Desposyni - Sang Réal - Archaic Dragon Revival Of The Ancient Source Family

Discussion in 'Ancient Archaeology and New Discoveries' started by Susan Lynne Schwenger, Oct 1, 2014.

  1. Susan Lynne Schwenger

    Susan Lynne Schwenger The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

    Messages:
    5,962

    Dragon Bloodlines of the Original Source Family​


    drakenberg-crest.
    The Two-Headed Dragon Showing Imperial Status of the Dragon Blood​


    "The red and gold tinctures and metals on the field of their heraldic escutcheon,

    [traditionally symbolizing the plumage of the Phoenix] superimposed by the White Star

    – literally the falling star of Lucifer

    – are the Arms of the Vere and reflect their ancient line of descent from Sathaniel or the Devil.

    The escutcheon, supported by two dynastic, hermetic Dragons becomes, historically,

    the Ancient Alchemical Seal of the House.

    The Phoenix of the Scythians was the Raven.

    The Raven itself, or rather the double-headed Raven found in Transylvania,

    devolved down to the Hittites and from them it was eventually adopted and modified as

    the double-headed black Eagle of the Holy Roman Empire."

    -- HRH Nicholas de Vere Von Drakenberg,

    The Dragon Legacy: The Secret History of an Ancient Bloodline​


    elevneyes.


    The Dragon Descent Of The Royal Elven House of Vere


    The Dragon Descent:​

    Angiers Descent

    Avallon Descent

    Blackwood Descent

    Llewelyn Descent

    Natalie Hopgood

    Plantagenet Descent


    Young%20DeVere.
    HRH Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg​


    My Kingdom is Not of This World
    Prince Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg,​


    Interview by Tracy R. Twyman​


    "The monarchical system in Britain is, to the greatest extent, impotent, and so if one wanted real political power,

    the last place one would find it would be on the throne of England.

    We have no need for thrones or crowns to remind us of who we are.

    Just as the work of Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln introduced the study of the 'Grail bloodline'

    to the English-speaking world in the 1980s, so has the work of two individuals redefined the scope of this study

    in more recent years.

    But while the better-known Laurence Gardner has received fame, fortune, accolades, and numerous book contracts

    as a reward for his work, a lesser-known figure has lurked quietly in the shadows up until the present.

    As the Sovereign Grand Master of the Imperial and Royal Dragon Court and Order, Prince Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg

    provided the inspiration, the research, and a hefty portion of the writing for Gardner's Genesis of the Grail Kings

    and Realm of the Ring Lords.

    Yet amazingly, de Vere is not listed as coauthor on many editions of Genesis, and receives no credit at all in Ring Lords.

    Both of these books, credited to Laurence Gardner,

    are based almost entirely upon the text From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells,

    by Nicholas de Vere, recently published by The Book Tree under the title The Dragon Legacy.​


    Gallahad,%20Bors,%20and%20Percival%20attaining%20the%20Graal.
    Gallahad, Percival, and Bors attaining the Graal​


    But there is much in the original de Vere text that is not to be found in the Gardner version,

    and there is an authenticity to de Vere's work, derived from the fact that he is the true inheritor

    and guardian of this tradition - the Dragon tradition, also known as the Grail tradition.

    De Vere has spent two decades delving into history, mythology, science, religion, and his own family archives

    to compile what is perhaps the most extensive and insightful text upon this subject ever published.

    What de Vere has come up with is enough to comprise not just another pop culture craze,

    but an entirely new theology, with a new philosophy and politics as well.

    Clearly de Vere is not out to get rich or be popular, as he has already forgone numerous opportunities to obtain both.

    Writing about an elite genetic strain of humanity that descends from a super-human race,

    and which possesses abilities inaccessible to those outside of that strain, is not exactly a ticket to universal adulation

    . To the contrary, de Vere's assertions regarding the elite status of the Dragon bloodline

    have branded him completely anathema to the Wiccan and New Age communities

    who would otherwise be among those most open to his message.

    Which begs the question: why has Nicholas de Vere spent the last twenty years of his life

    on this monumental task, and why does he continue to do so?

    In addition to his groundbreaking work as a researcher and author,

    de Vere serves as the head of an elite occult order with origins stretching back to the Knights Templar,

    and he holds a potential claim to several important royal titles.

    This, some have supposed, is the real motivation behind his work.

    Some believe that de Vere wants to be the King of England or France,

    an assertion that he flatly denies.

    Others see in de Vere a candidate for nothing less than the anti-Christ himself,

    and see in the Dragon Court an international Satanic conspiracy somewhere on a level

    between the Ordo Templi Orientis and the Bilderberg Group.

    But while it is true that, when the Great Dragon of Revelation does emerge to take hold of the world,

    he will undoubtedly be of the Dragon blood, and may even be a member of the Court,

    Prince Nicholas de Vere is certainly not he.

    As I am sure he would humbly admit himself, de Vere's mission is simply to prepare the way

    for He / (She ?) who is yet to come.

    Listen, then, dear readers, to the interesting and powerful message of Nicholas de Vere.' "

    -- Tracy R. Twyman​


    sidhe.


    The above painting depicts the Tuatha De Danaan (the clan of the Goddess Danu),
    now known as the Sidhe or faery folk, bringing four gifts to our world at the dawn of time,
    providing us with a template to the secrets of Magic.

    TT: How long ago did you write The Dragon Legacy?

    NDV: About six years ago. The Dragon Legacy was known on the net as From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells
    and this was a summary of years of research and reflection. Some of it appeared in Laurence Gardner's Genesis of the Grail Kings and then after I published it on the web, Laurence based his third book Realm of the Ring Lors
    largely on what I had already published.

    TT: What were your main sources of information when compiling the book?
    NDV: On the so-called Dragon "path" one is imbued hereditarily with Dragon capabilities in varying measures.
    As one progresses these capabilities wax and wane according to necessity.
    One of the main capacities is the Derkesthai Process, in which information is "channeled" through the conduit
    of the Dragon archetype; specifically the racial consciousness of those of the Dragon blood.
    Through this process one may pick up naturally, all sorts of information relating to varied aspects
    of the Dragon Tradition in its many branches and manifestations.
    However, this is of no use intellectually and rationally without informed academic confirmation
    and corroboration.
    To this end, another Dragon capacity is to be able to obtain after the fact those confirmations required.
    I anticipated works before I read them, either through meditation or through experience on the Dragon Path.
    In a not too dissimilar manner Kerkule discovered the "Bezine Ring."
    I would say that the serious academic backbone of The Dragon Legacy in terms of corroboration and confirmation,
    lies in the work of Dr. David Barker; George Woodcock; Lysander Spooner;
    Professor Miranda Green; Pierre Proudhon; Professors Pierpaoli and Regelson;
    David Anderson; The Oxford English Dictionary and an old associate Mr. C. Murray Hall M.A.
    (Lecturer in Barbarian Cultures: Sussex University).​
    cover_dragonlegacy.


    TT: How did you begin research into your family history?
    At what point in your life did you become aware of "the Dragon legacy" in your family?
    Is it something you grew up with?

    NDV: From the age of seven onwards my father told me about our ancestry, an ancestry steeped in royal blood
    and most significantly of all, in what is termed Royal Witchcraft, which is a major, ancient, draconian,
    druidic facet continuing within the later history of the Dragon tradition and within the Vere family.
    My father educated me about our particular origins in the royal and noble Blackwood family of Lanark, Scotland. This dynasty sired the most significant practitioner of the Dragon tradition in his time:
    Major Thomas Weir of Vere of Edinburgh, my 11th great grandfather.
    As a witch lord and the prince consort to the elven queen of the Lallan,
    Thomas performed the ancient Gaelic rites of the sacred kingship of Epona,
    and consequently founded this rite of kingship within my lineage.
    So I received the tradition at an early age from my father
    and he received it from his father, and so on.

    TT: Your formal title is "Prince Nicholas de Vere." What does this title imply?
    NDV: I trace my lineage back in an unbroken bloodline to the imperial prince Milo de Vere, Count of Anjou in 740 A.D.,
    son of Princess Milouziana of the Scythians. She was recorded throughout France as being the Elven, Dragon Princess
    of the Scottish Picts, and her Grandson, Milo II, derived his Merovingian descent through his father's marital alliance
    with the imperial house of Charlene.
    Later in history we picked up numerous other lines of Merovingian descent and the attitude in the house of Vere today,
    both here and in Ireland, reflects that of the Merovingians themselves where inheritance and blood descentis concerned.
    Concerning my maternal lineage: my mother is descended from the ancient Collison Jarls of Norfolk,
    and is the third cousin of the head of the House of Vere. We are a very tightly knit family.
    The head of the House himself is of Royal Collison descent and this matrilinear Collison extraction
    also stems
    from the ancient House of Vere and Princess Milouziana of the Scythians.
    We are Veres on all sides of the family.
    The overall head of the House of Vere today is the Prince Mhaior.

    By Papal Investiture and by inheritance from the House of the royal O'Brien descendants of King Brian Boru of Tara,
    the Prince Mhaior is himself an Archduke - not an insignificant Irish earl, as some totally ill-informed malcontent
    once triumphantly proclaimed in a ridiculous, failed attempt at an exposé of me.

    The Head of the House formally addresses me as "the Dragon Prince" of the House of Vere.

    TT: Who are the "Dragons" that you write about in your book?
    NDV: In brief, the recorded Dragon lineage starts with the Annunaki and descends through the proto-Scythians, the Sumerians in one branch and the early Egyptians in another; the Phoenicians, the Mittani, back to the Scythians again through marital alliance, along to the "Tuatha de Danaan" and the Fir Bolg; down through their Arch-Druidic, Priest-Princely families, to the Royal Picts of Scotland and the high kings of the Horse Lords of Dal Riada; through to the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and Avallon del Acqs, and down to a few pure bred families today.
    TT: Were the Dragons originally a separate species from what we would call "human"?
    NDV: Dragon tradition related to all the current genetic and historical evidence says yes they were.
    Both relatively recent and ancient accounts of Dragons or Elves going back to the Annunaki speak of them
    as having clearly distinct physical attributes, and these attributes are inherited from a species
    that scientists now assert preceded the human genetic bottleneck by about thirty thousand years.
    These attributes are not human in the accepted sense.
    Whether this ancient race was hybridized with another before history is anybody's guess,
    but their later hybridization to produce the Elven God-Kings and Ring Lords (the King Tribe),
    is clearly recorded in the Cylinder Rolls.

    TT: Are these Dragons the same as the "Nephilim" of the Bible or the "Watchers" of The Book of Enoch?
    NDV: The Nephilim and the Watchers are of the Dragon race, yes.

    TT: Were the gods of ancient cultures (Greece, India, Sumeria, etc.) Dragons?
    NDV: These pantheons are derived from one another so again the answer in simplistic terms is yes.

    TT: What kind of civilization did the Dragons reign over?
    Would you say that it was the same as the Atlantean or antediluvian civilization?

    NDV: The Platonic Atlantis theory is preceded by a much older tradition relating to the "Ogdoad." The Ogdoad,
    sacred to Jesus himself, were the eight great Gods who raked the Sacred Mountain - "Atlantis"
    - after the original Flood.

    This Flood occurred in the Black Sea and the Sacred Mountain,
    so inundated, was believed to be the Pontus Euxine.
    Apparently the Ogdoad failed in their attempt to bring fertility back to the Holy Place
    and abandoned itfor a life wandering the planet.

