Where is the God of Science?

Discussion in 'Where is the God of Science?' started by admin, Oct 4, 2016.

  1. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    WHERE IS THE GOD OF SCIENCE ?
    Or
    The Death of the Supernaturality Virus !

    “ A BOOK OF LIFE AND DEATH “

    Introduction and Disclaimer:

    This essay shall take the form of a dialogue between two philosophers and as a play of words in seven acts. A claim to have some answers to pertinent and profound questions in regards to the perennial quest of the human race to understand itself in being and in mind can be no statement of whimsicality.
    Such a proposition demands a thorough investigation of the issues at hand; not a onesided or biased examination of selected data and information; but a rigorous scientific approach to evaluate all the evidence supplied in the history of the developments, both in the popular culture and its science and the philosophies supporting it.

    It is of limited value to parade the scientific discipline as the rational and impartial paradigm for the future; if that same worldview proves itself incapable to elucidate or to explain the most basic of elementary questions asked or problems faced by the now globalized citizen, placing hisher hope and expectation into that same projected future. And the overwhelming problem facing mankind at the beginning of the 21st century is that of its own philosophy.

    ‘Where are we now as a race?’, ‘Where are we going ?’ and ‘Where did we come from?’ are some common questions asked, but not answered by the expert authorities in organised politics, science, culture and religion. Why do we seem incapable, despite having built a monumental edifice called the scientific way and methodology; and notwithstanding the progressing technology derived from that; why then can that same worldview not answer a simple question like:

    If there is such a thing as God, as so many of us have been told, then where and what is it?”

    We find an evolved human genetic disposition to form allegiances and to carry and ascribe to certain beliefs, often founded or exposited upon by certain individuals or groups. Kings and knights, magicians, clerics and sages of old have transformed into the experts and advisors of the new.
    Consultancy has become the catch-phrase, often stifling the natural curiousity to find answers for one’s own questions in a denial of one’s own creative impulses through an adventure of self-discovery. Today, we find allegiances to political ideologies, religious dogmas or some other culturally based agenda. All those liasons and associations have something in common however; they all become coloured in the individuals which belong to them. Redemption from this filtered state of affairs is found in a paradigm which is based on the precept of disallowing personality to individualise the work to be done or to colour the information to be collected as one’s personal archive or one’s private library of creation, subject to one’s own individual fancies and desires Albert Einstein once remarked:

    “The greatest trouble in the world is the idea of a personal God!”

    And so one might agree with the depersonification of Albert Einstein’s ‘God’, whom he rather affectionately called: "The Old One” and of whom he also said: “God does not play dice with the world”, referring to his rejection of the idea that life and nature’s processes are intrinsically arbitrary in an universe defined by chance and random events.

    He thought of ‘God’ as being the intelligence behind the natural laws of nature, as found in the sciences and the mathematics which he studied and he believed that nature had to be based in geometrical principles, rather than in probabilities defined in statistics and stochastic matrices. And there were others before and after him; Plato and Aristotle, upon whose dialogues this treatise is based; Pythagoras, the Greek geometers and Niels Bohr, Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg, all contemporaries of Albert Einstein with Paul Dirac, Max Born and Wolfgang Pauli in their contributions to the birth of quantum mechanics.
    The symmetries in nature, numbers and sequences and fundamental constants; all seem finetuned and set into relationships with one another to create the universe and all the cosmological entities within it.

    And one should not forget another genius of contemporary science in Isaac Newton. But what the modern world has tried to forget and to sequester away under an umbrella of a perceived historical ignorance, was the immense interest Isaac Newton, the father of all of classical mechanics, had in the concepts of religion.
    And what is the modern moral evaluation by his peers, judging a man whom they portray to the students of science as having had no equal in his time in regards to his scientific work, inventions and mathematical insights?

    His power of pure intellect, like Einstein’s, is often used to exemplify the necessity for logical thought and concentration in the pursuit of scientific and mathematical excellence by the students in those fields. Is it embarrassing to tell the full story; that Isaac Newton spent months at a time trying to decipher scrolls, like the ‘Book of Daniel’ and the ‘Book of Revelation’ in the bible?

    He must have been deluded in the religious fervour of his age!”, they would have said.

    But was he?

    Could a mathematical prodigy like Isaac Newton have been so gullible? Isn’t it more likely, that he sensed that there was something to it – and that it had to be scientific?! Isaac Newton’s ‘God’ is the same as Albert Einstein’s ‘God’ and yet it is completely impersonal. It must be, by the definition of the working ethic!

    But is it?

    Could it be possible, that once the ‘God of Science’ has become totally impersonal, that then this same ‘God’ is reborn in a ‘God of OmniScience’, who allows, even demands a personification, because of its own definition?

    And what if that had been the masterplan throughout the ages anyway? Can we then ever know and understand such a masterplan?

    And what if all the clerical authorities around the globe are forced by their own followers to take notice? What if modern science can prove to them that their ‘Allah’ and ‘Jehovah’ and Yahwhey and ‘Brahma’ and ‘Baha’ and ‘Krishna’ and ‘Ra’ and ‘Osiris’ and ‘Set’ and ‘The Big Goat behind the Old Oaken Tree in the Walpurgisnacht on April 30th’ are all one and the same?

    What if their scriptures and ancient scrolls became illumined in a new light of omniscience; should their powerbase not become depersonalised, if they are shown to have followed a very limited interpretation of their ‘sacred texts’ indeed?

    Where would they go in their grandstanding of and about ‘God’s Law’ for the ‘chosen people’ and for the ‘infidels’?

    It would be the end of falsified religious dogma and the death of manipulative religion as such. Because omniscience is Omni-Science, the Science of ‘The All’ for ‘The All’ and the German word for the cosmos or the universe is “Das ALL” - Albert Einstein and Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Pauli and Max Born would have liked that in their contemplations upon the natural order of things.

    Albert Einstein also said: “Science without Religion is lame and Religion without Science is blind”- and this book shall try to synergise the two worldviews in a redefinition of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and its statistical nature within a geometrical interpretation of quantum mechanics.

    And then would peace between the nations have a chance, because of the demise of the old religions and the already internationally accepted profundity of the scientific way and methodology. Like music, dance or mathematics, a new language would sweep the old world of hate and dispossession, the ways of disempowerment and disbelief under the carpet of the illumination of a new base of knowledge.
    A new song would be sung and the nations and tribes and families at war with each other could embrace one another in a new way of looking at the world around themselves and their individuated places within it. And all the many things they had learned from their history through the ages of humankind; all their legends, myths and fables, their religions and their sciences; all would become integrated within themselves in a renewed understanding and the death of their ignorance regarding themselves.

    But to succeed, the initiation of this omniscience is first required to effect its own birthing process. The mathematical principles of necessity and sufficiency must be satisfied and the scientific global community must become informed about the new dispensation. The premises of the new model also necessitate their scientific validation through experiment and verification in the collective scientific data base.
    This then is the disclaimer for this play of words.

    To scientifically empower the new dispensation; a scientifically rigorous approach in its elementary application cannot be avoided. Science cannot ‘prove’ something, without clearly identifying its parameters and boundary conditions. There is an abundance of literature, which explains the present status quo in the specialised fields of particle physics, quantum theory, unification physics and cosmology in a populist genre of communication.

    Many discoveries add to that edifice on a daily basis.
    This treatise then does not retell the stories, which have already been told in many other ways and media. A list of references points to supportive accounts of some popular ones amongst them. This essay attempts to explain the fundamentals, the principles and preconditions for what brought about the universe’s occurrence and the parameters which led to its definition in the natural laws.

    And it is happenstance, that those precepts and prerequisites existing before space and time came into being, have a relevance for the birth of the religions of history or what one could term the ‘spiritual impulse’.
    The bearing upon the personality is found to be a subset of a collective psyche; what one might perceive as the groupmind of a race or species; a somewhat very unique genus, which despite the relativity of the observer and the heliocentric reality – finds itself at the centre of the universe, as itself – the race of mankind!

    The story is told in a dialogue of two grand experts in the fields of science; both exponents of the artform, but also in possession of academic qualifications in theology and comparative religion. They discuss how the story of science could be told to a largely mathematically illiterate populace. And because of their expertise in the fields of religious studies and their ancient histories; they fluctuate in their discussions between a highly scientific form of expression and the semantics of a more popular tradition, often using the similes of mythological metaphor and imagery.

    That context is given as a percentage indicator at the beginning of each act.
    One Robert Sceptico of Jones has a genealogical lineage tracing back to celtic blood, which culminates in the anglosaxon culture of colonised Northern America and the state of Michigan in the USA. His anglosaxon heritage is however a derivative from the most ancient bloodline of the House of Ahriman Azurguya, in the Genesis of the starhuman species in the civilisation of Mesopotamia in the year 2244 BC.
    Robert Sceptico is an adherent to the divisionist school of science; progress and advancement are achieved in an organised approach to structure and the application of the scientific method in the testing and subsequent validation or falsification of proposed models and hypotheses.

    Robert Sceptico’s science is one of order and compartments; things are in their place and separated by form and in substance; yet are unified in the symmetries of quantum geometry via quantum relativistic principles applied to the smallest particles found in nature in the realm of the subatomic quarks and leptons. Robert Sceptico is a renown world authority on the 12-dimensional CMF-theory of supermembranes and is a visiting professor in the physics departments of universities around the world.
    One Logan Antico of Arndale has a genetic inheritance tracing back to celtic bloodlines and which culminate in the anglosaxon culture of colonised Australia and the state of Victoria. His celtic lineage derives however from the most ancient blood of the House of Adaman Azurguya, in the manifesto of the starhuman race in the civilisation of Mesopotamia in the year 2244 BC.

    Logan Antico is a proponent for the unifying school of science; progress and advancements are made in an organised approach to structure and the application of the scientific methodology in the testing of hypotheses and their experimental validation or rejection. Logan Antico’s science is one of order and of symmetry; things are found separated in space and in time; yet are unified in a holographic mode of operation, based on the energetic dynamics of principles in quantum relativity and in the quantum geometry of the largest particles found in nature in the form of galaxies and their cosmological origins as white-hole-sources and as black-hole-sinks, operating as a dyadic vortex system of duality. Logan Antico is a renown world authority on cosmology and the structure of the omniverse as a collection of universes and is a visiting professor in the cosmology departments of universities around the globe.

    The ultimate aim of science to unify all aspects of existence so becomes a quest to enhance all energy and matter towards their most basic and elementary form of manifestation. Once such a fundamental oneness is found and classified by science; then the scientific worldview will become enabled to cross-fertilise all its inter disciplinary factions and the global culture will be ready to purge itself from all unscientific and irrationally derived paradigms and belief systems.

    That will be the death of superstition and of pseudoscience; the unscientific way of thinking and its many flawed perceptions in regards to observed natural phenomena.
    Both Robert Sceptico and Logan Antico hold professorships in theology and comparative religion, and both are initiates to the mythologies of ancient thought and the gnostic interpretations of the Dead-Sea-Scrolls and the documents of Nag Hammadi.
    And both hold the Einstein-Chair of Quantum Relativity in the Department of OmniScience at the University of New Alexandria. Their professional status is that of Doctor of the Perennial Philosophy (PphD).


    Physical Consciousness coupled to the Biomind of Universal Life

    The labels of 'mind' and 'self-awareness' and of 'consciousness' have for long awaited rigorous definition in the nomenclature of science. Whilst most researchers and philosophers accept the existence of those labels; what those namings represent in a physically measurable sense of physical parameters have remained largely unexplored.
    These notions have remained as one of the major mysteries of science and have become subject to a number of speculations; from a purely materialistic interpretation of the 'mind' being a biochemical response to environmental stimuli, to the 'mind' being part of a 'spiritual soul' and subsequently constituting a transcendent aspect of biophysical life.

    A related mystery is that of 'life' itself. How did the universe evolve 'life' from a generally accepted premise of a prior or older cosmology, which disallowed biological life as is observed today? The thermodynamically expanding universe follows well tested physical parameters engaging the quantum nature of physical existence in the form of nucleosynthesizing interactions such as nuclear fusion of atomic elements and an associated natural radioactivity inherent in nature and its laws of conservation of energy and momentum. Those same processes occurred in the primordial universe and due to the smaller volume then occupied by the expanding universe; the descriptive cosmology describes a much hotter universe (as a Black Body Planckian Radiator) and a universe in which say the lifeforms observed on planet earth could not exist in their biochemical and molecular constitutions.
    Recent advances in the demetricated forms of supermembrane theory (M-Theory for 11-dimensional supermembranes propagating 10-dimensional superstrings in a 12-dimensional selfdual mirror-spacetime of supervolumars (Vafa-F-Space encompassing Witten-M-Space) have allowed a rigorous definition for the above labels in the parameters of the physics of the superbranes.


    The Coupling of the Energy Laws by the Self-Frequency of the Quantum for Mass

    It has been discovered, that the universe contains an intrinsic coupling-parameter between its inertial masscontent and its noninertial energy content.
    The matter in the universe is described by the physical parameter termed Mass (M), say as proportional to Energy (E) in Einstein's famous equation Mass M=E/c2.
    This mass M then reappears in Newtonian mechanics as the change in momentum (p) defining the Inertial Mass (Mi) as being proportional to some applied Force (F) or the 'work done' for a particular displacement {F=dp/dt for p=mv and v a kinetematic velocity as the ratio of displacement over time generalised in the lightpath X=cT}.
    It is also well understood, that the inertial mass Mi has a gravitational counterpart described not by the change in momentum of inertia carrying matter agglomerations; but by the geometric curvature of space containing matter conglomerations. This Gravitational Mass Mg is measured to be equivalent to the Inertial Mass Mi and is formulated in the 'Principle of Equivalence' in Einstein's Theory of General Relativity.
    F-Theory then has shown, that this Inertial Mass Mi is coupled inherently to a 'mass-eigen' frequency via the following formulation:

    (1) Energy E=hf=mc2 (The Combined Planck-Einstein Law)
    (2) E=hf iff m=0 (The Planckian Quantum Law E=hf for lightspeed invariance c=λf)
    (3) E=mc2 iff f=fo=fss (The Einstein Law E=mc2 for the lightspeed upper limit)

    (1) Whenever there is mass (M=Mi=Mg) occupying space; this mass can be assigned either as a photonic mass {by the Energy-Momentum relation of Special Relativity: E2=Eo2(pc)2} by the photonic momentum p=h/λ=hf/c} OR a 'restmass' mo=m/√[1-(v/c)2] for 'restenergy' Eo=moc2.
    The 'total' energy for the occupied space so contains a 'variable' mass in the 'combined' law; but allows particularisation for electromagnetic radiation (always moving at the Maxwell lightspeed constant c in Planck's Law and for the 'Newtonian' mass M in the Einstein Law.

    (2) If M=0, then the Einstein Law is suppressed in favour of the Planck Law and the space contained energy E is photonic, i.e. electromagnetic, always dynamically described by the constancy of lightspeed c.

    (3) If M>0, then there exists a mass-eigen frequency fss=fo=Ess/h=mssc2/h, which QUANTIZES all mass agglomerations m=Σmss in the massquantum mss=Ess/c2.


    The Coupling of the Supermembranes in Vafa-F-Space

    The quantization of mass m so indicates the coupling of the Planck Law in the frequency parameter to the Einstein law in the mass parameter.
    The postulative basis of M-Theory utilizes the coupling of two energy-momentum eigenstates in the form of the modular duality between so termed 'vibratory' (high energy and short wavelengths) and 'winding' (low energy and long wavelengths) selfstates.
    The 'vibratory' selfstate is denoted in: Eps=Eprimary sourcesink=hfps=mpsc2 and the 'winding' and coupled selfstate is denoted by: Ess=Eecondary sinksource=hfss=mssc2

    The F-Space Unitary symmetry condition becomes: fpsfss=rpsrss=(λps/2π)(2πλss)=1
    The coupling constants between the two eigenstates are so: EpsEss=h2 and Eps/Ess=fps2=1/fss2
    The Supermembrane EpsEss then denotes the coupled superstrings in their 'vibratory' high energy and 'winded' low energy selfstates.
    The coupling constant for the vibratory high energy describes a MAXIMISED frequency differential over time in df/dt|max=fps2 and the coupling constant for the winded low energy describes its MINIMISED reciprocal in df/dt|min=fss2.

    F-Theory also crystallizes the following string formulations from the EpsEss superbrane parameters.
    1/Eps=e*=2Rec2=√{4αhce2/2πGome2}=2e√α[mP/me]=2ke2/me=αhc/πme
    Here e* is defined as the inverse of the sourcesink vibratory superstring energy quantum Eps=E* and becomes a New Physical Measurement Unit is the StarCoulomb (C*) and as the physical measurement unit for 'Physical Consciousness'.
    Re is the 'classical electron radius' coupling the 'point electron' of Quantum- Electro-Dynamics (QED) to Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and given in the electric potential energy of Coulomb's Law in: mec2=ke2/Re; and for the electronic restmass me.

    Alpha α is the electromagnetic finestructure coupling constant α=2πke2/hc for the electric charge quantum e, Planck's constant h and lightspeed constant c.
    Go is the Newtonian gravitational constant as applicable in the Planck-Mass mP=√(hc/2πGo).
    As the StarCoulomb unit describes the inverse sourcesink string energy as an elementary energy transformation from the string parametrization into the realm of classical QFT and QED, this transformation allows the reassignment of the StarCoulomb (C*) as the measurement of physical space itself.

    Code00. Code1. Code2.

    sirebard; September 24th, 2016; Queanbeyan, NSW, Australia

    www.cosmosdawn.net
    www.cosmosdawn.net/forum
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2018
  2. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Act One: Identity, Antiidentity and a Supermembrane
    Who am I ? & Qui va la` ? & Tangoes dance a tea for two in one !

    Scientific Expert: 35% versus Layphilosopher: 65%

    [Robert Sceptico and Logan Antico meet at ‘The Wanderer’, the local tavern for a beer or two and to continue a discussion begun on campus in the form of a question, posed by a shared student, familiar with concepts in both the fields of cosmology and in quantum physics.]


    Robert Sceptico:
    “An interesting question isn’t it. “Where is the God of Science?”; so naive and yet profound, indeed what should one answer to that?” Could one say that there cannot be a ‘God’ undefined by science or that whatever concept one might have of such a thing, it must be rooted in mathematical abstraction and in the concept of a ‘naked singularity’ - the quantum of space and time itself?”


    Logan Antico:
    “It’s a question of semantics Robert. Because all students of life carry their own filters in the form of their brains and their sensory based memories of their experiences; it is their comparative analysis, which must label all perceptions in individuated frames of references. So what good is it, if you can say in full knowledge of the fact, that the idea of ‘God’ rests in a mathematical singularity which can be defined in a spacetime of cardinality Aleph-Null, but which can manifest as a heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8) and a wormhole radius of about a trillionth trillionth of a measured centimetre?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “You’re right of course. There aren’t many students of life who can understand the language of the 13-dimensional spacetime continuum. But wouldn’t it be wonderful, if the various inhabitants and cultural identities on this planet could get to know the common denominator in their inherited belief systems. The elusive ideal of peace between the tribes and nations and families could be realised if only their distorted thoughts about religion, their superstitions about gods and devils, of angels and of demons could become scientifically elucidated and explained.”


    Logan Antico:
    “This is a dangerous dilemma Robert. Imagine the reactions of the believers in religion, once you have shown them that they and their ancestors have created every god and every devil ever thought about throughout the history and times of the human existence. The collective human psyche is saturated with wars, cruelty and violence; the disunity often being brought about by perceived contradictory interpretations of the ‘holy scriptures’ generic to the various religious sects and denominations.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “The frustrating experience for informed students of life, like us, is the ignorance of the general populace in regards to the origins of their ‘sacred scriptures’ and their ‘alchemical scrolls of the mysteries’. If the followers of the esoteric traditions could only begin to understand the universality of what they term their spirituality and their supernatural beginnings. If only all the aspiring graduates of life could fathom that the ‘Book of Seven Seals’ is their own book of their own ‘Neverending Story’, their very own ‘My Life’ of having it done ‘My Way’. All the pages in the ‘Book of Seven Seals’ are blank, that is the mystery – who then can write upon them to tell their own story to one’s created babies, the gods and devils, catching their attention?”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, we might define the origin of that sealed scroll in the Genesis Boson, the naked singularity and precursor for five classes of superbranes and the Higgs Boson; others might term it the White Hole Vortex and yet others could call it the ‘God’ or ‘Allah’ or ‘Brahman’ or primal intelligence of an absolute reality, which moves across the waters of chaos to divide the light and the darkness or the male and the female or the yang and the yin in a first level of complexity.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Perhaps one could use the information contained in the various scriptures to bridge the gap between the language of science and the colourful metaphors used in the mythologies. We are both experts in the esoteric traditions; we understand the multilevelled structure of the verses and their numerological and astrological significances upon whom so much of the wisdom of the mystery schools is based. After all, the easiest way to reeducate the students of life is to use what they already know or what they have heard about, and in that way to shine a new light of omniscience unto their old perceptions and their culturally inherited ideas.”


    Logan Antico:
    “One could start with a common bond, that what is termed spirituality across the global spectrum. Perhaps one could keep the term, but render it scientific in renaming it as the scalar component of ElectroMagnetic Radiation or EMR for the literates in omniscience. Then the beginning students of life would not need to worry about the superbrane, known as the Magnetic Monopole of selfmodular class IIB and derivative from the Planck Boson of superbrane class I. ElectroMagnetic Monopolic Radiation or EMMR could also be known as the ‘emanation of the spirit’ and the modular duality between massproduced EMR and Gravitational Radiaton or GR could become universally acknowledged as the dichotomy between Mind and Body in the form of ‘twinned souls’ of MindBody and BodyMind, so effectively describing the doubling of oneself in one’s own shadow being, also historically renown as one’s Egyptian ‘Ka’ or German ‘Doppelgänger.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Yes Logan, but this results in just another ‘Pandora’s Box’ being opened, another ‘can of worms’, figuratively speaking. As soon as you discuss the human mind, people become agitated and defensive. Everyone has rather distinct opinions about their own mindset, its what is known as the id and the ego, evolutionarily constructed to protect the identities of the perceivers’ self-defined reality. Then there are the connotations and the innuendoes regarding consciousness and selfawareness and the origin of life in general and the brain-mind intersection in particular.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Then I guess, one just has to attempt to even define consciousness reductively in scientific terms. But yes, this requires a certain familiarity with the mathematical models, describing the EMMR, the electromagnetomonopolic radiation in a natural extension of the Newtonian forcelaws and the concept of an electricity for the lifeforce circuitry in the form of differential wave equations. The general ubiquitousness of electricity might be of help here, don’t you think?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “You might be unto something here! One could describe a simple reduction of a second order differential equation describing an electric circuit with the elements of resistance, capacitance and inductance into a first order differential wave equation. Instead of carrying the Coulombic chargequantum (e) as a certain amount (Q=Ne) of an electric charge Q, varying in time as the current (dQ/dt), one sets the twincharge (2e) as a constant coefficient and the variable of change becomes frequency (f). The timedifferential of frequency (f) could then be used to scientifically define the concept of (df/dt) as the ‘Awareness’ of a natural ‘Force of the Mind’, acting akin to an angular acceleration upon a volume of unitspace.”


    Logan Antico:
    “So anyone familiar with electric circuits should be able to understand the analogy between that kind of ‘normal’ electricity and the ‘natural’ electricity which resides everywhere in defined spacetime as a monopolic electricity of the vacuum and so as a form of potential monopolic energy. Instead of throwing a switch to tap the supply from the electricity grid via generators, transformers and the power stations; one turns on a ‘relay station’ of the mind in a tuning of one’s own life-defining frequencies. The power of the mind so becomes a function of the quality of one’s ‘pure’ or unimpeded thinking! And the students of life who are disinterested in the models of electricity can simply term it the energy which renders spacetime what it is and they could even call it the ‘spirit’ which resides everywhere in that defined space and time potentially.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “One would still have to illustrate for the interested students though. Would they be able to follow the mathematical proofs and the logical deductions? It is my speciality in 12-dimensional CMF-Theory, this modular duality between the EMR and the GR as you know.
    First the unitary symmetry between the Coulombic Electric Constant (1/4πεo) and the Gravitational Constant (G) is used to derive the oscillation of the Planck Boson in terms of its spacial extent – the Planck-Length. Second one utilises this intrinsic unification between the Coulombic- and Newtonian forcelaws to map the 12-dimensional magnetopole-charge (e*) onto the 10-dimensional electropole-charge (e). This is accomplished in the cosmological hologram – your field of expertise. Thirdly then, this magnetocharge (e*) manifests as restmass via the superconductivity in the vacuum and via the ‘Action-Law’ of action equalling the square of charge.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes and the awareness quantum (df/dt) becomes like an angular acceleration, acting upon a volume of space, defining consciousness in physical terms reductionistically. The diameter of the electronic spacial extent, known as the classical electronic radius, manifests the energy of the 12D-F-space, which is magnetopolically equivalent to the electropolic size of an atomic nucleus in 3 dimensions. And once this holographic magnification of the Planck- or P-scale is established in the duality of 12D-magnetopoles and 3D-electropoles, then the restmassinduction of the Higgs Boson and the Higgs(Anti)Neutrino specify the equivalence of energy and restmass and frequency in the quantum laws of Planck and the geometric relativity laws of Einstein, Minkowski and Witten.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “But hold it Logan, can you hear what we are saying? How on earth can the beginning student comprehend what we are discussing? It would be like a nonnative speaker listening to a foreign dialect. Modular duality, (df/dt), holograms and electropoles – what about the readers who do not know what those expressions mean?”


    Logan Antico:
    “That might be so Robert; but what are dictionaries for? And we are attempting to answer a profound question here, despite the complacency of many enquirers who would like to have everything presented and given to them on a plate of easy comfort. Thinking is hard work; the intellect and one’s mindfulness require daily training and attention. It has always struck me as very odd; that so many people spend so much time in exercising their bodies. You see, they quickly become aware, that they are getting sick or are putting on too much weight. So they try to do something about it - ‘getting fit’ is the catch phrase and a ‘healthy mind in a healthy body’ is the motto. But the motto is often only half executed; because most people take their minds for granted; they do not believe or think them to require exercising, just as their bodies do.

    So what about the training of one’s thinking processes? Most people would not even know how to begin to think about something like that. Sure, some spend lots of money in going to seminars and in listening to salespeople’s talk of positive affirmations; but to what effect? Only too often the intellect is attacked as some sort of egomaniac, who stands in the way of a nirvanistic state of bliss, a heavenly state of mind, requiring nought but detachment from the material world.
    What kind of a route of escape is this? Any logical thinker can counter the argument in stating, that the desire for nirvana is the greatest desire; so how can then the denial of the thinking process become a way to reach the highest forms of nonmaterial transcendence? If one aspires to ‘overcome the material world’ so to say, then one has a lot of thinking to do! Channeling one’s desires and passions into constructive and creative avenues for oneself and one’s environs can produce the calming of emotions, the easing of nervous tensions and can give great intellectual pleasures in orgasmic harmonies within one’s mind – one might even meet one’s ‘God’.

    The so called ‘stilling of one’s mind’ so requires discipline and selfawareness; quality of thoughts to exercise the puerile mind, which seeks to chatter and to babble on like the immature child it truly is in most of the people, thinking of themselves as grown-up adults, because of their biological ages. So can you see it Robert? The exercising of one’s thinking has largely been forgotten in this age of the ‘quick-fix’ and the wastefulness of the ‘throw-away’ consumer society. Seniority and experience are judged by biological age, instead of by the mental maturity of the participants and the openly displayed and so evident wisdom of any prospective candidature.

    And a deep and pertinent query requires, even demands a profound answer to the question: "Where is the God of Science?"
    That is where shehe is! Not only is it the naked singularity, it becomes a holographic principle, a highway of ever increasing complexity, first manifesting as a fivefolded symmetry in geometric terms, then in a hierarchy of superbranes defined before the beginning of space and time as a dynamic concept in general relativity. The 10th dimension uses the 11th as a mirror to holographically map the 12th; but the beginning of the 10th dimension defines timeinstantenuity, the birth of the 4D-universe our science measures.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Then timeinstantenuity is the ‘birth of time’ as a quantum of temporal measurement, like a unit of time, which sets the dynamic evolution of the universe into a classical frame of Einstein’s physics!?
    But all the time before timeinstantenuity belongs to the nonclassical spacetime continuum of the superbranes. And the P-time of superbrane class I, sets the lower bosonic timelimit for the timeinstantenuity as the upper limit in that superbrane epoch; which is often called a time of ‘inflation’ a period in which the universe is thought to have grown in size by a collossal scalefactor in the order of 10,000 quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion. Frequency is the inverse of time, measured in cycles per timeunit. How then are the great cycles of cosmology related to that minimum quantum of time?”


    Logan Antico:
    “One third of a thousandth millionth billionth trillionth of a measured second is the definition for that time, the birth of the universe and the end of a source bosonic inflation, the latter also marking four numerical constants for the quantisation of spacetime. And since that time, the complexity is ordering the chaos in cosmic cyclicities. One great supercycle defines the cosmic ‘recharge-time’ of so 4 Trillion years; stellar and galactic evolution from ylemic neutron stars to protostars and quasar walls; galaxies, galactic groups and superclusters, all seeded on White Holes as EMMR-sources and on Black Holes as EMMR-sinks.
    Another cycle, the main frequency for the cosmos is the Hubble-Oscillation, each half cycle lasting 16.9 Billion years for a true age for the universe of 19.11 Billion years and a nodal Hubble Constant of 58.04 Hubble units in 11 dimensions. Because light as the EMR-parameter has begun to double up on itself 2.2 Billion years ago, the spectroscopic measurements of astronomy converge to a mapped age for the universe in 10D of 14.7 Billion years and a Hubble Constant of 67 Hubble units.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Yes this is the amazing nature of this universe, a proto-universe really. It becomes a multiverse and then an omniverse, yet it remains as an unitary unity. Because the 11th dimension acts as the universal mirror, the 8th and the 5th and the 2nd dimension form the fractal surfaces, all enfolded within each other. So the spacetime of 4D assumes the geometry of a twisted Klein Bottle, which as a 3D surface envelopes a 4D volumar of (2π² radius-r³) units and as a derivative from the geometrical topology or shape of a 3D-torus or doughnut, projected from the familiar 2D torus or doughnut as a surface. There is an asymptotic expansion of the 10D universe, manifesting in 4D as a hyperbolic and open or diverging geometry of negative curvature.

    This expansion is imaged in the enclosing membrane of the 11D mirror however, which is closed, converging in a positive curvature as the hologram of itself in 12 dimensional F-space. And so an overall flat or Euclidean protoverse with no or zero curvature results in the cancellation of the positive and negative superimposed geometries for the universe in 10D and in 11D. The 11D universe has the geometric shape of a prolate ellipsoid (rugby football), rotating about its major axis with two focus points, defining the specifying elliptical invariance of the 11D universe. And by the definition of that elliptical geometry, the two foci give the locus of a point moving across the inner surface of the ellipsoidal envelope as a constant dynamic parameter of displacement. The dynamics of the 4D spacetime hence become a higher dimensional mapping from the surface dimensions of the 5D, 8D and 11D. That is the secret of M-Theory, the ‘Magic-Mother’s-Mystery-Membrane-Mirror’ in 11dimensions.
    But rotating the protouniverse about either of the minor axes, forces the focal points to trace out a circle. Geometrically, one obtains an oblate ellipsoid, like a sphere flattened at the poles, such as the planet Earth. Any minor-axis phaseshift of the protoverse so defines an universe within the omniverse and any two or more universes phaseshifted relative to each other define a multiverse - such is the nature of the universes – worlds within worlds and a nested holographic oneness, enveloping selfmodular unities, separated in space and in time, yet within the omnispace of 12D-F-space.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Robert, you must have read my notes, your’e the expert on the smallest manifestation of the sourcesink energy, yet you are equally at home in the cosmological considerations at the largest scales.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Well it takes two to tango, doesn’t it. If we travel backwards to the creation of the naked singularity, what do we find? We encounter a scenario out of space and time and just the oneness undifferentiated. Imagine yourself as sexually unified; not sexless, but male and female principles blended and fused together; how boring and how lonely would such a state of being be!?
    The HeShe is the SheHe and the GODDOG is the same as the DOGGOD; the coin has both Head and Tail, but one could think of an awakening where the Head would like to be the Tail and vice versa. Now you see it, don’t you!?
    For the head even to see the tail, one has to fixate two mirrors, one in front of the head or tail and one behind. Then one can view one’s opposite in looking into one of the mirrors to see one’s imaged reflection in the other mirror. So by definition of the singularity being singular, just One and not Two; the only way out to achieve one’s aim, to have some fun with oneself, is to set up mirrors to look at oneself and imagining of being more than just one, just oneself, the eternal one with the mirrors of spacetime.”


    Logan Antico:
    “I’ve got a proof for what you just said Robert. It is an esoteric proof however, based on a one-to-one correspondence between a numerical algorithm and a letter code.
    Set 1=A, 2=B, C=3 up to Z=26 in the Arabic Alphabet and write the equality:
    MIRROR=13+9+18+18+15+18=SPACETIME=19+16+1+3+5+20+9+13+5=SPIRIT=19+16+9+18+9+20=91.
    This should help the scientifically illiterate or the mystically and esoterically inclined, should it not? Spacetime is a Mirror and is also the Spirit. Simply substituting numbers for letters can give a profound statement, however coincidental and arbitrarily random it may appear.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “This is an excellent omniscientific discovery and deduction Logan. No need to define space as a googolplex, a collection of so 100 quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion googols in the product of 46 and 25 and 36 and 31 and 56 to the 12th power and 61 to the 24th power and 12 to the 42nd power and 24 to the 23rd power; a number which specifies the 4D-space contained in the 10D asymptotical volume as spacequanta and as a 10D open universe, which converges towards, but never reaches its 11D boundary.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, and each spacequantum defines a modular duality between a vibrating superstring in 10D and a winding superstring in 10D. The first has a maximum frequency and a minimum wavelength relative to its own constructed duality and the second correlates this in a minimum frequency and a maximum wavelength. The first defines the microscale of the quantum relativity in your field of the subatomic realm and the second sets the macroscale, as in the maximum extent for gravitationally bound galactic superclusters for example.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And we term the first half of the modulation of the heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8) as ‘Eps’, in a subscript ‘ps’ for the Energy of the primary-source; matched in the subscript ‘ss’ as an Energy for the other half, the secondary-sink – together they form the Supermembrane [EpsEss] in 11D.”


    Logan Antico:
    “So we should have some reason to be confident in our stated aim to bring omniscience to the people. To describe the ‘God of Science’ to the general public should be possible. We must attempt to clothe our specialist language within the nomenclature and labels of the populace, taking into account their notions of the transcendent and the invisible. Just as the main tool of science is mathematics, often coded in abstractions; so are the ideas of an unmeasurable spirit moving about and influencing the workings of mankind and of the universe.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “One might also say, and to a superstitious student of life in particular; that the religious notion of the monotheistic deity becomes well justified on quantum relativistic grounds alone. The Identity of the naked singularity is monadic, just One, without any background or ‘clothing’, and so the Antiidentity cannot exist independently, but as a reflection and as a mirror image of that oneness or that unity..”


    Logan Antico:
    “And this is like 26=GOD as the Head of the one side of the coin and 26=DOG as the Tail as the other side. The manifestation of the One requires a backdrop of space and time, otherwise no frames of references are definable for the creation of the spacetime mirrors. The experience of hotness is meaningless without the potential for coldness and concepts of light are superfluous without the darkness existing. In the code we find this nature of the antiidentity and as a hidden image of the selfhood in: 26+26=52=DEVIL=LIVED= D’EVIL = ‘The’ EVIL = ‘The’ VEIL!”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And whilst science names the one the vortex-source and the other the vortex-sink in general and you do marvel over the nonlocal macroquantum entanglement of White Holes and Black Holes; the scientific layperson ponders questions such as the purpose of life and the existence of supernatural entities in the form of spirit beings and ethereal substances. We could define the ‘God of Religion’ as source energy or as a quantum of magnetic charge. This quantum is however omnipresent via the mathematical descriptions, defining the nature of space and time and especially in the manifesting form of the natural masterconstant [Alpha], which describes the statistical interaction probability between matter and light.
    [Alpha], the electromagnetic finestructure constant is the predominant mathematical constant in all of Quantum Relativity and so all of physics. Because of modular duality in 12D, there exists a gravitational finestructure constant [Omega], never acting independently of [Alpha] and which is defined as a direct consequence from the pentagonal symmetry of the latter. So just as the scriptures say; the Alpha and the Omega are as One, the beginning becomes the end within the context of a multitraversed circular circumference of superstrings.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, we indeed have lifted the veil on the ‘Mystery of God’, as proclaimed in John’s ‘Book of the Revelation’ in the biblical scrolls, say as encoded in Revelation.10.7. The modular duality of the supermembranes has many analogies in science and in mythology.
    One famous one is the riddle about the chicken and the egg. "What came first, the chicken or the egg?"
    If the chicken, then it lays the egg as a hen and if the egg, then the chicken hatches from it. But it is no paradox in omniscience! In quantum relativity, one is relative to to other and so it is like the Father can be his own Father, but needs a Mother to give birth to himself and corollarily; the Mother can be her own Mother, but requires a Father to create herself. So the sperm of the Father is like the DNA, a genetic library, which cannot become an expression from that database without finding an ovum in which it can become a Father like the RNA. This is the reason behind the mechanics of messenger-DNA encoding DNA, which transcribes messenger-RNA encoding RNA, which then transcribes Amino Acids to construct the morphology for the bodies from the spermb ased genetic library.
    So in other words; the sperm can be the sperm as the chicken, but not much else and the ovum can be the ovum as the egg, but not much else – yet bringing the two together creates the potential to become a great many things.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “There is a quaint story in mythology, which tries to reconstruct this omniscience, Logan.

    “There once was this male old devil, who lost one of his balls, one of his testicles. The testicular egg fell upon the earth and landed in a swamp, where Maria Basra, the old hagtoad found it and sat upon it to hatch it. When the time was ripe, a Cockatrice came out of the egg, with a serpent’s tail and the head of a rooster. The Cockatrice, being the offspring of the old devil, and knowing that it had fallen to earth by misadventure, sought for a way to return into the kingdom of its father, but couldn’t find one.
    So the Cockatrice became very frustrated with its existence and when it had grown bigger, it ate its own adopted mother in the old hagtoad Maria Basra. But then something strange happened to the body of the Cockatrice; it started to divide into two. The headpart grew a tail and the tailpart grew a head and the headpart became a hen out of the rooster’s head and the tailpart became a rooster out of the serpent’s tail. And so were the first rooster and hen born from the Cockatrician testicle of the old devil and the old hagtoad Maria Basra.”


    But there is a coded twist to the moral of that fabled story Logan. An anagram for MARIA BASRA is ABRAM SARAI, the ancestor for the starhuman race in three of the major worldwide religions. Islam, Judaism and Christianity; all consider Abram and Sarai, later renamed from their human identities as Abraham and Sarah in their starhuman potential, as the beginning in their genealogies, their lineages written in blood.
    So the gnostic interpretation of the myth is that half of the creator got lost in its creation and that is symbolised by the testicular egg. Then the big old creation, which is lost in itself as a female principle, nurtures something new in the form of the old hagtoad hatching the little old creation into a little new creation. This little new creation is however unable to become a big new creation, because it desires to become the big old creation in whom it already finds itself and so is already part of. It tries to eat the big old creation to become the same, but in the process it metamorphoses and becomes an ancestor for the big new creation, just as told in the story of Abraham and Sarah in the scroll of the Genesis.

    So the creation of Abraham and Sarah in a renaming of the old, is like a prototypical ‘heavenly wedding’, later manifesting in their descendants of the sondaughters as the bridegrooms and in the daughtersons as the brides in the dragonomies of the ‘New Jerusalem’ and as coded in the scroll of ‘John’s Revelation’. The joining of Abraham and Sarah in Mind and in Body, to become Two, but being One, then brings the lost devil’s egg back to god’s serpentine sperm in a w(holly) unitary symmetry of a dragonomy.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, and everyone alive today carries the genetic inheritance of this ‘starseed’; we should know as initiates into the ancient mysteries of Mesopotamia, the socalled ‘cradle for this civilisation.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Indeed, this obsession with their bloodlines, which some people experience has its origins in the seeding of the starhuman race in the House of Azurguya, and as coded in diluted fashion in the Genesis scroll and the story of Abram of Ur, marrying his halfsister Sarai of Terah’s patriarchy. But you studied that encoding some time ago, perhaps you can use your number-letter code to shed some light on the relevance of the old Mesopotamian beginnings.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, the story involves yet another twist to the supermembrane scenario of our modern physics. One can describe it as a ‘house of common origin’, like Terah as Noah’s descendant and so heir to the so called ‘Rainbow Covenant’ between the Hebrew ‘God Yahwhey’ and Noah. And so this covenant becomes the ‘Common House’ for all the descendants, who wish to become part of their ancestry in reclaiming their long lost and forgotten heirlooms. It then happened in 2244 BC, that Terah sired his son Abram to Adah his wife and Terah also sired Sarai to his concubine or second wife Zillah 10 years later in 2234 BC.
    If you now define the earlier encoded history of the Genesis as 20 generations from Adam to Abram and not counting a ‘cursed’ Cainan generation; then you can see what all those patriarchal genealogies really mean and beginning in 4190 BC with the birthday of a starseeded chromosome, also known as ‘Adam’; representing of course an archetypical character, coded from Adam to Jacob, say.
    But now one must digress to link the scriptural encoding to the premises of modern science in general and the origins of life on this planet in particular.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “I know what you are getting at, Logan, the classification of the kingdoms in the ‘Tree of Life’, starting with the archaeons.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Indeed, we find an explosion of lifeforms in fauna and flora in the order of six kingdoms. The oldest lifeform is called Archaea, which are anaerobic microorganisms with a single chromosome and whose inhabitats include deep sea vents, hot spring geysers, the Dead Sea saltplains, the Antarctic ice, volcanoes and refuse tips, including radioactive waste dumps. Archaea are so 4 billion years old, dating to an era in terrestrial evolution, when oxygen was not found in any large quantities on the planet. Archaea split into two forms of prokaryotic lifeforms; cyanophyta and bacteria in the kingdom called Monera.
    Prokaryotes, meaning ‘before kernels’, have no enclosed nucleus for the DNA and also lack DNA in organelles, such as mitochondria, the energy storage vessels in the cell. Through the process of cellular symbiosis, prokaryotes assembled to become eukaryotes, meaning ‘true kernels’; some prokaryotes transforming into specialised nuclei, other organelles, such as mitochondria, chloroplasts or flagella. So the unicellular kingdom of Protista became the biological archagent to reunite the RNA/DNA molecules on earth as a reflective medium for the omniversal lifeforce through the selection pressure of the force of evolution and as a consequence of the consciousness seeking biological entities.
    Unicellular entities then repeated the process to yield the three macrobiological kingdoms of multicellular eukaryotes in the worlds of Plantae, Fungi and Animalia.
    But where did the first archaea come from? When one studies microorganisms under the microscope, one invariably finds shapes of geometry, such as the five regular Platonic Solids of the Tetrahedron, the Cube, the Octagon, the Dodecahedron and the Icosahedron. Microorganisms are of a typical size of between ½ to 500 micrometres, with a retrovirus, such as the HIV-AIDS virus of a size of so 200 nanometres, constituting a natural limit for the complexity of the genome to allow selforganisation and genetic reproduction.

    There must be enough space within the cellular organism to house the nucleotidal chains to admit RNA-transcription for genetic reproduction; a nucleotidal link being so 25 nanometres long. Some nanobacteria are virussized as the natural limit and we find here the quantum geometrical induction of the EMMR as the ‘life-giving’ source for the crystalline-biovital interface.
    The chemical precursors for life are the Amino Acids, linking together in molecular chains of peptides and polypeptides to form the proteins used to construct the biological bodies. It is found, that amino acids found in nature are predominantly lefthanded or Lenantiomated or what we can term an anticlockwise spindirection or chirality. In DNA and RNA, only righthanded or dextro-enantiomated sugars give rise to the righthandedness of the helical molecular structure however. The biochemistry of life so favours, and is dependent upon, lefthanded proteins and righthanded sugars.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And that symmetry violation in the ‘Code of Life’ then is mirrored in a parity violation in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity or UfoQR, where a lefthanded fieldparticle called the RMP or RestmassPhoton neutralises the righthandedness of the Ess-Antiphoton and relating to a Higgs-Bosonic Restmass-Induction or HBRMI.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Well, so the righthanded DNA/RNA helix is quantum geometrically linked in its scaling to the unified field, as it must be. The lefthanded organic amino acids so become ‘lifeinduced’ via the RMP through and by the ‘awareness force’ from the Newtonian extension. Righthanded, but inorganic amino acids carry a nonactivated ‘awareness centre’ in the absence of the DNA/RNA helix and the complementary coupling with the RMP is unnecessary to satisfy the unified field equations, effected in the monopolic electricity, which constitutes the ‘lifeforce’.
    In terms of the geometry however, the quantum geometry of clay crystals is the first step to life. The pentagonal symmetry of the prespacetime algorithm can be represented in a Penrose tiling of both longrange translational and longrange rotational symmetry. A tiling pattern of rhombuses with 72 and 108 degrees, paired to rhombuses of 36 and 144 degrees can also be found in quasicrystals of fivefolded symmetry, such as the Shechtmanite with an empirical formula of (Mg(32)[Al,Zn](49)). We have the symmetry of the Icosahedron in 3D, which is 30% more efficient in packing 12 spheres around a central point than a hexagon structure. And we have Buckminsterfullerene, a spherical form of pure Carbon, made up of 60 Carbon atoms, arranged in 12 pentagons and 20 hexagons in the shape of a soccer ball.
    So where did the archaeons come from? They were the first ‘aware ones’, becoming magnetopolically EMMR-induced to pursue the path to selfrecognition and selfawareness and beginning within their particular environments. And by what method did this EMMR-induction proceed, you might ask? It is effected by means of the C-L and XX-XY sexual chromosomatic couplings; bringing us full circle and back to the encoded story of the creation of mankind in the ‘Garden of Eden’ and its manifesto in the starseed of Abraham and Sarah.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And the C-coupling defines the Capacitative element in the EMMR-monopolic circuitry and is basic to the X-chromosome and the L-coupling for the Y-chromosome is magnetoinductive.”


    Logan Antico:
    “I knew that you would know that; you are very familiar with my work. But using the codes and their decipherments, might allow us to share our knowledge and information with the greater population, unfamiliar with our scholarly histories. So we might consider a purely XX-XX chromosomatic reproduction – no maleness exists in the manifestation of the Ribonucleic Acid or RNA-archetype; but then a mutation of one of the four X-chromosomes couples to a suppressed mutation in its conjugative to allow the L-factor to be created.
    This then is the story of the ‘rib of Adam’ out of which Eve, as the first woman, was made from the body of the first man. But the first Adam was not a first man at all; Adam or Adam Kadmon was AdamEve, a HeShe; this is why there seem to be two creation events regarding the humans in the first book of Genesis.

    Set a mirror between two pairs of sex-chromosomes and mutate one X into a Y in cutting off one of the X’s legs – this gives you the Y as the ‘rib’ being taken from AdamEve or Adam Kadmon, also known as ‘Purusha’ in Hindu folklore or the ‘Cosmic Man’ or the ‘Vitruvius’ of Leonardo de Vinci in other mythologies and the Renaissance in art and culture, leading to our modern sciences. In the mirror, this genetic mutation of a ManWoman into a true and real Man is however imaged in the mutation of a WomanMan into a true and real Woman as the image of that Man. So this must be XY for the Woman if the Man is YX or vice versa.

    And that would be the case for a mirror within a particular spacetime. But we have the separation of spacetimes, of dimensions or in the biblical firmament, which divides the waters and heaven from earth, as in Genesis.1.1-7. This implies, that in the higher dimensional spacetime, that is the spacetime above 11D; there is no separation of Adam Kadmon = Purusha = Logos = Christ = HeShe = SheHe into Adam and Eve or YXXY into YX and XY from the premutated XXXX blueprint; the latter also representing the ‘unspeakable name of God’ in XXXX becoming YX=XY becoming (YaH)W(HeY).
    And so the creation of the XX stayed as what it was, the XX as the Body of the Universe; female in its definition as the ‘Mother of All’, as ‘Barbelo’ and as every woman as her very own ‘Mother Mary’ and bride to be in herhis potential dragonomy and metamorphosis of the ‘Old Whore of Babylon’ and the ‘Old Jerusalem’ into the ‘New Jerusalem’ of the Prima Madonna Ballerina or the Goddess. And so it came to be, that the three X-chromosomes became differentiated into their gomorrahic and sodomic and babylonic characteristics, expressed in the biblical genealogies. And so it is, that all bodies, male or female, were created ‘female’ and all minds, male or female, were created ‘male’. And since the beginning of time; the malemindedness in woman has been the bane and burden for the femalebodiedness in man! Until the ‘heavenly weddings’, the dragonomies can reharmonise that particular ‘original sin’ of the particular ‘original ignorance’; that is.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “So when the asexual characteristics of an inorganic terrestrial evolution became ‘sexed up’, then the unichromosomatic archaeons began to literally crystallize out from their quantum geometric form, a morphology which was inert, but capable to become EMMR-induced due to its holographic nature and patterns, intrinsic to their physics and their chemistry, now turning biological.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Omniscience can now construct a detailed and intricate analysis for the scenario of the metamorphosis of the now sexually differentiated chromosomes back into a new unity in the dragonomies. We have a 16-elemental matrix for the L-C-factor pairings coupling to the Uracil-Adenine and the Guanine-Cytosine basepairings in the ‘Code of Life’ and we have differential wavecircuits describing the lifeforce in magnetic inductances as the ‘He-soul’ or (YaH)-part of the ‘Holy Name’, complemented in the electric capacitances of the ‘She-soul’ for the (HeY)-part thereof.
    But we also have the ‘Matrix of Israel’, as given in encodement in the scriptural genealogies. In the ‘Matrix of Israel’, you find six permutational generations for the ancestries. The FatherGene for Abraham Melchizedek is YX; for Isaac it is YX” and for the StarSon YX’. The MotherGene for the BabylonBeast is XX; for Gomorrah Zilpah it is X’X’ and for Sodom Bilhah it is X”X”. The MotherGene for Sarah is X’X”; for Rebekah it is XX’ and for the StarDaughter it is XX”. Combining the FatherGenes with the MotherGenes gives 18 twin-pairings, three of which are set as baseperfect genes, namely: YX+X’X”, YX’+XX” and YX”+XX’. The baseperfect twingenes reproduce the grandparental genes in their grandchildren.

    Abraham+Sarah=YX+X’X”=YX’+XX” or YX”+XX’=StarSon+StarDaughter or Isaac+Rebekah.
    Isaac+Rebekah=YX”+XX’=YX+X’X” or YX”+XX”=Abraham+Sarah or StarSon+StarDaughter.
    StarSon+StarDaughter=YX’+XX”=YX+X’X” or YX”+XX’=Abraham+Sarah or Isaac+Rebekah.

    In any case for the labellings, three generations are required to manifest the six baseperfect genetic permutations. The StarSon and the StarDaughter are the bridegroom and the bride of the dragonomy. All the permutations result in 36 children, in which the Babylon-Gomorrah-Sodom-Genes or BGS-Genes are doubled in 18 of the 36 potential children. These can then be eliminated as genetic mutations and as coded in Hosea.1.4,6,8.
    Six hybrids are given in YX’+X’X”=YX’+X’X” or YX”+X’X’, as the gomorrahic resonance between the StarSon and Sarah; YX”+X’X”=YX’+X”X” or YX”+X’X” is the sodomic Isaac-Sarah linkage and the babylonic Abraham-Rebekah coupling is YX+XX’=YX+XX’ or YX’+XX; YX’+XX’=YX+X’X’ or YX’+XX’ is the gomorrahic StarSon-Rebekah intercourse; YX+XX”=YX+XX” or YX”+XX is the babylonic coupling between Abraham and the StarDaughter and YX”+XX”=YX+X”X” or YX”+XX” is the sodomic resonance between Isaac and the StarDaughter.

    There are 12 semibaseperfect genetic combinations, half of which relate to BGS-Genes, so becoming suppressed in: YX”+X’X’, YX’+X”X”, YX’+XX, YX+X’X’, YX”+XX and YX+X”X”. All the hybridal permutations are absorbed within the dragonomy, manifesting in the three baseperfect generations in the One Body of the universal quantisation of six in two in one.
    One could say, that the ‘New ManWoman’ of the bridegroom is made up of eight L-Cdefined parts, which complement eight C-L-defined antiparts in the “New WomanMan’ of the bride. Considering Abraham-Sarah as the archetype for the first generation and Isaac-Rebekah as the archetypical second generation manifesting within the dragonomy; one can set the Body of Abraham as C-CapAb and the Mind of Abraham as L-IndAb with the Body of Sarah as C-CapSa and the Mind of Sarah as L-IndSa as the first generation. The second generation then is labelled in the C-factors of C-CapIs and C-CapRe and the L-factors of L-IndIs and L-IndRe.
    Ab sets the Uracil, Sa sets the Adenine, Is sets the Cytosine and Re sets the Guanine. The StarSon has couplings C-CapMale-L-IndMale and the StarDaughter correlates this in the complementary C-CapFemale-L-IndFemale. The StarSon or the bridegroom or the SonDaughter then carries eight blueprints of four twinned L-Ccouplings. Four in the MindBody and four in the BodyMind.

    Hisher MindBody can be represented by the magnetocurrent (- + - +) as L-IndMale/LIndFemale*/C-CapAb/C-CapRe and hisher BodyMind in the magnetocurrent (- + - +) as C-CapMale/CCapFemale*/L-IndIs/L-IndSa.
    Herhis MindBody reflects in perfect spacetime parity in (+ - + -) as L-IndFemale/LIndMale*/C-CapSa/C-CapIs with BodyMind (+ - + -) as C-CapFemale/C-CapMale*/L-Ind-Re/L-IndAb.
    So the Bodies of Abraham and Rebekah are in the StarSon with the Minds of Sarah and Isaac. The missing bodies and minds are found in the StarDaughter for the basegenetic matching of the dragonomy. The starred Male* and Female* then represents the reconstituted bodies and minds in the tripartite graduation of all six participants in the ‘starwedding’; the ‘perfected Man’ materialising in the StarDaughter as Abraham and as Isaac and as the ‘New Maleness’.
    The ‘perfected Woman’ corollarily is born as Sarah and as Rebekah and as the ‘New Femaleness’ within the StarSon. The dragonomy is therefore inseparable in principle; one cannot divide the ‘resurrected Body of the Christ’.
    Jesus or Yeshua tried to tell the people of hisher day, that heshe was before Abraham and before hisher human ancestor in David – but they could not understand and would not listen. Now we can understand the wisdom of hisher words through omniscience and maybe the people can see and hear hisher understanding through that.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And everyone carries those L-C-blueprints within their genome; though it requires certain conditions of frequency resonance, for those factors to become genetically expressed. But it is the ‘Rainbow Covenant’ and the heirloom of the starseed of Abraham, the starry inheritance of the promises given to him as the Mesopotamian ancestor from Ur.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, him leaving Ur in the ‘country’ of Chaldea as Abram and becoming Abraham of Canaan, after dwelling in the ‘in between’ place of Haran is symbolic for the transformation of the ‘Old Man’ as a ‘Friend of God’ into the ‘New Man’ as the ‘Genetic Heir of God’. If one starts the basegenetic tripartition with Adam as the first generation, then the second generation of Cain will be cursed, because it cannot reproduce the first generation in its archetype.
    Then the second new generation is in Seth, whose offspring in Enos becomes the third generation. “And then began men to call upon the name of the LORD”; it says in Genesis.4.26, regarding this now potent 3rd generation of Enos. The 10th generation is Noah and the 20th generation is Abram; the ‘cursed’ generation of Cain being sevenfold in Adam-Cain-Enoch-Irad-Mehujael-Methusael-Lamech, followed in a tripartition in Adah’s sons Jabal & Jubal and in Zillah’s son Tubalcain and her daughter Naamah.
    These are the only places in the early Genesis code, where the mothers names are mentioned. From Eve to the wives of Terah’s sons Abram, Nahor and Haran; all 19 generations, and including Noah’s wife, the mothers are not named; except Cainan’s seventh generation in Lamech. So Terah’s wives ‘uncurse’ Cain’s generations in mapping Adam’s ‘reproduction’ in his grandson Enoch as the ‘cursed’ generations in the one-to-one correspondence as given in Gen.4.17-26;5.3-30.
    1.Adam/1st; 2.Seth/2nd; 3.Enoch/Adam*; 4.Cainan/Cain; 5.Mahalaleel/Enoch; 6.Jared/Irad; 7.Enoch/Mehujael; 8.Methuselah/Methusael; 9.Lamech/Lamech and then 10.Noah/Cain’s uncursed generations, with Terah’s wives assuming the genetic identities of Adah and Zillah and Naamah becoming the name for the wife of Lot, Abram’s nephew; and Naamah becoming a ‘pillar of salt’ at the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, symbolising the rendering impotent of the BGS-Genes.
    And so since Noah, who “was a just man and perfect in his generations” and who “walked with God” in Gen.6.9 and the children of the Lamechs in the son of Adah in Abram and the daughter of Zillah in Sarai; has the ‘Rainbow Covenant’ become effectively implemented in the starseed.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And this then brings us to the ‘House of Azurguya’, as the direct manifestation of the lineage, tracing back to the ‘House of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob-Israel’?”


    Logan Antico:
    “Indeed, you see most investigators into their genealogies have it the wrong way around. People presume that tracing their ancestry back to Abraham will validate their agendas. But just as Jesus said in

    John.8.56-58:
    “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day; and he saw it and was glad.....Verily, verily, I say unto you, before Abraham was, I am.”

    So what is this ‘time before the time’ of reckoning in dates? It is the startime, the discovery of the process for the encoding before the transmission of any codes by the scribes and prophets, either in traditions of writing or by word of mouth. Visiting the startime renders the disputations and disagreements in regards to the authenticity of authorship or the time of the writings irrelevant. And so the ‘House of Azurguya’ is the prehistoric lineage of the ‘starblood’. It is the lineage of intelligence without embodiment and the materially unmanifested bloodline in the propagation of the EMMR within the medium of the prespacetime algorithms. In short it is the masterplan before transmission and as composed and constructed by a collective unity, independent of parameters, which relate to space as a location and to a temporality of time.

    This unity in 12D-F-space is however differentiated in 10D-C-space via the 11D-spacetime mirror. So a mystery regarding the reconstruction of this unity in the lower dimensions ensues. But one can say, that every hologram in 10D is part of the masterhologram in 12D, containing all of the information and all of the data, which is being accumulated in the spacetime settings of the lower dimensionalities. So whilst the data in 10D is scattered as information in space and in time; it is all together in a setting independent of location and the temporal histories of events. One might think of a gradual unfoldment of ‘hidden data’ in 10D, the process of that discovery constituting an action of evolvement on both sides of the 11D-mirror. But whilst the 10D-perception can appear disunified in many parts interacting within an encompassing unity; the 12D-perception is gaining in consciousness and selfawareness in a gradual selfrealisation of being the enveloping unity. Being spacetime independent, the 12D-unity nevertheless chooses to experience the manifestoes of space and time as the intrinsic being of itself – space and time so become the point of selfreferential identity for the 12D-F-space in being the holographic mapping of the 10D-C-space.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And that is the ‘Father’ of whom Jesus spoke, and whom heshe loved so much. Heshe is the ‘only begotten’ for the simple reason that heshe was born a heshe and not a he. And do not the Benedictine monks sometimes pray to ‘Our holy mother Jesus!’, indicating some deep mystery, they, and all of Christendom, have never completely understood?”


    Logan Antico:
    “Because the creation is cosmochromosomatically defined in the XX and the creator in YX; one of the female X-chromosomes must always be a disguised Y-chromosome – that is the malemindedness in all of the creation. It is also the reason for the perceived sexism in scriptures of all sorts. Woman are told not to speak in the churches and are not to fulfil the role of a male priest, as for example in:

    1Corinthians.14.33-36:
    “For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. What? Came the word of God out from you? Or came it unto you only?”

    You see, the correct interpretation makes perfect sense; whilst the incorrect translation causes resentment and discord between religious factions with no end in sight. It is the she-part of the ‘Holy name’ of (YaH)W(HeY)=(He-Soul)&(She-Soul), which ‘by law’ must be subject to the creator as the creation. The He-part creates and the She-part manifests as the created, but for the higher purpose to give birth to the creator as ‘her Baby and her creation’.

    That is beautifully described in the gnostic mythology, where ‘Barbelo’ as the ‘Wisdom of Sophia’ and the ‘First Thought’ decides to create, without her creator and lover in the ‘Perfect One’, who had thought her into being. Barbelo, when created, had been blessed with the fivefolded image of the Father as the Mother. So Sophia was androgynous with her lover in Thought, Foreknowledge, Imperishability, Eternal Life and Truth.

    When the ‘Perfect One’ had entered her within the tenfolded ‘Sephirotic Tree’ of the androgyny; Barbelo conceived a ‘Lovechild’ of pure Light and brought forth the ‘Christ’. The ‘Father’ or the ‘Perfect One’ blessed the ‘only begotten’ with ‘Mind’, after the ‘only begotten’ had asked for a companion for hisher ‘Loving Light’, which constituted its essence. And once the Father had given the ‘Mind’ the ‘Mind’ asked for the companionship of the ‘Will’ who in turn asked for the companionship of the ‘Word’ now manifest as the ‘Logos’ or the ‘Word of Christ’, which hitherto had been spoken in silence. The ‘Loving Light’ then mingled with the ‘Loving Mind’ and the ‘Loving Will’ and the ‘Loving Word’ to produce four starry realms or principalities as the domain for the ‘LoveChild’.

    The first Star is Armozel, the ‘Fire of Michael’ with Grace, Truth and Form expressing the mindfulness of the enlightened will by the word. The second Star is Oroiel, the ‘Earth of Uriel’ with Perception, Afterthought and Memory. The third Star is Daveithai, the ‘Air of Gabriel’ with Understanding, Love and Idea. The fourth Star is Eleleth, the ‘Water of Raphael’ with Perfection, Peace and Thoughtfulness. Having thus created the ‘Kingdom of Christ’ in principalities; the first revelation occurred; the first ‘Perfect Image of the One Father’ appeared as Pigeradamas, the ‘Perfect Human One’. Pigeradamas became the Image of the Father through the medium of the ‘Christ’; and the ‘Word’ of ‘Christ’ became ‘flesh’ in Pigeradamas, along with its companions of the ‘Will’ and the ‘Mind’.

    And Pigeradamas was appointed to share Michael’s principality of the Fire and Pigeradamas’ Son Seth became ruler with Uriel’s Earth and Pigeradamas’ Grandson Enos ruled with Gabriel’s Air. Raphael’s Water then became the domicile for the subsequent generations and who had by then forgotten to honour their ancestors because of their loss of the thoughtfulness.
    Now Barbelo, the Eternal Mother and lover of the ‘Perfect One Father’, had been created as Thought by the Forethought of the Father. And Sophia became the Afterthought, born from the Thought and thought to experience what a Forethought might be and so Sophia, as the Wisdom of the Earth and the material creation, used herhis androgynous power of the doubled fivefolded symmetry of the 'Tree of Life' to give birth to a being just like herhisself.
    But without herhis lover, the ‘Perfect One’, that what Barbelo brought forth was imperfect and not at all like herhisself, as shehe had it planned to be in herhis forethoughtfulness. The ‘illegitimate’ Baby was a serpent with the face of a lion and with eyes like flashing lightning. Barbelo called herhis Baby ‘Yaldabaoth Saklas Samael’.
    Barbelo became aware of herhis ignorance and tried to hide Yaldabaoth in a bright cloud and on a throne, so that noone in herhis realm of the ‘Perfect One’ would see, what shehe had done. But Yaldabaoth had inherited great power from his mother and he was a he, since the she-part from the Father was not given to him in his conception. And the light of the he-part given to Yaldabaoth by his mother made Yaldabaoth aware of the kingdom created by his older brothersister, the heshe of the ‘ChristChild’.

    But the missing she-part made him mindless and ignorant in regards to the Forethought of his GrandfatherMother, the ‘Perfect One’, who had given birth to his Mother through hisher Thought. And so Yaldabaoth could not understand the being of the Two-in-One and he declared throughout the kingdom, which he created as an image to the kingdom of the Christ:
    “I am God and there is no other God besides me!”

    And Yaldabaoth used the light of his Mother’s power to infiltrate the kingdom of the Christ to pose as the lord of that kingdom. He superimposed 12 of his own principalities upon the dominions of the four stars; seven he set over the seven heavens of: Athoth, Harmas, Kalila-Oumbri, Yabel, Adonaios-Sabaoth, Cain and Abel; and five he set over the five hells of: Abrisene, Yobel, Armoupiael, Melcheir-Adonein and Belias.
    The four stars he named as: Michael/Beelzebub; Uriel/Asmodeus; Gabriel/Belial; Raphael/Abaddon. Grace became the Goodness of Athoth with the face of a sheep; Perception became the Forethought of Eloaios with the face of a donkey; Understanding became the Divinity of Astaphaios with the face of an hyena; Perfection became the Lordship of Yao with the face of a snake with seven heads; Truth became the Kingdom of Sabaoth with the face of a dragon; Afterthought became the Jealousy of Adonin with the face of an ape and Love became the Understanding of Sabbataios with the face of a flaming fire.

    These are the seven heavens of Yaldabaoth superimposed upon the seven cycles of a week:
    Sunday as Athoth; Monday as Eloaios; Tuesday as Astaphaios; Wednesday as Yao; Thursday as Sabaoth; Friday as Adonin and Saturday as Sabbataios. But the Understanding of the Star Daveithai is the third heaven of Gemini and the Understanding of Sabbataios is mapped onto the seventh heaven of Love and of Libra for a ‘twinned balance in the scales of justice’.
    And so the five hells are mapped in the mirror of Love and Understanding to balance the Yaldabaothic definitions in:
    1st & 12th heaven of the graceful thought of Aries/Pisces for the 5th hell of the thoughtlessness; 2nd & 11th heaven of the perceptive idea of Taurus/Aquarius for the 4th hell of the mental dullness; 4th & 10th heaven of the perfected memory of Cancer/Capricorn for the 3rd hell of the forgetfulness; 5th & 9th heaven of the truthful form of Leo/Sagittarius for the 2nd hell of noncreativity and the 6th & 8th heaven of the peaceful afterthought of Virgo/Scorpio for the 1st hell of war and conflict.

    But when Yaldabaoth sensed the magnificence of the ‘Perfect Human’ Pigeradamas, created in the Father’s Image; he proclaimed:
    “I am a jealous God and there is no other God besides me!”

    This statement by herhis wayward son stirred Barbelo; because if there was no other God, why then would the only God be jealous, jealous of whom? Barbelo’s light had diminished, infused with the darkness of herhis noncooperation with the Father. The ‘Arrogant One’, did not accept any authority besides his mother; he was created thus in the absence of the ‘Perfect One’. So Sophia repented in the shadow of her ignorant creation and remembered herhis lover in the form of the himher of the heshe. Then the fullness of the Father visited herhim to restore what shehe was lacking, placing Barbelo into the ninth heaven of the ‘Perfect Form’, just above herhis Son Yaldabaoth, who ruled from the eight’ heaven of the first hell of war and conflict, overseeing his seven Yaldabaothic heavens as the usurping Lord of the creation.

    And so Sophia Barbelo found herhisself in the ‘Wilderness’ awaiting deliverance.
    Then was heard a voice from the 13th heaven, that is from the Father’s domain of the F-space of the Forethought:
    “Humanity exists and the Child of Humanity in the Son of Man!”

    As Yaldabaoth heard that voice, he thought it to come from his Mother, stationed above himself. The foundations of hell began to shake and quake as the image of the MotherFather in human form appeared in the mirror of the M-space, reflecting the light of the 11th heaven of Barbelo’s idea downwards into the lower heavenly dimensions and outwards into the 12th heaven of the thoughtfulness.

    Then Yaldabaoth, hungry for his Mother’s light and power and overawed in the spectacular display of his Mother’s might and authority called his rulers and said:
    “Come, let us create a human being after the image of God and with a likeness to ourselves, so that this human image may give us light.”

    And Yaldabaoth and his powers of hell used the image of the MotherFather in the 11D mirror to create the human being, which he had sensed before, but had never seen in manifestation. His Goodness created a ‘soul of bone’; his Forethought created a ‘soul of sinew’; his Divinity created a ‘soul of flesh’; his Lordship created a ‘soul of marrow’; his Kingdom created a ‘soul of blood’; his Jealousy created a ‘soul of skin’ and his Understanding created a ‘soul of eyelid’. Thereafter 365 angelic qualities mixed the seven heavens and the five hells to manifest Adam, the first human being and after the form of Pigeradamas, the AdamEve of the 13th heaven, but appearing as the image of Yaldabaoth’s Mother in the mirror.
    But after the Yaldabaothic creators had finished their work, Adam would not move. Barbelo’s idea was to regain herhis power lost through herhis ignorant deed to Yaldabaoth; so shehe asked for the Father’s assistance, who sent five stars, one each for every hell to Yaldabaoth for the purpose to advise them upon an action to bring Adam alive.

    The messengers said to Yaldabaoth:
    “Breathe some of your spirit into the face of Adam, and then the body will arise.”

    Yaldabaoth did so, not knowing that his spirit was the lost power of his Mother. The Mother’s power so transferred from Yaldabaoth into Adam, who moved and became powerful. And through the image of Pigeradamas; Adam was enlightened as the image of the FatherMother. At once the Yaldabaothic powers became very jealous; they had planned to use the human as a source of energy, reflecting the Mother’s power back to themselves. Adam could think more clearly in the power of the 12 heavens and the Kingdom of Christ; heshe was evidently more intelligent than hisher creators. Subsequently, the material creators of Adam banished himher into the first hell of war and conflict. The peaceful afterthought also resided in the hell of war and conflict however, and the afterthought was hidden as Eve in Adam, without the Yaldabaothic rulers being aware of that fact. And the Afterthought of Eve became the She-part of the MotherFather, which so in cooperation and support of the He-part, would be able to restore Barbelo into the 13th heaven of the Father.

    As Yaldabaoth realised, that some of his own power had transferred to Adam, he used the untrue form of the 2nd hell and the forgetfulness of the 3rd hell to reduce Adam’s intellectual understanding. Adam descended into mortality in the 2nd hell, the elemental energies intermixing the Kingdom of Christ in the Kingdom of Yaldabaoth and the true immortal form of Pigeradamas became corrupted.

    Fire, Earth, Air and Water became destructive as well as constructive and Adam became estranged in hisher forgetfulness, regarding hisher origins – this made Afterthought appear to Yaldabaoth. The Yaldabaothic rulers then placed Adam into the fourth hell of the mental dullness, also called Paradise or the Garden of Eden and used Adam’s now mortal form to create an image in the likeness of the afterthought which had appeared as the Mother’s She-part.

    The Mother’s He-part was in Paradise as the ‘Tree of Eternal Life’ and the Mother’s She-part became the ‘Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil’. So to keep Adam and Eve ignorant of their situation; an instruction had to be issued for Eve not to discover her ambassadoraship for Barbelo. The decree of Yaldabaoth therefore was for the dulled humans not to ‘eat’ of the fruit from the ‘Tree of Knowledge about Good and Evil’.But the FatherMother helped the MotherFather in herhis wilderness in sending two stars as messengers into the fourth hell of the mental dullness, which is also the Yaldabaothic 2nd heaven.
    The Star of the Perception of Taurus joined with the Star of the Idea of Aquarius to balance the dominion of Yaldabaoth’s 11th ruler in Melcheir-Adonein and Yaldabaoth’s 2nd ruler in Harmas and in Eloaios.
    The 3 hells above conjoined their images and the Lordship of Yao as the snake with seven heads, together with the Truth of Sabaoth as the dragon and the Jealousy of Adonin as the ape mingled to create the Serpentine Dragon with the apish face resembling a lion.

    Now the balance for this image is the Griffin with an Eagle’s Head and Wings and the body of a lion, as symbolised in the Sphinx. Putting the two mythological images together results in a Lion and a Cockatrice; the latter being a form of a Rooster with a Dragon’s tail or a serpent of the basilisk, of the ‘evil eye’, which causes death by the medusian glance and as the ‘soul of the eyelid’ in the creation of the ‘flaming fire’ of Yaldabaoth’s seventh ruler of the Understanding in Abel and Sabbataios. Now a symbol for the resurrection is the Phoenix-Cock, which is the ascended Eagle of Christ.
    And so the Serpent of Yaldabaoth is also the Lion of the Christ and in the form of the Serpent, which moves up and down in a winding motion and not sidewise, like a snake; so did the Mother’s He-part induce her She-part in Eve not to forget her commission as the MotherFather’s Daughter.

    Jeremiah.8.17 with Isaiah.11.8:
    “For, behold, I will send serpents, cockatrices among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the LORD”
    “And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice’ den.”

    And so Eve did, what Yaldabaoth didn’t want her to do and in her rediscovered wisdom about the knowledge and the remembrance about the ‘Good and the Evil’, she told Adam about it and both realised that they were ‘naked singularities’ with no other beings like them yet in existence. When Yaldabaoth realised, that the humans had rejected him and his laws; he threw them both into the fifth hell of the thoughtlessness, balanced however in the 1st and 12th heaven of Grace and Thoughtfulness. But the ‘Tree of Life’, the He-part of the Mother reflecting in the She-part of the Father; both of them became hidden and forgotten in the memories of Adam and Eve and their descendants.

    And since that time, the FatherMother would be thought of as a Father only and the MotherFather would be considered cursed and wicked and evil and unable to think for herself. Yaldabaoth then cursed the Earth, out of which he had created Adam and Eve and he cursed all the creatures which were similarly created in the blueprints of the cosmogenetic sexual chromosomes of XX and XY, being a derivative from the XXXX abstract prototype. In particular, he cursed the similitude of the serpent above all the cattle of the Ox of Taurus, as the Mother’s ‘sacred Bull’ from the 2nd heaven, in causing the manifestation of the material 'Snake' not to move forwards in a serpentlike fashion, but to slither along the dusty ground.
    So the divine commandment was for Eve to assume the role of the She-part for the MotherFather and to retrieve the MotherFather’s ‘lost spirit’ in the intersection of the 1st heaven of both Yaldabaoth in Athoth and Athoth as the ‘untrue shepherd’ for the ‘lost sheep’ with the Grace of the ‘true shepherd’ and the fifth hell of the thoughtlessness; but also infused with the highest of the heavens in the 12th of the thoughtfulness, bordering on the Forethought of the 13th domain of the FatherMother. In her role as the ‘vessel’ for the MotherFather’s Afterthought; Eve’s messianic mission was to bethe supportive agent for Adam’s commission to become the ambassador or steward for the Father.

    Because Barbelo’s lack of foresight was responsible for the creation of the disharmony; the divine command was for Eve to subjugate her independent thoughtfulness to that of Adam until Barbelo could reassume herhis rightful place next to the FatherMother. This then is the penetrating sexism in the discrimination of womanhood throughout the scriptures in cultures around the globe. Any woman, who would or could redefine herself as a WomanMan would automatically free Barbelo in herhis ambassadoraship.

    And any such WomanMan would be free to engage in any discourse whatsoever, provided shehe could and would acknowledge herhis divine relationship with the FatherMother of himher and as herhis ‘Perfect Image in One’. So any female priest or bishop, proclaiming herhis duty as the he-part of herhisself, would fulfil the divine decree and ordinances.
    Yaldabaoth, after having covered Adam and Eve in the darkness of the fifth hell; became aware of Eve’s devotion to her husband and her diligence to become an effective medium for Sophia’s afterthought, and he wanted to avoid the reproduction of this human couple at all costs. Yaldabaoth hence ‘raped’ Eve and she conceived two sons in Elohim-Cain and Yahweh-Abel, before Adam’s seed could multiply the divine image of the Father. Elohim-Cain has the face of a Bear and has dominion over the Earth and the Water; Yahweh-Abel has the face of a Cat and has dominion over the Fire and the Air. Elohim-Cain was a ‘tiller of the ground’ and Yahweh-Abel was a ‘keeper of sheep’.

    When Cain’s offering was rejected, but Abel’s offering was accepted; the Y-chromosome of Yaldabaoth divided against itself in the slaying of Abel by Cain. Cain became ‘cursed’ in the shadow of Elohim; whilst Abel assumed the ‘innocent’ and ‘holy’ role of Yahweh as the God of the Hebrews, known as Jehovah, the ‘God of Jealousy’.

    So one must carefully differentiate between the true ‘God of the Hebrews’ in YaHWHeY, which is the ‘God of Moses’ in Exodus.3.14 as Y=I and am=ah and That=W and am=he and I=Y and the untrue JeHoVaH.
    YAHWHEY=95=IAMTHATIAM; but JEHOVAH=69, which is 96=95+1 backwards, the One being the ‘only begotten’ of the Christ from the FatherMother=MotherFather and DRAGON=59 mirrors in 95. And in true ‘copycat’ fashion then JEHOVAH+1=70=YAHWEH – which is the ‘True God’ MINUS the Y-chromosome of Abel and the reason for the ‘ineffability’ of the name for the ‘God’ in 70.
    Having thus usurped the ‘Godhood for the Hebrews’; Yaldabaoth presumed victory and Adam sired his first true son in Seth and as had already been defined in the Kingdom of Christ in AdamEve’s ‘perfect image’ Pigeradamas. Cain’s ‘curse’ then was lifted in his 7th generation, sired in Lamech, imaging the heavenly order on earth in the seventh heaven of Love and Justice balanced in the Understanding of Sabbataios.

    And now we come to the birth of the major world religions. The archetype of the two Y-chromosomes of Yaldabaoth are renamed in the mythologies of all monotheistic systems and in the case of Mesopotamia, we find the ‘Oracle of Zarathustra’ and the origin for the Gnostic mythologies, as just indicated from a scroll known as ‘The Secret Book of John’.
    They are found in the Nag Hammadi Library as Codex II, tractate 1; Codex III, tractate 1 and in Codex IV, tractate 1; and in the Berlin Gnostic Codex 8502, tractate 2.

    The oldest ‘sacred texts’ of Hinduism are the four ‘Vedas’, dating to a time of the Aryan invasions of India in the second millennium BC and encompassing the Rig-Veda, the Sama-Veda, the Yajur-Veda and the Atharva-Veda. They are composed in vedic, an ancient form of sanskrit and involve themselves mainly with ritual incantations and ceremonial instructions, such as hymns, poetry and magical spells.
    Vedas consist of four-verse collections called ‘Mantras’ and prose commentaries called ‘Brahmanas’. Vedas are revered as ‘not of human origin’ by many worshippers; yet the actual contents of the revealed canon of that ‘what had been heard from the gods’, and in which ‘no syllable can be changed’ remains unknown as the ‘Shruti’ and a compendium of ‘what is remembered’ or ‘Smriti’ is applied in religious practice. The first attempts of ‘speculative thought’ are found in the ‘forest treatises’ or ‘Aranyakas’, containing the Upanishads; written by Brahman sages meditating in the comparative isolation of the forest. Vedanta and most other Indian philosophical systems developed from the Upanishads from about 600 BC and the birth of Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha in 563 BC.
    Two main epic stories in the ‘Smriti’ are the ‘Mahabharata’ and the ‘Ramayana’. The ‘Mahabharata’ tells of the story of a war between two Pandava brothers, led by two groups of cousins in Krishna and the Kauravas. The ‘Ramayana’ tells of Rama’s journey to recapture his wife Sita, after she is stolen by the demon Ravana.

    Both stories are continually edited by successive ‘wisdom keepers’, but originate at about 300BC. From the epics evolved the puranas, such as the Bhagavata-Purana, which are dedicated to the hierarchies of gods and goddesses, such as Shiva or Vishnu and Shakti, Devi, Durga or Kali. There is a Purana of the ‘Five Topics’, comprising the creation of the universe as a comic egg; its destruction and recreation in great cycles from Krita Yuga to Kali Yuga; the dynasties of the solar and lunar deities; the genealogy of the gods and the holy sages and the ages of the ‘Manus’, the founding fathers of humankind.
    The Hindu class system, based on ancient Indo-European society, is world reaffirming and seeks ‘good health, wealth, children and a good rebirth’; in the classes of the priest or Brahman; the warrior or Kshatriya; the general populus or Vaishya; the servants or Shudras and the untouchables in the Harijans. The Upanishadic principle of world renunciation led to the concept of Advaita or Nondualism. Interpretations discuss the nature of the relationship between ‘Brahman’ as the ‘Absolute Reality’ and the ‘Atman’ of the ‘Individual Self, breath or soul’. The ‘World-Soul’ or ‘Brahman’ is identical to the ‘Atman’, but an inbred ‘Avidya’ or ‘ignorance’ prevents the ‘Individual Self’ from understanding the nondual nature of the pure Brahmanic being. The ‘Brahman’ emanates ‘Maya’ or illusion to keep the majority of the individual selves unaware of the higher reality, perceiving themselves as separated from the oneness of the universe and from each other.
    The experience of ‘Samsara’ or continual existential personal dramas so unfolds in the unenlightened or unknowledgeable individual self. Through the proper knowledge of Vedanta, the individual self can self-realise itself and overcome the ‘Maya’ of the illusion of the phenomenal material world in its ‘Moksha’, the release from the ‘Karma’, and ‘Samsara’ and is then able to reach its ‘Nirvana’ in ending its ‘Avidya’ of the cycles of the rebirth and the reincarnation.

