The Globalist Climate Change Agenda Forum

Discussion in 'The Globalist Climate Change Agenda' started by admin, Dec 17, 2017.

  1. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    "The poor in the rich countries supporting the rich in the poor countries.”
    Dr. Fred Singer, Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, USA


    The UN's wealth-redistribution schemes are really a massive subsidy to kleptocrats ruling poor countries paid for by the poor and middle classes of wealthier and freer nations. by Alex Newman

    PARIS — The international wealth-redistribution schemes of the United Nations, justified under the guise of battling alleged man-made global warming, are really a massive subsidy to kleptocrats ruling poor countries paid for by the poor and middle classes of wealthier and freer nations, according to internationally renowned physicist Dr. Fred Singer.

    On top of that, the professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia said, the burden of proof in attributing climate changes to human activities is on man-made global-warming theorists seeking to regulate and control carbon dioxide, and not on skeptics. And so far, the alarmists have failed to demonstrate that mankind is responsible for any measurable impact on the climate, he said.

    Speaking at the Heartland Institute's “Day of Examining the Data” conference in Paris, which took place during the UN's COP21 climate summit last month, Singer and other scientists from around the world denounced the global-warming alarmism coming out of the nearby UN confab. Among other concerns, the experts said there was no climate crisis — much less a man-made one — and that the real agenda of the UN involves primarily money and power, not the climate.

    Dr. Singer, an atmospheric and space physicist with unassailable scientific credentials, told The New American in an interview after his speech that climate science was far from settled, and that taxpayer money distributed by governments was buying the cooperation of scientists. He also suggested that human impacts on the climate, if there are any, are likely to be so tiny as to be completely insignificant.

    “The climate has always been changing — warming and cooling, warming and cooling,” Singer said. “So we assume that this is a continuing process. The fact that we are now fairly well advanced in the industrial revolution — it has no influence on natural forcing, we don't affect what the sun does, we don't affect the volcanoes. So the null hypothesis, which means the normal way events go, we would assume that all changes in climate, even today, are due to the same kinds of natural forcing.”

    The burden of proof, then, is on the alarmists demanding trillions of dollars and vast new controls over humanity under the guise of battling alleged anthropogenic (man-made) global warming (AGW) — not the other way around. “The null hypothesis that has to be disproven or amended is that natural forcings are changing the climate, simply because it's always been that way and we would assume that it would continue that way,” Singer emphasized. “So the burden of proof definitely has to be on the people who want to control CO2.” Other speakers at the summit emphasized that CO2 is the gas of life, not pollution.

    And overcoming that burden will be a very tough, assuming it is even possible. “In all honesty, I will tell you that they have a very difficult job, I don't want that job of having to prove that,” said Singer, founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) and the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). “We're quite open to the idea that maybe CO2 does have some influence, but it has to be demonstrated,” he continued. “So far, they have not been able to demonstrate uniquely to our satisfaction that CO2 has any measurable influence.”

    In his personal view, Singer continued, he believes CO2 probably has “some kind of a role,” because after all, it is a greenhouse gas, and its concentration in the atmosphere is increasing. However, the atmosphere is very complicated, and the effects may be “extremely small, and virtually undetectable.” “In that case, it has no practical significance,” he said. “Effects too small to measure are too small to have any political influence, but this doesn't seem to bother the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] or the UN. They continue to propagate the idea that you have to control CO2.”

    As for why the UN would want to control CO2, and what the implications would be, Singer said control was the key word. “Now, control of CO2 means, essentially, control of energy, and that means control of economies,” he told The New American at the summit, which brought in skeptic and realist scientists and experts from around the world. “So it's a matter, really, of trying to control things, I think, more than anything else.” Literally every human activity, including breathing, produces CO2, which is required by plants and has been present in far higher concentrations in the past. Mutliple experts even said life on Earth is "starving" for more CO2.

