The Birth Of God As A Superbrane And The Creation Of The Universe

God Reborn
The Birth of God as a Superbrane

A Story of Intelligent Design and the Creation of the Quantum Universe in the Uniphyson of Quantum Entangled Omnispace​

The question of creation as a quantum fluctuation ex nihilo is answered as a creation ex uniphyscon as the quantum entanglement of omnispace in the form of universal physicalized consciousness.


​

Foreword:
A claim to have some answers to pertinent and profound questions in regards to the perennial quest of the human race to understand itself in being and in mind can be no statement of whimsicality.
Such a proposition demands a thorough investigation of the issues at hand; not a one-sided or biased examination of selected data and information; but a rigorous scientific approach to evaluate all the evidence supplied in the history of the developments, both in the popular culture and its science and the philosophies supporting it.

It is of limited value to parade the scientific discipline as the rational and impartial paradigm for the future; if that same worldview proves itself incapable to elucidate or to explain the most basic of elementary questions asked or problems faced by the now globalized citizen, placing hisher hope and expectation into that same projected future. And the overwhelming problem facing mankind at the beginning of the 21st century is that of its own philosophy.

‘Where are we now as a race?’, ‘Where are we going ?’ and ‘Where did we come from?’ are some common questions asked, but not answered by the expert authorities in organized politics, science, culture and religion. Why do we seem incapable, despite having built a monumental edifice called the scientific way and methodology; and notwithstanding the progressing technology derived from that; why then can that same worldview not answer a simple question like:

“If there is such a thing as God, as so many of us have been told, then where and what is it?”

We find an evolved human genetic disposition to form allegiances and to carry and ascribe to certain beliefs, often founded or exposited upon by certain individuals or groups. Kings and knights, magicians, clerics, and sages of old have transformed into the experts and advisors of the new.
Consultancy has become the catch-phrase, often stifling the natural curiosity to find answers for one’s own questions in a denial of one’s own creative impulses through an adventure of self-discovery. Today, we find allegiances to political ideologies, religious dogmas, or some other culturally based agenda. All those liaisons and associations have something in common however; they all become coloured in the individuals which belong to them. Redemption from this filtered state of affairs is found in a paradigm which is based on the precept of disallowing personality to individualize the work to be done or to colour the information to be collected as one’s personal archive or one’s private library of creation, subject to one’s own individual fancies and desires Albert Einstein once remarked:

“The greatest trouble in the world is the idea of a personal God!”

And so one might agree with the de-personification of Albert Einstein’s ‘God’, whom he rather affectionately called: "The Old One” and of whom he also said: “God does not play dice with the world”, referring to his rejection of the idea that life and nature’s processes are intrinsically arbitrary in an universe defined by chance and random events.

He thought of ‘God’ as being the intelligence behind the natural laws of nature, as found in the sciences and the mathematics which he studied and he believed that nature had to be based in geometrical principles, rather than in probabilities defined in statistics and stochastic matrices. And there were others before and after him; Plato and Aristotle, upon whose dialogues this treatise is based; Pythagoras, the Greek geometers and Niels Bohr, Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg, all contemporaries of Albert Einstein with Paul Dirac, Max Born and Wolfgang Pauli in their contributions to the birth of quantum mechanics.
The symmetries in nature, numbers and sequences and fundamental constants; all seem finetuned and set into relationships with one another to create the universe and all the cosmological entities within it.

And one should not forget another genius of contemporary science in Isaac Newton. But what the modern world has tried to forget and to sequester away under an umbrella of a perceived historical ignorance, was the immense interest Isaac Newton, the father of all of classical mechanics, had in the concepts of religion.
And what is the modern moral evaluation by his peers, judging a man whom they portray to the students of science as having had no equal in his time in regards to his scientific work, inventions and mathematical insights?

His power of pure intellect, like Einstein’s, is often used to exemplify the necessity for logical thought and concentration in the pursuit of scientific and mathematical excellence by the students in those fields. Is it embarrassing to tell the full story; that Isaac Newton spent months at a time trying to decipher scrolls, like the ‘Book of Daniel’ and the ‘Book of Revelation’ in the bible?

“He must have been deluded in the religious fervor of his age!”, they would have said.

But was he?

Could a mathematical prodigy like Isaac Newton have been so gullible? Isn’t it more likely, that he sensed that there was something to it – and that it had to be scientific?! Isaac Newton’s ‘God’ is the same as Albert Einstein’s ‘God’ and yet it is completely impersonal. It must be, by the definition of the working ethic!

But is it?

Could it be possible, that once the ‘God of Science’ has become totally impersonal, that then this same ‘God’ is reborn in a ‘God of Omniscience’, who allows, even demands a personification, because of its own definition?

And what if that had been the masterplan throughout the ages anyway? Can we then ever know and understand such a masterplan?

And what if all the clerical authorities around the globe are forced by their own followers to take notice? What if modern science can prove to them that their ‘Allah’ and ‘Jehovah’ and Yahwhey and ‘Brahma’ and ‘Baha’ and ‘Krishna’ and ‘Ra’ and ‘Osiris’ and ‘Set’ and ‘The Big Goat behind the Old Oaken Tree in the Walpurgisnacht on April 30th’ are all one and the same?

What if their scriptures and ancient scrolls became illumined in a new light of omniscience; should their powerbase not become depersonalized, if they are shown to have followed a very limited interpretation of their ‘sacred texts’ indeed?

Where would they go in their grandstanding of and about ‘God’s Law’ for the ‘chosen people’ and for the ‘infidels’?

It would be the end of falsified religious dogma and the death of manipulative religion as such. Because omniscience is Omni-Science, the Science of ‘The All’ for ‘The All’ and the German word for the cosmos or the universe is “Das ALL” - Albert Einstein and Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Pauli and Max Born would have liked that in their contemplations upon the natural order of things.

Albert Einstein also said: “Science without Religion is lame and Religion without Science is blind”- and this book shall try to synergize the two worldviews in a redefinition of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and its statistical nature within a geometrical interpretation of quantum mechanics.

And then would peace between the nations have a chance, because of the demise of the old religions and the already internationally accepted profundity of the scientific way and methodology. Like music, dance or mathematics, a new language would sweep the old world of hate and dispossession, the ways of disempowerment and disbelief under the carpet of the illumination of a new base of knowledge.
A new song would be sung and the nations and tribes and families at war with each other could embrace one another in a new way of looking at the world around themselves and their individuated places within it. And all the many things they had learned from their history through the ages of humankind; all their legends, myths and fables, their religions and sciences; all would become integrated within themselves in a renewed understanding and the death of their ignorance regarding themselves.

But to succeed, the initiation of this omniscience is first required to effect its own birthing process. The mathematical principles of necessity and sufficiency must be satisfied, and the scientific global community must become informed about the new dispensation. The premises of the new model also necessitate their scientific validation through experiment and verification in the collective scientific data base.
This then is the disclaimer for this play of words.

To scientifically empower the new dispensation; a scientifically rigorous approach in its elementary application cannot be avoided. Science cannot ‘prove’ something, without clearly identifying its parameters and boundary conditions. There is an abundance of literature, which explains the present status quo in the specialized fields of particle physics, quantum theory, unification physics and cosmology in a populist genre of communication.

Many discoveries add to that edifice on a daily basis.
This treatise then does not retell the stories, which have already been told in many other ways and media. A list of references points to supportive accounts of some popular ones amongst them. This essay attempts to explain the fundamentals, the principles and preconditions for what brought about the universe’s occurrence and the parameters which led to its definition in the natural laws.

And it is happenstance, that those precepts and prerequisites existing before space and time came into being, have a relevance for the birth of the religions of history or what one could term the ‘spiritual impulse’.
The bearing upon the personality is found to be a subset of a collective psyche; what one might perceive as the groupmind of a race or species; a somewhat very unique genus, which despite the relativity of the observer and the heliocentric reality – finds itself at the center of the universe, as itself – the race of mankind!

The ultimate aim of science to unify all aspects of existence so becomes a quest to enhance all energy and matter towards their most basic and elementary form of manifestation. Once such a fundamental oneness is found and classified by science; then the scientific worldview will become enabled to cross-fertilize all its inter disciplinary factions and the global culture will be ready to purge itself from all unscientific and irrationally derived paradigms and belief systems.

That will be the death of superstition and of pseudoscience; the unscientific way of thinking and its many flawed perceptions in regards to observed natural phenomena.


Physical Consciousness coupled to the Biomind of Universal Life

The labels of 'mind' and 'self-awareness' and of 'consciousness' have for long awaited rigorous definition in the nomenclature of science. Whilst most researchers and philosophers accept the existence of those labels; what those naming represent in a physically measurable sense of physical parameters have remained largely unexplored.
These notions have remained as one of the major mysteries of science and have become subject to a number of speculations; from a purely materialistic interpretation of the 'mind' being a biochemical response to environmental stimuli, to the 'mind' being part of a 'spiritual soul' and subsequently constituting a transcendent aspect of biophysical life.

A related mystery is that of 'life' itself. How did the universe evolve 'life' from a generally accepted premise of a prior or older cosmology, which disallowed biological life as is observed today? The thermodynamically expanding universe follows well tested physical parameters engaging the quantum nature of physical existence in the form of nucleosynthesis interactions such as nuclear fusion of atomic elements and an associated natural radioactivity inherent in nature and its laws of conservation of energy and momentum. Those same processes occurred in the primordial universe and due to the smaller volume then occupied by the expanding universe; the descriptive cosmology describes a much hotter universe (as a Black Body Planckian Radiator) and a universe in which say the lifeforms observed on planet earth could not exist in their biochemical and molecular constitutions.
Recent advances in the demetricated forms of supermembrane theory (M-Theory for 11-dimensional supermembranes propagating 10-dimensional superstrings in a 12-dimensional self-dual mirror-spacetime of supervolumars (Vafa-F-Space encompassing Witten-M-Space) have allowed a rigorous definition for the above labels in the parameters of the physics of the superbranes.

​

The Creation of the Universe and the Magnetic Monopoles of Dirac and t’Hooft-Polyakov

Video link:
View: https://youtu.be/nOmVhX4aJnw
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mMVoAb4t9xtg/
The Creation of the Universe and the Monopole String of Paul Dirac for the Magnetic Monopoles of t’Hooft-Polyakov The question of creation as a quantum fluctuation is answered as a creation ex uniphyscon as the quantum entanglement of omnispace in the form of universal physicalized consciousness | Anthony P Bermanseder - Academia.edu
​

https://www.researchgate.net/public...the_Uniphyscon_of_Quantum_Entangled_Omnispace
https://www.academia.edu/43675282/G...the_Uniphyscon_of_Quantum_Entangled_Omnispace
https://www.scribd.com/document/469...Birth-of-God-and-the-Creation-of-the-Universe​

Abstract:
The Dirac quantization condition and its relationship to the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha is derived from the initial boundary conditions of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity (QBBS). The QBBS is shown to form a 2/11-dimensional mirror membrane as a 1-dimensional Dirac string relating timespace of a string-membrane epoch preceding the QBBS to the spacetime following the creation event. The Dirac monopole then transforms as a point particle into a space extended elementary particle known as the classical electron and is electro charge coupled as an electropole to the magneto charge of a magnetopole. The electron as a point particle of QFT and QED so becomes the monopolar form of the Dirac monopole as the Dirac electron, but coupled to the elementary quantum geometric templates of the scalar Higgs boson with a dark matter particle defined as a RMP or Restmass Photon. The space occupying classical electron is shown to oscillate on the fermi scale of the nuclear interactions of colour charge asymptotic gluon-quark confinement, with the ground state for the electron defining the wormhole singularity of the QBBS in spacetime as the fifth transformation of superstring classes (heterotic class 64) from the timespace era. The Dirac string so manifests as a membrane-mirror for a 4-dimensional spacetime embedded within a 5-dimensional spacetime and descriptive for a 3-dimensional surface embedded as volumar within a higher dimensional cosmology, described in the properties of a Möbian-Klein Bottle geometric connectivity for a one-sided manifold becoming two-sided in the original form of the Dirac string as a one-dimensional mathematical singularity mirroring itself in the monopolar string self-duality of a multidimensional holographic cosmology .

The natural stability of the proton and the absence of an original supersymmetry between matter and antimatter is shown to be the result of the non-existence of antimatter in the primordial universe and the coupling of the Higgs boson to the RMP of spin -1 and energy 14.03 TeV*. Primordial neutron decay becomes the transformation of a RMP boson in the form of an ylemic dineutron into two lefthanded neutrons quantum spin coupled to a graviphoton as the scalar Higgs bosonic blueprint of the wave-quarkian quantum geometry. Particular initial boundary conditions for the QBBS, defined as the Dirac magnetic monopole indicate the energy regime for the Higgs Boson as being bounded in a subatomic displacement scale from 0.000014-0.0028 fermi. This displacement scale forms a natural boundary for the mesonic scale for the strong nuclear interaction and resolves the discrepancy in the mean lifetime for beta minus decay in showing that the excess of neutrons at the Higgs energy with RMP-dark matter excess is 126.95/125.78=1.0093 and becomes balanced by a deficit of neutrons at the Higgs energy with RMP -dark matter deficit in 122.49/123.57=0.9913 and time differences of 10.28 and 9.92 seconds* for a mean neutron lifetime of 880.14 s* respectively.

The thermodynamic evolution of the universe is shown to relate a general evolution of neutron stars with specific nuclear densities with respect to the cosmic radiation background to the Hawking properties of black holes as a background energy matrix originating from the distribution of a baryonic mass seedling and its coupling to the QBBS parameters. The Hawking-Gamow Temperature Unification for classical and quantum gravitation is so derived as the temperature ratio: T_Hawking/T_ylem = 1 = hcR_e³/2πG_om_c²R_ylem² R_Hawking = R_e³/α_nucleon.R_ylem²R_Hawking with α_nucleon = α_planckα_e¹⁸ . Hawking’s micro black holes are shown to play a decisive role in the universal cosmology, as they modulate the quantum gravitational universe of the creation event with the classical gravitation of the spacetime geometry. In particular the micro black holes form the energy centers within encompassing vortices of potential energy modeled on the Jeans length applied to the general temperature evolution of the universe and inclusive of dark matter haloes around galaxies deriving from the original intersection of the higher dimensional inflaton superluminal light path with the lower dimensional light path of the instanton.

The difficulties in measuring Newton’s gravitational constant are found to be directly related to the measured variation in the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha α_e as the polar orientation of the Dirac string of the QBBS and as a distribution of t’ Hooft-Polyakov monopoles in the Schwarzschild metric at the GUT unification energy scale from 2.7x10¹⁶ GeV* to 8.1x10¹⁷ GeV*.

Introduction:

Paul A.M. Dirac said in his 1931 paper addressing his work on the quantization of electric charge in connection with the magnetic charge of a magnetic monopole:

“The theory leads to a connection, namely, eg₀= hc/4π, between the quantum of magnetic pole and the electronic charge. It is rather disappointing to find this reciprocity between electricity and magnetism, instead of a purely electronic quantum condition such as hc/2πe².”

In his 1948 paper Dirac emphasized his belief in magnetic monopoles:

“The quantization of electricity is one of the most fundamental and striking features of atomic physics, and there seems to be no explanation for it apart from the theory of poles. This provides some grounds for believing in the existence of these poles.”

Then in 1978, Dirac expressed his disappointment as to the apparent unreality of magnetic monopoles and the physical importance of the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha:

“…[the theory]...did not lead to any value for this number value a^-1≈137 and, for that reason, my argument seemed to be a failure and I was disappointed with it.”

“The problem of explaining this number hc/2πe² is still completely unsolved. Nearly 50 years have passed since then. I think it is perhaps the most fundamental unsolved problem of physics at the present time, and I doubt very much whether any really big progress will be made in understanding the fundamentals of physics until it is solved.”

Ref:

1. Dirac, P.A.M. (September 1931). "Quantized Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field".Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 133 (821): 60–72.Bibcode:1931RSPSA.133...60D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0130.
2. Dirac PAM. Quantized singularities in the electromagnetic field. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1931; 133: 60-72.
3. Dirac PAM. The theory of magnetic poles. Phys Rev. 1948; 74: 817-830.
4. Dirac PAM. The monopole concept. Int J Theor Phys. 1978; 17: 235–247.
5. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.13403.pdf

​

The Creation in a Quantum Big Bang in Spacetime from Timespace

The origin and nature of the universe has been a question of inquiry since the beginnings of sentient life forms experiencing themselves in a variety of forms and degrees of being self-aware.
Many cosmological models have and are being constructed from the beginnings of speech and sound and geometric symbolism to words and written record keeping in parchments, scrolls, paper, manuscripts, and the digitalization of libraries.

​

The Big Bang model for the creation of the universe

In the journey through the history of planet earth in time, the models created and composed to explain this history and the encompassing history of the universe itself, have attained a nexus point of comprehension and understanding to enable the planetary civilization on earth to collectivize and universally share its information basis with the overall universe.

A universal civilization potential can then be realised, by substituting an older historical timeframe of Universal Political Correctness by the ‘Uniphyscon’ or ‘Universal Physicalized Consciousness’ and as a synonym for a new historical timeframe and timespace as the generator of Timespace.
Timespace differs from spacetime in that time can exist without space as a simple count of mathematical point singularities or frequency permutation states in the case of particular modular dualities relating the mathematically abstract inversion properties of numbers to the physicalization of the frequency states as inverse time to the period of oscillatory physical systems, such as a world defined in energy and its mathematical representations modelling the physical reality.

The universe was born from a mathematical singularity, known as a quantum fluctuation creating space and time in a minimized spacetime parameter configuration known as the Quantum Big Bang Singularity or QBBS.

This quantum fluctuation is defined as the energy potential of a Zero-Point Planckian Quantum Harmonic Oscillator and as a minimum displacement configuration in a QBBS timespace and can also be termed as the ‘bounce of the Planck length’ as this minimum length any displacement defined in space can have.
It was this ‘bounce’ of timespace which formed the required original boundary conditions for the universe to be born in spacetime in the coupling of this ‘instant in timespace’ called a instanton and coupled to an ‘instant in space’ as the inflaton.

The QBBS then defined the concept of multidimensional spacetime in a dual action of a lower dimensional universe becoming embedded in a higher dimensional universe as effect of the inflaton utilizing the boundary condition of the instanton to manifest a parallel cosmology in the lower- and higher dimensional spacetimes.
This minimum spacetime configuration of the instanton-inflaton parameter space coupling is defined as a parameter space of the QBBS and containing other mathematical abstract point spaces such as symbolic representations known as fundamental constants and elementary mathematical relationships between numbers and equations of different degrees of interwovenness and complexity.

All entities in the QBBS parameter space shared a common origin in the abstraction of an encompassing data collective, which can be called the plenum or world of Information-Energy.
This world existing before the QBBS, so defines a notime in nowhere, where the concept of order precedes the concept of time in its independence of duration or time intervals; but where event B cannot occur before event A has occurred and independent from how far apart events A and B would be in an existing spacetime.

As time and space became manifest with the universe in the QBBS, the abstract entities emerging from it did not exist in the form of the QBBS parameter spacetime, but in the QBBS timespace.
This QBBS parameter timespace can be described as a prior realm of abstract mathematical definition and algorithmic identities and as a mirror universe awaiting its own metaphysical creation and manifestation through the emergence of particular data collectors and information gatherers within a then existing spacetime.

The universal data collectors would evolvingly become self-aware in universal physicalized consciousness to utilize the abstract entities from the plenum of the information world to connect the spacetimed universe with the time-spaced mirror universe. As the mirror of the timespace was also a mirror of the spacetime, it could and would image all particulars of the physical universe in global and local parameters into Khaibit, the shadow of the physical universe as the mirror universe of the QBBS parameter spacetime.

This scenario required a medium of super-universal communication to connect the physical universe with Khaibit as its metaphysical shadow and mirror universe. The medium for the super-universal communication took the form of quantum entangled universal physicalized consciousness and where this ‘QE of the Uniphyscon’ enabled the two worlds to blend and merge from the platform of an old timespace configuration into a form of a new spacetime configuration.

The difference between the old form and the new form is that the old form began in time to create space and that the new form will be able to start from the space to create time. The implication is that the old spacetime could not manipulate the interdependency of space and time, such as the initial boundary conditions defined in the QBBS, including the invariance of the ‘speed of light c’ as a limit for velocity and the acceleration of any material object could achieve.

This dependency found in the natural laws was a consequence of the spacetime matrix beginning with time as the first and generating dimension and not with space as the generator dimension. In the old world the time dimension generated three expanding space dimensions with an additional six twistor space dimensions, strongly associated with the first time dimension for a 10-dimensional string spacetime.
The twistor dimensions are different from the expanding time dimensions in that the twistor dimensions remain independent from space, except for their minimum spacetime configuration of forming little curls or circles around the time dimension.

In the new world, the 1^st time dimension will exchange with the 10^th string dimension to change the old starting 1^st time dimension into the 1^st space dimension and opening up the 4^th, previously curled up string dimension as a new space dimension.

This will transform the old universe of 4-dimensional flat Minkowski spacetime into a new universe, defined physically as a 5-dimensional flat Kaluza-Klein hyper-spacetime. In the old world, the 4^th expanding time dimension formed the boundary for an expanding universe, but in the new world, the 10^th dimension will be the endpoint time dimension as a new boundary for the universe and connecting a new mirror of the 11^th dimension to the mirror universe Khaibit as the inside of the boundary of the 10^th dimension.
The outside of the Witten membrane space time mirror will be the inside of Khaibit as a 12^th dimensional Vafa spacetime forming a spacetime perfect image of the inside of the 10-dimensional space time of the universe.

The timespace of the QBBS generator will so become equivalent to the spacetime of the QBBS evolutionary path in the form of information exchange across the boundary of the Witten membrane mirror of the 11^th dimension. The end result will be a holographic multiverse in 12 dimensions and where the 11-dimensional membrane mirror will become the universal data collector as a root-reduced two-dimensional and two-sided Klein bottle manifold, yet one-sided as a Möbian connector having effectively doubled the old spacetime universe in 10 dimensions of the 4-dimensional hyperspace with a 6-dimensional twistor space and the 11^th dimension as the new shared time dimension between Klein as Möbius and Khaibit.

The two sidedness of Klein so is defined in the new time dimension as a 10-dimensional string space of 4 hyperspace dimensions with 6 quantumspace dimensions to bridge the difference to the 11-dimensional membrane space as the 10^th spacetime dimension connecting as a brane space to the 11^th spacetime dimension to generate the 12^th spacetime dimension as a superbrane volumar spacetime , so creating the shadow universe through the mathematical topology and definition of the Klein Bottle manifold of being one-sided but self-intersecting itself in the 11-dimensional Witten surface.

This Witten Mother-Magic-Membrane-Mirror as the 11^th dimension and connector of the two universes will encompass the hyper-spacetime of Kaluza-Klein as four space dimensions with one time dimension, embedding five dimensions within 11 dimensions and displacing the six twistor dimensions as three rotation dimensions in rotation space and with three vibration- or frequency dimensions in quantum space. The boundary of the hyper-spacetime will be a 3-dimensional surface or volumar, embedded within a 4-dimensional volumar, defined in the geometry and topology of hyperspace as V₄=½π²R⁴ and dV₄/dR=(2πR)(πR²)=2π²R³ and so the volume of a Horn torus in 3 dimensions, also known as a Riemann sphere with radius R_torus.

In geometric terms, this indicates that a 3-dimensional sphere as the size and volume of the universe with radius R₃ is equal in volume to a Horn torus with radius R_torus= ∛{2/3π}R₃ and so the radius of the Horn torus is reduced by a factor of 1.6765… from the radius R₃ of the sphere in three dimensions. Doubling the radius of the Horn torus as the radius for the encompassing sphere as R₃=2R_torus so shows that 8 spheres of radius R_torus fit precisely into an encompassing sphere with radius 2R_torus. But considering the volume of the universe as a 3-dimensional boundary with V₃=dV₄/dR=2π²R₄³ to embed a 3-dimensional volume V₂=(4π/3)R₂³ with its boundary as surface area dV₂/dR=4πR₂² then defines a boundary condition of R₄ ≥∛{2/3π}R₂, showing that in an expanding and time evolving universe; the 3-dimensional torus volumar will attain its critical nexus of changing from its 3-dimensional volumar status into a 3-dimensional surface membrane status at a time given by the boundary condition.

This time marker has been calculated as occurring 994.78 million years ago; correlating with a time upon planet Earth, when the first multicellular lifeforms emerged from their unicellular ancestors. Then the topological geometry of the universe changed from a single positive de Sitter curvature into a combination of its positive spheroidal de Sitter curvature with a negative hyperbolic Anti de Sitter curvature in 4-dimensional spacetime, cancelling the positive curvature to manifest a perfectly flat universe with zero curvature.

This can be visualized at the center of the Horn torus, where the tangential curvature of the torus radii meet in the horizontal plane to create the concave topology of a wormhole or an Einstein-Rosen bridge with the surface of the torus radii curving away from the center and for the emergence of geometric circular cross sections as the northern top and the southern bottom of the Horn torus.
But at the north pole and south poles of the vertical plane connecting the two hemispheres of the prior encompassing 3-dimensional spherical volumar, the curvature is convex, cancelling the concave curvature intrinsic for the cosmological evolution of the universe to all of the time prior to the critical curvature time marker and as measured and observed by any observer within the expanding universe.

​

This prior realm or world is described as the outside boundary of the manifested singularity of the QBBS, with the inside boundary defining the physical universe as the fifth of five abstract mathematical singularities and as a one-dimensional entity in transforming its nature as a mathematical point into that of a mathematical line known as a Dirac string.

A Dirac string so allows the mathematical abstraction of the point space to transform into a point line requiring space to extend into as itself and as a Y direction in some coordinate system.
The minimum parameter spacetime so enables a 2^nd dimension to emerge from the Dirac string, as the 1^st dimension of a minimized line segment of wavelength λ_weyl curls itself around the mathematical point space it used to occupy as a segment of the Dirac string. This process changes the 1^st dimension of the Dirac string from a time dimension into a 1^st space dimension as the now space limited summation of mathematical line segments and redefines the newly created space dimension of the XY-plane as a quasi-time dimension.

The entire Dirac string so transforms itself as a mathematical point without extent into a mathematical line of any number of such point spaces to create the Dirac string extending in two polar directions from the mathematical singularity of the QBBS. As there is no limit of how many mathematical points can exist in the Information-Energy prior spacetime plenum, the Dirac string is initially infinite as a consequence of no spacetime existing at the point of creation known as the first instant of time or the Instanton.

As the individual point spaces integrate as a sum of such point spaces however, each individual point preserved its individual universal identity in circularizing its point space into a membrane- or string space in the XY-plane. The Weyl wavelength λ_weyl so became redefined from its circular form as the perimeter of a point circle as the displacement of the circumference from the center of the point circle as its wormhole radius. With the creation of a 2^nd area or surface dimension from the point circle count from the mathematical point count, two orthogonal directions emerged from the potential infinite Dirac string, which became upper and lower bounded in changing the expansion from the lower bounded origin to the universal north as self-relative positive upper bound in a direction from the origin towards the self-relative positive east with a simultaneous creation of the self-relative negative west direction in the transformation of the expansion towards the self-relative south as the mirror of the positive and negative polarities of the upper bound in the origin.

This creation of the 2^nd dimension so formed a limit for the mathematical point spaces extending in space and in time into two opposite directions.
The potential infinite linespace became halted in the QBBS defining the two endpoints as two Weylian wormholes defined in the Guth-de Broglie Inflaton and mirrored at the origin as two polar opposite but identical minimum timespace configurations.

The northern positively charged wormhole so observes the self-relative anticlockwise rotation as effect of the right-handed torque of the Dirac string projecting orthogonally from the newly created XY-plane into the XZ-plane of a so created 3^rd dimension and with the torque angular displacement defining a new positively charged part of the northern hemisphere as pointing into the positive Z-axis direction or ‘out’ from the XY-plane. The southern negatively charged wormhole in the southern hemisphere corollary projects the torque in the negatively charged XY-plane in a clockwise rotation ‘into’ the XY-plane of the 3^rd dimension to complete the 8 sectors of the geometrically defined encompassing 3-dimensional sphere with radius twice the torus radius.
The four torus radii so define the radius of the sphere in meeting at the QBBS singularity physically defined as the Dirac magnetic monopole. The 2^nd quasi-time dimension so becomes a real space dimension and the newly created 3^rd dimension takes its place as a quasi-time dimension acting on the XY-plane as a flatland of membrane spacetime.


The Dirac Magnetic Monopole and the Instanton-Inflaton Quantum Entanglement of Wormholes

The Dirac monopole is defined only at the singularity as the QBBS, but is connected via the Dirac string in an arbitrary gauge space, defining potential energy in any place of the universe defined in a three-dimensional parameter space, subject to the initial boundary conditions derived from the timespace of the higher dimensional plenum of nowhere in notime.
It so is the Dirac string, which allows the point potentials to transform into string potentials in the rotation space around the Dirac string transforming individual point potentials into the Weylian wormhole potentials and integrating and summing subsequently about the three orthogonal space directions of the X-Y-Z plane intersection.
The magnetic monopole singularity of the QBBS so is defined as the Weylian wormhole of creation and the initial boundary condition for this minimum spacetime configuration becomes a conformal mapping of the Planckian wormhole from the timespace of the information plenum of algorithmic and mathematical definitions.

The northern- and southern parts of the Dirac string were defined as infinite, before becoming bounded in the creation of the 2^nd dimension followed by the emergence of the 3^rd dimension and the Weyl string in 2 space dimensions with a quasi-spacetime dimension, able to potentialize the timespace parameter definitions to create a 3-dimensional space with a 4^th spacetime dimension. The QBBS parameter spacetime definitions of the boundary conditions for the inflaton now fully integrate a 4^th real time dimension and manifest the Weylian wormhole volumar as a Black Hole defined by the instanton.

The nature of the inflaton so is to free the 3^rd quasi-spacetime dimension from its original definition of being potentially infinite in extent, but existing in a spaceless gauge free parameter realm of pure real time without one-dimensional space defining the number count of the timespace in nowhere in notime; or as existing in a free parameter world of infinite one-dimensional space without time.


Dirac’s Quantization Condition for magnetic charge g as proportional to electric charge e

The monopole of mass m_m and magnetic charge q_m circulates at a radius r and velocity v in the electric field between two capacitor plates in the XY-plane within a constant electric field E=Ez and where z is the unit vector in the Z direction connecting the two poles.
The Lorentz force q_mvB=q_mvE/c balanced by the centripetal force m_mv²/r then gives, in the classical high energy limit for v~c
E=m_mvc/rq_m ……………………………………………………………………………………………… [Eq. 1a]

The energy of the monopole is quantized in the Landau quantization E_n=hf(n+½)= (hω/2π)(n+½) and as a result of using the Hermitian function ψ_n(x) as general form for a probability frequency distribution and used to derive the form for a classical 1-dimensional harmonic oscillator in the form of a quantum harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics.

The Normal distribution formula has a form Ψ(x) = {1/√2π}exp[-½x²] which is found in the Hermitian function:



The classical form for the harmonic oscillator are given by the Hamiltonian:
ℋ = ᵱ²/2m +½ kᶍ ²= ᵱ ²/2m + ½mω²ᶍ²

The kinetic energy p²/2m=m²v²/2m=½mv² and potential energy ½kx²=½mω²x² from Hooke’s law and the equation of motion:

F=-kx =md²x/dt² and a solution x(t)=Acos(ωt+constant) with dx/dt=-ωAsin(ωt+constant) and with d²x/dt²=-ω²Acos(ωt+constant) , defining ω=√(k/m)=2πf=2π/T

The energy levels of the classical Hamiltonian then correspond to the eigenvalues of the Hermitian operator (Ψ)=(ih/2π)dΨ for the momentum operator = -(ih/2π)∂/∂x

The time independent Schrödinger equation (Ψ)=(ih/2π)dΨ=E(Ψ) then allows solution for the wave function x|(Ψ)=Ψ(x) for the eigenvalues of the Hermite function H_n(x)
as Landau poles and with energy levels E_n quantized in integer n and defining a minimum harmonic quantum oscillator for n=0 as the Zero-Point Energy of the Planck oscillator
E_o=½(h/2π)ω_o=½(h/2π)(2πf_o)=½hf_o

The mass of the monopole can be equated with the mass of a particle accelerated in a cyclotron for the high energy limit.
For a cyclotron frequency ω=2πf_c from mv²/r=qBv with v=rqB/m and ω=v/r=qB/m=qE/mc and E=cB for the coupling of the electric field with the magnetic field for
ω = q_mE/m_mc…………….................................................………..................……………[Eq. 2a]

The quantized kinetic energy for the orbit of the magnetic monopole so is ½m_mv²=n.hf for ω=2πf=q_mE/m_mc for
½m_mv²=n.hf=n.hω/2π=n.hq_mE/2πm_mc and describing the quantization of angular momentum J_Z for the magnetic monopole about the Dirac string.
J_Z = m_mvr = 2n.(h/2π) ………………………………………………………………………………….[Eq.3a]

m_mv = 2n.(h/2π)/r = Erq_m/c by [Eq. 2a] for a quantization condition for the electric field E=2n.(hc/2π)/r²q_m...….[Eq. 4a]

And without the zero-point dark energy minimum Planck quantum harmonic oscillator, in the Landau poles E_n = hf(n+½), which can be said to exist as a precursor of the manifestation of the Quantum Big Bang in a string-membrane epoch defined from an oscillation of the Planck displacement as the original quantum fluctuation L_planck = e/c²√α = √{hG_o/2πc³} = {G_o/c²}m_planck

This quantum displacement ‘bounce’ of the minimum spacetime configuration initiated the interdependency of fundamental constants, utilized in the laws of nature in defining the ratio of electrocharged over the squared speed of light c² in unitizing two unitary measurement systems; one mass centered in the form of Planck units suppressing universal charge, both electric and magnetic and the other suppressing universal mass in the corollary of charge centered Stoney units. The coupling of those two unitary systems then unify the finestructures of energy-charge based electromagnetism with those of an energy-mass based gravitational interaction.

The angular momentum J_Z relates to the electric field E in [Eq. 3a] for the mass of the monopole in Erq_m/vc=m_m=2n.(h/2π)/vr and the positive charge at the northpole and the negative charge on the southpole, considered to be infinite in extent but intersected by the cylindrical circular flux areas at the two poles for a total charge density of E.dA=E.2πr²= 2Q/ε_o =2σ_eπr²/ε_o for E=2σ_e/2ε_o = σ_e/ε_o = 2Q/2ε_oπr² = Q/ε_oπr² for ∑Q=σ_eπr² for each capacitor plate

E=2n.(hc/2π)/r²q_m = σ_e/ε_o = Q/πr²ε_o … and charge quantization Q = 2πε_o{n.hc/2π}/q_m …for Q=∑e=Ne...[Eq.5a]

Dirac’s quantization condition follows as q_mQ=2πε_o{n.hc/2π}={(4πε_ohc)/2πe²}{½n.e²}={n.e²/2α} for q_m=ne²/2αNe=ne/2αN

Magnetic monopole q_m =n.e/2Nα={n/N}{e/2α}..............................................[Eq. 6a]

Dirac's quantization condition for the nature of a magnetic monopole being coupled in its magnetic charge to the electric charge of an electron, so relates Dirac's constant of [Eq.1] in defining q_m=(Dirac's Constant)(an expression as a multiple of e/2α) and so presenting [Eq.7a] in a form of:

e* = n.e/4a = {n/2}{e/2a} = ð_dirac {e/2a} ……..……[Eq.7a]

and where ð_dirac becomes Dirac’s Constant with the modular duality between the quantization of the classical electron radius R_e in the Weyl radius r_ps in trigonometric and radian pi ( p)
in the integer proportionality ratio {360R_e/2pr_ps} = {360R_e/l_ps} = 10¹⁰


ð_dirac = 8pcR_ee/G_oh = 4R_e[ec]/L_planck²c³ = {n/2} ↔ {np/360} = 4.54214x10¹⁹ [C/m³s^-2]*………………..[EQ.1]

for n = 8pcR_ee/G_oh = 8pc{10¹⁰l_ps}e/180G_oh ↔ 8pc{10¹⁰l_ps}e/pG_oh = (240c²)(15x10²⁰)e = 36x10²²ec²
n = 324x10³⁸ e for n(2p/360) = (3.24x10⁴⁰2pe/360) = 2ð_dirac
from the algorithmic integer definition for fundamental constants c², h and |k=1/G_o=1/4pe_o=30c|_mod


The derivation of Dirac’s constant indicates the symmetry in Maxwell’s equations in a form of rendering the point charge magnetic monopole of Paul Dirac as equivalent to the ‘t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole of a Grand Unification energy spectrum, bounded in a finestructure unification condition relating the gravitational interaction to the electromagnetic interaction and so allowing the point charge electron of QFT and QED to reclaim its classical definition in the parameters of the electromagnetic fine structure alpha

α=2πk_ee²/hc=e²/2ε_ohc=m_oce²/2h=60πe²/h via the electron’s total energy given by m_ec²=k_ee²/R_e for the classical electron radius as a function of its mass m_e for R_e=k_ee²/m_ec²=2πk_ehe²/2πhc²m_e=hα/2πcm_e=α{h/2πcm_e}=αR_compton=α²{h²/4π²k_em_ee²}=α²R_Bohr1 =α²{ZR_n/n²}=α²{Z/R_Rydbergn²} and where R_Rydberg defines the quantized electron energy levels in the wavelength 1/λ_e=R_Rydberg{1/n² – 1/(n+1)²} in the Bohr atom for quantized angular momentum nh/2π=m_evR for v=nh/2πm_eR or total energy KE+PE={-½PE+PE}=½m_ev²-Zk_ee²/R=-Zk_ee²/2R=for E_n=hf_n=hc/λ_n

The lower bounded unification monopole describing the Dirac magnetic monopole has a Maxwellian displacement current along the Dirac string in units of [Am], but manifesting as a mass equivalence m_monopole=[ec]_mod =4.818x10^-11 kg* for an energy [ec]_modc²=ec³=2.7x10¹⁶ GeV*

​

Richard Feynman’s derivation for Dirac’s Quantization Condition for magnetic charge g as proportional to electric charge e

Richard Feynman’s method to derive Dirac’s quantization condition shows how to embed the Dirac string into two path integrals in a quantum-mechanical derivation, using two wave functions Ψ(x₁,t₁);Ψ(x₂,t₂), connecting two points A and B in two path integral summations e^{[2πi/h]S(x1)} , e^{[2πi/h]S(x2)} for probability amplitudes P=|K|² and K= Ψ₁.Ψ₂ = ∫D(x)e^[2πi/h]S(x) and for classical action S(x)=∫ℒ(x,dx/dt)dt and Lagrangian ℒ and where the summation of all paths is symbolised by D(x)

Then K=K₁+K₂= ∫D(x)e^{[2πi/h]S(x1)} + ∫D(x) e^{[2πi/h]S(x2)} for the action of a free particle unaffected by the Dirac string field enclosed by the two path integrals summed over all possible paths, S(0)= ∫KE dt=∫(½mdx/dt) dt P=|K₁+K₂|² Action S(1) however interferes with action S(2) in the external vector potential A_L in units of charge density (q/ε_o=m_og) in the action S=S(0)+(q/c) ∫ A_L .dL

The closed path integral so becomes ∮_C A_L .dl = ∫ A₂ .dl - ∫ A₁.dL for path A to B to A changing direction from clockwise to anticlockwise or vice versa.

K = ∫₁D(x)e^{[2πi/h](S[0]+[q/c] ∫}₁^A.dL) + ∫₂D(x)e^{[2πi/h](S[0]+[q/c] ∫}₂^A.dL) = {K₁ + e^{[2πiq/hc] ∮C AL .dl} K₂} e^{[2πiq/hc] ∫}₁^A.dL)

The interference term of the closed path e^{[2πiq/hc] ∮C AL .dl} for ∮_C A_L .dl =∯∇xA_L dA = ∯B_monopole .dA + ∯B_string .dA

Then e^{[2πiq/hc] ∮C AL .dl} = e^{[2πiq/hc] ∯Bmonopole.dA} e^{[2πiq/hc] ∯Bstring.dA} for e^{[2πiq/hc] ∯Bstring.dA} =1, as the Dirac string of dimension 1 is not observable, the vector potential being undefined everywhere except at the singularity

The magnetic flux is however ∯B_string .dA =μ_oq_m=g/ε_o for e^{2πi(qg/hcεo)} = 1 for 4πqge²/4πε_ohce²=2.qgα/e²=2αg/e and g=n.e/2α for q=e and e^2πi.n=1

​

Feynman’s path integrals encompass the Dirac string not at the center of the volume harboring the magnetic monopole singularity. Placing the singularity at the center and allowing the two parts of the Feynman derivation of the Dirac quantization condition to be the two hemispheres of a sphere with the magnetic monopole at the center of the sphere as done by the Wu-Yang configuration allows a cylindrical representation of the topology applicable to the entire universe.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.13403.pdf

As the Dirac string is one-dimensional without any width, the surface area for the magnetic flux of 2(2πR²) the magnetic monopole for cylinder radius √2R for surface area 4πR² describes the Dirac monopole as the central singularity and magnetic point charge for the cosmology.

The surface area for the universe is represented by the magnetic flux of the monopole as a one-dimensional form of energy manifesting the Quantum Big Bang from the monopolar singularity, albeit in using a higher dimensional string-membrane epoch characterised by the definition of a minimum spacetime configuration as a quantum fluctuation of the Planck length by the zero point quantum harmonic oscillator, defined as the Weyl-Eps quantum of creation as the inverse of the magneto charge e* in units of the gravitational parameter GM, defining a new charge unit of the star coulomb as the physicalisation of consciousness as a quantum angular acceleration acting on any spacetime volumar.

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) become enabled to replace the point charge electron with the point charge of the Dirac-'t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole, so allowing the classical electron radius R_e to enter the physical descriptions in the quantum field theories.

​

​

Dirac’s string modeled as spanning the universe for a singular magnetic monopole at the center of the earth

Dirac’s monopole can then be defined as a singularity monopole of magnetopole charge e*=Q_m, connecting the two opposite sides of the universe in the Hubble horizon R_H=c/H_o in the Dirac string. The spacetime observer relative universal northpole so is given as the positive charge distribution placed onto the northern hemisphere of the universe in a 3-dimensional surface derivative dV₄/dR=(2πR_H)(πR_H²)=2π²R_H³ from the 4-dimensional hypersphere V₄(R)=½π²R⁴.
The southern hemisphere then becomes the negative charge distribution as a 3-dimensional volumar connecting the Dirac string from its southpole to the northpole. The two infinite capacitor plate surfaces so are given in the higher dimensional string-membrane space which so effectively ‘cube’ the volume of the 3-dimensional sphere embedded in a 4-dimensional hyperspace as a 3-dimensional surface or membrane space.

The Dirac string starts from, and terminates on, a magnetic monopole. Thus, assuming the absence of an infinite-range scattering effect by this arbitrary choice of singularity, the requirement of single-valued wave functions (as above) necessitates charge-quantization. That is, 4π.2q_eq_m/4πε_ohc=8πq_eq_m{α}/{2e²}=2ee*/ε_ohc=4παe*/e must be an integer n for any electric charge q_e and magnetic charge q_m.

e*=n.e/4α={n/2}{e/2α}= {e/2α]} and where ð_dirac becomes Dirac’s Constant

The Dirac Constant for the Universal Cosmology and with n=324x10³⁸ e :
ð_dirac = 8πcR_ee/G_oh = 4R_e[ec]/L_planck²c³ = npe/360 = 4.54214x10¹⁹ [C/m³s^-2]* .....................................…[EQ.1]

in units of the star coulomb defining the magneto charge e* in a universal unit calibration [C*]=[C²/C*]=[C²s²/m³] and where the mensuration units for the gravitational parameter [GM]=[Nm²kg/kg²]=[m³/s²]=[C*] as the units for universally defined physicalized consciousness as an angular quantum acceleration (df/dt) acting on any spacetime volumar of units [m³] as the effect of the Dirac string manifesting at the observer relative center of the universe and as given in the location of the Dirac magnetic monopole at this center as a definition of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity (QBBS).

The derivations consider the magnetic permeability constant of ‘free space’ μ_o=4πx10^-6 H/m as a universal constant related to the impedance of ‘free space’ Z_o²=|E/H|²=|μ_oE/B|²=|μ_ocB/B|²=μ_o/e_o={120π/c}/{1/120πc}={120π}² and so describe a finestructure for Maxwell’s constant ε_oμ_o=1/c² [m/s]²* for the units of universal resistance in a calibrated mensuration system requiring the speed of light ‘c’ in units of [m/s]_SI to transform into units of [m/s]*. The units for the impedance Z_o so become measured in √([H/m]/[F/m])*=√([Js²/C²m][Jm/C²])*=[V/I]*=[Js/C²]*=[Ω]* and are observed in the physics of superconductivity in the form of the Quantum Hall effect n.h/e² , the conductance quantum 2e²/h and Josephson frequencies f=n.E/h. The ‘free impedance’ however relates to a deeper nature found in superconductive phenomena in that a dimensionless or modular resistance implies a natural law in the form of Action=Charge Squared as {h=ee=ee*=e*e*}.

The Action Law is therefore descriptive for the relationship between electric charges of electropoles and magnetic charges of magnetopoles.

​

​

Electric flux _Φe = ∑q_e/ε_o = ρ_eV/ε_o= Q_e/ε_o

Magnetic flux _Φm = ∑q_m(μ_oc) = ρ_mV(μ_oc) = (μ_oc)Q_m

Electric flux _Φe = ∇.E=[J/Cm²] = {∑q_e}[Jm/C²m³]={r_e}[C²/Jm] = ρ_e/ε_o for the electric charge density per unit volume

Magnetic flux Φ_m = ∇.B = {1/c}∇.E= [Js/Cm³]= {∑q_m}[Js/C²m] = μ_oρ_m for the magnetic charge density per unit area

The magnetic charge density for the Dirac monopole is ρ_m = e*f as a source energy monopolar current i_monopolar per unit area as the Maxwell displacement current per unit area
μ_oe*f/A_ps=(df/dt)/e*ec³ and f*= c/λ*=A_ps (dt/df)/μ_oe*²ec³

The magnetic flux for the Dirac monopole is Φ_m = μ_oρ_m = m_ps/[ec]_mod = m_psc²/[ec]_mod c² = E_ps/[ec³]_mod = [J/Am³]/{df/dtf} = [J/Am³]/{df_ps/dt_ps}= [J/Am³]

by modular string-membrane mirror duality E_ps=hf_ps=h/f_ss and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps²=1/f_ss² with λ_ps.f_ps=c=1/λ_ssf_ss

The Maxwell displacement current for the Dirac magnetic monopole as the QBBS singularity manifests as the ‘t Hooft-Polyakov ‘hedgehog’ magnetic monopole in GUT unification as the minimum monopolar mass of [ec]_mod=4.819369011x10^-11 kg* and energy [ec]_mod c²= 4.33743211x10⁶ J* as precisely 2.7x10¹⁶ GeV*. The upper bound for the ‘t Hooft-Polyakov monopole is 30[ec]_mod=1.301229633x10⁸ J* or 8.1x10¹⁷ GeV* with the two bounds related to the gravitational parameter GM partial to the measurements of Newton's gravitational constant G and the energy of the t'Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopoles of 'Grand-Unification' or GUT energy regimes.

The magnetic flux of the Dirac monopole becomes a mass ratio per unit area expressed as source energy per monopolar unification energy per unit area A with wormhole unit area A_ps6π²r_ps²=3λ_ps²/2=1.5x10^-44 [m²]*

Φ_m = μ_oρ_m = μ_oe*f = m_ps/[ec]_mod = m_psc²/[ec]_mod c² = E_ps/[ec³]_mod = 1/e*ec³ = 4.611023179x10^-10

μ_oe*f/A_ps=(df/dt)|₁/e*ec³ and f*= c/λ*= (df/dt)|₁/μ_oe*²ec³ = 3λ_ps²(df/dt)|₁/2μ_oe*²ec³ = 3h²(df/dt)|₁/2μ_o[ec] = 7.338671173x10^-7 Hz* per unit wormhole surface area, time t*=1,362,644.512 s* and λ*=c/f*=4.087933536x10¹⁴ m* for radius R*=λ*/2π=R(n*=H_ot*’=4.072259032x10^-13)=6.506148293x10¹³ m* for a time t*’=216,871.61 s* into the expansion and thermodynamic evolution of the universe with a coordinate seconds before the E-googol marker for the classical electron radius modulation.
As the E-googol defines R_E(n)= 3.43597108x10¹⁴ m* for a time t_E=n_E/H_o=2.1506x10^-12/H_o=1,145,323.7 s*; 217,320.8 s* or 2.515287 days


R_e/R_E=r*/R* for r*=R*R_e/R*=(6.506148293x10¹³)(2.777777x10^-15)/(3.43597108x10¹⁴)=5.25983302x10^-16 m*.

This displacement radius defines an effective electron mass via the Compton constant as m_e=αh/2πcr*=4.906433293x10^-30 kg* and reducing to a maximum mass at the QBBS instanton boundary as m_eeff=m_ps=αh/2πcr_ps=2.222x10^-20 kg*

The Dirac constant calculates asð_dirac =2αe*/e = 2α/eE_ps=4αem_planck√α/em_electron=4α√{(hc/2πG_o)(2πk_ee²/hc)}/{k_ee²/R_ec²}=4α√{k_ee²/G_o}{2πR_ec²/hcα} = 8πR_e[ec]/G_oh [C/m³s^-2]* for fine structure unification G_o=4πε_o for √{k_ee²/G_o}=e/G_o

The inflaton so draws the data from the information space to manifest the number count for the inflaton from the algorithmic definition of the mathimatia, which is a label for the collected library in the timespace prior to the QBBS.

This number count would count the number of spacetime quanta the inflaton would encompass as a 3-dimensional surface bounding the 10-dimensional string space as the boundary of a Riemann sphere in de Sitter spacetime embedding the Anti de Sitter spacetime in the cancelling of the topological curvatures.

The number of space quanta for the inflaton to use is a googolplex of a number of googols, meaning number counts exceeding 100 digital places.
The 4 googols and 8 data strings generated by particular algorithms and number sequences in the mathimatia were:

E=26x65⁶¹=1.006208782x10¹¹² as data string E*={266561] generating data string F*={136656} from programming code: {Add the End to the Beginning and Start the New Beginning with the Old Beginning}=Line A-Repeat

F=13x66⁵⁶=1.019538764x10¹⁰³ as data string F*={136656} and generating data string G*={673665} from programming code: {Add the End to the Beginning and Start the New Beginning with the Old Beginning}=Line A-Repeat

G=67x36⁶⁵=9.676924497x10¹⁰² as data string G*={673665} and generating data string H*={5[5+6=11]7366}≠H* from the programming command: {If Sum is reductive}=Line B-End-Line C-Reverse Line A-Repeat

H=Undefined, because 5+6=11=2 is root reductive in the number 11 the first initializing Maria Number in the Maria matrix for the numerical archetypes in time connector dimensions 1, 4 and 7 [Footnote1]

D=46x56¹²=4.375363663x10²² as data string D*={465612} from data string E*={266561} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat

C=25x61²⁴=1.761392119x10⁴⁴ as data string C*={256124} from data string D*={465612} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat

B=36x12⁴²=7.619295808x10⁴⁶ as data string B*={361242} from data string C*={256124} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat

A=31x24²³=1.722742045x10³³ as data string A*={312423} from data string B*={361242} from programming code: {If Line A} Repeat

Z=Undefined, because no process of 3[3+U=1]2423 can yield 312423 from data string U24233 with U=-2=-11 for mirror root reduction in the Maria code and programming command: {If Sum is reductive}=Line D-Define H

H=ABCD=(31x36x25x46)x(24²³x12⁴²x61²⁴x56¹²)=(1,283,400)x(7.882123905x101¹⁴¹)=1.011591782x10¹⁴⁷ from programming code:{if Line D}-End-Define H=ABCD-End-

The end of the googolplex algorithm, self-limited in the Maria matrix and the SEps algorithm limiting the universe defined from Khaibit and the timespace of a Planck-Stoney membrane timespace epoch immediately adjacent to the QBBS in the timespace-spacetime boundary of the Dirac string and the magnetic Dirac monopole so defines four spacetime markers E with F and G to be encompassed by the inflaton boundary H defined as a summation of wormhole quanta comprising the Riemann sphere as a 3-dimensional surface of volume dV₄/dR=(2πR)(πR²)=2π²R³ and for a specific redefinition for the radius of the Riemann sphere as the Hubble event horizon R_H=c/H_o.

[Footnote 1:]
The Maria Code in the Riemann analysis specifies the partitioning of the decimal monad: {1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10} around the primary Maria number and SEps-Constant “11” for a prime number algorithm +1+11+10+11+ as 33-tiered segments, transforming the wave mechanics of the SEps number sequence into the 64-codex of a DNA/RNA genomatrix for its potential quadrupling as a 256-codex incorporative of dormant intron/intein coding.

The Maria Code is defined in the distribution of Maria numbers M_p+99=M_p+12 for n=½{√(264k+1) – 1} by the quadratic n²+n-66k=0.
Maria numbers are those integer counters, which contain all previously counted integers as mod|33|.

The first Maria number so is 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11=66=2x33 for Maria#1=11 for k=2.
Archetypes 2+3+5+6+8+9=33 so define 6 of the 11 dimensions in the defined omnispace for archetypes 1+4+7=12 completing the remaining 4 time connector dimensions in mirroring the limiting and boundary 12^th dimension of Vafa omnispace in the 10th omnispace dimension across the11-dimensional Witten-Mirror as the Maria-Mirror or Maria membrane connecting higher dimensional omni-spacetime to lower dimensional quantum-spacetime.

A repeating Maria matrix is symbolised in this table with symbols ♥=54=Love and ♠=45=Use

11♥	65♠	110♥	164♠	209♥	263♠	Archetype 2
21♠	66♥	120♠	165♥	219♠	264♥	Archetype 3
32♠	77♥	131♠	176♥	230♠	275♥	Archetype 5
33♥	87♠	132♥	186♠	231♥	285♠	Archetype 6
44♥	98♠	143♥	197♠	242♥	296♠	Archetype 8
54♠	99♥	153♠	198♥	252♠	297♥	Archetype 9
65♠	110♥	164♠	209♥	263♠	308♥	Archetype 2*

[End of Footnote 1:]



The Hubble radius R_H is defined from first principles as the light path of the higher 11-dimensional monopolar light emitted in the QBBS as a monopolar electromagnetic radiation wave, travelling invariantly with lightspeed c in two parallel cosmologies. The first cosmology in a lower dimensional universe is described by a Black Body Planckian Radiator modeled on a thermodynamic cosmological evolution in the hyperbolic negatively curved Anti de Sitter spacetime however enveloped by a de Sitter universe of positive curvature , thereby cancelling the curvatures to result in a flat Minkowski spacetime in 4-dimensional spacetime. This Temperature dependent universe experiences its spacetime evolution in the energy interactions of the QBBS parameter space and engage a gravitational deceleration, which asymptotically will approach but never reach the asymptotic boundary as set by the inflaton.

This becomes a consequence of the higher dimensional universe; whose definitive parameter is the light path of the monopolar light and a light path not restricted by the matter content and the gravitational parameters in their lower dimensional form. The QBBS parameter space allows a parallel evolutionary of the gravitational parameter GM in the unification of the electromagnetic and gravitational parameters applicable to the both of the parallel cosmologies through the definition of the ‘QE UniPhysCon’ as a physicalized universal consciousness defined in the nature of the Dirac monopole and its extension in the t’ Hooft-Polyakov monopole of energy unification. The ‘Quantum Entangled’ UniPhysCon then is defined by the gravitational parameter GM in the lower dimensional universe, but in the higher dimensional universe the definition of GM translates into the form of any spacetime volumar being acted upon by a radius independent quantum acceleration or a frequency differential over time subject to the modular duality defined in the timespace of the string-membrane-volumars in modular dualities of inversion and mirror properties of the parameters. The motive and ‘prime directive’ for the QE UniPhysCon so is to transform gravitational potential energy in the form of the GM parameter and the matter content in the universe into physicalized universal consciousness quanta as the source energy quanta defined in the original Weylian wormhole as the effect of the nature of the Dirac monopole changing its status as a undefined source of magnetopolar charge into a defined source of electropolar charge, proportional to the nature of a magnetic charge, however able to manifest as magnetopolar charge as the inverse of the Weyl energy as the original source quantum of the QBBS.

An overarching reason and purpose for the existence of the universe as a multiverse within an omniverse from first principles is found in the nature of the universe as a holographic universe requiring a doubling of the physicalized universe from spacetime into timespace to satisfy the initial boundary conditions of the described omni spacetime of the 10-11-12 dimensional cosmology.

The 11-dimensional light path so defines the guiding evolutionary parameter for the thermodynamic expansion of the universe in the invariance of lightspeed c moving further away from the asymptotic gravitationally decelerating universe. But there will be a time marker for the EMMR, as the Electro-Magnetic Monopolar Radiation meets the inflationary boundary at the intersection of the 10^th string dimension with the 11^th dimension of the Witten mirror in omnispace.

This time marker has been calculated as the inverse of H_o=c/R_H and where H_o defines a nodal Hubble constant varying in time relative to a cycle time coordinate given in n=H_ot or dn/dt=H_o. This nodal Hubble constant represents the upper time boundary as the mirror of the wormhole Weyl frequency f_weyl=E_weyl/h as the source energy quantum of the QBBS.

The inflaton defined the size of the 11-dimensional universe in the nodal Hubble bound as the number of space quanta contained in the Riemann toroidal surface V_H=2π²R³ and as H is known from the googolplex algorithm obtained from the mathimatia of the time space plenum

V_H=2π²R³ = H.2π²(r_weyl)³ = H(2π²)(λ_weyl/2π)³ ) for ∛(H)(λ_weyl/2π) = 1.003849093x10⁴⁹(10^-22/2π) = 1.597675453x10²⁶ m* or 16.87610655 Billion lightyears

for the Weyl wormhole perimeter of the QBBS
λ_weyl=2πr_weyl= 10^-22 m*

This then also defines the nodal Hubble constant H_o as the upper boundary of the inflaton hyperspace as
H_o=c/R_H=1.877728042x10^-18 [Hz or 1/s]*

The inflaton wave matter speed is then the tachyon speed as the Guth-Weyl inflaton for inflaton velocity
v_dB=R_Hf_weyl=4.79302635…x10⁵⁶ [m/s]*

And the inflaton hyper-acceleration at instanton time as the Guth-Inflaton wave speed phase acceleration
a_dB=R_Hf_weyl²=1.437907905…x10⁸⁷ [m/s²]*

The inflaton then connects the birth of the universe at the instanton with the death of the universe as a rebirth in the ending of a first semi-cycle at the Hubble node as the size of the universe defined by the instanton-inflaton coupling.

This becomes the effect of the two wormhole images projected by the Hubble Horizon and its image in the shadow-mirror universe Khaibit back to the new created singularity of the QBBS, albeit now having a physical nature replacing the purely mathematical singularity of the mathematical point singularity of the Dirac magnetic monopole. The inflaton mapped the Weylian wormhole onto a new north pole at the inside of the Witten membrane of the 11^th dimension and this creation of space naturally became mirrored in creating the shadow-mirror space for Khaibit and a new south pole now no longer trapped in the infinity potential of the Dirac string but finitized in the existence of a physical universe expanding in a lower dimension under gravitational retardation and the laws of nature and oscillating with invariant lightspeed in a higher dimensional cosmology.

The 10-dimensional universe embedded itself in a multiverse of 3 spacial dimensions given by the Riemann manifold, with a time dimension conformally projecting the time connector dimensions 4, 7 and 10 to the 11^th dimension of the Witten-Maria mirror across line spacetime as the 4^th dimension with the 7^th dimension of twistor spacetime and the 10^th dimension of the quantum spacetime. The connection between the 10^th dimension of string spacetime in the quantum universe as a Dirichlet brane so forms the mirror image for the original 1^st time dimension in line spacetime changing into a 1^st space dimension with a quasi-spacetime in flatland for the second dimension assuming a time like nature to mirror the lower dimensional flatland in a higher dimensional flatland in a 11D-9D =2D dimensional root reduction.

The south pole in Khaibit so is also the south pole of the universe for a total extent of the inflaton as twice the Hubble event horizon and as three new singularities, each one separated from the adjacent one by one Hubble radius R_H. This now renders the midpoint in the expansion of the universe at a radial displacement of ½R_H as a rather special displacement coordinate, as at this point a new center for the universe must be defined to allow the Weyl wormhole of the QBBS to function as the south pole for the north pole at the intersection of the boundary of the Riemann universe with the Witten mirror. The Riemann universe as a 3-dimensional surface volumar embedding a 7-dimensional twistor spacetime is also named as Baab or Gate or Mother Black Hole to distinguish it from an ordinary 3-dimensional volumar within a 4-dimensional spacetime volumar.


The Dark Energy coupled to the Light Energy of a Quantum Entangled Mirror Universe

This midpoint will be imaged in Khaibit and allow the manifestation of Dark Energy from the mirror universe to affect and participate in the cosmological evolution of the physical universe.
The displacement of the QBBS from a coordinate ½R_H=function(n) must so define a scale factor for the expansion of the universe in the collinear two directions from the QBBS coordinate to the south pole in Khaibit and the north pole in Baab separated by precisely 4 Hubble radii, which geometrically become the total size of the 3-dimensional Riemann surface-volumar.

The timeless shadow universe in three imaged spacial dimensions so is defined as a projection of its information onto the surface boundary of a 3-dimensional surface as the Riemann volumar in time as the 4-dimensional spacetime of Minkowski, Riemann and Einstein and becomes the holographic universe of ‘t Hooft, Bekenstein, Thorn, Bousso, Maldacena and Susskind.

​

The coordinate ½R_H=function(n) for the expansion of the universe in the instanton-inflaton coupling with scale factor a is
R(n) = aR_H = R_H(n/(n+1) for a scale factor a=(n/(n+1) with dn/dt=H_o and a parametrization for velocity v_H(n)

v_H(n) = dR(n)/dt = (dR/dn).(dn/dt) = R_HH_o/(n+1)² = c/(n+1)² and a parametrization of acceleration a_H(n)

a_H(n) = d²R(n)/dt² = (dv_H(n)/dn).(dn/dt) = -2R_HH_o²/(n+1)³ = -2cH_o/(n+1)³

Then for n=½, the Hubble radius for the higher dimensional universe will be the invariant light path of the EMMR, travelling at light speed c for a displacement from the QBBS of as nR_H=½R_H. and being emitted from the first wormhole coordinate of the instanton as the inflaton.

The end of the inflation period is however defined in the Weyl wormhole frequency of f_weyl=c/l_weyl=10³⁰ [Hz]* for an inverse time t_weyl=3.333…x10^-31 [sec]* defining the time coordinate for the second wormhole at the Hubble event horizon reflecting or imaging the light path of the inflaton’s EMMR to then meet and intersect the instanton’s light path at cycle coordinate n=½ t_weyl [sec]* after the instanton’s light path had reached this n cycle coordinate.

The lower dimensional light path R(n)=ct=nc/H_o= is equal to the light path of the EMMR so just for a time t_weyl , after which the EMMR light path continues to increase the separation between the two displacements due to the gravitational retardation of the initial QBBS initial boundary conditions for the energy-matter-charge content of the universe.

For cycle coordinate n=1, the EMMR light path has reached the Hubble node, but the expansion of the lower dimensional universe under scale factor a=n/(n+1)=1/(1+1)=½ defines the critical halfway point for the onset of the dark energy from Khaibit and the shadow universe intersecting the light energy of the Riemann universe Baab.

The size of the universe at cycle coordinate n=1 is R(1)=½R_H =7.988377265x10²⁵ [m]* or 8.438053275 Gly by [Eq.1] for a ‘civil year’ of 365.2425 mean solar days and 1 Billion lightyears equal to 1 Gly.

The size of the universe at cycle coordinate n=½ is R(½)=(½.⅔)R_H=⅓R_H=5.325584843x10²⁵ [m]* or 5.62536885 Gly.

The dark energy so began to interact with the light energy 5.625 billion years after the Quantum Big Bang Singularity as the QBBS.

The time marker for the EMMR meeting the 11-dimensional boundary so is 1/H_o = 5.325584843x10¹⁷ [sec]* or a light path of 16.8761 Billion lightyears for a ‘civil’ year of 365.2425 mean solar days. When this event occurs, the EMMR will both refract and reflect its light path. The refraction will define a new 11-dimensional boundary in moving the Witten mirror into a previously undefined part of the spacetime created by the inflaton-instanton coupling, however defined in the timespace of the monopolar singularity as the precursor for the QBBS coupled to the Dirac string. This event will naturally become imaged in the 12-dimensional Vafa omni spacetime of Khaibit as the shadow-mirror universe and the reflection of the light path of the EMMR will begin a return journey to meet the asymptotically expanding Anti de Sitter universe in a baryonic dark matter intersection nexus.

The nexus point for the evolution of the seedling universe as a protoverse so is defined as the intersection of the EMMR light path beginning its journey from the wormhole of the instanton and ending it at the location of the wormhole of the inflaton one half-cycle of period 1/H_o=R_Hubble/c=16.876 billion lightyears.

At this cycle time coordinate a second universe was born from the instanton in the creation of a multiverse from the seedling universe.

This second universe is collocal with the protoverse, but its initial boundary parameters are a function of the seedling parameters depending on a superposed asymptotic cosmology for the protoverse to have completed its evolution in spacetime in satisfying its boundary conditions set in the generating timespace of the imaginary space, albeit ordered in principalities of time as events as definitions.

{ https://www.academia.edu/39210286/The_Origins_of_the_Mathimatia_and_Four_Pillars_of_Creation
https://www.academia.edu/39210282/The_Beginning_of_Nowhere_in_Notime https://www.academia.edu/39210281/The_Beginning_of_Space_in_Time
https://www.academia.edu/39110880/The_Eternal_Void_Exists_as_Unity_Everything_or_All_That_Is }

The evolution of the multiverse, embedded in an omniverse is based on the nature of the QBBS as emerging from a wormhole singularity, physicalizing the Dirac monopole mathematical and one-dimensional originator from timespace.

All cosmological black holes are limited in their metric inertia in their Schwarzschild radii.

The entire universe is a 'Black Holed Hierarchy', but there are black holes evolving with the matter content of the universe as physicalized potentials of the QBBS and there are ‘primordial’ black holes such as the Weyl wormholes of the instanton-inflaton quantum entanglement.

Primordial black holes are known as 'Boundary' Black Holes’ and those engage in their own black hole evolution as so called 'Extremal Strominger Branes'.
This allows definition of the Weyl wormhole as a Strominger boundary wormhole brane of the instanton and the QBBS and of a mass of m_weyl={λ_weylc²/4πG_o} = 6445.7753 kg*. The QBBS of the creation of spacetime so was seeded by the weight of about one large or two elephants in the gravitational field of the earth as about 6.5 metric tons. Strominger extremal black holes are massless in the sense that their wormhole masses can be expressed as frequency energy states in m_weyl=E_weyl/c²=hf_weyl/c²=kT_weyl/c² and that such extremal black holes do not emit Hawking radiation in evaporating their matter content over the course of large cosmological time scales.

At the Quantum Big Bang instanton, a baryonic restmass seedling M_o of about 1.814x10⁵¹ kg became distributed in spacetime vortices given in a de Broglie wave matter inflaton.

This inflaton defined the Hubble horizon as a wavefunction for the holistic holographic de Sitter universe and set a supercluster scale for a ‘daughter black hole’ known as a Sarkar Schwarzschild metric, embedded within a ‘mother black hole’ defined in the Hubble event horizon as a function of the total mass content of the QBBS as defined from the timespace and manifesting in spacetime.

The Sarkar black hole is an extremal black hole and forms the upper limit for gravitational scale interaction between galactic superclusters.
This shows, that the universe will become isotropic and homogeneous beyond the supercluster scale and so manifest the 'Cosmological Principle' in the uniformity of the topology and structure of the universe in cosmological models. The distribution of inertia then takes the form of voids and textures akin a honeycomb geometry and where the individual 'cosmic cells' span across scales of about 470 million lightyears, which so define the Sarkar metric.

But the Sarkar Black Hole is extremal and so is a limiting Black Hole in having a mass M_o as the evolution of the wormhole mass of the QBBS. It does not exist as a 'normal' black hole, such as found at the core of galaxies, which describe a M-Sigma relation in a general ratio of 0.1%-0.2% between the galactic core inertia and the total galactic mass.

The overall black hole evolution takes about 4 trillion years as a Strominger brane to satisfy the boundary condition for the Sarkar black hole to become massless after the completion of the spacetime evolution of the Weyl brane of the instanton merging with the wormhole of the inflaton in the size of the mother black hole of the Hubble event horizon at the boundary of superstring spacetime in 10 dimensions to the intersection with the membrane spacetime of omnispace in the Witten-Maria mirror.

For r_ps to grow to the Hubble event horizon R_H in a time t=n/H_o=nR_H/c, the wormhole mass m_ps must increase in then-cycle function for the gravitational parameter G(n)Y(n)=G_oM_o=G_oXⁿM_oYⁿ for(XY)ⁿ=XⁿYⁿ=1

and this function is proportional to the increase of the wormhole radius for the instanton growing into the size of the Hubble event horizon as the mirror wormhole of the inflaton.

​

]r_psYⁿ=R_H for r_ps.℮^nlnY=R_H for nlnY=ln{R_H/r_ps} and n_critical=ln{R_H/r_ps}/lnY=ln{1.5977x10²⁶/1.5916x10^-23}/ln{1.618034}=ln(2πn_ps)/lnY=234.4715…, implying that 234.4715..Hubble cycles are required for the asymptotic expansion of the lower dimensional universe to enable the second universe, born when the EMMI light path reached the Witten-Maria mirror membrane of the 11^th dimension to quantum tunnel into the subsequent universal cycle.

As 234.4715 Hubble semi-cycles are 234.4715x16.876 Gy=3.957 Trillion years for a time, the protoverse would be destined to exhaust its nuclear fuel supplied by stellar and galactic evolution and in the transmutation of the chemical and atomic elements.

​

The generating complex function for the Mandelbrot-Julia sets, given in their most general form as f(z) = z²+z is mirrored in the n-cycle time function T(n) in the context of the Friedmann cosmology and the general evolution of the universe, reconfigured in the universal encompassing sense by the scale factor a(n)=n/(n+1). This scale factor relates directly to the definition of the natural exponent ‘e’ and the universal wavefunction B(n) as a function of the alpha finestructure with the n-cyclic formula T(n)=n(n+1) = n²+n to introduce the basic Mandelbrot complex function.

The critical density of the universe derives from the total mass density of the QBBS instanton-inflaton coupling.
ρ_critical=M_universe/V_universe=M_H/2π²R_H³=c²/4π²G_oR_H²=H_o²/4π²G_o for the Riemann-Baab 3D-surface universe and as

ρ_critical=(3π/2)H_o²/4π²G_o=3H_o²/8πG_o for the 3D-volumar universe.


The primordial Mass-Charge definitions from the Logos mathimatia in timespace

Electromagnetic Fine structure: α_e = 2πke²/hc = e²/2ε_ohc = μ_oe²c/2h = 60πe²/h ..........(Planck-Stoney-QR units *)

Gravitational Fine structure (Electron): α_g = 2πG_om_electron²/hc = {α_g/α_planck} = {m_electron/m_planck}²

Gravitational Fine structure (Primordial Nucleon): α_nucleon = 2πG_om_c²/hc for m_c = m_planck.α_e⁹

Gravitational Fine structure (Planck Boson): α_planck = 2πG_om_planck²/hc

Gravitational Fine structure unification: {α_g/α_planck} = {m_electron/m_planck}² = {m_electron/m_c}²α_e¹⁸


Mass Seed = M_o =√{E.m_c².m_planck²/m_electron²} = m_c√{E}{α_planck/α_g} for googol space quanta counter E=26x65⁶¹ = 1.006...x10¹¹².

Charge Seed = C_o = √{E.e²/α_e} = √{E.hc/2πk_e} = √{E.hcG_o/2π} = {2e}.{M_o/m_c}.{E_ps.e} = {2e}.{M_o/m_c}{e/e*} for E_ps=1/e*

Source energy quantum E_ps = {Quantized charge in Dirac monopole as dipole}{Number of elementary charged particles}

E_ps = 1/e*= {C_o/2e²}.{m_c/M_o} = {C_o/M_o}.{m_c/2e²} = {√{E.e²/α_e}/{m_c√{E}{α_planck/α_g}}.{m_c/2e²} = {1/2e}√{α_g/α_planckα_e}

E_ps = 1/e* = hf_ps = h/f_ss = h²/E_ss = m_psc²= kT_ps = 1/2e√α_e}{m_electron/m_planck} = √{α_g/α_planckα_e}/2e = G_om_electron/2e²

1/E_ps = e* = 2R_ec² = √{4αhce²/2πG_om_e²} = 2e√α_e[m_planck/m_electron] = 2e√{α_eα_planck/α_g} = {2e²/m_electron}√(k_e/G_o) = 2e²/G_om_e = e²/2πε_om_e for G_o=1/k_e=4πε_o

for a cosmological unification of fine structures in unitary coupling E*.e*=1 in [Nm²/kg²]=[m³s^-2/kg]=1/[Nm²/C²]=[C²m^-3s²/kg] for [C²]=[m⁶/s⁴]

and [C]=[m³/s²]. E_ps = 1/E_ss = 1/e* = √{α_g/α_e}/2e = G_om_e/2e²

The Charge seed is proportional to the number of particles in Universe as {M_o/m_c} and where the primordial nucleons are all ylemic neutrons of spin ½ and which so define their radioactive decay products in a charge twin of positively charged protons and negatively charged electrons and with uncharged antineutrinos.

The unification between dipolar electropolar Coulomb charge 'e' and monopolar magnetopolar Star-Coulomb charge 'e*' unifies the Consciousness quantum E_ps=1/e* in the nature of dipolar electric charge in the redefinition of the Dirac string and the Dirac magnetic monopole from timespace into spacetime. In the universe the consciousness quantum manifests as the inverse of the electric charge quantum 'e', so cancelling any dipolar magnetic effects of the monopolar charge e* in Khaibit. In the universe this monopolar equivalence manifests in its elementary form as the diameter of the electron multiplied by the square of the speed of light c².

The Dark Matter energy so becomes defined in the Universal Consciousness Quantum ‘UniPhysCon’ → E_ps = 1/e* = 1/{2R_ec²} = 1/{Volume [2π²R_RMP³]}x{Angular Acceleration df/dt} for the dark matter elementary consciousness particle RMP=Restmass-Photon R_RMP = ∛{e]*.dt_ss/d_fps|_resonance/2π²}
R_RMP = ∛{(e]*/2π²)/(9x10⁶⁰)} = 1.411884763x10^-20 m* and of spin quantum -1 and a wavelength l_RMP=2pR_RMP=8.8711336x10^-20 m*

The dark matter particle has a mass of m_RMP=h/cλ_RMP=2.50500367x10^-23 kg* and an energy of 2.2545033xd10^-6 J* or 14,034.0 GeV* or 14.034 TeV* (13.999 TeV_SI) as the maximum capacity for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, the international research center for probing the universal energy scales in particle accelerators in Geneva, Switzerland.

Magneto-Monopolar charge quantum e*/c² = 2R_e ⇐ super-membrane displacement transformation ⇒ √α.l_planck = e/c² as Electropolar charge quantum ...[EQ.2]

Dirac’s quantization condition crystallizes naturally from the relationship between the classical electron radius and its relation to the Compton radius for the oscillation scale for the electron exchanging the nature of the Dirac monopole as a monopolar singularity in timespace and the QBBS with the classical electron scale from the wormhole radius r_ps to the classical electron radius R_e=hα/2πcm_electron=αR_compton in spacetime.

Dirac’s quantization condition in its historical context, states Magnetic monopole q_m = n.e/2α={n/N}{e/2α} for electropolar charge e quantized in integer n equal to the magnetopolar charge q_m multiplied by 2α.

Dirac’s magnetopolar charge q_m=g is however defined as:
e* = 2R_ec² = 2αR_comptonc² = 1/E_ps = {2e}√{α_planckα_e/α_g}
for the result e*/2α_e = R_comptonc² = {e/α_e}√{α_planckα_e/α_g}
for quantized (2e) = e*√{α_g/α_planckα_e} = e*{m_electron/m_planck}/√{α_e} = e*{m_electron/m_c}√{α_e¹⁷}

Magneto-Monopolar singularity charge quantum e*√{α_planckα_g/α_e} = 2e as Dipolar Electropolar charge quantum (2e) ...[EQ.3]

The singularity magnetic monopole of the QBBS becomes the point charge elementary electron in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and Quantum Electro-Dynamics (QED). The classical electron is then enabled to physicalize the Dirac string from timespace in the created spacetime quantizing the previously infinite Dirac string in the inflaton as two boundary wormhole singularities in multiples of the wormhole radius r_ps=λ_ps/2π quantized in the classical electron radius in 360R_e=10¹⁰λ_ps as a classical monopolar bound in the spacetime quanta count E.

​

The ylemic universe and the cosmic temperature evolution for the birth of stars and galaxies

Many questions raised in the avenues of astrophysics and cosmology engage the quantum physics of the early universe following the QBBS.
When did the first stars and galaxies form from their black hole seeds and how did the dark matter cosmology change its nature from a decelerating universe into a universe apparently dominated by dark energy, responsible for an apparent acceleration of the universe, beginning about half way through the age of the universe in its thermodynamic evolution?

​

​

The answers are found in the timespace definitions to provide the initial boundary conditions for the spacetime instantaneity defined in the instanton-inflaton coupling.
The timespace defined five superstring classes, which defined the Zero-Point Planck Harmonic Oscillator from the undefined timespace to the five superstring classes in the timespace to be then mirrored by the Dirac monopole at the QBBS singularity as a double-sided Möbius-Klein supermembrane into spacetime. At the Dirac singularity, the point particular nature became ‘stringed’ with the Weyl-Eps boson forming the physicalized manifestation of the Planck boson string for the initializing definition by the Logos mathimatia. The Planck Hormonic Zero-Point Oscillator so became the Weyl-Harmonic Zero-Point Oscillator in a conformal mapping of the timespace onto the QBBS supermembrane and then manifesting the five superstring classes of the timespace in the spacetime.

​

String-Membrane Boson	Classification	Realm	Time Formula	Manifest Time	Energy hf=h/t J*/GeV*	Displacement Scale
Algo-Boson	Time=Frequency tps=1/fps=fss=1/tss	Abstract Definiton	nps=λps/RH nps=Hotps=ctps/RH	6.256x10-49	1.066x1015 6.635x1024	RALGO=2πLALGO=1.878x10-40 LALGO=rALGO=2.989x10-41
Planck-Oscillation Boson	Zero-Point Quantum Fluctuation	Timespace	tOPL=√α tps √α RPL/c=e/c3	3.739x10-44	1.783x1010 1.110x1020	ROPL=2πLOPL=1.122x10-35 LOPL=rOPL=√aLplanck=1.786x10-36
Planck-Boson	string class I Planck open	Timespace	tPL=2πRPL/c RPL=√{hGo/2πc3}	4.377x10-43	1.523x109 9.484x1018	RPL=2πLplanck=1.313x10-34 Lplanck=rPL=2.090x10-35
Monopole Boson	Maximum 30[ec] for gravity GM↔ 2GoM	Timespace	tMO=h/EMO	5.124x10-42	1.301x108 8.100x1026	RMO=2πLMO=1.537x10-33 LMO=rMO=2.446x10-34
Monopole Boson	string class heterotic HO(32) closed	Timespace	tMO=2πRMO/c	1.537x10-40	4.337x106 2.700x1025	RMO=2πLMO=4.611x10-32 LMO=rMO=7.339x10-33
XL-Boson	string class IIB closed	Timespace	tXL=2πRXL/c	2.202x10-39	3.028x105 1.885x1015	RXL=2πLXL=6.606x10-31 LXL=rXL=1.051x10-31
Ecosmic-Boson	string class IIA closed	Timespace	tEC=2πREC/c	6.618x10-34	0.833 5.189x109	REC=2πLEC=1.985x10-25 LEC=rEC=3.159x10-26
False Vacuum Higgs-Boson Upper	Higgs string	Timespace	GoMotps/RHc2	4.672x10-33	0.143 8.885x108	RHiggs=2πLHiggs=1.402x10-24 LHiggs=rHiggs=2.231x10-25
False Vacuum Higgs-Boson Lower	Timespace OPL-Image	Timespace	√α tps	2.847x10-32	0.0234 1.458x108	RHiggs=2πLHiggs=8.541x10-24 LHiggs=rHiggs=1.359x10-24
Weyl-Boson-QBBS radius	string class heterotic HE(64) closed	QBBS Spacetime	tps=rps/c	5.305x10-32	0.0126 7.823x107	rps=λps/2π=1.592x10-23
Weyl-Boson-QBBS wavelength	string class heterotic HE(64) closed	QBBS Spacetime	tps=2πrps/c	3.333x10-31	2x10-3 1.245x107	λps=10-22
Weyl-Boson-QBBS modular wavelength	string class heterotic HE(64) closed	QBBS Spacetime	tps=2πλps/c	2.094x10-30	3.184x10-4 1.982x106	2πλps=6.283x10-22
False Vacuum Higgs- Boson Lower	Spacetime OPL-Image	Spacetime	tps/√α	3.902x10-30	1.709x10-4 1.064x106	RHiggs=2πLHiggs=1.171x10-21 LHiggs=rHiggs=1.864x10-22
False Vacuum Higgs- Boson Upper	Higgs string	Spacetime	RHc2tps/GoMo	2.378x10-29	2.803x10-5 1.746x105	RHiggs=2πLHiggs=7.134x10-21 LHiggs=rHiggs=1.135x10-21
Ecosmic Boson	Cosmic Ray Image Knee	Spacetime	tps2/tEC	1.679x10-28	3.971x10-6 2.472x104	REC=2πLEC=5.037x10-20 LEC=rEC=8.017x10-21
XL-Boson	Cosmic Ray Image Ankle	Spacetime	tps2/tXL	5.046x10-23	1.321x10-11 8.225x10-2	RXL=2πLXL=1.514x10-19 LXL=rXL=2.410x10-20
Monopole Boson	Cosmic Ray Image Toe	Spacetime	tps2/tMO	7.229x10-22	9.222x10-13 5.742x10-3	RMO=2πLMO=2.169x10-13 LMO=rMO=3.451x10-14 Universe the size of the Compton quantum scale Rcompton= Re/a=h/2πmc
Monopole Boson	Minimum 30[ec] for quantum gravity	Spacetime	tMO=h/EMO	2.169x10-20	3.074x10-14 1.914x10-4	RMO=2πLMO=6.507x10-12 LMO=rMO=1.036x10-12 Universe the size of the wave matter de Broglie quantum scale λdB=h/mc
Planck Boson	Planck boson Image	Spacetime	tps2/tPL	2.539x10-19	2.626x10-15 1.635x10-5	RPL=2πLPL=7.617x10-11 LPL=rPL=1.212x10-11 Universe the size of the Bohr atom scale λbohr1=Re/α2
Planck-Oscillation Boson	Planck bounce Image	Spacetime	tps2/tOPL	2.972x10-18	2.243x10-16 1.396x10-6	ROPL=2πLOPL=8.916x10-10 LOPL=rOPL=1.419x10-10 Universe the size of an atom
Algo Boson	Genesis boson Image	Spacetime	tps2/tAlgo	1.775x10-13	3.756x10-21 2.338x10-11	RALGO=2πLALGO=5.32558484x10-5 LALGO=rALGO=8.47593x10-6 Universe the size of smallest life bio-organisms; cellular complex

​

This evolution is defined in the wormhole mass m_weyl={λ_weylc²/4πG_o} transforming into the mass of the mother black hole M_H={R_Hc²/2G_o} in using the time coordinate for the Sarkar daughter black hole given as the coordinate of the E-googol from the timespace definitions as the mass seedling M_o={R_sarkarc²/2G_o}=(proportionality constant q_o)M_H. The proportionality constant q_o is known as the deceleration parameter for the QBBS cosmology.

The H-googol defined the Hubble event horizon and so the boundary conditions for the age and size for the protoverse as a seed for the multiverse emerging after one completion of the light path of the EMMR travelling in spacetime from the instanton to the inflaton.

The F-googol and the G-googol as counts of source energy wormhole quanta reduce the encompassing Riemann volumars in a factor of F/E=1.019538764x10¹⁰³/1.006208782x10¹¹²=1.0132477x10^-9 and G/E=9.676924497x10¹⁰²/1.006208782x10¹¹²=9.61721332x10^-10 to set a particular energy ratio between the light energy parameters and the dark energy parameters in the QBBS.
The light energy parameter refers to the part of Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emerging from the instanton as the effect of the acceleration electropolar charge coupled to the wormhole mass m_weyl and as different from the Electromagnetic monopolar radiation of the EMMR, which is the effect of the acceleration of magnetopolar charge as given in the Dirac monopole manifesting from imaginary timespace as physicalized spacetime.

The dark energy parameter then refers to the part associated with the matter content of the QBBS and so the mass seedling M_o of the instanton defined in spacetime at the E-googol marker and as part of the encompassing dark energy mass of the mother black hole M_H of the Hubble event horizon.

The Riemann volumar R(n)=R_H{n}/{n+1} at the E-googol marker for the Strominger black hole so is calculated as 2π²R_E³={E}{2π²r_weyl³}

for R_E=∛E(λ_weyl/2π)=3.43597108x10¹⁴ m* for a time t_E=n_E/H_o=2.1506x10^-12/H_o=1,145,323.7 s*

and a temperature T_E=1.163x10⁹ K*from T(n)=∜{{H_o³M_o/1100π²σ_SB}.{(n+1)²/n³}}

The Riemann volumar at the F-googol marker for the Strominger black hole so is calculated as 2π²R_F³={F}{2π²r_weyl³} for

R_F=∛F(λ_weyl/2π)=3.45107750x10¹¹ m* for a time t_F=n_F/H_o=2.1601x10^-15/H_o=1150.36 s* and a temperature T_E=2.0614x10¹¹ K*.

The Riemann volumar at the G-googol marker for the Strominger black hole so is calculated as 2π²R_G³={G}{2π²r_weyl³} for
R_G=∛G(λ_weyl/2π)=3.39155801x10¹¹ m* for a time t_G=n_G/H_o=2.1228x10^-15/H_o=1130.52 s* and a temperature T_E=2.0885x10¹¹ K*

For F’=(2G-F)=9.158461354x10¹⁰² space quanta = R_F’=∛F’)(λ_weyl/2π)=3.32987275x10¹¹ m* for a time t_F’=n_F’/H_o=2.0842x10^-15/H_o=1109.96 s*

and a temperature T_E=2.1173x10¹¹ K* and where googol F’ is the mirror image of googol F about googol G


Those Strominger black holes then became physically manifest as the first Gamow ylem protostars, physicalizing the potential matter vortices from the initial potential mass distribution of the M_o matter seedling.

Ylemic neutron stars form the boundary conditions for quark-gluon stars with characteristic radii relating the temperature of the universe at the particular n-cycle coordinate to vortex potential energy concentrations materializing from the matter distribution of the matter seedling M_o as ylemic neutron stars.

The thermodynamic evolution of the universe then relates a general evolution of neutron stars with specific nuclear densities with respect to the cosmic radiation background to the Hawking properties of black holes as a background energy matrix originating from the distribution of a baryonic mass seedling and its coupling to the QBBS parameters.

​

The Hawking-Gamow Temperature Unification for classical and quantum gravitation is so derived as the temperature ratio: T_Hawking/T_ylem = 1 = hcR_e³/2πG_om_c²R_ylem² R_Hawking = R_e³/α_nucleon.R_ylem²R_Hawking with α_nucleon= α_planckα_e¹⁸.

Hawking’s micro black holes play a decisive role in the universal cosmology, as they modulate the quantum gravitational universe of the creation event with the classical gravitation of the spacetime geometry. In particular the micro black holes form the energy centers within encompassing vortices of potential energy modelled on the Jeans length applied to the general temperature evolution of the universe.

​

The ylemic radius is independent from mass as a function of the ylemic Gamow temperature, decreases with time and only depends on atomic and subatomic parameters as the classical electron radius R_e and the primordial nucleon as the ylemic neutron m_c=m_planckα⁹ from the gravitational finestructure α_g=2πm_c²/hc=m_c²/m_planck²=α_e¹⁸ for k_B the Stefan-Boltzmann constant for thermodynamic energy, R_e the classical electron radius, G_o the quantum gravitational constant and m_c the proto-nucleonic mass from the gravitational finestructure in:

The Gamow Ylemic dineutronic radius for Black Hole Temperature evolution:

R_ylem = √{k_BT_ylemR_e³/G_om_c²} ……………………………………[EQ.4]

The ylem radius so is descriptive for a spacetime metric coupling the quantum gravitation of a Hawking micro black hole at the high fusion temperatures of the early universe to its later manifestation in neutron stars defined by their nuclear densities with electron and neutron degeneracies.

The maximum temperature for a black hole is given at a nexus point in the thermodynamic evolution of the universe, known as the bosonic unification of the background temperature with that of the bosonic temperature of the Weyl wormhole of the QBBS. The universe had cooled to a temperature of 1.42x10²⁰ Kelvin from the QBBS temperature of a temperature of 2.30x10³⁶ Kelvin at a time of 2 nanoseconds from the instanton.

At this time, the ylem dark matter radius was 6.26x10⁸ meters encompassing a lower dimensional universe of just 1.1382 meters across in the higher dimensional universe created by the inflaton and the hyper accelerated de Broglie wave matter EMMI light path.

Quantum gravity defined the Hawking micro black hole to have a mass of M_Hawking=r_psc²/2G_o=6445.77 kg* as the minimum mass a black hole can have for a Hawking minimum temperature of T_ps=1.41671x10²⁰ K*. This is defined as an inverse proportionality between the mass and the temperature of a black hole.
The hotter a black hole is, the smaller it must be and the larger a black hole can grow, the cooler it must become.

This quantum gravitational Hawking mass of about the weight of a large elephant, compares to the Planck black hole radius L_planck=2.090x10^-35 m*=2G_om_planck/c² for a halved Planck mass m_planck=8.463x10^-9 kg*, indicating the nature of quantum gravitation as a transformation of the timespace energy scale into the spacetime energy scale.

​

​

​

The Schwarzschild metric for 2L_p = 2G_oM_p/c² transforms a 3D Planck-length in the Planck-mass M_p = √{hc/2πG_o} from the Planck-boson gravitational fine structure constant 1 = 2πG_oM_p²/hc.
The Schwarzschild metric for the Weyl-wormhole radius R_ps then defines a hypermass M_hyper as the conformal mapping of the Planck-mass M_p as M_hyper = ½{R_ps/L_p}M_p = ½{R_ps/L_p}².M_ps and where M_ps = E_ps/c² = hf_ps/c² = kT_ps/c² in fundamental expressions for the energy of Abba-E_ps as one part of the supermembrane E_ps.E_ss in physical quantities of mass m, frequency f and temperature T.

c² and h and k are fundamental constants of nature obtained from the initializing algorithm of the Mathimatia and are labeled as the 'square of lightspeed c' and 'Planck's constant h' and 'Stefan-Boltzmann's constant k' respectively.

The complementary part of supermembrane E_psE_ss is Ess-Baab. Eps-Abba is renamed as 'Energy of the Primary Source-Sink' and Ess-Baab is renamed as 'Energy of the Secondary Sink-Source'.

The primary source-sink and the primary sink-source are coupled under a mode of mirror-inversion duality with Eps describing a vibratory and high energy micro-quantum quantum entanglement with Ess as a winding and low energy macro-quantum energy.
It is this quantum entanglement, which allows Abba to become part of Universe in the encompassing energy quantum of physicalized consciousness, defined in the magnetopolar charge.
The combined effect of the applied Schwarzschild metric then defines a Compton Constant to characterize the conformal transformation as: Compton Constant h/2πc = M_pL_p = M_psR_ps.

Quantum gravitation now manifests the mass differences between Planck-mass M_p and Weyl-mass M_ps.

The Black Hole physics had transformed M_p from the definition of L_p; but this transformation did not generate M_ps from R_ps, but rather hypermass M_hyper, differing from M_ps by a factor of ½{R_ps/L_p}².

To conserve supersymmetry, Logos defined an Anti-Instanton as the Inflaton of Khaibit to define the conformal mapping of M_ps from Universe into Khaibit as 2M_p{L_p/R_ps}².


Hawking Modulus HM = M_HawkingT_Hawking=m_Planck.E^o_Planck/k_B = √{hc/2πG_o}{½m_Planck.c²/k_B} = hc³/4πG_ok_B = {M_Hminin.T_Hmax}={r_psc²/2G_o}{T_ps}=9.1317939x10²³ [kgK]*

The maximum Hawking temperature for micro black holes so is given as T_ps=T_weyl as a maximized bosonic or Einstein-Boson-Condensate temperature for the QBBS.

The Hawking-Unruh form for the Hawking Modulus is M_Hawking.T_Hawking = m_planck.T_planck/8π = hc³/16π²G_ok_B =7.2668507x10²² [kgK]*
for the extent of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR) requiring 1440° or 8π radians to repeat its superposed electromagnetic-gravitational wavefunction.

The Unruh acceleration within a temperature background so relates to the surface properties of the holographic AdS-CFT (conformal field theory) cosmology and the entropy of a black hole in the Hawking-Bekenstein bound of S=2πk_BAc³/4G_oh in the UFoQR then becomes a_unruh=2πcM_Hawkingk_BT_Hawking/h and would give a black hole Hawking temperature of 2.46x10^-19 K* for a gravitational acceleration of 9.8 [m/s²]*.

The entropy of the Hawking-Bekenstein cosmology therefore relates to the conformal mapping of the Planck displacement scale onto the Weyl-Eps displacement scale in entropy S=¼{Area/L_planck²}=¼{2πAc³/G_oh}.

The Weyl-wormhole of heterotic supermembrane EpsEss and given by the sinusoidal waveform f_UFoQR(x)=sin(3x/2)-cos(3x/4) so represents the four Planck areas L_planck² per information bit in its 12 monopolar current loops spanning a wave number of k=4 in 8πl_ps radians.
As the Feigenbaum complexity bound for the universal base topology is 3π/2, and the surface area for the Riemann 3-dimensional manifold is 6π²R₃², the Hawking-Unruh factor of 4π=6π²/(3π/2)=12π²/3π as a coefficient modulation in the multidimensional universe.

As indicated by cosmological models, including Susskind, Maldacena, Bousso and Verlinde, relating string theory with gravitation and the holographic principle; crystallizes that quantum information from timespace allows gravitation and all interactions to emerge in spacetime. The transition from timespace into spacetime then is enabled by the Dirac string and the mirror modular dualities of string-membrane realm imaging the string parameters from timespace into spacetime. The primary physical parameter for the subsequently evolving cosmology then is the definition of temperature as a kinetic energy effect for the lower dimensional and gravitational universe and with entropy as a count of energy-frequency micro eigenstates as bits of information.

The higher dimensional information universe so forms a corollary in the EMMI light path of the monopolar source radiation to the EMI light path for the matter dependent electromagnetic radiation (EMR). As the EMR is produced by the dynamics of electropolar charges, as in the angular acceleration of protons in a fusion star; but the magnetopolar charges are accelerated in the frequency differential over time in df/dt as a radial independent angular quantum spin; the Unruh acceleration can be generalised to the gravitational acceleration g=GM/R² for the entropic cosmology and bounded in the Schwarzschild metric in partitioning lightspeed c in the product of wavelength times frequency.

For a temperature T=hg/4π²ck_B=G_oMh/4π²ck_BR²=hc³/16π²k_BG_oM the square of the Schwarzschild metric results in 4G_o²M²=R²c⁴

In particular, the definitions of the dark matter particle in the RMP and the Dirac monopole as the Weyl-wormhole indicate that for the first 6.662x10^-29=light path/c seconds from the QBBS, the physical energy content of the universe was purely restmass photonic in forming the ylemic dineutron bosons as the primordial radiation background for the thermodynamic expansion of the universe.

As the volume of the universe at electroweak unification is 2π²R_EW³={2.434875x10⁸⁷}{2π²r_ps³}, the physicalised matter content in the universe from baryon seedling M_o consisted of 2.43x10⁸⁷ dark matter particles in the form of bosonic ylemic dineutrons coupled as a doubled or squared matter colour charge template Y²C²M² containing the soon to be born Higgs boson as the scalar Goldstone boson coupled to a spin conserving colour neutral graviphoton of spin +1 coupled to the RMP’s negative quantum spin of -1.

The wave quark geometric Y²C²M²(-1) decays into two lefthanded neutrons each of quantum spin -½ to manifest the charge-parity violation of the weak interaction and the suppression of antimatter in the form of the M²C²Y² antimatter template for the Anti-Higgs boson and the Anti-RMP.

The graviphoton coupled to a matter weakon (W^-)(+1) can then couple to a weakly interacting neutron to flip the lefthanded neutron into a righthanded neutron in conjunction with an antimatter weakon (W⁺)(-1) coupled to an anti-graviphoton conserving weak interaction parity across the mirror of the QBBS as the Dirac string with the Khaibit shadow-mirror universe.

The neutral current weakon (Z^o)(±1) similarly engages anti-neutrino and neutrino interactions from their colour charged R²G²B²(+½) and B²G²R²(-½) templates, their Dirac form of weakonness being massless, but their Majorana form of unified field interaction resulting in the mass induction by the scalar Higgs (anti)neutrino of squared template form (R⁴G⁴B⁴)(0) and B⁴G⁴R⁴(0).

The production of antimatter in the form of pair production in the UfoQR between monopolar current loops for junctions 6-7-8 then became defined at the electroweak unification cycle coordinate in the cosmogenesis.

The Dirac monopole is defined in the units of the gravitational parameter or [m³/s²]=[Volume][Angular Acceleration] as:
e*=2R_ec²= 2R_e{λ_ps²}{f_ps²}=1/E_ps for 2R_e{λ_ps²}=2R_e{360R_e/10¹⁰}²={2.592x10^-15}R_e³=e*/f_ps²=e*f_ss²=e*(9x10⁶⁰) entropy self-states

The RMP is defined in its volumar 2π²R_RMP³=e*/f_ps²= e*/(9x10⁶⁰) entropy self-states) to define the ratio {R_e/R_RMP}=∛{2π²/2.592x10^-15}=7.6154355x10¹⁵ showing that so 7.615 quadrillion RMPs will fit into the source energy quantum and the inversion charge energy of the Dirac monopole and so the QBBS instanton.

The radius of the RMP is given R_RMP=1.411884763x10^-20 m* from the source energy quantum definition for the classical electron radius of 2.777…x10^-15 m*.
The unification condition for the physicalisation of the Dirac monopole as the t’Hooft-Polyakov monopole requires however the Mean Monopolar Quantum Bound (MQB) as the alignment of the Dirac monopole wavelength mapped onto the electron wavelength and this MQB is calculated from the quantization condition to align the Dirac wavelength with the mirror modular duality of the supermembrane EpsEss. As the inversion properties apply throughout the cosmology defined by the googolplex markers EFGF’, the Dirac wavelength aligns the divergence between the product R_ER_e in the coupling of l* to R_E and r* to R_e in the ratio = η_MO=(MQB/R_ER_e)=(1.351/0.9544)=1.41555 and in multiplying the RMP radius by (MQB/R_ER_e) for an effective dark matter displacement coordinate R_RMPeff=1.9986x10^-20 m*.

λ*=4.087933536x1014 Monopolar mean classical bound	2πr*λ* MQB=1.351	2πr*=3.30485x10-15 Monopolar mean quantum bound
RE*=3.6x1014 = 360x1012		Re*=Re=1010λps/360
RE=∛E(λweyl/2π)=3.43597108x1014	RERe=0.9544	Re=2.7777x10-15

​

The RMP dominated era ended when the ylemic dineutron radius became equal to the size of the universe at a time about 1/140^th of a second for a radius of 2.14114x10⁶ m*. This was the nexus for the RMP-Higgs ylemic quarkian geometry template to differentiate between the mesonic inner and the leptonic outer ring to kernel the proton in electroweak unification at a temperature of 1.68x10¹⁵ K* and when the dark matter universe became illuminated in the EMMI light path intersecting the RMP haloed universe.

The number of space quanta comprising the universe at RMP time is the size of the universe for cycle coordinate divided by 2π²r_ps³

As a space quanta count Eta_RMP = η_RMP= R_RMPeff³/r_ps³=1.9802x10⁹=1/5.0500x10^-10

For the googolplex E-FGF’, the photon baryon ratios for the time of the primordial neutron decay from to 1150.36 – 1130.52 – 1109.96 – 229.821 seconds for a time interval from 880.14 to 900.70 to 920.54 seconds, the respective photon-baryon ratios then replace the ratio of the dark matter restmass photons in the illuminated universe now enabled to freely produce protons, electrons with anti-neutrinos in beta minus weak interaction decay and completing the first 20 minutes of the thermodynamic evolution of the universe in the formation of primordial helium, deuterium, tritium and lithium in the nucleosynthesis of the QBBS.

η_MO {R_E/R_F}³={1.41555}{1.006208782x10¹¹²/1.019538764x10¹⁰³ }={1.41555}{9.8692548x10⁸}=1.397042x10⁹=1/7.15799x10^-10

η_MO {R_E/R_G}³={1.41555}{1.006208782x10¹¹² /9.676924497x10¹⁰² }={1.41555}{1.03980225x10⁹}=1.471892x10⁹=1/6.79398x10^-10

η_MO {R_E/R_F’}³={1.41555}{1.006208782x10¹¹² /9.158461354x10¹⁰² }={1.41555}{1.09866575x10⁹}=1.555216x10⁹=1/6.42998x10^-10

​

As the displacement string modular dualities define the minimum-maximum winding mode-frequency mode boundary conditions in string displacement/time =r_ps/t_ps = λ_psf_ps/2π = c/2π modular dual to r_ss/t_ss=2πλ_ssf_ss=2π/c the minimum Hawking temperature is modulated in
{r_pst_ss/r_sst_ps}={c²/4π²} as T_Hmin = {c²/4π²}T_ss = {c²/4π²}E_ss/k_B ={hf_ssc²/4k_Bπ²}=3.58856785x10^-26 K* = T_ss{c²/4π²}_mod and where {c²/4π²}_mod is dimensionless due to the string modular duality.

This minimum Hawking temperature for black hole modulation now defines the modular black hole mass dual to the micro black hole of the QBBS as
M_Hawkingmax=M_Hmax={M_Hminin.T_Hmax}/{T_Hmin} = {hc³/4πk_BG_o}/{hf_ssc²/4k_Bπ²} = {πcf_ps/G_o}_mod = 2.544690x10⁴⁹ kg*

This maximum Hawking mass so refers to the cycle time coordinate in the evolution of the thermodynamic universe, when the bosonic unification Hawking micro black hole mass with its dark matter ylemic halo will be balanced in a Hawking macro black hole mass descriptive in the encompassing temperature evolution of the universe.

As the micro black hole has the wormhole radius r_ps=λ_ps/2π of the QBBS at the bosonic unification time 2 nanoseconds into the expansion of the universe; the macro black hole will have the modular dual radius to the wormhole radius as r_ss=2πλ_ss or 6.283x10²² m* at a time characterizing the dark matter halo of the micro quantum state to reverse in a modulation of rendering the dark matter halo visible and illuminated.

The cycle time n=0.000393425… or 6.64 million years from the QBBS so manifests an anti-wormhole or white hole perimeter for the supermembrane sourcesink E_ps mirroring the supermembrane sinksource E_ss as the micro black hole perimeter of the bosonic temperature unification. Monopolar sourcesink E_ps so begins to activate in the cosmology in applying the dark matter haloes from a global universal perspective onto a galactic local disposition and preparing the universe for the birth of stars and galaxies, based on the displacement scale of the modulated Hawking macro quantum black hole.

The temperature for this nexus coordinate was 358.05 K* and with a cosmological comoving redshift of z=49.421.

A universal radius of 6.283x10²² m* calculates for the Strominger form of the universe as a black hole as M_Hmax=2πλ_ssc²/2G_o=2.5447x10⁴⁹ kg*

​

The critical displacement scale for the dark matter haloes from {λ_ss/2π – λ_ss – 2πλ_ss} or {0.159-1.00-6.28}x10²² m* is conformally mapped onto the galactic seeds encompassed by supercluster seeds of the Sarkar scale defined in the baryon mass seed R_sarkar=G_oM_o/c² from {1.12-2.23-4.47}x10²⁴ m* with the Hawking modulus applied to the Strominger black hole universal evolution.

The supermembrane modulation factor {c²/4π²}_mod={c²/39.478} so defines a generalized displacement scale for a galactic seed with its core and bulge separated from its inner and outer haloes in 2π² as the volumar coefficient for a space quantum (V_sq=2π²r_ps³) in 2π²~2x10⁶/10⁵=20=4x10⁶/2x10⁵ and for λ_psf_ps=c=1/λ_ssf_ss.

The ylem radius at the bosonic unification temperature was 6.2584x10⁸m* and it was 2.1411x10⁶ m* for the electroweak unification when the ylemic radius matched the size of the expanding universe.

The intersection of the ylemic radius in the inflaton universe with the instanton universe so was (6.2584x10⁸-2.1411x10⁶)m* = 6.1370x10⁸ m* and representing 2.04 light seconds and a volume of 2π²(2.04H_oR_H)³=2π²(2.04c)³= 4.5246x10²⁷ [m³]* or 5.686x10⁹⁴ dark matter space quanta from the higher dimensional universe, the lower dimensional universe was expanding into.

​

From the electroweak unification nexus at 1/140^th of a second into the cosmogenesis; the dark matter haloes became fully integrated into the lower dimensional universe with the ylemic radius continually shrinking relative to the expanding Hubble universe aiming for the Hubble event horizon set by the inflaton of the QBBS. At the present cycle time coordinate for the universe, the ylemic radius is 87.15 mm* for a Hawking-ylem-universal temperature of 7.474 K* and a lower dimensional radius of 8.96 billion light years within a higher dimensional radius of 16.88 billion light years of the EMI light path within 19.12 billion light years of the EMMI light path.

The gravitationally closed universe in de Sitter spacetime so is at the 53.11% (n/n+1) marker relative to its closure mass in de Sitter spacetime but is at the 86.73% (n) marker relative to its open anti de Sitter spacetime. As 86.73% of the closure mass represent .8673R_H=14.64 billion light years; the true EMMI age of the universe is underestimated in the intersection of the EMMI light path relative to the de Sitter spacetime observer in 13.27% of the true age as 16.88+2.24=19.12 billion years.

Relating the ylem temperature of the Gamow radius of the schwarzschilded protostar vortex to the Hawking temperature of black holes forms the relationship between the ylemic radius of the Gamow protostar and the Hawking black hole.

M_Hawking=HM/T_Hawking=(hc³/4πG_ok_B)/T_Hawking = R_Hawkingc²/2G_o for R_Hawking = hc/2πk_BT_Hawking as the curvature Schwarzschild radius for a Hawking black hole

T_Hawking = hc/2πk_BR_Hawking for T_ylem = G_om_c².R_ylem²/k_BR_e³

with T_Hawking/T_ylem = hcR_e³/2πG_om_c²R_ylem² R_Hawking = R_e³/α_nucleon.R_ylem²R_Hawking

for the gravitational finestructure constant α_nucleon for nucleons with m_planckα_e⁹=√{(hc/2πG_o)(2πk_ee²/hc)}α_e^[17/2] = {e/G_o}α_e^[17/2] = k_eeα_e^[17/2] = m_c
for the Planck mass m_planck²=hc/2πG_o and the gravitational fine structure α¹⁸=Stoney-Planck unification G_o=1/k_e=4πε_o and the general unitary unification of Dirac’s monopole in the identity of the gravitational parameter GM equal to magneto charge e* in [e*/G_o]=[m³/s²]/[Nm²/kg²]=[kg]=[M]

Electromagnetic Fine structure: α_e = 2πk_ee²/hc = e²/2ε_ohc = μ_oe²c/2h = 60πe²/h ..........(Planck-Stoney-QR units *)

Gravitational Fine structure (Electron): α_g = 2πG_om_electron²/hc = {α_g/α_planck} = {m_electron/m_planck}²

Gravitational Fine structure (Primordial Nucleon): α_nucleon = 2πG_om_c²/hc for m_c = m_planck.α_e⁹

Gravitational Fine structure (Planck Boson): α_planck = 2πG_om_planck²/hc

Gravitational Fine structure unification: {α_g/α_planck} = {m_electron/m_planck}² = {m_electron/m_c}²α_e¹⁸



The Hawking-Gamow Temperature Unification for classical and quantum gravitation in Hawking Micro Black Holes:

T_Hawking/T_ylem = hcR_e³/2πG_om_c²R_ylem² R_Hawking = R_e³/α_nucleon.R_ylem²R_Hawking with α_nucleon= α_planckα_e¹⁸ …..[EQ.5]

For Hawking Micro Black Holes T_Hawking=T_ylem: R_Hawking = hc/2πk_BT_Hawking = 2G_oM_Hawking/c²

The ylem temperature is therefore the Hawking temperature for black holes and also the temperature of the universe as the Cosmic Background Radiation or CBR, presently in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum.

For any time in the cosmic evolution, an ylemic radius and temperature is defined as a background spacetime matrix guiding the universal evolution of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity from the instanton to the inflaton for both the higher dimensional light path of the EMMI and the lower dimensional cosmology of the Planck-Einstein Black Body radiator’s thermodynamic evolution.

The original mass seedling M_o=2q_oM_H =Ω_oM_H= 2Λ_oM_H/A_dB is distributed as primordial Hawking Black Holes potentials as function of the Hawking modulus HM=M_HawkingT_Hawking=hc³/4πk_BG_o beginning at a time coordinate defining the Bosonic Temperature Unification (BTU) at a temperature defined by the Weyl-Eps boson string T_ps=E_ps/k_B=2.222x10²⁰ K*.

The time coordinate for this event calculates as about 2 nanoseconds from the QBBS, the instanton and the inflaton. Prior to the BTU, the universe expanded as a Boson-Einstein-Condensate of nucleonic quark-lepton-gluon plasma with the background temperature of the universe exceeding the temperature of the BTU.

The Hawking mass-temperature relation for this black hole evolution then begins to manifest the mass seedling M_o in seedling vortices, destined to evolve into the seeds for ylemic protostars, then growing in size to the scale of dark matter galaxies from which individual stars would form from the previously ‘Schwarzschilded’ ylemic protostars.

The time for the transformation of the ylemic seedling stars, would be the time in the evolution of the universe, when the general scale of the universe would equal the curvature radius defined in the baryonic mass seedling M_o as the gravitational bounding limit of galactic superclusters R_sarkar=2G_oM_o/c² ranging from 1.12 to 2.24 to 4.48x10²⁴ m* as the Sarkar radius for a black hole and its diameter and as half its radius for the black hole gravitational potential energy calibration from Einstein quintessence as the cosmological constant as ratio to the de Broglie phase inflaton hyper-acceleration A_dB in Λ_o/A_dB=G_oM_o/R(n_ps)²/A_dB={G_oM_o/λ_ps²}/{R_Hf_ps²}={G_oM_o/R_Hc²}=M_sarkar/2M_H=M_o/2M_H.

These three supercluster scales relate to 118 to 237 to 473 million light years respectively and show the birth of the first stars and galaxies in this time period.

But Λ_o/A_dB = M_o/2M_H = M_sarkar/2M_H = q_o = 2Ω_o for deceleration parameter q_o=0.014015 for the baryon seedling Ω_o=2q_o=0.028030 for M_H=R_Hc²/2G_o .

The baryonic mass seed so represents 2.8% of the closure mass M_H of the QBBS and increases as a function of the gravitational parameter G(n)M(n)=constant=G_oM_o.

It has reached the value of 4.85% for a present n-cycle time coordinate of n_present=1.132711, showing that the dark matter proportion will be 27.43% of the total and as 85% of the matter content and the dark energy as the Einstein quintessence closing the universe in 67.73% for the present time.

The baryonic matter component evolves according to Ω_BM=Ω_oYⁿ =0.02803{1.618034}^1.132711 = 0.0483 until saturation coordinate for the baryonic matter BM intersecting dark matter DM

for n=√2 for Ω_BM=Ω_oYⁿ =0.02803{1.618034}^√2 = 0.055357=constant for the cosmic matter evolution from 23.866 Gy.

The dark matter Ω_DM = 1-Ω_BM until onset of the dark energy component DE at n=½, from which Ω_DM is calculated by Ω_DM=Ω_BM{[1+1/n]³ - 1} and as 0.27434 for the present time.

ρ_BM+DM/ρ_critical = 2π²M_oYⁿR_H³/2π²R(n)³M_H = Ω_oYⁿ{V_AdS/V_dS} = Ω_oYⁿ{[n+1]/n}³ = Ω_oYⁿ{1+1/n}³ from n=½

for ρ_DM/ρ_critical= Ω_oYⁿ{(1+1/n)³ – 1}

The Dark Energy Fraction Ω_DE = 1- Ω_DM - Ω_BM = 1 - Ω_BM[1+1/n]³ and Ω_DE = 1 - Ω_DM - Ω_BM = 1 - Ω_BM[1+1/n]³ = 1 – Ω_oY^npresent{1+1/n_present}³ = 1 – 0.32269 = 0.67731 for the present time.

​

 

A Revision of the Friedmann Cosmology, Emergent Gravity and Dark Energy as entangled Quantum Information

It is well known, that the Radius of Curvature in the Field Equations of General Relativity relates to the Energy-Mass Tensor in the form of the critical density ρ_critical = 3H_o²/8πG and the Hubble Constant H_o as the square of frequency or alternatively as the time differential of frequency df/dt as a cosmically applicable angular acceleration independent on the radial displacement.
The scientific nomenclature (language) then describes this curved space in differential equations relating the positions of the 'points' in both space and time in a 4-dimensional description called Riemann Tensor Space or similar.
This then leads mathematically, to the formulation of General Relativity in Einstein's field Equations:

for the Einstein-Riemann tensor
​

and is built upon ten so-called nonlinear coupled hyperbolic-elliptic partial differential equations, which are mathematically rather complex and often cannot be solved analytically without simplifying the geometries of the parametric constituents (say objects interacting in so called tensor-fields of stress-energy {T_μν} and curvatures in the Riemann-Einstein tensor {G_μν}, either changing the volume in reduction of the Ricci tensor {R_ij} with scalar curvature R as {Rg_μν} for the metric tensor {g_μν} or keeping the volume of considered space invariant to volume change in a Tidal Weyl tensor {R_μν}).

The Einstein-Riemann tensor then relates Curvature Radius R to the Energy-Mass tensor E=Mc² via the critical density as 8πG/c⁴=3H_o2V_critical.M_critical.c²/M_critical.c⁴ = 3H_o²V_critical/c² = 3V_critical/R² as Curvature Radius R by the Hubble Law applicable say to a nodal Hubble Constant H_o = c/R_Hubble.

The cosmological field equations then can be expressed as the square of the nodal Hubble Constant and inclusive of a 'dark energy' terms often identified with the Cosmological Constant of Albert Einstein, here denoted Λ_Einstein.

Substituting the Einstein Lambda with the time differential for the square of nodal Hubble frequency as the angular acceleration acting on a quantized volume of space however; naturally and universally replaces the enigma of the 'dark energy' with a space inherent angular acceleration component, which can be identified as the 'universal consciousness quantum' directly from the standard cosmology itself.

The field equations so can be generalised in a parametrization of the Hubble Constant assuming a cyclic form, oscillating between a minimum and maximum value given by H_o=dn/dt for cycle time n=H_ot and where then time t is the 4-vector time-space of Minkowski light-path x=ct.

The Einstein Lambda then becomes then the energy-acceleration difference between the baryonic mass content of the universe and an inherent mass energy related to the initial condition of the oscillation parameters for the nodal Hubble Constant.

Λ_Einstein = G_oM_o/R(n)² - 2cH_o/(n+1)³ = Cosmological Acceleration - Intrinsic Universal Milgröm Deceleration as: g_μνΛ = 8πG/c⁴ T_μν - G_μν
then becomes G_μν + g_μνΛ = 8πG/c⁴ T_μν and restated in a mass independent form for an encompassment of the curvature fine structures.

Dark Energy Initiation for n=½ with q_dS=0 and q_AdS=1

​

Energy Conservation and Continuity

dE + PdV = TdS =0 (First Law of Thermodynamics) for a cosmic fluid and scaled Radius R=a.R_o; dR/dt = da/dt.R_o and d²R/dt² = d²a/dt².R_o
dV/dt = {dV/dR}.{dR/dt} = 4πa²R_o³.{da/dt}
dE/dt = d(mc²)/dt = c².d{ρV}/dt = (4πR_o³.c²/3){a³.dρ/dt + 3a²ρ.da/dt}

dE + PdV = (4πR_o³.a²){ρc².da/dt + [ac²/3].dρ/dt + P.da/dt} = 0 for the cosmic fluid energy pressure continuity equation:

dρ/dt = -3{(da/dt)/a.{ρ + P/c²}} .............................................................................................(1z)

The independent Einstein Field Equations of the Robertson-Walker metric reduce to the Friedmann equations:

H² = {(da/dt)/a}² = 8πGρ/3 - kc²/a² + Λ/3...............................................................................(2z)

{(d²a/dt²)/a} = -4πG/3{ρ+ 3P/c²} + Λ/3 ..................................................................................(3z)


for scale radius a=R/R_o; Hubble parameter H = {da/dt)/a}; Gravitational Constant G; Density ρ; Curvature k ; light speed c and Cosmological Constant Λ.

Differentiating (2z) and substituting (1z) with (2z) gives (3z):

{2(da/dt).(d²a/dt²).a² - 2a.(da/dt).(da/dt)²}/a⁴ = 8πG.(dρ/dt)/3 + 2kc².(da/dt)/a³ + 0
= (8πG/3){-3{(da/dt)/a.{ρ + P/c²}} + 2kc².(da/dt)/a³ + 0

(2(da/dt)/a).{(d²a/dt²).a - (da/dt)²}/a² = (8πG/3){-3(da/dt)/a}.{ρ + P/c²} + 2{(da/dt)/a}.(kc²/a²) +0 2{(da/dt)/a}.{(d²a/dt²).a - (da/dt)²}/a² = 2{(da/dt)/a}{-4πG.{ρ + P/c²} + (kc²/a²)} +0 with kc²/a² = 8πGρ/3 + Λ/3 - {(da/dt)/a}²

d{H²}/dt = 2H.dH/dt = 2{(da/dt)/a}.dH/dt dH/dt = {[d²a/dt²]/a - H²} = {-4πG.(ρ+ P/c²) + 8πGρ/3 + Λ/3 -H²}
= -4πG/3(ρ + 3P/c²) + Λ/3 - H²} = -4πG/3(ρ + 3P/c²) + Λ/3 - 8πGρ/3 + kc²/a² - Λ/3} = -4πG.(ρ + P/c²) + kc²/a²

dH/dt = -4πG{ρ+P/c²} as the Time derivative for the Hubble parameter H for flat Minkowski space-time with curvature k=0

{(d²a/dt²).a - (da/dt)²}/a² = -4πG{ρ+ P/c²} + (kc²/a²) + 0 = -4πG{ρ + P/c²} + 8πGρ/3 - {(da/dt)/a}² + Λ/3

{(d²a/dt²)/a} = (-4πG/3){3ρ + 3P/c²- 2ρ} = (-4πG/3){ρ + 3P/c²} + Λ/3 = dH/dt + H²

For a scale factor a = n/[n+1] = {1-1/[n+1]} = 1/{1+1/n}

dH/dt + 4πGρ = - 4πGP/c² .... (for V_4/10D = [4π/3]R_H³ and V_5/11D = 2π²R_H³ in factor 3π/2)

a_reset = R_k(n)_AdS/R_k(n)_dS + ½ = n-∑∏n_k-1+∏n_k + ½

Scale factor modulation at N_k={[n-∑∏n_k-1]/Πn_k } = ½ reset coordinate

{dH/dt} = a_reset .d{H_o/T(n)}/dt = - H_o²(2n+1)(n+3/2)/T(n)² for k=0

dH/dt + 4πGρ = - 4πGP/c²

{dH/dt} = a_reset .d{H_o/T(n)}/dt = - H_o²(2n+1)(n+3/2)/T(n)²…………………………………………….(4z)

-H_o²(2n+1)(n+3/2)/T(n)² + G_oM_o/{R_H³(n/[n+1])³}{4π} = Λ(n)/{R_H(n/[n+1])} + Λ/3
-2H_o²{[n+1]²-¼}/T[n]² + G_oM_o/R_H³(n/[n+1])³{4π} = Λ(n)/R_H(n/[n+1]) + Λ/3
-2H_o²{[n+1]²-¼}/T(n)² + 4π.G_oM_o/R_H³(n/[n+1])³ = Λ(n)/R_H(n/[n+1]) + Λ/3

For a scale factor a=n/[n+1] = {1-1/[n+1]} = 1/{1+1/n} with
H_dS=V(n)/R(n)={c/[n+1]²}/{[n+1]/nR_H}=H_o/n[n+1]=H_o/T(n)
H_AdS=H_o/n and a reset coordinate for the QBBS for n’=2 and dark energy onset n=½
R(n)_AdS/R(n)_dS={nR_H}/{nR_H/[n+1]}=n+1={n’-½} for n’=n+3/2=a_reset

Λ(n)/R_H(n/[n+1]) = - 4πGP/c² = G_oM_o/R_H³(n/[n+1])³ -2H_o²/(n[n+1]²)

and Λ = 0

for -P(n) = Λ(n)c²[n+1]/4πG_onR_H = Λ(n)H_oc[n+1]/4πG_on = M_oc²[n+1]³/4πn³R_H³ - H_o²c²/2πG_on[n+1]²

For n=1.132711............ - (+6.696373x10^-11 J/m³)* = (2.126056x10^-11 J/m³)* + (-8.8224295x10^-11 J/m³)*

Negative Dark Energy Pressure = Positive Matter Energy + Negative Inherent Milgröm Deceleration (cH_o/G_o)

The Dark Energy and the 'Cosmological Constant' exhibiting the nature of an intrinsic negative pressure in the cosmology become defined in the overall critical deceleration and density parameters. The pressure term in the Friedmann equations being a quintessence of function n and changing sign from positive to negative to positive as indicated.
For a present measured deceleration parameter q_dS=-0.5586, the DE Lambda calculates as 6.696x10^-11 (N/m²=J/m³)*, albeit as a positive pressure within the negative quintessence.
The Einstein Lambda then becomes then the energy-acceleration difference between the baryonic mass content of the universe and an inherent mass energy related to the initial condition of the oscillation parameters for the nodal Hubble Constant.

​

For the minimum Planck-Oscillator: E_op = ½hf_op = ½m_opc² = ½k_BT_op = Mc²/#bits
={Mc².l_planck²}/{4πR²} = {MG_oh/8π²cR²} = {hg/8π²c} with gravitational acceleration g =G_oM/R² and M=gR²/G_o for k_BT = hg/4π²c = {String T-Duality modulation factor ζ}{hg/c}
ζ= Linearization of Compton wave matter in de Broglie wave matter = r_ps/r_ss = {λ_ps/2π}/{2πλ_ss} = {λ_ps²/4π²} = {1/4π².λ_ss²} = 10^-44/4π²
for 4π=HM/HUM={hc³/4πG_ok_B }/{hc³/16π²G_ok_B}

The gravitational acceleration in Quantum Relativity g as the Weyl-wormhole gravitational acceleration then is g_ps = c.f_ps
for E_ps = hf_ps = hc.f_ps/c = k_BT_ps = hg_ps/c and generalizes as the Milgröm acceleration -2cH_o/(n+1)³ in the cosmology in g cH_o.
dE = TdS for c²dM = (2k_BT.c³)dA/4G_oh for dM = {hgc/2πc}dA/{4G_oh} = {g/8πG_o}dA dM/dA = {g/8πG_o}
dS/dA = k_B/4l_planck² = 2πk_Bc³/4hG_o from Entropy S=k_BA/4l_planck² = πc³k_BA/2G_oh with dS=2πk_B from dE/dS = T and E = ∑TdS = k_BT in the quantum self-state dM/dS = {dM/dA}.{dA/dS} = {g/8πG_o}.{4l_planck²/k_B}= {gl_planck²/2πk_BG_o} = {hg/4π²k_Bc³}=ζ{hg/k_Bc³}


https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02269.pdf

The scale factor (a=n/[n+1]) radius at the instanton-inflaton is R(n_ps)=R_H(n_ps/(n_ps+1)}=R_Hλ_ps/R_H=λ_ps in the limit for n_ps=λ_ps/R_H=6.259x10^-49~0

The Universal Temperature Evolution in light paths EMI and EMMI


















​

 

The Ylemic Gluon-Quark-Plasma Protostars of Universe as Vortex Energies


The stability of stars is a function of the equilibrium condition, which balances the inward pull of gravity with the outward pressure of the thermodynamic energy or enthalpy of the star (H=PV+U). The Jeans Mass M_J and the Jeans Length R_J a used to describe the stability conditions for collapsing molecular hydrogen clouds to form stars say, are well known in the scientific data base, say in formulations such as:
M_J=3k_BTR/2Gm for a Jeans Length of R_J=√{15k_BT/(4πρGm)}=R_J =√(k_BT/Gnm²).
Now the Ideal Gas Law of basic thermodynamics states that the internal pressure P and Volume of such an ideal gas are given by PV=nRT=NkT for n moles of substance being the Number N of molecules (say) divided by Avogadro's Constant L in n=N/L.

Since the Ideal Gas Constant R divided by Avogadro's Constant L and defines Boltzmann's Constant k=R/L. The statistical analysis of kinetic energy KE of particles in motion in a gas (say) gives a root-mean-square velocity (rms) and the familiar 2.KE=mv²(rms) from the distribution of individual velocities v in such a system. It is found that PV=(2/3)N.KE as a total system described by the v(rms). Setting the KE equal to the Gravitational PE=GMm/R for a spherical gas cloud gives the Jeans Mass (3/2N).(Nk_BT)=GMm/R with m the mass of a nucleon or Hydrogen atom and M=M_J=3kTR/2Gm as stated.

The Jeans' Length is the critical radius of a cloud (typically a cloud of interstellar dust) where thermal energy, which causes the cloud to expand, is counter acted by gravity, which causes the cloud to collapse. It is named after the British astronomer Sir James Jeans, who first derived the quantity; where k_B is Boltzmann Constant, T is the temperature of the cloud, R is the radius of the cloud, μ is the mass per particle in the cloud, G is the Gravitational Constant and ρ is the cloud's mass density (i.e. the cloud's mass divided by the cloud's volume).

Shortly after the Big Bang, there were of course no gas clouds in the early expanding universe and the Jeans formulations are not applicable to the mass seedling M_o; in the manner of the Jeans formulations as given. However, the universe's dynamics is in the form of the expansion parameter of General Relativity and so as R(n)=R_max(n/(n+1)) with the scale factor of Quantum Relativity.

Expressing the Jeans radius in the form of the Hawking radius of primordial micro black holes with a fixed nuclear density defined by subatomic parameters of the timespace made manifest in the QBBS, then allows analysis of the thermodynamic universe expansion as a function of temperature, independent on the distribution of the mass seedling M_o as the Gamow-Hawking protostars matching the universal temperature background as potential vortex energies given by the Hawking masses.

The thermal internal energy or ITE=H is the outward pressure in equilibrium with the gravitational potential energy of GPE=Ω. The nuclear density in terms of the super brane parameters is ρ_critical=m_c/V_critical with m_c a base-nucleon mass for an 'ylemic neutron'.
V_critical= 4πR_e³/3 or the volume for the ylemic neutron as given by the classical electron radius R_e=10¹⁰λ_ps/360={e*/2c²}_mod.

H=(molarity)k_BT for molar volume as N=(R/R_e)³ for dH=3k_BTR²/R_e³
The gravitational potential energy is Ω(R) = -∫G_oMdm/R = -4πρG_o∫{4πρR³/3}{R²/R}dR = -{16π²ρ²G_o/3}∫R⁴dR = -{16π²ρ²G_o/15}{R⁵}
dΩ/dR=-{16π²ρ²G_o/3}{R⁴}=-3G_om_c²R⁴ for dM/dR=d(ρV)/dR=4πρR² and for ρ=M/V=3m_c/4πR_e³

For equilibrium, the requirement is that dH=dΩ in the minimum condition dH+dΩ=0.

This gives dH+dΩ = 3k_BTR²/R_e³ - 3G_om_c²R⁴ = 0 and the ylemic radius as:

R_ylem=√{kTR_e/G_om_c²} ……………………………………………………………………………..[EQ.4]

as the Jeans-Length precursor or progenitor for subsequent stellar and galactic generation.

The ylemic (Jeans) radii are all independent of the mass of the star as a function of its nuclear generated temperature.
Applied to the proto-stars of the vortex neutron matter or ylem, the radii are all neutron star radii and define a specific range of radii for the gravitational collapse of the electron degenerate matter.
These spans from the 'First Three Minutes' scenario of the cosmogenesis to 1.1 million seconds (or about 13 days) and encompasses the standard beta decay of the neutron, underpinning radioactivity.

The upper limit defines a trillion-degree temperature and a radius of over 40 km; the trivial Schwarzschild solution gives a typical ylem radius of so 7.4 kilometers and the lower limit defines the 'mysterious' planetesimal limit as 1.8 km. For long a cosmological conundrum, it could not be modelled just how the molecular and electromagnetic forces applicable to conglomerate matter distributions (say gaseous hydrogen as cosmic dust) on the quantum scale of molecules could become strong enough to form say 1 km mass concentrations, required for 'ordinary' gravity to assume control.

The ylem radii's lower limit is defined in the cosmology as the Dirac monopole wavelength modulation at the 1.0 – 1.2 billion Kelvin degree marking the temperature of the universe in its defining Hawking-Gamow micro-mass black holes, which apply the Jeans formulation of hydrogen clouds to the primordial ylemic dineutron scenario. The stellar evolution from the ylemic (di-neutronic) templates is well established in QR and confirms most of the Standard Model's ideas of nucleosynthesis and the general cosmology for a thermodynamically expanding universe.

​

The standard model is correct in the temperature assignment but is amiss in the corresponding 'size-scales' for the cosmic expansion. The Big Bang cosmogenesis describes the universe as a Planck-Black Body Radiator, which sets the Cosmic-Microwave-Black Body Background Radiation Spectrum (CMBR) as a function of n as T⁴=18.2(n+1)²/n³ and derived from the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law and the related statistical frequency distributions. The metric from General Relativity for Schwarzschild-Black Hole Evolution has R_S=2GM/c² as a function of the star's Black Hole's mass M and we have the ylemic Radius as a function of temperature only as R_ylem√(kT.R_e³/G_om_c²).

The nucleonic mass-seed m_c=m_plancka⁹ and the product G_om_c² is a constant in the partitioned evolution of m_c(n)=Yⁿ.m_c and G(n)=G_o.Xⁿ.

Identifying the ylemic Radius with the Hawking radius gives the properties of the micro-mass black hole at the temperature of the universe and identifying the ylemic radius with a standard Schwarzschild Radius gives the properties of neutron-quark stars at their local temperatures as manifesting vortex energies from their Hawking-Gamow ylemic seedling black holes at a later n-cycle coordinate and in a later and cooler universe.

Quantum Relativity (QR) defines the Weyl-Temperature limit for Bosonic Unification as 1.9 nanoseconds at a temperature of 1.42x10²⁰ Kelvin and the weak-electromagnetic unification at 1/140 seconds or 7 microseconds at T=1.68x10¹⁵ K*. The earliest ylem stars are limited at a temperature of 1.68x10¹⁵ K* at the electroweak unification nexus with a mass limit of 433.58 M_sun or 8.672x10³² kg* as the first potential for a ylemic proto-star after the bosonic unification and after the undifferentiated 'bosonic plasma' entered its phase of the QBBS temperature no longer exceeding the temperature and energy of individualised elementary particles, enabling the di-neutrons to be born as ylem or Gamow's neutron matter.

185 seconds or 3 minutes after the Instanton, the universe was so 111 Million km across, when its ylemic 'concentrated' VPE-Temperature was so 812 Billion K* and the Hawking radius was the same as the radius of the classical electron for a micro black hole mass of 1.1x10¹² kg* and an ylem radius of 47.4 km* indicating a future black hole macro-mass of 1.9x10³¹ kg* as 9.6 M_sun as a limiting quark gluon-plasma star.

The 'pixelated' universe so became scaled in ylemic temperature bubbles in the form of primordial White-Hole-Sources coupled to Black Hole-Sinks in a form of macro quanta to reflect the sourcesink Eps coupled to the sinksource Ess of the underpinning elementary super membrane Eps.Ess. As the universe continued its expansion, the WH-BH dyads remained as temperature hotspots embedded within the cooling spacetime as the Black Body Radiator of the cosmogenesis.
As the universe expanded and cooled, the first ylem stars crystallized from the mass seedling M_o. The universe's expansion however cooled the CMBR background and as the temperature characterizing the Chandrasekar white dwarf-neutron star limit is at a temperature of 20 Billion Kelvin, the size of the universe at this temperature provides an upper limit for the size of a star in 7.8x10¹² m* or a radius 7.8 billion kilometers. This encompasses about 52 Astronomical Units (1 AU=1.5x10⁸ km as the distance between the earth and the sun) and so the radial extent and the 'size' of a typical solar system, encompassed by supergiants on the HR-diagram.

The ylemic temperature decreases in direct proportion to the square of the ylemic radius and one hitherto enigmatic aspect in cosmology relates to this in the planetesimal limit. A temperature of so 1.2 billion degrees defines an ylemic radius of 1.8 km as the dineutronic limit for proto-neutron stars contracting from 47.4 km* down to this size just 1.1 million seconds or so 13 days after the Quantum Big Bang Dirac Singularity. Chunks of matter can conglomerate via molecular and other adhesive interactions towards this size, where then the accepted gravity is strong enough to build planets and moons; but the ylemic template is defined in subatomic parameters reflecting the mesonic inner and leptonic outer ring boundaries and this the planetesimal limit becomes the modulation of the Dirac monopole wavelength as the mapping of the leptonic outer ring. So neutrino-gluon and quark blueprints micro-macro dance their basic definition as the holographic projections of the space-time quanta.

The nuclear density for neutron stars for electron degeneracy at the leptonic ring is increased for neutron degeneracy at the mesonic ring and therefore modifies the Chandra mass limit for white dwarves in the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) limit for neutron stars. A lower limit for the TOV limit is obtained in the Dirac monopole modulation MQB/0.9544=1.41555 increasing the Chandrasekar mass to 1.5x1.41555=2.123 solar masses. The upper limit considers the primordial neutron decay as superimposed onto the ylemic mass evolution in the loss of neutrons between the mass content of the ylemic protostars at the beginning and the end of the primordial beta minus decay of lefthanded neutrons into lefthanded protons and lefthanded electrons with righthanded antineutrinos. At the beginning of the 880.14 seconds the ylemic Hawking mass would be 8.844 solar masses as a function of its radius and reducing to 4.900 solar masses at the end of neutron decay for a mass fraction of 1.804. The upper TOV limit for the Chandrasekar mass so becomes 1.5x1.804=2.706 solar masses.

Hence any star experiencing electron degeneracy is actually becoming ylemic or dineutronic, the boundary for this process being the Chandrasekhar mass, extended to the TOV mass for neutron degeneracy. The ylemic protostar mass at the beginning of neutron decay also sets a natural limit for any stellar black holes in 8.844 solar masses or 1.769x10³¹ kg*.

The density of a black hole is calculated from ρ_BH=M_BH/V_BH =M_BHc⁶/8G_o³M_BH³=c⁶/8G_o³M_BH²=c²/2G_or_curv²= c²/2G_or_ylem²={m_cc²/2k_BT_Hawking}{m_c/R_e³}={m_cc²/2k_BT_Hawking}{ρ_nucleon}

For Hawking’s micro black holes activated as Gamow’s ylemic protostars then, the relationship between the black hole density and the neutron star density becomes a function of the ylemic-universal temperature projected from the ylem time into the future time when the neutron stars, magnetars and quark stars would be born from as the remnants of supernovae or the merger of neutron stars with each other or black holes.

k_BT_Hawking=½m_cc²{ρ_nucleon}/r_BH} and the limit for an electron degenerate star is given in the black hole density equal to the nucleon density for k_BT_Hawking=½m_cc² and so for a temperature T_Hawking=m_cc²/2k_B=3.163603x10¹² K*

For electron degeneracy ρ_nucleon=m_c/R_e³; for a temperature limit of T_Hawking=m_cc²/2k_B=3.163603x10¹² K*

For neutron degeneracy in the diameter of a protonic nucleus ρ_nucleon=Y³m_cR_e³; for a temperature limit of T_Hawking=Y³m_cc²/2k_B=1.340124x10¹³ K*

For neutron degeneracy in the radial size of a protonic nucleus ρ_nucleon=8m_c3R_e³; for a temperature limit of T_Hawking=8m_cc²/2k_B=2.530882x10¹³ K*

For neutron degeneracy in the charge radius of a proton ρ_nucleon=8Y³m_cR_e³; for a temperature limit of T_Hawking=8Y³m_cc²/2k_B=1.072099x10¹⁴ K*

Considering the size of the proton for neutron degeneracy engages a displacement scale from 2.778 to 0.858 fermi in a factor of 3.235 for a change in the nuclear density in a factor of (3.235)³=33.87 from 1.105x10¹⁶ – 3.743x10¹⁷ [kg/m³]*.

​

Macrostate						Macrostate
Tps|mod	←	Mcurv=RHawkingc2/2Go	←	RHawking=hc/2πkBTcurv	←	Tcurv as THawking
3.602774x10-12 K*		2.534656x1035 kg*		6.258410x108 m*		3.602774x10-12 K*
Tps=1.41671x1020 K*		6.258410x108 m*		2.534656x1035 kg*		3.602774x10-12 K*
THawking	→	Rylem=√{kBTHawkingRe3/Gomc2}	→	Mcurv=Rylemc2/2Go	→	Tcurv=hc/2πkBRylem
Macrostate						Macrostate
Tps=1.41671x1020 K*		rps=1.591549x10-23 m*		6445.775 kg*		Tps=1.41671x1020 K*
THawking	→	RHawking=hc/2πkBTHawking=Rcurv	→	Mcurv=Rcurvc2/2Go	→	THawking=hc/2πkBRcurv
Microstate						Microstate

For the Bosonic Temperature unification n_BU=H_ot_BU=3.562x10^-27 for T_CMBR=T_ps=1.417x10²⁰ K* a Hawking radius R_Hawking=r_ps=hc/2πk_BT_Hawking=1.591x10^-23 m* for a present micro black hole mass M_ylem=HM/T_Hawking=6445.78 kg* infers a macrostate ylem radius 6.258x10⁸ m* as a Hawking microstate radius for a macrostate HM black hole mass of M_curv=HM/T_ylem=2.535x10³⁵ kg*; for a ylem temperature T_ylem=3.603x10^-12 K*modulating the macrostate in the microstate as a minimum boundary self-state for the age of the universe.

Macrostate						Macrostate
TEW|mod	←	Mcurv=RHawkingc2/2Go	←	RHawking=hc/2πkBTcurv	←	Tcurv as THawking
1.0530621x10-9 K*		8.671658x1032 kg*		2.14115x106 m*		1.0530621x10-9 K*
TEW=1.65825x1015 K*		2.14115x106 m*		8.671658x1032 kg*		1.0530621x10-9 K*
THawking	→	Rylem=√{kBTHawkingRe3/Gomc2}	→	Mcurv=Rylemc2/2Go	→	Tcurv=hc/2πkBRylem
Macrostate						Macrostate
TEW=1.65825x1015 K*		1.359725x10-18 m*		5.506886x108 kg*		TEW=5.618369x1012 K*
THawking	→	RHawking=hc/2πkBTHawking=Rcurv	→	Mcurv=Rcurvc2/2Go	→	THawking=hc/2πkBRcurv
Microstate						Microstate

For the electroweak unification n_EW=H_ot_EW=1.340x10^-20 for T_CMBR=T_EW=1.658x10¹⁵ K* a Hawking radius R_Hawking=r_EW=hc/2πk_BT_Hawking=1.360x10^-18 m* for a present micro black hole mass M_ylem=HM/T_Hawking=5.507x10⁸ kg* infers a macrostate ylem radius 2.141x10⁶ m* as a Hawking microstate radius for a macrostate HM black hole mass of M_curv=HM/T_ylem=8.671x10³² kg*; for a ylem temperature T_ylem=1.053x10^-9 K*modulating the macrostate in the microstate as a minimum boundary self-state for the age of the universe.

Macrostate						Macrostate
Tpresent|mod	←	Mcurv=RHawkingc2/2Go	←	RHawking=hc/2πkBTcurv	←	Tcurv as THawking
0.02589 K*		3.527x1025 kg*		0.08709 m*		0.02589 K*
Tpresent=2.747 K*		0.08709 m*		3.527x1025 kg*		0.02589 K*
THawking	→	Rylem=√{kBTHawkingRe3/Gomc2}	→	Mcurv=Rylemc2/2Go	→	Tcurv=hc/2πkBRylem
Macrostate						Macrostate
Tpresent=2.747 K*		8.208x10-4 m*		3.324x1023 kg*		Tpresent=2.747 K*
THawking	→	RHawking=hc/2πkBTHawking=Rcurv	→	Mcurv=Rcurvc2/2Go	→	THawking=hc/2πkBRcurv
Microstate						Microstate

​

For a present n-cycle coordinate n_present=1.132711 for T_CMBR=2.747 K* a Hawking radius R_Hawking=r_Hpresent=hc/2πk_BT_Hawking=8.208x10^-4 m* for a present micro black hole mass M_ylem=HM/T_Hawking=3.324x10²³ kg* infers a macrostate ylem radius 0.0871 m* as a Hawking microstate radius for a macrostate HM black hole mass of M_curv=HM/T_ylem=3.527x10²⁵ kg*; for a ylem temperature T_ylem=0.0259 K* modulating the macrostate in the microstate as a maximum boundary self-state for the age of the universe.


As the ylem radius is proportional to the square root of the ylem universal temperature, but decreases with time in the universal temperature evolution for an increase in a black hole’s radius; the increase of the ylem protostar mass with temperature is compensated in the inverse proportionality in the Hawking modulus in the radii of the ylem protostar and the curvature
R_Hawking = hc/2πk_BT_Hawking = 2G_oM/c² = R_curv = R_ylem=√{k_BTR_e³/G_om_c²}.

Nuclear density then varies as ρ_nuclear={3c⁴k_B/16πG_o³m_c}T/M² = {5.0129636x10⁶⁶} T/M² which identifies the Chandra mass of 1.5 solar masses as f_ps²=9x10⁶⁰ frequency states modulating the nuclear density for a temperature of 1.9847x10¹⁰ K* for a Hawking-Gamow micro black hole of mass 4.6011x10¹³ kg*
T³ = {hc³/4πk_BG_o}² r_nuclear /{5.013x10⁶⁶} = r_nuclear {h²c²G_om_c/3πk_B³} [K³]* = r_nuclear {1.66348029x10^-19} [K³]*

Nuclear densities for neutron stars, magnetars and quark-plasma stars so become restricted in the subatomic parameters on the fermi scale all of at about half of the classical electron radius scale a Protonic Diameter, the Protonic Radius must then indicate the limit for the scale where proton degeneracy would have to enter the scenario. As the proton cannot degenerate in that way, the neutron star must enter its Quark-Star Gluon-Plasma phase transition at the ½R_e/Y scale, corresponding to a mass of 2Y.M_Chandra=9.7082x10³⁰ kg* or 4.854 solar masses. This marker is between the F-googol and the G-googol space quanta counter nexus coordinates.

This vortex manifested as a VPE concentration after the expanding universe had cooled to allow the universe to become transparent from its hitherto defining state of opaqueness and a time known as the decoupling of matter (in the form of the M_o seedling partitioned in m_c's) from the radiation pressure of the CMBR bosons.

Generally, when the gravitational inward pressure is larger than the thermal outward pressure for a star, then electron degeneracy can result in the atomic constituents of the star to break the electromagnetic force keeping the atoms electrons apart from the atomic nucleus. In the evolution of stars the nuclear fusion processes in the core of the star determine how the mass of the star will respond to the release of material of the star in the form of electromagnetic radiation and mass ejections. Once the nuclear fusion processes can no longer convert atomic elements in endothermic reactions at the iron limit, the exothermic reactions will reduce the star’s mass to that of its core. Depending on the mass of this core, particular limits determine the fate of the star’s core of either becoming a white dwarf in the Chandrasekhar limit of about 1.4 solar masses and increasing to 2-3 (Supernova SN2003fg~2.0) solar masses or the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) limit of about 2.3 (Neutron Star GW170817) solar masses for a general range between 1.5 – 3 solar masses for neutron degenerate matter. A neutron stars mass increases with the rate of rotation by about 20% from a non-rotating state.

As the classical electron radius oscillates between the wormhole Weyl-radius of the QBBS as r_ps=λ_ps/2π =1.59155x10^-23 m* and R_e=k_ee²/m_ec² = hα/2πm_ec =2.777..x10^-15 m*;
the Compton constant R_em_e=hα/2πc=αL_planckm_planck=α√{(hG_o/2πc³)(hc/2πG_o)}=α√{h²/4π²c²}
=hα/2πc=C_compton=R_eeff.m_eeff=2.580702x10^-45 [mkg]* will determine this electronic oscillation between the gluon-neutrino kernel and the inner mesonic ring and the outer leptonic ring for the subatomic structure of a nucleon or hadron. In particular the effective charge radius of the proton of quark content u.d.u=KKIRK differing from the quark content of the neutron d.u.d=KIRKKIR by 1.328 MeV* reduces the classical electron radius by the factor ½X to set R_proton=½XR_e= 0.85838x10^-15 m* for an effective electron mass of m_eeff=C_compton/R_eeff=3.00648x10^-30 kg* at that displacement in the classical electron oscillation.

[Footnote 2]

At the scale of a protonic diameter m_eeff=C_compton/XR_e=1.50324x10^-30 kg*, showing that an increase of the electron’s size will decrease its effective self-interacting electromagnetic mass, irrespective of the relativistic velocity of the electron.
https://www.academia.edu/39184674/T...andard_Model_and_Quantum_Field_Theory_Part_1_
https://www.academia.edu/40223805/A_Revision_of_the_Friedmann_Cosmology

The cosmology for the lower dimensional universe is described as the spacetime evolution of a Planck Black Body Radiator and so follows a thermodynamic process of a decreasing universal background temperature with increasing volume, due to the expansion of the universe.
The modular string-membrane dualities then couple the inversion displacement parameters of the QBBS and the micro-quantum scale of the instanton as a Weyl-Eps-wormhole in the supermembrane EpsEss evolution to the macro-quantum scale of the inflaton under utility of the ABCDEFGH googolplex spacetime quanta counters.
As the E-googol defines the quantum geometric template for the classical electron radius, rendered variable in the maximum of R_e=2.777x10^-15 m* and the minimum in the wormhole radius r_ps=λ_ps/2π=1.592x10^-23 m*, the magnitude ratio R_E/R_e=∛E)(λ_weyl/2π)/{10¹⁰λ_ps/360}=∛E)(λ_weyl/2π)/{2πr_ps10¹⁰/360}={∛E)/10¹⁰}{360/2π}={2.158884299…x10²⁷}{180/π}=3.43597108x10¹⁴ m*/2.7777777x10^-15 m*= 1.236949588…x10²⁹ spacetime quanta.

The wave nature of matter is given by the de Broglie wavelength for matter in λ_dB=2πr_dB=h/p=h/m_electronv_electron for an elementary particle like the electron.
This is expressed for the particle nature of matter in the Compton wavelength λ_compton=2πr_compton=h/m_electronc and so maximizing the velocity of the electron to lightspeed c.

As the classical electron radius is R_e=k_ee²/m_electronc²=αh/2πm_electronc=αr_compton , showing that increasing the size of the electron by a factor of 137 will define the light-matter interaction probability in the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha for Compton radius r_compton=R_e/α=3.80686301x10^-13 m*.
It defines the Compton constant C_compton=R_em_e=αh/2πc=R_ecm_ec for the inverse proportionality between the mass and the radial size of a particle or system in quantum mechanics and where the subscript ec indicates the scale of the particle oscillation in between the boundary conditions for the electron as the maximum R_e and the minimum r_ps.
Further quantum mechanical extension of the size of the atomic nucleus then defines the 1^st Bohr radius and the size of the hydrogen atom in multiplying the Compton radius by alpha as r_Bohr1=R_e/α²=5.2171943x10^-11 m*

The quantum mechanical nature of the atom, so becomes encompassed in the interaction of the classical electron with the electromagnetic finestructure and in allowing the spacial extent of the electron to oscillate within its classical definition of its electromagnetic self-interaction.
The temperature evolution of the universal cosmology so conformally relates this scale of the electron as a classical particle of spacetime, but as derivative of the Dirac monopole as its point particular representative to the macro-quantum form in the GFEH-googolplex.

[Footnote 2]:
KKK-Kernel mass=Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.66 MeV*= 958.99 MeV*, using the Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants.
Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as 939.776 MeV*. This excludes the electronic perturbation of the IR-OR oscillation.

For the Proton, one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and subtracts the electron-mass for the d-quark level and for the Neutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential.
An electron perturbation subtracts one 2-2/3=4/3 electron energy as the difference between 2 leptonic rings from the proton's 2 up-quarks and 2-1/3=5/3 electron energy from the neutron' singular up-quark to relate the trisected nucleonic quark geometric template.

Proton m_p=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.776+1.5013-0.5205-0.1735) MeV* = 940.5833 MeV* (938.270 MeV).
Neutron m_n=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.776+3.0026-1.0410+0.1735) MeV* = 941.9111 MeV* (939.594 MeV).

This is the ground state from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanism and reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for the inertial mass differential between the two elementary nucleons. All ground state elementary particle masses are computed from the Higgs-Scale and then become subject to various finestructures.
[End of Footnote 2]


The nuclear densities for neutron stars are defined in the ylemic vortices of the Gamow-Hawking protostars or Gamow-Hawking micro black holes in the function their temperatures. The temperature of the background universe so defines the temperature an electron- or neutron degenerate neutron star will have in its evolutionary development at a later stage of the cosmic temperature evolution. The birth of population III stars as the earliest stars has been calculated to begin as the cores of galaxies as the cores of superclusters at a time marker defined in the superstring modulation of the wavelength of the instanton 1/r_ss=2πλ_ss=6.283x10²² m* and so the size of a large galaxy manifesting so 6.64 million years after the QBBS.

The Milky Way galaxy as one of the oldest galaxies in the cosmogenesis formed in the Sarkar regime of general galactic evolution and when the baryon mass seedling could manifest in thew form of galaxies in the requirement for the Strominger extremal black hole evolution to have reached the Sarkar radius of 236.52 million light years. This galactic displacement scale matches the time period for a revolution of the local star system to complete a cycle of rotation about the center of the Milky Way galaxy.

n-cycle coordinate and time​	Radius as size of the universe	Modulation factor	Inversion Radius	Cosmological Redshift	Temperature	Hawking Radius Ylem Radius Hawking micro-BH mass	Cosmological Significance
2nqo=0.02803012 473.039 My​	Rsarkar=2GoMo/c2=4.47830347x1024	1.62x1020	3.62044x10-5	5.0152	30.570 K*	7.3757x10-5 m* 0.29071 m* 2.9871x1022 kg*	dark matter galaxies from supercluster seed manifest honey-comb universal geometry baryon seed mobaryon=0.02803=Mo/MH=2Lo/AdB
nqo=0.01401506 236.520 My​	Rsarkar=GoMo/c2=2.23915174x1024	4.05x1019	1.81022x10-5	7.4777	51.062 K*	4.4157x10-5 m* 0.37572 m* 1.7884x1022 kg*	Quasar wall - 1st protostars from supercluster seeds Deceleration parameter qo=½Mo/MH=Lo/AdB
½nqo=0.00700753 118.260 My ​	Rsarkar=½GoMo/c2=1.11957587x1024	1.01x1019	9.0511x10-6	10.967	85.578 K*	2.6347x10-5 m* 0.48641 m* 1.0671x1022 kg*	White Hole-Black Hole Sarkar modulation Birth of 1st galaxies like the Milky Way form as baryon seed for dark matter galaxies protostars manifest from ylem white hole-black hole coupling
3.93425x10-4 6.63948 My​	rss=2plss=6.283x1022	3.19x1016	5.07943x10-7	49.421	358.05 K*	6.2973x10-6 m* 0.99494 m* 2.5504x1021 kg*	Modular wormhole perimeter White Hole upper limit as wormhole sourcesink Eps begins to activate as black hole power sourcesink Ess dark matter galaxies geometry

The time period from 16 seconds to 21 minutes in the evolution of the universe encompasses a time for the Hawking micro black holes increasing in mass from 1.7x10¹¹ kg* to 1.0x10¹⁴ kg* corresponding to their temperatures decreasing from 5.10x10¹² K* to 8.82x10⁹ K*.
Setting the nuclear density as ρ_nuclearOR=3m_c/4πR_e³=3k_BT_Hawking/4πG_om_cR_ylem²
= 1.10545x10¹⁶ [kg/m³]* then calculates the density of a neutron star exhibiting electron degeneracy at the temperature regimes given by the ylem radius.

As in this formulation the gravitational parameter is partitioned in
G_om_c²=constant=G(n)XⁿM(n)Yⁿ=G(n)Xⁿm_cY^um_cY^v= for superscripts u+v=n for (XY)ⁿ=1, the mass evolution for the primordial nucleon m_c=m_planckα⁹=9.92472459x10^-28 kg* must be considered. For the present time, the m_c primordial nucleon has attained the scale of the measured neutron mass in m_cY^npresent= 1.711753x10^-27 kg*or 1.7053526x10^-27 kg_SI.


As the leptonic ring masses are integrated into the quarkian kernel masses, the measured masses for the electron, muon and tauon remain constant subject to their energy variation in the Compton constant m_eR_e=hα/2πc. So the nuclear densities calculated in the early period of the cosmology will increase at later times as the effect of the mass evolution of the universe, transmuting Vortex-Potential Energy (VPE) as the UniPhysCon ‘physicalized consciousness energy’ of the original source energy for the creation event.
The leptonic outer ring (OR) for the electron degeneracy then defines the nuclear densities for electron degenerate neutron stars being born as the from the spacetime vortices defined by Hawking-Gamow micro black holes.
The mesonic inner ring inner (IR) reduces the scale of the classical electron radius by a factor of 1000 and defines the Higgs boson at that scale as the progeny of the RMP separated from the electron base scale in a factor of 100,000 as the dark matter particle of the cosmogenesis.

​

The mesonic inner ring defines the neutron degeneracy for quark or proton stars coupled to the primordial neutron decay given in the inversion scale for the radial size of the universe as defined in the googolplex E-FGF’ in modular membrane mirror duality with the classical electron scale. As the strange wave quark is a resonance of the down wave quark in the oscillation potential between the kernel up wave quark K and the outer ring OR for the Compton constant and the energy scale for the classical electron; the neutron degeneracy is given in the entire range from the gluon-neutrino kernel of the QBBS-Dirac monopole singularity to the inner bound of the dark matter particle RMP at the 10^-5 fermi scale.

For electron degeneracy characteristic neutron star radii are in the range of the Compton radius R_e/a to its modulation in R_e/2pa to the modulated electron radius 2pR_e as Hawking radii for micro black holes for temperatures from 5.92x10⁹ K* to 3.72x10¹⁰ K* to 1.29x10¹¹ K* with typical neutron star radii as ylem radii from 4,045.5 m* to 10,143.3 m* to 18,899.0 m* for respective neutron star masses from 1.64x10³⁰ kg as 0.819 M_sun to 4.11x10³⁰ kg* as 2.05 M_sun to 7.65x10³⁰ kg* as 3.83 M_sun respectively.

The Chandrasekhar limit for white dwarves is approximated by the mass quantization M=Sm_ss=Shf_ss/c² and modulation M/Sm_ss=h/m_ssc²=hf_ps/h=f_ps|_mod=3x10³⁰ as 1.50 M_Sun for a temperature of 1.98x10¹⁰ K* for a Hawking black hole micro-mass of 4.60x10¹³ kg* and a Gamow-Hawking ylem radius of 7,407.7 m*


The charge radius of the proton is calculated as proportional to the classical electron radius as ½XR_e=0.8583806x10^-15 m* reduced from ½R_e=1.388889x10^-15 m* and reduced from XR_e=1.7167606x10^-15 m* as Hawking radii for the micro black holes for respective electron masses of 3.0064778x10^-30 kg* and 1.858105x10^-30 kg* and 1.50324x10^-30 kg*.

The nuclear densities for neutron degeneracy with increasing pressure from the surface density to the core density then calculate for respective Hawking radii for the micro black holes as:

r_nuclearOR=3m_c/4pR_e³=3k_BT_Hawking/4pG_om_cR_ylem²=1.105x10¹⁶ [kg/m³]* for a
temperature 8.117x10¹¹ K* and ylem mass 1.92x10³¹ kg* as 9.60 M_sun
r_nuclearX=3m_cY³/4pR_e³=3Y³k_BT_Hawking/4pG_om_cR_ylem²=4.683x10¹⁶ [kg/m³]* for a
temperature 1.313x10¹² K* and ylem mass 2.44x10³¹ kg* as 12.20 M_sun
r_nuclear½=24m_c/4pR_e³=24k_BT_Hawking/4pG_om_cR_ylem²=8.844x10¹⁶ [kg/m³]* for a
temperature 1.623x10¹² K* and ylem mass 2.71x10³¹ kg* as 13.57 M_sun
r_nuclear½X=24m_cY³/4pR_e³=24Y³k_BT_Hawking/4pG_om_cR_ylem²=3.746x10¹⁷ [kg/m³]* for a
temperature 2.627x10¹² K* and ylem mass 3.45x10³¹ kg* as 17.26 M_sun

n-cycle coordinate and time​	Radius as size of the universe	Modulation factor	Inversion Radius	Cosmological Redshift	Temperature	Hawking Radius Ylem Radius Hawking micro-BH mass	Cosmological Significance
2.45458x10-13 1.5130 days​	3.92162x1013	0.0124	3.17040x10-16	2.0184x106	5.9229x109 K*	3.80686x10-13 m* 4,045.503 m* 1.5418x1014 kg*	RHawking=Re/α=Compton radius Electron degeneracy surface for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=1.64x1030 kg*/0.819Msun
1.44329x10-13 76,863.6 s* 21.35 hours​	2.30591x1013	4.299x10-3	1.86419x10-16	2.6322x106	8.8207x109 K*	2.5562x10-13 m* 4,938.271 m* 1.0353x1014 kg*	Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=2.00x1030 kg*/1..000Msun
4.89513x10-14 26,069.4 s* 7.24 hours​	7.82083x1012	4.945x10-4	6.32267x10-17	4.5198x106	1.9847x1010 K*	1.1361x10-13 m* 7,407.407 m* 4.6011x1013 kg*	Nuclear density ρnuc=3mcYn/4π{Re}3 (1.105-1.907)x1016 [kg/m3]* Rylem=√{3kBT/4πGomcρnuc} for 1.5 MSun M=∑mss=∑hfss/c2 mass quantization for space quanta count M/Smss=h/mssc2=hfps/h=fpsλmod=3x1030 as 1.50 MSun
2.11706x10-14 11,274.58 s* 3.132 hours​	3.38237x1012	9249x10-5	2.73445x10-17	6.8728x106	3.7215x1010 K*	6.05875x10-14 m* 10,143.34 m* 2.4538x1013 kg*	RHawking=Re/2πα = Compton radius Ess modulation Electron degeneracy core for neutron stars Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=4.11x1030 kg*/2.054Msun
4.02765x10-15 2144.96 s* 32.749 min​	6.43488x1011	3.348x10-6	5.20221x10-18	1.5757x107	1.2919x1011 K*	1.7453x10-14 m* 18,899.00 m* 7.0686x1012 kg*	RHawking=2πRe Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=7.65x1030 kg*/3.827Msun
2.160062x10-15 1150.36 s* 19.173 min​	RF=∛F(λweyl/2π)=3.45107750x1011	9.6x10-7	Rf=2.789990x10-18	2.15163x107	2.0614x1011 K*	1.0938x10-14 m* 23,872.87 m* 4.4299x1012 kg*	Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=9.67x1030 kg*/4.834Msun
2.122808x10-15 1130.52 s* 18.8420 min​	RG=∛G(λweyl/2π)=3.39155801x1011	9.3x10-7	Rg=2.741872x10-18	2.17042x107	2.0885x1011 K*	1.0796x10-14 m* 24,029.28 m* 4.3724x1012 kg*	Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=9.73x1030 kg*/4.866Msun
2.084198x10-15 1109.96 s* 18.499 min​	RF’=∛F’)(λweyl/2π)=3.32987275x1011	9.0x10-7	Rf’=2.69200x10-18	2.19044x107	2.1175x1011 K*	1.0648x10-14 m* 24,195.54 m* 4.3125x1012 kg*	Primordial neutron decay: λF’-2πλRMP (1109.96-229.82) s* = 880.14 s*/879.28 s from Higgs Boson with RMP template Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=9.80x1030 kg*/4.900Msun
​
8.75370x10-16 466.186 s* 7.770 min​	1.39856x1011	1.6x10-7	1.13065x10-18	3.89284x107	4.05858x1011 K*	5.55556x10-15 m* 33,497.33 m* 2.2500x1012 kg*	RHawking=2Re Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=1.3566x1031 kg*/6.78Msun
​
​
4.315415x10-16 229.821 s* 3.8304 min​	Rneutrondecay=6.8946323x1010	3.8x10-8	2πλRMP=4π2RRMP=5.57389763x10-19	4.81381x107	6.89874x1011 K* MHawking=2.792x1037 THawking=3.2703x10-14	3.2684x10-15 m* 43,672.54 m* 1.3237x1012 kg*	Beginning of neutron decay from Higgs Boson with RMP template Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=1.77x1031 kg*/8.844Msun
3.473914x10-16 185.006 s* 3.083 min​	5.550187x1010	2.5x10-8	4.486994x10-19	5.36526x107	8.11715x1011 K*	2.7778x10-15 m* 47,372.40 m* 1.1250x1012 kg*	RHawking=Re Nuclear density ρnuc=3mcYn/4π{Re}3 (1.105-1.907)x1016 [kg/m3]* Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=1.92x1031 kg*/9.593Msun
1.828887x10-16 97.398 s* 1.623 min​	2.921968x1010	6.9x10-9	2.362236x10-19	7.39446x107	1.3134x1012 K*	1.7168x10-15 m* 60,257.94 m* 6.9529x1011 kg*	RHawking=XRe=Protonic diameter Nuclear density ρnuc=3mcYn/4π{XRe}3 (4.683-8.077)x1016 [kg/m3]* Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=2.44x1031 kg*/12.202Msun
1.378658x10-16 73.422 s* 1.224 min​	2.202648x1010	3.9x10-9	1.780709x10-19	8.51671x107	1.6234x1012 K*	1.3889x10-15 m* 66,994.07 m* 5.6250x1011 kg*	RHawking=½Re Nuclear density ρnuc=3mcYn/4π{½Re}3 (8.844-15.253)x1016 [kg/m3]* Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=2.71x1031 kg*/13.566Msun
7.257512x10-17 38.650 s* ​	1.159515x1010	1.1x10-9	9.37398x10-20	1.17383x108	2.6268x1012 K*	8.5838x10-16 m* 85,218.27 m* 3.4764x1011 kg*	RHawking=½XRe Nuclear density ρnuc=3mcYn/4π{½XRe}3 (3.746-6.461)x1017 [kg/m3]* Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=3.45x1031 kg*/17.257Msun
2.9962x10-17 15.957 s*​	4.78696x109	1.9x10-10	3.86997x10-20	1.82690x108	5.1002x1012 K*	4.42097x10-16 m* 118,744.56 m* 1.7905x1011 kg*	RHawking=Re/2π Ess modulation Neutron degeneracy Rylem=Rcurv for Mylem=4.81x1031 kg*/24.05Msun

 

Primordial Neutron decay from the Higgs Boson – RMP Dark Matter quantum geometric blueprint Y²M²C²


As the universe reached an age between 1130-1150 seconds, a 20 second period from the 18 minute 50 second marker manifested primordial radioactive beta-minus decay in the decomposition of a lefthanded ylemic neutron into its constituent parts of a lefthanded proton with a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino. As this process is a weak nuclear interaction (WNI) a coupling to the strong nuclear interaction (SNI) was made manifest in the ylemic neutron star’s core transforming the quark content of the ylemic neutron in the interaction with gluons and crystallizing the force carrying bosons for the WNI and the SNI as weakon bosons (W^- for matter and W⁺ for antimatter and Z^o for uncharged matter) and gluons respectively.

Neutron decay depends on the relative movement of the neutron with respect to their environment. The measured discrepancy in the mean lifetime of free neutrons of about 9 seconds using either a ‘proton trap bottle’ or a ‘proton beam’ counter of 879 and 888 seconds respectively, so engages the definition of the RMP as being coupled to the Higgs Boson in the matter template YCM.

Higgs Boson 72.93Y^np=125.78 GeV*/125.48 GeV with RMP dark matter excess=126.95/125.78=1.0093 for Mean D time ½(G-F’)=10.28 s*
Higgs Boson 71.020Y^np=122.49 GeV*/122.19 GeV with RMP -dark matter deficit=122.49/123.57=0.9913 for Mean D time ½(F-G)=9.92 s*
½{F-G}={1150.36-1130.52}=9.92 seconds for the dark matter/RMP deficit in the stated 20 second period for the primordial neutron decay as {1109.96-229.82}=880.14 seconds ½{G-F’}={1130.52-1109.96}=10.28 seconds for the dark matter/RMP excess in the stated 20 second period for the primordial neutron decay as {1109.96-229.82}=880.14 seconds

​

​

The decoupling of the RMP from the Higgs Boson introduced the colourless Graviphoton as the spin conserver in the UfoQR to preserve the spin neutrality of the Higgs Boson in the lefthanded RMP with the righthanded Graviphoton.
The RMP is the dark matter particle in the Higgs field and is defined in the units of the gravitational parameter as a space quanta volumar acted upon by the time differential of frequency df/dt as a form of quantum spin angular acceleration.

The primordial neutron decay in the first 20 minutes of the QBBS universe became triggered in the initial boundary conditions defined in the space quanta counters E, F and G, with the manifestation of the Dirac monopole singularity as the wavelength

λ*=c/f*=4.087933536x10¹⁴ m* for radius R*=λ*/2π=R(n*=H_ot*’=4.072259032x10^-13) =6.506148293x10¹³ m* for a time t*’=216,871.61 s* or 2.51 mean solar days into the expansion and thermodynamic evolution of the universe.


Initial Boundary Conditions from Membrane Timespace and the Matter-Antimatter Coupling for the QBBS

The Timespace of imaginary space, created the initial boundary condition for the QBBS to manifest in the instanton-inflaton quantum entangled coupling in a higher dimensional parameter space of the mathimatia. Five string classes transformed into each other under properties of modular dualities in the string epoch beginning with the ‘bounce’ of the Planck length at a then defined timespace coordinate of √αL_planck/c=√α t_planck=√{(hG_o/2πc⁵)(2πk_ee²/hc)} =√{G_ok_ee²/c⁶)}=e/c³=5.9498383x10^-45 s* for the finestructure unification condition {G_ok_e=1} between the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions; and ending at the instanton of t_weyl=3.333x10^-31 s*.

The heterotic classes allow the 5 bosonic strings to emerge from a 26 dimensional boson string space, where 10 clockwise string rotations are emergent in a 10-dimensional string spacetime and where 16 anti-clockwise rotation are suppressed.
The Planck boson in timespace then is known as the Planck string of class I of open strings at a time t_planck=2πr_planck/c=4.376x10^-43 s*; the second a closed monopole string of self-dual class IIB at a time t_monopole=2πr_monopole/c=1.537x10^-40; the third the closed XL-Boson heterotic class HO(32) at time t_XL=2πr_XL/c =2.202x10^-39 s*; the fourth the closed Ecosmic Ray-Boson string of class IIA at time t_Ecosmic=2πr_Ecosmic=6.618x10^-34 s* and the fifth the closed heterotic class HE(64) of the instanton.

A ‘false Higgs Boson’ vacuum at a time interval from tdBmin=G_oM_o/c³n_ps=4.672x10^-33 s* to tdBmax=√αt_weyl=2.847x10^-32 s* preceded the instanton in the timespace to image the start of the timespace string epoch in the ‘bounce’ or quantum fluctuation of the Planck time in the ‘quantum oscillation’ of the Weyl time.

Following the creation of spacetime in the instanton, the Weyl parameters of the spacetime could integrate and manifest the primary source energy definitions of the mathimatia parameter space and using the string modular properties for that purpose. One of those properties relates to the modular inversion of displacement in string T-duality, strongly associated with Mirror duality to connect the shadow-mirror universe Abba-Khaibit to the physicalized universe Friedmann-Baab.

The quantum entanglement between the two universes under modular string-membrane duality assumes the form of a supermembrane manifesting as a surface information agent in the two-sidedness of the Witten-Maria mirror of the 11-dimensional boundary between Khaibit-Universe-Energy-Primary-Source-Sink or Eps and Riemann-Universe-Energy-Secondary-Sink-Source or Ess.

The supermembrane EpsEss is the coupled under modular string-membrane duality in:


[1]EpsxEss=hf_psxhf_ss=h² with quantum energies E_ps=hf_ps=hc/λ_ps= hc/2πr_ps=m_psc²=kT_ps=1/e* and E_ss=hf_ss=h/cλ_ss= 2πh/cr_ss=m_ssc²=kT_ss=h²e*
[2]Eps/Ess=hf_ps/hf_ss=f_ps²=1/f_ss² with the inversion displacement coupling f_psλ_ps=c=1/{f_ssl_ss} by definition of modular T-Mirror duality
[3]and descriptive for 9x10⁶⁰ frequency permutation states for the universal physicalized consciousness quantum, the Uniphyscon defining Dirac’s monopole
[4]The wormhole radius r_ps=λ_ps/2π and wavelength λ_ps=2πr_ps=10^-22 m* for a high quantum energy E_ps and a small winding string mode
[5]The anti-wormhole radius r_ss=1/r_ps=2πλ_ss=2πx10²² m* and wavelength λ_ss=2πr_ss for a low quantum energy E_ss and a great winding string mode


Quantum mechanics of a string physics of the very small so is characterized by a small wavelength and radius r of atomic and subatomic structures, but this radius r is shown to be equivalent to a classical mechanics of extended objects of inverted radius 1/r in terms of the winding modes interchanging under T-duality. A low winding number relative to a small radius r_ps=1/R can describe a physics equivalent to that physics of the same radius r with a large winding number, as the unwinding of the multiplicity of the perimeter of the circle radius r, would increase the radius r_ps=1/R to a multiple of 1/R and so increase the radius to 2πn.r_ps=R=r_ss of classical objects. For the supermembrane E_psE_ss, the winding number becomes the coupling constant E_ps/E_ss=f_ps/f_ss=9x10⁶⁰ as the maximum permutation frequency state as the self-state or resonance eigenvalue of the unification physics connecting the microcosmos of quantum relativity to the classical universe of general relativity with special relativity.

The Möbian connectivity of the 11-dimensional Witten-Maria mirror manifests in the timespace of the superstring epoch in the form of the quantum relative blueprints and the doubling of a Möbian surface in changing the one-sidedness to a two-sidedness in a double rotation or twist extending a 360 degree rotation to a 720 degree rotation to return to an initial state, known as a spinor.

A two-sided ring of width w and radius r so has two surface areas 2πrw as an inner and an outer. Cutting the ring and twisting one end by 180 degrees, before gluing it back to the other end of the ring will connect the previously separated surfaces to one surface of total length 4πr and surface area 4πrw. A spinor pointing perpendicular to the width would then change direction after one full rotation because of the twist and require and more rotation to return to the initial starting position. Righthandedness becomes left-handedness after a 360 degree rotation and becomes righthanded again after another 360 degree rotation.

This property of a geometric topological transformation from a orientable geometric object like a ring into a non-orientable object like a Möbius strip became the basis for the quantum geometry of fundamental particles blueprinted in the supersymmetry of the timespace.

Five gauge Goldstone bosons as the ‘force carrying’ field particles broke the supersymmetry of the unification of five interaction fields:

​

#	Gauge Boson	Colour Charge	Spin	Field
1	Eps-Photon	Cyclic RGB	+1	EMI
2	Ess-Antiphoton	Anticyclic BGR	+1	WNI
3	Graviton	Anticyclic BGR	-2	GI
4	Gluon	Cyclic RGB	+1	SNI
5	Restmass-Photon	Cyclic Y2C2M2	-1	EMMI
6	Higgs-Boson	Cyclic Y2C2M2	0	EMMI
	Dirac Monopole Mirror
7	Anti-Higgs Boson	Anticyclic M2C2Y2	0	Imaginary EMMI
8	Anti-Restmass-Photon	Anticyclic M2C2Y2	+1	Imaginary EMMI
9	Anti-Gluon	Anticyclic BGR	-1	Imaginary SNI
10	Anti-Graviton	Cyclic RGB	+2	Imaginary GI
11	Ess-Photon	Cyclic RGB	-1	Imaginary WNI
12	Eps-Antiphoton	Anticyclic BGR	-1	Imaginary EMI

​

The cyclic right-handed Eps-Photon of Monopolar Radiation EMMR for the long-range Electromagnetic Interaction (EMI) is known as the ‘virtual’ photon of U(1)-SU(2)-SU(3) Unitary gauge symmetry of the Standard Model of particle physics combining Quantum Field Theory (QFT) in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) with Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Its anti-particle would so be an anticyclic left-handed Ess-Photon in the supersymmetry of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).

The Quantum Relativity derives from the geometric topology creating and defining the elementary particle and gauge bosons in their quantum geometry in the timespace and preceding the string-membrane epoch in the mathimatia. The cyclic RGB on one side of the Möbian strip would interact with its own image of the one-sidedness, however separated by the point-circle of the one-dimensional thickness of the Möbian geometry in the spacelessness or imaginary space of timespace.

The self-intersection of the Eps-Photon with its antistate of the Ess-Antiphoton through a membrane mirror of no thickness would mix the Red-Green-Blue cyclic colour triplet on one side of the mirror as a cyclic Eps rotation RGB=GBR=BRG in three successive 120 degree angular displacements. Relative to Ess, this movement would be identical in the quantum self-relativity of rotating from RGB to GBR to BGR, but relative to the other side of the mirror the movement would be anticyclic.

The colour charge triplet RGB is defined in the parameters of EMR as Planck’s Law E=hf and ‘light’ and in parameters of mass as Einstein’s Law E=mc² or ‘dark’. Electromagnetically Red, Green and Blue in equal proportions result in in the colour White and colour in the matter of paint in equal proportions result in the colour Black in thew colour charge triplet Yellow-Cyan-Magenta or YCM.

In the SU(3) gauge symmetry of QCD, the eight forms of the gluon, transmitting the force of the strong nuclear interaction reduce to one gluon agent in 8 and 4 permutation states.
For hadrons, like nucleons like the proton and the neutron, and constructed by three quarks, the eight gluon permutations transform a pure Black triplet into a pure White triplet in the set: {BBB+BBW+WBB+BWB+WBW+WWB+BWW+WWW}. For mesons and other quark-antiquark state particles the four gluon permutation states are the set: {BB+BW+WB+WW}.

The primary colour charge triplet RGB then forms a radiation-matter interaction super template with the secondary colour charge triplet YCM in the Black-White resonances given in the colour-anticolour couplings Red+Cyan=W or B and Green+Magenta= W or W and Blue+Yellow=W or B via E=hf for W or E=mc² for B respectively.

The original YCM blueprint for matter was created by a half-rotation in the 60°-120° sector where the colour charge interaction (R+G)(G+B)(B+R)=YCM=CMY=MYC, was followed by the second half-rotation in the 240°-300° sector from the inflexion point of 180° manifesting in spacetime as the Möbian twist of 180° to change the orientability of the Möbian topology to non-orientable. The colour charges of both the self-relative sources Eps and Ess inflexed to Blue-Green-Red to give the antimatter template (B+G)(G+R)(R+B)=CYM=YMC=MCY.

At the completion of the 360° rotation, only the primary gauge photon Eps inflected back to its starting position of a cyclic right-handedness, The secondary gauge photon Ess broke the gauge supersymmetry in continuing with its cyclic right-handedness so creating the necessity for the birth of the graviton as a spinor of double integer spin to reset the gauge symmetry in the timespace. This resulted in the suppression of the antimatter template MCY as the mirror of the mass eigenstate to the eigenstate of the BGR anti-EMMR blueprint. The breaking of the gauge symmetry at the inflexion points of 0°-180°-360° differentiated the even p-nodes at 0 and 2π radians from the odd π-nodes at π radians in defining the even π-nodes in RGB and as an anti-neutrino template R²G²B² and the odd nodes in BGR and as neutrino template B²G²R².

The original ‘short-range’ wave function for the EMMI of quantum spin +1 at the origin with the original wave function for the Anti-EMMI of quantum spin -1 and inflecting at the 180°-π node in the UFoQR as UFoQR(x)=sin(x)+sin(-x), now took the ‘long-range’ form UFoQR(x)=sin(3x/2)-cos(3x/4) in Eps continuing to inflect at odd p-nodes and intersecting with the graviton wave function in lieu of the now suppressed Anti-EMMI wave function, effectively retracing the path of Eps with a phase shift of 2π or 360°.

The combined wave function of the EMI and the GI then repeats its waveform in a periodicity of 8p radians or 1440° and intersects in 12 coordinates to define the materialization of particles and anti-particles in the combined wave path of 4λ_ps or four times the Weyl wormhole perimeter manifesting in the QBBS spacetime of the instanton-inflaton.

The 2^nd intersection or current node in the UFoQR then defines a Y²C²M² template for the Higgs Boson of 0 spin and the 4^th current junction defines the Anti-Higgs Boson of 0 spin as the M²C²Y² blueprint. As the coordinates for the 1^st and 2^nd, the 3^rd and 4^th to the 5^th junction nodes are 120° and 288.5° and 360° and 431.5° and 600° respectively to encompass the Weak Nuclear Interaction (WNI) part of the UFoQR in coupling the matter loops to the antimatter loops; two additional Y²C²M² and M²C²Y² templates are made manifest as the blueprints for the Restmass-Photon RMP of spin=-1 at the 200° coordinate and the Anti-RMP of spin=+1 at the 520° coordinate.

The templates for the creation of particles in the spacetime from the timespace so allows the bosonic integral boson-spins to bifurcate into fermionic half-integer spins for any YCM or MCY created particle pairs, such as a ylemic YCM Gamow neutron boson of spin=+1 splitting into two neutrons of spin=+½ in conjugate or parallel action of a ylemic MCY Gamow anti-neutron boson with spin=-1 splitting into two fermionic neutrons of spins -½-½. But this standard scenario of the Big Bang cosmology infers the equal status between matter and antimatter for the cosmogenesis.

The antimatter template MCY remains suppressed as a function of the anti-EMMI template, which also internalizes the anti-RMP and the anti-Higgs bosons into the UFoQR. So it is the Higgs Boson which manifests the elementary particles of the cosmogenesis in splitting its Y²C²M² matter template into a ylemic YCM Gamow neutron pair with opposite spins +½-½=0. This gives the reason as to why no normally occurring antimatter is observed in the universe, apart from the process of pair-creation defined in the UfoQR between junction nodes 8-9-10 at coordinates of -528.5°-360°-191.5°.

​

The graviton must have spin 2 as a consequence of quantum angular momentum conservation.
Before spacetime creation in the instanton of the quantum Big Bang, the transformation of the five string classes manifested in the inflaton using a prior supersymmetry between matter- and antimatter templates., represented in say sinx+sin(-x)=0 and where the positive region becomes a quantum geometric matter conformal mapping and the negative region becomes its conjugative for antimatter. As the linearization of the circle inflects at 180 degrees, matter and antimatter become defined in adjacent clockwise and anticlockwise semi cyclicities.

If now the arbitrary boundaries are defined in some unitary interval between 0 and 360 degrees or [-∞,0,+∞] or [-1,0,+1] or [0,½,1] or [-(X+1),-½,X]; then the left boundary dynamics of say righthandedness cancels the right boundary dynamic of left-handedness throughout the 2 semi cycles, say described in a Möbian connectivity and topology of surface non-orientability in a conformal mapping of a 2D surface onto a 11D supermembrane in a membrane-mirror space.

After the completion of a full cycle, the matter- and antimatter templates exist in the membrane space of the inflaton, say as a supersymmetry between the righthanded electromagnetic monopolar radiation (EMMR) and its antistate in a lefthanded electromagnetic monopolar antiradiation. This supersymmetry between radiative self-states precedes any possible supersymmetry between the matter and antimatter blueprints, as the dynamic of the EMMR eigenstate defines the former as a secondary manifestation of potential manifestation, once the instanton of spacetime creation supersedes that of the prior string-brane epoch.

To realize the matter-antimatter potential, the completion of the full EMMR cycle breaks its own supersymmetry in the exchange of the right- and left boundary and initial conditions. The original righthanded (Weyl-gauge photon say of the left mirror) now situated at the right mirror extends the unitary interval towards the positive abscissa (aleph null enumerability) and inflects its anticlockwise parity into its original clockwise parity or chirality.

The original Weyl-antiphoton from the right mirror, now situated at the left mirror retraces the path of the Weyl-gauge photon however and so does not inflect and so creates the necessity to negate two clockwise quantum spins by a doubled anticlockwise spin angular momentum.

This demands the birth of quantum gravity and of its gauge agent of the graviton in the formation of a new universal wavefunction traversing in the opposite direction of the now twinned electromagnetic monopolar propagation of the original emmr supersymmetry.
A consequence of this 'changing of the fundamental supersymmetry' becomes the restriction of any matter-antimatter symmetry to become confined to the concept of pair production in the presence of existing matter or antimatter in Nonparity.

Defining matter to couple in a Goldstone gauge boson form to the original Weyl-photon (RGB) then forces the Weyl-antiphoton (anticyclic BGR) to suppress the antimatter (MCY anticyclic to matter YCM) template in lieu of a 'twinned' emergent blueprint known as the scalar 0-spin Higgs Boson (Y²C²M²).

Imagine a Möbian strip without thickness und so restricted to be two dimensional. The perimeter of the quasi-inner ring so defines a self-intersection with its quasi-outer ring and depicts half of the total 2D-space of the Möbius strip for the inflection at 180 degrees. Then the Möbian strip breaks its own non-orientable nature and symmetry to create the 3rd dimension.
The second parameter space can now become orientable (without the Möbian twist of 180 degrees) and the self-relativity of the first part becomes now 3-dimensional relative and allows a new mixing of the tripartite sectors of the quantum chromodynamics of the constituent Goldstone bosons. From this point in the cosmogony onwards an older non-manifested matter antimatter supersymmetry can eventuate in the observed pair-production, being otherwise suppressed by the earlier radiation-antiradiation supersymmetry described.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRTKSzAOBr4
​

The Antimatter - Matter Asymmetry as an effect of Quantum Geometry in Diquarks

A contemporary 'controversy' and mystery in the Standard Model compares charged B-meson decay CP parity violation with uncharged B-mesons in the quest to solve the matter-antimatter asymmetry.

Antimatter Mystery Continues To Perplex Scientists (forbes.com)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/drdonl...tter-mystery-continues-to-perplex-scientists/

The answer is the nature of the 2nd and 3rd quark families. The c, b and t quarks are diquarks.
There was no antimatter at the Quantum Big Bang Singularity event (Timespace instanton triggering a Spacetime inflaton). So called supersymmetry is inherent in the prespacetime boundary conditions defined in the Dirac String/Monopole. https://www.bitchute.com/video/WABQpOJawitJ/ 2

The charged B-mesons have only an internal integer charged ring/antiring structure manifesting their structure say bubar=[ud]bar.ubar=ubar.dbar.ubar or bbaru=[ud]u as antiproton or proton quantum quark geometry of the internal down/antidown quark manifesting the weakon ring charge as the interaction transmitter.

The single ring/antiring structure manifests a c-quark component (ucbar or ubarc). The neutral B-mesons, say bdbar=ubar.dbar.dbar or bbard=[ud]d manifest the neutral (anti)neutron/lambda quantum geometry and therefore suppress the matter-antimatter divergence in the weakon kernel-inner ring /down-outer ring/strange oscillations. The two ring/antiring components cancel.

​

​

​

The importance of the uds-lambda quantum geometry​

​

The K-Means define individual materializing families of elementary particles:​

a (UP/DOWN-Mean) sets the (PION-FAMILY: πo, π+, π-)​

a (STRANGE-Mean) specifies the (KAON-FAMILY: Ko, K+, K-).​

a (CHARM-Mean) defines the (J/PSI=J/Ψ-Charmonium-FAMILY)​

a (BEAUTY-Mean) sets the (UPSILON=Υ-Bottonium-FAMILY)​

a (MAGIC-Mean) specifies the (EPSILON=Ε-FAMILY)​

a (DAINTY-Mean) bases the (OMICRON-Ο-FAMILY)​

a (TRUTH-Mean) sets the (KOPPA=Κ-Topomium-FAMILY)​

a (SUPER-Mean) defines the final quark state in the (HIGGS/CHI=H/Χ-FAMILY)​

​

The detailed table is described in a later section and available in linked references:​

​

​

The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron - An extension of the standard model and quantum field theory

http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_28.html


David Tong; Cambridge University; Published on Feb 15, 2017
Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe
Published on Feb 15, 2017

According to our best theories of physics, the fundamental building blocks of matter are not particles, but continuous fluid-like substances known as 'quantum fields'. David Tong explains what we know about these fields, and how they fit into our understanding of the Universe.

https://youtu.be/QUMeKDlgKmk ​

1. The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron | Cosmogenesis - Library of Akbar Ra in Alexandria Thuban (cosmosdawn.net)
2. (PDF) The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron: An Extension of the Standard Model & Quantum Field Theory (Part 4 | Anthony P Bermanseder - Academia.edu
3. https://www.academia.edu/39753909/T...rk_Lepton_Unification_in_XL_Boson_Class_HO_32

​

{1} Matter interacts with antimatter-based Neutrinos in Majorana-Dirac Electron Capture

​

An Electron in the inner atomic nucleus is captured by a proton to create a neutron accompanied by an electron neutrino. This requires a u-quark of the proton to transform into a d-quark of the neutron. As the d-quark is a KIR quark of inner mesonic ring of electro charge [+2/3] coupled to the MIR of electro charge [-1], a W^- weakon must be engaged to couple to a left-handed proton via the Nonparity of the weak nuclear interaction. However in electron capture a left-handed electron neutrino is emitted, requiring the interaction of a W⁺ weakon as the kernel gauge for any such right handed antimatter weak decay.

So should the interacting electron initiate electron capture then a W^- becomes the bosonic partner for the interaction; but if it is the interacting proton, then a W⁺ should become the weak interaction agent to neutralize its positive electric charge with the negative electric charge of the interacting electron.

The interaction of matter and anti-matter in the form of the weak interaction bosons and their associated anti-neutrinos and neutrinos can however be shown to result from a basic kernel-ring interaction of the anti-neutrinos and neutrinos as both Majorana particles and as Dirac particles. Majorana particles are their own anti-particles allowing identification of right-handed antineutrinos as left-handed neutrinos in the base templated or massless self-state.
Dirac particles distinguish right handed anti-neutrinos from left handed neutrinos due their mass and inertia in their native oscillation potential.

For a left-handed proton u[-½]d[+½]u[-½] and a left-handed electron e^-[-½], the W^- consisting of a right-handed electron and a right-handed anti-neutrino initiates the KIR-Oscillation from the Anti-Neutrino-Gluon kernel of the up quark in coupling it to the OR part of the W^-. The colourless Graviphoton or Gγ rendering the 'virtuality' of the W^- as physically real in neutralizing the bosonic weakon spin, which 'flips' the right-handed anti-neutrino into a left-handed neutrino observed.

Proton p⁺[-½] + Electron e^-[-½] ⇒ p⁺[-½] + OR^-[-½]* + ({Electron e^-[+½] + Antiν_electron[+½]}_W- + Graviphoton[-1])
⇒ d[+½]u[-½]{u[-½] + IR^-[0]}*{KIR-Oscillation (OR-IR)^o[-½]+W^-[+1]+GP[-1]} ⇒ d[+½]u[-½]d[-½] + {(OR-IR)^o[0] + Antiν_electron[+½]+GP[-1]}
⇒ n^o[-½] + ν_electron[-½]
with the KIR-Oscillation transferring the interacting left handed electron charge -1 without spin in the OR-IR-K for the IR-K up-down quark transformation {+2/3-1=-1/3} and neutralizing the weakon associated intrinsic right-handed electron spin as +½-½=0 for the remaining OR-IR transition.

The neutron is cyclically delinearized from spin self-state d[+½]u[-½]d[-½] into the triplet configuration YCM=CMY=MYC as d[-½]u[+½]d[-½].

A Magneto axis symmetric Proton K(KIR)K transforms into Magneto axis symmetric Neutron KIR(K)KIR as one of the proton's end Kernel up-quarks 'captures' the Weakonic VPE scalar OR^- Electron Outer Ring in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity.

It is in fact a W^-, that interacts, but coupling to the left-handed electron instead of the left-handed proton, the latter requiring some coupling to the W⁺ weakon in the quantum field to materialize the electron neutrino from the W⁺ template in a direct fashion and not as the Majorana-Dirac 'flip' initiated by the W^- from before.

It is the W⁺ intrinsic positron which is 'flipped' to 'free' the materializing neutrino from the W⁺ weakon base state.
But as the resultant Outer Ring - Inner Ring remnant {(OR-IR)⁺[0]} is positively charged and not charge neutral as was the case for the previous W^- weakon interaction; the W⁺ weakon from the proton is suppressed in electron capture in favour of the W^- weakon from the electron.

Proton p⁺[-½] + Electron e^-[-½] ⇒ p⁺[-½] + IR^-[-½] + ({Positron e⁺[-½] + ν_electron[-½]}_W+ + Graviphoton[+1])

⇒ d[+½]u[-½]{u[-½] + IR^-[0]}*{KIR-Oscillation (OR-IR)^o[-½]+e⁺[+½]+v_electron[-½]} ⇒ d[+½]u[-½]d[-½] + {(OR-IR)⁺[0]} +ν_electron[-½]

⇒ n^o[+½]+ν_electron[-½] + {(OR-IR)⁺[0]}

The W^- then supplies the required KIR for the up-quark to down-quark transmutation with the gauge spin neutralizer of the left handed Graviphoton [-1] flipping the right-handed electron antineutrino constituent of the W^- into its anti-particular form of a left-handed electron neutrino as a Majorana self-state transforming into a Dirac self-state.

Electron capture so displays the Majorana nature of the two base neutrinos of the electron positron and muon-antimuon definition in their massless gauge nature when engaged in the direct interaction or 'tapping' of the UFoQR in the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE/ZPE in R²G²B²[+½]+B²G²R²[-½] = BY²B[0]=GM²G[0]=RC²R[0] = VPE[0].

An Anti-Neutrino template R²G²B²[+½] = W²[+½] = B²G²R²[-½] as Neutrino template in E=hf radiative 'White'-eigen energy and being undifferentiated between the particle and anti-particular energy eigen state under the application of the spin symmetry of the 'flipping' 'white' Graviphoton.

The Dirac nature of the base neutrinos then can be said to apply to all (anti)neutrinos carrying mass in their oscillation potential and properties exhibited in their wave mechanical dynamics manifested in the Anti-Neutrino template R²G²B²[+½] being the anti-state for the Neutrino template B²G²R²[-½] and without or following the Graviphoton 'flip'.



CP violation in the weak nuclear interaction

The difference between matter and antimatter subsequently derives from the difference between the Outer Ring charge of the W⁺ for antimatter and the W^- for matter and so becomes related to the nature of constituent neutrinos and anti-neutrinos in the Kernel-Ring oscillations respectively.

The described gluon-anti-neutrino-electron oscillation from Kernel to mesonic IR to leptonic OR so becomes an inherent supersymmetry between bosonic gluons and fermionic (anti)neutrinos manifesting in the weak interaction and its associated parity violations in Charge-Parity (CP) symmetry.

All quark-antiquark states engaging outer ring oscillations, such as the neutral kaon pairing d.sbar and dbar.s and bottom quark energy states such as b.sbar =(ud)bar.sbar = so will exhibit a difference between matter and antimatter.

For matter IR with antimatter ORbar, for the neutral kaon K^o oscillates from its kernel VPE K.Kbar or u.ubar a matter IR to an antimatter ORbar for the antimatter weakon:

K^o = d.sbar = [K+IR].[Kbar+ORbar] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*ORbar][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*{ORbar+νelectron][-1]}W⁺ +Gγ[+1]

⇒ {u.ubar+d.dbar or u.dbar+ubar.d} + [-½-½+1] {strong weak anti-gluon-neutrino kernel-ring interaction suppressing any lepton decay products}

⇒ {π^o+π^o or π⁺+π^-} ⇒ K_short^o or
⇒ {ubar.d+e⁺[½]+ν_electron[-½]} ⇒ π^-[0] + e⁺[½]+ν_electron[-½] ⇒ K_long^o ,
if the W⁺ manifests from its quantum geometric VPE structure in an ORbar-IR oscillation.

For antimatter IRbar with matter OR, for the neutral kaon K^obar oscillates from its kernel VPE K.Kbar or u.ubar an antimatter IRbar to a matter OR for the matter weakon:

K^o = dbar.s = [Kbar+IRbar].[K+OR] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar*OR][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar{OR+antiνelectron][+1]}W^- +Gγ[-1]
⇒ {u.ubar+d.dbar or u.dbar+ubar.d} + {strong weak gluon-anti-neutrino kernel-ring interaction suppressing any lepton decay products}[-½-½+1]}

⇒ {π^o+π^o or π⁺+π^-} ⇒ K_short^o or ⇒ {u.dbar+e[-½]+ν_electron[+½]} ⇒ K_long^o , if the W^- manifests from its quantum geometric VPE structure in an IRbar-OR oscillation.

But an exchange of the inner and outer rings in their matter and antimatter nature is also possible resulting in the superpositioning of the neutral kaon's wavefunctions and leading to CP violation in that mixing between matter and antimatter in characteristics defined in the weakon quantum geometry.

Here, the Graviphoton does not neutralize the interacting weakon spin, but spin induces the interacting mesonic inner ring in the IR-ORbar or IRbar-OR oscillation and delaying the strong weak kernel-ring interactions for the antigluon-neutrino or gluon-anti-neutrino kernel templates respectively.

K^o = d.sbar = [K+IR].[Kbar+ORbar] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*ORbar][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*[0]{ORbar+νelectron][-1]}W⁺ +Gγ[+1]
⇒ [u.ubar][0]+{IR*[+1]+ORbar[-1]+ν_electron[0]} ⇒ [u.ubar][0]+[KIR.KIRbar][0] ⇒ {u.ubar+d.dbar} as a two-particle decay in anti-gluon-neutrino strong weak interaction and with the Graviphoton[+1] spin inducing the matter based Inner Ring to neutralize the opposite spin of the interacting W⁺[-1] weakon.

K^o = dbar.s = [Kbar+IRbar].[K+OR] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar*OR][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar{OR+antiνelectron][+1]}W^- +Gγ[-1]
⇒ [u.ubar][0]+{IRbar*[-1]+OR[-1]+antiν_electron[0]} ⇒ [u.ubar][0]+[KIRbar.KIR][0] ⇒ {u.ubar+d.dbar} as a two particle decay in gluon-anti-neutrino strong weak interaction and with the Graviphoton[-1] spin inducing the antimatter based Inner Ring to neutralize the opposite spin of the interacting W^-[+1] weakon.

The difference in the antimatter to matter and matter to antimatter kernel-ring oscillation so results in the mixing of the wave functions to exemplify the CP violation in the neutral kaon as decaying in different fashion and decay rates as the K_short^o = {d.sbar+dbar.s}/√2 and the K_long^o = {d.sbar-dbar.s}/√2 in decay times differing in a factor of the light-matter interaction probability α in t_Ks^o=8.95x10^-11 s* in a two particle decay {π^o+π^o or π⁺+π^- } and 5.18x10^-8 s* in a three particle decay

{π^o+π^o+π^o or π^o+π⁺+π^- or π⁺+e^-+ν_electron or π^-+e⁺+ν or similar pion-lepton combinations from the weakon templates} respectively.

This superposition so shows the K_short^o to engage the W^- and the K_long^o to utilize the W⁺ in a distinct quantum geometric difference between the kernel-inner ring - outer ring oscillations between that of interacting matter weakons and that of interacting antimatter weakons.

The discovery by in 1964 of the K_long^o also at times manifesting a two-particle decay proved the CP violation at the Brookhaven Alternating Gradient Synchrotron Laboratory by a collaboration led by James Cronin and Val Fitch of Princeton University.
As shown above, this CP violation becomes a consequence of wave-quarkian quantum geometry applied to quantum chromodynamics.

For the neutral B-mesons defined in a diquark structure (U=[uu] for c=U.ubar; b=[ud].ubar; t=[ds].U) detailed further on in this paper, the CP violation at a higher energy level becomes more pronounced and susceptible to the measurement of the manifesting energies.

Because the K_long^o decay pattern also allows a two particle decay in the form of the mesonic ring part of the b-quark being spin induced by the Graviphoton, instead of the latter spin neutralizing the weakon spin; an excess of the matter based diquark b=ud.ubar decay patterns relative to the antimatter based anti-diquark bbar=ud.bar.u will be observed in the experimental evidence in the subtraction of the K_long^o decay patterns becoming added to the decay patterns of the K_short^o.

Typical decay patterns for the B-mesons are:

B^- = b.ubar = [ud.ubar].ubar = [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar] = [K.Kbar] + [K+Kbar]+{IR*-OR[+½]+antiν[+½]}_W^- +Gγ[-1]
⇒ UUbar+OR[-½]+antiν[+½] ⇒ ucbar[0] + OR[-½] + antiν[+½] ⇒ D^o[0] + (e^-;μ^-)[-½] + antiν[+½]

B⁺= bbar.u = [udbar.u].u = [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K] = [K.Kbar] + [Kbar+K] + {IRbar*-ORbar[-½]+ν[-½]}_W⁺ +Gγ[+1]
⇒ Ubar+KIRbar*-ORbar[+½]+ν[-½] ⇒ c.ubar[0] + ORbar[+½] + ν[-½] ⇒ D^o[0]+(e⁺;μ⁺)[+½] + ν[-½]

B_d^o = b.dbar = [ud.ubar].dbar = [U+IR+Kbar].[KIRbar] = [U.Kbar+KIRbar] + {IR*-OR[+½]+antiν[+½]}_W^- +Gγ[-1]
⇒ Uubar+KIRbar+OR[-½]+antiν[+½] ⇒ c.dbar + OR[-½]+antiν[+½] ⇒ D⁺[0] + (e^-;μ^-)[-½]+antiν[+½]

B_d^o = bbar.d = [udbar.u].d = [Ubar+IRbar+K].[KIR] = [K.Kbar] + [Ubar.K+KIR]+{IRbar*-ORbar[-½]+ν[-½]}_W⁺ +Gγ[-1]
⇒ Ubar.u+OR[-½]+antiν[+½] ⇒ cbar.d + ORbar[+½] + ν[-½] ⇒ D^-[0] + (e⁺;μ⁺)[+½] + ν[-½]

For antimatter IR and matter OR, a possible decay mode is:

B_s^o = bbar.s = [udbar.u].s = [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K+OR]
⇒ [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K[0]+({OR+antiνelectron][+1]}W^-+Gγ[-1]) ⇒ [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K[0]+(OR[0]+antiν_electron[0])
⇒ ([Kbar.Kbar]+K+IRbar)(K+OR) ⇒ [Kbar.K] +[KIRbar.KOR] + {strong weak kernel-ring gluon-anti-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products}

⇒ uubar + dbar.s ⇒ π^o + K^o

⇒ [Kbar.KOR]+[K.KIRbar] {strong weak kernel-ring gluon-anti-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products} ⇒ ubar.s + udbar ⇒ K^- + π⁺

For matter IR and antimatter OR, a possible decay mode is: B_s^obar = b.sbar = [ud.ubar].sbar = [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar+ORbar]

⇒ [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar[0]+({ORbar+νelectron][-1]}W⁺+Gγ[+1]) ⇒ [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar[0]+(ORbar[0]+ν_electron[0]) ⇒ ([Kbar.Kbar]+Kbar+IR)(Kbar+ORbar)

⇒ [Kbar.K] +[KIR.KORbar] + {strongweak kernel-ring gluon-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products} ⇒ uubar + d.sbar ⇒ π^o + K^o

⇒ [K.KORbar]+[Kbar.KIR] {strongweak kernel-ring gluon-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products} ⇒ u.sbar + ubar.d ⇒ K⁺ + π^-

The creation of the neutral kaon K^o d.sbar-dbar.s quark content superposition repeats the CP violation as indicated.


{2} Matter interacts with matter based Anti-Neutrinos via superposed VPE-Weakon Action

Protons transform into neutrons with antimatter positrons and where the interacting anti-neutrino as constituent part of the W^- weakon induces Pair-Production for weakon's electron in tapping the VPE to manifest a like spinning positron to neutralize the boson spin of the Graviphoton. The spin of the Graviphoton so cancels the spin of the Pair-Production VPE as well as the spin of the weakon boson in a superposition of the VPE and the weak interaction.

A up quark of the proton then changes into a down quark for the produced neutron in a double transition from the Outer Ring of the weakon's electron transiting to the Inner Ring and the original anti-neutrino transits from the Inner Ring onto the Gluon-Neutrino kernel K as the decay products of a free neutron. The right-handed spin quantum of the anti-neutrino cancels the left-handed quantum spin of the weakon's electron base which was flipped by the Graviphoton for the MIR oscillation between the up quark and the down quark transformation.

{Mass produced photons (by acceleration of inertia coupled electro charges), have no magneto charge and so form their own anti-particles; whilst gauge or 'virtual' photons carry cyclic and anticyclic colour charges as consequence of the matter-antimatter asymmetry}.

Proton p⁺[-½] + Antiν_electron[+½] ⇒ p⁺[-½] + {Antiν_electron[+½] + (Electron e^-[+½]}_W^- + Positron e⁺[+½]_VPE^o_[+1] + Graviphoton[-1]

⇒ p⁺[-½] + {Electron e^-[-½] + Antiν_electron[+½]} + Positron e⁺[+½] ⇒ {p⁺[-½]+IR^-[0]+K^o[-½+½]} + e⁺[+½] ⇒ n^o[-½] + e⁺[+½]



{3} Matter interacts with antimatter-based Neutrinos via Unified Weakon Action {OR+Antiν=W^-;ν+Anti-OR⁺=W⁺}


Neutrons transform into protons with muons, the latter decaying into electrons and anti-neutrinos and neutrinos, so reducing the elementary matter-neutrino interaction to basic neutron beta minus-decay with the leptonic coupling between the 'resonance electron' as a basic muon coupled to its neutrino. A neutron's down quark transforming into a up quark in disassociating the mesonic Inner Ring part of the down quark from its up-quark kernel part to become the leptonic Outer Ring part of the manifesting muon. The interacting muon neutrino couples with the antineutrino of the weakon template as its own anti particle transferring its mass to the muon and changing its self-state from mass defined Diracness to massless Majorananess in the process.

Neutron n^o[-½] + ν_muon[-½] ⇒ n^o[-½] + ν_muon[-½] + ({Antiν_muon[+½] + (Muon μ^-[+½]}_W^- +GP[-1])

⇒ d[-½]u[+½]d[-½] + *{KIROR-Oscillation (OR-IR-K)[+½] +Antiν_muon[+½]+ν_muon[-½] + GP[1]}

⇒ d[-½]u[+½]u[-½] + IR^-[0] + {OR^-[+½]+GP[-1]} +{R²G²B²[-½]+B²G²R²[+½]} ⇒ p⁺[-½] + μ[-½] + VPE[0]

⇒ p⁺[-½] + μ^-[-½] +VPE[0] ⇒ p⁺[-½] + *{KIROR-Oscillation (OR-IR-K)[-½]}({e^-[+½] + Antiν_electron[+½]}_W^- + GP[-1])

⇒ p⁺[-½] + ν_muon[-½] + e^-[-½] + Antiν_electron[+½]

In the muon beta decay, the KIROR oscillation transfers the spin of the interacting muon as the spin of its self-state neutrino and enabling the constituents of the matter weakon W^- to manifest with the right-handed electron part flipping to manifest the left-handed electron of the beta decay.

mν_Higgs=m_eλ_w.r_E/(2πr_MR_e){1/r_G-1/r_F} ~ 9.3x10^-38 kg or 0.052 eV for a scalar blueprint Antiν_Higgs = R⁴G⁴B⁴[0]
with anti-state ν_Higgs = B⁴G⁴R⁴[0] and coupling as the Tauon (Anti) Neutrino as

Antiν_tauon = R²G²B²[+½] + R⁴G⁴B⁴[0] = R⁶G⁶B⁶[+½] = Antiν_electron + Antiν_Higgs
and ν_tauon = B²G²R²[-½] + B⁴G⁴R⁴[0] = B⁶G⁶R⁶[-½] = ν_electron + ν_Higgs

For a differential equation for Potential Energy: ∇²∅ - {μr}² = 0

∇²∅ - {r/R_e}² = 0 = (1/r).∂²/∂r²{r∅} - {r/R_e}².∅ ∂²/∂r²{r∅} = {r/R_e}².(r∅) for a solution

r∅ = constant.exp[-r/R_e] for the Yukawa Potential with μ = 1/R_e = 4πε_om_ec²/e² = 4πm_e/μ_oe²

∅ = constant.(1/r).exp[-r/R_e] ⇒ m_ec² = (μ_oe²c²/4πR).exp[-R/R_e] for R/R_e = exp[-R/R_e]

f(R/R_e) = R/R_e - exp[-R/R_e] = f(x) = x - exp[-x] = 0 with derivative f'(R/R_e) = f'(x) = 1 + exp(-x) and x_k+1 = x_k - f(x)/f'(x) for a Newton-Raphson solution

x_o =½ for x₁ = ½ - (-0.10653066)/(1.6065307) = 0.56631100; x₂ = 0.56631100 - (-0.00130508243)/(1.56761552) = 0.56714353;
x₃ = 0.56714353 - (0.00000037547)/(1.56714316) = 0.56714330... for R = 0.5671433 R_e

For the potential energy of the electron with effective mass m_e = μ_oe²/4πR, the Yukawa potential for the nucleus reduces the classical electron radius to 0.5671433 R_e, which approximates the radius of the proton as ½R_e but diverges from the proton's charge radius by the factor X approximately.

We have shown that the sought-after reduction of the classical radius of the electron occurs in the interval from A=½ to A=1 and where the Yukawa potential results in ½XR_e or= 0.85838x10^-15 m* for the charge radius of the proton at A=1 as precisely half of the reduced monopolar quantum relativistic electron radius at 1.716761063x10^-15 m*. The Yukawa potential applied to the classical electromagnetic electron in electro stasis so approximates the monopolar quantum relativistic electron in 0.5671433/0.618034 or 91.77%.


From the Feynman Lecture:

This function is called the Yukawa potential. For an attractive force, K is a negative number whose magnitude must be adjusted to fit the experimentally observed strength of the forces. The Yukawa potential of the nuclear forces dies off more rapidly than 1/r by the exponential factor. The potential—and therefore the force—falls to zero much more rapidly than 1/r for distances beyond 1/μ, as shown in Fig. 28–6. The “range” of nuclear forces is much less than the “range” of electrostatic forces. It is found experimentally that the nuclear forces do not extend beyond about 10⁻¹³ cm, so μ ≈10¹⁵ m⁻¹.

Fig. 28–6.The Yukawa potential e−μr/r, compared with the Coulomb potential 1/r.



​

The Higgs boson with a scalar Higgs scalar neutrino in the conformal mapping of the QBBS onto the cosmology

As the universe reached an age between 1130-1150 seconds, a 20 second period from the 18 minute 50 second marker manifested primordial radioactive beta-minus decay in the decomposition of a lefthanded ylemic neutron into its constituent parts of a lefthanded proton with a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino. As this process is a weak nuclear interaction (WNI) a coupling to the strong nuclear interaction (SNI) was made manifest in the ylemic neutron star’s core transforming the quark content of the ylemic neutron in the interaction with gluons and crystallizing the force carrying bosons for the WNI and the SNI as weakon bosons (W^- for matter and W⁺ for antimatter and Z^o for uncharged matter) and gluons respectively.

The Riemann hyperspheres of the instanton-inflaton evolutionary light path correspond to the quantum geometry inherent in the QBBS

R_E=∛E)(λ_weyl/2π)=3.43597108x10¹⁴ m* for a time
t_E=n_E/H_o=2.1506x10^-12/H_o=1,145,323.7 s* or 318.145 hours
and a temperature T_E=1.163x10⁹ K*from T(n)=∜{{H_o³M_o/1100π²σ_SB}.{(n+1)²/n³}} corresponds to R_e=2.7777x10^-15 m* in the ratio R_e/R_E=8.0844x10^-30

R_F=∛F)(λ_weyl/2π)=3.45107750x10¹¹ m* for a time t_F=n_F/H_o=2.1601x10^-15/H_o=1150.36 s* or 19.17 minutes
and a temperature T_E=2.0614x10¹¹ K* corresponds to R_HBlower=R_e{R_F/R_E}=2.789990x10^-18 m* in the upper bound for the Higgs Boson HB for a Compton mass m_HBlower=h/(2πcR_HBlower)=1.26766x10^-25 kg* or 71.020 GeV* increasing to 71.020(Y^np)= 122.491 GeV* for n_p=1.132711

R_G=∛G)(λ_weyl/2π)=3.39155801x10¹¹ m* for a time t_G=n_G/H_o=2.1228x10^-15/H_o=1130.52 s* or 18.84 minutes and a temperature T_E=2.0885x10¹¹ K* corresponds to R_HBmean=R_e{R_G/R_E}=2.741872x10^-18 m* in the mean mirror value for the Higgs Boson for a Compton mass m_HBmean=h/(2πcR_HBmean)=1.28991x10^-25 kg* or 72.266 GeV* increasing to 72.266(Y^np)= 124.640 GeV* for n_p=1.132711

For F’=(2G-F)=9.158461354x10¹⁰² space quanta = R_F’=∛F’)(λ_weyl/2π)=3.32987275x10¹¹ m* for a time t_F’=n_F’/H_o=2.0842x10^-15/H_o=1109.96 s* or 18.50 minutes
and a temperature T_E=2.1173x10¹¹ K* corresponds to R_HBlower=R_e{R_F’/R_E}=2.6920000x10^-18 m* in the lower bound for the Higgs Boson
for a Compton mass m_HBupper=h/(2πcR_HBupper)=1.31381x10^-25 Kg* or 73.605 GeV* increasing to GeV* for n_p=1.132711 increasing to 73.605(Y^np)= 126.950 GeV* for n_p=1.132711

​

​

The Gravitational constant as a function of the finestructure constant alpha and the distribution of magnetic monopole masses

G_oX^np(1+ec/30ec + 1/e*)=G_oX^np{1+1/30+1/e*}=(6.44221014x10^-11){31/30+1/500} =6.66983490x10^-11 [m³/kgs²]* = 6.67445232x10^-11 [m³/kgs²]_SI for the unitary calibration [m³/kgs²]*=1.000692286 [m³/kgs²]_SI

​

{s}SI	=	1.000978394	{s*}	=	0.999022562	{s}SI
{m}SI	=	1.001671357	{m*}	=	0.998331431	{m}SI
{kg}SI	=	1.003753126	{kg*]	=	0.996260907	{kg}SI
{C}SI	=	1.002711702	{C*}	=	0.997295631	{C}SI
{J}SI	=	1.005143377	{J*}	=	0.994882942	{J}SI
{eV}SI	=	1.00246560	{eV*}	=	0.997540464	{eV}SI
{K}SI		0.98301975	{K*}	=	1.017273559	{K}SI

​

The variation observed in the experiments to measure the gravitational constant G(n) therefore depend not on the time variation decrease for G(n), which is precisely balanced in the time variation increase of the M(n) factor in the gravitational parameter, but is a mirror effect of the universal pole direction variation in the alpha finestructure constant, given as Δα/α=8.08x10^-5 and as the effect of the Dirac string connecting the three wormholes of the QBBS instanton-inflaton couplings quantum entangling the Riemann-Baab universe with the Abba-Khaibit shadow universe in the definitions of the string-membrane modular T-Mirror dualities.

Alpha remains constant for a cosmology descriptive of a non-accelerating cosmology; but will result in a change in the electric charge quantum in a cosmology, which measures an accelerated spacial expansion, which is however the result of a self-intersection of the light path for particular cosmological redshift intervals in an oscillating cosmology.

Here a particular alpha variation reduces the SI-measurement for the square of the charge quantum e in a factor of
(1.6021119x10^-19/1.60217662x10^-19)² = 0.99991921... for a calibrated alpha variation
α_var = 1 - (1.602111895/1.60217662)² = 1 - 0.9999192 = 8.08x10^-5
with Alpha α = μ_oce²/2h = e²/2ε_ohc = 2π.(2.99792458)(1.602111895)²x10^-37/(6.62607004x10^-34) = 60πe²/h = 7.296762965x10^-3 = 1/137.0470721.

As the electropolar charge quantum appears squared in the Alpha-Constant, the Alpha-variation so becomes (1.0000807), with the old value of (e') exceeding the new value of (e) in so 4 parts in 100,000 and [Alpha]' greater in magnitude than Alpha by 81 parts in a million and in agreement with the Churchill-Webb measurements of 1998 and the more recent measurements from by the Wilczynska-Webb-Bainbridge-Barrow-Bosman collaboration (Published 2020), observing very distant quasars with redshifts from quasar J1120+0641 with z=7.085 for an alpha variation

Δα/α = (α_z − α₀)/α₀ = (−2:18 ± 7:27)x10^-5.

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/17/eaay9672

The variation in the laboratory measurements of Newton’s gravitational constant G is the combined effect of the monopole mass, which when added with the inverse of the magnetic charge quantum defining the Dirac monopole, but as the proportionality connecting the electropolar charge to the magnetopolar charge from e*E_ps = 1 = {e*/2e√α}{m_electron/m_planck}, increases the decreasing G(n) = G_oXⁿ
The nucleon mass m_c(n) = m_cYⁿ compensates for the constancy of G_om_o = G(n)m(n)) by one magnetic monopole mass m_m = [ec] with the source energy perturbation.

Inverting the proportionality {2e√α} = e*{m_electron/m_planck} for the proportionality constant as a function of alpha gives 2√a ={ e*/e}{ m_electron/m_planck} with {2√a}/{2e*√α} = E_ps

Using proportionality constant (2√a/300) to account for the proportionality 1+1/30 = 31/30 = 310/300 instead of E_ps as the perturbation
E_ps-2√α/300 = 1.43052605x10^-3 in G(n_present) = G(n_p)
G(n_p) = G_oX^np{31/30+1.43052605x10^-3}=(6.44221014x10^-11){1.03476386}=6.666123x10^-11 [m³/kgs²]*
= 6.67073786x10^-11 [m³/kgs²]_SI differing from the full perturbation by
(6.67445232x10^-11 - 6.67073786x10^-11) [m³/kgs²]_SI = 3.7144565x10^-3 [m³/kgs²]_SI or so 4 parts per 1000

Using Dirac’s quantization condition as proportionality E_ps-(2α/300)=1.95135491x10^-3 gives in G(n_present)
G(n_p) = (6.44221014x10^-11){ 1.03528469} = 6.66952152x10^-11[m³/kgs²]* = 6.67413873x10^-11 [m³/kgs²]_SI differing from the full perturbation by
(6.67445232x10^-11 - 6.67413873x10^-11) [m³/kgs²]_SI = 3.135873x10^-4 [m³/kgs²]_SI or so 3 parts per 10,000

And using the nature of the Action Law as the square of charge for a proportionality constant E_ps-(2√α/300)²=E_ps-(4α/90,000)=1.99967570x10^-3 results in G(n_p) = (6.44221014x10^-11){1.03533301}=6.66983281x10^-11[m³/kgs²]* = 6.67445024x10^-11 [m³/kgs²]_SI differing from the full perturbation by
(6.67445232x10^-11 - 6.67445024x10^-11) [m³/kgs²]_SI =2.07907x10^-6 [m³/kgs²]_SI or so 2 parts per Million

Because the source energy quantum E_weyl = E_ps = m_psc² = 1/e* = (1/2e√α){m_electron/m_planck}, the direct proportionality between electro charge quantum e and magneto charge quantum e* for the magnetic flux f_m = (m_ps/[ec]_mod)ec³ = E_ps = 1/e* modifies the gravitational parameter in the basic Schwarzschild metric r_curv = 2G_oM/c²

The distribution of the 30 GUT monopoles maximizes the minimum condition for a single monopole in the distribution of 30 monopoles in the doubling of the gravitational parameter from the gravitational potential energy GMR/R² = -∇Φ in 4-dimensional spacetime to the gravitational parameter for of a Schwarzschild Black Hole in 5-dimensional spacetime 2G_oM = G_o{∑M} = {G_o/[ec]}{1+1/30+…+1/30} for the GUT unification in the timespace preceding the QBBS.

This occurs at the unification mass scale for the fine structures alpha_EMR = 2πk_ee²/hc = 2πG_om_m²/hc = alpha_GR and requiring 30 ‘t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopoles in the definition of the Maxwell constant μ_oε_o = 1/c² in units [Js²/C²m][C²/Jm] with the condition k_ee² = G_om_m² = G_o[ec]² for unitary consistency [k_e] = [Jm/C²] = [Js/C²][m/s] = [Action h/Charge C²][c] with G_o = [e*/kg] = [m³/kgs²] = [Js/kg²][m/s] = [h/(ec)²][m/s] = [h/C²][s/m] = [h/C²][1/c] for the reciprocity of lightspeed c as the invariant constant relating the electropolar charges and fields to their magnetopolar counterparts in modular duality-inversion properties of the Action Law as [Charge C² = Action h]

This so defines k_e[e²] = m_m²/k_e for m_m² = k_e²[e²] = [e/4πε_o]² = [120πec/4π]² = [30ec]² = m_m² from the Maxwell constant ε_oμ_o = {1/120πc}{120π/c} = 1/c² for the unification condition for the mass of a boundary ‘t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole to be 30[ec] kg* or 30[ec]c² Joules of monopolar energy.

A single ‘t Hooft-Polyakov monopole would have a mass of m_monopole = [ec]_mod = 4.819369032x10^-11 kg*for a GUT string unification energy of 1.30122964x10⁸ J* or 8.1x10¹⁷ GeV*.

All 30 ‘t Hooft-Polyakov monopoles would have a mass of for a GUT string unification energy of 1.30122964x10⁸ J* or 8.1x10¹⁷ GeV*.

For a mass less universe with no magnetic monopoles, the Schwarzschild metric would take the form with a gravitational constant G_o defining the curvature as a function of purely electromagnetic mass r_curvc² = G_o{1+0}M = G_oM = M/k_e = 4πε_oM and where M would be expressed in terms of a Maxwell's displacement current [ec]_mod = currentxdisplacement


The evolution of the universe in an oscillating spacetime and the age of the earth

Newton's gravitational constant so is allowed to vary and decrease over time as a function of the change in the universal inertia increasing in direct proportionality and the transformation of source energy into physically expressed units of quantum consciousness in the gravitational parameter GM=G_oM_o=G(n)M(n) and n a dimensionless cycle time. Cycle time parameter n is defined in n=H_ot=ct/R_H defining the invariant light path X=ct as a scale factor for the size of the universe defined at cycle time coordinate n in a nodal minimum Hubble constant f_weyl, defined as the instanton of creation and varying between odd and even nodes for a maximized Hubble constant H_o=dn/dt as the inflaton of creation in the first semi-oscillation of protoverse as a first seedling universe.

An electromagnetic return of the source light traversing the light path X=ct in the 11-dimensional and higher-dimensional universe so gives birth to a second, but concurrent universe within the omniverse as a multiverse after the completion of the light path of creation has reached the nodal boundary set at the instanton of the Weyl wormhole frequency in the cosmology of the Quantum Big Bang.

The electromagnetic monopolar source light so both reflects and refracts its path from the maximized Hubble H_o-boundary of the inflaton. The refracted light path then increases the size of the bounding omniverse in the addition of wormhole quanta defined in the quantum of universal consciousness and the light path reflected from the 11-dimensional Witten spacetime mirror retraces the light path travelled from the instanton node to the inflaton node as the initial boundary conditions of the multi-dimensional cosmology.

The lower dimensional expansion of the universe so is continually decelerating in a parametrization of the wormhole parameters applied to the multitudinous form of the volumars occupying the 10 dimensional string universe; but the electromagnetic retracing of the original light path will intersect itself and cause the measurements of cosmological expansion as a redshift of the light observed to appear as a cosmological contraction and a contraction which will also be observed as a universe accelerating its own expansion.

At a present cycle time of n=1.1327117… and a nodal n=1 for t_present=1/H_o, the electromagnetic return of the monopolar light path has retraced 13.271 % of the Hubble event horizon defined in R_H=ct=c/H_o of about 16.9 billion light years for a fraction of 2.24 billion light years indicating that the electromagnetic monopolar age of the universe is 16.876+2.240=19.116 billion light years; but that this will be measured in the gravitationally decelerating cosmology as 19.12-4.48=14.64 billion light years.

As the age of the earth is near the doubled light path of the self-intersection in 4.48 billion years added to a doubled interval of a variation in the alpha finestructure constant in 28.6 million years, the age of the earth is 4.48+0.056=4.536 billion years.

Alpha remains constant for a cosmology descriptive of a non-accelerating cosmology; but will result in a change in the electric charge quantum in a cosmology, which measures an accelerated spacial expansion, which is however the result of a self-intersection of the light path for particular cosmological redshift intervals in an oscillating cosmology.
Here a particular alpha variation reduces the SI-measurement for the square of the charge quantum e in a factor of (1.6021119x10^-19/1.60217662x10^-19)² = 0.99991921...for a calibrated:

alpha variation α_var = 1 - (1.602111895/1.60217662)² = 1 - 0.9999192 = 8.08x10^-5 with Alpha α = μ_oce²/2h = e²/2ε_ohc = 2π(2.99792458)(1.602111895)²x10^-37/(6.62607004x10^-34) = 60πe²/h = 7.296762965x10^-3 = 1/137.0470721.

As the electropolar charge quantum appears squared in the Alpha-Constant, the Alpha-variation so becomes (1.0000807), with the old value of (e') exceeding the new value of (e) in so 4 parts in 100,000 and [Alpha]' greater in magnitude than Alpha by 81 parts in a million and in agreement with the Churchill-Webb measurements of 1998, increasing from Alpha = μ_oc.e²/2h = 1/137.047072 to Alpha = 1/137.036003.

The age of the Milky Way galaxy can be determined by using the process of nucleosynthesis in the early universe in the physics of nucleochronology, that is in measuring the abundance of radioactive elements, such as Thorium-232 (98.98%) compared to the abundance of a known abundance of another stable chemical element found in the periodic table of the atomic elements, such as Europium-153(52.2%); Europium-151(47.8%) is unstable with a half-life of 5.10x10⁹Gy.

In the early universe only rapid neutron capture occurred to synthesize the heavier elements. Spectroscopic evidence of absorption spectra for the ultra-metal-poor and massive Galactic Halo Star CS 22892-052 has discovered an abundance of the radioactive element Thorium with half-life 14.05 Gy in N(t_mean)=N_o.exp[-14.05/t_mean} for a mean lifetime of t_mean= t_½/ln2=14.05/ln2 = 20.27 Gy.

This larger age is comparable to the Electromagnetic Monopolar EMMI age of the QBBS; but ignores the chemical evolution of the universe adding the reactive elements Europium and Thorium in varying proportions by the rapid neutron capture process to their universal abundance in the subsequent thermodynamic evolution of the universe. The chronometric age determination for CS 22892-052 then provides an estimate of the age for the Milky Way Galaxy and its globular cluster stars.

At the time of the creation of the solar system 4.6 Gy ago, the Thorium/Europium ratio is measured today as 0.369 but as 0.219 in globular cluster star CS 22892-052 in N(t)=N_o(t_o){2^[-t/t½].

The {Th/Eu} is (0.369)=N_o.2^[-4.6/14.05] for N_o=0.463, substantially higher than that for globular cluster star CS 22892-052 measured as 0.219, indicating a far greater age for the star, then calculated for the abundance ratio in the much younger universe for a N_o=(0.219). 2^[4.6/14.05]=0.275.

And for the mean lifetime t_mean=t_½/ln2=20.27 GY

​

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/303968/fulltext/John J Cowan et all; The Thorium Chronometer in CS 22892-052: Estimates of the Age of the Galaxy; Astrophysical Journal;THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 480:246 254, 1997 May 1

An earlier paper, addressing the actinide chronometer production ratios for the rapid-neutron capture process derive an age for the Milky Way galaxy of 20.8 [+2/-4] Gy and an age for the universe of 19.5 [+3/-3] Gy for a (Sandage) Hubble constant of 60 km/Mpc.s . Those calculations concur with the EMMI age of the universe as 19.12 Gy for a nodal Hubble constant of 58.04 km/Mpc.s for a not accelerating universe with zero cosmological constant in the Friedmann-Walker cosmology.

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1983A&A...123..162T

Title: New actinide chronometer production ratios and the age of the Galaxy
Authors: Thielemann, F.-K., Metzinger, J., & Klapdor, H. V.Journal: Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 123, no. 1, June 1983, p. 162-169.

Measuring Alpha even further back towards the Quantum Big Bang with increasing redshift, would better approximate the 80 parts per million increase in Alpha from say lower deviations at the say 8 parts per million at lower redshifts. So the Alpha-Dip indicates that the textbook SI-value for the electropole is fractionally too high; but that the Alpha Finestructure Constant remains indeed constant once the variation in the electronic charge quantum is considered.

Because the magnetic permeability constants are numerically the same in both the (SI) and the (*) unitary measurement systems; but ε_o = 1/120πc = 8.841941283x10^-12 (F/m)* and is
ε_o = 8.8541878176x10^-12 F/m (SI), the (SI) measurement is too large by a factor of 1.00138505 to correlate correctly with the magnetic permeability constant μ_o to give the Maxwell constant μ_oxε_o = (120π/c).(1/120πc) = 1/c².

In the attempt to explain the Alpha-Dip, some theorists have proposed a 'slowing down' of (c). Recent formulations by populist physicist Paul Davies and in co-authorship with Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from the Department of Astrophysics at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia have followed the wrong avenues for the interpretation of the data, however. In a paper published in ('Nature': 'Black Holes constrain varying constants'; August 8th, 2002), the authors propose a varying light speed to be responsible for the Alpha-Dip and discount any possible variation in the electrocharge quantum. Davies' argument that an increase in (e) would alter the evolution of Black Holes in their entropy definitions does not consider that a product of the Boltzmann Constant (defining entropy), with (e) forms a fundamental fine-structured constant in its own right.

​

In particular, the universe's wavefunction B(n) is localized in any arbitrary spacetime in 'unfreezing' the M-space 'stuck' in between the (X,Y) coordinates and subsequently in between real and imaginary linearized time parameters. This demands the establishment of a Mean-Alignment-Time or MAT, relative to a 'unfreezing definition' in a specification of the 'naked singularity', oscillating as zero-point about the FRB.

As Exe* = Epsx1/Eps = 1 as fundamental unity in the 11D Membrane-Mirror-Space of modular duality with e* the magneto charge; one can heuristically state that (Energy E x charge quantum e) in the lower dimensional C-Line-Space C can be expressed as the inversed identity in the form of 1/T.

This then sets E.e=kT.e=1 for [ek]=1/T and using an inverse proportion for mass in the lower dimensionality: [e*k*]=1/T* sets a function f(n)=[ek]/[e*k*]=[T*/T].

This is the case for the Mass-Temperature inverse proportionality for the evolution of Black Holes from microstates to macro states and as in the Hawking Mass-Temperature relation for Black Holes and relabeling the Weyl string as the primary sourcesink ‘ps’ high frequency with small wavelength part of the modular dual supermembrane E_psE_ss and with the secondary sinksource ‘ss’ being the low frequency with large wavelength part of the Witten supermembrane.

Then the Minimum Planck Oscillator E_planck^o= ½hf_planck=½m_planck.c² for T_max=T_ps and T_min=T_ss in string modular T-duality for ½m_planck.T_planck=(1/8π)(4π).m_planck.T_planck
= Hawking Modulus HM = hc³/4πG_ok_B = M_BHmin.T_BHmax = {c²/4π²}. M_BHmax.T_BHmin}. B(n) is assigned B(n_present) = {[ek_B](SI)/[ek_B](*)}, with {[ek_B](SI) = constant
= (1.60217662x10^-19 C)(1.380649x10^-23 J/K)=2.21204355x10^-42 CJ/K} and using the old (SI) value with the Alpha-Variation for (e').

Using (e^±=1.6021119x10^-19 C) without the Alpha-Variation gives {[ek_B](SI)}=2.21195419x10^-42 CJ/K}. The (*)-constant is a relatively fixed constant as: (e^±*k_B*=2.267869086x10^-42 (CJ/K)*) and subsequently B(n_present) calculates a particular value for n at the asymptote B(n⇒±∞)=0 for e=1.606456344x10^-19 C*.

{[e^±k_B](SI)/[e^±k_B]*}=(2.21204355/2.267869086)=0.975384145=[2e/hA].exp(-[Alpha]x[n_present² + n_present]), which yields an unique (n_present) as a complex solution to the quadratic equation by ln(0.975384145/0.992729803)={ln(0.982527312} = {-Alpha}{n_present² + n_present} for 2.415747501 = n_present² + n_present for n_present² + n_present - 2.415747501 = 0
and solving as: {n_present = FRB(-½)±1.6327117}.

{[e^±k_B](SI)/[e^±k_B]*}=(2.21195419/2.267869086)=0.975344742=[2e/hA].exp(-[Alpha]x[n_present²+n_present]), which yields an unique (n_present) as a complex solution to the quadratic equation by ln(0.975344742/0.992729803)={ln(0.98248762} = {-Alpha}{n_present² + n_present} for 2.421284031=n_present²+n_present for: n_present² + n_present-2.421284031 = 0
and solving as: {n_present = FRB(-½)±1.634406324}.

For the unfrozen M-space with Alpha-Variation:
{10D-root: n_present = 1.1327117 (real) & 12D-root: n_present = -2.1327117 (imaginary)}.

For the unfrozen M-space without Alpha-Variation: {10D-root: n_present = 1.1344063 (real) & 12D-root: n_present = -2.1344063 (imaginary)}.

The difference in the present n cycle-time coordinate so becomes
1.634406324-1.6327117 = 0.001694624 as 0.001694624/H_o = 9.02486387x10¹⁴ s* or 28.59865512 Million civil years. This 'unfreezing' of M-space then allows the singularity algorithm of the cosmogenesis to manifest in what might be called the sex chromosomes of the universal DNA-encoding in terms of frequency or a number count. A new physical quantity in 'awareness' is defined as the time differential of frequency and allows the concept of 'consciousness' to be born from the defining qualities of magneto charges.



The Gravitational constant in the evolvement of the primordial nucleon mass m_c = m_planck.{α}⁹

The Standard Gravitational Parameter μ= GM = constant = G_oM(XⁿYⁿ)= G_oXⁿ.MYⁿ and for (XY)ⁿ=1 can be finestructured in a decreasing gravitational constant G(n)=G_oXⁿ with a corresponding increase in the mass parameter M as M(n)=M_oYⁿ as say for the proto-nucleonic mass of the Instanton m_c(n_ps) as m_c(n_present) = m_c.Yⁿ_present = m_neutron < m_cYⁿ_present = 1.711752..x10^-27 kg* and 958.99 MeV* upper limited


For a changing Gravitational constant G(n_present) .m_neutron(n_present)² = G_om_c².Yⁿ_present and is modulated say in A micro-macro Black Hole perturbation
]M_o²/2M_∞.M_MaxHawking = 1.000543 ~ 1

The Black Holed mass equivalence for astrophysical bodies is well formulated in the application of the basic Schwarzschild metric derived from General Relativity.

Stephen Hawking developed the inverse proportionality between the mass of a Black Hole M and its Temperature T in the form of the Hawking Modulus:

HM = m_Planck.E^o_Planck/k = √{hc/2πG_o}{½m_Planck.c²/k} = hc³/4πG_ok = {M_Smin.T_Smax} = [c²/4π²]_mod.{M_MaxHawking .T_Smin } = 9.131793821x10²³ kg*K*

The Hawking Modulus so has mensuration units [Mass][Temperature] in [kg][K(elvin)] or [kgK]* for the Stefan-Boltzmann entropy constant k_B.

And so M_min.T_max = hc³/4πG_ok = [c²/4π²]_mod.M_max.T_min = ½m_Planck.T_Planck = M_MaxHawking. [c²/4π²]_mod.T_ss and the Hawking Mass is determined as M_MaxHawking = λ_maxπc²/G_o = 2.54469..x10⁴⁹ kg*.

HyperMass M_Hyper (n_ps) = hc³.e*/4πG_o = 6445.775 kg at the Instanton boundary n=n_ps so increases to M_Hyper(n_present)Yⁿ_present =hc³.e*/4πG_oXⁿ_present ~ 11,117.26 kg as the projected Instanton boundary mass for the wormhole radius r_wormhole = r_ps modulating the Inflaton curvature with the Instanton curvature and utilizing n_present=1.132711... for a decreased perturbed G(n_present) = 6.442x10^-11 G-string units for the Standard Gravitational Parameter G(n)m_iY^k(n).m_jY^n-k = G_om_c² = constant for G(n)=G_oXⁿ.

Using the λ_minλ_max=1 wavelength modulation in the T-duality of λ_min=2πR_min=1/λ_max=2π/R_max, this modulation closely approximates the geometric mean of the seedling mass in {1/4π}M_o²/2M_∞.M_Max=M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking =3.2895..x10¹⁰²/3.2931..x10¹⁰² ~ 0.998910744...

This also circumscribes the actual to critical density ratio in the omega of the general relativistic treatment of the cosmologies.
The applied G value in G_m(n)=G_o.Xⁿ as now coupled to the derived Black Hole Mass modulation coupled to the quantum micro masses.

G_om_c²={G_oX^n+k}.{m_cYⁿ}.{m_cY^k}=G_m(n).m_nmax.m_nmin and where G_m is the actual G value as measured and which has proved difficult to do so in the laboratories.

G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_om_c²/m_nmax.m_nmin=G_om_c²/({m_cYⁿ}{m_nmin}) and where we have m_nmin=m_cY^k} for the unknown value of k with m_nmax=m_cYⁿ.

So G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av} for X^k={m_c/m_av}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}
=1.00109044..{m_c/m_av} and where now {m_nmin}={8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av/M_o²}=1.00109044..m_av.

m_av={M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_nmin}={M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY^k}=0.9989107..{m_cY^k} and represents a reduced minimum mass m_nmin=m_cY^k.

But the product of maximum and 'new' minimum now allows an actual finetuning to a measured nucleon mass m_N by:

m_N² = m_avYⁿ.m_cYⁿ=m_av.m_nmax.Yⁿ.

So substituting for m_av in our G_m expression, will now give the formulation:

G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av}

G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY²ⁿ/m_N²}

G_m(n)=G_o.{m_c²/m_N²}{M_o²/8π.M_∞.M_Hawking}Yⁿ

The average nucleon mass m_N is upper bounded in the neutron mass and lower bounded in the proton mass, their difference being an effect of their nucleonic quark content, differing in the up-down transition and energy level and because of electro charges increasing the intra-quarkian Magneto charge coupling between the two mesonic rings of the neutron and a single mesonic ring in the proton's down- or KIR-quark.

For a Neutron Restmass of: m_neutron=1.6812656x10^-27 kg* (941.9111 MeV*) or (1.6749792x10^-27 kg and 939.594 MeV)
the substitution (and using calibrations m=1.001671358 m*; s=1.000978395 s*; kg=1.003753127 kg* and C=1.002711702 C* gives:

G(n_p)= G_o{m_c/m_neutron}².(0.9989107..)Yⁿ_p = 6.670693x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)* or 6.675312x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).

For a Proton Restmass of: m_proton=1.6788956x10^-27 kg* (940.5833 MeV*) or (1.672618x10^-27 kg and 938.270 MeV).

G(n_p) = G_o{m_c/m_N}².(0.9989107..)Yⁿ_p = 6.6895399x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)* or 6.694171x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).

G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k = 6.670693x10^-11 (m³/kgs²)* then gives k_p =ln{G_m(n_p)/G_o}/ln{X} - n_p = 1.0602852 - 1.132711 = -0.0724258

The upper value of the neutron bound so represents an upper limit for the Gravitational Constant as the original quark-lepton bifurcation of the X-Boson precursor given in the KKK kernel. Only the KKK kernel is subject to the mass evolution of the cosmos; the leptonic masses being intrinsically incorporated in the Kernel means.

The m_c.Yⁿ so serves as an appropriate upper bounded approximation for G(n), subject to leptonic ring IR-OR perturbations.

The best approximation for 'Big G' hence depends on an accurate determination for the neutron's inertial mass, only fixed as the base nucleon minimum mass at the birth of the universe. A fluctuating Neutron mass would also result in deviations in 'G' independent upon the sensitivity of the measuring equipment. The inducted mass difference in the protonic-and neutronic rest masses, derives from the Higgs-Restmass-Scale and can be stated in a first approximation as the ground state.

Basic nucleon rest mass is m_c=√Omega.m_P=9.9247245x10^-28 kg* or 958.99 MeV*.

(Here Omega is a gauge string factor coupling in the fundamental force interactions as:

Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega and for Omega=G-alpha.)

KKK-Kernel mass=Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.66 MeV*= 958.99 MeV*, using the Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants.
Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as 939.776 MeV*. This excludes the electronic perturbation of the IR-OR oscillation.

For the Proton, one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and subtracts the electron-mass for the d-quark level and for the Neutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential.

An electron perturbation subtracts one 2-2/3=4/3 electron energy as the difference between 2 leptonic rings from the proton's 2 up-quarks and 2-1/3=5/3 electron energy from the neutron' singular up-quark to relate the trisected nucleonic quark geometric template.

Proton m_p=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.776+1.5013-0.5205-0.1735) MeV* = 940.5833 MeV* (938.270 MeV).

Neutron m_n=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.776+3.0026-1.0410+0.1735) MeV* = 941.9111 MeV* (939.594 MeV).

This is the ground state from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanism and reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for the inertial mass differential between the two elementary nucleons. All ground state elementary particle masses are computed from the Higgs-Scale and then become subject to various finestructures. Overall, the MEASURED gravitational constant 'G' can be said to be decreasing over time.

The ratio given as k is G_mYⁿ/G_o ~ 0.600362... and so the present G-constant is about 60% of the one at the Planck Scale.

G decreases nonlinearly, but at a present rate of 0.600362/19.12x10⁹ per year, which calculates as 3.1400..x10^-11 G-units per year.

Generally using the exponential series expansion, one can indicate the change in G.
For X^n+k=z=exp[(n+k)lnX] by (n+k)lnX=lnz for the value u=(n+k)lnX=-0.481212(n+k); z transforms in exponential expansion e^u=1+u+u²/2!+u³/3!+u⁴/4!+...

For a function f(n)=z=G_m(n)/G_o=X^n+k - f(n) = 1-(0.481212.)(n+k)+(0.2316.)(n+k)²/2-(0.1114.)(n+k)³/6+(0.0536.)(n+k)⁴/24-...+...

At time instantaneity of the Quantum Big Bang, n=n_ps=λ_ps/R_max=6.2591x10^-49 ~ 0

Then G_BigBang=G_oX^nps=G_o (to 50 decimal places distinguishing the time instanton from the Null time as the Planck-Time transform).

G_o represents the quantum gravitational constant applicable for any Black Hole cosmology and can be used to correlate the MOND gravitation with the Newton-Einstein gravitation in inferring a greater gravitational constant in the cosmic past in conjunction with an inherent Milgröm deceleration as a time derivative of the universal scale factor a={n/[n+1]}.

For our previously calculated k=ln(G_mYⁿ/G_o)/lnX and which calculates as k= -0.0724258..
f(n)=1-(0.481212.)(n+k)+(0.2316.)(n+k)²/2-(0.1114.)(n+k)³/6+(0.0536.)(n+k)⁴/24-(0.0258.)(n+k)⁵/120+...-...
for f(1.132711)=1-0.51022+0.13016-0.02214+0.00283-0.000288...+...~ 0.6006340 to fifth order approximation to 0.60036246...

Hence, the gravitational constant assumes a value of about 60.0% of its Big Bang initialization and calculates as 6.675x10^-11 G-units for a present cycle time n_present=H_ot_present=1.132711...

The introduction of the mass seed coupling between the macro quantum M_o and the micro quantum m_c=m_Palpha⁹ (from the gravitational finestructure unification) PERTURBS the 'purely electromagnetic' cosmology in the perturbation factor k and increases the purely electromagnetic G_memr in the black hole physics described.

So gravity appears stronger when one 'looks back in time' or analyses cosmological objects at large distances. The expansion parameter (a) in the Friedmann-Einstein standard cosmology can be rewritten as a curvature ratio R(n)/R_max={n/(n+1)} and describes the asymptotic universe in say 10 dimensions evolving under the inertial parameters of the c-invariance. This 'lower dimensional universe' is open and expands under hyperbolic curvature under the deceleration parameter q_o=½Ω_o=M_o/2M_∞=2G_oH_oM_o/c³ ~0.014015... This open universe is bounded in the 'standing wave' of the Hubble Oscillation of the 11D and 'higher dimensional universe'.

​