    This is probably why the legend of the Flood spread and can be found in most cultures.

    The Ogdoad turn up in Chinese myth, in early Egyptian religious texts, and even in much later Viking legend,
    where the gods of the Aesir were said to have abandoned the Sacred Mountain after the Flood.

    From the Ogdoad, who were the first Dragon god-kings of ancient proto-Scythia, we obtain the gods of the Anunnaki,
    and those later pantheons that derived from them. It is not to be doubted that after the Flood the children
    of the Anunnaki had established incredible civilizations in their time, so I suppose you could say that the cultures
    of the Sumerians (whose language, termed "proto-Sumerian", originated in Transylvania), the Egyptians
    and even the early settlers in northern Europe stemmed from and reflect an antediluvian prototype,
    a much older pre-Flood "Golden Age" presided over by the ancient Dragon god-kings and goddess-queens.

    The mistake would be to put the Atlantean period too far back in time and to locate Atlantis where Plato did.

    Scientists have proved the Biblical Flood to be in the Black Sea and this region is where most of the Titanic
    and Olympian sagas, associated with the Dawn of the Gods, unfold.

    TT: Is Dragon blood the true source of divine right kingship, in your opinion?
    Are the Dragons the rightful rulers of the world's governments?

    NDV: Anciently Dragon blood, the blood of the gods, is the true source of divine right kingship.
    To say that Dragons are the rightful rulers of the world's governments today might raise some contention.
    Perhaps it would be more realistic to suggest that they may well be the rightful rulers of the world's governments
    in the future.

    TT: When you refer metaphorically to "the Dragon", what exactly are you referring to?

    NDV: "The Dragon" is a term I use generally to mean the dragon archetype resting within the Dragon blood
    and passed on through the genes. It is the conduit through which flow the memories of the wisdom
    and experience of the Dragons who have gone before.

    The word "dragon" is derived from the Greek "edrakon", which is an aorist of the word "derkesthai",
    which means "to see clearly". "The Dragon" therefore is the inherited Dragon archetype
    and that archetype is the conduit of clear sight through which racial knowledge flows.

    Clear sight also and principally refers to transcendent consciousness.

    TT: What percentage of the world's populace would you say possesses this Dragon blood?

    Is it predominately found in certain types of people? How can you tell a Dragon from other types of people?

    NDV: Roughly ten percent of Europeans have Dragon blood, and stem from families whose physical attributes clearly point to a genetic inheritance over 100,000 years old.

    This figure is calculated from research deriving from studies by Oxford University and matched to historical accounts.

    TT: How did the Dragon race begin, and how did they become a separate race from the rest of humanity?

    NDV: They didn't originate from outer space, that's for sure.

    A principal element of the Dragon genome originated in the vast forests of central Europe,

    and cut off from other species, they developed as a distinct race.

    By the time of the Anunnaki they had been hybridized to form the ancestors

    of the later Elves or Dragon kings and queens.​
    faery.
    Aonghus and the Faeries and Elves = The Shining Ones​


    "The Shining Ones stems from the Sumerian era when ’The Controllers of the Fate of Men’

    were known as both the Anunnaki and the Anunnagi, the former meaning

    "those who are manifest when Heaven meets Earth"

    and the latter meaning simply ’Shining Ones’ or Star Children.

    The two mean the same thing and refer to the nocturnal habits of our ancestors

    as much as anything else.

    These habits are directly related to the production and maintenance of certain hormones,

    which then relate to the core meaning itself." -- Nicholas de Vere​


    TT: Did dragons possess "magical" powers?
    If so, do their descendants possess them as well?

    NDV: It depends what you mean by "magical." The greatest magic of all is to be able
    to naturally still one's mind to the point where one sees that "all acts are magical acts."

    As a natural course of events stemming from transcendent perception,
    certain facilities are within the grasp of Dragons.
    These abilities, though they vary, are hereditary.

    TT: Your former coauthor Laurence Gardner writes a lot about "starfire" and the power of pineal secretions,
    which are portrayed as being analogous to the Elixir of Life or Philosopher's Stone,
    bestowing increased brain capacity, magical ability, and prolonged life upon he who consumes it.
    These are elements that he clearly picked up from your research.

    In your writing, you claim that people of "Dragon blood" are the only ones bio-chemically equipped to produce
    these substances in their own bodies at a high enough level to yield results.

    But Gardner has written much about this so-called "monatomic gold", and seems to think that this is
    a synthetic substitute for "starfire" which ordinary people can consume to become Dragons themselves.

    Do you know anything about this substance? What is your comment on Mr. Gardner's theories?

    NDV: Firstly the physical, hormonal elements of Starfire are only one side of the story,
    and in my book I clearly state that the whole process contains several other "psycho-somatic" elements,
    not least that pertaining to relationship.

    As for being able to pop a pill to become a Dragon, this kind of stupid New Age attitude stems from the ridiculous,
    totally indefensible greed-driven free market assertion that anyone can become anything they choose,
    and the totally unfounded PC notion that everyone is equal.

    This kind of pathetic liberalism, born as a reaction to the socially inculcated victim mentality,
    should be abhorred by all rational beings, and so my attitude towards the concept of monatomic gold
    as a great social leveler and equalizer is one of contempt.

    However, you don't make lots of money by telling the bulk of your readership that they are genetically excluded
    from a process they cannot experience or understand; you sell New Age drivel by telling the ingenuous
    that they can all assume any role they like, and adopt any trendy "lifestyle" choice
    that whim and deceitful advertising dictates.

    As you know, I don't write to make money, so I don't care who I offend with the truth.

    Can I pop a pill to turn me into a black African Masai warrior?

    No. Is there a powder I can take to change me into a woman? Of course not.

    I don't see the need for monatomic gold myself. "Starfire" and the Seraphic relationship worked perfectly well for me,
    and in any case you are either genetically a Dragon or you are not, and no amount of monatomic gold
    is going to change your genetic makeup.

    TT: What was the original meaning and purpose of vampirism?
    NDV: Vampire stems from the word "vber" or "uber", and means "witch." It originates in Anatolia;
    the location of the seven yearly Druidic gatherings: the Nemetons.

    "Witch" in Gaelic is "Druidhe", or "druid."

    In practical terms and suggested by the term "uber" itself, a Scythian druid was an overlord,
    and so originally a vampire was an overlord, and hence a Dragon.

    The purpose of vampirism depends on the type of vampirism practiced.

    Starfire was the purpose of "royal" or druidic vampirism in the ancient Scythian families,
    and in Scythian "warrior" vampirism, drinking the blood of fallen brothers in battle was intended
    to take their essence and bravery into the recipient.

    The blood of vanquished foes was also drunk. In both cases this also had the advantage of topping up
    one's adrenaline and testosterone levels in the heat of conflict.

    The folklore image of the vampire in Europe stems from this historical root.

    Vampirism was an integral part of Scythian/Dragon life.​
    quinotaur.


    The above depicts the beast of Neptune, which resembles a Quinotaur.
    It was held to have fathered Meroveus by attacking the wife of the Frankish king Chlodio
    and thus to have sired the line of Merovingian kings.

    TT: Is the Dragon bloodline a Satanic or Luciferian bloodline?

    NDV: Yes is the honest and simple answer.

    TT: If a person believes that they have the Dragon gene,
    and they want to start developing the powers inherent in their blood,
    what course would you suggest they follow?

    NDV: Developing powers for their own sake isn't magic,
    it's greed, and greed and ambition are the destroyers of transcendent Dragon perception.
    Power flows naturally for those whose vision is clear, and clear perception
    will determine that those powers are used with detachment.

    Jesus said:​
    "Seek ye first the kingdom of God and all these things will be added unto you."​


    The fact of the matter is that to Dragons,
    Dragon magic is simple and straightforward and fundamentally it relies in discovering simplicity
    and stillness within the self.
    If the reader believes they are of the Dragon Blood and they wish to explore the transcendent concept,
    in lieu of a lengthy explanation for which there isn't space within the confines of this interview,
    I would recommend a little book entitled The First and Last Freedom, written by Jiddu Krishnamurti.

    TT: What is the history of the Dragon Court of which you are the Sovereign Head? Did you inherit this title,
    and if so, who from?

    NDV: The Imperial and Royal Dragon Court appears repeatedly throughout the history of my family.
    It is the physical, cultural manifestation of the Dragon spirit inherent within the Vere Dragon blood,
    reaching back long before the time of Christ.
    Briefly, to give a few examples, in more recent times it was the Royal Court of the Dragon Princess Milouziana
    from whom we are descended in numerous lines, and later it was the fairy Court of Alberic de Vere,
    the legendary Oberon.
    Immediately following Alberic it was the Court of his son, Robert de Vere, earl of Huntingdon,
    who was the historical Robin Hood; the elven, sacral priest-king of the witches.

    Later the Dragon Court was manifest in the "Thirteen Covens of Mid-Lothian",
    and in the cabal of Lady Somerville, the witch-mother of Thomas of Edinburgh.

    Thomas was the grandson of Sir William Vere of Stonebyres
    and the elvin, Dragon priest-king of the Thirteen Covens.

    Sir William was the son of James, 7th Baron Blackwood. Lady Jane Somerville's heraldic family badge is recorded
    as the fiery dragon surmounting the pentacle, denoting Dragon blood in the House of the Somerville earls.

    Notably in our family the Dragon Court is also derived from the Court of the Pendragon Kings
    whose lineage we inherit through numerous marital alliances with our close cousins,
    the Dukes of Hamilton, whose estates bordered our own in Lanarkshire.

    The Hamiltons were the heirs presumptive to the throne of Scotland.

    Lateral inheritance from the extinct cadet cousin branch of the Vere earls of Oxford brings
    to the contemporary Court, via the 11th earl, Richard de Vere, the degree of Societas Draconis
    - latterly misnamed "Sarkany Rend" - a membership bestowed upon him, it is believed academically,
    during his investiture into the Prince's Degree of the Order of the Garter,
    along with the Emperor Sigismund of Luxembourg, at St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle.

    The heraldry of the family prior to Richard's investiture into Societas Draconis
    already included the ancient Dragon motifs on both the paternal and maternal sides of the family,
    denoting pure Dragon blood in both descents, and reflecting the continuing presence of the Dragon Court
    in the family since the time of Princess Milouziana of the Scythians.

    The contemporary Dragon Court is furthermore a combination of what Aleister Crowley
    would term several "currents", of which the major external one to the family proper was bestowed
    via the Black Country Covenant of the Baphometic Order of the Cubic Stone,
    who trace their origins back to the Knights Templars.

    This was given in recognition of my family's hereditary involvement in Royal Witchcraft
    and the historical Dragon tradition. Other external currents derive from the Knighthood
    of the Plantagenet Clan Donnachaid, Dragon cousins to the House of Vere, and laterally from Dr. John Dee's
    "School of Night", of which Edward de Vere, the seventeenth earl of Oxford, was a prominent member.

    Edward also performed the rites of Dragon kingship in the family,
    specifically the rite of the kingship of the Calle Daouine.

    Down the centuries the Royal Dragon Court is carried continuously in the Vere Dragon Blood.

    It would be correct to say I inherited the Dragon Court by virtue of being a senior blood descendant
    of the House of Vere,
    and I am recognized as a Dragon sovereign by the other senior members of the family.

