emphatically denied the money was used for gain of threat research. However, according to David Asher, “the Chinese most certainly felt that NIH was supporting their gain of function research” and claimed that the variants developed in the lab “were not similar to anything, for example, what could occur in natural evolution.”

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

DISCUSSION: We investigated the patterns of molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. Although the genomic analyses suggested that SARS-CoV-2 was closest to RaTG13, their difference at neutral sites was much higher than previously realized. Our results provide novel insights for tracing the intermediate natural host of SARS-CoV-2. With population genetic analyses of 103 genomes of SARS-CoV-2, we found that SARS-CoV-2 viruses had two major lineages (L and S lineages), and the two lineages were well defined by just two SNPs that show complete linkage across SARS-CoV-2 strains. The L lineage (~70%) was found to be more prevalent than the S lineage (~30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, our evolutionary analyses suggested the S appeared to be more related to coronaviruses in animals. Since nonsynonymous sites are usually under stronger negative selection than synonymous sites, calculating sequence differences without separating these two classes of sites could lead to a potentially significant underestimate of the degree of molecular divergence. For example, although the overall nucleotides only differed by ~4% between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, the genomic average dS value, which is usually a neutral proxy, was 0.17 between these two viruses (Table 1). Of note, the genome-wide dS value is 0.012 between humans and chimpanzees, and 0.08 between humans and rhesus macaques [36]. Thus, the neutral molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 is 14 times larger than that between humans and chimpanzees, and twice as large as that between humans and macaques. The genomic average dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GD Pangolin-CoV is 0.469, which is comparable to that between humans and mice (0.5), and the dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GX Pangolin-Cov is even larger (0.722). The scale of these measures suggests that we should perhaps consider the difference in the neutral evolving site rather than the difference in all nucleotide sequences when tracing the origin and natural intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. In this work, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 can be divided into two major lineages (L and S). Intriguingly, the S and L lineages can be clearly defined by just two tightly linked SNPs at positions 8,782 (orf1ab: T8517C, synonymous) and 28,144 (ORF8: C251T, S84L). orf1ab, which encodes replicase/transcriptase, is required for viral genome replication and might also be important for viral pathogenesis [38]. Although the T8517C mutation in orf1ab does not change the protein sequence (it changes the codon AGT (Ser) to AGC (Ser)), it may affect orf1ab translation since AGT is preferred while AGC is unpreferred (Table S2). ORF8 promotes the expression of ATF6, the ER unfolded protein response factor, in human cells. Thus, it will be interesting to investigate the function of the S84L AA change in ORF8, as well as the combinatory effect of these two mutations in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. As previously noted, the data examined in this study are still very limited, and follow-up analyses of a larger set of data are needed to have a better understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2.
https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036/5775463
If it could be proven that the virus mutated that would mean it was not artificial. "Even for pandemic flu — a virus much more given to rapid change than the one that causes Covid-19 — a few months would be a short timeline for a widespread functional mutation. There isn't a clear-cut evolutionary case for a virus like SARS-CoV2, which has already managed to infect more than 6 million people and often causes mild symptoms, to quickly get milder. If anything, it seems more likely that it would be genetically stable.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...-peak-lull-in-cases-doesn-t-mean-weaker-virus

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

"The corona virus that causes COVID-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, shares 96% of its genetic sequence with a virus found in bats. It is in the collection of viral genomes assembled during those studies that scientists have now found the bat virus closest to SARS-COV-2. A strain called RATG13 gathered in the same cave in Yunnan shares 96% of its genetic sequence with the new virus. RATG13 is not that virus’s ancestor. It is something more like its cousin. Edward Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney, estimates that the 4% difference between the two represents at least 20 years of evolutionary divergence from some common antecedent, and probably something more like 50."
https://www.economist.com/science-a...uzzle-of-covid-19s-origin-are-coming-to-light

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

In May 2020 WIV researchers identified RmYN02 from an analysis of 227 bat samples collected in Yunnan province, China, between May and October of 2019. "Since the discovery that bats were the reservoir of SARS coronavirus in 2005, there has been great interest in bats as reservoir species for infectious diseases, particularly as they carry a very high diversity of RNA viruses, including coronaviruses," Shi Zhengli says. RNA from the samples was sent for metagenomic next-generation sequencing in early January 2020, soon after the discovery of SARS-CoV-2. Across the whole genome, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is another virus, called RaTG13, which was previously identified from bats in Yunnan province. But RmYN02, the virus newly discovered here, is even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 in some parts of the genome, including in the longest encoding section of the genome called 1ab, where they share 97.2% of their RNA. The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SAR-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor binding domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells.
The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02, is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its spike protein meet. SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a four-amino-acid insertion at the junction of S1 and S2; this insertion is unique to the virus and has been present in all SARS-CoV-2 sequenced so far. According to SHI ZHENGLI insertions in RmYN02 are not the same as those in SARS-CoV-2, which indicates that they occurred through independent insertion events. But a similar insertion event happening in a virus identified in bats strongly suggests that these kinds of insertions are of natural origin. SHI ZHENGLI: "Our findings suggest that these insertion events that initially appeared to be very unusual can, in fact, occur naturally in animal betacoronaviruses. Our work sheds more light on the evolutionary ancestry of SARS-CoV-2. Neither RaTG13 nor RmYN02 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, because there is still an evolutionary gap between these viruses. But our study strongly suggests that sampling of more wildlife species will reveal viruses that are even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps even its direct ancestors, which will tell us a great deal about how this virus emerged in humans."
Pure speculation. No closer bat virus has been found as of June 13, 2021. The more likey scenario is that Shi Zhengli and Daszak modified a virus resembling SARS-CoV-19 in BSL-2 lab and it escaped.

RmYN02 FURIN

The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SARS-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that the novel coronavirus uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells, they said. The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02 is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its Spike Protein meet, according to the researchers. The viral Spike Protein mediates SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells and harbors a S1/S2 cleavage site containing multiple arginine residues (multibasic) not found in closely related animal coronaviruses. However, the role of this multibasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. Here, we report that the cellular protease furin ¹cleaves the Spike Protein at the S1/S2 site and that cleavage is essential for S-protein-mediated cell-cell fusion and entry into human lung cells. Moreover, optimizing the S1/S2 site increased cell-cell, but not virus-cell, fusion, suggesting that the corresponding viral variants might exhibit increased cell-cell spread and potentially altered virulence. Our results suggest that acquisition of a S1/S2 multibasic cleavage site was essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection of humans and identify furin as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276520302641

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

Highlights
• Pangolin-CoV is 91.02% identical to SARS-CoV-2 at the whole-genome level
• Pangolin-CoV is the second closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 behind RaTG13
• Five key amino acids in the RBD are consistent between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
• Only SARS-CoV-2 contains a potential cleavage site for furin proteases
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220303602
Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, an organization that works on animal-to-human spillover diseases, said that accumulating evidence on pangolins made it “doubtful that this species played a role in the outbreak.” “We need to keep looking for the original reservoir” — likely a bat,” he said, adding that the potential intermediate host would likely be another mammal species that’s more widely traded in the Yunnan-to-Wuhan corridor of China. While the pangolin trade is vast, Dr. Daszak said most of it “is in their scales, dried, in which viruses would almost certainly not be able to persist.” He opposes trade in the highly endangered animal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/pangolin-coronavirus.html

PETER DASZAK

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

Daszak still claims that any suggestion of a lab leak of a genetically altered virus is "conspiracy theory," a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event, a belief embraced by many Trumpoids who know something is happening, but don't know what it is. Of course Daszak had to say that the virus came from nature and anyone who disagreed was a conspiratorialist, otherwise people might examine his role in the pandemic. The other players roles who caused the pandemic were easily ascertainable by reviewing the scientific literature they generated while conducting these experiments with SARS-CoV-2 close relatives in the very city where the pandemic first broke out and in at least two USA labs..

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

Since 2014, the EcoHealth Alliance has received a grant from the National Institutes of Health, until its funding was abruptly cut two weeks ago. The reason, as “60 Minutes” reported on Sunday evening, was a conspiracy theory spread by Representative Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican who in March wore a gas mask on the House floor to mock concern about the new coronavirus. On April 14, 2020 Gaetz appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show and claimed that the N.I.H. grant went to the Wuhan Institute, which Gaetz intimated might have been the source of the virus — the institute may have “birthed a monster,” in his words. The first of Gaetz’s claims was flatly false, and the second unlikely; the C.I.A. has reportedly found no evidence of a link between the virus and the Wuhan lab. But at a White House briefing a few days later, a reporter from the right-wing website Newsmax told President Trump that under Barack Obama, the N.I.H. gave the Wuhan lab a $3.7 million grant. “Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?” she asked. In fact, Trump’s administration had recently renewed EcoHealth’s grant, but Trump didn’t appear to know that. “The Obama administration gave them a grant of $3.7 million?” he asked. Then he said, “We will end that grant very quickly.” And they did. But ending the grant dealt a blow to efforts to find treatments and a vaccine for the coronavirus. Remdesivir, the antiviral drug that’s shown some promise in Covid-19 patients, was earlier tested against bat viruses EcoHealth discovered. Months before this pandemic began, Reuters reported, the Trump administration axed the job of an epidemiologist working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China to help detect emerging disease outbreaks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/opinion/coronavirus-trump.html
NIH PRESS RELEASE: "The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans." In a previous R01 we found that bats in southern China harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs, some of which can use human ACE2 to enter cells, infect humanized mouse models causing SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines. nih.gov

DASZAK: "Look, first, the idea that this virus escaped from a lab is just pure baloney. It’s simply not true. I’ve been working with that lab for 15 years. And the samples collected were collected by me and others in collaboration with our Chinese colleagues. They’re some of the best scientists in the world. There was no viral isolate in the lab. There was no cultured virus that’s anything related to SARS coronavirus 2. So it’s just not possible.¹Now, how did it get into the market? We know for sure that the Wuhan market was part of this outbreak, but we think that the first few cases weren’t in the market. And this is not uncommon. We’ve seen this with many, many other disease outbreaks, new viruses that emerge. They trickle out from rural areas through a person getting infected maybe in Hunan province and then moving into Wuhan, that maybe they’re part of the wildlife trade. Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets. These wet markets aren’t just places to sell wildlife; they’re places where people congregate. They come in in droves. They circulate around. They’re really good places for a virus to spread. And if a person brings it in, or an animal, that virus will spread. And it looks like that’s what’s happened here."
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/peter_daszak_coronavirus
1. Dr. Wang Yanyi said the institute now had three strains of live viruses, including one that was 96 per cent genomically similar to the Sars virus. But their highest similarity to Sars-CoV-2 was only 79.8 per cent, Wang Yanyi said.
If the disease "trickled out from rural areas" because there are as many bats in Wuhan as there are in New York City why didn't someone in those rural areas become infected first? Why wasn't Hunan put under lock-down? "Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets." Why did the market closest to the Wuhan Institute of Virology get infected and no other wet markets? As documented in this Data Base the virus did not originate in the market but this Chinese agent of influence sticks with a variation of the market story.
"Before accepting the first batch of test samples from COVID-19 patients on December 30, 2019, the institute’s labs did not have the novel coronavirus and no one at the institute has contracted COVID-19 to this day. “It is impossible for the virus to leak from such a high-security laboratory,” said Yuan Zhiming, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in an interview with CGTN on April 18. The claim that the novel coronavirus escaped from the laboratory is pure nonsense, said Peter Daszak, chairperson of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit organization, who has been cooperating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 15 years. There is no virus cultivation related to the new coronavirus in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so the so-called “laboratory leak theory” is impossible, said Peter Daszak who is responsible for studying emerging infectious diseases worldwide."
https://business.facebook.com/188625661189259/posts/3264254063626388
Simply untrue as evidenced by the scientific papers generated by the Institute.

NPR DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world. That's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic. We're finding 1 to 7 million people exposed to these viruses every year in Southeast Asia; that's the pathway. It's just so obvious to all of us working in the field," he says. No conspiracy theories Despite the evidence, misinformation about the virus's origins continue to proliferate. For Peter Daszak who has worked on other outbreaks, the pattern is all too familiar: "Every time we get a new virus emerging, we have people that say, 'This could have come from a lab,'" he says. What's unusual about this outbreak, he says, is that senior officials in both China and the U.S. have traded accusations that each nation is somehow responsible for the virus. "It's a real shame that the conspiracy theories can get to the level they've got with policymakers," he says. The political heat has strained the very scientific collaborations meant to detect these viruses as they emerge, warns Jonna Mazet. The PREDICT system she runs relies on the voluntary cooperation of many countries, with researchers freely sharing data about viruses they're spotting within their borders. "With this sort of blame game that's going on, we put ourselves at much more risk." Peter Daszak says the time for finger-pointing is over. "We have a bat virus in my neighborhood in New York killing people," he says. "Let's get real about this."

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

“One thing that I heard from the WIV lab director that I thought was very interesting, and he said, and he speaks okay English, we were asking him all these questions about, they call them rumors over there, we call them conspiracy theories, and he said basically, in sort of his version of English, we’ve not responded to those rumors because if you do that, you give them oxygen. So I think people misunderstand the Chinese government, and he’s a Chinese government worker at the senior level running a lab, not speaking up about when they’re accused. The reason is, he stated quite clearly, they don’t want to give oxygen to these conspiracies. They’re unfounded. And every now and again, they make a statement: that is simply not true. What do you do?"

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

Do you think that we will ever know where Sars-Cov-2 came from – and does it matter?
DASZAK: It does matter, but we're never going to know 100 per cent for sure – it's very hard to definitively prove, without being there at the time. In that space of uncertainty, conspiracy theories abound – for instance the idea it could have been bio-engineered. This is ridiculous, but it’s time consuming to fight these fires. I think it will take a couple of years to track Sar-Cov-2 properly. ¹ We need to trace back the sorts of animals that were going into Wuhan’s wet market – and the people. It’s quite possible it was circulating on a farm for weeks or months before emerging in Wuhan. Every time we've looked at the origins of the new disease in the past, we’ve found out it was actually around a lot longer than thought. Perhaps we will find it was just missed because, in most people, it just causes a cough – who in rural China doesn't have a cough every now and again?
1. In a couple of years the trail would have dried up!
What do you think is driving the conspiracy theories we’ve seen over the last few months?
DASZAK: People buy into conspiracy theories because they’re convincing stories told by charismatic people with just enough science and fact to make them seem plausible. The truth also tends to be less interesting. In this case, people in China are exposed to bats, who harbour viruses. It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring. Clearly this is part of the politics now. Take the US. We're seeing conspiracy theories being elevated in a polarised press, to the point where politicians then use that to make policy decisions. Which is pretty frightening. This is ultimately damaging to public health: US media focus on the lab leak hypothesis has led to "political tensions hindering an effort to find the source of the virus." Not unexpected. When you mix politics with science, you get...politics!"
Who are your heroes and villains of the pandemic?
DASZAK: Then there are people like SHI ZHENGLI in China, who has stuck through death threats and a complete disparaging of her character, just to do what she does: try to save lives. A few have been convicted, but many have been dragged through the mud for no good cause. I've heard many in leadership positions at NIH & in academia say privately that this casts a shadow of McCarthyism & is clearly politically motivated.
It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring.¹ 1. There is only a cyclone fence around WIV. Making new virus is exciting, not boring. DASZAK: Finally the only cases in rural China where bats abound were characterized by a mild cough or no symptoms. No rural Chinese came down with full blown Sars-Cov-2.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

Trump issued a statement boasting of his early insistence that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus. “To me, it was obvious from the beginning,” he said. “But I was badly criticized, as usual.”Biden's investigation was prompted when in May 2021 the CCP refused to allow the W.H.O. to conduct further investigation. This former Congressional researcher is hoping this website, along with the lawsuit I am filing against Dr. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH & NAID, will spark a Congressional investigation of the lab origins of Covid-19. The Biden Corona Report has to exonerate China since if it blamed China how would the Western powers punish China? The New York Times started setting the tone for the cover-up:

"One allied nation [France?] passed on information that three workers in the Wuhan virological laboratory were hospitalized with serious flulike symptoms in the autumn of 2019. The information about the sickened workers is considered important, but officials cautioned that it did not constitute evidence that they caught the virus at the laboratory — they may have brought it there.¹ Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters he had not seen any conclusive evidence about the cause of the pandemic, but supported the effort to look deeper. We need to know the origin, how this happened.” In his announcement Biden said two intelligence agencies believed the virus most likely occurred naturally, while at least one other favored the theory that it leaked accidentally from a lab in China. "None had high confidence in their assessments, the president noted."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/coronavirus-origins-intelligence.html
"Still, that a top lab studying this family of viruses happens to be located in the same city where the epidemic emerged could very well be a coincidence. Wuhan is an urban center larger than New York City, with a steady flow of visitors from other parts of China. It also has many large markets dealing in wildlife brought from across China and beyond. When wild animals are kept in close quarters, viruses have an opportunity to jump from species to species, sometimes resulting in dangerous recombinations that can lead to new diseases." The Wuhan Market theory has been debunked by numerous studies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/health/wuhan-coronavirus-lab-leak.html
1. What absurdity! Someone contaminated a lab where experiments with Coronavirus were being conducted from the outside? The NYT also reported: "The intelligence on the three workers came from outside the United States intelligence agencies’ own collection, which means its veracity is more difficult to authenticate. The source of the information was unclear, but several American officials said they believed the report that the three researchers got sick."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/politics/biden-coronavirus-origins.html

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

Early investigations into SARS-CoV-2 emergence and the resulting COVID-19 disease outbreak proposed the proximate cause was a zoonotic spillover event in late November or early December 2019 in Wuhan, China. This was supported by preliminary epidemiological studies, including the initial clinical series which linked two-thirds of the identified cases to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan. Critically, the study found no direct connection to the market for 14 individuals, including the first known case of COVID-19, leaving open the possibility of alternate points of origin and infection. Additionally, virologic samples of wildlife in the Huanan market could not be linked to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting transmission at the market was downstream from the spillover event. Here we consider that SARS-CoV-2 may have already been circulating in the community prior to the identification of the Huanan Market cluster. This hypothesis is supported by emerging epidemiologic and phylogenetic evidence indicating that the virus emerged in southern China and may have already spread internationally, and adapted for efficient human transmission by the time it was detected in late December.
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42669767/Satellite_Images_Baidu_COVID19_manuscript_preprint.pdf

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

"The new virus revealed itself gradually in humans last December 2019, in Wuhan, and in January 2020 several Chinese laboratories, including SHI ZHENGLI - a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin. SHI ZHENGLI directs the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, WIV a biosafety level 4 laboratory located in Jiangxia District, Wuhan. Her lab sequenced wholly or partly the genomes of samples from different patients, including five complete genomes. SHI ZHENGLI and her colleagues made their announcement on January 23, 2020 that the virus found in those five patients was 96.2-per-cent identical to the bat coronavirus they had warned about three years earlier." ¹"By that time, the virus had been circulating in Wuhan for at least seven weeks, and three consequential misconceptions had been propagated, not just by political leaders but by hospital officials and the Chinese version of the C.D.C.:

That the outbreak had begun in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which famously sold much more than seafood;

That the virus wasn’t dangerous

That it didn’t pass from person to person. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/11/why-werent-we-ready-for-the-coronavirus

1. The 4% differences is thousands of genomes. The viruses were SIMILAR not identical and the virus was not an evolutionary cousin of CoV-19 nor could it cause disease in humans

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

"On the second and third points, there was disagreement by clinicians treating patients, such as Zhang Li, at Wuhan’s Jinyintan Hospital, who told the Wall Street Journal in late February, “I was on alert because this was a new pneumonia and because I’d dealt with SARS.” The misconception that the market was the origin of the outbreak is implicitly contradicted by a scientific paper published in late January 2020, by a group of physicians from Wuhan and Beijing, describing clinical features of the first forty-one patients. Twenty-seven of them, the paper said, had been exposed in the Huanan market. Since a single horseshoe bat would be unlikely to infect twenty-seven people, even if they diced it into hors d’œuvres, and since by some accounts bats weren’t even on sale in the market at that time, a few scientists have speculated that there was an intermediate host animal—a snake, a pangolin, a palm civet?—in which the virus amplified itself, before that larger creature was sold or butchered. The molecular evidence for snakes is weak, pangolins are a complicated story, and civets aren’t implicated this time." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986264

DANIEL LUCEY

"An American physician and scholar Daniel R. Lucey (who had also worked the SARS outbreak, in Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Toronto) wondered about the fourteen other early patients. He noticed that the first of them, falling sick on December 1, 2019 had no direct or secondary contact with the market. That meant, given the incubation period, that the virus must have been circulating in Wuhan outside the market since November 2020. This doesn’t controvert the likelihood of the virus originating in a bat, but it suggests that perhaps it went into the Huanan market, as well as coming out of it, in humans." SARS-CoV-2 is a subtle bug."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext#bib35
"The logic seems straightforward. But a more complete analysis of early cases suggests that locating the origin of the virus may not be so simple. A study published in the found that of the first 425 patients, only 45 percent had connections to the market. A separate Jan. 24, 2020 analysis published in the Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — did not have market links¹."
1. Neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

"Scientific American quotes Dr. Kevin Olival Vice President for Research at EcoHealth Alliance a group that has been implicated in funding the pandemic: "How and where the SARS-CoV-2 spillover occurred is not known for certain. There was an early suspicion that the initial outbreak could have started at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which was closed on January 1 2020. But “we don’t know if the spillover happened outside the market and then began spreading after it was brought there,” says. It is also unclear if there was an intermediate animal host between the disease-carrying bats and humans." ¹ Dr. Olival’s role as Senior Research Scientist at EcoHealth Alliance involves coordinating the modeling and analytics research; integrating evolutionary and ecological theories to understand the drivers of disease emergence; and managing zoonotic disease surveillance efforts in Thailand and Indonesia under the USAID PREDICT project.
1. Everything is unclear.