    As always, money is also central. “Money is involved in various ways,” said Singer, who has a Ph.D. in physics from Princeton University and served as a distinguished research professor at the Institute for Space Science and Technology. “First of all, each government pays large sums of money to its scientific fellows and essentially it buys their cooperation.” Numerous other scientists at the counter-UN summit echoed those remarks, saying that billions in “climate funding” from government was being abused to purchase compliance or at least silence from the scientific community on the increasingly obvious problems with AGW alarmism.

    There are also forces that critics often denounce as “crony capitalists” at play — forces hoping to profit from government subsidies linked to climate alarmism. “There's a large industry trying to produce energy to replace fossil fuels, but they're not doing very well,” Dr. Singer explained. “Both solar and wind are unreliable, intermittent, and expensive. I doubt whether you could replace fossil fuels. The only thing I see on the horizon is nuclear.” Still, vast sums of public wealth are flowing into the coffers of “green energy” cronies such as bankrupt solar company Solyndra, a company controlled by large Obama donors that received about half-a-billion tax dollars from the Obama administration before going bust.

    Finally, there is the international wealth redistribution from richer nations to the governments and dictators ruling over poorer ones. “In addition to the scientists and to the energy sources which some hope will replace fossil fuels, like solar and wind, there's the matter of paying money to less-developed countries,” he said, touching on a theme that was central to the UN COP21 summit. “This is a direct subsidy to, frankly, to kleptocracies. We know what happens to that money. It goes into the pockets or bank accounts of the people who run these countries — it's been happening all the time, and I think it will continue to happen. So, as someone put it, it's a matter of the poor in the rich countries supporting the rich in the poor countries.”

    Obama has pledged billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to the UN Green Climate (slush) Fund, and despite tough talk from some GOP lawmakers about blocking the funding, the Republican-controlled Congress recently passed a budget that will reportedly allow the global wealth redistribution to proceed. The UN and the largely autocratic regimes hoping to benefit from the transfers are demanding $100 billion per year to start, eventually hoping to secure trillions in handouts from Western taxpayers under the guise of climate reparations.

    In addition to the qualifications already described, Dr. Singer also has a long history of public service, including time serving as the chief scientist at the U.S. Department of Transportation. He also served as the vice chairman of the National Advisory Committee for Oceans and Atmosphere (NACOA) and as deputy assistant administrator for policy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Before that, he served as deputy assistant secretary for water quality and research at the U.S. Department of the Interior. He was also the first director of the National Weather Satellite Service in the 1960s.

    Singer's academic career is also more than impressive. In addition to his professorship in environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, he served as founding dean of the School of Environmental and Planetary Sciences at University of Miami. He also served as the director of the Center for Atmospheric and Space Physics at University of Maryland for almost a decade. Singer has published hundreds of scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals, including many of the world's most prestigious scientific publications.

    During his speech at the Heartland Institute summit in Paris, Singer emphasized just how wildly inaccurate the “climate models” relied upon by the UN have been when compared to the observable data from the real world. He also highlighted the ongoing “pause” in global warming, now about 18 years and counting, that has so befuddled the climate alarmists. The NIPCC he founded has examined the peer-reviewed literature on climate and reached drastically different conclusions than the UN and its increasingly discredited IPCC.

    Other scientists and experts speaking at the summit echoed Singer's concerns and debunked various elements of the climate hysteria. Another counter-COP21 summit in Paris, this one organized by French realists, also brought together prominent scientists to challenge the UN and its alarmism. For more on the counter-COP21 summits, the UN conference, and climate change generally, check out the related articles below.
    Image: screenshot of TNA interview with Dr. Fred Singer
    Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. He can be reached at Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU.

    Top Scientist: UN “Climate Finance” Is Subsidy for Kleptocracy
  2. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    The Real Epidemic

    3 March 2020

    Big Brother
    The Police State
    Environment and Climate
    Guest Content

    climate change religion.

    Never mind the alleged Corona virus epidemic, there is an insanity epidemic spreading throughout the world and the vector is not a bat from a Chinese food market but the mainstream media. They are infecting the population at an unprecedented rate who are now showing symptoms of uncontrolled hysteria and complete loss of perspective.