    Academic sources and references pertaining to these Dragon descents are found within The Dragon Legacy.

    TT: Many people have ascribed to you a radical political agenda, and say that you are trying to use your genealogy
    as a springboard for a bid for the throne of England, and other such nonsense. What is your response to these claims?

    NDV: I cannot take such assertions seriously. The educated reader will already know that the House of Vere
    fielded over twenty prominent earls in an unbroken line over 561 years of British history.

    The House of Vere was credited with being the senior bloodline of England, both by its contemporaries
    and by later historians, and the Veres acted for centuries as Great Chamberlains to the various royal dynasties
    that came and went over time. As Great Chamberlains, they were the closest advisors to the monarchs
    and were therefore the major influence or power behind the British throne. In all this time the family
    never considered it expedient to stoop to pick up the Crown, as the House of Vere was above such considerations.

    It is apparent, given the family's pre-eminently powerful and influential historical position within British society,
    that the English monarchy was a trivia beneath the dignity and ambition of the House. I see no reason to change
    that opinion today, so as you say, the notion that I would demean myself by making a bid for the throne
    is utter nonsense.

    We have standards to maintain in this family.

    In any event the monarchical system in Britain is, to the greatest extent, impotent,
    and so if one wanted real political power, the last place one would find it would be on the throne of England.
    We have no need for thrones or crowns to remind us of who we are.

    TT: Are you a monarchist?

    NDV: By definition Stalin was a "monarch", as were all the presidents of the United States.
    By such a definition I cannot be said to be a monarchist per sé.
    I am only a royalist with the greatest of qualifications because not all who contemporarily claim to be royal
    or those who have occupied the positions of royalty in history have actually been of royal blood.

    TT: How do you feel about the current British monarchy?

    NDV: I have no feelings about them one way or another. They have a tendency to frighten the hell out of British
    wildlife during the hunting season but in other respects they seem harmless enough,
    so I see no real reason not to leave them where they are.
    What would you replace them with anyway? President Blair? What a scary thought.

    TT: There are a lot of wild theories being bandied about on the internet regarding the agenda of the Dragon Court.
    "New World Order: The Movie" (http://www.geocities.com/newworldorder_ ... court.html)
    regards the Dragon Court as part of an Illuminati conspiracy involving Satanism and Nazism.
    "Heeding Bible Prophecy" (http://www.angelfire.com/journal2/watch ... phecy.html)
    seems to proclaim nothing less than that the scion of the Devil - the Anti-Christ himself
    - will emerge from the ranks of the Dragon Court.

    David Icke and Arizona Wilder (http://www.davidicke.com/icke/articles2 ... hifts.html) claim that your former
    coauthor (and former Dragon Court member), Laurence Gardner, shape-shifted into a reptile and sacrificed babies
    in an underground military base at Montauk, New York.

    How close are these claims to the truth? What sinister activities are you hiding, Mr. de Vere

    NDV: People think that the Anti-Christ will emerge from the ranks of the Dragon Court? How intuitive of them.
    My views on Nazism are well known. Nazism was a peasant movement populated by the worst in German peasant scum.
    Its "Aryan" philosophy and aspirations were a complete joke, and its blind devotion to nationalistic jingoism
    was the height of psychological blindness and wishful thinking.
    You can't make genetic Aryans - a race of kings - out of a nation of genetic turnip-peasants.​
    Ass%27s%20Head.
    Beauty and the Beast​


    As for Satanism, if we mean adherence to Satan as some externalized deity separate from the Dragon blood
    and the object of religious devotion, such is an illogical nonsense.


    Originally the Satans in Biblical terms were nothing more than Circuit Prosecutors within the Jewish Theocratic system.

    Who in their right mind would worship lawyers? I wish people would study the facts.

    It would save so much time and energy.

    David Icke, dear, oh dear, oh dear. David once announced on his website that Laurence Gardner and his cronies
    performed blood-drinking rituals at his "Columba House." Before uttering this ridiculous libel David should have contacted
    the Post Office and checked as to where "Columba House" was actually situated.

    If he had done so, the Post Office would quite happily have told him that "Columba House" was in fact a six inch
    by twelve inch Post Office Box at the local Post Office Branch in Tiverton, Devon.

    Exactly how many shape-shifting reptilian vampires and their victims can you get into
    a standard British Post Office Box?

    Having all shape-shifted into reptilian vampires, David Icke would then have us believe that they all shrunk to the size
    of Minnie Mouse and got a postal worker to put them in the box.
    If the reader thinks this is possible or even probable, and I am sure that some who stay glued to the Internet
    all day will, then it is also entirely possible that the reader will believe that Laurence Gardner
    sacrificed babies at Montauk.

    David Icke is concocting all this out of his cynical, fiscally motivated imagination and flogging it to a willing audience
    who, frighteningly enough, actually swallow it whole.

    What sinister activities am I hiding? The internal activities of the Court are confidential.

    TT: What are your personal beliefs regarding God, spirituality, and religion?

    NDV: "Beliefs" regarding God and spirituality create religions, and religions create division and fear,
    within the individual and consequently within society as a whole. Religion is a crutch for the power hungry, the lazy,
    the weak minded and the unregenerate. Religions happen when people don't get the point of the message
    and blindly worship the message and the messenger, instead of grasping the gnosis inherent
    within the words that the message conveys.

    TT: Who do you think the Judeo-Christian god Jehovah really was?


    Do you believe that there is any historical basis behind the symbolic notion of Jehovah's conflict with Satan?

    NDV: The Jews got the main tenets of their religion from the Babylonians during the exile.
    Therefore one can say that although the later Jehovah is a composite, his main attributes can be traced back
    to the god Enlil, and it was Enlil who started a war with his step-brother Enki
    concerning their individual number-ranking and seniority of position within the Anunnaki dynasty.
    So in general terms we can say that the conflict between Jehovah and Satan originated in a petty family squabble.​
    Escorting_a_Soul_to_Heaven.
    Escorting a Soul to Heaven​


    TT: What is your opinion of Christ and his ministry?
    NDV: A pretty good one.
    TT: How do you feel about the Wiccan and New Age movements?
    NDV: Again my views of the Wiccan and New Age movements are also well known.

    Wicca, the so-called "Old Religion" is no more than sixty years old and the New Age movement is nothing
    more than a baseless, cynical marketing ploy geared towards extracting money from the gullible.

    TT: How do you feel about the sudden surge of interest in the "Grail bloodline" following the publication of
    The Da Vinci Code? Do you think that the popularization of the idea is dangerous?

    NDV: Some people, the minority, will maintain their interest and study the subject further, whilst the bulk of readers
    will treat the book as a novel experience and pass on to other subjects, once their curiosity has been satisfied.

    This happens with every new publication. The only inherent danger would be to the subject itself,
    once the money-vampires of the New Age get hold of it and try opening weekend workshops in
    "How to become a member of the Grail Bloodline."
    It would then get promoted and marketed as a "lifestyle choice" open to all.
    Once such familiarity has bred the inevitable public contempt, the subject may well be rendered valueless
    to the new enquirer.

    TT: What is the one most important thing you want people to take away after reading The Dragon Legacy?

    NDV: Firstly, one of the central themes of the book is transcendent consciousness. I would like to feel that the reader
    may derive some interest in this concept from reading The Dragon Legacy and will pursue the subject further.

    Secondly, the Dragon families have been with us for millennia and, in the course of time,
    their innate and rightful destiny will cause them to rise again.​
    faery%20queen.
    The Faery Queen​


    Prince Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg
    An invisible Hand Interview, April, 2011


    DeVere_1997_passport3.
    United Kingdom and Northern Ireland passport of Nicholas De Vere von Drakenberg


    Here, we focus on this concept of Drakenberg, as a “freedom technology,” somewhat like the sovereignty movement
    in the US, Canada and Britain. In that movement, people who choose to “go sovereign” file paperwork with the government announcing their freedom from the government’s rule, thus proclaiming that their own individual sovereignty is supreme.
    This is the true tradition upon which sovereignty has historically been based — royal blood that denotes inherited rights
    to titles and land and a "divine" mandate— to rest your own claim of sovereignty upon in the modern world.

    This is like talking to the elite on terms that they can understand, saying “Don’t mess with me, because I’m a prince,
    not just another slave.” Drakenberg is inherently ethereal in nature. Most states are merely corporations
    — imaginary entities brought to life by legal proclamation.
    "The Head of the House formally addresses me as 'the Dragon Prince' of the House of Vere."

    Drakenberg is trans corporeal, paradoxically both alive and dead, apparent and hidden, real and surreal, at the same time.

    Because of this, it represents real power that cannot be overthrown since it resides in our collective spirit.

    This is the "trans corporeal / transnational" idea behind it.

    It is an essentially metaphysical nation-state. Yet it absolutely "exists" in corporeal form wherever Dragons
    live out their ultra terrestrial lives, including the depth dimensions of life.

    We embody everything that that is the sovereign dragon nation.

    The dragon or fairy gene was very rare and true archdruidic, royal dragon families were rarer still.

    Persecutions excepted, if this were not the case anyway, then perhaps many fairy stories of the popular genre
    which originated from outside the dragon culture would never have taken hold,
    because the reality would have been constantly staring people in the face.

    Traditionally and consistently, the symbol of both wisdom ( Sophia) and healing was the serpent or,
    as it was also known, the dragon.

    In keeping with this the kings and queens of pre-catholic history were noted for their healing capabilities
    and as such, in Judaic mythology, were called, perhaps after the archangel Raphael, the Repha'im or Rapha'Elohim;
    the healing gods of the Anunnaki. Raphael was the Prince who appeared to Adam in Eden according to Milton.
    No mention of this is made in Genesis and one suspects that of the two entities that did appear to Adam, Enlil and Enki,
    or if you like: God and the Catholic Satan. Raphael - the Angel of the Rising Sun - must have been Enki who gave Kingship
    man in the form of the Elven Overlords and after whom, by various related epithets;
    including 'The Repha'im', the Elven Kings are known.

    Authorities believe that these people were identical to both the Nephilim and the Anakim of Idumea and Canaan.

    In early heraldry, derived from ancient sources, the dragon was depicted as a serpent with the wings of a swan.

    This image was also given the wings of a bat.

    The dragon nevertheless was humanoid and so the symbolism in the dragon glyph ought
    rather be interpreted to substantiate the etymology of the word itself.

    The serpent stands for the wisdom and healing powers of the sacred king or queen whose regalia
    often consisted of serpent-like scale armor and whose consciousness soars above that of humanity
    as if carried on wings, which were symbolized by Shamantic swan's feather cloaks.
    grandduchy.
    Sovereign Grand Duchy of Drakenberg Imperial & Royal Dragon Court


    The nocturnal habits of the dragon people, typically those of the Cimmerian Scythians, were noted by their contemporaries and the swan's wings of the dragon glyph attributed to them were either interchangeable with, or substituted by, those of the bat to signify this.
    One of their earlier names - Anunnaki - means "heaven meets earth". Lots of fanciful notions have been put forward
    to suggest that the Anunnaki were from outer space, but a far simpler way of understanding the name is to ask a simple
    question: "when do the heavens - the An or Stars - meet the Earth?". The answer is of course - "at night time".
    When considering the nature of the elves or the Anunnaki, rather than believing they came from a different planet, it might
    be worth considering that they occupied a different dimension. If this sounds equally as fanciful and implausible,
    consider this. A multitude of different animal species on this planet can be seen and touched.
    However, because of their physiology and chemical make-up were different and these differences in synaptic connections
    and hormone levels altered their perceptions of their universe, these species actually lived in another dimension
    and at a higher frequency, where time and the environment for them were totally different to the way humans
    perceived them. The level to which the fairies experienced life was far deeper than the level to which humans experienced it.