In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic "hotspots" and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases - animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-coronavirus-slipped-past-disease-detective
Despite referencing Scientific American and NEJM to show the virus didn't start at the market the Washington Post claimed it was doubtful the virus orginated at WIV. Why? "conspiracy theories." The Covid-19 Research Institute did not unearth any conspiracy to release the virus, instead it discovered evidence that the virus, which was created naturally in bats, altered using Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat and/or RECOMBINANT techniques by microbiologists who made the virus more deadly and transmissible than previous SARS Corona virus and accidentally leaked. This genetic engineering also gave the virus the ability to allow it to transmit a plethora of diseases, evade detection and do a whole lot of other things viruses found in nature don't do.

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

It is possible for viruses to escape from a laboratory by infecting a worker. In the early 2000s, there were three documented cases of the original SARS virus escaping from a laboratory environment, according to Lim Poh Lian, a senior consultant at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases in Singapore. In the case of a 2003 incident in Singapore, a student became infected with SARS after his samples of West Nile virus were cross-contaminated with live SARS virus. That virus was being grown in relatively large quantities in the lab for studies on the disease, and the student was not properly trained in safety procedures for the lab he was working in.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...t-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

JULY 2003 An outbreak of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome occurred among students in a college (College A) in Kunming, Yunnan province, China in 2003. Subsequent investigations revealed the presence of hantavirus antibodies and antigens in laboratory rats at College A and two other institutions. Hantavirus antibodies were detected in 15 additional individuals other than the index case in these three locations. Epidemiologic data indicated that the human infections were a result of zoonotic transmission of the virus from laboratory rats.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20380897/

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

"The modern era of pathogen releases can be said to have begun in 1973 in England, when a lab assistant working with smallpox infected herself and spread it to three others, two of whom died. Four years later, smallpox was almost officially eradicated from the wild, yet the following year a medical photographer at Birmingham Medical School mysteriously died of the disease. It turned out that researchers in another part of the building were experimenting with smallpox, and the virus most likely reached the photographer through the ventilation system. Mother Jones

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

Patients with unexplained pneumonias started showing up at hospitals; within days, dozens were dead. The secret police seized doctors’ records and ordered them to keep silent. American spies picked up clues about a lab leak, but the local authorities had a more mundane explanation: contaminated meat. [The Chinese blamed Covid-19 on contaminated frozen meat.] In April and May 1979, at least 66 people died after airborne anthrax bacteria emerged from a military lab in the Soviet Union. But leading American scientists voiced confidence in the Soviets’ claim that the pathogen had jumped from animals to humans. Only after a full-fledged investigation in the 1990s did one of those scientists confirm the earlier suspicions: The accident in what is now the Russian Urals city of Yekaterinburg was a lab leak, one of the deadliest ever documented. Dr. Meselson, a biological warfare expert, studied classified intelligence suggesting that the Soviet anthrax outbreak could have been linked to a military facility nearby. Six years later, he wrote that the Soviet explanation of the epidemic’s natural origins was plausible. The evidence the Soviets provided was consistent, he said, with the theory that people had been stricken by intestinal anthrax that originated in contaminated bone meal used as animal feed. “The concept of truth, in fact, is very complicated,” said Lev Grinberg, a Yekaterinburg pathologist who secretly preserved evidence of the true nature of the outbreak in 1979. “Those who don’t want to accept the truth will always find ways not to accept it.”
The incident was only confirmed in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when President Boris Yeltsin invited an independent team of scientists to investigate. Using 2010 data from the CDC, one expert estimated that somewhere in the United States, “a breach of containment happens about twice weekly.” Some have involved deadly agents including anthrax, avian flu, and Ebola. Most incidents are minor, but not all. Take two examples at lower-risk labs: In 2009, a researcher at the University of Chicago died after being infected by a weakened strain of plague. In 2012, a postdoc at San Francisco’s VA Medical Center came down with meningitis from his lab. He died.

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

"SARS-CoV-2 infection have caused global pandemic and claimed over 5,000,000 tolls1–4. Although the genetic sequences of their etiologic viruses are of high homology, the clinical and pathological characteristics of COVID-19 significantly differ from SARS5,6. Especially, it seems that SARS-CoV-2 undergoes vast replication in vivo without being effectively monitored by anti-viral immunity.

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane Medical School in New Orleans, observed that Chinese scientists would have to have collected SARS-CoV-2 and then grown it in a colony of cells, but somehow never publish any details of it even as they published reports on other coronaviruses for years."We don't know if any such reports existed as the WIV database was taken off line in September 2019 and never restored. Suppression of information in a totalitarian country is quietly, easily and quicky accomplished especially when there is so much at stake if it came to light the virus originated at the WIV, even though, if not for Daszak, the Chinese probably would never have carried these experiments out! “It makes no sense to me. Why did they hold onto the virus?” Dr. Garry said. But the reason they held on to them was to theoretically develop a vaccine before one of the viruses emerged and caused an epidemic. Garry continued: "Genetic analysis shows the virus began to spread sometime in the fall or winter of 2019. Those same analyses supported an earlier Kristain Anderson theory that the virus was not genetically engineered in a laboratory. Garry says the reason is simple — the virus infects people in a way that scientists had never seen before: "The virus is just really too good at what it's doing. No human using a computer could do this. This is very clearly a natural process that occurred." In addition, he says, there are no signs of human genetic modification in the virus's code.¹
1. Garry is a side kick of Kristain Anderson https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=criecCgAAAAJ&hl=en
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...irus-compare-to-mers-sars-and-the-common-cold
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

In 2004, the Chinese and French governments signed a cooperation agreement on fighting and preventing new diseases, stressing the active cooperation between China and France in the construction of high-level biosafety laboratories and the system construction of biosafety laws and regulations etc. In order to implement the spirit of Sino-French agreement, in 2005, Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook the task of building a national biosafety laboratory of Wuhan, Chinese Academy of Sciences. With nearly 10 years of unremitting efforts, the laboratory completed the physical facilities in January 2015. In August 2016, it obtained the recognition and authentication certificate for the critical protection equipment installation and commissioning.

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

At the time when it was launched by Jacques Chirac and his Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin, in 2004, the P4 was at the heart of a showdown in France. Those in favor, politicians and scientists, said that China, which had barely emerged from SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), should be helped to defend itself against epidemics. But Defense, External Intelligence (DGSE) and Foreign Affairs were standing against a project that they believed could serve a military bacteriological weapon program. They suspected that Beijing would want to equip itself with five or seven P4 laboratories, including two for military purposes. "We knew the risks involved and thought that the Chinese would control everything and quickly eject us from the project. We believed that providing this cutting-edge technology to a country with an infinite power agenda risked exposing France in return, ”said a diplomat who followed the case closely. According to a high-ranking source, the project would also have provoked a crisis in Pasteur, where the Assembly of the Hundred, the parliament of the Institute, would have denounced the access authorized by the contract to some of its databases, before see the decision imposed by its management. " There were arguments, because China has a real medical problem with epidemics and France had an advantage in this technology very advanced. But the Chinese know how to copy and duplicate. And we thought the P4 would give China instruments if it ever wanted to start a biological weapons program, "said a senior diplomat, who was in strategic affairs at the time. French scholars played a big role in pushing the project. " There was a blindness of the scientific community which refused to see the reality of the Chinese system. Researchers believed that openness to capitalism would transform China into a normal country. It was to forget that it remained above all a Leninist state in which science is not independent but directed by the Communist Party ", explains Valérie Niquet, specialist in Asia at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS). Since the start of the epidemic, the party and the state have been involved in research, manipulating dates and rewriting the history of the coronavirus.
https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

On April 21, Le Figaro published an article "Investigation: How the P4 laboratory in Wuhan, exported by France, escaped all control" signed by Isabelle Lasserre. Some comments in the article are shocking. The Chinese Embassy in France wants to question them. She wrote in the article that: "On February 16, Chinese state media also reported deficiencies. They claimed in particular that researchers threw laboratory materials down the drain, after experimentation and without having subjected them to the specific treatment intended for biological discharges. They also pointed out that a certain number of researchers, to make ends meet, were selling laboratory animals which had undergone experiments on the markets of Wuhan. As anyone with common sense knows very well, a high-level laboratory is endowed with rigorous management systems and codes of conduct for scientific research, how is it possible that the basic faults described in the article appear? This is an extremely serious problem which seriously damages the reputation of Chinese research institutions and the national image of China. We ask the journalist to tell her readers specifically that her comments come from which media and which reports. Otherwise, they can only be considered as lies. The author of the text made many criticisms of the joint construction of the P4 laboratory in Wuhan by China and France. It is his personal opinion, in which the Embassy does not intervene. But the descriptions in the article are very likely to misinform readers, and do not promote mutual knowledge of the Chinese and French peoples and friendly cooperation between the two countries. The Chinese Embassy in France recommends the video of an interview given by Mr. Yuan Zhiming, Director of the Wuhan branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on April 20 at CGTN. The author of the article could undoubtedly obtain useful information in this, which would help him to know the question concerned in a more complete and more precise way.
The core of the Wuhan BSL-4 Laboratory is surrounded by stainless-steel walls, forming a "box-within-a-box" structure. The core lab enclosure can ensure sufficient structural strength and tightness to form a static seal. The lab's dynamic seal uses negative pressure technology to ensure a strict and orderly pressure gradient between the functional areas, thereby effectively preventing any air contaminated by infectious pathogenic microorganisms from spreading to areas with low contamination probability and to the external environment spreading.
https://www.biospace.com/article/re...of-virology-s-vital-role-in-fighting-covid-19
Air emitted from the lab is filtered and discharged by two-stage high-efficiency filters to ensure the safety of the emissions. Waste water is discharged after high-temperature treatment in a sewage treatment system. Polluted waste in the lab is subjected to high-temperature and high-pressure treatment by double-door autoclaves, and then safely removed and delivered to a centralized medical waste disposal unit with corresponding qualifications for disposal. Whenever personnel pass through the entrance and exit channels, their positive pressure protective suits are chemically disinfected using the chemical showers to ensure the safety of the passageways. The above technical protection measures ensure that viruses inside the lab cannot escape.
Plum Island Reports Disease Outbreak By John Rather Aug. 22, 2004 THE Department of Homeland Security confirmed last week that the highly contagious foot-and-mouth virus had briefly spread within the Plum Island Animal Disease Center in two previously undisclosed incidents earlier this summer. A spokesman for the department, which took over the high-security laboratory from the Department of Agriculture in June 2003, said safety procedures had been stepped up and laboratory rooms disinfected after the incidents, which occurred on June 24 and July 19.

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

In a CNN interview on March 26, 2021 Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director under Trump, made a candid admission: “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.” Redfield added that he believed the release was an accident, not an intentional act. In his view, nothing that happened since his first calls with Dr. Gao changed a simple fact: The WIV needed to be ruled out as a source, and it hadn’t been. After the interview aired, death threats flooded his inbox. The vitriol came not just from strangers who thought he was being racially insensitive but also from prominent scientists, some of whom used to be his friends. One said he should just “wither and die.”

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

STILL HEAD OF W.H.O.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is an Ethiopian microbiologist and internationally recognized malaria researcher, who has served since 2017 as Director-General of the World Health Organization. Tedros is the first non-physician and first African in the role, who has been endorsed by the African Union. Born: March 3, 1965 (age 55 years), Asmara, Eritrea Nationality: Ethiopian Party: Tigray People's Liberation Front
Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) SUMMARY: The Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF) is a political party in Tigray, Ethiopia that has been listed as a perpetrator in the Global Terrorism Database, based on ten incidents occurring between 1976 and 1990 (see GTD link). Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), also known as Popular revolution for the freedom of Tigray, Woyane, Weyane is an active group formed c. 1975. TRAC ANALYSIS: IDEOLOGY Separatist / New Regime Nationalist / Ethnic Nationalist, Left Wing Terrorist Groups (Maoist, Marxist, Communist, Socialist) TRAC ANALYSIS: TACTICS Attacks on Soft Targets, Assassinations as a Terrorist Tactic TRAC

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

"Much of the blame for W.H.O.’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a W.H.O. goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does W.H.O. seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of W.H.O.’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at W.H.O. generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. To avoid stigmatization against nation and race, the World Health Organization discourages the use of regions, countries, individuals, and animals on naming human infectious diseases and pathogens in its guidelines issued in 2015. The guidelines emphasize that viruses infect all people. That is to say, when an outbreak happens, everyone is at risk, regardless of his or her identity or location. The W.H.O. on February 11, 2020 announced the name of the novel coronavirus as SARS-CoV-2 on social media to “prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing,” W.H.O. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said." https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-health-coronavirus-disinformation-11586122093

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course Mission. The Division aims to improve health in the W.H.O. European Region by addressing the determinants, risks and consequences of chronic, noncommunicable conditions, by promoting mental and physical wellbeing across the life course, by the population-based prevention and clinical control of disease, and by preventing violence and injury. Biography: Dr Gauden Galea is a public health physician who has worked for W.H.O. since 1998. He has held posts as regional adviser on noncommunicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region, and as coordinator of health promotion in W.H.O. headquarters. Dr Galea has been Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion at W.H.O./Europe since January 2011. He has a special interest in health promotion, in the social determinants of noncommunicable diseases, and in the links between these diseases and the development agenda."
"Dr Gauden: https://web.archive.org/web/20160609075623/http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/executive-management/dr-gauden-galeaGalea

ADDENDUM

https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...scientists-joining-covid-origin-investigation
https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/corona-leaked-likely-wuhan-institute-virology-experts
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884792-MACE-E-PAI-COVID-19-ANALYSIS-Redacted.htm
https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/did...program-in-a-chinese-laboratory-very-possibly
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2020-articles/19392-expert-attacks-ecohealth-alliance-s-involvement-in-really-risky-bat-coronavirus-research-in-wuhan-labs?
https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched
https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038

Shi’s answers were coordinated with public information staffers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, of which WIV is part, and it took her 2 months to prepare them. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen of Scripps Research says he suspects Shi’s answers were “carefully vetted” by the Chinese government. “But they’re all logical, genuine, and stick to the science as one would have expected from a world-class scientist and one of the leading experts on coronaviruses,” Andersen says. However, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, who from the early days of the pandemic has urged that an investigation look into the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a laboratory accident, was decidedly unimpressed. “Most of these answers are formulaic, almost robotic, reiterations of statements previously made by Chinese authorities and state media,” Ebright says.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...st-center-covid-19-origin-theories-speaks-out

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

Daszak's Zoonotic chirade was over after "an allied power" determined several lab technicans or scientists became contaminated with an enhanced SARS virus and brought it into Wuhan during its incubation period. (1.) Incubation time for COVID-19 between 2 and 10 days has been recorded by the W.H.O. The W.H.O. stated on February 10, 2020, at its press conference, that a very long duration of incubation can represent double exposure, 24 days was a specified point to be regarded in the sense of the study's key results. (2.) The Chinese National Health Commission initially expected a 10 to 14 days incubation period. (3.) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from United States of America assumes the incubation period of 2 to 14 days for COVID-1929 (4.) Doctors and health-care practitioners, of leading Chinese group DXY.cn predicts an incubation period of "3 to 7 days, and up to 14 days." (5.) In a report released on February 9, 2020, the incubation time was observed as long as 24 days (range from 0-24 days; average of 3 days) (6). In a JAMA report released on February 21, 2020, a 19-day incubation period in infected patient has been identified, Hubei Province registered another case with an incubation time of 27 days, on February 22, 2020. An analysis sponsored by the Holland Ministry of Health and released by Eurosurveillance examined data for 88 identified travelers to and from Wuhan, which were identified as COVID-19 infected patients between January 20 and 28, 2020. It was calculated that the mean incubation period was 6.4 days. The incubation duration varied from 2.1 to 11.1 days. The 11.1-day maximum limit may be known as conservative. The incubation time greatly differs between the patients, according to a Chinese article reported by New England Journal of Medicine on January 30, 2020.

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

520 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 1200, New York, NY 10018 212.380.4460
AS SOON AS THIS PANDEMIC ENDS THOSE WHO SURVIVED COVID
WILL DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THIS OFFICE

DASZAK GREW RICH FROM HIS SCAM THAT NEVER PRODUCED A VACCINE
DASZAK EMAILS

Dear Randy:
As a member of the EcoHealth Alliance Board of Trustees, I would like to thank you and your wonderful colleagues for the generous vocal support and for the funding you are making possible for Peter and his research team. The entire board and the Alliance team are truly grateful for the extraordinary boost in morale you and your colleagues have provided. Peter and his team are doing critically important work on COVID-19 and its origin. In genuine gratitude, Rita.
Dear Ralph, Linda, Jim, Rita, Linfa and Hume, I’ve been following the events around the novel coronavirus emergence in China very closely and have been dismayed by the recent spreading of rumors, misinformation and conspiracy theories on its origins. These are now specifically targeting scientists with whom we’ve collaborated for many years, and who have been working heroically to fight this outbreak and share data with unprecedented speed, openness and transparency. These conspiracy theories threaten to undermine the very global collaborations that we need to deal with a disease that has already spread across continents. We have drafted a simple statement of solidarity and support for scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, and would like to invite you to join us as the first signatories. If you agree, we will send this letter to a group of around half-a-dozen other leaders in the field and then disseminate this widely with a sign-up webpage for others to show their support by signing up to its language. I will then personally present this at my plenary during the ICID 2020 conference in Malaysia in two weeks, with the goal of also getting widespread attention in SE Asia to our support for the work that our colleagues in China are undertaking. I sincerely hope you can join us. Please review the letter, and let me know if you are willing to join Billy Karesh and myself as co-signatories. Also, please confirm your title and affiliation that will be shown in the letter. We plan to make circulate this widely to coincide with a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, which will likely be released tomorrow or Friday. Thank you for your consideration and support of the scientific and public health community around the world! Cheers, Peter Daszak President EcoHealth Alliance 460 West 34th Street – 17th Floor New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 212-380-4474 Website: www.ecohealthalliance. NUMEROUS PAGES DELETED AFTER THIS.

From: Tara Hoda<hoda@ecohealthalliance.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 1:57 PM
To: rcolwell@umiacs.umd.edu; Victoria Lord
Cc: Anthony Ramos; Peter Daszak
Subject: Carnegie Corporation Contacts
Dear Dr. Colwell: It was so wonderful meeting you at the board meeting last week. As mentioned, we will be submitting a Letter of Inquiry to the Carnegie Corporation under their International Peace and Security portfolio. Our proposed project focuses on promoting a multi-sectoral approach and building capacity and partnerships for pandemic outbreaks and international health security processes in Western Asia. Our LOI is attached to this e-mail. You had mentioned you may have connections with the following people who are members of Carnegie Corporation's Board of Directors:
1) Jared Cohon
2) John DeGioia
3) Marcia McNutt
4) Judy Woodruff
For the Carnegie Corporation, it will greatly increase our chances of having our proposal considered if we have a point of contact. Would you be willing to put us in touch with one of the people above, or to directly send an e-mail letting them EcoHealth Alliance will be submitting an application? Any and all leads would be greatly appreciated. Best, Tara
Tara Hoda Development Associate EcoHealth Alliance
I’m on a panel on biothreats…National Press Club, Washington, DC, Monday afternoon April 30…along with a roster of DoD, CIA, DHS, and other assorted luminaries. Anything I should say or comment on regarding EcoHealth, Peter?