    Inaccurate Tests and False Positives

    The novel corona virus Covid 19 outbreak, if that’s what it is, has a reported death rate of approximately 2% This is similar to the annual flu-related viruses. However, these figures are far from precise. As usual, the media would have you believe that when the medical profession make a pronouncement concerning some disease or other it is based on exact scientific methods and is therefore not to be challenged. Reading the media reports you would think that efficient and accurate tests are in place to definitively determine if a person has the corona virus or not. This is totally untrue.

    The only way to really know if a particular virus is present is to isolate it and then grow it in a cell culture or, failing that, carry out an antibody test to see if there are antibodies distinctive to that virus. Neither of these things have been done. The test used is the one most widely used for all virus detection the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test. This test is designed to pick out certain genomes from the suspected virus, duplicate the DNA until there is enough of it to use, and then compare it to a control sample to see if it similar to that virus. As the corona virus is an RNA virus it actually uses a process called Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) to convert the RNA Into DNA first. Unfortunately, there are numerous problems with this test.

    According to Virology-online –

    “PCR has many problems, the chief among which is contamination, since only a minute amount of contamination is needed to give a false positive result. In addition, because PCR is so sensitive compared to other techniques, a positive PCR result is often very difficult to interpret as it does not necessarily indicate the presence of disease.”

    So, before you believe that everyone the media claim has coronavirus actually has it remember that false positives happen all the time and, even when the test is actually positive, it doesn’t mean the host has the disease.

    There really is no definitive test for viral infections no matter what the ‘experts’ say. Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, director of the infectious diseases division at the University of Alabama at Birmingham has stated in a New York Times article –

    “There is no perfect test for pretty much any infectious disease I can think of,”

    Moreover, the same article says that a lot of the test kits in the USA are faulty and there have been cases of samples being mislabeled. Casting further doubt on the accuracy of the tests is the CDC advice not to bother testing people with no symptoms because even if they are infected, if they are still in the incubation period, there may not be enough virus in their bodies for the test to detect. Yet detecting minute amount of virus material is exactly what the PCR test is designed for.

    Is it Normal Pneumonia?

    In addition to this, China has now started to diagnose people differently. Rather than simply saying a patient has Covid 19 when they test positive, they are now diagnosing people by their symptoms and a CT chest scan. Therefore, if a patient has a cough, a fever and breathing difficulties and the scan suggests pneumonia then they will be diagnosed as Covid 19 positive. However, pneumonia has numerous causes including viruses, bacteria, fungi and pollution. It is obvious therefore, that far more people will be considered to have Covid 19 than actually have it.

    At this point it worth highlighting one of those causes of pneumonia just mentioned – pollution. John Rappaport and others have pointed out that Wuhan, the alleged ground zero for the ‘outbreak’, has extremely high levels of pollution and has large numbers of pneumonia cases every year. There have even been protests in the city concerning the pollution. What if the virus is a good cover story for deaths actually caused by air pollution? Pollution is the government’s fault; a virus is not. In fact, the ‘outbreak’ was initially referred to as ‘Wuhan pneumonia.’

    In an article in PLOS 1 from 2010 it was estimated that 2.5 million people contract pneumonia each year in China and 5% of those die. That is over twice the death rate of the supposed corona virus. So, this new deadly ‘end-of-the-word virus’ is only half as dangerous as normal pneumonia cases in China. Moreover, as most people don’t have any symptoms at all, how can it be determined that the corona virus is the cause of the illness in the first place. It was assumed the symptoms were similar to those caused by corona type virus, they looked for it and found it. What if the initial supposition had been pollution or bacteria or fungal infection. Had they tested for these it is very possible they would have found them in a lot of cases as well. It is therefore impossible to say that the corona virus is the actual cause of the disease.

    Why The Hysteria Over This 'Epidemic' and not Others?