    In real terms the fairies inhabited an entirely alien world but occupied the same planet. In this sense they were
    from a different dimension, characterized and regulated by their body chemistry which enabled them to see more
    in the environment than humans could. In this they were no more remarkable than any other non-human species
    we are able to study today.

    Flies, Sharks, Dolphins and a host of other life-forms have attributes and abilities humans do not possess
    and the way in which they interact with the planet is completely alien to the way in which humans do.

    For a fly time is completely different and for a Shark, any warm blooded creature glows with a blue,
    electrochemical haze or aura, proving to some extent, the veracity of the theory of Kirlian photography.

    The Fairies were dragons and this means that they 'saw clearly', they saw subtler emanations than man could.

    In order to be able to do this the fairy would have to have their senses tuned into a higher frequency than man,
    meaning that the fairies, perforce, were tuned to a higher frequency of perception and activity generally.

    In cybernetic terms, any system that is faster and consequently higher than a given base is called a nautonnier
    or navigator and in cybernetics these systems are set over and in control of the slower functional operations
    within any given mechanical or organic arrangement.

    If we transpose this theory onto human society we get leaders and followers, where the leaders are supposed
    to be able to function at a faster rate than the followers and thereby anticipate any given direction the system
    might go in and plan sensible strategies that the system might adopt for its well-being.

    Today this is a joke and incompetent, self-seeking, middle class idiots more often find themselves voted
    into control of vast social systems which, once upon a time, no-one would trust to anyone but the Elves.

    In the past therefore, because the Fairies were, for millennia, physiologically bred and exhaustively trained
    to operate at a higher level than men, humans often invited them to become social navigators or nautonniers.

    The Sumerian word for a navigator is a GALL, which sounds a bit like a Gael, doesn't it?

    The language of the western Royal Scythians was Gaelic and the Royal Scythians were the fairies, the Elves:
    The Dragons.

    The dragon's fiery breath symbolized the pneuma, the spirit of the divine, which coalesced into the Torah
    or cosmic law that the Dragon queens and kings delivered as their pronouncements in the affairs of man.

    Thus the image of the dragon of myth and legend is complete, as a set of symbolic attributes
    belonging to an ancient magical race of preternatural beings, the vampyr overlords or fairy overkings.

    Though humanoid, Dragons were not Homo Sapiens but from the far older elven race sometimes
    called in literature the Elda or Eldar, probably suggested or derived from the name of an ancient queen
    and her ancient, former habitation in Mesopotamia and possibly intended,
    in its attribution as a simile for Elder perhaps, to imply some form of racial primogeniture.

    Reflected upon within the context of early Sumerian historical records,
    such a synonym would indeed seem to be apposite,
    inasmuch as this ancient and mysterious people claimed that the Dragons,
    with Queen Hawah Elda's assistance, made mankind.
    croatiadragon.
    Signum Draconis: Order of the Dragon symbol on the ceiling of Prandau-Normann Castle, Valpovo, Croatia.


    In brief, the recorded Dragon lineage starts with the Annunaki and descends through the proto-Scythians,
    the Sumerians in one branch and the early Egyptians in another; the Phoenicians, the Mittani,
    back to the Scythians again through marital alliance, along to the "Tuatha de Danaan" and the Fir Bolg;
    down through their Arch-Druidic, Priest-Princely families, to the Royal Picts of Scotland and the high kings
    of the Horse Lords of Dal Riada; through to the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and Avallon del Acqs,
    and down to a few pure bred families today.

    Dragon tradition related to all the current genetic and historical evidence says yes they were.

    Both relatively recent and ancient accounts of Dragons or Elves going back to the Annunaki speak of them
    as having clearly distinct physical attributes, and these attributes are inherited from a species that scientists
    now assert preceded the human genetic bottleneck by about thirty thousand years.

    These attributes are not human in the accepted sense. Whether this ancient race was hybridized
    with another before history is anybody's guess, but their later hybridization to produce the Elven God-Kings
    and Ring Lords (the King Tribe), is clearly recorded in the Cylinder Rolls.

    The Nephilim and the Watchers are of the Dragon race. as were the gods of ancient cultures of Greece, India, Sumeria .
    These pantheons are derived from one another. The Platonic Atlantis theory is preceded by a much older tradition
    relating to the "Ogdoad."

    The Ogdoad, sacred to Jesus himself, were the eight great Gods who raked the Sacred Mountain
    - "Atlantis" - after the original Flood.

    This Flood occurred in the Black Sea and the Sacred Mountain, so inundated, was believed to be the Pontus Euxine.

    Apparently the Ogdoad failed in their attempt to bring fertility back to the Holy Place and abandoned it
    for a life wandering the planet.

    This is probably why the legend of the Flood spread and can be found in most cultures.

    The Ogdoad turn up in Chinese myth, in early Egyptian religious texts, and even in much later Viking legend,
    where the gods of the Aesir were said to have abandoned the Sacred Mountain after the Flood.

    From the Ogdoad, who were the first Dragon god-kings of ancient proto-Scythia, we obtain the gods of the Anunnaki,
    and those later pantheons that derived from them. It is not to be doubted that after the Flood the children
    of the Anunnaki had established incredible civilizations in their time, so I suppose you could say that the cultures
    of the Sumerians (whose language, termed "proto-Sumerian", originated in Transylvania),
    the Egyptians and even the early settlers in northern Europe stemmed from and reflect an antediluvian prototype,
    a much older pre-Flood "Golden Age" presided over by the ancient Dragon god-kings and goddess-queens.

    The mistake would be to put the Atlantean period too far back in time and to locate Atlantis where Plato did.

    Scientists have proved the Biblical Flood to be in the Black Sea and this region is where most of the Titanic
    and Olympian sagas, associated with the Dawn of the Gods, unfold.
    "Anciently Dragon blood, the blood of the 'gods', is the true source of divine right kingship.

    To say that Dragons are the rightful rulers of the world's governments today might raise some contention.

    Perhaps it would be more realistic to suggest that they may well be the rightful rulers

    of the world's governments in the future." -- HRH Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg


    "The Dragon" is a term I use generally to mean the dragon archetype resting within the Dragon blood
    and passed on through the genes. It is the conduit through which flow the memories of the wisdom
    and experience of the Dragons who have gone before.

    The word "dragon" is derived from the Greek "edrakon", which is an aorist of the word "derkesthai",
    which means "to see clearly". "The Dragon" therefore is the inherited Dragon archetype and that archetype
    is the conduit of clear sight through which racial knowledge flows.

    Clear sight also and principally refers to transcendent consciousness.
    uther.
    Uther Pendragon, Father of King Arthur


    Notably in our family the Dragon Court is also derived from the Court of the Pendragon Kings whose lineage we inherit through numerous marital alliances with our close cousins, the Dukes of Hamilton, whose estates bordered our own in Lanarkshire.
    The Hamiltons were the heirs presumptive to the throne of Scotland. Lateral inheritance from the extinct cadet cousin branch of the Vere earls of Oxford brings to the contemporary Court, via the 11th earl, Richard de Vere, the degree of Societas Draconis - latterly misnamed "Sarkany Rend" - a membership bestowed upon him, it is believed academically, during his investiture into the Prince's Degree of the Order of the Garter, along with the Emperor Sigismund of Luxembourg, at St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle. The heraldry of the family prior to Richard's investiture into Societas Draconis already included the ancient Dragon motifs on both the paternal and maternal sides of the family, denoting pure Dragon blood in both descents, and reflecting the continuing presence of the Dragon Court in the family since the time of Princess Milouziana of the Scythians.
    The contemporary Dragon Court is furthermore a combination of what Aleister Crowley would term several "currents", of which the major external one to the family proper was bestowed via the Black Country Covenant of the Baphometic Order of the Cubic Stone, who trace their origins back to the Knights Templars.
    Merov.
    Serpent tailed Mermen raising up Venus the Goddess


    "'The Dragon' is a term I use generally to mean the dragon archetype resting within the Dragon blood and passed on through the genes.

    It is the conduit through which flow the memories of the wisdom and experience of the Dragons who have gone before.

    The word 'dragon' is derived from the Greek 'edrakon', which is an aorist of the word "derkesthai", which means 'to see clearly'.

    'The Dragon' therefore is the inherited Dragon archetype and that archetype is the conduit of clear sight through

    which racial knowledge flows. Clear sight also and principally refers to transcendent consciousness. "

    -- HRH Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg


    This was given in recognition of my family's hereditary involvement in Royal Witchcraft
    and the historical Dragon tradition. Other external currents derive from the Knighthood
    of the Plantagenet Clan Donnachaid, Dragon cousins to the House of Vere,
    and laterally from Dr. John Dee's "School of Night", of which Edward de Vere,
    the seventeenth earl of Oxford, was a prominent member.

    Edward also performed the rites of Dragon kingship in the family, specifically the rite of the kingship of the Calle Daouine.
    houseofflesh.

    Down the centuries the Royal Dragon Court is carried continuously in the Vere Dragon Blood. It would be correct to say I inherited the Dragon Court by virtue of being a senior blood descendant of the House of Vere, and I am recognized as a Dragon sovereign by the other senior members of the family.
    "Developing powers for their own sake isn't magic, it's greed, and greed and ambition are the destroyers of transcendent Dragon perception. Power flows naturally for those whose vision is clear, and clear perception will determine that those powers are used with detachment. Jesus said 'Seek ye first the kingdom of God and all these things will be added unto you.' The fact of the matter is that to Dragons, Dragon magic is simple and straightforward and fundamentally it relies in discovering simplicity and stillness within the self." -- HRH Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg

    The Imperial and Royal Dragon Court appears repeatedly throughout the history of my family. It is the physical, cultural manifestation of the Dragon spirit inherent within the Vere Dragon blood, reaching back long before the time of Christ.
    Briefly, to give a few examples, in more recent times it was the Royal Court of the Dragon Princess Milouziana from whom we are descended in numerous lines, and later it was the fairy Court of Alberic de Vere, the legendary Oberon.
    Immediately following Alberic it was the Court of his son, Robert de Vere, earl of Huntingdon, who was the historical Robin Hood; the elven, sacral priest-king of the witches. Later the Dragon Court was manifest in the "Thirteen Covens of Mid-Lothian", and in the cabal of Lady Somerville, the witch-mother of Thomas of Edinburgh. Thomas was the grandson of Sir William Vere of Stonebyres and the elvin, Dragon priest-king of the Thirteen Covens.
    Sir William was the son of James, 7th Baron Blackwood. Lady Jane Somerville's heraldic family badge is recorded as the fiery dragon surmounting the pentacle, denoting Dragon blood in the House of the Somerville earls.
    Notably in our family the Dragon Court is also derived from the Court of the Pendragon Kings whose lineage we inherit through numerous marital alliances with our close cousins, the Dukes of Hamilton, whose estates bordered our own in Lanarkshire. The Hamiltons were the heirs presumptive to the throne of Scotland.
    Lateral inheritance from the extinct cadet cousin branch of the Vere earls of Oxford brings to the contemporary Court, via the 11th earl, Richard de Vere, the degree of Societas Draconis - latterly misnamed "Sarkany Rend" - a membership bestowed upon him, it is believed academically, during his investiture into the Prince's Degree of the Order of the Garter, along with the Emperor Sigismund of Luxembourg, at St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle. The heraldry of the family prior to Richard's investiture into Societas Draconis already included the ancient Dragon motifs on both the paternal and maternal sides of the family, denoting pure Dragon blood in both descents, and reflecting the continuing presence of the Dragon Court in the family since the time of Princess Milouziana of the Scythians.
    The contemporary Dragon Court is furthermore a combination of what Aleister Crowley would term several "currents", of which the major external one to the family proper was bestowed via the Black Country Covenant of the Baphometic Order of the Cubic Stone, who trace their origins back to the Knights Templars. This was given in recognition of my family's hereditary involvement in Royal Witchcraft and the historical Dragon tradition. Other external currents derive from the Knighthood of the Plantagenet Clan Donnachaid, Dragon cousins to the House of Vere, and laterally from Dr. John Dee's "School of Night", of which Edward de Vere, the seventeenth earl of Oxford, was a prominent member. Edward also performed the rites of Dragon kingship in the family, specifically the rite of the kingship of the Calle Daouine.
    Desposyni and the Merovingian Dynasty​