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

Mrs. Morris Hadley, another civic leader, whose husband was one-time head of the Carnegie Foundation and is now head of the CIA conduit Rubicon Foundation. Through his membership in the law firm of Milbank, Tween, Hadley, and McCloy he has close association with John J. McCloy, once chairman of the board of Chase Manhattan Bank, former chairman of the Ford Foundation, past president of the World Bank, past U.S. High Commissioner to Germany and chairman of the board of the New York International House, a Rockefeller-backed institution dedicated to making the foreign student feel at home.
I think that many of EcoHealth Alliance's initiatives would dovetail well with Carnegie Corporation's International Peace and Security area of interest. EcoHealth Alliance's President, Dr. Peter Daszak, is the chair of the National Academies of Sciences' Forum on Microbial Threats, a member of the NRC Advisory Committee to the US Global Change Research Program, and has advised the Director for Medical Preparedness Policy on the White House National Security Staff on global health issues. He is also actively involved in the W.H.O. Expert group on Public Health Emergency Disease Prioritization.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the “Statement” Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”
ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

Ecohealth Alliance integrates innovative science-based solutions and partnerships that increase capacity to achieve two interrelated goals: protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases and safeguarding ecosystems by promoting conservation. USAID PREDICT EMERGING PANDEMIC THREAT PROGRAM - assesses capacity and develops plans for the implementation of wildlife surveillance support. They develop models of disease risk and spread, implement a smart (strategic, measurable, adaptive, responsive, and targeted) wildlife surveillance strategy to identify and target high-risk wildlife in the region's most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dept of Defense - serological bio surveillance for spillover of henipa viruses and filo viruses at agricultural and hunting human-animal interfaces in peninsular Malaysia. The objective is to enhance capacity within the Malaysia government to characterize the distribution of and detect spillover of novel and known henipa viruses and filo viruses, (both groups include high consequence zoonotic pathogens) in indigenous populations and farms in peninsular Malaysia. Current surveillance strategies for novel zoonotic viruses rely exclusively on molecular detection tools, but Nipah and Ebola viruses are present at low prevalence in bat species which makes infected individuals difficult to detect. By establishing a multiplexed serological assay developed to detect antibodies against any henipa and filo viruses, the government of Malaysia will more effectively be able to determine the distribution of these high-impact viruses in wildlife reservoirs and detect evidence of spillover in at-risk human or livestock populations. The most comprehensive investigation of the epidemiology and ecolog of the RVF virus ever conducted. The project brings together a diverse group of experts from governmental, non-governmental, academic and private organizations, both domestic and international. the 2010-2011 outbreak of RVF in south Africa had a significant impact on the health of people, animals and the local economy. Thus, a better, more integrated understanding of the virus in the environment and in animal and human populations is critically needed to improve public awareness. a booklet explaining the risks of RVF and similar diseases was developed for distribution to study participants in the region. Rather than being a collection of independent science projects, this one health project integrates data collected from climate and weather, vegetation cycles, and mosquito studies to better predict outbreaks in South Africa. Evidence of RVF in animals and people is being collected to better understand exposure, with groups of people in occupations with high risk for rvf and flocks of sheep will be followed for approximately four years. the work is centered in the free state and northern cape provinces and includes the epicenter of previous RVF outbreaks within the 40,000km2 study region. Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development. Dr. Daszak’s research has been instrumental in identifying and predicting the impact of emerging diseases across the globe. His achievements include identifying the bat origin of SARS, identifying the underlying drivers of Nipah and Hendra virus emergence, producing the first ever global emerging disease hotspots map, developing a strategy to find out how many unknown viruses exist that could threaten to become pandemic, identifying the first case of a species extinction due to disease, and discovering the disease chytridiomycosis as the cause global amphibian declines.
PREDICT is a consortium or partners working to enable global surveillance for pathogens that can spillover from animal hosts to people by building capacities to detect and discover viruses of pandemic potential. The project is part of USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats program and is led by the UC Davis One Health Institute. The core partners are USAID, EcoHealth Alliance, Metabiota Inc., Wildlife Conservation Society, and Smithsonian Institution, along with a network of scientists and professionals in over 30 countries around the world. Contact us at predict@ucdavis.edu.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13618543

W.H.O.

GUIDESTAR NON-PROFIT REPORT

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/updates
Kaspar Sebastian Bohdan Daszak is 20 years old and lives in an apartment in Stockholm. He lives with John Ramstedt. BORN 8/27/2000. John or Peter Daszak's son? His home is valued at $1,627,859.80 United States Dollars
https://www.hitta.se/kaspar+daszak/stockholm/person/VgPwmnoooK

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

THE FRENCH HELP WIV BUILD THE LEVEL 4 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB DESPITE DUAL USE CONCERNS
THE PROXIMITY FACTOR
PATIENT ZERO
TEXAS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN BED WITH WIV THANKS TO FAUCI GRANT

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

SHI ZHENG LI CREATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY
BATLADY MAKE BIG MISTAKE: SHE DID IT IN A LEVEL 2 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB, AND IT LEAKED OR SOMEONE GOT INFECTED IN THE LAB AND BROUGHT THE VIRUS BACK HOME.
SHI ZHENG LI WORK AT THE TIME OF OUTBREAK INVOLVED STUDYING CORONA VIRUSES ALMOST IDENTICAL TO SARS Co-V-2
SHI ZHENG LI CHRONOLOGY SHOWS SHE HAS A FINGER IN EVERY CORONA VIRUS EXPERIMENT
SHI ZHENG LI POST SARS-CoV-2 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE
DESTRUCTION OF SARS-COV-2 SAMPLES
THE INTERVIEW WITH THE BAT LADY "COVID IS PUNISHMENT FOR AN UNSANITARY LIFESTYLE"
2018 SHI ZHENG LI WAS CREATING SYNTHETIC VIRUSES
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS IN UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL LAB PRODUCED NOVEL VIRUS MORE DEADLY TO OLDER PEOPLE JUST LIKE SARS-CoV-2 AND STIR DEBATE ABOUT GoF RESEARCH CAUSING A PANDEMIC 2020: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SL-SHC014-MA15: MAN MADE VIRUS WHICH USES ACE2 RECEPTOR

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS SYNTHESIZING VIRUSES THAT ATTACK ACE2 RECEPTORS IN HUMANS WERE PRECURSORS TO CREATION OF SARS-CoV-2
2015: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SARS: CREATION OF A VIRUS THAT CAN USE ACE2 AS RECEPTOR

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

NEW YORK TIMES 9/20/2020 CHINA VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE
THE AUSTRIAN STUDY: IS CONSIDERING A GENETIC-MANIPULATION ORIGIN FOR SARS-COV-2 A CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT MUST BE CENSORED? ROSSANA SEGRETO UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY
PASSAGING
THE NORWEGIAN STUDY
SIR RICHARD DEARLOVE FORMER MI-5 DIRECTOR SUPPORTS NORWEGIAN STUDY
UNIQUE NEW FEATURE OF SARS-CoV-2 CALLED "UNEXPECTED INSERTION"
SHING HEI ZHAN, BENJAMIN E. DEVERMAN AND YUJIA ALINA CHAN, “SARS-COV-2 IS WELL ADAPTED FOR HUMANS
HUMAN ENGINEERING OF A POLYBASIC HA CLEAVAGE SITE MUTANT WAS EASILY ACCOMPLISHED

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

RICHARD EBRIGHT: THESE EXPERIMENTS HAS GOTS TO GO!

THE WET MARKET

VIRUS WAS NEVER FOUND IN ANIMALS AT THE WET MARKET OR ANYWHERE ELSE
THE PANGOLINS DID IT
CHICOM RE-ACTION DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN
BOLTON AND TRUMP PAVE THE WAY FOR THE PANDEMIC

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

NEW WHO JUNKET
WHO DISPUTES THE FACT THE VIRUS LINGERS IN THE AIR INDOORS, INFECTING THOSE NEARBY.
CCP PROPAGANDA

Table of Contents

DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN DASZAK, WAS A NAZI DEATH CAMP GUARD

FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN

DOCTOR "MENGELE" DASZAK

FOR ECO-FASCISTS - COVID-19 "NATURE IS HEALING"

FAUCI TRUSTS THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

WHY DID AN OILY BUBBLE OF GENES JUST ABOUT 100 NANOMETERS IN DIAMETER (A TRILLION WEIGH LESS THAN A RAINDROP) FIRST SURFACE IN WUHAN, CHINA?

"THE BAT LADY" IS A WEIRDO

YOUNG BAT LADY

THE SMOKING GUN DOCUMENT

DASZAK EXPLORES THE LAB LEAK THEORY

Dr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation." Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment

EARLIER EXPERIMENTS INVOLVED THE SPIKE PROTEINS WHICH ARE THE KEYS TO INVADING THE HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

ECO-FASCIST DASZAK FINANCED WIV GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WITH YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY

THE PANDEMIC WAS CREATED BY DASZAK, AN ECO-FASCIST, TO CUT DOWN ON HUMAN POPULATION GROWTH THAT'S DESTROYING NATURE

THE MISSING COMPONENT: DASZAK'S IMPLICIT RACISM

THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AND THIS WEBPAGE IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY

DASZAK WAS A BLOODY SUCCESS

THE MONSTER MOVIE

CHINESE-AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK TWEETS

HAVING DASZAK AS A W.H.O INVESTIGATOR WAS LIKE HAVING AL CAPONE SIT ON ON THE CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION.

FAUCI'S INVOLVMENT IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

FIRE FAUCI AND REPLACE HIM WITH FORMER FDA HEAD Dr. SCOTT GOTTLIEB

Dr. FAUCI, WHO APPROVED DASZAK'S GRANTS, SUDDENLY WANTS ANOTHER INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IF HE SAID HE DIDN'T WANT ONE SUSPICION WOULD FALL ON HIM

FAUCI PROPONENT OF GoF / GoT OPPOSES GoF / BAN IN WASHINGTON POST AND DEFENDS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS

BENEFITS AND RISKS OF INFLUENZA RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED ANTHONY S. FAUCI, FRANCIS S. COLLINS

FAUCI SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT

THE LANCET QUESTIONS DASZAK'S OBJECTIVITY "ADDENDUM: COMPETING INTERESTS AND THE ORIGINS OF SARS-COV-2"

DASZAK WAS DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN RECOMBINANT EXPERIMENTS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS INVOLVED RECOMBINANT BAT CORONAVIRUSES / NOVEMBER 30, 2017:"DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS"

MANY OF THESE GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED WITH VIRUSES FOUND IN HORSESHOE BATS - CLOSE RELATIVES TO THE SARS-CoV-19 VIRUS

DASZAK'S METHODOLOGY RELIED ON GAIN-OF-THREAT, GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

DASZAK PLAYED ON THE BENEFICENT MOTIVATION OF MOST SCIENTISTS WHO CONDUCT GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS

ProGoFer's and Anti-GoFers

THE CRITICS OF GoF/GoT PREDICTED IT WOULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC

DAVID RELMAN STANFORD UNIVERSITY MICROBIOLOGIST

MICROBIOLOGIST JONATHAN LATHAM

DR. RICHARD EBRIGHT OPPOSES BARIC'S GoF EXPERIMENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AND WIV

DASZAK'S CRIMINAL LIABILITY

DR. DASZAK'S BOGUS FAMILY BACKGROUND: "PETER COTTINGTON DASZAK" IS NOT HIS REAL NAME

DASZAK IS UNQUALIFIED FOR MICROBIOLOGY

DASZAK INTERVIEW DECEMBER 2019

PETER DASZAK TALKS ABOUT HIS EARLY YEARS

DASZAK'S BOGUS C.V.

THE GRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY STEMMY AND FAUCI

BEFORE THE CORONA VIRUS OUTBREAK IN 2019 THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION, GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED IN BSL-2 LAB

FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LABORATORY MODIFICATION

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2. IN SILICO COMPARISON OF SPIKE PROTEIN-ACE2 BINDING AFFINITIES ACROSS SPECIES; SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THE SARS-COV-2 VIRUS

THE BINDING ENERGY BETWEEN SARS-COV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN AND ACE2 WAS HIGHEST FOR HUMANS OUT OF ALL SPECIES TESTED

THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LAB CREATION GAIN-OF-THREAT INSERTIONS AT POLYBASIC FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE PRRA IS EVIDENCE VIRUS WAS MODIFIED FOR INCREASED INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENICITY - DR. RONEN SHEMESH

ARGININE / FURIN

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT MADE A COVID-19, THAT OCCURRED IN NATURE, MORE TRANSMITTABLE AND MORE LETHAL

LASTING AFTER EFFECTS UNLIKE OTHER CORONA VIRUSES

CHRONOLOGY

HIGH RECOMBINATION AND MUTATION RATES IN MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS SUGGEST THAT CORONAVIRUSES MAY BE POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT EMERGING VIRUSES

REVERSE GENETICS WITH A FULL-LENGTH INFECTIOUS CDNA OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

2002-2004 THE WIV SCIENTISTS BEGAN COLLECTING BAT VIRUS SINCE THE SARS-1 OUTBREAK

DEVELOPMENT OF MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS MHV AND SARS-COV INFECTIOUS CDNA CONSTRUCTS (BARIC)

COMPOSITIONS OF CORONAVIRUSES WITH A RECOMBINATION-RESISTANT GENOME (BARIC)

REVIEW OF BATS AND SARS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS - GoT

SHI ZHENGLI: DIFFERENCE IN RECEPTOR USAGE BETWEEN SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME (SARS) CORONAVIRUS AND SARS-LIKE CORONAVIRUS OF BAT ORIGIN

PETER DASZAK: RISK OF VIRAL EMERGENCE FROM BATS (DASZAK)

RON FOUCHIER, EARLY GAIN-OF-THREAT "SCIENTIST CREATED AN AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS IN FAVOR OF SHARING H5N1 VIRUS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

W.H.O. CONCERNED THAT NEW H5N1 INFLUENZA RESEARCH COULD UNDERMINE THE 2011 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA PFREPAREDNESS FRAMEWORK

THE PAPER DESCRIBING HOW THE LETHAL H5N1 BIRD FLU COULD BE MADE EASIER TO SPREAD WAS PUBLISHED SIX MONTHS AFTER A SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD SUGGESTED THAT THE PAPERS’ MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DATA BE CENSORED.

FOUCHIER EXPLAINED HOW EASY IT WAS TO CREATE AN AIRBORNE AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS USING GAIN-OF-THREAT TECHNOLOGY

US-CHINA ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP; KUNMING, CHINA

BATS AS ANIMAL RESERVOIRS FOR THE SARS CORONAVIRUS: HYPOTHESIS PROVED AFTER 10 YEARS OF VIRUS HUNTING VIROLOGICA SINICA

NIAD AND HIH GRANTS

ONE OF SEVERAL NEAR FATAL ERRORS THAT TRIGGERED THE GoF / GOT BAN INVOLVED H5N1 INFLUENZA VIRUS

OBAMA BANS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH IN US

DOING DILIGENCE TO ASSESS THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF LIFE SCIENCES GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT OUTSOURCED TO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AFTER AMERICA BANS IT AS TOO DANGEROUS

UNDERSTANDING THE RISK OF BAT CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCE (DASZAK)

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CHIMERIC CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS (BARIC)

SPILLOVER AND PANDEMIC PROPERTIES OF ZOONOTIC VIRUSES WITH HIGH HOST PLASTICITY (DASZAK)

SARS-LIKE WIV1-COV POISED FOR HUMAN EMERGENCE / SHI ZHENGLI AND BARIC CO-AUTHORS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE ARGUMENT IS ESSENTIALLY A RERUN OF THE DEBATE OVER WHETHER TO ALLOW LAB RESEARCH THAT INCREASES THE VIRULENCE, EASE OF SPREAD OR HOST RANGE OF DANGEROUS PATHOGENS — WHAT IS KNOWN AS ‘GAIN-OF-FUNCTION’ RESEARCH.

2015 ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT OF PROPOSED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

As with all life sciences research involving pathogens, GOF studies entail inherent biosafety and biosecurity risks. GOF research involving the generation of pathogens with pandemic potential involves the greatest risks. A laboratory accident involving such a pathogen could potentially release a pathogen that could spread rapidly and efficiently through the human population.

BAT SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME-LIKE CORONAVIRUS WIV1 ENCODES AN EXTRA ACCESSORY PROTEIN, ORFX, INVOLVED IN MODULATION OF THE HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE (BARIC, SHI ZHENGLI)

EFFICIENT REVERSE GENETIC SYSTEMS FOR RAPID GENETIC MANIPULATION OF EMERGENT AND PREEMERGENT INFECTIOUS CORONAVIRUSES

INSIDE THE CHINESE LAB POISED TO STUDY WORLD'S MOST DANGEROUS PATHOGENS MAXIMUM-SECURITY BIOLAB IS PART OF PLAN TO BUILD NETWORK OF BSL-4 FACILITIES ACROSS CHINA

BAT CAVE SOLVES MYSTERY OF DEADLY SARS VIRUS — AND SUGGESTS NEW OUTBREAK COULD OCCUR: CHINESE SCIENTISTS FIND ALL THE GENETIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF SARS IN A SINGLE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE BATS.

NOVEMBER 2017 DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS

TRUMP LIFTS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT BAN

BSL-4 OPENS AT WIV JANUARY 19, 2018

NIH LIFTS FUNDING PAUSE ON GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

THE STATE DEPARTMENT CABLES INDICATE A LACK OF TRAINED TECHNICIANS AT WIV

BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

WANG YANYI

WUHAN LAB CHIEF WANG YANYI DISPUTES APRIL 2018 WIV NATURE ARTICLE

THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY VIRUS DATABASE WAS TAKEN OFFLINE

LACK OF CELL PHONE ACTIVITY AT WIV

ROAD BLOCKS AROUND WIV

FINANCING SHI ZHENGLI'S GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WAS PART OF THE PREDICT PROGRAM AND THAT IS WHY IT WAS SHUT DOWN

PATIENTS ZERO

DASZAK'S EMAIL'S DELETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2019 AND JANUARY 2020

FEDERAL OFFICIALS ENDED A MORATORIUM IMPOSED THREE YEARS AGO ON FUNDING RESEARCH THAT ALTERS GERMS TO MAKE THEM MORE LETHAL

EARLY W.H.O. REPORT

DASZAK WORKED CLOSELY WITH ZHENG-LI SHI WHEN SARS-CoV-19 SURFACED

THE BAT LADY WANTED TO CALL HER VIRUS TARS

RECTIFICATION OF LAB THAT MAPPED GENOME

WIV WAS CALLING IN OUTSIDERS TO HELP WITH BIOSAFETY

DASZAK CLAIMS HE WARNED THE WORLD ABOUT COVID

ZHENG-LI SHI: A PNEUMONIA OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW CORONAVIRUS OF PROBABLE BAT ORIGIN

NEW BIOSECURITY LAW DECREEDED IN CHINA

KRISTIAN ANDERSON STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATTING COVID-19

CHINESE ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT THE UNIQUE CORONA VIRUS WAS FOUND IN NATURE

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE CHINESE RESEARCHERS AT WIV WERE RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM THE GALVESTON NATIONAL LABORATORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AND OTHER U.S. ORGANIZATIONS, BUT THE CHINESE REQUESTED ADDITIONAL HELP

WHY CITE EXEMPTION FIVE?

TRUMP CUTS OFF FUNDS TO ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS ASKED THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY (NSABB) TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF ITS DEALINGS WITH THE WIV

WEIFENG SHI CLAIMS ANOMALOUS INSERTIONS CAN HAPPEN NATURALLY

TWO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY SCIENTISTS, XING-YI GE AND ZHENGLI-LI SHI, USE REVERSE GENETICS TO GENERATE A CHIMERICAL VIRUS CLOSELY RESEMBLING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS COVID-19

ORIGIN AND CROSS-SPECIES TRANSMISSION OF BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

POMPEO SAYS VIRUS WAS FROM LAB THEN WALKS IT BACK

TRUMP WANTED AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

TRUMP ENDS GRANT TO ECHO HEALTH ALLIANCE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GET ANONYMOUS GRANT FROM A CCP PUPPET

TRUMP PULLS USA OUT OF W.H.O.

NIH GRANT REINSTATED BUT THE MONEY CAN'T BE SUB-AWARDED TO THE WIV

TRUMP WANTS TO FORM A COMMISSION TO LOOK INTO THE WIV LAB LEAK

CHI COM AGENT OF INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK HEADED THE W.HO. TEAM THAT SUGGESTED COVID-19 ORIGINATED IN BARCELONA AND ENTERED CHINA VIA FROZEN MEAT

THE BARCELONA BEEF THEORY W.H.O. LEGITIMATIZED

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: HOW THE W.H.O.'S HUNT FOR COVID'S ORIGINS STUMBLED IN CHINA

ACCORDING TO W.H.O.'S REPORT DASZAK'S JOINT INTERNATIONAL TEAM EXAMINED FOUR SCENARIOS:

THE W.H.O. TEAM PUSHES THE PREPOSTEROUS THEORY THAT THE VIRUS WAS SPREAD TO HUMANS IN SHIPMENTS OF FROZEN FOODS FROM SPAIN

THE COVID IN SPAIN WAS NOT FOUND IN THE DRAIN

EVIDENCE FOR THE EARLY OCCURRENCE OF SARS-COV-2 FROM OTHER STUDIES

THE FROZEN FOOD THEORY LACKS ONE THING - THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN COVID CASES IN BARCELONA, SPAIN, BEFORE THE ONES IN HUNAN BROKE OUT

TYPE OF GOODS DEALT BY ENVIRONMENTAL POSITIVE STALLS / RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE COLD CHAIN IN 2019

THE PERSISTENCE OF LIVE SARS-COV-2 IN ENVIRONMENTS RELATED TO THE COLD-CHAIN / EXAMPLES OF INTRODUCTION OF COVID-19 INTO CHINA THROUGH IMPORTED COLD CHAIN PRODUCTS

CONCLUSIONS

THE HUNAN MARKET ORIGIN THEORY DEBUNKED BY W.H.O.

W.H.O.- INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

EXPLANATION OF HYPOTHESIS

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ARGUMENTS AGAINST INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD

HIGHLIGHTS FROM SHORT W.H.O. REPORT

W.H.O. REPORT IS A BIG NOTHING BURGER

USG REJECTS WHO INVESTIGATION

WALL STREET JOURNAL: SCIENTISTS REJECT COVID-COVER-UP ORCHESTRATED BY DASZAK

INVESTIGATE THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

FRANK COLLINS CLAIMS NEITHER NIH NOR NIAID HAVE EVER APPROVED ANY GRANT THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH ON CORONAVIRUSES THAT WOULD HAVE INCREASED THEIR TRANSMISSIBILITY OR LETHALITY FOR HUMANS

STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

CCP MOUTHPIECE GLOBAL TIMES: US INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION OF CORONAVIRUS ORIGINS EXPOSES ITS FOUR ‘ACHILLES HEELS’: GLOBAL TIMES EDITORIAL

RALPH BARIC'S ROLE IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

BARIC WAS CONDUCTING SARS RESEARCH BEFORE A 2003 OUTBREAK IN CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

BARIC'S LAB LEAKED IN 2003 AND CAUSED A MINOR EPIDEMIC IN NORTH CAROLINA

HOW CAN YOU HAVE SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS AND NOT HAVE SARS?

