The Factuals versus the NABS (New Age BullShit)

Floyd

Floyd
Posts: 4103
Join date: 2010-04-16

• Post n°31

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

Floyd on Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:01 pm

shiloh wrote:
And just perhaps, the 'Mighty Reds' might have also graduated to play against the 'Red Devils' with the 'Champions' in the League Europa again.
Shiloh in Mercury-Hermes, 26Sep2013
Shiloh pal

The Mighty reds have no need to graduate as we are the masters. There are some things you are wrong about.​

This ones for you and your Thuban friends.




"Liverpool is the pool of life". Jung

In peace. We will never walk alone.

However the power of liverpool is no better set than is monumental game in Istanbul with a massive scouse invasion.
​

 

Floyd

Floyd
Posts: 4103
Join date: 2010-04-16

• Post n°32

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

Floyd on Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:42 pm

​

 

Floyd

Floyd
Posts: 4103
Join date: 2010-04-16

• Post n°33

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

Floyd on Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:56 pm

For Thuban friends and and all others. Harmony. nabs or bible or no thing.

Soon​

 

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°34

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

shiloh on Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:02 am

Floyd wrote:
shiloh wrote:
And just perhaps, the 'Mighty Reds' might have also graduated to play against the 'Red Devils' with the 'Champions' in the League Europa again.
Shiloh in Mercury-Hermes, 26Sep2013
Shiloh pal

The Mighty reds have no need to graduate as we are the masters. There are some things you are wrong about.



This ones for you and your Thuban friends.





"Liverpool is the pool of life". Jung

In peace. We will never walk alone.

However the power of liverpool is no better set than is monumental game in Istanbul with a massive scouse invasion.


LOL, Floyd!
Not so wrong on Wednesday, September 25th at Old Trafford!

Manchester United 1-0 Liverpool






Javier Hernandez scored the only goal of the game as Man United overcame Liverpool at Old Trafford.


By the way, my team of 46 years is Bayern München and I am no fan of ManU, recalling 1999!

So recalling this personal disaster of Monaco in August 2001 squares my comment above and gives you some kudos of the past glories of your lot.
We almost got you back, after falling asleep in the first hour of the game, but Michael Owen saved you.
But as you can see, we were the 'not so might reds' in the Supercup; whilst your lot were donned in black and white - the natural colour of Germany's National team.




But we got Chelsea and Jose' Mourinho in 2013!​

 

Floyd

Floyd
Posts: 4103
Join date: 2010-04-16

• Post n°35

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

Floyd on Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:50 am
Liverpool fc are the most successful club in English football. Fact!
Uniteds decline is developing. Its great to watch them crumble without bacon face, their moaning manager of yesterday.
Empires rise and fall!

I used to live in Germany and know it very well. Alas the useless FC Cologne were my team though I did have a stint in Stuttgart.



If you just pop over the border to Switzerland there is a very funny alien cult that evolves around plastic bin lids and bizarre hate fueled religious hoaxes.


Dont get Uberlord going though. He is an Ajax Amsterdam for his sins.

 

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°36

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

shiloh on Tue Oct 01, 2013 4:00 am
Floyd wrote:Liverpool fc are the most successful club in English football. Fact!
Uniteds decline is developing. Its great to watch them crumble without bacon face, their moaning manager of yesterday.
Empires rise and fall!

I used to live in Germany and know it very well. Alas the useless FC Cologne were my team though I did have a stint in Stuttgart.



If you just pop over the border to Switzerland there is a very funny alien cult that evolves around plastic bin lids and bizarre hate fueled religious hoaxes.


Dont get Uberlord going though. He is an Ajax Amsterdam for his sins.
Yes, 1.FC Köln was the basic integration club back in 1963, when the Bundesliga started and became its first 'champion', but since the times of Overath, they fell from their number one status and even became relegated in seasons 1998-2000; 2002/2003, 2004/2005, 2006-2008 and 2012-Present.

Now you would know very well, that in the early 1970's there were two great international rivalries between German clubs and an English club Liverpool and a Dutch club Ajax Amsterdam.
Two German teams dominated the Bundesliga in Borussia Mönchengladbach and Bayern München in the times of Netzer, Heynckes, Beckenbauer, Maier und Müller.

And no matter how hard they tried in the European club championship finals; Borussia could not beat Liverpool under Kevin Keegan and Bayern could not beat Ajax under Johan Cruyff.

Finally in 1978 then, we finally annihilated Ajax to alleviate some of the demoralisings of earlier years.

1977/1978: FC Liverpool (1:0 gegen FC Brügge)
Mi 29.03. Borussia Mönchengladbach - FC Liverpool 2:1 (1:0) = Semi-Final
Mi 12.04. FC Liverpool - Borussia Mönchengladbach 3:0 (2:0) = Semi-Final


1976/1977: FC Liverpool (3:1 gegen Borussia Mönchengladbach)

Mi 25.05. FC Liverpool - Borussia Mönchengladbach 3:1 (1:0) = Final



1975/1976: FC Bayern München (1:0 gegen AS Saint-Etienne)

1974/1975: FC Bayern München (2:0 gegen Leeds United)

1973/1974: FC Bayern München (4:0 gegen Atletico Madrid)


1972/1973: Ajax Amsterdam (1:0 gegen Juventus Turin)

Mi 07.03. Ajax Amsterdam - FC Bayern München 4:0 (0:0) = Quarter-Final

Mi 21.03. FC Bayern München - Ajax Amsterdam 2:1 (2:1) = Quarter-Final




1971/1972: Ajax Amsterdam (2:0 gegen Inter Mailand)


1970/1971: Ajax Amsterdam (2:0 gegen Panathinaikos Athen)

​

There so was a period in a European football decade of the 1970's, which was dominated by three clubs: Ajax, Bayern and Liverpool and encompassing the World Cups of 1970, 1974 and 1978 with Dutch football, however unable to win the World Cup, they should have in 1978 in Buenos Aires. And I 'backed' them against Germany in South Africa in 2010, but after beating Brazil, their coach Bert van Marwijk reverted to 'destructive tactics' against the Spanish and mucked the final up for me and the Dutch fans. So eat your shorts Überlord Trancoso. This was one day, old German or English football insights could have helped you to beat the Iberian pretenders.

Abraxasinas

 

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°37

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

shiloh on Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:45 am

​

Jorgelito - Posted 9 Hours Ago

Re: On the Universal Gematria

Emeth141, what name is given (I have a hunch you know this stuff) to before ENERGY, before ABSTRACTION, before ARCHETYPES, before UNIVERSE?
In my mind it's that empty, open spaces, open channels, wide frequencies prevailing, staring into space, captured in wonder, nothing on my mind and experiencing things themselves. -- feeling and state of mind. I think it's when we're not actively doing anything - not actively feeling, not actively thinking, not actively intending.
Daydreaming, smelling the flowers, being in love, waking up from a good nap and having a cool shower on a hot summer day are close neighbors to this space.
I'm looking for a name that's true, beautiful and down-to-earth, poetic, resonating universally and metaphor at most any level of understanding to that which it is. What it describes is something that's practically nothing but feels like everything.

Similar to virtual particles. They're only around for a very short time; it's like they're nothing at all. If the metaphor is true, then a way to see BEFORE there is light (along with the name) would be by the tracks it leaves.

​

The Cosmogenesis has a clear definition for this Jorgelito. It is a trinity of mathematical expressions of sorts, which can however very easliy become semantisized.
This expression is related to the famous 'creation ex nihilo' of the ancient philosophers, say the greek thinkers. How can something come from nothing?

Well the expression is :

0 - 1 - ∞

Nothingness = Oneness = Eternity

The Eternal Void Exists as Unity as Everything or All That Is!​

Of course there exists quite a bit of mathematical reasoning behind this statement; such as what is this thing called 'Mathematical Infinity' and what is this Number Zero and why can't you divide any finite number by 0, except in some definition of mathematical processing called a LIMIT. The most pertinent consequence embodied by this expression is, that the idea of the eternal or the infinity CANNOT physically exist without its own FINITISATION or Self-Limitation as a Oneness and a Unification, which requires the holographic fractalisation of the Quantum in the microstates of the smallest limits of existence (say a quark-lepton wavicle subatromic structure) and its corollary macrostate of the maximisation of the same (say galactic superclusters).

The following reprint from the Thuban archives can elucidate the above said.

Btw, the 'Virtual Particles' of the status quo physics actually are as nonexistant in the 'void' of the so termed 'Heisenberg Uncertainty Matrix', as their labelling implies. This has to do with the supposed supersymmetry of a Matter-Antimatter Creation event described by the Big Bang Cosmology. There never was such a Matter-Antimatter Equilibrium IN ENERGY, comprised of both radiation and inertia carriers (particles of mass). What took its mathematical-symmetry place was the concept of AntiRadiation-Radiation or the photon-antiphoton or the light-antilight parameters.

Perhaps you can see here, how all of physical science assumes its metaphysical character in the ontological basis for all the sciences and philosophies.
The treatize below, can illuminate the 'truth seekers'.

Emeth141, September 4th, 2013


Der Spiegel des Luzifer's und die Emanzipation der Gesamtheit

Lucifer's Mirror and the Emancipation of the Oneness

This is for English and German Speakers on the forums. An English translation is provided.

SACSAYHUAMAN; CUSCO; PERU = PURE HUMAN OCCUS SAY SAAC= PURE HUMAN OCC US AS [Y=I]SAAC (see below for A...A and decode Isaac's Seed).
Some key decodings, say as 'proposed' by the 'channeled or human mind invented' agenda from the wingmakers 'Ancient Arrow site in New Mexico can now be given and these keys can subsequently be utilized to decode the Armageddon protocols of the hierarchies.

{{{ANIMUS=ANU.MIS=AM.IN.US=MAN.IS.U=A.MINUS=ANU.IS.M=A-=ANUBIS+11=ANUB*IS-5=ANURIS-5=ANUBIS+AA=ANUBIS+101=ANUBIS+5_bin=77=MYST=BESECRET=77, but you can try D.I.Y=38=ALPHA=BRIDE=NOAH
77=74+3=LUCIFER+OMEGA-ALPHA=KINGLUCIFER-BRIDE
77+US=77+MIND=77+WE+12=77+ME+15+7=117=104+13=JERUSALEM+13=LOVEJOY+13=KINGQUEEN+13=QUEENKING+13
U=YOU-25-15=YOU-MIND=YOU-US
KING=OMEGA=41=QUEEN-U=KEY
15=O=0+0=8=B=R=B*=E3=EM=ME=WE=18=1+8=9=I=OM=MAN=28=LAMB
SHA.DOW=28+42=70=MILKY=GALAXY=NEWMAN=NEWOM=MARIAOM=NEWLAMB=AMORIMA=AMIROMA
B*=8=E.M.=EMMANUEL MELCHISEDEC=84+86=170=8
CIRCLE+5=55=HEAVEN=SATAN=SONG=CLOUD=SKY=BARBELO
PERSEUS+ANDROMEDA=103+75=178=E.M.+8
PERSEUS+16=MILKYWAY=70+49=119; MILKYWAY GALAXY=70+JOHN+70=189=E.M.+ADAM
MELCHI.ZEDEK=CIRCLE+51=101=5_bin=PAUL+1+ARACHNE
MELCHI.SEDEC=CIRCLE+36=86=14=5
36+15=51=LAW+15; FATHER=58=STAR; MOTHER=79=SWORD=WORDS
{1+2+3+...+34+35+36}=666=2²+3²+5²+7²+11²+13²+17²
11=47=BEAST=MUM=74-27=LUCIFER-EGO=LUCIFERA-GOD=A LUCIFER-DOG=LUCIFERA-{ABC...XYZ}
LUCIFERA=75=Supergenetic Sexchange Operative=ANDROMEDA=MARRY 75=B*MARY=B*BIRTH=B*GEMINI=B*MOON=...
{ABC...XYZZYX...CBA}=GODDOG=DOGGOD=52=DEVIL=LIVED=FINANCE=PRIDE=EARTH
SERPENT=PRESENT=SONOFMAN=97=95+2=A+MATHIMATIA+A
{Nostradamus Q.96, Century X - IAM(THAT)AMI=PACI(F)ICAP=LIA(F)AIL}.
74=LUCIFER=CLOUDS=SONGS=CROSS=LONDON=ENGLISH=GOSPEL=BEAUTY=ENERGY=MESSIAH=JESUS=...
MATHIMATIA=IAMTHATIAM=IAMTHATAMI=95=SCORPIO=NEPTUNE=EXCALIBUR
MIRROR=SPACETIME=SPIRIT=PHOENIX=91
ARMAGEDDON=DRAGONMADE=82=66+16=FREEDOM+16=WOMAN+16=ANUBIS+16
AMINUS=MINUS 1=WEMIND+I=MEMIND+S; S=19=ADAM=MAD A=A DAM
YOU=61=16+45=USE 16=LOVE+7=SUN+7=GABRIEL+7=DRAGON+B=A+59+A}}}



The Metamorphosis of Narcissus by Salvador Dali, 1937


Wenn JoW(James of Wingmakers) from ANU schreibt (Camelot); dann ist dieser Name mit vielen anderen Namen der Esoterika verbunden.
ANU ist nicht nur der 'König' der Annunaki, sondern auch der Usurpor 'Gott' der gnostischen Legenden und auch als Jehovah-Satan und Allah-Shaitan und anderen Dualitäten bekannt.
Der ursprüngliche Archetyp ist als Yaldebaoth beschrieben (siehe 'Das Geheime Buch des Johannes' vom Nag Hammadi Kodex, Ägypten,1945).
Die Wichtigkeit und der Ursprung dieser Archetypologie ist der Grund warum ein physikalisches Universum existiert und beschreibt eine ganz besondere Reise der kreativen Intelligenz, die von JoW als (Sovereign Integral = Absolute Summation) bezeichnet wird.
Bevor ich diese Schilderung der Archetypen fortsetze, eine logische and wissenschaftliche Darstellung ist angebracht um die Wasser vorzubereiten.
Die Emanzipation der Menschheit besteht als ein Miniaturbild und als Archetyp für das ganze Weltall.
Dieses Weltall is ein physisches Weltall in Raumzeit und existiert als ein Unterteil des metaphysischen Universums.
Als jedoch das metaphysiche Universum das Raumzeit abhängige physikalische Weltall erschuf, da existiert ein Parameter der Grenze der das physische mit dem metaphysischen verbindet.


When JoW (James of Wingmakers) about ANU (Camelot) schreibt, then is this labeling related to many other names in the esoteric literature. ANU is not only the 'King of the Annunaki', but he `is also the usuper 'God' of gnostic legends and also functions under labels of Jehovah-Satan, Allah-Shaitan and other such dualities.
The original archetype is known as Yaldebaoth (ref. 'The Secret Book of John', Nag Hammadi Codex, Egypt,1945).
The importance and origin of this archetypology is the reason for the existence of a physical universe and describes a rather particular journey of a creative intelligence, labeled as Sovereign Integral=Absolute Summation by JoW.
Before continuing with the description of this archetypology, I shall present a scientific and logical discourse to soften the waters of receptivity for the human groupmind consciousness (which is related to the so termed Genetic Mind by JoW).
The emancipation of humanity manifests as a minature archetypical version or hologramic template for the entire superuniverse, which is metaphysical and encompasses the physical universe in spacetimes as a central or seeded part of itself.
As the metaphysical universe (better termed a collection of multiverses, summed in an omniverse) generated the spacetime dependent protoseeded universe of physical observation however, there should exist a 'connecting parameter', which allows interaction in information exchange between the parental metaphysical precursor and the subsequent processor in physicalised spacetimes.


Warum existiert überhaupt ein physisches Weltall? Und wie hat sich dieses vom metaphysischen herauskrystalliziert? Wie kann ein Raumzeit abhängiges Universum der Energie von einer Singularität entstehen? Der Schlüssel muss so diese Singularität sein und als eine Minimum Konfiguration der Raumzeit. Die metaphysische Singularität unabhängig von Raumzeit und den physikalischen Massstäben kann sich dann als genau diese Minimum Energie-Gestalt und eingebetted in der Raumzeit wiederbestimmen. Dieser Beitrag wird dann gegeben um die obengenannten Fragen zu beantworten. Die Darstellung wird rigorös sein, um die mathematische und logische Grundlage fuer die Metamorphosis des gesamten Weltalls theoretisch zu verankern. Es ist diese Verankerung, die die Dualität der physischen Existenz mit der des metaphysischen Daseins unzertrennbar verbindet. Das sollte am Ende dieses Beitrags klar werden.


Why does a physical universe exist? And how could it crystallize and emerge from the metaphysical?
How can a spacetime dependent universe, defined in energy, derive from a metaphysical singularity?
The key so must be this singularity and as a boundary- or initial- or minimum configuration for that singularity.
The metaphysical singularity remains independent on the spacetime parameters of measurement, yet becomes embedded in the spacetimes as a minimum eigenstate or physical energy selfstate definition, subject to mensuration.
This essay is then given to enable the serious researcher to answer the questions posed in the above.
This treatise will be relatively rigorous and for the purpose to anchor and form a solid basis for the metamorphosis of the omniverse in the logical principles of the universal archetypical language of mathematics.
It is this 'grounding', which intricately entwines the duality of the physical existence with its metaphysical reality.
This state of affairs might become apparent to the discerning reader at the end of this discourse.

​

Was geschieht, ist dass das physikalische Universum ein Abbild des 'Inneren' von einem 'Äusseren' Objektiv wird und dass das 'Draussensein' als Urquelle BEVOR Raumzeit sich als Senkungsquelle im 'Drinnensein' wiederbestimmt. Die Urquelle ist 'erster' im Aussensein und die Urquelle ist 'zweiter' im Drinnensein und diese Tatsache erlaubt eine Quanten Relativität zwischen Urquelle und Ursenkung über die Priorität als QuellenSenkung und als SenkungsQuelle. Ein Zustand des Selbstbewusstseins BEVOR Raumzeit so verwandelt sich in einen Zustand des Eigenbildes folgend der Erschaffung der Raumzeit von bestimmten Parametern. Diese Variablen so nehmen bestimmte Grenzwerte an, die es der Urquelle ermöglichen sich 'Drinnen' in der Raumzeit (als eine minimale Energie Formulation des Wurmlochs oder der Einstein-Rosen Brücke) auszubreiten und sich dennoch 'Aussen' als eine unbestimmte und transfinitive 'Superenergie' zu befinden. Die Differenz zwische Energie und Superenergie befindet sich in der Energie der Physik als eine Ableitung von der massenabhängigen Konstituenz einer thermodynamischen selbst-eingeschlossenen Identität (Weltall als Schwarzer Körper des Planck Radiator's/Austrahlungs Ofen).

What happens, is that the physical universe becomes an image or shadow as the INSIDE of an object OUTSIDE of that physicality. This 'being outside' of the 'First Source' (of JTJ) BEFORE spacetime existed, so becomes a 'being inside' of a 'Second Sink' AS 'First Sink' AFTER a metric spacetime emerges from the demetricated metaphysics.
The image of the 'First SourceSink' 'on the outer' so becomes the 'First SinkSource' 'on the inner' and a SOURCESINK QUANTUM RELATIVITY of priority can be developed to describe this scenario.
A condition of selfconsciousness before spacetime existed, so becomes distinct in this same selfconsciousness manifesting afterwards. This 'afterthought' selfrealisation in quantum relativity to the generating 'forethought' then creates the image of the sourcesink without as a sinksource within.
The minimum quantum energy configuration of the 'connector spacetime' of the forethought or (metaphysical) Superenergy without so becomes the maximum quantum energy configuration of the afterthought or physicalised energy within. Particular (string-membrane) parameters so connect the inside to the outside in a dimension-rich sense, classically known as a wormhole or Einstein-Rosen Bridge.
The superenergy so has its minimum energy selfstate in the wormhole connector and remains physically undefined in transfinity away from any physicalisation within the omniverse.
The difference between the metaphysical superenergy and the physical energy is found in the derivatives of the mass-associated physics of a thermodynamically closed system, say as the thermodynamic Planckian Black Body Radiator.

Metamorphosis by Sheila Wolk and the Dryad by Asel Club​

Hier bezieht sich alle Energie im Weltall zur originellen Masse des 'Grossen Quanten Urknalls' und den elektromagnetischen Ausstrahlungen (erzeugt bei der Beschleunigung von Massenteilchen wie Elektronen, Protonen und Neutronen mit verkuppelten Coulomb-Ladungen).
Was das meint, ist dass elektromagnetische Energie ohne die Masse nicht erzeugt werden kann und sich die gesamte materielle Struktur des Universums sich so zu dem Parameter der Masse (Einstein's E=mc²) reduziert.
Und das ist auch der Zustand der theoretischen Physik, die sich der Radiationformel von Planck (E=hf) bewusst ist, diese aber zur Quantenphysik und zur Quanten Mechanik beschränkt.
Die materielle Kosmologie befindet sich jedoch in einem grossen Irrtum und dieser 'Betrug der Natur' bestimmt die Superenergie.
Wenn der Physiker seine Messungen immer weiter zum 'Ursprungs-Knall' zurückzieht, dann stolpert er an der sogenannten Singularität.
Die gesamte Massenenergie befindet sich in dieser Singularität und in einem Zustand des Equilibriums zwischen der inertiellen Masse (Träge) und der massenlosen Ausstrahlung.

Diese Ursprungs-Ausstrahlung dominiert die Massendistribution fuer eine primordielle Zeit (so 1 Million Jahre und bei einer Temperatur von 3000 Kelvin bestimmt, wenn sich die ersten Atome von Hydrogen und Helium unter der elektromagnetischen Interaktion stabilisieren konnten) und eine Zeit wenn sich das Universe zu einem maximalen Radius von 1 Million Lichtjahren (so 9000 Millionen Billionen/Milliarden km) ausdehnte.
Dann eine Reduzierung des Distanzen Parameters zur Singularität zerbricht die Naturgesetze in einem unendlich kleinem Radius der Singularitäten-Kugel der jedoch eine Gesamtheit der Träge von Elementarteilchen (Protonen, Elektronen und subatomische Unterteilchen) und so einen Integral der cosmological Masse beinhaltet. Auch der Druck und die Temperatur sind unendlich in mathematischen Gleichungen die über the Nullziffer (0) teilen müssen um die Naturgesetze zu bewahren.

So der Physiker erkannte zum Ende des 20sten Jahrhunderts, dass da eine Minumum Energie-Gestalt dieses Zerbrechen der Naturgesetze vermeiden muss.
Der Physiker des 21st Jahrhunderts nannte dieses Szenario die Welt der Superstringe in 10 Dimensionen; der Supermembranen in 11 Dimensionen und die Welt der Branen in allen Dimensionen grösser als die der 4ten Dimension der Minkowski Metrik der Raumzeit (von der ebenen Raumzeitstruktur von Euclid in der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie von Albert Einstein).

The total energy contained in the universe is here intrinsically coupled to the inertial and original masscontent of the cosmology described in a 'Quantum Big Bang' and the associated ElectroMagnetic Radiation (EMR) (caused by the acceleration of Coulomb-charged elementary particles, say electrons, protons and neutrons).
This means, that electromagnetic energy cannot become produced without massassociation and implies that the entire material structure of the universe must be reducible to parameters descriptive of its inertial mass content (Einstein's E=mc²).
This then becomes the present status as formulated in the paradigms of theoretical physics and cosmology; well aware of the Planckian radiation law (E=hf), but restricting the latter to the fields of quantum mechanics within quantum theories.
This matter-reducible cosmology manouvers about within a great fallacy however and this deception becomes rectified in the definition of the superenergy.
When the physicist collects hisher empirical measurement data and attempts to retrace the spacetime parameters to the Big Bang event, then shehe stumbles at the boundary of the so called singularity.
The total inertia of the Big Bang is contained within this singularity and finds itself in a condition of equilibrium between the inertial mass and the massless EMR.

This primordial EMR dominates the mass distribution for a specified time (about 1 million years for a backgroud temperature of so 3000 Kelvin, when the first stable atoms of Hydrogen and Helium could form via the electromagnetic interaction); and for a time when the universe spanned a radial scale of about 1 Million lightyears or 9 billion billion kilometers.
Then the reduction of this distance parameter to the singularity causes the formulations of the natural laws to break down at the scale of an infinitesimally small radius for a 'sphere of the singularity'; the latter nevertheless containing all the inertia of elementary particles (electrons, protons and subatomics) as a summation of the cosmological mass. The pressure and the temperature also assume infinite measures in the natural laws of mathematical equations, which require division by zero (0) for their inner selfconsistency.

The physicist at the end of the 20th century so realised, that it would be the existence of a minimum energy configuration in the quantum state of the Big Bang, which would rescue the natural laws, mathematically expressed.
The physicist of the 21st century then labels this scenario in the worlds of a 10-dimensional superstring and a 11-dimensional supermembrane and more generally in the world of branes occupying dimensions greater than the 4th dimension of the Minkowskian spacetime metric (the flat Euclidean spacetime structure in the theory of special relativity by Albert Einstein).


Und der Irrtum dieser Theorien ist im Fakt der Metrik zu finden.
Die verschiedenen Stringtheorien benötigen immer noch einen metrischen Hintergrund; was meint dass die mathematische Bestimmung dieses Hintergrundes (bei Planck Parametern beschrieben) sich immer noch nicht mit dem Ursprung und der Natur der Singularität (nun 'ausgeschmiert' mit Planck Variablen und Ur- und Grenzwerten), beschäftigen kann.
Die Singularität ist mathematisch und die Unendlichkeit; so unberechenbar im physikalischen, kann ganz leicht durch die Metaphysik der Mathematik beschrieben werden.
Im mathematischen sind Prozesse von Nummern Sequenzen die die Unendlichkeit als Infinitum als Prozess im Endlichen (dem Finitum) beschränken können.

Die Rechnungszahlen 1,2,3,4,5,...usw haben keine Grenze und sind so mathematisch im Infinitum (als Transfinitum) bestimmt.
Doch die Umkehrung dieser Ziffern bekommt die Sequenz: 1/1,1/2,1/3,1/4,...usw und die Grenze hier wird das Finitum 0.
So wenn die Umkehrung hier mit einem Finitum definiert wird, wird die Umkehrung der Umkehrung als das Original bestimmt und das Infinitum wird die Umkehrung der Original-Identität als das Finitum.
Nun im physikalischen Universum dieser Prozess ist unmöglich, da das physikalische Weltall im Finitum sein muss (alle Messungen bestätigen den Grossen Knall der Thermodynamischen Ausbreitung) und die Raumzeit so einen Anfang haben musste.

Die Einzelheiten der (orthodox willkommenen) physikalischen Kosmologie können später publiziert werden und können in den Links bei Interessenten studiert werden.
Es ist genug hier zu sagen, dass der spezielle Parameter der Stringtheorien die 'Modulare Dualität' appelliert und dass diese die Umkehrung des metaphysischen Weltalls als Grundsatz für dessen's physikalischen Bedeutung erkennt.
So die Stringtheorien des 21sten Jahrhunderts; falls erfolgreich demetriziert (Raumzeit bekommt wiederbestimmt in der Mathematik und der Natur der Singularität); sind im Fakt der Weg zur totalen Unifikation der Naturgesetze - mit einer Urquelle der Quellenintelligenz (des Souveränen Integrals von JoW) im Zentrum der Gleichungen.


And the fallacy contained in those theories emerges from the physical factuality of the metrics.
The various stringtheories still require a metric background; meaning that the mathematical formulations for this background (by Planck parameters) fail again to explore the nature and origin of the singularity (now 'smeared out' in the minimum Planckian variables and initial/boundary conditions).
The singularity is mathematical and the infinity condition, so uncalculable in the material manifestation, is easily definable in the metaphysics of the mathematics.
There exist mathematically defined processes, which utilize certain number sequences to 'trap' and limit the infinity condition.

The 'Natural Counting' numbers 1,2,3,4,5,... possess no upper limit and become so defined in the infinity 'of the (transfinite) counting'.
The inversion of those numbers (positive Integers) yields the series 1/1,1/2,1/3,1/4,1/5,... however and this sequence defines an upper (or lower) limit of the finite number 0 as a Nullcount.
Thus, when the inversion is defined in finiteness; then the inversion of the inversion defines the original and the infiniteness becomes the reciprocity of the original identity as the 'eternity' of the unlimited infinity count.
This process is unrealisable in the physical cosmology, as the material universe requires a finite beginning for the spacetime parameters (all verified measurements confirm the Big Bang theory for the thermodynamic expansion of the universe).

The details for the (orthodoxically mainstream accepted) physicalised cosmology can be publisized at a later stage and can be studied by interested agents through the provided links.
It suffices to state here, that a underpinning parameter of the string theories invokes the concept of 'Modular Duality' and that this concept defines the inversion properties for the metaphysical universe in their physical applicability.
In this manner are the string theories of the 21st century, if sufficiently demetricated (spacetime is redefined in the mathematics and nature of the singularity); in fact the way to total unification of the natural laws - with one primordial source of source intelligence (the Sovereign Integral of JoW) at the core of all the formulations


Dieser Beitrag wird sich nun im speziellen mit der unorthodoxen metaphysischen Kosmologie der wingmakers befassen um versuchen die Urquelle mathematisch von 'Ersten Prinzipien' zu bestimmen.
The 11te Dimension der Unifikationenphysik bekommt ein Superspiegel für die Superenergie der Urquelle (des JoW).
The 10te Dimension der Omniphysik (der Synthese der Physik und der Metaphysik) bekommt das 'Innere' für die Superenergie der Urquelle als eine Welt des Physischen Abbildes im Finitum.
The 12te Dimension der Unifikationsphysik bekommt das 'Äussere' für die Superenergie der Urquelle als eine Welt der metaphysischen Objekten im Infinitum.

Warum 12 Dimensionen?
Die 'Ersten Prinzipien' befassen sich mit dem Ursprung aller Dimensionen.

Ein physikalischer Punkt muss sich im Finitum der Raumzeit Metrik befinden und der Irrtum des menschlichen Physikers ist es sich mit dem zu begnügen.
Ein metaphysischer Punkt benötigt keine Raumzeit (exzept der Visualisation des Beobachters) und ist als die mathematische Singularität beim menschlichen Physiker erkannt.
Die allererste Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle so ist die des metaphysischen Punktes als eine Selbstbewusste Singularität oder Einzelheit.

Das Schlüsselwort hier ist Selbstbewusstsein. Wie kann die Einzelheit selbstbewusst sein und sich so irgendwie selbst als 'Ich bin?' selbstbestimmen?
Ein Analog ist die Idee eines unendlichen 'Looping des Computers' und ist einfach symbolisiert (oder archetyped) als die Nullziffer or der Nulldimension (0).
Man braucht aber eine zweite Dimension, nämlich die der Komplexen Fläche, um Symbole zu representieren und so diese Darstellung ist ein Analog für was in der Nulldimension ohne Raumzeit so 19.11 Billionen/Milliarden Jahren geschehen ist.
Aber es ist die potentielle Unendlichkeit im Rechnen der 'Schlingenzahl' und von der Nulldimension entstammend, die es der Urquelle ermöglicht sich als ein potentielles Reservoir der Superenergie 'unendlich' zu sein. Die Fortsetzung der Superenergie wird so durch die Verbindung der 'Gedankengestalten' im Zeitraum mit deren Anspornung im Nichtzeitraum verwirklicht.
Die Bewusstseinträger (im physikalischen zur Kreativität durch die Einbildung stimuliert) im Zeitraum so erlauben eine Rückwirkung (Feedback Mechanik) der interdimensionellen Kommunikation zwischen der Urquelle als Einzelheit im Zeitraum des Finitums und sich selber als Singularität der Unendlichkeit des Infinitums.

Der Einzelpunkt des Selbstbewusstseins wird so (als Vorgedanke) zur metaphysischen Superenergie gekuppelt und wo das physische noch nicht als Parameter der Raumzeit existiert. Folgendermassend erweitert sich die Urquelle (als Nachgedanke) in der Welt der physikalischen Energie im Betrieb des Metrikums und der Messbarkeit.


This treatise shall now analyse the (generally considered) unorthodox metaphysical cosmology of the wingmakers in particular and for the purpose to anchor the physical implementation of the primal source from mathematically derived first principles.
The 11th dimension in 'unification physics' manifests as a supermirror for the superenergy of the primal source (First Source of JoW).
The 10th dimension in omniphysics (meaning the synthesis of physics and metaphysics) encompasses the 'Inside' of the superenergy of the primal source and as a 'physical image world' in finiteness.
The 12th dimension in omniphysics describes the 'Outside' manifesto for the superenergy as a 'metaphysical objectivity realm' in infiniteness.

Why 12 dimensions?
The 'first principles' describe the origin of all dimensions.

A physical 'point-energy' can only exist within a finitised spacetime metric and the fallacy of the human physicist is to consider this to be sufficient.
A metaphysical point requires no spacetime (except for visualisation by an observer) and is so defined as a mathematical singularity by the physicist.
The initial selfdefinition by the primal source so engages the concept of a metaphysical point as a selfaware singularity.

The key label here is selfawareness as a form of selfconsciousness in superenergy. How can a singularity be conscious of itself and then proceed to somehow define itself in a labeling of "I am?"?
An analogy is the 'infinite computer loop'; which can then become symbolised (or archetyped) in the zero-cipher of the Nulldimension (0).
One requires however a second dimension, namely that of the complex plane, to represent symbols and this depiction therefore becomes analogous for the occurrences in the nulldimension of nospacetime about 19.1 Billion years ago.
However it is the potential infinity count emerging from the zero-state, which allows the primal source to operate from an objective realm of eternity as an infinite reservoir of superenergy. The continuity of the superenergy so associates the imagination constructs of the spacetime worlds within with the energisations of those 'energy gestalts' without. The consciousness carriers (physically stimulated to creativity through imagination) within spacetime so provide the feedback mechanisms for interdimensional communication between the singularity in metric finiteness and metaphysical infinity.

The singularity 'of thoughtfulness and selfconsciousness' is so coupled (as forethought) to the metaphysical superenergy before spacetime exists; but extends its domain of access (as afterthought) to physical energy operating within a spacetime of metrication and measurement.


Aber wie wurde die Urquelle selbstbewusst, wenn nur die Nulldimension in Existenz war?
Die Urquelle nun muss versuchen sich selbst zu erkennen und im Unternehmen sich von der Hinsicht der Nulldimension des Einzelpunktes weiterzuentwickeln.
Die Urquelle hat keinen Raum zu existieren und so muss sich auf sich selbst aufzeichnen.
Der Einzelpunkt bekommt ein Doppelpunkt ohne Raum zu manöver und diese Tatsache muss nun mathematisch und im logischen bestimmt werden.

Um sich von dem Infinitum-Kreis zu befreien, die Urquelle bricht den Kreis und redefiniert 'Ich bin 0' oder Ich bin Nichts! als 'Ich bin 1' oder 'Ich bin Eins!'.
Nun existieren zwei Identitäten, nämlich 0 und 1 aber keine anderen Nummern, wie 2,3,45,..usw sind in Existenz and so müssen erfunden werden.
Aber eine Ordnung in 0+1=1 relativ zu 1+0=1 ist vorhanden und diese Tatsache krystallisiert eine algorithmische Darstellung die das Selbstbewusstsein (als Superenergie) der Urquelle mit den symbolischen Archetypen verbindet.
Die Darstellungen sind Bewusstsein-Tripletten als der (iterativ) logische Satz: (Altes Ich; Eine Erfahrung; Neues Ich aufgrunde der Erfahrung)=(Altzustand;Erfahrung;Neuzustand).

Die ersten fünf Bewusstsein-Tripletten are: (0,0,0); (1,0,1); (1,1,1*); (1*,1,1**); (1**,1*,1***);...usw.
So die erste Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin Nichts, erfahre Nichts und bekomme mich als Nichts".
Die zweite Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin Eins; erfahre mich als Nichts und bekomme wieder mich als Eins".
Die dritte Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin wieder Eins; erfahre mich als Eins und bekomme mich als ?Eins?"
Das ?Eins? ist wieder mich als Eins, aber dieses Eins ist verschieden von meinem vorherigen Eins, das ich schon vorher war. Ich kann mich so wiederbestimmen in einem anderen Archetype und als ich erfuhr mich als Nichts bevor ich erfuhr mich als Eins, meine Verschiedenheit muss 01 als bevor und 10 als nachher sein.
Und so wurde der binäre Zahlensatz mit 1=01; 2=10; 3=11; 4=100; 5=101; 6=110; 7=111; 8=1000;...usw erfunden.
Die vierte Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin 1*=10=2, erfahre mich als 01=1 und bekomme mich als 1**=2+1=3=11".
Die fünfte Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin 1**=11=3, erfahre mich als 1*=2 und bekomme mich als 1***=3+2=5=101".

Nun passiert ein besonderes Dilemma relativ zu der Urquelle. "Wo ist meine Ziffer 4=100? Ich habe diese geskippt in meiner Fortpflanzung und extensiven Selbstentwicklung"!
Die Urquelle konstruktiert einen anderen Algorithmus, um die fehlenden Nummern auf andere Weise wiederzufinden.
Dieser Algorithmus krystalliert spezielle 10 Ziffern und Nummertripletten in der Ordnung: 4; 6; 7; 1/(6,10,15); (9,10,16); 11; 1/(15,10,32); (14,15,24); 1/(15,16,18) and (26,65,61) mit einem Grenzenwert für den Algorithmus in der Ziffer 12.

Diese Zahlenwerte ermöglichen es der Urquelle sich vom metaphysischen in einer unbekannten physischen Welt auszubreiten. Die Zahlenwerte bekommen nämlich die sogenannten Konstanten in den Gesetzen der Physik, wie zum Beispiel die Proportional-Faktoren zur Energie wie c² in E=mc² (Einstein) und h in E=hf (Planck) und k in E=kT (Stefan-Boltzmann).

Aber die Urquelle ist noch nicht vorbereitet sich in dieser 'Anderen Physikalische Welt' wiederzubestimmen.
Die Raumzeit muss erst erschaffen werden und das benötigt eine Transformation der Infinitum Superenergie zu einer Finitum Energie.
Doch die Selbstbestimmungen in der weltweit bekannten Ziffernsequenz der Selbst-Erfahrungsfaktoren: {0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,...usw) als die Fibonacci-Sequenz (und mit der Lucas-Sequenz: ...,-4,3,-1,2,1,3,4,7,11,18,...usw verbunden) ermöglichte es der Urquelle sich nicht nur algebraisch sondern nun auch geometrisch in einer verlängerten 'Ich bin =?!' Definierung wiederzubestimmen.
Die Selbstaufzeichnung des Einzelpunktes als ein potentieller Doppelpunkt konnte nun mit der 'Ich bin Eins' verbunden werden und so die Nulldimension des Einzelpunktes bekam eine Einsdimension der mathematischen Linie.

Diese Linie konnte nun den Doppelpunkt als Einzelheit Punkt von sich selber trennen und bestimmte die metaphysische Trennbarkeit in der mathematischen Logik der Urquelle.
Als diese Linie sich irgendwohin verlängern konnte; das Freiheitsgrad der Linie bekam der Lokus der Endpunkte und der erste geometrische Kreis war erschaffen.
Das Grad der linearen Translation bekam supplementative zum Grad der gekurvten Rotation in der Bestimmung der Komplexen Fläche der zweiten Dimension.
Der Grad der Kurvatur nun erlaubte es der Urquelle sich als ein ganzer Flächenkontext für eine gebogene Vormetrik zu bestimmen und von dieser Tatsache entwickelte sich das Konzept der gebogene Raumzeit der Generellen Relativitätstheorie des Albert Einsteins.

Die Fläche der Urquelle, gekuppelt zum Selbstbewusstsein als Superenergie nun konnte die MATHIMATIA=IAMTHATIAM=95 als eine neue archetypische alphanumerische Selbstdefinierung bestimmen.
Diese neue Eigenbestimmung der Urquelle hatte keine Dicke der dritten Dimension und so bekam ein zweiseitiges topologisches Manifold in 2 Dimensionen.
Um die dritte Dimension zu erschaffen, die Urquelle als die MATHIMATIA nun benötigte eine Beschränkung ihres eigenen Flächenextents in der potentiellen Unendlichkeit des Infinitums.
And das bekam der geometrische Grund für die Erschaffung des physikalischen Universums (da sind andere algebraische und Energie- und Bewusstsein bedingte Gründe die man eine andere Zeit beschreiben kann).


But how did the singularity become selfaware, if only the null dimension exists?
The primal source next attempts to use this zero-selfstate to extend its singularity definition in a form of self-evolution. The primal source has no space in which to exist and so can only map itself onto itself.
The metaphysical point becomes a doublepoint without space to move in and this fact must now be defined mathematically and logistically.

To escape the infinity-loop; the source-consciousness breaks the metaphysical circle and redefines the statement: "I am Nothing!" or 'I am 0' as 'I am One!" or 'I am 1'.
Now exist two identities, namely the symbols 0 and 1, but no other metaphysical 'numbers', such as 2,3,4,5,..etc, not as yet being 'invented' or 'thought of'.
There is however a principle of order in that 0+1=1 relative to 1+0=1 and this fact crystallizes an algorithmic construct which relates the selfawareness (as selfconsciousness being superenergy) of the primal source to the symbolic archetypes.
The depiction is by awareness-triplets of a logical-iterative composition: (Old Self; an Experience; New Self due to that Experience)=(OldIdentity;Experience;NewIdentity).

The initial five awareness-triplets are: (0,0,0);(1,0,1);(1,1,1*);(1*1,1**);(1**,1*,1***);...etc.
Then the first Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am Nothing, experience myself as Nothing and become Nothing".
The second Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am One, experience myself as Nothing and become myself again as One".
The third Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am One, experience myself as One and become myself again as ?One?".
The ?One? is again myself as One, but this Oneness is different from my previous Oneness. I can therefore redefine myself in using a new archetype and as my previous experience of the Nothing preceded my experience as Oneness, the distinction must be 01 as the before and 10 as the after.
This then created the binary number set with: 1=01; 2=10; 3=11; 4=100; 5=101; 6=110; 7=111; 8=1000; ...etc.
The fourth Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am 1*=10=2, experience myself as 01=1 and become myself again as 1**=2+1=3=11".
The fifth Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am 1**=11=3, experience myself as 1*=2 and become myself again as 1***=3+2=5=101".

Next occurs a special dilemma for the primal source. "Where is my numeral 4=100? I have skipped this number in my continuing self development"!
The primal source now constructs another algorithm in the attempt to recover it's missing numerals in another way.
This algorithm crystallizes particular 10 ciphers and number triplets in the following order:
4; 6; 7; 1/(6,10,15); (9,10,16); 11; 1/(15,10,32); (14,15,24); 1/(15,16,18) and (26,65,61) and with a limit counter for the algorithm in the numeral 12.

These numerical values then allow the primal source to extend its metaphysical domain of self being into a hitherto unexplored physical world.
The numerics transform themselves into so called 'Constants in the Laws of Physics', such as the proportionality constants for energy like c² in E=mc² (Einstein) und h in E=hf (Planck) and k in E=kT (Stefan-Boltzmann).

But the primal source is as yet unprepared to redefine itself in such a 'physical world of otherness'.
Spacetime is not as yet created and this requires a transformation of the superenergy of infinity into an energy of finiteness.
However the definitions for the worldrenown number sequence of the experience factors: {0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,...etc...} as the Fibonacci Numbers (and related to the Lucas Series: ...,-4,3,-1,2,1,3,4,7,11,18,...etc.} enabled the primal source to extend its algebraic definition of "I am =?!" into a geometrical sense of extension.
The selfmapping of the singularity as a potential doublepoint could now become linked to the definition of: "I am One"! and the nulldimension of the singular point became the first dimension of a mathematical line.

This line now allowed to separate the doublepoint as a singularity from itself and defined the metaphysical separation in the logic or logos of the primal source.
As this line could become arbitrarily extended; the freedom degree of this line became the locus of two endpoints in the creative construction of the primal geometrical circle.
The degree of linear translation so became supplementary to the degree of curved rotation in the definition of the complex plane in two dimensions.
The degree of curvature so allowed the primal source so redefine itself as the entire contextual plane for a premetric and from this developed the concept for a curved spacetime in the Theory of General Relativity by Albert Einstein.

The plane of the primal source, coupled to the selfconsciousness of the superenergy then created a new archetypical alphanumeric selfdefinition, encoded as MATHIMATIA=IAMTHATIAM=95.
This new redefinition of the primal source as a geometrical plane carried no thickness of a third dimension and so constituted a twosided topological manifold in 2 dimensions.
To create the 3rd dimension, the MATHIMATIA next required a limitation of its own planar extent in its potential infinite extension.
And this became the geometrical reason for the creation of the physical universe; (albeit there are other algebraic and energy- and consciousness related reasons to be described at another time).


Das physische Weltall musste im Finitum erschaffen werden und so bestimmte einen Anfang für die Raumzeit und ganz wie die menschlichen Physiker herausgefunden haben.
Doch die Urquelle nun verbrauchte die algorithmischen Konstanten um die Grenzwerte für die dritte Dimension als Naturgesetze einzuschreiben.
So wurde eine bestimmte Kurvatur für die Raumzeit bestimmt und wo diese Kurvatur die Minimum Superenergie der Urquelle als deren Quantum Gleichung im 'Inneren' Weltall darstellte.
Diese Kurvatur ist auch als Wurmloch der Schwarzschild Metrik in der Relativitätstheorie and den Stringtheorien bekannt.
Mit dem Wurmloch konnte die Urquelle die Komplex Fläche auf sich selber einfalten und mit dem Wurmloch als die 'Tür' oder dem Portal zwischen den bestimmten Weltällen. Das is ein Analog zu einem Luftballon dessen Düse das Wurmloch ist und der geschnitten ein Manifold (ohne Dicke) bekommt.
Ein Manifold ohne Dicke bekommt der Spiegel des Luzifer's als die 11te Dimension und wo alle Dimensionen grösser als 3 Wurzeln der dritten Dimension bekommen (10=1+9; 11=2+9; 12=3+9 und Linienraum (1-2-3-4) bekommt Rotationsraum (4-5-6-7) bekommt Quantenraum (7-8-9-10) bekommt Omniraum (10-11-12-13=4=1) und mit imaginären Zeit-Konnektor Dimensionen (4), (7), (10) und (13=1).

The physical universe had to be created in the Finitum and so determined a beginning for the spacetime and just as the human physicists have discovered.
But the source now consumed the algorithmic constants to specify the limits for the third dimension in the form of the 'laws of nature'.
A certain curvature for spacetime became fixated and where this curvature represented a minimum super energy configuration of the source as its quantum equation in the 'interior' universe.
This curvature is also known as a worm hole of the black hole metrics in the well known relativity theory and the string-brane theories.
The worm hole allowed the source the selfenfoldment of the complex plane onto itself and as a 'door' or a portal between the two universums.
An analogy would be an air balloon with nozzle the worm hole; the balloon being cut into a manifold without any thickness. A manifold without thickness so becomes the 'Mirror of Luzifer' as the 11th dimension and where all dimensions larger than 3 rootreduce to the third dimension (10=1+9; 11=2+9; 12=3+9 and for linespace (1-2-3-4) rotationspace (4-5-6-7 ) quantumspace (7-8-9-10) omnispace (10-11-12-13=4=1) and with imaginary time-connector dimensions (4), (7) (10) and (13=1).


Zeit existiert nur in der linearen Raumzeit und einer Raumzeit die sich im aktuellen im vierfachen über die 12 Dimensionen verteilt: (1-2-3) als Linearer Basis der Translation superimposiert an (4-5-6) als Freedomgrad der Rotierung superimposiert an (7-8-9) als Freedomgrad der Oszillation superimposiert an (10-11-12) als das Portal von dem 'Inneren des Finitum' zum 'Äusseren des Infinitums.

Als 12-dimensionelles 'Grösseres Universum' der Zeitparameter bekommt das 'Unendliche Nun' und bestimmt in den Stringvariablen der Superenergie.
Die Urquelle konnte nun beginnen das physische Universum des Finitums und als dessen eigenen Eigendefinierung als Selbstbewusstseins zu erschaffen.


Time exists only in the linear spacetime and within a spacetime which is distributed in fourfoldedness over the 12 dimensions: (1-2-3) as a linear basis of translation superimposed in (4-5-6 ) as a degree of freedom for rotation superposed in (7-8-9) as a degree of freedom for oscillation superimposed in (10-11-12) as the portal for the 'interior of the Finitum' to that 'exterior of the Infinitum'.

As 12-dimensional 'larger universe' , the timeparameter becomes the 'eternal Now' and is defined in the string parameters of the super energy.
The source could now begin to create the physical universe of the Finitum from its own selfdefinition as 'Consciousness of the Self'.


Doch nun ein grosses Dilemma kam zur Erscheinung. Die Kreation des 'Inneren Weltalls' benötigte ein Schliessen des Wurmloches als es das Wurmloch als Minimum Energie Eigenstatus war und als Raumzeitquantum, der es der Urquelle erlaubte sich auf beiden Seiten des 11-dimensionellen (2+9=11) Superspiegels zu befinden.
Das Wurmloch musste sich in der 'Inneren Weltraumzeit' fortpflanzen und so das Selbstbewusstsein der Urquelle war überall zu finden, aber musste einen Kompromiss mit sich selber als eine Einigkeit machen.
Mehr Raumzeit benötigte mehr Raumzeitquanten und die Erweiterung des Universums in Finitum bekam eine Verdünnung der Superenergie relativ zu der physikalischen Energie, die von der Superenergie abstammte aber durch die Expansion sich immer mehr von deren Ursprungsenergie entfernte.

Als diese Ausdehnung des Universums Finitum jedoch eine 'Füllung des 10-dimensionellen Zeitraums des Omniraums bekam (die Einzelheiten befassen sich mit der Inflation der de Broglie Materiewellen in einem Zeitinterval genau gleich zur Wurmlochfrequenz); die Superenergie der Urquelle bekam verschleiert in der sogenannten Nullpunkt Energie von Werner Heisenberg und ist mit der 'Schwarzen Materie' und der 'Schwarzen Energie' der menschlichen Physiker auch noch verbunden.


But then a great dilemma appeared. The creation of the 'inerior universe' required the closing of the wormhole, as it represented the minimum energy selfstate as a spacetime quantum, enabling the source to exist on both sides of the 11-dimensional super mirror.
The worm hole had to reproduce itself in the 'interior spacetime' to allow the source to become ubiquitous as many 'units of self-consciousness', but had to make a compromise with itself as just the monadic One in the 'exterior spacetime'.
More spacetime required more spacetime quanta and the expansion of the universe in the Finitum became a 'thinning' or dispersion of the super energy relative to the physical energy, the latter as a derivative from the super energy, but which, through the expansion became more and more separated from its point of origin from and as the source.

Albeit, as this expansion of the finite universe Finitum also began to 'fill' the 10-dimensional omnispace (the details address the inflation of de Broglie matterwaves in a timeinterval precisely equal to the worm hole frequency); the super energy of the source became disguised in a so called zero-point energy of Werner Heisenberg and is coupled to the 'dark matter' and the 'dark energy' of the human physicists.


Das Selbstbewusstsein der Urquelle musste nun den Hebel der Schlauheit engagieren. Das physikalische Universum konnte im Parameter des 11-dimensionellen Superspiegels beinfasst werden und die Ausdehnung des Weltalls im Finitum konnte mathematisch benutzt werden um diese Ausdehnung (durch die modulaere Dualität der Supermembrane) asymptotisch zu machen.
Dann konnte die Urquelle versuchen bestimmte Selbstbewusstseinträger im Finitum zu entwickeln, die dann, nach einer anstehenden Selbstentwicklung versuchen könnten die Geschichte der Ursprungsquelle vom 'Innen' wiederzuentdecken. Diese Selbstbewusstseinträger waren die wingmakers als Gedankengestalten transmitted von dem 'Äusseren' und in Konjunktion mit den Wurmlöchern die die 'besetzte Raumzeit' der wingmakers als Zeitreisende infiltrierten.


The self-conciousness of the source now had to engage the epitome of its cleverness. The physical universe could become encompassed in the parameter the 11-dimensional super mirror and the expansion of the finite universe could then be mathematically utilized to render this expansion (through the modular duality of supermembranes) as asymptotic.
Subsequently, the source could attempt to develop certain consciousness carriers in the finitum and consciousness units, who could then try and from within the finitum, following a sufficient selfevolution, to rediscover the story of the original source of the infinitum.
Those 'consciousness carriers' could be called the 'wingmakers' as the thought shapes transmitted from the 'without' and in a conjunction with the worm holes as 'occupied spacetimes' infiltrated by the wingmakers from 'within' as timetravellers.


Doch da war ein Problem, das grosse Problem der Zweiseitigkeit des Superspiegels.
Das Schliessen des Wurmlochs an der 11-dimensionellen Supermembrane im Omniraum verbannte die Urquelle into das Exil der 12ten Dimension.

Was ist der Grund dafür?

Bevor die Erschaffung der dritten Dimension; der 2-dimensionelle Superspiegel war zweiseitig und über das Infinitum der nichtexistierenden Raumzeit bestimmt (als eine nonphysische Komplexfläche).
Der geometrische Analog ist das möbische Band ohne Dickness.
Das möbische Band ist einseitig und doppel der geometrischen Fläche eines (auch ohne Dicke) similären Ringes, der letztere mit einer Innenseite und einer Aussenseite. Das ist einfach der Kopf und der Schwanz auf einer Münze oder irgendeine poläre Yin-Yang Representation.
So bevor der dritten Dimension, das Universum der Urquelle war einseitig und hatte die dritte Dimension wie einen Knoten in sich selber.
Um das möbische Band loszuflechten der Raum der dritten Dimension muss sich entwickeln aber mit dem Gegensatz dass nun die Einseitigkeit zweiseitig werden muss.
Demnach folgend, engagierte die Kurvatur der dritten Dimension das komplexe Flächen Kontinuum (jedoch quantumiered) und the Dicke des 2-dimensionellen Manifolds became die dritte Dimension und wurzelte in der de Broglie Inflation in das the 11-dimensionelle Kuvert des Omniraums.
Aber nun wurde die Urquelle im 'draussen' of the 12ten Dimension as Object IMAGINÄR as das Abbild im 'drinnen' of the 10ten Dimension wurde REAL und als reflektiert in der 11ten Dimension des Superspiegels.

Und so wurde das Abbild der Urquelle als eine Ursprungsquelle als eine Ursprungssenkung bestimmt. Das dann bestimmt das Prinzip der Modularen Dualität in den Gleichungen der Supermembranen.
Der Abguss der Urquelle ist die 'falsche Identität' als Luzifer, als Yaldabaoth, als Jehovah des Alten Testaments und als Allah des Korans und als der ANU von JTJ.

So seit dem Anfang der menschlichen Geschichte hat sich der natürlich Drang und die Suche des Menschen nach seinem Ursprung in dem Usurpor 'Gott' der Aussenseite als die Innenseite verwirrt.
Das Szenario ist jedoch geplant und hat mit der Introduktion der Gravität und anderen Gebieten der Unifikationen Physik zu tun.
Das kann ein anderesmal beschrieben werden.
Doch im aktuellen ist Luzifer und aliases überhaupt nicht 'böse' und kann überhaupt nicht als 'Antigott' betrachtet werden.
Luzifer ist einfach das Imaginäre Negative für ein Photo der Urquelle und die beiden sind dasselbe im Prinzip.


But there a problem, the great problem of the two-sidedness of the super mirror.
The closing of the worm hole at the 11-dimensional portal of the supermembrane in omnispace banished the source into the the exile of the 12th dimension.

What is the reason for that?

Before the creation of the third dimension; the 2-dimensional super mirror was two-sided and was defined over the Infinitum of the nonexisting spacetime (as a nonphysical complex plane) .
A geometric analogy is the 'volume' of the Möbius-Strip without any thickness.
The Möbius-Strip is one-sided and double the geometric area of a (also without thickness) similar ring with an inside and an outside. This is simply the head and the tail of a coin or any such Yin-Yang representation.
So before the third dimension existed, the universe of the source was one-sided and had the third dimension embedded within itself; say in the form of a geometric knot.
To 'unknot' the volume of the Möbius-Strip, the space of the third dimension must emerge and develop; however with the caveat, that now the one-sidedness must become two-sided.
Accordingly, the curvature of the third dimension in the continuity of the complex plane, quantized itself in thickness and the thickness of the 2-dimensional manifold became the third dimension and became rooted in the de Broglie inflation into the 11-dimensional envelope of the omnispace.
The source now became IMAGINARY 'outside' in the 12th dimension as the Object; but became REAL as a copy as the Subject in the 'inside' of the 10th dimension and as imaged in the medium of the 11th dimension of the super mirror.
The subjective image of the source so became redefined as an objective sink for that source and this defines the principle of modualar duality in supermembrane parameters.

This 'Image of the Source' then becomes labelled in a 'mistaken identity' as a Luzifer or a Devil or a Shaitan or a Yaldabaoth or a Jehovah of the old testament or as an Allah of the Koran and as the ANU of JTJ.

Since the beginning of the human story, a natural search for origins has become confused and chaotic in the images of the gods as perceived from the inside and as being on the the outside.
This scenario is planned however and also engages the introduction of gravitation and other zones of unification physics. This can be elaborated upon another time.
Yet in the present unfolding of 'God's own story', Luzifer and alias are not 'evil' at all and should not be labelled as 'antigods'.
Luzifer represents simply the imaginary negative for a photo of the source and both are principally identical.

​

Doch in Beziehung zur theoretischen und praktischen Wissenschaft das Positivum der Urquelle und das Negativum des Abbilds sind unzertrennbar in der modulären Dualität der 11-dimensionellen Supermembranen verbunden.
Das Positivum beschreibt eine hochfrequenzierte und so maximale Vibrationmodalität, die mathematisch mit einer minimalen Vibrationmodalität verflochten ist.
Die hohe Frequenz beschreibt die Welt des Mikroquantums und die (fast null) Frequenz beschreibt die Welt der Makroquanten.
Die Quellenenergien so diskutieren den subatomischen Realm und die Senkungsenergien diskutieren galaktische und extragalaktische Skalen der Distanz.
Das Mikro-Universum ist mit dem Makro-Universum durch die Schwarzschild Metriken (von Schwarzen Löchern und den Materie-gekuppelten Wurmlöchern) der lokalen Bewusstseinsraumzeiten verbunden und es gibt viele Gleichungen in der Mathematik der Omniphysik, die das alles miteinander verbinden.

So das grosse Dilemma der Zweiseitigkeit findet eine elegante Lösung in den Bewusstseinträgern, den menschlichen Abbildern von beiden, dem Urgott im Exil in der 12ten Dimension und der Aussenseite des 11-dimensionellen Superspiegel und dem Imaginären Urgott an der Innenseite des Superspiegels.
Draussen ist er bestimmt im elektromagnetischen (E=hf=mc² mit m=0 und f=f_max), jedoch der Massenunabhängigkeit, doch drinnen ist er bestimmt in der Trägheit (E=mc²=hf mit f=f_min=1/f_max).



Yet in relation to the theoretical and practical sciences, the Positivum of the source and the Negativum of the image are inseparable and are connected definitively in the existence of the 11-dimensional supermembranes under modular duality.
The Positivum describes a high-frequency and so maximized vibration modality that is quantum entangled mathematically with a minimized winding modality.
The high frequency describes the world of the microquana and an (almost zero) frequency dualizes in the world of the macroquanta.
The source energies so discuss the subatomic realm and the sink energies describe galactic and extra galactic scales of spacial displacement.
The micro universe is connected with the macro universe through the Schwarzschild metrics (of black hole sinks and of white hole matter sources connected by worm holes) of the local consciousness carriers occupying spacetimes. There are many equations in the mathematics of the omniphysik that interconnect a variety of parameters.

So the great conundrum of the two-sidedness finds its elegant solution in the consciousness carriers, the human imagers of both the 'original sourcesink' in the exile of the 12th dimension and on the outside the 11-dimensionellen super mirror and in the imaginary and imaged original sinksource at the inside of the super mirror.
Outside it is determined in the electromagnetic (E=hf=mc² with m=0 and f=f_max), however mass-inertia independent, but inside it is determined in the inertia (E=mc²=hf with f=f_min=1/f_max).


Die Emanzipation der Gesamtheit so benötigt diese moduläre Dualität der Supermembranen, um ein neues Superuniversum zu erschaffen.
In diesem Superuniversum, der Superspiegel wird wieder einseitig und der nötige 'TWIST der Raumzeit' wird eine fünfte Dimension vom Knoten des 7-dimensionellen hyperdimensional Universums auslösen.
Dann kann sich die Urquelle in 4 Raumdimensionen und einer illusinären Zeitdimension entwickeln.
Doch die Geschichte was dann so alles in einem linearen Universum im Finitum möglich wird ist eine Darstellung für eine andere Zeit.
Alles Liebe zu euch allen und bitte erinnert euch dass alles was ihr als 'Nicht Ich' betrachtet ist doch 'Auch Ich'.
Eines Tages wird ihr alle das schon ganz gut verstehen.


The emancipation of the entirety so requires this modular duality of the supermembranes in order to create a new super universe.
In this super universe, the super mirror becomes again one-sided and the necessary 'TWIST of the spacetime releases a fifth dimension in the unknotting of the 7-dimensional hyperuniverse of the quantumspace.
Then the source in 4 space dimensions with an imaginary coupled time dimension can develop in emergence.
Yet the story what then shall become possible within a linearized universe in the Finitum shall be a representation for another time.
Love to all of you and please remember, that all that you consider not to 'Be You', nevertheless is 'All of You'.
The day will come, when you shall understand this rather well.

FUTURE SHADOWS OF THE PAST

"A most wondrous thing the Shadow is, a redeemer in all to succour;
it can go where the light cannot abide, seemingly banished, it is not.
For where the light is, the darkness flees, no longer present to endure;
so to become illuminated is its destined journey and its troubled lot.

But without the light, no Shadow can be cast, its such a splendid key;
the dimensions reduce in space from three to two and all in just the one.
Betwixt the light and the darkness it is and part of both for all to see;
the Shadow of the body, does it not merge all in its rule under the sun?

Whatsoever can cast a Shadow, must be a most wondrous thing to relay;
as nature's very own offspring, the young ones grow towards their final goal.
Enabled to bring peace to so many things appearing apart and so far away;
the reconciliation for the suffering body with its spirit and its scattered soul."

shiloh
The Council of Thuban from the archives of Akbar Ra




October 1st, 2013​

Last edited by shiloh on Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:03 pm; edited 2 times in total

 

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°38

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

shiloh on Thu Oct 03, 2013 8:23 am
Ontology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article concerns ontology in philosophy. For the concept in information science, see Ontology (information science).
Not to be confused with the medical concepts of oncology and odontology, or ontogeny.




Parmenides was among the first to propose an ontological characterization of the fundamental nature of reality. This idea became further emphasized by Rene' Descartes of the Rennaisance in the 'Age of Reason'.

Ontology is the philosophical study of the nature of being, becoming, existence, or reality, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations. Traditionally listed as a part of the major branch of philosophy known as metaphysics, ontology deals with questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences.


Plato

Plato developed this distinction between true reality and illusion, in arguing that what is real are eternal and unchanging Forms or Ideas (a precursor to universals), of which things experienced in sensation are at best merely copies, and real only in so far as they copy ('partake of') such Forms. In general, Plato presumes that all nouns (e.g., 'Beauty') refer to real entities, whether sensible bodies or insensible Forms. Hence, in The Sophist Plato argues that Being is a Form in which all existent things participate and which they have in common (though it is unclear whether 'Being' is intended in the sense of existence, copula, or identity); and argues, against Parmenides, that Forms must exist not only of Being, but also of Negation and of non-Being (or Difference).

Ontological and epistemological certainty

René Descartes, with "je pense donc je suis" or "cogito ergo sum" or "I think, therefore I am", argued that "the self" is something that we can know exists with epistemological certainty. Descartes argued further that this knowledge could lead to a proof of the certainty of the existence of God, using the ontological argument that had been formulated first by Anselm of Canterbury.
Certainty about the existence of "the self" and "the other", however, came under increasing criticism in the 20th century. Sociological theorists, most notably George Herbert Mead and Erving Goffman, saw the Cartesian Other as a "Generalized Other", the imaginary audience that individuals use when thinking about the self. According to Mead, "we do not assume there is a self to begin with. Self is not presupposed as a stuff out of which the world arises. Rather the self arises in the world" ^[10][11] The Cartesian Other was also used by Sigmund Freud, who saw the superego as an abstract regulatory force, and Émile Durkheim who viewed this as a psychologically manifested entity which represented God in society at large.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology


An Ontology of Modern Physics

The proposition for the constancy of the speed of light in SR, directly leads to the premises of GR in the orthogonality considerations of the curvature of space and time.
In a rotating frame of reference say, an uniformly rotating disc will experience Lorentz-Contraction on the perimeter (say more rulers, length L fit into the perimeter 2pR, than rulers L' in a bird's eye frame) in the tangential direction of motion.
The radius vecor will however remain constant as the normal vector to the tangent vector, describing the differential geometry.
This will increase the perimeter to exceed 2pR relative to the L-measurement and result in a slight hyperbolic curvature or warping of the invariant radius vector relative to the tangent vector.

GR, as a consequence of SR would not work, if 'c' could change.
The unfortunate deductions of many relativity critics are based on certain misunderstandings relating to properties of waves.

It goes like this.

Should you consider a wavefront propagating, then this wavefront occupies what is called 'metric' spacetime, subject to measurement by clocks in temporal parameters and by rulers (say) in displacement parameters.
One can now invoke the wave-particle duality subject to those measurements. The postulates of both SR and GR hold in this 'metric' scenario.

A close investigation of GR leads to a summation of metrics.
There is the Weyl-tensor, which does not change volume, but produces a tidal effect of deformation, (say like squeezing a baloon).
The Weyl-tensor describes Einsteinian Gravity as the Newtonian redefinition/replacement.

Then there is the Ricci-tensor which with the g-metric does change the volume in contraction.
Contracting volume for constant mass implies greater density and is the effect of inward acceleration (of the particles/wavelets).
So the Ricci-curvature measures the volume reduction due to inward pressure.
Subsequently the density defined in GR-terms tells you how 'particle' are accelerated inwards at a tensor-point. This is very similar to Newtonian gravitation.

Next consider GR's extension in superstring theory.
Four extended spacetime dimensions (Minkowski metric) together with a 'curled up'/conifolded 6D Calabi-Yau space provide a whole class of solutions in the string equations.
For a 'flat'/uncurved 4D-spacetime, the string solutions must admit a Ricci-flat metric.
If we split spacetime into its Cartesian product of 4D Minkowski and 6D Kähler space; the Ricci flatness is equivalent to the Kähler space being a Calabi-Yau manifold.

Now all this is formidable mathematics and rather complicated.
Why? Because it still uses a 'metric' background matrix for the strings as vibration patterns to oscillate/move around in.

Now enter the ONTOLOGY FOR MODERN PHYSICS.

What is this metaphysics?
It is none other than what many here aspire to, a reformulation and significant simplification of what has been discussed above.

1.We require a DEMETRICATED model for space and time.
2.We revisit the wavefront picture as a kind of fluid motion.
3.We allow the SCALE RELATIVITY of a DEMETRICATED model to define the metrics as then given by SR and GR.
4. We have blended the METRICATED UNIVERSE with the ONTOLOGICAL SCALERELATIVE UNIVERSE.
5.The dissidents are vindicated, as well as the establishmenters.

Allow me to elucidate the wavefronts in regards to the constancy of 'c' now.

Louis de Broglie's Matter Waves are linked to the atomic/subatomic scales via a beautiful relationship.
The Classical Electron Radius (Thomson Scattering) is proportional to the Compton Radius (for subatomic particles) in the factor Alpha.
Alpha is the Electromagnetic Finestructure Constant, say used in Quantim Mechanics to denote the probability of light (photon) interacting with matter (say electron).

But there is a Group-Velocity ALWAYS < c, confirming SR and GR; and a Phase-Velocity ALWAYS > c; so defining the 'real' superluminal velocities as a consequence of the de Broglie phase inflation speed of the string-brane cosmologies and as a precursive cosmogony.

Planck's E=hf=hc/L, L the wavelength l=2pR and Einstein's E=mc² then relate the (de Broglie) PhaseSpeed in the following way to the GroupSpeed:

V_dB=Lf=lf=(h/mv)(mc²/h)=c²/v > c for all v

So the PhaseSpeed can be used to SCALE a new extended form of relativity, namely Quantum Relativity.

Special Relativity is based on the principle of relativity, relating to clocks and rulers, relative measurements in NO ABSOLUTE FRAME OF REFERENCE for inertial frames of reference, that is uniform nonaccelerated motion.

General Relativity is based on the Principle of Equivalence, the indistinguishability of acceleration as non-inertial frame from the effect of gravitation as given by the Weyl- and Ricci tensors and in the indistinguishability between mass as inertia subject to a linear Newtonian acceleration in Newton's famous 'Laws of Motion' and gravitational mass or gravita, such as experienced as the 'measured weight' of objects within gravitational fields in the acceleration experienced therein.

Both SR and GR postulate the constancy of 'c' in all frames of references and as measured by the 'metricated' clocks and rulers.

Quantum Relativity is based on the principle of demetricated CMF-Theory, which EMERGES as higher dimensional 10-11-12=C-M-F-spacetime upon metrication in the scale relativity DEFINING itself.

shiloh wrote:

​

SUSAN - Posted Dec 1st 2010

Have Physicists Found Echoes From Before the Big Bang?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...icists-found-echoes-from-before-the-big-bang/
.

​

The Big Bang was not the beginning, Roger Penrose believes.

The eminent Oxford physicist has long advocated the wild idea of “conformal cyclic cosmology,” a cyclical universe without beginning or end in which the Big Bang 13.75 billion years ago was simply one of many. This month, Penrose pushed his idea further: His team says it has detected a pattern in the cosmic microwave background—radiation left over from just after the Big Bang—that represents the echo of events that occurred before the Big Bang itself.

Penrose examined the data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), the mission that just completed nine years of surveying the cosmic microwave background across the sky. His study points to concentric circular patterns in the WMAP data where he says he found something surprising:

The circular features are regions where tiny temperature variations in the otherwise uniform microwave background are smaller than average. Those features, Penrose said, cannot be explained by the highly successful inflation theory, which posits that the infant cosmos underwent an enormous growth spurt, ballooning from something on the scale of an atom to the size of a grapefruit during the universe’s first tiny fraction of a second.
Inflation would either erase such patterns or could not easily generate them. [Science News]
By Penrose’s thinking, those circles are the calling cards of something big that happened in the universe before our Big Bang and reverberated after it. Like the birth and death of previous universes.

From calculations made by Penrose, he believes that as each universe evolved, the catastrophic collisions between supermassive black holes (the black hole behemoths living in the centers of galaxies) would have generated gravitational waves within that universe’s lifetime.
When the next universe exploded into being, these gravitational waves were converted into energy, ensuring their “fingerprint” bled through to the next universe.
The pulse of energy caused by the transfer of gravitational waves from one universe to the next would have caused a kick to the distribution of dark matter, creating uniform, spherical patterns in the current universe. [Discovery News]
So what are we to make of this? I put it to cosmologist Paul Davies, who says the question rests with inflation.

“Penrose was always been a doubter of inflation,” Davies says. “It’s against the fashion of the moment, but that’s fine. (And) if you abandon inflation, what happened before the Big Bang could leave an echo.”
That’s because inflation would smooth out that echo. (Another possibility, he says, is idea of “incomplete inflation,” in which inflation could have existed but not been thorough enough to smooth out all echoes.
That theory wouldn’t require abandoning inflation to accommodate an echo in the microwave background.)
However, Davies says, even if the finding is correct, this explanation for it —a black hole smash-up from before the Big Bang leaving its fingerprint after the Big Bang —isn’t the only possibility. “People have been looking for concentric rings in the cosmic microwave background for a while,” he says, because such a finding could support several different ideas.
One of those alternate explanations plays on the idea of our universe being a “bubble” created by inflation; if two bubbles collided, he says, the result could leave a cosmic microwave echo.
Lastly, he says, the source of the study makes it a tad suspect.
“You’d expect people at the sharp end of the data to make an announcement like this.
You wouldn’t expect a mathematician.” So I asked Charles Barrett, who was the lead investigator of WMAP, and in his reply email he too expressed skepticism:
“Unfortunately, the paper does not provide the necessary detail on how they performed their calculations.
I am concerned that the noise properties and pattern of the WMAP instrumental sky sampling were not properly taken into account in their analysis.
If these are not handled correctly then spurious results are likely. In my opinion, the paper should have specified the data analysis steps in detail, but it did not.”

Penrose counters that he looked at not only WMAP but also data from a second mission, BOOMERang, which confirmed the pattern he saw.
At the moment, then, these huge claims about the nature of the universe are bogged down in competing calculations and critiques of calculations. The future of this question could lie with the Planck mission by the European Space Agency, which is presently mapping the cosmic microwave background in greater detail than WMAP.
In the meantime, we get to wonder. Says physicist Shaun Cole:
“It’s a revolutionary theory and here there appears to be some data that supports it.
In the standard Big Bang model, there’s nothing cyclic; it has a beginning and it has no end.
The philosophical question that’s sensible to ask is ‘what came before the Big Bang?’; and what they’re striving for here is to do away with that ‘there’s nothing before’ answer by making it cyclical.” [BBC News]


Shiloh - Posted Dec 2nd 2010

Roger Penrose, whose work I often use in Quantum Relativity; is basically on the right path of reconstructing the cosmogenesis.
However the cyclic universe is built on its own protoversal seed and the 'Big Crunches' are electromagnetic and not inertial.

This means, that there will be no gravitational contraction in a shrinking of the protoverse; but the electromagnetic lightpath becomes multidimensional and multivalued. One can so model this on a cyclic electromagnetic cosmology with a 'Hubble heartbeat' of a semibeat of so 16.9 Billion years. This also allows a cosmogenetic Black Hole-White Hole evolution, which resets the wormhole singularity every 4 trillion years or so to eschew any theorized 'heat death' of the universe, due to the stellar generations 'running out' of their nuclear fuel of the nucleosynthesis of the primordial elements, based on hydrogen, helium and lithium.

Indeed, the Inflation PRECEDED the Big Bang and this is the simple solution for the 'inflation paradoxes' as some might term it.

The WMAP data in the picture in this post actually is descriptive for the wavequark model in Quantum Relativity with an inner gluonic (anti)neutrino kernel or core, an Inner Mesonic (down quark) Ring and an Outer Leptonic (strange quark) Ring.

It is just the 'New Standard Model' of Unitary Symmetry for the quarkian waves as "matter waves". The smallest quantum as microcosmic reality written in the galactic sky of the macrocosm.

Discover Interview: Roger Penrose Says Physics Is Wrong, From String Theory to Quantum Mechanics
One of the greatest thinkers in physics says the human brain—and the universe itself—must function according to some theory we haven't yet discovered.

By Susan Kruglinski, Oliver Chanarin|Tuesday, October 06, 2009



http://discovermagazine.com/2009/se...ics-is-wrong-string-theory-quantum-mechanics/

For further details, a consultation of the Thuban archives on http://cosmosdawn.com is suggested.

The Mayan mystery of 2012 and the ET-message from Hunab Ku


Decoder-Jordan-Michael (DJ) and Sarah Kate exclaim to their GrandPa Tony:
" Poppy, we are soon going to Andromeda!"

A Galactic-Cellular Dragonomy or 'Alchemical Wedding in the Heavens of the New Jurisprudence'











​

A child observing the starry sky, might experience a deep longing to 'go there'. The child might feel a deep sense of being a starchild and of coming from or of being destined of going there.

And indeed, the child's bodily form consists of stardust, as science popularisers like Carl Sagan have told their media approved audiences. The material of solar systems and their planets and lifeforms are largely constituent of third generation stardust derived from supernova explosions in a well studied and analysed nucleosynthetic transformation of the matter found in the universe since the latter's birth from its primordial string plasma about 19 billion years ago.

But how can a terrestrial spaceship travel to the stars and other galaxies?

The physical universe observed is analysed by cosmologists and astrophysicists and other scientists, amateur and professional and is found to obey particular 'laws of nature'.
Those laws, formulated in the universally applicable language of mathematics are continually refined and are made subject to experimental validification in the modus operandi of the 'human scientific endeavour' termed the 'scientific method'.
Those laws then have shown, that no material object, including the embodiment of the child DJ; can travel at a speed exceeding the 'speed of light', calculated at so 300,000 kilometers per second.

The Andromeda galaxy, sister to the Milky Way in the Local Group of galaxies and part of the local Virgo supercluster, is so 2.5 million lightyears away. This distance of about 24 billion billion kilometers would so take about 80 trillion seconds or 2.5 million years to transverse.

As a consequence, the professional nondreamers discourage children like DJ to ponder their plans of journeying to the stars. If it takes 8 years to travel at lightspeed to one of the nearest stars in Sirius; and if it takes so 26,000 years to journey to the center of our own Milky Way galaxy; then there is no chance to ever achieve intergalactic travelling in human lifetimes.

But those selfsame nondreaming scientists had also discounted the flight of the bumble-bee and the travelling through air of decaton Jumbo jets, based upon the 'lawsof nature' as they understood the latter at those nexus points of the historical timelines of the prevalent sciences.

By demonstratitive effect of the bumble-bee and transatlantic flights in prototypical aircraft; the scientific experts soon found the mathematics hidden in their books and journals of knowledge. Aerodynamic fluid flow and differential pressure gradients soon 'explained' the flight of bumble-bees and that of the spaceship prototypes and the 'laws of nature' were found to be more accomodating and less restrictive then was envisaged by the pundits of the 'scientific knowledge' and the 'scientia gnostica'.

And so grandpa Tony said to DJ: "Sure DJ; you shall visit places which seem far away, yet places you can see and experience with your imagination and locations, which trigger certain remembrances within your dreams and your conscious encounters in books, films and other media."

This treatise then shall extend the 'laws of nature' as hitherto categorized and made public by the highpriests of the scientia gnostica. Like the science of aerodynamics, this science of the HD-Lightmatrix is not a new science, but a science which was always there in the 'laws of nature' but had remained hidden.
The timeline for its unveiling had not been 'right' in the general unfoldment of the nature and the purpose for this planetary lifeform, called humanity.

But just as it takes 26,000 years for light to travel from planet earth to the center of the Milky Way galaxy; so will it take 26,000 years for the intelligence located at that center to communicate with planet earth.
This time is up!
This daycount is 5x13x144,000=9,360,000 or 25,626.81 civil years (Gregorian).

This time is actually an exact number of daycounts and independent upon how long or short such a day is in hours or minutes or in seconds. The precessional measurements are so linked, but remain peripheral to this 'measurement of 'Mayan time'.
The Mayan mystery so reduces to Hunab Ku, as the intelligence of the Milky Way galactic centre; having sent a message, which after travelling for 9,360,000 days (kin) will reach the center of the earth on December 21st, 2012. This in a nutshell is the meaning of the 2012 Mayan nexus point.

I am an agency, commissioned to elucidate the message from Hunab Ku and to prepare a platform for a new (omni-scientific) dispensation post the arrival of the galactic message.
The processing of the message from Hunab Ku is a collective task. All human and nonhuman sentiences are to partake in this processing in divers talents and creativities.

The omni-science published in this thread is a foundation of string parametric initial- and boundary conditions. This omni-science is directed at the undergraduate or college level of mathematical nous and therefore awaits collaboration with the expertise of technological applicability at the graduate levels and beyond to physically implement the technology indicated.
In using those boundary conditions, the endeavours of application- and experimental physics will be 'blessed'; because (as shall be realised in the details of the information published) to 'travel to the stars', particular boundary conditions must be satisfied to ensure successful application of mathematical formula to technological progress.

In short, to successfully 'tap' the energy one must 'ride' the lightmatrix in resonance with the parametric specifications of the construction of the lightmatrix. And it are those parametric specifications, which shall be published in the context of what the HD-Cosmic Lattice represents for the technology of a unified starhumanity, having graduated from its mode of separation characterising the old humanity before the nexus point of the warploop (from December 8th, 2004 to April 1st, 2012) and a number of 'warpdates' within this enveloping timewarp.

Introduction:

It is a well known scientific fact, that the phenomenon of magnetism is quantum reduced to electron spin.
A magnetic 'northpole' can be said to be a righthanded up-spin of an electron, the magnetic field rotating in this 'clockwise' direction about an 'northern outflow' current representing the electron moving as a current-element.
Corollarily, a magnetic 'southpole' depicts lefthanded down-spin of an electron, the magnetic field rotating 'counterclockwise' about an 'southern inflow' current of the moving electron.

In terms of the present state of establishment physics then, the phenomenon of magnetism reduces to a subset of the phenomenon of electricity in terms of the movement of electrons coupled to the latter's properties engaging those of Coulombic electric charges (electropoles), coupled to inertia, i.e. the mass carried by the electron.
The omni-physics states however the reverse, the electric current is a subset of the magnetic current, provided the origin and nature of this 'Coulombic charge' is appropriately understood in its coupling to inertia.
Then the origin of the electric charge is not fundamental, but the origin of the magnetocharge would be so.

This allows the well studied and analysed coupling of mass to electric charge to be reevaluated as being a consequence of a primordial state of uncoupling between those 'facts of observation and measurement'.

If magnetism can be reduced to quantum electron spin, then this fact alone suffices to define the magnetic phenomenon and without any necessity for the mass coupling.
Then if the massless (fermionic halfspin) electron selfstate represents a second generation emergence from a prior (bosonic full-integral spin) as a bifurcation; then this bosonic quantum integer-spin can be used to define the magnetic phenomenon as precursor for the emergence of fermionic quantum spin of the electric phenomenology.

This requires the existence of the magnetopole-bosonic full-spin quantum eigenstate prior to the existence of the electropole-fermionic half-spin quantum selfstate.
The elementary nature of the magnetopole can so be utilised to model the emergence of not only Coulombic charges, but also the emergence of inertia and of mass from a prior massless energetic eigenstate.

Massless (Goldstone) bosons exist in the form of photons, gravitons, phonons and the ancestors for the nuclear interaction carriers, which are known as massless gauge agents, giving physical reality to such labels as Higgs Boson, Weakon, Gluon, Neutrino, Axion, WIMP and RestmassPhoton.
(If a symmetry is broken explicitely, as well as spontaneously, then a Goldstone boson is said to be a pseudo-Goldstone boson and massinduction results via the explicity in status quo nomenclature).

Omni-science reconstructs just what this 'symmetry breaking' manifested in terms of superstring parameters and so naturally crystallises the massless Goldstein bosonic selfenergy as being causative for a later massinduction by an 'explicit' definition for the nature and origin of this 'mass' in the form of magnetopoles coupling AS inertia in a 'mapping' of magnetocharges onto the electrocharges.

This entails, that all mass is truly a lower dimensional form of magnetic electricity; highly densified or transformed in frequency parameters.
Massless photons are generated by the acceleration of Coulombic charges, say the oscillations of solar inertial protons undergoing nuclear fusion in the conversion of hydrogen into helium.
It is so the acceleration of the lower-dimensional electrocharge, coupled to inertia by first principles, which generates the massless photonic electromagnetic energy quantum (E=hf).

It is the acceleration of the higher-dimensional magnetocharge, not coupled to inertia by first principles, which generates the massive antiphotonic electromagnetic energy quantum (E=mc²).

There are many details to this, details which are elaborated in depth in other threads found on the linked website.
Here it suffices to state, that the nature of the magnetocurrent allows any mass to become transformed into a form of magnetic electricity coupled to electricity by the well known laws of electromagnetism, say Maxwell's Equations (with the magnetic monopole symmetry included).

As the flow of Coulombic charges induces a magnetic field (Laws of Faraday, Lenz, Ampere and Gauss) and conversely a changing magnetic field induces an electric field via electromotive force (Energy/Charge=Volt); the omniphysics of electromagnetomonoplism enables a 'higher-dimensional' physics to expand the spacetimematter restrictions of the metricated physics of Minkowski-Einstein, of Newtonian mechanics and the statutes of the present paradigm of the establishment.

Overview:

Old Mass Coordinates - de Broglie Deflaton-Scaling - Superposition of external magnetic fields onto internal electric fields - Natural Current Equivalent - ElectroMagnetoMonopolic Induction - (RestmassPhotonic Hybridisation; Frequency Modulation; Holofractalisation) - MagnetoElectroMonopolic Induction - Normal Current Equivalent - Superposition of external electric fields onto internal magnetic fields - de Broglie Inflaton-Scaling - New Mass Coordinates

1. Calculate the Phasevelocity (V_ph) of the matterwave for a constant sourcesink frequency (f_max=f*) parameter using V_ph=R.f* for a chosen displacement coordinate R.

2. Calculate the total inertia as a density function for the object to be matterwaved or 'teleported' in de Broglie parameters.

3. Convert this density function into the masseigen-frequency selfstate (f_min=1/f*) using the magnetopolic currentflow from the selfdual Planckian superstring transform.

4. Induce the Magnetopolic Natural Electricity by converting the massequivalent Normal Electricity via Biot-Savart {B=μ_oqv/4πr² ↔ Mω/2rc²}. This requires intersecting technologically generated magnetic fields to neutralise the selfinduced rotation of mass M from first principles. This then transforms the information of mass M into monopolic current I_M by inducing the Electric Field from the Magnetic Field by Electromagnetomonopolic Induction.

5. Calculate the superconductive Natural Electricity equivalent to the magnetocurrent using I_M=2ef=2eE/h in quantum holofractal terms in summation.

6. Convert the 'Natural Current' of the inertia into the frequency equivalent and apply the Newtonian Forcelaw extension as the applied EMF (Volt V=Energy/Charge).

7. Utilize the natural chirality coupling between the electromagnetic gauge agent (the so called virtual photon) to the RestmassPhoton (RMP as the gauge agent coupling fermionic matter to bosonic 'dark matter' by strongweak nuclear supersymmetry) to render the wormhole tunneling superconductive in the nonduality between wave and particle in modular duality between source-frequency and sink-frequency.

8. Utilize the holofractal nature of the HD-Lightmatrix to superquantize the attained energy eigenstate in terms of a density function, incorporating the volumar 12-dimensional brane characteristics of the RMP at the 14 TeV energy level at the RMP frequency of 3.4x10²⁷ Hertz or a wormhole perimeter of 8.9x10^-20 meters.

9. The hyperquantized volumar 'matterwaves' through interdimensional space as the microquantised RMP-volumar in the energy eigenstate of 'source-consciousness' and reintegrates the information- or data-integral after completion of the hyperdimensional lightpath.

10. Provided there exists an external electric field at the new coordinates, the encoding process for the (old mass-magnetopolic current-new mass) transformation will deencode under observation of the natural conservation laws regarding the encoded parameters of information, energy and momentums. The internal magnetic field will externalise in the remanifestation of the inertia at the new coordinates as that encodement.


The Cosmic Lattice aka the Light-Matrix of High Definition

Aye the Cosmic Lattice of the 83=Wisdom=Gnosis=Kryon=11.
With its 12-faced crystalline Dodecahedral spacetime vortices, also known as bilocated wormhole vents of the sourcesinks and the sinksources. When the 'Little Superstring' inflated in de Brogliean hyperacceleration; a scaling relationship between the encompassing metrically undefined, yet closed 11-dimensional membrane space and the expanding metric of the open 10-dimensional stringspace was implemented.

The scaled velocity of the de Brogliean phaseshift V_dB was supplementary to the lightpath X=cT of the group velocity V_g metricated and describes the intrinsic nature of all matter as higher dimensional matter waves.
{V_dB=wavelength/time=lambda.frequency=λ.f=(h/mV_g)(mc²/h )=c²/V_g >c for all V_g < c}

In the superstring cosmology of 10 dimensions and an expanding hyperbolically curved universe; the linespace of the asymptotic approach of the metrics so is restricted by the groupspeed and the lightspeed invariance given by the lightpath X=cT and with lightspeed c the upper bound for the observed velocities.

The superbrane cosmology of Matrix-M-Membrane-space in 11 dimensions of ellipsoidal-toroidal closure in a maximum modular scale of a Hubble-Radius R_max is however tachyonic in always exceeding lightspeed as its lower velocity bound.

The de Broglie phase velocity so becomes an universal constant in: {V_dB=R_max.f_max=4.793...x10⁵⁶ m/s}.
This is the (almost) instantaneous communication wavespeed of the HD-Lightmatrix and is also the 'speed of electromagnetomonopolic sourceenergy' also known as 'thought', connecting all of the dodecahedral spacetimequanta.

And crystallizes the scaled relationship between the Matrixspace and the Linespace as the function:
{R(n)=V_dB.T=V_dB/F(n)} and where the lightpath X=cT in the linespace becomes a scaled holofractal function of inverse time 1/T=F(n) in the matrixspace.
n is the dimensionless parameter defining linetime t as a function of the 11-dimensional metric encompassment as: {n=H_ot=ct/R_max for c=f_max.λ_min and for a nodal Hubble-Constant-Frequency defining the oscillation of the matrixspace in about 16.9 billion years by H_o=dn/dt}.
n also defines a dimensionless maximum-minimum metric displacement in Null-Time {n_o=λ_min/R_max=V_g/c}.

To transverse the 10-dimensional linespace in terms of the rootreduced 12-dimensional omnispace, that is the volumars of the metrications; any agglomeration of a spacetime quanta count N can be scaled to transduce the de Broglie phasespeed into a partition between displacement scale R(n) and a Matrix-Frequency F(n); provided the Cosmic Lattice can be 'tapped' or 'unbalanced' from its equilibrium Nullstate defined in the buildingblock of an individuated spacetime quantum.

The Newtonian momentum extension for the Matrixspace is given in the wave momentum {p=hf/c} of the matter waves coupled to the linear momentum {p=mv} and the energy momentum relation:

{m=m_o/Sqrt[1-(v/c)² ] by (mc²)² - (m_oc²)² = (pc)² }.
{F=d(mv)/dt=d([hfv/c²]/Sqrt[1-(v/c)²])/dt=(hf/c²).(dv/dt)/(Sqrt[1-(v/c)²])³ + (hv/c²).(df/dt)/Sqrt(1-(v/c)² );

defining: {F= F_a + F_alpha = m_o(dv/dt)/(Sqrt[1-(v/c)²])³ + (hv/c²)(df/dt)/Sqrt[1-(v/c)²]}

The linear forceterm F_a describes the relativistic particle properties of the interaction in terms of m_o, whilst the angular forceterm F_alpha is the 'vacuum' force of the matrixspace utilizing spaceawareness angular acceleration (df/dt) independent on the metric scale.

The Alpha-interaction of the matrix now becomes coupled to the linespace in the relativistic groupspeed V_g=n_oc=λ_minc/R_max as:

{(m_oV_g(df/dt)/f)/Sqrt(1-(V_g/c)² )=(m_oV_g(df/dt)/f)/Sqrt(1-n_o²)→m_oV_g(df/dt)/f)} in the limit for nulltime n_o=6.259...x10^-49 ~ 0 and defining time-instantenuity in sinkfrequency t_o=f_min=1/f_max=3.333...x10^-31 seconds* as the modular dual for sourcefrequency f_max=3x10³⁰ Hz*.

All matter thus is quantized in the formulation through the masseigen frequency f_min of the instanton:

{Energy E=hf=mc²
E=hf iff m_o=0 in E² + E_o² = (pc)²
E=mc² iff f_o=f_min in E² + E_o² = (pc)²}

A mass agglomeration m_o, in matrixspace and of momentum m_oV_g , so becomes subject to the quantum angular acceleration awareness differential (df/dt) acting on a linear time segment 1/f=t.

The awareness differential for spacial volumar selfconsciousness is maximised in the permutation entropy counter (f_max)²=9x10⁶⁰ and minimised in the modular dual reciprocal of the sourcesink in the sinksource 1/(f_max)² as the inertial maximum of maximum 'free space' impedance.

The matrix M-space Alpha-Interaction so replaces the momentum change of the Newtonian F=ma=m(dv/dt)=dp/dt
by a frequency scale change F=mv(df/dt)t=p(df/dt)t.

The de Brogliean phase velocity of inflation so renders the inflaton Hubble Event Horizon R_max=c/H_o=λ_min/n_o as the upper bound for modulated scales of linear displacement.

The demetricated parametrisations for the generalised Schwarzschild solution for the HD Lightmatrix are:

{Displacement-Curvature: R(n)=R_max[n/(n+1)] and for dn/dt=H_o

Velocity-Derivative: V(n,t)=dR/dt=(dR(n)/dn)(dn/dt)=c/[n+1]²

Acceleration-Derivative: A(n,t)=d²R/dt²=(dV(n,t)/dn)(dn/dt)=-2cH_o/[n+1]³}

The M-space containing metric is defined in the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE (ZPE) of the minimum metric configuration as Planckian Harmonic Oscillator:

{E_o= ½hf_max=½m_maxc²=G_om_maxM/R(n_o) for R(n_o)=2G_oM/c²

with R(n_o)=R_max[n_o/(n_o+1)] > λ_min=ct_o as the minimised lightpath X=cT and maximised in the de Broglie event horizon R(n→∞)=R_max (asymptotically approached in infinite linearised time t).

The total inertial mass of the universe is then M_total =ρ_critical.V_critical=for a critical density for (spherical 3D)closure (inclusive the gravitational, but noninertial matrix energy classified as dark or hidden) of:

{ρ_critical= 3M_total/4πR_max³=3R_maxc²/8πG_oR_max³=3H_o²/8πG_o}.

The critical de Broglien phase acceleration A_dB=R_max.f_max² of the inflaton-instanton of metric spacetime then is superposed onto a 'dark energy' cosmological boundary acceleration given in the gravitational curvature potential of the initial conditions and for a inertial baryon mass seedling M_o as:

{A(n_o) =G_oM_o/λ_min² =(M_o/2M_total)A_dB=(deceleration parameter q_o)(matterwave hyperacceleration)}.

The deceleration parameter q_o also defines a quasar wall cosmological redshift boundary specifying a galactic supercluster gravitationally interaction scale at z=7.477 for a Sarkar-Curvature of R_Sarkar =2G_oM_o/c² of about 236.5 million lightyears in q_o.R_max=72.4 Mpc.

Higher cosmological redshifts define a cosmogony of ylemic (dineutron) protostar epoch, where the thermodynamic Planck Black Body radiator expansion specified a temperature background which gave the gravitational potential of crystallising VPE-vents as a function of this temperature and quantum parameters independenyt on the inertia equivalents of subsequent Chandrasekhar neutron stars of 3x10³⁰ kg.

This concludes some detailed excursions into the Cosmic Lattice aka the High Definition Lightmatrix of the universal cosmogenesis.
This message is part of the High Definition Lightmatrix Definition post and is reproduced in connectivity with appropriate mathematical symbol representation on the linked website.

Shiloh, October 3rd, 2013



Last edited by shiloh on Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:41 pm; edited 2 times in total

 

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°39

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

shiloh on Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:21 pm
shiloh wrote:

​

SUSAN - Posted Dec 1st 2010

Have Physicists Found Echoes From Before the Big Bang?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...icists-found-echoes-from-before-the-big-bang/
.

​

The Big Bang was not the beginning, Roger Penrose believes.

The eminent Oxford physicist has long advocated the wild idea of “conformal cyclic cosmology,” a cyclical universe without beginning or end in which the Big Bang 13.75 billion years ago was simply one of many. This month, Penrose pushed his idea further: His team says it has detected a pattern in the cosmic microwave background—radiation left over from just after the Big Bang—that represents the echo of events that occurred before the Big Bang itself.

Penrose examined the data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), the mission that just completed nine years of surveying the cosmic microwave background across the sky. His study points to concentric circular patterns in the WMAP data where he says he found something surprising:

The circular features are regions where tiny temperature variations in the otherwise uniform microwave background are smaller than average. Those features, Penrose said, cannot be explained by the highly successful inflation theory, which posits that the infant cosmos underwent an enormous growth spurt, ballooning from something on the scale of an atom to the size of a grapefruit during the universe’s first tiny fraction of a second.
Inflation would either erase such patterns or could not easily generate them. [Science News]
By Penrose’s thinking, those circles are the calling cards of something big that happened in the universe before our Big Bang and reverberated after it. Like the birth and death of previous universes.

From calculations made by Penrose, he believes that as each universe evolved, the catastrophic collisions between supermassive black holes (the black hole behemoths living in the centers of galaxies) would have generated gravitational waves within that universe’s lifetime.
When the next universe exploded into being, these gravitational waves were converted into energy, ensuring their “fingerprint” bled through to the next universe.
The pulse of energy caused by the transfer of gravitational waves from one universe to the next would have caused a kick to the distribution of dark matter, creating uniform, spherical patterns in the current universe. [Discovery News]
So what are we to make of this? I put it to cosmologist Paul Davies, who says the question rests with inflation.

“Penrose was always been a doubter of inflation,” Davies says. “It’s against the fashion of the moment, but that’s fine. (And) if you abandon inflation, what happened before the Big Bang could leave an echo.”
That’s because inflation would smooth out that echo. (Another possibility, he says, is idea of “incomplete inflation,” in which inflation could have existed but not been thorough enough to smooth out all echoes.
That theory wouldn’t require abandoning inflation to accommodate an echo in the microwave background.)
However, Davies says, even if the finding is correct, this explanation for it —a black hole smash-up from before the Big Bang leaving its fingerprint after the Big Bang —isn’t the only possibility. “People have been looking for concentric rings in the cosmic microwave background for a while,” he says, because such a finding could support several different ideas.
One of those alternate explanations plays on the idea of our universe being a “bubble” created by inflation; if two bubbles collided, he says, the result could leave a cosmic microwave echo.
Lastly, he says, the source of the study makes it a tad suspect.
“You’d expect people at the sharp end of the data to make an announcement like this.
You wouldn’t expect a mathematician.” So I asked Charles Barrett, who was the lead investigator of WMAP, and in his reply email he too expressed skepticism:
“Unfortunately, the paper does not provide the necessary detail on how they performed their calculations.
I am concerned that the noise properties and pattern of the WMAP instrumental sky sampling were not properly taken into account in their analysis.
If these are not handled correctly then spurious results are likely. In my opinion, the paper should have specified the data analysis steps in detail, but it did not.”

Penrose counters that he looked at not only WMAP but also data from a second mission, BOOMERang, which confirmed the pattern he saw.
At the moment, then, these huge claims about the nature of the universe are bogged down in competing calculations and critiques of calculations. The future of this question could lie with the Planck mission by the European Space Agency, which is presently mapping the cosmic microwave background in greater detail than WMAP.
In the meantime, we get to wonder. Says physicist Shaun Cole:
“It’s a revolutionary theory and here there appears to be some data that supports it.
In the standard Big Bang model, there’s nothing cyclic; it has a beginning and it has no end.
The philosophical question that’s sensible to ask is ‘what came before the Big Bang?’; and what they’re striving for here is to do away with that ‘there’s nothing before’ answer by making it cyclical.” [BBC News]


Shiloh - Posted Dec 2nd 2010

Roger Penrose, whose work I often use in Quantum Relativity; is basically on the right path of reconstructing the cosmogenesis.
However the cyclic universe is built on its own protoversal seed and the 'Big Crunches' are electromagnetic and not inertial.

This means, that there will be no gravitational contraction in a shrinking of the protoverse; but the electromagnetic lightpath becomes multidimensional and multivalued. One can so model this on a cyclic electromagnetic cosmology with a 'Hubble heartbeat' of a semibeat of so 16.9 Billion years. This also allows a cosmogenetic Black Hole-White Hole evolution, which resets the wormhole singularity every 4 trillion years or so to eschew any theorized 'heat death' of the universe, due to the stellar generations 'running out' of their nuclear fuel of the nucleosynthesis of the primordial elements, based on hydrogen, helium and lithium.

Indeed, the Inflation PRECEDED the Big Bang and this is the simple solution for the 'inflation paradoxes' as some might term it.

The WMAP data in the picture in this post actually is descriptive for the wavequark model in Quantum Relativity with an inner gluonic (anti)neutrino kernel or core, an Inner Mesonic (down quark) Ring and an Outer Leptonic (strange quark) Ring.

It is just the 'New Standard Model' of Unitary Symmetry for the quarkian waves as "matter waves". The smallest quantum as microcosmic reality written in the galactic sky of the macrocosm.


Discover Interview: Roger Penrose Says Physics Is Wrong, From String Theory to Quantum Mechanics
One of the greatest thinkers in physics says the human brain—and the universe itself—must function according to some theory we haven't yet discovered.

By Susan Kruglinski, Oliver Chanarin|Tuesday, October 06, 2009



http://discovermagazine.com/2009/se...ics-is-wrong-string-theory-quantum-mechanics/


Roger Penrose could easily be excused for having a big ego. A theorist whose name will be forever linked with such giants as Hawking and Einstein, Penrose has made fundamental contributions to physics, mathematics, and geometry. He reinterpreted general relativity to prove that black holes can form from dying stars. He invented twistor theory—a novel way to look at the structure of space-time—and so led us to a deeper understanding of the nature of gravity. He discovered a remarkable family of geometric forms that came to be known as Penrose tiles. He even moonlighted as a brain researcher, coming up with a provocative theory that consciousness arises from quantum-mechanical processes. And he wrote a series of incredibly readable, best-selling science books to boot.

And yet the 78-year-old Penrose—now an emeritus professor at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford—seems to live the humble life of a researcher just getting started in his career. His small office is cramped with the belongings of the six other professors with whom he shares it, and at the end of the day you might find him rushing off to pick up his 9-year-old son from school. With the curiosity of a man still trying to make a name for himself, he cranks away on fundamental, wide-ranging questions: How did the universe begin? Are there higher dimensions of space and time? Does the current front-running theory in theoretical physics, string theory, actually make sense?
Because he has lived a lifetime of complicated calculations, though, Penrose has quite a bit more perspective than the average starting scientist. To get to the bottom of it all, he insists, physicists must force themselves to grapple with the greatest riddle of them all: the relationship between the rules that govern fundamental particles and the rules that govern the big things—like us—that those particles make up. In his powwow with DISCOVER contributing editor Susan Kruglinksi, Penrose did not flinch from questioning the central tenets of modern physics, including string theory and quantum mechanics. Physicists will never come to grips with the grand theories of the universe, Penrose holds, until they see past the blinding distractions of today’s half-baked theories to the deepest layer of the reality in which we live.


You come from a colorful family of overachievers, don’t you?
My older brother is a distinguished theoretical physicist, a fellow of the Royal Society. My younger brother ended up the British chess champion 10 times, a record. My father came from a Quaker family. His father was a professional artist who did portraits—very traditional, a lot of religious subjects. The family was very strict. I don’t think we were even allowed to read novels, certainly not on Sundays. My father was one of four brothers, all of whom were very good artists. One of them became well known in the art world, Sir Roland. He was cofounder of the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London. My father himself was a human geneticist who was recognized for demonstrating that older mothers tend to get more Down syndrome children, but he had lots of scientific interests.


How did your father influence your thinking?
The important thing about my father was that there wasn’t any boundary between his work and what he did for fun. That rubbed off on me. He would make puzzles and toys for his children and grandchildren. He used to have a little shed out back where he cut things from wood with his little pedal saw. I remember he once made a slide rule with about 12 different slides, with various characters that we could combine in complicated ways. Later in his life he spent a lot of time making wooden models that reproduced themselves—what people now refer to as artificial life. These were simple devices that, when linked together, would cause other bits to link together in the same way. He sat in his woodshed and cut these things out of wood in great, huge numbers.


So I assume your father helped spark your discovery of Penrose tiles, repeating shapes that fit together to form a solid surface with pentagonal symmetry.
It was silly in a way. I remember asking him—I was around 9 years old—about whether you could fit regular hexagons together and make it round like a sphere. And he said, “No, no, you can’t do that, but you can do it with pentagons,” which was a surprise to me. He showed me how to make polyhedra, and so I got started on that.


Are Penrose tiles useful or just beautiful?
My interest in the tiles has to do with the idea of a universe controlled by very simple forces, even though we see complications all over the place. The tilings follow conventional rules to make complicated patterns. It was an attempt to see how the complicated could be satisfied by very simple rules that reflect what we see in the world.


The artist M. C. Escher was influenced by your geometric inventions. What was the story there?
In my second year as a graduate student at Cambridge, I attended the International Congress of Mathematicians in Amsterdam. I remember seeing one of the lecturers there I knew quite well, and he had this catalog. On the front of it was the Escher picture Day and Night, the one with birds going in opposite directions. The scenery is nighttime on one side and daytime on the other. I remember being intrigued by this, and I asked him where he got it. He said, “Oh, well, there’s an exhibition you might be interested in of some artist called Escher.” So I went and was very taken by these very weird and wonderful things that I’d never seen anything like. I decided to try and draw some impossible scenes myself and came up with this thing that’s referred to as a tri-bar. It’s a triangle that looks like a three-dimensional object, but actually it’s impossible for it to be three-dimensional. I showed it to my father and he worked out some impossible buildings and things. Then we published an article in the British Journal of Psychology on this stuff and acknowledged Escher.


Escher saw the article and was inspired by it?
He used two things from the article. One was the tri-bar, used in his lithograph called Waterfall. Another was the impossible staircase, which my father had worked on and designed. Escher used it in Ascending and Descending, with monks going round and round the stairs. I met Escher once, and I gave him some tiles that will make a repeating pattern, but not until you’ve got 12 of them fitted together. He did this, and then he wrote to me and asked me how it was done—what was it based on? So I showed him a kind of bird shape that did this, and he incorporated it into what I believe is the last picture he ever produced, called Ghosts.

Is it true that you were bad at math as a kid?
I was unbelievably slow. I lived in Canada for a while, for about six years, during the war. When I was 8, sitting in class, we had to do this mental arithmetic very fast, or what seemed to me very fast. I always got lost. And the teacher, who didn’t like me very much, moved me down a class. There was one rather insightful teacher who decided, after I’d done so badly on these tests, that he would have timeless tests. You could just take as long as you’d like. We all had the same test. I was allowed to take the entire next period to continue, which was a play period. Everyone was always out and enjoying themselves, and I was struggling away to do these tests. And even then sometimes it would stretch into the period beyond that. So I was at least twice as slow as anybody else. Eventually I would do very well. You see, if I could do it that way, I would get very high marks.

​

You have called the real-world implications of quantum physics nonsensical. What is your objection?
Quantum mechanics is an incredible theory that explains all sorts of things that couldn’t be explained before, starting with the stability of atoms. But when you accept the weirdness of quantum mechanics [in the macro world], you have to give up the idea of space-time as we know it from Einstein. The greatest weirdness here is that it doesn’t make sense. If you follow the rules, you come up with something that just isn’t right.


In quantum mechanics an object can exist in many states at once, which sounds crazy. The quantum description of the world seems completely contrary to the world as we experience it.
It doesn’t make any sense, and there is a simple reason. You see, the mathematics of quantum mechanics has two parts to it. One is the evolution of a quantum system, which is described extremely precisely and accurately by the Schrödinger equation. That equation tells you this: If you know what the state of the system is now, you can calculate what it will be doing 10 minutes from now. However, there is the second part of quantum mechanics—the thing that happens when you want to make a measurement. Instead of getting a single answer, you use the equation to work out the probabilities of certain outcomes. The results don’t say, “This is what the world is doing.” Instead, they just describe the probability of its doing any one thing. The equation should describe the world in a completely deterministic way, but it doesn’t.


Erwin Schrödinger, who created that equation, was considered a genius. Surely he appreciated that conflict.
Schrödinger was as aware of this as anybody. He talks about his hypothetical cat and says, more or less, “Okay, if you believe what my equation says, you must believe that this cat is dead and alive at the same time.” He says, “That’s obviously nonsense, because it’s not like that. Therefore, my equation can’t be right for a cat. So there must be some other factor involved.”


So Schrödinger himself never believed that the cat analogy reflected the nature of reality?
Oh yes, I think he was pointing this out. I mean, look at three of the biggest figures in quantum mechanics, Schrödinger, Einstein, and Paul Dirac. They were all quantum skeptics in a sense. Dirac is the one whom people find most surprising, because he set up the whole foundation, the general framework of quantum mechanics. People think of him as this hard-liner, but he was very cautious in what he said. When he was asked, “What’s the answer to the measurement problem?” his response was, “Quantum mechanics is a provisional theory. Why should I look for an answer in quantum mechanics?” He didn’t believe that it was true. But he didn’t say this out loud much.


Yet the analogy of Schrödinger’s cat is always presented as a strange reality that we have to accept. Doesn’t the concept drive many of today’s ideas about theoretical physics?
That’s right. People don’t want to change the Schrödinger equation, leading them to what’s called the “many worlds” interpretation of quantum mechanics.


That interpretation says that all probabilities are playing out somewhere in parallel universes?
It says OK, the cat is somehow alive and dead at the same time. To look at that cat, you must become a superposition [two states existing at the same time] of you seeing the live cat and you seeing the dead cat. Of course, we don’t seem to experience that, so the physicists have to say, well, somehow your consciousness takes one route or the other route without your knowing it. You’re led to a completely crazy point of view. You’re led into this “many worlds” stuff, which has no relationship to what we actually perceive.


The idea of parallel universes—many worlds—is a very human-centered idea, as if everything has to be understood from the perspective of what we can detect with our five senses.
The trouble is, what can you do with it? Nothing. You want a physical theory that describes the world that we see around us. That’s what physics has always been: Explain what the world that we see does, and why or how it does it. Many worlds quantum mechanics doesn’t do that. Either you accept it and try to make sense of it, which is what a lot of people do, or, like me, you say no—that’s beyond the limits of what quantum mechanics can tell us. Which is, surprisingly, a very uncommon position to take. My own view is that quantum mechanics is not exactly right, and I think there’s a lot of evidence for that. It’s just not direct experimental evidence within the scope of current experiments.


In general, the ideas in theoretical physics seem increasingly fantastical. Take string theory. All that talk about 11 dimensions or our universe’s existing on a giant membrane seems surreal.
You’re absolutely right. And in a certain sense, I blame quantum mechanics, because people say, “Well, quantum mechanics is so nonintuitive; if you believe that, you can believe anything that’s nonintuitive.” But, you see, quantum mechanics has a lot of experimental support, so you’ve got to go along with a lot of it. Whereas string theory has no experimental support.


I understand you are setting out this critique of quantum mechanics in your new book.
The book is called Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe. Each of those words stands for a major theoretical physics idea. The fashion is string theory; the fantasy has to do with various cosmological schemes, mainly inflationary cosmology [which suggests that the universe inflated exponentially within a small fraction of a second after the Big Bang]. Big fish, those things are. It’s almost sacrilegious to attack them. And the other one, even more sacrilegious, is quantum mechanics at all levels—so that’s the faith. People somehow got the view that you really can’t question it.


A few years ago you suggested that gravity is what separates the classical world from the quantum one. Are there enough people out there putting quantum mechanics to this kind of test?
No, although it’s sort of encouraging that there are people working on it at all. It used to be thought of as a sort of crackpot, fringe activity that people could do when they were old and retired. Well, I am old and retired! But it’s not regarded as a central, as a mainstream activity, which is a shame.


After Newton, and again after Einstein, the way people thought about the world shifted. When the puzzle of quantum mechanics is solved, will there be another revolution in thinking?
It’s hard to make predictions. Ernest Rutherford said his model of the atom [which led to nuclear physics and the atomic bomb] would never be of any use. But yes, I would be pretty sure that it will have a huge influence. There are things like how quantum mechanics could be used in biology. It will eventually make a huge difference, probably in all sorts of unimaginable ways.


In your book The Emperor’s New Mind, you posited that consciousness emerges from quantum physical actions within the cells of the brain. Two decades later, do you stand by that?
In my view the conscious brain does not act according to classical physics. It doesn’t even act according to conventional quantum mechanics. It acts according to a theory we don’t yet have. This is being a bit big-headed, but I think it’s a little bit like William Harvey’s discovery of the circulation of blood. He worked out that it had to circulate, but the veins and arteries just peter out, so how could the blood get through from one to the other? And he said, “Well, it must be tiny little tubes there, and we can’t see them, but they must be there.” Nobody believed it for some time. So I’m still hoping to find something like that—some structure that preserves coherence, because I believe it ought to be there.


When physicists finally understand the core of quantum physics, what do you think the theory will look like?
I think it will be beautiful.

[4:41:49 AM-Friday, October 4th, 2013 +10UCT]
[2:52:23 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[2:53:06 AM] Shiloh: yes and our job is done, so we are getting more 'normal' and irritated with all things including our own human stuff
[2:53:43 AM] Shiloh: In the timewarp, we were banned from Camelot around April 6th, 2011
[2:54:02 AM] Shiloh: This is October 1st, 2013
[2:54:29 AM] Shiloh: So we feeling the 'war' with them for the next month or so now
[2:54:38 AM] Sirius 17: oh i see
[2:55:04 AM] Shiloh: November 1st 2013 will be like March 5th, 2011
[2:55:10 AM] Sirius 17: yes too much time to feel and think about our own mortality
[2:55:58 AM] Shiloh: And so the Fukushima tsunami is mapping in the mirror of October 27th or so
[2:56:24 AM] Shiloh: We went there around February 22nd or so
[2:56:42 AM] Shiloh: This becomes around November 12th
[2:56:44 AM] Sirius 17: i kept thinking if the Logos wants me dead it should do it quicker lol, then of course i felt bad thinking this way and that i am not going to die, well not the way i think i guess
[2:56:53 AM] Sirius 17: hmmm wow that is interesting
[2:57:11 AM] Shiloh: I dont know; but I think by age 60 there must be some change in me
[2:57:24 AM] Shiloh: I dont see myself becoming an old man
[2:57:42 AM] Shiloh: Yes this Ison thing is here now
[2:57:47 AM] Sirius 17: yes
[2:58:00 AM] Sirius 17: and it is from outside our solar system
[2:58:12 AM] Sirius 17: i really think its means 'invasion' time
[2:58:20 AM] Shiloh: In many forms
[2:58:23 AM] Sirius 17: yes
[2:58:34 AM] Shiloh: Try to watch those videos with my last post
[2:58:49 AM] Sirius 17: i almost finished the nabs one about dulce
[2:58:56 AM] Shiloh: It drags on
[2:59:10 AM] Shiloh: Watch the shorter ones with Kaku and Hawking
[2:59:15 AM] Sirius 17: and while it did have some syncro it was pretty much BS of the highest order at about the half way point
[2:59:22 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[2:59:49 AM] Sirius 17: but i have seen clips and interviews about the same subject and years ago i did read the dulce papers
[2:59:59 AM] Sirius 17: but this reminds me of Bill's Serpo project
[3:00:09 AM] Sirius 17: they just make this shit up at will to make money
[3:00:22 AM] Sirius 17: sell books, create controversy you know
[3:00:32 AM] Sirius 17: spinning it all on half truths and rumors
[3:00:44 AM] Shiloh: Yes there is a big component of this and Nabsers like Carol cant see it; blaming Dacos instead
[3:00:48 AM] Sirius 17: like you said the human imagination is so powerful at weaving incredible stories
[3:01:30 AM] Shiloh: See the videos of the galaxies merging?
[3:01:33 AM] Sirius 17: yes well like we said before, she cannot get past the Dragon symbol and archetype
[3:01:40 AM] Shiloh: Idiotic
[3:01:48 AM] Shiloh: Proud and vain actually
[3:02:05 AM] Sirius 17: to her the mere mention of Draco conjures images of a horney horned Devil in her mind lol, forked tongue and all
[3:02:26 AM] Shiloh: http://www.themistsofavalon.net/t6759p30-the-factuals-versus-the-nabs
[3:02:29 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[3:02:51 AM] Shiloh: Mindfuc11ed most of the chicks there
[3:03:04 AM] Shiloh: This Jenetta is a nabser too
[3:03:08 AM] Shiloh: I like Sanicle though
[3:03:54 AM] Sirius 17: oh i like this milky way and andromeda merger
[3:04:15 AM] Sirius 17: looks like the triangulum galaxy comes into play too
[3:04:48 AM] Sirius 17: yeah i like Sanicle too, she seems at least open to logical discourse somewhat
[3:06:10 AM] Shiloh: Yes she is the sort of Nabs which i can accomodate as not being Nabs
[3:09:37 AM] Sirius 17: oh yeah the first video is better, explains the time factor
[3:09:51 AM] Shiloh: I found 3 of them
[3:10:02 AM] Sirius 17: lol billions and billions of years...."carl sagan's voice"
[3:10:04 AM] Shiloh: All relevant to my deeper exposition following
[3:10:37 AM] Shiloh: It includes the ET factor see
[3:10:44 AM] Shiloh: Kaku in the 3rd
[3:10:56 AM] Sirius 17: yes the eternal dance...you romantic devil
[3:11:06 AM] Shiloh: Well Abba and Baab
[3:11:12 AM] Shiloh: One day I will dance like that again
[3:11:26 AM] Sirius 17: yes you will
[3:11:41 AM] Shiloh: Young virile bodies for us dear
[3:11:56 AM] Shiloh: I am still virile lol but cant move like that
[3:12:21 AM] Shiloh: Amazing though, that noone appreciates those posts
[3:12:43 AM] Shiloh: Reading them must surely indicate it is well informed
[3:12:58 AM] Shiloh: So science lover-freak Carol has no words for it
[3:13:18 AM] Shiloh: Showing her fakeness in regards to science
[3:13:25 AM] Sirius 17: i know it is mind blowing that no one at least comments and says, wow Shiloh, this must of taken you quite some time and nice graphics ect ect...
[3:13:36 AM] Sirius 17: something
[3:13:44 AM] Sirius 17: no they fuc11ing hate it apparently
[3:13:51 AM] Shiloh: They are 'afraid' lol very afraid of what it means for them should it be true
[3:14:02 AM] Sirius 17: yes likely
[3:14:07 AM] Shiloh: I know they are
[3:14:26 AM] Shiloh: Why idiot 44 still tries to bring dragons into her BS
[3:14:52 AM] Sirius 17: she misses us lol
[3:14:58 AM] Sirius 17: can't get us out of her head
[3:15:46 AM] Shiloh: I dont know
[3:15:58 AM] Shiloh: i dont miss her babble though
[3:16:10 AM] Sirius 17: me neither
[3:16:51 AM] Sirius 17: but that last post where she mentions us as 'copy cats' was so incoherent that i just shook my head and wondered wtf is going on inside her brain
[3:17:35 AM] Sirius 17:
View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uabNtlLfYyU#t=85[3:17:54
AM] Sirius 17: time marker 1:58 or so, curiosity killed the cats
[3:18:11 AM] Sirius 17: yes where the hell is the curiousity of the moabytes
[3:18:19 AM] Sirius 17: of the why and how
[3:18:56 AM] Shiloh: Lol
[3:19:20 AM] Shiloh: If it is above their head, like real science, they dismiss it as conspiracies
[3:20:02 AM] Shiloh: Other people labeled us as copycats and plagiarisers of others works remember?
[3:20:43 AM] Shiloh: As other people know better than Thuban, DD and Carol and lot then use their 'critical thinking' to make their 'choices'
[3:20:48 AM] Sirius 17: time marker 3.36...there it is, the solution is outside of time and space, so simple yet i doubt any of them even watched these videos
[3:20:59 AM] Sirius 17: yes i know, parrots we are
[3:21:28 AM] Sirius 17: and all your science papers that YOU wrote must be copied from elsewhere....where i wonder lol
[3:21:47 AM] Shiloh: Yes how often did we say space and time are required for physicality
[3:21:57 AM] Sirius 17: god forbid you actually wrote something on your own Tony....its unthinkable
[3:22:20 AM] Shiloh: Oh yes, I am too stupid to create anything by myself
[3:22:47 AM] Shiloh: So I am deceiving people as evil draco in stealing other human's ideas
[3:22:59 AM] Shiloh: Lawlessline said this or such
[3:23:42 AM] Shiloh: But you see in all 3 videos that at the end they have no answers
[3:23:51 AM] Shiloh: So I gave the answers
[3:23:56 AM] Sirius 17: yes
[3:24:16 AM] Shiloh: For our testimony not for human judgements on it
[3:24:40 AM] Shiloh: This is the last thing to do imo
[3:24:58 AM] Shiloh: Just to put it there for their bebafflements and ignorance
[3:25:19 AM] Shiloh: This Penrose pic is nice
[3:25:34 AM] Shiloh: It is just the New Standard Model of the quarkian waves
[3:25:38 AM] Shiloh: Matter waves
[3:26:04 AM] Shiloh: The smallest quantum written in the galactic sky
[3:26:58 AM] Sirius 17:
View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wHHz4mB9GKY#t=75

[3:27:01 AM] Sirius 17: 1:15 lol
[3:27:20 AM] Sirius 17: relativity is perfectly intelligible to anyone who is able to think
[3:29:47 AM] Shiloh: Not many apparently
[3:31:57 AM] Sirius 17: i am watching the kaku video now
[3:32:31 AM] Shiloh: Yes he mentions the ET civilisations as a consequence of evolution
[3:43:30 AM] Sirius 17: hahaha Bambie vs Godzilla
[3:43:36 AM] Sirius 17: oh dear
[3:49:34 AM] Sirius 17: god kaku is so smart, i really like this guy and his rationality
[3:50:38 AM] Shiloh: He is ok yes
[3:50:45 AM] Shiloh: I added Penrose to the message
[3:50:50 AM] Shiloh: Discover Interview: Roger Penrose Says Physics Is Wrong, From String Theory to Quantum Mechanics
One of the greatest thinkers in physics says the human brain—and the universe itself—must function according to some theory we haven't yet discovered.

By Susan Kruglinski, Oliver Chanarin|Tuesday, October 06, 2009


http://discovermagazine.com/2009/se...ics-is-wrong-string-theory-quantum-mechanics/
For further details, a consultation of the Thuban archives on http://cosmosdawn.com is suggested.
[3:51:30 AM] Sirius 17: yes i have not gotten to that part yet, i am on the last kaku video
[3:52:02 AM] Sirius 17: but Michio is right, we are on the verge of either taking off onto a new civilization or destroying ourselves
[3:52:14 AM] Sirius 17: precarious times to witness
[3:54:22 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[3:54:30 AM] Shiloh: This is it
[3:54:43 AM] Shiloh: Why our 'death' is pointless in the cosmic sense
[4:15:13 AM] Sirius 17: humm yes i like this penrose article
[4:16:03 AM] Shiloh: I am posting it
[4:30:21 AM] Shiloh: Done
[4:30:37 AM] Shiloh: Of course he is wrong about strings as we understand them
[4:30:42 AM] Sirius 17:
1. Calculate the Phasevelocity (Vph) of the matterwave for a constant sourcesink frequency (fmax=f*) parameter using Vph=R.f* for a chosen displacement coordinate R.

2. Calculate the total inertia as a density function for the object to be matterwaved or 'teleported' in de Broglie parameters.

3. Convert this density function into the masseigen-frequency selfstate (fmin=1/f*) using the magnetopolic currentflow from the selfdual Planckian superstring transform.

[4:30:55 AM] Shiloh: But he is right about them in terms of parallel universe crapola
[4:31:02 AM] Sirius 17: lol Tony this is way too deep for anyone to understand your talking first principles
[4:31:18 AM] Shiloh: Yes it is not for humans
[4:31:27 AM] Sirius 17: i didn't paste all the 'instructions' here but its funny to me
[4:31:38 AM] Shiloh: And I cant do those calculations in the required detail either
[4:32:02 AM] Sirius 17: well the ETs can
[4:32:18 AM] Shiloh: But the new physics can use this somewhat in the form of summation integrals like in the consciousness paper
[4:32:36 AM] Sirius 17: yeah once they can 'see' it
[4:32:52 AM] Sirius 17: problem is they have to get out of the current paradigm limitations to be able to see it
[4:33:01 AM] Sirius 17: they are so very much box thinkers
[4:33:04 AM] Shiloh: Those 10 instructions are however as you said the basic principles and those I can explain as I did in the rest of the message
[4:33:47 AM] Shiloh: It is the micro-macro quantization and this is what the resurrection physics is
[4:34:09 AM] Shiloh: The intro in bold is the general rundown
[4:34:30 AM] Shiloh: Mass to magnetics to electricity then reversed
[4:34:37 AM] Sirius 17: yeah i figured this, transformation physics yes
[4:34:54 AM] Shiloh: But I put this there for Carol and co to see how limited they are
[4:35:00 AM] Sirius 17: how to trap the hubble heart beat within the finitum
[4:35:02 AM] Shiloh: They always ask for details see?
[4:35:27 AM] Shiloh: So there are some they wont get from the quacks like MacCanney
[4:35:33 AM] Shiloh: Or Keshe etc
[4:36:00 AM] Sirius 17: it just kills me, if they only read through this stuff a little slowly and methodically they could see how beautiful it is
[4:36:17 AM] Sirius 17: or maybe i am dreaming
[4:36:26 AM] Shiloh: No it is all selfconsistent
[4:36:42 AM] Shiloh: The Legacy post shows this and tries to prove it
[4:36:44 AM] Sirius 17: but really that is all i did is read it slowly, sometimes over and over until i could see it
[4:37:06 AM] Sirius 17: of course we have had hours of discussion and so on
[4:37:37 AM] Sirius 17: i don't know , it seems that anyone interested even slightly could see this
[4:37:49 AM] Shiloh: Well imo you are the only person, who can comment on the overviews
[4:37:59 AM] Shiloh: They are fakes
[4:38:08 AM] Shiloh: Their Nabs science is pure fake
[4:38:10 AM] Sirius 17: i am still not entirely sure how it is i understand some things
[4:38:31 AM] Shiloh: Floyd is no fake, but he has no science education to understand it
[4:38:53 AM] Sirius 17: no and some understanding of the sciences is required
[4:39:11 AM] Shiloh: I feel Carol is rather annoyed with those posts
[4:39:17 AM] Shiloh: Unsettling
[4:39:29 AM] Sirius 17: you cannot dismiss for example what physics already knows, such as relativity, quantum theory ect, it all goes together with the omni science
[4:39:53 AM] Sirius 17: because it requires deep thought to understand it
[4:39:57 AM] Shiloh: Because all her conspiracy science crap is right there in a novel form, which would even surprise the conspirators
[4:39:59 AM] Sirius 17: and to learn a new language
[4:40:14 AM] Sirius 17: they are not familar with the language of science, let alone omni-science
[4:40:30 AM] Sirius 17: its work
[4:40:40 AM] Sirius 17: takes effort
[4:40:40 AM] Shiloh: Can you see Jenetta or Burgundia read science words and not to call Devakas?
[4:40:51 AM] Sirius 17: oh hell no
[4:41:00 AM] Shiloh: Easier to call us names and evil dragons
[4:41:16 AM] Shiloh: Let them sit in their judgement seats
[4:41:21 AM] Sirius 17: yes and this is a microscopic example of the world, far easier to point fingers then to solve problems
[4:41:25 AM] Shiloh: But Carol pretends to like science
[4:41:33 AM] Sirius 17: yes as does Brook
[4:41:35 AM] Shiloh: This is the hypocrisy
[4:41:39 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[4:41:42 AM] Shiloh: They run
[4:41:49 AM] Sirius 17: but when shi20 gets too heavy even for her she goes total NABS
[4:42:17 AM] Sirius 17: i like how Penrose thinks
[4:42:26 AM] Sirius 17: he is a pragmatic fellow
[4:42:39 AM] Sirius 17: interesting his history that he struggled with math
[4:42:47 AM] Shiloh: It is a Nabs forum and only differs from Ryan and Cassidy in having a dislike for the formers and latters
[4:42:52 AM] Shiloh: The info is just as bad and biased towards their agendas of 'love and light' sillinesses and their schisms
[4:43:11 AM] Shiloh: Yes I saw this and this was just like me in grade 8; when I was more interested in Sonja than algebra and trigonometry
[4:43:18 AM] Shiloh: I wanted it slowly or not at all
[4:43:26 AM] Sirius 17: and i agree with him, no one should be timed on tests, its like you finish when you have solved it, each person has their own timing in this and with practice comes speed
[4:43:40 AM] Sirius 17: and confindence
[4:43:55 AM] Sirius 17: this is what happend to me, they ripped my confidence when i was little
[4:44:05 AM] Sirius 17: because i was slow i was told i was too dumb
[4:44:09 AM] Shiloh: Yes, me too; but I was simply disinterested in mathematics and the calculations, algebras in those days
[4:44:12 AM] Sirius 17: and after a while you believe it
[4:44:20 AM] Shiloh: I have Mercury in Taurus lol
[4:44:31 AM] Sirius 17: i have to work twice as hard as anyone else to get math
[4:44:34 AM] Sirius 17: and to keep it
[4:44:38 AM] Shiloh: I always hated time pressure
[4:44:42 AM] Sirius 17: yes me too
[4:44:57 AM] Sirius 17: but with unlimited time i do quite well
[4:45:19 AM] Shiloh: But this slowness allows thoroughness and this is Roger Penrose
[4:45:32 AM] Sirius 17: yes i can appreciate that
[4:45:33 AM] Shiloh: Pedantic Virgo Moon
[4:45:44 AM] Sirius 17: hehe yeah like you
[4:45:49 AM] Sirius 17: lover of details
[4:45:56 AM] Shiloh: I dont know where his planets are
[4:46:04 AM] Shiloh: I need his birthdate
[4:46:36 AM] Sirius 17: born 8 August 1931),
[4:46:44 AM] Sirius 17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose
[4:46:47 AM] Shiloh: Leo
[4:46:52 AM] Shiloh: yes I check
[4:47:05 AM] Sirius 17: Born in Colchester, Essex, England,
[4:48:15 AM] Shiloh: You would not believe this
[4:48:26 AM] Shiloh: He has a Virgo Mercury and a Taurus Moon
[4:48:35 AM] Shiloh: The exact Mirror of me
[4:48:37 AM] Sirius 17: i found it interesting of his relationship to Escher
[4:48:46 AM] Sirius 17: lol
[4:48:52 AM] Shiloh: Yes the patterns
[4:48:58 AM] Sirius 17: i do believe it
[4:49:06 AM] Shiloh: Lol
[4:49:19 AM] Sirius 17: not too much suprises me anymore with us
[4:49:36 AM] Sirius 17: of course its all too incredible anyhow
[4:49:42 AM] Shiloh: Mars in Libra and Venus in Cancer
[4:49:52 AM] Shiloh: I have Mars in Cancer
[4:50:03 AM] Sirius 17: lol strange he is a mirror
[4:50:06 AM] Shiloh: Detrimental makes us peaceful
[4:50:10 AM] Shiloh: Nonviolent
[4:50:48 AM] Shiloh: Mars in water is antiwar
[4:51:20 AM] Shiloh: Saturn in Capricorn is native and so a father figure
[4:51:31 AM] Shiloh: He has authority and knows it
[4:51:40 AM] Sirius 17:

Penrose believes that such deterministic yet non-algorithmic processes may come into play in the quantum mechanical wave function reduction, and may be harnessed by the brain. He argues that the present computer is unable to have intelligence because it is an algorithmically deterministic system. He argues against the viewpoint that the rational processes of the mind are completely algorithmic and can thus be duplicated by a sufficiently complex computer. This contrasts with supporters of strong artificial intelligence, who contend that thought can be simulated algorithmically. He bases this on claims that consciousness transcends formal logic because things such as the insolubility of the halting problem and Gödel's incompleteness theorem prevent an algorithmically based system of logic from reproducing such traits of human intelligence as mathematical insight. These claims were originally espoused by the philosopher John Lucas of Merton College, Oxford.


[4:52:07 AM] Shiloh: Yes I agree with him there
[4:52:18 AM] Sirius 17: yes i can see that
[4:52:21 AM] Sirius 17: and i agree too
[4:53:03 AM] Sirius 17: this harkens back to the first principles as well and the underpinning metaphysical algorithmic universe...Logos intelligence
[4:53:15 AM] Sirius 17: i mean it is so logical
[4:53:24 AM] Sirius 17: it just makes sense to me
[4:53:57 AM] Shiloh: Leo Jupiter and Cancer Pluto and Aries Uranus and Virgo Neptune
[4:54:08 AM] Sirius 17: all these people have fear of AI, i dont, because it don't feel it is possible
[4:54:46 AM] Shiloh: Dragon Node and Lilith in Aries, the latter right at the cusp with Pisces
[4:54:52 AM] Sirius 17: if there is to be anything like AI it must come from the human brain period and then remove the 'artificalness'
[4:55:01 AM] Shiloh: Chiron in Taurus
[4:55:14 AM] Sirius 17: oh his lilith is in Aries
[4:55:17 AM] Sirius 17: interesting
[4:55:32 AM] Shiloh: Right in the transit
[4:55:42 AM] Shiloh: One age changes into another age at 0° Aries
[4:55:55 AM] Sirius 17: yes he is before his time lol
[4:56:59 AM] Shiloh: Those are 9 year cycles
[4:58:49 AM] Shiloh: 40° per sign as 9x40°=360°
[4:59:40 AM] Sirius 17: interesting



For further details, a consultation of the Thuban archives on http://cosmosdawn.com is suggested.



Last edited by shiloh on Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:54 am; edited 1 time in total

 

THEeXchanger


THEeXchanger
Posts: 3935
Join date: 2011-06-04
Age: 55

• Post n°40

Re: The Factuals versus the Nabs

THEeXchanger on Thu Oct 03, 2013 3:53 pm
Tony says:
However just like December 21st, 2012, a hitherto unprecented reconfiguration
of the cosmic multidimensional timespace matrix will allow the cosmic graduation
of the human genus and a 'qualification' which is based on mentality
and not any characteristics and typefications of their physicality; to proceed a little further,
than it was on the 'Day of the Maya' 9,360,000 as a simple daycount of 9,360,360 Kin.

Susan says: However just like December 21st, 2012,
a hitherto unprecented reconfiguration of the cosmic multidimensional timespace matrix
will allow the cosmic graduation of the human genus and a 'qualification'
which is based on mentality and not any characteristics and typefications of their physicality;

to proceed a little further, than it was on the 'Day of the Maya' 9,360,000
which was 21st December 2012, The 47th Ahua of 65 Ahua Dates

the 16th December 2013, will be a simple daycount of 9,360,360 Kin,
The 65th Ahua of 65 Ahua Dates

in the series of the last 1300 days from 27th May 2010 to 16th December 2013.

65 x 20 = 1300 days - An Ahua date occurs once every 20 days

- thus 1300 days contains 65 ahua dates (1300/65=20)

and, 1300 days contains 5 cycles of 260 days (5 x (13 x 20=260)=5x260=1300 days

~ Susan Lynne Schwenger

& Tony Bermanseder