The Birth Of God As A Superbrane And The Creation Of The Universe

Discussion in 'The Birth of God as a Superbrane' started by admin, Jun 10, 2020.

  1. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    Academia.edu
    https://www.academia.edu/video/Jla0W1
    Login required to view video
    The Creation of the Universe and the Monopole String of Paul Dirac for the Magnetic Monopoles of t’Hooft-Polyakov

    The question of creation as a quantum fluctuation is answered as a creation ex uniphyscon as the quantum entanglement of omnispace in the form of universal physicalized consciousness.


    Description

    A Story of Intelligent Design and the Creation of the Quantum Universe in the Uniphyscon of Quantum Entangled Omnispace .
    The Dirac quantization condition and its relationship to the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha is derived from the initial boundary conditions of the Quantum Big Bang Singularity (QBBS).
    The QBBS is shown to form a 2/11-dimensional mirror membrane as a 1-dimensional Dirac string relating timespace of a string-membrane epoch preceding the QBBS to the spacetime following the creation event.
    The Dirac monopole then transforms as a point particle into a space extended elementary particle known as the classical electron and is electro charge coupled as an electropole to the magneto charge of a magnetopole.
    The electron as a point particle of QFT and QED so becomes the monopolar form of the Dirac monopole as the Dirac electron, but coupled to the elementary quantum geometric templates of the scalar Higgs boson with a dark matter particle defined as a RMP.
     
  2. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
  3. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    The Brain’s Autopilot Mechanism Steers Consciousness

    Freud’s notion of a dark, libidinous unconscious is obsolete. A new theory holds that the brain produces a continuous stream of unconscious predictions


    896B2D46-0862-40AA-8F1D7F3149B7EB59_source.


    The Brain's Autopilot Mechanism Steers Consciousness - Scientific American

    • Iona Miller
      Freud’s notion of a dark, libidinous unconscious is obsolete. A new theory holds that the brain produces a continuous stream of unconscious predictions, Research on the unconscious mind has shown that the brain makes judgments and decisions quickly and automatically. It continuously makes predictions about future events.
      According to the theory of the “predictive mind,” consciousness arises only when the brain’s implicit expectations fail to materialize.
      Higher cognitive processing in the cerebral cortex can occur without consciousness. The regions of the brain responsible for the emotions and motives, not the cortex, direct our conscious attention. Recent research indicates that conscious and the unconscious processes do not usually operate in opposition. They are not competitors wrestling for hegemony over our psyche. They are not even separate spheres, as Freud’s later classification into the ego, id and superego would suggest. Rather there is only one mind in which conscious and unconscious strands are interwoven. In fact, even our most reasonable thoughts and actions mainly result from automatic, unconscious processes.

      The Predictive Mind
      A revolutionary, and now widely accepted, countermodel to Freud’s scheme goes by the term “predictive mind.” The theory comes in different flavors, but overall it holds that automatic processes play a central role in the mind, allowing us to predict events quickly and accurately as they arise. Learning, experience and consciousness constantly improve our implicit, or unconscious, predictions, and we take note of events only when the predictions fail. That is, we become conscious of circumstances when they merit our attention. This automaticity enables us to function smoothly in the world, and becoming conscious when predictions fail enables us to avoid the pitfalls of automatic processing and adjust to changes in our environment. In a simplified example, unconscious processes predict the trajectory of a ball tossed to us and adjusts our limb motions accordingly. Conscious processing would become engaged, however, if the ball took a sudden right-angle turn.

    • Eric Taylor
      You go girl! I always believed the phantasy aspect of Freud's theories was most interesting, and the multi-dimensional string-theorists seem to be proving me true for their silly, but at heart I am more a utilitarian in trying to understand the world around us mixing the many in custom fashion, but rarely adhere to just any one theory, preferring to be a "Lone Wolf" away from the groupies many.

      2919095_n.?_nc_cat=1&ccb=2&_nc_sid=ac3552&_nc_ohc=9G3LNo74j-0AX-exTVU&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.

    • Eric Taylor

      8661709_n.?_nc_cat=1&ccb=2&_nc_sid=ac3552&_nc_ohc=3hRSF7QyVsAAX86aQYV&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd3-1.
    • Richard Andrew Farrow
      Love your posts Iona. May I respectfully suggest to view and study 'A Course in Miracles' which sets out a startling view of Mind. It need not be viewed as religious text but as a formidable presentation of both ego mind and Mind of Spirit, with the Course as 'Mind Training'. It was dictated to Helen Schucman a Psychotherapist in New York in the 1970's working with her colleague Bill Thetford who was exasperated at the state of stress/ anxiety/ confusion in their own hospital practice and had exclaimed 'There must be a better way !" There followed 7 years of work where these two were guided to the most miraculous of texts and his wish was answered in full ! 1f60d.

    • Greg Nixon
      This version of mind (or "minds") makes it seem possible to be replicated on a machine or machines. Why can't a robot mind be programmed to be "predictive"? Is this article predictive?




      and would like to comment on this page, relating the number of micro tubules to the actual scale of the classical electron radius, as this might be a missing link to relate your theory (and Roger's CCC btw) to the cosmology and the underpinning fact of physical consciousness relating to the cosmological spacetime matrix.

      Using this conformal mapping from the Quantum Big Bang 'singularity' from the electric charge in brane bulk space as a magnetic charge onto the classical spacetime of Minkowski and from the Planck parameters onto the atomic-nuclear diameters in 2Rec2 = e* from the Planck length conformally maps the Planck scale onto the classical electron scale.
      This is addressed in my commentary on Roger's CCC -Weyl model.
      But watching your presentation as indicated in the screenshots above; added to this conformal scale mapping in your scale of 2.5 fm, which is of course close to the classical electron radius and as defined in the alpha electromagnetic fine structure and the related mass-charge definition for the eigen energy of the electron in mec2=ke2/Re.

      Also in my model of quantum relativity (QR), there is a quantization of exactly 1010 wormhole 'singularity-bounce' radii defining the radian-trigonometric Pi ratio as Rwormhole/Relectron = 360/2π.1010 or 1010 = {360/2π}{Re/rwormhole} as a characteristic number of microtubules in a conformal mapping from the classical electron space onto the 'consciousness' space of the neuron-cell intermediate between the Hubble scale of 1026 m and the Planck scale of 10-35 m as geometric mean of 10-4 to 10-5 metres.

      It is so the geometry of the architecture of the microtubules and the nature of their construction utilizing the pentagonal quasi-crystalline pattern in its application for maximising the compression of information in the Fibonacci geometrical pattern-sequencing. This then results in the conformal mapping of this geometry as a quantum geometry and defining physical consciousness as a conformal mapping of the quantum of spacetime in the form of Weylian 'Quantum Big Bang' wormholes of the cosmogenesis.

      The pre-Big Bang 'bounce' of many models in cosmology can be found in a direct link to the Planck-Stoney scale of the 'Grand-Unification-Theories'. In particular it can be shown, that the Squareroot of Alpha, the electromagnetic fine structure constant, multiplied by the Planck-length results in a Stoney-transformation factor LP√α = e/c2 in a unitary coupling between the quantum gravitational and electromagnetic fine structures {Gok=1 and representing a conformal mapping of the Planck length onto the scale of the 'classical electron' in superposing the lower dimensional inertia coupled electric charge quantum 'e' onto a higher dimensional quantum gravitational-D-brane magnetopole coupled magnetic charge quantum 'e*' = 2Re.c2 = 1/hfps = 1/EWeyl wormhole by the application of the mirror/T duality of the super membrane EpsEss of heterotic string class HE(8x8)}.


      What is Consciousness?

      Answer: The dynamic occupancy of spacetime by physicalised quantum conglomerations.


      Uwe Uehle:
      December 1 at 2:27pm

      Just for perspective. Of course no space is truly empty - but this is symbolic for the miracle you're bathing in right here - right now

      atom.


      Margo Callaghan
      Wow what a mind bender-


      Tony Bermanseder
      Space is consciousness related via an advanced quantum mechanics. Therefore you can figure out what the metaphysics or spirit concept really relates and points to.
      It is not dieu ex machina but machina ex dieu.

      Calculation:
      7.4 Billion people weigh about 518 Billion kilograms for an average weight of 70 kg. As one proton has a mass of about 1.7x10-27 kg; the total mass of humanity in weight are so 3x1038 protons. One proton has a volume of so 4x(1.4x10-15)3 = 10-44 cubic metres and for all the protons of humanity the volume adds to about 3x10-6 cubic meters or 3 cubic centimeters which is a cubic size for a cube about _______________ that long.



      Andrew Bellon
      so what is all that empty space doing...is there direct interaction between nucleons and virtual particles relating to the nature of "spin," or how the universe actually sustains itself from moment to moment?


      Tony Bermanseder
      This is an appropriate question, which leads directly into the deepest nature of what energy is and it relates on a most fundamental way to the reality of universal consciousness.
      Firstly, the 'empty space' of an atom manifests as a form of 'force field' in that the interaction 'Goldstone' bosons mediate a 'force', which then manifests as the appearance of solid state physics. So tapping a table actually taps an energy field etc. The problems with this mainstream physical interpretation and model begin right here, because the 'Goldstones' (photons, weakons, gravitons, gluons, higgs) are said to be 'virtual' that is not having a real physical existence.

      This is erroneous, just as the mainstream notion of consciousness and mind being nonphysical is also not supported by a higher dimensional cosmology and physics. As an example consider Einstein's E=mc2 applied to the total mass content of the universe. For a mass of say 1050 tons you will have an energy summation of so 1070 Joules. But if you now use the quantum energy, also well defined in Planck parameters, you calculate the quantum energy per space quantum and you get far higher values for this energy.

      Using the conventions (Planck Length, Holographic bounds etc) and using the Event Hubble extent of the universe, you get something like (Number of space quanta) x 2x109 = 2x109x(10147) ~ 2x10156 Joules. Now the string physics tells you that the energy per string quantum is something like 1064 Joules per cubic meter as a physical manifesto of this quantum energy; whilst the energy of all matter in space is something like 10-10 Joules per cubic meter. So the 'discrepancy' between quantum energy and matter energy is in a factor of so 74 (and 87 in the quantum-Planck limit). This number then becomes associated with the 'Dark Energy' and the 'Dark Matter' to explain the discrepancy.

      The 'empty space' of the atom so is in fact 'spanned' by the 'virtual' energy which is dark and has a dark matter component which is defined in physical consciousness parameters based on the quantum energy parameters and especially the physical size of the electron.

      This naturally allows a refined approach to fundamental physics, such as the difference between the Hydrogen atom and the neutron and how radioactive beta/neutron decay allows the primordial universe to build the table of the chemical elements. This transformation then relates to the interaction probability between matter and light in electromagnetic parameters so showing the basic electron to be a 'point particle/string' of a minimum size; but also a 'smeared out' or extended circular membrane characterised by the Fermi scale of the 'Goldstones'.

      The spacial extent of the differences then defines physical consciousness as a modular dual or mirror property of the space quantum itself; namely whatever is measured as energy derived from the macro-physics becomes a reciprocated magneto-polar 'supercharge' in the form of the electronic diameter maximised multiplied by the time differential of frequency as inversed time. But this change of string/brane vibration over time is also an angular acceleration without radial extent and so you find the innermost nature of the quantum spin, which is radially independent.

      Those physical definitions for consciousness then carry enormous implications of course. Namely space itself is conscious in a physical sense and any dynamic occupying space adds to a space inherent base consciousness independent of the dynamics and living entities moving about within it.

      Collapsing a hydrogen atom that is forcing the electron to overcome its weakon force field of the beta decay results in a neutron star of 'degenerate electrons' and you then can observe the quantum physics in the astrophysics. So your original question regarding the empty space resolves in the transformation of energy density in space. Then you should adapt the quantum theory to the holographic universe and the multidimensional membrane physics to resolve the wave-particle duality and the quantum entanglement on both the micro-cosmic and the macro-cosmic scales to find the universal unification. The quantum entanglement can easily be seen to be the effect of the modular duality inferred at the beginning to resolve a number of apparent paradoxes, such as the Schrödinger Cat and the Chicken-Egg DNA/RNA etc paradoxes.

    • Tony Bermanseder
      https://www.academia.edu/.../Journal_of_Consciousness...

      p1j2vs_t&w=98&h=98&url=http%3A%2F%2Fa.academia-assets.com%2Fimages%2Fopen-graph-icons%2Ffb-paper.
      ACADEMIA.EDU
      Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research
      Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research
    • Tony Bermanseder
      To understand creation and existence and how human consciousness 'differs' from that of a space occupying animal or plant or rock; one analyses the creation event metaphysically as the ontology of cosmology, called cosmogony. This quest leads to a bifurcation of two worlds, one prior to the other symbolised in heaven-firmament-earth concepts of creation mythos/religion/spirituality. Using the metaphor of 'paradise lost' and the 'expulsion from Eden' as the precondition for a physical quantum Big Bang creation, then allows one to relate consciousness as a physicalised quantity to resonant states of the initial- and boundary conditions for the universe to exist. Many details are on the academia website, including a very technical video within this paper. https://www.academia.edu/.../God_Reborn_The_Birth_of_God...

      p1j2vs_t&w=98&h=98&url=http%3A%2F%2Fa.academia-assets.com%2Fimages%2Fopen-graph-icons%2Ffb-paper.
      ACADEMIA.EDU
      God Reborn The Birth of God as a Superbrane A Story of Intelligent Design and the Creation of the Quantum Universe in the Uniphyscon of Quantum Entangled Omnispace
      God Reborn The Birth of God as a Superbrane A Story of Intelligent Design and the Creation of the Quantum Universe in the Uniphyscon of Quantum Entangled Omnispace
    • https://www.bitchute.com/video/WABQpOJawitJ/

      =https%3A%2F%2Fstatic-3.bitchute.com%2Flive%2Fcover_images%2FfXwWSSH91bS2%2FWABQpOJawitJ_640x360.
      BITCHUTE.COM
      Dirac's monopole and the creation of the universe
      Dirac's monopole and the creation of the universe
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2020
  4. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    Einstein's Lost Theory Describes a Universe Without a Big Bang

    Turns out Einstein returned to considering his disgraced cosmological constant lambda later in his life.

    The Crux By Amir Aczel March 8, 2014 3:32 AM
    Einstein's Lost Theory Describes a Universe Without a Big Bang | Discover Magazine

    einsteinHubble.
    Einstein with Edwin Hubble, in 1931, at the Mount Wilson Observatory in California, looking through the lens of the 100-inch telescope through which Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe in 1929. (Credit: Courtesy the Archives, CalTech)

    xxx​

    Einstein's words below do not negate a Quantum Big Bang, but incorporate the concept of a 'bounded curved spacetime' well established in the Holographic Principle and the universe as a 'Mother Black Hole' dyad. the issue is resolved in allowing a negative hyperbolic cosmology to be superimposed onto a positive spheroidal curvature encompassing cosmology. This video gives the details for the technically oriented.

    “In what follows, I would like to draw attention to a solution to equation (1) that can account for Hubbel’s facts, and in which the density is constant over time.” And: “If one considers a physically bounded volume, particles of matter will be continually leaving it. For the density to remain constant, new particles of matter must be continually formed in the volume from space.” https://www.bitchute.com/video/WABQpOJawitJ/
    Dirac's monopole and the creation of the universe

    This video is also contained in the following pdf form.
    https://www.academia.edu/.../God_Reborn_The_Birth_of_God...


    xxx

    In 1917, a year after Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity was published — but still two years before he would become the international celebrity we know — Einstein chose to tackle the entire universe. For anyone else, this might seem an exceedingly ambitious task — but this was Einstein.

    Einstein began by applying his field equations of gravitation to what he considered to be the entire universe. The field equations were the mathematical essence of his general theory of relativity, which extended Newton’s theory of gravity to realms where speeds approach that of light and masses are very large. But his math was better than he wanted to believe — his equations told him that the universe could not stay static: It had to either expand or contract. Einstein chose to ignore what his mathematics was telling him.
    The story of Einstein’s solution to this problem — the maligned “cosmological constant” (also called lambda) — is well known in the history of science. But this story, it turns out, has a different ending than everyone thought: Einstein late in life returned to considering his disgraced lambda. And his conversion foretold lambda’s use in an unexpected new setting, with immense relevance to a key conundrum in modern physics and cosmology: dark energy.


    The Static Universe Before Hubble

    Einstein had what would have seemed a very good reason for ignoring what the math was telling him. Few people know that Einstein was not merely a superb theoretician, but also a physicist skilled in observations and experiments. In 1914, Einstein was wooing a young Scottish-German astronomer, Erwin Finlay Freundlich, to seek proof of relativity through shifts in apparent star locations during a total solar eclipse that was to take place in the Crimea (which ended badly because of the outbreak of World War I). Letters that Einstein wrote to Freundlich during 1913-4 reveal that Einstein had a burgeoning interest in astronomy and understood much about the field, including technical details of lenses and mirrors.* Ironically, his deep knowledge of astronomy would lead Einstein to make the greatest blunder of his entire career….Or not.

    Astronomical knowledge of the time told Einstein that the universe was unchanging in its size. How could someone think that? Well, this was the second decade of the twentieth century, and telescopes were still relatively small and not very powerful. They were strong enough to allow astronomers to discover all the now-known planets in our solar system, to get good views of “cloudy patches” of the sky such as the Orion nebula, and to view several galaxies, including the Great Andromeda Galaxy — our nearest neighbor at 2.3 million light years’ distance.

    But astronomers believed that all these fuzzy objects they were seeing were somehow part of our own Milky Way. (The great Eddington even believed at that time that the Sun was the center of this universe! And an idea about the distances to the most faraway stars only began to emerge through the work of Harlow Shapely on Cepheid variables, conducted at the Mount Wilson Observatory, in 1916.) Since astronomers could detect no expansion of stars or nebulas in the entire cosmos known to them, they assumed that the universe was static.


    The Birth of the Cosmological Constant

    To force his equations — which theoretically predicted the expansion of the universe — to remain still, Einstein invented the cosmological constant, λ. He multiplied the metric tensor in his equation, g, by the cosmological constant, leading to a term λg, which adjusted his metric tensor acting on space-time. This mathematical trick assured him that his equations would yield a universe that was prevented from expanding or contracting.

    Unbeknownst to Einstein, at exactly the time he published his paper on the cosmological equations, across the world in California, the new 100-inch Hooker telescope was being fit in its place at the Mount Wilson Observatory. Within a little over a decade, Edwin Hubble, aided by Vesto Slipher and Milton Humason, would use this, the most powerful telescope on Earth, to study the redshift of distant galaxies and conclude from it definitively that our universe is expanding.

    Einstein heard about these results, and in the early 1930s, he traveled to California and met with Hubble. At the Mount Wilson Observatory he saw the massive data set on distant galaxies that had led to “Hubble’s law” describing the expansion of the universe and got angry at himself: had he not forced his equations to stay static with that cosmological-constant invention of his, he could have theoretically predicted Hubble’s findings! That would have been worth a second Nobel Prize for him (he deserved a few more, anyway) — in the same way, for example, that the CERN scientists’ 2012 experimental discovery of the Higgs boson recently won Peter Higgs the Nobel in 2013. In disgust, Einstein exclaimed after his Mount Wilson visit: “If there is no quasi-static world, then away with the cosmological term!” and never considered the cosmological constant again. Or so we thought until recently.


    Dark Energy: Lambda Returns

    When a genius such as Einstein makes a mistake, it tends to be a “good mistake.” (I am indebted to the mathematician Goro Shimura for this expression.) It can’t simply go away — there is too much thought that has gone into it. So, like a phoenix, Einstein’s cosmological constant made a remarkable comeback, very unexpectedly, in 1998.

    That year, two groups of astronomers made an announcement that rocked the world of science. The “Supernova Cosmology Project,” based in California and headed by Saul Perlmutter, and the “High-Z SN Search” group at Harvard-Smithsonian and Australia, announced their results of the shifts of distant galaxies leading to a conclusion that nobody had expected: The universe, rather than slowing its expansion since the Big Bang, is actually accelerating its expansion!

    And it turns out that the best theoretical way to explain the accelerating universe is to revive Einstein’s discarded lambda. The cosmological constant (acting differently from how it was designed, as a force stopping the expansion) is the best explanation we have for the mysterious “dark energy” seen to permeate space and push the universe ever outward at an accelerating rate. To most physicists today, lambda, cosmological constant, and dark energy are closely synonymous. But unfortunately Einstein was not there to witness the reversal of his “greatest blunder,” having died in 1955.

    And it has been widely assumed that he died without ever reconsidering the cosmological constant. Until now.


    Einstein’s Lost Manuscript

    The Irish physicist Cormac O’Raifeartaigh was perusing documents at the Einstein Archives at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem in late 2013 when he discovered a handwritten manuscript by Einstein that scholars had never looked at carefully before. The paper, called “Zum kosmologischen Problem” (“About the Cosmological Problem”), had been erroneously filed as a draft of another paper, which Einstein published in 1931 in the annals of the Prussian Academy of Sciences. But it was not. It seems that even with Einstein, old notions die hard: This paper was his stubborn attempt to resurrect the cosmological constant he had vowed never to use again.
    In a paper just filed on the electronic physics repository ArXiv, O’Raifeartaigh and colleagues show that in the early 1930s (the assumed date is 1931, but this is uncertain), Einstein was still trying to return to his 1917 analysis of a universe with a cosmological constant. Einstein wrote (the authors’ translation from the German):

    “This difficulty [the inconsistency of the laws of gravity with a finite mean density of matter] also arises in the general theory of relativity. However, I have shown that this can be overcome through the introduction of the so-called “λ–term” to the field equations… I showed that these equations can be satisfied by a spherical space of constant radius over time, in which matter has a density ρ that is constant over space and time.”