GAIN OF FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH INVOLVES CREATION OF RECOMINANT VIRUS IN UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA IN COLLABORATION WITH SCIENTISTS FROM WIV

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 9, 2015

BARIC'S LAB RAT BITES STUDENT

REDACTIONS OF BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS

BARIC SUPPORTS THE ZOONOTIC THEORY BECAUSE HE PLAYED A PART IN STARTING THE PANDEMIC DUE TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH WIV SCIENTISTS

TRUMP-FUELED SUSPICION OF WUHAN LAB ENSNARES NEW YORK NONPROFIT RESEARCHING BAT CORONAVIRUSES

ANTHONY FAUCHI EMAILS

THE ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GRANTS

SAM HUSSEINI: PETER DASZAK'S ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE HAS HIDDEN ALMOST $40 MILLION IN PENTAGON FUNDING AND MILITARIZED PANDEMIC SCIENCE

THE PREDICT PROGRAM WAS A CON JOB AND FAILURE: IT HAS BEEN ALLEGED THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THE GRANT MONEY WAS HIDDEN AWAY BY DASZAK FOR HIS

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

Dr. William B. Karesh is the Executive Vice President for Health and Policy at EcoHealth Alliance. He serves as the president of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Working Group on Wildlife Diseases and also chairs the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Wildlife Health Specialist Group, a network of wildlife and health experts around the world. Dr. Karesh also serves on the World Health Organization's (W.H.O.) International Health Regulations Roster of Experts focused on the human-animal interface and wildlife health. Currently, Dr. Karesh is the EPT Partner Liaison for the USAID Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT-2 program, a >$120 million effort focused on predicting and preventing pandemic diseases. He is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Armine Arustamyan California Intercontinental University Degree Name Doctoral Field Of Study Business Administration Dates attended or expected graduation2010 – 2014 Activities and Societies: Global Business Leadership American University of Armenia Degree NameMaster's Degree Field Of Study System Management and Industrial Engineering Dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1997 Yerevan State University Degree Name Master Field Of Study Science in Physics Dates attended or expected graduation1987 – 1992

Leilani Francisco PhD MA PMP The Johns Hopkins University Degree Name Ph.D. Field Of Study International Public Health University of Maryland College Park Degree Name B.A. Field Of Study Sociocultural Anthropology University of South Florida Degree Name M.A.Field Of Study Applied Medical Anthropology

Dr. Epstein received a PhD in Disease Ecology from Kingston University, London and his DVM and MPH from Tufts University. A veterinarian and disease ecologist, Dr. Jonathan Epstein is the Vice President for Science and Outreach at EcoHealth Alliance. His research focuses on the ecology of emerging zoonotic viruses such as Nipah and Ebola virus, along with SARS, Midde East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and others that have emerged within Asia and Africa.

Evelyn Luciano Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA)Field Of StudyHuman Resources Management and Services Certificate Dates attended or expected graduation2003 – 2003 Rollins College Degree Name Master of Arts (MA) Field Of Study Counseling Psychology dates attended or expected graduation1995 – 1999 Community Mental Health and School Counseling Catholic University of Puerto Rico Degree Name BSN Field Of Study Bachelor of Science In Nursing Grade BSN Dates attended or expected graduation1975 – 1979

Dr. Ellen Carlin DVM is Assistant Research Professor at the Center for Global Health Science and Security, with a primary faculty appointment within the Department of Microbiology and Immunology. Her research interests are in the epidemiology of emerging infections. She studies incidence and transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens, focusing on the interfaces among people, animals, and the environments in which they live. She was Senior Professional Staff with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security (Peter T. King, NY), where for more than five years she handled medical preparedness, biodefense, and science and technology policy. At Georgetown, Ellen is also the director of the Global Infectious Disease graduate program at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Aleksei Chmura: Experienced Chief Of Staff with a demonstrated history of working in the non-profit organization management industry. Skilled in Nonprofit Organizations, Environmental Science, Research, Community Outreach, and Budgeting. Strong administrative professional with a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Biology/Biological Sciences, General from Kingston University. Kingston University is ranked 581 in QS World University Rankings by TopUniversities and enjoys a poor reputation.

Anthony Ramos: Former Senior Director Marketing and Development at EcoHealth Alliance Former Director of Marketing at Schneider Associates Studied Classic Culinary Arts at The French Culinary Institute Studied International relations at Boston University Lives in Lake, Michigan.

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

DASZAK: I'm in charge of in the organization in China...So the point is to establish capabilities in other countries not just take specimens from them and bring them back... that's the strategy and you know this the old adage that if you teach people how to do it, give them the tools then you've really made a difference. The money always dries up and this is something we've seen in the nonprofit world. You get great funding for five years from the foundation they always shift priorities because that's what emerged they closed them down. We have our staff in countries. We have sub contracts through local universities or agencies in-country and we have contracts to do work and it's all collaborative science so people love to interact on collaborative science. You know what I found especially in places like China where increasingly there's a paranoia around collaboration. Science collaboration is open and transparent because of the nature of what you're trying to do you're trying to discover stuff quickly, understand what it means, publish it in high-impact journal, and that drives openness and transparency and that's been great for us around the world it's also great for the U.S. and that's we really need to push that agenda. I think publishing is a very interesting mechanism you have to publish that's the argument we use.

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

Daszak is a double agent who CIA thought was working for them but had been rolled over by the Chinese Communist Party because his father was a Nazi War Criminal, a death camp guard, who taught him to respect authoritarian governments. Daszak became a W.H.O. & Lancet inspector. A good place to be to cover-up for the Chinese and himself after he funneled money to the WIV and to the Bat Lady experiments which resulted in COVID-19 being created. And there is the question of how much money was siphoned off by Daszak?

Daszak: “I’ve seen incredible efforts from everything from [religious sect] Falun Gong to the [Chinese dissident] Miles Guo camp, Steve Bannon’s group pushing the conspiracy theories around China. It’s useful to them. They’re funding it and pushing it and science has been to some extent caught up in that to other instances absolutely crushed by it. We’ve not had access to work in China on the origins for the last 12 months, which is ironic because we could have been on the ground there working with our Chinese colleagues and by now we could have found some really important answers. The rhetoric has held that up. We need that communication [with the Chinese] in an outbreak to learn from them how they control it so we can control it better. It's sad to say, but it will probably cost lives. By sort of narrow-mindedly focusing in on ourselves, or on labs, or on certain cultural politics, we miss the real enemy.”
Daszag was a prime target of Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP via EcoHealth. He parrots the Party Line. But he also was co-opted by the CIA until Trump cut his funds off. ECOHEALTH is a think tank put together by the AID CIA LITE that was supposed to protect America from Pandemics by keeping an eye on bats. But ECOHEALTH began to subsidize Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat experiments at WIV and a recombinant virus leaked from the lab into the streets of Wuhan then into the market and out again. Was it coincidence that SARSCov2 started close to WIV? Just how close the Chinese won't say as they refuse to give out the address of patient zero.

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

"THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER DONORS WHO FUNDED OR COLLABORATED ON CIVILIAN RESEARCH AT THE WIV HAVE A RIGHT AND OBLIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY OF OUR RESEARCH FUNDING WAS DIVERTED TO SECRET CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS AT THE WIV." US EMBASSY FACT SHEET

The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior Researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. Accidental infections in labs have caused several previous virus outbreaks in China and elsewhere, Including a 2004 SARS outbreak in Beijing that infected nine people, killing one. The CCP has prevented independent journalists, investigators, and global health authorities from interviewing researchers at the WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry into the origin of the virus must include interviews with these researchers and a full accounting of their previously unreported illness. Starting in at least 2016 – and with no indication of a stop prior to the COVID-19 outbreak – WIV researchers conducted experiments involving RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). The WIV became a focal point for international coronavirus research after the 2003 SARS outbreak and has since studied animals including mice, bats, and pangolins. The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus, including “RaTG13,” which it sampled from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like illness. W.H.O. investigators must have access to the records of the WIV’s work on bat and other coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak. As part of a thorough inquiry, they must have a full accounting of why the WIV altered and then removed online records of its work with RaTG13 and other viruses.
Secrecy and non-disclosure are standard practice for Beijing. For many years the United States has publicly raised concerns about China’s past biological weapons work, which Beijing has neither documented nor demonstrably eliminated, despite its clear obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention. Today’s revelations just scratch the surface of what is still hidden about COVID-19’s origin in China. Any credible investigation into the origin of COVID-19 demands complete, transparent access to the research labs in Wuhan, including their facilities, samples, personnel, and records. As the world continues to battle this pandemic – and as W.H.O. investigators begin their work, after more than a year of delays – the virus’s origin remains uncertain. The United States will continue to do everything it can to support a credible and thorough investigation, including by continuing to demand transparency on the part of Chinese authorities.Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The United States and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

The United States has repeatedly called for a transparent and thorough investigation into the origin of COVID-19. Understanding the origin of this pandemic is essential for global public health, economic recovery, and international security. To assist the vital work of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) investigative team that arrived in China this week, the United States government is today sharing new information concerning the activities inside China’s government laboratories in 2019. In particular, we urge the W.H.O. to press the government of China to address the following: Illnesses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV): The United States government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses. WIV Research on “RaTG13” and “gain-of-function”: Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers studied RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). Since the outbreak, the WIV has not been transparent nor consistent about its work with RaTG13 or other similar viruses, including possible “gain-of-function” experiments to enhance transmissibility or lethality. Secret WIV Links to Military Research: Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017. The COVID-19 pandemic was avoidable. Any responsible country would have invited world health investigators to Wuhan within days of an outbreak. China instead refused offers of help – including from the United States – and punished brave Chinese doctors, scientists, and journalists who tried to alert the world to the dangers of the virus. Beijing continues today to withhold vital information that scientists need to protect the world from this deadly virus, and the next one. The United States reiterates the importance of unfettered access to virus samples, lab records and personnel, eyewitnesses, and whistleblowers to ensure the credibility of the W.H.O.’s final report. Until the CCP allows a full and thorough accounting of what happened in Wuhan, it is only a matter of time until China births another pandemic and inflicts it on the Chinese people, and the world.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/ensurin...-investigation-of-covid-19s-origin/index.html

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

Baric taught SHI ZHENGLI all she knows about virus creation at the University of North Carolina. Collwell is focused on oceans. Saif is a vet. Hume Field and rest work for the bio-war criminal, Daszak!
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, who has been working in China for 15 years studying diseases that jump from animals to people, said, “We don’t know the source yet, but there’s pretty strong evidence that this is a bat origin coronavirus.” He said, “It’s probably going to be the Chinese horseshoe bat,” a common species that weighs up to an ounce.

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

But zoonoses fall into a gray area, and the 2003 monkeypox outbreak in the Midwest is a perfect example of what can go wrong, said Peter Daszak, director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine at the Wildlife Trust, a group specializing in human-animal diseases. The disease, related to smallpox but less deadly, arrived in a shipment of 18 Gambian giant pouched rats imported for a Chicago pet store, where they infected prairie dogs. By summer's end, there were 37 confirmed human cases -- none fatal, but some scary -- mostly among prairie-dog owners. Millions of live animals come into the country each year, and very few have really good surveillance," Dr. Daszak said. "Fish and Wildlife checks cargoes to see if they have endangered species, but it's the U.S.D.A. that does health checks, and they don't go unless it's an agricultural product, so the pet trade tends to get a pass." "The C.D.C. does a great job with outbreak investigation, but that's after the fact," he said of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "After monkeypox, they put a blanket ban on rodents from some West African countries. But who's looking at rodents from other places? Nobody. And that's a gap."
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/us/sentries-in-us-seek-early-signs-of-an-avian-flu.html

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

It is likely, the study found, that one of these "SARS-like" viruses evolved into the SARS virus at an exotic animal marketplace, where it infected civets, which, in turn, infected humans, according to Michael Farzan, a Harvard Medical School assistant professor who was not involved in the research. But why did this happen when it did? One intriguing possibility is that it is linked to China's economic boom, according to Peter Daszak, a co-author of the SARS paper who is executive director of the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. With the newfound wealth there, he said, animal markets have grown as more people can afford fresh animal meat. As the markets grow, so do the chances that a virus will jump from one species to the next.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/26/health/blaming-bats-when-man-may-be-culprit.html

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

The flu that is moving through humans appears to have a combination of genes from two normally separate sets of pigs, those from the Americas and from Eurasia, scientists say. However, it is unknown how those pigs met, and there is not yet any genetic proof that this particular flu was ever in a pig. Peter Daszak, president of the Wildlife Trust, found records showing that Mexico imported two pigs from France in 2007, the United States imported a few from Britain and Ireland, and Canada imported hundreds from Europe. “And surely this isn’t the whole truth,” he said. “There must be a hidden illegal trade.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/health/01origin.html

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

“By mapping encroachment into the forest you can predict where the next disease could emerge,” Dr. Daszak, EcoHealth’s president, says. “So we’re going to the edge of villages, we’re going to places where mines have just opened up, areas where new roads are being built. We are going to talk to people who live within these zones and saying, ‘what you are doing is potentially a risk.’”
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-ecology-of-disease.html

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

Peter Daszak, a parasitologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, has even put a number on it: 5.3 new ones each year, based on a study using data from 1940 to 2004. He and his co-authors blamed population growth, deforestation, antibiotic overuse, factory farming, live animal markets, bush meat hunting, jet travel and other factors.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/health/new-tools-to-hunt-new-viruses.htm

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

It was the darkest hour since the new illness, known as Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, first appeared in Saudi Arabia late in 2012. In all, more than 700 cases have been documented in 20 countries, nearly all of them linked to Saudi Arabia. More than 250 people have died. King Abdullah fired the country’s health minister and his deputy in April, leaving experts wondering whether the shake-up would bring greater transparency and international cooperation. “In the U.S., when you have a crisis like the Veterans Administration scandal, the new head is in front of the TV cameras explaining what the new plan is,” said Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a veterinary organization that tracked the disease in animals. “There is no tradition of openness in Saudi Arabia.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/world/middleeast/flawed-saudi-response-fueled-outbreak-of-mers-middle-east-virus.htm

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

Daszak describes Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, as exactly the kind of threat that Disease X was meant to represent: a novel, highly infectious coronavirus, with a high mortality rate, and no existing treatment or prevention. “The problem isn’t that prevention was impossible,” Daszak told me. “It was very possible. But we didn’t do it. Governments thought it was too expensive. Pharmaceutical companies operate for profit.” And the W.H.O., for the most part, had neither the funding nor the power to enforce the large-scale global collaboration necessary to wit. Examples from several countries suggest that the Chinese vaccines may not be very effective at preventing the spread of the virus, particularly the new variants, but Daszak overlooks this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/magazine/pandemic-vaccine.html

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

We, the undersigned, are public health scientists who have closely followed the emergence of 2019-nCoV, and are deeply concerned about its impact on global health and well-being. We have watched as the scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable. We sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China who continue to save lives and protect global health during the challenge of this novel coronavirus outbreak. We are all in this together, with our Chinese counterparts in the forefront, against this new viral threat. The rapid, open and transparent sharing of data on 2019-nCoV is now being threatened by rumors and misinformation around the origins of this outbreak. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that 2019-nCoV does not have a natural origin. Scientists from multiple countries have published and analyzed 2019-nCoV genomes1, and they overwhelmingly conclude that this virus originated in wildlife, as have so many other emerging diseases. This is further supported by a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and by the scientific communities they represent. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumors, and prejudice that jeopardize our global collaboration in the fight against this virus. We support the call from the Director-General of the World Health Organization to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture13. We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus. We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the front-line!
Signatories
Dr. James Hughes, Professor Emeritus, Emory University School of Medicine
Dr. Rita Colwell, Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland College Park
Dr. Linda Saif, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University
Dr. Billy Karesh, Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Peter Daszak, President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Hume Field, Honorary Professor, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

When peterdaszak.com went online the first ones to become aware of it were the Chinese The CCP had an alert on their agent Peter Daszak. But by visiting the page they confirmed the fact he was a Chinese agent or agent of influence. Peter was a prime target for Chinese intelligence recruitment as he was already in bed with the CCP. He parrots the Party Line. The Nazi ideas he learned from his father made him respect the Reds, who are sterilizing ethnic minorities like the Nazis did.

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

Communism found a receptive home in mainland China. The WIV is run by Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee CHANGCAI HE who was the chairman of the corporate trade union of Wuhan Branch from Jan. 2004 to Sep. 2013, and the Corporate Secretary of the Party at Wuhan Branch from Oct. 2005 to Jul. 2013. Since the Aug. of 2013, he has been the deputy director general of Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS. This CCP apparatchik runs the institute and if anyone steps out of line they are either imprisoned, sent to a "re-grooving" institute or killed.
Changcai HE: http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Directors2016

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

Academician Xi Chong Nanshan has already delivered a speech on TV. Wuhan New Coronavirus is not the true source of the virus. There are 5 new coronavirus series, ABCDE bat sleeve BAT (H52) and then mutates H53> The C family pathogens in China, with variants of C56 and MV2, spread throughout the world. But the United States had five major families of ABCDE two years ago, the US Government CDC (Center Disease of Control) Concealing the illness, when a military contest was held in Wuhan in November, two American soldiers went to the Wuhan Hospital in Hubei to catch a cold. It was the first hospital in Wuhan, China, which discovered a coronavirus transmission in early December (Golden Eagle) Tan Hospital and Wuhan Central Hospital). From this calculation, it should be that the US soldiers brought the virus into Wuhan in the Wuhan military competition, and the virus series H1 (referred to as the son) came to China. If China wants to check the origin of these two American blood sources, we can confirm the source. The US should have ABCDE two years ago (H13, H3, H1, H56, MV2) These five kinds of viruses have hundreds of pathogens in bats. Among them, the United States has mutated five kinds of pathogens. The United States has always been a stable fact. This is why the U.S. government is in a hurry to send them Americans back to the United States, and is afraid to find pathogens from Americans. In this way, the outbreak of the new coronavirus can rest on the Chinese. The viruses in the Middle East are MV2 and H56. No such virus has been detected in China. The seriously ill Iranians said that they had never been to China and had no Chinese friends, but had been to the United States. The world knows that many wealthy people in Middle Eastern countries buy properties in the United States, and their children are also studying in the United States. I am going to write this article today and spread it to the seven major media in the world. My title will read "Americans are the tumors of the world's viruses." The Washington Post published the title of the article last month, stating "Chinese are sick men of East Asia", the birthplace of the virus. I let the world see the hypocrisy, viciousness, loss of conscience, and the spread of the virus to people all over the world.

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world, that's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic."