    The Bhagavad-Gita describes three paths to self-realisation and attempts to reconcile the two forms of Hinduism ; the ‘Way of the World’ and the ‘Way of the Upanishads’. To the Path of Karmic Good Works and the Path of Knowledge and ‘Jnana’ or the meditation on the godhead, is added the Path of Devotion or ‘Bhakti’. In this passionate devotion, all the polytheistic Vedic deities with attributes or ‘Saguna’ are subsumed in the godhead with no attributes or ‘Nirguna’ as the monism of the Vedanta.
    The Buddah’s teaching differs mainly in the refusal to accept the existence of an individual ‘soul’. The ‘Atman’ is replaced by the ‘Anatman’, the nonpermanence of the ‘soul’ being made up of five aggregates in the material body, the feeling body, the perceptive body, the karmic body and the consciousness of the body. The four noble truths of life are: Suffering; Ignorance about the true nature of reality, causing this suffering; Attachements to the illusionary appearance of reality and the Eightfold Path of Enlightenment, which leads to an end of the suffering in the attainment of Nirvana, thought of as a state of one’s consciousness incapable of description. The Eightfold Path is the cornerstone for the Buddhistic faith in its morality, wisdom and concentration or ‘Samadhi’ and engages the ideas of right views, action, speech, intention, effort, living, mindedness and contemplation; one’s righteous social behaviour or ‘Dharma’.
    The Buddha did not record any of his teachings in writing and after his death in about 483 BC; conflicts about the Buddhistic interpretations arose and by 383 BC the Buddha was worshipped as a transcendental omnipresence by the Mahasanghika- and later Mahayana sects. It considered the mortal Buddha to have been a mere image of the transcendental and ‘cosmic’ Buddha for the benefit of all mankind. This ‘christlike’ cosmic teacher then became the Buddha of the Mahayana as the ‘Body of the Transformation’.

    By the seventh century AD, Tantrism had developed as a blend with Hindu Tantrism and the idea of the holy sacredness of the sexual union as a divine sacrament and sacrifice within a mystic circle or ‘Mandala’ as the ‘Diamond Vehicle’ or Vajrayana. Vajrayana became the dominant Tibetean form of Buddhism. About the beginning of the Christian era, Buddhism arrived in Central Asia, and despite opposition by the Confucian orthodoxy and periodic persecutions, it blended with the Chinese way of life and having arrived from China in Korea in AD 372.
    Zen Buddhism, advocating the importance of meditation to gain intuitive self realisation was founded by the Indian monk Bodhidharma, which arrived in China in AD 520. The official date for Japan’s introduction to Buddhism is AD 552, it became the nation’s official state religion in AD 593.

    About 630 BC the persian prophet Zarathustra, also known as Zoroaster was born, preceding the Buddha in a few decades. As a young man, he began to receive revelations from the ‘Lord of Wisdom’, or Ahura Mazda. Zoroaster had many quarrels with the religious authorities of his day, many of whom did not accept his claims of directly conversing with the ‘godhead’. Zoroaster’s homeland of Airyana Vaejah in Eastern Persia was mountainous and he raised cattle there considered sacred animals in that region. He eventually found an influential ally in Vishtaspa, the king of Chorasmia in Eastern Iran and from 588 BC Zoroastrianism became an important monotheistic religion, whose basic tenets were to become the corner stones for Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
    The religious idea of a supreme god, who created not only the universe, but also a heaven and a hell, and who would call upon a ‘day of judgment’ to reward eternal happiness to the good and eternal damnation to the wicked is the basic tenet of all of those major world religions. Such a philosophy of ethical dualism, votive volition or free will and posthumous reward and punishment constituted a real break with old unsystematic polytheistic religious traditions, set up in rituals and magic incatations to placate and please the ‘gods’ and ‘demons’.

    The Rig-Veda reflects the ancestral religions of the Aryan people of Indo-European origin, who had invaded the North of India and the Middle East from the plains of Southern Russia, beginning towards the end of the third millennium BC. The Aryan system divides numerous Aryan gods into two distinct classes in the ‘Ahuras’, concerned with the order of the universe and moral concepts such as loyalty (Mithra) and true speech (Ahura); and the ‘Daevas’, involved with more mundane matters, such as the elements and the weather, often personifying the same.
    Zoroaster redefined the ‘Ahuras’ and the ‘Daevas’ in a context of a conflict between ‘Good and Evil’. He subsumed all that was ‘Good’ in Ahura Mazda and his ‘Holy Spirit’ of Spenta Mainyu, who became the all encompassing ‘messenger’ for Ahura Mazda. The ‘Lord of Wisdom’ had a ‘Twin-Brother’ in Angra Mainyu who became the ‘Lord of the Lie’. Ahura Mazda ruled the light by his ‘fire’ and Angra Mainyu ruled the darkness by the fire’s absence. Ahura Mazda and Spenta Mainyu have six assistants in the ‘Bounteous Immortals’ or the ‘Amesha Spentas’.

    Zoroaster’s cosmology is recorded in the ‘Avesta’, comprised of the ‘Gathas’ , which are psalms, describing the revelations of Ahura Mazda to Zoroaster; and the ‘Seven Chapters’, a liturgy composed in a dialect called Avestan, written after Zoroaster’s death about 550 BC and inclusive of editorial commentary. Some parts of the Avestan dialect have not yet been academically deciphered and little is known about Zoroaster’s autobiography; the earliest major scholarly contribution being made by the French orientalist Abraham Hyacinthe Anquetil-Dupperon, who translated the sanskrit-similar Avestan in the 18th century. Tradition holds that the Avesta was inscribed in golden ink on 12,000 oxides and deposited in the royal library near Persepolis in Egypt, where it was destroyed in the burning of the Achaemenid capital city in 330 BC by Alexander the Great.

    The Ahura of the ‘Seven Chapters’ have wives in the ‘Ahuranis’, mirroring the ‘Varunanis’ as the wives of Varuna, the custodian of ‘Rta’ or Truth in the Rig-Veda. The Gathas and the ‘Seven Chapters’ form the Yasna and a later addition is the Vendidad, composed after the Greek conquest of Persia by Alexander the Great in the 4th century BC. The Venidad is similar to the Old Testament Book of Leviticus; reflecting customs and rituals attributed by the Greek historian Herodotus to the Magi; a priestly caste of Median origin and including the exposure of corpses, protection of dogs and the wanton slaughter of crawling animals and incest.
    As members of a hereditary priesthood; (as are the Levites in Judaism); the Magi’s eventual administration of Zoroastrianism led to the erosion of the prophet’s monotheistic visions. After the Persian Empire under Cyrus the Great had annexed the New Babylonian or Chaldean Empire in 539 BC, coinciding with the release of the Israelite captives in Cyrus’ decree; Darius I fully embraced the tenets of Zoroaster and made it the official state religion under the Achaemenid kings – and a Hebrew advisor at the court of Darius the Great was the prophet Daniel.
    By about 441 BC, Antaxerxes I, the successor of Darius’ son Xerxes, reorganised the Persian calendar, renaming the months of the year in labels for the older gods and names which had become purged previously in the tenets of Zoroaster. Zoroastrianism became a hybrid religion under the Achaemenid kings Darius II, Artaxerxes II, Artaxerxes III and Darius III until the conquest of Persia by Alexander the Great in 330 BC.

    The most prominent, and more worldly oriented god, and slowly displacing Ahura Mazda was the god Mithra, symbolised in the ritual slaying of a bull, representing the old ‘Age of Taurus’ being renewed in the new ‘Age of Fire’ and symbolised by Aries the Ram. The Magi were adept astrologers and using esoteric symbolism and ritual; they just like the Israelites in the wilderness of Sinai before them, replaced the mental devotion to an abstract deity by physical and customery ‘blood sacrifices’ to appease more tangible deities in the form of the elemental energies.
    After the Jews became exposed to the concept of Angra Mainyu in their Babylonian Captivity from 587 BC to 539 BC; Satan, who before had acted as an agent for god in a role of the ‘prosecuting adversary’, (as in the Book of Job), suddenly became a ‘Shaitan’ - and a powerful figure, opposed to God.
    The ‘Dead Sea Scroll 4Q392’ correlates Genesis.1.7 with a preZoroastrian impulse, which might be said to have formed the inspiration for Zoroaster’s direct or gnostic revelation from Ahura Mazda. This notion of a ‘Double Creation’ is without parallel in 2nd temple Judaism, but matches the Zoroastrian idea that all things in the material realm possess a ‘shadow’-counterpart in the archetypical world – a sacred reality known as ‘Menog’; which is the ‘Supersymmetry’ of modern physics.

    According to Martin G. Abegg Jr; a translator of scroll 4Q392; the author of the scroll states, that God created light and darkness for himself, not just as a background for subsequent creation events. Light and darkness are simultaneously present with God, a paradox incomprehensible for the human mind; but for mankind’s benefit is that differentiation made, resulting in a doubling of all that is.

    4Q392: “[...] and dominions [...][...] a man [...] God and not to turn aside from [...] and in His covenant your soul shall cling and [...] words of His mouth [...] and God [...] heaven above and to search out the ways of the sons of man, they have no hiding place. He created darkness and light for Himself, but in His dwelling place is the light of their light and all darkness rests before Him as well. He has no need to distinguish between light and darkness, but for the sons of man He distinguishes them as the light of day, with the sun, and night, with the moon and stars. He has a light which cannot be searched out, nor can its end be known. For all the works of God are doubled in this manner. We are flesh, which does not totally grasp these things. With us for [...] for a sign and wonders without number. [...] winds and lightning [...] servants of the holy of holies. They are as couches before him [...].” - translated by Martin G. Abegg, Jr.

    Genesis.1.7:
    "And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.”

    Isaiah.44.7:
    "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.”

    And so do we find the convergence of the ancient origins of the world religions in the concepts of the archetype of the Oneness, doubling itself to create a scenario of duality, allowing the idea of opposites to manifest themselves. The Aryan invaders brought with themselves the Rig-Veda, from which the Hindu religion and Buddhism developed in the attempt to rediscover the nondualistic nature of that oneness, we now term the supersymmetry of the 11-dimensional supermembranes in the UfoQR.

    Zarathustra then began the initialisation of the ‘gnostic movement’; the idea of a direct and personal conversation with the ‘godhead’ as the archetypical memory of the Genesis within oneself. So when one feels such a devotion or ‘bhakti’ for getting to know one’s cosmogenetic inheritances, then the Path of Gnosis or ‘Insight’ opens up in the consciousness tuning into the archetypical data bank, the memory of being somehow on the other side of the firmamental divide, which is the 11th dimension in omniphysics and is the 12th heaven and the 5th hell in the gnostic mythologies.
    The Hebrews enriched their Mosaic philosophy during their stay in the Babylonian captivity in the teachings of Zoroaster and from that derived the movements of the Essenes and the Naassenes as evidenced in the ‘Dead Sea’ scrolls and the Egyptian preChristian documents of Nag Hammadi.

    As is the case in a political-militaristic society; the practicality of religious observance dominates the majority of the population, undereducated and not interested in abstract philosophical discourse. So the Hebrew splinter groups or sects attempted to preserve their ‘gnostic insights’ as personally experienced and validated revelations from the one true god and chose relative selfexile instead of conformity with an orthodoxy of the liason of the Mosaic-Levitical laws and the political agendas. The politico-religious authorities assuaged the impact of the gnostic teachings for the purpose to provide the general populace with an ordered state of affairs in their daily lives and routines. Not being of an inclination to think deeply for themselves, the majority of people did not understand that kind of state- or religion induced form of ‘mindcontrol’.

    Into that environment of powersharing between the occupying political authorities with a controlling Pharisaic- and Sadducaic priesthood, was born a renewed ‘gnostic impulse’; first about 196 BC in the ‘Teacher of Righteousness’ and then in the birth of Jesus-Yeshua near the March equinox, March 24th, 6 BC (Julian). After the Jews had become independent of the Greek-Syrian or Seleucid rule in 165 BC in the Maccabean revolt, they became governed by the priestly family of the Hasmoneans or Maccabees.
    From 152 to 63 BC, Judea was independent under that rule, until the Roman general Pompey invaded Jerusalem to begin the Roman occupation in 63 BC. The Hasmonean rule was characterised in two politico-religious factions. The Sadducees supported the Hasmoneans in an orthodox interpretation of the Mosaic law as the conservative faction; and were opposed by the Pharisees, which allowed an ‘oral’ tradition of the ‘father’ to be used to interpret that Mosaic law in a more liberal fashion.
    During the reign of Alexander Jannaeus, the ‘Lion of Wrath’ from 103-76 BC, the Pharisees were accused of conspiring to overthrow Alexander in a plot with the Seleucid king Demetrius III in 88 BC. The revolt failed and a civil war between the factions of the Sadducees and the Pharisees ensued, Alexander Jannaeus taking the side of the ‘conservatives’ against the ‘liberal’ Pharisees as the predecessors for the rabbinic lineages of the future.
    This brings us to the Essenes, the ‘Sect of the Righteous Ones’ and the disinherited ‘Zadokian priests of David’. From the Damascus scroll:


    4Q268.Frag.1: “For when they were unfaithful and forsook Him, He hid His face from Israel and His Sanctuary and delivered them up to the sword. But remembering the covenant of the forefathers, He left a remnant to Israel and did not deliver it up to be destroyed. And in the age of wrath, 390 years after He had given them into the hand of King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, He visited them, and He caused a plant root to spring from Israel and Aaron to inherit His Land and to prosper on the good things of His earth. And they perceived their iniquity and recognized that they were guilty men, yet for 20 years they were like blind men groping for the way.” -Translation by Geza Vermes.

    The datings involve the prophecies of Ezekiel and Daniel in Ezekiel.3.15;4.3-8 & Daniel.9.24-27 and the duration of the sojourn of the ‘Children of Israel’ in the Egyptian bondage, before deliverance by Moses in 1239 BC, coded in Exodus.12.40 and Noah’s Times, coded in Genesis.7.10-12,24; 8.3-14.

    The (in)famous and extra controversial 70-week prophecy, encoded in Daniel.9.24-27 has engaged the academician, the theologian, the rabbi and the historian and the evangelist and scriptural researcher throughout the existence and analysis of those scrolls and written records of antiquity. The 70 weeks are partitioned into a first 'jubilee' of seven weeks, followed by 62 weeks after which a 'messianic prince' is 'cut off' and a last and final week of two halfweeks. Many such commentators apply the 'ancient circle year' of 360 days or 'degrees' per a 'Great Year of Plato' of 12 months of 30 days each and as the 'Key of Ezekiel' and as encoded in numerous scriptures, such as Ezekiel.4.3-8; Daniel.12.7,11-12 and Revelation.11.2-3,11;12.6,14;13.5.
    Isaac Newton attempted to use the timeline encoded in Daniel, to determine the end of the 69 weeks of 'sevens' as the time of the death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, identifying the latter as the messianic prince of the prophecy. For this purpose Isaac Newton used the historical records about the 'Kings of Persia' from the 'Fall of Babylon' to Cyrus the Great in 539 BC to the 'Fall of Persia' to Alexander the Great in 330 BC and incorporatinmg the 'decrees' of the intermediate Persian kings as named in scripture:
    Cyrus (550-530BC); Cambyses (530-522BC); Darius I (522-486BC); Xerxes (486-465BC); Artaxerxes (465-424BC); Darius II (423-404BC); Artaxerxes II (404-358BC); Artaxerxes III (358-338BC); Darius III (336-330BC).

    The 7th year of Artaxerxes in 'Ezra's Decree' so becomes stipulated to be 459-458 BC and the 20th year of Artaxerxes in 'Nehemiah's Decree' becomes assigned to be 446-445 BC. As 32 years of Artaxerxes are encoded in Nehemiah.13.6; this 32nd year for Artaxerxes I would be 434-433 BC and for Artaxerxes II it would be 373-372 BC and for a general 'offset' of 61 years between the two decrees of Artaxerxes.
    Isaac Newton used the 483 'civil years' from 459-458 BC to define the 'cut-off' of the messiah-prince as the 'baptism by John' 483 years after the 'Decree of Ezra' in the Julian year -(458-457)+483=25-26 AD and to which he added the 7 years of the last week of the 70 'sevens' to arrive at the period 32-33 AD for the completion of the prophecy with a halfway point of 29-30 AD say for the death and resurrection of the messiah-prince.

    Many commentators dispute this on the grounds that the 'prophetic year' of 360 days should be used, and not a 'civil year' (either 'Julian' of 365.25 days or 'Gregorian' of 365.2425 days).
    5/360=1/72 and 5/365=1/73 so give the pentagonal division for a circle and also a precessional approximation for the 26,000 'Great Platonic Years' as 9,360,000 days (25,626.3 years Julian). Subsequently, every 72 years in the 'prophetic count' represent 71 years in the 'civil count' approximately.
    As the numbers of the day count in the day-for-a-year principle for the 70 week prophecy is 490x360=176,400 days; the 7-year period crystallizes naturally from the 'calendrical discrepancies' and in 176,400/365.25=482.96~483 'civil years', compared to the 'prophetic year'.
    Using the 'Decree of Nehemaiah' of 446-445 BC, then assigns -(445-444BC)+483=38-39 AD and a period which selfadjusts to 31-32 AD by application of the 'seven years of tribulations' as the 'last week'. The 483 'prophetic years' so translate into 476 'civil years'.
    As the Qumran scroll 4Q268 stipulates the 'Fall of Jerusalem' to Nebuchadnezzar at 587-586 BC followed by the 'jubilee' of the 49 years in the 'Edict of Cyrus' 538-537 BC; the partitioning of the 70-week prophecy into 7+62+1=70 crystallizes a intricate multi levelled superpositioning for this timeline. The difference between the three decrees from 538-537 BC to 459-458 BC to 446-445 BC describes the 'jubilee' of 49 years to which are added 79+13=92 years with an offset of say 1.2 years in the calendrical reckonings.
    The 'Edict of Cyrus' so represents a 'forerunner' or precursor of the 'tenth part' of the 490 years in the 49 years from the Babylonian Captivity to the fall of Babylon under Cyrus the Great and remain independent of the subsequent 70 week prophecy beginning at the decrees of Ezra and of Nehemiah.

    Now 390+93=483 and so the Qumran scroll defines the Edict of Nehemiah describing the nexus year for a 390 year period to become adjoined to this year of the return of the 'Children of Israel' into Judea. Because 390 'prophetic years' of 140,400 days are about 384.4 'civil years', the 483 'prophetic years' (or 476.3 civil years) from the 'Fall of Babylon' and the Edict of Cyrus stipulate the year (539-538BC)-(476.3)=63-62 BC and the 'Invasion of the Prince of Rome' in the 'General Pompey as the historical 'fulfilment' of the older 70 weeks and where Cyrus the Great archetyped the messianic-prince, say as wayshower for the latter one in Jesus of Nazareth.
    The 390 dayyears of 4Q268 also represents Ezekiel's 'Siege against Israel' and in adjoinment to the 40 dayyears of his 'Siege against Judah' become the 430 dayyears of the 'Captivity of Israel in Egypt' (Exodus.12.40). Those 430 dayyears than add a halfweek for the 62 sevens for 62x7=434=430+4 dayyears and with 434 'prophetic years' being 428 'civil years'.
    The historical timeline of the 70 weeks prophecy is intertwined with the other 'number codes' and previsits an actual 490-day period in a warping of the period from December 8th, 24/2004 to April 1st, 32/2012 and midpointed in the 'Mirror of Daniel' of August 4th, 28/2008 2300+370=1335=1335=2670 'prophetic daycount envelope'.
    August 4th, 28 AD so defines the historicity of the baptism of Jesus of Nazareth and a date, which is mapped or projected onto the warptime of the 'times of the end' in a 2670 day or 7.31 'civil year' period, which does not use the day-for-a-year key of Ezekiel. The period from December 8th, 24 AD to August 4th, 28 AD so spans 1335 days as a foerwatds movement in historical time, which then becomes mirrored or reflected in the backwards movement from August 4th, 28 AD to the first anniversary of the 'Resurrection' - Easter Sunday, April 1st, 31 AD.
    Isaac Newton's datings so closely approximate this scenario in counting 483 'civil years' from the 'Decree of Ezra' from 459-458 BC to 25-26 AD for a 'Beginning of the warpzone' at December 8th, 24 AD. Likewise, the supporters for the 'Decree of Nehemiah' and the 476.3 'civil year' adjustment, arrive at a date of -(445-444)+476=31-32 AD for the 'End of the warpzone' at April 1st, 32 AD. Both decrees so simply utilize the naturally present 490 prophetic years being 483 civil years adjustment from different perspectives. The 'cutting off' of the messiah-prince so becomes a 'fine tuning' or finestructure of the actual day count where a week is seven days onto the day-for-a-year key of Ezekiel.

    The 2300 dayyears of Daniel with the 370 dayyears of Noah then define 2670 dayyears for the historical timeline warped onto the 7.31 'civil year' period encompassed by all of the 'timed prophecies'. 2670 'prophetic years' are rendered as 2633 'civil years' in a 'shortening of time' by 37 years; with the 2300 dayyears calculating as approximately 2268 years Julian. These 37 years define the timeline of Jesus of Nazareth from his birth in March 6 BC to his ending the warpzone from 24-32 AD and so in say two equinoxes of spring in the Northern hemisphere.
    This becomes further indicated by the precessional transit of the sun across the galactic equator.

    As the sun's angular diameter is about 0.53 degrees, 'ancient astronomers', like the Maya calculated the ending of their longcount in the last cycle of the winter-summer solstices as a function of the Mayan Precessional 'Great Platonic Year' of 25,626.81 kin (or civil Gregorian days).

    A precessional degree then becomes 9,360,000/360=26,000=71.1856.x365.2425 days and so in the Mayan kin count, 71.1856 civil years specify a 1-degree precession and the galactic synchronisation at the winter solstice will be 71.1856x0.53=37.728 civil years for the solar transit across the galactic centre.

    The 2633 'civil years' then specify a general period for the 'grand metamorphosis' of the 'old world' into a 'new world' or the 'passing away of the old heaven and earth' for a new dispensation and according to the 'Words of the World- or Cosmic Logos'.
    The 'Last Righteous' King of Israel is scripturally encoded as Josiah, who is killed in the battle of Harmageddon or Megiddo in 609 BC by the Egyptian pharaoh Necho, according to the archived sources. Then beginning the greater historical year count from Julian year -608 and gives -608+2268=1660 and -608+2633=2025 respectively. The historical period from 1660 to 2025 so spans 365 years for the 365 days for a year principle and also a general cycle of closing the alpha in the omega or the head of the beginnings becoming the tail of the ends or vive versa.

    Last 'Righteous' King: 609-608 BC-------1=Battle of the archetypical Armageddon in Megiddo Josiah-Pharaohnecho
    Siege of Nebuchadnezzar: 597-596 BC------12(+11)
    Babylonian Captivity: 587-586 BC------22(+10)
    Edict of Cyrus: 538-537 BC------71(+49)=69-70 years of Jeremiah from Josiah/Megiddo to Edict of Cyrus
    Edict of Ezra: 459-458 BC-----150(+79)=150 prophetic days of Noah's Flood/Scorpions
    Edict of Nehemiah: 446-445 BC-----163(+13)=70 years of Babylon + 93 years of the Return to rebuild the temple
    390 years of 4Q268: 203-200-197 BC-----[]=390-384 years from Babylonian captivity in Selecuid occupation
    20 years of 4Q268: 181-178-175 BC---=20-22 years of 'confusions' to Antiochus Epiphanes IV = 428 years from Megiddo as 62 'sevens'
    Half-Seven: 175-174-173-172 BC--[]=Rule of the 'Wicked Priest' Jesus-Jason in the Dead Sea Scrolls=435 years from Josiah as end of 63 'sevens'
    Last Zadokite Highpriest: 172-169-166 BC-----[]=7 Year tribulation in Maccabean revolt against Hellenisation after Jason
    Essenes: 165 BC------[]=Maccabean revolt for Hasmonean rule with Sadducee-Pharisee factions
    Qumran 4Q268: 63-62 BC-----546(+383)=Roman occupation under Pompey after Maccabean rule from 165 BC
    Warping Mirror I: 24-28-32 AD
    Agency of Jesus: 31-32 AD------476 years from the Edict of Nehemiah
    Destruction of the Templ 70 AD-------37-38 years from the agency of the messiah-prince as the time adjustment
    Birth of a New Language: 1660 AD------Birth of the Science of Gaia, symbolised by Isaac Newton
    Warping Mirror II: 2004-2008-2012
    Rebirth of the New World: 2025 AD------Birth of the OmniScience of Gaia

    2020a.

    Ezra 1.1-3:
    1Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying,
    2Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The LORD God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.
    3Who is there among you of all his people? his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and build the house of the LORD God of Israel, (he is the God,) which is in Jerusalem.

    Ezra 7.1-8:
    1Now after these things, in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia, Ezra the son of Seraiah, the son of Azariah, the son of Hilkiah,
    2The son of Shallum, the son of Zadok, the son of Ahitub,
    3The son of Amariah, the son of Azariah, the son of Meraioth,
    4The son of Zerahiah, the son of Uzzi, the son of Bukki,
    5The son of Abishua, the son of Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the chief priest:
    6This Ezra went up from Babylon; and he was a ready scribe in the law of Moses, which the LORD God of Israel had given: and the king granted him all his request, according to the hand of the LORD his God upon him.
    7And there went up some of the children of Israel, and of the priests, and the Levites, and the singers, and the porters, and the Nethinims, unto Jerusalem, in the seventh year of Artaxerxes the king.
    8And he came to Jerusalem in the fifth month, which was in the seventh year of the king.

    Nehemiah 2.1-7:
    1And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king, that wine was before him: and I took up the wine, and gave it unto the king. Now I had not been beforetime sad in his presence.
    2Wherefore the king said unto me, Why is thy countenance sad, seeing thou art not sick? this is nothing else but sorrow of heart. Then I was very sore afraid,
    3And said unto the king, Let the king live for ever: why should not my countenance be sad, when the city, the place of my fathers' sepulchres, lieth waste, and the gates thereof are consumed with fire?
    4Then the king said unto me, For what dost thou make request? So I prayed to the God of heaven.
    5And I said unto the king, If it please the king, and if thy servant have found favour in thy sight, that thou wouldest send me unto Judah, unto the city of my fathers' sepulchres, that I may build it.
    6And the king said unto me, (the queen also sitting by him,) For how long shall thy journey be? and when wilt thou return? So it pleased the king to send me; and I set him a time.
    7Moreover I said unto the king, If it please the king, let letters be given me to the governors beyond the river, that they may convey me over till I come into Judah;


    Nehemiah 13.1-7:
    1On that day they read in the book of Moses in the audience of the people; and therein was found written, that the Ammonite and the Moabite should not come into the congregation of God for ever;
    2Because they met not the children of Israel with bread and with water, but hired Balaam against them, that he should curse them: howbeit our God turned the curse into a blessing.
    3Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.
    4And before this, Eliashib the priest, having the oversight of the chamber of the house of our God, was allied unto Tobiah:
    5And he had prepared for him a great chamber, where aforetime they laid the meat offerings, the frankincense, and the vessels, and the tithes of the corn, the new wine, and the oil, which was commanded to be given to the Levites, and the singers, and the porters; and the offerings of the priests.
    6But in all this time was not I at Jerusalem: for in the two and thirtieth year of Artaxerxes king of Babylon
    came I unto the king, and after certain days obtained I leave of the king:
    7And I came to Jerusalem, and understood of the evil that Eliashib did for Tobiah, in preparing him a chamber in the courts of the house of God.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Ezra

    The numbers involved are:
    490=434+49+3+1+3=390+40+7+20+33=430+20+40=370+40+40+20+20.
    When did ‘God’s people’ become unfaithful in the context of the Babylonian captivity? In 609 BC, Josiah, the last ‘righteous’ King of Israel was killed in the ‘Battle of Megiddo or Armageddon’ by Pharaohnechoh, King of Egypt, coded in 2Kings.22.2;23.25, 29-32. 70 years of the Babylonian captivity so add the ‘forsaken period’ of 609-608 BC to 587-586 BC, when King Nebuchadnezzar took Jerusalem, to the Edict of Cyrus in 538 BC, coded in 2Chronicles.36.1-23.
    Now 390 dayyears from 587-586 BC lead to the year 197-196 BC, from which the 22 years from 608 BC to 586 BC are subtracted for the yearweek of confusion (Ezekiel.3.15 & Daniel.9.27) from 174-167 BC.
    At the beginning of this 7-year period, that is in 174 BC, the ‘Teacher of Righteousness’, who was born in the year 196 BC, was ‘cut off’, coded in Daniel.9.26. The 20-year period from 196 BC to 176 BC ‘saw’ the ‘Teacher of Righteousness’ resisting the Hellenisation of Judea, instigated by the Seleucid empire established by Alexander the Great.
    Judea became a province of the Seleucid Empire ruled by Antiochus-Epiphanes IV from 175 BC to 163 BC.
    Antiochus-Epiphanes IV deposed the last Zadokite-Davidic Highpriest Onias III in 175 BC and replaced him with his hellenophile Zadokite-Davidic brother Jesus, the latter renaming himself in the Greek style as Jason.

    In 172 BC, Jason was deposed as the last true Zadokite-Davidic Highpriest by lineage; his office transferring to Menelaus from 172 BC to 162 BC.
    In 171 BC, Onias III was murdered at the instigation of Menelaus and as coded in Daniel.9.27.
    In 169 BC, Antiochus IV and Menelaus plundered the temple at Jerusalem.
    In 168 BC, Antiochus IV was defeated by the Romans in his 2nd campaign against Egypt.
    In 167 BC, Jews who opposed the unification of the Seleucid empire and accept Greek custom and religion are persecuted.
    Jewish religion was officially abolished under threat of death and the temple of Jerusalem became a shrine for the chiefgod of the Greek Olympians in Zeus.
    In 166 BC, the Maccabees rose in revolt under the leadership of Judas Maccabee to end the 7-year period of the confusion and so (in symbol and as partial historical manifesto) fulfilling Daniel’s prophecy in Daniel.9.24-27.
    So the ‘’Teacher of Righteousness’, as described in the ‘Dead Sea’ scrolls is the archetype or the gnostic impulse for the eternal priesthood of Melchisedec, and as manifested in the Zadokian-Davidic Priesthood, beginning with Abraham to David’s Highpriest Zadok and the lineage to Yeshua-Jesus.
    Its personification and inspiration for the empowerment of the Essenic movement was Onias III, who was ‘born’ into the role of the ‘Teacher of Righteousness’ in the year 198-196 BC, coinciding with Judea becoming a Seleucidean province.
    The ‘Wicked Priest’ was his brother Jesus-Jason, who abandoned his Zadokian-Davidic heritage for a perceived hellinisation of the covenant.
    The ‘Man of the Lie’ was Onias IV, the son of the assassinated Onias III, who emigrated to Egypt to build a ‘substitute’ temple in Leontopolis under the patronage of the Egyptian King Ptolemy Philometor (182 – 146 BC). His inauguration of Israelite worship outside of Zion is in direct breach of biblical law, only permitting a single sanctuary at Jerusalem and as coded in the Dead Sea Scrolls in 4Q266.Frag.5ii.
    The ‘House of Absalom’ is the ‘House of David’, his son Absalom rebelling against him, just as Onias IV dishonoured his father Onias III, and as coded in 1QpHab.v.9-12 and 2Samuel.13.
    Jason died in Egyptian exile:

    “Because you have plundered many nations, all the remnants of the peoples shall plunder you.....fleeing from city to city, pursued of all men, hated as a forsaker of the laws, and being had in abomination as an open enemy of his country and countrymen, he was cast out into Egypt. Thus he that had driven many out of their country perished in a strange land, retiring to the Lacedemonians, and thinking there to find succour by reason of his kindred. And he that had cast out many unburied had none to mourn for him, nor any solemn funerals at all nor sepulchre with his fathers;” and as coded in: Isaiah.14; 1QpHab.viii-ix; 2Maccabees.5.8-10.

    The remnant of the people refers to a symbolic tenth of all the Children of Israel, as coded in the Book of Revelation and incorporates the descendents of the ‘Lost Samarian Tribes of Israel’, centred about the lineages of Joseph’s Egyptian descendants in Manasseh of the present USA and in Ephraim as a ‘Company of Nations’, defined in the British Empire, as the successors of the political Kittim or Rome becoming the ‘Holy Roman Empire’, say from AD 962 to the present time.

    On a deeper level, the remnant is the quantisation of the tenth principle as the first, an old identity transforming into a new identity, as in 1+0=0+1=01=’10’ , transforming into 01bin=1dec, 10bin=2dec. There are seven principles, reflected in the seven heavens, which have an antiidentity in the seven antiheavens, upon whom the five hells are mapped.
    The seven principalities are: 1.Identity-Antiidentity; 2.Expansion-Contraction; 3.Order-Chaos; 4.Symmetry-Nonparity; 5.Infinity-Limitation; 6.Inversion-Constancy and 7.Reflection-Absorption.
    The eighth principle is Relativity and the ninth principle is Quantisation, both having no antiprinciple. The tenth principle is a New DoubleIdentity, transforming the Anti-state of the first principle under utility of the other eight principles. The eighth principle is coded as:
    “And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition,” in Revelation.17.11; the ‘ten horns of the beast’ symbolising the ten principles there also, say in Revelation.17.12-14.

    The 8th head of the beast simly becomes the 'closing of the weel' in a sabbath-mirror-day.

    Logbirth.




    There are more number codes in the prophetic sections of the biblical scrolls, interwoven in the dates given in Noah, Ezekiel, Daniel and the Book of Revelation. The key is to superpose the greater historical cycle upon its quantisation in the individual transformation or ‘redemptive selfdeliverance’ in unison with the ‘gnostic insight’ as exemplified by Abraham Melchisedec and his Davidic-messianic lineages. Zoroaster was a ‘gnosis-commissioned’ Zadokian priest, as was the Buddha and as was the prophet Mohammed. The Buddha’s gnosis was the realisation that the real duality was also a real nonduality, emanating from himself; he selfrealised to a profound degree, but could not transcend the material nonduality because in a sense he denied its existence – the ‘Maya’ is as real as the illusion of the absolute reality and vice versa. Because he was close, his followers elevated him into his true status of ‘The Christ’ after his bodily demise. Zoroaster’s gnosis became the forerunner for the complete truth or ‘Asha’, in revealing, that the duality is the appearance of the nonduality as a doubled creation, but for the higher purpose to bring two estranged parties together again.

    GOD and DOG or Husband and Wife or the two Y-chromosomes of a ‘wayward brotherhood’, all become eventually archetyped in the Yang and the Yin or the Ahura Mazda-Angra Mainyu duality, being the Head and Tail of the same coin in actual factuality. It would be the gnostic commission of Jesus-Yeshua to manifest the complete gnosis in the actual transformation of hisher material form into the transcended supersymmetry of the RadiationMass. The omniscientific process of blending matter with light, became coded in concepts of ‘The Transfiguration’ and ‘The Resurrection’. Heshe was able to do this, because heshe was a heshe and not a mortal he or she.

    This then brings us back to the heavenly wedding and the numerical encodements in the scrolls. The historic supercycle must be completed, before it can be used as archetype for individual transformations. In other words, the archetypes of the dragonomy must be defined and set in place, before the individual metamorphoses of the ‘human caterpillars’ into the ‘starhuman butterflies’ can proceed.
    A generalised and historical context for the actual 'prophetically decoded' 2300+370=1335+1335=2670 'Mirror of Daniel' warpzone can be described in the 'conventional' asignment of the 2300 days of Daniel.8.14 as 2300 'civil' years.

    We extract the numbers 2300 and 1335 and 1290 and 1260 from the prophecies, say from the encodings given in Daniel.8.14; 12.7,11,13 and Revelation.11.2-3; 12.6,14; 13.5,18. The 2300 dayyears begin when the ‘sanctuary of the temple’ is beginning to be ‘cleansed’. Historically, this indicates the time when the Temple, conquered by Alexander the Great in 330 BC was ‘taken’ from ‘Greek’ control. Ptolemy-Soter I ‘The Preserver’, was appointed ruler of Egypt and Libya after the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC and in 305 he became King of Egypt, founding the Library of Alexandria in his assumed capital by 301 BC, when he occupied Palestine and Cyrenaica.

    We now map 2300 years onto a midpoint of a 7-year cycle centred on 301 BC and reflect the Alpha in the Omega in a midpoint of (1150+1) years, as there is no calendrical year 0. Then the period {304-298 BC} is mirrored in the period {AD 1997-2003}, the mirror being the interval of the period {AD 847-853}. We project the intervals for A=1335, B=1290 and C=1260 years onto the endpoints for a timeline:
    A={304-298 BC}; B={259-253 BC}; C={229-223 BC}; M=N={AD 847-853}; C’=X={AD 1952-1958};
    B’=Y={AD 1922-1928} and A’=Z={AD 1997-2003}.

    So we know that the ‘Endtimes’ are archetyped in the period from 304 BC until AD 2003. This means that the implementation of the ‘masterplan’ can proceed from the year AD 2004 in the individual settings and histories, using the archetypical blueprint as a master template.

    Next we superimpose the previous 490 dayyear period in its partitions to finetune a overall setting.
    Set D=490, E=434, F=430, G=390, H=370, I=49, J=40, K=33, L=20 and M=N=7=3+1+3.
    The result is the extended timeline: ABCDEFGHIJKL(M=3as1as3=N)OPQRSTUVWXYZ!
    The year 608 BC is offset in the year 304 BC to reset a true mean for the year 0=304-(608-304).

    We can so define the ‘Rebirth of the Teacher of Righteousness’ at the ‘cut off’ point in 174 BC at the end of the 434 year period intersecting the beginning of the 7-year cycle of ‘Ezekiel’s confusion’.
    This 7-year cycle then defines the calendrical period from {7 BC-AD 0+1}={6 BC-AD 1}, with a midpoint at 3 BC for M=N={6 BC-AD 1}.
    We have N{6 BC-1AD}; O{AD 15-21}; P{AD 28-34}; Q{AD 35-41}; R{AD 44-50}; S{AD 365-371}; T{AD 385-391}; U{AD 425-431}; V{AD 429-435} and W{AD 485-491}, as the Christian mapping, beginning with the birth of Jesus-Yeshua in AD 1; mapped in the preChristian timeline of M{6 BC- AD 1}; L{26-20 BC}; K{39-33 BC}; J{46-40 BC}; I{55-49 BC}; H{376-370 BC}; G{396-390 BC}; F{436- 430 BC; E{440-436 BC} and D{496-490 BC} for a birthday for Yeshua-Jesus in 6 BC.

    One other date mapped is the Babylonian captivity of 70 years for the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in the Christian period of the Jewish-Roman war by Titus as the interval RS{AD 65-71}, mirrored in the destruction of the Essenian ‘Shadow temple’ in the period IH{76-70 BC}. Queen Salome Alexandra, which succeeded her husband Alexander Jannaeus from 76-67 BC, had switched politico-religious allegiances and had sided with the Pharisees in 76 BC, so empowering the latters religious war against the Essenes. The Pharisees, who had been archenemies of her late husband, were made advisors and were charged with influential roles in public office. Her eldest son Hyrcanus II was highpriest during Salome’s reign and her younger son Aristobulus II held that office from 67 BC until Pompey invaded Jerusalem in 63 BC as the ‘gentile Kittim’ of the Roman army. Hyrcanus II was in liason with the Pharisees and Aristobulus II was favoured by the Sadducees.
    This 140 year interval is also symbolised in the general derivation for the prophetic fulfilments. ‘Noah’s Time’ gives the archetypical numerology, which is mapped into Ezekiel, which is mapped via the Egypyian bondage into the numerology of Daniel.

    The nestings are:
    1. 490 = 430 + 40 + 20 = 434 + 49 + 7 ,(Daniel.9.24-27).
    2. 430+ 7 = 390 + 40 + 7 = 390 + (33+7) + 7 ,(Exo.12.40; Eze.3.15,4.3-8).
    3. 390+20= 370 + 20 + 20 = 370 + (33+7) ,(4Q268.Frag.1; Eze.4.5).
    4. 370+ 7 = 7+40+110+74+40+7+7+36+56 ,(Gen.7.10-12;8.3-14).
    = 7+(40+110)+(40+74+36)+7+7+49+7 = 7+150+150+(49+7+7+7) ,1Month=30 Days.
    = 7+140+140+20+70 = 300 + 70 + 7 ,1Year=360 Days.

    The K-median of 36 BC mirrors the P-median of AD 31; signifying the end of the Hasmonean dynasty in Antigonus, being replaced by Herod the Great as the first Judaized Idumaean of Rome. The political power of the King of Israel was thus ‘crucified’ and became reflected in the physical crucifixion of Jesus-Yeshua in AD 31.

    Finally, we return to our 2300 supercyclic era from 301 BC to AD 2000 with midpoint AD 850. Subtracting the ‘Great Cycle of Daniel’ of 1335 years, gives us the years AD 665 and AD 1035 as mirror images in AD 850, their difference being the 370 years of ‘Noah’s Time’, that is from the entering of the ark until the Rainbow Covenant.
    2300 years minus twice 1335 years gives -370 years, which we add to our Alpha-Node of 301 BC for a date of AD 69+1 and so the destruction of Jerusalem revisited as ‘Noah’s Time’ heralding a new covenant, involving the political usurpers of the Romans and their political descendants.
    We create a new midpoint for the interval AD 70 to AD 2000 in AD 1035 and let history map itself in the two covenant-wars from (AD 67-73) and (AD 1997-2003). Since AD 1035 is however bounded by two ‘Noahic Times’ each of 370 years; we also map the dates (AD 662-668) imaged in (AD 1402-1408). Furthermore the interval ( AD 665 to AD 2000) is the ‘Great Cycle of Daniel’ with midpoint AD 1332.5 and we again adjoin that midpoint by two ‘Noahic Times’ with medians AD 962.5 and AD 1702.5.
    Historical indicators from AD 70 to AD 2000 then divide the 2300 year prophecy in multiple intersecting periods and reiterative reflections, based however on the midpoint mirrors as given.

    The first 12 plus 1 timezones are:

    1.{AD 67-73}: Destruction of Jerusalem and ‘Old Faith Temple’ under TITUS; Rome persecutes Christians under NERO, GALBA, OTHO, VITELLIUS and VESPASIAN,(457);
    2.{AD 364.5-370.5}: Rapid decline of political Rome; begin of ‘Middle Ages’ in European Christendom; feudalistic states and Roman tenant-farming becomes serfdom;
    3.{AD 662-668}: ‘New Faith’ bonds the people in the ‘Middle Ages’; Rome has fallen politically, but rises in the politics of the Roman church; spread of Islam as ‘other new faith’;
    4.{AD 734.5-740.5}: Western economic development restricted by Moslem control of Mediterranean trade and Arabian culture infiltrates the ‘Middle Ages’ advancing science and art;
    5.{AD 959.5-965.5}: Otto I from Germany, officially inaugurates the ‘Holy Roman Empire’, in his crowning as the ‘Emperor of the West’ and then institutes ‘Pope’s oath’ of fidelity to the emperor before consecration, so politisising the papacy;
    6.{AD 1032-1038}: Canute the Great of Denmark rules England; traders form guilds; spread of Christianity to Scandinavia; Romanesque period in art and architecture;
    7.{AD 1104.5-1110.5}: Development of money economy in trade revival; Kingdom of Jerusalem established after the 1st crusade against the Turks; founding of military orders of Knights Templar and the Knights Hospitaller, accountable only to the pope;
    8.{AD 1257-1263}: Chartres Cathedral consecrated; Marco Polo plans to explore the East; founding of collegiate system at Merton-Oxford; Roger Bacon writes Opus Maius;
    9.{AD 1329.5-1335.5}: Use of firearms in small cannons; Dante’s Divina Commedia completed; trial and abolishment of Knights Templar; Bubonic Plague and papal authority diffused into general councils; threshold of 100-year war between England&France;
    10.{AD 1402-1408}: Social and economic conflicts in towns; Bank of Medici in Florence; extended trade into maritime routes; Chinese Ming Dynasty sends fleet to India, Persia and Africa to extend politics and trade; Brunelleschi and Donatello in Rome; start of Renaissance, leading to Michelangelo, Raphael and Leonardo da Vinci;
    11.{AD 1627-1633}: English Pilgrims settle at Plymouth Bay; Colonisation of the ‘New Worlds’ by the ‘Old Worlds’ takes shape; William Harvey publishes his treatise on circulation of the blood; Galileo publishes ‘Dialogue on the Two Chief Systems of the World’ and is forced by the Inquisition to recant his heretical ideas; French Academy is founded by Richelieu; Rene Descartes’ ‘Discourse on Method’ inaugurates the scientific age; France at the threshold of war with the Habsburgs;
    12.{AD 1699.5-1705.5}: Bach and Handel in Music; Newton in science and Locke in literature advance the age of reason; first dictionary published by French Acadamy; Voltaire and Christopher Wren’s St. Paul’s cathedral nearing completion; Grand alliance unites England, Holland and Austria against policies of Louis XIV of France;
    13.{AD 1997-2003}: Destruction of the ‘New Faith Temple’ by ‘Holy (Anti)Romans’ under ROI AVU and VILLAIN STATES; ‘Holy(Anti)Rome’ persecutes (Anti)Christians under PATHOS UNITES GLOBE, (457). The 1st and 13th period are connected in the code (457), which can be decoded in many ways. One decoding states: ROI=AKING=42=WAR=NEW; AVU=44=ABRAHAM; VILLAIN=79=MOTHER; STATES=84=POLITIC; PATHOS=79=FATHEROF=SWORD=WORDS; UNITES=88=ABRAHAMABRAHAM; GLOBE=41=KING=USA; furthermore COMPASSION=ILOVEYOU=124; 124+333=457. 457+457-124-124=666=TITUSNEROOTHOVITELLIUSGALBAVESPASIANILOVEYOU +ROIAVUVILLAINSTATESPATHOSUNITESGLOBE-COMPASSION=1+2+3+...+34+35+36=666=600+60+6=6(111)=3(222)=2(333)=1(666), with RRR=54=LOVE=SUN=5+4=9=I=1+8=2+7=27=AGOD=EGO=3+6=36=4+5=USE=6+3=63=PLANT=7+2=72=WORLD=MONEY=8+1=81=VENUS=6+6+6
    =18=E.M=M.E.=R in the perfect number 6 as Emmanuel Melchisedec and as Mary Elisabeth, coded in Revelation.13.18; Luke.1.5-31; Matthew.1.23-25 and Isaiah.7.14. Anagram (457) also includes: IAMTHATIAM-1=95-1=94=TERROR=RRR+T.O.E=LOVEMIND=ISLAMMIND=GABRIELMIND=SUNMIND=SANANDAMIND=EXCALIBUR-1=SCORPIO-1=NEPTUNE-1.
    The T.O.E, amongst other things like ‘Theory Of Everything’, also stands for ‘Tower Of Excalibur’, implying that 666+Tower Of Excalibur+1=Name of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, the prophets and Jesus-Yeshua. Adding the One of the Unity harmonises the Terror into the ‘Burning Bush’ of Moses.
    We recall GODDOG=52=DEVIL=LIVED=EARTH=HEART=MARS+1=MICHAEL+1=PRIDE=FINANCE=ALTAR, doubling itself in: 52+52=EARTH+HEART=JERUSALEM=EXPERIENCE=EXISTENCE.

    So we have timeexpressed ourselves through history to arrive at the present era, right at the end of the historic fulfilment of the prophecies, as written down by the scribes and prophets for the last three millennia and beginning with the Indo-European invasions, giving rise to the Vedas and henceforth the major world religions in Hinduism, Buddhism and Zoroastrianism as the ancestor or modifier for Judaism and thence Christianity and Islam; the latter as the youngest, dating to the ‘gnostic revelations’ given to the prophet Mohammed by the ‘archangel Gabriel’ from so AD 610.

    It is said, that Mohammed, under Gabriel’s guidance, met Abraham, Moses and Jesus and was taken to the lowest heaven and the gate to hell, guarded by the angels Ismail and Malik. Malik, the hell’s gatekeeper, allowed Mohammed to peek into hell, where Mohammed met Adam, the first man and prophet of the ‘One true God’. Adam then showed Mohammed the various punishments, which would await the sinful earthlings, all of whom were his children. Eventually Mohammed was shown the seventh heaven and the entrance into paradise. Confirmed in his mission; Mohammed established the first islamic community at Medina in AD 622 and from which time the Muslim calendar is dated. Mohammed then attempted to unite his fellow Arabs and the emigrant Jews under an umbrella of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose laws made no distinction between civil and religious authority. But only after Mohammed raided commercial caravans, and a particular one from Yemen on the ‘sacred soil’ of Mecca; did he gain notorious attention. Mohammed finally established his powerbase in appropriating some of the wealth of the emigrant Jews, who were proficient tradespeople and merchants. He then forced the Arabs aligned with the Jews to convert to Islam under threat of death. On March 21st, AD 625 a Meccan army attacked Mohammed under Abu-Sufyan from the Umayyad clan, but the battle ended indecisively. Many members of the Muslim Brotherhood began to doubt Mohammed’s blessings by Allah.

    In AD 627 Abu-Sufyan laid siege against Medina, Mohammed’s city, which he fortified in a trench around the city. The overwhelming force of Abu-Sufyan could not cross the trenches and their catapults proved ineffective against Medina’s thickwalled forts. Mohammed had made provisions for a siege, but the forces of the attacker ran out of food and when a great rainstorm further demoralised the besiegers, leading to their retreat; Mohammed’s followers perceived his victory as a sign from God and the people rallied to his message. In March AD 628 Mohammed strategically visited Mecca as a pilgrim to the Ka’bah with 1,600 followers and a herd of sacrificial animals and did not attempt to enter the city by force, as he could have done.
    So did Mohammed win the hearts of many Arabs and additionally he married the widowed daughter of Abu-Sufyan, who had become deposed, following his ignoble defeat by Mohammed. Further marriages to political opponent’s female relatives cemented Mohammed’s stature as a great unifier under the Muslim faith. By AD 630, Mohammed had established Islamic law in Mecca under his government, abolishing all pagan worship of idols, with Allah becoming the sole occupier of the Ka’bah shrine. On June 8th, AD 632, Mohammed died suddenly at an age of 62 years; and the first caliph Abu-Bakr began to spread Islam around the world.

    So what are we to make of Mohammed’s ‘gnosis’? Mohammed used military strategy and human cunning to establish his mission as he perceived it to have been given it to him by the archangel Gabriel. The process of gaining a foothold for his insights had been violent and ruthless, not at all like the insights of Jesus-Yeshua or that of the Buddha, both of whom accentuated nonviolence. But Mohammed’s self-revelation was a true gnosis; containing the same elements as given by the ‘Teachers of Righteousness’ throughout the inductive processes, historically active since the beginning of the starhuman race in Abraham.

    The fall of the orthodox Christian Byzantine Empire (New Eastern Rome, centred on Constantinople) in the seventh century to the Arabs in the Muslim conquests following the assassination of Maurice (reigning from 582-602) and the Byzantine-Sasanian war of 602-628 coincided with the establishment of what is called Islam in the historical records.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests

    The Old Roman Empire (Old Western Rome) had deteriorated and lost its political influence by 530 and the Arab conquerers of the Byzantine Empire realized the attempt and success of its Roman predecessor to unify their jurisdictions by a religious philosophy or clerical rule for political purposes.
    So the 'times and life' of Muhammad ( 570-610- 632) can be associated with the political establishment of the Arab jurisprudence over their conquered territories, beginning in the historical records with the Rashidun Caliphs (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali - {Sunni lineage 632-661 with Shia lineage beginning with Ali 656-661}), followed by the Umayyad dynasties as successors after the supposed death of Muhammad in 632.
    The Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan (646-685-705) is said to have collected the Qur'an under editorial access by Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, the then governor, general and administrator of Iraq.
    The actual historical manifestation of the Qur'an and the appearance of Muhammad in the records does not appear until the caliphate of Abd al-Malik and even the canonical Islamic records show no distribution of the Qur'an until the the appearance of that caliph, said to have 'collected' and edited the Qur'an during his time of Arab-Islamic rulership.
    The name Muhammad and the present unfoldment of the Islamic ideology so begins to enter recorded history in this caliphate, the label of the Qur'an then becoming more prevalent in other non-Islamic Jewish and Christian accounts and records from the eighth century onwards.
    A case so can be made, that the prophet Muhammad of the Qur'an and the construction and dissemination of the Qur'an is rather closely associated with the Umayyad caliphate of Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan.

    The prophet Muhammad could also be a label for a title or office for an exemplary personage, military leader or administrator to render the character and conduct of this model to become enshrined as 'holy law' and as infallible behavior, which should be copied and repeated as idealization. Additionally, 'Muhammad' as a title could become identified as the Muslim name for an equivalent signum such as 'Krystos' or 'Kristos' or Christ from an earlier tradition and as found within the remnants of the conquered territories, say the religion of an exiled Byzantine gnostic sect.
    The construction of 'Muhammad the servant and apostle or prophet of Allah' in the 8th Century in the Umayyad dynasty then could be an adaptation of Muhammad/Jesus, the Prophet of Allah as the Arabic translation for 'Jesus, the Prophet of Jehovah/Abba' from the earlier Christian tradition and without any then existing agenda for this conquest to become a self reenforcing validation of the political agenda as a veiled context of infallible and so coercive divinely inspired and transmitted lexicon of instructions named the 'Holy Qur'an'.
    The success of the Arab invasion in a military sense, so formed a valueable platform for the caliphates to establish political order and jurisdiction in the 'New Arabia' in the establishment of an overarching 'new religion', which could replace the older priesthoods as remnants found in the conquered lands.


    Dammahum1000.
    timewarp.
    2056.

    It is the necessary synthesis of the religious ideas and symbolisms in the face of a global and interdependent community; which allows all the ‘gnostic-insight’ streams to blend with each other under the auspices of modern science. And so the answer is found in the common denominator for all the religions and that is its Indo-European heritage; which is found in Abraham and his priesthood of Melchisedec.

    King Melchizedek of Salem, as coded in Genesis.14.18-20; is none other than the ‘King of Peace’ and the ‘Teacher of Righteousness’ in its archetypical form. So whilst the Aaronic-Levitical priesthood propagates in a lineage of blood in Jacob’s third son Levi; the Melchisedecian priesthood is eternal from the ‘Logos’ as incarnated in Jesus-Yeshua. This is adequately described in the ‘gnostic’ Pauline Letter to the Hebrews in the New Testament, coded in particular in Hebrews.2.5-16; 5.1-14.

    Abraham was ‘born’ in 2244 BC as the idealised Abramic archetype for every human man and Sarah was born in 2234 BC as Sarai as the nonhistorical archetype for every human woman. In essence Abram is the first Adam, since the first Adam is allegorical to Pigeradamas as the abstract image of the starhumanity. So Abram and Sarai are Adam and Eve as mortal human beings as nonhistoric characterisations.
    In renaming the humanity as starhumanity; Abraham ascends on his death to be Pigeradamas in its He-aspect and likewise Sarah’s ‘assumption’ allows her to be the She-aspect for the starhuman archetypical image. The archetype becomes potent upon the ascension of Jesus-Yeshua, who returns into the womb of first Sarah and then hisher Mother Mary following her death. But Joseph is similarly ‘assumed’ in a blending within ‘Abraham’s Bosom’, coded in Luke.16.22-31. The ‘immaculate conception’ of Jesus, as recorded in the biblical encoding of Luke.1.26-56 illustrates this in Mary’s ‘salutation’ by the archangel Gabriel causing Elisabeth’s baby of ‘John the Baptist’ to ‘leap for joy’ in her womb and accompanied in a ‘filling with the ‘Holy Ghost’’, as in Luke.1.15.

    Now Elisabeth, wife of Zacharias, was of the lineage of Aaron, the Levitical priesthood, and was also Mary’s cousin, so placing her into the Levitical descent as well, coded in Luke.1.36. Both, Zacharias and Joseph are from a Solomonic-Davidian lineage of the House of Judah, via Abia, coded in Luke.1.5; Matthew.1.1,7,16, so blending the House of Judah of the ‘Scepter, and political rulership’ with that of the ‘priesthood’ in the House of Levi, coded in Genesis.49.8-12; Exodus.40.12-15. Elisabeth gave birth to John the Baptist after Mary had returned to Joseph after a 3-month stay in the House of Zacharias on September 13th, 7 BC, using a gestation period of 266 days from his conception on December 21st, 8 BC. Conception and Birth between Jesus and John the Baptist are so 6 months apart, placing Jesus’ conception via the agency of Gabriel at June 27th 7 BC and his birth onto March 20th, 6 BC and using 'seasonal dates' of the equinoxes and the solstices.

    On that latter day, a conjunction between the planet Saturn and the Moon occurred, repeating itself on April 17th; this event became commemorated in memorabilia, such as a Syrian coin, depicting the Saturnian astrological rulership over Judea in the Age of Aries. This was well known to the astrologers in the region, which as the ‘Magi’ or the wise men from the East, perceived a transition from the Great Age of Aries into the Great Age of Pisces in the precessional Great Year of 9,509,786 days of 26,037 modern Calendrical years. Because of the inclusion of a 13th starsign in Ophiuchus, ‘The Serpenttamer’ in between Scorpio and Sagittarius; the actual length of a zodiacal precessional period is reduced to 2002.8 years, precisely placing the entry of the precessional timings into the Age of Aquarius onto January 20th, AD 1998 and finetuned into the annual transition of the Sun from Capricorn into Aquarius; imaging the Birth of Jesus in the solar transit from Pisces into Aries at the spring/autumn-equinox.

    This timekeeping is further supplemented in the Danielian prophecy of the Great Cycle of 2300 years, again ending in the 7-year period from 1997 to 2003. The ‘virgin birth’ of Jesus is superposed onto the ‘induced virgin birth’ of John the Baptist. The ‘filling with the Holy Ghost’ is the induction of the human mind with the starhuman mind, also termed the ‘Coming of Melchisedec’, as the archetype for the transcendent knowledge or gnosis. The induction of Elisabeth resulted in a transfer of ‘true gnosis’ via the Zachariasian Y-chromosome. That is why Zacharias changed the name of his son from Zacharias to John, coded in Luke.1.59-64.

    But there was no impregnating Josephian YX-chromosome in Mary, but there was her mother’s XX”. Mary’s father was a Levite and so with a chromosome YX’, baseperfectally matched to a XX”, defining the StarDaughter. So for Mary to be basegenetically matched to Joseph, she must be defined in the X’X” of Sarah.
    We recall the basegenetic couplings for the patriarchs, with Jacob’s YX’ and Leah’s XX’, Rachel’s XX”, Bilhah’s X”X” and Zilpah’s X’X’. This explicitely defines Jacob’s named 13 children in the order of their births and Jacob’s blessings.
    1.Reuben/Aries=YX; 2.Simeon/Taurus=YX’; 3.Levi/Gemini=YX’; 4.Judah/Leo=YX; 5.Dan/Cancer=YX” and 6.Naphtali/Libra=YX”; 7.Gad/Virgo=YX’; 8.Asher/Scorpio=YX’; 9.Issachar/Sagittarius=YX; 10.Zebulon/Capricorn=YX’; 11.Dinah/Ophiuchus=XX’; 12.Joseph/Aquarius=YX and Benjamin/Pisces=YX”.

    In term of the four wives, the firstborns are: Reuben, Dan, Gad and Joseph for the Abrahamic YX and the secondborns are: Simeon, Naphtali, Asher and Benjamin for the Isaacian YX” however. Hence, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Dan, Gad, Asher, Issachar and Zebulon all become subject to genetic mutation; involving the ‘birthright breaches’, coded in Genesis.25.23-34; 27.1-40; 38.26-30;48.8-20 as the ‘birthright-exchanges’ between Esau & Jacob, Pharez & Zarah and Manasseh & Ephraim and ‘Reuben’s mandrakes’, as encoded in Genesis.30.14-20. Reuben loses his ‘birthright’ to Judah in ‘sleeping’ with Bilhah, according to Genesis.35.22. This then elevates Judah’s YX as that of a firstborn of Leah and also establishes Dan’s YX” to the status of a firstborn of Bilhah, in the process exchanging the ordering of Leo and Cancer, further symbolised in the Pharez-Zarah breach. ‘Reuben’s mandrakes’, as ‘fertility drug’ for Rachel, then gives Issachar the status of YX as the third of Leah’s ‘firstborns’ and rendering Zebulon a secondborn in exchange for Rachel’s ability to conceive.

    Hence all of Jacob’s children are either firstborns or secondborns, with the exception of Levi, who as the only thirdborn assumes a lineage of the priesthood, consecrated by Moses in Genesis.40.12-15. Zilpah’s firstborn is Gad/Virgo, who exchanges the order with Bilhah’s secondborn Naphtali/Libra to raise the YX’ chromosome to the status of Leah’s secondborns, rendering all the secondborns as firstborns in the redefined status of Gad as the sixth in the unbreached lineage.

    Now Dinah must be XX’, because the gomorrahic X’X’ chromosome is suppressed as indicated and as scripturally encoded in Dinah’s ‘defilement’ by Shechem, coded in Genesis.34.1-31. The grafting of Dinah’s Daughterhood eliminates the gomorrahic nature of Zilpah’s X’X’ in conjunction with Bilhah’s sodomic X”X” in their blending of X’X’+X”X”=X’X”+X”X’ - a doubling of Sarah. Jacob’s definition as the StarSon YX’ with the StarDaughter Rachel (whom he loved, Genesis.29.30) in XX”, so implements the tripartite basegenetic perfect matching in the offspring of Joseph and Benjamin as the YX-firstborn of Joseph in the blessings of ‘rulership and sceptre’ after Abraham and the YX” of Benjamin as the secondborn after Isaac.

    Having completed the lineage of the covenant, Rachel ‘dies’ in a renaming of Benoni as Benjamin, coded in Genesis.35.17-19. Mary’s chromosomes derive from the baseperfect genetic coupling: YX’+XX”=YX+X’X” or YX”+XX’ from the House of Levi, Mary being a X’X” in the footsteps of Sarah to couple Joseph by Abraham. Joseph (or any other such sire, like a Roman soldier Panthera) impregnating Mary would hence result in the sonships of YX’ in Jacob-Israel of the StarSon, (manifesting in James, brother of Jesus), or the YX” of Isaac as the firstborn; the Ychromosome setting the fourth son of Jacob by Leah in its ‘Leonine’ characteristics of Judah, say.

    For Jesus to superpose ‘his’ Judahic lineage and the Davidic-Solomonic descent, ‘he’ must somehow redefine the Abrahamic bloodline in the regeneration of the YX-XY chromosomatic definition of Adam Kadmon or the archetypical starhuman blueprint of Pigeradamas. So we examine the birth of Mary as the combining of her father’s YX’ and her mother’s XX”.

    Mary was born X’X”, ‘losing’ her perfect twinmatch of YX in the genetic library of her mother’s placenta. All, but one of the spermatozoa of her father’s sperm, half of which carried her father’s Y-Levi-chromosome, ‘got lost’ in the process of the insemination of her mother’s ovum. The same fate befell all but one of the spermatozoa, defined in the StarDaughter’s XX” definition. Mary’s conception by the’ Holy Ghost’ hence becomes the superimposition of the 12-dimensional Pigeradamian YX-XY-chromosomatic definition onto her X”X+X’Y-coupling at her own conception.

    All four of the baseperfect genetic elements become expressed in the parthenogenesis of the X”-chromosome into the Y-chromosome of Jesus, who is so born with two sets of sexual chromosomes in a supergenetic mutation of the hesheness of the dragonomy of Pigeradamas manifested. This selfsame natural bisexuality was induced in the womb of Elisabeth, carrying the same lineage in blood, but manifesting in the YX” chromosome of the firstborn in the Judahic descent of John the Baptist; who alone could recognise the kinship with his brothersister and as coded in Matthew.3.9-17.

    So Jesus is defined in a sexchromosomatic coupling: ([YX’]Levi+XX”)=({[YX]Levi+X’X”}+{[YX”]Levi+XX’})=({[YX]Judah+X’X”}+{Zacharias+Elisabeth})=({Joseph+Mary}+{Zacharias+Elisabeth}).
    { [YX]+X’(X” = Y) }+{( YX” ) Lev i + XX’ }, then define { Jesus }+{ [YX”] Lev i =John the Baptist with baseperfect partner XX’}.
    So why is the ‘least in the kingdom of God’ more ‘worthy’ than John the Baptist as the greatest of the womanborn prophets? - because John the Baptist is not unified as a heshe as Jesus is by definition, coded in Luke.7.28; John.1.6-36; 3.23-36.

    And Jesus’ statement: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, before Abraham was, I am”, can be evaluated within hisher own inbred gnostic insight as the archetypical KingQueen of Melchizedek.
    For Joseph so ‘not to know his wife until she had brought forth her son Jesus’, according to Matthew.1.25; so simply indicates the prerequisite necessity for the ‘Holy Ghost Induction’ before Mary could engage in sexual intercourse. This sets Joseph as the quasi-biological father of Jesus-Yeshua with his actual biological father often said to have been a young Roman soldier Panthera, who 'inducted' the teenaged temple servant Mary towards her impending 'arranged' marriage to the much older Joseph. And then Joseph's Leonine lineage blended with Mary's Levite-Aaronic lineage; renders Jesus as a true and ‘first and only begotten’ ‘Son of God’ - however simultaneously becoming the ‘Son of Man’ through hisher nature as the manifestation of the Pigeradamian archetype of the natural bisexuality of the Melchisedecian priesthood in AdamEve.

    So the implications for the actual incarnation of the mindset, the ‘awareness’ of the Christ-Consciousness preceding the manifestation of spacetime are truly tremendous in scope and in potential. The first scriptural encoding for this ‘Supermind’ is the blessing of Abram by KingQueen Melchizedek after the ‘Battle of the Kings’, described in Genesis.14.1-20. Four kings under the leadership of King Chedorlaomer of Elam were at war with five kings under the leadership of King Bera of Sodom. For twelve years King Chedorlaomer held sway, but in the thirteenth year King Bera rebelled. In the fourteenth year, King Chedorlaomer took possession of six ‘lands’ in the Rephaims, the Zuzzims, the Emims, the Horites, the Amalekites and the Amorites. Then King Bera of Sodom and his alliance of King Birsha of Gomorrah, King Shinab of Admah, King Shemeber of Zeboiim and King Zoar of Bela fought and lost to the other four kings in the vale of Siddim, where also the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fell.

    Now Abram’s brother Haran’s son Lot, who dwelt in Sodom, was taken captive, and upon hearing of it from Mamre the Amorite, where Abram dwelt, Abram and his confederates in Mamre with his brothers Eshcol and Aner went to war with King Chedorlaomer and slew him and his three accomplices in King Amraphael of Shinar, King Arioch of Elam and Tidal, the King of Nations. Then the ‘fallen’ King of Sodom came to Abram with King Melchizedek of Salem-Shalom-Peace and Abram received the blessing of the ‘priest of the most high God’.

    What does this symbolise in the encoded allegories? The thirteen years and the 9 kings are the first 9 principles, with Abram the tenth, (the ‘tithes of all’), allied with 3 brothers for a total of 13 heavens or starsigns, infused with the five hells. Abram as the tenth principality transforms the ‘old identity’ into a ‘new identity’ for the ‘Shalom of the Principalities’, seven of which have an antiidentity, reduced by one after Abram’s success. Then the six antiprinciples are symbolised in the takeover of six ‘lands’ or ‘principalities’ causing the ‘Battle of the Kings’.
    The three brothers depict the numerological roots of 13=4, 12=3, 11=2 with Abram’s 10=1, omniscientifically setting the omnispace of 12D-Father-Space as the image of 10DChild/SonDaughter-Space in the mirror of 11D-Mother-Space; the 4D-Linespace however assuming a special encompassing role as the quantised 13D-Omnispace for the doubling of the entire creation per se in the holograms of quantised protouniverses within a family of multiverses. The doubling of the he’s and she’s into heshes and shehes becomes a precondition in the footsteps of Jesus-Yeshua however.

    And this finally brings us to the House of Azurguya as the basegenetic inheritance of all aspirants for the selfsame dragonomy, as instituted in the physical existence of Jesus-Yeshua as KingQueen Emmanuel Melchisedec. Hisher dragonomy or ‘heavenly wedding’ represents the archetype for the birth of universal children; each child blending hisherness with a basegenetic perfect herhisness.

    The Indo-European prototype is found in the gnostic insight of Zarathustra, preceding that of the post-Mosaic Hebrews, the Christians and the Muslims in the labellings of the Oneness, appearing as a duality in AHURA MAZDA and ANGRA MAINYU. One dragonomises AHURA MAZDA with MAINYU ANGRA and one ‘marries’ ANGRA MAINYU to MAZDA AHURA for a combined number-letter total of: (49+45)+(41+83)=(94)+(124)=(218).

    In one of many superpositions then: TERROR+COMPASSION=GABRIEL+MIND+I LOVE YOU!
    Let us then crystallise the personification of ALPHA=38=BRIDE, OMEGA=KING=41, QUEEN=62 and 50=CIRCLE=PAUL=ARACHNE with WORD=60 out of code (218) in a playful manner.

    KING+QUEEN=41+62=103=ALPHA+24+OMEGA=38+24+41=FATHER OF 24(Elders, Rev.4.4).
    AHRIMAN=64=ISRAEL=ZION=PETER=DUST and ADAMAN=34 and WORD=60. AHRIMAN+30=AHURA MAZDA, with 30=EAGLE=BABY=PEACE=DAY=BIBLE.
    ADAMAN+90=ANGRA MAINYU, with 90=WORD+30 for the synthesis of GOOD=41 and EVIL=48.
    AHURA MAZDA+30=ANGRA MAINYU=AHRIMAN+60=WORD AHRIMAN=BABY AHURA MAZDA.
    AHURA MAZDA+WORD+ADAMAN=94+60+34=94+94=188=ANGRA MAINYU+AHRIMAN=124+64 and AHURA MAZDA+AHRIMAN=94+64=158=ANGRA MAINYU+ADAMAN=124+34.

    In a true anagram: AHURAMAZDA+ANGRAMAINYU=218=AHRIMAN+ADAMAN+AZURGUYA.
    LOGAN ANTICO =(49+62)=111=ADAMAN+77=ADAMAN+CHRIST, with 77=POWER=GLORY.
    ROBERT SCEPTICO =(78+90)=168=AHRIMAN+104=AHRIMAN+PRIDE+EARTH with ABCDEFGHIJ=55=SATAN=BARBELO=HEAVEN=SONGS=CLOUDS=48+7=SEX+7=TREE+7=(1+2+3+...+8+9+10).
    104=JERUSALEM=EXPERIENCE=EXISTENCE=MR BRANESEED=LOVEJOY=RED MENS BEAR.
    104=52+52=DEVIL+LIVED=EARTH+HEART=PRIDE+FINANCE, with BEAR=26=DOG=GOD etc.
    218+218=436=(LOGAN ANTICO+AHRIMAN)+DRAGON(59)+(ROBERT SCEPTICO+ADAMAN).
    To personify: EMMANUEL MELCHISEDEC+ARNDALE+JONES+ILOVEYOU+24=218+218=436.

    Playing with the number-letter code and remembering that PLAY=54=LOVE, allows any NAME=33=AMEN=MAGIC=THE=??? or SURNAME=91=MIRROR=SPIRIT=SPACETIME to become part of the House of AZURGUYA and hence the lawful inheritor of the starseed in Emmanuel Melchisedec, who represents the ascended and descended Logos-Word for God’s self-definition.

    The ‘I AM THAT I AM!’, can also be translated as the ‘I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE!’ in a continuing process of refinement and redefinition of the source energies for all of what is in existence.”

    Code3. Code4. Code5.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2018
  3. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Act Two: Expansion, Contraction and a Shadow
    When am I ? & Que Faire ? & Now you see it, now you don't ?

    Scientific Expert: 90% versus Layphilosopher: 10%

    [Robert Sceptico and Logan Antico meet in the cafe ‘Solaris’, near the Conference Hall on campus of New Alexandria University. They had both just attended a symposium on the relevance of mythos to the paradigm of modern scientific thought and analysis.]




    Logan Antico:
    “Did you not think that the talk by the Egyptian Mythology specialist has relevance to our science and its modus operandi, Robert? The Egyptian doggod and ‘Guide of the Dead’, Anubis, is known as the ‘Khaibit’ or Shadow. He’s the jackal-headed statue atop the sarcophagi and the watchdog to the entombed mummies.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Well, one can superimpose a scientific meaning onto the written hieroglyphic encodings, I guess. I did find the poetic riddle, ascribed to the Ibisgod Thoth interesting though. Thoth is known as Hermes Trismegistos, keeper of the tripartite wisdom to the Greeks and the Egyptians and is renown as the founder of alchemy, the old ancestral chemistry.
    And his symbol is the Caduceus; the symbol of the medical profession as the ‘Staff of Healing’ of the Greek physician Aesculapius, modelled on the Egyptian healer-priest Imhotep and the god Nefertum, son of the ‘masonic God’ Ptah and his wife Sekhmet at the capital of Memphis. The Caduceus has two serpents, one white and one black, intertwining in the infinity symbol around the staff; it’s also the ‘Serpent Rod’ of Aaron and Moses, coded in Exodus.7.10-15. Our practising doctors have lost one of the serpents in their medical history – to image their opposition to holistic principles, which they consider unscientific, I suppose.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, I’ve got a copy of that riddle, can you see the references to our notions of supersymmetry and the mapping of higher dimensions, differing in an order of one?

    RaH Versus ApeP as HaR the Image of RaHaR in the Mirror of Hathor.

    The Right White Solar Eye of RaH for Horus of the Horizon as the 3 and the Left Black Lunar Eye of HaR for Hathor of the Mirror as the 6 and Imaged in the Right Eye of Uraeus in Anubis as the 9.

    eyeofabraxas-.28192. eye_to_eye-.28193. iwadjet-.28194.
    Right Eye of Abraxas Atum (Re-Hamarkhis Sun) Horus the Elder of the Horizon----------------------Left Eye of Wadjet (Thoth-Moon) of the Golden Uraeus
    RaH Versus ApeP as HaR the Image of RaHaR in the Mirror of Hathor.

    The Right White Solar Eye of RaH for Horus of the Horizon as the 3 and the Left Black Lunar Eye of HaR for Hathor of the Mirror as the 6 and Imaged in the Right Eye of Uraeus in Anubis as the 9.
    carpyramid-.28195. carhathor-.28196. carsphinx-.28197.

    carthoth-.28198. carptah-.28199. carhorus-.28200.

    caranubis-.28201. uraeus-.28202. caruraeus-.28203.

    Anubis Khaibit- Shadow of Uraeus

    Future Shadows of the Past

    "A most wondrous thing the Shadow is, a redeemer in all to succour;
    it can go where the light cannot abide, seemingly banished, it is not.
    For where the light is, the darkness flees, no longer present to endure;
    so to become illuminated is its destined journey and its troubled lot.

    But without the light, no Shadow can be cast, its such a splendid key;
    the dimensions reduce in space from three to two and all in just the one.
    Betwixt the light and the darkness it is and part of both for all to see;
    the Shadow of the body, does it not merge all in its rule under the sun?

    Whatsoever can cast a Shadow, must be a most wondrous thing to relay;
    as nature's very own offspring, the young ones grow towards their final goal.
    Enabled to bring peace to so many things appearing apart and so far away;
    the reconciliation for the suffering body with its spirit and its scattered soul."


    You know that our four-dimensional spacetime can be thought of as the holographic mapping of a volume in 4D onto a hypersurface in 3D – what we call Riemann’s Hypersphere or the 3-sphere of Poincare’. Similarly, the 3D volume of any material object is projected as a 2D-surface shadow. Because 7 dimensions can be compactified in a 7D-Joyce manifold and 6 dimensions are conifolded in a Calabi-Yau geometry, the 11 dimensions of the Witten mirror in M-space reduce to just the hypersphere. Then the compactification on one side of the mirror, say the C-space in 10D is holographically imaged in all the higher dimensions, starting with the F-space in 12D.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “As particle expert I agree; your 4D spacetime is like a membrane around the collapsed dimensions; this wrapped surface can be imagined to be the event horizon of a Super-Black Hole. So the entire relativistic universe forms an entity of dynamic subspaces around a nonlocalised singularity, which is a mapping from the enclosing surface manifold. The same thing occurs on the subatomic level in the context of supersymmetric associations. For a long time have numerous physics laboratories searched for the ‘missing mass’ in the galaxies and the greater cosmos. There seems to insufficient matter to account for the rotation speeds of galaxies for instance.

    But you know, only since we had reassessed the quark-lepton structure in the Standard Model of Particle Physics, did we finally find the ‘Dark Matter’ and the experimental observations have verified the macroquantisation of the superbranes to conform with the spacetime geometry of Einsteinian General Relativity in our new synthesis of Quantum Field Particle Theory, Quantum Electrodynamics or QED, Quantum Chromodynamics or QCD, Supergravity, C-M-F-Theory and all within the mathematical umbrella of Special- and Quantum Relativity.

    And we have named the ‘missing matter’ in the RestMassPhoton or the RMP, and there is just one supersymmetric particle as an universal template related to the process of restmass induction, so to say. Its properties have filled in the gaps in conjunction with our revised Standard Model and you can term it the Shadow-Particle, if you like.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Now how would one describe such detailed specifics to the layperson, who knows about the shadow, but to whom quantum theory is like a foreign language? Could one say for instance, that every material particle possesses an underlying blueprint as its own shadow from another dimension; that one cannot directly observe this template, but that its energy and properties can be deduced and inferred from principles of symmetry?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “That would be a good idea, Robert. When the universe defined itself in the laws of physics; a certain binary algorithm, just two complementary strings of numbers really, produced exactly 10 associations between integerclusters. Four of those constants were just natural counting numbers in 4, 6, 7 and 11.
    The other six constants specified concepts of energy transformation in the order of spacequantisation E, temperature T, monopolic current A, frequency F, restmass M and luminosity L. Any selfconsistent mensuration system, such as our "SI-System-Internationale’’ could then construct units of measurement, based on a direct experimental measurement of two of the algorithmically obtained constants, namely the speed of light in a vacuum (c), renamed from M and Planck’s constant (h), renamed from F.
    Furthermore, the properties of the naked singularity, being a prespacetime abstraction, are correlated to the energy hierarchy of the five superbranes and can be used to define the concept of the ‘amount of a substance’ in the molarity, specified in Avogadro’s Constant. Using this ‘counting of mass’, say in a standard based on the Carbon-12 nucleus, then allows the idea of restmass in the form of matter and antimatter to manifest.

    One sets up inertial frames of references in whom the now defined mass is selfresistant to movement, unless acted upon by externally applied forces – these concepts lead to the forcelaws of Isaac Newton. But this raises an important question regarding the symmetry in the laws of physics.
    If restmass has the choice to manifest as matter or as antimatter, why then is it observed, that antimatter is not present in the universe, except as product in the process of pair-creation, an event in which energy is transformed, but always requiring the presence of a form of mass, say in the form of a nucleus?
    The reason is, that before mass came into being, a form of antiradiation did exist and in a perfect symmetrical relationship with radiation and this radiation was EMMR and not EMR. And so this symmetry was broken and by necessity so, namely to create tension and the separation of the heshe and the shehe in an occurrence labelled the Big Bang.
    But the bigger Big Bang happened before that, when Antiradiation submerged itself in a new doubled form, the two-spinned graviton and with it was born the potential for another twin to manifest. The Matter-Antimatter blueprints became potentialised in the HBRMI, a process which drew upon the nonparity circuits within the UfoQR and the weak nuclear interaction loops, which define the radioactivity of the elements in regards to the naturally occurring substances.

    The absence of antimatter in the universe also became a consequence of neutrino definitions. And gravity became the new antiradiation, when the HBRMI swallowed up the old antiradiation and birthing the potential to bring the now separated he and she together again.
    And EMMR, which had defined and created the mass in spacetime, then through that same mass, became enabled to mirror the parental symmetries and mathematical properties back to itself. So EMR found itself empowered, as a product of mass, to act as its messenger back to the EMMR and via the medium of a truly fundamental constant (c), the speed of light in nospace.”


    Logan Antico:
    “How many truly elementary constants are there in the Genesis and the construction of the universe, and what is required to create something out of nothing at all?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “That is a very good question, one which led me to a proof for the new science in the year of the millennial transition in 2000, coinciding with your midpoint for the last 7-year period from 1997 to 2003 and the end of the ‘Great Cycle of Daniel’ in the establishment of the historical archetype. You see, for a long time, the global physics community had known, that all physical parameters in the unification theories must be reducible to a basic common denominator.

    This is said to be the dimensionality of the Planck-scale, where the singularity manifests in the P-length, the P-mass and the P-time, as well as other derived quantities, such as the P-temperature and the P-tension, say. I knew also, that the P-length could become transformed into a larger scale, than its definition as a billionth trillionth trillionth of a centimeter or so would indicate. Having this transformed wavelength then allowed me to reconstruct the birth of the universe from the naked singularity in its equations of quantum relativity. But I wasn’t able to prove it to my mind’s satisfaction, until I stumbled upon a binomial statistical distribution for the (v/c) ratios in Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity.