    The Sang Réal Holy Grail Dragon Bloodline traces back to the times of Mesopotamia and the great Sumerian Anunnaki genetic experiment or Adamic Creation known as Adam and Eve.​
    "The term Desposyni (from the Greek δεσπόσυνοι, plural of δεσπόσυνος, meaning 'of or belonging to the master or lord' refers to blood relatives of Jesus. The term was coined by Sextus Julius Africanus, a writer of the early 3rd century. Scholars argue that Jesus' relatives held positions of special honor in the Early Christian Church. Christians of the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox traditions, as well as most Anglicans and some followers of Lutheranism, reject the idea that Jesus had blood siblings, as their churches hold the doctrine of the Virgin Mary's Perpetual Virginity." -- Wikipedia​


    merovingian.
    The Ancient Dragon Bloodline Crest of the Merovingian Dynasty​


    "For the relatives of our Lord according to the flesh, whether with the desire of boasting or simply wishing to state the fact, in either case truly, have handed down the following account... But as there had been kept in the archives up to that time the genealogies of the Hebrews as well as of those who traced their lineage back to proselytes, such as Achior the Ammonite and Ruth the Moabitess, and to those who were mingled with the Israelites and came out of Egypt with them, Herod, inasmuch as the lineage of the Israelites contributed nothing to his advantage, and since he was goaded with the consciousness of his own ignoble extraction, burned all the genealogical records, thinking that he might appear of noble origin if no one else were able, from the public registers, to trace back his lineage to the patriarchs or proselytes and to those mingled with them, who were called Georae. A few of the careful, however, having obtained private records of their own, either by remembering the names or by getting them in some other way from the registers, pride themselves on preserving the memory of their noble extraction. Among these are those already mentioned, called Desposyni, on account of their connection with the family of the Saviour. Coming from Nazara and Cochaba, villages of Judea, into other parts of the world, they drew the aforesaid genealogy from memory and from the book of daily records as faithfully as possible. Whether then the case stand thus or not no one could find a clearer explanation, according to my own opinion and that of every candid person. And let this suffice us, for, although we can urge no testimony in its support, we have nothing better or truer to offer. In any case the Gospel states the truth." And at the end of the same epistle he adds these words: "Matthan, who was descended from Solomon, begat Jacob. And when Matthan was dead, Melchi, who was descended from Nathan begat Eli by the same woman. Eli and Jacob were thus uterine brothers. Eli having died childless, Jacob raised up seed to him, begetting Joseph, his own son by nature, but by law the son of Eli. Thus Joseph was the son of both." -- Eusebius of Caesarea, Historia Ecclesiae​


    dragon-dynasties-small.
    Ancient Dragon Dynasty


    "There still survived of the kindred of the Lord the grandsons of Judas, who according to the flesh was called his brother. These were informed against, as belonging to the family of David, and Evocatus brought them before Domitian Caesar: for that emperor dreaded the advent of Christ, as Herod had done. So he asked them whether they were of the family of David; and they confessed they were. Next he asked them what property they had, or how much money they possessed. They both replied that they had only 9000 denaria between them, each of them owning half that sum; but even this they said they did not possess in cash, but as the estimated value of some land, consisting of thirty-nine plethra only, out of which they had to pay the dues, and that they supported themselves by their own labour. And then they began to hold out their hands, exhibiting, as proof of their manual labour, the roughness of their skin, and the corns raised on their hands by constant work. Being then asked concerning Christ and His kingdom, what was its nature, and when and where it was to appear, they returned answer that it was not of this world, nor of the earth, but belonging to the sphere of heaven and angels, and would make its appearance at the end of time, when He shall come in glory, and judge living and dead, and render to every one according to the course of his life. Thereupon Domitian passed no condemnation upon them, but treated them with contempt, as too mean for notice, and let them go free. At the same time he issued a command, and put a stop to the persecution against the Church. When they were released they became leaders of the churches, as was natural in the case of those who were at once martyrs and of the kindred of the Lord. And, after the establishment of peace to the Church, their lives were prolonged to the reign of Trajan." -- Eusebius of Caesarea, Historia Ecclesiae, 3:20​


    A meeting between Sylvester (Pope Sylvester I) and the Jewish Christian leaders took place in 318....The vital interview was not, as far as we know, recorded, but the issues were very well known, and it is probable the Joses, the oldest of the Christian Jews, spoke on behalf of the Desposyni and the rest. ...That most hallowed name, Desposyni, had been respected by all believers in the first century and a half of Christian history. The word literally meant, in Greek, "belonging to the Lord." It was reserved uniquely for Jesus' blood relatives. Every part of the ancient Jewish Christian church had always been governed by a desposynos, and each of them carried one of the names traditional in Jesus' family---Zachary, Joseph, John, James, Joses, Simeon, Matthias, and so on. But no one was ever called Jesus. Neither Sylvester nor any of the thirty-two popes before him, nor those succeeding him, ever emphasized that there were at least three well-known and authentic lines of legitimate blood descent from Jesus' own family..." ...The Desposyni demanded that Sylvester, who now had Roman patronage, revoke his confirmation of the authority of the Greek Christian bishops at Jerusalem, in Antioch, in Ephesus, and in Alexandria, and to name desposynos bishops to take their place. They asked that the practice of sending cash to Jerusalem as the mother church be resumed... These blood relatives of Christ demanded the reintroduction of the Law, which included the Sabbath and the Holy Day system of Feasts and New Moons of the Bible. Sylvester dismissed their claims and said that, from now on, the mother church was in Rome and he insisted they accept the Greek bishops to lead them. ...This was the last known dialogue with the Sabbath-keeping church in the east led by the disciples who were descended from blood relatives of Jesus the Messiah.​
    last-super.
    The Last Supper with Mary Magdalen to the right of Jesus, Leonardo di Vinci​


    "Jesus was in fact an historical king of the Ancient Dragon Bloodline and a Merovingian who fought Rome and whose bloodline survives through his children with Mary Magdalen, called the 'Desposyni". The Magdalen carried the 'Sang Réal' Blood Royal or Holy Grail to Southern France and Great Britain. This core truth has been covered up by the Vatican for centuries. The Church of Rome deliberately obscured the truth about Jesus and created the ‘Son of God’ myth for political gain, instituting in the centuries following Jesus's death a reign of terror against anyone suspected of being Desposyni.

    However, there were protectors, not only of the secret truth of Sang Réal, but of the Desposyni themselves. The Knights Templar Order was founded by Hugh de Payens at the Council of Troyes and officially endorsed by the Church in 1129 AD. Hugh de Payens was a Knight of the Dragon Bloodline or Desposyni, along with the first nine Knights of the Knights Templar, all blood relatives of de Payens. Their commitment was to SERVE- PRESERVE and PROTECT the Blood Royal of the Dragon lineage." -- Amarushka​


    jesus-mary-kilmore-sm.
    Jesus and Mary Magdalen, Kilmore Church, Isle of Mull, Scotland​


    Please Click on the Above Image and Read the caption following the photo.
    The symbolism in support of the existence of the Desposyni Sang Réal is undeniable!​


    It has been claimed that a son of Jesus and Mary Magdalen was born on the holy Isle of Iona and, curiously, this stained glass window is to be found just eighteen miles away in Kilmore Church, Dervaig, on the Scottish Isle of Mull.​
    Mary-Magdalene-by-Francesco.
    Francesco Hayez (1791-1882),The Penitent Mary Magdalen


    Mary Magdalen is mentioned as one of the three Mary’s ‘who always walked with the Lord’ and as his companion (Philip 59.6-11). Gospel of Philip also says that the Lord loved her more than all other disciples, and used to kiss her often (63.34-36).

    templar.
    Knights Templar


    Recalling the existing medieval nexus between European self-identity and Christendom the following words
    of St. Bernard may be interpreted as a religious rationalization, if not an encouragement to assertively defend
    Western interests. Bernard writes:
    "The knights of Christ may safely fight the battles of their Lord, fearing neither sin if they smite the enemy,

    nor danger at their own death; since to inflict death or to die for Christ is no sin, but rather, an abundant claim to glory....

    The knight of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently,

    for he serves Christ when he strikes, and serves himself when he falls." -- St. Bernard

    The following is quoted from the book, Templars in America:

    "It wasn’t one family—it was a series of them. There were 24 hereditary high priests in the temple of Jerusalem, and after the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 they scattered throughout Europe and the Far East. Their descendents kept in touch and only married within that group of families—keeping the bloodline pure and passing down their teaching in secret. Now, they knew that Jesus wasn’t God and that he had taught a form of spirituality which was totally in conformity with Judaic tradition and with the Egyptian tradition that preceded it."


    How does that story connect with Gnosticism?
    "These families were Gnostics. The church required you to believe in a set of fixed dogma and accept it as fact. It said that if you are not a good boy down here then you’ll burn in hell for eternity; or you could conform to church belief and join the feathered choir in heaven. The Gnostic is a different animal. He follows a teacher who teaches an ascending path of initiation, whereby more and more is revealed until ultimately you attain union with God. Examples would be Buddhists, Zoroastrians, Egyptians, or the Jewish Kabbalists. And the families we’re talking about were following something very closely akin to the Kabbalah and the Egyptian tradition."

    How does Gnosticism connect with the legends surrounding Mary Magdalen and Jesus?
    "She was his wife. The Christian concept that Jesus was God and therefore he was untouchable by anybody is nonsense, because as a Jew he would have had to conform to Jewish tradition at that time—and Jewish tradition said that the male had to marry and have children. And he was also heir to the throne of David. It would have been incumbent on him to produce another heir to keep the bloodline going. Had he not been married and done that, he couldn’t have been the heir to the throne.

    And Mary Magdalen came from a very important family—far more important than the Christian gospels tells us. And it probably was an arranged marriage by the two families to promote the aristocracy because Jesus was certainly an aristocrat, not just a humble carpenter."