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

COVID-19 has NOT been found in bats nor in any intermediate species. Peter Daszak insisits the virus jumped from an intermediate species to humans to cover up the fact that the virus' creation was financed by Eco-Health Alliance. Daszak used the CIA / USAID / PENTAGON money he didn't pocket to fund the project that was supposed to predict a SARS-like viral emergence with is bogus "PREDICT PROGRAM."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/14/health/WHO-covid-daszak-china-virus.html
Daszak reflected on the atmosphere in Wuhan and his first glimpse of the seafood market where the initial outbreak occurred last year, although it was not the site of the first cases. He also said the path ahead would be straightforward scientifically, but not politically. A transcript of the conversation, condensed and edited for length, follows:
James Gorman: You’ve been to China and to Wuhan many times before. How was this different?
DASZAK: Well, this was weird. There’s certain things when you go into China that you’re supposed to do. The first thing you do is have a meeting and then have a meal. And if you don’t have a meal, it’s considered extremely rude. This time we spent two weeks in Zoom calls from our quarantine hotel. Then we went to meet in person and still didn’t have meals with our host. We had meals in a separate room. So it was just a very difficult, very intense, very emotional trip. In Wuhan, there’s this feeling of post-traumatic shock. The city went on lockdown, I think, 76 days. They were locked in their apartments — people died, and they didn’t know about it. And from then on, they’ve been accused of starting a pandemic, and it’s been called the Wuhan virus, the China virus, and there was just a sense of outrage and sadness.
James Gorman: Did that make it difficult in terms of the scientific purpose of the trip?
DASZAK: No. You’ve got a task to do. You’ve volunteered. You know what it’s going to be like. You get caught up in the historical importance. I don’t know if we were the first foreigners to walk around the Huanan seafood market, which is blocked off even to Chinese citizens. The only people that have been in there have been the Chinese disease investigators. We met with the doctors that treated the first known Covid patients. ¹These people have been through harrowing conditions, and they’re now lauded as heroes in China, and then the rest of the world now is fighting that war. And China, of course, is absolutely petrified of this virus catching hold again. When you arrive at the airport, they come on the plane in full P.P.E.; you’re escorted down a separate quarantine pathway; you get tested. You’re driven to the hotel, you go in your room, and you’re locked in for two weeks. It’s just severe. The people who come to your door are in full P.P.E. The waste from your trash, from the hotel room, goes into a yellow bag with a biohazard sign on it. It was a totally different experience when I returned home, where I didn’t even get a notification that I’ve got to quarantine. I signed on to the New York state app, but no one is going to knock on my door and tell me, “Stay indoors.”
1. But Daszak didn't get their names. James Gorman:
Did you learn anything from this trip that you didn’t know before?
DASZAK: From Day 1, the data we were seeing were new that had never been seen outside China. Who were the vendors in the Huanan seafood market? Where did they get their supply chains? And what were the contacts of the first cases? How real were the first cases? What other clusters were there? When you asked for more, the Chinese scientists would go off, and a couple of days later, they’ve done the analysis, and we’ve got new information. It was extremely useful. At the time, you couldn’t really say much. We were trying to not undermine the process by revealing anything while we were on the trip.
James Gorman: What can you say now about the market and what you saw?
DASZAK: The market closed on the 31st of December 31, 2020 or January 1, 2021, and China C.D.C. sent a team in of scientists to try and find out what was going on. It was a very extensive study, swabbing every surface of this place. We knew early on that there were 500 samples collected, and there were many positives, and in that sampling were some animal carcasses, or meat. But there was not really much information publicly about what had been done. So we got all that information. And that, to me, was a real eye-opener. They’d actually done over 900 swabs in the end, a huge amount of work. They had been through the sewage system. They’d been into the air ventilation shaft to look for bats. They’d caught animals around the market. They’d caught cats, stray cats, rats, they even caught one weasel. They’d sampled snakes. People had live snakes at the market, live turtles, live frogs. Rabbits were there, rabbit carcasses. A farm with rabbits could have been really critical. There was talk about badgers, and in China, when they say badger, that means ferret badger. It’s a mustelid, related to weasels. Animals were coming into that market that could have carried the coronavirus. They could have been infected by bats somewhere else in China and brought it in. So that’s clue No. 1. There were 10 stalls that sold wildlife. There were vendors from South China, including Yunnan Province, Guangxi Province and Guangdong Province. Yunnan Province is where the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is found in bats. Guangxi and Guangdong are where the pangolins were captured. They had close viruses. You’ve got animals coming in to the market which are susceptible. Some of these are coming from places where we know the nearest relatives of the virus are found. So there’s the real red flag. Now the Chinese group did swab those animals, and they were all negative, but it’s just one small group of animals in the freezer that were left behind. We don’t know what else was for sale there. So these two clues are really important. When we got to actually visit the market, to me it was quite striking. The pictures you see of that market closed now are of quite orderly buildings with shutters, and you think, This a very efficient, typical city market. It doesn’t really look like a live animal market. Once you get there on the ground, it’s different. It’s pretty ramshackle. It looks like a place that would sell live animals. There’s plenty of evidence of live aquatic animals, the turtle tanks, the fish tanks, the snakes, which we know were available. What we now have are a clear link and a potential pathway.
James Gorman: What about the cases that appeared before the outbreak in the seafood market?
DASZAK: There was other spread going on outside of Huanan market. There are other patients who have no links to the market, quite a few in December. There were other markets. And we do know that some of the patients had links to other markets. We need to do some further work, and then the Chinese colleagues need to do some further work. When we sat down as a group, the China team and the W.H.O. team on the last full day of work, and said, “Let’s go through the hypotheses,” the one that received the most enthusiastic support was this pathway — wildlife, through a domesticated wildlife link, into Wuhan.
James Gorman: What is the next step?
DASZAK: For the animals chain, it’s straightforward. The suppliers are known. They know the farm name; they know the owner of the farm. You’ve got to go down to the farm and interview the farmer and the family. You’ve got to test them. You’ve got to test the community. You’ve got to go and look and see if there are any animals left at any farms nearby and see if they’ve got evidence of infection, and see if there is any cross-border movement. If the virus is in those southern border states, it’s possible that there’s been some movement across neighboring countries like Vietnam, Laos or Myanmar. We’re finding more and more related viruses now. There’s one in Japan and one in Cambodia, one in Thailand. For the human side, look for earlier cases, for clusters; look in blood banks for serum, if possible. Anything like this is going to be sensitive in China, and it’s going to take some persuasion and diplomacy and energy for them to do that because, to be honest, looking for the source of this virus within China is not a great, high priority I think for the Chinese government. Anywhere this virus is shown to emerge is a political issue. That’s one of the problems, and that is clear and obvious to anyone who has been looking at this.
James Gorman: Do you have a particular animal that you suspect right now as an intermediate link, more strongly than others?
DASZAK: IT’S TOO UP IN THE AIR. We don’t know if civets were on sale. We know they are very easily infected. We don’t know what the situation is with the mink farms in China or the other fur farms, like raccoon dogs, even though they’re normally farmed in a different part of China. That needs to be followed up on, too. But if you were to say which pathway would you put the most weight on, I think the virus emerging either in Southeast Asia or Southern China from bats, getting into a domesticated wildlife farm. I’ve been to many of these, and they often have mixed species — civets, ferret badgers, raccoon dogs. Those animals would be able to get infected from bats. Either the people that work there get infected and bring it in, or animals are shipped in, live or recently killed, that bring the virus into a market. Once it’s in a market — either Huanan or another one in Wuhan — you’ve got a dense population of people moving through those markets. And it’s going to be a real potential for an amplification.
James Gorman: The new data that you saw, for instance, on the vendors and their supply chains, will that be in your full report?
DASZAK: I hope so. There’ll be some things that are going to be confidential, without a doubt. Patient records are kept highly confidential in China. We have an image in the West of China being authoritarian and they are videoing everyone. They can have access to anything. But patient records are very private, and some are not accessible. We wanted to meet with certain patients. They didn’t want to meet, so they weren’t pushed to meet with us. There’s no reason to believe that was shenanigans. I’m hoping all the information about vendors, vendor chains will be there. But if not, we’ve seen it. We’ve got it. And we will be following up.

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

Nearly one-quarter of the world’s mammal species are bats, and their ability to fly while hosting a petri dish of viruses makes them both zoological marvels and efficient vectors of disease. Infectious diseases that are believed to have emerged from bats in recent decades include coronaviruses like SARS and MERS, along with other viruses like Nipah, Hendra and Ebola. Most of these viruses were transferred from bats to an intermediate host, like a palm civet or camel, before making their way to humans.
The coronavirus that causes Covid-19, which came to public attention in late 2019, has not been conclusively traced to bats, in Yunnan Province in southwestern China.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/world/asia/thailand-bats-coronavirus.html
The WIV was awarded a patent for cages to hold live bats for testing just months before the virus started spreading. The Mail has established that the WIV filed an application in June 2018 to patent "bat rearing cages capable of healthy growth and breeding under artificial conditions." The patent was granted in January 2019. A separate patent, filed by the WIV on October 16, 2020, relates to the "artificial breeding method of wild bat."The patent discusses cross-species transmission of SARS- CoV from bat to humans and other animals, saying: "Bats infected with the virus naturally or artificially have no obvious clinical symptoms, and the mechanism is unknown. The invention aims to provide an artificial breeding method of wild bat predators, which aims at overcoming the defects in the prior art, and the wild bat predators are artificially domesticated, bred and passaged to establish an artificial breeding group, thereby providing a brand-new model experimental animal for scientific research." Daszak tweeted in April 2020: "The researchers don't keep the bats, nor do they kill them. All bats are released back to their cave site after sampling. It's a conservation measure and is much safer in terms of disease spread than killing them or trying to keep them in a lab. The WIV does not have live or dead bats in it. There is no evidence anywhere that this happened"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-planned-breed-animals-virus-experiments.html

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

The CCP controlled scientists can only find a virus in nature that resembles SARS-CoV-2 and not the virus itself is telling. A virus virtually identical to SARS-CoV-1 was found in the Himalayan, or masked, palm civet. It is related to the mongoose, resembles a large weasel and is a threatened species. There are viruses in bats closely resembling SARS-CoV-2 that were used in the gain-of-threat experiments. Until SARS-CoV-2 is discovered in animals it is laboratory escape.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/24/world/strain-of-sars-is-found-in-3-animal-species-in-asia.html
Initial phylogenetic analyses reveal that the SARS-CoV-1 in civets and humans actually come from two distant branches, but the SARS-CoV from civets during the incipient phase of the epidemic had 99.8% sequence similarity to the human SARS-CoV “Our research has shown that the SARS coronavirus found in human victims is the same as the SARS coronavirus found in civet cats,” a paper quoted Wang Ming, an official from the Guangzhou Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, as saying. As research progressed horseshoes bats were blamed, however, the Chinese put an end tothe epidemic when they slaughters and boiled most of the civets in all of China. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ame2.12017

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

David Asher, a former lead investigator of the task force created by the Trump administration, said it was "sort of ridiculous" to believe the deadly disease passed naturally from animals to humans. "We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci's NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The data disproportionately stacked up, as we investigated, that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source. I had biostatisticians at one of our national labs calculate the odds of this evolving in nature, and it was like 1 in 13 million, and then they revised it to about 1 in 13 billion. So, to say this came out of a zoonotic situation is sort of ridiculous. We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. [Anthony] Fauci’s NIAID organization, that there was almost no evidence that supported a natural zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The epicenter of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain of function techniques.” State Department official Chris Ford "seemed disinterested,” Asher recalled. “He said even if we came to it, how did we know where it came out of, what lab. Very rarely in my life in government have I ever encountered someone who was more of a ‘neg’-ocrat, less a bureaucrat, than that individual.”
Fauci acknowledged that NIH granted the Wuhan lab $600,000 over a period of five years to investigate bat coronaviruses, but emphatically denied the money was used for gain of threat research. However, according to David Asher, “the Chinese most certainly felt that NIH was supporting their gain of function research” and claimed that the variants developed in the lab “were not similar to anything, for example, what could occur in natural evolution.”

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

DISCUSSION: We investigated the patterns of molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. Although the genomic analyses suggested that SARS-CoV-2 was closest to RaTG13, their difference at neutral sites was much higher than previously realized. Our results provide novel insights for tracing the intermediate natural host of SARS-CoV-2. With population genetic analyses of 103 genomes of SARS-CoV-2, we found that SARS-CoV-2 viruses had two major lineages (L and S lineages), and the two lineages were well defined by just two SNPs that show complete linkage across SARS-CoV-2 strains. The L lineage (~70%) was found to be more prevalent than the S lineage (~30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, our evolutionary analyses suggested the S appeared to be more related to coronaviruses in animals. Since nonsynonymous sites are usually under stronger negative selection than synonymous sites, calculating sequence differences without separating these two classes of sites could lead to a potentially significant underestimate of the degree of molecular divergence. For example, although the overall nucleotides only differed by ~4% between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, the genomic average dS value, which is usually a neutral proxy, was 0.17 between these two viruses (Table 1). Of note, the genome-wide dS value is 0.012 between humans and chimpanzees, and 0.08 between humans and rhesus macaques [36]. Thus, the neutral molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 is 14 times larger than that between humans and chimpanzees, and twice as large as that between humans and macaques. The genomic average dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GD Pangolin-CoV is 0.469, which is comparable to that between humans and mice (0.5), and the dS value between SARS-CoV-2 and GX Pangolin-Cov is even larger (0.722). The scale of these measures suggests that we should perhaps consider the difference in the neutral evolving site rather than the difference in all nucleotide sequences when tracing the origin and natural intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2. In this work, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 can be divided into two major lineages (L and S). Intriguingly, the S and L lineages can be clearly defined by just two tightly linked SNPs at positions 8,782 (orf1ab: T8517C, synonymous) and 28,144 (ORF8: C251T, S84L). orf1ab, which encodes replicase/transcriptase, is required for viral genome replication and might also be important for viral pathogenesis [38]. Although the T8517C mutation in orf1ab does not change the protein sequence (it changes the codon AGT (Ser) to AGC (Ser)), it may affect orf1ab translation since AGT is preferred while AGC is unpreferred (Table S2). ORF8 promotes the expression of ATF6, the ER unfolded protein response factor, in human cells. Thus, it will be interesting to investigate the function of the S84L AA change in ORF8, as well as the combinatory effect of these two mutations in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. As previously noted, the data examined in this study are still very limited, and follow-up analyses of a larger set of data are needed to have a better understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2.
https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036/5775463
If it could be proven that the virus mutated that would mean it was not artificial. "Even for pandemic flu — a virus much more given to rapid change than the one that causes Covid-19 — a few months would be a short timeline for a widespread functional mutation. There isn't a clear-cut evolutionary case for a virus like SARS-CoV2, which has already managed to infect more than 6 million people and often causes mild symptoms, to quickly get milder. If anything, it seems more likely that it would be genetically stable.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...-peak-lull-in-cases-doesn-t-mean-weaker-virus

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

"The corona virus that causes COVID-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, shares 96% of its genetic sequence with a virus found in bats. It is in the collection of viral genomes assembled during those studies that scientists have now found the bat virus closest to SARS-COV-2. A strain called RATG13 gathered in the same cave in Yunnan shares 96% of its genetic sequence with the new virus. RATG13 is not that virus’s ancestor. It is something more like its cousin. Edward Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney, estimates that the 4% difference between the two represents at least 20 years of evolutionary divergence from some common antecedent, and probably something more like 50."
https://www.economist.com/science-a...uzzle-of-covid-19s-origin-are-coming-to-light

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

In May 2020 WIV researchers identified RmYN02 from an analysis of 227 bat samples collected in Yunnan province, China, between May and October of 2019. "Since the discovery that bats were the reservoir of SARS coronavirus in 2005, there has been great interest in bats as reservoir species for infectious diseases, particularly as they carry a very high diversity of RNA viruses, including coronaviruses," Shi Zhengli says. RNA from the samples was sent for metagenomic next-generation sequencing in early January 2020, soon after the discovery of SARS-CoV-2. Across the whole genome, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 is another virus, called RaTG13, which was previously identified from bats in Yunnan province. But RmYN02, the virus newly discovered here, is even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 in some parts of the genome, including in the longest encoding section of the genome called 1ab, where they share 97.2% of their RNA. The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SAR-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor binding domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells.
The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02, is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its spike protein meet. SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a four-amino-acid insertion at the junction of S1 and S2; this insertion is unique to the virus and has been present in all SARS-CoV-2 sequenced so far. According to SHI ZHENGLI insertions in RmYN02 are not the same as those in SARS-CoV-2, which indicates that they occurred through independent insertion events. But a similar insertion event happening in a virus identified in bats strongly suggests that these kinds of insertions are of natural origin. SHI ZHENGLI: "Our findings suggest that these insertion events that initially appeared to be very unusual can, in fact, occur naturally in animal betacoronaviruses. Our work sheds more light on the evolutionary ancestry of SARS-CoV-2. Neither RaTG13 nor RmYN02 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, because there is still an evolutionary gap between these viruses. But our study strongly suggests that sampling of more wildlife species will reveal viruses that are even more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps even its direct ancestors, which will tell us a great deal about how this virus emerged in humans."
Pure speculation. No closer bat virus has been found as of June 13, 2021. The more likey scenario is that Shi Zhengli and Daszak modified a virus resembling SARS-CoV-19 in BSL-2 lab and it escaped.

RmYN02 FURIN

The researchers note that RmYN02 does not closely resemble SARS-CoV-2 in the region of the genome that encodes the key receptor domain that binds to the human ACE2 receptor that the novel coronavirus uses to infect host cells. This means it's not likely to infect human cells, they said. The key similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and RmYN02 is the finding that RmYN02 also contains amino acid insertions at the point where the two subunits of its Spike Protein meet, according to the researchers. The viral Spike Protein mediates SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells and harbors a S1/S2 cleavage site containing multiple arginine residues (multibasic) not found in closely related animal coronaviruses. However, the role of this multibasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. Here, we report that the cellular protease furin ¹cleaves the Spike Protein at the S1/S2 site and that cleavage is essential for S-protein-mediated cell-cell fusion and entry into human lung cells. Moreover, optimizing the S1/S2 site increased cell-cell, but not virus-cell, fusion, suggesting that the corresponding viral variants might exhibit increased cell-cell spread and potentially altered virulence. Our results suggest that acquisition of a S1/S2 multibasic cleavage site was essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection of humans and identify furin as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276520302641

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

Highlights
• Pangolin-CoV is 91.02% identical to SARS-CoV-2 at the whole-genome level
• Pangolin-CoV is the second closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 behind RaTG13
• Five key amino acids in the RBD are consistent between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
• Only SARS-CoV-2 contains a potential cleavage site for furin proteases
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220303602
Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, an organization that works on animal-to-human spillover diseases, said that accumulating evidence on pangolins made it “doubtful that this species played a role in the outbreak.” “We need to keep looking for the original reservoir” — likely a bat,” he said, adding that the potential intermediate host would likely be another mammal species that’s more widely traded in the Yunnan-to-Wuhan corridor of China. While the pangolin trade is vast, Dr. Daszak said most of it “is in their scales, dried, in which viruses would almost certainly not be able to persist.” He opposes trade in the highly endangered animal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/pangolin-coronavirus.html

PETER DASZAK

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

Daszak still claims that any suggestion of a lab leak of a genetically altered virus is "conspiracy theory," a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event, a belief embraced by many Trumpoids who know something is happening, but don't know what it is. Of course Daszak had to say that the virus came from nature and anyone who disagreed was a conspiratorialist, otherwise people might examine his role in the pandemic. The other players roles who caused the pandemic were easily ascertainable by reviewing the scientific literature they generated while conducting these experiments with SARS-CoV-2 close relatives in the very city where the pandemic first broke out and in at least two USA labs..

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

Since 2014, the EcoHealth Alliance has received a grant from the National Institutes of Health, until its funding was abruptly cut two weeks ago. The reason, as “60 Minutes” reported on Sunday evening, was a conspiracy theory spread by Representative Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican who in March wore a gas mask on the House floor to mock concern about the new coronavirus. On April 14, 2020 Gaetz appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show and claimed that the N.I.H. grant went to the Wuhan Institute, which Gaetz intimated might have been the source of the virus — the institute may have “birthed a monster,” in his words. The first of Gaetz’s claims was flatly false, and the second unlikely; the C.I.A. has reportedly found no evidence of a link between the virus and the Wuhan lab. But at a White House briefing a few days later, a reporter from the right-wing website Newsmax told President Trump that under Barack Obama, the N.I.H. gave the Wuhan lab a $3.7 million grant. “Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?” she asked. In fact, Trump’s administration had recently renewed EcoHealth’s grant, but Trump didn’t appear to know that. “The Obama administration gave them a grant of $3.7 million?” he asked. Then he said, “We will end that grant very quickly.” And they did. But ending the grant dealt a blow to efforts to find treatments and a vaccine for the coronavirus. Remdesivir, the antiviral drug that’s shown some promise in Covid-19 patients, was earlier tested against bat viruses EcoHealth discovered. Months before this pandemic began, Reuters reported, the Trump administration axed the job of an epidemiologist working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China to help detect emerging disease outbreaks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/opinion/coronavirus-trump.html
NIH PRESS RELEASE: "The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans." In a previous R01 we found that bats in southern China harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs, some of which can use human ACE2 to enter cells, infect humanized mouse models causing SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines. nih.gov

DASZAK: "Look, first, the idea that this virus escaped from a lab is just pure baloney. It’s simply not true. I’ve been working with that lab for 15 years. And the samples collected were collected by me and others in collaboration with our Chinese colleagues. They’re some of the best scientists in the world. There was no viral isolate in the lab. There was no cultured virus that’s anything related to SARS coronavirus 2. So it’s just not possible.¹Now, how did it get into the market? We know for sure that the Wuhan market was part of this outbreak, but we think that the first few cases weren’t in the market. And this is not uncommon. We’ve seen this with many, many other disease outbreaks, new viruses that emerge. They trickle out from rural areas through a person getting infected maybe in Hunan province and then moving into Wuhan, that maybe they’re part of the wildlife trade. Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets. These wet markets aren’t just places to sell wildlife; they’re places where people congregate. They come in in droves. They circulate around. They’re really good places for a virus to spread. And if a person brings it in, or an animal, that virus will spread. And it looks like that’s what’s happened here."
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/peter_daszak_coronavirus
1. Dr. Wang Yanyi said the institute now had three strains of live viruses, including one that was 96 per cent genomically similar to the Sars virus. But their highest similarity to Sars-CoV-2 was only 79.8 per cent, Wang Yanyi said.
If the disease "trickled out from rural areas" because there are as many bats in Wuhan as there are in New York City why didn't someone in those rural areas become infected first? Why wasn't Hunan put under lock-down? "Maybe a farmer got infected, or a farmer’s animals, and they were shipped into the markets." Why did the market closest to the Wuhan Institute of Virology get infected and no other wet markets? As documented in this Data Base the virus did not originate in the market but this Chinese agent of influence sticks with a variation of the market story.
"Before accepting the first batch of test samples from COVID-19 patients on December 30, 2019, the institute’s labs did not have the novel coronavirus and no one at the institute has contracted COVID-19 to this day. “It is impossible for the virus to leak from such a high-security laboratory,” said Yuan Zhiming, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in an interview with CGTN on April 18. The claim that the novel coronavirus escaped from the laboratory is pure nonsense, said Peter Daszak, chairperson of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit organization, who has been cooperating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 15 years. There is no virus cultivation related to the new coronavirus in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so the so-called “laboratory leak theory” is impossible, said Peter Daszak who is responsible for studying emerging infectious diseases worldwide."
https://business.facebook.com/188625661189259/posts/3264254063626388
Simply untrue as evidenced by the scientific papers generated by the Institute.

