Countries Who Refuse 2 Accept The United Nations - The Un Control Of Global Migration - 2018 ?

THIS was posted on facebook
back in 2018 ???

https://www.facebook.com/cCapNorth/photos/a.386896074996230/790532094632624/

 

The Terrible Truth About the UN Migration Compact - VIDEO ...

The Terrible Truth About the UN Migration Compact - VIDEO - TheWatchTowers.org
https://thewatchtowers.org/the-terrible-truth-about-the-un-migration-compact-video/

SADLY THE VIDEO IS MISSING HERE

BUT; THERE IS WORDS:

The Terrible Truth About the UN Migration Compact – VIDEO
November 22, 2018



In December 2018, world leaders gather to sign the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration
– a disaster for Western countries which virtually eliminates property rights and free speech,
enshrining the right for everyone to enter Western countries and live off the taxpayer.
Global Compact

The Global Compact for Migration is the first-ever UN global agreement on a common approach to international migration
in all its dimensions. The global compact is non-legally binding.

It is grounded in values of state sovereignty, responsibility-sharing, non-discrimination, and human rights,
and recognizes that a cooperative approach is needed to optimize the overall benefits of migration,
while addressing its risks and challenges for individuals and communities in countries of origin, transit and destination.

The global compact comprises 23 objectives for better managing migration at local, national, regional and global levels.

The compact:
aims to mitigate the adverse drivers and structural factors that hinder people from building
and maintaining sustainable livelihoods in their countries of origin;

intends to reduce the risks and vulnerabilities migrants face at different stages of migration
by respecting, protecting and fulfilling their human rights and providing them with care and assistance;

seeks to address the legitimate concerns of states and communities, while recognizing that societies
are undergoing demographic, economic, social and environmental changes at different scales
that may have implications for and result from migration;

strives to create conducive conditions that enable all migrants to enrich our societies through their human,
economic and social capacities, and thus facilitate their contributions to sustainable development at the local,
national, regional and global levels…




2018-11-22 · The Terrible Truth About the UN Migration Compact
– VIDEO. November 22, 2018 November 22, 2018 Q . In December 2018,
world leaders gather to sign the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

 

KASSAM: Why Major Countries Are Shunning
The UN Compact On Migration | The Daily Caller
December 4, 2018

​

The document demands migrants get the same rights as natives, immediately, including voting rights and welfare​

​

Source: KASSAM: Why Major Countries Are Shunning The UN Compact On Migration | The Daily Caller

What do you do if you’re a supranational behemoth
with a multi-billion dollar budget coupled
with a vast number of subsidiary entities that focus on migration?

If you’re the U.N., you publish the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly
and Regular Migration and seek to set up more supranational government
entities to duplicate the work you’re already doing,
at a gargantuan cost to (mostly Western) taxpayers.

The report — a subject of consternation around the world,
and wisely nixed by President Trump in 2017
— is due to be signed in Marrakech on December 11. (2018)

But if the latest nations to object

— Italy, Austria, Hungary and Poland

— have anything to say about it, the document may end up
in the shredders of the U.N.’s headquarters in New York.

Speaking of the agreement in late 2017, then U.S. Ambassador
to the United Nations Nikki Haley stated,

“Our decisions on immigration policies must always be made by Americans
and Americans alone …

The global approach in the New York Declaration is simply not compatible
with U.S. sovereignty.”

It seems the rest of the world is waking up, with a U.K. parliamentary petition
now nearing 100,000 signatures in opposition to Britain becoming a signatory.

Similar movements are springing up in Denmark, New Zealand and Belgium.

It’s not just because the Global Compact for Migration
is broadly unnecessary (U.N. agencies currently already spend
up to $6bn a year on migration-related study and assistance),
but it is also incredibly perverse.

Opening with an invocation to 17 other United Nations agreements
and treaties (including the Paris Climate Accords),
the document goes on to pay lip service
to national sovereignty while directly attacking the same principle
with demands for regulations on both the public and private sectors,
and indeed restrictions on the free press who might report skeptically
on migration.

Hidden amongst the 38 jargon-laced pages, the compact affirms
the “entitlements” of migrants and refugees;
including but not limited to additional job training, diaspora “trade fairs,”
assistance sending money to their countries of origin, and a commitment
to “educating” native communities on the benefits of multiculturalism
and increased immigration.

The document insists it is based on “human rights law”
and “upholds the principles of non-regression and non-discrimination.”

This means a nation-state is agreeing to not alter its own internal immigration policies after signing up to the compact.

What supranational governmental organizations call
“pooling sovereignty,” and what the rest of us call “giving up sovereignty.”

The document demands migrants get the same rights as natives, immediately, including but not limited to voting rights and access to welfare.

It states that the U.N. (well, someone in an office there, anyway)
will develop a “comprehensive strategy for improving migration data”
but that national and local governments across the Western world
will be expected to pick up the tab.

It even suggests that signatories should “invest” in such pro-migration schemes through “trade preferences” — another attack on nation-state sovereignty and government policy dictated by respective electorates (I think we call this democracy?).

Curiously, the document even calls for a “civil registry” of migrants, including identification through national censuses.

When the Trump administration suggested a citizenship question
on the U.S. census, the liberal media lost its collective (and it really is collective) mind. But the U.N. wanting a global register of migrants seems fine.

The compact even calls for “biometric data-sharing.”

That’s not creepy at all, right?

There are a great many things deeply flawed about the compact.

Too many for one article (for instance, the idea of forcing nations
to “reduce visa and permit processing times” again at a cost to domestic taxpayers) but the largest problem of all is that the document even exists.

Its advocates maintain that is “not legally binding” (of course it isn’t;
nothing the U.N. does actually is) and that the implementation is entirely voluntary.

But here’s the problem:

Why would any nation-state sign up to a non-legally binding arrangement that it doesn’t intend to enforce, in the short-, medium- or long-term?

The truth is the globalists in governments across the Western world
are devout in their mission to — as the compact says
— “support multicultural activities …
that will facilitate mutual understanding and appreciation of migrant cultures”
and all the policy-related stuff that goes along with it.

Targeting the free press (Objective 17, 33c of the compact) is just one
of the mechanisms by which they hope to get there.

And if you really fancy a laugh (and you kind of hate yourself) read the “Implementation” part of the document, on the last three pages,
where the U.N. dedicates itself to dedicating itself to founding
new institutions to work alongside existing institutions
with the aim of creating institutional dedication
through a framework of consultative, dedication institutions.

Oh, you think I’m joking?

Go on, read it. I dare you.

Raheem Kassam is a fellow at the Claremont Institute
and the Middle East Forum. He is the author of two bestselling books:
“No Go Zones” and “Enoch Was Right.”

---

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller or TheWatchTowers

KASSAM: Why Major Countries Are Shunning The UN Compact On Migration | The Daily Caller - TheWatchTowers.org
https://thewatchtowers.org/kassam-w...the-un-compact-on-migration-the-daily-caller/

 

THIS NEEDS to be copied to bitchute

The Terrible Truth About the UN Migration Compact


View: https://youtu.be/VfeHWGhQZ6U