    But he was now aware of Hubble’s discovery of the expansion of the universe:

    “On the other hand, Hubbel’s [sic**] exceedingly important investigations have shown that the extragalactic nebulae have the following two properties 1) Within the bounds of observational accuracy they are uniformly distributed in space 2) They possess a Doppler effect proportional to their distance” (Quoted in O’Raifeartaigh, et al., 2014, p. 4)

    And so Einstein proposed a revision of his model, still with a cosmological constant, but now the constant was responsible for the creation of new matter as the universe expanded (because Einstein believed that in an expanding universe, the overall density of matter had to still stay constant):

    In what follows, I would like to draw attention to a solution to equation (1) that can account for Hubbel’s facts, and in which the density is constant over time.” And: “If one considers a physically bounded volume, particles of matter will be continually leaving it. For the density to remain constant, new particles of matter must be continually formed in the volume from space.”

    Einstein achieves this property by the use of his old cosmological constant, λ:

    “The conservation law is preserved in that by setting the λ-term, space itself is not empty of energy; as is well-known its validity is guaranteed by equations (1).” (Quoted in O’Raifeartaigh, et al., 2014, p. 7.)

    So Einstein keeps on using his discarded lambda — despite the fact that he invented it for a non-expanding universe. If the universe expands as Hubble showed, Einstein seems to be saying, then I still need my lambda — now to keep the universe from becoming less dense as it expands in volume.

    Almost two decades later, a similar “steady state” universe would be proposed by Fred Hoyle, Hermann Bondi, and Tommy Gold, in papers published in 1949. But these models of the universe are not supported by modern theories. In fact, a tenet of modern cosmology is that as the universe will expand a great deal (after an unimaginably long period of time), it will become very thinly populated, rather than dense, with stray photons and electrons zipping alone through immense expanses of emptiness, all stars having by then died and disappeared.


    Views of the Cosmos, Old and New

    As for why Einstein was so intent on maintaining the use of his discarded lambda, the constant represents the energy of empty space — a powerful notion — and Einstein in this paper wanted to use this energy to create new particles as time goes on.
    Today we view the same energy of the vacuum as the reason for the acceleration of the universe’s expansion. Einstein presciently understood that the energy of the vacuum, unleashed by his cosmological constant, was too important to let die.

    Einstein was far from the only person to wonder about the universe and whether it has always existed or was born at some point in the past and would die at a future time. This question has been pondered by people ever since the dawn of civilization. The origin and ultimate fate of the universe are highly interlinked with its overall geometry — the actual shape of the space-time manifold. In a closed geometry, the universe was born and will someday recollapse on itself. In an open geometry, it was born and will expand forever, and the same happens in a flat (Euclidean) geometry. Based on modern theories supported by satellite observations of the microwave background radiation in space, space-time is nearly perfectly Euclidean, meaning that the universe was born in a Big Bang and will expand forever, becoming less dense with time. Eventually, matter may decay into few kinds of elementary particles and photons, the distances among them growing to infinity.


    Cosmology in Context

    Between 1917 and 1929 — the year Hubble and his colleagues discovered the expansion of the universe, implying the possibility of a beginning for the cosmos — Einstein and most scientists held that the universe was “simply there” with no beginning or end. But it’s interesting to note that creation myths across cultures tell the opposite story. Traditions of Chinese, Indian, pre-Colombian, and African cultures, as well as the biblical book of Genesis, all describe (clearly in allegorical terms) a distinct beginning to the universe — whether it’s the “creation in six days” of Genesis or the “Cosmic Egg” of the ancient Indian text the Rig Veda.

    This is an interesting example of scientists being dead wrong (for a time) and primitive ancient observers having an essentially correct intuition about nature. And with the present explosion of models of the universe and sometimes outrageous “scientific speculations” about its origin and future, some commentators are clearly overstating what science has done. One recent example is the book by the physicist Lawrence M. Krauss, A Universe From Nothing, which claims that science has shown that the universe somehow sprang out of sheer nothingness.***

    A century ago, Einstein’s powerful field equations of gravitation showed the way forward. His uncanny intuition about the universe prevailed despite temporary reversals, and his decades-old insights are now at the cutting edge of modern physics and cosmology, helping us shed light on the greatest mysteries of all: the nature of matter, gravity, time, space, and the mysterious dark energy pushing it all outwards.

    *I was fortunate to be the first scholar to examine these letters before they became accessible to the public, translated them from the German with the help of my father, and published some of the results.

    **It’s interesting that Einstein repeatedly misspells the name of Edwin Hubble (“Hubbel”). Had he not yet met Hubble in person? We don’t know. The spelling error does hint at the fact that Hubble’s discovery was not yet so strongly established that his name would be well known by all scientists.

    ***I take strong issue with this approach, and expand on the topic of what is known by science about the birth and fate of the universe, in a forthcoming book.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2021
  5. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    Einstein's Lost Theory Describes a Universe Without a Big Bang

    Turns out Einstein returned to considering his disgraced cosmological constant lambda later in his life.


    The Crux By Amir Aczel March 8, 2014 3:32 AM
    Einstein's Lost Theory Describes a Universe Without a Big Bang | Discover Magazine

    einsteinhubble-.
    Einstein with Edwin Hubble, in 1931, at the Mount Wilson Observatory in California, looking through the lens of the 100-inch telescope through which Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe in 1929. (Credit: Courtesy the Archives, CalTech)

    Tony Bermanseder-Linda Garrett

    Einstein's words below do not negate a Quantum Big Bang, but incorporate the concept of a 'bounded curved spacetime' well established in the Holographic Principle and the universe as a 'Mother Black Hole' dyad. the issue is resolved in allowing a negative hyperbolic cosmology to be superimposed onto a positive spheroidal curvature encompassing cosmology. This video gives the details for the technically oriented.

    “In what follows, I would like to draw attention to a solution to equation (1) that can account for Hubbel’s facts, and in which the density is constant over time.” And: “If one considers a physically bounded volume, particles of matter will be continually leaving it. For the density to remain constant, new particles of matter must be continually formed in the volume from space.”

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/WABQpOJawitJ/
    Dirac's monopole and the creation of the universe
    This video is also contained in the following pdf form.
    https://www.academia.edu/.../God_Reborn_The_Birth_of_God...

    James Allen
    Ahhh! A match made in Heaven!


    Linda Garrett
    Sorry you can create something from absolutely nothing. In the beginning


    James Allen-Linda Garrett
    Creatio ex Nihilo

    Linda Garrett
    How do you have a big bang out of nothing... what banged...????



    Tony Bermanseder-Linda Garrett

    The scientific discovery/model of the intelligent designer as omnipresent consciousness: https://www.academia.edu/.../God_Reborn_The_Birth_of_God...

    p1j2vs_t&w=98&h=98&url=http%3A%2F%2Fa.academia-assets.com%2Fimages%2Fopen-graph-icons%2Ffb-paper.
    ACADEMIA.EDU
    God Reborn The Birth of God as a Superbrane A Story of Intelligent Design and the Creation of the Quantum Universe in the Uniphyscon of Quantum Entangled Omnispace
    God Reborn The Birth of God as a Superbrane A Story of Intelligent Design and the Creation of the Quantum Universe in the Uniphyscon of Quantum Entangled Omnispace

    Tony Bermanseder
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/WABQpOJawitJ/

    =https%3A%2F%2Fstatic-3.bitchute.com%2Flive%2Fcover_images%2FfXwWSSH91bS2%2FWABQpOJawitJ_640x360.
    BITCHUTE.COM
    Dirac's monopole and the creation of the universe


    The question of creation as a quantum fluctuation ex nihilo is answered as a creation ex uniphyscon as the quantum entanglement of omnispace in the form of universal physicalized consciousness.

    Foreword:

    A claim to have some answers to pertinent and profound questions in regards to the perennial quest of the human race to understand itself in being and in mind can be no statement of whimsicality.
    Such a proposition demands a thorough investigation of the issues at hand; not a one-sided or biased examination of selected data and information; but a rigorous scientific approach to evaluate all the evidence supplied in the history of the developments, both in the popular culture and its science and the philosophies supporting it.

    It is of limited value to parade the scientific discipline as the rational and impartial paradigm for the future; if that same worldview proves itself incapable to elucidate or to explain the most basic of elementary questions asked or problems faced by the now globalized citizen, placing hisher hope and expectation into that same projected future. And the overwhelming problem facing mankind at the beginning of the 21st century is that of its own philosophy.

    ‘Where are we now as a race?’, ‘Where are we going ?’ and ‘Where did we come from?’ are some common questions asked, but not answered by the expert authorities in organized politics, science, culture and religion. Why do we seem incapable, despite having built a monumental edifice called the scientific way and methodology; and notwithstanding the progressing technology derived from that; why then can that same worldview not answer a simple question like:
    “If there is such a thing as God, as so many of us have been told, then where and what is it?”
    We find an evolved human genetic disposition to form allegiances and to carry and ascribe to certain beliefs, often founded or exposited upon by certain individuals or groups. Kings and knights, magicians, clerics, and sages of old have transformed into the experts and advisors of the new.

    Consultancy has become the catch-phrase, often stifling the natural curiosity to find answers for one’s own questions in a denial of one’s own creative impulses through an adventure of self-discovery. Today, we find allegiances to political ideologies, religious dogmas, or some other culturally based agenda. All those liaisons and associations have something in common however; they all become coloured in the individuals which belong to them. Redemption from this filtered state of affairs is found in a paradigm which is based on the precept of disallowing personality to individualize the work to be done or to colour the information to be collected as one’s personal archive or one’s private library of creation, subject to one’s own individual fancies and desires Albert Einstein once remarked:

    “The greatest trouble in the world is the idea of a personal God!”
    And so one might agree with the de-personification of Albert Einstein’s ‘God’, whom he rather affectionately called: "The Old One” and of whom he also said: “God does not play dice with the world”, referring to his rejection of the idea that life and nature’s processes are intrinsically arbitrary in an universe defined by chance and random events.

    [*]He thought of ‘God’ as being the intelligence behind the natural laws of nature, as found in the sciences and the mathematics which he studied and he believed that nature had to be based in geometrical principles, rather than in probabilities defined in statistics and stochastic matrices. And there were others before and after him; Plato and Aristotle, upon whose dialogues this treatise is based; Pythagoras, the Greek geometers and Niels Bohr, Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg, all contemporaries of Albert Einstein with Paul Dirac, Max Born and Wolfgang Pauli in their contributions to the birth of quantum mechanics.
    The symmetries in nature, numbers and sequences and fundamental constants; all seem finetuned and set into relationships with one another to create the universe and all the cosmological entities within it.

    And one should not forget another genius of contemporary science in Isaac Newton. But what the modern world has tried to forget and to sequester away under an umbrella of a perceived historical ignorance, was the immense interest Isaac Newton, the father of all of classical mechanics, had in the concepts of religion.

    And what is the modern moral evaluation by his peers, judging a man whom they portray to the students of science as having had no equal in his time in regards to his scientific work, inventions and mathematical insights?
    His power of pure intellect, like Einstein’s, is often used to exemplify the necessity for logical thought and concentration in the pursuit of scientific and mathematical excellence by the students in those fields. Is it embarrassing to tell the full story; that Isaac Newton spent months at a time trying to decipher scrolls, like the ‘Book of Daniel’ and the ‘Book of Revelation’ in the bible?

    “He must have been deluded in the religious fervor of his age!”, they would have said.

    But was he?

    Could a mathematical prodigy like Isaac Newton have been so gullible? Isn’t it more likely, that he sensed that there was something to it – and that it had to be scientific?! Isaac Newton’s ‘God’ is the same as Albert Einstein’s ‘God’ and yet it is completely impersonal. It must be, by the definition of the working ethic!

    But is it?

    Could it be possible, that once the ‘God of Science’ has become totally impersonal, that then this same ‘God’ is reborn in a ‘God of Omniscience’, who allows, even demands a personification, because of its own definition?
    And what if that had been the masterplan throughout the ages anyway? Can we then ever know and understand such a masterplan?

    And what if all the clerical authorities around the globe are forced by their own followers to take notice? What if modern science can prove to them that their ‘Allah’ and ‘Jehovah’ and Yahwhey and ‘Brahma’ and ‘Baha’ and ‘Krishna’ and ‘Ra’ and ‘Osiris’ and ‘Set’ and ‘The Big Goat behind the Old Oaken Tree in the Walpurgisnacht on April 30th’ are all one and the same?
    What if their scriptures and ancient scrolls became illumined in a new light of omniscience; should their powerbase not become depersonalized, if they are shown to have followed a very limited interpretation of their ‘sacred texts’ indeed?
    Where would they go in their grandstanding of and about ‘God’s Law’ for the ‘chosen people’ and for the ‘infidels’?

    It would be the end of falsified religious dogma and the death of manipulative religion as such. Because omniscience is Omni-Science, the Science of ‘The All’ for ‘The All’ and the German word for the cosmos or the universe is “Das ALL” - Albert Einstein and Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Pauli and Max Born would have liked that in their contemplations upon the natural order of things.

    Albert Einstein also said: “Science without Religion is lame and Religion without Science is blind”- and this book shall try to synergize the two worldviews in a redefinition of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and its statistical nature within a geometrical interpretation of quantum mechanics.
    And then would peace between the nations have a chance, because of the demise of the old religions and the already internationally accepted profundity of the scientific way and methodology. Like music, dance or mathematics, a new language would sweep the old world of hate and dispossession, the ways of disempowerment and disbelief under the carpet of the illumination of a new base of knowledge.
    A new song would be sung and the nations and tribes and families at war with each other could embrace one another in a new way of looking at the world around themselves and their individuated places within it. And all the many things they had learned from their history through the ages of humankind; all their legends, myths and fables, their religions and their sciences; all would become integrated within themselves in a renewed understanding and the death of their ignorance regarding themselves.



    Tony Bermanseder
    A biblical account is revisited here in its metaphysical context of John.1.1-3. https://www.academia.edu/.../The_Beginning_of_Nowhere_in...


    ACADEMIA.EDU
    The Beginning of Nowhere in Notime
    The Beginning of Nowhere in Notime

    Continued in more papers in sequence: https://www.academia.edu/.../The_Beginning_of_Space_in_Time


    ACADEMIA.EDU
    The Beginning of Space in Time
    The Beginning of Space in Time

    Remember the name given to 'the father' by Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane if you choose to look at those accounts.

    What banged?
    The 'awakening' of the self-awareness/consciousness in the creator-creation mode within a spaceless and timeless 'eternity' realm (many would describe as the ever existing God) and its 'Sound' or 'Word'.

    The Quantum Big Bang of physics and cosmology then becomes a derivative of this cosmogony and allegorized as the 'Loss of Paradise' or the 'Banishment from Eden', (necessary to image the metaphysical 'true image of God' as Adam in a physical image of Adam as Jesus).

    As there is no 'Mother of Creation' in the metaphysical 'Old Heaven' an 'Old Earth/Universe' must be created (in the Bang) to allow a time dependent evolution of Old Adam having lost his Rib/Eve to regain this loss (Mary Magdalene's mysterious exclamation as to ascension in John.20.17). It then is the recombination of JC with CJ as the right-left sides of 'God in the Old Heaven' which allows the creation of a New Heaven with as New Earth in the star-humanity of the encoded 'prophecies'.

    Where is the 'Mother of Creation' as the physical universe before the Bang? She is inside or within the Creator-Creation modality, say as a FatherMother and imaged as something (Adam's rib) required to be taken out from God's Son Adam in archetypical allegory and symbol. In the scientific universe, this relates to changing the genomatrix and especially the sexual chromosomes XX as a recursive function of self-propagation/reproduction becomes or transmutates into XX=XY+1 as one digit of the X as X-1=Y to allow XX=XX+XY.

    Therefore the present obsession of the 'illuminated' echeloners of global politics to change the old human genome into a new form of transhumanism. Unbeknown to them, they are not the only 'initiates' into the mysteries of the 'Word of God', they are trying to sequester for themselves in divers methods of obscuration, deception and perversion, especially their hijacking and abuse of human sexuality on all levels, mental, physical and emotional.
    The technocratic cabal-creed-cult attempts to 'fulfil' the 'encoded prophecies' in a manner defined by them and operate under a mantle of secular atheism and scientific superiority. They know of the universal Logos very well and try to forego any manifestation of the 'Word of God' in a manner encoded in the Christian bible and related source manuscripts.

    The present times of tribulation so are necessary to manifest this birth of a New Creation from the ashes of the Old Creation as amply described in the New Testament, many Christians 'believe' in without understanding the deeper agendas of the 'Word of God' and as expressed in the 'Last Supper' (John.13-16) and the 'Sermon of the Mount' (Mat.24).


    One easy way for any Christian to understand the interconnectivity between cosmogony describing metaphysics (or spirituality) and cosmology, say the hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology and astronomy; is to simply reword the definition of John.1.1-3 and noticing that 'God" was preceded in the creation account by the 'Word' or Logic/Logos of God.

    This rewording then crystallizes the absolute importance and 'redemptive quality' of the 'Word of God' in the physical incarnation of the 'quantum consciousness individuation' most Christian know as Jesus Christ imaged in Christ Jesus.

    But because the label of 'God' requires scientific or logical definition, before it should be used in a self-consistent and universally-generally applicable manner; appropriate research and study then allows redefinition of a major code in the Judeo-Christian religion in the following manner;

    John 1:1-3 - King James Version (KJV)
    1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    2 The same was in the beginning with God.
    3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    1 In the beginning was the Definition, and the Definition was with the Source Energy, and the Definition was the Source Energy.
    2 The same was in the beginning with the Source Energy.
    3 All things were made by the Logos; and without the Logos (of the Logic) was not any thing made that was made.





    Tony Bermanseder-Linda Garrett

    Indeed if you would care to expand your information horizon in the links given, but how the non defined matrix of space and time emerges from the self-defined Logos of Creation mostly escapes the heartfelt but ignorant-sinful believers and their circulatory sense of reasoning and perception.
    In a worldly way, one could state that the Fundamentalist Christians (of whom I am one in the true meaning of the time 7BC to 70AD) got the nature and significance of Jesus ben Joseph bar Thomas magnificently correct; but the concept of 'God as Father Creator' abominably wrong (where is the Mother Creation?!) and that as a direct inversion of the New Age Believers. Where folks like you error the most is in your misunderstanding of the scripture codes, which carry both a exoteric-literal and endoteric 'hidden-occult-revelatory' meaning and interpretation and then in a number of manifestations, such as timelines and 'sayings' and prophecies.

    The common political tyranny now experienced by the 'True Christians' and their persecutors could ony manifest itself due to the ignorance of the general population in the context of what this 'neutral revelatory hidden knowledge' truly represents as 'universal law' subject to great potential for the 'created and evolving family.
    The horrendous abuse perpetrated by the globalist technocratic elitist creed is only possible if the general populus is kept in relative ignorance as to the actual workings of reality, both metaphysical and physical in the nature of physicalised consciousness, which in its resonance state of perception manifests as 'the Love of God'. {1John.4.8;16}.


    Tony Bermanseder-James Allen

    Space is consciousness related via an advanced quantum mechanics. Therefore you can figure out what the metaphysics or spirit concept really relates and points to.
    It is not dieu ex machina but machina ex dieu.

    What is Consciousness?
    Answer: The dynamic occupancy of spacetime by physicalised quantum conglomerations.

    Uwe Uehle:
    December 1 at 2:27pm
    Just for perspective. Of course no space is truly empty - but this is symbolic for the miracle you're bathing in right here - right now
    atom.

    Margo Callaghan
    Wow what a mind bender-

    Tony Bermanseder

    Space is consciousness related via an advanced quantum mechanics. Therefore you can figure out what the metaphysics or spirit concept really relates and points to.
    It is not dieu ex machina but machina ex dieu.

    Calculation:
    7.4 Billion people weigh about 518 Billion kilograms for an average weight of 70 kg. As one proton has a mass of about 1.7x10-27 kg; the total mass of humanity in weight are so 3x1038 protons. One proton has a volume of so 4x(1.4x10-15)3 = 10-44 cubic metres and for all the protons of humanity the volume adds to about 3x10-6 cubic meters or 3 cubic centimeters which is a cubic size for a cube about _______________ that long.

    Andrew Bellon
    so what is all that empty space doing...is there direct interaction between nucleons and virtual particles relating to the nature of "spin," or how the universe actually sustains itself from moment to moment?

    Tony Bermanseder

    This is an appropriate question, which leads directly into the deepest nature of what energy is and it relates on a most fundamental way to the reality of universal consciousness.
    Firstly, the 'empty space' of an atom manifests as a form of 'force field' in that the interaction 'Goldstone' bosons mediate a 'force', which then manifests as the appearance of solid state physics. So tapping a table actually taps an energy field etc. The problems with this mainstream physical interpretation and model begin right here, because the 'Goldstones' (photons, weakons, gravitons, gluons, higgs) are said to be 'virtual' that is not having a real physical existence.