    Who were the Knights Templar?
    "On the surface they were a medieval, monastic order who gave the appearance of being part of the church and devout Christians. In actual fact, they were anything but that. Yes, they were a monastic order, they’d been approved by the pope, and they were virtually independent of all civil and other church authorities, being responsible through their grand master to the pope and the pope alone. But in actual fact, they’d been founded by a group of families who had a very different and a very heretical view about Christ and his teaching. They had kept that teaching alive in secret for nearly 1,100 years and conspired to set up a counterbalance to church power." -- Interview by Deborah Caldwell

    king-arthur-and-the-holy-grail.
    King Arthur Pendragon



    The Greatest Fraud

    by Nicholas de Vere 2003


    The Donation of Constantine first appeared during the 8th century and was a document which purported to recognize the Roman popes as Christ’s representatives on Earth and to donate to Pope Sylvester and the Roman Church all those Imperial powers formerly invested in the Throne of Byzantium.
    The ’Donation’, the Church claimed, was written in the 4th century at the insistence of the emperor Constantine. The Church said that he was so grateful for having been cured of leprosy by Pope Sylvester, that he gave into the Church’s hand the entire power and wealth of the unified Roman Empire, including the right to crown and dethrone kings. Now that is what you call expensive medical insurance.
    Supposedly written before 337 AD - the year of Constantine’s death - the Donation of Constantine actually didn’t make an appearance on the stage of European history until four hundred years later. So far-reaching are the powers bestowed upon the Church by this document, one would have thought that it would have been made public at the time of its bestowal. Not centuries later.
    The provisions of the Donation were enforced in 751 AD following which the Merovingians were deposed by the Church and replaced by their sycophants, the Mayors of the Palace who later became known as the Carolingians. The Church had made a pact with the Mayors and offered to ’recognize’ their legitimacy as rulers if they would dispense with the true Dragon Kings. The deal was done and the Carolingians were made the puppet rulers under the Roman Church.​
    map.
    The Frankish Empire in the age of the Merovingians and Carolingians​


    The Donation, because it was made by a Dragon King, Constantine, legitimized the Church’s right to take this action. To all intents and purposes they had the authority of Dragon Kingship given up to them by this Charter. No doubt the Merovingians knew this to be a fraud, which is why they refused to recognize the authority of the Church to meddle in affairs of state. What do we learn from this?
    We can see from the Church’s choice of ’benefactor’ that the Church was well aware that universally, only those of the Dragon Blood would be recognized as true kings. Therefore they chose Constantine as he was known to have been descended from both the Britannic PenDragon House and the Dragon House of David. Furthermore he was a member of the Desposyni - the heirs of the Lord - the blood descendants and legitimate representatives of Jesus Christ.​
    Baptism%20of%20King%20Clovis%20I.
    500CE: Medieval Europe. The baptism of Clovis I by Bishop Remigius, He founds the Merovingian dynasty​


    In the Donation, it appeared as if Constantine had relinquished his hereditary spiritual position as a Messiah and invested it in the Papacy.
    By suggesting they were the representatives of Christ, the popes were claiming Dragon descent for themselves. It was well known that Jesus had descendants and that they were part of the only Eurasian dynasty which was authorized to be kings - the Elven Overlords or Dragons. It would have appeared to the public then, that in the displacement of the Merovingians, one Dragon dynasty was being replaced by another, albeit a paper one. This reduced any danger of mass unrest. As time passed however, it became uncomfortably clear that the function of kingship under the Merovingians had been entirely different to that under the Carolingians.​
    Pepin%20and%20wife.
    Puppet Ruler Pepin and Bega, first of the Carolingian line,
    painting by Rubens, 17th century​


    Whilst the Merovingians had formerly assumed the role of overseers, sages and wise counsellors, the Carolingians and their successors, prompted by the Church, became deliberately poorly educated, ignorant, insensitive tyrants and territorial tradesmen.
    Dragon Kingship and the Grail Code had died to be replaced by a corrupted form of feudal totalitarianism and brutal, economic slavery as the Church carefully and strategically replaced the old dynasties with its own merchant-class client families who, from that day on, became vassals of the Vatican.
    Lastly we learn that from 751 AD the true Dark Age began in earnest. The Elven Holocaust was initiated and would run its course for another thousand years until, in England at least, the witchcraft laws were repealed in 1736. North of the border in Scotland, however, the persecution of witches in the 1700’s was at its fiercest until the end of the century.
    During this time, history has witnessed the rise of the Church of Rome and its successful struggle for power. In time, no dynasty ruled in Europe or remained in power unless the Church sanctioned their reign. The Church chose the royal families, it crowned kings and it deposed its detractors. In short, the Church, under the auspices of the Donation of Constantine was the sole and supreme temporal power in Europe and the known world. Without this purported imperial benefice however, the Church would have remained a marginalized Mediterranean cult contesting for patronage along with a host of other Gnostic Christian denominations.
    The royal dynasties, sponsored by the Church and crowned by its Divine Right, instituted their courts and parliaments, passed laws and employed agents to act on their behalf. To all intents and purposes it seemed as if the Church had the absolute right of Dragons and wielded power by the very sanction of Jesus Christ and God.​
    St-Boniface-Thors-Oak.


    The above depicts the Merovingians v.s. the puppet ruler of the Carolingians led by Saint Boniface (c. 680 – 5 June 754), the Apostle of the Germans for the Church.​
    "The unprecedented coagulation of military power in the hands of the Frankish aristocracy who supported Charles Martel; the replacement of the Merovingian kings of Francia by a new, 'Carolingian' royal dynasty; the absorption by the Franks of large areas of central and northern Europe, from modern Holland to Saxony; the Europe-wide conquests of Charlemagne [Martel's grandson] ... these developments engulfed the Christian populations of much of continental Europe in a kingdom of truly 'imperial' dimensions, known to us as the Carolingian [or Frankish] empire. Regional 'micro-Christendoms' survived. But at the top of a victorious society, dominated by the Franks, their various representatives came together, for the very first time, to create what they considered to be the only true 'Christendom' that mattered.

    As we have suggested, the conversion of the Saxons was achieved by a combination of armed force and the zeal of missionaries. So far as we know, never before had the adherence of any people to the Christian faith been brought about by quite so drastic a use of the mailed fist and with so much blood-letting among reluctant pagans. The completion of conversion of the entire Roman Empire in the fourth and fifth centuries, accomplished though it had been under the urge of imperial legislation, had probably not entailed the killing of as many non-Christians as did the winning of this comparatively small area in North-western Germany [Saxony]. It was the first but not the last instance in which acceptance of baptism and of the Christian name was induced by a liberal application of the sword. We shall find the procedure repeated again and again in the thousand years between the eighth and the nineteenth century. We shall see it usually as part of the process of the conquest of one people by another -- invaders and conquerors employing the Church and its agents as one of their tools." -- Peter Brown​


    No monarch reigning today and no government under the monarch or instituted in their name would enjoy their position if the Church, empowered by the Donation, had not given them permission to rule in the first place. Without the Donation of Constantine, European history today would be totally different and none of the dynasties past or present would have had the right to have reigned. Nor would they reign now and none of their governments or agencies would have exercised power.
    One slight problem, though. The Donation of Constantine is a complete and utter fraud and the Church was never given any temporal powers at all, let alone the right to found dynasties, crown kings or institute governments. The whole document was a lie from beginning to end and has been known to be a fake since Lorenzo Valla applied the methods of historical criticism to it during the Renaissance.
    How do we know Valla was correct? The New Testament references incorporated into the wording of the Donation were taken from the Latin Vulgate version of the Bible. The Vulgate Bible was compiled by St. Jerome who was born more than two decades after Constantine was supposed to have signed the Donation. The actual Vulgate Bible wording that appears in the Donation didn’t exist until St Jerome invented it, fifty years after the document had supposedly been dated and signed by the Emperor. By this time Constantine had been dead for decades and couldn’t have signed the Dragons’ rights away anyway.
    The language of the Donation is eighth century clerical or dog Latin, whilst the Latin used in the 4th century Empire was late classical Roman. The Imperial and Papal ceremonials described in the Donation didn’t exist in Constantine’s time but were developed some centuries later.
    Several documentary instances of the Church’s use of the Donation to assert their authority in the medieval period still exist, including the letter of Pope Gregory IX entitled ’Si Memoriam Beneficiorum’ dated October 23rd 1236 and addressed to the Emperor Frederick II. Pope Gregory writes,​
    ".......that as the Vicar of the Prince of Apostles (the Roman Pope) governed the empire of priesthood and of souls in the whole world, so he should also reign over things and bodies throughout the whole world; and considering that, he should rule over earthly matters by the reins of justice to whom - as it is known - God had committed on earth the charge over spiritual things. The Emperor Constantine humbled himself by his own vow and handed over the empire to the perpetual care of the Roman Pontiff with the Imperial Insignia and scepters and the City and Duchy of Rome........".​


    vatican-city.
    Vatican City of Rome​

    People in the medieval and Renaissance period, confronted with this document, did not generally criticize the Donation on the grounds of its veracity. They just exclaimed aghast that they could not believe that Constantine would have been stupid enough to have given the Roman Church everything.
    From the Donation we understand that Constantine offered the Pope all the robes and Crowns of office but the Pope, being such a humble man, gave them back to the Emperor. This lets the Church off the hook should some malcontent turn up and ask for sartorial evidence. If the readers read the Donation for themselves they will be appalled at the pretentious egotism, the arrogance and the sheer material greed of the Church, as authors of the document.
    The fraudulent imperial power of the Vatican to create kings by ’coronation’ - derived from this faked 8th century ’Donation of Constantine’ - was later adopted by the Archbishops of the Church of England with the complicity of the Tudors, who were Catholics themselves.
    When he split with Rome, Henry VIII still retained and later ratified and re-established in the Anglo-Catholic Church of England the fraudulent right of the Church’s clergy to create by coronation, a succession of British monarchs. This was an illegal act. The ’Donation of Constantine’ was proved to be a completely fake document. Therefore no Royal Elven House that knew its origins and cared about social justice could possibly bring itself to recognize a Christian British monarchy or any of their Church sponsored, Church crowned predecessors or any of their regnant or formerly regnant, European cousin Houses.
    elevn%20house.
    Vere Descent from the Elven House of Llewelyn of Oon, Pendragon, the Scots Kings and the Pictish Trive of Mar


    Because the Donation was a fraud and no subsequent priest of any Catholic derived denomination ever had the right to crown kings, Britain has had no legally reigning monarch for 900 years. As a consequence of this, all the laws passed by these monarchs were and are illegal and worthless and all the governmental agencies set up by or derived from these monarchs or their laws are also illegal and worthless up to the present day.
    When considering this, the reader might like to consider the fact that all the arrests ever made by the police in Britain and Europe are acts of kidnap and habeas corpus. Equally, any man who has taken up arms for the Crown and killed for his country is unprotected by law and guilty therefore of murder.
    However, paradoxically, as the entire British legal system is illegal, there are no laws, and so the crimes of habeas corpus and murder as we define them today, simply do not exist. Subconsciously people know that their politicians and monarchs have no legitimate authority to rule over them. They manifest this knowledge in an increasing disrespect for these optional, arbitrary and illusory social conventions, which is yet another reason why social order is breaking down.
    If the UN is right, we may face chaos in the near future; and all because of a stupid fraud, perpetrated by a group of myopically greedy, maniacal peddlers of false religion who are now long dead.
    Again, for asserting this kind of view the Fairies are implicitly guilty of Treason, even though all British laws are constitutionally illegal and the act of treason itself is a non sequitur. Think of the implications of this.
    It applies to any nation state in the Christian world today which is still a monarchy or which has evolved as part of a successive, developing political process originating from a monarchy, by virtue of its continuing sanction from, or sponsorship by, the Church of whatever denomination. It is unauthorized by any temporal or divine power to coerce anyone to obey any law originating at any stage of that government’s evolution.
    In effect, Britain, Europe and America are ruled by the sword, and that sword is being wielded by people who are no more than short sighted, self seeking robber barons. They have no constitutional right to rule even in America, where in the 19th century, the libertarian commentator, Lysander Spooner, demonstrated that the consensual nature of the original document, upon which the subsequent, consecutive clauses are founded, was being flouted, thereby making the entire Constitution illegal. Pierre Proud’hon called them all "Tyrants and Usurpers".

