The Factuals versus the OABS (Old Age BullShit)

Totalitarian Control versus Individualism
Legalist-Totalitarian versus Confucian-Liberterian


What You’re About To SEE CAN'T be UNSEEN! EXPLOSIVE Interview w/Lord Monckton Will STIFFEN The NWO
What you are about to see in the video below is…
YOUTUBE.COM
​

The only republic Turnbull will give us is a banana one

Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun
December 18, 2016 8:26am

How could Malcolm Turnbull think beating the republican drum yesterday when tomorrow could reveal not only a debt blowout but a cut in Australia's credit rating that puts us even deeper in trouble?
Turnbull's frolic yesterday:

MALCOLM Turnbull has called for a new road map on an Australian Republic with a two-stage national vote that includes a plebiscite first to allow voters to choose whether or not the new President will be elected by a popular vote...​

Describing the question as an issue of “national pride’’ he proposed the two-stage process to allow voters to determine the model before Australians voted on a Republic at a second national vote.​

​

Turnbull's problem tomorrow, as noted by Judith Sloan, is the release of the mid-year economic and fiscal outlook:

This year’s MYEFO is more interesting than most because the rating agencies clearly are breathing down Scott Morrison’s neck. There is a strong possibility the agencies — Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s are the important ones — will downgrade the federal government’s much-prized AAA rating...​

By far the most important consideration for the agencies are the budget numbers...​

While it remains the case that our government net debt as a percentage of gross domestic product is still low by international standards, the rate of deterioration has been rapid. In 2009-10, net debt as a percentage of GDP was 3.3 per cent. This year it is 18.9 per cent.​

If our rating is downgraded and there is a lift in rates, total net interest payments would increase noticeably. Even at this stage, it is costing us close to $13 billion a year to service the net debt...​

Recall that [the September growth] figures showed a decline of 0.5 per cent in GDP in the September quarter, with annual GDP growing by 1.8 per cent annually...​

The key figures to watch [in the MYEFO] are the underlying cash balances over the forward estimates. In the May budget, this (financial) year’s budget deficit was expected to be $37bn, falling through the forward estimates period to land on a small deficit of $6bn in 2019-20. A return to surplus was predicted to occur in 2020-21.​

In all likelihood, this year’s budget deficit will come in slightly lower than the estimate made nearly eight months ago. The surging price of iron ore and coal should be feeding into higher company tax receipts and this will have a short-run impact on the budget bottom line. Mind you, weaker company profits in other sectors and other sources of revenue will be offsetting this impact...​

Looking beyond the immediate outlook, the figures on revenue appear particularly murky. The underlying budget assumption of 5 per cent annual growth in nominal GDP from 2017-18 still looks too optimistic. Note that on the latest national account figures, nominal GDP is growing at only 3 per cent a year.​

An economically inclined reader, Gavin Stevens, has dug even further into the budget projections, revealing some Pollyanna figures when it comes to the anticipated revenues to be generated by individual tax measures. Take company tax. According to the budget, there will be a surge of company tax receipts in 2017-18 of 11.2 per cent, followed by 10.3 per cent the following year. Individual income tax receipts are expected to increase by between 6.4 per cent and 7.1 per cent a year between 2017-18 and 2019-20, which is hard to square with the present low rate of wages growth and the increasing incidence of underemployment in the labour market.​

The point is that there is a high degree of optimism baked into the revenue figures in the budget and it is likely to be reasserted in MYEFO. If this optimism proves unfounded, the improvement in the bottom line that was an integral part of the May budget will not eventuate.​

Comments




Tony


It seems Big Mal knows something about the international federal reserve banking cartel agenda, most of the Australian government and constituency does not. The Australian 'debt' is not meant to be 'paid back', as the 'printing of currency' (out of thin air without physical collateral) results in inflation in consumer goods and services, which is forcibly paid by the consumers with a then existing currency. The 'interest payments' so prove to be purely fictitious, albeit resulting in the dilution of the value of the currency.

Indeed and this would also expose the sellout of the ABC to the corporate media controlled by the globalist cultural marxist agenda from the UN to the CFR (Council of Foreign Relations - ask Julie Bishop and Big Mal and Billy and Dicky about them) to the feds to the political puppets of the mainstream.

The EU has been an experiment to 'continentalize' the world's nations, just as shown in Orwell's 1984 (the films themselves a plant by the globalist elite to 'justify' its Fabian-collectivist motto of communism/left=fascism/right etc) as a forerunner for the NWO governed by the UN of International Socialism and using Cultural Marxism as global agenda to implement 'world governance'.

When you understand that all 'in power' political parties follow a Fabian agenda also known as collectivism; you will also begin to understand that those political parties literally 'hide' behind their controlleurs of globalism. Then the responsibility to make decisions on fiscal, economic and other grounds by congress-parliament-senate is delegated to the money suppliers. This can be named as the CFR for Council of Foreign Relations who control the worldwide Federal Reserve Banking cartel. In other words, the 'governing' parties in the western (first) worlds have been coerced and deceived to delegate their political responsibilities to their money lenders. The Australian 'debt' can never be 'paid back', as the 'printing of currency' (out of thin air without physical collateral) results in inflation in consumer goods and services, which is forcibly paid by the consumers with a then existing currency. The 'interest payments' so prove to be purely fictitious, albeit resulting in the dilution of the value of the currency.

Malcolm Turnbull's politically motivated objection to prosecute the global warming scam, as a 'criminal fraud offence' and as alleged by Queensland police, is mentioned at the 32 minute marker in this interview of Lord Christopher Monckton.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbjItdIUDMo


Political scientists at the UN claim that there is an overwhelming scientific consensus that man-made global warming is real. That claim is just as false as the theory of man-made global warming itself. Here is a list of 145 very prominent scientists who reject the UN’s claim. [See An Inconvenient Lie for more information and documentation.] Climate Science International posted 2016 Dec 15

http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php…

CLIMATE SCIENTISTS' REGISTER ENDORSERS

If you are a someone who has professionally studied the causes of climate change and you would like to add your name to the below list of scientists who endorse The Register, please click here.
The Climate Scientists' Register

“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."

 

Bill Moyers and the Fabian Society​

Dru Micn
4 hrs ·

I am imploring my many republican friends to please allow yourself an open mind long enough to read this. And then instead of simply dismissing it as bullshit, think about what you have read for just a minute or two. In the name of friendship and in the name of preserving this great country of ours. Thank you.



Farewell, America - BillMoyers.com
America died on Nov. 8, 2016, not with a bang or a whimper, but at its own hand via electoral suicide. We the people chose a man who has shredded our values, our morals, our compassion, our tolerance, our decency, our sense of common…
BILLMOYERS.COM/STORY/FAREWELL…




Tony Bermanseder Bill Moyers is a member of the Bilderbergers and the CFR and so follows a pro globalist agenda. So his followers and supporters should understand what worldview they are indeed supporting.



The Fabian Society Exposed
The Fabian Society originated in England in 1884, with the purpose of forming a single,…
YOUTUBE.COM







Stefan Molyneux Talks About The Fabian Society



The Bill Moyers setback and the Trumpian hope!



The Mystery of the 'Conspiracy News'!

From Napoleonic wars from 1790's to the capitalist Bolshevik creation of communism to two world wars financed by the federal banking cartel to Kissinger's/Nixon's/Ford's Rhodesia in the 1970's
as a preparatory mirror towards the 'final solution' 2016-2020-2030-
The 'illuminati' of the 'liberal zionist globalist conspiracy believers' as the CFR of the political 'nationalistic individualistic freedom supporters'.
An obscure radio broadcast of real history the vox populi is not supposed to hear.
Self righteous, 'dozed off in egalitarian multicultural dreams' and mind-fucked democracy-sheeple wake up!

Published on Oct 20, 2014
THIS WAS RECORDED 49 YEARS AGO!
Here is a link to the written transcript: http://usa-the-republic.com/illuminat ...
Biographical Info: http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/myron ... And here at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myron_Co...

This recording was made in 1967. Mr. Fagan gives documentary evidence on how the ILLUMINATI became the instrument of the House of Rothschild in their endevour to achieve a "One World Government". He uncovers many plots of historical events. All this makes chilling listening! What he speaks of way back in the 60's is truelly coming to fruition as we speak. It's time to spread the word and wake the sleepy and sleeping before it's too late! God bless us all. Amen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ForvEyNABs8


DEMOCRACY & GOVERNMENT

Farewell, America

No matter how the rest of the world looked at us on Nov. 7, they will now look at us differently.
BY NEAL GABLER | NOVEMBER 10, 2016
Farewell, America



The sun sets behind the Jefferson Memorial in Washington. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)
America died on Nov. 8, 2016, not with a bang or a whimper, but at its own hand via electoral suicide. We the people chose a man who has shredded our values, our morals, our compassion, our tolerance, our decency, our sense of common purpose, our very identity — all the things that, however tenuously, made a nation out of a country.
Whatever place we now live in is not the same place it was on Nov. 7. No matter how the rest of the world looked at us on Nov. 7, they will now look at us differently. We are likely to be a pariah country. And we are lost for it. As I surveyed the ruin of that country this gray Wednesday morning, I found weary consolation in W.H. Auden’s poem, September 1, 1939, which concludes:
MORE ON MEDIA


The Media and the Earthquake

BY NEAL GABLER | NOVEMBER 8, 2016
“Defenseless under the night
Our world in stupor lies;
Yet, dotted everywhere,
Ironic points of light
Flash out wherever the Just
Exchange their messages:
May I, composed like them
Of Eros and of dust,
Beleaguered by the same
Negation and despair,
Show an affirming flame.”

I hunt for that affirming flame.
This generally has been called the “hate election” because everyone professed to hate both candidates. It turned out to be the hate election because, and let’s not mince words, of the hatefulness of the electorate. In the years to come, we will brace for the violence, the anger, the racism, the misogyny, the xenophobia, the nativism, the white sense of grievance that will undoubtedly be unleashed now that we have destroyed the values that have bound us.

We all knew these hatreds lurked under the thinnest veneer of civility. That civility finally is gone.
We all knew these hatreds lurked under the thinnest veneer of civility. That civility finally is gone. In its absence, we may realize just how imperative that politesse was. It is the way we managed to coexist.
If there is a single sentence that characterizes the election, it is this: “He says the things I’m thinking.” That may be what is so terrifying. Who knew that so many tens of millions of white Americans were thinking unconscionable things about their fellow Americans? Who knew that tens of millions of white men felt so emasculated by women and challenged by minorities? Who knew that after years of seeming progress on race and gender, tens of millions of white Americans lived in seething resentment, waiting for a demagogue to arrive who would legitimize their worst selves and channel them into political power? Perhaps we had been living in a fool’s paradise. Now we aren’t.
This country has survived a civil war, two world wars and a Great Depression. There are many who say we will survive this, too. Maybe we will, but we won’t survive unscathed. We know too much about each other to heal. No more can we pretend that we are exceptional or good or progressive or united. We are none of those things. Nor can we pretend that democracy works and that elections have more-or-less happy endings. Democracy only functions when its participants abide by certain conventions, certain codes of conduct and a respect for the process.

No more can we pretend that we are exceptional or good or progressive or united. We are none of those things.

The virus that kills democracy is extremism because extremism disables those codes. Republicans have disrespected the process for decades. They have regarded any Democratic president as illegitimate. They have proudly boasted of preventing popularly elected Democrats from effecting policy and have asserted that only Republicans have the right to determine the nation’s course. They have worked tirelessly to make sure that the government cannot govern and to redefine the purpose of government as prevention rather than effectuation. In short, they haven’t believed in democracy for a long time, and the media never called them out on it.

Democracy can’t cope with extremism. Only violence and time can defeat it. The first is unacceptable, the second takes too long. Though Trump is an extremist, I have a feeling that he will be a very popular president and one likely to be re-elected by a substantial margin, no matter what he does or fails to do. That’s because ever since the days of Ronald Reagan, rhetoric has obviated action, speechifying has superseded governing.

Trump was absolutely correct when he bragged that he could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and his supporters wouldn’t care. It was a dictator’s ugly vaunt, but one that recognized this election never was about policy or economics or the “right path/wrong path,” or even values. It was about venting. So long as Trump vented their grievances, his all-white supporters didn’t care about anything else. He is smart enough to know that won’t change in the presidency. In fact, it is only likely to intensify. White America, Trump’s America, just wants to hear its anger bellowed. This is one time when the Bully Pulpit will be literal.

The media can’t be let off the hook for enabling an authoritarian to get to the White House. Long before he considered a presidential run, he was a media creation — a regular in the gossip pages, a photo on magazine covers, the bankrupt (morally and otherwise) mogul who hired and fired on The Apprentice. When he ran, the media treated him not as a candidate, but as a celebrity, and so treated him differently from ordinary pols. The media gave him free publicity, trumpeted his shenanigans, blasted out his tweets, allowed him to phone in his interviews, fell into his traps and generally kowtowed until they suddenly discovered that this joke could actually become president.

Just as Trump has shredded our values, our nation and our democracy, he has shredded the media. In this, as in his politics, he is only the latest avatar of a process that began long before his candidacy. Just as the sainted Ronald Reagan created an unbridgeable chasm between rich and poor that the Republicans would later exploit against Democrats, conservatives delegitimized mainstream journalism so they could fill the vacuum.

With Trump’s election, I think that the ideal of an objective, truthful journalism is dead, never to be revived.

Retiring conservative talk show host Charlie Sykes complained that after years of bashing from the right wing, the mainstream media no longer could perform their function as reporters, observers, fact dispensers, and even truth tellers, and he said we needed them. Like Goebbels before them, conservatives understood they had to create their own facts, their own truths, their own reality. They have done so, and in so doing effectively destroyed the very idea of objectivity. Trump can lie constantly only because white America has accepted an Orwellian sense of truth — the truth pulled inside out.
With Trump’s election, I think that the ideal of an objective, truthful journalism is dead, never to be revived. Like Nixon and Sarah Palin before him, Trump ran against the media, boomeranging off the public’s contempt for the press. He ran against what he regarded as media elitism and bias, and he ran on the idea that the press disdained working-class white America. Among the many now-widening divides in the country, this is a big one, the divide between the media and working-class whites, because it creates a Wild West of information — a media ecology in which nothing can be believed except what you already believe.

With the mainstream media so delegitimized — a delegitimization for which they bear a good deal of blame, not having had the courage to take on lies and expose false equivalencies — they have very little role to play going forward in our politics. I suspect most of them will surrender to Trumpism — if they were able to normalize Trump as a candidate, they will no doubt normalize him as president. Cable news may even welcome him as a continuous entertainment and ratings booster. And in any case, like Reagan, he is bulletproof. The media cannot touch him, even if they wanted to. Presumably, there will be some courageous guerillas in the mainstream press, a kind of Resistance, who will try to fact-check him. But there will be few of them, and they will be whistling in the wind. Trump, like all dictators, is his own truth.
What’s more, Trump already has promised to take his war on the press into courtrooms and the halls of Congress. He wants to loosen libel protections, and he has threatened Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos of Amazon with an antitrust suit. Individual journalists have reason to fear him as well. He has already singled out NBC’s Katy Tur, perhaps the best of the television reporters, so that she needed the Secret Service to escort her from one of his rallies. Jewish journalists who have criticized Trump have been subjected to vicious anti-Semitism and intimidation from the white nationalist “alt-right.” For the press, this is likely to be the new normal in an America in which white supremacists, neo-Nazi militias, racists, sexists, homophobes and anti-Semites have been legitimized by a new president who “says what I’m thinking.” It will be open season.

• MOST
• POPULAR
• SHARED

1. NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON
2. FAREWELL, AMERICA
3. TRUMPED BY PUTIN
4. REV. DR. WILLIAM BARBER ON NORTH CAROLINA LEGISLATURE ON ...
5. POLITICAL CIVIL WARS IN OHIO

This converts the media from reporters to targets, and they have little recourse. Still, if anyone points the way forward, it may be New York Times columnist David Brooks. Brooks is no paragon. He always had seemed to willfully neglect modern Republicanism’s incipient fascism (now no longer incipient), and he was an apologist for conservative self-enrichment and bigotry. But this campaign season, Brooks pretty much dispensed with politics. He seemed to have arrived at the conclusion that no good could possibly come of any of this and retreated into spirituality. What Brooks promoted were values of mutual respect, a bolder sense of civic engagement, an emphasis on community and neighborhood, and overall a belief in trickle-up decency rather than trickle-down economics. He is not hopeful, but he hasn’t lost all hope.

For those of us now languishing in despair, this may be a prescription for rejuvenation. We have lost the country, but by refocusing, we may have gained our own little patch of the world and, more granularly, our own family. For journalists, Brooks may show how political reporting, which, as I said, is likely to be irrelevant in the Trump age, might yield to a broader moral context in which one considers the effect that policy, strategy and governance have not only on our physical and economic well-being but also on our spiritual well-being. In a society that is likely to be fractious and odious, we need a national conversation on values. The media could help start it.

But the disempowered media may have one more role to fill: They must bear witness. Many years from now, future generations will need to know what happened to us and how it happened. They will need to know how disgruntled white Americans, full of self-righteous indignation, found a way to take back a country they felt they were entitled to and which they believed had been lost. They will need to know about the ugliness and evil that destroyed us as a nation after great men like Lincoln and Roosevelt guided us through previous crises and kept our values intact. They will need to know, and they will need a vigorous, engaged, moral media to tell them. They will also need us.

We are not living for ourselves anymore in this country. Now we are living for history.


TOPICS: DEMOCRACY & GOVERNMENT
TAGS: 2016 ELECTION, DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON, MEDIA CRITICISM

NEAL GABLER



Neal Gabler is an author of five books and the recipient of two LA Times Book Prizes, Time magazine's non-fiction book of the year, USA Today's biography of the year and other awards. He is also a senior fellow at The Norman Lear Center at the University of Southern California, and is currently writing a biography of Sen. Edward Kennedy.

 

Russian Attacks by the Globalists​

Typical reaction of the 'fake media'. Watch the body language of the bbc stooge.


'How DARE YOU!' Former Putin official EXPLODES at BBC and STORMS OUT during interview
A FORMER spokesman for Vladimir Putin stormed off a BBC radio show after a dramatic clash over the situation in Aleppo.
EXPRESS.CO.UK|BY OLI SMITH


Lameduck
Put it this way folks, as far as I'm aware, there isn't one single reporter from the west on the streets of Aleppo. The west are taking all their news stories from 'rebel' groups which the Russians and Syrians are in the process of ejecting. Every news story they get is from one side and one side only. Anything they get from the Russian or Syrian Government side is dismissed as false. Anything from the 'rebel' side is taken seriously, aired and discussed. Western MSM is getting ever more hysterical and ludicrous with each passing day. The Russian guy in the video seems to have been lured into some kind of bear pit with people either side of him screaming at him. I don't blame him one bit for leaving. BBC should be thoroughly ashamed of itself.

JohnBenton
Well done Mr Nekrassov, the BBC/Guardian lies about Aleppo need exposing. Don't worry we know who is telling the truth here and it's not the BBC.

DonalMac
I can't stand on BBC News TV socialist and Marxist.




Brandon Lewis Lott
I knew our country (and the west in general) lied for a long time, but at this point it is fucking ridiculous, I'm seriously ashamed of my country. fucking puppets all of them.





Charlotte Cowell



Canadian Journalist on lies about Syria | December 9th 2016
YOUTUBE.COM




Tony Bermanseder




EXCLUSIVE: Who are actually "Assad mercenaries" killing…
YOUTUBE.COM




Getting Real News From Aleppo - With Vanessa Beeley
YOUTUBE.COM


Tony Bermanseder should we blame the CIA? lol


Axelson Tactical LLCLike Page
12 hrs ·
RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR SHOT DEAD IN TURKEY
----
I have a feeling Putin is going to demonstrate the appropriate response when someone kills one of your Ambassadors.

BREAKING: Russian Ambassador Assassinated In Turkey (VIDEO)
Ambassador Andrei Karlov was murdered after being shot while speaking at an art gallery event.
CONSERVATIVEOUTFITTERS.COM|BY CONSERVATIVE OUTFITTERS





Tony Bermanseder
Globalist overseer ideology--CFR---Fed reserve banking cartel---CIA-Vatican---All globalist aligned government puppets---law enforcement executive---individual brainwashed gobal citizenry



Russian ambassador Andrei Karlov 'wounded' in gun attack in…
YOUTUBE.COM


Tony Bermanseder
Many mainstream media 'experts' believe that Russia and Turkey are in some kind of entente following the Syrian-Turkey border incursions of 2015-2016. Putin knows, that Erdogan is in full taquia mode regarding the west as say shown in the Dabiq 'surrender' of the islamists to Syrian 'rebels' and the turkish army a few months ago; and in sympathy with the Islamic political caliphate agenda. This assassination (attempt) has shown the true colours of the Turkish government, perhaps as a planned event by the globalist NWO, which of course uses the islamic fanaticism for its own purposes.

The rationality and logic of about half of the population of the western civilized world anno 2016


The communist-islam-fascist alliance
bad man conversion to islam - so good
good woman conversion to islam - so bad
​

Those who practice the religion of peace are inextricably bound up with the ideology of Jihad!

Australians will do well to take note of Dr. Emanuel Tanya’s explanation of the Muslim terrorist. Dr. Emanuel Tanya is a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. His family was German aristocracy prior to World War II and owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

Very few people were true Nazis, he said, but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.

My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.
We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.

The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.

The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet, for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because, like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. Now Islamic prayers have been introduced in Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too, while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.

In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket. Food on aircraft has the halal emblem just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation's shores.

In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of "no-go" zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.

As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts - the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Immigrants who are members of an abominable conquest-focused totalitarian ideology controlled by indoctrinated fanatics will always be a threat to the Australian community.

 

Arab feminism - globalist feminism



Safe Spaces in a unified world!

Larissa Waters on Donald Trump

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qohQXcUNqFI
​

 

Don't worry, be happy!





​

 

​

 

​

 

^[​

 

​

 

​