The Factuals versus the OABS (Old Age BullShit)

The Rockefeller-Exxon 'climate scam wars' behind Tillerson's appointment as 'Secretary of State'.


​

This is a good info clip which is actually able to see through the left-right agenda and is politically relevant right now. The Rockefeller-Exxon 'climate scam wars' behind Tillerson's appointment as 'Secretary of State'.
The science follows. Now watch the fake media call this conspiracy and fake
Say until April 2017. This information will of course be suppressed. But the true science will prevail and change the academic approach to the scam.

Author and economic analyst John Sneisen talks with world renowned physicist and inventor who served under George H. W. Bush as the director of the Department of Energy's Office of Science. He is currently the professor of physics at Princeton University.
William Happer goes into his views on carbon dioxide and how historically the Earth warmed and cooled through natural weather fluctuation. He says the fear mongering regarding global warming/man-made climate change is false and that there are no cons to carbon dioxide only pros. He claims that more carbon dioxide would be very welcome to plant life as well as human life.

Will Happer also dug into the subject of atomic physics, his invention (the sodium guide star), life on other planets and the mysteries of the universe. He also made many mentions of Albert Einstein.

He was in Phoenix, Arizona with John Sneisen for the Freedom Force conference "Global Warming: An Inconvenient Lie" which included such names as G. Edward Griffin, Lord Christopher Monckton, Dr. Tim Ball and Patrick Wood to name just a few.


​

Renowned Princeton Physicist: No Cons To Carbon Dioxide (William…

A better and more informative source than the Guardian, the NJT, Salon or the WP and CNN and co.

 

A decent breakdown of all things real and fake news - according to fake news!
A reality check necessitates inversion!






​

 

The History of Climate Change — Empires Fall When Warming Turns to Cooling
5834176
Blog/Nature

Posted Dec 15, 2016 by Martin Armstrong


QUESTION: Hi Martin I have a question I hope you can find time to answer. It appears we are heading into dark times with regards to the convergence of all of these cycles. We have government hunting every penny, we have civil war heating up between the left and right, we have revolution against government, international war and decreased solar activity. It seems everything is about to go bang all at once, has there been other periods in history when all of these cycles have converged as we are beginning to witness now on a global scale? Really fascinating stuff, and thank you.
Regards, John.

ANSWER: Oh yes. Here is a chart of the real data for global cyclical trends in the energy output of the sun and CO2 levels. Look at this chart prior to the Minoan warming. There was a very cold period a bit longer than 8,000 years ago — the Ice Age. You see what I would call a slingshot move when the temperatures swung sharply to a record high over about 300 years, according to the ice core samples. Thereafter, we move into a bear market, oscillating trend to retest the low made 4700 years ago. Then there is the steady rise into what we call the Minoan high.
Prior to the Minoan high, the temperature (climate change) was much more volatile. This is what drove the great migrations of humans around the globe if we assume they are correct and life began in Africa. This is the sharp swings that most likely resulted in frozen mammoths, lions, and woolly rhinoceros that were discovered in 1772. The warming up period into the Minoan high was really the birth of civilization/urbanization.



It was about 6700 BC when the earliest city appeared known by the name Catal Huyuk located in Turkey that covered about 30 acres. The buildings were of mud and brick construction, but inside there appeared plastered walls. No doubt, this was the latest modern invention that illustrates two important developments. First, this confirms the birth of an urban trade skill, and secondly, homes were found with paintings on the walls, suggesting the flourishing development of art — one of the last skills to develop within urban life reflecting good economic times.

The Minoan civilization was an Aegean Bronze Age civilization that arose on the island of Crete and other Aegean islands and flourished from approximately 3650 BC to 1400 BC. Clearly, sea travel must have emerged for the people to migrate from Turkey to Crete. Civilization appeared to emerge with this warming period. You then have the catastrophic eruption of Thera (Santorini), which may have been the largest known volcanic eruption within recorded history. That ended the Minoan civilization and gave rise to the plundering society of Mycenaean Greeks who conquered the Minoans and then Troy. But as weather turned colder, Greece, mostly rocky, entered its Dark Age and was unable to produce enough food. They became the Sea Peoples who invaded Northern Africa.

The climate changed again and began to warm, inspiring the rise of the Roman Empire. The warming trend allowed Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) to conquer and civilize Europe. The Roman Empire had three major climate changes known as the Early Subatlantic (900 BC–175 AD), Mid-Subatlantic (175–750 AD), and Late Subatlantic (since 750 AD). Written, archaeological evidence independently records that during the period of the Roman Empire’s maximum expansion and final crisis, the climate underwent drastic changes of cooling. During the reign of Trajan (98-117 AD), this was the peak in the territory occupied by the Roman Empire, which coincided with the Roman climatic peak in warming.

The climate change resulted in a sharp trend to a colder climate, which inspired the barbarian invasions (migration) into the Roman Empire where they moved south as the north grew severely colder. Historians imply that there were rapid fluctuations during the late empire after the reign of Trajan. We do have Seneca the Younger describing in 61 AD, a year before Nero ordered him to kill himself, the high level of air pollution in Rome associated with the extensive wood burning for fuel. This confirms there has always been pollution associated with cities.

The Roman Empire is considered to have peaked with the reign of Marcus Aureleus in 180 AD. That is where we draw the line for the beginning of the decline and fall of Rome. That is certainly the peak in the population of Rome itself. When the climate began to turn down, back into a strong cooling period, the fortunes of Rome also turned down. The evidence suggests that the Great Monetary collapse of Rome (around 180–290 AD), coincided with a sharp period of cooling. This seriously affected the northwestern provinces of the empire, especially in Germany and France, which clearly instigated the barbarian invasions of the south. We also have tree-rings dating (dendrochronology) from this period, which indicates there was a severe drought that began about 338 AD and persisted until 377 AD. This contributed to moving the capitol to Constantinople, which construction began about 324 AD when Constantine became the sole ruler.

The climate changed much colder in the north and sent the invasion of the Huns. The migration of the Huns, north of the Black Sea, drove the Goths to flee and press into the Roman Empire. The Roman Emperor Claudius II Gothicus (268-270 AD) was given that title for his defeat of the Goths. Climate change was a major driving force that led to the fall of the Western portion of the Roman Empire with the last Roman Emperor Romulus Augustus (475-476 AD). In the Eastern Roman Empire, climate change resulted in a regional prolonged drought from about 400—540 AD.



The medieval warming was when the Dark Age of Europe began to light, giving birth to the Renaissance period. We begin to see the age of empire building when Spain, Portugal, Britain, and the Dutch all went off to the travel the world. We then begin to fall back into the last mini-Ice Age. We can see that the hard times led to revolution against monarchy in America and France. Paintings of the American Revolution illustrate how cold it really was with Washington crossing the iced Delaware River.
So unfortunately, when I say we have put everything into this model, I really mean what I say. When you put together the historical data, what pops out at you is just amazing. I had to gather coins from around the world to recreate the world monetary system and then place that on the timeline as well. What jumps out at you is the correlation of civilization and the rise and fall of empires with climate change.



To have these charlatans schlep this bogus theory that man has created this global warming trend prevents real research. It is outrageous that these people have the audacity to want to make disagreeing with them a criminal act. I will not shut up, for these people are blocking a real investigation into how the world functions. I really would prefer death to living in this fake world that these horrible, pretend scientists are trying to create as Karl Marx did. These same types of people burned Giordano Bruno alive at the stake for saying that the Earth revolved around the Sun. If these people could, they would do this to me in a second.
I welcome Trump's pick for the EPA - THIS IS DESPERATELY NEEDED!

Categories: Nature
Tags: Climate Change, Global Warming, Roman Empire
« Trump Picks Climate Change Skeptic for EPA
Climate Change – the New Religious Cult »

 

Corporate media Lies on Syria and Aleppo

{As can be seen this 'UN - peace conference' attracted a rather limited 'empty seats' globalist audience}






Independent Canadian journa



{Inside infowars, the most 'hated' alternative news outlet}
​

George Ades
December 17 at 11:39pm · Nicosia, Cyprus ·

A brief summary of the situation in Syria to put things in perspective.

In the spring of 2011, Washington decided it did not want Assad governing Syria. The reasons? Their own, but all to do with serving American interests.

When Assad refused to obey the “command” to step down, demonstrations suddenly erupted in that peaceful, secular country in the same way as they did in Ukraine when the US decided that it didn’t like the democratically elected government there either. Before long, these demonstrations developed into what the US called an “Arab Spring”, a civil war.

At first, these “rebels” who miraculously found an abundance of weapons took the Syrian forces by surprise and made some territorial gains, however, once the Syrian Army recovered from the initial shock, they moved against these so called rebels who started calling themselves the “Free Syrian Army” and were taking back the ground they had lost to them. All indications were that the “rebellion” in Syria would soon be over.

Around about that time, the US decided to hold joint military exercises for NATO countries and Middle Eastern allies in Jordan, right on the border with Syria. At the end of these exercises, it was announced that a contingent of 15,000 troops, plus heavy weapons would be left behind. (In Jordan, right on the border of Syria.) At the time I had written that we should expect direct US/NATO intervention in Syria on the side of the “rebels” who by this time were in complete disarray and losing to the legitimate Syrian forces.

However, I was wrong in my guess of “direct US/NATO involvement.” What we got instead was a veritable army, complete with heavy weapons appearing out of nowhere. They called themselves ISIS/ISIL and later got more ambitious and gave themselves the grand name of “Islamic State”. Unlike the first “rebels” who with US backing tried to overthrow the Assad government, this lot were an international mix of criminals who made their way to Syria, unhindered, through Turkey and Jordan. In fact it is no secret that they received their training and weapons in those two countries before crossing the border and spreading terror with their savage tactics of beheadings, rapes, burning people alive, selling captured women for the sex trade and much more. These hordes of terrorists with their brand new American weapons, which included heavy armour, and their brand new fleet of Toyota semi-trucks fitted with heavy machine-guns, made spectacular military gains both in Syria and Iraq overrunning the militaries of the two countries and occupying large areas and entire cities in both.

The appearance of this terrorist army, gave the US and its NATO minions the pretext they needed to get “directly” involved in both Syria and Iraq to…..”combat” this threat that could not be handled by the militaries of these countries. After three years of US/NATO involvement, these hordes just got stronger. The USAF and the RAF just kept missing their intended targets and hitting those whom they were supposed to be there to protect and assist. Airdrops of supplies and weapons to their “allies” on the ground, somehow kept ending up in the terrorists’ hands. Washington and London did their best to convince us that their respective air forces were simply….”incompetent”.

Finally, Russia that kept calling “foul” but was ignored mainly because the directed corporate media had already embarked on a campaign to vilify that country and its president, decided it had to get involved, both to safeguard its own interests in that country and also to spare the Syrian people from the inevitable fate that not too long ago afflicted Libya, again through direct US/NATO involvement that reduced that wealthy, peaceful, secular country to a bankrupt state torn by “civil war”.

Russia’s military involvement did not go down well with the Western governments who saw their well-laid plans for the region being upset by a very effective Russian air force that does not miss its intended targets, either with its bombs or with the supplies they regularly drop to the besieged by the terrorists, areas.

The US and NATO and the Russians are, at least on paper, supposed to be fighting the same enemies in Syria. After all, both the “Islamic State” and the branch of Al-Qaeda, that keeps changing name, are recognised by both parties as terrorist organisations (despite John McCain’s posing for photos with the leaders of these groups). Yet, Russia is refused permission to fly over European and NATO countries to bomb these mutually recognised terrorists. Russian ships sailing to the Eastern Mediterranean to contribute to this fight against these terrorists are constantly harassed by NATO ships and refused permission to refuel in Mediterranean ports.

The US/NATO contribution to the “war on terror” intensified since the Russians came on the scene, their “mistakes” multiplied and they are now hitting key Syrian positions by “accident”. They fly over areas where the Syrian allies are operating and the next day accuse the Syrian and Russian air forces of deliberately targeting hospitals in these very areas they had just flown over themselves.

Unsupported claims of “use of chemical weapons by the Syrian forces” keep coming out of Washington and they are immediately echoed by the willing NATO minions and the entire Western corporate media. Even when these claims are debunked by independent, international bodies, that is completely ignored.
My conclusions: There is no Civil War in Syria; there is a Proxy War taking place there. The only people who are really fighting the foreign mercenary terrorists in that country are the Syrians and their allies who are also the only ones who have a right to be there as they have been legally invited to assist. The “Islamic State” has been created, trained, armed, assisted and funded by the US and its cronies.

If you have different views on the US/NATO role in what’s going on in Syria, I and I’m sure a lot of other friends, would be interested in hearing them.

 

David Nuisance Bermanseder shared Killuminati Soldiers of Truth's photo.





Killuminati Soldiers of TruthLike Page

Vatican, Catholic Church and Satanism
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/…
Catholic Veneration Of The Dead - Warning !!! Graphic Images
https://www.facebook.com...




Tony Bermanseder
Actually he is not only the 'last' antichrist pope, according to Malachy, but also a head puppet of the (criminally global) CIA

 

USA NWO Bikinis and World War 3
​

 

The IPCC Science Debunked by its own Mathematical Model
​

The International Panel for Climate Change or IPCC uses a computerized mathematical model to predict the change of the earth's temperature as a function of a number of feedback loops, related to greenhouse gases such as water vapour, methane and carbon dioxide.
The mathematical model is based on a linear-parabolic boost or multiplication of a 'base temperature' say as set at a fluctuation about 0° as an average global temperature of say 14°.
The IPCC model uses the generally applicable and well understood feedback equations for a 'reflected' rectangular hyperbolic curve to then deviate from the mean basic value due to the feedback mechanisms.
This can be modeled as the intersection between the parabolic divergence from the relative linear constancy of the basic temperature average.

Christopher Monckton's analysis and submitted papers then apply the parabolic-hyperbolic intersection for the feedback parameter, say the CO2 emission; to the change in the global temperature.
This intersection is calculated in the Debian mathematical problem of 'doubling the volume of a cube'; this volume matching a doubling of CO2 emissions from its original unitary presence, say the CO2 emissions at the linear average as given by the relative straightness of the hyperbolic curve until it rises steeply due to the feedback curve given by the parabolic section.

It can so be shown, that a doubling of the CO2 (and total feedback) emissions is limited by a maximum increase to 26% of the base value of the temperature.

The 'climate sensitivity' of the Earth's temperature relative to the feedback loops so becomes significantly reduced and the 'global warming catastrophy' caused by Anthropocentric Global Warming (AGW), mainly due to carbon emissions is effectively disproven.
​

​

Political scientists at the UN claim that there is an overwhelming scientific consensus that man-made global warming is real. That claim is just as false as the theory of man-made global warming itself. Here is a list of 145 very prominent scientists who reject the UN’s claim. [See An Inconvenient Lie for more information and documentation.] Climate Science International posted 2016 Dec 15

http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php…

CLIMATE SCIENTISTS' REGISTER ENDORSERS

If you are a someone who has professionally studied the causes of climate change and you would like to add your name to the below list of scientists who endorse The Register, please click here.
The Climate Scientists' Register

“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."

​

 

Multiculturalism and Racial Diversity in Asia, Tokyo and Hong Kong


Cult of White Privilege IS EthnoMasochism

​

 

Your censors of snopes, the mainstream media 'approved' guardians of the truth
A far-left Californian couple with their feline companion!







​

The Left tightens grip on Facebook

Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun
December 18, 2016 7:30am

Facebook has already been attacked for censoring conservatives.
Now it's hiring almost exclusively Left-wing factcheckers - led by partisans - to decree what is "fake" news. This is ominous:

Snopes, which will now have the power to declare what news is or is not legitimate on the world’s largest online platform, almost exclusively employs leftists.​

Facebook announced Thursday that mythbusting website Snopes will be one of a few fact-checking organizations allowed to label stories as “fake news.”​

Almost all of the writers churning out fact checks for Snopes have a liberal background, and many of them have expressed contempt for Republican voters. The Daily Caller could not identify a single Snopes fact-checker who comes from a conservative background...​

At least two of the site’s fact-checkers joined Snopes after writing for Raw Story, a far-left publication that describes itself as a “progressive news site that focuses on stories often ignored in the mainstream media.” Several others have demonstrated liberal partisanship.​

Snopes managing editor Brooke Binkowski said on Twitter that Brexit supporters were “pandering to racist mouth-breather ‘Britain First’ types.”​

Snopes fact-checker Arturo Garcia is an editor-at-large for Raw Story. Garcia is also a managing editor of Racialicious, a pro-Black Lives Matter blog... Back when Trump was reportedly considering launching his own media network, Garcia implied that it would be a TV channel for white people, calling it “White Entertainment Television.”​

Another Snopes fact-checker, Bethenia Palma Markus, previously wrote for Raw Story and is listed as a “contributing writer” by Truth-Out.org, a left-wing nonprofit working to “spur the revolution in consciousness and inspire the direct action that is necessary to save the planet and humanity.”...​

Facebook routinely buried conservative news and topics from trending on the site and artificially made liberal topics part of the national discussion, former Facebook employees admitted last May. TheDC previously reportedthat the former Facebook trending news team was filled by liberals...​

Facebook announced Thursday it will use fact-checking organizations that have signed the Poynter Institute’s International Fact Checking Code of Principles. The Associated Press reports that Facebook is currently working with Snopes, ABC News, Factcheck.org and PolitiFact, and that the list could grow.​

The spokesperson said Facebook will flag stories it thinks might be fake, based on feedback from its users, and that those four news organizations will then determine whether the story is real or not. If a story is determined to be fake, Facebook users will see a warning before they share the story.​

​

Helen Waters
Well that's good news!




Tony Bermanseder
It is good you see this Helen. The first time I tried to post this facebook censored and deleted it. I reposted and it is still up I see.
They dont want you to know who censores what you can read and see.
Those two and co are paid by Soros btw. Its all about money talks and the truth can go to hell.




Brandon Lewis Lott
the first victim in any conflict is truth







Tony Bermanseder

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPhJHKwwR-s

Johnny Cash - What Is Truth (Remastered)
YOUTUBE.COM

 

The Abuse of Science and Technology for Population Control
The real agenda behind environmentalism



A potpourri of Millennial Trump-haters logic and rationale

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF8UEZGN538


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayrNbgVWnps



​