    Genesis of the Grail Kings


    The Explosive Story of the Ancient Bloodline
    by Laurence Gardner


    Whereas the research for this book's predecessor, Bloodline of the Holy Grail, was New Testament based, Genesis of the Grail Kings concentrates on Old Testament times, particularly on the early stories from the books of Genesis and Exodus.
    As discovered in previous studies, the Gospel texts which have been in the public domain for centuries often bear little relation to the first-hand accounts of the era to which they relate.
    The New Testament, as we know it, was contrived by the 4th-century bishops to support the newly manipulated Christian faith and, in just the same way, the Old Testament scriptures were designed to uphold the emergent Hebrew faith, rather than to represent historical fact.
    Clearly, one has to get back to the pre-biblical writings in order to find any anomalies, but the problem in scriptural terms is that the earliest Hebrew writings (which were restructured many centuries later) were themselves only written between the 6th and the 1st centuries BC, so they are not likely to be wholly authentic in their telling of accounts from thousands of years before. Indeed, it is plain that this is the case because, when these books were first written, their express purpose was to convey the history of a religion which did not actually emerge until well into the ancestral story.
    The Bible explains that the Bloodline story began with Adam and Eve, from whose third son Seth evolved a line which progressed through Methuselah, Noah and, eventually, to Abraham who became the great patriarch of the Hebrew nation. The text relates that Abraham brought his family westwards out of Mesopotamia (present day Iraq) to the land of Canaan (Palestine), from where some of his descendants moved into Egypt. After many generations, they journeyed back into Canaan where, in time, David of Bethlehem became king of the newly defined kingdoms of Judah and Israel.
    If viewed as it is presented in the scriptures, this is a fascinating saga, but there is nothing anywhere to indicate why the ancestral line of David and his subsequent heirs was in any way special. In fact, quite the reverse is the case; his ancestors are portrayed as a succession of wandering territory seekers, who are seen to be of no particular significance until the time of King David himself.
    Their biblical history bears no comparison to, say, the contemporary pharaohs of ancient Egypt, but their significance, we are told, comes from the fact that Abraham and his descendants were designated as 'God's chosen people'. This, of course, leaves us wondering because, according to the Old Testament, their God led them through nothing but a succession of famines, wars and general hardship, rather than acting throughout as their merciful shepherd - an image which is only portrayed from time to time.
    Given that the first group of these ultimately canonical books was written while the Jews were held captive in Mesopotamian Babylon in the 6th century BC, it is apparent that Babylon was where the original records were then held. In fact, from the time of Adam, through some nineteen said generations down to Abraham, the whole of Hebrew patriarchal history was Mesopotamian. More specifically, the history was from Sumer in southern Mesopotamia, where the ancient Sumerians did indeed refer to the grass-lands of the Euphrates delta as the Eden.
    When researching for Bloodline of the Holy Grail, it was apparent that good sources for background information were the various Gospels and texts that were not selected by the bishops for inclusion in the canonical New Testament - the books that were strategically ignored. Similarly, there were books that were excluded from the Old Testament: the books of Enoch and Jubilees, for example.
    A further work, to which attention is specifically drawn in the Old Testament books of Joshua and 2-Samuel, is the book of Jasher. But despite Jasher's apparent importance to the Hebrew writers, it was not included in the final selection. Also, the book of Numbers draws our attention to the book of The Wars of Jehovah, while in the book of Isaiah we are directed towards the book of The Lord. The very fact that these writings are mentioned in the Bible means that they must pre-date the Old Testament. Indeed, they are all cited as being important but, for one reason or another, the editors saw fit to exclude them when the canonical selection was made.
    It has often been wondered why the biblical God of the Hebrews led them through trials, tribulations, floods and disaster when, from time to time, he appears to have performed with a quite contrary and merciful personality. The answer is that, although now seemingly embraced in a general context as the One God by the Jewish and Christian churches, there was originally a distinct difference between the figures of Jehovah and the Lord. They were, in practice, quite separate deities. The god referred to as Jehovah was traditionally a storm god - a god of wrath and vengeance, whereas the god referred to as the Lord emerges as a god of fertility and wisdom.
    In early times, the prevailing Hebrew word for Lord was Adon, whereas the apparent personal name of Jehovah was not used at all. It came from the original Hebrew stem YHWH (Yahweh), which meant 'I am that I am - a statement said to have been made by God to Moses on Mount Sinai hundreds of years after the time of Abraham. However, the Bible also makes it clear that the God of Abraham was actually called El Shaddai, which means Lofty Mountain.
    Jehovah was, therefore, not a name at all. The early texts refer simply to El Shaddai and to his opposing counterpart Adon. The Canaanites called these gods El Elyon and Baal, meaning precisely the same things: Lofty Mountain and Lord. In modern Bibles, the definitions God and Lord are used and intermixed throughout as if they referred to the same Jehovah character, but originally they did not. One was a vengeful god (a people suppressor), and the other was a social god (a people supporter). Additionally, in contrast to Bible teachings, the various traditions relate that these gods both had parents, wives, sons and daughters.
    Throughout the patriarchal era, the emergent Hebrews endeavoured to support Adon the Lord but, at every turn, El Shaddai (the storm god Jehovah) retaliated with floods, tempests, famines and general destruction. Even at the time of the Captivity (around 586 BC), the Bible explains that Jerusalem was overthrown at Jehovah's bidding. Tens of thousands of Israelites were then taken hostage into Babylon simply because one of their past kings (a descendant of King David) had erected altars in veneration of Baal the Adon.
    It was during the course of this Captivity that the Israelites finally conceded. They decided, after generations of Adon support, to succumb to the opposing god of wrath, developing a new religion out of sheer fear of his retribution. It was, in fact, at this time that the apparent name of Jehovah first appeared - little more than 500 years before the time of Jesus. Subsequently, the Christian Church took Jehovah on board as well, calling him simply God, and all the hitherto social concepts of Adon were totally discarded. The two religions were henceforth both faiths of fear, and even today their followers are classified as 'God fearing'.
    This leaves us with the knowledge that, within an overall pantheon of gods and goddesses (many of whom are actually named in the Bible), there were two predominant and opposing gods. In different cultures they have been called El Elyon and Baal, El Shaddai and Adon, Ahriman and Mazda, Jehovah and Lord, God and Father - but these styles are not personal names; they are all titular definitions.
    To discover the identities of these gods, we have to look no further than where they were first recorded as being operative. In this regard, ancient Canaanite texts (discovered in Syria in the 1920s) reveal that their respective courts were in the Tigris-Euphrates valley in Mesopotamian Sumer - above the Eden delta of the Persian Gulf.
    Sumerian written records can be traced back to the 3rd millennium BC and they explain that the gods in question were brothers. In Sumer, the storm-god who eventually became known as Jehovah was called Enlil or Ilu-kur-gal (meaning Lofty One of the Mountain) and his brother, who became Adon the Lord, was called Enki - a very appropriate name because Enki means Archetype.
    The texts inform us that it was Enlil who brought the Flood; it was Enlil who destroyed Ur and Babylon, and it was Enlil who constantly opposed the education and enlightenment of humankind. Indeed an early Syrian text relates that it was Enlil-Jehovah who obliterated the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah on the Dead Sea - not because they were dens of wickedness as is generally taught, but because they were great centres of wisdom and learning.
    It was Enki, on the other hand, who (despite the vengeful wrath of his brother) granted the Sumerians access to the Tree of Knowledge and the Tree of Life. It was Enki who set up the escape strategy during the Flood, and it was Enki who passed over the time-honoured Tables of Destiny - the tablets of scientific law which became the bedrock of the early mystery schools in Egypt.
    Many books mention the hermetic school of Pharaoh Tuthmosis III, who reigned about 1450 BC, but it is not generally known that the school he inherited was the original Court of the Dragon, founded by the priests of Mendes in about 2200 BC. It was later ratified by the 12th-dynasty Queen Sobeknefru as a sovereign and priestly Order, to be eventually passed from Egypt to the Kings of Jerusalem and the Black Sea Princes of Scythia. Around 600 years ago King Sigismund of Hungary reconstituted the Order, which exists today as the Imperial and Royal Court of the Dragon Sovereignty under the auspices of the House of Vere of Anjou.
    The kings of the early succession (who reigned in Sumer and Egypt before becoming Kings of Israel) were anointed upon installation with the fat of the Dragon: the sacred crocodile. This noble beast was referred to in Egypt as the Messeh (from which derived the Hebrew verb 'to anoint') - and the Kings of this dynastic succession were referred to as Dragons or Messiahs (meaning Anointed Ones). In times of conflict, when the armies of different kingdoms were conjoined, an overall leader was chosen and he was called the Great Dragon (the King-of-kings) or, as we better know the name in its old Celtic form, the Pendragon.
    An interesting aspect of the word 'kingship' is that it was identical with kinship - and kin means 'blood-relative'. In its original form kinship was kainship, and the first King of the Messianic succession was the biblical Cain (Kain), Head of the Sumerian House of Kish. On recognizing this, one can immediately see an early anomaly in the traditional Genesis story, for the historical line to David and Jesus was not from Adam and Eve's son Seth at all. It was from Eve's son Cain, whose recorded successors (although given little space in the Old Testament) were the first great kings of Mesopotamia and Egypt.
    Two more important features then come to light when reading the Bible with this knowledge in mind. Conventional teaching generally cites Cain as being the first son of Adam and Eve - but he was not; even the book of Genesis tells us that he was not. In fact, it confirms how Eve told Adam that Cain's father was the Lord, who was of course Enki the Archetype. Even outside the Bible, the writings of the Hebrew Talmud and Midrash make it quite plain that Cain was not the son of Adam.
    So what else is wrongly taught about this particular aspect of history? The book of Genesis (in its English translated form) tells us that Cain was 'a tiller of the ground' - but this is not what the original texts say at all. What they say is that Cain had 'dominion over the earth', which is a rather different matter when considering his kingly status.
    The Bible translators appear to have had a constant problem with the word Earth - often translating it to ground, clay or dust, instead of recognizing it as relating to The Earth. Even in the case of Adam and Eve, the translators made glaring errors. The Bible says, 'Male and female created he them, and he called their name Adam'. Older writings use the more complete word Adâma, which means 'of the Earth'. However, this did not mean they were made of dirt; it means (as the Anchor Hebrew Bible explains in precise terms) that they were Earthlings.
    Around 6000 years ago, Adam and Eve (known then as Atâbba and Kâva - and jointly called the Adâma) were purpose-bred for kingship by Enki and his sister-wife Nîn-khursag. This took place at a 'creation chamber' which the Sumerian annals refer to as the House of Shimtî (Shi-im-tî meaning 'breath - wind - life' ). Adam and Eve were certainly not the first people on Earth, but they were the first of the alchemically devised kingly succession. Nîn-khursag was called the Lady of the Embryo or the Lady of Life, and she was the surrogate mother for Atâbba and Kâva, who were created from human ova fertilized by the Lord Enki.
    It was because of Nîn-khursag's title, Lady of Life, that Kâva was later given the same distinction by the Hebrews. Indeed, the name Kâva (Ava or Eve) was subsequently said to mean 'life'. There is an interesting parallel here because, in Sumerian, the style Lady of Life was Nîn-tî (Nîn meaning Lady, and tî meaning Life). However, another Sumerian word, ti (with the longer pronunciation: 'tee') meant 'rib' - and it was by virtue of the Hebrews' misunderstanding of the two words, tî and ti, that Eve became incorrectly associated with Adam's rib.
    Both Enki and Nîn-khursag (along with their brother Enlil - the later Jehovah) belonged to a pantheon of gods and goddesses referred to as the Anunnaki which, in Sumerian, means 'Heaven came to Earth' (An-unna-ki). In fact, the Grand Assembly of the Anunnaki (later called the Court of the Elohim) is actually mentioned in the Old Testament's Psalm No. 82, wherein Jehovah makes his bid for supreme power over the other gods.
    According to the Dragon tradition, the importance of Cain was that he was directly produced by Enki and Kâva, so his blood was three-quarters Anunnaki, while his half-brothers, Hevel and Satânael (better known as Abel and Seth), were less than half Anunnaki, being the offspring of Atâbba and Kâva (Adam and Eve). Cain's Anunnaki blood was so advanced that it was said that his brother Abel's blood was earthbound by comparison. It was related in the scriptures that Cain 'rose far above Abel', so that his brother's blood was swallowed into the ground - but this original description was thoroughly misinterpreted for the modern Bible, which now claims that Cain 'rose up against Abel' and spilled his blood upon the ground. This is not the same thing at all.
    The story can now be progressed by considering the oldest Grant of Arms in sovereign history - an entitlement which denoted the Messianic Dragon bloodline for all time. The Sumerians referred to this insignia as the Gra-al, but biblical history refers to it as the Mark of Cain. This Mark is portrayed by the modern Church as if it were some form of curse, but it is not defined as such in the Bible. Genesis actually relates that, having got into an argument with Jehovah over a matter of sovereign observance, Cain feared for his life. Consequently, the Lord placed a mark upon Cain, swearing sevenfold vengeance against his enemies.
    It has never been fully understood why Jehovah should decide to protect Cain when it was he who held the grievance against him. But the fact is that Jehovah did not make this decision; the mark was settled upon Cain by the Lord - and the Lord (the Adon) was not Jehovah but Cain's own Father, Enki.
    Few people ever think to enquire about the supposed enemies of Cain as defined in Genesis.