    This is erroneous, just as the mainstream notion of consciousness and mind being nonphysical is also not supported by a higher dimensional cosmology and physics. As an example consider Einstein's E=mc2 applied to the total mass content of the universe. For a mass of say 1050 tons you will have an energy summation of so 1070 Joules.
    But if you now use the quantum energy, also well defined in Planck parameters, you calculate the quantum energy per space quantum and you get far higher values for this energy.
    Using the conventions (Planck Length, Holographic bounds etc) and using the Event Hubble extent of the universe, you get something like (Number of space quanta) x 2x109 = 2x109x(10147) ~ 2x10156 Joules. Now the string physics tells you that the energy per string quantum is something like 1064 Joules per cubic meter as a physical manifesto of this quantum energy; whilst the energy of all matter in space is something like 10-10 Joules per cubic meter. So the 'discrepancy' between quantum energy and matter energy is in a factor of so 74 (and 87 in the quantum-Planck limit).
    This number then becomes associated with the 'Dark Energy' and the 'Dark Matter' to explain the discrepancy.
    The 'empty space' of the atom so is in fact 'spanned' by the 'virtual' energy which is dark and has a dark matter component which is defined in physical consciousness parameters based on the quantum energy parameters and especially the physical size of the electron.

    This naturally allows a refined approach to fundamental physics, such as the difference between the Hydrogen atom and the neutron and how radioactive beta/neutron decay allows the primordial universe to build the table of the chemical elements. This transformation then relates to the interaction probability between matter and light in electromagnetic parameters so showing the basic electron to be a 'point particle/string' of a minimum size; but also a 'smeared out' or extended circular membrane characterised by the Fermi scale of the 'Goldstones'.

    The spacial extent of the differences then defines physical consciousness as a modular dual or mirror property of the space quantum itself; namely whatever is measured as energy derived from the macro-physics becomes a reciprocated magneto-polar 'supercharge' in the form of the electronic diameter maximised multiplied by the time differential of frequency as inversed time. But this change of string/brane vibration over time is also an angular acceleration without radial extent and so you find the innermost nature of the quantum spin, which is radially independent.

    Those physical definitions for consciousness then carry enormous implications of course. Namely space itself is conscious in a physical sense and any dynamic occupying space adds to a space inherent base consciousness independent of the dynamics and living entities moving about within it.

    Collapsing a hydrogen atom that is forcing the electron to overcome its weakon force field of the beta decay results in a neutron star of 'degenerate electrons' and you then can observe the quantum physics in the astrophysics. So your original question regarding the empty space resolves in the transformation of energy density in space. Then you should adapt the quantum theory to the holographic universe and the multidimensional membrane physics to resolve the wave-particle duality and the quantum entanglement on both the micro-cosmic and the macro-cosmic scales to find the universal unification. The quantum entanglement can easily be seen to be the effect of the modular duality inferred at the beginning to resolve a number of apparent paradoxes, such as the Schrödinger Cat and the Chicken-Egg DNA/RNA etc paradoxes.

    atom.

    James Allen
    Consciousness is awareness and as I am aware of the universe the universe is aware of me.


    Tony Bermanseder
    True as 'space awareness' can be defined as the frequency differential over time, acting on ANY spacetime volumar (df/dt=Magnetocharge quantum/quantized volumar = Inverse Source Energy Quantum/quantized spacetime volumar distributed over the square of the frequency resonance state 9x1060). Physicalized Consciousness is the product of this awareness and the quantized (electron) volumar. https://www.academia.edu/.../Journal_of_Consciousness...

    p1j2vs_t&w=98&h=98&url=http%3A%2F%2Fa.academia-assets.com%2Fimages%2Fopen-graph-icons%2Ffb-paper.
    ACADEMIA.EDU
    Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2021
  6. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    The Antimatter -Matter Asymmetry as an effect of Quantum Geometry in Diquarks

    A contemporary 'controversy' and mystery in the Standard Model compares charged B-meson decay CP parity violation with uncharged B-mesons in the quest to solve the matter-antimatter asymmetry.

    Antimatter Mystery Continues To Perplex Scientists (forbes.com)
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/drdonl...tter-mystery-continues-to-perplex-scientists/

    The answer is the nature of the 2nd and 3rd quark families. The c, b and t quarks are diquarks.
    There was no antimatter at the Quantum Big Bang Singularity event (Timespace instanton triggering a Spacetime inflaton). So called supersymmetry is inherent in the prespacetime boundary conditions defined in the Dirac String/Monopole. https://www.bitchute.com/video/WABQpOJawitJ/ 2

    The charged B-mesons have only an internal integer charged ring/antiring structure manifesting their structure say bubar=[ud]bar.ubar=ubar.dbar.ubar or bbaru=[ud]u as antiproton or proton quantum quark geometry of the internal down/antidown quark manifesting the weakon ring charge as the interaction transmitter.

    The single ring/antiring structure manifests a c-quark component (ucbar or ubarc). The neutral B-mesons, say bdbar=ubar.dbar.dbar or bbard=[ud]d manifest the neutral (anti)neutron/lambda quantum geometry and therefore suppress the matter-antimatter divergence in the weakon kernel-inner ring /down-outer ring/strange oscillations. The two ring/antiring components cancel.

    neutrinoweakon1. neutrinoweakon2.

    uds-.

    The importance of the uds-lambda quantum geometry


    higgs.


    alephghayin (2).

    The K-Means define individual materializing families of elementary particles:
    a (UP/DOWN-Mean) sets the (PION-FAMILY: πo, π+, π-)
    a (STRANGE-Mean) specifies the (KAON-FAMILY: Ko, K+, K-).
    a (CHARM-Mean) defines the (J/PSI=J/Ψ-Charmonium-FAMILY)
    a (BEAUTY-Mean) sets the (UPSILON=Υ-Bottonium-FAMILY)
    a (MAGIC-Mean) specifies the (EPSILON=Ε-FAMILY)
    a (DAINTY-Mean) bases the (OMICRON-Ο-FAMILY)
    a (TRUTH-Mean) sets the (KOPPA=Κ-Topomium-FAMILY)
    a (SUPER-Mean) defines the final quark state in the (HIGGS/CHI=H/Χ-FAMILY)

    The detailed table is described in a later section and available in linked references:

    The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron -
    An extension of the standard model and quantum field theory

    feyn1.
    http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_28.html


    feyn2.
    David Tong; Cambridge University; Published on Feb 15, 2017
    Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe
    Published on Feb 15, 2017

    According to our best theories of physics, the fundamental building blocks of matter are not particles, but continuous fluid-like substances known as 'quantum fields'. David Tong explains what we know about these fields, and how they fit into our understanding of the Universe.

    https://youtu.be/QUMeKDlgKmk



    1. The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron | Cosmogenesis - Library of Akbar Ra in Alexandria Thuban (cosmosdawn.net)
    2. [(PDF) The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron: An Extension of the Standard Model & Quantum Field Theory (Part 4 | Anthony P Bermanseder - Academia.edu]
    ((PDF) The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron: An Extension of the Standard Model & Quantum Field Theory (Part 4 | Anthony P Bermanseder - Academia.edu)
    3. [(PDF) The Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron: An Extension of the Standard Model & Quantum Field Theory (Part 5) Quark-Lepton Unification in XL-Boson Class HO(32 | Anthony P Bermanseder - Academia.edu]
    (https://www.academia.edu/39753909/T...rk_Lepton_Unification_in_XL_Boson_Class_HO_32)



    {1} Matter interacts with antimatter-based Neutrinos in Majorana-Dirac Electron Capture

    electron1. electron2. electron3.

    An Electron in the inner atomic nucleus is captured by a proton to create a neutron accompanied by an electron neutrino. This requires a u-quark of the proton to transform into a d-quark of the neutron. As the d-quark is a KIR quark of inner mesonic ring of electro charge [+2/3] coupled to the MIR of electro charge [-1], a W- weakon must be engaged to couple to a left-handed proton via the Nonparity of the weak nuclear interaction. However in electron capture a left-handed electron neutrino is emitted, requiring the interaction of a W+ weakon as the kernel gauge for any such right handed antimatter weak decay.

    So should the interacting electron initiate electron capture then a W- becomes the bosonic partner for the interaction; but if it is the interacting proton, then a W+ should become the weak interaction agent to neutralize its positive electric charge with the negative electric charge of the interacting electron.
    The interaction of matter and anti-matter in the form of the weak interaction bosons and their associated anti-neutrinos and neutrinos can however be shown to result from a basic kernel-ring interaction of the anti-neutrinos and neutrinos as both Majorana particles and as Dirac particles. Majorana particles are their own anti-particles allowing identification of right-handed antineutrinos as left-handed neutrinos in the base templated or massless self-state.
    Dirac particles distinguish right handed anti-neutrinos from left handed neutrinos due their mass and inertia in their native oscillation potential.

    For a left-handed proton u[-½]d[+½]u[-½] and a left-handed electron e-[-½], the W- consisting of a right-handed electron and a right-handed anti-neutrino initiates the KIR-Oscillation from the Anti-Neutrino-Gluon kernel of the up quark in coupling it to the OR part of the W-. The colourless Graviphoton or Gγ rendering the 'virtuality' of the W- as physically real in neutralizing the bosonic weakon spin, which 'flips' the right-handed anti-neutrino into a left-handed neutrino observed.

    Proton p+[-½] + Electron e-[-½] p+[-½] + OR-[-½]* + ({Electron e-[+½] + Antiνelectron[+½]}W- + Graviphoton[-1])

    d[+½]u[-½]{u[-½] + IR-[0]}*{KIR-Oscillation (OR-IR)o[-½]+W-[+1]+GP[-1]} d[+½]u[-½]d[-½] + {(OR-IR)o[0] + Antiνelectron[+½]+GP[-1]}
    no[-½] + νelectron[-½] with the KIR-Oscillation transferring the interacting left handed electron charge -1 without spin in the OR-IR-K for the IR-K up-down quark transformation {+2/3-1=-1/3} and neutralizing the weakon associated intrinsic right-handed electron spin as +½-½=0 for the remaining OR-IR transition.
    The neutron is cyclically delinearized from spin self-state d[+½]u[-½]d[-½] into the triplet configuration YCM=CMY=MYC as d[-½]u[+½]d[-½].

    A Magneto axis symmetric Proton K(KIR)K transforms into Magneto axis symmetric Neutron KIR(K)KIR as one of the proton's end Kernel up-quarks 'captures' the Weakonic VPE scalar OR- Electron Outer Ring in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity.
    It is in fact a W-, that interacts, but coupling to the left-handed electron instead of the left-handed proton, the latter requiring some coupling to the W+ weakon in the quantum field to materialize the electron neutrino from the W+ template in a direct fashion and not as the Majorana-Dirac 'flip' initiated by the W- from before.
    It is the W+ intrinsic positron which is 'flipped' to 'free' the materializing neutrino from the W+ weakon base state.
    But as the resultant Outer Ring - Inner Ring remnant {(OR-IR)+[0]} is positively charged and not charge neutral as was the case for the previous W- weakon interaction; the W+ weakon from the proton is suppressed in electron capture in favour of the W- weakon from the electron.

    Proton p+[-½] + Electron e-[-½] p+[-½] + IR-[-½] + ({Positron e+[-½] + νelectron[-½]}W+ + Graviphoton[+1])

    d[+½]u[-½]{u[-½] + IR-[0]}*{KIR-Oscillation (OR-IR)o[-½]+e+[+½]+velectron[-½]} d[+½]u[-½]d[-½] + {(OR-IR)+[0]} +νelectron[-½]
    no[+½]+νelectron[-½] + {(OR-IR)+[0]}

    The W- then supplies the required KIR for the up-quark to down-quark transmutation with the gauge spin neutralizer of the left handed Graviphoton [-1] flipping the right-handed electron antineutrino constituent of the W- into its anti-particular form of a left-handed electron neutrino as a Majorana self-state transforming into a Dirac self-state.

    Electron capture so displays the Majorana nature of the two base neutrinos of the electron positron and muon-antimuon definition in their massless gauge nature when engaged in the direct interaction or 'tapping' of the UFoQR in the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE/ZPE in R2G2B2[+½]+B2G2R2[-½] = BY2B[0]=GM2G[0]=RC2R[0] = VPE[0].
    An Anti-Neutrino template R2G2B2[+½] = W2[+½] = B2G2R2[-½] as Neutrino template in E=hf radiative 'White'-eigen energy and being undifferentiated between the particle and anti-particular
    energy eigen state under the application of the spin symmetry of the 'flipping' 'white' Graviphoton.
    The Dirac nature of the base neutrinos then can be said to apply to all (anti)neutrinos carrying mass in their oscillation potential and properties exhibited in their wave mechanical dynamics manifested in the Anti-Neutrino template R2G2B2[+½] being the anti-state for the Neutrino template B2G2R2[-½] and without or following the Graviphoton 'flip'.


    CP violation in the weak nuclear interaction

    The difference between matter and antimatter subsequently derives from the difference between the Outer Ring charge of the W+ for antimatter and the W- for matter and so becomes related to the nature of constituent neutrinos and anti-neutrinos in the Kernel-Ring oscillations respectively.
    The described gluon-anti-neutrino-electron oscillation from Kernel to mesonic IR to leptonic OR so becomes an inherent supersymmetry between bosonic gluons and fermionic (anti)neutrinos manifesting in the weak interaction and its associated parity violations in Charge-Parity (CP) symmetry.
    All quark-antiquark states engaging outer ring oscillations, such as the neutral kaon pairing
    d.sbar and dbar.s and bottom quark energy states such as b.sbar =(ud)bar.sbar = so will exhibit a difference between matter and antimatter.

    For matter IR with antimatter ORbar, for the neutral kaon Ko oscillates from its kernel VPE K.Kbar or u.ubar a matter IR to an antimatter ORbar for the antimatter weakon: Ko = d.sbar = [K+IR].[Kbar+ORbar] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*ORbar][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*{ORbar+νelectron][-1]}W+ +Gγ[+1]
    {u.ubar+d.dbar or u.dbar+ubar.d} + {strong weak anti-gluon-neutrino kernel-ring interaction suppressing any lepton decay products}[-½-½+1]}

    oo or π+-} Kshorto or
    {ubar.d+e+[½]+νelectron[-½]} π-[0] + e+[½]+νelectron[-½] Klongo , if the W+ manifests from its quantum geometric VPE structure in an ORbar-IR oscillation.


    For antimatter IRbar with matter OR, for the neutral kaon Kobar oscillates from its kernel VPE K.Kbar or u.ubar an antimatter IRbar to a matter OR for the matter weakon:
    Ko = dbar.s = [Kbar+IRbar].[K+OR] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar*OR][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar{OR+antiνelectron][+1]}W- +Gγ[-1]
    {u.ubar+d.dbar or u.dbar+ubar.d} + {strong weak gluon-anti-neutrino kernel-ring interaction suppressing any lepton decay products}[-½-½+1]}

    oo or π+-} Kshorto or {u.dbar+e[-½]+νelectron[+½]} Klongo , if the W- manifests from its quantum geometric VPE structure in an IRbar-OR oscillation.

    But an exchange of the inner and outer rings in their matter and antimatter nature is also possible resulting in the superpositioning of the neutral kaon's wavefunctions and leading to CP violation in that mixing between matter and antimatter in characteristics defined in the weakon quantum geometry.
    Here, the Graviphoton does not neutralize the interacting weakon spin, but spin induces the interacting mesonic inner ring in the IR-ORbar or IRbar-OR oscillation and delaying the strong weak kernel-ring interactions for the antigluon-neutrino or gluon-anti-neutrino kernel templates respectively.

    Ko = d.sbar = [K+IR].[Kbar+ORbar] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*ORbar][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IR*[0]{ORbar+νelectron][-1]}W+ +Gγ[+1]
    [u.ubar][0]+{IR*[+1]+ORbar[-1]+νelectron[0]} [u.ubar][0]+[KIR.KIRbar][0] {u.ubar+d.dbar} as a two-particle decay in anti-gluon-neutrino strong weak interaction and with the Graviphoton[+1] spin inducing the matter based Inner Ring to neutralize the opposite spin of the interacting W+[-1] weakon.


    Ko = dbar.s = [Kbar+IRbar].[K+OR] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar*OR][0] = [K.Kbar][0]+[IRbar{OR+antiνelectron][+1]}W- +Gγ[-1]
    [u.ubar][0]+{IRbar*[-1]+OR[-1]+antiνelectron[0]} [u.ubar][0]+[KIRbar.KIR][0] {u.ubar+d.dbar} as a two particle decay in gluon-anti-neutrino strong weak interaction and with the Graviphoton[-1] spin inducing the antimatter based Inner Ring to neutralize the opposite spin of the interacting W-[+1] weakon.



    The difference in the antimatter to matter and matter to antimatter kernel-ring oscillation so results in the mixing of the wave functions to exemplify the CP violation in the neutral kaon as decaying in different fashion and decay rates as the Kshorto = {d.sbar+dbar.s}/√2 and the Klongo = {d.sbar-dbar.s}/√2 in decay times differing in a factor of the light-matter interaction probability α in tKso=8.95x10-11 s* in a two particle decay {πoo or π+- } and 5.18x10-8 s* in a three particle decay {πooo or πo+- or π++e-electron or π-+e++ν or similar pion-lepton combinations from the weakon templates} respectively.

    This superposition so shows the Kshorto to engage the W- and the Klongo to utilize the W+ in a distinct quantum geometric difference between the kernel-inner ring - outer ring oscillations between that of interacting matter weakons and that of interacting antimatter weakons.

    The discovery by in 1964 of the Klongo also at times manifesting a two-particle decay proved the CP violation at the Brookhaven Alternating Gradient Synchrotron Laboratory by a collaboration led by James Cronin and Val Fitch of Princeton University.
    As shown above, this CP violation becomes a consequence of wave-quarkian quantum geometry applied to quantum chromodynamics.

    For the neutral B-mesons defined in a diquark structure (U=[uu] for c=U.ubar; b=[ud].ubar; t=[ds].U) detailed further on in this paper, the CP violation at a higher energy level becomes more pronounced and susceptible to the measurement of the manifesting energies.
    Because the Klongo decay pattern also allows a two particle decay in the form of the mesonic ring part of the b-quark being spin induced by the Graviphoton, instead of the latter spin neutralizing the weakon spin; an excess of the matter based diquark b=ud.ubar decay patterns relative to the antimatter based anti-diquark bbar=ud.bar.u will be observed in the experimental evidence in the subtraction of the Klongo decay patterns becoming added to the decay patterns of the Kshorto.

    Typical decay patterns for the B-mesons are:

    B- = b.ubar = [ud.ubar].ubar = [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar] = [K.Kbar] + [K+Kbar]+{IR*-OR[+½]+antiν[+½]}W- +Gγ[-1]
    UUbar+OR[-½]+antiν[+½] ucbar[0] + OR[-½] + antiν[+½] Do[0] + (e--)[-½] + antiν[+½]


    B+= bbar.u = [udbar.u].u = [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K] = [K.Kbar] + [Kbar+K] + {IRbar*-ORbar[-½]+ν[-½]}W+ +Gγ[+1]
    Ubar+KIRbar*-ORbar[+½]+ν[-½] c.ubar[0] + ORbar[+½] + ν[-½] Do[0]+(e++)[+½] + ν[-½]


    Bdo = b.dbar = [ud.ubar].dbar = [U+IR+Kbar].[KIRbar] = [U.Kbar+KIRbar] + {IR*-OR[+½]+antiν[+½]}W- +Gγ[-1]
    Uubar+KIRbar+OR[-½]+antiν[+½] c.dbar + OR[-½]+antiν[+½] D+[0] + (e--)[-½]+antiν[+½]


    Bdo = bbar.d = [udbar.u].d = [Ubar+IRbar+K].[KIR] = [K.Kbar] + [Ubar.K+KIR]+{IRbar*-ORbar[-½]+ν[-½]}W+ +Gγ[-1]
    Ubar.u+OR[-½]+antiν[+½] cbar.d + ORbar[+½] + ν[-½] D-[0] + (e++)[+½] + ν[-½]



    For antimatter IR and matter OR, a possible decay mode is: Bso = bbar.s = [udbar.u].s = [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K+OR]
    [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K[0]+({OR+antiνelectron][+1]}W-+Gγ[-1]) [Ubar+IRbar+K].[K[0]+(OR[0]+antiνelectron[0])

    ([Kbar.Kbar]+K+IRbar)(K+OR) [Kbar.K] +[KIRbar.KOR] + {strong weak kernel-ring gluon-anti-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products} uubar + dbar.s πo + Ko
    [Kbar.KOR]+[K.KIRbar] {strong weak kernel-ring gluon-anti-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products} ubar.s + udbar K- + π+

    For matter IR and antimatter OR, a possible decay mode is: Bsobar = b.sbar = [ud.ubar].sbar = [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar+ORbar]
    [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar[0]+({ORbar+νelectron][-1]}W++Gγ[+1]) [U+IR+Kbar].[Kbar[0]+(ORbar[0]+νelectron[0]) ([Kbar.Kbar]+Kbar+IR)(Kbar+ORbar)

    [Kbar.K] +[KIR.KORbar] + {strongweak kernel-ring gluon-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products} uubar + d.sbar πo + Ko
    [K.KORbar]+[Kbar.KIR] {strongweak kernel-ring gluon-neutrino interaction suppressing any lepton decay products} u.sbar + ubar.d K+ + π-

    In both cases the creation of the neutral kaon Ko d.sbar-dbar.s quark content superposition repeats the CP violation in the manner indicated.