NPR DASZAK: "The real risk is in the wild in the way people interact with wildlife around the world. That's where we need to be focused if we want to really do something about preventing the next pandemic. We're finding 1 to 7 million people exposed to these viruses every year in Southeast Asia; that's the pathway. It's just so obvious to all of us working in the field," he says. No conspiracy theories Despite the evidence, misinformation about the virus's origins continue to proliferate. For Peter Daszak who has worked on other outbreaks, the pattern is all too familiar: "Every time we get a new virus emerging, we have people that say, 'This could have come from a lab,'" he says. What's unusual about this outbreak, he says, is that senior officials in both China and the U.S. have traded accusations that each nation is somehow responsible for the virus. "It's a real shame that the conspiracy theories can get to the level they've got with policymakers," he says. The political heat has strained the very scientific collaborations meant to detect these viruses as they emerge, warns Jonna Mazet. The PREDICT system she runs relies on the voluntary cooperation of many countries, with researchers freely sharing data about viruses they're spotting within their borders. "With this sort of blame game that's going on, we put ourselves at much more risk." Peter Daszak says the time for finger-pointing is over. "We have a bat virus in my neighborhood in New York killing people," he says. "Let's get real about this."

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

“One thing that I heard from the WIV lab director that I thought was very interesting, and he said, and he speaks okay English, we were asking him all these questions about, they call them rumors over there, we call them conspiracy theories, and he said basically, in sort of his version of English, we’ve not responded to those rumors because if you do that, you give them oxygen. So I think people misunderstand the Chinese government, and he’s a Chinese government worker at the senior level running a lab, not speaking up about when they’re accused. The reason is, he stated quite clearly, they don’t want to give oxygen to these conspiracies. They’re unfounded. And every now and again, they make a statement: that is simply not true. What do you do?"

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

Do you think that we will ever know where Sars-Cov-2 came from – and does it matter?
DASZAK: It does matter, but we're never going to know 100 per cent for sure – it's very hard to definitively prove, without being there at the time. In that space of uncertainty, conspiracy theories abound – for instance the idea it could have been bio-engineered. This is ridiculous, but it’s time consuming to fight these fires. I think it will take a couple of years to track Sar-Cov-2 properly. ¹ We need to trace back the sorts of animals that were going into Wuhan’s wet market – and the people. It’s quite possible it was circulating on a farm for weeks or months before emerging in Wuhan. Every time we've looked at the origins of the new disease in the past, we’ve found out it was actually around a lot longer than thought. Perhaps we will find it was just missed because, in most people, it just causes a cough – who in rural China doesn't have a cough every now and again?
1. In a couple of years the trail would have dried up!
What do you think is driving the conspiracy theories we’ve seen over the last few months?
DASZAK: People buy into conspiracy theories because they’re convincing stories told by charismatic people with just enough science and fact to make them seem plausible. The truth also tends to be less interesting. In this case, people in China are exposed to bats, who harbour viruses. It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring. Clearly this is part of the politics now. Take the US. We're seeing conspiracy theories being elevated in a polarised press, to the point where politicians then use that to make policy decisions. Which is pretty frightening. This is ultimately damaging to public health: US media focus on the lab leak hypothesis has led to "political tensions hindering an effort to find the source of the virus." Not unexpected. When you mix politics with science, you get...politics!"
Who are your heroes and villains of the pandemic?
DASZAK: Then there are people like SHI ZHENGLI in China, who has stuck through death threats and a complete disparaging of her character, just to do what she does: try to save lives. A few have been convicted, but many have been dragged through the mud for no good cause. I've heard many in leadership positions at NIH & in academia say privately that this casts a shadow of McCarthyism & is clearly politically motivated.
It’s a lot more exciting to blame scientists inside a top secret lab that’s blocked off with barbed wire even if what is going on behind those doors is actually pretty boring.¹ 1. There is only a cyclone fence around WIV. Making new virus is exciting, not boring. DASZAK: Finally the only cases in rural China where bats abound were characterized by a mild cough or no symptoms. No rural Chinese came down with full blown Sars-Cov-2.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

Trump issued a statement boasting of his early insistence that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus. “To me, it was obvious from the beginning,” he said. “But I was badly criticized, as usual.”Biden's investigation was prompted when in May 2021 the CCP refused to allow the W.H.O. to conduct further investigation. This former Congressional researcher is hoping this website, along with the lawsuit I am filing against Dr. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH & NAID, will spark a Congressional investigation of the lab origins of Covid-19. The Biden Corona Report has to exonerate China since if it blamed China how would the Western powers punish China? The New York Times started setting the tone for the cover-up:

"One allied nation [France?] passed on information that three workers in the Wuhan virological laboratory were hospitalized with serious flulike symptoms in the autumn of 2019. The information about the sickened workers is considered important, but officials cautioned that it did not constitute evidence that they caught the virus at the laboratory — they may have brought it there.¹ Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters he had not seen any conclusive evidence about the cause of the pandemic, but supported the effort to look deeper. We need to know the origin, how this happened.” In his announcement Biden said two intelligence agencies believed the virus most likely occurred naturally, while at least one other favored the theory that it leaked accidentally from a lab in China. "None had high confidence in their assessments, the president noted."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/coronavirus-origins-intelligence.html
"Still, that a top lab studying this family of viruses happens to be located in the same city where the epidemic emerged could very well be a coincidence. Wuhan is an urban center larger than New York City, with a steady flow of visitors from other parts of China. It also has many large markets dealing in wildlife brought from across China and beyond. When wild animals are kept in close quarters, viruses have an opportunity to jump from species to species, sometimes resulting in dangerous recombinations that can lead to new diseases." The Wuhan Market theory has been debunked by numerous studies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/health/wuhan-coronavirus-lab-leak.html
1. What absurdity! Someone contaminated a lab where experiments with Coronavirus were being conducted from the outside? The NYT also reported: "The intelligence on the three workers came from outside the United States intelligence agencies’ own collection, which means its veracity is more difficult to authenticate. The source of the information was unclear, but several American officials said they believed the report that the three researchers got sick."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/politics/biden-coronavirus-origins.html

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

Early investigations into SARS-CoV-2 emergence and the resulting COVID-19 disease outbreak proposed the proximate cause was a zoonotic spillover event in late November or early December 2019 in Wuhan, China. This was supported by preliminary epidemiological studies, including the initial clinical series which linked two-thirds of the identified cases to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan. Critically, the study found no direct connection to the market for 14 individuals, including the first known case of COVID-19, leaving open the possibility of alternate points of origin and infection. Additionally, virologic samples of wildlife in the Huanan market could not be linked to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting transmission at the market was downstream from the spillover event. Here we consider that SARS-CoV-2 may have already been circulating in the community prior to the identification of the Huanan Market cluster. This hypothesis is supported by emerging epidemiologic and phylogenetic evidence indicating that the virus emerged in southern China and may have already spread internationally, and adapted for efficient human transmission by the time it was detected in late December.
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42669767/Satellite_Images_Baidu_COVID19_manuscript_preprint.pdf

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

"The new virus revealed itself gradually in humans last December 2019, in Wuhan, and in January 2020 several Chinese laboratories, including SHI ZHENGLI - a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin. SHI ZHENGLI directs the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, WIV a biosafety level 4 laboratory located in Jiangxia District, Wuhan. Her lab sequenced wholly or partly the genomes of samples from different patients, including five complete genomes. SHI ZHENGLI and her colleagues made their announcement on January 23, 2020 that the virus found in those five patients was 96.2-per-cent identical to the bat coronavirus they had warned about three years earlier." ¹"By that time, the virus had been circulating in Wuhan for at least seven weeks, and three consequential misconceptions had been propagated, not just by political leaders but by hospital officials and the Chinese version of the C.D.C.:

That the outbreak had begun in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which famously sold much more than seafood;

That the virus wasn’t dangerous

That it didn’t pass from person to person. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/11/why-werent-we-ready-for-the-coronavirus

1. The 4% differences is thousands of genomes. The viruses were SIMILAR not identical and the virus was not an evolutionary cousin of CoV-19 nor could it cause disease in humans

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

"On the second and third points, there was disagreement by clinicians treating patients, such as Zhang Li, at Wuhan’s Jinyintan Hospital, who told the Wall Street Journal in late February, “I was on alert because this was a new pneumonia and because I’d dealt with SARS.” The misconception that the market was the origin of the outbreak is implicitly contradicted by a scientific paper published in late January 2020, by a group of physicians from Wuhan and Beijing, describing clinical features of the first forty-one patients. Twenty-seven of them, the paper said, had been exposed in the Huanan market. Since a single horseshoe bat would be unlikely to infect twenty-seven people, even if they diced it into hors d’œuvres, and since by some accounts bats weren’t even on sale in the market at that time, a few scientists have speculated that there was an intermediate host animal—a snake, a pangolin, a palm civet?—in which the virus amplified itself, before that larger creature was sold or butchered. The molecular evidence for snakes is weak, pangolins are a complicated story, and civets aren’t implicated this time." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31986264

DANIEL LUCEY

"An American physician and scholar Daniel R. Lucey (who had also worked the SARS outbreak, in Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Toronto) wondered about the fourteen other early patients. He noticed that the first of them, falling sick on December 1, 2019 had no direct or secondary contact with the market. That meant, given the incubation period, that the virus must have been circulating in Wuhan outside the market since November 2020. This doesn’t controvert the likelihood of the virus originating in a bat, but it suggests that perhaps it went into the Huanan market, as well as coming out of it, in humans." SARS-CoV-2 is a subtle bug."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext#bib35
"The logic seems straightforward. But a more complete analysis of early cases suggests that locating the origin of the virus may not be so simple. A study published in the found that of the first 425 patients, only 45 percent had connections to the market. A separate Jan. 24, 2020 analysis published in the Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — did not have market links¹."
1. Neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

"Scientific American quotes Dr. Kevin Olival Vice President for Research at EcoHealth Alliance a group that has been implicated in funding the pandemic: "How and where the SARS-CoV-2 spillover occurred is not known for certain. There was an early suspicion that the initial outbreak could have started at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which was closed on January 1 2020. But “we don’t know if the spillover happened outside the market and then began spreading after it was brought there,” says. It is also unclear if there was an intermediate animal host between the disease-carrying bats and humans." ¹ Dr. Olival’s role as Senior Research Scientist at EcoHealth Alliance involves coordinating the modeling and analytics research; integrating evolutionary and ecological theories to understand the drivers of disease emergence; and managing zoonotic disease surveillance efforts in Thailand and Indonesia under the USAID PREDICT project.
1. Everything is unclear.

In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic "hotspots" and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases - animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-coronavirus-slipped-past-disease-detective
Despite referencing Scientific American and NEJM to show the virus didn't start at the market the Washington Post claimed it was doubtful the virus orginated at WIV. Why? "conspiracy theories." The Covid-19 Research Institute did not unearth any conspiracy to release the virus, instead it discovered evidence that the virus, which was created naturally in bats, altered using Gain-of-Function / Gain-of-Threat and/or RECOMBINANT techniques by microbiologists who made the virus more deadly and transmissible than previous SARS Corona virus and accidentally leaked. This genetic engineering also gave the virus the ability to allow it to transmit a plethora of diseases, evade detection and do a whole lot of other things viruses found in nature don't do.

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

It is possible for viruses to escape from a laboratory by infecting a worker. In the early 2000s, there were three documented cases of the original SARS virus escaping from a laboratory environment, according to Lim Poh Lian, a senior consultant at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases in Singapore. In the case of a 2003 incident in Singapore, a student became infected with SARS after his samples of West Nile virus were cross-contaminated with live SARS virus. That virus was being grown in relatively large quantities in the lab for studies on the disease, and the student was not properly trained in safety procedures for the lab he was working in.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...t-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

JULY 2003 An outbreak of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome occurred among students in a college (College A) in Kunming, Yunnan province, China in 2003. Subsequent investigations revealed the presence of hantavirus antibodies and antigens in laboratory rats at College A and two other institutions. Hantavirus antibodies were detected in 15 additional individuals other than the index case in these three locations. Epidemiologic data indicated that the human infections were a result of zoonotic transmission of the virus from laboratory rats.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20380897/

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

"The modern era of pathogen releases can be said to have begun in 1973 in England, when a lab assistant working with smallpox infected herself and spread it to three others, two of whom died. Four years later, smallpox was almost officially eradicated from the wild, yet the following year a medical photographer at Birmingham Medical School mysteriously died of the disease. It turned out that researchers in another part of the building were experimenting with smallpox, and the virus most likely reached the photographer through the ventilation system. Mother Jones

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

Patients with unexplained pneumonias started showing up at hospitals; within days, dozens were dead. The secret police seized doctors’ records and ordered them to keep silent. American spies picked up clues about a lab leak, but the local authorities had a more mundane explanation: contaminated meat. [The Chinese blamed Covid-19 on contaminated frozen meat.] In April and May 1979, at least 66 people died after airborne anthrax bacteria emerged from a military lab in the Soviet Union. But leading American scientists voiced confidence in the Soviets’ claim that the pathogen had jumped from animals to humans. Only after a full-fledged investigation in the 1990s did one of those scientists confirm the earlier suspicions: The accident in what is now the Russian Urals city of Yekaterinburg was a lab leak, one of the deadliest ever documented. Dr. Meselson, a biological warfare expert, studied classified intelligence suggesting that the Soviet anthrax outbreak could have been linked to a military facility nearby. Six years later, he wrote that the Soviet explanation of the epidemic’s natural origins was plausible. The evidence the Soviets provided was consistent, he said, with the theory that people had been stricken by intestinal anthrax that originated in contaminated bone meal used as animal feed. “The concept of truth, in fact, is very complicated,” said Lev Grinberg, a Yekaterinburg pathologist who secretly preserved evidence of the true nature of the outbreak in 1979. “Those who don’t want to accept the truth will always find ways not to accept it.”
The incident was only confirmed in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when President Boris Yeltsin invited an independent team of scientists to investigate. Using 2010 data from the CDC, one expert estimated that somewhere in the United States, “a breach of containment happens about twice weekly.” Some have involved deadly agents including anthrax, avian flu, and Ebola. Most incidents are minor, but not all. Take two examples at lower-risk labs: In 2009, a researcher at the University of Chicago died after being infected by a weakened strain of plague. In 2012, a postdoc at San Francisco’s VA Medical Center came down with meningitis from his lab. He died.

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

"SARS-CoV-2 infection have caused global pandemic and claimed over 5,000,000 tolls1–4. Although the genetic sequences of their etiologic viruses are of high homology, the clinical and pathological characteristics of COVID-19 significantly differ from SARS5,6. Especially, it seems that SARS-CoV-2 undergoes vast replication in vivo without being effectively monitored by anti-viral immunity.

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane Medical School in New Orleans, observed that Chinese scientists would have to have collected SARS-CoV-2 and then grown it in a colony of cells, but somehow never publish any details of it even as they published reports on other coronaviruses for years."We don't know if any such reports existed as the WIV database was taken off line in September 2019 and never restored. Suppression of information in a totalitarian country is quietly, easily and quicky accomplished especially when there is so much at stake if it came to light the virus originated at the WIV, even though, if not for Daszak, the Chinese probably would never have carried these experiments out! “It makes no sense to me. Why did they hold onto the virus?” Dr. Garry said. But the reason they held on to them was to theoretically develop a vaccine before one of the viruses emerged and caused an epidemic. Garry continued: "Genetic analysis shows the virus began to spread sometime in the fall or winter of 2019. Those same analyses supported an earlier Kristain Anderson theory that the virus was not genetically engineered in a laboratory. Garry says the reason is simple — the virus infects people in a way that scientists had never seen before: "The virus is just really too good at what it's doing. No human using a computer could do this. This is very clearly a natural process that occurred." In addition, he says, there are no signs of human genetic modification in the virus's code.¹
1. Garry is a side kick of Kristain Anderson https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=criecCgAAAAJ&hl=en
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...irus-compare-to-mers-sars-and-the-common-cold
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

In 2004, the Chinese and French governments signed a cooperation agreement on fighting and preventing new diseases, stressing the active cooperation between China and France in the construction of high-level biosafety laboratories and the system construction of biosafety laws and regulations etc. In order to implement the spirit of Sino-French agreement, in 2005, Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook the task of building a national biosafety laboratory of Wuhan, Chinese Academy of Sciences. With nearly 10 years of unremitting efforts, the laboratory completed the physical facilities in January 2015. In August 2016, it obtained the recognition and authentication certificate for the critical protection equipment installation and commissioning.

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

At the time when it was launched by Jacques Chirac and his Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin, in 2004, the P4 was at the heart of a showdown in France. Those in favor, politicians and scientists, said that China, which had barely emerged from SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), should be helped to defend itself against epidemics. But Defense, External Intelligence (DGSE) and Foreign Affairs were standing against a project that they believed could serve a military bacteriological weapon program. They suspected that Beijing would want to equip itself with five or seven P4 laboratories, including two for military purposes. "We knew the risks involved and thought that the Chinese would control everything and quickly eject us from the project. We believed that providing this cutting-edge technology to a country with an infinite power agenda risked exposing France in return, ”said a diplomat who followed the case closely. According to a high-ranking source, the project would also have provoked a crisis in Pasteur, where the Assembly of the Hundred, the parliament of the Institute, would have denounced the access authorized by the contract to some of its databases, before see the decision imposed by its management. " There were arguments, because China has a real medical problem with epidemics and France had an advantage in this technology very advanced. But the Chinese know how to copy and duplicate. And we thought the P4 would give China instruments if it ever wanted to start a biological weapons program, "said a senior diplomat, who was in strategic affairs at the time. French scholars played a big role in pushing the project. " There was a blindness of the scientific community which refused to see the reality of the Chinese system. Researchers believed that openness to capitalism would transform China into a normal country. It was to forget that it remained above all a Leninist state in which science is not independent but directed by the Communist Party ", explains Valérie Niquet, specialist in Asia at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS). Since the start of the epidemic, the party and the state have been involved in research, manipulating dates and rewriting the history of the coronavirus.
https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

On April 21, Le Figaro published an article "Investigation: How the P4 laboratory in Wuhan, exported by France, escaped all control" signed by Isabelle Lasserre. Some comments in the article are shocking. The Chinese Embassy in France wants to question them. She wrote in the article that: "On February 16, Chinese state media also reported deficiencies. They claimed in particular that researchers threw laboratory materials down the drain, after experimentation and without having subjected them to the specific treatment intended for biological discharges. They also pointed out that a certain number of researchers, to make ends meet, were selling laboratory animals which had undergone experiments on the markets of Wuhan. As anyone with common sense knows very well, a high-level laboratory is endowed with rigorous management systems and codes of conduct for scientific research, how is it possible that the basic faults described in the article appear? This is an extremely serious problem which seriously damages the reputation of Chinese research institutions and the national image of China. We ask the journalist to tell her readers specifically that her comments come from which media and which reports. Otherwise, they can only be considered as lies. The author of the text made many criticisms of the joint construction of the P4 laboratory in Wuhan by China and France. It is his personal opinion, in which the Embassy does not intervene. But the descriptions in the article are very likely to misinform readers, and do not promote mutual knowledge of the Chinese and French peoples and friendly cooperation between the two countries. The Chinese Embassy in France recommends the video of an interview given by Mr. Yuan Zhiming, Director of the Wuhan branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on April 20 at CGTN. The author of the article could undoubtedly obtain useful information in this, which would help him to know the question concerned in a more complete and more precise way.
The core of the Wuhan BSL-4 Laboratory is surrounded by stainless-steel walls, forming a "box-within-a-box" structure. The core lab enclosure can ensure sufficient structural strength and tightness to form a static seal. The lab's dynamic seal uses negative pressure technology to ensure a strict and orderly pressure gradient between the functional areas, thereby effectively preventing any air contaminated by infectious pathogenic microorganisms from spreading to areas with low contamination probability and to the external environment spreading.
https://www.biospace.com/article/re...of-virology-s-vital-role-in-fighting-covid-19
Air emitted from the lab is filtered and discharged by two-stage high-efficiency filters to ensure the safety of the emissions. Waste water is discharged after high-temperature treatment in a sewage treatment system. Polluted waste in the lab is subjected to high-temperature and high-pressure treatment by double-door autoclaves, and then safely removed and delivered to a centralized medical waste disposal unit with corresponding qualifications for disposal. Whenever personnel pass through the entrance and exit channels, their positive pressure protective suits are chemically disinfected using the chemical showers to ensure the safety of the passageways. The above technical protection measures ensure that viruses inside the lab cannot escape.
Plum Island Reports Disease Outbreak By John Rather Aug. 22, 2004 THE Department of Homeland Security confirmed last week that the highly contagious foot-and-mouth virus had briefly spread within the Plum Island Animal Disease Center in two previously undisclosed incidents earlier this summer. A spokesman for the department, which took over the high-security laboratory from the Department of Agriculture in June 2003, said safety procedures had been stepped up and laboratory rooms disinfected after the incidents, which occurred on June 24 and July 19.

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

In a CNN interview on March 26, 2021 Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director under Trump, made a candid admission: “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.” Redfield added that he believed the release was an accident, not an intentional act. In his view, nothing that happened since his first calls with Dr. Gao changed a simple fact: The WIV needed to be ruled out as a source, and it hadn’t been. After the interview aired, death threats flooded his inbox. The vitriol came not just from strangers who thought he was being racially insensitive but also from prominent scientists, some of whom used to be his friends. One said he should just “wither and die.”