    Who could they possibly have been? Where would they have come from?

    According to the Bible only Adam and Eve, along with their sons Cain and Abel, existed - and Cain had apparently killed Abel. Therefore, if one accepts the text as it stands, there was no one around to be Cain's enemy!

    The Sumerian Gra-al, which biblical tradition calls the Mark of Cain, was an emblem dignified as the Cup of the Waters,
    or the Rosi-Crucis (the Dew Cup), and it was identified in all records (including those of Egypt, Phoenicia and the Hebrew
    annals) as being an upright, centred Red Cross within a Circle.

    Throughout the ages it was developed and embellished, but it has always remained essentially the same and is recognized
    as being the original symbol of the Holy Grail.

    That the Merovingian bloodline came from elsewhere is clear because of the legend that surrounds their founder,
    King Meroveus, who is said to have been the spawn of a “Quinotaur” (a sea monster), who raped his mother
    when she went out to swim in the ocean. Now it becomes obvious why he is called “Meroveus”,
    because in French, the word “mer” means sea.

    And in some traditions, Atlantis was called Meru, or Maru.(2)

    For these gods, navigation above all was important to them, for it was their sea power that maintained their military
    might and their successful mercantile trade.(3)

    The Atlanteans were associated with the sea and were often depicted as mermen, or sea monsters, with scales, fins,
    and horns. They were variously associated with a number of important animals, whose symbolism they held sacred:
    horses, bulls, goats, rams, lions, fish, serpents, dragons, even cats and dogs.

    All of these things relate back to the sea imagery with which these gods were associated.
    "Today France is united into the political mass that Dagobert had envisioned it to be when he united Austrasia,

    and the “Holy Roman Empire”, which the Merovingian kings were clearly attempting to form with the help of the Vatican,

    has now become a reality in the form of the European Union. During WWII and immediately afterwards, the Priory of Sion,

    that secret order dedicated to the Merovingian agenda, openly campaigned for a United States of Europe.

    They even proposed a flag, consisting of stars in a circle, which is identical to the flag used by the European Union today.(10)

    Furthermore, the world empire of the Atlantean kings who spawned the Merovingians is more complete now than it has ever been

    since the gods left the earth during the Deluge. The United Nations, a feeble example, will surely give way at some point to a united world

    government strong enough and glorious enough to be called an empire.

    The fallen kingdom of the gods is clearly returning, and the new Golden Age is upon us. It is, indeed, a glorious time to be alive."

    -- Michael Baigent



    Joseph Smith and the Latter Day Saints


    The Blood Royal Flows Forth Into the New World...

    jsmith.
    Joseph Smith, Founder of the Mormon Church of the Latter Day Saints


    The founding names of the Mormon Church, Joseph Smith and Brigham Young were both Merovingian bloodline
    and that's why the Mormon-controlled state of Utah has a beehive at the centre of its seal.

    The bee or beehive is an ancient symbol of the Merovingian bloodline, as is the fleur-de-lis,
    so beloved of British Merovingian royalty.

    Mary Magdalen was an Ephraimite, while Jesus was of the tribe of Judah, and Lucy Mack Smith , LDS founder Joseph Smith's
    mother, was a direct descendant of the supposed wife of Jesus on the maternal side.

    Joseph Smith Sr.., on the other hand, descended directly from Jesus on the paternal side, making Joseph Smith Jr.
    a direct descendant of Christ from both sides, one of the reasons he was chosen to restore the Church of Jesus Christ.
    luchmaxsmith.
    Lucy Max Smith, Wife of Joseph Smith


    The union of Joseph Smith Sr.. the Father of Joseph Smith and Lucy Mack Smith brought together the Ephraimite bloodline
    of Mary Magdalen and the Judaic bloodline of Christ to give birth to a modern day Mormon prophet.
    It also fulfilled a Biblical scripture that Ephraim and Judah, two warring tribes, would unite in the last days.
    "I'm not saying it's fact. It's speculation, but not without some evidence. He had a right to restore (the church)

    because he is an heir of the bloodline." -- Swanson


    young1851.
    Mormon Leader Brigham Young


    Dr Reed Durham, a president of the Mormon History Association, said:
    "There is absolutely no question in my mind that the Mormon ceremony which came to be known as the Endowment, introduced by Joseph Smith to Mormon Masons, had an immediate inspiration from Masonry. It is also obvious that the Nauvoo Temple architecture was in part, at least, masonically influenced. Indeed, it appears that there was an intentional attempt to utilize Masonic symbols and motifs." -- Dr Reed Durham

    If anyone is in any doubt that Mormonism is Freemasonry under another name, they should compare the Masonic oaths
    with those of the Mormons. Here is just one example: In the Mormon ceremony it says:
    "We and each of us do covenant and promise that we will not reveal the secrets of this, the Second Token of the Aaronic Priesthood,

    with its accompanying name, sign, grip, or penalty. Should we do so, we agree to have our breasts cut open and our hearts

    and vitals torn from our bodies and given to the birds of the air and the beasts of the field."


    -- Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, “First Token of the Priesthood”, Temple Endowments Ceremony


    saltlaketemplebeehive.
    Mormon Temple, Salt Lake City


    One of the more familiar symbols of Mormonism is the beehive. Examples of pioneer use of the hive can be seen on Brigham Young's home (known as the Beehive House) in Salt Lake City.
    "Masons who visit the Temple Block in Salt Lake City are impressed by what they call the Masonic emblems displayed on the outside of the Mormon Temple.

    Yes, the 'Masonic emblems' are displayed on the walls of the Temple—the sun, moon and stars, 'Holiness to the Lord,' the two right hands clasped in fellowship, the All-seeing eye, Alpha and Omega, and the beehive. Masonic writers tell us that the Mormon Temple ritual and their own are slightly similar in some respects.

    Without any apologies we frankly admit that there may be some truth in these statements." -- E. Cecil McGavin, Bookcraft, 1956


    The inherited Y-chromosome of Joseph Smith Sr. and the mtDNA of Lucy Mack Smith his wife remained unmutated over
    centuries. Preliminary DNA testing substantiates this claim back through a number of generations.

    If Christ had had children, presumably through Mary Magdalen, and if a daughter of Christ provided the mtDNA
    for the lineage of Lucy Mack Smith, and if a son of Christ provided the Y-chromosome for Joseph Smith Sr.,
    then it can be argued that Joseph Smith Jr. was a pure descendent of Christ.

    Professor Swanson cites Brigham Young on the matter of Joseph’s pure heritage:
    "That blood which was in him was pure and he had the sole right and lawful power, as he [Joseph Smith] was the legal heir to the blood that has been on the earth and has come down through a pure lineage. The union of various ancestors kept that blood pure". -- Swanson

    The proposed purity of Joseph Smith’s lineage is a reflection of the lineage of the Virgin Mary, whose father descends
    from Judah through the branch of Zerah (Judah’s twin son), while Mary’s mother descended from the lineage of Perez
    (the other twin), after passing through Jesse, David, and King Zedekiah. Hence, Mary was uniquely able
    “to pass on the inheritance of the full house of Judah to Christ” (29) through both branches of her own genealogy.

    The argument of the purity of Joseph Smith’s genetic heritage back to Judah, indeed, to Jacob, Isaac, and Abraham,
    hinges entirely on the question of whether Jesus had children. Several quotations from discourses
    by LDS Apostles Orson Hyde and Orson Pratt proffer that Christ was married, he was a polygamist, and he had children (85–108). “Evidence” suggests that for their protection, the children of Christ were carried away and hidden in different nations, notably, in Western Europe (France and the British Isles, today). Swanson establishes the presence of Israelite blood in Europe by drawing upon Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln’s pseudo-scholarly notions, popularized by Dan Brown in The DaVinci Code (383), purporting that the myth of the Holy Grail conceals the location of Christ’s progeny in the western edges of the continent."
    salt-lake-mormon-temple.
    Salt Lake City, Mormon Tabernacle


    According to Swanson, the Holy Grail refers specifically to
    “that vessel being the uterine chalice or womb of Mary Magdalen”.
    “So complex, enigmatic, profound, and cryptic is its message that to the unknowing it is merely the confusing miasma of bygone prophets, troubadours, and romancers. Even the poets of this holy drama were never quite sure what the script meant” -- Swanson

    The Royal Dragon Bloodline is carried forth by the Mother's descent!

    Blessings of the Goddess!

    dragonIsis.
    Fire Dragon and the Goddess

     

Share This Page