    {2} Matter interacts with matter based Anti-Neutrinos via superposed VPE-Weakon Action

    Protons transform into neutrons with antimatter positrons and where the interacting anti-neutrino as constituent part of the W- weakon induces Pair-Production for weakon's electron in tapping the VPE to manifest a like spinning positron to neutralize the boson spin of the Graviphoton. The spin of the Graviphoton so cancels the spin of the Pair-Production VPE as well as the spin of the weakon boson in a superposition of the VPE and the weak interaction.

    A up quark of the proton then changes into a down quark for the produced neutron in a double transition from the Outer Ring of the weakon's electron transiting to the Inner Ring and the original anti-neutrino transits from the Inner Ring onto the Gluon-Neutrino kernel K as the decay products of a free neutron. The right-handed spin quantum of the anti-neutrino cancels the left-handed quantum spin of the weakon's electron base which was flipped by the Graviphoton for the MIR oscillation between the up quark and the down quark transformation.
    {Mass produced photons (by acceleration of inertia coupled electro charges), have no magneto charge and so form their own anti-particles; whilst gauge or 'virtual' photons carry cyclic and anticyclic colour charges as consequence of the matter-antimatter asymmetry}.

    Proton p+[-½] + Antiνelectron[+½] p+[-½] + {Antiνelectron[+½] + (Electron e-[+½]}W- + Positron e+[+½]VPEo[+1] + Graviphoton[-1]

    p+[-½] + {Electron e-[-½] + Antiνelectron[+½]} + Positron e+[+½] {p+[-½]+IR-[0]+Ko[-½+½]} + e+[+½] no[-½] + e+[+½]


    {3} Matter interacts with antimatter-based Neutrinos via Unified Weakon Action {OR+Antiν=W-;ν+Anti-OR+=W+}

    Neutrons transform into protons with muons, the latter decaying into electrons and anti-neutrinos and neutrinos, so reducing the elementary matter-neutrino interaction to basic neutron beta minus-decay with the leptonic coupling between the 'resonance electron' as a basic muon coupled to its neutrino. A neutron's down quark transforming into a up quark in disassociating the mesonic Inner Ring part of the down quark from its up-quark kernel part to become the leptonic Outer Ring part of the manifesting muon. The interacting muon neutrino couples with the antineutrino of the weakon template as its own anti particle transferring its mass to the muon and changing its self-state from mass defined Diracness to massless Majorananess in the process.

    Neutron no[-½] + νmuon[-½] no[-½] + νmuon[-½] + ({Antiνmuon[+½] + (Muon μ-[+½]}W- +GP[-1])

    d[-½]u[+½]d[-½] + *{KIROR-Oscillation (OR-IR-K)[+½] +Antiνmuon[+½]+νmuon[-½] + GP[1]}
    d[-½]u[+½]u[-½] + IR-[0] + {OR-[+½]+GP[-1]} +{R2G2B2[-½]+B2G2R2[+½]} p+[-½] + μ[-½] + VPE[0]
    p+[-½] + μ-[-½] +VPE[0] p+[-½] + *{KIROR-Oscillation (OR-IR-K)[-½]}({e-[+½] + Antiνelectron[+½]}W- + GP[-1])
    p+[-½] + νmuon[-½] + e-[-½] + Antiνelectron[+½]

    In the muon beta decay, the KIROR oscillation transfers the spin of the interacting muon as the spin of its self-state neutrino and enabling the constituents of the matter weakon W- to manifest with the right-handed electron part flipping to manifest the left-handed electron of the beta decay.

    mνHiggs=meλw.rE/(2πrMRe){1/rG-1/rF} ~ 9.3x10-38 kg or 0.052 eV for a scalar blueprint AntiνHiggs = R4G4B4[0] with anti-state νHiggs = B4G4R4[0] and coupling as the Tauon (Anti) Neutrino as
    Antiνtauon = R2G2B2[+½] + R4G4B4[0] = R6G6B6[+½] = Antiνelectron + AntiνHiggs and νtauon = B2G2R2[-½] + B4G4R4[0] = B6G6R6[-½] = νelectron + νHiggs

    For a differential equation for Potential Energy: 2 - {μr}2 = 0

    2 - {r/Re}2 = 0 = (1/r).∂2/∂r2{r} - {r/Re}2.2/∂r2{r} = {r/Re}2.(r) for a solution
    r = constant.exp[-r/Re] for the Yukawa Potential with μ = 1/Re = 4πεomec2/e2 = 4πmeoe2

    = constant.(1/r).exp[-r/Re] mec2 = (μoe2c2/4πR).exp[-R/Re] for R/Re = exp[-R/Re


    f(R/Re) = R/Re - exp[-R/Re] = f(x) = x - exp[-x] = 0 with derivative f'(R/Re) = f'(x) = 1 + exp(-x) and xk+1 = xk - f(x)/f'(x) for a Newton-Raphson solution
    xo =½ for x1 = ½ - (-0.10653066)/(1.6065307) = 0.56631100; x2 = 0.56631100 - (-0.00130508243)/(1.56761552) = 0.56714353;
    x3 = 0.56714353 - (0.00000037547)/(1.56714316) = 0.56714330... for R = 0.5671433 Re

    For the potential energy of the electron with effective mass me = μoe2/4πR, the Yukawa potential for the nucleus reduces the classical electron radius to 0.5671433 Re, which approximates the radius of the proton as ½Re but diverges from the proton's charge radius by the factor X approximately.

    We have shown that the sought-after reduction of the classical radius of the electron occurs in the interval from A=½ to A=1 and where the Yukawa potential results in ½XRe or= 0.85838x10-15 m* for the charge radius of the proton at A=1 as precisely half of the reduced monopolar quantum relativistic electron radius at 1.716761063x10-15 m*. The Yukawa potential applied to the classical electromagnetic electron in electro stasis so approximates the monopolar quantum relativistic electron in 0.5671433/0.618034 or 91.77%.

    From the Feynman Lecture:
    This function is called the Yukawa potential. For an attractive force, K is a negative number whose magnitude must be adjusted to fit the experimentally observed strength of the forces. The Yukawa potential of the nuclear forces dies off more rapidly than 1/r by the exponential factor. The potential—and therefore the force—falls to zero much more rapidly than 1/r for distances beyond 1/μ, as shown in Fig. 28–6. The “range” of nuclear forces is much less than the “range” of electrostatic forces. It is found experimentally that the nuclear forces do not extend beyond about 10−13 cm, so μ ≈1015 m−1.​

    Feynmann3.
    Fig. 28–6.The Yukawa potential e−μr/r, compared with the Coulomb potential 1/r.

    ufoqr.


    Besides conventional string class considerations, the graviton must have spin 2 as a consequence of quantum angular momentum conservation.
    Before spacetime creation in the instanton of the quantum Big Bang, the transformation of the five string classes manifested in the inflaton using a prior supersymmetry between matter- and antimatter templates., represented in say sinx+sin(-x)=0 and where the positive region becomes a quantum geometric matter conformal mapping and the negative region becomes its conjugative for antimatter. As the linearization of the circle inflects at 180 degrees, matter and antimatter become defined in adjacent clockwise and anticlockwise semi cyclicities.
    If now the arbitrary boundaries are defined in some unitary interval between 0 and 360 degrees or [-∞,0,+∞] or [-1,0,+1] or [0,½,1] or [-(X+1),-½,X]; then the left boundary dynamics of say righthandedness cancels the right boundary dynamic of left-handedness throughout the 2 semi cycles, say described in a Moebian connectivity and topology of surface non-orientability in a conformal mapping of a 2D surface onto a 11D supermembrane in a membrane-mirror space.
    After the completion of a full cycle, the matter- and antimatter templates exist in the membrane space of the inflaton, say as a supersymmetry between the righthanded electromagnetic monopolar radiation (emmr) and its antistate in a lefthanded electromagnetic monopolar antiradiation. This supersymmetry between radiative self-states precedes any possible supersymmetry between the matter and antimatter blueprints, as the dynamic of the emmr eigenstate defines the former as a secondary manifestation of potential manifestation, once the instanton of spacetime creation supersedes that of the prior string-brane epoch.

    To realize the matter-antimatter potential, the completion of the full emmr cycle breaks its own supersymmetry in the exchange of the right- and left boundary and initial conditions. The original righthanded (Weyl-gauge photon say of the left mirror) now situated at the right mirror extends the unitary interval towards the positive abscissa (aleph null enumerability) and inflects its anticlockwise parity into its original clockwise parity or chirality.
    The original Weyl-antiphoton from the right mirror, now situated at the left mirror retraces the path of the Weyl-gauge photon however and so does not inflect and so creates the necessity to negate two clockwise quantum spins by a doubled anticlockwise spin angular momentum.

    This demands the birth of quantum gravity and of its gauge agent of the graviton in the formation of a new universal wavefunction traversing in the opposite direction of the now twinned electromagnetic monopolar propagation of the original emmr supersymmetry.
    A consequence of this 'changing of the fundamental supersymmetry' becomes the restriction of any matter-antimatter symmetry to become confined to the concept of pair production in the presence of existing matter or antimatter in Nonparity.
    Defining matter to couple in a Goldstone gauge boson form to the original Weyl-photon (RGB) then forces the Weyl-antiphoton (anticyclic BGR) to suppress the antimatter (MCY anticyclic to matter YCM) template in lieu of a 'twinned' emergent blueprint known as the scalar 0-spin Higgs Boson (Y2C2M2).

    Imagine a Moebian strip without thickness und so restricted to be two dimensional. The perimeter of the quasi-inner ring so defines a self-intersection with its quasi-outer ring and depicts half of the total 2D-space of the Möbius strip for the inflection at 180 degrees. Then the Möbian strip breaks its own non-orientable nature and symmetry to create the 3rd dimension.
    The second parameter space can now become orientable (without the Möbian twist of 180 degrees) and the self-relativity of the first part becomes now 3-dimensional relative and allows a new mixing of the tripartite sectors of the quantum chromodynamics of the constituent Goldstone bosons. From this point in the cosmogony onwards an older non-manifested matter antimatter supersymmetry can eventuate in the observed pair-production, being otherwise suppressed by the earlier radiation-antiradiation supersymmetry described.


     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2021
  7. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    March 13th, 2021
    s65_hans.schatten.
    Anthony Bermanseder left a reason for downloading
    Primordial (semi-)Harmonic Wave Patterns in the Zero-point Energy Field Are Instrumental in the Creation of a Self-Observing Universe

    Nice paper Dirk.
    I especially liked your incorporation of Pythagorean 'numerology', and your hint at a Fibonacci underpinning of your harmonic wave harmonic model.

    Your work here is supported by the origin of the 'Quantum Big Bang' as a a fractal-universal topology of the Horn Torus.
    Considering the Horn Torus geometry as independent from physicalized space- and time, you can construct the universal background of timespace preceding spacetime from a emerging multidimensionality and so a generator of dimensionality, say how the 2nd flat-area dimension derives from the Linespace of Dirac so descriptive of the Dirac String connected to the Dirac monopole and embedded in aforsaid Horn Torus topology and geometry.

    Perhaps in your future work and associations you could utilize those fundamental topological spacetime parameters to construct your excellent theoreticasl approach on an even more elegant and rigorous setting.

    Cheers, Tony B.

    PS.: Technical details of the Horn Torus from the Dirac String model can be found in this paper: https://www.academia.edu/43675282/G...the_Uniphyscon_of_Quantum_Entangled_Omnispace

    A technical video (with minor technical correction not edited) without the metaphysical introduction: https://www.academia.edu/video/Jla0W1

    s65_hans.schatten.
    Anthony Bermanseder
    The Dirac Magnetic Monopole and the Instanton-Inflaton Quantum Entanglement of Wormholes

    https://cosmosdawn.net/forum/attachments/horn-torus-gif.55919/

    The Dirac monopole is defined only at the singularity as the QBBS but is connected via the Dirac string in an arbitrary gauge space, defining potential energy in any place of the universe defined in a three-dimensional parameter space, subject to the initial boundary conditions derived from the timespace of the higher dimensional plenum of nowhere in notime.

    It so is the Dirac string, which allows the point potentials to transform into string potentials in the rotation space around the Dirac string transforming individual point potentials into the Weylian wormhole potentials and integrating and summing subsequently about the three orthogonal space directions of the X-Y-Z plane intersection.
    The magnetic monopole singularity of the QBBS so is defined as the Weylian wormhole of creation and the initial boundary condition for this minimum spacetime configuration becomes a conformal mapping of the Planckian wormhole from the timespace of the information plenum of algorithmic and mathematical definitions.

    The northern- and southern parts of the Dirac string were defined as infinite, before becoming bounded in the creation of the 2nd dimension followed by the emergence of the 3rd dimension and the Weyl string in 2 space dimensions with a quasi-spacetime dimension, able to potentialize the timespace parameter definitions to create a 3-dimensional space with a 4th spacetime dimension. The QBBS parameter spacetime definitions of the boundary conditions for the inflaton now fully integrate a 4th real time dimension and manifest the Weylian wormhole volumar as a Black Hole defined by the instanton.

    The nature of the inflaton so is to free the 3rd quasi-spacetime dimension from its original definition of being potentially infinite in extent, but existing in a space less gauge free parameter realm of pure real time without one-dimensional space defining the number count of the timespace in nowhere in notime, or as existing in a free parameter world of infinite one-dimensional space without time.




    March 15th, 2021
    s65_dirk.meijer.
    Dirk K F Meijer

    Hallo Tony, Thank you so much for sending this very adequate message. I re-read your splendid review and see the clear correspondence with my work with regard to toroidal approaches and our mutual view on the fabric of reality. After reading, I was again aware of all this but failed to mention it in my recent paper.

    Sorry for my omission, and thanks again for the refreshment of my scientific memory!
    Kind regards, Dirk


    March 15th, 2021
    s65_hans.schatten.
    Anthony Bermanseder

    No problems at all Dirk. I forget things too. I am not interested at all in recognition or acknowlegment. I did not comment on your paper, because I thought of you reading or not reading my paper.

    Like one other point you might consider in your quest to lift the veil on the consciousness debate is Wien's law, relating the human body as a EMR emitter to the universal energy matrix.
    So please allow me to further indicate the importance of the Fibonacci series as linked to the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha and its relationship to the fundamental Goldstone interactions.
    This then should allow you to enhance your paper and approach to a model for consciousness as a physics of harmonic vibrations and frequencies.

    The Black Body Radiation spectrum of the human body peaks at about 300-310 Kelvin in the near infrared.
    Wien's law then infers a wavelength of 9-10 microns for this temperature:
    wavelength peak = 0.002897/Temperature, measured in meters.

    The Quantum Big Bang temperature Tps = Tweyl = Twormhole = hc/kBλps = 1.41671x1020 K* manifests as a initialising/boundary parameter to trigger the temperature gradient for the so called 'False Higgs Vacuum' with the quantum form forcing the universe's spacetime expansion from its algorithmic form of the timespace of the Dirac string transformation centered on the Dirac monopole and the wormhole wavelength and frequency modulating the linear radian form of the Planck length into its trigonometric circular form (details are in the main paper and the critique of the Penrose-Hameroff model for physicalized consciousness - (PDF) Quantum Consciousness in the Penrose-Hameroff Model | Anthony P Bermanseder - Academia.edu).

    From the Planck-Radiation-Law, the exponential energy ratio: (Planck-Law/Stefan-Boltzmann Law)=hf/kT=hc/λkT, the quantum form for Wien's Law defines the Wien constant
    b*=hc/k =0.0141671 as being bounded in ∛alpha = F(S) = # = 0.19395906 as the Strong Interaction Constant normalized to Unity 1 in a Unification Polynomial:
    (1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X) = 1 or X4+2X3-X2-2X+1 = 0 and is used to find the coupling ratios between fundamental interactions: f(S)¦f(E)¦f(W)¦f(G) = #¦#3¦#18¦#54 from the proportionality #¦#3¦{[(#3)2]}3¦({[(#3)2]}3)3 = Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega.

    The Gravitational finestructure, here named Omega, is further described by a five folded supersymmetry of the string hierarchies, the latter as indicated in pentagonal or five folded supersymmetry characterized by the Fibonacci-Lucas Series.

    This pentagonal supersymmetry can be expressed in several ways, say in a one-to-one mapping of the Alpha finestructure constant as invariant X from the Euler Identity:
    X+Y = XY = -1= i2 = exp(iπ).

    The Unification polynomial then sets the ratios in the inversion properties under modular duality:
    (1)[Strong short]¦(X)[Electromagnetic long]¦(X2)[Weak short]¦(X3)[Gravitational long] as 1¦X¦X2¦X3 = (1-X)¦(X)¦(1+X)¦(2+X)

    λ* = F(S)b* = #hc/kB = ∛alpha hc/kB = 2.74784x10-3 m* = {0.94694}2.9018x10-3 m* and therefore differing from Wien's b constant by 5.3 % as the Baryonic Matter saturation approximation for the total energy content of the universe. Star units (*) for 1 m* = 0.998331431 mSI The present Baryonic matter content is BM=4.834% with Dark (Restmass Photonic) Matter at DM=27.434% and with a Dark Energy component of DE=67.73% according to Quantum Relativistic cosmology.

    The Baryonic Matter saturation coordinate is given in the cyclic monopolar EMR lightpath from the positively curved de Sitter cosmology (in 11 quantum gravitational dimensions) intersecting the linear expanding Planck-Black-Body Radiator CosmicMicrowaveBackgroundRadiation lightpath of the negatively curved Anti de Sitter cosmology (in 10 string dimensions) subject to universal gravitation.
    BM=5.55% with DM=22.09% with DE=72.36% for cycle coordinate n'=2-√2=0.585786 and n=2-n'=√2 or 23.866 Gyears after the creation event and 23.87-19.12=4.75 billion years from the present time.

    The baryonic matter component evolves according to ΩBMoYn =0.02803{1.618034}1.132711 = 0.0483 until saturation coordinate for the baryonic matter BM intersecting dark matter DM for n=√2 for ΩBMoYn =0.02803{1.618034}√2 = 0.055357=constant for the cosmic matter evolution from 23.866 Gy.
    The dark matter ΩDM = 1-ΩBM until onset of the dark energy component DE at n=½, from which ΩDM is calculated by ΩDMBM{[1+1/n]3 - 1} and as 0.27434 for the present time.

    friedmann8.

    darke.


    DayNightmiddle.

    Curvature.


    As you know, the atmospheric window for life on earth is also at 9 microns, allowing universal communication for the frequency spectrum given by the human body and other lifeforms to actually communicate its collective planetary consciousness to the cosmos.
    Water vapor does not absorb in this window between about 8-14 microns and has a peak at about 9.6 microns for a body temperature of 302 Kelvin or so 28 degree Celsius.

    So life on earth communicates with the universe through its infrared EMR emission as Black Body Radiators, both collectively and individually.

    Now you can use those physics facts in models of consciousness. In your toroidal model, say from biochemical principles and my model from the universal genesis.

    In universal genesis, the wormhole frequency of all creation, derived from the Dirac string cosmology defines a wavelength of 10-22 meters in the 'quantum of universal consciousness' given in units of the gravitational parameter GM as volumexangular acceleration or volumexfrequency squared.

    But those units define both the dipolar electric Coulomb charge and the magnetic monopolar Dirac charge in the T-string duality and the c2 invariance: e=(Planck-Length)x(c2) conformally mapped onto e*=(Electron Diameter)x(c2).

    So you have Wien's Law recovered in the consciousness quantum by (wormhole wavelength)x(c2)=9 microns as the universal consciousness parameter manifested in the gravitational parameter GM and so the fundamental nature of mass as an expression of the minimum frequency configuration of the universal monopolar EMR spectrum with the wormhole frequency of the creation event as its maximum.

    An electromagnetic cosmology based on string parameters can be said of preceding the introduction of inertial mass in the quantum Big Bang and defines an intrinsic curvature within the higher dimensional (de Sitter) universe based on gravitational mass equivalents and their superconductive monopolar current flows.

    A massless, but monopolically electromagnetic de Sitter universe would exhibit intrinsic curvature in gravitational mass equivalence in its property of closure under an encompassing static Schwarzschild metric and a Gravitational String-Constant Go=1/ke as given in the Maxwellian finestructures in the string space and as ke=1/4peo=120pc/4p=[30c]mod=1/Go in the finestructure unification condition of Goke=1 with Planck-Stoney Unification of measurement units, suppressing the electromagnetic charge quantum e and the Planck constant h respectively.



    In other words, the Big Bang manifested inertial parameters and the matter content for a subsequent cosmic evolution in the transformation of gravitational 'curvature energy', here called gravita as precursor for inertia into inertial mass seedlings; both however described by the physics of black holes and the associated Schwarzschild metrics in the unified quantum energy law:

    Energy E = mc2 = hf
    E=hf (Planck) iff m=mo=0
    This manifests the lower dimensional observational matter-energy expressions and a frequency quantization for mass m


    Energy E=mc2 (Einstein) iff f=fss=1/fps for mo = ∑mss = {h/c2}∑fss for the mass-frequency quantization with Eps=hfps=hc/λps=mpsc2=kBTps =1/e* with the SourceSink Energy - Sink SourceEnergy Coupling: EpsxEss=h2 and Eps/Ess=fps2=1/fss2 as a Permutation Frequency Eigenstate Counter


    The Gravitational Finestructure so derives in replacing the Planck-Mass mplanck by a proto-nucleonic mass:
    mc=√(hc/2πGo).f(alpha)=f(alpha).mplanck and where f(alpha) = alpha9.

    The Gravitational finestructure, here named Omega, is further described in a five folded supersymmetry of the string hierarchies, the latter as indicated in pentagonal or five folded supersymmetry.

    This pentagonal supersymmetry can be expressed in several ways, say in a one-to-one mapping of the Alpha finestructure constant as invariant X from the Euler Identity: X+Y = XY = -1= i2 = exp(iπ).

    A Unification Polynomial: (1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X) = 1 or X4+2X3-X2-2X+1 = 0 is used to find the coupling ratios: f(S)¦f(E)¦f(W)¦f(G) = #¦#3¦#18¦#54 from the proportionality
    #¦#3¦{[(#3)2]}3¦({[(#3)2]}3)3 = Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega.

    The Unification polynomial then sets the ratios in the inversion properties under modular duality:
    (1)[Strong short]¦(X)[Electromagnetic long]¦(X2)[Weak short]¦(X3)[Gravitational long] as 1¦X¦X2¦X3 = (1-X)¦(X)¦(1+X)¦(2+X).

    Unity 1 maps as (1-X) transforming as f(S) in the equality (1-X) = X2; X maps as invariant from f(E) in the equality (X) = (X); X2 maps as (1+X) transforming as f(W) in the equality (1+X) = 1/X; and X3 maps as (2+X) transforming as f(G) in the equality (2+X) = 1/X2 = 1/(1-X).

    The mathematical pentagonal supersymmetry from the above then indicates the physicalised T-duality of M-theory in the principle of mirror-symmetry and which manifests in the reflection properties of the heterotic string classes HO(32) and HE(64) as the 3rd and 5th string classes, respectively.

    Defining f(S) = # = 1/f(G) and f(E) = #2.f(S) then describes a symmetry breaking between the 'strong S' f(S) interaction and the 'electromagnetic E' f(E) interaction under the unification couplings.

    This couples under modular duality to f(S).f(G) = 1 = #55 in a factor #-53 = f(S)/f(G) = {f(S)}2 of the 'broken' symmetry between long-range- and short-range interactions.

    SEWG = 1 = Strong-Electromagnetic-Weak-Gravitational as the unified supersymmetric identity then decouples in the manifestation of string-classes in the de Broglie 'matter wave' epoch termed inflation and preceding the Big Bang, the latter manifesting at Weyl-Time as a string-transformed Planck-Time as the heterotic HE(64) class.

    As SEWG indicates the Planck-String (class I, which is both open ended and closed), the first transformation becomes the suppression of the nuclear interactions sEwG and describing the self-dual monopole (string class IIB, which is loop-closed in Dirichlet brane attachment across dimensions say Kaluza-Klein R5 to Minkowski R4 or Membrane-Space R11 to String Space R10).

    The monopole class so 'unifies' E with G via the gravitational finestructure assuming not a Weylian fermionic nucleon, but the bosonic monopole from the keGo=1 initial-boundary condition GomMonopole2=kee2 for mMonopole=e/Go=kee=[30ec]mod=mplanck.√a.

    The Planck-Monopole coupling so becomes mplanck/mmonopole=mplanck/30[ec]mod=1/√a with f(S) = f(E)/#2 modulating f(G) = #2/f(E)=1/# ↔ f(G){f(S)/f(G)} = # in the symmetry breaking f(S)/f(G) = 1/#53 between short (nuclear asymptotic) and long (inverse square).

    The short-range coupling becomes f(S)/f(W)=#/#18=1/#17=Cube root(Alpha)/Alpha6 and the long-range coupling is Alpha/Omega=1/Alpha17=#3/#54=1/#51=1/(#17)3.

    The strong nuclear interaction coupling parameter so becomes about 0.2 as the cube root of alpha and as measured in the standard model of particle physics in the form of an energy dependent 'running coupling constant' and which takes a value of αZ = 0.1184 at the energy level of the Zo weakon at about 92 GeV.

    I hope this exposition can prove useful in your and yours endeavors and an enhancement of your papers.

    Cheers, TonyB.
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2021
  8. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    Epilogue:

    1. The birth of the universe in space and time from physicalized universal consciousness

    2. The definition of physicalized consciousness in the refence frame of the source energy of universal intelligence

    3. The Origin of energy in the Universe as a transformation of the mathematical-metaphysical singularity as a Planck-Stoney Quantum fluctuation of Dirac’s magnetic monopole

    4. Universal Communication between Consciousness Carriers as a function of Wien’s Law and the 9 micron infrared atmospheric window on earth

    5. The Time fractal of the Genesis Code in Seven Days of Creation


    Epilogue:
    The birth of the universe in space and time from physicalized universal consciousness


    Time began, when the nonexistent and the uncreated became conscious of itself and what ‘It’ was, as also being ‘It’ as the existent and as the created. The difference between the uncreated and the created then describes the concept of time as a process for ‘It’ of becoming conscious of itself in the form of a universal self, using time potentials to experience itself as a form of energy. ‘It’ created itself as a universal self in realizing its own potential from the uncreated state of ‘It’ in no time to create itself in ‘Now time’, and therefore giving birth to time.

    Consciousness so is a form of source energy, which forms a relationship between the nonexistent and uncreated and the existent and created. This original consciousness also forms a partnership between the energy forms in existence and the energy forms not in existence in the form of the consciousness energy as imagination.
    The not existing or ‘Nothingness’ of a potential and eternal void was as ‘One’ with the ‘Every thingness’ of ‘All that It could have been’ and was as ‘All That Is’ and could be in a realization of the energy potentials contained in the eternity of the void.
    And the movement and dynamic of differentiating the potentials of the ‘could have been’ from the potentials of the ‘could be’ became the definition of differentiating the order of before and after as a flow of time from the relative past to the relative present to the relative future.
    The imagination in self-consciousness so exists to realize the potentials of the source energy in a form of the forethought realizing itself as the afterthought. This process connects the time relative past with experienced realized energy potentials through the time relative present moment or now time to the time relative future with not experienced and unrealized energy potentials of the source energy, albeit distributed in the parts of the source energy.


    The source energy so experiences the ‘flow of time’ as a principle of order where event B cannot occur before event A has become happenstance in the realization of a relative time potential. Time potentials then becomes self-relative in the form of the source energy and its partition into sub structures of the precursor or parent source energy. The duration between events A and B so becomes a function of the relativity of time as experienced or measured or counted in the distributed forms of the source energy and as a self-relativity of the worlds within worlds of an encompassing overworld or super realm of the source energy.
    This super world is known as universe emerging from a protoverse to evolve into a multiverse and being encompassed as an omniverse as a necessary boundary- and initial condition to enable the source energy experience itself through the time potentials in a spacetime interwoven with the time potentials. The birth of the universe is known as the separation of a world above called ‘Heaven Above’ from a world below called ‘Earth Below’ in the creation of a spacetime mirror called the ‘Firmament’.


    This process was the separation of the ‘Notime’ from the ‘Now time’ and defines the original realization of the original time potential by the source energy. This process is also known as a quantum fluctuation of a mathematical singularity, physicalizing the metaphysical or ‘spiritual’ universe without the parameter of spacetime within a spacetime defined in the mathematical singularity. The creation and birth of time so also gave birth to spacetime in the form of the mathematical singularity defining both a space parameter and a time parameter to become interwoven or ‘quantum entangled’ with each other in a spacetime parameter, known as the wormhole parameter of a quantum tunnel connecting the two worlds separated by the firmament of the spacetime mirror.

    The quantum tunnel, connecting heaven to earth, so is also known as a Einstein-Rosen bridge connecting a Planck-Stoney cosmology to a Weyl-Hawking cosmology in the utility of a 12-dimensional Vafa-Witten spacetime mirror. The Planck-Stoney cosmology then forms the higher dimensional universe known as the membrane-superstring physics using the 11th dimension in a mirror symmetry to connect the 12th dimension of an ‘old heaven’ to the 10th dimension of an ‘old earth’, emerging or evolving from the 1st dimension and mirroring a 0th or Null dimension in the 13th dimension as a boundary for the ‘old heaven’. The lower dimensional universe is bounded in the 1st dimension and so is the mirror image of the 12th dimension across the mirror of the 11th dimension, which so is also the 2nd dimension in the root reduction of the numbers 12=1+2=3 with 11=1+1=2 and 10=1+0=1. The lower dimensional universe so occupies the spacetime of 3 space dimensions and connects to the higher dimensional universe in a 4th spacetime dimension.


    The 4th dimension so is a time dimension, which can also be a space dimension, should the higher dimensional universe reconfigure itself by using the spacetime mirrors of the 2nd and 11th dimensions in a transformation of the 8 dimensions between dimensions 2 and 11 and in using the quantum tunnel as the thickness of the universal mirror of universal time. The 3rd space dimension so is born and created in transforming the 8 dimensions in the quantum tunnel as a new mirror of time as the 7th dimension separating dimensions 8, 9 and 10 from dimensions 4, 5 and 6 in a trio of time dimensions 4, 7 and 10. The mathematical singularity or quantum fluctuation creating the universe in spacetime from the consciousness of the nowhere in notime, so partitioned a 12-dimensional universe into 4 worlds in spacetime and 3 worlds of 4-dimensional space in notime.

    The first world of 4-dimensional line-space of dimensions 1, 2, 3 and 4 is connected to the second world of 4-dimensional space of dimensions 5, 6, 7 and 8 as a 7-dimensional rotation-space by the 4th spacetime dimension known as Minkowski time-space and the second 7-dimensional world is connected to the third world of 4-dimensional space as a 10-dimensional vibration-space by the 7th spacetime dimension, known as Penrose time-space.
    As the third world of four space dimensions without time manifests dimensions 9, 10, 11 and 12; a third time-space is created in the 10th space dimension, known as String time-space.
    The three worlds of 4-dimensional spacetimes so are described as occupying line-space, twistor-space, frequency-space and quantum-space in 1-3 and 4-6 and 7-9 and 10-12 dimensions as four worlds of spacetimes connected to each other in a shared time-space dimension closing the 3 dimensional continuum or circle from the 1st dimension to the 12th dimension in time connector dimensions 4, 7 and 10 or the algorithmic sequence: Begin(1|0)-2-3-(4|1)-5-6-(7|2)-8-9-(10|3=1*)-(11|2=2*)-(12|1=3*)-(13|0=4*)End.


    This process forms the boundary-initial condition of mirroring heaven in earth in the dimensional root reductions of 10=1+0=1 and 11=1+1=2 and 12=1+2=3 defining the line-space, the area-membrane-space and the volumar-space in 3 dimensions in the lower dimensional universe but mirrored in the higher dimensional universe in dimensions 10, 11 and 12.

    The 8 dimensions describing the ‘thickness’ of the spacetime mirror connecting heaven to earth, so originally manifest the physical universe in the birth of spacetime in the wormhole parameters of the Weyl-Hawking cosmology. It does this in transforming a one-sided mirror, known as the dragon Möbius, defined in 2 dimensions of a 3 dimensional space into a two-sided mirror, known as the dragon Klein. The dragon Möbius resides in the area- or membrane space of the Mathimatia, which is a label describing the consciousness realm of ‘Universal Intelligence’ also known as the Universal Word or Logos-Sophia. Möbius so is both a 2-dimensional mathematical dragon and a 11-dimensional mathematical dragon connecting its particular membrane space of geometric occupancy to its environmental space as its cave of residence or embedment of 3-dimensional geometry in the lower dimensional universe of the old earth and the 12-dimensional geometry in the higher dimensional universe of the old heaven.

    The transformation of the old heaven with the old earth into a new heaven with a new earth then is defined in the dragon Möbius in mathematical 2-dimensional membrane space and residing in mathematical 3-dimensional volumar space changing into the dragon Klein defined in 3-dimensional volumar space and residing in 4-dimensional volumar space, also known as hyper-space within a 5-dimensional spacetime with the 7th dimension of Penrose time-space.
    The Möbius-Klein dragon metamorphosis of Minkowski time-space into Penrose time-space with the transformation of 3-dimensional line-space within 4-dimensional spacetime into 4-dimensional hyper-space within 5-dimensional spacetime so changes the one-sidedness of the Möbius dragon mirror into a two-sidedness of the Klein dragon mirror. Before the transformation, the old heaven in the 12th dimension is trapped and restricted in the so is one-sidedness of the self-reflection of the consciousness of the source energy.


    The creation of the universe and the quantum tunnel required the thickness of the 11-dimensional quantum mirror to transform this thickness into its lower 10-dimensional equivalence as a medium of self-reflection for the source energy. The 10-dimensional String time-space so expanded itself through the wormhole parameters of the Planck-Stoney and the Witten-Hawking cosmologies from the 11th dimension as a root reduced 2nd dimension and so creating the 3rd dimension of the line-space in the quantum tunneling of the 12th dimension through the thickness of the quantum tunnel as a ‘timing machine’.

    As this manifested the birth of space and time in a one-sidedness of direction from the 12th dimension to the 3rd and as the 3 worlds of volumars in the 4-space worlds of 1-4 and 5-8 and 9-12 dimensions, the old heaven became subject to the one-sidedness of the creation event of the quantum universe coming into existence from the consciousness or source energy of the creation-creation duality.

    The old heaven so formed a creator-creation duality with the old earth and in which the creator part is defined in the darkness on the non-reflecting surface of the one-sided Möbius mirror as the left side above the firmament and the reflecting surface of the dragon Möbius, also known as the mirror of the Sabbath rest defining the light of the creation being emitted into the creation as the right side of the firmament below.
    The existence of the universe in spacetime, then enabled cycles of light and darkness to prepare the time potentials to evolve into a process by which the old earth could become a new earth in using the dragon Klein as a two-sided spacetime mirror embedded in a 4-dimensional space as a 5-dimensional hyper-spacetime.
    The two-sidedness of Klein would then be able to reflect a processed monopolar electromagnetic source light to back towards the 11-dimensional Witten mirror as a consequence of the breaking of the Möbius mirror destroying the one-sidedness and replacing it with the two-sidedness of Klein. The replacing of the archetypical low vibration red dragon Möbius with the archetypical high vibration blue dragon Klein would so create a new heaven as the image of the new earth.


    The creator-creation duality so describes the original existence-nonexistence dichotomy as a dyadic monad of being two things within one thing, but unable to experience the two things as one unity, due to the in separateness of the two things in the absence of the existence of space to separate in.
    A monadic dyad as two things unified as one thing would however allow a separating in space between the two things, if the two things could become irrevocably connected with each other. The time potentials of the source energy so define the quantum entanglement as a space independent parameter of spacetime as a primary foundation for the cosmology of the source energy as universal consciousness.


    The old heaven so released its consciousness energy as electromagnetic-monopolar light to enable the transformation of consciousness into energy forms subject to spacetime parameters derived from the wormhole cosmology of the mathematical singularity geometrically defined in the dragon Möbius, transforming into the dragon Klein using the time potentials of the source energy as universal consciousness.
    This transformation of source energy was initiated in the Planck-Stoney cosmology, which defined interdependent units for measurement and experience under the guidance of universal principles, also known as the laws of nature.
    The time potential for the transformation of the Planck-Stoney cosmology into the Witten-Hawking cosmology became realized in the quantum tunneling creating the 3rd dimension from the thickness of the 11-dimensional Witten membrane mirror and allowed the transmutation of five superstring classes of the 10-dimensional String time-space into each other in a gradient of energy between the five classes.
    The first class so is known as the Planck string, the second class as a Monopole string, the third class as a XL-boson class, the fourth class as a Cosmic Ray string and the fifth class as a Weyl string, the last enabling the 4-dimensional Minkowski spacetime to emerge as a Einstein-Maxwell-Planck cosmology, descriptive of a thermodynamic expansion of the universe as a Black Body Planck Radiator emitting electromagnetic radiation in frames of references relating inertial mass parameters with non-inertial parameters.



    The definition of physicalized consciousness in the refence frame of the source energy of universal intelligence

    As a noninertial frame of reference experiences a form of acceleration relative to an inertial frame of reference; the form of acceleration becomes the mode of operation for measurements using the laws of nature. When measuring the weight of something on the earth’s poles, this weight will be greater than if measured on the equator by about 0.53 %, because there is no horizontal force on the weight as the earth spins around its axis; but there is a ‘fictitious horizontal force’ on the equator, where the weight moves in a circle about the axis of the earth in a period of rotation of about 24 hours.
    The vertical reaction force on the weight on the poles exactly balances the action force of gravity without any horizontal force component; but on the equator the vertical action force of gravity is balanced by both, the vertical reaction force of the weight and a vertical component, horizontal relative to the poles, as the fictitious centrifugal force. The gravitational action so is measured as a reduction in weight and in the absence of the centrifugal force component. This example supposes a perfect spherical symmetry for the earth. As the earth is flattened on the poles as an oblate spheroid, gravity on the poles is greater than at the equator as the poles are closer to the center of the earth, than is the equator.


    It is so the inertia, which causes fictitious forces as non-accelerated frames of reference for measurement and observation in a classical physics of Newton’s laws and Einstein’s extension of the laws of mechanics in the curvature of spacetime incorporating the inertial frames of reference of Special Relativity within the non-inertial accelerated frames of reference of General Relativity. The classical physics of Newton, Maxwell and Einstein is based on the geometry of spacetime and is applied to describe the geometry of the universe as an interaction of physical entities within a spacetime of both inertial and non-inertial reference frames. Minkowski spacetime is considered flat without curvature and Penrose spacetime is considered curved or twisted in a geometry of positive ellipsoidal or negative hyperbolic curvatures underpinning the force of gravity as a curvature of spacetime interacting with mass as the basis of inertia.

    The physical basis for consciousness as the source energy so becomes the precursor of inertia and so mass in the original nature of a non-inertial reference frame. The mass content of the universe at the creation event of the quantum tunneling of the 12th dimension transforming into the 3rd dimension of the parameters of the Weyl string and as the total inertia of the universe was caused by the non-inertial and so accelerated frame of reference of the source energy in form of universal spacetime consciousness quantum tunneling as a function and derivative of the Planck string transforming into the Weyl string.

    The non-inertial reference frame of the source energy so defined the original spacetime unit as a source energy quantum of physicalized consciousness in the Weyl wormhole parameters of creation, also known as a Quantum Big Bang.
    The connection and unification between all forms of energy as derivatives of the source energy of universal consciousness so is found in the Mathimatia of the Universal Logos-Sophia, which utilizes the Euclidean classical geometry of Newton, Maxwell, and Einstein as a consequence from a quantum geometry of Planck, Stoney, and Witten.



    The Origin of energy in the Universe as a transformation of the mathematical-metaphysical singularity as a Planck-Stoney Quantum fluctuation of Dirac’s magnetic monopole

    It then becomes a quantum acceleration, which forms the basis for a physical definition of the source energy and physicalized consciousness. Angular acceleration of an elementary particle, such as a proton, a neutron, an electron, or a neutrino is known as quantum spin defined as a half-integer fermionic quantum rotation or as a integer bosonic quantum rotation multiplied by a constant spacetime parameter called Planck’s constant h divided by 2π.

    Angular acceleration is by definition independent from linear displacement, the parameter of linear extent being replaced by angular extent. In the quantum geometry of the source energy, the units of measurement or mensuration for the quantum acceleration so assume the form of frequency divided by time or the inverse of the square of time, generalised as the time differential of frequency or df/dt.
    Logos Mathimatia or the universal intelligence then defines the parameter df/dt as the unit of spacetime awareness, which if multiplied by the wormhole volumar of the Weyl string Vweyl of the Quantum Big Bang will define the source energy quantum from first principles as {proportionality constant}.Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl=Eweyl=hfweyl=mweylc2=kBTweyl, in the mathematical formulations for the energy transformations in electromagnetic radiation (Planck) and mass (Einstein) and temperature as kinetic energy (Stefan-Boltzmann) respectively.


    A supersymmetry between the electric- and magnetic field vectors in Maxwell’s equations for electrodynamical energy systems emerges as a consequence of the source energy physicalizing its original energy definition as a form of mass independent consciousness and as a function of quantum angular acceleration defined in a space-less void of the mathematical or metaphysical singularity. The absence of mass or inertia defines the quantum acceleration as the time derivative of frequency as a pure number count not requiring any spatial coordinates or displacements and by necessity relate a frequency distribution as a quantized number field given by particular boundary- and initial conditions, defining a particular form for the frequency distribution once the space coordinates and displacement vectors are added to the frequency distribution at the instanton-inflaton coupling defining the parameters of a Quantum Big Bang redefining the mathematical singularity. The boundary conditions for the frequency distribution then assume the form of a maximum and a minimum permutation count under an inversion duality and as defined in the T-duality of superstring-membrane theory.

    The initial condition for the transformation of the source energy as a metaphysical singularity in null space into displacement coordinate-vector space, then defines a maximum frequency permutation self-state unifying with its minimum frequency permutation state in the form of the time differential for frequency or df/dt. In the null space of the singularity, the inversion property so defines the maximum frequency state fmax for a time coordinate tmin and the minimum frequency state fmin=1/fmax with tmax not defined as a limit or upper bound for a subsequent expansion of the coordinate space emerging from the null space.

    The eigen state for the source energy so is defined in a source energy quantum of metaphysical consciousness physicalized in a Quantum Big Bang and as a consequence of defining the minimum spacetime configuration in the quantum fluctuation of the mathematical singularity. This null space so is space-less and without energy as defined in spacetime, but nevertheless carries energy in the form of not physicalized consciousness defined metaphysically or in abstract mathematical terms.

    The null space is descriptive of the 12-dimensional universe of the mathimatia and remains not physicalized until the boundary of the 5th superstring class has become defined in the physical null space.

    The source energy quantum for physicalized consciousness and therefore physicalized energy so is defined as the Weyl-boson of the Quantum Big Bang self-creation event, creating spacetime as the Weyl-wormhole as a transformed superstring class from the first superstring class of a Planck-boson causative and defining the quantum oscillation of itself to manifest the spacetime parameters created in a physicalisation of the Planck-boson as the Weyl-boson at the instanton as the birth of spacetime and coupled to a inflaton as the upper boundary initial condition for the lower boundary as the instanton.

    At the instanton df/dt|max=df/dt|weyl=df/dt|primarysourcesink=df/dt|ps =fmax/tmin=fmax2 for Eps=Eweyl=hfps=hc/lps=mpsc2=kBTps

    The physicalized energy expressions with unitary mensuration units for the spacetime parameters however emerged from the null space, describing the higher dimensional ‘string-membrane’ space and this ‘definition spacetime’ of the 5 string classes preceded the Weyl-boson spacetime in the frequency- or number-space modulating the spacetime parameters and measurement units to define the Weyl-Eps-boson in the units of the Witten spacetime.

    Eps=Eweyl={melectron/2e}√{hc/2pGo/hcα}|mod={mplanck/melectron}/{2e√α}|mod and defining the source energy quantum as having units of Inverse electropole charge or 1/e defining a magnetopole charge e*=1/Eweyl as the proportionality condition for multidimensional unification Eweyl.e*=Eps.e*=1 and for 2e/e*=2e.Eps = constant = {mplanck/melectron}/{√α} = Gomelectron/2e2}.

    In the manifested spacetime from the quantum Big Bang, the magnetopole charge e* has the units of the gravitational parameter GM in the form of e*=2Relectronc2 in units [Volume][df/dt]=[m3/s2]
    Using the mass of the electron and the Planck-mass as a dimensionless ratio, the Planck-mass is proportional to the Planck-length in the quantization of quantum angular momentum in mplanck=√{hc/2πGo} with Lplanck=√{hGo/2πc3} in Planck’ constant
    Gomplanck2/c=h/2π= c3Lplanck2/Go for the proportion mplanck={c2/Go}Lplanck by the generalised finestructure unification Goke=1 from 2πGoM2/r2=2πkee2/r2 with the Maxwell fine structure μoεo={120π/c}{1/120πc} and the free spacetime impedance
    Zo=√μoo}=120π. Here Go=4πεo|mod={4π/120πc}|mod=1/30c|mod.


    The monopole string class so 'unifies' Electromagnetism with Gravitation via the gravitational finestructure assuming not a Weylian fermionic nucleon, but the bosonic monopole from the keGo=1 initial-boundary condition GomMonopole2=kee2 for mMonopole=e/Go=kee=[30ec]mod=mplanck.√a. The ‘Grand-Unification’ magnetic monopole mass so becomes [30ec]modc2=30ec3 eV* for a magnetic monopole mass of 8.1x1017 GeV* manifesting in Weyl-spacetime as a defect in the Higgs-boson symmetry, breaking a SU(3)SU(2)U(1) gauge symmetry in the supersymmetry of a SU(5) string-membrane spacetime.

    The Higgs-boson, as a universal mass generator from its quantum geometric template; so manifests the magnetic monopole as a magnetic point charge, manifesting in a magneto-current mass equivalence in the modulation of
    [ec]mod=[monopole mass mmonopole]=[monopolar current imonopole]=[electropolar charge e]x[displacement/time] and where the displacement of the magnetic point charge occurs in the string modular space of the ‘bounce’ of the Planck-Length as the oscillation of a Zero-Point Planck-boson oscillator defining the minimum spacetime configuration of superstring class one transforming into superstring class 2 as the Monopole-boson and manifesting the quantum Big Bang in superstring class 5 at the instanton-inflaton coupling, creating spacetime in the Weyl-boson and the inflaton.


    The quantum fluctuation of the Planck-boson is defined in the ‘bounce’ of the Planck length as
    Lstoney=√α.Lplanck=√{2πkee2/hc}.√{ hGo/2πc3}=√{keGoe2/c4}=e/c2.
    And modulate the string displacement of the ‘Planck bounce’ as the ratio of electropole charge to the square of the speed of light. Substituting Lstoney for the mass-current equivalence of the magnetic monopole [ec]|mod=[mass]=[monopolar current/Stoney displacement]=[ec/(e/c2)]=[c3]mod as the energy of monopole [ec] as a mass in c3=2.7x1016 eV*.
    A monopole mass of [ec]mod=4.818x10-11 kg* or 2.7x1016 GeV* so is upper bounded by the monopole string as a Higgs defect of 8.1x1017 GeV* and a factor of 30.


    The proportionality constant in units mass/displacement [kg/m] describes Maxwell’s displacement current in the non-inertial reference of the Stoney units of the transformation of the Planck string into the Stoney monopole string.

    As the Planck string suppresses the parameter of electric charge ‘e’ in the Planck displacement or Planck length Lplanck=√{hGo/2πc3} and Planck mass mplanck=√{hc/2πGo} and the Planck time tplanck=Lplanck/c=√{2πGoh/c5} with the Planck energy Eplanck=mplanck.c2=h/tplanck and Planck temperature Tplanck=Eplanck/kB=√{hc5/2πGokB2} from Newton’s law for gravitational force Fgrav=GoMm/R2, and from Coulomb’s law for electric force Femr=kee2/R2.

    This defines a Planck charge qplanck=√{hc/2pke}=√{2eohc}=e/√a for a Coulomb electric permittivity constant eo=1/moc2 and an magnetic permeability constant mo from the Maxwell equations for classical electromagnetism and the electromagnetic finestructure constant a=2πkee2/hc.
    The electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha α so becomes the agency to transform the Planck units into Stoney units.
    The Stoney string suppresses the Planck- and Action constant ‘h’ in the Stoney length Lstoney=√{Gokee2/c4} and a Stoney mass mstoney=√{kee2/Go} and the Stoney time tstoney=√{Gokee2/c6} with Stoney energy Estoney=mstoney.c2=h/tstoney and Stoney temperature Tstoney=Estoney/kB=√{kee2c4/GokB2}.


    This defines a Stoney charge qstoney=e as the Coulomb charge quantum and defines Planck’s constant h=2πkeqplanck2/c=2πkee2/c =2πkeqstoney2/c=αh for a unitized finestructure constant being 1 in Stoney units but being about 1/137 in Planck units using the numerical values for the constants of nature defined in the symbols of the mathimatia.

    The proportionality constant for the unification of the electromagnetic and gravitational forces or energy interactions so is obtained in the ratio of the Stoney mass to the Stoney displacement or mstoney/Lstoney=√{(kee2/Go)/( Gokee2/c4)}= √{c4/Go2}=c2/Go and the same ratio of the Planck mass to the Planck length in
    √{(hc/2πGo)/(hGo/2πc3)}= √{c4/Go2}=c2/Go.


    Maxwell’s mass displacement current for the ‘flow of inertia’ so is quantum gravitationally expressed in the constant c2/Go and where Newton’s gravitational constant G is applied to a inertia free or massless universe defined in a curvature of ‘free space’ for the Maxwell definition for the invariance of the speed of light and propagation of electromagnetic waves and in the formulation μoo=1/c2 and fine structured in the ‘free space impedance’
    Zo=|Electric Field Strength E|/|Magnetic Field Strength H|=√{μoo}=√{(120π/c)/(1/120πc)}=120π.


    In an inertia free universe without mass, the curvature would become independent on mass and the displacement parameter would be given in the Stoney length Lstoney=√{Gokee2/c4} and where the curvature would be defined in the proportionality constant √{Goke} in units of √{[Nm2/kg2][Nm2/C2]}= √[m6/s4.C2]=[m3/s2C] and so the units of the gravitational parameter GM divided by the units of Coulomb charge ‘e’ and the units of spacetime awareness multiplied by the units of a spacetime volumar divided by the units of the charge ‘e’.
    The quantum physics of this formulation enables the Logos mathimatia to unitize both the gravitational parameter GM and the consciousness quantum (proportionality constant)Vweyl.{df/dt}=1/e* in a definition of e* being the magnetopolar charge as inversion of the quantum energy formulations E=hf=mc2=kBT. Instead of the unit for electropolar charge using the Coulomb [C], the magnetopolar charge uses the Star Coulomb [C*] as the unit of measurement.


    This unitization of the units of the Stoney length in the Star Coulomb also unitizes the product of the proportionality constant in the Stoney length as Goke=1 and therefore unifies the energy interactions of gravitation and electromagnetism on the quantum level of the source energy.

    This also redefines the Stoney length as Lstoney=√{Gokee2/c4}
    = Lstoney=√{e2/c4}=e/c2= Lstoney=√α.Lplanck=√{2πkee2/hc}.√{ hGo/2πc3}=√{keGoe2/c4}=e/c2.


    The Stoney length e/c2 in the units of displacement of the Planck length, so represents the quantum fluctuation causative for the Quantum Big Bang and the separation of the old heaven from the old earth in a factor of the inverse of the square root of alpha or a numerical factor of about 11.706=1/0.0854 describing the oscillation of the Planck length between a linear displacement value of {e/c2=1.784x10-36 m*} and {√{hGo/2πc3=2.090x10-35 m*} in star units derived from the free space impedance where the speed of light is precisely 3x108 [m/s]*=2.99792458x108 [m/s] SI.

    A fundamental natural law multidimensional universe crystallizes from the definition of the ‘free space impedance’
    Zo=|E/H|=√{μoo}=√{(120π/c)/(1/120πc)}=120p in the unitary analysis:

    Zo=√{(H/m)/(F/m)}=√([Js2/C2m]/[C2/Jm])=[Js]/[C2] = [Action/Charge2] in Ohms [Ω]=[V/I]=[Js/C2] and proportional to [h/e2] as the 'higher dimensional source' for the manifesting superconductivity of the lower dimensions in the quantum Hall effect (~e2/h), the conductance quantum (2e2/h) and the Josephson frequencies (~2e/h) in Ohms [Ω].


    Universal Communication between Consciousness Carriers as a function of Wien’s Law and the 9 micron infrared atmospheric window on earth

    A crucial point in the quest to lift the veil on the consciousness debate is Wien's law, relating the human body as a EMR emitter to the universal energy matrix.
    The importance of the Fibonacci series as linked to the electromagnetic finestructure constant alpha and its relationship to the fundamental Goldstone interactions is indicated by Wien’s Law as an approximation to Planck’s Law of Radiation and the Black Body spectra.
    Models for physicalized consciousness then point to a physics of harmonic vibrations and frequencies.


    The Black Body Radiation spectrum of the human body peaks at about 300-310 Kelvin in the near infrared.
    Wien's law then infers a wavelength of 9-10 microns for this temperature:
    Wavelength peak = 0.002897/Temperature, measured in meters.


    The Quantum Big Bang temperature Tps = Tweyl = Twormhole = hc/kBλps = 1.41671x1020 K* manifests as a initializing/boundary parameter to trigger the temperature gradient for the so called 'False Higgs Vacuum' with the quantum form forcing the universe's spacetime expansion from its algorithmic form of the timespace of the Dirac string transformation centered on the Dirac monopole and the wormhole wavelength and frequency modulating the linear radian form of the Planck length into its trigonometric circular form (details are in the main paper and the critique of the Penrose-Hameroff model for physicalized consciousness - (PDF) Quantum Consciousness in the Penrose-Hameroff Model | Anthony P Bermanseder - Academia.edu).

    From the Planck-Radiation-Law, the exponential energy ratio: (Planck-Law/Stefan-Boltzmann Law)=hf/kT=hc/λkT, the quantum form for Wien's Law defines the Wien constant b*=hc/k =0.0141671 as being bounded in alpha = F(S) = # = 0.19395906 as the Strong Interaction Constant normalized to Unity 1 in a Unification Polynomial:
    (1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X) = 1 or X4+2X3-X2-2X+1 = 0 and is used to find the coupling ratios between fundamental interactions: f(S)¦f(E)¦f(W)¦f(G) = #¦#3¦#18¦#54 from the proportionality
    #¦#3¦{[(#3)2]}3¦({[(#3)2]}3)3 = Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega.


    The Gravitational finestructure, here named Omega, is further described by a five folded supersymmetry of the string hierarchies, the latter as indicated in pentagonal or five folded super symmetry characterized by the Fibonacci-Lucas Series.
    This pentagonal supersymmetry can be expressed in several ways, say in a one-to-one mapping of the Alpha finestructure constant as invariant X from the Euler Identity: X+Y = XY = -1= i2 = exp(iπ).


    The Unification polynomial then sets the ratios in the inversion properties under modular duality:
    (1)[Strong short]¦(X)[Electromagnetic long]¦(X2)[Weak short]¦(X3)[Gravitational long] as : 1¦X¦X2¦X3 = (1-X)¦(X)¦(1+X)¦(2+X)
    λ* = F(S)b* = #hc/kB = alpha hc/kB = 2.74784x10-3 m* = {0.94694}2.9018x10-3 m* and therefore differing from Wien's b constant by 5.3 % as the Baryonic Matter saturation approximation for the total energy content of the universe, using Star units (*) for 1 m* = 0.998331431 mSI.


    The present Baryonic matter content is BM=4.834% with Dark (Restmass Photonic) Matter at DM=27.434% and with a Dark Energy component of DE=67.73% according to Quantum Relativistic cosmology.
    The Baryonic Matter saturation coordinate is given in the cyclic monopolar EMR light path from the positively curved de Sitter cosmology (in 11 quantum gravitational dimensions) intersecting the linear expanding Planck-Black-Body Radiator Cosmic-Microwave-Background-Radiation light path of the negatively curved Anti de Sitter cosmology (in 10 string dimensions) subject to universal gravitation.


    BM=5.55% with DM=22.09% with DE=72.36% for cycle coordinate n'=2-√2=0.585786 and n=2-n'=√2 or 23.866 G-years after the creation event and 23.87-19.12=4.75 billion years from the present time.
    The baryonic matter component evolves according to ΩBMoYn =0.02803{1.618034}1.132711 = 0.0483 until saturation coordinate for the baryonic matter BM intersecting dark matter DM for n=√2 for ΩBMoYn =0.02803{1.618034}√2 = 0.055357=constant for the cosmic matter evolution from 23.866 Gy.
    The dark matter ΩDM = 1-ΩBM until onset of the dark energy component DE at n=½, from which ΩDM is calculated by ΩDMBM{[1+1/n]3 - 1} and as 0.27434 for the present time.


    friedmann8.
    darke. DayNightmiddlepdf. Curvature.

    The atmospheric window for life on earth is also at 9 microns, allowing universal communication for the frequency spectrum given by the human body and other lifeforms to actually communicate its collective planetary consciousness to the cosmos.
    Water vapor does not absorb in this window between about 8-14 microns and has a peak at about 9.6 microns for an Ozone-Greenhouse absorption nexus and for a body temperature of 302 Kelvin or so 28 degree Celsius.


    So life on earth communicates with the universe through its infrared EMR emission as Black Body Radiators, both collectively and individually.

    Those physical facts can then be used in models of consciousness using toroidal geometries, say from biochemical principles and from the viewpoint of universal genesis.

    In universal genesis, the wormhole frequency of all creation, derived from the Dirac string cosmology defines a wavelength of 10-22 meters in the 'quantum of universal consciousness' given in units of the gravitational parameter GM as {volume}x{angular acceleration} or {volume}x{frequency squared}.

    But those units define both the dipolar electric Coulomb charge and the magnetic monopolar Dirac charge in the T-string duality and the c2 invariance: e=(Planck-Length)x(c2) conformally mapped onto e*=(Electron Diameter)x(c2).

    Wien's Law is recovered in the consciousness quantum by (wormhole wavelength)x(c2) = 9 microns as the universal consciousness parameter manifested in the gravitational parameter GM and so the fundamental nature of mass as an expression of the minimum frequency configuration of the universal monopolar EMR spectrum with the wormhole frequency of the creation event as its maximum.

    An electromagnetic cosmology based on string parameters can be said of preceding the introduction of inertial mass in the quantum Big Bang and defines an intrinsic curvature within the higher dimensional (de Sitter) universe based on gravitational mass equivalents and their superconductive monopolar current flows.

    This derivation so indicates an electromagnetic cosmology based on string parameters as preceding the introduction of inertial mass in the quantum Big Bang and defines an intrinsic curvature within the higher dimensional (de Sitter) universe based on gravitational mass equivalents and their superconductive monopolar current flows.

    A massless, but monopolically electromagnetic de Sitter universe would exhibit intrinsic curvature in gravitational mass equivalence in its property of closure under an encompassing static Schwarzschild metric and a Gravitational String-Constant Go=1/ke as given in the Maxwellian finestructures in the string space and as ke=1/4peo=120pc/4p=[30c]mod=1/Go in the finestructure unification condition of Goke=1.

    In other words, the Big Bang manifested inertial parameters and the matter content for a subsequent cosmic evolution in the transformation of gravitational 'curvature energy', here called gravita as precursor for inertia into inertial mass seedlings; both however described by the physics of black holes and the associated Schwarzschild metrics in the unified quantum energy law:

    Energy E = mc2 = hf
    E=hf (Planck) iff m=mo=0


    This manifests the lower dimensional observational matter-energy expressions and a frequency quantization for mass m
    Energy E=mc2 (Einstein) iff f=fss=1/fps for mo = ∑mss = {h/c2}∑fss for the mass-frequency quantization with Eps=hfps=hc/λps=mpsc2=kBTps =1/e* with the SourceSink Energy – SinkSource Energy Coupling: EpsxEss=h2 and Eps/Ess=fps2=1/fss2 as a Permutation Frequency Eigenstate Counter.


    The Gravitational Finestructure so derives in replacing the Planck-Mass mplanck by a proto-nucleonic mass:
    mc=√(hc/2πGo).f(alpha)=f(alpha).mplanck and where f(alpha) = alpha9.
    The Gravitational finestructure, here named Omega, is further described in a five folded supersymmetry of the string hierarchies, the latter as indicated in pentagonal or five folded supersymmetry.
    This pentagonal supersymmetry can be expressed in a number of ways, say in a one-to-one mapping of the Alpha finestructure constant as invariant X from the Euler Identity: X+Y = XY = -1= i2 = exp(iπ).


    A Unification Polynomial: (1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X) = 1 or X4+2X3-X2-2X+1 = 0 is used to find the coupling ratios:
    f(S)¦f(E)¦f(W)¦f(G) = #¦#3¦#18¦#54 from the proportionality
    #¦#3¦{[(#3)2]}3¦({[(#3)2]}3)3 = Cube root(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega.


    The Unification polynomial then sets the ratios in the inversion properties under modular duality:
    (1)[Strong short]¦(X)[Electromagnetic long]¦(X2)[Weak short]¦(X3)[Gravitational long] as 1¦X¦X2¦X3 = (1-X)¦(X)¦(1+X)¦(2+X).


    Unity 1 maps as (1-X) transforming as f(S) in the equality (1-X) = X2; X maps as invariant from f(E) in the equality (X) = (X); X2 maps as (1+X) transforming as f(W) in the equality (1+X) = 1/X; and X3 maps as (2+X) transforming as f(G) in the equality
    (2+X) = 1/X2 = 1/(1-X).


    The mathematical pentagonal supersymmetry from the above then indicates the physicalised T-duality of M-theory in the principle of mirror-symmetry and which manifests in the reflection properties of the heterotic string classes HO(32) and HE(64) as the 3rd and 5th string classes, respectively.
    Defining f(S) = # = 1/f(G) and f(E) = #2.f(S) then describes a symmetry breaking between the 'strong S' f(S) interaction and the 'electromagnetic E' f(E) interaction under the unification couplings.


    This couples under modular duality to f(S).f(G) = 1 = #55 in a factor #-53 = f(S)/f(G) = {f(S)}2 of the 'broken' symmetry between long-range- and short-range interactions.
    SEWG = 1 = Strong-Electromagnetic-Weak-Gravitational as the unified supersymmetric identity then decouples in the manifestation of string-classes in the de Broglie 'matter wave' epoch termed inflation and preceding the Big Bang, the latter manifesting at Weyl-Time as a string-transformed Planck-Time as the heterotic HE(64) class.


    As SEWG indicates the Planck-String (class I, which is both open ended and closed), the first transformation becomes the suppression of the nuclear interactions sEwG and describing the self-dual monopole (string class IIB, which is loop-closed in Dirichlet brane attachment across dimensions say Kaluza-Klein R5 to Minkowski R4 or Membrane-Space R11 to String Space R10).
    The monopole class so 'unifies' E with G via the gravitational finestructure assuming not a Weylian fermionic nucleon, but the bosonic monopole from the keGo=1 initial-boundary condition
    GomMonopole2=kee2 for mMonopole=e/Go=kee=[30ec]mod=mplanck.√α.


    The Planck-Monopole coupling so becomes mplanck/mmonopole=mplanck/30[ec]mod=1/√α with f(S) = f(E)/#2 modulating
    f(G) = #2/f(E)=1/# ↔ f(G){f(S)/f(G)} = # in the symmetry breaking f(S)/f(G) = 1/#53 between short (nuclear asymptotic)
    and long (inverse square).
    The short-range coupling becomes f(S)/f(W)=#/#18=1/#17=Cube root(Alpha)/Alpha6 and the long-range coupling is Alpha/Omega=1/Alpha17=#3/#54=1/#51=1/(#17)3.


    The strong nuclear interaction coupling parameter so becomes about 0.2 as the cube root of alpha and as measured in the standard model of particle physics in the form of an energy dependent 'running coupling constant' and which takes a value of
    αZ = 0.1184 at the energy level of the Zo weakon at about 92 GeV.


    The monopole quasimass [ec]mod describes a monopolar source current ef from the unification identity 1/e*fps = h = E*/fps as a fine structure for Planck's constant h, manifesting for a displacement λ=c/f. This is the GUT unification energy of the Dirac Monopole at precisely [c3] eV or 2.7x1016 GeV and the upper limit for the Cosmic Ray spectra then as [30c3]=8.1x1017 GeV*as the physical manifestation for the string classes: I, IIB, HO(32), IIA and HE(64) in order of modular duality transmutation.

    The transformation of the Monopole string into the XL-Boson string decouples Gravity from sEwG in sEw.G in the heterotic superstring class HO(32). As this heterotic class is modular dual to the other heterotic class HE(64), it is here, that the proto nucleon mass is defined in the modular duality of the heterosis in: Omega=Alpha18=2πGomc2/hc=mc/mplanck2.

    The HO(32) string bifurcates into a quarkian X-part and a leptonic L-part, so rendering the bosonic scalar spin as fermionic half spin in the continuation of the 'breaking' of the supersymmetry of the Planckian unification. Its heterosis with the Weyl-string then decouples the strong interaction at Weyl-Time for a Weyl-Mass mW, meaning at the time-instanton of the end of inflation or the Big Bang in sEw.G becoming s.Ew.G.

    The X-Boson then transforms into a fermionic protonucleon triquark-component (of energy ~ 10-27 kg or 560 MeV) and the L-Boson transforms into the proto-muon of energy about 111 MeV.
    The last 'electroweak' decoupling then occurs at the Fermi-Expectation Energy about 1/365 seconds after the Big Bang at a temperature of about 3.4x1015 K and at a 'Higgs Boson' energy of about 298 GeV.


    A Bosonic decoupling preceded the electroweak decoupling about 2 nanoseconds into the cosmogenesis at the Weyl-temperature of so Tweyl = Tmax = Eweyl/kB=Eps/kB=1.4x1020 K as the maximum Black Hole temperature maximized in the Hawking MT modulus and the Hawking-Gibbons formulation: McriticalTmin = ½mplanckTplanck = (hc/2πGo)(c2/2kB) = hc3/4πkBGo for Tmin = 1.4x10-29 K and Boltzmann constant kB.
    The Hawking Radiation formula results in the scaling of the Hawking MT modulus by the factor of the 'Unified Field' spanning a displacement scale of 8π radians or 1440° in the displacement of 4λps.


    The XL-Boson mass is given in the quark-component: mX = #3mW/[ec] = Alpha.mW/mplanck=#3{mW/mplanck}~1.9x1015 GeV; and the lepton-component: mL = Omega.[ec]/#2=#52[ec/mW] ~ 111 MeV.
    It is this lepton component which necessitates the existence of the muon (and the tauon and their neutrino partners as constituents of the weak interaction gauge bosons) as a 'heavy electron', as the quantum geometry defines the muon mass in a decoupling of the L1 energy level given in a diquark hierarchy and based on a quantum geometry of the quantum relativity.


    The definition of quantum consciousness is so obtained in the definition of magnetopolar charge e*=1/Eweyl=1/Eps in the units of the Star Coulomb being the measurement of inverse energy as the inversion of the unit for energy in the Joule as [J=kgm2/s2]*=[1/C*].
    For the parameters of the electron of mass me=kee2/Rec2=hα/2πcRe and classical displacement Re=kee2/mec2 and the Compton constant meRe=kee2/c2=hα/2πc=α.Lplanck.mplanck=Lec.mec for monopolar distribution of electron masses and as a consequence of the Planck length oscillation as a minimum spacetime configuration causative for the Quantum Big Bang. The subscript ‘ec’ denotes the Grand-Unification monopole mass as the second string class where mass
    m=E/c2=hf/c2=h/λc=h/(ec/c2)=hc/e=[Action].c/e=[e2]c/e=[ec]mod of about 4.818x10-11 kg* as the Dirac monopole of the GUT energy in electronvolt as [ec]mod.c2=[c3] eV*.


    The Compton constant defines the inverse proportionality between the ‘size’ of the electron from point like at the wormhole radius at 10-22 m* to its maximized extent at Re=2.777..x10-15 m* as a function of its mass in mec.Lec=h/2πc, relative to meRe=hα/2πc, with Lec=Re being the characteristic displacement scale for the weak nuclear interaction as the magnetic asymptotic confinement scale of the gluon-quark interactions, emerging in a kernel-inner mesonic ring-outer leptonic ring quantum geometry for the subatomic quantum mechanics of the elementary particles of the Standard Model. For the minimized classical Weyl-size of the electron at a wavelength of 10-22 m*, the Compton constant defines an effective mass of mec=h/2πc(Rweyl)=h/c(10-22)=2.22x10-20 kg* for Lec=Rweyl, which is the Weyl wormhole mass mweyl=mps=Eps/c2.

    The Heisenberg uncertainty principle relating energy with time and displacement with momentum in the expression
    ΔE.Δt = Δx.Δp ≥ h/4π applied to the quantum mechanical scale of de Broglie wave matter λdB = h/mv and the Compton mass-photon interaction Δx=rcompton=h/2πcm shows a natural limit for the measurement of position in Δp = Δmv ≥ h/4πΔx = ½mc.


    When Δp exceeds mc , then ΔE exceeds mc in the Energy-Momentum relation E2=(pc)2+(mc2)2 and we can apply this natural limitation on measurement to the position of the electrostatic electron mass in a variable classical electron radius as
    rec=αh/2πcm=αrcompton={μoe2c/2h}.{h/2πcmec} = μoe2/4πmec and rendering the Compton mass-photon interaction modified in the electromagnetic fine structure constant α to relate the inverse proportionality between the electron's rest mass to its spacial extent in:
    meRe= Compton constant=αh/2πc=lplanck.α.mplanck=mecrec


    The Compton constant ensures Lorentz invariance across all reference frames in cancelling the length contraction with the relativistic mass increase in the product of the proper length lo and the proper rest mass mo as lo.mo=loγ.mo/y in special relativity (SR) in the self-relative reference frame of the monopolar electron and with γ=1/√(1-v2/c2).

    Physicalized Consciousness is a monopolar source current Imonopolar, acting on a spacetime volumar coupled to the time differential of frequency as defined by the spacetime awareness enclosed in the volumar. The source monopolar current is equivalent to the mass of the interaction.
    For the resonance energy state, the spacetime awareness df/dt is {df/dt}|max=fps/fss=fps2=9x1060 frequency eigenstates, defining the volume of the Restmass-Photon RMP as the ‘dark matter’ particle of physicalized consciousness
    Vrmp=e*/{df/dt}|max=2Rec2/{df/dt}|max=500/9x1060=5.555…x10-59 [m3]* and calculates as
    Rrmp= {5.555..x10-59}/2π2}=1.933..x10-21 m* for a toroidal hyper-surface volumar

    (V4=½π2R4 for dV4/dR=2π2R3=(2πR).(πR2) for a 3-dimensional Horn Torus) and calculates as
    Rrmp= {5.555..x10-59}/4π/3}=9.109…x10-21 m*


    The resonance state with the source energy quantum
    {proportionality constant}.Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl=Eweyl.=hfweyl=mweylc2=kBTweyl, ={mass/displacement}.
    Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl={ec/displacement}}. Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl={Imonopole}. Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl = {monopolar mass current
    = Eweyl = hfweyl = mweylc2= kBTweyl


    Logos Mathimatia or the universal intelligence then defines the parameter df/dt as the unit of spacetime awareness, which if multiplied by the wormhole volumar of the Weyl string Vweyl of the Quantum Big Bang will define the source energy quantum from first principles as {proportionality constant}.Vweyl.{df/dt}weyl=Eweyl=hfweyl=mweylc2=kBTweyl, in the mathematical formulations for the energy transformations in electromagnetic radiation (Planck) and mass (Einstein) and temperature as kinetic energy (Stefan-Boltzmann) respectively.

    The proportionality constant in units mass/displacement [kg/m] describes Maxwell’s displacement current in the non-inertial reference of the Stoney units of the transformation of the Planck string into the Stoney monopole string.

    Dirac’s monopole becomes the singularity of the creation event in the Quantum Big Bang Singularity or QBBS as a universal mirror connecting nowhere in notime as a one-dimensional Dirac superstring dividing the timespace of abstract mathematical, algorithmic, and logical definition to a spacetime rediscovering the potential of the timespace in the flow of time and the experience of spacial separation. This serves the universal purpose to manifest the potential energy configurations of physicalized consciousness in the activity and dynamical interactions of physical information carriers.

    The increase of physicalized consciousness in the quantum acceleration potential df/dt in the cosmology enhances the self-awareness of the physicalized information processors in the potential transformation of restmass quanta defined in the low energy part of the supermembrane EpsEss. As the restmass quanta mss are always coupled to the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR) and the agency of the Restmass-Photon RMP as a dark matter agent for the UFoQR; the definition for physicalized consciousness as the angular radial independent quantum acceleration acting upon any volumar of space ensures the dynamic evolvement of volumar spacetime in the experience of the flow of time common to both the experienced spacetime and its generating timespace. In timespace the absence of duration as a unit count is replaced in the ordering principle for events, independent on any duration count between the occurrence of the events.
    The perception of spacetime becomes however a function of individuated physicalized consciousness in its scope of resonating with the source energy parameters in the form of the time differential for eigen-frequency specifying the ‘spacial awareness’ as a eigen- or self-state to harmonize or resonate with the timespace definitions made manifest in spacetime.


    The inertial frame of self-reference then defines the acceleration of a magnetic charge generating monopolar electromagnetic radiation (EMMR) as a form of the original Electromagnetic Monopolar Interaction EMMI light path of the creation event and where the parameter of a magnetic point charge as the mass of a magnetic monopole becomes the quantum for the RMP as the dark matter agent and as a fifth fundamental interaction in the UFoQR in mirror capacity to the electropolar charge of the electron.

    moby13.

    moby12.

    Time began from nowhere in notime at the now time of the source energy becoming conscious of itself and the creation of somewhere from sometime became the logical consequence of the birthing of time as a spacetime parameter and function to enable the original consciousness energy experience itself as its own parts or ‘children of descendency’ in the sharing of the universal or cosmic self-consciousness.
    The function and primary focus of spacetime then is to manifest a mirror symmetry between the ancestral original creator source consciousness and the descendent created source consciousness known as spacetime awareness.

    The source energy is known and labeled in many ways and including the names of ‘God’ and the great ‘I AM’ and gods, as ‘All That Is’ and as deifications of mythos and of history in the libraries and records of the history of the worlds. The stories of creation and of the gods so share particular similarities and differ in other aspects as a function of culture and custom and regionality, relative to the scribes and record keepers indigenous to an area, where the records are being composed and collected.

    The creative source is known in the Mathimatia of the Universal Logos-Sophia as the universal intelligence or source energy manifesting itself from a timeless and space-independent realm labeled as timespace in spacetimes interwoven in the physical parameters of spacial extent and a timed duration between events; the primary and spacetime-aware. To relate the nospace and the notime with space and time a modular inversion and mirror duality becomes integrated in the creation of a protoversal seed with the potential to reflect and mirror its creation modular duality in the inversion properties of quantization of the micro-self-states and the macro-self-states of existence in the form of a supermembrane consisting of two interwoven, albeit reciprocated parts. The high energy and micro-quantum part is known as Abba as the name of the creator-creation sourcesink and the macro-quantum part is known as Baab as the name of the creation-creator sinksource in a generalised White-Hole-Black-Hole or Yang-Yin or DNA-RNA or chicken-egg or male-female or phallus-yoni cosmology.

    Gaia13Da. Gaia13Db.

    planesres.


    The Time fractal of the Genesis Code in Seven Days of Creation
    - imaged in December 5th - December 12th, 2020

    The fractal of the Genesis code is the number 7 as a count of units of time.
    A full day, as a circle of time counted as 360 degrees, can be divided into two halves of 180 degrees. The first half of the circle can be defined as lightness from a sunrise or dawn at 0 degrees to sunset at 180 degrees. The second half of the circle from 180 degrees to 360 degrees can then be defined as evening to morning of the full day. The period of time from sunrise to noon or midday to sunset of the 180 degrees is then halved into two 90 degree periods defining the upper half of the full circle as the Light of a Day and comprising 12 hours as 180 degrees.


    The lower half of the circle of a full day then can be defined as the Darkness of a Night and comprising 12 hours as 180 degrees. The four 90 degree sectors of the circle can then be said to be four watches of 6 hours each and where a watch of 6 hours completes 90 degrees of the circle of 360 degrees.
    One hour of the 24 hours of the complete circle therefore is defined as 360/24=15 degrees.
    As one hour in a day represents 15 degrees of the full circle of 360 degrees, one day in 360 days defines a circle- or degree year as 360 days. Proportionally then, one hour in a day of 24 hours is the same as 15 days within a degree year of 360 days.


    This defines a ‘shortened time’ as a count in hours from a ‘standard time’ as a count in days in 7x24=168 hours being 7 full days.
    The original division of the circle of 360 degrees into 2x180 degrees becomes redefined as 3½ days of 84 hours of daytime and 3½ days of 84 hours of nighttime.
    The seven days of creation so are 7x12=84 hours of daytime from morning to evening, followed by 7x12=84 hours of nighttime from sunset to sunrise.


    The fractal of the Genesis-Star-Genetic Code is defined by 2x7x12=14x12=168 hours as: 7+70+700+7,000+70,000+700,000+7,000,000+70,000,000+700,000,000+7,000,000,000+70,000,000,000+700,000,000,000+7,000,000,000,000=7,777,777,777,777 full days of creation in one week of consecutive daytime and 1 week of consecutive nighttime.

    There are so six periods of daytime from 7-70 and 70-700 and 700-7,000 and 7,000-70,000 and 70,000-700,000 and 700,000-7,000,000 followed by a mirror of half-time and 7,000,000-70,000,000 and 70,000,000-700,000,000 and 700,000,000-7,000,000,000 and 7,000,000,000-70,000,000,000 and 70,000,000,000-700,000,000,000 and 700,000,000,000-7,000,000,000,000

    The alpha-sunrise as the morning of the 1st day of creation are the 7 days of the beginning and counting from left to right or clockwise with the omega-sunset of the 6th day being the 7,000,000 days at the ‘Halftime Logos Mirror’ of the daytime and mirroring the 6 days of daytimes in the 6 days of night times.

    The 6th night of the 7,000,000 days so continues as the 6th night to the 70,000,000 days to begin the nighttime of the 5th full day and following the clockwise motion of the circle in the nighttime from 180 degrees to the 360 degrees of the 7,000,000,000,000 days to reset the 360 degrees in the 0th degree of the sunrise of the 1st day ending the nighttime of the 1st full day and completing the circle of the star-genetic time.

    7day.

    The 1st day of star-genetic creation are 7 days and 7 Trillion nights
    as 7 days and 7,000,000,000,000/360=19.444… Billion Degree-Years ‘DY’ with 7 Trillion/365.2425=19.165 Billion Civil Years ‘CY’
    {The Age of the universe as a multiverse, subject to quantum tunneling can be calculated as 19.12 Billion years in an cosmology of 12-dimensional supermembrane duality}


    The 2nd day of star-genetic creation are 70 days and 700 Billion nights
    as 70 days and 700,000,000,000/360=1.9444… Billion ‘DY’ with 700 Billion/365.2425=1.916… Billion ‘CY’
    {A ‘electromagnetic higher dimensional universal age’ of 19.12 Billion years defines an ‘intersection’ (return of the electromagnetic light path) interval of 2.24 Billion years for a lower dimensional universal age of 19.12-2x2.24=14.64 Billion years coincident with an age of planet Earth of 2.24 billion years for the onset of prokaryotic unicellular lifeforms transmutating into eukaryotic multicellular lifeforms}


    The 3rd day of star-genetic creation are 700 days and 70 Billion nights
    as 700/360=1.944… ‘DY’ with 700/365.2425=1.916… ‘CY’ and 70,000,000,000/360=194.444… Million ’DY’ with 70 Billion/365.2425=191.653… Million ’CY’
    {200 Million years is a time marker for the evolution of the first mammals and diversification of dinosaurs in the transition from the Triassic into the Jurassic era of the Mesozoic time period. The time required for the local star system of Rahsol to complete a cycle of rotation about the center of the Milky Way galaxy takes about 236 Million years}


    The 4th day of star-genetic creation are 7,000 days and 7 Billion nights
    as 7,000/360=19.444... ‘DY’ with 7,000/365.2425=19.165…’CY’ and 7,000,000,000/360=19.444… Million ‘DY’ with 7 Billion/365.2425=19.165… Million ‘CY’
    {20 Million years ago in the evolution of life on planet Earth represents a nexus point towards the end of the Miocene era and initiates the evolution of apes (Hominoidea) from an earlier primate genomatrix (Old World Monkeys)}


    The 5th day of star-genetic creation are 70,000 days and 700,000 Million nights
    as 70,000/360=194.444…’DY’ with 70,000/365.2425=191.653 ‘CY’ and 700,000,000/360=1.944… Million ‘DY’ with 700 Million/365.2425=1.916… Million ‘CY’
    {The Hominoidea-Hominidae-Homininae-Hominini-Hominina-Homo taxonomy of human evolution had passed the Australopithecine and Homo Habilis nexus marker to emerge the homo erectus or ‘upright man’ as archaic forerunner of homo sapiens 2 Million years ago}


    The 6th day of star-genetic creation are 700,000 days and 70,000 Million nights
    as 700,000/360=1944.444…’DY’ with 700,000/365.2425=1916.534… ‘CY’ and 70,000,000/360=194,444.444… ‘DY’ with 70 Million/365.2425=191,653… Million ‘CY’
    {200,000 years ago characterized the appearance of Homo Sapiens or ‘wise man’ as evolved from Homo Sapiens-(Devosonian, Homo Neanderthalensis, Homo Heidelbergensis) in the form of ‘Anatomically Modern Human’ AMH (Cro-Magnon Man) in the Late/Upper Pleistocene period of the Quaternary era of geology}


    The 7th day of star-genetic creation are 7,000,000 days and 7,000,000 nights
    as 7,000,000/360=19,444.444…’DY’ with 7 Million/365.2425=19,165.349… ‘CY’ and 7,000,000/360=19,444.444… ‘DY’ with 7 Million/365.2425=19,165.349… Million ‘CY’
    {The ‘last ice age’ and period of glaciation (Younger Dryas) in the Holocene epoch 12,000 years ago is defined within the last precessional cycle of precession, defined by a simple day-count calendar of 9,360,000=65x144,000 day-kin of the Maya from [-52.0.0.0.0=4Ahau 3Kayab as 01Mar23,615 BCG (Gregorian proleptic)/27Aug23,615 BCJ (Julian proleptic)= 25Sivan-19,854] to a Midpoint of a 65 Baktun Precessional Cycle defining the glaciation for the dates [-20.10.0.0.0 =4Ahau 13Muan as 27Jul10,802 BCG/18Oct10,802 BCJ=16Elul-7041] to [13.0.0.0.0= 4Ahau 3Kankin as 21Dec2012 ADG/08Dec2012 ADJ=8Teveth5773] as a 9,360,000/360=26,000 ‘DY’ with a 9,360,000/365.2425=25,626.809… ‘CY’ count of years for the completion of the fifth of five such precessional cycles of time.}


    Dedicated to the supermembrane AbbABaaB for the reconfiguration of an old world into a new world!
    Queanbeyan, New-South-Wales; Australia; July 4th, 2020



     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2021
  9. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    Holofractal Quantum Geometric Cosmology
    To: info@torustech.com
    9:50 am; April 2nd, 2021

    Dear Nassim!

    Regarding your latest work and research efforts about the apparent synchronicity of galactic and intergalactic phenomena in astrophysics and related to the holographic principle.
    I concur with you about the holofractal cosmology and your scaling methodology and especially with your geometric approach to quantize the fundamental spacetime parameters.
    I have attached a short revision of the Pioneer anomaly, which supports your claim of a unified and less randomized cosmology as a dimensionally separated interaction between a closed de Sitter spacetime and an open anti De Sitter spacetime described by a Horn torus topology. (See Dirac paper as part of the God Reborn as Universal Consciousness pdf attached).

    The local solar system is a comoving part of the Friedmann expansion into de Sitter spacetime and so becomes a non-inertial comoving reference frame relative to the inertial and static reference frame of de Sitter spacetime.
    This then leads to a logical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly measured for the last decade or so.

    If you consider this divergence from the continuum hypothesis as a fundamental property of spacetime emergence; then you might follow the argument that QFT must be refined in a form of your research as neural network approximation or a form of LQG.

    Then describing the emergence of quantum gravity coupled to spacetime in the classical Einstein-Planck cosmology with specific boundary-initial conditions from a prior timespace, say defined in the Planck epoch of the Dirac String and its magnetic monopole; will effectively define the scale of the evolving universe in the Dirac parameters and with the Quantum Big Bang Singularity (QBBS) manifesting a transformation of the Dirac monopole charge into the electron charge.
    You could then refine your work on the scaling parameters of the cosmology. I believe you wrote some papers on this some time ago, sometime in the early decade of 2000.

    This timespace to spacetime will ‘free’ the magnetic monopole of the timespace in dimensional generation to manifest the electron of QFT from purely quantum geometric premises.

    I have also addressed your work on the proton’s charge radius and the Rydberg constant in the other attached paper on the Monopolar Quantum Relativistic Electron.
    Whilst your work is very similar to mine in many aspects, significant differences are my extensive usage of modular duality in string-membrane theory and an incorporation of the dimension related finestructure variation, measured again to have a directional dependency, which is simply the original orientation of the Dirac String from the timespace of the Planck epoch prior to the QBBS.

    The papers are published on academia with a video, which is however edited in the pdf.
    I wish you success in attaining more accreditation for your research efforts and have sent this information to you to support you in your work.
    Feel free to use any data hereby given to you and you consider appropriate to support your work in any way you please. There is no copyright.


    All the best
    TonyB.



    https://www.bitchute.com/video/WABQpOJawitJ/
    https://independent.academia.edu/APBermansederacademiaedu

    The Pioneer Anomaly as Milgrom Deceleration Effect of de Sitter Curvature

    What causes the apparent residual sunward acceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft?

    upload_2021-4-2_9-49-31.



    The Pioneer anomaly or Pioneer effect is the observed deviation from predicted trajectories and velocities of various unmanned spacecraft visiting the outer solar system, most notably Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11.
    Both Pioneer spacecraft are escaping from the solar system, and are slowing down under the influence of the Sun's gravity. Upon very close examination, however, they are slowing down slightly more than expected. The effect can be modeled as a slight additional acceleration towards the Sun.
    At present, there is no universally accepted explanation for this phenomenon. The explanation may be mundane, such as measurement error or thrust from gas leakage or uneven radiation of heat. However, it is also possible that current physical theory does not correctly explain the behaviour of the craft relative to the sun.


    Initial indications

    The effect is seen in radio Doppler and ranging data, yielding information on the velocity and distance of the spacecraft. When all known forces acting on the spacecraft are taken into consideration, a very small but unexplained force remains. It appears to cause a constant sunward acceleration of (8.74 ± 1.33) × 10-10 m/s2 for both spacecraft. If the positions of the spacecraft are predicted one year in advance based on measured velocity and known forces (mostly gravity), they are actually found to be some 400 km closer to the sun at the end of the year. The
    magnitude of the Pioneer effect is numerically quite close to the product of the speed of light and the Hubble constant, but the significance of this, if any, is unknown.
    Gravitationally bound objects such as the solar system, or even the galaxy, do not partake of the expansion of the
    universe - this is known both from theory and by direct measurement.
    Data from the Galileo and Ulysses spacecraft indicate a similar effect, although for various reasons (such as their relative proximity to the Sun) firm conclusions cannot be drawn from these sources. These spacecraft are all partially or fully spin-stabilized. The effect is much harder to measure accurately with craft that use thrusters for attitude control. These spacecraft, such as the Voyagers, acquire small and unpredictable changes in speed as a side effect of the frequent attitude control firings. This 'noise' makes it impractical to measure small accelerations such as the Pioneer effect.


    The Cassini mission also had reaction wheels for altitude control, thus avoiding this particular problem, but also had radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) mounted close to the spacecraft body, radiating kilowatts of heat in hard-to-predict directions. The measured value of unmodelled acceleration for Cassini is (26.7 ± 1.1) × 10-10 m/s2. Unfortunately, this is the sum of the uncertain thermal effects and the possible anomaly. Therefore the Cassini measurements neither conclusively confirm nor refute the existence of the anomaly.
    (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)



    One major consequence for the intrinsic de Sitter curvature becomes the 'Dark Energy' manifesting in a differential of acceleration between inertial and noninertial frames of references.
    The local solar system is a comoving part of the Friedmann expansion into de Sitter spacetime and so becomes a non-inertial comoving reference frame relative to the inertial and static reference frame of de Sitter spacetime.
    This then leads to a logical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly measured for the last decade or so.

    As the flat Friedmann universe requires a critical density for its flatness, which is supplied in the 'Dark Energy' in the form of the de Sitter Lambda encompassing the Minkowski universe in positive curvature and closure; the 'missing mass' in the open Friedmann cosmology readjusts the
    critical mass in the formulations describing the 'Dark Energy'.
    This manifests in the 'higher dimensional' curved de Sitter space-time forming an acceleration gradient relative to the 'lower dimensional' flat Minkowski spacetime. Considering the de Sitter cosmology to be 'background'-inertial then results in the Minkowski space-time to be rendered non-inertial by the experience of a 'de Sitter' force or pressure.

    As the deceleration parameter qoΩo=Mo/2Mcritical=Λo(no)/AdB~0.01405 defines the Omega relative to the Friedmann space-time; replacing the baryon seed Mo by the critical mass Mcritical will adjust the Friedmann lambda in the factor Ωo=0.0282 in the de Sitter lambda.
    Then the formulation: Omega+Milgrom=Lambda becomes {2.807x10-11
    -1.162x10-10 = -8.812x10-11}for the Friedmann cosmology and {9.989x10-10 -1.162x10-10 =+8.827x10-10} for the de Sitter cosmology in acceleration units for the present time.

    The flat Friedmann universe for a zero cosmological constant so balances the Omega deceleration with the Intrinsic (Milgrom) acceleration and omits the de Sitter component, which acts in addition to the Omega for the present time to balance the Milgrom in opposite direction.
    The Pioneer anomaly then becomes quantifiable in the Planck-Action applied to the de Sitter spacetime and manifesting in the Minkowski spacetime.

    The Planck-Action is the product of Planck-Momentum pplanck=mplanckc and the Hubble-Radius Ro
    for mplanckcRo=mplanckc2/Ho to indicate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in px=Et.
    The general energy operator then is p2/m for an acceleration a=p2/m2x=(p2.p)/(m2xpplanck)=(mv3)/(xmplanckc).
    Applying the de Sitter referential lambda acceleration {nps
    ps/Ro=Ho/fps for Rofps2 hyper-acceleration and Rofps=de Broglie matter wave speed)) as RoHo2=c2/Ro=(mv3)/(xmplanckc) yields a proportional relationship between the de Sitter Hubble-Radius as reference for a subscale x in the Friedmann universe in: (x/Ro)=(v/c)3 and relative to the Planck-Mass standard.

    Applied to the Pioneer anomaly then, a characteristic displacement of x=100 AU (1.5x1013 meters), will infer a characteristic velocity of v=c.
    (x/Ro) ~ 13.6 km/s or 0.0045% of lightspeed. This is indeed the order of velocity measured for the Pioneer probes at such distances.







    The bare rest mass of the electron in the Coulombic charge quantum and the mensuration calibration in the alpha fine structure


    We shall also indicate the reason for the measured variation of the fine structure constant by Webb, Carswell and associates; who have measured a variation in alpha dependent on direction.
    This variation in alpha is found in the presence of the factor γ3 in the manifestation of relativistic force as the time rate of change of relativistic momentum prel. Furthermore, the mass-charge ratio {e/meo} relation of the electron implies that a precision measurement in either the rest mass moe or the charge quantum e, would affect this ratio and this paper shall show how the electromagnetic mass distribution of the electron crystallizes an effective mass me from its rest mass resulting in meoγ = meγ2 related to the coupling ratio between the electromagnetic (EMI) and the strong nuclear interaction (SNI), both as a function of alpha and for an asymptotic (not running) SNI constant defined from first principles in an interaction transformation between all of the four fundamental interactions.

    Since {1 - ß2} describes the ß2 distribution of relativistic velocity in the unitary interval from A=0 to A=1, letting {1 - ß2} = {√α}3 = 6.232974608...x10-4, naturally defines a potential oscillatory upper boundary for any displacement in the unit interval of A. An increase or decrease in the 'bare' electron mass, here denoted as moe can then result in a directional measurement variation due to the fluctuating uncertainty in the position of the electron in the unitary interval mirroring the natural absence or presence of an external magnetic field to either decrease or increase the monopolar part of the electron mass in its partitioning: melectric + mmagnetic + δmmonopolic = mec{½+½[v/c]²} + δpsmec = mec with mec2√{1 + v2γ2/c2} = mec2γ = mecc2 for m = mec from the energy-momentum relation E2 = Eo2 + p2c2 of classical and quantum theory.

    The cosmic or universal value of alpha so remains constant in all cosmological time frames; with the fluctuation found to depend on an asymptotically constant strong interaction constant as a function of alpha.
    In the SI measurement system Planck's constant h = 6.62607004x10-34 Js and the speed of light is c = 2.99792458x10-8 m/s and the electron charge are e=1.60217662x10-19 C for a bare electron mass of 9.10938356x10-31 kg.
    In a mensuration system in which c would be precisely 3x108 (m/s)*; the following conversions between the SI-system and the *-system are applied in this paper.

    Furthermore, there exists one fundamental constant in the magnetic permeability constant μo = 4πx10-7 H/m which becomes numerically equal in the Maxwell constant μo = 1/εoc2 in an applied fine structure μoo = {120π/c}.{1/120πc} = 1/c2 (s/m)2; (s/m)2*. Subsequently in the calculation of alpha, the speed conversion must be incorporated for unitary consistency.

    Alpha remains constant for a cosmology descriptive of a non-accelerating cosmology; but will result in a change in the electric charge quantum in a cosmology, which measures an accelerated spacial expansion, which can however be the result of a self-intersection of the light path for particular cosmological redshift intervals in an oscillating cosmology.

    [BeginofQuote]A scientific tug-of-war is underway over the size of the proton. Scientists can’t agree on how big the subatomic particle is, but a new measurement has just issued a forceful yank in favor of a smaller proton.
    By studying how electrons scatter off of protons, scientists with the PRad experiment at Jefferson Laboratory in Newport News, Va.,
    sized up the proton’s radius at a measly 0.83 femtometers, or millionths of a billionth of a meter. That’s about 5 percent smaller than the currently accepted radius, about 0.88 femtometers. [EndofQuote]

    https://www.sciencenews.org/article/new-measurement-bolsters-case-slightly-smaller-proton?tgt=more



    It is the unitary interval between A=½ and A=1 which so determines the quantum nature for the quantum mechanics in the relativistic ß distribution.

    In particular for A=½ and for ß2 = x = 0, the Compton constant defines the required electron rest mass of electro stasis as ½mec2 = e2c²/8πεoRe} for an effective electron size of Re,
    whilst for A=1 the mec2 = e2c²/4πεoRe for a doubling of this radius to 2Re for ß2 = x = X.

    A reduced classical electron size is equivalent to an increase of the Compton wavelength of the muon and indicates the various discrepancies in the measurements of the proton’s charge radius using Rydberg quantum transitions using electron and muon energies.

    Using the Rydberg Constant as a function of Alpha (and including the Alpha variation) as Ry∞ = Alpha3/4πRe = Alpha2.mec/2h = mee4/8εo2h3c = 11.1299104x106 [1/m]* or 11.1485125x106 [1/m] defines variation in the measured CODATA Rydberg constant of a factor 10,973,731.6/11,148,512.5 = 0.98432...
    Subsequently, using the Rydberg energy levels for the electron-muon quantum energy transitions, will result in a discrepancy for the proton's charge radius in 0.88x0.98 ~ 0.866 femto meters as a mean value for the charge radius of the proton.



    Energy for quantization n: E = -Ze2/8πεoR = KE+PE = ½mv2 - Ze2/4πεoR for angular momentum nh/2π= mvR with mv2/R = Ze2/4πεoR2 for v = Ze2/2εonh and R = n2h2εo/Ze2πm = Re/Alpha2 = RBohr1 = 5.217x10-11 m* for the minimum energy n=1 for m=meffective=me=9.29061x10-31 kg* and atomic number Z=1 for hydrogen.

    En =hfn = hc/λn = -Z2e4(πme)/(8πεo2h2n2) = -Z2e4(πe2/4πεoRec2)/(8πεo2h2n2) = -Z2e6/(32πReεo3h2n2c2) for 1/λn = -Z2e6/(32πReεo3h3n2c3) = -Z2.Alpha3/4πn2Re for eigen state n and
    Rydberg constant Ry∞ = Alpha3/4πRe = Alpha2.mec/2h = mee4/8εo2h3c

    In the Feynman lecture the discrepancy for the electron mass in the electromagnetic mass multiplier of 4/3 is discussed.
    Its solution resides in the unitary interval for A, as the arithmetic mean of: ½{½+1} = 3/4 as the present internal magnetic charge distribution of the electron, namely as a trisection of the colour charge in 3x
    =1 negative fraction charge in the quantum geometry of the electron indicated below in this paper.

    The classical size for the proton so is likewise approximated at the mean value of its own colour charge distribution, now consisting of a trisected quark-gluon-anti-neutrino kernel of 3x
    =2 positive fraction charges, which are 'hugged' by a trisected 'Inner Mesonic Ring' (d-quark-KIR) as a contracted 'Outer Leptonic Ring' (s-quark-KOR) for the manifestation of the electron-muon tauon lepton family of the standard model.

    For the electrostatic electron the ß distribution at A=½, the Compton constant gives mecrec = meRe for ß2 = 0 and at A=1, the Compton constant gives mecrec = ½me.2Re for ß2 = X and as the mean for a unitary interval is ½, the electron radius transforms into the protonic radius containing monopolar charge as internal charge distribution in Rp = ½XRe and where the factor X represents the symmetry equilibrium for a ß=(v/c} velocity ratio distribution for the effective electron rest mass me proportional to the spacial extent of the electron.

    For the proton then, its 'charge distribution' radius becomes averaged as Rproton = 0.85838052x1015 m* as a reduced classical electron radius and for a speed for the self-interactive or quantum relativistic electron of 2.96026005x10-13 c. This quantum relativistic speed reaches its v/c=1- limit at the instanton boundary and defines a minimum quantum relativistic speed for the electron at
    ve = 1.50506548x10-18 c for its electrostatic potential, where Ue=∫{q²/8πεor²}dr = q²/8πεoRe = ½mec2 for a classical velocity of ve=0 in a non-interacting magnetic field B=0. 2Ue=mec2 so implies a halving of the classical electron radius to obtain the electron mass me=2Ue/c2 and infers an oscillating nature for the electron size to allow a synergy between classical physics and that of quantum mechanics.


    upload_2021-4-2_9-50-22.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. admin

    admin Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,597
    Plato's human survival Science-Art - Robert Pope Correspondence

    From: Robert Pope
    Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:29 PM
    To: omniphysics@cosmosdawn.net
    Subject: Re Plato's human survival Science-Art



    Dear Anthony Bermanseder,

    When your At the center of Hunab Ku artwork is viewed with the appropriate asymmetric electromagnetic glasses its multidimensional reality has an unexpected property I am unable to explain.

    When the Abba’s message artwork is likewise viewed its multidimensional the images are really incredible and not difficult to explain.

    In Newton's 28th Query Discussions he rejected that the first cause of gravitational force belonged to the mass of objects in space.

    Few people know that from his colour wheel experiments he deduced the existence of non-mechanical subatomic colour particle forces in association with Plato's subatomic use of Anaxagoras'
    field rotating anticlockwise. Last year I was internationally recognized for resolving the Heisenberg uncertainty principle leading up to your brilliant research. I simply used the aforementioned glasses to show Newton's sub atomic particle force movement alongside Plato's holographic human survival messages within the flat plane surface of a painting alongside curved form movement traversing through its multidimensional background.

    I have used your work to explain the importance of your research and felt that it could be rather important that I should now contact you.

    Regards Robert Pope,
    Professor Robert Pope. Director Science-Art Research Centre, Australia
    President Neurological Cancer Research Division, Institute for Basic Research, America




    Dear Robert Pope!

    Thank you for your message and your utility of my works and publications.

    I know that my work is not recognized by ‘official’ academic circles, as it incorporates an underpinning metaphysical component. It so comes as a pleasant surprise that your familiarity and expertise with the artistic and poetic aspects of nature has allowed you to see deeper than the status quo academic researcher.

    For example, I know, that the Mandelbrot fractal geometry with the Misiurewicz parameter space relates to the evolution of the universe with odd and even Hubble nodes in multidimensional space.
    I have copied an older correspondence (in blue colour below) with Jonathan Dickau, who researches this fractal geometry to some extent; but I have not received a reply to my proposals and ideas regarding this from him.

    So you can see, that my approach to decipher the universal encoding patterns is in closer affinity to your approach and a methodology shared by Newton and Einstein seeking a geometric aesthetic-beautiful description of the universe in preference to a statistical randomized cosmology.

    Your words and honour bestowed upon the ‘Abba’ name (Jesus called his heavenly father Abba and not Jehovah or Yahwe: Mark.14.36, Rom.8.15 and Gal.4.6) entice me to share this clip with you:
    planetaryresurrection88.
    A Tribute to AbbA as BaaB in a Metamorphosis of the Old World of Humanity into the New Eternity of Star-Humanity
    Planetary Resurrection (bitchute.com)

    Furthermore, Newton’s subatomic colour particles are fully expressed in the actual quark-lepton structure of the quantum relativistic revision of the ‘Standard Model’ incorporating Newton’s and Einstein’s dream of a geometric nature of the cosmos and the universe.

    neutrinoweakon.


    Subsequently, the origin of this quantum geometry derives from the Möbius-Klein Bottle geometry and its one-sided mirror topology then allowing a multidimensional cosmology to emerge as spacetime, both circularized without time and linearized with time from a prior Planck epoch of timespace.

    This one-sided to two-sided mirror topology, then relates to the 12-dimensional superstring-membrane-volumar proposels of Witten, Vava, Susskind, Maldacena and co and this is explored in the attached paper from first principles.

    God Reborn - The Birth of God as a Superbrane - A Story of Intelligent Design and the Creation of the Quantum Universe in the Uniphyscon of Quantum Entangled Omnispace
    The question of creation as quantum fluctuation ex nihilo is answered as a creation ex UniPhysCon as the quantum entanglement of omnispace in the form of universal physicalized consciousness.


    encompasses a rather technical paper describing this as the Creation of the universe from the Dirac String centered on the Dirac monopole and thus enabling the dimensions to emerge as freedom degrees and to birth the quantum relativistic electron as electromagnetic manifestation from its prior nature as a monopolar Dirac magnetic monopole.


    Feel free to use any of my materials to any purpose you find appropriate for your own endeavors as you see fit Robert.
    And thanking you again for your considerations.
    TonyB.


    This work might relate to your 'science dream' of integrating the asymmetry of the universal cosmology into the symmetry of the standard models as a quasi-supersymmetry Jonathan.
    Allow me to explain.
    It is well known, that the Hubble constant decreases over time; but this function is then related to the expanding universe in terms of the scale factor based cosmological redshift and the accelerating universe.
    The Planck mission measured a Hubble constant of about 67.8 Hubble un its, but the ESA mission measured one of about 74 Hubble units; leading to proposals, that the Hubble constant differs for nearer astrophysical objects. (See my attached paper).
    Now consider my thesis, which if you could fully understand it, could show you a way to relate the Misiurewicz parameter space to the oscillating Hubble constant within a parallel multidimensional cosmic evolution as proposed in the attached paper and the thesis as a function of n-cycle time for the nodal Hubble constant as the constant time derivative Ho=dn/dt.

    In my proposals H(n)=v(n)/R(n)={c/[n+1]2}/{n.RH/[n+1]}={c/RH}/T(n) =Ho/T(n) for T(n)=n(n+1) defining your 'daddy function' for the quadratic parameter space for the Misiurewicz M-point.
    So the M-point directly relates to the n-cycle coordinate in my revised Friedmann cosmology as a function of the quadratic nature of recession velocity.

    Now consider the numbers from the Planck mission and the ESA missions.
    Because my odd Hubble node has the value 58.04 Hubble units and a number Sandage would be pleased with for the even node as the wormhole frequency of the QBBS and the present de Sitter coordinate is 0.53 for a anti de Sitter coordinate of 1.132712, the delta of 1-0.132712=0.867 places the 'nodal' age of the universe of 16.88 GY reduced to 14.64 GY as the approximate measured Planck mission Hubble constant of Ho/(2-1.132712)=66.9.

    But using the ESA mission as examining the age of the universe for its present de Sitter coordinate of 0.53=1.132712/2.132712 and using this scaled n-coordinate instead of its true value for a decreasing Hubble constant of T(1.132712)=1.132712(2.132712}=2.416 for Ho/2.416=58.04/2.416=24.023 ; gives you the ESA mission value as T(0.53)=0.53(1.53)=0.811 Hubble units for H(n)=Ho/0.811=71.6 Hubble units as an approximate value agreed to by say codata over the last few years

    The asymmetry so might relate to the scaling of the universe's expansion but becomes resymmetrized in a revision of the Friedmann cosmology, closely related to the Mandelbrot quadratic parameter space.

    I shall leave it at that for now, hoping this little excursion into the Dickau parameter space might entice you to more closely consider my Friedmann parametrization of the cosmological parameters.

    Tony

    Wiki definition of the M-point:
    "In mathematics, a Misiurewicz point is a parameter in the Mandelbrot set (the parameter space of quadratic polynomials) for which the critical point is strictly preperiodic (i.e., it becomes periodic after finitely many iterations but is not periodic itself). By analogy, the term Misiurewicz point is also used for parameters in a Multibrot set where the unique critical point is strictly preperiodic. (This term makes less sense for maps in greater generality that have more than one (free) critical point because some critical points might be periodic and others not.)"
     

Share This Page