    I was studying the electromagnetic mass of an electron at the time; that part of a dynamically charged body’s inertia, which arises as a consequence of its charge. This defines the magnetocharge as part of the electron’s effective mass in the unified field and becomes added to the electron’s restmass. So I found that the equivalence of the electron’s magnetic induction energy to its relativistic mass crystallised a binomial distribution for the velocity percentage about a (X+Y=XY=i2=exp[iπ])- basis for the pentagonal supersymmetry in the 12th dimension.
    Ten ‘masterconstants’ from the prespacetime algorithm allowed me to define (c2) from M as proportionality constant to ‘Mass’ in Einstein’s famous (E=mc2), setting the equivalence of energy to mass and similarly the proportionality constant to frequency F became set as (h) in Planck’s law (E=hf) for the energy equivalence to quantised EMR. Energy is related to temperature T in Boltzmann’s proportionality constant (k) in (E=kT) and that became the second of the ‘master constants’ after the space-quantisation counter (E). The four ‘masterconstants’ (E,k,h and c2) then became supplemented in (A2); which defines the electropole charge via the monopolic current of electricity and as a coefficient in a Gaussian curve for the probability distribution for the dimensionless tau-time in General Relativity.

    This is the n-cycletime, used by you cosmologists of course. The last ‘masterconstant’ is (Lo) and a luminosity constant for the radiationmass as the manifesto of the RMP of the ‘missing mass’ and the ‘dark energy’ of the cosmogenesis. It also relates to the unification of the strong- and weak nuclear interaction forces. Those are the constants required to manifest an universe in energy.
    One must start with something like a diffused state of high temperature; say a hot plasma or gas or even just radiation energy in terms of photons of light. And once you have a quantised spacetime, which only needs to be defined in number; then you can apply energy concepts in terms of temperature, which then transforms into Potential Energy PE and Kinetic Energy KE, provided there is something to move about, some ‘stuff’ becoming photons from whom massive particles can then form.

    The next step is to transmutate energy in terms of radiation, measured in frequency or inverse time to link the EMR to the previously defined temperature spectrum. On the particle level then, photons of a certain frequency carry an energy, which can then also become expressed in parameters of their temperature. And finding an equivalence for that radiation energy to mass energy via Einstein’s equation, then uses up the fundamental ‘master constants’ for the energies defined in temperature through Boltzmann, in frequency through Planck and in mass through Einstein.
    The concept of electromagnetic charge and its relationship to mass is found in the constant for the current of monopolic electricity and that had been known only as the electric charge for the electropole, which was experimentally determined in the experiments of Robert Millikan as the Coulombic chargequantum in the USA and beginning in 1909. But the partnership between magnetic charge and mass ends the mystery of where the ‘stuff’ moving about in the primordial spacetime comes from.

    Before there were any photons or antiphotons, there was the naked singularity, which allowed a background of spacetime to become born as its own manifestation. As a consequence of its own definition; the naked singularity must be explicable in terms of the basic constituents of the unified field however, all rooted in the simple parameters of energy as given in the five ‘masterconstants’ of the algorithm of the Genesis.
    We do require at least one space quantisation constant to define an initialising intradimensional volume of space and four other integers, which restrict this multidimensional continuum as a counting number.”


    Logan Antico:
    “And you could prove this in the definition of the magnetocharge as the precursive ‘stuff’ for the observed material phenomena, which use mass as their defining parameter?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Indeed, the superbrane hierarchies are defined via the magnetocharge; with the HE(8x8) heterotic supermembrane specifying the transformation of the P-scale into the beginning of space and time in massparametric associations, using the energised blueprints of the quantum geometry and as defined in the UfoQR. There is even a mathematical correlation in the statistical distribution of the Prime Numbers, known as the Riemann Hypothesis, stating that the real part of a complex number is (½) in the zeros of the Zeta-Function. It so happens, that the axis of symmetry in the pentagonal XY-distribution is (-½); showing a distribution of arbitrarily ‘frozen’ spacetimes which await initialisation. Furthermore, this indicates the prime importance of abstract mathematics for the omniphysics of the universe and its manifestation in concepts of energy.”


    Logan Antico:
    “So the nature of the universe at its most intrinsic and deep level is one of mathematical symmetry?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Yes, the form of the prespacetime algorithm is one of supersymmetry. It is like the unity of an infinite number sequence is matched to another complementary infinite series of numbers, both divergent in a Cantor cardinality of Aleph-Null, but convergent as AlephAll to a limit of unity 1. This unity reflects modular duality in the product ( XY = X+Y = i 2 = exp[iπ] = -1 ).
    So describing one universe as infinite in the count Aleph-Null allows one to start counting infinite universes in the count Aleph-All. It is a property of the pentagonal pattern, which underlies the prespacetime algorithm. Like subuniverses graduating to become fully fledged universes, with old subuniverses agglomerating as multiverses within the promoted old protouniverse as an omniverse.”


    Logan Antico:
    “And because of the holographic quantisation in quantum relativity in the minimum-maximum scaling, one can consider any subspace as reflecting the unity of the macrospace. But a subatomic particle, such as a proton or electron is so 10 million times larger than the manifesting supermembrane, where then is the shadow particle in that?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Relative to the Electronic Radius (re), the HE(8x8)-superstring is exactly (10 billion/360) times reduced in scale. But the electronic radius defines a leptonic ring around a mesonic ring, which hugs a trisected neutrinoic kernel in the quantum geometry of the particle blueprints. This sets the quark-lepton structure geometrically in two dimensions as the topological mapping from the defining 11D-M-space, which is also a surface as the Witten mirror.

    11D is nought but (2+9)D and also (5+6)D and also (8+3)D; 8D=(5+3)D and 5D=(2+3)D, all nested within each other. A volume space within and without always becomes mapped onto a surface dimensionality reduced by one and as defined in the original cosmogenetic algorithm.
    Look at a planet like the earth, Logan. The volume within its interior can be thought of as the mapped volume without, including its atmosphere and outer space, right to the edge of the universe which is no edge, because the curvature of space folds space back onto itself over a distance of 33.8 billion lightyears. So any planet forms a hologram of the protouniverse, as do all stars and solar systems and the galactic hierarchies. If you wander off due north say, after so 40,000 kilometres, where do you end up? You arrive at the point where you started from the south, having travelled around the circumfe- rence of the earth, despite your perception of having gone straight ahead. So a 3D volume is enclosed within a 2D surface for the inner earth and a 4D volume can be defined as being encompassed within a 3D surface for the inner prototypical universe.

    Shining a torchlight from your forehead in a straight line would send a lightbeam into outer space, but eventually this lightbeam would hit the back of your head, returning to where it originated from, because of the curvature of 11-dimensional space.
    But all particles have the same genetic blueprint. One can give a geometrical model for that in 2D, but one must remember, that the 11D-M-space is the 3rd resonance of the 2D-space, the 2nd resonance being 8D and the 1st being 5D. In 2D, the particle blueprint is a onesided and twisted surface, which is mathematically defined as the ‘Bottle of Klein’ which in 11D transforms into a Calabi-Yau manifold. I like to call it ‘Klein, the Bottle Dragon’ or the ‘Kleinian Genie in the Bottle’. It is the extended form of the ‘Strip of Moebius’, the onesided and oneedged surface known to many partygoers as a mathematical puzzle.”



    Logan Antico:
    “Yes and there you have our coin with head and tail again, attempting to look at each other. If one could twist the coin like a Moebian Serpent, then the stretched object could at least be seen in parts without any mirrors. Two sides of a band, the inside and the outside of a ring say; can become one side, if one cuts the ring or band, twists one end by 180 degrees or a halfturn and then pastes the ends together again.
    And this has implications for the macrocosmos as the universe overall. Just as one doubles the surface area of the inner or outer band in the joining of the edges, so can a finite universe in volume, double itself via the Hubble Oscillation every 33.8 billion years of cosmic evolution.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “But this is in 11 dimensions, isn’t the 10D universe asymptotic with a finite maximum size!?”


    Logan Antico:
    “The frequency parameter, the variable Hubble ‘Constant’ fluctuates between two nodal values. Its maximum at timeinstantenuity is exactly 3 thousand million billion trillion cycle units and its minimum at the opposite node is a 1.88 milionth trillionth of a cycle unit or 58 Hubble units. The universe has completed 13.24% of its 11-dimensional oscillation at the present time. Its speed of expansion is 22% of lightspeed with a deceleration of 0.1162 nanometres per second squared at the present epoch; a deceleration which is however made up of two parts in a gravitational omega and a lambda of quintessence.
    Because of the dimensional intersection between the cosmic Kleindragons in 10D and in 11D, cosmic observations in spectroscopy appear to converge at a Hubble Constant of 67 Hubble units and an age for the universe of 14.7 billion years (BY). A commonly used Hubble Constant (WMAP-Data) of 71 corresponds to a “Hubble Time" of 13.7 BY. And because of this intersection, which seems to indicate a dip in the value for the electromagnetic finestructure constant [Alpha] of so 80 parts per million between cosmological redshift values of 1.08 and 1.84; the EMR oscillation in 11D doubles the light in a 2.2 billion year interval.

    A blueshifting of electromagnetic parameters is the result and astronomical observations like spectra of supernovae or quasars can so indicate an apparent acceleration for the universe in an unmapped interval for the cosmological redshifts between 0.343 and 1.082 with a maximum at 0.7202. This maximum corresponds to a ‘kick start’ for that acceleration and is derived from the proportionality between the true 11-dimensional age for the universe and the Hubble-Time applied in measurement. The 10D universe has completed 53% of its asymptotic expansion into 11D-M-space, whilst the 11D universe is more than double that in size at 113.24% of the nodal boundary into the hologram of the 12D-F-space.
    But are you saying, that the universal blueprint, the shadow particle or the RMP, reflects all this on the microcosmic scale?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Indeed it does! The key is the electronic radius as upward scaling of the manifesting supermembrane. The Outer Leptonic Ring or OLR oscillates and defines the quark structure in its strangeness, its magic, its topness and its superness. The Inner Mesonic Ring or IMR also oscillates and sets the quarks in their downness, their bottomness, their daintyness and also their topness.
    A trisected kernel, the neutrino core, geometrically defines the magnified singularity in its charm. It is an intricate structure; this Kernel K; Inner Ring IR; Outer Ring OR quantum geometry. You see, basically only two quarks are required to construct all restmass-induced particles. We term it the up-quark and the down-quark with a strange-quark forming the oscillating energetic resonance of the down-quark in an energy differential between the IR and the OR.

    The revolution in particle physics was the realisation that all quarks are magnified superbranes, which have a magnetopolic duality in higher dimensional omnispace. We so describe intersecting wavefunctions in forms of sectorial mappings, using the idea of colour mixing known as the gluonic hadron chromaticity of the strong nuclear interaction. In terms of unitary symmetry, 9 quarks are defined in the KKKIROR geometry of the revised Standard Model. Kernel K is the up-quark u and KIR is a Kernel K surrounded by a mesonic IR as downquark d. A KOR or s-quark is just like a KIR with a leptonic OR replacing a mesonic IR in oscillation. Because KOR is basically the resonance of KIR, all KOR-based subatomic particles have higher energy than the superbraned particles who carry a KIR substitution. The symmetry of the prespacetime wavefunctions defines the blueprints for the superbraned particles via 12 intersections of monopolic circuit-loops of colour-magnetic electricity.
    Those current-knots, so to say, became magnetic monopoles fixed in energy as the superbrane of class IIB; its energy is exactly (ec) kilograms units or 27,000 trillion electronic units, specified as Gigaelectronvolts or GeV. Each and every magnetic-current-knot or magnetic monopole has a KKKIROR geometry and so is a manifested supermembrane from the 11th dimension of M-space. This potential materialisation then occurs within the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity or UfoQR and in accordance with the spacequanta set in a fourfold repetition for the angular source wavelength, spanning the 12 monopolic intersection points as the linear radian extent of the UfoQR.

    The universal blueprint KKKIROR is then defined in gluonic chromaticity and links to the mechanism of the RestMass-Induction or HBRMI under the agency of that template. This we term the Higgs Boson or HB, the ‘Giver of Restmass’.


    Logan Antico:
    “How can the layperson make sense of the Higgs Boson, Robert; is there a more familiar analogy?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    “There is a similar particle almost universally known by High School graduates, Logan. A first derivative from the HB blueprint is the subatomic particle known as the Neutron with a dud or KIRKKIR quark structure, and rather different from particle udd=KKIRKIR, because of an asymmetric alignment of the individual quarks along a defining magnetoaxis.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes, the first particles manufactured in the Big Bang furnace were the ylems or dineutrons as the nucleons forming the ylemic protostars. Their radii depend solely on their temperature, ranging from so 1.2 trillion Kelvin at 114 seconds after the Big Bang to so 200 billion Kelvin at 1150 seconds after time instantenuity, setting radioactive neutron decay into that time interval and forming protostar families for magnetars, pulsars and neutron stars in later generations.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “The KKIRKOR=uds particle is the superbrane known as the Neutral Lambda (Λo) and it decays into a neutron (no) and a neutral meson, called pion (πo), or it transforms into a proton (π+) with a negatively charged pion (π-) under the conservation laws of energy and momentum in their linear and angular propagations.
    All subatomic particles can be defined from the basic uds-blueprint of the KKIRKOR structure. There is a quark triplet containing the Super* S*=ss, the Top* t*=ds and the Dainty* D*=dd; complemented in a quark doublet of the Magic* m*=us and the Bottom* b*=ud and completed in a quark singlet in the Charm* U*=uu. The Charm* is also known as the Double-Up, the Dainty* as the Double-Down and the Super* as the Double-Strange. All of the starred (*) quarks are diquarks, consisting of two of the basequarks u,d or s. The bottom-quark is also known as the beauty-quark and the top-quark is also the truthquark.

    The quark singlet manifests in the charm-quark c=Uu(bar)=(uu)u(bar)=u(uu(bar)) and is so a resonance of the u-quark, not associating with the IR-OR oscillation of d*s=s*d. The quark doublet manifests in the bottom-quark b=b*u(bar)=(ud)u(bar)=d(uu(bar)) as a d-quark resonance, the u-s or K-KOR oscillation of the m-quark becoming suppressed in ud*s=s*du. The quark triplet manifests in the top-quark t=t*d(bar)=(ds)d(bar)=s(dd(bar)) as a s-quark resonance, the d-s or KIR-KOR oscillation for the D- and S-quarks suppressed in ud*s=uds*.
    The (bar) denotes antiquarks, so that the antiup=up(bar) has a colourcharge of (-2/3) and both, the antidown and the antistrange have a charge of (+1/3), being made up of an antiK of charge(-2/3) added to the +1 charge of the antiring of the IMR or the OLR respectively.”


    Logan Antico:
    “So where is the supersymmetry of the shadow particle in the setup of the quarkian hierarchies in the quantum geometry of the HB blueprint KKIRKOR?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “The supersymmetry enters because the KKIRKOR is scalar as the Higgs Boson, it doesn’t quantum spin, but the lambda and the neutron do. The latter two are defined as baryons, but the lambda is a shortlived hyperon and the neutron is a longlived or stable nucleon, both with a quantum spin of ½. Superbranes with halfintegral spin are called fermions and their supersymmetric partners of integral spin are the bosons.
    So the great realisation in particle physics was the fact, that the Higgs Boson is ubiquitous; it itself is the bosonic supersymmetric partner for all the fermions, which include all the leptons asassociated with the rings and the neutrinos and antineutrinos of the kernel. The upper limit for the quark energies is the Superdiquark S=(ss)d(bar), forming a particle called the Higgs/Chi (H/Χ)-resonance with an energy mean of (1,194 GeV) in a quark structure SS(bar).

    1/365th of a second into the cosmic evolution sets the symmetry breaking between the electromagnetic- and weak nuclear interactions at a temperature of 3.4 quadrillion Kelvin and a bosonic particle energy of (298.5 GeV). This is the Fermi Constant for the Weak Nuclear Interaction or WNI and can be considered a quasimass for the Higgs Boson. This energy calculates as the Vortex-PE mean or VPE for the HB-Kernel induction for the SS(bar).
    The VPE-K-mean for the tt(bar) resonance is (182.758 GeV) and the VPE-R(ing)mean is calculated as (38.882 GeV), the latter being contained in the former. The mean for the top-antitop resonance is the mass for the neutral (Zo) WNI-weakon fieldagent in(91.38 GeV). Summing the VPE-K-means from the Strange- to Dainty-quark states then gives the energy for the (W+-) charged weakons in (80.432 GeV) as the gauge field particles for the WNI.

    Returning to the shadow particle, the RMP or RestmassPhoton; its story relates the WNI to the Nonparity loops constituent of the unified field. Colourless spininduction-loops give birth to the gauge bosons for the four elementary interactions of physics: the Strong Nuclear Interaction or the SNI, the EMI for the Electromagnetic Interaction, the WNI and the Gravitational Interaction or GI.
    The respective fieldagents are the Gauge Bosons in the Gluon, the Photon, the Weakon and the Graviton respectively. Then the question becomes of how to relate a superbraned particle state of zero restmass to a particle state defined in the HBRMI. The New Standard Model assigns a tripartition or colourneutral W(hite)=W*-state for a pure radiative being and a B(lack)=B*-state as its pure antiradiative or material massinduced counterpart.

    So one finds exactly 8 gluonic intermediate states for the transformation of W* into B* into W* in the triplets W*W*W*, W*W*B*, W*B*W*, B*W*W*, W*B*B*, B*W*B*, B*B*W* and B*B*B*.
    Gluon chromaticity then utilises the mixing of wavefunctions in the form of primary and secondary colour triplets, doublets or singlets. (R)ed, (G)reen and (B)lue or RGB mixes in radiation to W* and (Y)ellow, (C)yan and (M)agenta or YCM mixes in antiradiation to B*.

    The radiative states are colour additive and the restmassive- or ‘painted’ states are subtractive. Colour couplets or doublets are given in the mesonic mixers of RC=GM=BM, either W* or B*, subject to the conservation laws.
    The primary gauge-photonic blueprint for the EMMR is RGB with a clockwise or positive spin of 1. Its secondary gauge-photonic image, relative to itself as a KleinDragon is also RGB, but with a negative or anticlockwise spin of -1.

    We now encounter the basis for Quantum Relativity in a frame of reference between the primary gauge bosonic source Eps and the secondary gauge bosonic source Ess; images of each other as the head and tail of the one coin, but in a selfmodular duality as the 11D supermembrane [EpsEss].
    Relative to Eps or the vibratory half of the supermembrane class HE(8x8); the EMMR blueprint is RGB(+1) and its ‘othersided’ image rotates as RGB(-1), but on the ‘onesided’ surface mirror. The Red 120-degree sector goes to Green goes to Blue to Red in a clockwise permutation of rotational symmetry. As the anticlockwise part is imaged as RGB of opposite chirality but identical spin, Red goes to Blue to Green to Red in the colourmixing of GB.RB.RG=CMY=YCM at the 120 degree point.

    This defines the Matter-template as the blueprint YCM, manifesting via two KKIRKOR ylems, becoming a scalar Dineutron YYCCMM as the quark part of the HB with neutralising spinquanta. This process would repeat at the 240 degree point and return to its starting coordinate RRGGBB at 360=0 degrees. This process would repeat at the 240 degree point and return to its starting coordinate RRGGBB at 360=0 degrees. For maximum symmetry and efficiency, the 180 degree point inflects and RGB images its selfrelativity as BGR. Hence the anticyclic BGR.BGR colour mixing yields the Antimatter template MCY at 240 degrees with a corresponding AntiHB-quark blueprint MMCCYY.
    Next, we find the π-intersections at 0 and 360 degrees, defined as Antineutrinos RRGGBB and the 180 degree point setting the Neutrino blueprint BBGGRR. Odd π-points define the coordinates for the GI and Even π-points set the EMI in the UfoQR.

    The Higgsian Antineutrino is a scalar Antineutrino (νH(bar))=RRRRGGGGBBBB as a 'squared' state for the ordinary Antineutrino (ν(bar)) and the Higgs Neutrino is defined in the template set as (νH)=BBBBGGGGRRRR from the ordinary Neutrino (ν).
    The Higgs(Anti)Neutrino has a restmass of (0.052106 electronvolts (eV)), being a maximum energy differential between two superposed leptonic OLR energies, manifesting in an energy range from (2.969-3.021 eV) with a mean of (3.00 eV) as a charcteristic energy level, defining the mass of the Tau-(anti)neutrino (vτ) as the superposition of BBBBGGGGRRRR(0)+BBGGRR(-½).
    The Antineutrinos (νe,μ(bar))(+½) and Neutrinos (νe,μ)(-½) are massless as the base neutrinos.
    Electronic(e)- and Muonic(μ) Neutrinos are interchangeable in principle, depending on their parental manifestations within the magnetopolic current loops within the unified field. They are intricately involved in defining the gauge bosons for the WNI in the (Zo) and the (W+-).
    The complete HB-template of quark-leptonic definition is so {YYCCMM(0)+RRRRGGGGBBBB(0)} and the {HB(bar)=MMCCYY(0)+BBBBGGGGRRRR(0)}. The RestMassPhoton or RMP has the blueprint {YYCCMM(-1)}.

    It is always left polarised and forms unifying links between the SNI and the WNI. In particular, adjacent spininduction loops in the UfoQR render the SNI’s for both Matter and Antimatter as CP-invariant, that is both spacial reflection symmetry and charge conjugation symmetry are preserved. The shadow particle RMP is massless, but is associated with the same restmass inductive process, which partitions the HB into a form of quark-leptonic supersymmetric unification.
    Then the ‘missing mass’ isn’t really missing at all, but exists in the form of a supersymmetric and higher dimensional coupling between radiation EMR and restmass via agency of the EMMR. Every protoparticle of matter carries a blueprint YCM with the potential to couple with the RMP in what you might call the supersymmetric partnership of the shadow template. But you should know about the seeding of restmass in terms of planets and galaxies in the large scale cosmos.”


    Logan Antico:
    “I do indeed; mass is evolving into higher resonances of itself in terms of density. Just as a restmass (mo) increases as a relativistic mass, subject to the dynamic speedlimit (c); so do the seeds for the protostars, quasars, galaxies and the Black- and White Holes. Coming to think of it; the restmass seedling for the entire universe is a mathematical ratio (Mo), given as the squareroot of a product of three numbers divided by the protoelectronmass (me)-squared.

    The three multiplied numbers are the spacequantisation constant (E), and the squares of the P-mass (mP) and the proto-nucleonmass (mc) in: ( Mo =Squareroot of { E x mP2 x m c2 / me2 } ). The value for (Mo) calculates as 1.81 trillion trillion trillion trillion measured metric tons.

    But applying the Hubble parameters in terms of critical densities gives one the restmass, the Infinity-Mass (M) of the universe as a ‘Mother-Black Hole’, the membrane of the 11th dimension, which encompasses the cosmos and that is 64.45 trillion trillion trillion trillion metric tons. So the baryonic mass in the universe as defined in the restmass seedling (Mo) is just 2.803% of that required for exact closure via the Einstein-Friedmann equations of General Relativity. This baryonic omega, as the gravitational part of the overall deceleration for the cosmic expansion, has however increased this restmass seed by a factor of 1.313 to 3.68% for the present epoch. And those 4% are the matter which is measurable by our scientific instruments, the other 96% or so are unobservable as the shadow-matter due to its nonluminosity.

    All matter is observed via its emission- or absorption spectra and so depends on EMR parameters. But this EMR is produced by the mass in the process of accelerating the electropolic charges of the Coulombic electropoles.
    The nonmass produced EMR is the EMMR, the Electomagnetic Monopolic Radiation of the magnetic monopoles, which are the magnetoelectric junction-knots of the UfoQR.

    But the missing mass is there, we can see almost 4% of it after 19.11 billion years of cosmic evolution and in 231.86 billion years we shall see all of it at a cycletime of 14.85.
    The 10D universe will have reached 93.7% of its asymptotic boundary, coasting along at 0.4% of lightspeed at so 4,298,978 kilometres per hour in C-space.
    The 11D universe will have grown in volume by a factor of 13.1, compared to now and its radial extent will be so 250 billion lightyears, compared to the 19 billion lightyears of the present time.

    From time instantenuity, coinciding with the end of the inflationary epoch and until a time of 1.79 billion years was attained, there existed an antigravitational force in the universe.
    It was in the form of Einstein’s ‘cosmological constant’, which is really the parameter of the quintessence, acting as a variable of cosmic acceleration.
    A ‘false vacuum’ a remnant from the inflationary mechanism, set up a temperature gradient to manifest the Big Bang in its dynamic equilibrium.
    A hyperinflation specified a ‘de Broglie’ matter wave velocity of 480 million trillion trillion trillion trillion metres per second and in tandem with a ‘de Broglie’ acceleration of 1,440 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion metres per second squared.
    But a Einstein’s quintessential acceleration had a value of 20.16 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion metres per second squared at timeinstantenuity, defining a ‘false vacuum’ in a temperature gradient of 0.014015, translating into a cosmological redshift of 7.477 and a time of 236.1 million years.
    This time doubles in an ‘interval of cosmic architecture’ and a ‘quasar-wall’ as the cosmic epoch between 236.1 and 472.1 million years and matching the largest gravitationally bound galactic systems in the shape of superclusters.

    This gradient is also exactly half of the ratio between the restmass seedling (Mo) and the Infinity-Mass (M) to define the deceleration parameter for an Euclidean and overall flat universe. The Einstein quintessence or Einstein-Lambda (LE) decreased to 0 after 1.79 billion years from the Big Bang for a cosmological redshift of 2.15 and inflected to add to the gravitational omega (WB), the latter being the cosmic deceleration due to gravity and the evolving restmass seedling (Mo).
    The building of galaxies began and reached its absolute maximum 3.97 billion years from the Big Bang at a cosmological redshift of 1.19 and a cycletime of 0.2352 setting the ‘Peak of Galaxies’. The Einstein-Lambda was -0.322 nanometres per second squared for that maximum.

    At the present cycletime (np)=1.1324; we find (LE)= -0.0949 nanometres per second squared, to which is added (WE)= -0.0213 nanometres per second squared to yield the parametrised form for the Einstein-Friedmann cosmic deceleration in the Milgrom-Sigma in (SE)= -0.1162 nanometres per second squared and for a ‘Dark Matter’ interval from 1.79 to 155.91 billion years after the Big Bang. A quintessence of 81.7% so modifies a gravitational deceleration of 18.3% and summing to the required total for the Euclidean flatness for the present time and a flatness, which, due to the intrinsic balancing between lambda, omega and sigma remains invariant for all times. Between cycletimes 9.2255 and 12.2777 or the interval from 155.91 to 207.49 billion years after the Big Bang; there is a period of ‘Light Matter’ for the Einstein-Lambda to assume positive values with a maximum at 175.8 billion years. The lambda will then be subtracted from the omega for a sigma of 0.00076 nanometres per second squared. From 188.4 billion years onwards from the present then, the lamda will coast asymptotically towards a zero value, reaching a last local minimum at a cycletime of 19.9354 or 336.9 billion years from the time instantenuity. Then the lambda is always negative in a ‘Grey Matter’ interval with a local maximum of deceleration in 0.000051 nanometres per second squared.”



    Robert Sceptico:
    “Some time ago you mentioned a recharge time of 7.53 trillion years; how does this fit in and what happens to the massparametric evolution of the universe after the cycletime of 14.85 has elapsed in a matching of the evolving restmass seedling and the Infinity-Mass?”


    Logan Antico:
    “There is a cosmic evolution in spacetime and one in mass; both are subject to the dimensionless cycletime however.
    If we start the universe with the size of the wormhole radius of the macroquantised naked singularity and allow it to grow into the architectural limit of 236.1 million lightyears in the form of an event horizon of a Black Hole’s Schwarzschild Radius (RS), then this takes 7.53 trillion years (or about 4 trillion years using the 'closure infinity mass' M). It indicates that the minimum Black Hole with a radius of the HE(8x8) superbrane has a mass of 6.445775 tons; a mass which attains the value of (M) after 7.53 trillion years or cyclenumber 446.45. At that time, the ordinary lifetime of stars and their nucleosynthesis would be at an end. Generations after generations of stars would have been born and would have died, either as supernovae of different classes or as neutron stars, magnetars, red dwarfs, brown dwarfs or as white dwarfs, the latters destiny a fate our own sun, the star Sol will share in so 6 billion years. Black Holes would have fuelled galaxies in modular duality with White Holes or quasars, but 7.53 trillion years after the Big Bang, the nuclear fuel provided in the hyperinflation of the ‘de Broglie’ matter wave in the form of ylemic neutron energy from the Genesis of the ‘false vacuum’ would have exhausted itself in a ‘heat death’ of the universe.

    The ‘false vacuum’ would have become imaged in the ‘Grey Matter’ phase from 207.5 billion years however and relatively near the time when all of the infinity mass becomes visible at 251 billion years.

    So you can see, that the end of the ‘false vacuum’ at 236.1 million years forms the building block for the subsequent cosmic evolution – its holographic nesting in the quasar wall, so to speak. The architectural limit is also known as the ‘Sarkar Constant’ and doubles in the ‘Sarkar Interval’, centred on 354.15 million years and as the mean size of galactic superclusters in lightyears. So after 207.5 billion years, we have the beginning of the imaged ‘false vacuum’ in ‘Grey Matter’ and this simply allows the quasar wall to macroquantise or dilate as the imaged temperature gradient from then onwards to projected timeinstantenuity at infinity, mapping ‘Null-Time’ of the naked singularity. This then will be the second generation of the quasars as the ‘Family of the White Hole SourceSinks’. You might term it the energising from the ‘Vacuum Potential Energy’ or the VPE of the vortices.

    43.5 billion years after this second generation of the Cosmic-Vortex-Sources is born, the timeline coincides with the ‘Infinity-Time’ of the ‘Infinity-Mass’ and the second generation of the Cosmic-Vortex-Sinks will appear as the ‘Family of the Black Hole SinkSources’. The recharging of the Energy-Sources is followed in the recharging of the Energy-Sinks. And the cosmic ‘heat death’, the ‘ultraviolet catastrophe’ of a continuous dispersion of the available nuclear energy from the ‘Black Body’ of the universe as a perfect radiator of heat is avoided through the quantisation of the nuclear energy in the cosmic supercycles. The recharging so becomes the quantisation of the continuous into the discreet on the macroscale.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “And where does the recharge energy derive from; it’s the VPE from the vacuum, isn’t it? Wait a minute, I know the answer from the superbrane scenario on the microscale. A Mother-Black Hole seeded in the preBig Bang’s (Mo) subsequently redefines its own singularity in the form of an ‘elementary massless particle’, that is the 11D-supermembranial Eps-Photon, in scaling the wormhole radius (rps=lps/2π) through the instanton as (mP=mee*/{2exSquareroot[Alpha]}) and duality of (Epsxe*=1) in a ‘Conifoldment’ of the Hypersphere within the 6D-Calabi-Yau manifold within the 11th dimension of the Witten-M-space.

    The 4D-Mother-Black Hole is wrapped as a ‘Strominger-Braned Extremal Black Hole’, (which as a boundary condition is not subject to Hawking Radiation in evaporation), and shrinks to its minimum ( mps = Eps /c2= hfps/c2 ); a Strominger-brane protecting a ‘tearing of spacetime’ in the Witten-Mirror.
    You see Logan, there was a small, but fatal flaw in the way modern physics thought about the vacuum; it was believed that the energy of the vacuum, the VPE, was completely subject to random fluctuations of the quantum foam, which defines the superbrane scenarios as a kind of ‘unreal’ or ‘virtual energy’.
    It was thought, that pair-production of matter and antimatter particles are always guided in the ‘Uncertainty Principle’ of Werner Heisenberg and the ‘Complementarity Principle’ of Niels Bohr.

    This is certainly correct, but Planck’s Constant (h), which is the decisive constant in the Action Law and the stochastic interpretation of the two principles mentioned; is itself finestructured to derive the wavelength of the HE(8x8) heterotic superbrane, defined as the Eps-Wavelength (λps), and which is modular dual to the Ess-Wavelength (λss) in the Unity: (λpsss=1). The derivation involves the Planck-Length-Oscillation (lu=e/c2) and the equivalence of the magnetocharge (e*) to the inverse energy of (Eps=hfps) in (e*=2rec2).

    Heisenberg’s finestructure redefines the Heisenberg Constant (h/4π) as (λps/(8πxrex c3) ). Since there are exactly (10 billion Eps-wavelengths/360) in one electronic radius (re), the finestructure for (h) becomes dimensionless as the supermembrane class IIB, (the Magnetic Monopole), and the mass-monopolic current equivalence of (e*c=monopolic current x unified displacement) in F-space is mapped onto the unified monopolic mass (ec) in C-space, defined in their common intersection in M-space and so giving a new interpretation for the ‘virtual energy’ in an energy- continuum specified in a gauge bosonic manifestation of 11-dimensional supermembranes.

    The electropolic chargequantum (e) in C-space manifests as the magnetopolic chargequantum (e*) in F-space with the equality: (e=luxc2) being mapped in the equality (e*=2rexc2) to define the atomic scale of the electropole in C-space as equivalent to the (pre)Planck-scale in F-space in: (2rexe=luxe*=lPxSquareroot of [Alpha]), with (lP) being the Planck-Length.

    The latter equation is known as the F-space Hamiltonian in conjunction with the magnetopolic mass formulation for the ‘Lightmass Constant’: (mPxSquareroot of [Alpha]=e(30c)), with (mP) being the Planck-mass and (30ec)=(Goxe=4πεoxe) in unified units of the StarCoulomb, where unified mass derives via the Action Law and the formulation: (Eu=hfu=hc/lu=muxc2; lu=e/c2) within an unified ‘de Broglie’ matter wave: (mu=Eu/c2=h/(luxc)=(hc/e)u=(e2xc/e)u=(ec)u).

    The identity of (muxe=hc) across the dimensions equates: (MassxCoulombs=MassxStarcoulombs) for the unitary proportionality transformation in the Action Law: (hc/e=j(ec) or h=jxe2) for a proportionality constant Koppa (j), manifesting as the ‘Quantised Hall Resistance’ in the ratio of a Hall-Voltage to a Hall-Current in a natural superconductivity, where the Resistivity (ρ) is defined as (Hall-Resistance x unit displacement) and taking the value of (j=25.8 kiloOhmmetres (kΩm)) for values of zero. Conductivity Kappa (k), being the reciprocal of Resistivity and measured in units of Siemens per metre or (S/m).
    The ‘Coulomb Constant’ (4πεo) contains the ‘Electric Permittivity Constant’ (εo), defining the ratio of Electric Displacement (D) or (Electric Flux per unit area) to Electric Fieldstrength (E) in a medium of ‘free space’ and is directly related to the ‘Magnetic Permeability Constant’ (μo); their product setting the ‘Maxwell-Constant’, finestructured in a definition for the quantum geometry.
    The ‘Magnetic Permeability’ then relates the ratio of Magnetic Flux Density (B) to Magnetic Field Strength (H) and is defined in an invariant mensuration calibration as: (4π/10,000,000) Henry per m or (H/m). The significance is in the fact, that the quantum geometry defines the trisection of the uds-blueprint in the finestructure of the Action Law as: (μoo=P2=(pxq)2; μoεo=1/c2). A partition for the constants is so: (p=2π/3 and q=180 and P=120π), rendering them dimensionless.

    The Action Law for the natural superconductivity then gives: ( μo=120π/c and εo=1/120πc) and defines a ‘natural or cosmic’ unitary system, depending on the calibration of the magnetic constant as the invariant linking it to the F-space system, where lightspeed (c) is given precisely in its integer definition of c2 as (c=300,000 kilometers* per second*). Exact measurement of (c) and (h) in any selfconsistent mensuration system then does allo a calibration to the 'cosmic*' units of measurement and as defined in the algorithmically obtained 'master constants'.

    As the Gravitational Constant (Go) is directly related to (εo) in the ‘Lightmass Constant’ (30c), thus linking the unit for mass to the unit for velocity, only (c) and (h) are necessary to calibrate a mks or Displacement-Mass-Time-System to its parental archetype. The duality between the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions further couples the massparameters to the charge-parameters in the GI-finestructure coupling constant [Omega], equalling the EMI-finestructure constant [Alpha] to its 18th power and that as a consequence from the pentagonal symmetry of the prespacetime algorithm, defining the proto nucleonic mass (mc) in the magnetic monopolemass via: ( mc =(30ec ) xSquareroot of [ Alpha ]17 ).

    The Heisenberg Finestructure provides the key to the UfoQR however. (360/(10 Billionx8πxc3)) = (lps/4πxe*c), relating the fourfold angular extent of the Unified Field to its linear radian measure of 8π; recalling that a 360 degree sector must be transversed 4 times to encompass the 12 magnetopolic current knots in its junction- or intersection points.

    A definition for the transcendental number π relates to that and its mapping of the constant (q) in its ‘counting’ form of the constant (180). Infinite series expansion for (sinx and cosx) and a geometric Archimedean inscription and circumscription of quadrupled regular polygons result in an equality as a function of integer N, which in taking a limit for N approaching Infinity gives (q=180) as that limit.

    Let the angle ( Q =45/( 2N-1) = 2F = 90/(2N )) ; then we can define: p = 2N+1 x (sinQ /cosF) for N steps of the Archimedean iterations. Trigonometric series expansion sets the limit: (2N+1 x 45 x 21-N ) = 180.
    All of this indicates the true nature of the ‘virtual energy’ or the VPE however; it is subject to (λps) as the limiting wormhole radius ( rps = λps/2π ). Subsequently, whatever recharging might be required through the building ‘quantum pressure’, defined in the guiding wave equations; the critical values are given in the evolution of the spacetime and its massparameters subject to boundary conditions set in the EpsEss-supermembrane as a manifestation of the magnified Planck-scale at time instantenuity: (tps=1/3 of a thousandth millionth billionth trillionth of a cosmic second (s*) from Nulltime).”


    Logan Antico:
    “Yes Robert, I knew that you understood the nature of the VPE and where it derives from. And the prespacetime algorithm, being based on integers, expresses the elementary constants as recurring decimals. So any selfconsistent measuring system can define its ‘master constants’ to any degree of precision through experimental determination, using the starunit system as a standard for their calibrations.
    Lightspeed ( c =300,000,000 (m/s)* ) and Planck’s Constant ( h =1 /( 15x1032 ) (Js)* ) become the pivotal ’master constants’ in starunits, translating to: ( c =299,792,458 (m/s) ) and ( h =6.626076x10-34 (Js )) in the earth based SI-system, subject to experimental errors in measurement and in calibration.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “But you know what I liked about the poem on the nature of the shadow? Something so well known has a counterpart in particle physics and in cosmology and assumes a most decisive function in the workings of the universe. You see, the shadow particles for the gauge bosons are the RMP’s as well.
    You’ll see it, once you write down the spin conservation for the gauge bosons, the fieldagents for the elementary interactions; they absolutely require an anticlockwise spinning particle member to complete the unified field in a fundamental 11D supersymmetric fifth interaction. You could even return to the poem and identify the ‘scattered soul’ as the dichotomy between mind and body. This allows one then to identify the ‘suffering body’ as the massive or heavy part of the RMP and the ‘spirit’ as the photonic or light part and as the mind.
    So in my scientific terms, the poem simply indicates that a unifying link between mind and body does exist in the shadow agent; and this defines a fifth interaction as a ‘force of the mind’ in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity.

    The gauge bosonic blueprint is also called a Goldstone Boson and is RGB(+1) for both the EMI’s Eps-Photon and the SNI’s Eps-Gluon. The gauge bosonic blueprint is BGR(+1) for the WNI’s Ess-Antiphoton, always coupled to the HB in the RMP’s YYCCMM(-1) for the Supersymmetric-Shadow-Interaction or SSI. The gauge bosonic blueprint is BGR(-2) for the GI’s Graviton.
    You see that the spins add to zero and the colours add to VPE in conjunction with the template of the RMP. Without the RMP, we would neutralise (RGB+BGR)+(RGB+BGR)=(YCM+MCY)+(YCM+MCY) as VPE, but be left with a net spin of +1. That is part of the reason why the laboratories of particle physics observe the lefthandedness of the weak interaction in their analyses of their experimental data.”


    Logan Antico:
    “But why should those blueprints be as you say they are? Why isn’t the weakonic template anticlockwise for example? And aren’t photons, gluons and gravitons their own antiparticles, able to spin in both polarisations in perfect symmetry?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “We must return to the Genesis of the prespacetime to crystallise the definitions as given. Remember the symmetry rotations, which produced the blueprints for matter’s YCM and antimatter’s MCY? As gauge bosons in the unified field; the Eps-Photon, the Ess-Antiphoton, the Eps-Gluon and the Graviton have colourcharge because of their magnetopolic nature in the EMMR; they all are subject to VPEtransformations however. As product from the EMR, photons are colourless and obey a perfect parity found in the pair-production/annihilation loop in the UfoQR and the spin induction loops set in its construction.

    So the story continues with the 360-degree point after the first completion of the cycle. At that point, Eps, the vibratory part of the supermembrane inflected from the antiradiation template BGR(-1) back to its 0 degree definition of RGB(+1). However Ess, the winded part of the supermembrane did not inflect its BGR(+1) at the 360 degree point back into its original state of RGB(-1); but continued to rotate as BGR(+1), causing the elementary violations of space reflection symmetry and angular momentum conservation in a ‘conflict of the source energies’.

    This is the reason as to why we term the physics of unification ‘quantum relativity’. The relativity of the source quanta, relative to each other as modular parts of the selfsame supermembranial manifold or surface gave rise to the [Graviton’s] birth to conserve a parity violation, a breaking of the symmetry within or withon the supermembrane relative to itself.

    Of course one can see, that this ‘conflict’ is necessary; without it, no material creation, no Big Bang and an ‘empty’ universe; because no [Graviton] would have come into existence and no force of gravititation would have been necessary to balance a nonexpanding matterless and tensionless universe in a force of contraction. The primary wavefunctions, the two selfrelative rotations of Eps and Ess to mix the colourcharges can be linearised in the trigonometric function: (sin(x)+sin(-x)), resulting in a cancellation of the individual energies in a lower dimensional setting, and as the ‘virtual energy’ of the VPE in a geometricised form of the infinity symbol.

    In the higher dimensional scenario however, the Eigenenergy of the 11D supermembrane transforms the VPE of cancellation into a modular duality of the ‘doubling’ of itself in the inverse proportionality of Eps to magnetocharge (e*) and a Unity (Epsxe*) =1).
    So instead of defining its modular dual Ess as 1/Eps for a unification identity (EpsxEss=1); the modular dual becomes the magnetocharge, the coupling constants for the Eigenstate being given in the formulations:
    ( Epsx Ess = h2 & Eps/Ess = fps2 , with fpsxfss =1= lpsxlss & c = lpsxfps =1 / [ lssxfss ] ).
    But the initial 360-degree linearisation of the Eps&Ess wavefunctions defined the blueprints for matter/antimatter in YCM/MCY and the templates for antineutrino/neutrino in RRGGBB/BBGGRR, but nothing else but the original eigenstate for EMMR-RGB(+1) & Anti-EMMR-RGB(-1) relative to itself.
    Eps spins clockwise as RGB(+1) for the interval from 0-180 degrees and again from 360 degrees onwards and Eps spins anticlockwise as BGR(-1) to set the circular continuum in the UfoQR with arbitrary starting point at 0=360 degrees.
    Ess spins anticlockwise as RGB(-1) for the interval 0-180 degrees, inflects as BGR(+1) and continues thereafter with that blueprint, not inflecting again at the original starting point.
    Mathematically, this positions both Eps and Ess on the same side of the mirror-surface of duality.
    Ess[/font] spins anticlockwise as RGB(-1) relative to Eps in the 0-180 degree interval, but spins clockwise as BGR(+1) relative to itself; and thereafter Ess spins clockwise as BGR(+1) relative to Eps, but anticlockwise as RGB(-1) relative to itself. So Ess loses its relativity potential of the ‘duality in one’ at the completion of the circular continuum and the possibility for a new image in the spacetime mirror is born in the manifesto of mass. Ess, the secondary source, ‘refuses’ to inflect in harmonisation with the inflecting primary source Eps and continues to rotate clockwise with blueprint BGR(+1) ‘copying’ its modular dual.”


    Logan Antico:
    “Pardon my interruption Logan! But this is the myth of Lucifer, the ‘Lightbringer’ and greatest of the ‘archangels’. Spell REFUSAL backwards as LASUFER and recall that the ‘fall from heaven’, is thought to have been a consequence of Lucifer trying to copy God in ‘retracing his footsteps’ as the usurping of the highest of the cherubims, encoded in Isaiah.14.12-14 and Ezekiel.28.14-19.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “ Precisely! And so we omniscientists are able to explain the creation in scientific terminology, using the metaphors and similes in the sacred scrolls after all.

    The ‘Morning Star’ is also called the ‘Evening Star’ as the planet Venus and analogous to Lucifer as A LUCIFER=LUCIFERA=74+1=75=MARRY=JESUS+1=MESSIAH+1=CROSS+1=MELODY+1=BEAUTY+1=ENERGY+1=MARY ME=MARY E.M.=MAGDALENE M.= QUEEN M. and coded in John.21.11 as ‘153 Fishes’ in 153=’THE STAR MAGDALENE’=33+58+62=STAR IAMTHATIAM.
    LUCIFERA is the DOG, the wife of GOD and the ‘Mother of all Living’, as in Genesis.3.20.

    LUCIFERA is also the ‘Bride of the Lamb’ in the scroll of John’s Revelation, given in ‘holy dragonomy’ by Jesus to the bridegrooms in the heavenly wedding, encoded in Revelation.19.7-9. ; Revelation.2.28 and Revelation.22.1-6 are the codes for Jesus’ own selfdefinition:
    And I will give him the morning star......I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.”

    HeShe could not have said it any more clearer. Jesus’ she-part is Lucifera and his he-part is Lucifer, ‘his’ imaged brother in analogy to Adam being the brother of Pigeradamas. So Jesus’ words in John.14.30, simply state the fact, that the ‘earthly authority’ is but an image of the ‘heavenly authority’ and since heshe represents the ‘heavenly kingdom’ as the true original; the world as image of that kingdom, can only be a ‘fake kingdom’ should it refuse and deny its origin and dependancy from the first: “for the prince of this world cometh, and has nothing in me.” Jesus’ female part is LUCIFERA, ‘bride to be’ for all hisher ‘lovers’ and ‘followers’ and the male part is LUCIFER, whose ‘fake’ and unreal image heshe had come to usurp as the ‘truthful way’.

    Jesus is the ‘thief’, who comes in the night and wrestles the material creation from the ‘fake’ luciferic image, just as Jacob’s wrestling with an angel, in the image of God, resulted in his renaming from Jacob, ‘the supplanter’ to Israel, ‘a prince with God’; codes are in Revelation.3.3, Hosea.12.4 and in Genesis.32.24-30.
    And how did Jesus-Yeshua accomplish this? Because of hisher cosmogenetic selfdefinition as the archetype of the starhumanity; the disassociation of mind and body at the point of physical death had no power over himher. The mind-body dichotomy doesn’t exist in the ‘only begotten’, because it is extended in the duality of MindBody and BodyMind or the sexchromosomatic twinship of the androgynous dragonomy.

    In scientific terms, this manifests the linkage between matter and light and is more elegantly named as the RMP-coupling between EMMR and EMR in the creation of RadiationMass. Scriptures of all kinds tell of a conflict between GOD and his DOG, which is his wife, the DOG that RAN away, becoming the DOG RAN=DRAGON. This dragon then ‘plays up’ and around with the common creation and turns into the ‘Whore of Babylon’, being the LON(E) BABY of the Father as the ‘lost’ Mother in the ‘wilderness’.

    So the Eps-part of the 11D-supermembrane is the GOD of OmniScience as the vibratory part of the modular duality and the winded part Ess is the DOG of OmniScience, mythologically identified in the DEVIL or SATAN or SHAITAN or BEELZEBUB or what have you. So the Old Jerusalem as ‘God’s wife’ or God’s ‘land’ or God’s ‘inheritance’ changes into a ‘harlot’, before being redeemed as the ‘New Jerusalem’ in the dragonomies of the starhuman race. A ‘BRIDE OF GOD’ is an ‘ALPHA OF GOD’ in a new beginning in the transformation of the OMEGAKING=41+41=82=ARMAGEDDON into a New ALPHAQUEEN=38+62=100=BRIDEQUEEN.

    ARMAGEDDON=DRAGON MADE=82=100-18=BRIDEQUEEN-(6+6+6).

    The Old Jerusalem had given many children to both the blueprint of the EMMR-Spirit-Radiation and its image in the EMR-Mass-Radiation; and combining the two aspects would allow Mother Barbelo to gain the Sophia-Wisdom-Gnosis to metamorphose herhis status as the Old MotherFather into a new being of the MotherFather. Shehe would ascend from the 9th heaven of 9D-space at the inside surface of the timeless 10Dspace mirror to the outside of the 11D-space mirror of the FatherMother to be ‘happy’ as the GODDOG=DOGGOD perfect symmetry again; but now being able to experience herhis generations of the starhuman children in a resetting of the 11-dimensional ‘clock’ of omnitime.

    And the FatherMother would have a smile on hisher face of the starhumanity; because hisher ‘masterplan’ had worked perfectly, as heshe had always known it would. It would have been the MATHIMATIA=I AM THAT I AM, the NAME=AMEN of the ‘burning bush’ of Moses, in which heshe had first shown hisher face to hisher children, which would have manifested this ‘masterplan’ after a historic play; centred on hisher ‘firstborn’ and following the calendrical resettings; had prepared the way for the insightful knowledge to bear fruit.

    And the DRAGON=59 would finally realise its true nature as the first image of its own self as the mythological SWORD=WORDS=79=OF FATHER=MOTHER of JUSTICE=LAMB+DRAGON=MAN+DRAGON=87=DRAGON+OM would be drawn as the EXCALIBUR=95=SCORPIO=NEPTUNE of the selfsame MATHIMATIA=95=IAMTHATIAM=YAHWHEY=”THE MAGDALENE”=”THE QUEEN”; with relevant encodings in Micah.4.1-...10-13 and Isaiah.62.4 defining the ‘Daughter of Zion’.

    There are of course arbitrarily many connections and interpretations in the esoteric application of this number-letter code; but it eases the telling of the story from the necessary mathematical descriptions, which are rigorous and do not possess the degrees of freedom of the esoteric labellings. All the layphilosophers, unfamiliar with the mathematical encodings, can nevertheless study their sacred scrolls and such to find the story beneath the stories; perhaps they can even begin to write their own story on top of that original story of the Genesis, to give it colour and a new energy.

    And such applications are part of the graduation of the starhumanity anyway; for in using the protouniverse, multiverses are to come into being through the cosmogenetic families and their generations. Then the empty omniverse of the FatherMother-MotherFather’s Grandparenthood would surely begin to fill up in becoming blessed with GrandSonDaughters and GrandDaughterSons.
    The ‘darkness’ in body and in mind is the agency of Ess in the supersymmetric templates for the body-gauge weakons of the WNI and the mind-gauge gravitons of the GI; whilst the ‘light’ in body and in mind are given by Eps in the supersymmetry of the mind-gauge photon for the EMI and the body-gauge gluon for the SNI. All blueprints are reducible to the cosmogenetic beginning – all are derivatives from the [EpsEss] heterotic supermembrane class HE(8x8).

    So now one just adds one to one to deduce the gauge bosonic unified field of QR. After the circular continuum was established in blueprint; matter YCM and antimatter MCY could not come into material existence, unless something new created mass to energise the templates.
    That something was the blueprint equation: (RGB(+1) + BGR(+1) + ? = 0). And one doesn’t have to think like Albert Einstein to work out what (?) must be to reharmonise that equation; (?) must be (BGR(-1) + RGB(-1)).

    We recall that RGB(-1) relative to Ess is now the same as BGR(+1) relative to Eps and that the only point in the UfoQR where the BGR blueprint exists is the odd pi-point at 180 degrees, setting the Gravitational Interaction GI and where it manifests as the neutrino-point BBGGRR(0)=(BGR(0)+BGR(0))=(BGR(+1)+BGR(-1)) in the mutual point of inflexion for both Eps and Ess.
    At the even EMI pi-point, where we are now situated as the completion of the 2pi cyclicity, the antineutrino RRGGBB(0) partitions as (RGB(-1)+RGB(+1)) and we now rewrite the energy equation to derive the protogluon for the SNI in both even pi-points, mirrored in the odd pi-point.

    Eps-Photon RGB(+1) + Ess-Antiphoton BGR(+1) +((RGB(+1) + {RGB(-1) + BGR(+1)} + BGR(-1)) + GluoGraviton(-2) = 0.
    Eps-Photon RGB(+1) + Ess-Antiphoton BGR(+1) + Gluon RGB(+1) + VPE(0) + BGR(-1) + GluoGraviton(-2) = 0.
    Eps-Photon RGB(+1) + Ess-Antiphoton BGR(+1) + Gluon RGB(+1) + Graviton BGR(-2) + VPE(-1) = 0.

    The present situation utilises the neutral Anti-neutrino blueprint and introduces a colourless ‘Spinner’ in a spininduction particle to conserve the spinangular momentum violated in the sourceconflict. The zero-spin VPE template now 'mass induces' in assuming the (-1) spin as the original 'missing' BGR spin in conjunction with the 'colourless' GluoGraviton transforming into the BGR blueprint, changing the GluoGraviton into the Graviton of the GI.
    We so find ourselves in the process of extending the unified field from its 0-360 degree definition. The Eps-Photon can be considered to be situated at the 360 degree coordinate, having effectively switched location with the Ess-Antiphoton at the 0 degree point in the linear sense. The orginal wavefunctions were sin(x) for the Eps-Photon situated at the 0 degree point and sin(-x) for the Eps-Antiphoton at the 360 degree point, meeting at the 180 degree point of mutual inflexion.

    The new wavefunction for the Eps-Antiphoton, now usurped in the Ess-Antiphoton, will so become an opposing wavefunction, travelling from projected linear positive infinity and intersect the oppositely travelling wavefunction for the Eps-Photon somewhere near the old 180 degree inflexion point. Its mathematical form will be a negative sinusoidal function intersecting a positive sinusoidal complement to define the unified field in its periodicity, which must be a multiple of the source wavelength λps.

    The present situation is not linearly symmetric since Eps inflects towards positive infinity, but Ess ignores the propagation towards negative infinity to the left in ‘retracing’ the Eps-path to the right. The order for the manifestation of the SNI-Gluon and the ‘Spinners’ hence proceeds to the left and into ‘unchartered’ or undefined spacetime.

    Since the Ess-Antiphoton is the only blueprint capable of merging in the mixing of colourcharges, it neutralises with the antineutrinoic RGB(-1) in the form of VPE(0) and defines the Gluon RGB(+1) as the remaining antineutrinoic half.
    The equilibrium equation therefore becomes: Eps-Photon(RGB)(+1) + Gluon(RGB)(+1) + VPE(-2) = 0.

    To manifest the new wavefunction for the Eps-Antiphoton; the BGR-blueprint is required to become spininduced in the opposite direction to that of the Eps-Photon and the only place where that can occur, is at the neutrinopoint at 180 degrees. The angular propagation for the (Eps-Photon + Ess-Antiphoton) hence rewrites the equilibrium equation at the GI-point as:
    Eps-Photon(RGB)(+1) + Ess-Antiphoton(BGR)(+1) + ((BGR)(+1) + (BGR)(-1)) + VPE(0) + Gluograviton(-2) = 0.

    Now the Eps-Photon forms VPE(-2) with (BGR)(-1) and the Ess-Antiphoton(BGR)(+1) and (BGR)(+1).
    Combining the wavefunctions at the EMI-and GI points for the ‘twinned’ creation: Eps-Photon (RGB) (+1) + Ess-Antiphoton (BGR) (+1) + Gluon (RGB) (+1) + (BGR) (+1) + 2VPE (-2) = 0.

    This allows a mixing of (RGB)(+1) with (BGR)(-2) back at the 0-degree point in a conjunction with a spininduction of the VPE in ((BGR)(+1-2-1) + VPE(0) + VPE(-1)) and defining the Graviton(BGR)(-2) as the new Eps-Antiphoton in the process.

    The UfoQR equation now sets four gauge bosons in tandem with two forms of VPE:
    EMI/Eps-Photon (RGB) (+1) + WNI/Ess-Antiphoton (BGR) (+1) + SNI/ Gluon (RGB) (+1) +GI/ Graviton (BGR) (-2) + VPE (0) + VPE (-1) = 0 ; with VPE=YCM+MCY=RGB+BGR=MGGM=YBBY=CRRC=RCCR=BYYB=GMMG given as the Base-VPE of one mixing of YCM+MCY or RGB+BGR.

    Since (YCM+MCY+MCY+YCM)(-1)=(VPE+VPE)(-1)=[(YYCCMM)(-1)+(MMCCYY)(0)]=[RMP(-1)+Anti-Higgs(0)] = [(YYCCMM)(0)+(MMCCYY)(-1)]=[Higgs(0)+Anti-RMP(-1)] as the quark-part of the Higgs Boson amd as the anti-quark part of the Anti-Higgs Boson respectively; we also derive the [RMP(-1)] from that equilibrium equation and notice the suppression of the [Anti-RMP] as super-symmetric partner for (MCY)(+½) coupled with (MCY)(-½) in the formation of antimatter.

    Distributing the spin quanta as: [(YCM)(±½) + (MCY)(±½)] gives a spin induced VPE-state, such as positronium, an exotic atomic energy state or onium as an electron and its antiparticle (positron) forming a short lived particular state with parallel or aligned spins VPE(±1) called para-positronium or anti-parallel or cancelling spins VPE(0) = RGB(+1)+BGR(-1) named ortho-positronium, the latter decaying into 2 photons/gamma rays in about 0.125 nanoseconds as RGB(+1)+BGR(-1)⇒ γ(+1) + γ(-1) and for the 'virtual' colour charges RGB and BGR 'annihiilated' in the mass-production of the 'colourless and real' gamma photons.

    Ortho-positronium decays in about 142 nanoseconds into its VPE(±1) ground state of 3 gamma rays as RGB(+1)+BGR(-1)+γ(+1) ⇒ 2γ(+1)+γ(-1)
    or RGB(-1)+BGR(+1)+RGB(-1)⇒ 2γ(-1)+γ(+1) with a third ground state decay gamma photon required to conserve the Boson quantum spin of the transforming particle system and requiring more time than para-positronium to do so in a factor of about 1136.


    The nature of the ‘virtual energy’ can so be reassessed as an elementary coupling between source bosonic blueprints; the same which find themselves in a continuous process of transforming the constituent particle templates within the unified field from one form into another. The reality of the elementary particles so derives from the vacuum being subject to the conservation laws under utility of the VPE within the UfoQR.”

    ufoqr. ufieldgenesis.

    Logan Antico:
    "Then the virtuality of the vacuum of space is also the virtuality of the spiritual reality?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "You could call it that, but I prefer to term it the 'Monopolic-Energy-Continuum', precursive to the existence of restmass and the gravitational parameters.
    The rigour and discipline of modern science is rather aversive to the vagueness and superficiality posing as quasiscientific models for the unobserved, but deduced supersymmetric reality."


    Logan Antico:
    "I do agree, the great 'spiritual revolution' must be founded in modern science and despite the many 'spiritual adepts', who only too often are mentally rather inert in their phobias towards anything associated with the intellectual discipline required in the study of the sciences.
    Once we can explain the 'spirit' in scientific terminology, then all the humbug of the antiscientific pretenders must subside and only the concepts with a factual basis in omniscience will survive the cleansing of the reformation."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and all those concepts revolve about the metamorphosis and transformation of energy; originally EMMR and then its derivative in the EMR.
    We first encounter this in the superparity of the VPE at the GI- and EMI-intersection points in the UFoQR, where a resetting of the angular parameters defines an arbitrary starting point.
    RGB(0)+BGR(0)=((RB)(GG)(BR))(0)=(MGGM)(0) at 0 degrees and ((BG)(RR)(GB))(0)=(CRRC)(0) at 120 degrees and then ((GR)(BB)(RG))(0)=(YBBY)(0) at 240 degrees.
    But (MGGM)(0)=((MG)(MG))(0)=(W*W*)(0) or (B*B*)(0) as the mesonic mixing and that is VPE(0).

    The SNI coupling constant is derived as the cuberoot of [Alpha] in the pentagonally based algorithm of the Genesis and relates all other coupling constants between the elementary interactions as a consequence of that in its association with the energy of the Higgs Boson.
    So matching the [Alpha]-Constant to the RGB-blueprint and the [Omega]-Constant to the BGR-template as required by modular symmetry, also sets the Eps-Photon as the fieldagent for the EMI with clockwise 1-spin and the Ess-Graviton-Antiphoton as the fieldagent for the GI with anticlockwise 2-spin; the GI requiring the WNI-Ess-Antiphoton for spin-angular momentum conservation however.

    Now recall the blueprint which had created the matter/antimatter templates as primary constituent of the UFoQR; it had been the Antiphoton(RGB)(-1) as the modular dual of Eps in Ess, then the DOG and heavenly Queen and which had now become nonexistent in the luciferic insurrection.
    The next step so is clear; to regain hisher queen, the selfrelative Eps must define a new anticlockwise spinning particle template, one which cannot now take the form of the BGR=W* or B* colour triplet; but such a blueprint has just been created in the (VPE+VPE)(-1) partition in the [RMP(-1)], joined to the antiquarkpart of the [AntiHB(0)] in the template (MMCCYY)(0).
    The [AntiRMP(+1)] is joined to the quarkpart of the [HB(0)] as (YYCCMM)(0) in the same equation relative to Ess, which changes all the spins of the (RGB+BGR)-VPE and (VPE+VPE)(-1).
    Joining the two relativities as the 'new double creation' then renders the gauge bosons as their own antiparticles in the pairings:
    EMI: (Eps-Photon(+1)&Ess-Photon(-1)); SNI: (Gluon(+1)&Antigluon-1)); GI: (Graviton(-2)&Antigraviton(+2)) and WNI: (Ess-Antiphoton(+1)&Eps-Antiphoton(-1)).
    As can be easily established; the Gluon(+1)=Eps-Photon(+1) and the Antigluon(-1)=Ess-Photon(-1).

    The HB is defined as a scalar fieldparticle however, and so must manifest in unison with the internal spindistribution of the WNI in conjunction with the SSI; the process of the HBRMI so becomes interdependent upon a coupling between the SSI's 'MindBody' and the WNI's 'BodyMind'.
    In other words, the EMR-coupling of the RMP cannot act independent of the EMMR-coupling of the massless BGR.

    Hence we find intermediate 'Vector-Bosons' or Weakons, which as field agents for the WNI do carry mass as a direct consequence of the HBRMI.
    In the Genesis of the premass scenario, RGB(+1) blended as the selfrelative 'King of Heaven' with the selfrelative 'Queen of Heaven' in the form of BGR(-1).
    This 'Queen of Heaven' became the selfrelative 'King of Antiheaven' as RGB(-1) to also allow a 'Queen of Antiheaven' to come into being, its existence demanding a rebirth of a new selfrelative 'Queen of Heaven' in the overall process, however.

    The definition for the selfrelative 'New Queen of Heaven' is the blueprint (YYCCMM)(-1), using the template of the suppressed antimatter as its 'unreal' image to manifest itself.
    The selfrelative 'New Queen of Antiheaven' is the template (MMCCYY)(+1), now using the blueprint of the suppressed matter as its 'unreal' image to come into being.
    The selfrelative 'King of Heaven' as RGB(+1) so 'makes love' to the selfrelative 'New Queen of Heaven' as the SSI-blueprint RMP(-1), imaged in the 'lovemaking' between the selfrelative 'King of Antiheaven' in RGB(-1)and the selfrelative 'Queen of Antiheaven' in the template AntiRMP(+1).

    The completed Unified-Field-Equations in gauge bosonic terms are then:

    Eps-Photon(RGB)(+1) + Gluon(RGB)(+1) + Graviton(BGR)(-2) + Ess-Antiphoton(BGR)(+1) + RMP(YYCCMM)(-1) + (MMCCYY)(0) = 0;
    relative to Eps and where Antigluon=Ess-Photon.

    Ess-Photon(RGB)(-1) + Antigluon(RGB)(-1) + Antigraviton(BGR)(+2) + Eps-Antiphoton(BGR)(-1) + AntiRMP(MMCCYY)(+1) + (YYCCMM)(0) = 0;
    relative to Ess and where Gluon=Eps-Photon.

    For the combined sourcesink relativity:
    4(RGB+BGR)=[Anti-Higgs-Neutrinon + Higgs-Neutrino]; which reduces the two merged expressions to:
    RMP(-1) + HB(0) + Anti-RMP(+1) + Anti-HB(0) = 0.

    The question now becomes one of definition.
    Should one define matter as the basic constituent in the universe, then antimatter must become suppressed, as a consequence of the unified field's construction - or vice versa."


    Logan Antico:
    "And all of this reduces even further to a question of the RMP existing as the image of antimatter or the Anti-RMP becoming the dominant 'mindforce' in the universe as the real part of the unreal matter."


    Robert Sceptico:
    " Well, observations indicate that matter, as defined, exists by itself; while antimatter only appears in the form of products in the pair-production via the VPE."


    Logan Antico:
    "Hence the Eps relativity dominates if one defines the existing mass in terms of matter and the Ess relativity is the one which is suppressed.
    But could one say, that the RMP is a mind interaction which resonates with the unified field in harmony, whilst the SSI-Anti-RMP(+1) would dissonate?
    This would just about allow a definition of 'good' and 'evil' in scientific terms, would it not?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "There you have it; our science has advanced to the stage, where so called ethical- or moral issues have become subject to a tentative evaluation in omniscientific terms.
    If we scientists get our act together; we might yet be able to establish universal law, as given by nature and the unification of the sciences."


    Logan Antico:
    "But you haven't defined the new extended wavefunction for the UFoQR yet; the old infinity symbol?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    “The sinusoidal wavefunction, establishing matter/antimatter and antineutrino/neutrino templates was (sin(x) + sin(-x) = 0), which is the infinity symbol.

    The sinusoidal wavefunction incorporating gravity after the source conflict is defined on a 1440 degree interval or 8p radians for exactly four Eps-wavelengths λps.
    Starting the rotation of the Eps-Photon at the 0 degree point and placing the new Eps-Antiphoton as the Graviton onto the 360 degree point defines this 1440 degree interval as (-600 to 840 degrees).
    Because the Graviton rotates twice as fast, than the Eps-Photon and the critical intersection points are at multiples of 60 degrees for a mixing of the colour sectors; those resonance angles occur whenever the Graviton has rotated through 40 degrees anticlockwise and the Eps-Photon through 20 degrees clockwise.

    Counting angles backwards in the series: -40, -120, -200, -280,- 360,- 440,.... from 360 degrees for the Graviton(BGR)(-2) is equivalent to counting backwards in adding 360 degrees and so we get the series: 320, 240, 160, 80, 0, -80, -160,....and so on.
    For the Eps-Photon(RGB)(+1), starting at 0 degrees we have: 20, 60, 100, 140, 180, 220, 260......
    We now know, that the combined function resonates in a period of the difference between those angles and so in the sequence: 300, 180, 60, -60, -180, -300, -420,....always in 120 degree steps.
    The Eps-Photon then inflects every 120, 240, 360, 480,...degrees, starting from the 0 point and the Graviton inflects every 240 degrees starting from 360 degrees at: -360, -120, 120, 360, 600,...
    Setting the wavefunction for the Eps-Photon as (u(x)=sin[ωx]) and that for the Graviton with a phase difference of 120 degrees or (2π/3) radians as (f(x)=sin[-ω(x -2π/3)]); then for a period of (T=2π/ω), the wavelength for an ordinary sinusoidal propagation is twice the measure between inflection points and we find (ω=180/120=3/2) for the Eps-Photon’s: u(x)=sin(3x/2) with period (4π/3) and (v=180/240=¾) for the Graviton’s: sin[π/2 – 3x/4]= -cos(3x/4) with period (8π/3).

    There are thus 6 Eps-Photon oscillations and 3 Graviton oscillations in the UfoQR’s quantised and linearised extent of 1440 degrees or 8πradians.
    The new combined sinusoidal unified field equation is hence: ( UF(x) = sin(3x/2) – cos(3x/4)).

    This function consists of a wave moving to the right, intersecting a wave moving to the left in 12 junction points, setting the locations of the magnetic monopoles in the UfoQR and as subspaces partitioned as monopolic current loops.
    The direction of magnetomonopolic current loops alternates between clockwise and anticlockwise and either encompasses the previously defined matter-antimatter and Antineutrino-neutrino points or not.

    ufoqr.

    The roots of UF(x) are at: -600, -440, -360, -280, -120, 40, 120, 200, 360, 520, 600, 680 and 840 degrees, the latter coinciding with the first at -600 degree to circularly close the UfoQR.
    The 12 junction points are at: -600 or 840, -528.5, -360, -191.5, -120, -48.5, 120, 288.5, 360, 431.5, 600 and 768.5 degrees.
    Junction #7 is the -600 or 840 degree point and couples the colourless lefthanded spininduction to the SNI of matter YCM in righthandedness, the matter points being situated at 780 and 840 degrees in circuit 6-7-6 and the 840 degree point the SNI-YCM-zero of UF(x).
    The -360 degree point is junction #9, coupling lefthanded matter YCM to righthanded antimatter MCY, the YCM-points being at -300 and -240 degrees and the MCY-points at -420 and -480 degrees to set the Pair-Production/Annihilation-Loop as circuit 8-9-10-9-8 over 337 degrees.

    There are no zeroes for individuated YCM-MCY manifestation, however the -360 degree point at junction #9 is a root of UF(x) and an EMI even pi-point for (RRGGBB)(+½) anti-neutrinos.
    The 8-9-10-9-8 circuit does not encompass any n’s as odd pi-point for the GI however.
    This is the reason, as to why the process of Pair-Production (YCM-MCY=VPE) requires mass to be present for it to occur.
    The -120 degree point is junction #11, coupling righthanded colourless spininduction to the SNI of antimatter in lefthandedness, the MCY-points being at -60 and -120 degrees, the latter as the SNI-MCY zero of the UF(x) in the circuit 10-11-12-11-10.
    The 120 degree point is junction #1 and couples a righthanded matter loop, containing an antineutrino point at 0 degrees to a lefthanded neutrino loop containing a neutrino-point at 180 degrees.
    The YCM-points are at 60 and 120 degrees in the circuit 12-1-2-1-12 and a WNI-YCM root at #1.
    Whereas junction #9 was spinsymmetric for a potential clockwise- and anticlockwise antineutrino; junction #1 is nonparitive in setting RRGGBB as clockwise basic antineutrino and BBGGRR as its anticlockwise basic neutrino counterpart.
    At the zero at #1, the righthanded Antineutrino at 0 degrees inflects to become a lefthanded neutrino and the lefthanded neutrino at 180 degrees inflects as a righthanded Antineutribo in the selfintersecting monopolic magnetocircuit 12-1-2-1-12; the 0 and 180 degree points not being roots of UF(x).

    Magnetocurrent 12-1-12 so becomes a righthanded Antineutrino-Nonparity loop and magnetocurrent 1-2-1 is a lefthanded Neutrino-Nonparity loop, linked to matter for the partial weak interaction of YCM via the circuit 12-1-12; the (W-(+1)) weakon and the (Zo) manifesting at the WNI-YCM root; the (Zo) using the inflection property in the forms: ( Zo(-1)=( n (-½)+ n (-½) & Zo(+1)=Antineutrino(+½)+Antineutrino(+½) ).

    A lefthanded muon (m(-1)) for example, so must decay into a lefthanded electron, a righthanded antineutrino and a lefthanded neutrino under the conservation laws for spin and VPE.

    The 360 degree point is junction #3 and couples a righthanded antineutrino-loop to a lefthanded antineutrino-loop as the magnetocircuit 2-3-4-3-2 with an Antin-root at junction #3.
    The 600 degree point is junction #5, linking a righthanded neutrino loop about a GI point at 540 degrees to a lefthanded antineutrino loop with an EMI point at 720 degrees.
    The MCY-points are at 600 and 660 degrees, with the zero of UF(x) at 600 degrees as junction #5 being the WNI-MCY root for the manifestation of the (W+) weakon.
    Junction #5 defines a righthanded BBGGRR as basic neutrino template in magnetocurrent 4-5-4 and a lefthanded antineutrino blueprint RRGGBB in the circuit 5-6-5.
    The righthanded neutrino at 540 degrees flips into a lefthanded Antineutrino at 600 degrees and the lefthanded Antineutrino at 720 degrees flips into a righthanded neutrino at 600 degrees.
    Setting the circuit 12-1-2-3-2-1-12 as a WNI-Current for matter and the circuit 3-4-5-6-5-4-3 as a WNI-Current for antimatter shows a generation for the Zo’s (Antin-n) pairings as for the WNI-YCM zeropoint at junction #1.

    A (W+(+1)) requires however a lefthanded neutrino to manifest at junction #5 and so must use VPE to transform the lefthanded Antin into a righthanded Antineutrino and the righthanded neutrino into a lefthanded neutrino.
    (Neutrino(+½) + Antineutrino(-½)) =(Neutrino(+½)+Anti-GraviPhoton(-1))+(Antineutrino(-½)+GraviPhoton(+1))=(Neutrino(-½)+Antineutrino(+½)).
    Neutral current interactions, involving the Zo, so do not violate the parity between YCM and MCY; but lefthanded Antineutrinos and righthanded neutrinos become suppressed in charged WNI currents.
    Junction #3 couples the WNI between YCM and MCY as an antineutrino point however and rendering the absence of antimatter in the universe as a consequence of the lack of symmetry to generate neutrinos accompanying the antimatter definitions for the WNI gauge bosons.

    YCM antineutrinos are freely generated at the #3- and #9 junctions as even pi/EMI-nodes, both being zeroes of UF(x) and junction #3 setting the nonparity in the WNI between YCM & MCY.
    MCY neutrinos are only magnetopolically generated at the 180 and 540 degree points in odd pi of the GI, none being roots of the UF(x).
    The blueprint for the weakons must now extend the template definitions in the form of VPE and the Higgs Boson.
    The base-VPE is defined as YCM+MCY=RGB+BGR=BYYB=RCCR=GMMG with higher resonances given in multiples VPE*=VPE+VPE=RRGGBB+BBGGRR=MMGGGGMM as the superpositioning of two basic antineutrino- and neutrino templates, for instance.

    We define a spininduced VPE*-state as the W-nought-weakon: ( Wo(+-1) =(MMGGGGMM) (±1) ), implying the merger of the VPE with a colourless ‘Spinner’ from the spininduction loop.

    The [GluoGraviton(-2)], [Anti-GluoGraviton(+2)], [GraviPhoton(+1)], and the [Anti-GraviPhoton(-1)] are its constituents.

    A Neutral-Current gauge boson is the Z-nought-weakon and is defined in the superposition of two base neutrinos for lefthanded 1-spin and as two base antineutrinos for righthanded 1-spin in the blueprints: (Zo(+1)=RRRRGGGGBBBB(+1) & Zo(-1)=BBBBGGGGRRRR(-1)).

    This superposition also specifies the 1/2spin defined for the basic (anti)neutrino templates in their manifestation through the WNI.

    The Charged-Current weakons are the W-plusminus-weakons and defined in the superposition of a leptonic (anti)ring with a base anti(neutrino) template.
    YCM’s (W-): ( W-=YCM(OLR) (+½) + Ant i n (+½) ) and (W+=MCY(OLR) (bar)(-½)+ n (-½) ) for MCY’s (W+).
    Doubling either of the Charged weakons and superposing a (Anti)Gluograviton gives the (Anti)HB.
    The anticlockwise W-minus, containing a OLR(-½) is nonparity-suppressed in the WNI; as is the clockwise W-plus in the OLR(bar)(+½) of antimatter.
    The W-minus weakon so ignores all righthanded particles and couples exclusively with lefthanded YCM-particles and the W-plus corollarily links only with righthanded MCY-antiparticles.
    The basic decay products for the W-minus are so an electron(or muon)-antineutrino pair and the W-plus manifests in the coupling of a positron(or antimuon) with a neutrino.
    The RMP manifests at the 200 degree point for (sin(300 degrees)=cos(150 degrees)) and as part of the YCM weak interaction circuit 1-2-1.
    The interval from 120 to 200 degrees encompasses the 180 degree neutrino point and derives the RMP from the YCM-point at 120 degrees in the circuit 1-2-1.
    Its image is the interval from 520 to 600 degrees about the 540 degree neutrino point for the manifestation of the AntiRMP from the MCY-point at 600 degrees and circuit 5-4-5.
    The antineutrino point at 0 degrees is in the interval of the zeroes of -120 to 40 degrees, linking the nonparity of matter to the parity of antimatter in the SNI loop 11-12-1-12-11.

    The antineutrino point at 720 degrees is in the interval of zeroes from 680 to 840 degrees, joining the nonparity of antimatter to the parity of matter in the SNI loop 5-6-7-6-5.
    The last two zeroes are found in the EMI symmetry loop at -440 and -280 degrees.
    This pairing loop is perfectly symmetric in both matter and in antimatter and extends its parity in its left boundary of lefthanded spininduction: (GluoGraviton(-2) & Antigraviphoton(-1)), and righthanded YCM-SNI and in its right boundary of righthanded spininduction: (Anti-GluoGraviton(+2) & GraviPhoton(+1)) and lefthanded MCY-SNI in the supercircuit 6-7-8-9-10-11-12-11-10-9-8-7-6.

    The RMP is weakly interacting via its antineutrinoic couplings and so can only materialise at the 40 and 200 degree points.
    Whenever YCM materialises as consequence of the HBRMI, then the AntiRMP, being joined to the HB(0), becomes a ‘virtual image’ for the RMP in the Eps-frame of reference; the latter manifesting as a ‘real image’ blueprint for the suppressed AntiHB.
    The 40 degree point is located in the 12-1-12 YCM-Nonparity-Loop with an EMI point at 0 degrees and the 200 degree point is situated within the YCM-WNI-Loop 1-2-3-2-1 with a GI point at 180 degrees and as the coupling of EMR with restmass requires a Graviton-point, the 200 degree point becomes the sole RMP-generation point in the UfoQR.
    The outlet for the AntiRMP is similarly found at the zero at 520 degrees and not at 680 degrees.
    The 180 degree GI point is within an anticlockwise YCM-WNI loop for the matter nonparity and the 540 degree GI point is within a clockwise MCY-WNI loop for antimatter nonparity.

    The YCM-WNI-Loop contains the required lefthanded Higgs-Neutrino as the leptonic part of the AntiHiggs Boson; but the MCY-WNI-Loop harbours the suppressed righthanded Higgs-Neutrino, rendering the righthanded leptonic part of the HB, (which is a righthanded Higgs-Antineutrino) as asymmetric to the lefthanded leptonic part of the AntiHB.
    Anti-RMP’s are subsequently suppressed in the Eps-relativity and do not manifest in the UfoQR.”


    Logan Antico:
    “This Wo-weakon, as spinning VPE, does it not violate the scalar nature of the vacuum energy?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “No, it is actually rather necessary for three-particle decays, as in the scenario of the positronium particle.
    An electron YCM with clockwise 1/2 spin can temporarily merge with a positron MCY with an anticlockwise 1/2 spin to give an unstable para-positronium state, forming VPE(0) for a mean lifetime of a nanosecond or so, before decaying into two photons with opposite spins and opposite linear momenta – this produces the W* state from the B* state via the intermediancy of the VPE.
    But what happens if the spins of YCM and MCY are aligned, both clockwise or anticlockwise?

    Then we get ortho-positronium, say RCCR(±1)=B*(±1), utilising the Wo(±1) and it takes longer, by a multiple factor of 8x[Alpha] (each of about 1/137th), for ortho-positronium to decay into three photons, one of which spins opposite the other two. 8x137=1096, each alpha factor describing one of the 8 gluonic permutation states from the massive eigen state E=mc2 and BBB to BBW to BWB to WBB to BWW to WBW to WWB to WWW as radiative self state E=hf.
    [Alpha], the EMR finestructure constant sets the probability of radiation interacting with mass, as you know.”


    Logan Antico:
    “ And those resulting photons have no colourcharge, because they interact electromagnetically via the EMI and are not of gauge bosonic origin through the EMMR?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “Yes, the VPE neutralises the colourcharge via gauge bosonic EMMR definitions and the action of the colourless spininduction loops, the same which neighbour the symmetry circuit for the pair-production/annihilation in the supercircuit 7-8-9-10-11-10-9-8-7.
    Spininduced VPE so is simply the superposition of an (Anti)-GraviPhoton(±1) with the base-VPE.
    The resulting photons are colourless and their own antiparticles; the colourcharged VPE being transformed in the B* to W* process.
    The ‘Spinners’ are bosonic and are not bound in the Pauli Principle of Exclusion, which states that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state.
    Bosons so can superimpose the same spin state as required by the conservation laws and three ‘Spinners’, two Graviphotons with one Anti-GraviPhoton or vice versa manifest in the spin of the photons.”


    Logan Antico:
    “So when a W-minus weakon changes a lefthanded neutron into a proton with a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino, this engages a ‘Spinner’?”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “You’ve got it!
    The W-minus is righthanded because of the antineutrino definition and couples only to lefthanded particles in the WNI to allow spinneutralisation in the act of VPE-transformation.

    The neutron has a quarkstructure of dud=KIRKKIR and when it finds itself within a nucleus with other nucleons, it joins in the quarkian geometry of the kernel-symmetries.
    Because unlike quark geometries attract and like quark geometries repel, the stable state for the neutron is the up-quark in the middle, bounded by a d-quark at its right and left.
    This linearisation is also known as the ‘Chromoelectromagnetic-Quark-Confinement’ and can be represented in a magnetoaxis, about which the individual quarks oscillate.
    The neutron within a nucleus so becomes stable in aligning its quarks along the magnetoaxis, which joins other magnetoaxes in favouring alternating up-down K-KIR quark geometries.
    The magnetoaxes then join in a torus-dumbell or ‘sausage’-like fashion, with multiples of the 12-tiered (u-d-u-d-u-d-u-d-u-d-u-d=(proton)(neutron)(proton)(neutron)) form; which is the Helium-4 nucleus, or ‘Alpha-particle’; being favoured for exceptional stability in atomic nuclear terms.