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

STILL HEAD OF W.H.O.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is an Ethiopian microbiologist and internationally recognized malaria researcher, who has served since 2017 as Director-General of the World Health Organization. Tedros is the first non-physician and first African in the role, who has been endorsed by the African Union. Born: March 3, 1965 (age 55 years), Asmara, Eritrea Nationality: Ethiopian Party: Tigray People's Liberation Front
Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) SUMMARY: The Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF) is a political party in Tigray, Ethiopia that has been listed as a perpetrator in the Global Terrorism Database, based on ten incidents occurring between 1976 and 1990 (see GTD link). Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), also known as Popular revolution for the freedom of Tigray, Woyane, Weyane is an active group formed c. 1975. TRAC ANALYSIS: IDEOLOGY Separatist / New Regime Nationalist / Ethnic Nationalist, Left Wing Terrorist Groups (Maoist, Marxist, Communist, Socialist) TRAC ANALYSIS: TACTICS Attacks on Soft Targets, Assassinations as a Terrorist Tactic TRAC

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

"Much of the blame for W.H.O.’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a W.H.O. goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does W.H.O. seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of W.H.O.’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at W.H.O. generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. To avoid stigmatization against nation and race, the World Health Organization discourages the use of regions, countries, individuals, and animals on naming human infectious diseases and pathogens in its guidelines issued in 2015. The guidelines emphasize that viruses infect all people. That is to say, when an outbreak happens, everyone is at risk, regardless of his or her identity or location. The W.H.O. on February 11, 2020 announced the name of the novel coronavirus as SARS-CoV-2 on social media to “prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing,” W.H.O. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said." https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-health-coronavirus-disinformation-11586122093

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course Mission. The Division aims to improve health in the W.H.O. European Region by addressing the determinants, risks and consequences of chronic, noncommunicable conditions, by promoting mental and physical wellbeing across the life course, by the population-based prevention and clinical control of disease, and by preventing violence and injury. Biography: Dr Gauden Galea is a public health physician who has worked for W.H.O. since 1998. He has held posts as regional adviser on noncommunicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region, and as coordinator of health promotion in W.H.O. headquarters. Dr Galea has been Director of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion at W.H.O./Europe since January 2011. He has a special interest in health promotion, in the social determinants of noncommunicable diseases, and in the links between these diseases and the development agenda."
"Dr Gauden: https://web.archive.org/web/20160609075623/http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/executive-management/dr-gauden-galeaGalea

ADDENDUM

https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...scientists-joining-covid-origin-investigation
https://sites.google.com/a/housatonicits.com/home/research/dr-peter-daszak-b1965
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/corona-leaked-likely-wuhan-institute-virology-experts
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884792-MACE-E-PAI-COVID-19-ANALYSIS-Redacted.htm
https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/did...program-in-a-chinese-laboratory-very-possibly
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2020-articles/19392-expert-attacks-ecohealth-alliance-s-involvement-in-really-risky-bat-coronavirus-research-in-wuhan-labs?
https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched
https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038

Shi’s answers were coordinated with public information staffers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, of which WIV is part, and it took her 2 months to prepare them. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen of Scripps Research says he suspects Shi’s answers were “carefully vetted” by the Chinese government. “But they’re all logical, genuine, and stick to the science as one would have expected from a world-class scientist and one of the leading experts on coronaviruses,” Andersen says. However, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, who from the early days of the pandemic has urged that an investigation look into the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a laboratory accident, was decidedly unimpressed. “Most of these answers are formulaic, almost robotic, reiterations of statements previously made by Chinese authorities and state media,” Ebright says.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...st-center-covid-19-origin-theories-speaks-out

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

Daszak's Zoonotic chirade was over after "an allied power" determined several lab technicans or scientists became contaminated with an enhanced SARS virus and brought it into Wuhan during its incubation period. (1.) Incubation time for COVID-19 between 2 and 10 days has been recorded by the W.H.O. The W.H.O. stated on February 10, 2020, at its press conference, that a very long duration of incubation can represent double exposure, 24 days was a specified point to be regarded in the sense of the study's key results. (2.) The Chinese National Health Commission initially expected a 10 to 14 days incubation period. (3.) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from United States of America assumes the incubation period of 2 to 14 days for COVID-1929 (4.) Doctors and health-care practitioners, of leading Chinese group DXY.cn predicts an incubation period of "3 to 7 days, and up to 14 days." (5.) In a report released on February 9, 2020, the incubation time was observed as long as 24 days (range from 0-24 days; average of 3 days) (6). In a JAMA report released on February 21, 2020, a 19-day incubation period in infected patient has been identified, Hubei Province registered another case with an incubation time of 27 days, on February 22, 2020. An analysis sponsored by the Holland Ministry of Health and released by Eurosurveillance examined data for 88 identified travelers to and from Wuhan, which were identified as COVID-19 infected patients between January 20 and 28, 2020. It was calculated that the mean incubation period was 6.4 days. The incubation duration varied from 2.1 to 11.1 days. The 11.1-day maximum limit may be known as conservative. The incubation time greatly differs between the patients, according to a Chinese article reported by New England Journal of Medicine on January 30, 2020.

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

520 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 1200, New York, NY 10018 212.380.4460
AS SOON AS THIS PANDEMIC ENDS THOSE WHO SURVIVED COVID
WILL DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THIS OFFICE

DASZAK GREW RICH FROM HIS SCAM THAT NEVER PRODUCED A VACCINE
DASZAK EMAILS

Dear Randy:
As a member of the EcoHealth Alliance Board of Trustees, I would like to thank you and your wonderful colleagues for the generous vocal support and for the funding you are making possible for Peter and his research team. The entire board and the Alliance team are truly grateful for the extraordinary boost in morale you and your colleagues have provided. Peter and his team are doing critically important work on COVID-19 and its origin. In genuine gratitude, Rita.
Dear Ralph, Linda, Jim, Rita, Linfa and Hume, I’ve been following the events around the novel coronavirus emergence in China very closely and have been dismayed by the recent spreading of rumors, misinformation and conspiracy theories on its origins. These are now specifically targeting scientists with whom we’ve collaborated for many years, and who have been working heroically to fight this outbreak and share data with unprecedented speed, openness and transparency. These conspiracy theories threaten to undermine the very global collaborations that we need to deal with a disease that has already spread across continents. We have drafted a simple statement of solidarity and support for scientists, public health and medical professionals of China, and would like to invite you to join us as the first signatories. If you agree, we will send this letter to a group of around half-a-dozen other leaders in the field and then disseminate this widely with a sign-up webpage for others to show their support by signing up to its language. I will then personally present this at my plenary during the ICID 2020 conference in Malaysia in two weeks, with the goal of also getting widespread attention in SE Asia to our support for the work that our colleagues in China are undertaking. I sincerely hope you can join us. Please review the letter, and let me know if you are willing to join Billy Karesh and myself as co-signatories. Also, please confirm your title and affiliation that will be shown in the letter. We plan to make circulate this widely to coincide with a letter from the Presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, which will likely be released tomorrow or Friday. Thank you for your consideration and support of the scientific and public health community around the world! Cheers, Peter Daszak President EcoHealth Alliance 460 West 34th Street – 17th Floor New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 212-380-4474 Website: www.ecohealthalliance. NUMEROUS PAGES DELETED AFTER THIS.

From: Tara Hoda<hoda@ecohealthalliance.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 1:57 PM
To: rcolwell@umiacs.umd.edu; Victoria Lord
Cc: Anthony Ramos; Peter Daszak
Subject: Carnegie Corporation Contacts
Dear Dr. Colwell: It was so wonderful meeting you at the board meeting last week. As mentioned, we will be submitting a Letter of Inquiry to the Carnegie Corporation under their International Peace and Security portfolio. Our proposed project focuses on promoting a multi-sectoral approach and building capacity and partnerships for pandemic outbreaks and international health security processes in Western Asia. Our LOI is attached to this e-mail. You had mentioned you may have connections with the following people who are members of Carnegie Corporation's Board of Directors:
1) Jared Cohon
2) John DeGioia
3) Marcia McNutt
4) Judy Woodruff
For the Carnegie Corporation, it will greatly increase our chances of having our proposal considered if we have a point of contact. Would you be willing to put us in touch with one of the people above, or to directly send an e-mail letting them EcoHealth Alliance will be submitting an application? Any and all leads would be greatly appreciated. Best, Tara
Tara Hoda Development Associate EcoHealth Alliance
I’m on a panel on biothreats…National Press Club, Washington, DC, Monday afternoon April 30…along with a roster of DoD, CIA, DHS, and other assorted luminaries. Anything I should say or comment on regarding EcoHealth, Peter?

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

Mrs. Morris Hadley, another civic leader, whose husband was one-time head of the Carnegie Foundation and is now head of the CIA conduit Rubicon Foundation. Through his membership in the law firm of Milbank, Tween, Hadley, and McCloy he has close association with John J. McCloy, once chairman of the board of Chase Manhattan Bank, former chairman of the Ford Foundation, past president of the World Bank, past U.S. High Commissioner to Germany and chairman of the board of the New York International House, a Rockefeller-backed institution dedicated to making the foreign student feel at home.
I think that many of EcoHealth Alliance's initiatives would dovetail well with Carnegie Corporation's International Peace and Security area of interest. EcoHealth Alliance's President, Dr. Peter Daszak, is the chair of the National Academies of Sciences' Forum on Microbial Threats, a member of the NRC Advisory Committee to the US Global Change Research Program, and has advised the Director for Medical Preparedness Policy on the White House National Security Staff on global health issues. He is also actively involved in the W.H.O. Expert group on Public Health Emergency Disease Prioritization.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the “Statement” Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”
ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

Ecohealth Alliance integrates innovative science-based solutions and partnerships that increase capacity to achieve two interrelated goals: protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases and safeguarding ecosystems by promoting conservation. USAID PREDICT EMERGING PANDEMIC THREAT PROGRAM - assesses capacity and develops plans for the implementation of wildlife surveillance support. They develop models of disease risk and spread, implement a smart (strategic, measurable, adaptive, responsive, and targeted) wildlife surveillance strategy to identify and target high-risk wildlife in the region's most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dept of Defense - serological bio surveillance for spillover of henipa viruses and filo viruses at agricultural and hunting human-animal interfaces in peninsular Malaysia. The objective is to enhance capacity within the Malaysia government to characterize the distribution of and detect spillover of novel and known henipa viruses and filo viruses, (both groups include high consequence zoonotic pathogens) in indigenous populations and farms in peninsular Malaysia. Current surveillance strategies for novel zoonotic viruses rely exclusively on molecular detection tools, but Nipah and Ebola viruses are present at low prevalence in bat species which makes infected individuals difficult to detect. By establishing a multiplexed serological assay developed to detect antibodies against any henipa and filo viruses, the government of Malaysia will more effectively be able to determine the distribution of these high-impact viruses in wildlife reservoirs and detect evidence of spillover in at-risk human or livestock populations. The most comprehensive investigation of the epidemiology and ecolog of the RVF virus ever conducted. The project brings together a diverse group of experts from governmental, non-governmental, academic and private organizations, both domestic and international. the 2010-2011 outbreak of RVF in south Africa had a significant impact on the health of people, animals and the local economy. Thus, a better, more integrated understanding of the virus in the environment and in animal and human populations is critically needed to improve public awareness. a booklet explaining the risks of RVF and similar diseases was developed for distribution to study participants in the region. Rather than being a collection of independent science projects, this one health project integrates data collected from climate and weather, vegetation cycles, and mosquito studies to better predict outbreaks in South Africa. Evidence of RVF in animals and people is being collected to better understand exposure, with groups of people in occupations with high risk for rvf and flocks of sheep will be followed for approximately four years. the work is centered in the free state and northern cape provinces and includes the epicenter of previous RVF outbreaks within the 40,000km2 study region. Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development. Dr. Daszak’s research has been instrumental in identifying and predicting the impact of emerging diseases across the globe. His achievements include identifying the bat origin of SARS, identifying the underlying drivers of Nipah and Hendra virus emergence, producing the first ever global emerging disease hotspots map, developing a strategy to find out how many unknown viruses exist that could threaten to become pandemic, identifying the first case of a species extinction due to disease, and discovering the disease chytridiomycosis as the cause global amphibian declines.
PREDICT is a consortium or partners working to enable global surveillance for pathogens that can spillover from animal hosts to people by building capacities to detect and discover viruses of pandemic potential. The project is part of USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats program and is led by the UC Davis One Health Institute. The core partners are USAID, EcoHealth Alliance, Metabiota Inc., Wildlife Conservation Society, and Smithsonian Institution, along with a network of scientists and professionals in over 30 countries around the world. Contact us at predict@ucdavis.edu.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13618543

W.H.O.

GUIDESTAR NON-PROFIT REPORT

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/updates
Kaspar Sebastian Bohdan Daszak is 20 years old and lives in an apartment in Stockholm. He lives with John Ramstedt. BORN 8/27/2000. John or Peter Daszak's son? His home is valued at $1,627,859.80 United States Dollars
https://www.hitta.se/kaspar+daszak/stockholm/person/VgPwmnoooK

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

THE FRENCH HELP WIV BUILD THE LEVEL 4 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB DESPITE DUAL USE CONCERNS
THE PROXIMITY FACTOR
PATIENT ZERO
TEXAS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN BED WITH WIV THANKS TO FAUCI GRANT

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

SHI ZHENG LI CREATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY
BATLADY MAKE BIG MISTAKE: SHE DID IT IN A LEVEL 2 BIOCONTAINMENT LAB, AND IT LEAKED OR SOMEONE GOT INFECTED IN THE LAB AND BROUGHT THE VIRUS BACK HOME.
SHI ZHENG LI WORK AT THE TIME OF OUTBREAK INVOLVED STUDYING CORONA VIRUSES ALMOST IDENTICAL TO SARS Co-V-2
SHI ZHENG LI CHRONOLOGY SHOWS SHE HAS A FINGER IN EVERY CORONA VIRUS EXPERIMENT
SHI ZHENG LI POST SARS-CoV-2 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE
DESTRUCTION OF SARS-COV-2 SAMPLES
THE INTERVIEW WITH THE BAT LADY "COVID IS PUNISHMENT FOR AN UNSANITARY LIFESTYLE"
2018 SHI ZHENG LI WAS CREATING SYNTHETIC VIRUSES
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS IN UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL LAB PRODUCED NOVEL VIRUS MORE DEADLY TO OLDER PEOPLE JUST LIKE SARS-CoV-2 AND STIR DEBATE ABOUT GoF RESEARCH CAUSING A PANDEMIC 2020: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SL-SHC014-MA15: MAN MADE VIRUS WHICH USES ACE2 RECEPTOR

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2
SHI ZHENG LI 2015 EXPERIMENTS SYNTHESIZING VIRUSES THAT ATTACK ACE2 RECEPTORS IN HUMANS WERE PRECURSORS TO CREATION OF SARS-CoV-2
2015: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SARS: CREATION OF A VIRUS THAT CAN USE ACE2 AS RECEPTOR

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

NEW YORK TIMES 9/20/2020 CHINA VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE
THE AUSTRIAN STUDY: IS CONSIDERING A GENETIC-MANIPULATION ORIGIN FOR SARS-COV-2 A CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT MUST BE CENSORED? ROSSANA SEGRETO UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY
PASSAGING
THE NORWEGIAN STUDY
SIR RICHARD DEARLOVE FORMER MI-5 DIRECTOR SUPPORTS NORWEGIAN STUDY
UNIQUE NEW FEATURE OF SARS-CoV-2 CALLED "UNEXPECTED INSERTION"
SHING HEI ZHAN, BENJAMIN E. DEVERMAN AND YUJIA ALINA CHAN, “SARS-COV-2 IS WELL ADAPTED FOR HUMANS
HUMAN ENGINEERING OF A POLYBASIC HA CLEAVAGE SITE MUTANT WAS EASILY ACCOMPLISHED

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

RICHARD EBRIGHT: THESE EXPERIMENTS HAS GOTS TO GO!

THE WET MARKET

VIRUS WAS NEVER FOUND IN ANIMALS AT THE WET MARKET OR ANYWHERE ELSE
THE PANGOLINS DID IT
CHICOM RE-ACTION DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN
BOLTON AND TRUMP PAVE THE WAY FOR THE PANDEMIC

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

NEW WHO JUNKET
WHO DISPUTES THE FACT THE VIRUS LINGERS IN THE AIR INDOORS, INFECTING THOSE NEARBY.
CCP PROPAGANDA

Table of Contents

DASZAK'S FATHER, BOHDAN DASZAK, WAS A NAZI DEATH CAMP GUARD

FROM GIFTED LIVES BY JOAN FREEMAN

DOCTOR "MENGELE" DASZAK

FOR ECO-FASCISTS - COVID-19 "NATURE IS HEALING"

FAUCI TRUSTS THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

WHY DID AN OILY BUBBLE OF GENES JUST ABOUT 100 NANOMETERS IN DIAMETER (A TRILLION WEIGH LESS THAN A RAINDROP) FIRST SURFACE IN WUHAN, CHINA?

"THE BAT LADY" IS A WEIRDO

YOUNG BAT LADY

THE SMOKING GUN DOCUMENT

DASZAK EXPLORES THE LAB LEAK THEORY

Dr. Daszak: "This summary contains the information for the 2014 and 2017 NIH and NIAID grants to the Ecohealth Alliance that funded the WIV research on bat conronaviruses. As the grant description shows, this research included gain-of-function / gain-of-threat research to make coronaviruses viruses more pathogenic using techniques including genetic engineering, cell culture, and animal experimentation." Source of document: Covid-references-International Center for Technology Assessment

EARLIER EXPERIMENTS INVOLVED THE SPIKE PROTEINS WHICH ARE THE KEYS TO INVADING THE HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

ECO-FASCIST DASZAK FINANCED WIV GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WITH YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY

THE PANDEMIC WAS CREATED BY DASZAK, AN ECO-FASCIST, TO CUT DOWN ON HUMAN POPULATION GROWTH THAT'S DESTROYING NATURE

THE MISSING COMPONENT: DASZAK'S IMPLICIT RACISM

THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AND THIS WEBPAGE IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY

DASZAK WAS A BLOODY SUCCESS

THE MONSTER MOVIE

CHINESE-AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK TWEETS

HAVING DASZAK AS A W.H.O INVESTIGATOR WAS LIKE HAVING AL CAPONE SIT ON ON THE CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION.

FAUCI'S INVOLVMENT IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

FIRE FAUCI AND REPLACE HIM WITH FORMER FDA HEAD Dr. SCOTT GOTTLIEB

Dr. FAUCI, WHO APPROVED DASZAK'S GRANTS, SUDDENLY WANTS ANOTHER INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IF HE SAID HE DIDN'T WANT ONE SUSPICION WOULD FALL ON HIM

FAUCI PROPONENT OF GoF / GoT OPPOSES GoF / BAN IN WASHINGTON POST AND DEFENDS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS

BENEFITS AND RISKS OF INFLUENZA RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED ANTHONY S. FAUCI, FRANCIS S. COLLINS

FAUCI SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT

THE LANCET QUESTIONS DASZAK'S OBJECTIVITY "ADDENDUM: COMPETING INTERESTS AND THE ORIGINS OF SARS-COV-2"

DASZAK WAS DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN RECOMBINANT EXPERIMENTS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS INVOLVED RECOMBINANT BAT CORONAVIRUSES / NOVEMBER 30, 2017:"DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS"

MANY OF THESE GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS WERE CONDUCTED WITH VIRUSES FOUND IN HORSESHOE BATS - CLOSE RELATIVES TO THE SARS-CoV-19 VIRUS

DASZAK'S METHODOLOGY RELIED ON GAIN-OF-THREAT, GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

DASZAK PLAYED ON THE BENEFICENT MOTIVATION OF MOST SCIENTISTS WHO CONDUCT GoF / GoT EXPERIMENTS

ProGoFer's and Anti-GoFers

THE CRITICS OF GoF/GoT PREDICTED IT WOULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC

DAVID RELMAN STANFORD UNIVERSITY MICROBIOLOGIST

MICROBIOLOGIST JONATHAN LATHAM

DR. RICHARD EBRIGHT OPPOSES BARIC'S GoF EXPERIMENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AND WIV

DASZAK'S CRIMINAL LIABILITY

DR. DASZAK'S BOGUS FAMILY BACKGROUND: "PETER COTTINGTON DASZAK" IS NOT HIS REAL NAME

DASZAK IS UNQUALIFIED FOR MICROBIOLOGY

DASZAK INTERVIEW DECEMBER 2019

PETER DASZAK TALKS ABOUT HIS EARLY YEARS

DASZAK'S BOGUS C.V.

THE GRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY STEMMY AND FAUCI

BEFORE THE CORONA VIRUS OUTBREAK IN 2019 THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION, GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED IN BSL-2 LAB

FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LABORATORY MODIFICATION

THE AUSTRALIAN STUDY: SPIKE PROTEIN OPTIMIZED TO BIND TO HUMAN ACE2. IN SILICO COMPARISON OF SPIKE PROTEIN-ACE2 BINDING AFFINITIES ACROSS SPECIES; SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THE SARS-COV-2 VIRUS

THE BINDING ENERGY BETWEEN SARS-COV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN AND ACE2 WAS HIGHEST FOR HUMANS OUT OF ALL SPECIES TESTED

THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF LAB CREATION GAIN-OF-THREAT INSERTIONS AT POLYBASIC FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE PRRA IS EVIDENCE VIRUS WAS MODIFIED FOR INCREASED INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENICITY - DR. RONEN SHEMESH

ARGININE / FURIN

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT MADE A COVID-19, THAT OCCURRED IN NATURE, MORE TRANSMITTABLE AND MORE LETHAL

LASTING AFTER EFFECTS UNLIKE OTHER CORONA VIRUSES

CHRONOLOGY

HIGH RECOMBINATION AND MUTATION RATES IN MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS SUGGEST THAT CORONAVIRUSES MAY BE POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT EMERGING VIRUSES

REVERSE GENETICS WITH A FULL-LENGTH INFECTIOUS CDNA OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

2002-2004 THE WIV SCIENTISTS BEGAN COLLECTING BAT VIRUS SINCE THE SARS-1 OUTBREAK

DEVELOPMENT OF MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS MHV AND SARS-COV INFECTIOUS CDNA CONSTRUCTS (BARIC)

COMPOSITIONS OF CORONAVIRUSES WITH A RECOMBINATION-RESISTANT GENOME (BARIC)

REVIEW OF BATS AND SARS

GIVING A SARS-LIKE VIRUS THE ABILITY TO INFECT HUMANS - GoT

SHI ZHENGLI: DIFFERENCE IN RECEPTOR USAGE BETWEEN SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME (SARS) CORONAVIRUS AND SARS-LIKE CORONAVIRUS OF BAT ORIGIN

PETER DASZAK: RISK OF VIRAL EMERGENCE FROM BATS (DASZAK)

RON FOUCHIER, EARLY GAIN-OF-THREAT "SCIENTIST CREATED AN AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS IN FAVOR OF SHARING H5N1 VIRUS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

W.H.O. CONCERNED THAT NEW H5N1 INFLUENZA RESEARCH COULD UNDERMINE THE 2011 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA PFREPAREDNESS FRAMEWORK

THE PAPER DESCRIBING HOW THE LETHAL H5N1 BIRD FLU COULD BE MADE EASIER TO SPREAD WAS PUBLISHED SIX MONTHS AFTER A SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD SUGGESTED THAT THE PAPERS’ MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DATA BE CENSORED.