    However, assuming that Covid 19 is real and it is the cause of the illness, why the worldwide hysteria? In early 2018 the CDC declared flu and pneumonia to be an epidemic in the USA. It was estimated at one point that 4000 people would die every week. Does anyone remember that headline? Does anyone remember 24-hour hysterical coverage? Where people locking themselves in their houses and emptying shop shelves of hand sanitizers? No? Why the difference in coverage? Could it be that the media and the press love the USA but consider China to be the one of the most evil empires in the world, second only to Russia? I certainly don’t recall the ‘experts’ saying we should all avoid travel to USA or that anyone coming back from America should be tested and quarantined.

    600,000 people contract pneumonia every year in the UK. According to Respiratory Research by the end of 2014 the mortality rate for pneumonia in the UK was just over 23%, In Denmark it was 18% in Belgium it was over 16% and in the Netherlands it was just under 16%, all far higher than the death rate of Covid 19 infection. As pneumonia is contagious why isn’t their daily hysteria about walking about the streets of the UK or visiting our European neighbours?

    Closing the Barn Door after the Horse has Bolted.

    But let us assume that the Covid 19 virus is real, is highly contagious and has a high mortality rate, which it doesn’t. What could you do to prevent it spreading? The answer is very little.

    By the time the first case would have been diagnosed it would have been probably at least a month since the first person was infected, taking into account the time it takes for symptoms to appear and for the Chinese authorities to link what would have appeared as normal pneumonia deaths in the beginning to a possible novel virus. In that time the initial patients would have been in contact with hundreds of people who in turn would have been in contact with hundreds more and so on and so on. There would be no way on earth to stop the spread of the virus spreading beyond Wuhan and China. It would have crossed into other countries before it was even recognized to exist.

    All the hysteria about putting towns in lock-downs and stopping flights is all for show. It is a pointless case of closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. Then we have the ludicrous idea of banning large scale events. Suppose a large crowd of people were going to go to a football match and it is cancelled because it is assumed some of those attending would be contagious. What happens on the day of the cancelled match? Do these people just sit in the house or mysteriously become Covid 19 negative? No, they probably go out shopping, to the cinema or to the pub? Wherever they go they will come into contact with dozens if not hundreds of other people and potentially infect them. So instead of infecting a number of people at 1 venue they potentially infect a number of people at various venues. The only way cancelling an event will make any difference is if the potential Covid 19 carriers suddenly become uninfected or they all stay at home and come into no contact with any body on the day of the match. And then what happens the following day? Unless they are now seriously ill, they will go out into the community again. This will happen whether the football match takes place or not.

    The Implementation of the Agenda

    You shouldn’t fear the virus but you should fear what comes next. It is obvious by the media-instilled hysteria that the ‘crisis’ is being manufactured to fulfill an agenda. Number one on the list of will be the elite’s long-cherished goal of introducing mandatory vaccination. Because the vast majority of the public has no knowledge of the multitude of health risks associated with vaccination, they will not think to question it if it is made compulsory and, in fact, in their fear and ignorance, will probably welcome it. Number two on the list will be the acceptance of forced quarantine. There are already a number of UK newspapers stating that the public are too selfish for us to win the fight against the virus because we don’t do what the authorities tell us anymore and we can’t be trusted to self-isolate. One has even said that individuals must do what is required to protect the herd. The deliberate use of the word herd is, of course, intentionally done to make the association with the myth of herd immunity and vaccines. To protect the herd everybody must be vaccinated. In other words, you must be prepared to inject you and your family with dangerous substances and allow yourself to be locked up for the benefit of humanity. Sacrifice yourself for the greater good. Number three on the elite’s wish list is compulsory monitoring of your medical status. Basically, you will soon have to carry medical ID around with you to confirm you have all your required vaccinations or you will not be able to travel on public transport, or enter public buildings and then you will be arrested and forcibly vaccinated. This, in turn, will lead to item 4, the compulsory microchipping of the population. Carrying medical records around with you will be viewed as inconvenient for you and the authorities as you could forget them or lose them. Therefore, to make everyone’s life easier you will be forced to have an RFID microchip implanted with all your vaccination details on it that the authorities can easily read.

    The best bit about this for the Orwellian dictatorship that will soon be in place is that the authorities won’t even have to enforce it. The sheeple themselves will do that. So terrified will the masses become that they will police themselves. If you are unfortunate enough for people to believe you have Covid 19 , whether you do or not, and you do not really fancy being locked up, or If they discover that you are someone that actually knows how dangerous vaccines are and refuse to get the jab, your neighbours and friends will soon be at your door, pitchforks, in hand and will lock you up in your own home, hand you over to the authorities, or as the hysteria becomes more contagious and frenzied, simply beat you to death or lynch you. I genuinely don’t think it will be long before the we see the first person who will become victim to the insanity-ravaged mobs who binge on the daily hysteria fed to them by the disgraceful media.

    On a final note, to emphasise, how the media are distorting reality and feeding people’s fear to achieve the elite’s agenda, the Daily Mail’s website on 02.03.20 had a graph the title of which was UK Corona Cases. Below it, the graph rose steadily until, on the 22nd February, it rose dramatically and frighteningly to the number 10483. As the title of the graph was UK Corona Cases you would assume that this is the figure for diagnosed corona cases in the UK but no, it was simply for the number of people tested for the virus! It bore absolutely no relationship whatsoever to the number of actual cases as was suggested by the title. In fact, elsewhere on their website it said the number of people that have tested positive were 40! This disgusting, irresponsible, fear-mongering ‘journalism’ is going to lead to tragedy when a terrified public start taking matters into their own hands. One would hope when this happens, ‘journalists’ like this will be held responsible but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

    One more thing, the Daily Mail graph reminded me of another fake graph that has been the origin of such fear-mongering – the infamous Al Gore hockey stick graph that gave birth to the end of the world climate cultists - another aspect of Project Fear that is being used to fulfill the globalist’s agenda. Maybe they will combine the two and blame the spread of the corona virus on mythical man-made climate change.

    Watch this space!

    Carl Mason
    HOW DARE U.....!

    Rudy Cramer
    I think this virus has put an end to the headlong rush to globalization. It's put it bask a few decades and climate change, (which is total bullshit), will go the same way. I think people want a rest from this overarching UN sanctioned crap. First it was the IPCC and now it's the World Health Organization. I hope after the virus is over, that we can have some time to enjoy life, without the spectre of some fear, constantly being pushed on us. We really have a VALID fear now, because of a contagious disease, and this fear will put a stop to others, I hope.

    Tony Bermanseder
    Instead of 5-10% of unwoke people, this percentage will increase to 10-20%. This will have about 80% of the vox populi to continue trusting government authorities, 'experts of all sorts' and the unelected bueraucrats sponsored by the 'elitist controllers' of the century long technocratic controlleurs.
    Agenda 2021 was implemented in 2020 with projection 2030.

    The next 4 years will either support your optimism or demote the vox populi to an irreversible decline into scientific tyranny.

    1921 We by Yevgeny Zamyatin --- 1927 Metropolis by Fritz Lang (projected as occurring in the year 2030) --- 1931 Brave New World by Aldous Huxley --- 1984 by George Orwell --- 2013 Elysium by Neill Blomkamp --- 2020 by Old World Order --- 2025 by ? --- 2030 by New World Order - Can the Old Technocracy of 2020 transform into a New Technocracy of 2030 by Metamorphosis 2025?

    Last edited: Apr 13, 2020

    CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member


    "Most of US experienced warming trend over last 30 years.

    This simply means that most days in a year are warmer than they should be": NOAA

    What they DON'T say...historically, most days are COLDER than they should be

    Earth cores and other data sets from archaeology, paleontology, mineralogy,
    climatology and several other sciences state that, since the Earth was formed in the Precambrian Era,
    normal mean temperature of the Earth over the last 4.6 billion years has been roughly 25 degrees Centigrade
    (see Paleomap, below). Today, as I write this, Earth's average mean temperature is approximately 15 degrees C.

    In other words, the Earth is getting back to NORMAL after experiencing the "Little Ice Age",
    a period of regionally cold conditions between roughly AD 1300 and 1850

    If the "climate change" cult believes that there is an ability to stop nature
    from taking its course, they are delusional.

    CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member


    CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member


Share This Page