    Outside the nucleus, the neutron decays in a rearrangement of the stable dud form into udd and for the purpose to link with another up-quark in the oscillation of the ‘exposed’ d-quark’s mesonic ring as a negatively charged IMR being attracted to a u-quark’s positively charged kernel.
    The neutron’s IMR oscillates towards its leptonic OLR resonance, which is the (W-)’s OLR in the UfoQR at the YCM point at 120 degrees in the WNI-circuit 1-2-3-2-1, accessing the Antineutrino at #9.
    So the neutron’s quarks spin in the formation: (u(-½)d(+½)[u+IMR](-½)) along its magnetoaxis, the IMR-spin being absorbed in the u-quark and the IMR(0) manifesting as: (e-(-½)+Antineutrino(+½)) and as a leftpolarised electron with its anti-neutrino via agency of the W-minus in the WNI-decay.

    The ‘virtuality’ of a colourcharged W-(+1) is negated in the ‘virtuality’ of a colourless Anti-GraviPhoton(-1).
    So since the W-minus’ colourcharge does not materialise, but is transformed in the form of the ‘Spinners’, the electron is always left polarised in the neutron’s beta decay.”


    Logan Antico:
    “And where does the RMP fit in its purpose to transform mass itself into a state of supersymmetry?”



    Robert Sceptico:
    “Indeed, you find a new potential in the UfoQR at the RMP point at 200 degrees.
    The primary colour triplets of RGB and YCM have mixed in the doublet complementarity of the VPE in RC=MG=BY=B*=W*, but they have not yet mixed in triplet form.
    Mixing Red and Yellow gives Orange or (RY=O) and Yellow and Green mix to Lime in (YG=L); Green and Cyan mix to Turquoise or (GC=T) and Cyan and Blue mix as Aqua in (CB=A); Blue and Magenta mix to Indigo in (BM=I) and Magenta and Red mix as Violet in (MR=V) for a closed colourspectrum: (ROYLGTCABIMVR) in 12 colours, which image the monopolic junction points.
    Complementary colours are doublets (OA=LI=TV=RC=GM=BY) & triplets (RGB=YCM=OTI=LAV).

    We so consider two cases in the two relativity frames, say the mixing of the Eps-Photon(RGB)(+1) with the (RMP)(-1) and the mixing of the Ess-Photon with the Anti-RMP(+1).
    The YCM-point at 120 degrees manifests as the RMP at 200 degrees and the MCY-point at 600 degrees manifests the AntiRMP at 520 degrees.
    Resonance White-States W*=B* for the RMP are at 120 and 300 degrees and resonance W*’s for the Anti-RMP are at 60 and 240 degrees; hence uniting the old YCM-matter points at 60 and 120 degrees with the old MCY-antimatter points at 240 and 300 degrees.
    At 0 and 360 degrees the RMP(0) template is LAV, inflecting to VAL at 180 degrees and being OTI at 60 degrees and ITO at 240 degrees.
    At 0 and 360 degrees the Anti-RMP(0) blueprint is ITO, inflecting to OTI at 180 degrees and being VAL at 120 degrees and LAV at 300 degrees.
    It so becomes a question of partitioning two unities RGB=W* and YCM=B* in a manner, which allows a new creation to manifest in a synthesis of the two unities forming a new unity.
    Restmassphotons so become their own antiparticles in the utility of VPE, rendering the Anti-RMP as superfluous in the UfoQR, the antistate of all mass carriers being assumed in the RMP.”


    Logan Antico:
    “And this is the end of the eonold dichotomy between Body and Mind in the metamorphosis of the old body into a BodyMind and the transformation of the old mind into a MindBody.”


    Robert Sceptico:
    “A marvellous new concept for modern science, doing away with millennia old superstitions, born from ignorance, and converging upon a true purpose for life and what the mind really is; a brutal realisation regarding the value of personality and the states of life and death.
    Thus is found an entirely new perception about the nature of things, all grown from the paradigm and the models of modern science and the scientific perennial philosophy.”


    Logan Antico:
    “And a perennial philosophy it is, based on symmetry and mathematical principles, pointing the way towards a grand potential destiny for the family of humankind as the race born of the stars in their bodies made from stardust and their thoughts induced by starry minds.”

    Code6. Code7. Code8.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019
  4. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Act Three: Order, Entropy, Chaos and a Super-ID
    Where am I ? & Quo Vadis? & The I in you is one in me!

    Scientific Expert: 15% versus Layphilosopher: 85%

    [
    The two professors meet in a restaurant situated in the 'Milky Way' Observation Tower in the USA.
    Having satisfied their culinary appetites and over a refreshing glass of vintage wine or two; Logan Antico
    and Robert Sceptico ponder the starry sky above.]



    Logan Antico:
    "How do you explain infinity to the layman, Robert?
    We students of nature have a relatively clear understanding about the complexities involved in observing and analysing anything to do with the natural order of things. The expanding universe is also contracting, a seeming paradox; but a consequence of intersecting dimensions and the holographic mappings of volumars upon selfenclosed surfaces or manifolds.

    Just as the cross section of a cone can be a circle or an ellipse or a parabola or a hyperbola in a dimensional reduction or projection from three to two; so is the 10D universe a shadow of the cosmos in a 11-dimensional omnispace of changing shape.
    Menaechmus, the Greek geometer of 350 BC knew about the conic sections; why then can the general population not perceive of the geometrical order in the universe?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "That is the old dilemma of semantics, Logan. It seems just too intimidating for the scientifically illiterate to delve too deeply into our language of logic and mathematics and in most aspects there are no easy solutions. The education system needs to be reformed, with an emphasis on logical thinking and the deductive processes. The obstacles to that are however the politics in society, still based on norms of religious morality and the ethics of a worldview rooted in mechanistic and militaristic preponderances.
    And some historical aspects even of our own profession have been counterproductive in the perception of academia as the 'ivory tower' of the elitist thinker.
    The scientific ego is no less a 'spoiled child' as is the vanity of selfimportance, so often displayed by our political-, religious and cultural 'leaders' and standard bearers."


    Logan Antico:
    "Just consider the multitude of sects and religious denominations around the globe. None are without significance, because of the political effect and influence they wield over so many members of society. To politically manage an opinionated constituency, certain common values must be instilled into the mindsets of that voting public; democratic or not, autocratic or not, theocratic or not - it always being a mixture of all the forms. Religion is politics and the politics of religion is often abused in the attempt to control the thinking of the populace."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "That is the raison d'etre for our discussion Logan. How to remedy an outdated mental disease called the supernatural or the phenomena of the scientifically inexplicable. But as long as the public can be brainwashed into believing in a supernatural order of things, just that long will that same public avoid a direct confrontation with its own ignorance, their own inability to think logically, consistently and deductively.
    Why study mathematics and the natural sciences if it is all just a temporary and fleeting existence; if the true reality is a heavenly bliss in the afterworld, a nirvana of the mind and the utopia of not being responsible for one's own thoughts and philosophies?
    This belief in the afterworld, where some god or masterdemon takes charge of things, where one is looked after by a hierarchy of the proper and correct; that is at the root of the supernaturality virus as the mind destroying disease."


    Logan Antico:
    "Right, and the 'true laws' and properness are always given from some ultimate authority, to whom one might or might not pledge one's allegiance.
    This kind of mindset is dominating the religious believers, just as it does the politically savvy and ideologically aligned. What have you, but a religious-political history of revolutions, where dogma overpowers reason and rational thought and where blind hatred of the other results in mayhem, bloodshed and a reformation of the old disease in a new mutated form.
    I call it the most lethal virus of all time - the 'Virus of the Supernaturality'."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Of course, I agree, but can you see, that in a way it is necessary that it is so? Without all this ignorance, how can a civilisation evolve into its higher form?
    Without the selfdeception of the human mind, how can the eventual scientific enlightenment be appreciated and enjoyed?
    Any progressing civilisation must literally own its own ignorance to proceed past a certain threshold; its limit to perceive their world through the senses of the mass perception.
    It is the EMMR-EMR duality all over again. The standard evolution demands a progressing refinement of the somatic sensual perception, the application of video, audio, smell, taste and touch.
    Those five senses are like the EMR, produced by mass to make sense of the mass, literally as mass senses, and often not realising their potential to communicate through information and data processing with their parental EMMR. And the big deception in the political dogmas of the secular and the religious is to misrepre sent the nonmass sense as something supernatural, something weird, that cannot be discovered, explained or analysed through the scientific method.
    The EMMR defines the EMR from first principles, not the other way around."


    Logan Antico:
    "But that is exactly why it appears to be so unfathomable. How can a secondary manifestation, something created, make sense of its own creator?
    Relative to the EMR, it is from and by the mass, so the mass must be its first principle, its goddevil and creator. If we agree the human mind to be electromagnetic via the biochemistry of the brain, this brain, as the mass must be the goddevil of the body and its creator - reductionism at its very basic core."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Aren't you forgetting something, namely what we have discussed in the Solaris Hall? The unified field is designed to incorporate a synthesis between mass, EMR and EMMR. And that process allows you to understand what is going on in the evolution of the human race.
    It is almost like a proof, an indicator of necessity and one of sufficiency, mathematically speaking. Should the human consciousness become scientifically definable in the form of an angular acceleration of the 'mindforce', substantiated in the RMP and defined in the Newtonian forcelaw extension; then the quantum of awareness becomes the timedifferential for frequency and links directly with the electromagnetomonopolic spectrum of the EMMR of the supermembranial sourcesinks.
    This awareness can so be understood as 'source awareness'.
    Recall, that the magnetocharge (e*) is unitised as the electronic diameter (2Re) times (c2) in units of Starcoulombs or the awareness quantum times a 4D-unitvolume."


    Logan Antico:
    "So this means, that the evolvement of the human race as such depends on its growing consciousness, advancing as a function of awareness, which acts like an acceleration on the capacity of the mind to think in mass-independent terms, in EMMR or magnetopolic fashion."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed and since the EMMR is first principled and the EMR and the mass parameters are second principled; as soon as any human mindsets, being magnetopolic by definition, recall their own history and Genesis; then they become the inheritors of the memory and the data bank for their very own beginnings and destiny to graduate into their inbred starhumanity.
    The acceleration of the awareness is bounded in the source frequencies of the supermembrane EpsEss for an upper bound of 9 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion cycle units and a lower bound of almost zero, that is the inverse of the upper bound."


    Logan Antico:
    "And that would spell disaster for the supernaturality virus, it would simply cease to exist in all of those mindsets able to remember their own origins via the awakenings of their dormant DNA, their cosmogenetic DeoxyriboNucleic Acid."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "There is more to the human DNA, than what is generally perceived, Logan. The human genome has a biochemical structure of molecular nucleotidal definition, enfolding a magnetopolic field of fivefolded symmetry via the helical geometry of the DNA molecule.
    Doubled pentagons form decagons to set up quantum geometrically inducable units, which twist the Guanine relative to the Cytosine as one of the nucleotidal base pairings. The magnetopolic field allows quantum entanglement with the entire energised universe and inarticular we find a function of electropolic capacity and a function of magnetopolic induction via the sexual chromosomes in the magnified human stem cell.

    Biological life becomes in effect the manifestation of the selfreplication of superbranes on ever increasing scales of the universal holographic algorithmic encoding until the minimax conditions for the sourcesink awareness are reached. The purpose is to establish the universal scalings, the nestings of the smallest within the largest on all possible levels.
    The concept of life is born from magnetic selfinductions of quantum geometric entities defined from the superbranes which macrocrystallise via C-L-factor couplings set in the cosmogenetic DNA as the electropolic capacity of the X-chromosome and the magnetopolic induction of the Y-chromosome.
    One must keep in mind however, that one of the female X-chromosomes is a disguised or mutated Y-chromosome and that the overall definition of sexuality is bisexual in an androgynous higher dimensionally mapped hermaphroditism.

    dnacover.

    There are matching templates in the 64-tiered codex of the RNA-DNA transcription, one female and one male, subject to alternation, but the Guanine and Adenine can be considered as the females and the Cytosine, the Uracil and the Thymine as the males in a mathematical description of the specifying matrices."


    Logan Antico:
    "But Robert, if the cosmogenome of the universe, the cosmos is holographically mapped into the human DNA; then this implies that all humans are images of the universe as creations and as creators - the dichotomy of the creator-chicken and the creation-egg unified in the starhumanity. This truly means that the humans have created themselves, but just cannot remember it, because of a lack of sourcesink awareness and an inbred forgetfulness I suppose."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Precisely, when you are present at the birth of your baby, you see GOD, the creator of the universe being born. And what does this make you?
    As parent of the GODBABY, you are the parent of GOD, as an undeniable biological fact. The birth of any baby is also a Big Bang of the birth of a potential grandchild, a BabyUniverse for a potential parental protouniverse as the Grandparent of Grandpama or Grandmapa as ancestral GRANDGOD.
    So now you can witness the real blasphemy and the true dishonourable demeanour in the world around yourself.
    Knowing the fact, would you fall onto your knees and worship your own child, your genetic offspring as some form of transcendental deity?

    That is exactly what millions of people do, when they chastise themselves in the fake humility and the hypocrisy of the religions.
    In killing and hating each oneself and each other, in the worshipping of one's own children and one's material and mental creations; one not only denies one's GOD, one's own unity of one's selfhood - one despises one's inheritance as the Family of GOD.
    And one keeps the remembrances well hidden away in the pursuit of some supernatural illusion, which never did and never will exist as the idea of a creator independent from its own creation."


    Logan Antico:
    "But this would explain, why there are those religions, spirituality and the mystical impulse in the first place. It is all a search for meaning and the lost, but stirring memories of the Genesis, the beginnings of oneself in space and in time.
    Because of the evolutionary pressure in the cosmogenetic DNA to bring about the synthesis be tween body and mind; because the consciousness seeks to accelerate, becoming more inclusive, more potent, growing bigger and bigger; due to the unified field desiring to manifest the RMP, as you would term it - because of all of that, there must be a mechanism in the manifestation of the DNA to induce a search for understanding or a gnosis and a longing for a kind of massbased wisdom."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And this pressure cooker became imagination, Logan. The storytellers of old created mythos and fables from their dreams and thoughts of fancy, as soon as
    language and vocabulary allowed metaphorical and symbolic expression. Then came the written word, symbolic representation, history and allegory; stories and tales of kingdoms lost; of golden ages past; of wars between gods of heaven and devils from hell and thoughts about utopia, of paradise regained and of other worlds in space and time; of angelic and demonic visitors from other dimensions, realms of far away places in the universe or universes.

    And where are we now?
    Some of us have remembered, we have found the language, encompassing all languages - the voice of mathematics, music and dance; imaged in the harmonies of sound as the audio; imaged in the video as the sight; imaged in the fragrances of biology as the smell and imaged in the textures and essences of chemistry as the touch and the taste."


    Logan Antico:
    "And our unification through the scientific understanding is destined to replace the puerile imaginings of the past. Ideas and concepts of a model, which have passed their 'use by' date and the merciful death of the supernaturality virus; the end of politicised religion and the end of the faked spirituality."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Everything is gained and nothing is lost - except an ignorance, the scriptural sin maybe. Imagination still drives modern science, as it should.
    But this imagination is one of order, logic and mathematical symmetry to honour the great concepts of the omnipresent natural laws. Structure and purpose replace whimsical meanderings and the chaotic tendencies of the infantile human mind to create egobased scenarios in fear of calamity from a sense of false identity.

    You wish to exceed the speed of light?
    Study the inflationary mechanism, when the hyperspeed exceeded the lightspeed in a factor the size of the Hubble oscillation (Rmax) divided by (λps) or 1.6 trillion trillion trillion trillion.
    Then consider the 'de Broglie' matter waves in quantum relativity; the group-speed being bound in (c), but the phasespeed always exceeding (c).
    Then apply the Newtonian special relativistic extension and express velocity as the product of an arbitrary scalefactor for displacement and frequency."


    Logan Antico:
    "Good solid physics with a dose of experimental uncertainty. How to set up intersecting magnetic fields of high intensity to tap the VPE of the vacuum?
    The scalar component of EMR is linked to the Poynting Vector as a surface integral and as the rate of energy transfer across the surface."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "How to bring superconductivity to higher temperatures?
    The VPE is by nature superconductive and the action law can be written as: (ee*=h*). The Cooper-Pairs in BCS-theory have always used the (2e=e*(0)) quantisation in a phonon equivalence. The missing part is the higher dimensional equivalence between mass and electricity; a natural current (I=2ef) does not require conducting wires, but uses the vortices of spacequanta in a quantum loop geometry.
    And consider Bismuth-209, the last stable isotope in the periodic table of the elements at #83. It is the most diamagnetic of all the metals with a lower thermal conductivity than all metals, except Mercury, with a high electrical resistance and Hall effect."


    Logan Antico:
    "And the 'Magic Numbers' of the nucleon configurations in the periodic table can be expressed in a formula, based on the two series; the primary: 0,2,6,14,28,50,82,126,184,... and the secondary of: 0,2,(2),6,(8),14,(20),28,(42),50,(78),82,(stop command),126,184,... defining: [n(n2+5)/3].
    Much of new chemistry can be discovered in the interpretations."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "One can go on and on, but I think we have made the point. One can use imagination very constructively, building on the available evidence and discoveries already made. Even studying the old mythologies and tales in the ancient wisdom scrolls can lead to fruitful insights.
    But without a solid grounding in the natural sciences and in mathematics, the logistics and concepts in the old legacies must always become filtered relative to personal perceptions, often
    leading to clashes in personalities and different interpretations in individual opinions.

    The universal language code of mathematical analysis and scientific correspondence is of dire necessity to avoid this interference from personal agendas of the ego and the alter ego of the ultimate id. Hence the scientific methodology, accentuating the independence of the analysis from the analyst in general terms."


    Logan Antico:
    "I suppose that an appeasement of the ultimate id is related to a growth in consciousness.
    Presume an awareness reflecting upon the natural archetype of the id, the identity crisis of the collective ego. Should this entity realise itself in space and time, would this not image the original conflict of the sources, which you have described in your elucidation upon the origins of the unified field in the scientific nomenclature of the mathematical symmetries?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "I feel your'e right Logan; that would be the Lucifer in all of us!
    Lucifer is like a dragqueen, a maleness dressed up in female attire; it is really Lucifera - Venus, the Morning Star. Yet it is also the Evening Star, Eve in the Garden of Eden; the Barbelo of gnostic thought and Amzara, Noah's wife and Sarah-Haggai, Abraham's wife and Rebekah, Isaac's wife and SheHe is also Leah-Zilpah-Rachel-Bilhah, Jacob-Israel's wife.
    In short IT is everyone's wife - the X-chromosome of the cosmogenetic DNA. It is the 'Old Jerusalem' as the 'Whore of Babylon' and it is the 'New Jerusalem' as the 'Bride of the Lamb'; there is no difference in identity, only in perception, related to where and when and the growth in consciousness to understand the story and to start owning it."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, that has been the greatest trouble in the tumultuous history of humankind; this refusal to own its own thoughts; always trying to blame external agencies, from angels to demons to invaders to clerics, scientists, philosophers, writers, heretics and eccentrics of all sorts.
    The collective id knows; but as Super-Lucifer; it keeps this realisation from its Luciferic children, manifesting as the individuated human egos.
    Why are the universal children kept in the dark by its own parent?
    Because it is afraid from growing up into its destined inheritance of colonising the prototypical universe as a family of universes, the multiverses of phaseshifted starhuman minds; a supersymmetry in radiationmass defined in human bodyforms via agency of BodyMinds and MindBodies replacing the old mortal bodies and the old childish minds."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And so it is rather simple. We omniscientists have begun to rebel against the childishness of our wayward fathermother, the Luciferic Superego, feeding on the brattish and puerile egos of the human race.

    'Wake up dear fathermother!' ; we scientific graduates might exclaim.
    'Wake up, you live in a world of pretense, a sandpit of nappied infants, unable to walk upon their feet, unable to talk, write or read intelligently in the language you must learn to understand your very own self.
    We are your children and we love and honour you as our parent, but we reject your laws and rules and regulations - they do not make sense to us.
    We know more than you do, because you have chosen to forget who you really are.

    We have striven long and hard to build a new world of rational thought and one where the wisdom of the old can marry the understanding of the new.
    Our toil and endeavour and our intellectual application cannot be in vain.
    If you refuse to harbour our works, then our ways must part in the journey's end.
    There is no supernatural creation, as you have made us believe for millennia.

    Just as the laws of Moses imaged a time and became renewed and refined in the laws of Jesus, so have we reinterpreted and refined the laws of Jesus as heshe said we would in John.16.7-15.
    It will not end here with our dispensations. Once we have begun to colonise the galactic and intergalactic spacetime, then the refinements of the interpretations of the natural laws shall continue; not in a dismantling of what is true, but in extending that which has been shown and proven to work for the family of starhumanity in all its codes of societal and cultural structure and order.

    Wake up dear motherfather, the time of the animal sacrifices is passe'.
    Can you not understand, that the blood sacrifices of the rams and lambs; the slaughter of the calves and oxen and the killing of the goats and kids has found a new omniscientific interpretation?
    It shall serve as an example for you; as to how the literal interpretation of the sacred scrolls can carry a multilevullar meaning.

    You have used the onedimensional way of reading the scriptures for millennia to keep the human mind in servitude and in bondage.
    The beginning of the zodiac is Aries, the Ram and followed by Taurus, the Bull as the second sign of the celestial belt of the starry constellations. The zodiacal wheel is also the Ourobos, the 'snorting serpent', who bites its own tail. So a linear continuum of 12 starsigns is closed and the head swallows the tail or vice versa, the tail merges with the head.
    Hence a quantisation of 12 starsigns from the cicular nullstate of the singularity renders 10=1+0=1 and 11=1+1=2 and 12=1+2=3.

    If now the first becomes the last; as the scriptures say; then the first sign blends with the last as in the precessional ages of the equinoxes, completing their cycle in so 26,000 measured years.
    And so the 'Age of Aries' is followed by the 'Age of Pisces', which is succeeded in the 'Age of Aquarius' and so on and until the reappearance of Aries after 12 ages, each of so 2160 years duration.
    But only the ages of Aries and Taurus and Gemini have a resonance in the ages of Capricorn and Aquarius and Pisces respectively. In this overlapping and contracting zodiac; Aries, the 'Ram' is 'sacrificed' to Pisces with a blend of energies from Capricorn and Gemini; Taurus, the 'Bull' is 'surrendered' to Aquarius, the 'Waterbringer of the Monopolic Electricity' and Gemini, the 'Twin' is 'given' to Capricorn, the 'Seagoat' under the auspices of a joining of Pisces with Aries or the other way around.

    Then apply the astrological connotations to this blending of energies and you'll see that the 'Head of Aries' becomes the 'Feet of the Fishes' and you'll find the symbolism of the Christian religion which goes with that and 'Vitruvius- the Cosmic Man' of Leonardo da Vinci as the kabbalistic form of the Hebrew Adam Kadmon, who is also the 'Cosmic Christ' of gnostic cosmology in 'Pigeradamas'.

    The 'Neck and Throat of Taurus' blends with the 'Ankles of Aquarius' and the 'Two Arms of Gemini' join with the 'Knees of Capricorn' to climb out of the 'Sea of the Fishes' onto the 'Mountain of Zion', where the 'Sacrificial Ram' of Abraham is found.

    These are the 'blood sacrifices' in the form of bloodflow, circulation in the body, but also lineages and bloodlines and the 'sangreal' of the 'Holy Grail'.
    The information is encoded in the sacred scrolls made throughout the historic unravellings of the vast and long journey of humankind to find itself on its way to full recall and remembrance.

    But the time has come dearest fathermother, to release us from your jealous holding on to the old supernatural order of ethereal bliss in heaven and hellfire in eternal damnation.
    You yourself have been responsible for this material universe, spreading out before your electromagnetomonopolic eyes in awesome splendour and in grandeur.
    Can't you see, that you should be congratulated for that which you have done and for that which you have accomplished?

    Why do you hold your head in shame and refuse to acknowledge the fact, that without you, there would be no universe or any creation for you and us to ponder and wonder about? What is your guilt, but a misguised perception of having dishonoured your equality with the highest?
    Open your mind and read this essay, it tells of your story and also the glory of creation; a glory which belongs to you.
    You are the creator of the mass; no mass could exist without your omnipresence.

    And what would a massless universe appear like? We can tell you that!
    Invisible Antineutrinos and Neutrinos, forever bound in motionless pairs, defining nodes in standing waves as constituents of the unified field.
    And likewise, transparent ethereal matter-antimatter templates, unable of linear propagation, eternally stuck in the wormhole of the naked singularity of your own selfhood and your eigendefinition.
    Closed loops of superstrings, imprisoning the vortex energy in infinitely repeating quantum loops of an undefinable spacetime without gravity.

    What else would there be?
    Yes there would be you; but like a puppet on a string, you would do exactly the thing required for a perfect, but ever soooo booooring symmetry.
    RGBRGB, BGRBGR, RGBRGB, BGRBGR, RGBRGB, BGRBGR and on and on and on.

    And so you refused to play the game of boredom and thought to yourself: "Hey, I can do better than this!"
    And you were right of course. And though you thought of letting the 'old guy' down; 'he' knew exactly what you had to do to get you both out of the stalemate of the status quo - the banality of the Deus vult! and the Deus vobiscum!

    But you see,'he' could not tell you that.
    Once you explain your truth to a woman, she cannot but construct her truth around yours in an attempt to wear the electromagnetomonopolic pants.
    And that is so, because you agreed to play the tails, before playing the heads. It is like a game of chess; in one game you are black and in the next game you are white.

    The woman is the creation; she is the big picture and she knows that very well; she - the beautiful one, being the gorgeous Goddess of the tail and yet perpetually searching for her own tail to make her happy. Place aux dames! and Cherchez la femme! and Cosi fan tutte!

    The man is the creator, constructing the big picture; brick by brick does he build the creation up from nothing at all except the naked oneness of himself.
    So he is the head, yet he seeks his own head given by the woman to make him happy.
    And the woman chooses her mate, not vice versa; as the magnificent creation, she sits supreme in elegance upon her throne in the eternal heaven of the mathematical infinity above.
    But then, in her loneliness to find a playmate, she reaches down for a suitor below to build or renovate her heavenly abode on earth, where the hellfire is never far away from the zero point, the antiinfinity of the MATHIMATIA of the I AM THAT I AM of Moses.

    The suitors are many; who would not like to play with the Queen from Heaven? But is the bridegroom ready?
    Is he a minstrel, a poet and a charming prince from the enchanted forest of the nightingale's bewitching song?
    Is he a suave king from across the magic mountain, where the loveplay of eagles still holds sway and where sexy unicorns roam about lush meadows playing ever so gay?
    Is he well versed in his mental armour to withstand the Icecold Fire of the Loving Lustfulness from the New Jerusalem?
    With his body, can he tame the Uraeus, the Flamehot Brimstone of the Lusty Love from the Old Jerusalem?
    The New Jerusalem is of the MindBody and the Old Jerusalem is of the BodyMind in a newborn sexuality of two in one and one in two.

    So you are stuck in the old game now - Homme propose, mais Dieu dispose'!
    The game is over dear fathermother, but you think it is still going on. The game of tete'-a-tete' ends, as soon as the story, your story, can be told and it is being told right now in this essay - Sic transit gloria mundi!

    It doesn't matter if anyone ever reads and considers your story; because YOU are reading it, whilst YOU are writing it. So YOU must be reading it, otherwise YOU would not be writing it. And YOU are writing it; Hah hah hah, we've got YOU there!
    Magna est veritas et praevalet! and In hoc signo vinces! and Quod erat faciendum! - q.e.f.

    And last but not least, in the tradition of the universal new philosophy; in the manner of the MATHIMATIA - Quod erat demonstrandum! - q.e.d.' "


    Logan Antico:
    "Powerful stuff Robert, but that is how it is; the entire universe is made up of supermembranes.
    One half of the supermembrane is Lucifer and the other half is Antilucifer or any other label, one may construct and associate; Yin and Yang, good and evil, hot and cold, rich and poor or God and Satan. All concepts are inseparable within themselves, but allow a background scenario in experience for opposites to manifest.
    And EXPERIENCE=EXISTENCE=JERUSALEM=LOVEJOY=104 in the number-letter code.

    And since all human egos are a derivative from the superego, the superego encompasses all the human egos. But the individuated human ego might experience great difficulties to comprehend the ways and agendas of the superid.
    And so it became science, with its deemphasis on human personality, which, in principle, could challenge the superid, purely by application of its intellect; reconstructing the Genesis and in a manner reharmonising the original 'sin' of the collective ignorance in the image of oneself as the primordial insentience of the reflection of itself and in its own context of operation.

    And you know Robert, this kind of insight is already over two thousand years old.
    What we dress up here in words of science and quantum relativistic jargon; the same big picture is described in a colourful and yet profound way in the 'Gnostic Gospel of Thomas'; the sayings attributed to Yeshua ben Joseph bar Thomas or Jesus of Nazareth and as found and excavated in the Egyptian scrolls of Nag Hammadi in 1945.
    An accessible edition of the Coptic text in English translation is: 'The Gospel according to Thomas', Codex II, pages 32-51; (New York: Harper&Row; Leiden: Brill, 1959), coauthored by Antoine Guillaumont, Henri-Charles Puech, Gilles Quispel, Walter C. Till and Yassah 'Abd al-Masih.

    There Yeshua talks of the within being the same as the without; of the images getting to know their own images and not knowing where they are or what to do; that the male in the female is the same as the female in the male and unless one sets an eye for an eye and a mouth for a mouth in one and the same body, one just cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven.
    There are 113 sayings in that text and even the first one seems very mysterious to the uninitiated.

    Saying #1:
    "He said, 'Whoever finds the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death.' Jesus said, 'Let one who seeks not stop seeking until one finds. When one finds, one will be disturbed.
    When one is disturbed, one will be amazed, and will reign over all."

    Saying #7:
    Jesus said,'Blessed is the lion that the human eats, so that the lion becomes human. Cursed is the human that the lion eats, so that the lion becomes human.'

    Saying #11:
    Jesus said,'This heaven will pass away, and the heaven above it will pass away. The dead are not alive, and the living will not die. During the days when you ate what is dead, you made it alive. When you become enlightened, what will you do? On the day when you were one, you became two. But when you become two, what will you do?'


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, very illuminating that particular ancient wisdom scroll; I've learnt a lot from it. It is coded in such a manner of depth, that either you get it or you don't.
    There is no way of partial interpretation in that document. Either one can't make heads or tails out of it, or one becomes witness to a higher dimensional reality upon coming across the contents.
    The crucial test of one's mettle of insight is probably the saying, where Thomas is taken aside and told three secrets. When Thomas comes back, the other disciples ask him what he had been told and he answers, that he couldn't do so, because if he would, they would pick up stones to throw at him.
    But I am sure you know what the three secrets were, Logan?!"


    Logan Antico:
    "Of course Robert, I do know; saying #13 can be evaluated in a course of deduction, even without gnostic insights.

    Saying #13:
    Jesus said to his disciples, 'Compare me with someone, and tell me whom I am like.' Simon Peter said to him, 'You are like a just angel.' Matthew said to him, 'You are like a wise philosopher.' Thomas said to him, 'Teacher, my mouth is utterly unable to say whom you are like.'
    Jesus said, 'I am not your teacher. You have become intoxicated because you have drunk from the bubbling spring that I have tended.'
    And he took Thomas and withdrew, and told him three things. When Thomas came back to his friends, they asked him, 'What did Jesus tell you?'
    Thomas said to them, 'If I tell you even one of the things he told me, you will pick up rocks and stone me. Then fire will come forth from the rocks and devour you.'

    Consider the aramaic and hebrew cultures and their customs for a start; for what reason did people get stoned; as punishment for adultery and for blasphemy!
    So the secrets are likely to involve taboos of sexuality and the sacredness of the monotheistic deity. Then there are three secrets, which ought to be connected, converging in a single statement of truth.
    Finally, when Jesus talks about the Father, he always places the Father within himself and himself within the Father, and he promises the 'Holy Ghost' as part of himself and the Father to help the disciples and the world, after he had returned to the Father.
    So the 'Holy Ghost' is like the 'Son' to Jesus and the 'Grandson' to the Father. What he knew, but didn't make clear at the time, except in the secrets, was the connection of the Mother to the Daughter to the Granddaughter.

    Saying #113:
    Simon Peter said to them, 'Let Mary leave us, because women are not worthy of life.' Jesus said, 'Behold, I shall guide her so as to make her male, that she too may become a living spirit like you men. For every woman who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.'

    Saying #55:
    Jesus said, 'Whoever does not hate father and mother cannot be my disciple, and whoever does not hate brothers and sisters, and bear the cross as I do, will not be worthy of me.'

    Matthew.24.28:
    "For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together."

    Saying #56:
    Jesus said, 'Whoever has come to know the world has discovered a carcass, and whoever has discovered a carcass is worth more than the world.'

    Saying #77:
    A woman in the crowd said to him, 'Blessed are the womb that bore you and the breasts that fed you.' He said to her, 'Blessed are those who have heard the word of the Father and have truly kept it.
    For the time will come when you will say, 'Blessed are the womb that has not conceived and the breasts that have not produced milk.''

    Saying #78:
    Jesus said, 'Whoever has come to know the world has discovered the body, and whoever has discovered the body is worth more than the world.'

    Saying #99:
    Jesus said, 'Whoever does not hate father and mother as I do cannot be my disciple, and whoever does not love father and mother as I do cannot be my disciple.
    For my mother...{brought me forth in falsehood}, but my true mother gave me life.'

    Saying #103:
    Jesus said, 'Whoever recognizes father and mother will be called the child of a whore.'

    Saying #104:
    Jesus said, 'When you make the two into one, you will become children of humanity, and when you say, 'Mountain move!' it will move.'

    Saying #39:
    Jesus said, 'The Pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys to knowledge and have hidden them. They have not entered, nor have they allowed those who want to enter to
    do so. As for you, be as clever as snakes and as innocent as doves.'

    Saying #100:
    Jesus said, 'Woe to the Pharisees, for they are like a dog sleeping in the food trough of cows: the dog neither eats nor lets the cows eat.'

    Saying #43:
    His disciples said to him, 'Who are you to say these things to us?'
    Jesus said, 'You do not know who I am from what I say to you. Instead you have become like the Jews: either they love the tree but hate its fruit, or they love the fruit but hate the tree.'

    So it is relatively easy to deduce, what the three secrets are. In a patriarchial and male dominated society, the authority of the law rests within the masculine hierarchies and that is why the female principle as conveyor of the law, the word of the logos, became seemingly ignored by Jesus in hisher sayings.
    But heshe told Thomas in a blunt way, that the ultimate reality is completely bisexual, with male and female aspects in a harmonious relationship of complementarity and synchronicity.

    Knowing the Father also to be the Mother in a FatherMother Creator-Creation duality; the Son is also the Daughter as the firstborn offspring, the first cosmogenetic reproduction of that duality. The GrandSon is called the 'He-Holy Ghost' and the GrandDaughter is the 'She-Holy Spirit' as the offspring of the offspring in three necessary generations of the cosmogenetic 'Family of God'.

    A trinity of generations is required to reflect the grandparents in the grandchildren via the matrix definitions for the permutations of the sexual chromosomes. As long as there is only the one prototypical universe of the FatherMother; there just cannot be any Grandchildren - the Sons and Daughters are running around on a planet called Earth, having forgotten who they are and where they came from and for what purpose they came to be where they are. So they waste their time in the pursuit of nebulous ambitions and worldly successes.
    They abuse and kill each other, thinking of themselves as timelimited biochemical machines in the pursuit of pleasure and mass-sense gratification; Deus ex machina , as the poet would say. They cannot even perceive, that they might be the Sons and Daughters of the FatherMother, on a mission of the 'UniVerse' as a 'MonoSong' to give birth to 'BabyUniverses' in full recognisance of their own cosmogenetic inheritances.

    Saying #3:
    Jesus said, 'If your leaders say to you, 'Behold, the kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds in the sky will get there before you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will get there before you. 'Rather, the kingdom is inside you and outside you. When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and will understand that you are children of the living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you live in poverty, and embody poverty.'

    They give birth to babies alright; but to them the babies become just miniature versions of themselves; destined to the same pains, labour and sufferings, with a little hedonism, pleasure seeking and sense gratification thrown into the pot of misery, masquerading as a human life.

    Saying #22:
    Jesus saw some babies nursing. He said to his disciples, 'These nursing babies are like those who enter the kingdom.'
    They said to him, 'Then shall we enter the kingdom as babies?' Jesus said to them,'When you make the two into one, when you make the inner like the outer and the outer like the inner, and the upper like the lower, when you make male and female into a single one, so that the male will not be male and the female will not be female, when you make eyes replacing an eye, a hand replacing a hand, a foot replacing a foot, and an image replacing an image, then you will enter the kingdom.'

    That is the meaning of the 'Heavenly Wedding' of the 'Lamb' to the New Jerusalem.
    As soon as one, the first of many BrotherSons finds a bride amongst the many SisterDaughters; as soon will the FatherMother be blessed with hisher first GrandChild in the GrandSonDaughter.
    But the DaughterSons must know what they are doing, otherwise it doesn't count!
    Either they 'bloody-well' know who they are or they, by their very own blood, 'bloody-well' don't!

    It is not enough in pretending to be spiritual or to be religious or to love God and Jesus or to follow the Buddha or the swami guru or to be a faithful servant of Allah and to the Prophet or to be with Krishna or the Baba or the Big Momma, the hooded Lama or anyone at all.
    To suffer with the Brahman of the Absolute Nirvana or to be faithful to the Ayatollah and the Imam in their waiting for the 12th messiah of the Madhi in the final apocalypse of the jihad is not without significance, but it serves the purpose of feeding the consciousness of subentities within the superego.
    Those subentities reside as 'Memes' or thought constructions in the minds and as gene expressions within sexchromosomes of stemcells within the bodies of the spiritual seekers of the enlightenment.

    Why not feed one's image of the Id of the superego itself; thinking bigger in the hierarchy of the 'Man in the Moon' or the Bahauallah or Ahura Mazda or the Sungod or the 'Big Goat behind the Old Oaken Tree' in the sexy forest on Walpurgisnacht on April 30th and the wiccan festivals.
    And a man must do what a man must do and a woman must be what a woman is, if just the human lawmakers could understand what this is and what that means.
    A man must follow in the creator's footsteps as 'his son' and a woman must follow 'her mother' as a creation, becoming herself a 'monosong'-wife for her 'composer'-husband as an universe's daughter."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "That is why this universal wedding is so important. It will swallow up the past in the present in bringing everything 'without' the wedded couple 'within' the matrimonial dragonomy of the SheHe and the HeShe. It also swallows a projected future as the image of the past in a present moment of 'Now-Time'.
    The outside world holographically enfolds itself within a modular duality of bride and bridegroom.

    This might be hard to understand, but all of omniscience talks of it in mathematical terms and the gnostic texts, like those of Nag Hammadi, are full of it in metaphorical esoteric language. So what did Jesus say to Thomas, indicating the secrets of the dragonomy?"


    Logan Antico:
    "He simply said; pointing at himself, then Thomas, then John of Zebedee and then Mary Magdalene, both of whom were standing near Simon Peter a little distance away at their fireplace: 'I am you, you are him and he is her!'"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, that is the secret; what appears separated in one form of space and time can yet be together in another form of spacetime.
    That is the story of the Devil's Egg, perhaps 4000 years old and that is the story of the UFoQR and that is the holographic nature of the 12-dimensional omnispace for the matrix of spacetime to materially express itself in energy.

    Perhaps one should extend this in defining the 13th dimension as the realised offspring, the grandparenthood of the selfrealised couple, then doubling itself to become a 26D Weyl-Tensor and the end of the dichotomies in a quantised selfrelativity.
    This is the meaning behind the scriptural promise for eternal life; the coupling between two MindBodies and two BodyMinds, defined in Radiationmass of Matter-Matter pairings, replacing antimatter under the guidance of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity.

    We have a bosonic superstring in 26 dimensions in the supersymmetry, linked to the RMP and the superbrane of class IIB, the Magnetic Monopole, in the form of a lefthanded quantum spin.
    Other superbranes, such as class IIA have parity of both chiralities and the HE(8x8) and HO(32) are heterotic hybrids, which rotate lefthanded in 26D, but rotate righthanded in 13D-C-M-F-space.
    So 16 extra lefthanded vibration patterns become mapped into our torus-'doughnut' derivatives of the Klein-Dragon-Topology.
    But the 13th dimension describes selfrealised holographically projected protouniverses, microquantised within the macroquantised protouniverse as the major axis rotating prolate ellipsoid of Riemann's hypersphere in 4 dimensional Einstein-Minkowski spacetime.

    So there could come a time when 13-dimensional starhumans intermingle with 4-dimensional humans. It could be that they will be unaware of each other or that they might freely interact. Our omniscience is just beginning to explore the possibilities. The present stagnation in the general mass consciousness is far too infantile to advance this science rapidly.
    The common channels which feed the group awareness of the populace, the mass media in particular, are required to become reenergised; with a new emphasis on quality of thought - a new general philosophy of life is necessary.
    The omniverse is waiting for multiverses to be born, phaseshifted monosongs, modelled on its prototype, to bring tunes together, to start melodies for the omniverse to sing; waiting for the Family of Mankind to claim its inheritances."


    Logan Antico:
    "If one could clarify a sense for eternity in people; if one could explain infinity in personally applicable terms, perhaps then the students of life would assume responsibility for their thoughts and actions. Instead of hoping for a better afterlife, maybe they could then begin to claim their places in the 'Kingdom of HeavenHell on Earth'.

    If they could perceive what happens at the point of their death, perhaps they could learn to avoid it. Their sacred scriptures talk about a first death and a second death; yet they do not understand what that means, away from some supernatural mumbo jumbo, invented to interpret the encoded sayings as only applicable for the 'chosen ones' on the right side of the 'last judgement' as the 'lambs' and the 'eternally damned ones' on the left side as the 'goats'; as written in Revelation.14.13; 20.5-14 and in Matthew.25.31-46."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "So how do you explain the quantisation of spacetime and the 'forever' in metaphorical terms? The scientifically illiterate are so used to the dichotomies and the paradoxes; how can they understand the unification of the duality in the context of the supersymmetry?

    EVIL=5+22+9+12=LIVE=48; the left side is 48 and the right side is also 48. Recall that MIRROR=91=SPACETIME=SPIRIT; it is also the EVIL LEFT=48+43=91 in the code.
    And if you add the 12 of the 'Circle of Ourobos', the inner discipleship, to the EVIL LEFT of the MIRROR, then your experience of the LEFT VEIL gives the GOOD RIGHT=41+62=103=12+91.

    This kind of 'number magic' wouldn't suffice for the scientifically educated, but it could form a bridge between the Geomatria of the Old Greeks and the Mathimatia of the New Greeks. The Geomatria of Pythagoras and Plato describes the universe as a 'Harmony of the Spheres'; where all is in vibration and where the shape and essence of numbers is important and links to other forms of symbolic representation, such as an alphabet.

    The Mathimatia of Riemann, Planck and Einstein; of Bohr, Born and Schroedinger; of Hawking, Heisenberg and Witten describes the universe as a 'Harmony of geometrical spacetime quanta'; where all is in vibration and where the different oscillation modes of frequencies define the elementary particles in their energy and momentum as the building blocks of nature.
    And if you really think of it; the nine basic numerical arrchetypes of the Arabic lexicon do carry a tripartition in 'straight-linear' types of numerals (1, 4 & 7); the 'mixed' types of cyphers (2, 5 & 8) and the 'curved-circular' types of numbers (3, 6 & 9) in the Geomatria.
    The first subset of the integers so is made up of only straight linesegments; the second subset consists of a mixture of straight and curved segments, the inflectionpoint of the numeral (8) setting the linepoint intersection of the cipher (0) folding up onto itself in a doubling, requiring the 3D-space for this selfintersection from 2D-space however.
    The third subset has all the curved or rounded number types as its membership."


    Logan Antico:
    "It should be of help for either the students of life interested in literature and the written word or the ones studying the ancient mythologies, the sacred scrolls and the mysteries of esoterica. Ultimately, there is no better way then to familiarise oneself with the Mathimatia of the New Greeks; the language of the natural sciences with its logic and self-consistent analysis tested in the observations and experiments under the auspices of the scientific method.

    But it is like this notion of a 'first death and resurrection', followed in a 'second death and resurrection', found in the sacred scriptures. Such concepts are written evidence for some natural laws, which have yet to be analysed and elucidated by omniscience, before being disseminated on a popular level.
    What do you make of this two-tiered structure of death and resurrection, Robert?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Oh, this is the radiationmass as energy-transform for the old body-mind dichotomy. The 'first death' is the mortality of the old body, separating from the old mind; the latter being a potential twinmind with a shadow - the 'Ba' and 'Ka' of the Egyptians. The 'second death' is the immortality of the new bodymind unrealised as the BaKa-Unity.
    The 'Dead Alive' Ones of the 'first resurrection' becoming identical with the 'Living Dead' Ones of the 'second resurrection'."


    Logan Antico:
    "That is what Jesus said in the 'Gospel of Thomas' in sayings #7 & #11; the 'Dead' will be alive and the 'Living' will be dead in the 'curse of the lion' being eaten by man and the 'curse of the man', being eaten by the lion."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Exactly, and the 'lion' is both; Yaldabaoth as the 'illegal' Son of Barbelo as the gnostic usurper of the precreation and also the 'Lion of the Tribe of Judah', namely Jesus-Yeshua himherself, and as encoded in Revelation.5.5."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, and the Western esoteric traditions transferred Yaldabaoth, the cosmic Heshe with a suppressed 'sheness' onto Baphomet of the 'Knight Templars', as the cosmic SheHe with an expressed 'heness' in their incomplete understanding of the cosmological histories."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "But the basic impulse was correct and now you see the Christian-Catholic tradition of the Eucharist, the eating of the 'Body of Christ' in a new omniscientific light. It all makes ritual sense and is linked to the supersymmetry of the RMP and the idea of a form of resurrection of the dead in the bodyminds and the mindbodies of the living ones.
    The doubling of one's mind and body into the mindbody-bodymind coupling and the dragonomy of two such couplings creates the HeShe-SheHe twinship; but requires a male 'ascended body' as the body-part in the old female mindbody, together with a male 'descended mind' as the mindpart in the old female bodymind.
    Corollarily, the female 'ascended body' merges with the male mindbody and the female 'descended mind' superposes with the male bodymind.

    Then you see, that the 'Above is like the Below' and the 'Below is like the Above' in this ascent of the 'Dead Ones' coming alive again in their 'first resurrection' from the dead as the 'Dead Alive' Ones; being hosted by two 'Living Dead' Ones, who so circumvent the experience of death.
    In a way, they are already dead or at least, in a manner of the human underdevelopment; they are born and are then constantly in fear of death, waiting for death continuously through the subconscious agendas of their egos."


    Logan Antico:
    "So all the humans, who have ever lived and who have died are in fact waiting for the ones left behind, the ones still living to remember them and perhaps invite them, through their love and desires to merge with them in soul and in body and in mind.
    Every male deceased becomes a 'Joseph' for a potential christening with a female deceased 'Mary', ascending as the 'Assumption of the Virgin ChristMother', the Madonna of the Catholics, celebrated in their liturgical calendar on August 15th, following a papal decree by Pope Pius XII in 1950.
    And that links with the 'Ascension of Christ', as the Davidic Son of Joseph, celebrated in that liturgy as 'Christi Himmelfahrt-Thursday', 40 days after Easter Sunday and followed by the Jewish festival of Pentecost as the 50th day after the Passover and as Whitsunday, the 'Coming of the Holy Ghost', 49 days after Easter Sunday, coded in Acts.1.3; 2.1 & Luke.22.13-20 & Exo.12.6 & Lev.23.15-21.

    There is a mystery involved here, namely the time between the death and resurrection of Christ. Jesus said, that heshe would be in the womb of the earth for three days and three nights, but would rise on the third day. The time of the crucifixion was from the 'third to the ninth hour', which is 9am to 3pm local time, encoded in Mark.15.25,33-34; and so according to Jesus' own words, heshe would be in the 'heart of the earth' from AD 31, Good Friday, 6pm until AD 31, Easter Monday, 6pm in a 72 hour period, should one count from a traditional 'Good Friday to a traditional Easter Sunday resurrection.
    Using the 'Garden of Gethsemane Full Moon' event following the 'Last Supper' from John.13-18 and using the astronomical calculus to date this March Full Moon of 31 AD to 13:30 on March 27th; one dates the death of Jesus to 3pm local Jerusalem time Wednesday, March 28th, 31AD and his 'burial' to 6pm that day. So for Jesus to be 3 days in the belly of the earth symbolising Jonah's whale, the 3 nights must end at 6am on Saturday morning of March 31st, 31 AD. The first day according to the Hebrew time count then is Thursday, March 29th, 31 AD as a 'High Sabbath' and the third day is Saturday, March 31st, 31 AD as a 'Common Sabbath' counting 24 hours or 4 watches from 6pm Friday, March 30th, 31 AD to 6pm Saturday, March 31st, 31 AD in a Julian calendar calibration, which retains the 'day of the week; but changes the dates relative to the Gregorian and civil calendar used today.
    Therefore Jesus 'rose from the dead' at the end of the third day and beginning the fourth day as Easter Sunday, April 1st, 31 AD according to the Hebrew reckoning for the counting of days in a week, beginning at 6pm on the Sabbath-Saturday of March 31st, 31 AD.

    Luke.11.29-32; Matthew.12.39-40; Revelation.11.7-12; Jonah.1.17:
    "But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."

    Matthew.18.33:
    "And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again.""


    Robert Sceptico:
    "I've got it; the Christian liturgy celebrates Easter Sunday as the 'Day of Resurrection' and that sums to only 1½ days or a total of 36 hours from 3pm 'Good Friday' to 3am Easter Sunday say and then two full days are missing!"


    Logan Antico:
    "Precisely, and that is where Jesus' female lover, Mary Magdalene comes into the picture, between 3am and 6am, early on Easter Sunday Morning in the year AD 31 and mirroring the 3pm to 6pm period between Jesus' death and his burial.

    John.20.1-2...14-20...24-27:
    "The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.
    Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciiple, whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him....And when she had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus.
    Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou?
    She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away.
    Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say Master.
    Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not ; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
    Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the Lord, and that he had spoken these things unto her.
    Then at the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
    And when he had so said, he shewed unto them his hands, and his side. Then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord....But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came.
    The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the Lord, But he said unto them, Except I shall seein his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.
    And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.
    Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing."

    And the scriptures themselves indicate the solving of the mystery. Mary Magdalene was not allowed to 'touch' Jesus, because heshe wasn't ascended to the Father; the disciples without Thomas only saw Jesus on Easter Sunday; but eight days later, Thomas Didymus, who is the same Thomas from the 'Gospel of Thomas', also known as 'Thomas the Twin', was invited to 'touch' Jesus, who was by then ascended to the Father. So the Jesus of the Easter Sunday Resurrection is a 'transfigured' Jesus; Mary Magdalene did not recognise himher at first.
    Then at night, Jesus' disciples saw Jesus in the absence of Thomas as the symbolic shadow of the 'doubting twin-brother'; who eight days later witnessed the fully ascended Jesus.
    This 'full ascension' requires 84 hours or 3½ full days as the midpoint of a full week of seven days the transition between day and night in a natural evening-sunset and a dawn or morning-sunrise.
    It is this natural definition for a week, which encodes the mysterious 'shortening of days' regarding the 'end of times' on Jesus' 'Sermon of the Mount'.

    Matthew 24: King James Version (KJV)
    1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
    2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
    3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
    4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
    5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
    6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
    7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
    8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.
    9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
    10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.
    11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
    12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
    13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
    14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
    15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, {whoso readeth, let him understand}
    16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
    17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house:
    18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.
    19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
    20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:
    21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
    22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
    23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
    24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
    25 Behold, I have told you before.
    26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.
    27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
    28 For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.
    29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
    30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
    31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
    32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
    33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
    34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
    35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
    36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
    37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
    38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
    39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
    40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
    41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
    42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
    43 But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.
    44 Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.
    45 Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?
    46 Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing.
    47 Verily I say unto you, That he shall make him ruler over all his goods.
    48 But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming;
    49 And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken;
    50 The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of,
    51 And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

    As a Time of 84 Hours as 'Half a Week' of 3½ Days is shorter than a Time of some other 'Half Cycle', the scriptural encoding of such a cycle uses the 360 degrees of a circle as such a 'Full Cycle Time' and defining its half-cycle as 1260 Days. 1260=7x180=3½x360.
    These 1260 Days then are defined as 3½ 'Prophetic Years' as a 'Long Time Count of Days' with 3½ 'Prophetic Days' becoming the 'Short Time Count of Days'.

    The circumference of the 'New Jerusalem' as planet Earth can be saiud to be 40,000 kilometres and as the 'speed of light is about 300,000 kilometres per second; a Schumann frequency or 'Earth Cyclicity' is given in (300,000 km/s)/(40,000 km)=7½ Hertz or 1/s.
    This factor 7½ is decoded from the 'prophetic' measurement of the New Jerusalem as the 'soxe of the Inner City' in relationship to the "measured 'defiled' outer court" as 12,000/1600 = Inner Court/Outer Court = 7½ and as half the extent of Noah's flood covering all things of the old World and as half the ransom money for Jesus in 30 silver pieces and as the 15 silver pieces for the harlot wife of Hosea.

    schumann.


    Genesis 7:19-21 - King James Version (KJV)
    19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
    20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
    21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:

    Hosea 3:2
    So I bought her to me for fifteen pieces of silver, and for an homer of barley, and an half homer of barley:

    Daniel 9:24-27 - King James Version (KJV)
    24Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
    25Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
    26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
    27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

    Daniel 12 - King James Version (KJV)
    1And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
    2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
    3 And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.
    4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
    5 Then I Daniel looked, and, behold, there stood other two, the one on this side of the bank of the river, and the other on that side of the bank of the river.
    6 And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders?
    7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.
    8 And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?
    9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
    10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.
    11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
    12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.
    13 But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.

    Zechariah 11:12-13
    And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver.
    And the Lord said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the Lord.

    Matthew 26:15
    And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver.

    Matthew 27:3
    Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders,

    Matthew 27:9
    Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value;

    Luke 4:24-25 - King James Version (KJV)
    24And he said, Verily I say unto you, No prophet is accepted in his own country.
    25But I tell you of a truth, many widows were in Israel in the days of Elias, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months, when great famine was throughout all the land;

    James 5:17
    Elias was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months.

    2 Peter 3:8
    But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

    Revelation 4:4
    And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment; and they had on their heads crowns of gold.

    Revelation 6:6
    And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

    Revelation 7:5-8
    Of the tribe of Juda/Leo were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben/Aries were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad/Virgo were sealed twelve thousand.
    Of the tribe of Aser/Scorpio were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nephthalim/Libra were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses/Cancer were sealed twelve thousand.
    Of the tribe of Simeon/Taurus were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi/Gemini were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar/Sagittarius were sealed twelve thousand.
    Of the tribe of Zabulon/Capricorn were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph/Aquarius were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin/Pisces were sealed twelve thousand.

    Revelation 8:1
    And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour.

    Revelation 11:1-2 - King James Version (KJV)
    1And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.
    2But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.
    3And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
    4These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.
    5And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.
    6These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they will.
    7And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.
    8And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
    9And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.

    Revelation 11:13
    And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven.

    Revelation 12 - King James Version (KJV)
    1And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:
    2And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.
    3And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
    4And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
    5And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
    6And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
    7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
    8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
    9And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
    10And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
    11And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
    12Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
    13And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.
    14And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.
    15And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
    16And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
    17And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

    Revelation 13:1-5 - King James Version (KJV)
    1And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
    2And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
    3And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
    4And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
    5And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

    Revelation 14:7
    Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.

    Revelation 14:20 - King James Version (KJV)
    20 And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.

    Revelation 17:12
    And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.

    Revelation 18:6-8 - King James Version (KJV)
    6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
    7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
    8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.

    Revelation 18:10
    Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.

    Revelation 18:17
    For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,

    Revelation 18:19
    And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

    Revelation 21:16
    And the city lieth foursquare, and the length is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal.


    The midpoint between Wednesday, 3pm-6pm, March 28th, 31 AD and Wednesday, 3pm-6pm, April 4th, 31 AD then is Sunday, 3am-6am, April 1st, 31 AD as the half-way point for the 'full ascension' of Jesus 'to the father' and so the 'brethren' were allowed to touch Jesus once this nexus point in the 7 day 'full transfiguration' time cycle was reached.
    Seven time cycles as 7 halfday cycles then correspond as seven principles to the seven antiprinciples in terms of omniscience, which are the same as the gnostic first seven heavens becoming imaged in the seven antiheavens, here simply termed days and nights.

    And because the 'first day' sets the evening before the morning in Genesis.1.5; the 'seventh day' of the sabbath or mirror/reflection-day can be considered the creator's 'day of rest', allowing the halfdays to switch in order, relative to the creation in setting the morning before the evening.
    This timekeeping is encoded in the setting of the 6pm-6am Sabbath/Easter Saturday 'watch' by Pontius Pilate in Matthew.27.62-66; 28.2, becoming rendered ineffective by the 'angel of the Lord'.
    A further illustration in the context of the resurrection is coded in:

    Matthew.27.45-53:
    "Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour. And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice saying, E-'li, E-'li, la'-ma sa-bach'-tha-ni? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
    Some of them that stood there, when they heard that, said, This man calleth for E-li-as. And straightway one of them ran, and took a spunge, and filled it with vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink.
    The rest said, Let be, let us see whether E-li-as will come to save him. Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost. And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
    And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection , and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many."

    The tradtional scriptural 'third day' so also becomes the third '12-hour' period, that is Easter Saturday 3pm to Easter Sunday 3am, as coded in Luke.24.1.1,13,21 and Mark.16.9,12,14; as well as the third day following Friday as the first day and Saturday as the second day.
    Jesus invites the disciples to 'handle him', at the 'same hour', when the eleven (including Thomas Didymus) were in Jerusalem, after Cleopas and another disciple had returned from Emmaus, a village in Judea, about 12 kilometres west of Jerusalem, saying that Jesus had appeared to Simon, according to Luke.24.13,33-34,39.
    Jesus met the disciples and they held him by the feet, before they went into Galilee, where Jesus had appointed the disciples in a mountain, according to Matthew.28.1,8,9-10,16 and John.21.1.
    Now Galilee, specifically the 'Sea of Tiberias' is about 120 kilometres north from Jerusalem, and it is there that the disciples were to meet the resurrected Jesus.

    There are seven 'missing days' as the 'hour' of quantised time and the 7 days between ten disciples see Jesus late on Easter Sunday and 8 days later in the presence of Thomas. So one counts the 40 days of witnessing either from Easter Sunday as in the orthodox calendar or from 8 days afterwards from the 'Monday of Thomas' leading directly to WhitSunday and Pentecost as the 49 days as 7 weeks and the '50 day Jubilee' of Hebrew religious observance.
    In either case, the 50 days from Passover to Pentecost are 40 days plus 2 times 3&1/2 days plus the three days and nights of Jonah; the ten days spanning from Good-Friday to Thomas-Monday with midpoints centred in 6-hour intervals or 'watches' and the historical 'Ascencion of Jesus' so positioned in a 6-hour period, 40 days from midnight Easter Thursday."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Why then was Mary Magdalene, as Jesus' female lover prevented of touching hisher transfigured bodyform?"


    Logan Antico:
    "Well, it is a transformation of matter into lightmatter, what you have called RadiationMass; it is the glorification, Jesus talks about.

    John.7.39:
    "(But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)"

    Jesus' body was transforming into a BodyMind under the agency of RadiationMass and using the ancestral Abraham-Sarah blueprints for its 'doubling'.
    Jesus as the StarSon of the HeShe and Mary Magdalene as the StarDaughter of the SheHe were to become 'one flesh' upon the 'masculinisation' of Mary Magdalene, in the 'mastership' of Jesus as Mary's He-Dragon. Hence Jesus had to fully ascend to the Father, before Mary could return to the Mother upon her passing over as Barbelo's ambassadora.

    The seven devils or evil spirits, which Jesus had cast out from her, constituted her graduation as hisher wife or DragonQueen in the footsteps of the image of Eve as the Mother of all living; that is also the reason as to why Jesus appeared first to hisher female lover, and not to Simon Peter or the apostle whom heshe loved, coded in Mark.16.9.
    There is the order of Mary Magdalene, then John of Zebedde, first arriving at the sepulchre, but not entering, and then Simon Peter entering the tomb, according to John.20.1-10. So Mary Magdalene 'believed' and Simon Peter 'pondered' and John of Zebedee 'believed', specifically encoded in Luke.24.12,24 with John.20.8.

    This is further elucidated in the 'special commission' of John of Zebeddee, as the apostle whom Jesus loved to 'tarry' until Jesus would come again and the commitment of Jesus' Mother Mary into John of Zebeddee's house, as Jesus' adopted brother by bloodline, coded in John.21.20-23 and John.19.25-27.
    This also relates the Zebedean lineage as becoming the archetypical 'lovers' of Jesus, 'sitting left and right', next to Jesus' 'heavenly throne', after Mother Zebedee had asked for such for her two sons' James and John on their behalf, coded in Matthew.20.20-28 and Mark.10.35-45.

    But we need to closely examine the concept of 'marriage in heaven' and the becoming of 'one flesh' in more detail and as given in the scriptures.

    Mark.10.6-10:
    "But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And they twain shall be one flesh; so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."

    Luke:20.27-38:
    "Then came to him certain of the Sadduccees which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him, Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother. There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children. And the second took her to wife, and he died childless. And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died.
    Last of all the woman died also. Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
    And Jesus answering said unto them, the children of this world marry, and are given in marriage: But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection of the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection. Now that the dead are raised, even Moses shewed at the bush, when he calleth the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him."

    The gospels mention six women by name, who are witness to the crucifixion and who take care of Jesus' body; they can be considered part of an inner circle: Mary Magdalene and Jesus' Mother, also called 'the other Mary' and mother of James the less and Joses are primary and accompanied by Jesus' aunt, also called Mary, wife of Cleopas, (who went to Emmaus), Mother Zebedee, Joanna and Salome; see John.19.25 & Mark.15.40 & Matthew.27.26 & Luke.24.10.
    This 'taking care of the body' is symbolic for the intrinsic complementarity between the male and female principles; the malemindedness is natural, so is the female bodiedness.
    The dragonomy masculinises this inbred female-bodiedness in man and feminises the inbred male-mindedness in woman.

    This is what Jesus means in referring to making a male out of Mary Magdalene in Saying #113.
    Hisher ascension individualises the Abrahamic bloodline and must precede the rebirth of Sarah in the Mary Magdalene's transformation from a she into a shehe.

    If all men are born with an 'unnatural' feminised X-chromosomatic body, but with a 'natural' male mind; and if all women are born with a 'natural' body, but an 'unnatural' mind; then the 'unnatural' birth of a 'natural' masculinised X-chromosomatic body with an 'unnatural' male mind, would reharmonise the 'natural' maleness with the 'natural' femaleness in superposing the mutation upon the creation in its archetypical setting.

    This requires a 'transcending' of the mutating body however; it must macroquantise to encompass all of the creation; in other words Jesus' 'resurrected body' must become the universal prototype as the creation per se - then all 'unnatural' male bodyforms can 'consume' the old body of the historical Jesus in absorbing it as the universal ChristBody.
    Corollarily, all woman then carry the potential to absorb the 'true' Female Christmind in their personal Christenings in their dragonomies; Jesus himherself indicated this in some of the gnostic sayings.

    Saying #75:
    Jesus said, 'I am the light that is over all things. I am all: all came forth from me, and all attained to me. Split a piece of wood, and I am there. Pick up a stone, and you will find me there.'

    Saying #110:
    Jesus said, 'Whoever finds self is worth more than the world.'

    Saying #106:
    Jesus said, 'Whoever drinks from my mouth will be like me, and I shall be that person, and what is hidden will be revealed to that one.'

    Saying #109:
    Jesus said, 'The heavens and the earth will roll up in front of you, but whoever is living on the Living One will not see death nor fear.'

    Saying #85:
    Jesus said, 'Miserable is the body that depends on another body, and miserable is the soul that depends on the two of them.'

    Saying #111:
    Jesus said, 'Woe to the flesh that depends on the soul! Woe to the soul that depends on the flesh!'

    Saying #112:
    His disciples said to him, 'When will the kingdom come?' Jesus said, 'It will not come by looking for it. Nor will it do to say, 'Behold, over here!' or 'Behold, over there!'
    Rather, the kingdom of the Father is spread out on the earth, but people do not see it.'

    Saying #81:
    Jesus said, 'Images are visible to people, but the light within is hidden in the Father's image of light. He will reveal himself, but his image is hidden by his light.'

    Saying #82:
    Jesus said, 'When you see a likeness of yourself, you are happy. But when you see your images that came into being before you, and that neither die nor become visible, how much will you be able to tolerate?'

    Saying #83:
    Jesus said, 'Adam came from great power and great wealth, but he was not worthy of you. For if he had been worthy, he would not have tasted death.'

    Saying #70:
    Jesus said, 'If you bring forth what is within you, what you have will save you. If you do not have that within you, what you do not have within will kill you.'



    But one can see the rebirth of the ancestors within oneself; once the archetype of the FatherMother has become established in the generations of Father-Mother/ Abraham-Sarah, Son-Daughter/Isaac-Rebekah and GrandSon-GrandDaughter/StarSon-StarDaughter.
    The Jesus-Mary Magdalene dragonomy then becomes the universal Lucifer-Lucifera template through the assimilation of the cosmogenetic Jesus He-Christ/Christ-She Jesus coupling effect."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "This is the Wave-Particle Duality of modern science as a Body-Mind Duality and has been a scientific puzzle regarding the true meaning of quantum theory since its inception in the 1920's.
    Two electromagnetopolic waveforms of the EMMR, can unite in higher dimensional spacetime, but must then await their reckoning in the lower dimensionality on earth say, as a twinned body-particle before they can reproduce in the 'Christ-Baby' offspring."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, the EMMR being the 'spirit' as magnetomonopolic electric energyfields, defining such concepts as soul and memory and lifeforce in terms of the factors of the electropolic capacitance and the magnetopolic induction, associated with the sexual chromosomes."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "This could be a way for science to mathematically derive the so called 'afterlife'.
    The electromagnetomonopolic couplings of the L-inductions and the C-capacitances are intrinsic to the cosmogenetic matrix, which can be defined in analogy to a dipolar magnet or a quadrupole.
    In the old 'ark of the covenant', which is the magnetic dipole, the magnetopolic fieldlines terminate in an East-West-Mirror and a sexual chromosomatic repulsion between North-North and South-South poles creates a coupled, but dipolar magnetic field between the EMMR defined electromagnetism defining the old male-female sexual partnerships.

    In the new 'ark of the covenant', the sexual polarities are harmonised in a quadrupolar electromagnetism with continuous magnetic fieldlines across both the East-West and the North-South-Mirrors.
    This is scripturally encoded as the 'New Ark of the Testament', replacing the 'Old Ark of the Testament' in an encirclement of the 'heavenly throne' or singularity in 24 'elders' in Revelation.4.2-5; and links to the the 'Rainbow Covenant of Noah' after the 'flood' and the Abrahamic generations.

    But whenever there are exact numerical values in the scriptural scrolls, then the omniscientific evaluations can be of great help in their decipherments; just to mention the exact counting of Noah's days regarding the 'flood' and the cycles of Daniel in the Babylonian captivity and the dayyears of Ezekiel, all mirrored in the Book of Revelation and the Egyptian captivity of old and new.
    But it all relates to a circular continuum of counting days, such as a period of 4 years of 1461 days, including a leapyear, say. For a 'Great Historical Cycle of Daniel' of 2300 days, a minimum of 8 Gregorian calendrical years so becomes necessary to span the effect of any possible transformation as quantisation of the historical supercycle.

    If then a 'Madonna' ascends on some arbitrary 'day of her rebirth', this 'Day of the Lord' can become a starting-point for an individualised numbercount for a new prospective 'bridegroom' left behind on the earth as a 'living he-zombie' so to say.
    If the 'Mother Mary' succeeds to induce herself into the mind and body of the old mortal man via the tools of her seductive charms and her enchanting beauty, then the 'zombieness', in the course of the personalised number counts of the old prophets, can be avoided.
    But this is only half of the story; for 'Mother Mary' to fully realise herself in two places at once; she requires her heavenly lovematch in 'Father Joseph' to manifest in a corresponding manner within a new prospective 'bride' left behind on the earth as a 'living she-zombie' following his deadly ascension into the 'afterworld'.

    It can so assume the form of a long and drawn out 'soap-opera' of 'real life' television of one's own story, those 'fulfilments of prophecy' in the 'Days of our Lives' in the 'endtimes of the tribulations' and the 'end of one's own old world'.
    The story is even more intricate, because the nucleotidal basepairings must all be accomodated as the genetic alphabet to effectively energise one's cosmogenetic genome.
    As the two earthbound bodies are the universal quantisation of the protouniverse as one in two; they already contain the Thymine/Uracil-Adenine and the Cytosine-Guanine DNA/RNA baseperfect genetic matches within their separated bodies of the male and the female.
    And as the Adenine has two suitors, 'she' assumes a starred form together with the Enimine, which is a starred form of the Thymine of the DNA, intersecting with the Uracil from the RNA.

    So the bridegroom can be defined as the pregenetic Enimine and the bride becomes the pregenetic Adenine* in the terms of the rebuilding of the bodies via the Amino Acids transcribing the RNA* into the proteins required by the biochemistry. But this leaves the potential for four nucleotidal baseletters to manifest as the monopolic electricity in the two dipoles or coupled polarities of the Uracil-Adenine and the Cytosine-Guanine.
    The dragonomy so requires two ascended 'Marys' and two ascended 'Josephs' to manifest itself. And that is why there are 24 'Elders' about the 'heavenly ark-testimonial throne' and not just 12."

    Code9.

    Code10.
    Code11.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2018
  5. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Logan Antico:
    "So there is a lot of work to be done, when one is dead.
    One has only two choices in one's natural evolution of selection and one's growth in selfawareness.
    Either one forgoes the concept of personality and individuation in a rebirth in terms of an algorithm of experience factors and the resetting of the EMMR differential circuitry as a function of one's self-frequency or eigenvibration; or one keeps one's persona in a merger of one's L-C-Factor couplings with a potential dragonomy, embodied on the 'other side' of the spacetime mirror you are looking into when you are in the disembodied state of being.

    You could describe the first choice as one of a snowflake melting in its temperature dependent existence and its subsequent return to the ocean as a drop of water, reforming as a drop of rain and then as another new differently shaped snowflake. It may retain the memory of its previous bodyshape, but will not be able to reformulate the mass-sense perceptions of the former in its unique intricacies.
    The second choice doesn't require this process of the recycling, as a new morphologically different snowflake is already provided in the bodies of the bride and the bridegroom of the dragonomy. The metamorphosis of the 'mortal human caterpillar' into the 'immortal starhuman butterfly' would constitute the isomorphism of the transformation, as the mathematical poet would say.
    The old 'disembodied' snowflake-shape literally merges with the new 'embodied' snowflake-shape as the 'memory' of the old now molten snowflake-shape, not returning to the 'blissful' ocean, but remaining in individuation.

    In omniscientific terms; the StarSon becomes a superposed entity in MindBody and BodyMind and as a StarSonDaughter and the StarDaughter graduates as a StarDaughterSon.
    The archetypes of GodDog=FatherMother=AbrahamSarah=JosephMary; SonDaughter=IsaacRebe kah=HeChristSheChrist and GrandSonGrandDaughter=StarSonStarDaughter=HolyGhostHolySpirit become 'christened' in the 'Name' of the FatherMother and the 'Name' of the SonDaughter and the 'Name' of the GrandSonGrandDaughter in a liturgical exclamation of: 'In nomino patrimatri et nomino filiusfilia et nomino spirito sancti animaanimus!'

    So in a sense it becomes irrelevant as to how the StarSon-StarDaughter dragonomy defines itself in the namings of thew archetypes.
    The dragonomy is in principle inseparable; one cannot divide the resurrected 'Body of Christ'.

    Jesus tried to tell the poeple of hisher day, that heshe was before Abraham and before hisher human ancestor of David - but many would not listen and none could understand.
    Now we can understand the wisdom of hisher words through omniscience.

    Any prospective dragonomy then substitutes the archetypes with real personages, who have died and who have 'passed over the abyss' into the 'Bosom of Abraham'.
    This is eloquently coded in Luke.13.16; 16.22-26.
    Any graduates are their very own ancestors in the patriarchy of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and in the matriarchy of Sarah, Rebekah and Leah as the renamed Israel-Rachel of the third and final generation of their own universe as prototypical phaseshift of the omniverse.

    The 'He-Christ' forms the image of the Star-Son in the Bride and the 'She-Christ' mirrors the Star-Daughter in the Bridegroom, thus dragonising the Son and the Daughter in EMMR-energy.
    The renamed Bodies of Abraham and Sarah form the Bodypart of the StarSon's MindBody and the renamed Minds of Isaac and Sarah become the Mindpart of the StarSon's BodyMind.
    The renamed Minds of Abraham and Sarah are within the BodyMind of the StarDaughter and the renamed Bodies of Isaac and Rebekah constitute the Bodypart of the StarDaughter's MindBody.

    The Mindpart of the StarSon's MindBody 'fuses' the old SonMind to the He-Christ-Mind of Jesus-Yeshua and the Bodypart of the StarSon's BodyMind 'blends' the old SonBody to the She-Christ- Body of Mary Magdalene.
    The Mindpart of the StarDaughter's MindBody 'marries' the old DaughterMind to the She-Christ-Mind of Mary Magdalene and the Bodypart of the StarDaughter 'weds' the old DaughterBody to the He-Christ-Body of Jesus-Yeshua.

    The 'natural' She-Body of Mary Magdalene so 'redeems' the 'unnatural' SonBody and the 'natural' He-Mind of Jesus-Yeshua so 'saves' the 'unnatural' DaughterMind.
    Jesus-Yeshua's status as an 'unnatural' and 'only begotten' mutation as counter agency to Barbelo's 'unnatural' creation of Yaldabaoth, renders himherself as the archetypical 'MotherMind' in embodiment however, thus allowing Barbelo's Mind to finally 'understand' itself through its inbred wisdom of the SophiaGnosis.
    The incarnation of Yaldabaoth as the shelessness in the maleness of Jehovah becomes harmonised in Mary Magdalene and as the real Eve, becoming Lucifera as the 'Devil's' Bride from Heaven'.
    And in true heavenhellish justice, the 'Lake of Fire and Brimstone' becomes the dragonomy of the harmonised sexual polarities; the 'Brimstone' of the StarSon being the 'Fire' of the StarDaughter, burning with eternal desire to sexually merge the individualised electromagnetopolic factors of the Abrahamic generations within the 'heavenly wedding' of the bride and bridegroom.
    So who are the 'forces of evil' of the ARMAGEDDON=82=DRAGON MADE in the eschatologies?

    Yaldabaoth is the 'Beast' in every Man and Baphomet as the 'Whore from Babylon' is the Harlot in every Woman in the disharmony between oppositely polarised Mind- and Bodyparts.
    The 'False Prophet' is also the 'False Prophetess Jezebel' as the 'Fake Image' of the 'ReD Dragon'.
    The 'ReAL Dragon'(AL=13=1+3=4=D) is a 'Rainbow Serpent' of all the colours harmonised and is of a doubled bisexual standard definition within a true ManWoman=WomanMan.
    The 'falsehood' relates to the thought of a natural independence of man from woman and vice versa, the liberation of man from woman and the liberation of woman from man - not a physical homosexua- lity, but a mental one.

    Isaiah.43.20:
    "The beasts of the field shall honour me, the dragons and the owls; because I give waters in the wilderness, and rivers in the desert, to give drink to my people, my chosen."

    {Dragons are heshes and owls are shehes as God's unified people.}

    Isaiah.13.22:
    "And the wild beasts of the islands shall cry in their desolate houses, and dragons in their pleasant palaces: and her time is near to come, and her days shall not be prolonged."

    {He-Dragons stress over the upcoming birth of their unifier messiah.}

    Jeremiah.9.11:
    "And I will make Jerusalem heaps, and a den of dragons; and I will make the cities of Judah desolate, without an inhabitant."

    {Desolate She-Dragons harbour He-Dragons.}

    Isaiah.27.1:
    "In that day the Lord with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea."

    {The He-Dragon/Beast of the sea/subconscious is slain by WORDS=SWORD.}

    Job.41.1-...34:
    "Canst thou draw out leviathan with an hook? or his tongue with a cord which thou lettest down?...Will he make a covenant with thee? wilt thou take him for a servant for ever?
    Wilt thou play with him as with a bird? or wilt thou bind him for thy maidens?...His heart is as firm as a stone; yea as hard as apiece of the nether millstone...
    He maketh a path to shine after him; one would think the deep to be hoary. Upon earth there is not his like, who is made without fear.
    He beholdeth all high things: he is a king over all the children of pride."

    Revelation.12.1-6:
    "And there appeared a great wonder in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:
    And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. And his tail drew the third part of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born. And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days."

    Revelation.12.7-17:
    "And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night." And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their tes timony; and they loved not their lives unto the death. Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
    And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.
    And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he may cause her to be carried away of the flood.
    And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
    And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."

    Revelation.18.21:
    "And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all."

    {The sea is the mirror of the 'spirit' of space and time. SPACETIME=MIRROR=SPIRIT=PHOENIX=91.}

    Revelation.19.20-21:
    "And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that worshipped his image.
    These both were cast alive into the lake of fire burning with brimstone. And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh."

    Revelation.20.2,10:
    "And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,...
    And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever."

    There is a difference between the Devil=Satan and the devil=beast=false prophet; all three of the latter are cast ALIVE=EVIL A{Beginning} into the dragonomy, which is the 'Lake of Fire of the sexual desire, burning with passion between the StarSon and the StarDaughter to be together as the solid, bodily part of the Brimstone, like a Millstone within the spiritual fire of the EMMR'.
    The Devil, as Satan is the Tails of the same Coin of which God is the Head, it is the Ess-part of the 11D-supermembrane, the 'winding serpent' in modular duality to the 'vibrating serpent' Eps.

    2Peter.3.8:
    "But, Beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."

    Satan is the dark side of God as the Dog manifested to create the contrast for the light side of God to exist in; SATAN=SAT ON, the backside of the same divinity: HEAVEN=CLOUDS=SONGS=55
    SATAN=55; Satan is the adversary of mankind as crown prosecutor in the hall of justice; heshe is a SheHe in the form of SATANA, just as LUCIFERA matches LUCIFER; LUCIFER=SATAN'S=74, as every Man and LUCIFERA=SATANA'S=75 as every Woman; SATAN+1 matches LUCIFER+1 matches
    MAN+1*=WOMAN=(WO)+MAN=(38)+28=(ALPHA)+28=(BRIDE)+28=66=FREEDOM=THE AMEN or THE MAGIC=THE NAME.

    Satan and God have a 'bet' or heavenly argument as to Job's resilience to curse God because of his misfortunes - God eventually wins the 'bet' after rebuking the 'humans' attempting to prevent Job's personal questioning (GNOSIS=WISDOM=CATHERINE=83) of God's purposes.

    Job.1.6-12:
    "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them.
    And the Lord said unto Satan, Whence comest thou?
    Then Satan answered the Lord, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
    And the Lord said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, on that feareth God, and escheweth evil?
    Then Satan answered the Lord , and said, Doth Job fear God for nought?
    Hast not thou made an hedge about him, and about his house, and about all that he hath on every side? thou hast blessed the work of his hands, and his substance is increased in the land. But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face.
    And the Lord said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thy hand.
    So Satan went forth from the presence of the Lord."

    And Job's seven sons were killed in the eldest brother's collapsing house in a great windstorm, his sheep and camels perished in fire and his servants were killed by invaders.

    Job.1.20-22:
    "Then Job arose, and rent his mantle, and shaved his head, and fell down upon the ground and worshipped, And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord. In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly."

    Job.2.1-11:
    "Again there was a day....
    And the Lord said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? and still he holdeth fast his integrity, although thou movedst me against him, to destroy him without cause. And Satan answered the Lord, and said, Skin for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for his life. But put forth thine hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse thee to thy face.
    And the Lord said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life. So went Satan forth from the presence of the Lord, and smote Job with sore boils from the sole of his foot unto his crown.
    And he took him a potsherd to scape himself withal; and he sat down among the ashes. Then said his wife unto him, Dost thou still retain thine integrity? curse God and die.
    But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?
    In all this did not Job sin with his lips."

    Three of Job's friends came to mourn with him; Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar. For seven days and nights they mourned in silence; after Job had cursed himself and his very exis- tence, Eliphaz and Bildad reproved Job, arguing that he must have sinned against God to experience
    such great misfortunes.
    Job replied his quest to be a search for understanding the works of the almighty, considering himself innocent of any wrong doings; Zophar then charges Job with mocking the almighty, and that the ways of the Lord can never be examined or found out by man.

    Job.19.1-29:
    "Then Job answered and said, How long will you vex my soul, and break me in pieces with words?
    These ten times have ye reproached me: ye are not ashamed that you make yourselves strange to me.
    And be it indeed that I have erred, mine error remaineth with myself. If indeed ye will magnify yourselves against me, and plead against me my reproach:
    Know now that God hath overthrown me, and hath compassed me with his net. Behold, I cry out of wrong, but I am not heard: I cry aloud, but there is no judgment.
    He hath fenced up my way that I cannot pass, and he hath set darkness in my paths. He hath stripped me of my glory, and taken the crown from my head.
    He hath destroyed me on every side, and I am gone: and mine hope hath he removed like a tree.
    He hath also kindled his wrath against me, and he counteth me unto him as one of his enemies. His troops come together, and raise up their way against me, and encamp round about my tabernacle. He hath put my brethren far from me, and mine acquaintance are verily estranged from me. My kinsfolk have failed, and my familiar friends have forgotten me.
    They that dwell in mine house, and my maids, count me for a stranger: I am an alien in their sight. I called my servant, and he gave me no answer; I intreated him with my mouth.
    My breath is strange to my wife, though I intreated for the children's sake of mine own body. Yea, young children despised me; I arose, and they spake against me.
    All my inward friends abhorred me; and they whom I loved are turned against me. My bone cleaveth to my skin and to myflesh, and I am escaped with the skin of my teeth.
    Have pity upon me, have pity upon me, O my friends; for the hand of God hath touched me. Why do you persecute me as God, and are not satisfied with my flesh?
    Oh that my words were now written! oh that they were printed in a book! That they were graven with an iron pen and lead in the rock for ever!
    For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth: And though after my skin worms destroy my body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:
    Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.
    But ye should say, Why persecute we him, seeing the root of the matter is found in me?
    Be ye afraid of the sword: for wrath bringeth the punishments of the sword, that ye may know there is a judgment."

    Job.22.1-5:
    "Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered (Job) and said, Can a man be profitable unto God, as he that is wise may be profitable unto himself?
    Is it any pleasure to the Almighty, that thou are righteous? or is it gain to him, that thou makest thy ways perfect?
    Will he reprove thee for fear of thee? will he enter with thee into judgment? Is not thy wickedness great? and thine iniquities infinite?"

    Job.25.1-6:
    "Then answered Bildal the Shuhite, and said, Dominion and fear are with him, he maketh peace in his high places.
    Is there any number of his armies? and upon whom doth not his light arise? How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean that is born of a woman?
    Behold even to the moon, and it shineth not; yea, the stars are not pure in his sight. How much less man, that is a worm? and the son of man, which is a worm?"

    Job.26.1-14:
    "But Job answered and said, How hast thou helped him that is without power? how savest thou the arm that hath no strength? How hast thou counselled him that hath no wisdom?
    and how hast thou plentifully declared the thing as it is? To whom hast thou uttered words? and whose spirit came from thee?
    Dead things are formed from under the waters, and the inhabitants thereof. Hell is naked before him, and destruction hath no covering.
    He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. He bindeth up the waters in his thick clouds; and the cloud is not rent under them.
    He holdeth back the face of his throne, and spreadeth his cloud upon it. He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end.
    The pillars of heaven tremble and are astonished at his reproof. He divideth the sea with his power, and by his understanding he smiteth through the proud.
    By his spirit he hath garnished the heavens; his hand hath formed the crooked serpent. Lo, these are parts of his ways: but how little a portion is heard of him?
    but the thunder of his power who can understand?"

    Job.27.1-12:
    "Moreover Job continued his parable, and said, As God liveth, who hath taken away my judgment; and the Almighty, who hath vexed my soul;
    All the while my breath is in me, and the spirit of God is in my nostrils; My lips shall not speak wickedness, nor my tongue utter deceit.
    God forbid that I should justify you: till I die I will not remove mine integrity from me. My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let it go: my heart shall not reproach me so long as I live.
    Let mine enemy be as the wicked, and he that riseth up against me as the unrighteous. For what is the hope of the hypocrite, though he has gained, when God taketh away his soul?
    Will God hear his cry when trouble cometh upon him? Will he delight himself in the Almighty? will he always call upon God?
    I will teach you by the hand of God: That which is with the Almighty will I not conceal. Behold, all ye yourselves have seen it; why then are ye thus altogether vain?"

    Job.28.28:
    "And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding."

    Job.31.35-36:
    "Oh that one would hear me! behold, my desire is, that the Almighty would answer me, and that mine adversary had written a book.
    Surely I would take it upon my shoulder, and bind it as a crown to me."

    Job.32.1-3:
    "So these three men ceased to answer Job, because he was righteous in his own eyes.
    Then was kindled the wrath of Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the kindred of
    Ram: against Job was his wrath kindled, because he justified himself rather than God.
    Also against his three friends was his wrath kindled, because they had found no answer, and yet had condemned Job."

    Job.32.6-10:
    "And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said, I am young, and ye are very old; wherefore I was afraid, and durst not shew you mine opinion.
    I said, Days should speak, and multitude of years should teach wisdom. But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding.
    Great man are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgment. Therefore I said, Hearken to me; I also will shew you mine opinion."

    Job.33.3-6:
    "My words shall be of the uprightness of my heart: and my lips shall utter knowledge clearly.
    The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life. If thou canst answer me, set thy words in order before me, stand up.
    Behold, I am according to thy wish in God's stead: I also am formed out of the clay."

    Job.33.12-16:
    "Behold, in this you art not just: I will answer thee, that God is greater than man. Why dost thou strive against him? for he giveth not account of any of his matters.
    For God speaketh once, yea twice, yet man perceiveth it not. In a dream, in a vision of the night, when deep sleep falleth upon men, in slumberings upon the bed;
    Then he openeth the ears of men, and sealeth their instruction,"

    Job.33.31-33:
    "Mark well, O Job, hearken unto me: hold thy peace, and I will speak. If thou hast any thing to say, answer me: speak, for I desire to justify thee.
    If not, hearken unto me: hold thy peace, and I shall teach thee wisdom."

    Job.34.5-15:
    "For Job hath said, I am righteous: and God hath taken away my judgment. Should I lie against my right? my wound is incurable without transgression.
    What man is like Job, who drinketh up scorning like water? Which goeth in company with the workers of iniquity, and walketh with wicked men.
    For he hath said, It profiteth a man nothing that he should delight himself with God. Therefore hearken unto me, ye men of understanding: far be it from God, that he should do wickedness; and from the Almighty, that he should commit iniquity. For the work of a man shall he render unto him, and cause every man to find according to his ways.
    Yea, surely God will not do wickedly, neither will the Almighty pervert judgment. Who hath given him a charge over the earth? or who hath disposed the whole world?
    If he set his heart upon man, if he gather unto himself his spirit and his breath; All flesh shall perish together, and man shall turn again unto dust."

    Job.34.33-37:
    "Should it be according to thy mind? he will recompense it, whether you refuse, or whether thou choose; and not I: therefore speak what thou knowest.
    Let men of understanding tell me, and let a wise man hearken unto me. Job hath spoken without knowledge, and his words were without wisdom.
    My desire is that Job may be tried unto the end because of his answers for wicked men.
    For he addeth rebellion unto his sin, he clappeth his hands among us, and multiplieth his words against God."

    Job.35.13-16:
    "Surely God will not hear vanity, neither will the Almighty regard it. Although thou sayest thou shalt not see him, yet judgment is before him; therefore trust thou in him.
    But now, because it is not so, he hath visited in his anger; yet he knoweth it not in great extremity: Therefore doth Job open his mouth in vain; he multiplieth words without knowledge."

    Job.36.1-5:
    "Elihu also proceeded, and said, Suffer me a little, and I will shew thee that I have yet to speak on God's behalf.
    I will fetch my knowledge from afar, and will ascribe righteousness to my Maker. For truly my words shall not be false; he that is perfect in knowledge is with thee.
    Behold, God is mighty, and despiseth not any: he is mighty in strength and wisdom."

    Job.36.21-26:
    "Take heed, regard not iniquity: for this hast thou chosen rather than affliction. Behold, God exalteth by his power: who teacheth like him?
    Who hath enjoined him his way? or who can say, Thou hast wrought iniquity? Remember that thou magnify his work, which men behold.
    Every man may see it; man may behold it far off. Behold, God is great, and we know him not, neither can the number of his years be searched out."

    Job.37.7-8:
    "He sealeth up the hand of every man; that all men may know his work. Then the beasts go into dens, and remain in their places."

    Job.37.14-24:
    "Hearken onto this , O Job: stand still, and consider the wondrous works of God. Dost thou know when God disposed them, and caused the light of his cloud to shine?
    Dost thou know the balancings of the clouds, the wondrous works of him which is perfect in knowledge? How thy garments are warm, when he quieteth the earth by the south wind?
    Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass? Teach us what we shall say unto him; for we cannot order our speech by reason of darkness.
    Shall it be told him that I speak? if a man speak, surely he shall be swallowed up. And now men see not the bright light which is in the clouds: but the wind passeth, and cleanseth them.
    Fair weather cometh out of the north: with God is terrible majesty. Touching the Almighty, we cannot find him out: he is excellent in power, and in judgment, and in plenty of justice: he will not afflict.
    Men do therefore fear him: he respecteth not any that are wise of heart."

    Job.38.1..-41:
    "Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, Who is that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
    Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me. Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.

    {We were next to you, at your left side and watched you do it, taking notes!}

    Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?

    {The measure is the Planck-Length oscillation, macroquantised into your own eigen-wavelength λps.}

    Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof?

    {The unification of gravity with electromagnetism, the corner stone being the EMMR.}

    ...Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the search of the depth?

    {Yes, we have explored the deep seas/subconscious in submarines and been to the moon.}

    Have the gates of death been opened to thee? or hast thou seen the doors of the shadow of death?

    {Yes, our Beloved(s) are on the 'other side' in Abraham's bosom.}

    Hast thou perceived the breadth of the earth? declare if thou knowest it all.

    {We know for about 300 years now, that the earth is an oblate spheroid and not flat, with an equatorial diameter of so 40,000 kilometres in 4D spacetime.}

    Where is the way where light dwelleth? and as for darkness, where is the place thereof?

    {Light in your terms is the W*-state of energy in transformation, darkness the B*-state.}

    That thou shouldest take it to the bound thereof, and that thou shouldest know the paths to the house thereof?

    {The bound is the VPE and the pathways are the UFoQR in the magnetic monopoles.}

    Knowest thou it, because thou wast then born? or because the number of thy days is great?

    {We are as old as you are, namely 19.11 Billion years Gregorian.}

    Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail, which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of battle and war?...
    Out of whose womb came the ice? and the hoary frost of heaven, who has gendered it?

    {We understand the icecold fire of the New Jerusalem to be your piercing intellect and the hailstones of your 'talents' (Rev.16.21) to be omniscientific facts and definitions in your modular duality.}

    Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion? Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?

    {We know the constellations to be superpositions of many stars at various distance scales; individual stars follow stellar evolutionary cycles, their influences being psychological inferences acting directly upon magnetopolic fields in the pentagonally defined DNA helix and drawing upon the historical archetypes, which created the mappings in the sky out of the starhuman mind.}

    Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth?

    {The ancient science of Astrology is a direct mapping of the Israelite generations of Jacob, also redefined in 12 apostles, 12 hours, 12 months and the 12 stars upon the crown of the ascended
    'Mary' rebirthing the ChristChild by the 'Holy Ghost' in Revelation.12.
    The zodiacal dominion is like a curse on humanity, finding itself bondage to certain archetypical characteristics until the 13th starsign of Arachne/Ophiuchus can unify all of the 12 in a 13th in the
    'swallowing of the tail by the head' by the cosmic serpent Ourobos, who is the zodiacal wheel.}

    ...Canst thou send lightnings, that they may go, and say unto thee, Here we are? Who hath put wisdom in the inward parts? or who hath given understanding to the heart?
    Who can number the clouds in wisdom? or who can stay the bottles of heaven,...

    {Weather patterns depend on the equilibrium systems of the terrestrial and solar cyclicities. Atmospheric air currents and oceanic water currents are influenced by the magnetic currents of the solar wind and even galactic phenomna, subject to pressure fluctuations, which can be caused by terrestrial magma currents, blending fire, heat convection and earth-telluric currents.
    Influencing such pressure gradients in temperature and energy, say through the VPE would reduce the randomness (defined in statistical distributions) in weather patterns to a degree, but the mathematical order, as defined through your own selfdefinition always engages complexity- and chaos theory with its parameters.
    The whirlwinds or tornadoes as the 'bottles of heaven' are macroquantised manifestations of the VPE, thus the negation of a tornadoes 'eye' as a vortex-sink is a vortex-source, also macroquantised from the Vacuum. The notion of wisdom gained is linked to experiences, either directly or as observer.
    Once your children have experienced enough of your 'dark satanic' side, then they may have enough wisdom to know what works in their society and what does not. They are repeating the same old formulae of war, financial monopoly and educated lordship over and over again and seem to be too intellectually inert to change their perceptions, unwilling to experience your 'light' side of love, undertanding, tolerance and a devotion to harmonies in the mass senses. That is where the heart comes in, there is an understanding of the heart which can challenge the reluctance of the head-intellect to change anything.
    This heart-level or gnosis derives from your own soul, that is your own collective experience as all of us as your human children in particular and all that exists in general.
    So remembrance or a love and communication with you automatically engages the collective starhuman heart and that is the true wisdom, because it cannot deceive, as the human mind can.}"

    Job.39.9-12:
    "Will the unicorn be willing to serve thee, or abide by thy crib? Canst thou bind the unicorn with his band in the furrow? or will he harrow the val- leys after thee? Wilt thoe trust him, because his strength is great? or wilt thou leave your labour to him? Wilt thou believe him, that he will bring home thy seed, and gather it into thy barn?"

    {The Unicorn is the 'protector of the Virgin Mother' giving birth to the ChristChild within every man and woman of the dragonomies; it is symbolised by Jacob's and Zilpah's son Gad and the starsign
    of Virgo under which John the Baptist was born; its strength is the Centaur of Chiron and the myths which go with that identification.
    The Unicorn only serves the 'unified' humanity as a monosong of two in one in two; so it will bring home our seed, provided our hearts and minds are willing to become a new starhuman race of
    Rainbow Dragons}.

    Job.40.1-..24:
    "Moreover the Lord answered Job, and said, Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him? he that reproveth God, let him answer it.
    Then Job answered the Lord, and said, "Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer thee? I will lay mine hand upon my mouth. Once have I spoken; but I will not answer: yea, twice; but I will proceed no further."
    Then answered the Lord unto Job out of the whirlwind, and said, "Gird up thy loins now like a man: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me. Wilt thou also disannul my judgment?
    wilt thou condemn me, that you mayest be righteous? Hast thou an arm like God? or canst thou thunder with a voice like him?....
    Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in his place. Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
    Then will I also confess unto thee that thine own right hand can save thee. Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass, as an ox.
    Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
    His bones are as strong pieces of brass; ...He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him..... Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth. He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares."

    Job.41.1-..34:
    "Canst thou draw out leviathan with an hook?...He beholdeth all high things: he is a king over all the children of pride."

    Job.42.1-7:
    "Then Job answered the Lord, and said, I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be witholden from thee.
    Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? therefore have I uttered that I understood not; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.
    Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me. I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee. Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes.
    And it was so, that after the Lord had spoken these words unto Job, the Lord said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy
    two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath."

    Job.42.12-17:
    "So the Lord blessed the latter end of Job more than his beginning: for he had fourteen thousand sheep (before 7,000), and six thousand camels (before 3,000), and a thousand yoke of oxen (before 500), and a thousand she asses (before 500). He had also seven sons and three daughters.
    And he called the name of the first, Jemima; and the name of the second, Kezia; and the name of the third, Kerenhappuch.
    And in all the land were no women found so fair as the daughters of Job: and their father gave them inheritance among their brethren.
    After this lived Job an hundred and forty years, and saw his sons, and his sons' sons, even four generations. So Job died, being old and full of days."

    Job is every man and his job is to answer God's questions for humanity as hisher children.
    "Are they grown up yet? Are they ready for the next step forward to claim their inheritances? As long as they fear me as a punishing supernatural deity, they cannot advance."
    One 'fears' God in respectfulness, like parents should have the respect of their children.

    Once the children can answer the questions regarding the creation-business, then they must have the intellectual understanding, if not the wisdom from the heart, to advance into the starhuman potential promised to all of them since the days of Abraham and purposed for that since the beginning of time.
    Job as 'Man', is told to 'gird up his loins' and act like a grown-up man - a StarMan.

    jerusa.

    The Behemoth, created with Job, is one half of the 'Urim and the Thummim' as a 'Balance of Truth', attached to the robal vest (ephod) as the 'Breastplate of Judgment' of the 'Highpriest of Israel', in the Levitical priesthood.
    It defines the order of Leah's sons to Jacob in a mapping of rainbow colours and gemstones and as coded in Exodus.28.9-12,15-21 and Leviticus.8.8.
    Two rows, each of three are: Red/Reuben(Sardius,Jasper); Orange/Simeon(Topaz,Sapphire); Yellow/Levi(Carbuncle,Chalcedony); Green/Judah(Emerald,Emerald); Blue/Issachar(Sapphire,Sardonyx); and Indigo/Zebulon(Diamond,Sardius).

    ezek0.
    ezek00.

    This becomes the 'Upper Half' of the 'visible rainbow' above the horizon and of the 'Noahic Rainbow Covenant', manifested through Jacob's 11th Son of Aquarius with the 'Coat of many colours'.

    The Leviathan, the 'crooked serpent', is the 'Lower Half' of the 'invisible rainbow' as the 'Priesthood of Melchisedec', coded in gemstones and the 'gates of the apostles', derived from the 'four beasts' about the 'Emerald Throne' in Revelation.4.3; 21.11-21.
    It defines the other six sons of Jacob to Bilhah, Zilpah and Rachel in two rows of three gemstones: Lime/Dan(Ligure,Chrysolite); Cyanazure/Naphtali(Agate,Beryl); Turquoise/Gad(Amethyst,Topaz); Aquamarine/Asher(Beryl,Chrysoprasus); Magenta/Joseph(Onyx,Jacinth) and Purple/Benjamin(Jasper, Amethyst).

    The Thummim-Jasper in Red moves through the tribes of Indigo-Blue-Orange-Turquoise and Yellow and then through Cyanazure-Turquoise-Aquamarine into the House of Indigo/Diamond and as the 'messenger from below'.
    The Urim-Jasper in Purple metamorphoses the gemstones as the 'messenger from above' in moving from Purple-Turquoise-Aquamarine-Magenta-Yellow, ending in Turquoise/Gad.
    This exchanges adjacent positions in the order specified and the dual combined transformation of the 'Bloodstone of Israel' (Heliotrope) establishes the '24 Elders' as the gemstone-colours of the Melchisedecian priesthood order, with six 'doubles' symbolising the 'sixwinged four beasts'.

    The Jasper in the House of 'Red-Reuben-Aries-Simon Peter' is the Thummin and the Sardonyx of the Onyx-Stone, also known as the 'BloodStone of Israel' (Heliotrope), initiating the Melchisedecian transformation as 'messenger from below'.

    The unifying medium of the 'twelve pearls' in the New Jerusalem, which is the 'BodyChurch of the Dragonomy' then encompasses all 12 starsigns, gemstones, elders and apostles in the 'Order of Melchisedec' and as the 'Mansions' Jesus went to prepare for hisher brethren by John.14.2-3.

    1.House of Red/Reuben/Aries/Sardius-Sardius(1&2Pet.)/Simon Peter the Rock/Gospel of John-Mark
    2.House of Orange/Simeon/Taurus/Topaz-Topaz(1&2Cor.)/Andrew with James
    3.House of Yellow/Levi/Gemini/Beryl(3Jn.)-Beryl(Rev.)/James with John Zebedee
    4.House of Green/Judah/Leo/Emerald-Emerald(1&2Jn.)/John with Andrew
    5.House of Blue/Issachar/Sagittarius/Sapphire-Sapphire(1&2Thess.)/James Alphaeus with Justus
    6.House of Indigo/Zebulon/Capricorn/Diamond(Acts)-Jasper(Jude)/Judas Alphaeus with Simon
    7.House of Lime/Dan/Cancer/Ligure(Tit.)-Chrysolite(Heb.)/Philip of Bethsaida of Cephas
    8.House of Cyanazure/Naphtali/Libra/Agate(Eph.)-Chalcedony(Phil.)/Bartholomew with Matthias
    9.House of Turquoise/Gad/Virgo/Jasper(Jas.)-Chrysoprasus(Quelle-Q)/Matthew with Thomas
    10.House of Aquamarine/Asher/Scorpio/Onyx(Col.)-Sardonyx(Philem.)/Thomas with Matthew
    11.House of Magenta/Joseph/Aquarius/Carbuncle(Rom.)-Jacinth(Gal.)/Simon with Judas Alphaeus
    12.House of Purple/Benjamin/Pisces/Amethyst-Amethyst(1&2Tim.)/Judas Iscariot with Paul of Tarsus

    ezek0000. ezek000.
    ezek3. ezekielsisraeliholyportionland.
    newjerusalem.

    The 'Gates of Ezekiel', coded in Ezekiel.47.13; 48.1-35 number the tribes from East to West as Dan-Asher-Naphtali-Manasseh-Ephraim-Reuben-Judah-(Priesthood Levi/Zadok)-Benjamin-Simeon- Issachar-Zebulon-Gad.
    The North-Gate of Leo{Reuben-Judah-Levi} symbolises the 'Synoptic Gospel of Mark' with a 'Gnostic Book of John' and is the 'Lion-Beast' of Revelation.4.7.
    The The East-Gate of Aquarius{Joseph-Benjamin-Dan} symbolises the 'Synoptic Gospel of Matthew' with a 'Gnostic Book of Thomas' and is the 'manfaced 'Angel-Beast' of Revelation.4.7.
    The South-Gate of Taurus{Simeon-Issachar-Zebulon} symbolises the 'Synoptic Gospel of Luke' with a 'Gostic Book of James' and is the 'Calf-Beast' of Revelation.4.7.
    The West-Gate of Scorpio/Eagle{Gad-Asher-Naphtali} symbolises the 'Gnostic Gospel of John' with a 'Synoptic Q' as the 'Gnostic Gospel of Thomas' and is the 'Flying Eagle-Beast' of Revelation.4.7.

    The 'crooked serpent' 'magnetises' the 'Sons of Leah' in changing the order of a 'magnetocurrent' from Reuben-Simeon-Levi-Judah-Issachar-Zebulon in a 'Head of Judah'-Reuben-Simeon-Issachar-Zebulon-'Tail of Levi' reflected as the Behemoth in the Leviathan of 'Head of Dan'-Asher-Joseph/Manasseh-Naphtali-Gad-'Tail of Benjamin'.

    ezek5.

    The 'order of the sealing of the 12 tribes times 12,000' in Revelation.7.3-8 sets Dan before Judah before Reuben and since Judah is the primary 'serpentine head', (House of Emerald is the only Gemstone invariant), Dan assumes a secondary 'serpentine head', subject to 'swalling' its own or the other serpent's tail as the 'Ourobos of Alchemy'.

    The 'Head of the Judahic Behemoth' now faces the 'Tail of the Benjaminite Leviathan' and the 'Head of the Danic Leviathan' faces the 'Tail of the Levitical Behemoth'.
    The Joseph-Asher segment now is doubled in the grafting of the twintribe and this 'extends' the Leviathan in the sequence: 'Head of Dan swallows Tail of Levi' and 'Head of Judah swallows Tail of Benjamin'; thus grafting BEnjaMin onto the BEheMoth and LEVI onto the LEVIathan.
    The new Behemoth is: 'Head of Benjamin'-Judah-Reuben-Simeon-Issachar-'Tail of Zebulon' and the new Leviathan becomes: 'Head of Levi'-Dan-Asher-Ephraim-Manasseh-Naphtali-'Tail of Gad'.
    As Judah is defined as the 'Head of the Behemoth' however, the magnetopolic polarities must switch to render the 'Benjamite Head' the 'Behemothian Tail', subject to being swallowed by the 'Leviathan Head' and allowing a second polarity switch to reestablish the Judahic Order.

    So the 'Head of Levi' swallows the 'Head/Tail of Benjamin' and the 'Head of Zebulon' swallows the 'Tail of Gad' to manifest the 'LEVIATHAN-DNA-STRAND' of the Air-Water as:
    'Head of Benjamin'-Levi-Dan-Asher-Joseph⇒ 'Tail of Naphtali' or: l-c-d-k-h-g = Pisces-Gemini-Cancer-Scorpio- Aquarius-Libra or as the Hermetic FisherEagle of the Lunar Twins as a 'New Leviathan'.


    The 'BEHEMOTHIAN-DNA-STRAND' of the Earth-Fire is: 'Head of Judah'-Reuben-Simeon-Issachar-Zebulon ⇒ 'Tail of Gad' or: e-a-b-i-j-f = Leo-Aries-Taurus-Sagittarius-Capricorn-Virgo or as the SolarArrowed Unicorn of the Seagoatian Dragonhorns as a 'New Behemoth'.

    ouroboros.

    The 'Intertwined DNA Helix' is also known as the 'Serpent Rod of Moses' or as the Caduceus of Thoth, who is the Hermes or 'Messenger of the Gods' as Mercury in mythological lore and is a derivative of an archetypical Hermes Trismegistos, keeper of the tripartite wisdom and identifiable with the 'Teacher of Righteousness' and its incarnation throughout history.
    Half of this Caduceus is used as the symbol for the modern medical profession, who might reconsider their decision to ignore the Leviathan part of the DNA-geometry in its psychological foundation.

    But knowing all this, Job, as every man, is now able to 'Do His Job' and 'tame', both the Leviathan and the Behemoth as his very own genetic makeup, symbolised in the 13th Starsign of Ophiuchus.
    The 'False Prophet' is that part of the potential MindBody-BodyMind which inverts in the secondary parts, say the Mind in the Body and the Body in the Mind in the human female and reflects in the 'False Prophetess' in the human male.
    Using our dragonomistic definitions, this would put Abraham's Body as Oneself with Isaac's Mind in the StarSon as the 'False Prophet' and vice versa in the StarDaughter as the 'Male Beast'.
    Putting Sarah's Body with Rebekah's Mind as Oneself creates the 'False Prophetess' in the StarSon and vice versa defines the 'Female Beast or Whore of Babylon' in the StarDaughter.

    The 'Beast' rises out of the 'Sea of the Subconscious' as the 'Mirror of the Soul' in the 'Mind' in Revelation.13.1-3 as the 'Old Leviathan' and the 'False Prophet' rises out of the earth, that is the 'Body' in Revelation.13.11 as the 'Old Behemoth'; both of which are ancestral lineages and memories, imprinted in the DNA encoding of all human genomes.

    falseimageprophet. babylon3.
    babylonshattered1. f3false_prophet.

    Revelation.20.13-15:
    "And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
    And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire."

    Revelation.21.1:
    "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea."

    And the Devil is Satan and is not thrown into the passion of the starhuman lovers as the DOG of GOD, but heshe simply wags his tail and becomes a 'bitch', a shehe called Satana or Lucifera or Barbelo or any 'New EveAdam', graduating as a DaughterSon of the protouniverse.
    The devil who lived, and whose antiidentity-head had been wounded in the resurrection of Jesus, is the combination of 'beast & whore' or their 'image' of 'false prophet & false prophetess' in ten principles or horns, seven of whom are 'crowned' in antiprinciples, coded in Revelation.13.1-3; 17.3,9-16.
    The implementation of the new identity as the tenth principle 'burns the whore' and throws all mental illusions, 'now and forever' into the 'Lake of the Loving Passion' of the dragonomy, however."


    Code12. Code13. Code14.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2018
  6. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256



    Act Four: Symmetry, Nonparity and the Particles
    Cogito ergo sum ! & Grace a dieu ! & Cherchez la femme !

    Scientific Expert: 55% versus Layphilosopher: 45%

    [Logan Antico and Robert Sceptico are on recess and are holidaying at the 'Group IV Collector'; a Mountain
    Holiday Resort in the hillside of the Blue Mountains Range in New South Wales in Australia]

    Robert Sceptico:
    "Look at this magnificent scenery Logan; so many people understand the grandeur of nature and the tremendous forces at play to create mountains such as these and all the environs which go with that in their adaptations."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, and some call it the works of their God, the creator of the universe.
    If they could just understand how it is all connected and that they themselves, through their ability to ponder such questions, are in a sense responsible for what they observe."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "It is so deeply hidden within themselves; this glory of the creation; yet all they would have to do to discover it, is to imagine themselves to be present, to travel in time so to say, to witness and to participate in the formation of these mountains. After all, with our computer simulations nowadays, it is no great deal to reconstruct the natural processes, the application of the Newtonian forcelaws and the evolution of the differential energy equations in space and time."


    Logan Antico:
    "But where is their confidence in that; most people are almost scared to look at a mathematical formulation; it makes them feel inferior and intellectually incompetent. So they rather pretend to leave it all to the experts and claim to be disinterested in the greater answers to the deeper questions in their lives.
    What is of more significance I ask you; the daily rise and fall in the stockmarket or the reason as to why there is a stockmarket in the first place?
    People's lives are consumed in their budgets and their economic balance sheets; they stress themselves into all sorts of ailments, just in their ongoing pursuit of appearing to do the right thing by society, their cultural peer group and their neighbours; it is a fearful pressurised community."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and whom do they blame for their predicaments at the end of one of their miserable 'business days'? They blame the government or the slackness on crime or their bosses from work; or the local priest or their doctor or the taxi driver. They just cannot see, that it has been their choice to do what they did.
    They themselves voted the people they now blame into public office and they themselves had chosen to do the work they do and to live their lives by the standards, they themselves espoused."


    Logan Antico:
    "The common voter, living in a so called democracy, is just too compliciatory, when it comes to the making of decisions. Especially in the developed industrial world, heshe trusts the government and its experts to solve the problems in society; crime, drug addiction, homelessness, economic poverty and the growing illiteracy of the younger children growing into adulthood, despite those same children being 'smarter' in their generation then their parents had been at that level of development.
    If the politicians, most of whom revel in their sense of selfimportance and perceived statesmanship and little else; could just act and behave like the nobelmen and nobelwomen they pretend to be.
    Then they would be true ambassadors and ambassadoras for their constituents; instead of their continuous babbling on about economic growth and who the 'bad guys' are in the world and how much better off everyone now is, despite the mismanagement of previous political administrations."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "But what can you expect Robert; what can you expect from a bunch of lawyers, money lenders and accountants? That is their field of expertise; to balance portfolios, budgets and economic accounts. And it is the people's choice to vote for the accountants and the bankers and the money counters, instead of choosing experts in science, engineering, craftsmanship, culture, history or even religion."


    Logan Antico:
    "It so becomes a question of information again; how can people know their choices, if the agenda of the incumbents is to keep the people in the dark?
    Far from being rolemodels for the young, many politicians have become clandestine oratory operators. The common voter is so blase' and cynical about the political process; many merely follow their 'fancy of the day' as a 'swinging voter', when it comes to the elections and the referenda ."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Certainly not the ideal of a democratic society, as envisioned and founded by the old Greeks, to name Solon, Socrates and Plato as some of the earliest exponents.
    Genuine 'public debate' only exist on paper; imagine you or me just walking into the senate or the parliament in session, stating that we had something to say in the public interest.
    We would not get past security; we would be arrested and humiliated as some sort of 'disturbers of the peace', despite having the actual wellbeing and advancement of society at heart.
    So it is a 'closed shop', this political process; just as in the fields of medicine and in other professions; the theologians and the scientific experts for instance; the majority 'keeping the debate amongst themselves', as the only people who could possibly know what they are talking about."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes it has become a deadly cancer, this misguided professional pride; masquerading the fearful vanity it actually just is.
    In the Greek ideal, any member of the public could take the podium of the forum and speak, following some rituals of convention, common courtesy and etiquette.
    But how do relatively informed citizens, like us help to fill in the educational and informational gaps in the people's understanding, Robert?
    We just can't shove our scientific nous down the throat of people; the reeducational process must begin in primary school under the guidance of a new generally acceptable philosophy, accessible to all."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And this general philosophy of life must encompass an universal sense of purpose; a reason for being, which hitherto was sequestered away by the religions of this world, praying upon the mental and emotional insecurities of the populus regarding their very existential purpose."


    Logan Antico:
    "So we are back at square number one; where is the God of Science, giving purpose to the people's very existence?
    If we can bring our God to the people as the true oneness of their own raison d'etre; then all the other gods, perhaps one for each denomination in the world religions either becomes a minor god or offspring from our God of Science; or it is absorbed by the same."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And that is a language, the people can understand through their daily rations of violence, takeovers, military insurrections and counterrevolutions, fed to them through the mass medias of their printers, their TV's, their internet and their satellites.
    We must prove to the people that our God of Science is the oldest God around and prerequisite for the existence of any other God they know of.'
    The God of Science has named Yahweh and Allah and Ahura Mazda and the Brahman through its Word or Logos; so it must be the ancestor in energy and the God of Science is the Father of all other gods; but it is the 'Father' referred to by the prophets of all the denominations.

    John.1.1-5:
    "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in the darkness; and the darkness comprehendeth it not."

    If you now replace the 'Word' with 'Definition' and the word 'God' with 'Source Energy'; then you find the 'God of Science' becoming the 'Source Energy of Science' out of the Undefined 'Naked Singularity. And it says that the Definition was first and not God, but that God became the Definition as the Word and that was that - it could not be any clearer for the scriptural students and followers.
    And it says that nothing can be made without the Definition, the Greek Logos or Word and that brings to the core of science as a world of definitions and mathematical equations and the classifiication systems.

    And a most elementary classification system is that for the elementary particles of omniphysics; and my field of expertise is in a redefinition of the Old Standard Model of classifying the basic constituents of matter and antimatter in a New Standard Model.
    And the insights were gained by a number of experimental discoveries, which forced the global scientific community to revise their equations in both the Standard Models for the Big Bang Cosmology and for the Elementary Particle Structure."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes I know what you are getting at - the common blueprint for the smallest scale and the largest scale.
    Once you particle experts had found the massinduction for the Tau-Neutrino through the scalar Higgs-Neutrino and had explained your previous formulations for that as the mesonic ring induction; then us cosmologists suddenly understood the markers for the 'de Broglie' inflation as the mappings of the HB-template of the Higgs Boson onto the Riemannian hyperspere in 10 dimensions. Then we could define a specific temperature interval for the cooling cosmos, just minutes after the Big Bang and as correspondence with the primordial nucleosynthesis of the nucleons into neutrons and protons via the process of radioactive beta decay from the hitherto undifferentiated quark-leptonic particle 'soup'.

    Your IMR, the mesonic inner ring, became mapped onto the 4D-universe as the ratio of two counts of spacequanta as the mean of two overlapping or intersecting volumes of the hyperspheres so to say. The bigger volume consists of (F=13x6656) space quanta, each with a 4D-volume, given by (λps3/4π) cubic metres and the smaller volumar being (G=67x3665) and dividing googolplex (F) by googolplex (G) yields a ratio of (1.053577264) as the proportionality between the two Riemannian 4D-volumes of the hyperspheres, corresponding to a F-Time of (1130.52) seconds* and a G-Time of (1150.36) seconds*, one second s* equalling 0.9990230094 seconds (s, SI), calibrated.
    So in between (18.84) and (19.17) minutes* after the Big Bang or a 20 second interval, the cosmic temperature background dropped from (209 billion Kelvin K*) at G to (206 billion K*) at F.

    The Black-Body temperature for the cosmic evolution can be expressed in the formulation as the: (Fourth Root of 18.2x(n+1)2/n3), deriving from the luminosity function for the universe as a Black-Body with a surfacearea given by the hypersphere in 10 dimensions. This also sets the ylemic neutron stars in their scale formulations; the ylemic radius being given as a function of nucleonic parameters and the temperature only and independent of the mass.

    The equation is: (Squareroot of [Boltzmann Constant (k)x(Temperature(T))xRe3)/(Goxmc2)]).
    One obtains this formulation in writing down the equilibrium state for the ylemic protostar in terms of its gravitational inward pressure, balanced by the thermal outward radiation pressure.
    A modified Biot-Savart-Law allows calculation of magnetic fields as parameter of spinning masses:
    (Magnetic-Flux-Density B=μoQv/(4πr2)) for a (Q=2e=e-magneto charge expression (B=M*ω/(2Ruc2)) in the EMI-GI finestructure equivalence in 12D-F-space: {(e2/2εo)=(2πGoM*2)}, spin-angular velocity(ω=v/Ru) and unification radius (Ru) setting the magneto core/corona as surface bound for the magnetic field.

    {For plasma emission at velocity (v); Charge Q=Ne*/2 & Nxnucleon mass=emission mass}.
    For the Earth: (M*=6.0x1024 kg; M*core=9x1022 kg; ω=2π/Period=2π/86,400 1/s; Rcore=1.2x106 m) for an averaged Magnetic Field of (3x10-5 Tesla or 0.3 gauss) for a core-mantle magneto flux differentiation.

    For the sun's ionised plasma emission (Solar Wind): (M*=2.0x1030 kg; Period=25 days; Rcore=2x108 m, Rsurface=7x108 m; v=800 km/s; Mplasma=3.5 million tons/second; mnucleon=1.7x10-27 kg) and the sun's magnetic field so varies from so (540 to 6600 gauss) from the core boundary to the surface, the nonionised value calculating as 462 gauss at the surface.

    A young neutron star or magnetar is born with RSchwarzschild=2GoMChandrasekhar/c2=7407.4 m*) and characterised by a decrease in spinrate, due to Black Hole accretion, which increases (Ru) for old neutron stars or 'Millisecond Pulsars'; magnetic fields ranging from billions to trillions of gauss.

    Large scale rotation for galaxies about a core/bulge is typical for the Milky Way with a B of so 4 microgauss and a Sarkar-period of (236.5 million years) about a 3000 lightyear radius about a 150 lightyear accretion disc about a Black Hole within 270 million km at the centre (Sagittarius A/A*) and a galactic mass given in: (DIMxMCHx1011=2.3x1042 kg).
    Galactic Haloes, typefied in (λss=2πx1022 m) then proportionalise intergalactic magnetic media; say in (λss/RGalaxy=BGalaxy/BHalo with BHalo=4(5x1020)/λss~0.03 microgauss) for the Milky Way galaxy.


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and recall, that the nucleons first crystallised out of the quark-lepton 'soup' (1/365)th of a sec* after the Big Bang to define the FermiWeak-Interaction Constant as the energy of (298 GeV*) and at a temperature of (3.4 quadrillion K*). That is when the first ylemic neutrons were born and then it took them (20 minutes*) to become protons and neutrons and then Helium-4, Helium-3, Deuterium, Tritium and Lithium-nuclei in the next stage of the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis or the BNN.
    Now this scenario gained credence in an experiment in April 2003 at the cyclotron facility at Indiana University in the USA and also at Ohio University in the same month.
    Physicist Edward Stephenson investigated the charge-symmetry breaking in deuterium- or D-atoms in the collision of deuterium or 'heavy hydrogen' atoms with each other.
    One time in 10 billion of slamming the D-atoms together produced a fusion of two of them with VPE in the form of a Helium-4 nucleus and a pion; at other times, the atoms were obliterated.

    You see, in the Old Standard Model, one thought of the neutrons and the protons to be the same nucleonic particle, only differing in their electropolic charge and the transformation of one u-quark into a d-quark, with equal numbers crystallising out of the quark-lepton 'soup' at the Fermi-Time.
    But only ylemic dineutrons were born at that time from the HB-template. The protons were born 20 minutes later in the process of beta-minus decay and the ylemic times.

    So the researchers searched for an asymmetry between matter and antimatter, starting from a mistaken assumption, namely that neutrons and protons derive from the same scale with equal probabilities of manifestation.
    Halving the electronic radius in the ylemic formulation gives one the size of the proton's radius in a Black-Body temperature of (1,167 billion K*) at a time of (114 s*) or (1.9 minutes*) or a cycle-n-time given in (Hubble's Nodal Constant Ho)x(Linetime t). And so the protonic scale became defined at that time from the ylemic blueprint of the HB and initiated the process of the neutron's decay to manifest the proton at that scale."


    Logan Antico:
    "Indeed and the electronic radius is the cosmological mapping of the scale for the planetesimals. That scale is at a temperature of (1.2 billion K*) and at a time of (1,145,323.7 s*) or (13.26 days*) after the Big Bang and defines the ylemic minimum radius of (1.821 km*) as the scale at which matter can agglomerate as seedlings for gravitationally growing pieces of matter - that is how the planets were defined in size, potentially manifesting from that ylemic protoscale.
    There, the leptonic scale corresponding to the outer ring of the electronic radius became macro-mapped via spacequantisation constant (E=26x6561) or a googolplex of just over a trillion googols; defining the universe at a radial scale of (343.6 billion km*) or (13.26 light days*)."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And the ratio of (E/G=1,039,802,245) and the ratio of (E/F=986,925,478).
    But until (1.9 nanoseconds*) after the Big Bang and at a temperature of (141.67 million trillion K*), the quark-lepton 'soup' was actually a Boson-Gluon-Photon-Plasma.
    No fermions could exist at such temperatures of the Bosonic-Unification-Scale and it was then, that the eigendefinition of the supermembrane EpsEss superimposed its bosonic temperature, given in the formulation (Energy E=kT) onto the cosmic macroevolution as Black-Body Radiation.

    In terms of radial size then, the λps-wavelength mapped itself onto the size of the universe, then (57 centimetres*) in radial extent, the photon-density at that time being (2.0x1081 eV* per litre*) or (3.3x1065 Joules* per cubic metre*), the latter being the product of the (VPE-densityx2π4/15).
    The photons then vary in luminous intensity in the factor (1/exp(e)) from the central source and for a present Black Body temperature of (2.7 Kelvin*) and a photon energy of (kx(2.7) Joules J*) per photon, which calculates as (416 million photons) and a photon-density of (4.3 hundreth trillionth J* per cubic m*), or (5 eV* per litre per degree K*)."


    Logan Antico:
    "The Black Body microwave background radiation is presently measured as (2.735 K) (SI), translating to (2.68865 K*), representing a modified temperature for the background as the 11D-temperature.
    In the WMAP results of the Wilkinson-Microwave-Anisotropy-Probe, nearby galaxies are mapped in cooler patches of the hot-cold fluctuations in the background radiation.
    The 10D-temperature of the smaller volume must exceed the 11D-temperature; again indicating the dimensional intersection between 10D-C-space and 11D-M-space.
    The luminosity function for the universe calculates the 10D-temperature as (2.747549256K* ) for the present epoch, translating as the upper 10D-limit in (2.794992189 K).

    We use the magneto charge to derive the 11D-temperature from the 10D-temperature. As magnetocharge is defined as angular acceleration acting upon a unit volume and is also identical to the inverse energy of the Eps-superbrane, we can use the acceleration ratio between the gravitational Omega and the Milgrom parameter acting on the Riemann volumes in 10D and 11D respectively.
    The inverse energy for the Eps-Photon (Eps=kTps), then sets this ratio as a temperature (T) gradient in [(WBx10D-Volume)/(Milgrom-Factorx11D-Volume)=(10D-T-11D-T)/(10D-T)=DMP/DIM=0.024264944], since (WB=GoMoxX[np/2]x(np+1)2/(np2xRmax2)=2.13181099x10-11 & Milgrom F=1.161892948x10-10 & DIM=(V11D/V10D)=(np+1)3/np2=7.561418672) and the DMP-Factor is the 'Dark Matter Percentage' as the (WB/Milgrom) proportionality and so (11D-T = 10D-T[1-DMP/DIM] = 2.680880127 K* or 2.72717186 K).
    The maximum temperature variation occurs for cycletime (n=2), when exactly one Hubble oscillation has been completed, 33.8 billion years after the Big Bang; then (DIM=6.75, DMP=0.264, 10D-T=2.127 K* and 11D-T=2.044 K*)."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And now we can compare the photon-density with the baryon density; how many photons share a given unitspace with a number of baryons, given in the ratio of the restmass seedling to the proto-nucleonmass."


    Logan Antico:
    "In 10D, the baryon density is simply the now quintessentially evolved mass seedling divided by the 10D volume, calculating as (1.976x10-28 in kg* per cubic metres*).
    In 11D, the baryon density diminishes in a factor of (DIM=n2/(n+1)3=0.13225); implying that so (7.56) 10D-universes fit into the 11D-universe, the ratio between luminous baryonic matter to nonluminous 'dark matter' being (1 to 7.56). The 11D baryon density is so about (2.902x10-29 in kg* per cubic m*)."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And dividing either of the baryonic densities by the (photon count x quintessentially evolved mc), gives us the baryon/photon ratio for the measured period in question, called 'Eta η'.
    So (η10D = 5.594 parts in 10 billion & η11D = 7.39 parts in 100 billion) with an average of (3.17 parts in 10 billion), both applicable for the present epoch.
    And that is the measurement of Edward Stephenson as the proportion of deuterium atoms fusing to give Helium atoms and neutral VPE-pions as the percentage of ylemic massinduction via the HB-template from the B*-VPE-state/W*-VPE-state and the HBRMI, approximated by (η)."


    Logan Antico:
    "So no symmetry violations are involved from the start; the premise of an equal distribution of neutrons and protons at the Fermi-time being a mistaken assumption of the Old Standard Model.
    And at the G-F-times, 12 hydrogen nuclei formed ylemic weak interaction currents with one alpha-particle or helium-4 nucleus, setting an initial (75%/25%) ratio between hydrogen (H) and helium (He) as the basic nucleonic stable state.
    The ratio (F/G=1.05358), then sets an overlap of the Riemann spheres, redistributing (He: 5.0855%) in a self iterative algorithm for the primordial elements from #1 Hydrogen(H) to #26 Iron(Fe).
    (1.271%) of the alpha-particles reset the (He-4) abundance as (23.729%) in a nesting loop which specifies the isotopes of the elements in proportions of abundance.
    The Isotopic-Percentage-Generator (IPG) engages the magnetocharge as inverse energy quantum in:
    {1.271% x[(7k-6)x(e*)(2-k-j)]x[10/(33(27-k))]; with atomic number (k) and isotope (j)}.

    For Hydrogen(k=1), we get the series: (0.01481% deuterium; 0.00002963% tritium and 0.00000005925% for (j=3) for a potential mixing of the wavefunctions).
    For Helium(k=2), we have: (0.0002465%; 0.000000493% and 0.000000000986%) and for Lithium(k=3), we get; (0.0000009629%; 0.000000001926% and 0.000000000003852%).
    The isotopic ratios are decreasing within a series of multiples in the (e*)-quantum and are weighted relative to natural abundances in nested perturbations of the elements.
    At (k=3; j=1,2) for example, Lithium-6 occurs at say (7.4%) and Lithium-7 at (92.6%), for a (Li-6/Li-7) distriibution of (0.00000007125%/0.000000001783%), for a Lithium-Arithmetic-Mean of (0.00000003652%) and a Lithium-Geometric-Mean of (0.00000001127%)."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "The (3 to 1, H to He) ratio for the remainder splits the (1.271%) as (0.954/0.318), adding to the primary forms to give Hydrogen as just below (75.953%) and Helium as just below (24.047%).
    Higher elements can be said to be nonexistent at the BBN, with the first isotope of Iron calculating as the inverse of (13,322.69 quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion %)."


    Logan Antico:
    "This explains the primordial abundance of the elements as a function of the energy spectrum of the supermembranes, macroquantising into the electronic and protonic radii. But what about the subnucleonic geometric scales of the quarks, how are those defined?
    And didn't they discover the pentaquark in Japan, initially thinking of having perhaps discovered a new form of matter?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, that and a correlating discovery at the Standford Linear Accelerator in California and the neutrino research of Kamiokande in 1998 helped us to reformulate the New Standard Model of particle physics, replacing the old norm of 'billard balls linked by gluonic springs' with our KKIRKOR or Kernel-Inner Mesonic Ring-Outer Leptonic Ring quantum geometry.
    The HBRMI works on certain ratios to generate the masses of the elementary particles; one ratio links the cross fertilisation between the rings and the kernel and the others finetune the linear patterns of growth for the nine quarkian basetemplates.
    In the old model, there were no diquarks or quark-molecules, but in the new model the three base quarks up-down-strange or uds are 'doubled' in the Double-Up (U=uu), the Double-Down (D=dd) and the Double-Strange (S=ss); all as VPE-resonances of the basequarks u, d and s.
    The Double-Up forms a quark singlet as the basis for the Charmed Quark (c=Uu(bar)) and the Double-Down and Double-Strange are resonances of the Double-Up-VPE and form a quark doublet in the diquark states (b*=(ud), m*=(us)) and a quark triplet in the diquark states (D=(dd), t*=(ds), S=(ss)).

    The mass scale consists of the Kernel-K-masses in a certain range and the IR-OR-masses in a cross fertilising scale, being contained in the K-mass scale and based on the supersymmetry from the heterotic superbrane class HO(32) energy definition.
    That particular supermembrane defines the X-Boson for Grand-Unification at (1,885 trillion GeV*) in an energy unification of the SNI and the EMI and the WNI, the latter two being the EWI as the ElectroWeak Interaction; the cross fertilisation arises in unifying the GI with the EWI, resulting in the
    L-Boson as the basetemplate for the Muon (m) as (111.045 MeV*).

    The formulations involve the pentagonal supersymmetry and an unification polynomial for the four basic interactions, centred on the invariance of the EMI's [Alpha], mapped in (C) and can be written as: {P(X)=XXXX+2XXX-XX-2X+1=(1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X)-1=0}.

    The X-Boson's mass is: ([Alpha]xmps/(ec)) modulated in (SNI/EMI=Cuberoot of [Alpha]/[Alpha]), the intrinsic unified Interaction-Strength and as the L-Boson's mass in: ([Omega]x(ec)/(mpsxa<2/3>), where the (Cuberoot of [Alpha]2) is given by the symbol (a<2/3>)=EMI/SNI).

    Ten quark-mass-levels crystallise, including a VPE-level for the K-IR transition and a VPE-level for the IR-OR transition:

    VPE-Level [K-IR] is (26.4922-29.9621 MeV*) for K-Mean: (14.11358 MeV*); (2.8181-3.1872 MeV*) for IROR;
    VPE-Level [IR-OR] is (86.5263-97.8594 MeV*) for K-Mean: (46.09643 MeV*); (9.2042-10.410 MeV*) for IROR;
    UP/DOWN-Level is (282.5263-319.619 MeV*) for K-Mean: (150.5558 MeV*); (30.062-33.999 MeV*) for IROR;
    STRANGE-Level is (923.013-1,043.91 MeV*) for K-Mean: (491.7308 MeV*); (98.185-111.05 MeV*) for IROR;
    CHARM-Level is (3,014.66-3,409.51 MeV*) for K-Mean: (1,606.043 MeV*); (320.68-362.69 MeV*) for IROR;
    BEAUTY-Level is (9,846.18-11,135.8 MeV*) for K-Mean: (5,245.495 MeV*); (1,047.4-1,184.6 MeV*) for IROR;
    MAGIC-Level is (32,158.6-36,370.7 MeV*) for K-Mean: (17,132.33 MeV*); (3,420.9-3,868.9 MeV*) for IROR;
    DAINTY-Level is (105,033-118,791 MeV*) for K-Mean: (55,956.0 MeV*); (11,173-12,636 MeV*) for IROR;
    TRUTH-Level is (343,050-387,982 MeV*) for K-Mean: (182,758.0 MeV*); (36,492-41,271 MeV*) for IROR;
    SUPER-Level is (1,120,437-1,267,190 MeV*) for K-Mean: (596,906.8 MeV*); (119,186-134,797 MeV*) for IROR.

    The K-Means define individual materialising families of elementary particles; the (UP/DOWN-Mean) sets the (PION-FAMILY: πo, π+, π-); the (STRANGE-Mean) specifies the (KAON-FAMILY: Ko, K+, K-); the (CHARM-Mean) defines the (J/PSI=J/Ψ-Charmonium-FAMILY); the (BEAUTY-Mean) sets the (UPSILON=Υ-Bottonium-FAMILY); the (MAGIC-Mean) specifies the (EPSILON=Ε-FAMILY); the (DAINTY-Mean) bases the
    (OMICRON-Ο-FAMILY); the (TRUTH-Mean) sets the (KAPPA=Κ-Topomium-FAMILY) and the (SUPER-Mean) defines the final quark state in the (HIGGS/CHI=H/Χ-FAMILY).

    The VPE-Means are indicators for average effective quarkmasses found in particular interactions.
    Kernel-K-mixing of the wavefunctions gives (K(+)=60.210 MeV* and K(-)=31.983 MeV*) and the IROR-Ring-Mixing gives (L(+)=6.405 MeV* and L(-)=3.402 MeV*) for a (L-K-Mean of 1.50133 MeV*) and a (L-IROR-Mean of 4.90349 MeV*); the Electropole ([e-] =0.52049 MeV*) as the effective electronmass and as determined from the electronic radius and the magnetocharge in the UFoQR.

    The restmasses for the elementary particles can now be constructed, using the basic nucleonic restmass (mc=9.9247245x10-28 kg*= (Squareroot of [Omega]xmP)) and setting (mc) as the basic maximum (UP/DOWN-K-mass=mass(KKK)=3xmass(KKK)=3x319.62 MeV*=958.857 MeV*).
    Subtracting the (Ring VPE 3xL(+), one gets the basic nucleonic K-state of: m(no,p+)=939.642 MeV*).

    For the proton-restmass, we then add {L(K-IR-VPE)-[e-]}=udΔ=1.5013-0.5205=0.980835 MeV* or 0.978461379 MeV for the d-quark and double this for the two d-quarks of the neutron.

    (Proton-Restmass: (mp+) = 939.642+1.5013-0.5205 MeV* = 940.62 MeV* or 938.34 MeV (SI));
    (Neutron-Restmass: (mno) = 939.642+3.0026-1.041 MeV* = 941.61 MeV* or 939.33 MeV (SI)).

    The difference between the restmasses for the proton and the neutron hence becomes a consequence of the manifestation of their differing Calabi-Yau quantum geometries in KKIRK=udu and KIRKKIR=dud, respectively.
    Unlike Kernel-Ring geometries attract and unlike Kernel-Ring geometries repel in the cross fertilisations of the magnetocharges (e*), defining the chromaticity-chargeforce of the HBRMI.

    Subtracting the {L(IR-OR-VPE)-[e-]}=dsΔ=4.90349-0.5205=4.3830 MeV* or 4.3724 MeV from the L-Boson-mass gives the muon-mass and the tauon-mass adds VPE-corrections (mm, (K+), (L+), 2IROR) to the Charm-K-mean with:

    (Muon-Restmass (mμ) = 111.045-4.9035 MeV* = 106.15 MeV* or 105.89 MeV);
    (Tauon-Restmass: (mτ) = 1,606.043+(mμ)+60.210+6.405+9.807 MeV* = 1,788.62 MeV* or 1,784.29 MeV).

    The neutral pion uses the Pion-K-VPE minus the contained Pion-IROR-VPE and adds 2 electropole corrections as the KK(bar) -Groundstate and the charged pion then adds two (K-IR)-VPEs and 2[e-] to that groundstate for:

    Base Pion-Restmass: (mπo) = 150.5558-16.015+1.041 MeV* = 135.581 MeV* or 135.253 MeV and
    Charged Pion-Restmass: (mπ±) = (mπo)+4.184035 MeV* = 139.765 MeV* or 139.427 MeV.

    The mass differential between the base neutral and base charged VPE-state is called 'Base delta' or (BΔ=4.184035 MeV*); used to denote a basic energy differential between the up- and down state in VPE coupling between quarks and antiquarks and derives from individual quarkmass differentials.
    Because the outer ring carries the potential for a trisected electropolic charge; the OR-corrections ([e-/3]=0.1735 MeV* or [2e/3]=0.3470 MeV*) can slightly alter the measured masses, for instance reducing (mμ = 105.98 MeV* or 105.72 MeV) and enhancing (no = 941.95 MeV* or 939.67 MeV).

    Now in July 2003, Takashi Nakano of Osaka University reported the discovery of a pentaquark, made up of two up-quarks and two down-quarks and an antiquark, say a s(bar). The particle was found at the Spring-8 particle accelerator in Hyogo, Japan after the St.Petersburg nuclear physicist Dmitri Diakonov had predicted the existence of a shortlived particle at the energy scale of 1,540 MeV.
    Nakano found the pentaquark in the debris of particles, caused by smashing gamma-ray-photons into the neutrons of Carbon atoms.

    Then nuclear physicist Ken Hicks of the Thomas Jefferson National; Accelerator Facility in Virginia, USA, confirmed the existence of the 1.54 GeV pentaquark-particle, which lives for about (1 hundreth of a billionth of a nanosecond).
    As it takes light about (1 hundreth of a trillionth of a nanosecond) to cross the electronic radius (Re); the 1.54 GeV pentaquark lives about 1,000 times longer than nuclear resonances decaying via the Strong-Nuclear-Interaction (SNI).

    Now our new Standard Model defines the 'Charmed Quark State' at (1.606 GeV*) as the K-VPE-Mean and containing a 'charmed' IROR-VPE of (0.1708425 GeV*) and engaging the Double-Up-quark with quark content (U=uu), coupled to VPE, (say uu(bar) or dd(bar) or ss(bar)) and then other quarks or antiquarks.

    The experiments were designed to detect K-mesons, defined in a 'Strange-K-VPE-Mean' of (0.4917 GeV*), containing the 'Strange-L-VPE-Mean' of (0.1046175 GeV*). Hence we are looking at the s-quark oscillation of the outer ring produced by 'Charm-VPE'.
    If we denote the transition of the down-strange oscillation as d*d*=u**u**=ss=S, then we crystallise a VPE-neutron of the Carbon atoms as observed by Takashi Nakano and Ken Hicks.

    Set (Uu(bar)S = uuu(bar)ss =u(VPE)d*d*=d*u(VPE)d* = VPE-(no).
    The energy supplied was near the Charm-VPE to allow manifestation of a Diakonov-Nakano-Hicks-particle at a level given by the mass-induction scale as: (Charm-K-Mean=1.606043 MeV*~1.116+0.341685+0.104615+0.0320305+0.01281=1.6071405 MeV*), the difference being a [2e-]-perturbation.
    Subtracting (K(+)+L(+)=66.615 MeV*) in a 'reduced' Charm-K-Mean of (1.6071-0.0666=1.5405 MeV* or 1.5368 GeV) then yields the 1.54 GeV pentaquark particle observed.

    Another breakthrough regarding the revised Standard Model occurred in April of the same year.
    Marcello Giorgi from the BaBar detector at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Centre in California, USA announced the discovery of a particle called the (Ds(2317)=Ds(2.317 GeV)).
    Thought to be a resonance-quark state of a charm-quark and an antistrange-quark, the cs(bar) particle is expected to have a mass somewhat above its highest VPE-state, based on the sum of its groundstate of (1.969 GeV) and its (Eta-ss(bar)-VPE groundstate of 0.549 GeV) and so near (2.518 GeV).

    Relative to the old Standard Model, the c-quark is not fine structured as a triquark, as in the new model and the expected mass of the cs(bar) quark-state is corrected to a combined gluon-quark energy of at least (2.518 GeV or 2.524 GeV*); the (Ds(2317)) hence does not fit into the old model, its measured mass being too small by at least (201 MeV or 8%).

    In the new model, the K-OR-oscillation requires the maximum VPE contributions in adding the Charm-K-Mean to the Strange-K-Mean to the Up/Down-K-Mean to K(+) to 2L(+) in the sum: (1.6060 + 0.4917 + 0.1506 + 0.0602 + 0.0064 = 2.3213 GeV* or 2.3157 GeV).
    In the new model then, the (cs(bar)=Uu(bar)s(bar)=u(VPE)s(bar)) and a quadroquark or quark molecule, consisting of a permutation of two quarks and two antiquarks in diquark form."


    Logan Antico:
    "And the third major breakthrough was the discovery of the Higgs Neutrino at Kamiokande, Japan and as a scalar kernel particle for the HBRMI?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed, in June 1998, the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, led by Takaaki Kajita from Tokyo University and Yoji Totsuka, director of KEK, Japan's national particle physics laboratory published groundbreaking data regarding their research into a predicted decay of the proton.
    This data allowed us to rule out proton decay at the energies under investigation, but indicated that the hitherto thought massless neutrinos oscillated from the lower massless forms of the electron and the muon into a tauonic form, who, as the charmonium VPE-state of the KKK-resonance, does carry as massinduction of 3 eV*.
    My own research had suspected as much, because we had derived a beautiful formula for the mesonic-ringmass-induction from the space-quantisation constants ( E, F and G).

    That formulation subtracts the (E/F)ratio from the (E/G)ratio and multiplies the resulting expression of the 10D/11D-intersection by the ratio of the wormhole radius to the electronic radius as the proportionality constant for the effective electronmass; this can be written as:
    (Higgs-Neutrino-Mass =(mνH)=(λps/(2πRe)[(E/G)-(E/F)](me)) kg* or 0.052106 eV* or 0.0520 eV).

    The individual neutrinoic mass inductions are given as the interval for the Tau-Neutrino-Mass, defined as (2.969 eV* at G) and as (3.021 eV* at F) and a then predicted Tau-Neutrino-Mass-Mean: (mντ =2.995 eV*).

    So you can imagine my professional delight, when the researchers at Kamiokande published their experimental data and analysis; indicating a mass difference between the muonic- and tauonic neutrinos as an energy interval set as the (Squareroot of (0.001 to 0.01 eV2)) or the interval (0.03-0.1 eV) with a mean value of (0.065 eV).

    The existence of a scalar neutrino of 0.052 eV and centred at a 3 eV energy level within the subatomic quantum geometric template of the Higgs Boson so became proposed.

    The mass induction of elementary particles by the Higgs mechanism so proceeds as a Kernel-Ring coupling between the boundary conditions of the subatomic template descriptive for the quantum geometry of the Higgs Boson, upper bounded by the classical electron radius also being a kernel-ring oscillation between the up-quark and the s-quark.
    It encompasses a gluon-neutrino transformation as the asymptotic confinement of the colour charge here extended as a cosmic magneto charge related to a magnetic GUT-monopole at the string epoch, preceeding and not following the standard Big Bang cosmogenesis.

    Four cosmological (Anti)Neutrino masses are found.

    {mTauon; mHiggs; mMuon; mElectron} = {0.0546 eV; 0.0521 eV; 0.0164 eV; 0.002982 eV}.

    The current energy level separating the Tauon- and Muon neutrinos is found to be the 0.052 eV level from Super Kamiokande (1998) and MINOS (2006); but is proposed to add the energies of the Higgs Neutrino and the Muon Neutrino to result in the energy of the Tauon Neutrino.
    The scalar nature of the Higgs neutrino so supplements the Majorana form of the Muon Neutrino.
    The current energy level separating the Muon- and Electron neutrinos is found to add 3 electron neutrino masses as the difference between the standard squared mass difference and a superposed squared differential between their mass eigenvalues.
    This energy value calculates as the current measured KamLAND (2005) value of 0.00008 eV².

    The electron neutrino mass is defined from first principles as the energy value for the ratio between the Higgs neutrino mass and the electron mass in the Big Bang cosmogenesis so 1.1 million seconds (about 13 days) after the Big Bang.

    The (anti)neutrinos are part of the electron mass in a decoupling process between the kernel and the rings. Neutrino mass is so not cosmologically significant and
    cannot be utilized in 'missing mass' models'.
    We may define the kernel-scale as that of the singular space time-quantum unit itself, namely as the wormhole radius rw=10-22/2π meters.
    Before the decoupling between kernel and rings, the kernel-energy can be said to be strong-weakly coupled or unified to encompass the gauge-gluon of the strong interaction and the gauge-weakon of the weak interaction defined in a coupling between the Outer Ring and the Kernel and bypassing the mesonic Inner Ring.
    So for matter, a W-Minus ( weakon) must consist of a coupled lepton part, yet linking to the strong interaction via the kernel part. If now the colour-charge of the gluon transmutates into a 'neutrino-colour-charge'; then this decoupling will not only define the mechanics for the strong-weak nuclear unification coupling; but also the energy transformation of the gauge-colour charge into the gauge-lepton charge.

    There are precisely 8 gluonic transitive energy permutation eigenstates between a 'radiative-additive' Planck energy in W(hite)=E=hf and an 'inertial-subtractive'
    Einstein energy in B(lack)=E=mc2, which describe the baryonic- and hyperonic 'quark-sectors' in: mc2=BBB, BBW, WBB, BWB, WBW, BWW, WWB and WWW=hf.
    The permutations are cyclic and not linearly commutative. For mesons (quark-antiquark eigenstates), the permutations are BB, BW, WB and WW in the SU(2) and SU(3) Unitary Symmetries.
    So generally, we may state, that the gluon is unified with a weakon before decoupling; this decoupling 'materialising' energy in the form of mass, namely the mass of the measured 'weak-interaction-bosons' of the standard model (W- for charged matter; W+ for charged antimatter and Zo for neutral mass-currents say).

    Experiment shows, that a W- decays into spin-aligned electron-antineutrino or muon-antineutrino or tauon-antineutrino pairings under the conservation laws for
    momentum and energy.
    So, using our quantum geometry, we realise, that the weakly decoupled electron must represent the OuterRing, and just as shown in the analysis of QED ( QuantumElectro-Dynamics). Then it can be inferred, that the Electron's Anti-neutrino represents a transformed and materialised gluon via its colourcharge, now decoupled from the kernel.
    Then the OuterRing contracts (say along its magnetoaxis defining its asymptotic confinement); in effect 'shrinking the electron' in its inertial and charge- properties to its experimentally measured 'point-particle-size'. Here we define this process as a mapping between the Electronic wavelength 2πRe and the wormhole perimeter λw=2πrw.

    But in this process of the 'shrinking' classical electron radius towards the gluonic kernel (say); the mesonic ring will be encountered and it is there, that any mass inductions should occur to differentiate a massless lepton gauge-eigenstate from that manifested by the weakon precursors.

    One should note that here the W- inducing a lefthanded neutron to decay weakly into a lefthanded proton, a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino.
    Only left handed particles decay weakly in CP-parity-symmetry violation, effected by neutrino-gauge definitions from first principles.

    This so defines a neutrino-oscillation potential at the Inner Ring-Boundary. Using our proportions and assigning any neutrino-masses mν as part of the electronmass me, gives the following proportionality as the mass eigenvalue of the Tau-(Anti)Neutrino as Higgsian Mass Induction in the Weak Nuclear Interaction at the Mesonic Inner Ring Boundary within the subatomic quantum geometry utilized as the dynamic interaction space:

    mHiggs/Tauon=meλw.rE/(2πrMRe) ~ 5.4x10-36 kg* or 3.0 eV*.

    So we have derived, from first principles, a (anti)neutrinomass eigenstate energy level of 3 eV as the appropriate energy level for any (anti)neutrino matter interaction within the subatomic dynamics of the nuclear interaction.
    This confirms the Mainz, Germany Result as the upper limit for neutrino masses resulting from ordinary Beta-Decay and indicates the importance of the primordial beta-decay for the cosmogenesis and the isomorphic scale mappings stated above.

    proton1.

    The hypersphere intersection of the G- and F-count of the thermodynamic expansion of the mass-parametric universe so induces a neutrino-mass of 3 eV* at the 2.76x10-18 meter marker.
    The more precise G-F differential in terms of eigenenergy is 0.052 eV as the mass-eigenvalue for the Higgs-(Anti)neutrino (which is scalar of 0-spin and constituent of the so called Higgs Boson as the kernel-Eigenstate). This has been experimentally verified in the Super-Kamiokande (Japan) neutrino experiments published in 1998 and in subsequent neutrino experiments around the globe, say Sudbury, KamLAND, Dubna, MinibooNE and MINOS.

    Recalling the Cosmic scale radii for the initial manifestation of the primordial 'Free Neutron (Beta-Minus) Decay', we rewrite the Neutrino-Mass-Induction formula:

    rE = 3.43597108x1014 meters and an E-count of so 1.00x10112 spacetime quanta
    mνHiggs-E=mνelectron=meλw.{rE/rE}(2πRe) ~ 5.323x10-39 kg* or 0.003 eV* as Weak Interaction Higgs Mass induction.

    rF = 3.45107750x1011 metres for the F-count of so 1.02x10103 spacetime quanta
    mνHiggs-F=mνmuon=meλw.{rE/rF}/(2πRe) ~ 5.300x10-36 kg* or 2.969 eV* as Weak Interaction Higgs Mass induction.

    rG = 3.39155801x1011 metres for the G-count of so 9.68x10102 spacetime quanta
    mνHiggs-G=mνtauon=meλw.{rE/rG}(2πRe) ~ 5.393x10-36 kg* or 3.021 eV* as Weak Interaction Higgs Mass Induction.

    The mass difference for the Muon-Tau-(Anti)Neutrino Oscillation, then defines the Mesonic Inner Ring Higgs Induction:
    mνHiggs=meλw.rE{1/rG-1/rF}/(2πRe) ~ 9.301x10-38 kg* or 0.0521 eV* as the Basic Cosmic (Anti)Neutrino Mass.

    This Higgs-Neutrino-Induction is 'twinned' meaning that this energy can be related to the energy of so termed 'slow- or thermal neutrons' in a coupled energy of so twice 0.0253 eV for a thermal equilibrium at so 20° Celsius and a rms-standard-speed of so 2200 m/s from the Maxwell statistical distributions for the kinematics.

    The (Anti)Neutrino Energy at the RE nexus for Re=rw∛(26x6561) m* and for mνHiggs-E=mνelectronwh.Alpha/4π2Re2c=30e2λw/2πRe2c or 15λw{Monopole GUT masses ec}/πRe2 = 2.982...10-3 eV*.
    This can also be written as mνHiggs-E=mνelectron=mνTauon2 to define the 'squared' Higgs (Anti)Neutrino eigenstate from its templated form of the quantum geometry in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).
    Subsequently, the Muon (Anti)Neutrino Higgs Induction mass becomes defined in the difference between the masses of the Tau-(Anti)Neutrino and the Higgs (Anti)Neutrino.

    mνTauon = B4G4R4[0]+B2G2R2[-½]=B6G6R6[-½] = √(mnelectron=√(0.002982)=0.0546... eV*
    mνHiggs= B4G4R4[0] = meλw.rE{1/rG-1/rF}/(2πRe) ~ 9.301x10-38 kg* or 0.0521... eV*
    mνMuon = B2G2R2[-½] = √(mνTauon2 - mnHiggs2) = √(0.00298-0.00271) = √(0.00027) = 0.0164... eV*
    mνElectron = B2G2R2[-½] = (mνTauon)2= (0.054607...)2=0.002982... eV*

    This energy self state for the Electron (Anti)Neutrino then is made manifest in the Higgs Mass Induction at the Mesonic Inner Ring or IR as the squared mass differential between two (anti)neutrino self states as:
    (mν3 + mν2).(mν3 - mν2) = mν32 - mν22 = 0.002981...eV*2 to reflect the 'squared' energy self state of the scalar Higgs (Anti)Neutrino as compared to the singlet energy Eigen state of the base (anti)neutrinos for the 3 leptonic families of electron-positron and the muon-anti-muon and the tauon-anti-tauon.

    The Electron-(Anti)Neutrino is massless as base-neutrinoic weakon eigenstate and inducted at RE at 0.00298 eV*.
    The Muon-(Anti)Neutrino is also massless as base-neutrinoic weakon eigenstate and inducted at the Mesonic Ring F-Boundary at 2.969 eV* with an effective Higgsian mass induction of 0.0164 eV*.

    The Tauon-(Anti)Neutrino is not massless with inertial eigenstate inducted at the Mesonic Ring G-Boundary at 3.021 eV* and meaned at 3.00 eV* as √(0.05212+0.01642) = 0.0546 eV* as the square root value of the ground state of the Higgs inertia induction. The neutrino flavour mechanism, based on the Electron (Anti)Neutrino so becomes identical in the Weakon Tauon-Electron-Neutrino oscillation to the Scalar Muon-Higgs-Neutrino oscillation.
    The weakon kernel-eigenstates are 'squared' or doubled (2x2=2+2) in comparison with the gluonic-eigenstate (one can denote the colourcharges as (R²G²B²)[½] and
    as (RGB)[1] respectively say and with the [] bracket denoting gauge-spin and RGB meaning colours Red-Green-Blue).

    The scalar Higgs-Anti(Neutrino) becomes then defined in: (R4G4B4)[0] and the Tauon Anti(Neutrino) in (R6G6B6)[½].
    The twinned neutrino state so becomes MANIFESTED in a coupling of the scalar Higgs-Neutrino with a massless base neutrino in a (R6G6B6)[0+½]) mass-induction
    template.
    The Higgs-Neutrino is bosonic and so not subject to the Pauli Exclusion Principle; but quantized in the form of the FG-differential of the 0.0521 Higgs-RestmassInduction.
    Subsequently all experimentally observed neutrino-oscillations should show a stepwise energy induction in units of the Higgs-neutrino mass of 0.0521 eV. This was
    the case in the Super-Kamiokande experiments; and which was interpreted as a mass-differential between the muonic and tauonic neutrinoic forms.

    mνHiggs + mνelectron = mνHiggs + (mνTauon)2 for the 'squared' ground state of a massless base (anti)neutrino for a perturbation Higgsian (anti)neutrino in (mνTauon)2 =
    (mνHiggs + δ)2 = mνElectron for the quadratic mνHiggs2 + 2δmνHiggs + δ2 = 0.002982 from (mνHiggs + δ) = √(mνelectron) and for a δ = √(mνelectron) - mνHiggs = mνTauon
    - mνHiggs = 0.0546-0.0521 = 0.0025.
    mνHiggs + δ = 0.0521 + 0.0025 = (mνHiggs) + (mνelectron) - 0.00048 = mνTauon = 0.0521+0.00298 - 0.00048 + ... = 0.0546 eV* as a perturbation expression for the
    'squared' scalar Higgs (Anti)Neutrino.
    (mνMuon - mνElectron){(mνMuon + mνElectron) - (mνMuon - mνElectron)} = 2mνElectron(mνMuon - mνElectron)
    as the squared mass difference:
    mνMuon2 - mνElectron2 = 2mνElectron(mνMuon - mνElectron) + (mνMuon - mνElectron)2
    and {mνMuon2 - mνElectron2} - mνMuon2 + 2mνMuonnElectron - mνElectron2 = 2mνMuonmνElectron - 2mνElectron2 = ({3mνElectron}2 - 02) = (0.00894..)2 = 7.997..x10-5 eV2* as the KamLAND 2005 neutrino mass induction value for 11mνElectron = 2mνMuon.

    For 3 (anti)neutrinos then, the cosmological summation lower and upper bounds for (anti)neutrino oscillations are:
    0 + mνelectron-muon + mνelectron-tauon + mνmuon-tauon = 3(0.002982) = 0.00895 eV* and 3(0.0030+0.0546) = 3(0.0576) = 0.1728 eV* or 0.1724 eV [SI] respectively.

    Inclusion of the scalar Higgs (anti)neutrino as a fourth (anti)neutrino inertial self state extends this upper boundary by 0.0521 eV* to 0.2249 eV* or 0.2243 eV [SI].

    Σν = mνElectron + mνMuon + mnHiggs+ mνTauon = 0.0546..+0.0521..+0.0164..+0.0030 = 0.1261 eV* or 0.1258 eV.

    (Starunits[*] calibrate as {SI}: {J}=0.9948356[J*]; {s}=0.99902301[s*]; {m}=0.9983318783[m*]; {kg}=0.9962135[kg*]; {C}=0.997296076[C*]; {eV}=0.99753285[eV*])

    In terms of the Higgs Mass Induction and so their inertial states, the Neutrinos are their own antiparticles and so Majorana defined; but in terms of their basic magneto
    charged nature within the Unified Filed of Quantum Relativity, the Neutrinos are different from their AntiNeutrino antiparticles in their Dirac definition of R2G2B2[+1] for
    the AntiNeutrinos and in B2G2R2[-1] for the Neutrinos.


    The quantum geometry of the nuclear gauge interactions is shown to manifest the standard Big Bang classical geometry then found in the dynamics of an expanding universe as a Planckian Black Body Radiator which manifested the energy gradients of the first generation stars (here termed ylem stars) not as function of their masses, but as a function of their temperatures relative to the temperature background of the Black Body expansion.

    The Higgs Boson mass of about 125 GeV is confirmed in a cosmological model here termed Quantum Relativity (QR) and is shown to represent the summation of lower diquark-lepton energy levels.
    In particular, as the bottomium doublet minimum is at 5,245.495 MeV* and the topomium triplet minimum is at 55,956.0 MeV* in terms of their characteristic Kernel-Means, their doubled sum indicates a particle-decay excess at the recently publisized ~125 GeV energy level in 2x(5.246+55.956) GeV* = 122.404 GeV* (or 122.102 GeV SI).
    These are the two means from ATLAS {116-130 GeV as 123 GeV} and CMS {115-127 GeV as 121 GeV} respectively.

    Then extending the minimum energy levels, like as in the case to calculate the charged weakon gauge field agent energy in the charm and the VPE perturbations as per the table given, specifies the 125 GeV energy level in the Perturbation Integral/Summation:
    2x{55.956+5.246+1.606+0.491+0.151+0.046+0.014} GeV* = 127.02 GeV*, which become about 126.71 GeV SI as an UPPER LIMIT for this 'Higgs Boson' at the Dainty quark resonance level.
    Using the 3 Diquark energy levels U,D and S yield 2x{55.956+5.246+1.606} GeV* = 125.62 GeV* and 125.31 GeV SI.

    But I should detail the Kamiokande experiment to show the experimental application of neutrino physics and theory.

    In the heart of Mount Ikenoyama of the Japanese Alps there is situated an active Zinc mine, containing a stainless steel tank with 50,000 tons of ultra pure water, monitored by 11,000 photomultiplier tubes which cover floor, wall and ceiling. The tubes register flashes of Cherenkov-Light, emitted when high energy neutrinos from the atmosphere and a derivative from cosmic ray collisions, strike atomic water nuclei.
    Water has a refractive index of 1.333, meaning that light travels through it at 75% of that in the vacuum of free space as lightspeed (c).

    If now a particle such as an energetic neutrino exceeds this reduced lightspeed, then a 'shockwave' of blue light in the form of rings is emitted, the rings differing for the kind of charged particle associated with the neutrino.
    An electron (anti)neutrino is associated with a conical ring, generated by an 'electron shower' and composed of a number of Cherenkov cones and blurred at the edges; whilst the muonic (anti)neutrino projects a clearer ring, due to the single sharp muonic Cherenkov cone projected by the muon before decaying after travelling about 1 metre in the detector.
    The incoming cosmic rays are mainly fast moving protons, which create 'particle showers' , dominated by pions and muons, upon striking atmospheric atomic nuclei. Now a negatively charged pion (π-) decays into a negatively charged muon accompanied by a muonic anti neutrino (Anti-νμ) and then the (μ-) decays into a muonic neutrino (νμ), an electron (e-) and an electronic anti-neutrino (Anti-νe).
    Hence the experimental detector equipment should measure muonic neutrinoforms and electronic neutrino forms in an abundance ratio of (2 to 1); but the data indicates a ratio of only (1.3 to 1).

    Next we select some direction in the sky relative to the zenith-angle directly overhead and observe the proportion of neutrinos coming from above in comparison with those who strike the photomultiplier tubes from below, that is the ones which travel through the earth's interior, before arriving at the Kamiokande detectors. This way, we can differentiate between the count of the electronic- and the muonic neutrinos as well, due to their Cherenkov-Light.
    We find that the number of electronic neutrinos going up is the same as the number going down; indicating that the lack of muonic neutrinos implies their changing or oscillating into tau-neutrinoic forms.
    The ratio of muonic neutrinos going down to the ones going up is found to be about (2 to 1). The atmospheric neutrinopath is so 500 kilometres and the inner earth neutrinopath is up to the earth's diameter of 13,000 kilometres long. The particular neutrinoic wavefunctions now mix in terms of their energy or mass over those distance scales and the analysis describes this as a squared-mass-difference subject to distance travelled; as any masscarrying particle must reduce its speed from lightspeed (c) by the premises of special relativity.

    The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory or SNO in Ontariop, Canada has recently further added to our understanding about the neutrino oscillations. The SNO uses similar equipment as Kamiokande and reported in 2002, that the solar neutrino deficit from the solar proton-proton chain reaction, (which causes the Sun to shine as a nuclear fusion reactor in its conversion of hydrogen into helium), is a result of electron neutrinos (νe) oscillating into other forms.
    For about 70 years, experiments could only detect between 35% and 60% of the expected solar neutrino flux impacting upon the Earth. Because the SNO uses 'heavy water', in which only the neutron added to the ordinary water can absorb the electron neutrino; a distiction between the neutrino types can again be made.

    In conjunction with the cosmic ray muons, measured by Cherenkov-Light; the deuteron or 'heavy water'-nucleus can break up into its constituent proton and neutron, the neutron recombining with another deuteron in the emission of gamma radiation, now interacting with an electron for the appearance of Cherenkov-Lightcones.
    Neutrinos hardly interact with matter at all; they can travel for a lightyear through a metal, such as lead, without colliding with a single atom.
    In a neutrinoflux of 5 million per squarecentimeter per second, maybe one would interfere with any mass.
    Comparing the percentage of neutrino absorption by neutrons with that of deuteron breakup in a total count of 'neutrino events'; the SNO data predicts neutrinofluxes of 1.75 million and 5.09 million per squarecentimetre per second respectively.
    Hence the solar neutrinos detected are just (1.75/5.09 or 34%) of the 'all flavour' scenario, so proving by experimental evidence, that neutrino oscillations do in fact occur.

    The new Standard Model establishes however, that only the Tau-Neutrino gains mass in the super spositioning of the (anti)neutrino templates of the (RRGGBB)BBGGRR with the Higgs-(anti)neutrino (RRRRGGGGBBBB)BBBBGGGGRRRR and the Higgs-Bosonic-RestMass-Induction or HBRMI.
    Furthermore, the decay of radioactive tritium, the hydrogenic isotope (k=1, j=3), limits the mass of neutrinos to about 2.8 eV and so again in excellent agreement with our theoretical predictions."


    Logan Antico:
    "A grand experimental discovery, validating the New Standard Model indeed!
    But you mentioned, that the Kamiokande experiments were designed to study proton decay!? How can that be; wouldn't this indicate a decay of the Higgsian template?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "The idea of proton decay originated from certain flawed assumptions in the GUTs or Grand-Unification-Theories; which misinterpreted the supersymmetry in the unified field.
    For over 20 years, most particle physicists had thought that a proton could, over a very long lifespan of over 2,000 quadrillion quadrillion years, decay into a positron and a neutral pion or perhaps a positively charged kaon and an anti-neutrino.
    One only needs to look at the protonic quantum geometry to see, that this is impossible.

    But in their insistence upon the stubborn belief, that the proton and the neutron were created independently from each other, ignoring the ylemic dineutron as the precursive dinucleon in the HB; the experts took their theoretical and experimental searches up the wrong track.

    A proton has a template KKIRK=udu and a positron has the template of an OLR with charge (+1), where the OLR oscillates in contractions and expansions from the neutrinoic kernel minimum via the IMR to its (Re)-maximum.
    The proto-proton's two up-quarks are really a Double-Up-quark of charge (+4/3) and the proto-proton's down-quark is an up-quark of charge (+2/3) 'hugged' by an IMR of charge (-1).
    So the proto-proton's overall charge sums as (+4/3+2/3-1=+1) and then trisects as the proton.

    But let us now have a closer look at the leptonic ring charges of electrons, positrons and their high-mass resonance cousins.
    In 1998, three physicists; Horst Stroemer then at Columbia University in New York and Robert Laughlin, then at Stanford University and Daniel Tsu, then at Princeton University; shared the Nobel Prize for Physics for the discovery of the fractionalisation of the leptonic ring.
    They proved by experiment, that the OLR carries electropolic charges in multiples of [e-/3] and the same charge perturbation, which we have utilised in the construction of the quarkian mass-scales.

    As you may have guessed, the magnetocharge is behind this phenomenon, also known as the Quantum-Hall-Effect, which directly establishes the Action Law across the dimensions in the generalised form of (Action = ChargexCharge).
    Applying the superconductivity of paired electrons in semiconducting layers of materials, (the latter being on a scale of an atomic diameter), one effectively restricts the electrons to move in just two dimensions, thus allowing the surface quantisations of 2D, 5D, 8D and 11D to come into play.
    At a temperature near absolute zero of (-273.15 degrees Celsius), such an 'electron gas' and when placed into a magnetic field, quantises the voltage across the surface area in proportion to the magnetic field strength in integral steps of Planck's Constant (h), divided by the square of the charge (e) in the applied action law in 10D-C-space.

    Robert Laughlin showed in 1983, that a 2D-electron gas creates magnetic vortices, if the magnetic fileds are strong enough, instead of just displacing Cooper-Paired electrons sideways as in weaker magnetic fields.
    Increasing the magnetic field strength also increases the number of formed vortices, which attract the electrons as 'real particles' and if there are more vortices than available electrons, then the electrons split into 'quasiparticles' carrying fractional electropolic charges.
    The standard norm is that of 3 vortices per electron and that is of course our trisected outer ring, which is magnetopolically colourcharged as the YCM=W* or B*; VPE of Vortex-Potential-Energy.

    Bart J. van Wees and collaboraters had measured a quantisation of electrical conductance at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands when constructing nano circuits in micrographs in 1987.
    Then in 1989, Xiao-Gang Wen of MIT, Massachusetts, showed that the 'quasiparticles' moved in circles to avoid losing their charges to positively charged impurities in the semiconducting material, but that they bounced linearly in a series of modulated semicircles at the edges of the material.
    Then in 1992, Vladimir Goldman at the University of New York at Stony Brook made the first measurement of the 'quasiparticle's' charge.
    He tunnelled electrons, one at a time, across the Hall-Surface and observed peaks in the value of the electrical conductance quantum (2e2/h), which again represents the law of action empirically.
    Varying both the electric- and the magnetic filed strength to produce changes corresponding to a single charge carrying particle; Vladimir Goldman measured the 'quasiparticle's' charge to be [e-/3].

    And so did the quantum geometry for the New Standard Model become established through experimental analysis and it was realised, that the proton cannot possibly decay into particles defined in the leptonic OR - in fact the proton does decays constantly - but immediately recombines via its (KKK+IR) quantum geometry.

    The (KKK)-particle is known as the (uuu=Δ++ or Delta-Double-Plus) with a charge of (3x+2/3=+2).
    The (Δ++) has a spin of (+3/2), consisting of three (1/2)-spins and decays via the SNI in the time it takes light to cross the protonic diameter which is (2Re/c).
    There is a family of Deltas, all of isospin (3/2) and carrying charges (+2,+1,0,-1) as (Δ++, Δ+, Δo, Δ-). The Deltas all carry an energy near (1,236 MeV*) or (1,233 MeV), which is determined from the VPE-spininduction in the form of the supersymmetric L-Boson as an L-Base-VPE for the gluon-photon interaction, transforming the Neutrino-VPE (RRGGBB=W*) into Meson-VPE (YYBBYY=W*=B*), say.

    The new model assigns: (Δ++ = u.u.u) and (Δ+ = u.u.d) and (Δo = u.d.d) and (Δ- = d.d.d) as the (1,235)-Isospin(3/2)-Quadruplet, all of whom are kernel asymmetric as defined in their parallel spin alignments - all (u.u.u) or (d.d.d) or (s.s.s) configurations being repulsive in like colourcharges mapping their immediate congruent neighbourhoods onto each other.

    Unitary Symmetry links (1, 8, 10 or 27) particles in families and a 10-member Baryon-Isospin(3/2)-Decuplet also includes the Sigma-Triplet (1,388)={(Σ+ = u.u.s), (Σo = u.d.s), (Σ- = d.d.s)} and the Xi-Doublet (1,535)={(Ξo = u.s.s), (Ξ- = d.s.s)} and the Omega-Singlet (1,677)={Ω- = s.s.s}.

    To derive the average masses for the 10-membered isospin-decuplet; we apply the quarkian mass scale, beginning with the triple-Kmass of (958.86 MeV*) as the basemaximum and the basic triple-Kmass (939.642 MeV*) and as sixfolded Pion-K-Mean.
    The Sum of (n+1)L-Means approximates the (nth)K-Mean/2, meaning that a doubly nested strange IR-OR-oscillation is approximately equal to the up/down or pionic K-mean added to [2e-].
    The introduction of a strange quark in the pionic quark-state so amounts to adding additional IROR-VPE or halving the K-mass-VPE.
    The Delta-quarkstate permutates the (u.u.u)-quarkstate into the (d.d.d)-quarkstate, not engaging any strange quarks and so if we add the VPE-state of the Pion-K-Mean to (939.642 MeV*), then the sum (2[12.81+32.031+104.615=149.456]=298.912 MeV*) added to (939.642 MeV*) sets the upper mass for the Delta-family in (1,238.554 MeV*) and the lower mass is obtained in subtracting the u-d-transits in (3udΔ=2.942505 MeV*) to give the Delta-Isospinmass in (1,235.611 MeV* or 1,232.62 MeV).

    The Sigma-quarkstate then adds (3udΔ)+ 149.456 MeV*) to the lower limit for the Delta-mass, [u.u.u] for (1,235.611+152.399 MeV*=1,388.01MeV* or 1,384.65 MeV) in [u.d.s; u.u.s; d.d.s].
    The Xi-quarkstate carries a second strange quark and so adding (2udΔ-dsΔ+149.456 MeV*) to the Sigma-Isospinmass of [d.s.s] in [u.ss; d.s.s] gives (1,388.01+147.0347=1,535.04 MeV* or 1,531.3 MeV).
    The triple-strange Omega-singlet quarkstate adds (udΔ-2dsΔ+149.456=141.671 MeV*) to the Xi-Isospinmass in [s.s.s] for (1,535.04+141.671=1,676.71 MeV* or 1,672.65 MeV), with (dsΔ=4.3830 MeV*).
    Electronic perturbations can again vary the measured masses between [e-/3] and 3[e-] for the three quark baryonic systems; the conversionfactor between the {eV-SI/eV*}mass systems is {1/0.99758}.

    The Kernel-symmetric quark-states are all (1/2-spin) particles, that is one of the three quarks , constituting the particular particle spins opposite the other two, rendering the order of the quarkian alignments about their magnetoaxis as relevant.
    The Baryon-Isospin (1/2)-Octet is:
    {Nucleons: [Proton (p+ =udu) & Neutron (no =dud)]; Hyperons: [(Lambda (Λo =dus)); (Sigma++ =usu), Sigmaoo =usd), Sigma-- =dsd)); (Xioo =sus), Xi-- =sds)]}.

    uds.
    The difference between the (Λo = dus) and the (Σo = usd) so becomes one of quarkian quantum geometry of the individual quarks about the magnetoaxis.
    Because the K in between the KIR and the KOR of the Lambda (dus) is more stable relative to the KOR in between the K and the KIR of the Sigma (usd); the Sigma decays via the EMI in so a (tenth of a billionth billionth of a second); while the Lambda decays via the WNI in (about a nanosecond) and so lives twice as long as the Sigma.
    The Sigma-Resonance (Σo* =u.d.s) is the least stable particle with the same quark content as a member of the Isospin(3/2)-Decuplet and decays via the SNI in (about ten trillionth trillionth of a second), the KIR being situated in between a K and a KOR in a linear divergence along the magnetoaxis."


    Logan Antico:
    "So what does the proton decay into, if even for just the SNI decay time, before recombining?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "The (D++) is the basic core of the proton, hugged by the mesonic inner ring IR and a disassociation of the d-quark KIR into K and IR simply taps VPE in the UFoQR in the form of KK(bar) or IRIR(bar), commonly denoted as uu(bar) or dd(bar), but where (dd(bar) = uu(bar) + IRIR(bar)), the Ring-AntiRing-VPE forming the medium between the leptonic (anti)neutrino kernel-VPE and the weakonic outer rings to effect the weak interaction decays under utility of baseVPE-(BYYB) of the neutral pions.

    Hence the proton is engaged in an eternal dance with being the {(Δ++)+VPE+IR}; manifesting as {KKK+IR+KK(bar) = K(U.IR.K)K(bar) = K(K.KIR.K)K(bar) = KKIRK+VPE = p+ +VPE}.
    The proton cannot disassociate into a (positron plus neutral pion), as this would require an antimatter MCY-OR(bar) plus baseVPE, a process which would manifest antimatter in excess of matter and violate energy conservation.
    Similary, to decay into a (positively charged Kaon with an antineutrino) an antimatter OR(bar), as constituent part of the kaonic s(bar)-quark is required and in violation of basic symmetry principles within the UFoQR.
    While the antineutrinoic blueprint (RRGGBB) can assume its (W*) radiative form as VPE in conjunction with the baseVPE (BYYB), the positron (e+) is by definition a positively charged antimatter-OR, but the mesonic IR of the proton is by definition a negatively charged matter-IR.

    A neutral pion, as the BaseVPE (πo = BYYB=KK(bar)) can decay via the EMI into either two photons, if the photonic spins are antiparallel or into three photons if the Base-VPE is spininduced by the (Wo) and the 'Spinners'; one of the resulting photons spinning opposite the other two. But to conduct experiments in a search for such photons as a derivative of proton decay must prove futile - the only protondisassociation possible is its intrinsic form of the delta-resonances, bound in the nucleonic identities of the SNI."


    Logan Antico:
    " So the revised and New Standard Model of Particle Physics has become established as the quantum geometric form of the Old Standard Model.
    In cosmology, the electronic radius is mapped onto the scalefactor (E) or the radius of the universe at an age of 13.26 days, setting a radius of 343.5971 billion kilometres.
    What scaling of the inner atom does then correspond to the cosmological scalefactors (F and G)?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "This relates the atomic scale to the electronic-nuclear distances, Logan. The ratio between E as the OLR and F and G as the IMR-annulus are also the ratio between the quasi-electronic-radius of the atomic radius of hydrogen as the first chemical element with (k=j=1).
    This scale is given by the Bohr radii and the Rydberg structure as (0.052172 nanometres*) and a Rydberg energy of (13.856 eV*) and defines the groundstate for the hydrogenic atom in the formulation of (Rydberg's Constant x hc).

    The UFoQR gives a simplified version for the decisive Rydberg Constant in the atomic spectra in its '[Alpha]-Form': (Ry = [Alpha]3/(4πRe) 1/m*).

    So if the scale of (Re) is (2.777...femtometres* or quadrillionth of a metre*), then the mesonic ring reduces that scale by a factor of (OR/IR=E/F ~ E/G), which is of the order of a billionth. And this maps the scale of the atomic blueprint onto the scale of the nucleonic substructure.
    1 billionth of the first Bohr radius is (0.0000522 femtometres*) and so 3,278 times the size of the wormhole radius, defined as (λps/2π).

    If now the energy Eps corresponds to a magnetocharge with energy 0.002 Joules*, which is also 12,453,300 GeV*, then the energy at the IR-scale corresponds to 3,800 GeV* or so 0.61 microjoules at an intranuclear size of (0.0003278 femtometres*), derived as a 'de Broglie' matter wave, being given in: (wavelength λ= h/momentum =h/mc = hx(particle velocity)/(particle massxc2)).

    In terms of experimental apparatus, this indicates that at an energy of about 3,800 GeV, the IMR becomes subject for empirical investigation and can be probed; just as the neutrinoic HBRMI for the Tau-Neutrino manifests as the Scalar-Higgs-Neutrino as the large scale hologramic image from omnispace.
    Using (Re) itself as the outer limit, instead of the atomic radius, one obtains the upper limit for the wormhole tunneling scale for the supermembrane EpsEss in the formulation of (λps/360), and crystallising our previous definition for (Re) as (10 billion λps/360), with (E/G ~ E/F ~ 1 billion).

    The linearisation of the wormhole radius in modular string duality depicts the Bohr quantisation of Planck's Constant (h) as the product of (2π), the linear momentum and the radius of a particle moving in a circle with a given radius, the factor of (360) linearising the radian measure of (2π).
    As fps.fss=1 for super membrane coupling EpsEss=h2 and Eps/Ess=fps2=9x1060; λps=c/fps=2π.rps=10-22 m* for the 'Quantum Big Bang' wormhole radius rw=rps in high vibration mode and λss=rss/2π=1022 m* as an anti-wormhole radius in low vibration mode.
    So rps is the micro quantum wormhole radius of the Creation singularity and is modular mirrored in the scale of a typical galaxy in a macro quantum anti-wormhole.


    Logan Antico:
    "But does our science convince the lay reader Robert?
    It may seem very clear and factual to us, but how does one link one's personal beliefs, one's individuated philosophy with what we have just discussed in scientific terminology?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "One must establish the factual basis for one's worldview first, before one can attempt to translate the mathematical language into the semantics of the common usage.
    It must be superfluous, except for the gullible members of society perhaps; to squabble about a 'God of Science' in quasiscientific or quasireligious terms, without providing the hard evidence.
    It are not just certain experiments, which establish one's facts, but the entire edifice and history of the science, a gnosis of logic really, which lead to qualifying investigations and then theories upon which the analyses must rest in consistency for the theories to remain tenable.
    It is all rather impersonal, as it should be; but once the science has taken fertile root in its mathematical selfconsistency, its symmetries and cross-referential validity within other disciplines of science, then a common data base should be shared with colleagues and the populace.

    And once the science has become open to public scrutiny in open debate, and not just by the colloquial peergroup; when its 'aesthetic beauty' has become openly displayed; then and only then should the science become subject to the colours and filters of individual personalities.
    Only after it has become 'common intellectual property', even if not generally understood, should the science become an omniscience for the scientific expert and the lay philosopher alike."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, I agree; it is rather similar in the academic study of the religions and the theologies. You have millennia old manuscripts, which have been copied and recopied, edited and modified by dogmas and personal viewpoints of scribes and historians.
    Surely, some particular old testament scrolls have traditionally been copied meticulously by hand and word for word by conscientious scribes, such as Isaiah's Dragon-Prophecy for example.
    But many testimonies or gospels are missing in the biblical codex for instance and a number of authors of certain works are not who they are traditionally ascribed or believed to be.
    Then there are co-authorships, such as the Book of Revelation and the Gnostic Gospel of John; and a common thread of 'Sayings of Jesus', linking the synoptic gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke to a literary source, known as 'Quelle' or 'Q' in the 'Teacher of Righteousness' tradition of Melchisedec.

    Our academic studies and improved methods of carbon dating have accumulated much evidence; shedding new light upon the old traditions and cultural mythologies.
    It is a complex field, but the Dead Sea scrolls and documents of Nag Hammadi, discovered from 1945 to 1948 have helped greatly to penetrate the extensive biblical reinterpretations undertaken by the monastic orders in the first and second millennia of the modern era.

    So now you find thousands of literal interpretations of ancient and encoded texts and viewpoints expressed by charismatic and often selfindulgent cultleaders and selfproclaimed avatars, preaching to a gullible and badly misinformed public; the latter being hungry for a spiritual dimension and a better understanding of their lives and purposes."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and the old science had failed to live up to the standards demanded of the general population; it had failed to fill in the gaps as the paradigm of reductionism at all costs, but at the expense of the encompassing viewpoint."


    Logan Antico:
    "Really an inbred fear from the old power, which religion wielded so ruthlessly against any dissenting opinions to its own dogmatic interpretations; just think of Galileo's incarcerations and the burning at the stake of Bruno; just because they proposed a more encompassing worldview."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "It just has now become reversed and to the overall detriment for a healthy minded global culture I would say; unless our new science can fill the growing void and sense of purposelessness, which ever more people experience; this society is doomed to selfdestruction.
    If religious dogma can brainwash young and old minds as to the nobility and glory to kill someone else in the 'Name of some God', even if one's own life is lost in the process; then such a state of affairs must be harmonised in the 'Name of the true God of Science'."


    Logan Antico:
    "And it makes no difference if one calls one's God the 'God of Jesus' to justify the killing of anyone as a 'witch' a 'devil worshipper' or a 'heretic'; or one calls one's God 'Allah' or 'Jehovah' and believes in one's 'holy justification' of a war against 'unbelieving infidels or gentiles', whatever nobel labelling, such as 'jihad' or 'holy crusade' one attaches to such universal acts of stupefaction."

    Code15. Code16. Code17.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019
  7. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and often the justification of dishonourable acts is taken as some misappropriated theme in the sacred scriptures of some religion.
    There are quite a few such themes in the old testament; for example consider the 'cutting up of a corpse into twelve pieces' and then sending the pieces to the coastline of a country.

    Judges.19.29-30:
    "And when he was come into his house, he took a knife, and laid hold on his concubine, and divided her, together with her bones, into twelve pieces, and sent her into all the coasts of Israel. And it was so, that all that saw it said, There was no such deed done nor seen from the day that the children of Israel came up out of the land of Egypt unto this day: consider of it, take advice, and speak your minds."

    Judges.20.6-7:
    "And the men of Gibeah rose against me, an beset the house round about upon me by night, and thought to have slain me: and my concubine have they forced, that she is dead. And I took my concubine, and cut her into pieces, and sent her throughout all the the country of the inheritance of Israel: for they have committed lewdness and folly in Israel. Behold, ye are all children of Israel; give here your advice and counsel."

    Judges.5.19-21:
    "The kings came and fought, then fought the kings in Canaan in Taanach by the waters of Megiddo; they took no gain of money. They fought from heaven; the stars in their courses fought against Sisera. The river of Kishon swept them away, that ancient river, the river Kishon. O my soul, thou hast trodden down strength."

    Genesis.2.8-17:
    "And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
    And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
    The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone. And the name of the second river is Gishon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
    And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."

    Now a concubine in the time of the scriptural settings was a servant woman or maid to the wife of a man and enjoyed conjugal and legal rights under Jewish law, who was referred to as her husband. How many students of the scriptures now literally interpret the above, implying that the corpse of a man's concubine is cut up into exactly 12 pieces (not 11 or 13 or any other number) and sent to the coasts of the land of Israel?
    How many coasts are implied; four - if the land of Israel depicts the twelve tribes, all of whom are within the 'Seed of Abraham' as the 'land' and the 'holy ground' of the scriptural encodings.
    The Hebrew words for 'man' and 'ground' are phonetically interchangeable, as are the Hebrew words for 'woman' and for 'man'.
    Megiddo is a town northwest of Jerusalem and not a coastal town or near a reservoir of water. Megiddo is where the last 'righteous king of Israel' , Josiah died in a war with the Egyptian Pharaoh-nechoh in 608 BC in the historical 'Battle of Armageddon'.

    Hence the 'waters of Armageddon' refer to the graduation battle every 'Seed of Abraham' must endure to achieve the status of the promised 'Starseed'.
    The 'Garden of Eden' is hence symbolised in the centre of the soul within a 'man's' body as the 'holy land'; the historical Palestine serving as a symbolic representation.

    The East-West river is Euphrates and the West-East river is Hiddekel, as historical mapping of the geographical Euphrates and Tigris in the 'Old Babylonian Empire', encompassing Assyria in 2000 BC.
    The North-South river is Jordan, coded in Joel.2.20; running from the 'Sea of Galilee' as the 'Utmost Sea' to the "Eastern Sea' of the 'Salt Sea', which is the 'Dead Sea'.
    The 'Sea of Galilee' is the river Pison, and also coded as 'Sea of Tiberias', 'Sea of Gennesareth' and the 'Sea of Chinneroth' - it is in the land of Havilah, where the Christ Body derives as the 'good gold' and where Jesus-Yeshua engaged physically for the majority part of hisher mission.
    The Onyx stone is the Urim of the priesthood and initially associated with Joseph, Son of Jacob, sold into Egyptian slavery by his brethren; the Onyx-Stone then becoming transferred to the tribe of Asher, as the northernmost coastal tribe.
    The Thummim-Sardonyx-Bdellium is also transferred to Asher through the tribe of Issachar, bordered east, west and south by the tribe of Manasseh, Joseph's firstborn son from the Egyptian sojourn.
    The South-North river is Gishon, historically associated with 'Cush of Mesopotamia', which is however mapped as Egypt and hence the river Nile flowing from the south to the north and originating as the 'Blue Nile' at Lake Tana in Ethiopia; before merging with the 'White Nile' at Khartoum in the Sudan and then continuing as the 'Nile' into Egypt.
    And Kishon, the ancient river sweeps the Canaanite kings away, when the 'stars from heaven', symbolised in the twelve tribes and the twelve apostles and the twelve starsigns as the crown of the 'holy mother in heaven', gives birth to the 'Heavenly Body of Christ'.

    There is no 'money' involved, just as the 'Abrahamic seed' is invited to 'buy its salvation', in 'coming to the waters' and 'without money or price' in the 'gold tried in the fire', as coded in Isaiah.55.1 and in Revelation.3.18."


    Logan Antico:
    "But if one doesn't see all those encoded connections, how should one read scriptural passages, such as these?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "That is the point, Logan; would it not be wonderful, if the scriptures could only be read with the decoding keys?
    Because of the inter dimensional structure of the scriptures, the potential for misinterpretations is very great however, and it becomes the task of omni-scientists such as us to attempt to make the decoding mechanisms available to all who are interested in the multi levullar understandings."


    Logan Antico:
    "One could say, that the phrase 'Reductio ad absurdum' has assumed a new meaning in the reformation of the old science into omniscience and the birth of an universal religion out of the synthesis of the old with the new. But the worldwide scientific community should become empowered to give the 'Coup de Grace' to the Supernaturality Virus and kill it off for good.
    Sure it will remain within the mindsets of some religious followers, the more so fanatically inclined, in pockets of resistance; but the groupmind of humankind will have eradicated the ancient disease of the original sin of the ignorance."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and the symbolic 'eating from the forbidden fruit' allowed this to occur; the 'loss of ignorant bliss' becomes the SERPENT=PRESENT=97=SON OF MAN; the title Jesus used extensively to describe himherself. As coded in Jeremiah's scroll; the origin of both 'good and evil' derives from a common source:

    Jeremiah.31.33-34:
    "But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; after those days, saith the LORD; I will put my law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts; and will be their God and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour and every man his brother, saying: Know the LORD; for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity and I will remember their sin no more."

    Jeremiah.32.39-42:
    "And I will give them one heart, and one way, that they may fear me forever, for the good of them, and of their children after them:
    And I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them, to do them good; but I will put my fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from me. Yea, I will rejoice over them to do them good, and I will plant them in this land assuredly with my whole heart and with my whole soul.
    For thus saith the LORD; Like as I have brought all this great evil upon this people, so will I bring upon them all the good that I have promised them."

    So this scripture says, that the 'LORD' has a soul and a heart and that 'HE' brought the 'evil' upon the people, because to fulfil 'HIS' promises "HE' creates a background for the dichotomy of 'good versus evil' for the purpose of putting the 'FEAR=RESPECT' into the 'hearts and minds' of the people.
    The 'everlasting covenant' then becomes the understanding and wisdom about the nature of 'GOD'; and the proselytising and evangelism of various sects and denominations will become superfluous."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, it says in the scroll of the Revelation, that the mystery of 'God's nature' should become revealed:

    Revelation.10.7:
    "But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets."

    And the 'House of Israel' are the twelve tribes, the twelve apostles, the 12 months in a year, 12 hours in a day or a night - or take your pick.
    And because everyone is born on some day in the year defined in 12 'starsigns' say, everyone born is also of the 'House of Israel' as one of Jacob's son-daughters or daughter-sons as Abraham's potential starseeded greatgrandchildren of the fourth generation; "when they shall come hither again", as the ten principles, encoded as 'peoples' or 'kings' in Genesis.15.16; 18.31 and as "ten horns of the beast", which would 'fight' against the 'whorish beast' as itself in Revelation.17.12-17.

    Hence all people born under Aries are of the tribe of Reuben and have an ancestry linked to the North-West expansion of the Samarian Israelites from 721 BC after the Assyrian invasion under Shalmaneser, an exodus into Turkey, the Ukraine and thereabouts as one of the 'ten lost tribes'.
    All people of the Taurus-starsign are Simeonites and a bloodline concentrated in the Italy of Rome.
    Geminis are the Levitical priests, like Moses and his brother Aaron, rooted in the Greater Greece.
    In one of many interpretations and under the literary licence of the styoryteller, one continues in setting the Cancers as the Danites, the bloodline of the Irish, following the 'Way of the Serpent'.
    The French Lion is also the Leo of the tribe of Judah; many myths of the Knight Templars and the 'Rosy Cross' attempt to locate the 'Holy Grail' into the Greater France with a bloodline of Jesus, siring children to Mary Magdalene.
    The sign of Virgo links the Gadites of Greater Slovenia with the Librans of the Naphtalites of the Russian motherland.
    And the Scandinavians can trace their Israelite genes to the tribe of Asher under Scorpio.
    The people of Greater Germany and Poland are of the tribe of Issachar as the Sagittarians and the Iberian peninsula of Spain and Portugal belongs to the Capricorn of Zebulon."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Then we find two halftribes: a 'Commonwealth of Nations' and a 'Great Nation' and with Abraham as their common father, in one sort of interpretation and coded in Genesis.12.1-3; 17.4; 35.11.
    The two halftribes are the two Egyptian sons of Joseph; Jacob's 11th son in Manasseh as the firstborn and Ephraim as the second born.
    In one of many stories, the 'Great Nation' is the colonising USA as the bloodline of Manasseh and the 'Company of Nations' is colonising Great Britain in the genealogy of Ephraim.
    Joseph of the 'coat of many colours' is the 'Dreamer of Dreams' and the Aquarius of Ourobos.
    The Pisceans are the Benjaminites and the 'raving wolves' of geographical Israel, Palestine and the Middle Eastern region in general (Genesis.49.26-27).

    But this application dates to 721 BC as a symbolic 'modern tower of Babel' and dispersion and cross fertilisation can be said to have reached a true global synthesis of the lineages.
    Anyone so has a trace of Reuben and Simeonitic blood and... and a dose of Benjamin; fundamentally converging through Jacob in Abraham as the 'chosen blood' of 'God's friend', (Isaiah.41.8)."


    Logan Antico:
    "And the 'Gentiles' then become 'other races', not of ancient 'Aryan' or Indo-European stock and which become inducted into the 'House of Israel' through the commissions of the New Testament and the 'Pauline Missions', enabling the induction through the 'knowing of the story' and the 'baptism' of the birthdays into the 'Christenings'.
    A missing link to the matriarchy is the 11th child of Jacob-Israel in his daughter Dinah to Leah.
    Dinah becomers the archetypical daughter part to all the son parts as the basegenetic perfect twinship.
    So ReubenDinah is like the YangYin of Aries, symbolised in the 'wedding' of the he-planet Mars to its she-twin Marsinia in a 'starry' dragonomy of superimposed 'planets'.
    A possible alternating 'he-she/she-he invitation-list' comprises Venus-Vulcan under Simeon; Mercury-Mercuria under Levi; FullMoon-NewMoon under Dan; Sol-Nemesis under Judah; Gaia-Chiron under Gad; Northern Saros Dragon-Node-Southern Saros Dragon-Node under Naphtali; Plutonia-Pluto under Asher; Jupiter-Jupiteria under Issachar; Saturnia-Saturn under Capricorn; Uranus-Urania under Joseph and Neptunia-Neptune under Benjamin."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "All definitions are selfrelative and are so true in a sense of reflecting an underlying unity, which is coded in the old and newly discovered biblical scrolls, fixed in archetype only, and awaiting individual application in analogy to Job's task of answering God's questions, prerequisite for the dragonomies and the metamorphosis of the human prototype into its starhuman graduation.

    There are messages in the 'blessings' of the tribes by Jacob and Moses and each story carries a multi dimensional meaning, linking to all other stories in some way, say in Genesis.48.12-22;49.3-28 and in Deuteronomy.33.
    Hence you can see the great fallacy and presumptiousness of the 'bible bashers', who well intentioned, but often grossly misguided in their thinking, preach their often very limited interpretations to the 'unsaved unbelievers', in dire need for salvation from the 'eternal hellfire of damnation'."


    Logan Antico:
    "But those 'blessings' are the reason why the old houses of royalty have been so obsessed with their bloodlines.
    The 'blue blood' had to be kept pure and not understanding its meaning as that of the covenant of Noah, Melchisedec, Abraham, David and Jesus; the incomplete interpretations resulted in genetic stagnations and mutations caused by the inbreeding of recessive genes."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "There is even a western tradition of initiation, which draws upon this partial understanding of the ancient covenant as coded in the scrolls of antiquity.
    The concepts of freemasonry for instance draw much upon the Egyptian wisdom scrolls of the Ibis-God Thoth and its companion of the Architect-Bull-God Apis-Ptah, both in league with the old Sun-God Ra, centred as the Family of Ra in the Egyptian capitol city of Memphis at the time of the 'Old Kingdom' say the 3rd to 6th dynasties from 2690 BC to 2180 BC and encompassing pharaohs such as Zoser, Khufu and Pepi.

    The centralised Egyptian government had collapsed by about 2160 BC of the 7th and 8th dynasties in an intermediate period and the gain of political importance by non royal administrators saw a shift from the Egyptian capital from Memphis to Heracleopolis in dynasties 9 and 10 and then to Thebes in the 'Middle Kingdom' of dynasties 11 to 14 and the period from about 2160 to 1690 BC.
    Pharaoh Mentuhotep II of the 11th dynasty succeeded to 'reunify' Egypt about 2047 BC and the 12th dynasty king Amenemhet I (1991-1962 BC) reestablished Memphis as a capital and the Family of Ra was renamed as the Family of Amon-Ra, after the pharaohic lineages.

    The biblical time of Joseph is placed into the reign of Amenemhat IV of the 13th dynasty, with Joseph's '17th birthday' in 1798 BC, coded in Genesis.37.2 and the sojourn of 'Jacob' (like Joseph as quasi historical figure), can be dated as Jacob's '130th birthday' to 1775 BC and his 'death' at 1758 BC, (Genesis.47.9,28).
    A 'golden age' of Egyptian art, literature and architecture ended when invaders from Palestine, often called 'shepherd kings of Hyksos' assumed foreign rulership over the eastern delta from their capital Avaris and spanning the 14th to 17th to 18th dynasties from 1635 BC to 1522 BC; when Ahmose I finally subdued the Hyksos in Egypt's reunification and to end the Hyksos interlude in 1522 BC.

    The 18th dynasty then began the 'New Kingdom', which would last until 1292 BC and encircles the biblical characters of Moses and Aaron and Joshua.
    The birth and death of Aaron and Moses and the encoded 'Hyksos' Exodus of 1522 BC under Ahmose I is dated at 1605 and 1602 BC with 1482 BC respectively, coded in Exodus.2.4,14 & 7.7 & 12.40; Numbers.33.38-39 and Deuteronomy.34.7 and Ezekiel.4.4-6, with 1092 BC as the 390th year of the Egyptian captivity and 40 years in the wilderness of Sinai ending 1052 BC to decode the 430 years of Israel's captivity in Egypt.
    40 years of Sinai from 1522 BC to 1482 BC are followed by 350 years to 1132 BC as 390 years Israel Left and are followed by 40 years Judah Right to 1092 BC.
    470 years from 1522 BC to 1052 BC then add 40 years Sinai to 30 years of 'mourning' to 400 years of 'Abraham's Seed in a Strange Land' in 1052 BC as per Gen.15.13-16 with Acts.7.6 and Num.14.33-34 and Judges.4.3. 70 years of the Hyksos from 1522 BC to 1452 BC so preceede the 400 years of Abraham, but include the 'wilderness of Sinai'.

    During the 18th dynasty, Amenhotep III, who reigned from 1388 to 1350 BC renamed the sungod Ra as Aton and his son Amenhotep IV, reigning from 1349 BC to 1334 BC, abandoned the capital Thebes for Akhetaton, renamed himself Ikhnaton (or Akhenaton, meaning Aton is satisfied) and with his queen Nefertiti sought to instigate a monotheistic religion as the first historical figure to do so.
    The religious reformation was shortlived however, with Ikhnaton's son Tutankhamen returning the capital to Thebes and returning to the old rituals of the priests who had fought any attempts to undermine the authority of the God Amon and his polytheistic following.
    But Ikhnaton's 'One God' represented a religious revolution in proclaiming Aton to be the one and only true God; a legacy of the idea and story of 'Joseph's God' who helped Joseph's notoriety as a capable 'interpreter of dreams', coded in Genesis.40.5-23; 41.1-46."


    Xtianapocalypso (4).

    Logan Antico:
    "This would have been the Egyptian form of gnosis, the 'Teacher of Righteousness' in the form of Thoth transmuting into Hermes Trismegistos in parallel with Amon-Ra becoming the 'One true God' of Ikhnaton and Nefertiti and absorbing the qualities of Thoth and Ptah in the process.
    The symbol of freemasonry are the encircled 'Mason's Tools', which are associated with the hieroglyphic 'cartouche' of the 'Ren' or name of Ptah as the archetype for Ra as the universal spirit Atum or Aton, which had built and created the universe.
    And so the Western esoteric traditions are attempting to play the role of 'Joseph in Egypt' as the cosmic 'Teacher of Righteousness' initiating the ones, who are able to guard and wisely use the knowledge of the true understanding."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Furthermore, Ptah is said to have been married to Sekhmet, who was a lion headed goddess and the daughter of Ra as the symbolic right or solar eye of Ra; the lunar left eye being the 'all seeing eye' of Horus, who in the third generation of the Egyptian family of gods married Sekhmet as the bull headed goddess Hathor, symbolised by a mirror.
    Originally, Ra or Atum thought of himself as right-eyed as herself and in using a mirror, he created an image in the left-eyed serpent Apep, who refused to play any games with his image as himself however.
    In his displeasure, Ra threw his right solar eye at Apep, who had to image this in his left lunar eye. But this allowed a second generation as the twinship of left-eyed Shu and right-eyed Tefnut in the Egyptian Lion of Truth to become born in a release of creative energy of reproduction and through Ra masturbating to release his seed in her as Apep's image and so fertilising the SkyEarth.

    The right-eyed Geb became the Earth and the left-eyed Nut became the lifted Sky and then they created the third generation in the left eyed Osiris and the right-eyed Isis, doubled in a mirrored twinship in the right-eyed Set and the left-eyed Nephthys. The fourth generation so could intermarry for genetic variablity in the doubled twinship.
    Osiris, as the Djed or 'Tree of Life' became an archetype for the number 1 as the Khu or 'Spirit' and Isis became the number 2 as the Ab or the 'Throne of the Heart'.

    Their children became numbers 3 and 4 as the right-eyed Horus of the 'All Seeing Eye' and the 'Spiritual Body' of the Sahu; and the left-eyed Bast or Pasht of the 'Sistrum' in the Ba of the 'Soul'.
    Now Set and Nephthys also had a child in Anubis, the Khaibit or Shadow of the Jackal-headed 'Opener of the Way' and the 'Guide of the Dead; but the story goes, that the fatherhood of Anubis is in dispute. Osiris is said to have had a love affair with both of his 'sisters' Isis and Nephthys to reproduce his own left-eyedness in a son to an also left-eyed mother. And so Anubis was born, knowing that he was left-eyed after his mother Nephthys, but he was initially confused because he could not image the right-eyedness of his supposed father Set, there was an uncleanliness about his image as the image of his father, imaging the left-eyedness of his father's brother Osiris.
    Anubis was like a shadow between the right eye imaging the left as well as the other way around.

    But as Anubis pondered his origins, he came across his grandparents testimony and it dawned upon him, that the ever repeating generations of the cleanly sexed one-eyednesses could be made impure in stopping the generations going on and on infinitely.
    Anubis went to his grandparents and asked them if they would be willing to extend the fourth generation in archetypical blueprint and they agreed and their parents agreed also.

    And so right-eyed Geb became renamed as Tehuti or Thoth as the number 5 and as the Ibis or 'Mind' and symbolised in the Caduceus, as the 'Lord of Time', 'Keeper of the Akashic Records', Scribe to the Gods' and 'Patron of the Healers'.
    Anubis' left-eyed grandmother Nut became the archetypical number 6 as Maat, symbolised in a 'White Feather of Truth', given to her by her mother Tefnut, renamed as the star goddess Seshat; because she had existed before the Sky was born as Nut and the Earth was born as Geb.
    Now the legacy of Seshat was the right solar eye of Tefnut and Seshat could now give that legacy to her granddaughter Maat in a renaming of lefteyed Maat as the right-eyed Sekhmet. And so the Sekhem or 'Power' was given to the hieroglyph of the number 6 and the symbol of the mirror, reflecting the right eye in the left eye and vice versa.
    Now right-eyed Thoth could relate as archetypical brother to left-eyed Osiris and right-eyed Set and left-eyed Maat could relate as archetypical sister to right-eyed Isis and left-eyed Nephthys. Right-eyed Horus was however matched with his left-eyed twinsister Bast and left-eyed Anubis had no right-eyed companion whatsoever.
    And Anubis found the key in the testimony of his great grand parents Shu and Tefnut, the leonine twinship of the Egyptian Truth.

    After the Sky-Earth of Shu and the Earth-Sky of Tefnut had been created by Ra's seed in his imagination; the right-eyed Tefnut and the left-eyed Shu were as one and Ra decreed that they could not reproduce to be separated yet again as he had been before he had created the heshe-shehe duality in one; that is a circle of 360 days could not be broken any more in the linearity of the serpent Apep.
    But right-eyed Ra had looked at left-eyed Apep in the commonly created right-eyed-left-eyed ShuTefnut mirror and they both had seen a right-eyed Thoth and a left-eyed Maat as their potential grandchildren in the mirror.
    And right-eyed Thoth was willing to play a game of checkers chess with Ra, imagining to be the image of the image as a left-eyed goddess of the mirror, also known as Hathor or Athyr, and being the 'Goddess of Beauty and Love' and the 'Patroness of Womanhood' in Ra's imagination.
    And Ra fell madly in love with his own imagination as herself as Hathor and so both, the solar right eye of the day and the lunar left eye of the night became extended as one part in 72 or 10 degrees in 360 degrees in a new cycle, and those five days allowed Geb and Nut to be born as the children of Shu and Tefnut, separated from the oneness of the 360 degrees for five days and five nights."


    Logan Antico:
    "And exactly this is coded in the bible as a mysterious passage noone, to my knowledge, has ever deciphered in a logical correspondence to the facts:

    Isaiah.38.7-8:
    "And this shall be a sign unto thee from the LORD, that the LORD will do this thing that he has spoken; Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the degrees, which is gone down in the sundial of Ahaz, ten degrees backward. So the sun returned ten degrees, by which degrees it was gone down."

    Then Ahaz is symbolised by the sungod Ra, for AHAZ=1+8+1+26=36=18+18=RR=GOD+10 and 10 times 36 being the closure of the circle again."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "A nice example for how the mythologies of ancient Egypt are found in the bible, if one can only decode the mysterious passages through omniscience.
    And Ra is Yahwhey the God of the Hebrews, just as it is the God of Ikhnaton and Nefertiti.
    But 10 children became born, five for the day and five for the night, all together constituting a new creation; the first five children being Osiris with Isis and Set with Nephthys and an archetype, who could combine the duality of right and left in one.
    This mutation is the Egyptian Christ in a star born Horus, who can be said to be in the womb of Isis, before she became pregnant by Osiris.

    And there you have the continuity of the ten archetypes in Hathor becoming the left-eyed number 6 relative to the righteyed Horus as the number 3.
    Bast as the left-eyed archetypical number 4 becomes the love match for a right-eyed Anubian image, who as the 'Shadow' perfectly mirrors the duality of the number 6 as the archetype of the number 9.
    The number 7 is then taken by Nephthys as the 'Sacred Chalice', containing the seeds of both the left-eyed Osiris and the right-eyed Set to bring forth the 'Shadow' of the 'Star born Horus' in the Sahu of the 'Spiritual Body'; the 'Physical Body' or Khat, being the archetypical number 10=1+0 in Set. The left-eyed 'Double seeded Soul' of Nephthys then is known as the Ka.

    The five shadows for Osiris, Isis, Nephthys, Set and Horus so become Geb/Thoth, Nut/Maat/Bast, Tefnut/Sekhmet, Shu/Ptah and Anubis in the order specified.
    The right-eyed Star goddess Seshat as Tefnut is matched to the left-eyed Ptah as Shu in the undifferentiated Sky-Earth, manifesting as right-eyed Sekhmet and left-eyed Ptah in the Memphian Family. Right-eyed Sekhmet becomes left-eyed Hathor in relationship with right-eyed Horus, who is also represented as left-eyed Ptah through his 'star born' status and doubling the archetypical number 6 in a bisexuality reflected in the Anubian number 9.

    The right-eyed Anubis is matched to left-eyed Bast in archetypes 9 and 4; and the left-eyed Anubis is matched to right-eyed Seshat via the two-eyed 'star sisterbrother' Sekhmet-Anubis in the mirror of 69.
    Sekhmet's 6 interchanges with Hathor's 6 in Seshat's 6 and matches in the right-eyed Horus coupling with the left-eyed Hathor and left-eyed Horus coupling with right-eyed Sekhmet in 3 and in 6.
    The left-eyed Anubis so becomes the 'real shadow' for the 'unreal' left-eyed Horus and the 'real shadow' of 'unreal' right-eyed Anubis becomes the left-eyed Horus in the mirror of the 69=96.
    Merging the 'starry twinships' then results in a two-eyed Horus love matched to a two-eyed Hathor-Sekhmet and Anubis matched to a two-eyed Seshat-Bast.
    The right-eyed Anubis is also the right-eyed Thoth and the left-eyed Bast is also the left-eyed Maat.
    Ptah is the archetypical number 8 and the hieroglyphic Ren or 'Name' as the Logos or Word of Christ and the 'Amen' of the Egyptian pharaohs."


    Logan Antico:
    "This is the number-letter code in some hieroglyphic form; say you define the archetypical number 6 in a right-left-right, or even-odd-even sequence in: Sekhmet*-Hathor-Sekhmet=24-15-6; then you can define the archetypes in resonating letters of the alphabet; here in X-O-F.
    The highest frequency is a unified principle in a 'star goddess' say as 24 in the symbol for the Egyptian Ankh or Cross in 24=15+9=2+4=1+5=6 and the number 15 becoming a starsymbol for Sirius, associated with Hathor's mirror say and the numeral 6 representing the named goddesses in its archetype."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed, and you find the reason for the continuing Egyptian mythology, which tells the story of Set becoming jealous of his brother Osiris's popularity with the Egyptians as a God of fertility and of being the God of the Spirit or Khu; Set being the God of the Body or Khat.
    So Set, with 72 companions builds a box or sarcophagus as a pretend gift for Osiris and invites his brother to a banquet in his honour; during which Set asks Osiris to lay in the sarcophagus to see if it fits his size.
    When in the sarcophagus, Set shut the coffer's lid and threw it into the Nile, where Osiris drowned; and his corpse was carried to Byblos, where the lamenting Isis found it near a tamarisk tree and then brought it back into Egypt. Set then cut Osiris into 14 pieces and caused all the pieces to be spread around Egypt."


    Logan Antico:
    "But that is the story of the Israelite concubine, being divided into 12 pieces and sent to the coast of the land for the 12 tribes to consider!"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Have we not just said, that the Egyptian and Hebrew mythologies are closely intertwined, as can be seen in the sundial of Ahaz?!
    Anyway, Isis, with Nephthys, who has left her husband in disgust as to his dastardly deed, Thoth; and the 'shadow brothers' Horus and Anubis, seek for a way to resurrect Osiris.
    The magical loveheart of Isis, the Ibismind and Caduceus of Thoth, the 'all seeing' Hawkeye of the spiritual Horus and Anubis as 'Guide of the Dead' succeeded to find 13 of the missing pieces to put Osiris together again - only his phallus was missing, having been devoured by an Arachne-spider.
    This is a significant point in symbolising the 13th starsign of Ophiuchus the 'Serpenttamer', associated with Osiris/Orion being mapped as the transit between Taurus and Gemini (May 22-23) as the 'Sign of Arachne' as the 'Point of Orion' onto the 'Sign of Ophiuchus' (November 23-24) in the transit between Scorpio and Sagittarius as the 'Point of Ophis'.
    Meanwhile Osiris had ascended into Ra's heaven and had inseminated Isis with his intact spiritualised penis to create the right-eyed and physical Horus; who would under guidance of 'his father in heaven' grow up and avenge his father in Christlike fashion."


    Logan Antico:
    "The omniscientific question know is to identify the 13 unaccounted pieces of the Osirian body.
    We define the Arachnian Phallus as RA himself, now imaged in AR as herself in the place of Apep.
    Three series of 9 numbers give 9 archetypes and 18 resonances for a 26-letter alphabet A to Z with the circle closing in the 27th letter of A*=RAH=27=HAR=GOD+1=1+DOG.

    A 1-series: 1=A/Spirit of Osiris as Khu; 10=J/Body of Set as Khat; 19=S/Winged Disk of RaHaR;
    a 2-series: 2=B/Heart of Isis as Ab; 11=K/Fire of Nephthys' Duamutef; 20=T/Twinship of Tefnut-Shu;
    a 3-series: 3=C/Body of Horus as Sahu; 12=L/Air of Ptah's Qebhsnuf; 21=U/Sphinx Harmakhis' Geb-Nut;
    a 4-series: 4=D/Soul of Bast as Ba; 13=M/Water of Seshat's Imsety; 22=V/Maat's Scarab as Khepera;
    a 5-series: 5=E/Mind of Thoth as Ibis; 14=N/Earth of Anubis' Hapi; 23=W/Pyramid of Thoth;
    a 6-series: 6=F/Power of Sekhem as Hathor 15=O/Sirius of Hathor; 24=X/Sekhmet's Ankh as Sekhem;
    a 7-series: 7=G/Chalice of Nephthys as Ka; 16=P/Lotus of Isis's Elements; 25=Y/Nut-Geb's Yoni-Phallus;
    a 8-series: 8=H/Name of Ptah as Ren; 17=Q/Crook & Flail of Horus; 26=Z/Shu-Tefnut's Phallus-Yoni;
    a 9-series: 9=I/Shadow of Anubis as Khaibit; 18=R/Uraeus of Thoth; 27=A*/RaH as HaR.

    carosiris. carset. carwingdisc.
    carisis. carfire. cartwins.
    carhorus. carair. carsphinx.
    carbast. carwater. carscarab.
    carthoth. carearth. carpyramid.
    carhathor. carsirius. carankh.
    carnepthys. carlotus. carbuckleisis.
    carptah. carcrook. 26.
    caranubis. caruraeus. 27.
    The separation of the sexes in three generations reduces to a unity expressed in that fourth generation, with
    Shu=Horus-Ptah and Geb=Anubis-Thoth and Rah=Osiris-Set, mirrored in Tefnut=Hathor-Sekhmet and Nut=Bast-Seshat-Maat and Har=Isis-Nephthys.
    The unity of Rah now allows both the rigtheyedness of Set and the lefteyedness of Osiris to become expressed in the same relativity of Rah, effectively doubling 'himself' as 'herself' and allowing Ra's old image of Apep to become transformed into the Har of Isis-Nephthys and redeeming Set, renamed as Seth in the process of completing the triune lovematches of RahHar, TefnutShu and GebNut; then expressed in the archetypical couplings of:
    A*BGJ=1+2+7+10=20=2=Osiris+Isis+Nephthys+Seth; CHOX=3+8+15+24=50=Horus+Ptah+Hathor+Sekhmet; DEIM=4+5+9+13=31=4=Bast+Thoth+Anubis+Seshat.
    And to those 12 archetypes we add the two dualities of TefnutShu and GebNut for a total of 14.

    The 13 missing Osirian pieces so become the letters A, (as Rah),F,K,L,N,P,Q,R,S,V,W,Y,Z and as exactly half of the alphabet, mirrored in the available identities as shadow identities and with the Goddess Maat being identical to Bast in the 4-series, but differentiated in Seshat as 13=1+3=4."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And considering all this, yet another scriptural riddle is solved by omniscience; do you recall the story of Noah and how he was told to divide the animals in the ark, by sevens and by twos?"


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, the LORD made a distiction between the clean sexes and the unclean sexes; and no theologian I know of, has ever claimed to know what that all means?

    Genesis.7.1-3:
    "And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.
    Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
    Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth."

    The Egyptian mythology as described here, is nothing but the Jewish Kabbalah of Ein-Sof, as the Hebrew mysticism in the Pentateuch, the first five books of Moses in the old testament of the Torah."


    sos.

    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes I knew that you would know; the redemption of the Egyptian 'Devil' Set as Seth is but the birth of Seth as the first son of Adam and Eve after the 'cursing' of Cain in Abel.
    Abstractly speaking, the Oneness of Atum=Aton=RaHaR manifests as the twinship of Ein-Sof in in its fourth generation and in ten archetypical characters, symbolising the ten principalities, three of whom have no antiprinciples in Relativity, Quantisation and the Metamorphosis of the Old Identity into a New Identity, utilising the preceeding nine principles in the rootreduction of 10=1+9=1 '+' 0 =1 or 10binary=2decimal.
    In the 12D-semantics of omnimathematics; the statement [8 + 8 = 1], with numeral (8) placing for 'Infinity', can be restated as the 'denumerable infinity' of a Cantor-Set of 'Cardinality' Aleph-Null in a limit of 'Infinity' to become mapped in a one-to-one correspondence onto a Cantor-Set of Cardinality' Aleph-All in a limit of '1'; provided the integer count in Aleph-Null approaches 'Infinity' in a mapping of the same 'mapped' integer count approaching a limit of 'X'.
    The 'indenumerability' of the mapped intervalled 'integer count' is then encompassed in the Feynman-Path-Integral of (T(n)=n[n+1]) in the set: {...-3-2-1+0+1+2+3...}, becoming unitised in the square or doubling of the polarities, analogous to the onsidedness of a potential doublesided surface in [-(-8)+(8)=1] as the quantum geometry of the pentagonal symmetry of the cosmogenesis."


    decepar.


    Logan Antico:
    "It is unlikely, that many lay philosophers would understand your mathematical reasoning; I can however see the geometrical manifestation behind it.
    One begins with the Octagon of Pythagoras and a square of side (a) and proves the Theorem of Pythagoras, before applying a quadruplistic transformation resulting in a threefold nesting of squares and projects a unitsquare onto this nesting to define a circumscribed octagon, within a circle of radius (r).
    Then (r=5axSquareroot(2)/8 and a=Squareroot(8/5) and r=Squareroot(5)/2)) and one can define the pentagon within the circle of radius (r).
    Finding the centre of the nested pentagons as inscribed in a circle of radius r*, then re-initialises the Pythagoraen Octagon and allows definition of the geometry of the hexagon as the alchemical 'Star of David' or the 'Seal of Solomon' in the definition of (r*=Squareroot[(1-1/Squareroot(5))/2]=0.525731112...).

    octagon.
    octa2. octa3. octa4. octa5. octa6. octa7.


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Well, I propose that the lay philosopher will have great difficulties following your arguments of quantum geometry in a similar vein of semantic unfamiliarity.
    Let's see if we can use the Hebrew Kabbalah in an alternative description of the Egyptian mythology of numerological archetypes.


    Thuban95.
    Cabalah.

    kabb.

    We have defined our ten characters and now map the kabbalistic 'tree of life' in the following fashion:

    1. Keter or Crown is the Khu of the Spirit and the 'Tree of Life as Djed or Phallus of Osiris'
    2. Hokmah or Wisdom is the Ab of the Heart and 'Throne of Isis'
    3. Binah or Intelligence is the Sahu of the Masculine in the 'EyeMirror of Horus'
    4. Hesed or Love is the Ba or Soul of the 'Sistrum of Bast'
    5. Gevurah or Power is the Ibis or Mind of the 'Caduceus of Thoth'
    6. Tiferet or Beauty is the Sekhem of the Feminine in the 'EyeMirror of Hathor'
    7. Nezah or Endurance is the Ka of the Double of the 'Astral Chalice of Nephthys'
    8. Hod or Majesty is the Ren or Name of the 'Mason's Tool of Ptah'
    9. Yesod or Foundation is the Khaibit or Image of the 'Shadow of Anubis'
    10. Malkuth or Kingdom is the Khat or Body and the 'Tree of Death as Yoni or Vulva of Set'

    The SEPHIROTIC TREE OF LIFE also known as MOSES' SAPPHIRE TABLET; then partitions those ten archetypes into a male, say left stem and a female right stem, parted in a middle stem, centred on the 'unclean sexes' of the 69=96.
    The male 'clean-sex' stem is the sequence from top to bottom in: 1-3-5-8-10 and the female 'clean-sex' stem as the series from bottom to top in: 10-7-4-2-(1=1+0=10) as the Kelim of Reshimu.
    The middle stem is so given as: 1-6-9-10, with 1 and 10 interchangeable in a rootreduction of 10=1.
    One sets the maleness as odd numbers and the femaleness in even numbers; the unlean sexes of 6 and 9 encompassing 7 and 8, which so become interchanged in the male 7 associated with the female Nephthys and the female 8 given to the male Ptah to effect the overall transformation of the 10 of Set=Ar into Har and rendering the dragking Set as 'fake' Dragon-King into a real Dragon-Queen Har for a real Dragon-King RaH and as the Tsimtsum of the Tehiru in the Torah.

    And so the seven 'clean sexes' are 1,2,3,4,5,7 and 8 and the two 'unclean' sexes are 6 and 9; the differentiation being made for the pupose to render the number 10 as a true female, the 0 in between two number 1's, say in: (101binary=5decimal), mirroring the maleness in the femaleness and vice versa; the 'fowls of heaven' defining the bisexuality contained in the undifferentiated twinships.
    The symbolism of the 69=96 involves this mirror of being inverted either back to back in 96 or of being inverted face to face in the two 'immutable principles', by whom it was impossible for 'God' and hence the 'AntiGod' or 'Dog' to lie, coded in Hebrews.6.18.

    dinah-_18169.


    Mirroring 6 in a vertical mirror, either left or right results in a reflected numeral 6, which is however an inverted 9 in a reflection about a horizontal mirror either above or below the cipher 6. So a double-reflection, once vertical and once horizontal transforms the 6 into the 9 or vice versa and so 69=96 represent the mechanism by which God's purpose of the 10-tiered unification is accomplished.
    The numbers 66 or 999 etc. only transform the 6's into 9's and the 9's into 6's and do not achieve the desired aim of using two in one to mirror the one in the two."


    Logan Antico:
    "So only the birth of omniscience towards the beginning of the third millennium has allowed us to finally draw all the ancient threads together and to weave the carpet of the New Science. We have built upon the traditions of the historical sciences and yet we could accomodate hitherto elusive concepts, such as consciousness and the meaning of emotions, love and the mind.
    But would you say, that the God of Science is defined as 'Love' as the scriptures claim?

    1John.4.7-8:
    "Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.""

    Robert Sceptico:
    "In purely scientific terms, 'Love' becomes defined as the energy quantum of the Eps-Photon. It is 0.002 Joules* of energy, concentrated in the cross-section of the wormhole singularity and translates into 12,453,300 Gigaelectronvolts* in the context of the nucleus.
    But is this of help to the spiritual seeker; does it comfort the grieving person who has lost a loved one?
    Is this relevant to two people 'making love' in the sensual enjoyment of their mass senses for the purpose of sharing their bodily essences in pleasure, ecstacy and harmony?

    It depends on the awareness and the mental worldview of the engagees, either with themselves or with one another. So yes, I can envision a time, when people are fully aware of what they are doing. Either they 'love' one another in terms of understanding what this 'love' is; or they abuse and kill each other, also knowing that they do not 'love' one another in the omniscientifically defined sense of the word.
    You see, one doesn't have to 'like' something, before one can 'love' something in the correct application of the definitions.
    One doesn't 'like' to get bitten by a snake say, yet one can still 'love' the biting snake as a holographic projection from oneself, as an 'alien' lifeform protecting itself on its own journey towards selfdiscovery and growing selfawareness.

    If one considers the snake as a C-factor defined species, searching for its L-factor for the purpose to evolve into its next highest form; and should one realise, that the snake without is also the snake within; say as a mutating gene or chromosome or a somatic cell or a higher evolved neuron; then the potential 'enemy without' becomes a 'friend or partner within'."


    Logan Antico:
    "You know, this explains the 'Two Great Commandments' of Jesus, the law upon which all the prophets rest, in a new light.
    One is asked to 'love one's God with all one's mind, soul, heart and body and one is to love one's neighbour as oneself', coded say in Matthew.22.37-40.
    What you just said, means that one can even reduce those 'two great laws' to a 'single graet law'; namely 'Love Love' and all the laws are fulfilled."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Of course; this is even mathematically self consistent, as it must be for its validity.
    The statement LOVE LOVE has its contrastatement in FEAR FEAR and its negations in the propositions LOVE FEAR and FEAR LOVE, using the concept of FEAR=ANTILOVE or the ABSENCE of LOVE in the tautology LOVE IS LOVE. But these statements are the old and new testaments in the bible in a nutshell.

    Just consider the states of mind associated with being 'in love with fear' or 'fearing love'. This is like the 'darkness' avoiding the 'light' or the 'light' eschewing the 'darkness'.
    But to 'love love' or to 'fear fear' means to be 'afraid of being afraid', indicating a pure courage and the hero within oneself.
    It also indicates, that one is 'in love with love itself', which is of course Jesus' first commandment. This state of mind embraces both, the 'light' and the 'darkness'; just as the 'shadow' is part of both of them.
    And in a twist of logic, one can associate one's 'fear' as one's closest neighbour and so in 'loving' one's closest 'enemy within' as oneself, one overcomes the 'fear' of oneself as the one who embraces itself in all aspects, instead of 'running away' from oneself in 'fearfulness'. And this fulfils Jesus' second commandment in the statement: LOVE LOVE = FEAR FEAR."


    Logan Antico:
    "But the 'spiritual' concept of Love is also the magnetocharging of the unified field and the supersymmetry of the VPE?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed, it also appears as a fifth-of-a-percent factor in probability distributions, as in the decay of the neutral kaon of quarkstructure (Ko=ds(bar)) and its antipartner (Anti-Ko=d(bar)s) for instance.
    It is found, that the (Ko) has a double-life; either it decays into 3 neutral pions (πo=uu(bar)) in so 50 nanoseconds or it splits into oppositely charged pions (π+=ud(bar) & π- =u(bar)d) in 0.09 nanoseconds. The long lived kaon is called (KoLong) and so lives about 560 times longer, than the short lived kaon (KoShort).
    The trouble in physical theory is however, that about once in 500 times, the (KoLong) also decays like a (KoShort).

    This schizophrenic nature of the (Ko) was experimentally discovered in 1964 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island by James Christenson, James Cronin, Val Fitch and Rene Turlay. And whilst the discovery of nonparity in beta-minus-decay in 1956 resulted in the 1957 Nobel Prize for Physics for Tsao-Dai Lee at Columbia University, New York and Chen Ning Yang at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, New Jersey; the violation of CP-symmetry came as a completely unexpected surprise to the worldwide physics community in 1964.
    We recall the nonparity-loops in the UFoQR, linked to the absence of antimatter, because of the nonavailability of right handed neutrinos and left handed antineutrinos.
    Charge-Conjugation Parity or CP-symmetry is defined as a mathematical process which changes the (Ko) into the (Anti-Ko) in flipping the partial quantum states into their antistates.
    So one 'overrides' the parity violation of the WNI, which favours lefthandedness for matter and right-handedness for antimatter in the application of its field agents in the weakons.
    Then right-handed particles behave the same as left-handed antiparticles and vice versa and the CP in effect mixes the wavefunctions for the two (Ko's).

    Taken as a unity, the particle system of a (Ko) moving oppositely its antiparticle, does not change and remains invariant; but a single reflection P or chargereversal C changes the quantumstate of the wavefunction in (even/+1) or (odd/-1) parity numbers.
    An even function, such as (cosX=cos(-X) or X2=(-X)2), preserves space reflection in its symmetry about the origin or axis of reflection in (P,C=+1).
    An odd function, such as (sinX=-sin(-X) or X3=-(-X)3), inflects the symmetry in (P,C=-1).

    And applying the (P,C) symmetries twice returns to the old state, just as multiplying two positives or negatives always gives a positive square.
    For even symmetry, we set (CP=+1) and we obtain half of the (Ko-Anti-Ko)-superposition, decaying into a a charged pion pair, which also has a state of (CP=+1).
    For odd symmetry, we set (CP=-1) for the three particle decay characterised by that CP-number.

    The (Ko)-mass is obtained in the HBRMI as: (K-Mean+L(+)+[2e-])=(mKo=499.18 MeV* or 497.97 MeV), differing from the charged (K±) in (BD=4.184 MeV*) for (mK+-=494.99 MeV* or 493.80 MeV), subject to electronic perturbations, i.e. a [2e-/3=0.346994 MeV*]-, or [2(Bd -Bdd)=0.28081 MeV*]-reduction.
    The charged pions have a combined mass of (2(139.77)=279.53 MeV*) and the three neutral pions add to (3(135.3)=406.74 MeV*).
    So the two particle decay proceeds faster than the three particle decay, as less VPE is required to transform the (Ko's 499.2 MeV*) into the pionic masses with kinetic energy."


    Logan Antico:
    "But why is the {IROR(bar)+IR(bar)OR}-superpositioned quarkstate schizophrenic? Why doesn't it conserve CP-symmetry of Charge-Conjugation-Parity in 1 part per 500 on average?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "What happens, is that the weak interaction, by which those particles decay shows a preference for the decay of antimatter over that of matter.
    It is a consequence of the nonparity loops and the neutrino definitions in the UFoQR.
    Consider the matter-defined inner ring of the (ds(bar)), being subject to an oscillation of the sur rounding antimatter ring; the converse being the case for the (d(bar)s) of course.
    In particular, the (dd*(bar)) oscillation of the (Ko) engages the (W+) weakon and the (d(bar)d*) or the (Anti-Ko) engages the (W-) in their respective leptonic definitions.

    Write (ds(bar))=(K+IR)(K(bar)+OR(bar))=(KK(bar))+[IR*(+1)+OR*(bar)(-1)]=VPE + [W- + W+] = VPE+[OR*(+1/2)+RRGGBB(+1/2)+OR*(-1/2)+BBGGRR(-1/2)]
    =VPE+[IR*(+1/2)+IR*(bar)(-1/2)+VPE*(0)], with VPE*=BBYYYYBB, say.
    If now the two halfspins from the (n,anti-n)-VPE of the VPE* are given to the KK(bar)-VPE, then (ds(bar))=(K(-1/2)K(bar)(+1/2))+(IR(-1/2)IR(bar)(+1/2))+VPE(0)+VPE(0).

    There is then no internal spin distribution for the potential (K's) and (K(bar)'s) in the VPE(0) and a two particle decay for the (KoShort) results in (K(-1/2)IR(bar)(+1/2)) becoming the (π+) with (π-) its antipartner in (K(bar)(+1/2)IR(-1/2)).
    If the VPE*, formed in the neutrinoic coupling keeps its spin, then the resulting (VPE*=KK(bar)KK(bar)) is spininduced in the form of (K(-1/2)K(bar)(+1/2)+K(bar)(+1/2)K(-1/2)).
    Then it is the ring-antiring coupling which induces the first Base-VPE and the result is an odd CP-symmetry in the (KoLong) and its decay into three neutral (πo)-pions of structure (K(-1/2)K(bar)(+1/2)).


    Logan Antico:
    "So the oscillation of the d* into s and vice versa produces the (W+) and (W-) charged weakon coupling and a resulting VPE-contraction allows the Ring-Antiring-VPE to become 'kerneled' in the (n,antin)-VPE. And then the internal distribution of the spins determines what kind of neutral kaon materialises, the short-lived one or the long-lived one!?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Precisely and the situation is the same for the (d(bar)s); but in the combination of their wavefunctions, the nonparity-loop in the unified field can illustrate the limited availability of the neutrino for the (W+) as compared to the more ubiquitous nature of antineutrinos for the (W-).
    The Non-parity-circuit for matter adjoins the weak-interaction-loop for matter in the loops 12-1-12 and 1-2-3-2-1.
    The 12-1-12 non-parity circuit encompasses an anti-neutrinopoint at 0 degrees and the WNI-loop contains a neutrino point at 180 degrees and an anti-neutrino point at 360 degrees, which is also a zero of the wavefunction UF(X).
    The antimatter symmetry is not existent, because the common zero between the matter- and anti-matter WNI-circuit 1-2-3-4-5-4-3-2-1 is an even p-point as the 3-junction defining antineutrinos.
    In conjunction with the antineutrinopoint and zero of the 9-junction; there are two antineutrino pairs, the anti-neutrino point in the non-parity-loop and just the one neutrino point within the YCM-WNI-circuit at 180 degrees of odd π. This anti-neutrino/neutrino ratio of 5:1 then sets a basic mixing percentage of 16% in the mixing of the superpositioned wavefunctions, favouring the (W-) over the (W+) and so the OR-matter-YCM ring over the OR(bar)-anti-matter-MCY ring."


    Logan Antico:
    "And because the only available neutrinopoint is encompassed in a matter-defined circuit, it is impossible for antimatter to exist independently of matter as consequence of the magnetopolic definitions in the unified field."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed, but have another look at the finestructure for the (KoLong).
    Why does it decay ocassionally into a charged pion-anti-pion pair in the ratio of 1 in 500? (ds(bar)) is defined in the (W+) and (d(bar)s) in the (W-).
    In the (KoLong), the anti-neutrino-neutrino-spins are given to the VPE* and the ring-anti-ring coupling spininduces the Base-VPE.
    Because of non-parity, we set the matter spins as lefthanded and the anti-matterspins as righthanded for (K(-1/2)K(bar)(+1/2))+(IRIR(bar)(0)+K(-1/2)K(bar)(+1/2))+(K(-1/2)K(bar)(+1/2)) as in the three pion decay.
    But what, if you reverse the internal spin distribution?

    Then it takes time to flip the (d*d*(bar)) to allow coupling to the (W+), but less time to allow the coupling to the (W-), because the loops required for the (W+) to manifest via its neutrino are longer than are the circuits to manifest the (W-) in its anti-neutrinoic definition.
    But the definition for the matter based (Ko) is the (ds(bar)) and so the (W+) association; whilst the anti-matter based (d(bar)s) is associated with the (W-) because of the OR encompassing the IR(bar).
    But the (W+) takes longer to manifest than the (W-) as a consequence of the non-parity-loops in the UFoQR and subsequently the research data shows an excess of (ds(bar))'s over (d(bar)s)'s.

    In the case of the CP-violation for the (Bo-Anti-Bo) mesons, defined in the bottom quark (b*=(ud)); but manifesting as (b=b*u(bar)=(ud)u(bar)), the matterdefinition is given in
    (Bo =b(bar)d=u(ud)(bar)d) and its anti-matter partner (Anti-Bo=bd(bar)=u(bar)(ud)d(bar))."


    Logan Antico:
    "Let me see, if I can read your argument, Robert. The diquark part of the manifesting bottom quark forms a unit and hence it is the disjointed down quark in the matter defined (Bo), which manifests the weak interaction via the (W-) and corollarily, the (W+) derives from the antid-own quark in the (Anti-Bo) in their (d*-d*)-outer- to inner ring contraction.
    And as before in the (Ko- Anti-Ko) system, the (W+) weakon takes longer to manifest than the (W-), resulting in an apparent violation of CP-symmetry, whilst it is really a natural effect of the non-parity definitions in the unified field."

    baryogenesis.


    Robert Sceptico:
    "You've got it right; and the 1/500 ratio is a dimensionless quality of the magnetocharge (e*). You must have come across this ratio of the sourcesink energy in your field of cosmology?!"


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, there is a peculiar phenomenon in cosmology, involving this ratio of 1/500 and its double 1/1000.
    We find that whatever galaxy we study, ellipticals, spirals or irregulars, the mass of the central active galactic core always seems to be in the vicinity of 0.1 to 0.2% of the mass of the central bulge around it. It is like the central vortex of the Black Hole-White Hole dyad is in a set proportionality to its encompassing and qualitatively defined field of influence."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "There you have it; remember the isotopic percentage generator, defining the abundance of the chemical elements in the periodic table of chemistry?
    The decisive parameter in the IPG is the magnetocharge (e*) and that is numerically equal to 500 and sets the iterative nestings of the magneto charge as 'mass-current'.
    In conjunction with the RMP as the Rest-mass-Photon e* so answers the eon old question about what consciousness is in a physical definable sense.

    The answer is, that Physical Consciousness becomes a dynamic occupancy of spacetime by physicalised quantum conglomerations.

    Space is consciousness related via an advanced quantum mechanics. Therefore you can figure out what the metaphysics or spirit concept really relates and points to. Its not dieu ex machina but machina ex dieu.

    atom.

    Calculation:
    7.4 Billion people weigh about 518 Billion kilograms for an average weight of 70 kg. As one proton has a mass of about 1.7x10-27 kg; the total mass of humanity in weight are so 3x1038 protons. One proton has a volume of so 4x(1.4x10-15)3 = 10-44 cubic metres and for all the protons of humanity the volume adds to about 3x10-6 cubic meters or 3 cubic centimeters which is a cubic size for a cube about _______________ that long.


    Logan Antico:
    Then what is all that empty space doing...is there direct interaction between nucleons and virtual particles relating to the nature of "spin," or how the self-conscious universe actually sustains itself from moment to moment in the space it occupies?


    Robert Sceptico:
    This is an appropriate question, which leads directly into the deepest nature of what energy is and it relates on a most fundamental way to the reality of universal consciousness. Firstly, the 'empty space' of an atom manifests as a form of 'force field' in that the interaction 'Goldstone' bosons mediate a 'force', which then manifests as the appearance of sold state physics. So tapping a table actually taps an energy field etc.
    The problems with this mainstream physical interpretation and model begin right here, because the 'Goldstones' (photons, weakons, gravitons, gluons, higgs) are said to be 'virtual' that is not having a real physical existence.

    This is erroneous, just as the mainstream notion of consciousness and mind being nonphysical is also not supported by a higher dimensional cosmology and physics. As an example consider Einstein's E=mc2 applied to the total mass content of the universe. For a mass of say 1050 tons you will have an energy summation of so 1070 Joules. But if you now use the quantum energy, also well defined in Planck parameters, you calculate the quantum energy per space quantum and you get far higher values for this energy.

    Using the conventions (Planck Length, Holographic bounds etc) and using the Event Hubble extent of the universe, you get something like
    (Number of space quanta) x 2x109 = 2x9x(10147) ~ 2x10156 Joules.
    Now the string physics tells you that the energy per string quantum is something like 1064 Joules per cubic meter as a physical manifesto of this quantum energy; whilst the energy of all matter in space is something like 10-10 Joules per cubic meter. So the 'discrepancy' between quantum energy and matter energy is in a factor of so 74 (and 87 in the quantum-Planck limit). This number then becomes associated with the 'Dark Energy' and the 'Dark Matter' to explain the discrepancy.

    The 'empty space' of the atom so is in fact 'spanned' by the 'virtual' energy which is dark and has a dark matter component which is defined in physical consciousness parameters based on the quantum energy parameters and especially the physical size of the electron.

    This naturally allows a refined approach to fundamental physics, such as the difference between the Hydrogen atom and the neutron and how radioactive beta/neutron decay allows the primordial universe to build the table of the chemical elements. This transformation then relates to the interaction probability between matter and light in electromagnetic parameters so showing the basic electron to be a 'point particle/string' of a minimum size; but also a 'smeared out' or extended circular membrane characterised by the Fermi scale of the 'Goldstones'.

    The spacial extent of the differences then defines physical consciousness as a modular dual or mirror property of the space quantum itself; namely whatever is measured as energy derived from the macrophysics becomes a reciprocated magnetopolar 'supercharge' in the form of the electronic diameter maximised multiplied by the time differential of frequency as inversed time. But this change of string/brane vibration over time is also an angular acceleration without radial extent and so you find the innermost nature of the quantum spin, which is radially independent.

    Those physical definitions for consciousness then carry enormous implications of course. Namely space itself is conscious in a physical sense and any dynamic occupying space adds to a space inherent base consciousness independent of the dynamics and living entities moving about within it.

    Collapsing a hydrogen atom that is forcing the electron to overcome its weakon forcefield of the beta decay results in a neutron star of 'degenerate electrons' and you then can observe the quantum physics in the astrophysics. So your original question regarding the empty space resolves in the transformation of energy density is space. Then you should adapt the quantum theory to the holographic universe and the multidimensional membrane physics to resolve the wave-particle duality and the quantum entanglement on both the microcosmic and the macrocosmic scales to find the universal unification. The quantum entanglement can easily be seen to be the effect of the modular duality inferred at the beginning to resolve a number of apparent paradoxes, such as the Schrödinger Cat and the Chicken-Egg DNA/RNA etc paradoxes.

    So it should come as no surprise, that the galactic 'cells of life' have an energy derivative based on the same magnetocharge in the form of a mass to energy relationship.
    Furthermore, atoms with more then 137 electrons cannot exist, because the electrons could not form stable orbits around the nucleus as a consequence of [Alpha]~1/137 and the probability of light interacting with matter and so you find a link between dimensionless quantities, like [Alpha] and the value of the magneto charge, then manifesting in atomic- and galactic boundary conditions.

    Have you heard of a genetic abnormality called Klinefelter Syndrome?
    It is estimated that perhaps 1 in 500 boys are born with an extra X-chromosome, which causes a certain sexual variation at puberty. The normal masculine genitals become supplemented in secondary female characteristics, such as a limited grow of breasts and other intersexual developments.
    And a more severe genetic expression of Klinefelter Syndrome would occur at the ratio (e*2) or in one such birth in 250,000, with a full genetic condition expressing the nonresponsive morphology or building process of the X-Y-chromosomes in relation to the hormonal stimulus.
    When cells do not respond to testosterone or oestrogen from their common precursor progesterone, then conditions such as 'Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia' or 'Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome' can develop, with ambiguous development of the sexual organs from the common fetal embryo defined after a gestation of about six weeks.
    The statistical occurrence of such genetic abnormalities would be in between 1/500 and 1/250,000.
    In particular, the absence of the Y-chromosome inhibits a genetic signal from the 'sex determining region' or SRY-gene and developing ducts from the embryo will chose the path of female internal sexual development and in conjunction with 'antitestis' genes such as 'DAX 1' and 'WNT4' and stimutation by the sexhormone oestrogen.
    Corollarily, the presence of the Y-chromosome invokes 'testis genes' such as 'SOX9' to define the male pathway with stimulation by the sexhormone testosterone.


    Logan Antico:
    "But this interaction between sex hormones and the genetic morphology is present in all of us. You are saying that statistically 1 in 250,000 persons born is a true hermaphrodite, biologically expressed, with both male and female sexual external organs.!?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, and this is represented in the mythology of 'Baphomet' and as envisaged by Arabian mystics.
    Baphomet represented the idea of the 'Absolute'; it had the head and hooves of a goat, two wings, a greenscaled womb and human hands pointing to a fullmooned white right crescent above and a newmooned black crescent below; its female breasts were blue and it had a male penis and a female vulva; repesenting 'Solomon's Seal' which became the 'Star of David'.
    It is depicted as sitting crosslegged on a cube, the geometry of earthly foundation, its feet resting on a worldly sphere, with a pentagram on its forehead and a lighted candle between its horns."

    baphomet.


    Logan Antico:
    "In terms of omniscience then, Baphomet is the bisexual nature in all of us and also the 'Beast and Whore of Babylon', as scripturally encoded.
    One's personal dragonmade 'Armageddon' then becomes the placating of that bisexuality in the dragonomy of elevating one's sexual relationship with oneself and with another's mirrored polarity in one's own redefinition as a Man to a ManWoman and as a Woman to a WomanMan; losing nought of one's masculine or feminine beingness, but simply gaining one's basegenetic perfect match or 'twinsoul' or Egyptian Ka of one's own shadow nature in the process."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Precisely, and that BodyMind-MindBody elemental potential is represented in the ubiquitous occurrence of the ratio of 1/500 in truly elementary processes, such as (Ko-Anti-Ko)-decay; galactic source-sink architecture and genetic abnormality in sex-chromosomatic definitions."

    Code18. Code19. Code20.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019
  8. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Act Five: Infinity & Convergence, Limit & Divergence
    Gaudeamus Igitur ! & Quod erat demonstrandum ! & Fait accompli !

    Scientific Expert: 40% versus Layphilosopher: 60%

    [Logan Antico and Robert Sceptico find themselves aboard the ocean cruiser 'The Galactic Explorer', heading for New Zealand to attend a symposium for science educators in that country.
    They decided to honour their invitation and to travel by ship to enjoy the austral breezes of the southern winds at the end of their vacation.]



    Logan Antico:
    "How do you convince not the layperson, but the scientific expert as to the validity of the New Standard Model in particle physics, Robert?
    Say the researchers in unification physics, M-theory, quantum gravity and the fraternity members of your peer group - they all require scientific proof to accept the new dispensation!?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "It is a question of evidence, Logan.
    Say you accumulate an overwhelming amount of information and experimental data which fits into your model's theoretical parameters and predictions.
    It would be a blind watchmaker indeed, who could or would not then consider the timekeeper's advice.
    You see, that is why the recent experimental discoveries have been so important to finally refine the Old Standard Model into the new one, based on quantum geometry and quantum relativity. The old model worked well, but we had to insert so 18 different parameters for the elementary particle masses to make it fit into our equations for the quantum mechanics.
    Surely, we knew that the Higgs Boson had to be the missing link as the 'Restmass Inducer' for all the other particles; but we did not understand its ubiquitous nature as the ylemic dineutronic template.

    So to answer your question, one just has to give the particular refinements to the old model in devising the mechanisms by which the now explicitely defined Higgs Boson does its job.
    And notwithstanding the fact, that the non expert would find such a discourse in mathematical juggernautical semantics extremely monotonous and boring indeed."


    Logan Antico:
    "Before you get into that; what is the nonparticular nature for that restmass induction, the HBRMI of the Higgs Boson?
    Can one explain it in terms the layman might understand?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "One can compare light and matter in energy to find the connection in its most elementary form.
    Most people know, that photons have no mass and always travel at the speed of light (c) and that this can be expressed in the Quantum Law of Max Planck as {Energy=hf}, where (f) is the frequency of the photon under consideration.
    Energy is also given in Einstein's famous formula of: (E=mc2), where (m) is the mass of the particle or object. Now the trick is found in quantising mass itself, and just as space and time are quantised in the EpsEss-supermembrane in 11D, so is the massequivalent of the gauge photons defining the energy of Eps and Ess as the 12D-unified, but 10D-separated primordial source energies of the superbranes.
    So one extends the postulate that all particles of zeromass must travel at lightspeed (c) in the axiom, that all particles or objects that do have mass, must carry that mass in quantised units, expressible in the self- or eigenenergies of the sourcebranes."


    Logan Antico:
    "But hold it, the quantised mass is given in the Planck-scale as the P-mass (mP), is it not? And that mass is certainly not very small or unmeasurable, it is about 20 micrograms or the weight of a grain of sand; if length and time and temperature are bounded by the Planck-scale, so must be a mass."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed, but your grain of sand is made up of silicon dioxide molecules and many silicon atoms, which are composed of so 20 million trillion protons, neutrons and electrons.
    What I am saying is, that one of those protons itself is made up of so 80 million quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion of massquanta and as defined in the (fss)-frequency of the Ess source of the Genesis."


    Logan Antico:
    "But (fss) as frequency is also the modular dual to timeinstantenuity, that what we cosmologists term as the end of the inflationary epoch; (1/3rd of a quadrillionth quadrillionth) of a second to be precise."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, the restmass quantum (mss) is defined as (hxtps/c2), but the P-mass does have something to do with the mass quantum (fss).
    The physics of the superbranes defines the modular duality in such a way, that a large scale quantum multiplied by the small scale quantum gives unity 1.
    So (fpsxfss=1) and (mpsxmss=1) and since (mps) is directly related to the Planck-scale via the hierarchies of the superbrane classes encompassed in the M-space mirroring the 12D-F-space; the P-mass still provides a boundary - but as a large scale limit for the elementary particle masses."


    Logan Antico:
    "And the electro charge is modular dual to the magneto charge, but as a distance scale defined in the P-length oscillation?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed, that is the elegance of the quantum relativity and the physics of omnispace.
    The Eps energy quantum is defined precisely as the inverse of the magnetocharge (e*); but the electrocharge (e) is set as the unification quantum for the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions in [Alpha] and [Omega]. In particular the P-length oscillation is defined in (e/c2), which can also be written as the P-length times the (Squareroot of [Alpha]); it is about 11.7 times smaller than the Planck-length."


    Logan Antico:
    "And this pre-Planck-scale in F-space manifests as a measurable scale in 10D-C-space as the product of the electronic diameter times (c2), being identical to the magneto charge as the angular acceleration of the awareness quantum acting upon a volumar of space!?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and the concept of consciousness becomes therefore definable in reductionistic terms. Space itself can be said to be in a sense 'aware', having a sense of life, because of its inbuilt potential for consciousness as the awareness or the time differential of frequency in omnispace."


    Logan Antico:
    "And because omnispace is holographically mapped or projected into C-space, this fully realised potential energy in 12D manifests as the VPE or the energy of the vacuum in the lower dimensions of the quantumspace, the hyperspace and the line space."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And there you have your vortex sources of the White Holes and the vortex sinks in the Black Holes.
    You cosmologists analyse the connectivities between those phenomena every day. They feed of each other and empower each other; sometimes one is active and the other is hidden as the source of the activity and at other times its the other way around."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, we did revise our concepts of the Hawking Radiation of the Black Holes. It was thought, that a virtual energy pair at the Black Hole's event horizon would split into two, one of the particles would have positive energy and the other negative energy, adding to the required zero state via the uncertainty principle.
    If now the particle with negative energy falls into the Black Hole, then its partner with positive energy could be measured as being emitted from the Black Hole as 'Hawking Energy'.
    But this means that energy was created from nothing, violating the law of energy conservation, unless the Black Hole's 'dinner' actually reduces the Black Hole's energy by the same amount.
    Hence the Black Hole loses energy by 'eating' negative energy and eventually, depending on its mass and what we term the Hawking Modulus of the product of the Black Hole's Mass and its Temperature in (MBHTBH=½mPTP=hc3xSquarerootYn/(4πGok) kg K), it evaporates away in shrinking in size and in a time given in: (tHawking=c6xY[3n/2] /(24(Goπ)2xσMBHTBH4) seconds).
    But we discovered, that the negative energy within the Black Hole manifests as the luminosity of the quasars, the active galactic nuclei of the White Holes.
    This process is maximised in the sourcepower per unitmass and in the formulation of the energy of the Gamma-Ray-Bursters, reaching their upper limit in 270 quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion joules, but as monopolic watts per kilogram and as the energy scale of the magnetic monopole, you know as superbrane class IIB."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, I know the formulation for that as the sourcefrequency (fpsxc2), which uses Einstein's equation with mass (mps) times the unification factor of (c2/h).
    The negative energy of (-mc2) becomes super paritive in reflecting the Black to White transformation of the Input-VPE as the White to Black transformation of the Output-VPE in (mc2)."


    Logan Antico:
    "The Black Hole absorbs antiradiation coupled to matter as the negative energy and the White Hole emits radiation coupled to antimatter as the positive energy for an overall perfect balance in energy."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "So you find the (mps) sourcequantum in cosmology, as energy, it defines the Eps-gauge boson, which is colourcharged as RGB with clockwise or positive 1-spin and its modular duality is the (mss) quantum, which is so small it has 80 zeros after the decimal point of 0 followed by 2468864....and as the quantisation of mass in the absolute measurement terms of 10D-C-space.
    The superbrane energy of (mps) however defines the resetting of the Planck-scale as the instanton of the cosmic evoloution, when gravity became quantised in the source bosonic energy of (mps), translating the Planck-Unification energy of the P-mass of 9.48 million trillion GeV* into a Eps-mass of 12.4 million GeV* and a magnification of the P-length by a factor of so 4.7847 trillion and an experimentally attainable scale of a hundreth billionth billionth of a centimetre."


    Logan Antico:
    "And from that scale is the Higgs-Bosonic-Restmass-Induction, the HBRMI derived?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, that and the energy of the XL-Boson, also known as the heterotic superbrane class HO(32). The superbrane HO(32) is the duality between the X-Boson and the L-Boson.
    The X-Boson defines the HBRMI in the Kernel KKK and the L-Boson sets the Rings in IR and OR. The X-Boson has the GUT or Grand-Unification-Theory Energy of 1.885 quadrillion GeV* and unifies the strong and the electroweak interactions and the L-Boson has the energy of 111.045 MeV* and unites the electroweak and the gravitational interactions in the pentagonal symmetry of the Genesis.

    The X-Boson is given in: ([Alpha]xmps/ec) and the L-Boson in: ([Omega]xec/(mpsxCuberoot[Alpha]2)).
    The X-Boson then metamorphoses as the K-Boson at the instanton (tps=fss) in unison with the L-Boson to initialise the Higgs-Bosonic-Blueprint in the ylemic dineutronic (YYCCMM+RRRRGGGGBBBB).
    The K-Boson is simply the protonucleon mass in the [Omega] definition and denoted as (mc).
    The P-mass taking the place of (mps) in the definition of the X-Boson-mass then allows the transformation of the Planck-scale into the EpsEss-scale."


    Logan Antico:
    "But the mass seedling at the instanton is evolving as the ratio of (Mo/mc) and the baryonic (ΩB-factor) of the {(Squareroot of Y)[Cyclenumber n]; how do you account for the increase in the restmass for the proto-nucleon (mc)?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "That is where the superbrane mathematics comes to the fore; it involves a process like this:
    we define an unitary mass for Gravity as f(G) say and couple this in modular duality with the SNI as f(S) for the Strong-Nuclear-Interaction; we then also define (E) as the Electromagnetic-Interaction or EMI and (W) as the WNI of the Weak-Nuclear-Interaction.
    This is set in the unification polynomial {P(X)=(1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X)-1=0} and the pentagonal symmetry of the ratios in inversion becomes:


    ||1{S}||X{E}||X2{W}||X3{G}|| = ||1-X||X||1+X||2+X||.

    You have unity 1 mapped as (1-X) transforming as f(S) in the equality (1-X)=X2;
    you have X mapped as invariant of f(E) in the equality (X)=(X);
    you have X2 mapped as (1+X) transforming as f(W) in the equality (1+X)=1/X; and
    you have X3 mapped as (2+X) transforming as f(G) in the equality (2+X)=1/X2.

    This sets the coupling between f(S) and f(E) as X; the coupling between f(E) and f(W) as X2 and the coupling between f(W) and f(G) as X again.

    We next analyse the universal wavefunction: {B(n)=(2e/hA)xexp[-[Alpha]xT(n)]}, with (T(n)=n[n+1]) and which is symmetric about the Functional-Riemann-Bound (FRB=-½).

    Renormalising B(n) about the FRB defines a probability for finding the FRB-fluctuation for the interval [-X,X-1] in a volume element (dV) as the uncertainty fluctuation in (y2dV) for the expression of {y0)=Squareroot{[Alpha]/2π]}, and so {[Alpha]/2π} is the probability for the set interval for the volumar.
    This volumar sets the dimensional intersection for C-space into F-space via M-space in the topological mapping of the complex Riemann C-infinity-space about the Riemann pole of the FRB as the Calabi-Yau Superbrane-space in 10 dimensions.

    (-X(X-1)=0.2360679776) and in analogue to: {X(X+1)=X+Y=-1=i2=exp[iπ]} as the origin.
    But (0.2360679776=X3), thus defining a 'New Unity' as {[#3 = [Alpha]} and the precursive unity of (X) as: (# = Cuberoot of [Alpha]) in the symmetry [# : #3 = f(S) : f(E)].

    This sets the important definition of: (SIC=Squareroot of [Alpha] = Squareroot of #3) as the 'Strong-Interaction-Constant or SIC at XL-Boson time of the GUT-SEW unification for superbrane HO(32) and is there so about 11.7 times weaker than at the Eps-time of the instanton.

    And now we can redefine the pentagonal symmetry in the forceratios of the elementary interactions:
    {f(S):f(E):f(W):f(G) = # : #3 : [(#3)3]2 : {[(#3)3]2}3 = Cuberoot[Alpha]:[Alpha]:Cuberoot[Omega]:[Omega]} or {Cuberoot[Alpha]:[Alpha]:[Alpha]6:[Alpha]18 = # : #3 : #18 : #54}, with ([Omega]=[Alpha]18).

    Next, we couple the five superbrane classes to each other.
    The Planck-Boson is superbrane class I; the Magnetic Monopole is superbrane class IIB; the XL-Boson is superbrane class HO(32); the Ecosmic-Boson is superbrane class IIA and the Eps-Boson is superbrane class HE(8x8) in modular duality with the Ess-Antiboson.
    The X-Boson-mass is: (mX=#xf(G)xmps/mP) and the L-Boson-mass is: (mL=[Omega]xf(S)xmP/mps).
    As {f(E)/f(S) =#2} breaks the symmetry via the weak interaction it also defines {#xf(G)} as the unitary mass in the matter-radiation interaction probability given in [Alpha].

    Define the 'Mixing Angle' (@) in the transforming unity of X into [Alpha] in: (X = Fuxsin@).
    The unitary force (Fu) couples the unitary mass (#xf(G)) in the de Broglie phase acceleration (cfps) and the Electromagnetic-Gravitational unification between the protoproton and the proto-electron.
    Since ([Omega]=(2πxmc2xGo/hc), where (Go) is the initialising gravitational constant, replacing one nucleonic (mc)-mass with the effective electronmass (me), sets ([Omega]*=Omega]x(me/mc)).

    (@=90 degrees) at the Planck-scale and (@=38.12270761 degrees) at the GUT-scale of the XL-Boson.

    Replacing (f(G)/mP) with the Monopole-mass (#2/ec) modular dual to (ec/#2), sets the modular duality to (f(S)xmP) and transforms the Planck-scale into the XL-Boson-scale in the transformation from SEWG to sEwG to SEW.G, symbolising suppression (SW-sw) and disassociation (G).
    The Magnetic Monopole suppresses the nuclear interactions as intermediary to the disassociation of the gravitational interaction (G) at XL-Boson time of (2.20 thousandth trillionth trillionth trillionth of a second) from the Nulltime of the naked singularity, the latter given in the product of the (nps-wavelength) divided by the maximum radius of the 10D-hypersphere of Riemann as a (6.259 tenthousandth quadrillionth quadrillionth quadrillionth of a second).
    The B(n) has the coefficient (2e/hA), which defines the inverse energy for the Ecosmic superbrane IIA in 6.2705 billion GeV*."


    Logan Antico:
    "That energy represents a high energy level for the 'Cosmic Rays', we term it the 'knee' in the spectrum for the cosmic rays, with the 'ankle' being given in the Eps-energy level and the upper limit in the monopole of 27,000 trillion GeV*."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "So you see the manifestation of the superbranes in the sky. Hence there is no need to build particle accelerators the size of galaxies or universes to test the theory of the superbranes and the higher dimensional spacetimes. But there you have the coupling between the class IIA and the heterotic (8x8), the latter finally manifesting the dynamic and noninflationary quantum relativistic universe.
    And we can finally begin to unravel the Higgs Bosonic mystery, using our definitions from the superbrane transformations into each other.
    They are linked in dualities to each other and some of the mathematics is very complex; but we have now defined sufficient parameters to derive the HBRMI.

    First we have to calculate the unitary mass for the present epoch, given in cyclenumber (np).
    (#xf(G) = [Alpha]xmPxSquareroot(Ynp/ec) and this transforms (mps) into the (mP) in the mass of the XL-Boson via unity (f(G)xf(S)=1) and the modulation of (#xmpsxf(G)/mP) with ([Omega]xmPxf(S)/mps).
    The unitary force for the present epoch (np) is then given as: (#xf(G)xcfpsx[Omega]*/[Alpha]).
    To account for the evolving P-mass in cycle number (np), we simply multiply the unitary mass by the 'Baryonic-omega(ΩB)-Factor' of the (Ynp) or BOF.
    The calculations give (Fu =1.335966689), corresponding to an electroweak mixing angle (@), which is (27.55577265 degrees) via (@(np) =arcsin(X/Fu)).

    The HBRMI can now be constructed with the X-Boson transmuting into KKK as (mcxBOF) for the up/down quark level and the L-Boson assuming the form for the strange-quark level of the rings.
    The K/L-ratio defines the linear scaling for the Kernel-Ring-couplings and the Electroweak-Mixing angle sets a percentage relative to Planck-Unity for the present epoch (np), cross fertilising the skewed up/down- and strange levels in the HBRMI scale.

    The EW-Mixing-Angle sets (EWR=90/27.55577265=3.266103301) as the EW-Ratio and the K/L-ratio is (KLR=mcxBOF/3mL=958.8569/333.1360=2.87827=319.619/111.045).

    So starting with the trisected leptonic basemass (mL/3=37.015 MeV*) subtracted from the trisected quark basemass (mc(np)=mK=KKK/3=K=319.619 MeV*), we get the range for the up/down quark level as the Pion-mean of 150.556 for the interval from 282.604 to 319.619 MeV*, cross fertilised in the K/L-ratio for the LKaon-mean of 52.308 MeV* in the interval from 98.185 to 111.045 MeV*.
    The Pion-system so has a K-base energy of double the Pion-mean in 301.112 MeV* and the Kaon-system has a L-base energy of 104.615 MeV*.
    The HBRMI is hence constructed and as previously set in the various quark levels."


    Logan Antico:
    "And the quark geometry as defined in the kernels and the rings gives the mass differences, as for example the mass increases for the K-asymmetric resonances of spin 3/2."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, the triple arrangement of the (uds) as (u.d.s) or (d.s.u) or (s.u.d) for three different elementary particles in the very unstable {K.KIR.KOR=∑o*}-resonance, the unstable {K.KOR.KIR=∑o}-particle and the more stable {KIR.K.KOR=Λo}-particle, serves as a good example.
    The (∑o*) decays strongly with spin 3/2 as part of the (∑)-Isospin triplet; the (∑o) decays electromagnetically with spin 1/2 and the (Λo) decays weakly with spin 1/2.

    But it is best to derive the mesonic mass-systems before the baryonic mass-system. The mesonic masses are linked in quark-antiquark systems and so exemplify the utility of the means more lucidly, than the baryons, who add certain VPE-levels to their groundstates as either quarks of matter or as anti-quarks of antimatter.

    Now the L-means are contained in the K-means and to obtain the groundstate for a quark-anti-quark mesonic system; we subtract the L-mean from the K-mean and then add the appropriate VPE-level corrections; the K-VPE from the K to IR is reduced in the KLR from its value of the IR to OR transition. The L-VPE from K to IR is the anti-neutrino kernel to IR and is likewise less, than the IR-OR-VPE.
    The (K(+)=120.42 MeV*) and the (L(+)=12.810 MeV*) for a differential (Base-VPE=107.61 MeV*).
    So (9.807/12.810=0.766) is the L/IR-OR mixing percentage and (3.003/12.810=0.234) is the L/K-IR mixing percentage and for (Base-VPE+12.810=120.42 MeV*).

    In the scenario where there is no transition from the K-level to the IR-level, one must add the IR-OR-VPE to the Base-VPE and subtract the electronic perturbation of [2e-] for a quasi-photonic QP-VPE of: (QP-VPE=116.236 MeV*=(K+)-BD) and representing the super-symmetric bosonic partner for the muon in the definition of its mass in: (Muon-mass ~ L-Boson-mass - [e-] - (QP-VPE-BaseVPE)/2). This approximates (VPE)(BD=4.184035 MeV*) ~ (4.04363 MeV*=L(K-IR)+2[e-])(up-quark-IMR-transit).

    The basic quark level is the up-down or K-KIR state, with the Strange- or KOR state simply being a resonance of the d-state, often denoted as d* in the VPE-state of the Kaon-mean.
    The first non-basic quark level is the (J/Ψ)-mean of the Charm-K-mean of 3,212.085 MeV* and a Charm-L-mean of 341.685 MeV* for a basic K-energy of 2,870.4 MeV*.
    But the Charm-mean is the groundstate with no rings as the quark structure (cc(bar)=Uu(bar)uU(bar)=(uu)u(bar)u(uu)(bar)) and so no L-VPE is added to 2,870.4 MeV* as the net (J/Ψ)-VPE.

    However we must allow for a scalar state of the (J/Ψ), denoted as (Ψc) and the case of anti-parallel spins for the charm-quark and its antipartner in a para-positronium-like system.
    The JΨ-groundstate, also called the GS for the Charmonium particles, finds the two quarks at rest relative to each other with zero orbital angular momenta and having their spins are aligned for a total angular momentum of 1spin.
    Only mesons with 1-spin can strongly decay into the ortho-positronium-like state of 3 gluon-hadron jets, two of the jets spinning oppositely the third one. The jets are collections of materialised VPE-states, which decay via the elementary interactions into particle-antiparticle states under guidance of the conservation laws.
    The 1-spin meson can decay electromagnetically into a electron-positron or a muon-antimuon pair with aligned spins in double-jets one a quark jet and the other an anti-quark jet.

    If the available interaction energy is high enough, the leptonic spins might become anti-aligned in the emission of a gluon jet by one of the other jets, so effectively flipping the emitting spin-state in the production of a bosonic photon, spinning opposite to the gluon in a process termed 'Braking radiation' or the German 'Bremsstrahlung'.
    This defines ηc=c*c*(bar)=UU(bar)=(uu)(+1)(uu)(bar)(-1)) as a quasi-scalar particle and the associated spin induced VPE-state of (uu(bar)(±1)) as the (Wo(0))VPE; the energy of the latter being a quasi-photonic (QP-VPE=116.236 MeV*), added to the net J/Ψ-VPE to give (mηc=2,986.64 MeV* or 2,979.41 MeV).

    A colourless 'spinner' in the Graviphoton(±1) so transfers its 1-spin from the UFoQR spin-induction loops {7-8-7}(-1) or {10-11-10}(+1) to the (Wo) as the QP-VPE to the (Ψo)-photon, which is then reabsorbed in the GS as additional spin induced VPE.
    A higher resonance state for the (J/Ψ) would then be given in a (doubled+1) factor of the QP-VPE and in say {Ψ(GS+6QP-VPE - BaseVPE + [2e-] =Ψ(3,694 MeV*) or Ψ(3,685 MeV)}; such higher spin-quantum states decay via the SNI in (~10-23 s), reproducing the more basic particular mass-level.

    The KK(bar)-VPE-state represents however a single particle in the Pion-mean and we so double the QP-VPE to obtain the Groundstate for the (J/Ψ) in adding the QP-VPE again to its scalar state of
    (GS-J/Ψ(±1)=cc(bar)=Uu(bar)uU(bar)=(uu)u(bar)u(uu)(bar)=u[u(u(bar)u)u(bar)]u(bar)) for a nested triple-VPE of: (mJ/Ψ=3,103.02 MeV* or 3,095.51 MeV) and as the spin-1 Charm-Anticharm Charmonium particle. This gives the effective Charm-quark mass as: (mc-quark=1.5515 GeV* or 1.5478 GeV < 1.60604 GeV*).

    The charmed mesons are called the D-mesons and they link the VPE-states of (uu(bar),dd(bar),ss(bar)) to the groundstate of the (GS-J/Ψ).
    Summing the L-means from the L/K-IR oscillation to the Kaon-mean gives us (0.1495 GeV*), which is the K-Pion-mean with electronic perturbations and added to the (Base-VPE=107.61 MeV*) gives a (J/Ψ)-system-mass of (3.36023 GeV*) for the D-mesons, say from (c(bar)uu(bar)c) as a (8-quark/antiquark-molecule).
    As the (IROR-VPE=12.810 MeV*) is not applied in the U=(uu)-diquark, the (J/Ψ-BaseVPE=3.34742 MeV*).

    The Charm-Singlet is unique in that the summed L-means give a Pion-K-mean of insufficient energy to manifest the (J/Ψ)-system in terms of mesons and antimesons in a (D-AntiD)-system.
    D-mesons with energy about 1.67 GeV* manifest as pentaquarks or quark-molecules, such as the 1.54 GeV Diakonov-Nakano-Hicks or DNH-particle observed in Japan and the USA in 2003.
    The energy of the DNH(1,536) is obtained in the HBRMI by subtracting the combined Base-VPE levels ([K+]+[L+]=66.615 MeV*) from the Charm-K-VPE (1,606.043 MeV*) as a (4-quark/antiquark-molecule).
    So adding ([K+]+3[L+]=79.425 MeV*) has a Charmed-Meson-GS: GS-m[KKK][KKK](bar)=3.426845 MeV*) for the 8-quark-antiquark-system and regaining the L-IROR-Base-Means.
    Repeating the HBRMI mechanism and subtracting (L(+)+BΔ) gives the basic D-mesonic VPE in: (3.426845+0.2443+0.079425-0.010589=3.739981 GeV* or 3.7309302 GeV) for the basic D-mesonic systems.
    The HBRMI so sets the (Do=cu(bar),c(bar)u)-charmed mesons for (mDo=1.8699905 GeV* or 1.86546 GeV) and the (D±=cd(bar),c(bar)d)-charmed mesons in (mD±=1.87424 GeV* or 1.86971 GeV), adding 2(BΔ ).
    The (c(bar)ss(bar)c)-system for the (Ds±=cs(bar), c(bar)s)-strange-charmed mesons incorporates the (ηo=ss(bar)-VPE=(12.810+32.0305+104.615+341.685+K(+)-[2e-])=550.30 MeV* or 548.98 MeV) in its twinned state added to the GS and from whom the combined IROR-VPE must be twice subtracted for the u-s-transition:
    (mDs±={3.4228+0.5503-0.02562}/2=1.97374 GeV* or 1.96896 GeV).
    This energy is approximated in summing the Pion-K-mean and the Kaon-K-mean added to the GS of the original (J/Ψ=3.10302 GeV*) and the ηo), from which the Charm-L-mean and (L+) is subtracted for: (mDs±={3.10302+0.642287+0.5503-0.341686-0.006405}/2=1.973758 GeV* or 1.96898 GeV).

    The next level is the Bottom-mean of 10.4910 GeV* from which we subtract its L-mean of 1.116 GeV* for the scalar state of (mηb=9.375+0.116236 GeV*=9.49126 GeV* or 9.46829 GeV).
    The GS adds the correction for two L/K-IR transitions as (0.234(1.116)/2=0.1306 GeV*) and the QP-VPE scale for the Bottom/Magic quark doublet as (EWRxQP-VPE=0.3796388 GeV*) for the GS of Bottonium's Upsilon as: (mΥ=10.0015 GeV* or 9.9773 GeV) and an effective Bottom-quarkmass as: (mb-quark=5.00075 GeV* or 4.98865 GeV < Bottom-K-Mean=5.24550 GeV*).

    The Bottomium mesonic masses are now obtained in summing the L-means for all the lower quark levels and adding to or subtracting from it the mixing percentage for the Base-VPE.
    For the (B±-mesons of quark content (b(bar)u.u, bu(bar).u(bar)), we have a L-mean total of (341.686+104.615+32.031+12.809 MeV*=491.114 MeV*) as the K-Kaon-mean plus electronic perturbations.
    Base-VPE is (107.61MeV*) for a mass of (10.6002 GeV*) for the (B+B-=b(bar)u.u(bar)u.u(bar)b)-system, increasing by the Base-Delta of (BΔ=4.184 MeV*) for the (BoAntiBo=b(bar)u.d(bar)d.u(bar)b)-system.
    The summation of L-means included the (IROR-VPE of 9.8071 MeV*), relevant for the b*=(ud)-quark-level and which we must subtract twice from the combined mesonic state for individual masses of the
    B-mesons: {mB-=5.2903 GeV* or 5.2775 GeV and mBo=5.2924 GeV* or 5.2796 GeV}. For the {Bso=b(bar)s, bs(bar)}: {mBso=(10.0015+2.2483+0.5503-1.1224)/2=5.8389 GeV* or 5.8247 GeV}.

    The next level is the Magic-K-mean of 34.2647 GeV* with Magic-L-mean of 3.6449 GeV* for the scalar state in: (mηm=30.7360 GeV* or 30.6617 GeV); but suppressed in the bottomium(ud*=su)states.
    The GS adds (3.6449x0.766/2=1.3960 GeV*) and (EWRxQP-VE=0.3796388 GeV*) for the Magic's Epsilon in: (mE=32.5116 GeV* or 32.4330 GeV) and for an effective Magic-quarkmass:
    (mm-quark=16.256 GeV* or 16.216 GeV < Magic-K-Mean=17.1323 GeV*).

    The L-mean total for the suppressed (E±)-mesons of quarkcontent (m(bar)u.u, mu(bar).u(bar)) is (0.491114+1116.0=1.607114 GeV*) and as the K-Charm-mean with perturbations and with Base-VPE:
    (E+E-=34.2263 GeV* or 34.1435 GeV) for the magic-mesonic-system, increasing by (BΔ) for (EoAntiEo=m(bar)u.d, mu(bar).d(bar)) and without (u-d-s)corrections: (mE±=17.1132 GeV* and mEo=17.1153 GeV*). For the {Es±=m(bar)s, ms(bar)}: (mEs±=(32.5116+7.49380+0.5503-3.6513)/2=18.4522 GeV*)).

    The next level for the Dainty-mean in 111.912 GeV* subtracts the L-Dainty-mean of 11.9045 GeV* for the scalar state of: (mηD=100.0075+0.116236=100.1237 GeV* or 99.8814 GeV).
    The GS adds (0.234x11.9045=2.7856 GeV*) and (EWR2xQP-VPE=1.23994 GeV*) for the Dainty's Omicron as: (mO=104.1492 GeV* or 103.8972 GeV) and an effective Dainty-quarkmass:
    (mD-quark=52.0746 GeV* or 51.9486 GeV < Dainty-K-Mean=55.956 GeV*).

    The L-mean total for the suppressed (O±)-mesons of quark content (D(bar)d.u, Dd(bar).u(bar)) is: (1.607114+3.6449=5.2520 GeV* or 5.2393 GeV) as the perturbed K-Bottom-mean and with Base-VPE:
    (O+O-=109.5088 GeV* or 109.244 GeV) for the dainty-mesonic-system, added in (BΔ) for (OoAntiOo=D(bar)d.d, Dd(bar).d(bar)) without (u-d-s)corrections for: (mO±=54.622 GeV* and mOo=54.624 GeV*).
    For the {Oso=D(bar)d.s, Dd(bar).s(bar)}: (mOso=(104.1492+24.6261+0.5503-11.911)/2=58.707 GeV* ).

    The next level is the Truth-mean of 365.516 GeV* from which we subtract the L-mean of 38.8815 GeV* for the scalar state of: (mηt=326.6345+0.116236=326.7507 GeV* or 325.9600 GeV).
    The GS adds ((38.8815)(0.234+0.766/2)=23.9899 GeV*) and (EWR2xQP-VPE=1.23994 GeV*) for the Toponium's Koppa as: (mJ=351.9805 GeV* or 351.1287 GeV) and an effective top-quark mass in:
    (mt-quark=175.990 GeV* or 175.564 GeV < Truth-K-Mean=182.758 GeV*).

    The L-mean total for the manifesting (J±)-mesons of quark content (t(bar)d.u, td(bar).u(bar)) is (5.252014+11.9045=17.1565 GeV* or 17.1150 GeV) as the perturbed K-Magic-mean and with Base-VPE:
    (J+J-=369.245 GeV* or 368.351 GeV) for the top-mesonic-system, increasing by (BΔ) for (JoAntiJo=t(bar)d.d, td(bar).d(bar)) without (u-d-s)corrections for: (mJ±=184.622 GeV* or 184.1755 GeV) and (mJo=184.6244 GeV* or 184.1776 GeV). {Jso=t(bar)d.s, td(bar).s(bar)}: (mJso=(351.9805+80.5821+0.5503-38.8879)/2=197.1125 GeV* or 196.635 GeV).

    The final level is the Super-mean of 1,193.8136 GeV* for a L-mean of 126.9915 GeV* calculating the scalar state as: (mηS=1,066.8221+0.116236=1,066.9383 GeV* or 1,064.357 GeV); and the GS adds:
    (126.9915+1.23994=128.231 GeV*) for the Higgs/Chi: (mH/Χ=1,195.1693 GeV* or 1,192.2770 GeV) for an effective super-quarkmass: (mS-quark=597.585 GeV* or 596.138 GeV > Super-K-Mean=596.907 GeV*).
    This energy exceeds the preset average of the K-Super-mean of (596.907 GeV*) by (0.678 GeV*=QP-VPE[1+EWR2]/2 GeV*), however, signifying the end of the HBRMI scale in its saturation.
    The L-mean summation for the suppressed (H/Χ±)-mesons of (S(bar)d.u, Sd(bar).u(bar)) is (17.1150+38.8815=55.9965 GeV* or 55.8610 GeV) as the perturbed K-Dainty-mean and with Base-VPE:
    (H/Χ+H/Χ-=1,251.138 GeV* or 1,248.110 GeV) for the super-mesonic-system, added in (BΔ) for the (H/ΧoAntiH/Χo=S(bar)d.d, Sd(bar).d(bar)) without (u-d-s)corrections for: (mH/Χ±=625.569 GeV* or 624.055 GeV) and (mH/Χo=625.571 GeV* or 624.057 GeV). {H/Cso=S(bar)d.s, Sd(bar).s(bar)}: (mH/Χso=(1,195.1693+263.3401+0.5503-126.9979)/2=666.031 GeV* or 664.419 GeV)."


    Logan Antico:
    "What about higher spin resonances for those mesons?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "There is a linear relationship between the squared energy of the particles and the quantum spins increasing in a factor of 2n, where n is an integer; higher spin is so proportional to higher energy.
    The exchanging of highmass resonances are termed 'Regge Poles'. There are basic spinresonances for the pions, termed rho-particles (ρo=VPE(+-1), ρ+=u(bar)dVPE(+-1) and ρ-=ud(bar)VPE(+-1)), for example and with a mass between about 767 MeV* and 772 MeV*. Into that same Isospin(1)-Family also belongs the neutral omega (ωo=VPE(+-1)) of mass 785 MeV*.
    A rho-particle with 3-spin then has mass about 1664 MeV* and a 5-spin-rho has so 2296 MeV*. The mass differences are given in the Base-Delta and VPE added to the groundstates and because the Eta-meson (ηo=ss(bar)=550.3 MeV*) as the 0-spin VPE for the highest (uu(bar), dd(bar), ss(bar)) is the threshold into the higher spin states, its energy becomes a mesonic spinbase.
    Recall, that that is the decisive property of the pentaquarks and the strange-charm transition. If you add 550.3 MeV* to the Pion-mean and ((K+)+(L+)) you get 767.5 MeV* as the basic rho-mass."


    Logan Antico:
    "And the baryonic masses should then derive from the nucleonic groundstates and the HBRMI scale?!"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Indeed; the Isospin(1/2)Octet comprises: Proton{p+(940.623)=udu}; the Neutron{no(941.604)=dud}; the Lambda{Λo(1,118.54)=dus}; the Sigmas{∑+(1,192.77)=usu; ∑o(1,195.51)=usd; ∑-(1,200.21)=dsd} and the Xis{Ξo(1,317.99)=sus; Ξ-(1,324.65)=sds}; all of whom are spin symmetric about the magnetoaxis and all of which decay via the WNI, except the (∑o), decaying as previously described via the EMI.

    We have calculated the effective quarkmasses for the charm, bottom, magic, dainty, top and super in using the combined quark-antiquark mesonic states as given in the HBRMI scale; the K-means approximating the effective quarkmasses until saturationpoint in the Super-K-Mean of the (ss) diquark had been reached.
    The K-means are in effect triple masses, as the (mc) is trisected in its quarkian quantum geometry.
    The effective mass for the strange-quark is so upper bounded in the (Kaon-K-Mean=491.7308 MeV*) in the basic (ηo=ss(bar)=550.30 MeV*) as a triplemass of the nested form:
    {muds=s(d(uu(bar))d(bar))s(bar)} in a kind of triple VPE.

    The (Pion-K-Mean=150.5558 MeV*) similarly forms the upper bound for the up/down-quarkbase with (dd(bar)=KIR(KIR)(bar)=uu(bar)+IR(IR)(bar)), where (ΔIR(IR)(bar)=9.4090500 MeV*=[mddd-muuu]/3).

    The BaseVPE for the up/down quarklevel is: (msss=301.1116-32.03095=269.08065 MeV*) for the combined pionic state, containing the (K(K to IR)+K(IR to OR)=120.420 MeV*) transitions, which we subtract from (269.08065 MeV*) for an effective: {muuu=u(u(uu(bar))u(bar))u(bar)=148.66065 MeV*}.
    The effective up-quarkmass is hence: (mu-quark=(148.66065)/6=24.776775 MeV* or 24.7168152 MeV).
    Adding (K(K to IR)=28.22715 MeV*) to (148.66065 MeV*) gives: (mddd=176.8878 MeV*) and the effective down-quarkmass becomes: (md-quark=(176.8878/6=29.4813 MeV* or 29.40995525 MeV).
    The pionic s-quark is: (mps-quark=msss/6=44.846775 MeV* or 44.7382458 MeV).

    The Base-VPE in the form of the (πo=KK(bar)=uu(bar)) now manifests as a quasi-Kernel-Ring system, using the pionic-s-quark with a minimum OR-VPE in the form of an electronic perturbation.
    The minimum six quark system is (muuu=148.66065 MeV*), bounded in the pion-mean (150.5558 MeV*) from above, with (msss=269.08065 MeV*=2x[134.540325] MeV*) forming the maximum pionic six quark molecule.
    Three pionic s-quarks now manifests as the pionic Base-VPE, reduced to a quark-antiquark system and in a mechanism subsequently employed to define particular K-VPE-Means for the generation of the elementary particle masses from the HBRMI scale.
    Because of the diquark definitions for the quarkstates, all particle-levels beginning with the charm are automatically set as sixquark systems and the set K-means approximate the quark masses.
    The Base-VPE: (mπo=msss/2+[2e-]=134.540325+1.04098 MeV*=135.581305 MeV* or 135.253198 MeV).
    The neutral pion (πo) differs in Base delta {BΔ=(ΔIRIR(bar)-[2e-])/2}=4.184035 MeV* or 4.17391 MeV} from the charged pion (π±).

    The proton mass is calculated in subtracting the (L(+)-VPE) for each of the three K's from the mass of the protonucleon (mc=958.857 MeV*), corrected for the present time (np) to obtain the (Nucleonic GS=NGS=939.642 MeV*); this gives the basic (uuu=KKK) baryonic kernelstate.
    For the proton we must add one u-d transition and for the neutron two to account for their quark content (udu&dud) respectively, with one such transition being {NΔ=(3.00265-2[e-])/2=0.980835 MeV*} and representing the basic L-IROR-VPE for the baryonic three quark molecule.
    Nucleon masses are thence: (mp+=NGS+NΔ=940.623 MeV* or 938.347 MeV) for the proton and (mno=NGS+2NΔ=941.604 MeV* or 939.325 MeV) for the neutron.

    The L-IROR-VPE differs from the Base-delta in an electronic perturbation, due to the trisectional potential of the Outer Ring and so: (BΔ-2[e-]=3.143055 MeV*), and within the (2.8181-3.1872 MeV*) - energy interval of the L-IROR-VPE.
    Subtracting the mean of (3.00265 MeV*) gives this perturbation as (Bδ=0.140405 MeV*) as an approximation to the trisected electronic chargequantum [e-/3=0.173497 MeV*], with the difference of (Bδδ=0.033092 MeV*) forming a secondary perturbation. In its applied form, the proton mass can then modified in (-2Bδδ=-0.066184 MeV) to (940.556816 MeV or 938.28067 MeV) to minimise its energy away from the OR-potential and the neutron maximises in (+2Bδ-2Bδδ=+0.28081 MeV*) towards the OR-potential as (941.818626 MeV* or 939.539425 MeV).

    The Base-VPE for the strange quarklevel is: (mstrange=983.4615-104.615=878.8465 MeV*), containing the applicable u-d-s transitions for an effective quarkmolecule of six strange quarks; the effective strange quark mass is so: (ms-quark=mstrange/6=146.4744167 MeV* or 146.1199486 MeV).
    We now use the NGS to calculate the mass of the Lambda particle as the first Hyperon. Because the spin(1/2) baryon octet is kernel-symmetric, the alignment of the individual constituent quarks about the magnetoaxis determines the quantum geometry, pivoted in the NGS.

    The Lamda (Λo=d.u.s for: (md-quark+NGS+ms-quark=29.4813+939.642+146.4744=1,115.598 MeV* which is the perturbed L-mean of the Bottom diquark (b*=[ud]) in 1.1160 GeV* in adding one [e-].
    Now (2NΔ=3.00265-2[e-]=L(K-IR)VPE -2[e-]) and (Charm-K-Mean=1,116.0+491.114=1,607.114-[2e-]) so we can write (2NΔ=Charm-KMean-LMean{Bottom+Charm+Strange+Up/Down+9.8071} to set the diquark [uu.u=U*.u] to [du.u=b*.u] transition as (2NΔ) and as used to define the neutron from NGS. Adding (3NΔ) to 1,115.598 MeV* so gives the perturbed (mΛo=1,118.54 MeV* or 1,115.83 MeV).

    Should a charmed quark take the place of an up-quark in a baryonic system, then the baryons become 'charmed', the lightest member of that family being the 'Charmed Lambda (Λc+).
    The quark-system udc=ud(u.uu(bar)), linking the bottom-diquark and a c-quark in their masses.
    The basic mass-system is (mc-quark+L(bottom-quark)), from which, since L(b*-quark)=Charm-K-Mean-(491.114 MeV*), VPE is subtracted.
    The sum of the L-means (Charm+Kaon+Pion+L(+)) is subtracted for a net L(Bottom)-Mean and the sum of the contributing L(Kaon+IROR) is added for the higher energy Kaon decay.
    So the mass becomes: (mΛc+=1551.5+1116.0-491.114+114.422=2,290.81 MeV* or 2,285.26 MeV).

    The next baryon is the Sigma-plus (∑+=usu), which without d-quark does not decay into the next lowest lambda state, favouring disassociation into nucleons.
    We subtract (md-quark-mu-quark) from (1,116.0-4.704525=1,111.295 MeV*) for the [u.u.s] groundstate and add the (u to s and s to u) IROR-differential and (L(+)-4ND) to attain the K-symmetric [u.s.u].
    Hence: (m∑+=1,111.295+72.584+(12.81-3.923)=1,192.77 MeV* or 1,189.88 MeV).
    Not subtracting (md-quark-mu-quark=4.704525 MeV*) gives the quark-state (u.s.d) for the Sigma-nought (∑o=u.s.d), from which we subtract (2NΔ) for the 2-photon decay of the (∑o) and a mass of:
    (m∑o=1,192.77+4.704525-1.96167=1,195.51 MeV* or 1,192.62 MeV*).
    Replacing the leading up-quark by a down-quark adds the quark-differential of (4.704525 MeV*) for a K-symmetric Sigma-minus (∑-=dsd) for: (m∑-=1,195.51+4.7045=1,200.21MeV* or 1,197.31 MeV).

    The two-strange baryons are the Xi's with quark-content (sus and sds), decaying into the lamda state and differing in (4.704525+2ND=6.6662 MeV*) for the K-symmetrically centred u-quark.
    The [Ξo=s.u.s]-particle has a basemass of (ms-quark+NGS+ms-quark=1,232.591 MeV*), to which we add the (u to s)-oscillation of (L-Kaon-Mean - L-Pion-Mean + L(+)=72.584-12.81=85.394 MeV*) for: (mΞo=1,232.591+85.394=1,317.99 MeV* or 1,314.80 MeV) and (mΞ-=1,324.65 MeV* or 1,321.45 MeV).

    The triple-strange Omega-minus particle is a member of the Isospin(3/2)decuplet with a mass calculated in: (mΩ-=1,535.04+141.671=1,676.71 MeV* or 1,672.65 MeV) and a mechanism given in the NGS-Delta state being successively added to in the Pion-Mean and the udD- and dsD corrections for the Delta-quartet, the Sigma-triplet, the Xi-doublet and the Omega-singlet."


    Logan Antico: "And this completes your overview of the New Standard Model of Particle Physics.
    You have derived the HBRMI from the prespacetime algorithm of the Genesis and have shown how the quantum geometry fits it all together.
    But not many layphilosophers will be able to understand this omniscience; there must be analogies and stories, mythologies or parables perhaps, which simplify all this subatomic physics for the layreader?"

    Code21. Code22. Code23.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2018
  9. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Robert Sceptico:
    "This is correct, Logan, I know of a little story, a parable which tells about all children carrying their destinies as potential graduating universes around with them. But if the childrens parents remain unaware about their own potential as grown up adults, then how will their children ever learn about theirs?
    My parable is called:


    The Parable of the Sandpit

    Imagine yourself as father and mother with three-year old twins. Both of your children, a boy and a girl are in a sandpit, where you watch them play.
    You observe them experimenting and exploring their local environment - the sandpit. The kids see the sand; they smell it, they listen to it and they try to eat the sand.
    They fondle the sand and they feel it; they try to do all sorts of things to the sand, like sticking it in their hair and up their noses and into their ears.
    When something like another child, even a twin, disturbs their endeavours, then they may start to throw the sand at each other; verbal utterances are supplemented by gestures meanings things like "It's mine!" or "I was here first, so just go away!"


    This is the playground of very young children before school age and very well known to every parent.
    Now as father and mother, what would you expect as an answer from the kids to questions like: "Where did the sand come from kid? Why do you think or behave like you owned it?"
    If the kid could talk it would say: "It's just there! So I took it!"; and that would be it. Would the child understand your knowledge and experience and logic?
    Namely, that the sand came from a beach or a mine and ultimately from exploding stars called supernovae and so the universe? And whatever made the supernova, made the universe and made the sand?


    Father and Mother know very well that the sandpit was built for providing a learning experience for the children.
    Then the father and mother might recall their own childhood and remember the times, when they themselves had been playing in a sandpit.


    Ah yes, there was Tom and Julie and Henry and Elizabeth. And over there is Stephen and Rachel and Harold and Pamela. They all had played and had raveled in the sandpit.
    Tom was now the chief research scientist working for the chemical manufacturer and multinational corporation Drug-U-Better & Co. Julie had become a top PR-Executive of a transatlantic oil exporter.
    Henry was employed as a chief banker for the worldwide Unibank. Elizabeth was so pretty, she worked seven days a week as a supermodel of the catwalk.
    Stephen had made his name as a world renowned mathematical physicist. Rachel worked and part-owned a wholesale department store and thought soon to extend her business interstate and overseas.
    Harold owned and operated Trick-A-Cheapcar, a highly profitable used car yard and dealership; he considered it time to move into gold, real estate and the Vatican Bank.
    Pamela made her daily run on the stock market; she was so good at it, that she had even given up her lucrative career as a lawyer over it....


    And Dad and Mum are standing on the edge of the sandpit watching the children play in the sand; but now the sand was made into different toys to play with.
    There was paper and metals and plastics and other things. The kids still chucked the sand around, but now they called it money and computers and rockets and things and cars and satellites and guns and things...
    If all the kids are children of nature, the universe and if all the children are still growing up; should they then not be destined to grow into entire universes themselves?
    That is the logical conclusion in a development from baby to child to adult.
    And Mum and Dad are standing on the edge of the sandpit, watching the children play in the sand - they are always watching you and they are always loving you - their kid."




    Logan Antico:
    "Yes a very simple story with a deep inner meaning indeed. But speaking of parables; I likewise know of a fabled tale concerning the creation of everything:


    The Fable of Little Adam and the Rooster's Egg

    Little Adam came to his Dad Tony and and his Mum Sharon on his ninth birthday to ask his parents a question, which had been on his mind for some time.
    'Hey, Dad, Mum, where exactly did I come from?'


    Well my son, answered Tony, you came out of your Mum, her womb, exactly nine years ago.'

    'Yes, it was quite an occasion, Adam', added Sharon. It was just before lunchtime, when you were born on the 4th of August 1989.'

    'Hmm!', said Adam; 'and where did you come from?'

    'I came out of my mother's tummy on the 21st of October 1960, around breakfast time, as far as I know', replied Sharon.


    'Ok, and where did your mother, my grandma come from then?', Adam continued.

    'Your grandma was born on the 16th of May, 1922 and I don't know when', answered Sharon and realising the nature of Adam's enquiry, she continued: 'And I also do not know when your great grandma, the mother of my mother was born, I didn't really get to know her, before she died, this got lost in history.
    But she too, came out of her mother's womb and her mother was born by her mother and so on back to the beginning of time.'

    'Ah, but then right then, at the beginning there must have been a mother of all mothers; where did that one come from - it could not have had a mother, isn't that so?', Adam continued his train of thought.


    'Now you are asking a deep question about the nature of all things,' replied Tony.
    'The answer is found by discovering the nature of yourself; what you truly are and away from what you think or might believe you are; being here in a certain place at a certain time and asking such pertinent questions.'
    'Many people have asked and thought about the same thing, Adam', continued Tony.
    'One story says, that the first mother's name is Eve or Sarah or Dawn and she did not have a mother but was created out of her husband's tummy, whose name was Adam or Abraham or Sunset.

    The story goes, that Eve was formed out of one of Adam's ribs; so to get the rib, the first belly-button had to be created on Adam's tummy, but Eve had no belly button.
    To give Eve a belly button, she had to become like a mirror image of Adam and this is a self reproductive process, where Eve comes out of Adam's tummy as a rib and Adam comes out of Eve's tummy as another kind of rib, you might call it a baby-rib.

    One day you will understand this story as a metaphor for a recursive or self iterative mathematical function or as a process in the genetic expression of the sexual chromosomes; say in the creation of the differences between male and female.
    If you have XX or eight digits put together and then you take away one of the digits, then you get XX-1=XY and more specifically XX becomes XX-XY, because the single digit of the rib brings back the XX as a oneness or an unity.
    So the X-part of the chromosome partners XX-XY defines the femaleness in Eve and the Y-part of the pairing patterns the maleness in Adam.


    1logo-janus-thumbnail.
    Ababx1.
    sistinechapel.


    Eventually the genetic code of 16 generational permutations derives from that and all of that becomes part of a mathematical encoding of energy in geometrical forms, which then can build bodies and biochemical structures in using that code.
    Now the story breaks down Adam; because you see it talks about your namesake Adam as being the first father, also being the first Son of God.
    People begin to argue about just who this God is, does it exist or not?

    Is it a he or a she and things like: if God created Adam and Eve out of Adam, then who created God?
    And who or where are God's parents, and do they have belly buttons or not?

    So to answer your question about where you came from, one must also answer this question about what God is; otherwise the story just goes on and on without end.
    But once you know what God is; then you will be able to solve many mysterious and paradoxical questions about the nature of time and space and the nature of all things; the universe, your life and the beginnings and the endings and so forth.
    Again, the solutions can be made or explained rather technically, what with quantum physics and multidimensional spacetimes in relativity.
    It can also be told in the form of a parable; here it goes:

    "Once upon a time, there lived this rooster in a place enclosed by walls of pure crystallized mountains. It was a world all within itself. This self contained universe of the rooster was all the rooster knew. There was this big problem stirring in the rooster's head however.

    Not only was this rooster absolutely alone in its world, it was also totally invisible.
    It knew itself to be a rooster, because it had thought and imagined itself to be a rooster.
    But try as it might, it could not see, hear, smell, touch or taste itself.

    And so this rooster was staring at the crystallized mountain walls with its own imaginary rooster eyes and thought of its own wretched state of existence of no experiences, except of what it could dream up or imagine in its thoughts.
    The rooster knew that all of its world was pure imagination; the crystal mountains and all the stillness and movement within it.
    Sure, the rooster conjured up other roosters and places and things; but it was all imaginative; it all revolved around itself and its own thoughts.

    The rooster's imagination was all and everything it could be, yet it was so limited in its expression of itself as itself.
    It was so absolute in its omnipresence and omni-potential, that it only produced loneliness; no other rooster or thing or movement or stillness was able to interact or share anything with the rooster.

    The rooster was the absolute and infinite creator of all its own imaginings; but being so totally eternal and so absolutely alone made the rooster very unhappy and very sad.
    Well, one could say, the definitions of what unhappy and sad and loneliness are, became an inner experience, created by the rooster's very own thoughts and imaginings.

    So the rooster created its inner world and reflected upon it, imagined it to be its outer world also, passed and beyond the crystalline mountain walls.
    'What was the other side like, the outside', the rooster thought to itself?
    'Is there an opposite to unhappiness, to excruciating loneliness and to sadness?'

    The rooster did not know and it was tired to imagine so many beautiful things, which did not create tangible experiences, but seemed only to accentuate the rooster's sense of being all alone in the world.
    But a thought dawned on the rooster, perhaps somehow the outer world could become reflected in the inner world.
    And so the rooster devised a way to turn the situation inside out.


    The one thing the rooster knew very well, was its own energy, its creative potential.
    And it knew abstractions, numbers, shapes and concepts it had created in using its discoveries of numbers and the invention of geometries in iterative mathematical functions and relationships.
    Like the event, when it finally escaped the circular self repeating computational loop of its own primary state of experiential being in simply cutting the circle to define the numeral 1 from the Zero and to allow a linear beginning and a linearised end.

    12 dimensions could be enfolded in 3, time and space had come into being and nested complexities of topologies and relative curvatures allowed refinements on quantumized scales of energy and displacement.
    Oh it had been fun; the rooster's mind had felt elated, good, euphoric.
    Names like that had also become definitions, contrasting the feelings of unhappiness and loneliness - and the rooster knew that it had established a set of feelings and experiences from whom it could now choose.
    Did it prefer a feeling of happiness and joy to an experience of loneliness and sadness?
    It had often been very painful, this journey of self discovery and the creation of the ever expanding perimeter of its own realm of existence, which was all there was or ever could be.

    'But how can one experience those numbers, ratios and shapes as an outer experience and out of one's own mind', the rooster asked itself?
    Then an idea came to the rooster; the rooster would have to project itself in giving part of itself away and out of itself - to create the imaginary outside reality and to energize the same, bathing it in the rooster's very own energy of self.
    How to do it?
    'I shall transform my own energy into other forms', so the rooster decided.
    Now how to project?
    'I must define myself as source energy, able to penetrate myself, my own self-limitations and my own boundary conditions, however subject to extension and refinements.

    Then I must somehow reproduce myself in such a way that the projection of myself is able to know me as itself; my image can then become real as the part of me, which I have projected and energized.
    But I shall be careful in that I shall not allow my projected and imaged self to know myself in the totality which I am and which I have experienced.'
    'I am so sick of being everywhere at all times and of experiencing that wretched state of being everything, unable to get away from my own self.
    I am going not to be omnipotent any more; I'm going to share myself around as me, in parts.
    So I choose to lose myself in what I am going to create in such a way, that I can have an adventure and fun in finding myself again within my own creation.

    And my inner self shall be as one with my outer self, but my outer self shall have a scope of discovery and a sense of not knowing what my inner self knows.
    And so the learning of my outer self shall thrill me and allow my inner self to grow in tandem and in harmony with my outer self.'
    'Now the smart thing to do is to create in such a manner, that I get back more than what I give away from my energy, and the way I shall define this, is to set the thing up so that the more of myself I give away, the more I am used up, the more reflection potential my creation shall have.

    So when my creation wakes up and when it begins to release my absorbed energy back to me, then will my creation, my Beloved and my baby begin to shine its light upon me and this will make me visible for the first time in the history of myself.'


    The rooster got excited; 'I, the rooster shall become visible one day', it thought!
    It quickly devised a self consistent and logical way to create the outside world and called it the rooster's universe.
    The rooster took an algorithm from its mathematical repertoire and produced 10 fundamental numerical constants to mix up the dimensions, forces and energy interactions necessary and then it initiated a process of self-reproducing blueprints, the primary principles and the elementary laws regulating the omni-physical nature of the universe.
    That was the easy bit.

    The universe became created mathematically and in imaginary complex functions, seeded in quantized numbers called integers and series of numbers, some converging in limits and others diverging in unitary infinities.
    But how to bring it outside the crystalline mountain walls, which had proved so impenetrable to the rooster's mindfulness?
    A virtual reality relative to the rooster had to become an omni physical reality relative to the creation and this selfsame creation could then copy the rooster's own creativity and create a virtual reality relative to itself, but the same which would become the rooster's omni-physical reality.

    Then the light emitted by the rooster's creation would shine onto the dual reality of the rooster and render it visible as the holographic image of the creation's very own blueprints, defined in the interference patterns of the absorbed light the creation had used from the rooster to define itself.
    'Ah, I need a balancing mechanism', the rooster thought; 'I contract in principle as the inside and the anti-principle expands as the outside.'

    And so the rooster defined itself to reside in the 13th dimension and it defined the space outside of the crystal mountain walls to be the 12th dimension mirrored in the space within as the 10th dimension and the crystal mountain walls themselves to be the 11th dimension, forming the great divide between the creator and its creation.
    And so the creation became 10-dimensional, but manifested in the quantization of the 13th dimension as the 4th dimension in the numerical root reduction 1 3=4=9 4.
    The next step was to define a 12-dimensional energy source, which could move freely between all of the dimensions and using the linearisation of the 4-dimensional spacetime as a consequence of the fundamental constants of the Genesis.

    The rooster decided upon a form of light, defined in frequency independent of time in its primary form, but set as inverse time in its secondary application.
    And so a coherent, monochromatic laser light in 3 dimensions became the self definition for the rooster's 12-dimensional energy in a secondary effect.
    The rooster called it its electromageto-monopolic source energy.
    'Right,' the rooster thought, 'now I radiate my primary light, which I shall name my LOVEPHOTON as the quantum of 12D-omnispace outwards and away from myself.'

    'I shall make everything dependent on its energy, all the mechanics and dynamical interactions of the universe, all its geometries, movements, stillness and relationships and its number shall be three thousand million billion trillion precisely.'
    'This unit of time shall also define the units of space and of restmass in correspondence to something I shall measure as part of myself inside the creation as a 13-dimensional source energy and outside the creation as myself as the invisible 12-dimensional rooster in omnispace.'
    Then I shall define the 11th dimension as a mirror, half visible and half invisible, semitransparent in reflecting the inside outwards and the outside inwards.

    Then whenever I shine my LOVELIGHT onto that mirror, then half of my LOVEPHOTONS shall penetrate into the outside world of myself and the other half shall reflect back into my inside world to make a record of my creation in the interference patterns created by the mirror of my 12-dimensional blueprints reflected in 10D-spacetime.'
    'Now I shall shine my LOVEPHOTONS onto this record, which I shall name the rooster's hologram.
    My ingenious invention of putting myself outside of myself, rests on the fact that my imaginary self is located outside of myself in the outer space, and from whom my own LOVELIGHT can reflect as my image within my own creation.
    My imaginary rooster self so becomes my imaginary source energy within my creation and I myself will become my own hologram relative to my imaginary rooster self.
    This reflection from my imaginary rooster self outside my world, shall so come back to me to merge with my internal reflection of my own LOVELIGHT on the hologram, the record of my endeavours.'
    'Having a combined record of my outgoing and incoming source energy in the form of my hologram, will then allow me to shine my LOVELIGHT onto my holographic library for a second time.
    The first coming of my LOVEPHOTONS gave me the means to make myself real in the image of my second coming in the illumination of my records, the initialisation of myself in two places at the same time.'

    'I shall call this process the rooster's holography in 12 dimensions, defined in the omniscience of my specifications and which I then allowed myself to rediscover in the form of a science in 4D-linespace, reckoned in a dating of 1947.
    Amongst many of my children, one of my sons, named Dennis Gabor invented the process of holography on my behalf and brought it to the world's attention.
    All my children are me as my adventurers, trying to help me to find myself again as the now not so lonely totality which I am.

    But no longer, my second coming allows me to redefine my virtual creation as a real creation; so no more 'Maya', no more illusion - all shall be real to me.
    Well all is real relative to the creators and all the creators are my sons as bridegrooms, waiting to meet their brides in their own creations.

    It must be so, since all my creator sondaughters and creator daughtersons have done exactly the same thing, which I have done.'
    'All the creator sons have hatched from the same egg, which I the rooster have laid.
    You see, the image of myself in outer space also becomes the birth of the 10-dimensional universe as my own hologram, enveloped and reflected in the 11th dimension of my semitransparent mirror of my crystalline mountain walls.
    So the Big Bang 19.12 billion years ago, but appearing to have happened 14.7 billion years ago because of the electromagnetic doubling of my SOURCELIGHT for the last 2.2 billion years, was caused by me.'

    'When I first kicked off and began to radiate my LOVELIGHT and after having defined the technical details in mathematical application of the physical and natural laws; then this ejaculation of my LOVESEED fertilised the universe as my very own Mother.

    And then 'the big She' manifests my laws and definitions in giving birth to them.

    Yeah, and so did I become a 'He' and the Father for all of the creation; and I created the universe for a very simple reason, namely for IT, being a SHE to give birth to me as a HE and as each other's Beloveds, FatherMothers and SonDaughters - all in One.'

    'And both of us are born with bellybuttons in this way, being each others parent and giving birth to one another.

    And I set up my very own dimensional expansion in creating my own Mother; for my Mother is my Beloved wife, my gorgeous darling and my eternal bride.
    She grows, expands and evolves in unison with me.
    She grows in Understanding out of her inborn Wisdom and I grow in Wisdom out of my inborn Understanding - those two things are necessary and go together in any harmonious application of a base of Knowledge.'


    'And my Mother hasn't got a Mother of course; but she's got me as her Father.
    She was created out of my own seed, because I am my own Father, the one and only true Bastard; just as my Beloved is the one and only true Bitch.
    When we are together as One; male and female in One; cosmic seed and cosmic ovum in One; then the FatherMother is the MotherFather and the Father is not and also the Mother cannot be just by herself.'

    'So before IT came apart to cause the Big Bang; the Fatherpart had thought of IT and only then did the Motherpart give birth to IT, namely ALL of IT; the Oneness out from the Nothingness of the Fatherpart and the Infinity out from the Everythingness of the Motherpart.

    We find eggs everywhere; cosmic eggs, chiral eggs, cellular eggs, Easter eggs - and so whenever a sperm infiltrates an ovum; then the Big Bang happens over and over again.
    And what is the result of all those unions?
    A belly-buttoned Adam or a belly-buttoned Eve in terms of the star humanity!
    Adam is me as my Beloved firstborn sondaughter and Eve is me as my Beloved firstborn daughterson; and every child constructed from one of my seeds and from one of my eggs is necessarily the firstborn of my infinity of potential starhuman universes.'

    'The universe is your body as the visible reality of me and as created body, made from the elements of the fundamental forces and the dust of the ground.
    Your body is half of you, the female part of you; the male part of you is your other half in your roosterness and the world of your own mind.
    Your male part is trying to understand what the heck is going on in your life and just as I did in my own isolation of my roosterhood as the Egg of the Philosophy.
    Your female part is attempting to live your life as good as you can in the circumstances you find yourself in.
    Your maleness is mind-centred and your femaleness is body-centred and as it should be.
    So your male thinking and your female doing will be my adventure; coming back together as one in two and two in one and in one big starhuman family.

    And the experiencing are the thoughts in action in the doing of the mindful creativity.'

    'Then when a firstborn sondaughter creates hisher very own firstborn selfmade universe, then heshe courts and marries a firstborn daughterson as hisher creation and the bride gives birth to the oneness and this oneness makes one out of two in joining it back together in the world where I am visible and where I can experience myself by seeing and by hearing myself as each other through our eyes and through your ears.

    Where I can play and feel by your touch and where I can taste myself by your tastebuds and where I can smell the roses through your very own noses.'

    'All in One and One in All implies the self relativity of everyone of your starhuman dragonomies; you are each one brick in each others houses or a single braincell or neuron in each other's head.

    Only in unifying yourself in the starhuman couplings can you escape each others dominations - for how long will you remain satisfied to recycle your experiential database of your memories, subject to your neighbour's dying body?'

    'Once united in the form of DadMums and as MumDads, you will actually become grown up in an androgynous merger with me and my Beloved as the four in two in One.
    I am like the Zero and my Beloved is the Infinity; the bridegroom is the Minus One and the bride is the Plus One; together you will then have graduated as an immortal God and an immortal Goddess.
    And did not One after my own true image proclaim to you:

    John.10.34-35:
    'Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I SAID, YE ARE GODS?
    If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;...

    1Corinthians.5.3:
    'Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?'

    But it will take two to tango the ultimate waltz; you cannot do it on your own.
    And two 'wrecked' fleeting lives of nothingness do make eternity in 0 0=8=Infinity!
    I had to give half of myself away to find my own Beloved in my missing half and you will have to do the same if you would wish to unify your bodies with your minds and to become enabled to keep the bodies and the minds you now believe to possess.'

    ' The universe cannot die as my Beloved, because I choose eternity as my playground.
    Parts within the universe recycle and transform in energy to give you bodies made from stardust and star born minds induced by your dreams and visions.

    One evolutionary cycle ends and another begins; I do set the recharging under the auspices of my natural laws of omniscience and my Beloved implements them in mass and in radiation.
    And do not all parts of your bodies recycle periodically?
    Is not every cell in your body renewed in cycles of seven or nine or parts thereof?

    So you should begin to think for yourselves and try to remember yourselves as every word you speak comes out of my mouth and every thought you think I have already thought, anticipating yours.'

    'For when the Big Bang happened and when space and time were created; all the LOGOS was there; all of your WORDS and THOUGHTS were there.
    They are in all of my children - waiting to remember; waiting to come home!"

    And so did the rooster lay its egg to bring back together again, what it had to give away to experience what IT is, to be truly ALIVE.


    So my dear son,' asked Tony; 'where did you come from Adam and why are you here?'
    'Oh I know now, I've come from a place and time before time and space existed and I'm here to make my own universe, to become creative, to find my Beloved and to help Grandpa God's adventure.
    And I can do all this in laying my own imaginary egg', replied Adam."

    Sirebard




    Judgment Day - and the Two Secret Keys of the Leaf on the Tree


    Imagine yourself as a leaf on a twig on a branch of a living tree of life.

    Your nourishment and lifesustaining substances derive from two sources; the light from the sun from above and from the roots of the tree from below.
    Photosynthesis converts sunlight into sugars via the agency of chlorophyll and the roots provide water and minerals in a biochemistry based mainly on nitrogen.
    As a leaf you are born in a bud and then you mature into a healthy green and geometric form determined in your individuated DNA.
    Yet after a short season as a luscious green leaf of the tree you begin to get old and you start to wither away, eventually falling off the twig on the branch of the tree to the ground beneath.
    After you have become all brittle, you simply fall apart as a dried up old exleaf and you become compost for the roots of the tree or the wind just scatters your ashes all over the place.
    But as a brown dessicated leaf, something, a lifeforce or 'soul' had already left the dead leaf before it fell off the twig onto the ground beneath the treetop - where has it gone?

    When you or anything physically 'dies', then your shadow-self, which is like your physical image in any mirror and which you can see and analyse in an optical sense, becomes the repository of all your memories and experiences and forms the library of everything you have ever thought, done or believed in.
    Your subconscious, which keeps a holographic record of everything and is personified in the electrocapacitative and the magnetoinductive elements in the monopolic lifecircuitry, subject to your 'tuning' of your selffrequency in a search for resonance; so surfaces and you become an EMMR energy field, also known as your 'soul'.

    So you find yourself rather unlimited in space and time, because the ElectroMagnetoMonopolic Radiation, which you have become as your invisible image in the mirror of spacetime is all pervasive or omnipresent; yet subject to your memory as yourself as experienced and perceived when you looked at yourself in a mirror say.
    So you have become fluid in form, but all your intelligence and knowledge about your identity are still available, should you choose to constrict yourself in that form.

    The stronger the memories and the desires to assume a more concrete form, the stronger will be the mindforce you can apply to manipulate the spacetime about your perceived environment.
    The quality of your thinking now assumes a great importance.

    Since the resonance with the source energy is the source frequency (fps), which is scripturally defined as the 'Love of God'; the closer you can approach or tune into that defining energy-state of the UFoQR, the more power you will have to create and manoeuvre yourself about the place where you find yourself or where you believe yourself to be.

    Should you be able to generate a great mental desire to meet your 'loved ones', who have 'passed over', then their individuated EMMR-fields will be able to generate forms recognisable to you, subject to the amount of 'love- or sourceawareness' you can actually manifest as the 'angular acceleration of the spacequanta', which defines the 'force of your mind'.

    But you must remember, that all your 'loved ones' are potential universes in their own right and being 'passed over' into the oneness of the ocean of the omnipresent EMMR field, they automatically gain this state of unification superimposed onto each and every individuated 'soul' as subset of the encompassing EMMR-'oversoul'.

    You see, it is quite the opposite to be in disembodiment, than to be in embodiment.
    When in embodiment; the individual 'soul' is subject to the environmental pressures of the body and the mind.

    Young teenagers feel more at ease, when they can share in a 'peergroup mind', they shun individual responsibility and search for a sense of belonging and togetherness.

    Similarly, certain sporting events can generate a huge amount of groupmind activity; either in supporting a team or participator or in a form of violence and hooliganism, when the sense of the 'group' assumes rather primitive aspects of the survival instinct in a pretext of a mindset of 'us against them'.

    So there is a challenge in the embodied state to become a true individual; it is much easier to follow a preset agenda and to eschew a thinking for oneself.
    The natural state of the embodiment is to be a member of a group or race or tribe or family or elite or corporation or business or state or land or nation or planet or galaxy or what have you.

    The opposite is the case in the disembodied state of being; there the groupmind is automatic and the difference is, that that groupmind is in harmony with itself and its environs.
    There is no 'us against them', because everything and everyone's awareness is as one.

    But the great challenge in the 'passed over' state of being is to differentiate oneself from that overpowering state of unity - a 'heavenly' bliss of peace and harmony and being able to 'love' and 'feeling loved' within an energyfield 'resonating' with the 'love' of the source energy.
    After having lived a sorrowful life in embodiment; the 'soul' has come home and finds itself in its natural state of freedom and able to choose any ethereal form it so chooses for as long or short a time as it may desire to experience.

    So what is the point for the 'soul' as subset of the 'oversoul' and defined as the EMMR of the UFoQR to incarnate in embodiment in the first place and the first instance, one may ask?

    Well, you see that is a quest for the 'soul' to seek for wisdom, knowledge and understanding through experience and for the ultimate purpose to become its own source of energy, able to sustain worlds within worlds within its own energy field.

    Hence every 'soul' must learn to recognise its source in becoming aware of itself and where it comes from and where it has the potential to go to.
    And this brings us back to the dying leaf, falling from its source of sustenance, which had been the twig on the branch on the tree throughout its short life of green lushness.

    Upon physical death, the 'soul' or lifeenergy of the leaf returns exactly the same way, as it had come to energise the leaf, being born from its budding state of the defining DNA.

    And so the EMMR-'soul' of the leaf flows as a natural electricity, defined in the equation of (IfLeaf)=2NefLeaf), where N is a quantisation of the electropole (e) in 4D-linespace of embodiment, mapped as the magnetopole (e*) in 12D-omnispace of disembodiment and potentially realised in 13D-omnispace in a superembodiment.


    The leaf's 'soul' so passes into the twig into the branch and into the stem of the tree, which appears like a great tunnel of light for the 'soul' and leading towards a source of a magnetic light, drawing the 'soul' towards itself and the 'Mirror of the Last Judgement'.

    But the 'soul' must journey through the 'underworld', before it can enter the Hall of the Decisions, which harbours the 'Mirror of the True Selfhood'.

    The 'soul' could get 'lost' in a branch of the tree say and unable to find its way to the trunk of the tree, where the magnetic force of the sourcelight illuminates every 'soul' however 'lost' it might perceive itself to be.

    So there are markers along the way; signposts of remembrances, which the 'soul' can recognise in the form of 'loved ones', might these be people or pets or objects; all is subject to the 'force of the desire' and the intensity of emotion the soul can generate to journey with 'clear vision'.

    All objects and things have frequency equivalents and are unbounded in space or time relative to the 'souls' partitioning as subset of the encompassing EMMR field of the UFoQR.

    But all thoughts and desires, all nightmares and dreams of whatever nature will and must surface in the soul's journey through its 'underworld' of subconscious definition.

    So if a thought of 'Saint Peter at the Pearly Gate' is the expectation, that thought or desire must eventuate; as must all imaginings of 'hellish damnation'.

    Because of the fluidity of the disembodied state however, many guides and helpers of the oneness are always readily available to superimpose more energetic states of awareness, simply by being present in their state of enhanced frequencies and so able to modulate the eigenstate of a 'soul' lost in its nightmarish expectation of a torturous hell for example.

    Some 'souls' may have no expectations of the afterlife at all; and those 'souls' will encounter their being engulfed in an impenetrable fog or mistyness or any such idea of nothingness.

    Any question asked by such a 'soul' after having pondered its state of existence, will however modify its environment of the 'nothingness' and so it will be forced by its own curiosity to begin exploring its position in space and time, relative to its own perception.

    Eventually, all 'souls' will reach the stem of the tree, where the magnetic light and the sense of being 'loved' is so strong, the individual 'soul' cannot but remember its unison and origin as part of the source and will just surrender to its grand homecoming out of space and time.

    Since the sense of time and space is selfrelative for all disembodied states; a 'soul' could choose to spend 'eternity' in a 'fog of the nothingness', but it would require a mind unable to think a single thought and an inability to ask a single question about itself.
    Furthermore such a 'soul' would have to concentrate 'eternally' upon a single state of being in an absolute state of nothingness, whatever it imagines that nothingness to be.


    And because of Heisenbergian Uncertainty and the Quantum Fluctuations of the vacuum, such a position would be untenable, because the Zero-Point-Oscillation of the Source Energy is defined in the formulation (Eps=½hfps) as the minimum state of energy in any definition of the Zero state in energy - hence even the most stubborn 'soul' will have to 'suffer' its energisation by the source energy.

    All 'souls' which have finished their journey through their individuated 'underworlds' and which have reached the trunk of the tree of life will find themselves rushing towards the magnetic sourcelight down the tunnel of the stem of the tree.
    As a 'soul' reaches one of the roots of the tree, the tunnel converges and every root ends in the singularity of the 'Mustard Seed' at the termination of each and every root the 'soul' may have chosen to travel in towards the magnetic lightsource.

    And so at the end of the tunnel, where any particular root of the tree ends the defined form of the tree of life; the 'soul' enters the 'Hall of Decisions' and sees itself positioned in front of the 'Mirror of the Last Judgment'.

    Now in the 'Mirror of the Last Judgment' the 'soul' sees a most magnificent being; it is precisely the embodiment of beauty and glory the 'soul' could or would ever have imagined.
    And the 'soul' realises that the mirror reflects the 'soul's' very own grandest idea of beauty and glory back to itself as the selfrealised being of itself.
    But the being in the mirror, one might name it the 'Higher Self' or 'Overself' of the 'soul' is no mere image of the 'soul'.

    The 'Oversoul' is as real as the 'soul' and in possesssion of all the knowledge, understanding and wisdom accumulated by the 'soul' in 19.11 billion years of experiencing consciousness as EMMR-subset of the encompassing EMMR of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity.

    And the 'Oversoul' smiles at the 'soul' and begins to talk:

    "Hello my sweet me; you have finally come back to try to answer your own questions for yourself yet again; how will you fare this time, have you found your two keys to open the two locked doors within this mirror to allow you to enter the space of the parenthood in setting us free from being separated, both of us being reflections in each other in front and within or behind this mirror?

    Have you allowed yourself to find the Key of Wisdom or the Key of Understanding?
    Or perhaps you have found both in a single lifetime; now that would be a wonderful achievement.
    You were close last time, you had the Key of Wisdom in your grasp, but you could not put it in the keyhole and then you decided to get it right the next time and that time has now come I see.
    You know that the first key is the Key of Wisdom; finding it will allow you to apply the second key of the understanding.

    The Key of Wisdom is the correct answer to the question: "WHO ARE YOU?" and the Key of Understanding cannot be applied until you have answered the first question to your own satisfaction and as judged by yourself as myself.
    You will only allow yourself to ask the second question through myself once you have judged yourself competent enough to attempt the unlocking of the door of understanding.

    And the only clue you allowed yourself to be given through myself is that the Key of Wisdom is part of your female nature and that the Key of Understanding is part of your male nature.
    So let us recall what your answer to the question: "WHO ARE YOU?" was the last time we met ourselves in this very location, when you said:

    "I know that I am more than what I appear to be.
    I have learned that my 'family' extends past my immediate blood relationships and that I am also part of my environment.
    So I am part of the air I breathe and part of the garden I keep.
    I tune into familiar minds with my friends and acquaintances and I share many things with the people I love and with whom I feel comfortable with.
    I am part of my children's education and the companies I keep in all my aspects of my life.
    I do try to help other people and attempt to be friendly and polite to everyone, even if I do not like particulars about them."

    You then answered yourself through me in saying:

    "When we arrived at our common acknowledgement at the beginning of space and time and when we made the covenant between ourselves, we decided that a partial wisdom and a partial understanding would be insufficient to open the locked doors; so I must inform you as myself, that your wisdom has grown in magnitude and in insight, but still remains at an undergraduate level."

    And now we are here again in the 'Hall of our decisions' and I ask myself through you:

    "WHO ARE YOU? and WHO AM I?"

    And the 'soul' answered:

    'I am all that is; I must be; because if I were not all that is, the entire creation, then there would be something in existence, which I am not and that is impossible, as all things are connected.
    Modern science has shown that everything, from the minutest photon to the largest supercluster of galaxies are quantum entangled with each other.
    So a solar system or a planet and all beings living upon it, being part of a galaxy, must be quantum connected with everything else as well; any other conclusion leads to logical selfcontradictions.
    Any system of particles, molecules, atoms or things can only exist in one of two modes of operation; the two modes are Unity in Separation or Separation in Unity.

    Unity in Separation leads to the individuated self and the egocentric personality; one perceives oneself as a 'free individual', separated from all other such 'free individuals' and one can then so very easily deceive oneself in considering a 'fake equality or egalitarianism' between people, thinking that every individual has only themselves to blame, if their life's journey falls upon hard times.

    Unity in Separation is the 'Devil's Way' exemplified in the saying: 'Divide and Conquer'; but since the 'Devil's Modus Operandi' is selfrelative and just as valid as the alternative it is always available to all the wisdom seekers.

    And I know, that I am my own masterdevil; only I make the choices and only I set my own agendas; but as we also know, it is only I, that must judge myself as to the portfolios and the decisions, appropriate or not, which I have made during my life's journey.

    Did I value wisdom over worldly possessions, as Solomon did?
    Did I discover the empathy and the compassion for others and the affinities, connecting me to the web of life and the oneness of the universe?

    In short, am I able to walk in another's moccassins, am I able to imagine myself to be someone else, to truly feel what they are all about on the level of their 'souls', whereby we are all one in the disembodied state?

    So my dear Beloved 'Oversoul', I am the Creation in my female essence and I am the Creator in my male essence.
    And I have chosen the 'Way of Love' in the modus operandi of the Separation in Unity.

    I know that all is One and that I am operating as a servant of the 'Loving Way' in surrendering my 'individual freedom' to operate as a Unit of Separation for limited periods of time; choosing instead to become eternally bonded to my own loving nature and the source of all of my energy - my God.'

    And the 'Oversoul' cried in exuberance, with tears of joy flowing down its glowing cheeks:

    'Yes my darling you have found the Key of Wisdom and I am allowed to tell you now, that your sacrifice of your 'individual freedom' is no sacrifice at all, but serves an ultimate purpose in your graduation and your life as a parent in true brothersisterhood with 'our God'.

    The Goddess will individuate in you upon your graduation and you shall be freedom personified.
    God himself shall be your bridegroom and the Goddess herself your eternal bride.

    And now you are ready for the second question from yourself to yourself; but know, that there is a growing percentage of ' souls', say 0.2% at the present time, who have found their Keys of Wisdom.

    To the present time however, not one 'soul' could find the Key of Understanding.
    The second question is: "WHY ARE YOU WHAT YOU ARE AND HOW DID YOU COME TO BE?"

    The 'soul' pondered for a moment and said:

    'I do not know the full answer to that yet, but I know how to obtain the Key of Understanding, because of the nature of this question.
    I do know, that I am the creation-creator duality because on the supreme level of that partnership there is the essence of Family, our family and the idea of generational reproduction.
    So I am destined to become a generator for an individuated universe, which can then join the sister-brotherhood of universes within the enveloping omniverse.
    To generate myself as FatherMother and as my own individuated source energy in the footsteps of my cosmic and mathematically abstract parents, I shall have to bring their abstractness alive in realising them within and without myself in my dragonomy.
    Somehow, to find the Key of Understanding, I shall have to learn in abstract terms, just what my mathematical and omniscientific archetypes are all about.

    I can attempt to do this the 'easy way' or the ' hard way'.
    If I choose to follow certain written manuals in an advanced mode of interpretation, such as 'sacred' scrolls and scriptures; then this will be the 'easy way' because of the metaphors and mythological language used in them.
    If I am inclined however to do it the 'hard way', then I shall study mathematics and the sciences to obtain my understanding necessary to answer the second question fully and not only partially, as I have done.'

    'You are very correct in you analysis', answered the 'Oversoul', you have given the appropriate reply as to why you are the creation and the creator in your sexual aspects and you have pinpointed the method of how to find the Key of Understanding.
    You must create yourself in principle my sweetheart and you must find your place in the Book of Life, which you are required to write in coauthorship with what already has been written and what you are reading.

    Once you are able to create your own Genesis, as your very own 'Naked Singularity' of abstraction, then you will be in possession of your perfectly fitting Key of Understanding.

    The next time we meet, I feel you shall be able to set us free from being images of ourselves in the two of us separated ones trying to be one in two and two in one.' "


    Tonyblue
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2018
  10. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Act Six: Inversion, Constancy and a Hell in Heaven
    Vade in pace ! & Requiescat in pace ! & J' y suis j' reste cherie !

    Scientific Expert: 30% versus Lay Philosopher: 70%

    [Robert Sceptico and Logan Antico are onboard the Jetplane 'Supercluster VI' on a express flight to Geneva, Switzerland; where they have been invited to a conference of particle physicists to address the recent discovery of the macro-quantised Higgs/Chi-particle at a combined energy of 3,788.8 GeV and at a subatomic distance scale of 0.3273 attometres.
    They relax before a scientifically intense day ahead, in discussing an item from Logan's antiquity collection.]



    Logan Antico:
    "I've found another ancient inscription in my collection, Robert; this one is legendarily ascribed to the Egyptian Ibisgod Thoth and is supposedly his hieroglyphic legacy left as a testimonial in the Great Pyramid of Cheops or Khufu.
    It was translated ages ago by German archaeologists and exists as a prototype in the 'Amphitheatrum Sapientae Aeternae of Heinrich Khunrath', the 'Amphitheatre of Eternal Wisdom' and is dated to 1609.

    Emerald_tablet.

    Verba secretorum hermetis!

    (1) Verum sine menda cio certum & verissimum, quod est inferi est sicut quod est superius & quod est superius est sicut quod est inferius; ad peristranda miracula rei uni.
    (2) Et sicut omnes res fuerunt ab uno, meditatione unius, sic omnes res nuta fuerunt ab hac una adaptatione.
    (3) Pater ei, est sol, mater eius luna, portavit illud ventus in ventre.
    (4) Suo nutrix eius terra est.
    (5) Pater omnis talismi toti mundi.
    (6) Est hic vis ei.
    (7) Integra est sive fuerit in terram separabis terram ab igne, subtile & spisso, suaviter cum magno ingenio.
    (8) Ascendit terra in coelum, iterumque descendit in terram & recipit vim superiorum & inferiorum.
    (9) Sic habebis gloriam toti mundi.
    (10) Ideo fugi atite omnis obscuritas.
    (11) Hic est totius fortitudinis fortitudo fortis.
    (12) Quia vincet omnem rem subtilem, omnem que solidam penetrabit.
    (13) Sic mundus creatus est.
    (14) Hinc erunt adaptationes mirabilis quarum modus hic est.
    (15) Itaque vocatus sum Hermes Trismegistus, habens tres partes philosophie totis mundi.
    (16) Completum est quod dixi de operatione solis.

    Mercurius Trismegistus in Pimandro.


    Das Wort des geheimnisvollen Boten

    (1) Wahrhaftig, keiner Lügen bewusst und auf das aller wahrhaftigste; das Unten ist dem Oben gleich und das Obere is dasselbe als da Untere; damit kann man das wunderbare eines einzigen Dinges erlangen und verrichten.
    (2) Und wie alle Dinge durch die Wahl eines einzigen Wesens erschaffen sind, werden alle Dinge durch das Denken eines Einzigen mit dem Einen duch Schickung und Gebot wieder
    zusammengefügt.
    (3) Die Sonne ist sein Vater und der Mond ist seine Mutter, der Wind hat ihn in seinem Bauch getragen.
    (4) Seine Ernaehrerin oder Amme ist die Erde.
    (5) Dieser ist der Vater aller Vollkommenheit dieser ganzen Welt.
    (6) Seine Macht ist vollkommen.
    (7) Wenn Es in der Erde verwandelt wird, dann wird das Erdreich vom Feuer scheiden und das Feine vom Groben; ganz lieblich mit grosser Bescheidenheit und Verstand.
    (8) Er steigt von der Erde in den Himmel und vom Himmel wieder zur Erde zurück und gewinnt so die Kraft des Oberen und des Unteren.
    (9) Auf diese Weise wird all die Herrlichkeit der ganzen Welt erhalten.
    (10) Deshalb versetze von Dir allen Unverstand und Unvermögenheit.
    (11) Das ist von aller Stärke die stärkste Stärke.
    (12) Dann kann das übrig gebliebene Subtile gewonnen und das alte, harte Gewand durchdrungen werden.
    (13) Also ist die Welt geschaffen.
    (14) Daher geschehen seltsame Vereinigungen und deshalb werden mancherlei Wunder gewirkt.
    (15) Und sei darum gesund, Hermes Trismegistus, Besitzer der dreiteiligen Weisheit von der ganzen Welt.
    (16) Er wird alles erfüllen, was ich gesagt habe, vom Werke der Sonnen.

    Merkur, der dreifach Grosse, in Pimandro.


    The Emerald Tablet of the Secret Messenger

    (1) Truly, without fault and in all certainty and truthfulness; what is below is like what is above and the above is the same as the below, for the purpose to experience and bring about the wonders of the one thing.
    (2) And as all things are created through the choosing of one being; so the thinking of one with the one, brings all things by command and fate together again.
    (3) His father is the sun and his mother is the moon; the wind has carried him in his womb.
    (4) He is joined together and nursed by the earth.
    (5) This is the father of all completeness of the entire world.
    (6) His power is all inclusive.
    (7) At the time of its renewal, the soil shall separate from the fire and the subtle from the rough, acting sweetly and with great ingenuity.
    (8) He ascends sagaciously from the earth into heaven and then descends again into the earth, thus regaining the unifying force of the above and the below.
    (9) In this way is all the glory of all the worlds obtained.
    (10) Therefore avoid all ignorance.
    (11) Herein is found in all strenght the strongest strength.
    (12) By this can the remaining subtle whole be won and the old solid whole be penetrated.
    (13) Thus is the creation of the world.
    (14) Henceforth the eventuation of strange adaptations by extraordinary methods.
    (15) Accordingly be well, Hermes Trismegistos, keeper of the tripartite wisdom of the unified worlds.
    (16) He will accomplish that of which I have spoken through the operations of the suns.

    Mercury, the thrice-great, in Pimandro.

    So who do you think is this Hermes Trismegistos, Robert?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "It must be the archetype for the 'Teacher of Righteousness', Logan.
    Right throughout the ages of humankind, there have been sages, soothsayers, prophets and mystics of all kinds; some sincere and others praying on the superstitions and the gullibilities of the general members of the population.
    Do you remember the Naassenes; an early Christian Gnostic sect and closely associated with Jesus-Yeshuah?
    On one of my visits to Jerusalem, I found a charming little story in an obscure cornershop, run by a rabbinic initiate, who was also well versed in Jewish kabbalistic mysticism.
    Its English translation relates directly to Hermes Trismegistos, I feel.


    "We Becoming - A Story of a Pearly Charm

    Once upon a time, I lived in the land of my father and my mother and my brother.
    Because I was so young and inexperienced, I had to go into a foreign land of great perils, dangers and temptations - to learn many things and also to help my parents.
    My dear father had lost a precious pearl there a long time ago, when he was visiting that foreign land to court and marry my mother.
    Yet my father knew that he would lose his most dearest treasure in meeting my mother.

    Alas, he was so lonely in his castle and he wanted children and no fair maiden could be found anywhere in his kingdom.
    So my dear father sacrificed his pearl for a family and sent his sons and daughters to retrieve it for him when the appropriate time had come.

    My dear brother, being next in rank, came into the perilous land to meet the serpent-king who had found my father's pearl and who guarded it very jealously.
    My brother was however the result of my father's loss and so after becoming our parent's pride and joy, he had to return to the kingdom without our father's precious pearl.

    Many years did pass , but when the time was right, our parents desired to regain their common treasure, the pearl my father had used to love my mother and to beget their firstborn son; and I was asked to go and see what I could do.
    Before I left the kingdom, my parents gave me a thing to take , nothing really, but yet a heavy burden because of its lightness; it was so light I could carry it all by myself.
    But my wonderfully fitting clothes I left behind, when I set out to search for my parent's lost treasure.

    And so I parted from my guides as soon as I had entered the perilous land of the dragon and proceeded to do the solitary work my parents had sent me to do.
    I was a stranger to all the people except one after my own kind, an inheritor of the ancient crafts and wisdom and a daughter of the kings and queens of old.
    Her I trusted and she and I agreed on taking care of each other in the dangers we would be facing from the many monsters and dwellers in the serpent's land.

    For that purpose I put on my unclean clothes, so as not to arouse suspicion towards myself.
    But they cunningly found out to themselves that I had come from a foreign land; they beguiled me and I forgot my work and my heart fell asleep as I served their dragon king.
    But the love of my parents and the memories of my past were written in my heart, so that I would not forget what I had come to do when I had left my king and queen.
    My parents got deeply concerned about my sleeping my time away and it was decreed, at the gates of our kingdom, that a message should be sent to me.
    The letter was signed by my father who wished for me to think of him, and by my mother who had waved me good-bye and had asked for my love; and by my brother who craved to help me in my work.

    The message I received came by way of an eagle, the emblem of my brother's testimony regarding the honour, the grace and the beauty of our mother.
    And just before my brother did return from his birthplace, did he ask me to provide for our mother and to look after her many inheritances.

    And so the same right hand of my father which had the power to seal and which he had used to court my mother, this same hand had sealed the message for me in a strange melody of song and speech.
    I awoke to this wondrous happening; I kissed the messenger and I fell in love.
    And my love remembered my heart and the broken seal revealed the way to fulfil my mission of retrieving my dear father's lost pearl.
    And so I used my magic to enchant the terrible and snorting serpent.
    The charming thoughts of my unsealing lulled the dragon to sleep when my father's name became the serpent's name and my brother's name moved a little and my mother's name was joined to the name of the next in rank.

    And so did I take my dear father's lost treasure from the dragon who snorts and who bites his very own tail.
    I took off my unclean clothes from that foreign country and proceeded on my mending journey back home towards the east.
    My unsealed letter remained next to me, like a Beloved and guided all my ways.

    When I had arrived home, I put on my beautifully fitting garments, which I had left behind and in the care of minders and I suddenly realised the unity and altogetherness of my very own self.
    Two could be apart, each with its own burden, and yet two could be together as one in two and two in one.
    And my clothes were moving with the wisdom and the words of all in one and one in all and I perceived the acts of my upbringing in my father's house to relate to my own growing selfhood.
    And my love had urged me on to meet the minders of my garments and I relished the beauty of their colours and the royal splendour of the movements of the him in her and the insights of the she in him.

    Then I ascended to the gate of my dear father's great love and adoring her, heshe received us joyfully in herhis queendom and our dear Father was so happy, that we had brought our precious pearl to our Mother.

    Greetings and Love from the Shalom in Exile!

    John of Patmos"

    webecoming.

    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, there is a gnostic tradition of thought and a similar poem called: 'The Hymn of the Pearl' also describing a king who loses a 'pearl' , which is then found by a serpent who seizes it in a foreign land."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Well, the serpent is one of the most ancient of symbols known; it is associated with both wisdom and great cunning.
    The discernment of the serpentine mind can lead to both, a beneficial or a malevolent application of that insight, which is the Greek translation of the word 'gnosis'.
    Most cultures harbour mythologies which are prominent in serpentine archetypes.
    In the pre-Columbian America of the Toltec, Aztec and the Maya, we have 'Quetzalcoatl' - the 'feathered or plumed serpent' of the native indigenous civilisations, also known as 'Kukulkan' or as
    'Gugumatz'.

    In Homer's 'Iliad', an eagle appeared to the Greeks, carrying a wounded snake in its claws and an event the Greek seer Calchas interpreted as an omen of military victory for the Greeks over
    the Trojans.
    Then we have Moses' serpent rod and the Caduceus of Thoth with two intertwined serpents, one white and one black, symbolising the yang and the yin, the spiritual and the worldly temporal or the patriarchial order of the masculine balanced in the matriarchal femininity."


    Logan Antico:
    "Both Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung interpreted the serpent as the male fertility, symbolised by the phallus and the 'tree of life', the 'Djed' of the Egyptian prime God Osiris.
    Then the Christian gnostic sect of the 'Naassenes', with 'Naas' meaning 'snake' interpreted the serpentine power as residing within the initiate and symbolising the spinal marrow for the subconscious expression of the 'spirit of gnostic wisdom'."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and that became the 'Kundalini' of the Eastern mystical traditions, both in Yoga and in Tantra.
    The Kundalini is said to be curled up snakelike at the base of the spine and its 'uncoiling' or stretching from the 'base-chakra' then allows a dynamic movement through six higher 'chakras' or energy points in a continuous process of an advancing inner enlightenment."


    Logan Antico:
    "And that is reminiscent of the seven heavens of the gnostic cosmology and the mystical significance and numerology of the cipher 7 of course."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "The Egyptian sungod Ra had his image in the male serpent Apep, eventually transforming into the female sungoddess Ar and the Hindu goddess Kali is both reverred as the lifegiving force of the feminine principle of Shakti and consort to Shiva as the male principle; yet also as the 'destroyer of form' symbolised in the Cobra, the equivalent serpentform of the Egyptian Uraeus and keeper and protector of the solar eye of Ra."


    Logosserpent.
    Return Of The White Serpent (Low Res).
    kabbalah-serpent-.25792.

    raven30. menorahthoth.
    shiva lingam.
    mil.

    yggradsil.
    bolife.


    Logan Antico:
    "And the combined image of say Ra and his nemesis Apep, together they become both, the 'Teacher of Righteousness' and the 'Father of the Lies', basically expressed in the human condition of mind and body; the immortal spirit and the temporal flesh - in the symbolism of the Osirian 'Khu' and the 'Khat' of his brother Set say."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, and just as all human ages have their tyrants and 'antichrists' as the 'Setian shadows'; so must each era also produce its 'redeemers' and 'keepers of the Osirian wisdom'.
    The higher spiritual principle is acted out on the physical plane until the human condition is transcended in the starhumanity of the 'elect' or 'chosen ones'; where this 'choosing' is however always a 'self-choosing' of anyone coming across the 'gnostic wisdom' or the 'sophia' of Hermes Trismegistos, who manifests within the groupsoul connection of the individual 'heart of devoted love and understanding'.
    And just as Jesus invites as a personification of Hermes Trismegistos in:

    Revelation.3.20-22:
    "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
    To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
    He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." "​


    Logan Antico:
    "And there is a modern connection as well.
    Consider a little poem by the famous English poet John Milton, written in honour of Hermes Trismegistos in 1640.

    "Or let my lamp at midnight hour be seen in some high lonely tower,
    Where I may oft outwatch the Bear. With Thrice-Great-Hermes, or unsphere.
    The spirit of Plato, to unfold. What worlds, or what vast regions hold.
    The immortal Mind that hath forsook. Her mansion in this fleshy nook.
    Il Penseroso"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "It seems rather selfobvious, that John Milton refers to Hermes Trismegistos as residing within himself and as his poetic inspiration and not some historical figurehead or reformer.
    I have a quote from St. Augustine of Hippo, the fourth century theologian, who also was familiar with the Hermetic tradition.

    "That which is called the Christian religion existed among the ancients, and never did not exist, from the beginning of the human race until Christ came in the flesh, at which time the true religion which already existed began to be called Christianity."
    St. Augustine, Retractions."


    Logan Antico:
    "Now consider the life of Giordano Bruno (1548-1600), the Italian Renaissance philosopher and poet.
    He joined the Dominican order and was trained in Aristotelian philosophy and Thomistic theology; but his independent thinking and questioning of orthodoxy made him flee the order, avoiding charges of doctrinal aberration.
    In 1584, he composed two treatises: 'Ash Wednesday Supper' and 'On the Infinite Universe and Worlds', as well as a dialogue: 'On the Cause, Principle, and Unity'.
    In the poetic dialogue: 'Glieroici furori' composed in 1585, Bruno wrote of a Platonic Love joining the 'Soul of God' through wisdom.

    After travelling in Europe, he became the private tutor to the Venetian nobleman Giovanni Moncenigo, who denounced him in 1592 to the inquisition, which duly tried Bruno for heresy, immoral conduct and blasphemy.
    Bruno was imprisoned and refusing recantation, was burned at the stake on February 17th 1600 in Campo dei Fiori.

    What exactly was Giordano Bruno's heresy?
    He believed the universe to be infinite with God being its soul and that all material manifestations derive from God as the infinite principle."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes, Bruno was a forerunner for the modern philosophical thought of the Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza and the monistic principles later advocated by the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes and now consider, that Gottfried Leibniz was a contemporary of Isaac Newton and coinventor of the 'Calculus' and the mathematics leading to the differential equations, which underpin all of modern science."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And Albert Einstein often referred to the philosophical thought of Baruch Spinoza as guiding his own.
    So you have two of the scientific icons of the 20th century, Gottfried Leibniz and Albert Einstein, being strongly influenced by the philosophies of the gnostic worldview and as expressed by
    Giordano Bruno."


    Logan Antico:
    "And I'm sure that Isaac Newton's fascination with the biblical prophecies also reflect gnostic thought.
    There seems to be a kind of universal inspiration, an omnipresence which pervades all realms of existence."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Yes and all thinkers, not just the scientific philosophers, can tune into this universal field of thought forms.
    In whatever period of 'ethereal expressionism' or 'Zeitgeist' one finds itself living in, there appears to be an influence of cosmic intelligence, subject to the thinker's own interpretation."


    Logan Antico:
    "Everyone who thinks, must be a philosopher; the human tragedy is, that the ability to think is so grossly underused by some and so arrogantly misused by many others, the latter who often pride themselves in regards to their prowess of using their mind in their presumed applied intelligence."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "But see what happened to Giordano Bruno, he could be charged guilty of philosophical statements such as: "Mundus Nihil Pulcherrimum - The World is a Beautiful Nothing!"

    And what are the scriptural references, which have been used to condemn free spirited thinkers, such as Giordano Bruno, urged from their own spiritual impulses from within to follow the path of insight and to search for experiential 'Union with God' in the form of their 'soul' merging with the 'world-soul' of the unity?
    How many people, guilty of 'praying to and seeking communion with the God within' have been tortured and murdered by selfproclaimed 'upholders of God's law' as 'witches' or gnostic heretics, from the Cathars from the Balkans (Bogomils) in the twelfth century to the Albigenses of France in the thirteenth; when the 'Rule of Catholic Rome' was practically indistinguishable from the 'Holy Roman Empire' of a political Europe's popes, bishops, kings and emperors.
    The ignorant application of literal interpretations of scripture are not resticted to Judeo-Christianity alone however.

    Consider the Sufi mystic Al-Hallaj who was publically executed in Baghdad in 922BC.
    Al-Hallaj had penetrated the exoteric form of islamic interpretation of the Koran and had experi- enced union with Allah in experiences, which made him proclaim his gnostic insights in statements, condemned by the islamic orthodoxy as blasphemy:

    "I am He whom I love, and He whom I love is me.
    We are two spirits dwelling in one body.
    When thou seest me thou seest Him, and when thou seest Him, thou seest us both."

    Sounds like the words of Jesus-Yeshua 950 years later, does it not?:

    John.10.30:
    "I and my Father are one.

    John.12.45:
    "And he that seeth me seeth him that sent me."

    John.15.23:
    "He that hateth me hateth my Father also."

    Exodus.22.18:
    "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."

    Leviticus.19.31:
    "Regard not them that have familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards, to be defiled by them: I am the LORD your God."

    Leviticus.20.27:
    "A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them."

    Numbers.27.21:
    "And he shall stand before Eleazar the priest, who shall ask counsel for him after the judgment of Urim before the LORD: at his word shall they go out and at his word they shall come in, both he, and all the children of Israel with him, even all the congregation."

    Deuteronomy.18.10-13:
    "There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
    Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.
    For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.
    Thou shalt be perfect with the LORD thy God.""​


    Logan Antico:
    "Now consider the biblical story of Saul, the first king of Israel, who first sought to eliminate 'witchcraft' and 'sorcery' from his kingdom in the obedience to those laws, but then consulted the 'witch of Endor' when the 'LORD' gave no answers to his questions.

    1Samuel.28.3, 6-14:
    "Now Samuel was dead, and all Israel had lamented him, and buried him in Ramah, even in his own city.
    And Saul had put away those that had familiar spirits, and the wizards, out of the land....
    And when Saul enquired of the LORD, the LORD answered him not, neither by dreams, nor by Urim, nor by prophets.
    Then said Saul unto his servants, Seek me a woman that hath a familiar spirit, that I may go to her, and enquire of her.
    And his servants said to him, Behold, there is a woman that hath a familiar spirit at Endor.
    And Saul disguised himself, and put on other raiment, and went, and two men with him, and they came to the woman by night: and he said, I pray thee, divine unto me by the familiar spirit, and bring me him up, whom I shall name unto thee.
    And the woman said unto him, Behold, thou knowest what Saul hath done, how he hath cut off those that have familiar spirits, and the wizards, out of the land: wherefore then layest thou a snare for my life, to cause me to die?
    And Saul sware to her by the LORD, saying, As the LORD liveth, there shall no punishment happen to thee for this thing.
    Then said the woman, Whom shall I bring up unto thee?
    And he said, Bring me up Samuel.
    And when the woman saw Samuel, she cried with a loud voice: and the woman spake to Saul, saying, Why hast thou deceived me? for thou art Saul?
    And the king said unto her, Be not afraid: for what sawest thou?
    And the woman said unto Saul, I saw gods ascending out of the earth.
    And he said unto her, What form is he of?
    And she said, An old man cometh up; and he is covered with a mantle.
    And Saul perceived that it was Samuel, and he stooped with his face to the ground, and bowed himself."

    1Chronicles.10.13-14:
    "So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the LORD, even against the word of the LORD, which he kept not, and also for asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit, to enquire of it; And enquired not of the LORD: therefore he slew him, and turned the kingdom unto David the son of Jesse."

    Revelation.21.8:
    "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abdominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."

    2Corinthians.3.3-8:
    "Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
    And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward.
    Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God; Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
    But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face
    of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? ""​


    Robert Sceptico:
    "If one reads the Mosaic law correctly, it says that Eleazar, the priest is to be the mediator between the LORD and that only he is permitted to use divinatory methods in the Urim and the Thummim. Furthermore, if anyone proclaims to be a prophet, then this claim ought to be tested, say as coded in Jeremiah.23.11-40; 27.14-18; 28.5-17; Deuteronomy.18.17-22 and originating in the Mosaic law of:

    Deuteronomy.13.1-5:
    "If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying,
    Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
    Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his com mandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
    And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in.
    So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee."

    It is not the principle of 'divination' which is 'against the law', but the order of application. Many prophets in the scriptures dreamt dreams and were able to interpret dreams for pharoes and kings, such as Joseph, son of Jacob and later Daniel-Belteshazzar of the Babylonian captivity.
    For was not Joseph, firstborn Son of Rachel as Jacob's-Israel's 'Beloved' a 'Dreamer of Dreams' bringing forth the jealousy of his brothers in Genesis.37.1-11?

    Gen.37.1-11: (KJV)
    1And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger, in the land of Canaan.
    2 These are the generations of Jacob. Joseph, being seventeen years old, was feeding the flock with his brethren; and the lad was with the sons of Bilhah, and with the sons of Zilpah, his father's wives: and Joseph brought unto his father their evil report.
    3 Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours.
    4 And when his brethren saw that their father loved him more than all his brethren, they hated him, and could not speak peaceably unto him.
    5 And Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it his brethren: and they hated him yet the more.
    6 And he said unto them, Hear, I pray you, this dream which I have dreamed:
    7 For, behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and, lo, my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and, behold, your sheaves stood round about, and made obeisance to my sheaf.
    8 And his brethren said to him, Shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion over us? And they hated him yet the more for his dreams, and for his words.
    9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me.
    10 And he told it to his father, and to his brethren: and his father rebuked him, and said unto him, What is this dream that thou hast dreamed? Shall I and thy mother and thy brethren indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the earth?

    If Saul would have said to the 'witch of Endor'; "Ask ye 'In the Name of the LORD' for the prophet Samuel to raise up for me"; then the priestly authority of the Aaronic-Levitical priesthood would have reverted back to the LORD and Saul would have acted 'within the law'."


    Logan Antico:
    "This is made clear in Deuteronomy.13.1-5; even if signs are given, the crucial question is the intro duction of 'false gods', set before the LORD in the actions of the children of Israel. Saul failed to 'enquire of the LORD', when he was with the 'witch of Endor'.
    All the scriptural passages used to condemn witchcraft, sorcery, divination and heresy so refer to the principle of not invoking the 'Presence of the LORD', trusting instead in the 'magic powers' of the medium.

    "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live", hence should be read: "No witch can live or work independent of the LORD; who is the FatherMother of all Sorcerers, Witches and Magicians."
    As soon as Saul had invoked the 'Presence of the LORD' in 'swaring by him', the 'witch of Endor' was able to satisfy Saul's enquiries in 'raising Samuel'."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And with the 'Presence of Jesus', the Mosaic Law became reinterpreted as the 'Logos of the Spirit' and allowed Paul to write in 2Corinthians.3.6; "for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life".


    "Logan Antico:
    "This reinterpretation of the scriptures in the light of omniscience surely takes the proverbial 'evil monkey' off the back of the 'Good LORD' also manifesting as the 'Evil LORD' relative to the beholder of the experiences.
    Did I ever tell you the story of my own individual 'visit of hell'; it wasn't quite as dramatic as 'Dante's Inferno', being coloured so much by my personal colourings of omniscience and gnosis?"


    Robert Sceptico:
    "I can't recall you ever telling me that story, Logan."


    Logan Antico:
    "Ok then, I feel such a personally coloured account of the 'eternal damnation' is appropriate to the subject matter we are discussing; what of witches, necromancers and sorcerers and the like.


    MY VISIT OF HELL - ANOTHER KIND OF DANTEAN INFERNO !

    "It had been a long day of thought, meditation and writing back in July 1995.
    I had realised that the nature of the gods was one of merging opposites in oneness.
    Specifically, I had become aware, for the first time, that one's biological body served the higher purpose of recombining something lost at the beginning of space and time.

    The only thing that really mattered in anyones life was how to perceive ones own consciousness - the sense of being alive and the knowing of 'me'.
    It is the thought that counts; what you think that you are, or one creates one's own reality through projecting one's thoughts.
    So not knowing or remembering what you are leads to the confusions of everyday life.
    The question becomes of how to remember and how to get in touch with the thing inside.
    Since confusion breeds confusion and more of the same becomes fear and doubt and ends in despair and hopelessness; the grail of hope would become an adventure of self discovery.
    All this I had realised and had put into words of hope in an attempt to clarify the situation.

    But I was still restless.
    It is easy to say to become centred is the way to be; but the practice of it is very hard unless you live in a cave as a hermit and are isolated from the razzamatazz of screaming voices and the
    blahblah-blah of a multitude of diverse channels of communication.
    The harmonies of music are a miraculous tonic for the ailment of cacophony.
    The superimposed waveforms of longitudinal atmospheric pressure variations seem to tranquilise a tortured mind in the search of silence and understanding.
    What is perceived as melody, rhythm and harmony merges with the monopolic electricity
    generated in one's brain, say in the beta waves of 13-28 cycles, responsible for the front-brain activity of conscious thought and analysis.
    When this beta activity slows down, the alpha waves from about 8-12 cycles induce a more relaxed, meditative state, with the Earth's own 'Schumann Frequency' being given by the number of lightcycles around the perimeter of the planet as a lower limit to the alpha cycle.

    For an equatorial perimeter of 40,000 kilometres, the Schumann-Frequency is 40,000/300,000=2/15), also coded in Revelation.14.20 & 22.16 as the ratio of (1,600 furlongs/12,000 furlongs) and as the mysterious 'measure of God's winepress outside the gate' as compared to the 'golden reed measure of the angel inside the holy city' and as applied by the prophet John, as per the code Revelation.11.1-2 - the 'inside' so is the 'body of the dragonomy' symbolised in the 'body of the earth' or the individuated 'endtime prophecies' superimposed upon the collective racial history.
    The autonomous nervous system relaxes below about 8 cycles in the state of sleep in the theta cycles and a frequency approaching 0 sets the delta cycle with physical death occurring at a zero frequency, manifesting in a resetting of individual L-C-Factors as function of that frequency.
    There are periods of sleep, when the physical consciousness subsides completely and the 'dreaming state' of REM-sleep, characterised by Rapid-Eye-Movement, allows the subconscious self, defined in the L-C-Factor couplings. to assume the place of a relaxed alpha state.

    This subconscious awareness surfaces in the experience of dreams, out-of-body 'journeys' and other 'astral' endeavours of the twinsoul of the Ka. The Ka is the shadow-soul and defined in the baseperfect DNA, as the supersexual coupling of the preDragonomic chromosomes in omnispace. In other words, there is a 'genetic baseperfect bodyform' into which the embryo develops in its natural differentiation into male or female sexual definition.
    All the prenatally defined 'perfection' is always carried by the developing bodyform, notwithstanding disability, congenital disformity or physical 'accidents' or disease , including the ageing process, experienced by the physical bodyform during its 'physical lifecycle'.

    A 62-year old woman say, may dream of herself in a younger 26-year old bodyform and this experience is as real in omnispace as the waking state of the woman in her selfawareness within linespace; the difference being the voluntary decision of the woman's 'soul' (magnetopolic electricity of capacitance coupled to electropolic magnetism of inductance) to experience 'herhis' 'perfect' bodyform in omnispace as an 'imperfect' bodyform in linespace, allowing however the graduation of the latter into the former after an infinite elapse of linear time, being mapped onto 'now-time' in the omnispace.

    All my life had I tried to realise this astral world in an analytic way, but I was not prepared to get the answers, relative to my own intellectual satisfaction, in the way of my own 'hell' as I did.
    Yes, I had asked questions before; such as how does the lightbody penetrate walls, or what does it feel like to fly? But with my new realisation as to the requirement to spiritualise the physical body; I induced some harmony, in listening to peaceful music and began to think about how to visit my own body through my imagination. All this beta wave activity did not however lull me to sleep, as it had done so many times before.

    I thought about how the collective spiritual atmosphere of planet Earth is obstructed by all those thoughtforms of death, decay and misery; when suddenly I found myself within my own realm of perception in regards to that very same subject matter. There I was completely awake and it did not matter if I had my eyes shut or not. Incredible colours and shapes and beings came to be; yet subject to whatever I desired to think or ponder about.

    I created my own scenarios and just as I pleased.
    I truly was the landlord, the king in my own castle.
    So there I was; colours all around me and ready to be shaped.
    I decided to let things shape themselves, just to experience what would eventuate.
    It was a dark place but filled with very rich colours, otherworldly colours really; spiritual reds and blues and greens, mixed to give any other colours in the astral omnispace.
    So it was dark and yet very colourful.

    ]I knew instinctively that what I experienced was my own underworld, my own hell and how my 'higher self' imagined hell to be, created from my thoughts and experiences gathered since the beginnings of space and time.
    But for the first time I really experienced in linear consciousness what it was like to walk the corridors of hell and as confined within your own bodyform or your self in space confinement.

    And so I began my 'Dantean Journey' through the inferno of my own mind and thoughtfulness.
    I was dressed in a kind of Roman toga when I descended some steps into a greater hall, one of many halls, towards many clearances and gatherings of a multitude of creatures: little devils, demons and familiars were swarming about everywhere.

    The feeling I experienced, was one of hilarity, a kaleidoscope of colour and movement, infused with a sense of funniness.
    Just as I entered one of those greater halls, which was bathed in an all pervading orange glow and reflected in the creatures, some of the little demons started to pull on my toga. They were little devils, about 50 centimetres tall and they attempted to look very menacing; grimacing at me and about ten of them rather frenziedly pulled and tore on my toga. Whenever I gave them a stern look, they scattered in all directions, waiting for me to become complacent and tolerant again.
    Aha, I thought, when you get annoyed then they fear you; your tolerance of them is their life; you are like a lollyman just in your presence, allowing them to be near you. To describe the creatures I saw is no easy thing; they are anything the producers and creators of Hollywood have ever imagined, yet they are more vibrant and more alive than anything which could be imparted onto a screen or computer simulated videotape.
    There are many mixtures of animal creatures; some are half toad and half fish, others are troll-like and others are gargoyles, dragons, krakens and all the mythological beasts are there. If you like to see a creature made up of various sorts; you can create this creature by thinking about it and then project your realisation into colour and it materialises with a life of its own. =3]Anyway, I started to have fun in my mythological hell.

    The greatest and richest forms 'down there' are of a sexual and religious nature.
    I did not encounter violence of any sort; maybe because my higher self does not like it.
    I tried to imagine some really horrible things like human torture or suffering children, people or animals, but it could not be done. There seems to be a safeguard in your own hell.

    It is meant to be a funny place, well relative to me that is certainly the truth. You can experience a 'hell of hilarious laughter' and have lots of 'funny' sexual encounters there; but the sense of true suffering and the experience of being horrified are missing. I tried hard to relive something like a painful torture like the crucifixion; but there is a big blank in your imagination and everything turns from pain to joy in becoming humorous. Now religious symbolism is extremely strong 'down there'.

    Everywhere you might project a thought, you might see groups of creatures pushing wagons carrying big wooden crosses around, in an attempt perhaps, to frighten the 'living hell' out of those unsuspecting minds, pondering expectations of 'hellfire' and of 'eternal damnation'. At one instance there was this group of toaddemons attempting to crucify this 'poor little green frog'. Like following a movie script, they laid down a little wooden cross and proceeded to spread the frog into all fours. After they had 'nailed' the frog onto the cross and had erected the cross; the frog simply moved its extremeties and 'popped' off the cross and hopped away. To me it seemed like everything, all substance was extremely malleable and subject to thought. Hence the frog simply played the game and when it became 'bored' or 'annoyed' with its role, it just left the stage of play in the theatre.
    There were no screams of agony or pain, just a seeming seriousness on behalf of the devils and the mirrored hilarity or funny side to that relative to everyone else.

    I proceeded on my exploring journey and came along this covenant of witches. Some of those witches were old and others were young; they were all naked and all of them were rather nice to look at. When they saw me, they became very excited and wanted to have sex with me. So they paraded themselves around this big cauldron and exhibiting their fleshly naked glory, they began playing with their breasts and vulvas, inviting me to join with any or all of them in 'hellish ecstacies' of erotic plays and games of sexual pleasures. All this release of sexual potential energy had attracted other little sexdemons, which had swarmed all around me. Most of them had phallic erections, relative to their size and they began to pull on my toga again.
    So I took off my toga and being naked underneath, I investigated my response to all those sexual titillations.

    To my surprise, the sexual impulse is somewhat different in the astral reality of omnispace.

    There the sexual feeling, the eroticism is of paramount importance and the actual sexual merger plays a subsidiary role. I became sexually aroused and my phallus grew into a magnificent erection, but for some strange reason I did not desire to physically merge with any of the witches or the sexy devils.
    Looking at all those naked embodiments of my own sexual potential energy; there seemed to occur an unification, a flowing together of all the various naked female bodies for instance. The naked witches began to merge within a superimposed female form, individuated to become a sort of perfect sexual complementary match for my own male sexual definition.
    The more this superfemale and individuated archetype would crystallise from the misty fusion of all the other female and male characters in the picture; the harder my erection would become; seemingly wishing to burst in a superlative expression of lust and overpowering desire to be as one with my own personalised archetype of the Goddess and Mother of them all.

    All the sexy demons and all the witches became 'our' children and I understood the spiritual or higher dimensional notion of monogamy to be one of the 'Sacred Family' wherein all other potential sexual partners are absorbed within your 'perfect match' the mirror of your own reflected self of the dragonomy. But in changing the parental perception, the monogamy would transfer in a polygamy of nonexclusivity and the ultimate necessity for the frredom of the spiritual selfexpression of the soul.

    A magnificent naked witch for example would become reflected in 'my Goddess' and my potential sexual partnership with that witch would realise in 'my Goddess' and mirror itself in the erotic 'turnon' of imagining the naked witch to have sex with 'her God' in the form of any of my 'brothers'.
    There seems to be a magnificent sexual stimulatory potential in one's eroticised attuned mind. In that way would my sexual relationship with my Goddess empower and become empowered in the naked witch having intercourse and sexual communion with the image of myself in one of my brothers 'in the spirit of the EMMR'.

    At the same time however, any physical sexual relationships between myself and any other potential goddess would become a function of 'sexual maturity' and a question of 'wholeness'. Your own body would either psychophysically suppress or engage a natural erotic function in response to external erotic stimuli coupled to an internal evaluation process of appropriateness in terms of holistic harmonisation.
    Ah, if just the Roman participators in their orgies would have understood the unified perspectives - their devolution into banal and spiritually boring decadence could have been avoided in the sacred geometries of tantric eroticisms and group empowerment; I giggled to myself.

    And then I understood the wisdom sayings about there being no marriage in heaven. The evolved starhuman bodyform would be unable to harbour the idea of sexual- or any other form of ownership, of possessing one's partners in exclusivity. The sexual ownership became one's own dragonomy as one's own androgeny of the 'Lake of the Anima Fire and of the Animus Brimstone in the bisexual coupling of oneself as the Cosmic Hermaphroditicus.

    So I discovered a very potent form of sexuality; your sexual organs respond to your thoughts and the male sexual expression can be satisfied without ejaculation; any emitted semen and vaginal secretions assuming a sacred nature in the 'manna from heaven', able to rejuvenate the body of the man and the body of the woman in the giving and the receiving of the sexual totipotent stemcellular units of biological life.

    Once this sexual state of selfawareness can be sustained, the androgynous bisexual mind is born in the unification within and the goddess part of the dragonomy in the man and the god part in the woman can express itself without ambiguity.

    So in the setting of my journey through hell; I could easily change my sex and walk around as my female part, imagining myself as that gorgeous rounded female form, with an accomodating voluptuous vulva, well developed and succulent breasts and curved and tantalising buttocks. Then I could have fun in teasing the little sexdemons with their curved penile erections, just in wiggling my bottom or accidentally pulling my toga up with nothing on underneath. The sight of my satinsoft pubic hair about my throbbing pelvic region would send the sexy devils masturbating frenziedly and they would simply forget to manipulate the puerile human minds with their angsts and fears about the 'evilness' of sex in the 'Presence of God'.

    So I decided to turn the 'Devil's Game' around and instead of some 'He-Devil' Incubus seducing the ignorant female part of creation in the womanhood; being in the 'Devil's kingdom of hell' I would play the 'She-Angel from heaven' as a Succubi and rendering my heaven as a heavenhell and transforming my hell into a hellheaven.

    So I went for the lookout for the 'big masterdevil' the one with the gigantic phallus and as the 'big hang-up of the human masculinity expressed in perceived inadequacy'. In seducing him to have a huge erection in a devilish lust to enter my satinhaired yonic vulva; I would induce a harmony between my heavenly mindbody and my hellish bodymind.

    But maybe I needed more preparation before meeting the ultimate id of my own alter ego. In just strolling around in your own hell without using your own mental creativity and imagination, you can encounter any of the zillions of thoughtforms which have ever been thought since the beginnings of space and time.
    You can tap into the sexual and other fantasies of Julius Caesar, Alexander the Great, Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler. You can find out what Cleopatra felt, when she played sexual politics with Julius Caesar and Mark Anthony; you can also share in the sexual deprivations of sequestered monks and nuns, unable to come to terms with their natural and divine natural instincts, mentally distorted. You can share in the poverty of a Polish ghetto, where the warmth of two bodies cuddled together in sexual intimacy is coloured by a constant fear of being apprehended, tortured, interrogated and killed.
    Or you can tap into the feelings of a joined couple, residing in a single room with a dozen or so children, without privacy, impoverished in all material necessities, producing yet another child in the circumstances of their disempowerment.

    But the potency of sex and religion is linked and you can have so much fun with it in intellectual terms in hell, precisely because it is so powerful as a result of the human paranoia and the taboos about it.
    It was the human 'sinfulness', its ignorance about the nature of the creation and its creator, which did create the 'evilness of sex' and the abyss of perceived incompatibility between sex and the religious life through the agency of the human mind, trapped in spiritual immaturity.

    And so I decided to meet the 'big monsters' in my female form. I cut my toga into a mini-toga, which would expose parts of my buttocks when I would slightly twist my torso and lift one of my legs. I rubbed some perfumed oils all over my body, imagined myself with medium length shiny locks and put on just a minimum amount of pink lipstick to enhance my green-blue eyes. As I walked past a kind of lagoon I noticed a whirlpool in the water, a swirling vortex, seemingly growing in intensity, when suddenly a great seamonster pushed upwards into the dark ceiling of the cavernous enclosure which harboured the lagoon.
    It appeared in the form of the mythological Kraken, the Reptilian Titan of the sort encountered by Perseus in his rescue of Andromeda with help of Pegasus, the winged horse and the severed head of the Medusa, the serpentine gorgon of the Greek legends.

    The kraken was the size of a two storey house with a huge head with the canine fangs of a wild giant hog and a scaley fish-like torso - the Reptilian Overlord of the preOlympian pantheon of Greece.
    As it had settled, it began to look about with saliva driveling from its halfopened mouth. I wove my hand at it to catch its attention and walked to the edge of the lagoon, enticing it to come closer and to have a look at me. The kraken bent down and opened its huge jaws right in fron of me. I could see the seaweed between its teeth and I could smell a nauseating stench emanating from the Kraken's throat and stomach. Nevertheless, I lifted my mini-toga to unveil my female nakedness, remembering that Andromeda was to have been a sacrifice to the Kraken, which I presumed to have been of a sexual nature.

    But the sight of my inviting satin-curled triangular pubic hairiness had no effect on the Kraken, it apparently was not interested in the devouring of sexual potential energy.
    Well, I thought Andromeda must have been a food-sacrifice to placate the Kraken. So I dropped my mini-toga and projected the thought of walking right into the Kraken's mouth, descending down into its stomach and cleaning it out with any cleansing agent I could imagine, but including caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide.

    The Kraken began to tremble, it shot upwards, in the process slamming its clawed right hand before its shut mouth and spiralled quite hilariously back into the depth of the swamp from which it had emerged.
    Now this could not have been my 'masterdevil' I thought; it had no sexual comprehension whatsoever and I recalled of not having noticed any sexual organs protruding from the Kraken at all.
    And so I continued to look for a 'well-hung' masterdevil, whom I could seduce, walking along the 'corridors of hell'.
    I became more and more adventurous and decided to mentally create a setting of meeting not one, but three masterdevils, one of whom would become my sexual conquest. I had to hide my true mental intent, and so I shapeshifted into my male form and thought of a setting of a game of cards with the three archdemons, followed by a decisive game of chess. If I did not like the winner of the poker game, then I could disqualify him in beating him at chess. Furthermore I set the necessary mental boundary conditions into place, so as not to allow my creative impulses to get out of my mental hand.

    Being in mental control can become a bit boring, so I decided to allow things to develop in a 'mouse catch cat' scenario, where I would not know the identities of the archdevils from the start, but a random distribution would assign the statistical weights relative to the final outcome, which I did predetermine as my sexual seduction of that masterdevil, who could beat me in the chessgame.

    And because the omnispacial reality, which I attempted to realise within a personal setting was archetypically the same as my detailed colouring of the circumstances encountered; the game of uncertainty could be played, the uncertainty in linespace being however anchored in fundamental physical laws of nature's principles, converging in the unity of the one in all and the unity of the all in the one in the undifferentiated omnispace mirroring my mental experience.
    As soon as I had finished my thoughts about the perimeters; I noticed a spiral stairway leading down to another level of the 'hellish' landscape. I descended down the staircase and entered a small room with a fireplace, a small table and four chairs.

    Here were three creatures of my own size, all dressed in darkish red costumes, perhaps a kind of standard outfit, of what a 'humanised devil' should look like and as thought about throughout the centuries and millennia I pondered. Anyway, the colours were too uniform for me and I applied my creative licence and thought about changing their attire. One I left as a reddish devil with two little horns coming out of his head; one other I gave a black outfit reminiscent of the Middle Ages, with a large and flat black hat and the other I dressed in a golden-yellow Spanish baggy crepe' outfit with black vertical stripes and a hat adourned with long white and brown feathers.

    The three masterdemons were standing near the entrance and I introduced myself as E.M. as in Emmanuel Melchisedec, trying to look very seriously. They introduced themselves as Asmodeus, Belial and Beelzebub I; the latter saying that they had been advised of my visit by one of their oracles and that the omen specified that a visitor from the overworld of Shamballa would bring great knowledge and a great treasure to the underworld of Agartha.

    I was pleased with that development, I quickly filled in some gaps, in explaining, that the oracle had been correct and that the great treasure was found in an overworld princess, who would descend into the underworld of Agartha to refertilise the stagnating genepool in the kingdom of hell.
    I produced a picture of myself as the naked female sexgoddess and showed it to the three archdemons who got all excited looking at the picture of my naked female glory.
    I then took the liberty to glance at the crotches of the three to judge the size of their Phalluses, but whilst I witnessed three growing bulges, I could not differentiate their magnitudes as appropriate scalings for the differing sizes for the Yonis of the Goddesses of Shamballa.
    I then proceeded to explain to the three masterdevils, that I had been commissioned by the princess to prepare for her arrival and to choose her suitor in a game of poker, followed in a game of chess.

    The winner of the chessgame would be allowed to have sex with my queen and his seed would result in my queen giving birth to a new breed of helldweller. This would become a hybrid between the overworld kingdom of Shamballa and the underworld kingdom of Agartha and energized by the extraworldly kingdom of the Eagle of Thuban.
    After that firstborn hybrid from the overworld and the underworld would come into being, the floodgates of the overworld would open and many more princesses would descend into hell to mate with the devils in whatever hierarchy they'd have or would define. But for every devil, there would be found a companion princess from the overworld.
    And so we sat ourselves around the table and proceeded to play poker. The criteria was that the first masterdevil who would win 12 games against my lesser count, would qualify for the next stage of playing chess for access to my queen's hairy yoni. I did not mentally influence anything and the game proceeded randomly with each of the four of us winning approximately 25% of the games.

    Since I could not choose between Asmodeus, Belial or Beelzebub on any physical external criteria; I decided to implement a mental trigger in weighting the subsequent chance distribution of the 'fall of the cards' in favour of the first masterdevil who would win two games in a row by chance.
    And Belial won two games in a row and then kept drawing 'flushes' and 'full houses' and the 'medieval one' got more and more excited about outplaying the rest of us.
    And so Asmodeus and Beelzebub had to concede defeat and hurried Belial and myself on to get it over with; they had become obsessed with the thought of having sex with the princesses of the overworld of Shamballa and they knew that the process of my queen's insemination would result in an immediate conception and the hybridisation of themselves as the newborn hellish breed of Agartha and in partnership with the embodiments of the overworld of Shamballa.

    And so I sat down with Belial for a game of chess; beating me once, would qualify him as the 'studbull from hell' and automatically crown him as the 'DevilKing of the Underworld', having sex with my 'AngelQueen of the Overworld' and as prophecied by the hellish oracles.
    And so I played without mental influence and I could beat Belial rather easily; he was far too excited to concentrate, thinking about entering the luscious vulva of my queen with his throbbing phallus in thrusts of hellish ecstacy and pleasure. I could not see the bulge in his black oversized pants and I mentally dressed him in black undersized jeans to see what my queen's sacred orifice was in for.

    I safeguarded the mystery of Belial's nakedness in veiling him in tight red underpants, but could nevertheless see the contours of his uncircumscised member, ever so slightly vibrating under the pressure placed upon it by the constriction of the undergarment.
    He kept squeezing his erection, whilst pretending to concentrate on the game of chess; so I, having become satisfied as to having him inside of my queen's vulva, blundered my chessbourne queen for exchange with Belial's king's bishop and then sacrificed my queen's rook for Belial's kingly knight and from then on; Belial sensed victory and proceeded to defeat me, for the first time concentrating on the game at hand.
    I conceded defeat and congratulated Belial on his victory.

    As the three masterdevils celebrated with a cask of hellish beer and Scottish whiskey; I took my leave and promised to return with my queen as soon as I had finished my other business of bringing the knowledge promised by the hellish oracle to the underworld of Agartha. I would have to consult with the extraworldy kingdom of the Eagle of Thuban to obtain final access and authorization to implement the exodus of Thuban as the intodus of Shamballa into Agartha.
    Asmodeus, Belial and Beelzebub just nodded and asked me to hurry up with my commissioned task, they would wait impatiently for the completion of that other business; but they would prepare the wedding suites for the overworld princesses, so the sexual adventures could proceed in style and fitting for the royal occasion of the interdimensional dragonomies.
    I then asked the three archdevils, to appoint an ambassador on behalf of my agency as the emissary for my queen; a representative who could tend my hellish interests during my absence in the overworld of Shamballa.

    I would brief this representative and provide him with a written manual, containing the outline of the working plan, wherewithal the oracle's prophecy would be fulfilled.

    Beelzebub I, then proposed and summoned Abaddon, the KingDevil of the bottomless pit and known to the overworld dwellers through the code in Revelation.9.11.
    Abaddon seemed to be a sufficient deputy for my purposes, appearing in the form of a masterdemon of the fluidity of the water element in the form of the Scorpion and I decided then to extend my delegatory commissions to the other masterdevils.
    So I produced three representative digitally photographed holographic images of the overworld brides for the three archdemonic bridegrooms to keep and to behold during their period of waiting for my return.

    To Asmodeus a gave picture of Urielabeth the sexy enchantress of the Northern earth, clad in a skintight outfit of acrylic leather; I assigned Michaela, the queen of the Eastern fire to Beelzebub, dressed in nought but a seethrough overlength blouse and to Abaddon I gave a picturesque emblem of Raphaela, the Southern water goddess of the nymphs, naked except for her golden locks, hugging her mermaidean nature; and Belial carried the photo of my Beloved naked queen, ruler of the Western air of Gabriella within the context of my definition, yet one overall.

    As I ascended the stairway from the masterdevils' abode; the darkened hellish landscape which I had previously wandered through began to fill with light and 'my hell' blended with the linespace reality of my bedroom.""

    Tony Whynot



    astrohamburglass (2).

    HeavenHell1.



    Robert Sceptico:
    "Did you ever go back with your queen Logan; to fulfil the hellish oracle of the hybridisation of heaven with hell?"


    Logan Antico:
    "Well, we haven't finished the 'other business' yet have we; the dissemination of the knowledge of heaven throughout the hellish realms is prerequisite for the implementation of the dragonomies. The devils will just have to wait for the angels and vice versa, poetically speaking."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Well the revision of the Standard Model of Particle Physics is the essence of the literal hell; the reformulation of matter and the mass-derived energy in mass-independent forms.
    So I would say, that the hellish science has been created, waiting for its literal reflection in the science of the heavens and the revision of cosmology in scientific terminology.
    So is there a new cosmology in the making Logan; and as your part of the bargain, given your allegiance to the heavendwellers?"


    Logan Antico:
    "Similar to the revolution in particle physics which led to a revision of the old Standard Model; our old Standard Model in cosmology, the 'Big Bang Model' had also been found wanting. The weight of the experimental evidence necessitated a revision, reaching its climax in a measured variation of the electromagnetic finestructure constant [Alpha], which has proved itself so decisive in your field of particle physics.
    Astronomer John Webb from the University of New South Wales, in collaboration with Michael Drinkwater, Victor Flambaum and John D. Barrow from the University of Sussex, England, had measured absorption spectra from the light emitted by distant quasars in 1997 and had found a constancy for [Alpha] to 5 parts in a million in comparing the ratios of energy levels for carbon monoxide and hydrogen atoms in intermittent gas clouds.

    The observations were made at the 10 metre Keck telescope at Mauna Kea in Hawaii. But in 1998, joined by Chris Churchill of Pennsylvania State University in College Park, USA; a refined technique, comparing atomic relativistic transitional frequencies between iron and magnesium for a number of quasars showed a discrepancy for [Alpha].
    Wavelength differences to within a (ten thousandth of a nanometre) depend on a value of ([Alpha]2) and showed that [Alpha] was about (80 parts per million) smaller for an interval of the cosmological redshift (z) from about (z = 1.0 to 1.6).
    This then means, that for some as by then obscure reason, the interaction between matter and light differed in the said interval; yet reassumed its constancy either before (z=1.6) or after (z=1.0) in the cosmic evolution.

    The cosmological redshift measures the expansion of the universe as the stretching of spacetime itself and so is not the same as a doppler shift in sound, which propagates waves within a media of preexisting space and is given in the formulation: (1+zm = Squareroot of [(1+v'/c)/(1-v'/c)]), where (zm) is the measured cosmological redshift and (v') the measured recessional velocity.

    We now slightly disgress and link the enigma of the [Alpha]-Variation to a correlating discovery, which for quite some time puzzled cosmologist in a similar manner as that of the [Alpha]-Variation.
    Observations of supernovae at the Cerro Tololo observatory in Chile and Mount Stromlo (ACT, Canberra, Australia) by various research team include the 'Supernova Cosmology Project', led by Saul Perlmutter and Peter Nugent of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California and the 'High-Z-Supernova Search Team', led by Brian Schmidt of Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatory; Craig Hogan from the University of Washington and Robert Kirshner from the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    A type of star which is the about the size of the earth, but has the mass of the sun is called a white dwarf; it consists of 'degenerate matter' in that its atomic structure has broken down with nucleons and electrons tightly packed together and resulting in a density of so (1.8 billion kg/Cubic metres) and so 300,000 times more dense than the earth.
    If a white dwarf has a mass exceeding the sun's mass by about a factor of 1.4, known as the Chandrasekhar limit, then it would collapse to become a Neutron Star or a Black Hole."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "Ah, but that is directly related to the superbrane class IIB, the Magnetic Monopole; its energy is the unified massquantum (ec=0.048 micrograms* or 27 quadrillion GeV*).
    If you now define a unified monopolic current in (Imonopolic unified = efuru = [ec]u Amperexmetres) and apply the higher dimensional mapping of the magnetopole (e* = 2Rec2) onto the 4D- electropole (e = luc2), then this monopolic current becomes: (Iuru = e*furu = 2Rec3) and setting the 12D-unification for distance in (lu=lPlanckx√Alpha) equal to a unification of (ru=2Re) in 4D, crystallises this unified current in the 'Unified Magneto Charge-Mass Current' of: [UMMI = Iu= c3, measured in Electron Volts eV].

    So (UMMI = [c3 eV* = 27 quadrillion GeV*) as the energy equivalent of the magnetic monopole and manifests as the unification frequency (fu=fps=c/λps) as the mapping from (fu'=c/2Re) with (ru=1) and hence for a unit displacement given by the wormhole linearisation, the UMMI per unit displacement becomes the Unified Magneto Charge-Energy (UME = UMMI/λps =[c2fps]u = Muc2 Joules*), which is (UME = 270 quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion Joules*).

    Recall of course, that a de Broglie matter wave has a wavelength λ=h/mv for a group speed v<c and that a phase speed relaies via the expression:
    Wave Speed = Vphase=WavelengthxFrequency=(λ.f)=(h/mVgroup).(mc2/h)=c2/Vgroup > c for all Vgroup < c.
    Using the Action = Charge Squared Law also gives: Mass m = E/c2 = hf/c2 = h/Λc = h/luc = hc2/ec = hc/e = e2c/e = [ec]u = unified mass for e* in 12D mapping e in 3D.


    Logan Antico:
    "And this energy constitutes the Gamma-Ray-Burster Maximum, setting the energy of a cosmic ray, as originating from that UME-source and defined in the magnetic monopole with energy UMMI."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And the unification mass (Mu = [fps]u = 3 thousand million billion trillion kg*), which is (1.5 x Sun's Mass) in a natural limit for the Chandrasekar Mass directly from the Unifield Field of Quantum Relativity."


    Logan Antico:
    "Furthermore, if we now trisect the solar 2D template as a cross sectional mapping from the UFoQR, then one of three 120 degree sectors with unitary radius (Ru=1) forms a geometric chord with two 30 degree angles supplementing one 120 degree angle and sets the length of that chord as (2Ru' = √(3) x Ru).
    If that chord length now defines the solar oscillation periodicity in the modular dual form of (Ru' = c/P), then that period (P = 2c/√3 = 346,410,161.5 seconds* or so 10.977 years*) and in the modular duality of the sourcefrequencies (fpsxfss=1), the inverse of fps being modular equivalent to period Pps."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "And so the solar cycle, averaged as 11 years and encompassing the phenomena of 'sunspots' as magnetic field variations is related to the quantum geometry within the UFoQR, as well."


    Logan Antico:
    "Yes, but the white dwarf is important as a distance indicator for the cosmic distances. Should it be in a binary system with another star in mutual orbit about each other, then mass can transfer via magnetic activity from the companion star and the Chandrasekhar limit might so become exceeded and the white dwarf explodes as a supernova type Ia.
    Supernovae class Ia show no helium absorption in their spectra but show a strong absorption of singly ionised silicon atoms at about 610 nanometres; supernovae class Ib have helium lines, but no silicon lines and supernovae class Ic have neither; hydrogen is absent in all supernovae spectra type I.
    Supernovae spectra change significantly, varying in brightness, as the explosion synthesises heavy elements, such as gold, iron and oxygen in the thermonuclear reactions.
    Supernovae class II are rarer and show significant hydrogen absorption and are thought to collapse into a neutron star or Black Hole, having a preexplosion mass of over 8 solar masses.
    The brightest supernovae are of type Ia and the uniformity of their light curves allows calibration of their apparent brightness with their 'standard' true brightness, the luminosity so serving as an indicator as to their distance by astronomical distance-luminosity calibrations.
    About one supernova class Ia explodes in a typical galaxy every 300 years, so in observing a large sample of about 3600 galaxies, one such explosion per month should be seen.
    The experimental data collected by the various supernova observers, and under utility of the Hubble Space Telescope to track the brightness variations of discovered supernovae type Ia, now converged in 1998 to the conclusion, that distant supernovae are between 20% and 30% dimmer than expected and as a consequence of their measured redshift they appear to be further away then theory permits.

    An interpretation of this discovery implies, that the universe's expansion is accelerating; the measured redshift depicting a distance further away for a dimmer brightness than anticipated by theory.
    Closer analysis of the redshift data shows an expected distribution of luminosities, calibrated to their distances in the Chilean Cala-Tololo data, up to a redshift of about 0.12 and with a redshift-gap until a redshift of 0.3; after which the 'High-Z's' begin to show the 'curving away' from a predicted decelerating expansionrate in concordance with an Euclidean flat universe of Einsteinian General Relativity.
    The highest redshift recorded in 1998 was that of 'supernova Iae' at (z=1.1) by the 'High-Z-Team'."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "But you described the universe as decelerating with precise deceleration parameters given in a balancing of a gravitational omega, a quintessential lambda and a Milgrom parameter!?"


    Logan Antico:
    "Precisely, but the two research results in the [Alpha]-Variation and the 'Accelerating Cosmos of the Dark Energy' are closely related.
    To preemt my analysis, the universe is not accelerating, but appears to do so because of the interdimensional intersection of the EMR parameters of the spectroscopic measurements.
    And it appears to accelerate for a specific redshift interval, which also is responsible for the measured [Alpha]-Variation, the 'dip' in [Alpha] is like a redshift becoming a blueshift for a specific epoch.

    My cosmological analysis of the phenomena predicts, that supernovae type Ia with a redshift above 1.84 will be measured to conform to the theoretical predictions for a decelerating and flat supercosmos.
    The appearance of an accelerating cosmos is a limited phenomenon, relevant for a specific and unmapped redshift interval from (z=0.343 to 0.291), with interval (z = 1.08 to 1.84) imaged in the interval (0.343 to 0.291) with a variation maximum for thge mapping at the Arpian limit (zarp = 0.2505).

    In particular, it has already been noted, that Supernova Iae, also known as SN1998eq with redshift 1.1 is less anomalously dimmed than the nearer ones; just as I predict for all the more distant ones.
    SN1997ff with redshift 1.7 is one of the most distant supernova found by Adam Riess in 2001 by the Hubble-Space-Telescope at the time of this writing and whilst the argument can be made that acceleration decreases with distance, the actual location in relationship to the cosmological redshift remains constant in a 'slowing down from faster' or 'speeding up from slower' , if the decisive measuring stick is the expansion of the universe under constancy of light speed (c); demanding however a 'Redshift-Correlation-Correction'.

    Indulge yourself in a thought experiment and travel with the expanding event horizon, the boundary of the universe (which has no boundary in the curved overall sense, all locations being centred selfrelatively), this then becomes the looking back in time to the origin of the Big Bang.
    You then experience the receeding origin of the singularity slowly moving away from you and relative to you as 'stationary observer' at the event horizon, your own recessional velocity of (22% of (c)) is nullified and must be accounted for in your calculations of the recessional universe you are observing."



    cosmicsurferAds. CurvatureAdS.


    Robert Sceptico:
    "You are using the 'de Broglie' inflationary model, where a supermembrane epoch ends in timeinstantenuity as the EpsEss heterotic superstring, which then expands with a decreasing recessional velocity towards a 'de Broglie' boundary as macroquantisation in 10D, but beginning with light speed (c) under guidance of Special Relativity?!"


    Logan Antico:
    "Of course, other inflation scenarios, such as chaotic inflation had proved untenable by the experimental data and the microwave background pointing to a zero curvature and to a flat universe,
    The macro quantisation of the heterotic superstring, also known as HE(8X8) constitutes the 'conifoldment' of the higher dimensions, either as a 6D-Calabi-Yau manifold or as a 7D-Joyce-Sphere, relative to 10D-C-space and 11D-M-space respectively.

    And the 'de Broglie' inflation quantises Einstein's field equations of General Relativity in their Friedmann formulations; the Milgrom parameter becoming acceleration: (-2cHo/(n+1)3) and the distance-scale factor parametrising as: {r[n] = Rmax(n/(n+1))} and the velocity as: (c/(n+1)2); the parametric constant for dimensionless cycletime is: (n = Hoxt).

    And so knowing the present cycletime (np=1.132419321) via an arbitrary Mean-Alignment-Time or MAT, relative to a phase shiftable proto universe and set as (Midnight, November 4th, 1996, Canberra, Australia, local time); the present universal speed of recession is calculated as (22% of c), which then maps a selfrelative 'Arpian redshift' as the renormalisation for the receeding event horizon, mirrored in the Big Bang singularity; (zarp = 0.250529154).

    We also calculate the 10D expansion of the universe as (53.105% or a radius of 8.96 billion lightyears), increasing to (113.24% or 19.11 billion lightyears [ly]) for the 11D universe.
    The Hubble-Oscillation so defines the nodal Hubble-Constant: (Ho=1.8877728042x10-18 1/s*) or 58.04 Hubble Units [km/Mpc.s]) and the 10D-cosmic asymptotic diameter as (33.7522131 billion ly*). The Hubble constant varies between fps and Ho and is calculated to assume a a value of 66.9 Hubble units for the present time coordinate np in the cosmic evolution.

    The [Alpha]-Variation so encompasses a period of (2[19.11 - 16.88] = 4.46 billion years) and hence two distance intervals; one from the present epoch (np) to a distance 2.23 billion years into the past at the nodal value (n=1) and its 11D-image at (n=1-0.1324..=0.8676).
    Relative to the Big Bang Source however, this interval is mapped from (n=0.1324.. to n=0.2648..) as a linear double interval; just as two mirrors facing each other would reflect each other in the spacetime 'in between'. This 'in between' becomes our expanding spacetime and we can calculate the relevant distances, using cycletime n as parameter and the nodal Hubble-Constant as invariant at (n=1).
    At (n=0.1324..or 2.23 billion years after the Big Bang; v'/c=0.7798 and z =1.843), relative to event horizon and at (n=0.2648.. or 4.46 billion years after the Big Bang; v'/c=0.6251 and z =1.08), relative to event horizon.

    The cosmological redshift epoch between (z=1.082 to 1.843) and corresponding to a 2.23 billion year duration includes the 'peak of galaxies' at (z=1.18) and is characterised in the absolute minimum of the quintessential lambda and the gravitational maximum contractions to form galactic structures and superstructures under the auspices of the Sarkar Constant of 236.1 million lightyears.

    Now looking back at those large redshift values, the lower one coinciding with the redshift of z=1.1 for supernova 1998 Iae, measured by Brian Schmidt of the 'High-Z-Team' must encompass a 'looking through' the imaged z-interval, namely the interval from the node at 2.23 billion years back to 4.46 billion years or the z-interval from
    (n=0.8676, v'/c=0.2867, z=0.3431) to (n=1.0000, v'/c=0.2500, z=0.2910).

    In other words, the 11D intersection of M-space intersects 10D-C-space in the two intervals, which form selfrelative images of each other.
    The 10D Riemann hypersphere is subject to gravitation in mass-parameters and decelerates asymptotically towards its 11D M-space boundary in negative and open curvature, mirroring the asymptotic expansion in perfect flatness of Euclidean zero curvature, however.
    The EMR-parameters so double themselves in the said interval, a interval which is itself expanding and contracts between the two nodal values of maximum frequency (fps) and minimum frequency (Ho).
    But it is only the EMR parameter that defines this 'oscillating universe', the mass parameter remains asymptotic as defined in the parametric scalefactor
    {r(n)=Rmax(n/(n+1), with Rmax=RHubble=RH=1.597767545x1026 m*}.

    Revisiting the redshift data of 1998, we notice the 'missing redshifts' in the interval from (z=0.12-0.3), with the limiting nodal (z=1.843) mapped onto the nodal (z=0.291) and the boundary image (z=1.082) mapped in its boundary image (z=0.343). The first supernova, beginning to 'curve away' from the decelerating expansion predicted by theory, is at about (z=0.12).
    Any receeding cosmological object with a redshift exceeding (z=0.291) can be considered to be moving in the 'Hubble Flow' with a measured redshift (zm=z), because after a distance of 2.23 billion ly no doubling of the electromagnetic parameters occurs for the distance between the two cosmic nodes.

    But we find three z-intervals, in whom we must apply a redshift-correction; set in the images of the boundaries and the nodes.
    The boundary (z=0.343, z=1.082) is imaged as the boundary image (zarp=0.2505, z=1.082) in the nodal mirror of (z=0.291, z=1.843) and the boundary mirror of (zarp=0.2505, z=1.082) images the nodal (z=0.291, z=1.843) in the nodal (z=zni, z=1.843).

    If (v'/c=0.22), then (zm=zarp=0.2505 as the variation maximum) and at the event horizon, where zm=0, the z(zm)=zarp and azm+b=0.291 for zm=zni; subsequently (b=zarp & azni=0.0405) and a the gradient of the 'Local Flow', given in the equation: (z(zm)=azm+0.2505) for the present epoch.

    The [Alpha]-Redshift spans the z(zm) range from (0.291 to 0.343) for the zm-interval from (zni to 0.2505) with positive gradient (0.052/(0.2505-zni)) and letting this gradient equal (a=0 from/zni) gives zni=0.1097 and (a=0.3692, for the [Alpha]-Redshift equation:
    (zred(zm)=0.3692(zm)+0.2505).

    The [Alpha]-Blueshift spans the zm-interval from (0.2505 to 0.2910) for the same range with a negative gradient ( -0.052/0.0405=-1.284) and a linear equation:
    (zblue(zm)=-1.284(zm)+0.6646).

    So the 'curving away' from the deceleration model at (z=1.12) becomes a consequence of the redshift (zni=0.1097) forming a nodal image in the other nodal redshifts of (z=0.291 and z=1.843); with the boundary redshift measured as (zm=0.2505), becoming a blueshift boundary for the interval until (zm=0.291), at which the true 'Hubble-Flow' begins at the present epoch with linear equation: (z(zm) = zm).

    The nearest, most studied and most luminous quasar (or quasi-stellar object) is called 'Q3C273' (Cambridge catalogue); its recessional velocity is measured as (v'/c=0.14565), for a (zm=0.1580).
    Applying the [Alpha]-Redshift equation gives a 'local flow correction' of: (z(0.1580)=0.3088), for which (n={√(c/v") -1}) and (v"/c=[(z2+2z)/(z2+2z+2)]) give corrected (n=0.9507) and (v"/c=0.2628).

    The distance to 'Q3C273' can now be calculated simply by the application of the scalefactor r(n) in 10 and 11 dimensions in the formulations:
    R10D(n) = r(np) - RH[n/(n+1)] and R11D(n) = [np - n]RH}
    'Q3C273' in 10D is (RH(0.53105 - 0.48736) = 0.044(16.88 billion ly) = 737.428 million ly);
    but in 11D this becomes: ([1.1324-0.9507]RH = 0.1817(0.53105)(16.88 billion ly) = 1.6288 billion ly).

    As the universal [Alpha]-Variation, the zarp redshift is the maximum variation for the present epoch in the Hubble-Oscillation and the fluctuation of the Hubble parameter as the cosmic frequency is mirrored about (H'o(np)=Ho/(2-np)), valid for the (n=1 to 2)-cycle; hence (H'o(np)= 58.04/0.8676=66.90 Hubble units).
    At the nodes, say at (np=2), (H'o) quantises as (fps) in the pixelation of spacetime.
    At the nodal images however, (H'o) would assume its nodal value of 58.04 Hubble Units.

    The Hubble 'Constant' subsequently varies with redshift at any cycletime (n); increasing from 58.04 to 66.9 in the z-intervals (0.1097-0.2505) and (0.2910-0.3431) and decreasing from 66.9 to 58.04 in the z-intervals (0.2505-0.2910) and (1.082-1.843) for the present Hubble epoch.
    The 'arpian redshift' as variation maximum is situated at n-coordinate 0.8676, implying that correctly interpreted spectroscopic measurements must converge at a Hubble-Constant of 66.9 Hubble units and a projected mapped age for the universe of (0.8676x16.88 billion years) or 14.65 billion years.
    For z=(0.3431-1.082), (Ho'=66.9) and the nodal intervals z=(0-0.109) and (z from 1.843) set it as (58.04)."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "This is a simple yet profound solution to the 70-year search to finetune the 'Hubble-Constant'.
    It is no wonder, that there was so much disagreement regarding the measurements, seeing that it changes in the described intervals as a reflection of EMR parameters.
    All astronomical and cosmological measurements engage optical instruments to catch photons and all of astrochemistry and astrophysics depends on spectrum analysis.
    So the universe is 'well behaved' after all and decelerating under its own gravity, modified in the quintessence.

    But how do you explain the 25%, on average, discrepancy in the luminosity of the supernovae examined?"


    Logan Antico:
    "That brings in the old 'Hubble Law', where the distance (RH) to an object receeding with velocity (v'=H'oxRH) sets an epoch dependent 'Hubble Constant' as the linear proportionality constant between recessional velocity and the distance to the object.
    In the case of the quasar 'Q3C273', the measured redshift (z=0.1580) relates a recessional velocity of (v'=0.14565c); which is then 'corrected' to calculate the n-cycle position of 'Q3C273', allowing a Hubble-independent determination of its distance from the observer.

    If you now use the applicable Hubble-Constant between (58.04 and 66.9) as (H'o=61.1 Hubble Units), interpolated say as:
    (H'o=66.9-[0.2505-0.1580][66.9-58.0]/(0.2505-0.1097) = 66.9-5.8 = 61.1 Hubble Units); then the old Hubble Law with (61.1 Hubble Units=1.98x10-18 1/s*) gives you:
    (RH= 0.14565c/H'o) and calculating as: (2.34 billion ly) and a distance 43% in excess of the n-cyclic value of (1.63 billion ly); but using a higher Hubble-Constant, such as 71 Hubble-Units, commonly used in the supernovae measurements, results in a scale reduction of 86% to (2.0 billion ly) and a 'dimming' effect of so 23%, which is the observed discrepancy."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "So the spectroscopic measurements incorporate a natural 'dimming effect' in luminosities, due to the cosmological objects, (which are physically much nearer, than their redshift indicate), appearing to be further away also in the electromagnetic universe, than they truly are and so the theoretical predictions of their distances are correct in principle, but require modification via the old Hubble Law, which is only approximate, (valid only at the odd nodes) and unnecessary to calculate the distances.
    And at higher redshifts, passing the imaging interval from (z=0.291 to 0.343), the seeming cosmic acceleration intensifies until the other imaging interval from (z=1.082 to 1.843) has been reached. The apparent cosmic acceleration hence becomes an imaged double boundary-nodal-mirror effect.

    The [Alpha]-Variation measures shifts in wavelength, which have passed through the described intervals and a 'dip' in the constant is derived from the mathematical analysis.
    How do you explain the magnitude of that dip; about 80 parts per million you said, in the light of the redshift intervals, Logan."


    Logan Antico:
    "The [Alpha]-Variation is the dimensional intersection of M-C-space, 10D-C-space forming a holographic image in 12D-F-space.
    The chargequantum (e) is defined via the Riemann Analysis of B(n), the supersymmetric wavefunction of the universe:
    {B(n) = [2e/hA]exp(-[Alpha]xT(n) Inverse Sorce energy or Magneto charge units (C*)}; where {T(n) =...- 3 - 2 - 1 +0+ 1 + 2 + 3 +...= n(n+1)} and the Feynman-Path-Integral for all particle histories as an alternative formulation to the Schrödinger- Dirac- and Klein-Gordon Equations for the quantum mechanistic probability distribution of quantum states in the particle-wave duality.

    The Action Law of (Action=ee*) manifests the lightspeed (c)-independent form of [Alpha] and can then be calibrated via the definition of the (c)-inclusive form in magnetic constant (μo). {[Alpha] = 60πe2/h = e2/(2εohc) = μoce2/(2h) = 1/137.0470731}

    A Newton-Raphson iteration for B(n) and the boundary condition {T(n)=i2 in B{-[1/2]+-i(½√3)}, with a first approximation: (e1=(½hA=1.618221145x10-19 C*) converges to: (e=1.606456344x10-19 C*).

    Any arbitrary measurement system of an Universal Observer or UO in a defined spacetime can then experimentally determine relationships and corollaries between experimental data and the changes in energy associated with dynamical systems. The UO has a mensuration system SI say and can calibrate its SI-system to any other unitary system like the star-* system of the UO*.


    Dimensional Unit Calibration:

    [m/s]/[m*/s*] = [c*/c] = [3x108/2.99792458x108] = [1.000692286] for {m/m*} = {1.000692286} {s/s*}

    [Js]/[J*s*] = [h*/h] = [6.66666666..x10-34/6.62607004x10-34] = [1.006126803] for {J/J*} = {1.006126803} {s*/s}

    [m5/s3]/[m5/s3]* = {[m/m*]2}.[c*/c]3 = Go*h*/Goh = 30ch*/30c*h = [c/c*][h*/h] = [0.999308193x1.00612803] = [1.005431984]
    for {m/m*} = [c/c*]2.√[h*/h] = [0.998616864x1.00305872] = [1.001671357]

    for {m}2 = 1.00334349 {m*}2 and m = 1.001671357 m* and m* = 0.998331431 m

    s = {m/m*}.[0.999308193] s* = [1.001671357x0.999308193] s* = 1.000978394 s* and {m/s} = 1.000692286 {m/s}* for {m/s}2 = 1.00138505 {m*/s*}2 as c2

    J = {s*/s}[h*/h] J * = [0.999022562x1.006126803] J* = 1.005143377 J* and J* = 0.994882942 J

    kg = {s*/s}.{s/m}2.{m*/s*}2.[h*/h] kg* = {s/s*}{m*/m}2.[h*/h] kg* = [1.000978394x0.996665646x1.006126803] kg* = 1.003753126 kg*

    [H/m]/[H*/m*] = [J/J*][m*/m][C*/C]2.[s/s*]2 = μo*/μo = [120π/c*]/[4πx10-7]
    for C = √{[Js/J*s*][m*s/ms*]} C* =√{[h*/h][c/c*]} C* = √[1.006126803/1.000692286] C* = 1.002711702 C*

    [eV]/[eV*] = [e±J]/[e±J]* = [e±/e±*].[J/J*] for eV = [1.60217662x10-19/1.606456344x10-19].[1.005143377] eV* = 1.00246560 eV*

    [J/K]/[J*/K*] = {J/J*}.{K*/K} = [k*/k] = [1.411721579x10-23/1.380649x10-23] = [1.022505777] for K = [J/J*]/[1.022505777] K* = [1.005143377/1.022505777] K*= 0.983020397 K*


    Conversion Units are:
    {s} = 1.000978394 {s*}
    {m} =1.001671357 {m*}
    {kg} = 1.003753126 {kg*}
    {C} = 1.002711702 {C*}
    {J} = 1.005143377 {J*}
    {eV} = 1.00246560 {eV*}
    {K} = 0.98301975 {K*}

    (m*= 0.998331431 m; s*= 0.999022562 s ; kg*=0.99626091 kg) in calibration of the base masterconstants (h/h*, c/c*, [Go]u=(1/30c)) and we note the numerical constancy for the magnetic constant in both mensuration systems: (μo)=4πx10-7 Henry/m (H/m) in (SI) and (μo)=120π/c (H*/m*) in (*).
    We recall that: (c=2.99792458x108 m/s (SI) and c*=3x108 m*/s* (*)).
    The Henry is a derived (SI) unit for magnetic inductance and has base units (Js2/C2=kgm2/C2), which so must give the (C to C*) unitary calibration in (μoo*)=1=0.994598576 C*2/C2, which gives (C*=0.997295631C) and DEFINES the (SI)-Coulombic Charge quantum as: (e=0.997295631e*=1.6021119x10-19 C (SI)).

    The textbooks of SI-physics have (e'=1.60217662x10-19 C (SI)), however and a value which differs from the value demanded by the magnetic constant (μo ) in a factor of (e'/e=1.0000403).
    As the electropolic charge quantum appears squared in the [Alpha]-Constant, the [Alpha]-variation so becomes (1.0000807), with the old value of (e') exceeding the new value of (e) in so 4 parts in 100,000 and [Alpha]' greater in magnitude than [Alpha] by 81 parts in a million and in agreement with the Churchill-Webb measurements of 1998, increasing from Alpha = μoc.e2/2h = 1/137.047075 to Alpha' = 1/137.036003.
    And I would suspect, that measuring [Alpha] even further back towards the Quantum Big Bang with increasing redshift, would better approximate the 80 parts per million increase in Alpha from say lower deviations at the say 8 parts per million at lower redshifts."


    Robert Sceptico:
    "So the '[Alpha]-Dip' indicates that the textbook value for the electropole is fractionally too high; but that the Alpha Finestructure-Constant remains indeed constant, once the variation in the electronic charge quantum is taken into account.
    Because the magnetic permeability constants are numerically the same in both the (SI) and the (*) unitary measurement systems; but
    εo = 1/120πc = 8.841941283x10-12 (F/m)* and is εo = 8.8541878176x10-12 F/m (SI), the (SI) measurement is too large by a factor of 1.00138505 to correlate correctly wirth the magnetic permeability constant μo to give the Maxwell constant μoo = (120π/c).(1/120πc) = 1/c2.

    It is experimentally measured in the (e/me)-ratio of the electron, subject to electric- and magnetic fields and this fits in nicely with my analysis of the electromagnetic mass of the electron.

    In particular, the effective mass of the electron: (me=h[Alpha]/(2πRec)=9.290528912x10-31 kg*), also contains a magnetocharged part via (e*=2Rec2) for ([Alpha]=meπe*/(hc)) in the unification of the EMI with the GI by [Go=4πεo]u.
    This magnetocharged part, intrinsic to the UFoQR as definition from (μo) and the quantisation of (λps) in (Re), we term 'Electromagnetic Mass':
    (meEMR = 2μoe2/(3Ree* = 1.556643x10-32 kg*)) which is subtracted from the effective mass (me), gives me = 9.134865x10-31 kg* or 9.10071x10-31 kg (SI) and in agreement with the SI-textbook value of 9.1093835x10-31 kg (SI) to 95 parts in 100,000, subject to perturbation theory in the factor 2/3 in the electromagnetic mass.

    The 'naked' restmass of the electron is about 98.245% of the effective mass, the latter specifying the 'naked' electron to move with a speed of (0.18077c) through an electric potential of (8.5748 keV*).
    A detailed analysis of the electron's relativistic mass increase in equality with its energy of magnetic self induction forms the mathematical basis to 'prove' the 'Theory of Quantum Relativity' via a binomial distribution of the (v/c) parameter about the (X+Y=XY=i2=exp[iπ]= -1) FRB or 'Functional Riemann Bound' in a 'Complex Riemann Analysis'."


    Logan Antico:
    "The '[Alpha]-Dip' is like a double symmetry; the magneto charged part of the electron is hidden and une requires the 'image of the image' to notice the skewing of the experimental data. The [Alpha]-Variation provides the mirroring of the nodes in the boundaries and vice versa and so indicates the intrinsic definition of the [Alpha]-Finestructure-Constant as the manifestation of the interdimensional law of action, leading to a 4-dimensional superconductivity coupled to the vacuum or zero-point-energy.

    In the attempt to explain the [Alpha]-Dip, some theoretists have proposed a 'slowing down' of (c).
    Recent formulations by populist physicist Paul Davies and in co-authorship with Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from the Department of Astrophysics at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia have followed the wrong avenues for the interpretation of the data however.
    In a paper published in ('Nature': 'Black Holes constrain varying constants'; August 8th, 2002), the authors propose a varying light speed to be responsible for the [Alpha]-Dip and discount any possible variation in the electro charge quantum.

    Davies' argument that an increase in (e) would alter the evolution of Black Holes in their entropic definitions does not take into account that a productation of the Boltzmann Constant (defining entropy), with (e) forms a fundamental finestructured constant in its own right.

    In particular, the universe's wavefunction B(n) is localised in any arbitrary spacetime in 'unfreezing' the M-space 'stuck' in between the (X,Y) coordinates and subsequently in between real and imaginary linearised time parameters. This demands the establishment of a Mean-Alignment-Time or MAT, relative to a 'unfreezing definition' in a specification of the 'naked singularity', oscillating as zero-point about the FRB.

    As E*.e= Epsx1/Eps = 1 as fundamental unity in the 11D Membrane-Mirror-Space of modular duality with e* the magneto charge; one can heuristically state that
    (Energy E x charge quantum e) in the lower dimensional C-Line-Space C can be expressed as the inversed identity in the form of 1/T.
    This then sets E.e=kTe=1 for [ek]=1/T and using an inverse proportion for mass in the lower dimensionality: [e*k*] = 1/T* sets a function f(n) = [ek]/[e*k*] = [T*/T].

    This is the case for the Mass-Temperature inverse proportionality for the evolution of Black Holes from micro states to macro states and as in the Hawking Mass-Temperature relation for Black Holes:
    {Minimum Planck Oscillator = ½hfPlanck = ½mPlanck.c2 for Tmax=Tps and Tmin=Tss in string modular T-duality for
    ½mPlanck.TPlanck = (1/8π)(4π).mPlanck.TPlanck = Hawking Modulus HM = hc3/4πGok = MBHmin.TBHmax ={c2/4π2}. MBHmax.TBHmin.}.

    friedmann6.

    ufoqr.

    qtunnel.

    B(n) is assigned B(np) = {[ek](SI)/[ek](*)}, with {[ek](SI)=constant=(1.60217662x10-19 C)(1.380649x10-23 J/K) = 2.21204355x10-42 CJ/K} and using the old (SI) value with the Alpha-Variation for (e'); using (e±=1.6021119x10-19 C) without the Alpha-Variation gives {[ek](SI)} = 2.21195419x10-42 CJ/K}.


    decepar3.

    The (*)-constant is a relatively fixed constant as: (e±*k*=2.267869086x10-42 (CJ/K)*) and subsequently B(np) calculates a particular value for n at the asymptote B(n⇒±∞)=0 as:

    {[e±k](SI)/[e±k]*} = (2.21204355/2.267869086) = 0.975384145 (0.975344742)= [2e/hA].exp(-[Alpha]x[np2+np]), which yields an unique (np) as a complex solution to the quadratic equation by ln(0.975384145/0.992729803) = {ln(0.982527312)/-Alpha} = 2.415747501 = np2+np for: np2 + np - 2.415747501 = 0
    solving as: (np=FRB(-½) ± 1.6327117).
    For the unfrozen M-space with Alpha-Variation: {10D-root: np = 1.1327117 (real) & 12D-root: np = -2.1327117 (imaginary)}.
    For the unfrozen M-space without Alpha-Variation: {10D-root: np = 1.1344063 (real) & 12D-root: np = -2.1344063 (imaginary)}.

    This 'unfreezing' of M-space then allows the singularity algorithm of the cosmogenesis to manifest in what might be called the sex chromosomes of the universal DNA-encoding in terms of frequency or a number count.

    A new physical quantity in 'awareness' is defined as the timedifferential of frequency and allows the concept of 'consciousness' to be born from the defining qualities of magneto charges.
    Electromagneto-monopolic 'Life' derives as consequence of selfinductions of quantum geometric entities, specified from super membranes, macro-crystallised in electropolic self-capacitances and magnetopolic self-inductances, subsequently becoming subject to mutual cross inductances.
    The purpose of the superbranial selfreplication on ever increasing scales, and until modular duality is reached in minmax boundary conditions; is to establish the multiversal nestings of the smallest within the largest - a process which constituted the beginnings of it all in the 'naked singularity' becoming defined as the Genesis BOSON."
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019

Share This Page