FOUCHIER EXPLAINED HOW EASY IT WAS TO CREATE AN AIRBORNE AVIAN FLU VIRUS THAT COULD INFECT HUMANS USING GAIN-OF-THREAT TECHNOLOGY

US-CHINA ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP; KUNMING, CHINA

BATS AS ANIMAL RESERVOIRS FOR THE SARS CORONAVIRUS: HYPOTHESIS PROVED AFTER 10 YEARS OF VIRUS HUNTING VIROLOGICA SINICA

NIAD AND HIH GRANTS

ONE OF SEVERAL NEAR FATAL ERRORS THAT TRIGGERED THE GoF / GOT BAN INVOLVED H5N1 INFLUENZA VIRUS

OBAMA BANS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH IN US

DOING DILIGENCE TO ASSESS THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF LIFE SCIENCES GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT OUTSOURCED TO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AFTER AMERICA BANS IT AS TOO DANGEROUS

UNDERSTANDING THE RISK OF BAT CORONAVIRUS EMERGENCE (DASZAK)

IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF SARSR-COV SPILLOVER RISK, COUPLED WITH SPATIAL AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONS AND VIRUSES OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN (DASZAK)

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CHIMERIC CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS (BARIC)

SPILLOVER AND PANDEMIC PROPERTIES OF ZOONOTIC VIRUSES WITH HIGH HOST PLASTICITY (DASZAK)

SARS-LIKE WIV1-COV POISED FOR HUMAN EMERGENCE / SHI ZHENGLI AND BARIC CO-AUTHORS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE ARGUMENT IS ESSENTIALLY A RERUN OF THE DEBATE OVER WHETHER TO ALLOW LAB RESEARCH THAT INCREASES THE VIRULENCE, EASE OF SPREAD OR HOST RANGE OF DANGEROUS PATHOGENS — WHAT IS KNOWN AS ‘GAIN-OF-FUNCTION’ RESEARCH.

2015 ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL BAT CORONA VIRUS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DIRECT PROGENITOR OF SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT OF PROPOSED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH

As with all life sciences research involving pathogens, GOF studies entail inherent biosafety and biosecurity risks. GOF research involving the generation of pathogens with pandemic potential involves the greatest risks. A laboratory accident involving such a pathogen could potentially release a pathogen that could spread rapidly and efficiently through the human population.

BAT SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME-LIKE CORONAVIRUS WIV1 ENCODES AN EXTRA ACCESSORY PROTEIN, ORFX, INVOLVED IN MODULATION OF THE HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE (BARIC, SHI ZHENGLI)

EFFICIENT REVERSE GENETIC SYSTEMS FOR RAPID GENETIC MANIPULATION OF EMERGENT AND PREEMERGENT INFECTIOUS CORONAVIRUSES

INSIDE THE CHINESE LAB POISED TO STUDY WORLD'S MOST DANGEROUS PATHOGENS MAXIMUM-SECURITY BIOLAB IS PART OF PLAN TO BUILD NETWORK OF BSL-4 FACILITIES ACROSS CHINA

BAT CAVE SOLVES MYSTERY OF DEADLY SARS VIRUS — AND SUGGESTS NEW OUTBREAK COULD OCCUR: CHINESE SCIENTISTS FIND ALL THE GENETIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF SARS IN A SINGLE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE BATS.

NOVEMBER 2017 DISCOVERY OF A RICH GENE POOL OF BAT SARS-RELATED CORONAVIRUSES PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE ORIGIN OF SARS CORONAVIRUS

TRUMP LIFTS GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT BAN

BSL-4 OPENS AT WIV JANUARY 19, 2018

NIH LIFTS FUNDING PAUSE ON GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH

THE STATE DEPARTMENT CABLES INDICATE A LACK OF TRAINED TECHNICIANS AT WIV

BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

WANG YANYI

WUHAN LAB CHIEF WANG YANYI DISPUTES APRIL 2018 WIV NATURE ARTICLE

THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY VIRUS DATABASE WAS TAKEN OFFLINE

LACK OF CELL PHONE ACTIVITY AT WIV

ROAD BLOCKS AROUND WIV

FINANCING SHI ZHENGLI'S GAIN-OF-FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT EXPERIMENTS WAS PART OF THE PREDICT PROGRAM AND THAT IS WHY IT WAS SHUT DOWN

PATIENTS ZERO

DASZAK'S EMAIL'S DELETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2019 AND JANUARY 2020

FEDERAL OFFICIALS ENDED A MORATORIUM IMPOSED THREE YEARS AGO ON FUNDING RESEARCH THAT ALTERS GERMS TO MAKE THEM MORE LETHAL

EARLY W.H.O. REPORT

DASZAK WORKED CLOSELY WITH ZHENG-LI SHI WHEN SARS-CoV-19 SURFACED

THE BAT LADY WANTED TO CALL HER VIRUS TARS

RECTIFICATION OF LAB THAT MAPPED GENOME

WIV WAS CALLING IN OUTSIDERS TO HELP WITH BIOSAFETY

DASZAK CLAIMS HE WARNED THE WORLD ABOUT COVID

ZHENG-LI SHI: A PNEUMONIA OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW CORONAVIRUS OF PROBABLE BAT ORIGIN

NEW BIOSECURITY LAW DECREEDED IN CHINA

KRISTIAN ANDERSON STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATTING COVID-19

CHINESE ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT THE UNIQUE CORONA VIRUS WAS FOUND IN NATURE

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION NATURE "ENGINEERED BAT VIRUS STIRS DEBATE OVER RISKY RESEARCH: LAB-MADE CORONA VIRUS RELATED TO SARS CAN INFECT HUMAN CELLS"

THE CHINESE RESEARCHERS AT WIV WERE RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM THE GALVESTON NATIONAL LABORATORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AND OTHER U.S. ORGANIZATIONS, BUT THE CHINESE REQUESTED ADDITIONAL HELP

WHY CITE EXEMPTION FIVE?

TRUMP CUTS OFF FUNDS TO ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS ASKED THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY (NSABB) TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF ITS DEALINGS WITH THE WIV

WEIFENG SHI CLAIMS ANOMALOUS INSERTIONS CAN HAPPEN NATURALLY

TWO WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY SCIENTISTS, XING-YI GE AND ZHENGLI-LI SHI, USE REVERSE GENETICS TO GENERATE A CHIMERICAL VIRUS CLOSELY RESEMBLING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS COVID-19

ORIGIN AND CROSS-SPECIES TRANSMISSION OF BAT CORONAVIRUSES IN CHINA

POMPEO SAYS VIRUS WAS FROM LAB THEN WALKS IT BACK

TRUMP WANTED AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

TRUMP ENDS GRANT TO ECHO HEALTH ALLIANCE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GET ANONYMOUS GRANT FROM A CCP PUPPET

TRUMP PULLS USA OUT OF W.H.O.

NIH GRANT REINSTATED BUT THE MONEY CAN'T BE SUB-AWARDED TO THE WIV

TRUMP WANTS TO FORM A COMMISSION TO LOOK INTO THE WIV LAB LEAK

CHI COM AGENT OF INFLUENCE PETER DASZAK HEADED THE W.HO. TEAM THAT SUGGESTED COVID-19 ORIGINATED IN BARCELONA AND ENTERED CHINA VIA FROZEN MEAT

THE BARCELONA BEEF THEORY W.H.O. LEGITIMATIZED

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: HOW THE W.H.O.'S HUNT FOR COVID'S ORIGINS STUMBLED IN CHINA

ACCORDING TO W.H.O.'S REPORT DASZAK'S JOINT INTERNATIONAL TEAM EXAMINED FOUR SCENARIOS:

THE W.H.O. TEAM PUSHES THE PREPOSTEROUS THEORY THAT THE VIRUS WAS SPREAD TO HUMANS IN SHIPMENTS OF FROZEN FOODS FROM SPAIN

THE COVID IN SPAIN WAS NOT FOUND IN THE DRAIN

EVIDENCE FOR THE EARLY OCCURRENCE OF SARS-COV-2 FROM OTHER STUDIES

THE FROZEN FOOD THEORY LACKS ONE THING - THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN COVID CASES IN BARCELONA, SPAIN, BEFORE THE ONES IN HUNAN BROKE OUT

TYPE OF GOODS DEALT BY ENVIRONMENTAL POSITIVE STALLS / RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE COLD CHAIN IN 2019

THE PERSISTENCE OF LIVE SARS-COV-2 IN ENVIRONMENTS RELATED TO THE COLD-CHAIN / EXAMPLES OF INTRODUCTION OF COVID-19 INTO CHINA THROUGH IMPORTED COLD CHAIN PRODUCTS

CONCLUSIONS

THE HUNAN MARKET ORIGIN THEORY DEBUNKED BY W.H.O.

W.H.O.- INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

EXPLANATION OF HYPOTHESIS

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ARGUMENTS AGAINST INTRODUCTION THROUGH A LABORATORY INCIDENT

ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD

HIGHLIGHTS FROM SHORT W.H.O. REPORT

W.H.O. REPORT IS A BIG NOTHING BURGER

USG REJECTS WHO INVESTIGATION

WALL STREET JOURNAL: SCIENTISTS REJECT COVID-COVER-UP ORCHESTRATED BY DASZAK

INVESTIGATE THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

FRANK COLLINS CLAIMS NEITHER NIH NOR NIAID HAVE EVER APPROVED ANY GRANT THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH ON CORONAVIRUSES THAT WOULD HAVE INCREASED THEIR TRANSMISSIBILITY OR LETHALITY FOR HUMANS

STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19

CCP MOUTHPIECE GLOBAL TIMES: US INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION OF CORONAVIRUS ORIGINS EXPOSES ITS FOUR ‘ACHILLES HEELS’: GLOBAL TIMES EDITORIAL

RALPH BARIC'S ROLE IN CREATING THE PANDEMIC

BARIC WAS CONDUCTING SARS RESEARCH BEFORE A 2003 OUTBREAK IN CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

BARIC'S LAB LEAKED IN 2003 AND CAUSED A MINOR EPIDEMIC IN NORTH CAROLINA

HOW CAN YOU HAVE SARS-RELATED SYMPTOMS AND NOT HAVE SARS?

GAIN OF FUNCTION / GAIN-OF-THREAT RESEARCH INVOLVES CREATION OF RECOMINANT VIRUS IN UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA IN COLLABORATION WITH SCIENTISTS FROM WIV

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 9, 2015

BARIC'S LAB RAT BITES STUDENT

REDACTIONS OF BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS

BARIC SUPPORTS THE ZOONOTIC THEORY BECAUSE HE PLAYED A PART IN STARTING THE PANDEMIC DUE TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH WIV SCIENTISTS

TRUMP-FUELED SUSPICION OF WUHAN LAB ENSNARES NEW YORK NONPROFIT RESEARCHING BAT CORONAVIRUSES

ANTHONY FAUCHI EMAILS

THE ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE GRANTS

SAM HUSSEINI: PETER DASZAK'S ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE HAS HIDDEN ALMOST $40 MILLION IN PENTAGON FUNDING AND MILITARIZED PANDEMIC SCIENCE

THE PREDICT PROGRAM WAS A CON JOB AND FAILURE: IT HAS BEEN ALLEGED THAT A LARGE PORTION OF THE GRANT MONEY WAS HIDDEN AWAY BY DASZAK FOR HIS OWN USE

ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE STAFF AND DUPES

SOME OF USAID/CIA ECO-HEALTH PREDICT CREW

Executives Listed on Filing

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

RmYN02 FURIN

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

ADDENDUM

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK EMAILS

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

W.H.O.

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

THE WET MARKET

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

OWN USE

ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE STAFF AND DUPES

SOME OF USAID/CIA ECO-HEALTH PREDICT CREW

Executives Listed on Filing

PAID EMPLOYEES OF ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK IS CO-OPTED BY THE CHINESE AND BECOMES A CHINESE AGENT-OF-INFLUENCE

CHI COM PROPAGANDA QUOTES PETER DASZAK WHO HAS BEEN "CO-OPERATING WITH THE WIV FOR 15 YEARS"

STATE DEPARTMENT REPORT BASED ON CIA INTELL REVEALS DASZIK WAS INVOLVED IN CHINESE MILITARY PROJECTS SEE REPORT

ENSURING A TRANSPARENT, THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF COVID-19’S ORIGIN PRESS STATEMENT MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE JANUARY 15, 2021

DASZAK WORKED IN CHINA FOR 15 YEARS - RECRUITED BY CHINESE INTELLIGENCE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html

DASZAK BLAMES UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR MONKEY POX

DASZAK BLAMES CHINA'S ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR SARS

DASZAK BLAMES EURASIA FOR SWINE FLU, NOT CHINA

DASZAK NEVER MENTIONS CHINESE VILLAGES

DASZAK NEVER BLAMES CHINA FOR SPREAD OF NEW VIRUSES

DASZAK HAPPY TO BLAME THE SAUDIS FOR MERS

DASZAK BLAMES PHARMA FOR COVID

DASZAK'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SCIENTISTS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF CHINA COMBATING THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

TRAP SET BY THIS RESEARCHER SNARES CHINESE INTEREST IN DASZAG

THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) POLITICAL OPERATIVE AT WIV

CHICOM DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

NO PROOF FOR ZOONOTIC THEORY: VIRUS STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

COVID DASZAK INTERVIEW PUTS FORTH THE BAT TO ANIMAL TO HUMAN THEORY ALTHOUGH HE FAILS TO SAY WHAT ANIMAL

THE CORONAVIRUS THAT CAUSES COVID-19 HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUSIVELY TRACED TO BATS, IN YUNNAN PROVINCE IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

UNLIKE SARS CoV1, SARS COV-2 WAS NEVER FOUND IN THE BLOOD OR FECES OF ANY ANIMAL

DAVID ASHER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT'S ARMS CONTROL AND VERIFICATION DOESN'T BELIEVE THE ZOONOTIC THEORY

RaTG13 AND THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE

2020: RaTG13: CHINESE SCIENTISTS CAN ONLY FIND VIRUSES THAT RESEMBLE SARS CoV2 96% AND EXHIBIT DISSIMILAR AMINO ACID INSERTIONS SINCE THEY DO NOT TRANSMIT DISEASE

THE SEARCH FOR THE VIRUS IN NATURE CONTINUES: THE BAT-DERIVED CORONAVIRUS RmYN02 SHARES 93.3 PER CENT NUCLEOTIDE IDENTITY WITH SARS-COV-2 AT THE SCALE OF THE COMPLETE VIRUS GENOME BUT IS NOT THE EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTOR OF SARS CoV

RmYN02 FURIN

FOCUS ON BATS TO INTERMEDIATE HOST TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION TO OBSCURE TRUE SOURCE OF VIRUS

THE LAB LEAK THEORY BECOMES SYNONOMOUS WITH DONALD TRUMP AND "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

THE NEW YORK TIMES: LAB LEAK THEORY IS FALSE

HAVING DASZAK DO A FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE WIV IS LIKE HAVING A FORENSIC INVESTIGATOR INVESIGATE A CRIME HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF. IT IS ABSURD

DASZAK: TELEGRAPH UK CO PEOPLE BUY INTO CONSPIRACY THEORIES BECAUSE THEY’RE CONVINCING STORIES TOLD BY CHARISMATIC PEOPLE WITH JUST ENOUGH SCIENCE AND FACT TO MAKE THEM SEEM PLAUSIBLE.

AMERICA NEEDS A BI-PARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION NOT A PARTISAN ONE INTENT ON PROVING TRUMP WRONG

THE DASZAK MYTH THAT COVID-19 STARTED AT THE WUHAN WET MARKET DEBUNKED

HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY ABSOLVES WUHAN MARKET TRANSMISSION

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE

ZHANG LI OBJECTS TO WUHAN MARKET THEORY

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

VIRUS ESCAPES FROM LABS HAPPEN FREQUENTLY

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SARS ESCAPE

HANTAVIRUS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN YUNNAN, CHINA ZHENGLI SHI

THE SMALLPOX ESCAPE

THE ANTHRAX ESCAPE

ALTHOUGH BARIC MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS WAS MAN-MADE OR NATURAL THE MORBIDITY AND INFECTIVITY ARE CLUES TO ITS ORIGIN

THE SARS COV-2 HIGH RATE OF REPLICATION

NPR: VIRUS IS TO DEADLY TO BE COMPUTER GENERATED

THE FRENCH SHOULD NEVER HAVE CONSTRUCTED THE WIV

ISABELLE LASSERRE

DEFENSE, EXTERNAL INTELLIGENCE (DGSE) AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS WERE STANDING AGAINST A PROJECT THAT COULD SERVE A MILITARY BACTERIOLOGICAL WEAPON PROGRAM.

CHINESE RESPONSE TO ISABELLE LASSERRE

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON THE PANDEMIC

WORLD LEADERS HAVE THEIR DOUBTS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE VIRUS

“There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus, not least so we can ensure that we are better prepared for future global pandemics. This work will need to be done with all of our international partners” - spokesman for UK prime minister Boris Johnson who contracted the virus.

W.H.O.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CULPABILITY: HEAD OF W.H.O. IS MAOIST CHINESE AGENT OF INFLUENCE

WALL STREET JOURNAL BLAMES W.H.O.

W.H.O. REPRESENTATIVE TO CHINA DURING EARLY PHASE OF PANDEMIC WAS EXPERT IN NONCOMMUNICABLE DISEASES

ADDENDUM

THE INCUBATION PERIOD CONTROVERSY

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE

DASZAK EMAILS

CARNEGIE FOUNDATION CIA LITE

ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE FILED PURPOSES

W.H.O.

PETER DASZAK'S TWEETS

JOHN DASZAK'S TWEETS

INFORMATION FOUND AT COVID-19 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE BAT LADY SINGS

THE ACE2 AFFINITY INDICATED A DESIGNER VIRUS

COVID-19 STILL NOT FOUND IN NATURE

BTCOV/4991, RATG13, RMYN02 CLOSE BUT NOT INDENTICAL TO SARS-CoV-19

THE WET MARKET

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

CULCULCAN · Sep 10, 2021

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11khFLtujFuHgsUUcFAnNSVAI7AJCtw5T/view

The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.

pdf - attached

CULCULCAN · Sep 19, 2021

BREAKING: Dr. Fauci aka THE MAD MEDiC, Director of the National Instiute of Allery and Infectious Diseas (NiAD) and, the Chief Medical...

Funded 60 Projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and All Were in Conjunction with the Chinese Military

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...titute-virology-conjunction-chinese-military/

CULCULCAN · Sep 27, 2021

Quick reminder that Fauci et al have been FUNDING Chinese Communist Party military studies for over a decade: https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/nih-funded-over-250-studies-authored-by-chinese-military/

INVESTIGATION: U.S. Has Funded Over 250 Studies for Chinese Communist Military Researchers.
Various National Institutes of Health agencies – including Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

CULCULCAN · Sep 27, 2021

CULCULCAN · Sep 27, 2021

PROOF THAT TIES IT ALL TOGETHER

CULCULCAN · Oct 9, 2021

Coronavirus Update Dr Paul Cottrell Prepare NOW for 18 Months!

View: https://youtu.be/LnqNK-GT20g

CULCULCAN · Oct 24, 2021

Do you remember
when we treated a virus or viruses
with soup, vitamin c, and, plenty of rest
instead of communism
or communist regimes ???

CULCULCAN · Dec 15, 2021

https://tv.gab.com/channel/white__r...xplains-how-covid-19-61b2ee0baba3c517292726dd

Dr. Paul Cottrell explains how COVID-19 vaccines have the potential
to cause AIDS-like illnesses and why the bioweapons program needs to be shut down

Dr. Paul Cottrell explains how COVID-19 vaccines have the potential
to cause AIDS-like illnesses and why the bioweapons program needs to be shut down

Log in or Sign up

Gene-edited 2013 Bat Cornavirus Ratg13

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

Attached Files:

The Fauci COVID19 Dossier.pdf

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Gene-edited 2013 Bat Cornavirus Ratg13

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

Attached Files:

The Fauci COVID19 Dossier.pdf

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches